Latest / Why Humans Lie / The Book Buried Under the Floor: Who Stole Lori Ford's Memoir?

Transcript

The Book Buried Under the Floor: Who Stole Lori Ford's Memoir? · Why Humans Lie

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: In March of two thousand nine, a surveyor named Linda
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Schmidt was measuring a fence line dispute on Aldermore Road
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: in Sutter County when she found something under a crawl
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: space panel that had nothing to do with fences. It
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: was a book, a bound advance copy sealed inside a
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: ziplock bag, placed there deliberately. The author's name on the
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: cover was Margaret Claire Sutter. Margaret Claire Sutter did not
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: exist that Galley would eventually end a literary career, reopen
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: a copyright case, and force a jury to decide a
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: question that felt almost philosophical. Can a person steel a memoir,
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: the record of someone else's lived life and call it
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: their own. Reading through the investigation file for this case,
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: one detail refuses to let go. Not the forged signature,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: not the falsified copyright, not even the money. It is
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: the image of that book in a ziplock bag under
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: a floor panel, hidden before the ink on the published
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: edition was even dry. Someone put it there, knowing exactly
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: whose work was inside. That knowledge is where this story begins.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: This is the story of Laurie Ford, a fifty four
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: year old memoirist from Sutter County, and what happened to
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: her memoir between the day she signed with a literary
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: agent and the day a stranger pulled her book from
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: beneath a house she had never visited. Laurie Ford had
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: written two books before she started the manuscript that would
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: become a life in full. She was not a famous writer.
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: She was the kind of writer who treated the work
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: as a discipline, careful, unhurried, shaped by real experience. She
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: lived on Weybridge Circle in Sutter County. Her mornings followed
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: a fixed order. At six o'clock every morning, she fed Edgar,
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: a sulcata tortoise she had kept for years. Sulcata tortoises
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: require precise feeding schedules. A delay of more than twenty
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: minutes creates measurable metabolic risk. Laurie knew this. Everyone who
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: knew Laurie knew this. Edgar's schedule was not a quirk,
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: it was a commitment. She organized her life around her.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: Sister Diane described her as someone who returned calls the
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: same day she received them. She kept her files in order,
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: she tracked correspondence. When she set a deadline for herself,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: she met it. These were not incidental details about her character.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: They would become significant later when the record showed that
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: someone else had tracked her schedule just as carefully. Laurie
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: had spent years working on a Life in full. The
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: memoir drew on her own history in specific personal terms.
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: It was hers in the way that only lived experience
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: can belong to someone, not just legally, but in every sentence.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: By early two thousand seven, the manuscript was finished, she
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: began looking for represent In April of two thousand seven,
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: she signed with Robert Osborne of Osborne Representation, a literary
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: agency operating out of a shared office suite in Portland.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: Osborne had one assistant, a woman named Kendramarsh. He presented professionally.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: He was attentive during the submission process. Laurie had no
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: reason for concern. What she did not know was that
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: within three weeks of signing their agency agreement, a revised
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: version of that document had been created. The original named
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: her as the author. The revision renamed her Laurie Ford
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: Sutter in the agency record, and in the parallel publishing
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: contract the name had changed again, this time to Margaret
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: Claire Sutter alone. Laurie was never shown either revision. Between
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: April of two thousand seven and June of two thousand eight,
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: Robert built what prosecutors would later call the construction phase.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: He embedded himself in the manuscript process, offering notes, managing
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: correspondence with the publisher, and handling the documents Laurie trusted
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: him to handle. He made himself indispensable. He positioned himself
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: between Laurie and every person who might have asked a
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: clarifying question about who had actually written the book. He
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: also knew her schedule, He knew about Edgar. He knew
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: when Laurie left the house, when she was reachable, and
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: when she was not. Whether that knowledge was gathered through
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: ordinary contact or something more deliberate, the prosecution's record would
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: later make clear that he used it precisely and at
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: exactly the right moment. The moment arrived. In October of
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: two thousand eight, Laurie traveled to Sacramento for eleven days
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: because Edgar had developed a respiratory emergency. Before she left,
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: Robert offered to hold her mail while she was gone.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: He filed the copyright registration for A Life in Full
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: under the name Margaret Claire Sutter. The copyright registration was
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: filed on a Tuesday, Laurie was in Sacramento, Edgar was sick,
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: and Robert Osborne had her mail. That sequence of events,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: those four facts lined up in that order is what
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: Brian Russou kept returning to when he began pulling the
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: case apart. In January of two thousand nine. Rousseau was
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: a licensed private investigator out of Eugene. Laurie's sister, Diane,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: had hired him after Laurie's stopped returning calls. Diane described
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: her sister as withdrawn, quieter than she had ever been.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: The book had come out in January. It was listed
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: under a name none of them recognized. Rousseau requested copies
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: of the contracts he requested the copyright registration. He laid
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: them side by side and found three anomalies, three things
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: that should not have existed. The first was the name
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: on the copyright, Margaret Claire Sutter. The second was a
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: discrepancy in two versions of the agency agreement, one naming
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: Lourie Ford, one naming Lourie Ford Sutter, one that dropped
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: her entirely. The third was the book itself published and
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: available with Lourie's words and someone else's name on the cover.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: He started counting something else. In December of two thousand
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: and eight, Laurie had emailed Robert seven times, asking about
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: delays about the contract she hadn't seen, about money she
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: hadn't received. Robert had written back each time with variations
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: of the same word. Russou counted that word eleven times
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: across those replies, patients, not answers, not documentation, patience. That
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: alone did not prove fraud, but it told Russo something
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: about how Robert managed Lourie's questions, not by resolving them,
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: by redirecting them inward, suggesting that her concern was the problem,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: not the absence of a paper trail. That redirection had consequences.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: In November of two thousand eight, Robert told Laurie that
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: her anxiety about the contract was a symptom, a symptom
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: of anxiety, he said, not of anything actually wrong. Laurie
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: began seeing a therapist shortly after. The record does not
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: say she stopped asking questions, but it shows she stopped
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: asking Robert. Then Roussou found something that did not belong
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: to the email trail at all. A surveyor named Linda
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: Schmidt was measuring a fence line dispute on Aldermore Road
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: in Sutter County in March of two thousand nine. Inside
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: a prawl space beneath a removable panel, she found a
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: ziplock bag. Inside the bag was a hardcover book. It
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: was a galley, a bound advance copy printed before publication,
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: the kind sent to reviewers. It was sealed, It was
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: in good condition. The name on the cover was Margaret
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: Claire Sutter. The address on Aldermore Road had been a
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: rental property. The listed tenant was a man named Dennis Archer.
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: Investigators found Robert Osborne's name on the sublease. He had
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: used that address to receive mail during a six week
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: period in the summer of two thousand eight, months before
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: the book was published, months before any one outside the
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: publisher had seen a bound copy. The galley had been
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: placed there before the book existed as a finished object
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: before publication, before it was real to anyone who hadn't
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: put it there. Prosecutors described this in straightforward terms. He
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: had hidden proof of ownership somewhere no standard search would
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: find it. The defense offered no explanation. The case against
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: Robert was already built on documents. The name changes the
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: copyright the forged signature, which forensic examiner William Tate confirmed
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: within ten days, noting, in particular the way Robert had
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: copied the capital L and the ligature between the O
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: and the R in Laurie's name. He had studied her
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: handwriting well enough to approximate it. Not well enough to
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: fool Tate, but well enough to fool an editor who
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: received a contract by facts. Paul Hennick was that editor.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: He ran a regional imprint in Portland and had published
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: a Life in full under the name Margaret Claire Sutter
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: in January of two thousand and nine. When investigators asked
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: him about the pen name, Hennick said it had been
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: Laurie's idea. Robert had told him so verbally. There was
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: no written record of that conversation, no email, no note
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: in the file, no signed agreement confirming Laurie had requested
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: the pseudonym. What Hennick did have was a signed publishing contract.
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: The signature on that contract, the one attributed to Laurie Ford,
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: was the one William Tate examined. It was not hers.
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: Here's where the case shifts its weight. Every thing up
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: to that point. The name changes in agency documents, the
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: copyright timing, the eleven patient emails, even the galley in
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: the crawl space could be argued around. The defense tried.
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: The pen name was verbal, the document revisions were clerical,
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: The galley was inexplicable, but perhaps explainable. The signature could
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: not be argued around. But the case did not rest there.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: Russou had found something else during his document search, something
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: that expanded the frame entirely. A second client, a woman
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: named Patricia Mead. Mead was sixty one years old, a
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: retired school administrator from Beaverton. She had signed with Robert
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: in two thousand and six, a year before Laurie. Her
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: memoir was about her son's addiction. She had worked on
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: it for years. Robert told her it hadn't sold. She
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: had believed him. Her copyright registration had been filed in
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: a false pen name. The same po box Robert used
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: for the Sutter registration appeared on Meade's paperwork. Her book
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: was never published. She still had his emails, two clients,
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: two false registrations, the same address. When the prosecution laid
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: out its case, the natural assumption known, the one the
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: evidence seemed to confirm at every turn, was that Robert
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: had built his scheme to sell the book and collect
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: the advance. That was the financial motive. The eleven thousand
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: dollars advance had passed through his agency account. He had
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: dispersed only a portion to Loriri, attributing the rest to
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: fees and expenses. He could not document. The money was there,
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: the trail was there. The shape of the crime looked
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: like theft picture. The sequence as Robert would have constructed it.
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: A client with a finished manuscript, a publisher willing to
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: move quickly, a pen name delivered verbally so no one
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: writes it down. A copyright filed in an eleven day
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: window while the client is out of state and he
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: holds her mail, a forged signature to close the contract.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: An advance that clears through his account. By the time
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: Laurie Ford realized something was wrong, the book was already
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: in print. That version of events is coherent, it holds together,
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: and it is probably accurate as far as it goes.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: But it collapses the moment you consider Patricia Meade. Meade's
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: book was never published. There was no advance, There was
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: no publication deal that produced money. Robert could redirect the
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: only thing her file contained was a copyright registration in
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: a false pen name at a po box. Robert controlled
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: no financial gain that the record confirms. If this was
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: about money, Meade's case made no sense walk through what
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: the record actually shows. Instead, Robert filed a copyright for
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: Meade's unpublished manuscript in a name she did not choose,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: at an adapt she did not know about. He told
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: her the book hadn't sold. She stopped asking questions. He
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: maintained control of the manuscript and the registration without ever
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: needing to produce a publication or a check. The galley
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: in the crawl space fits this frame more precisely, and
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: it fits the financial one. He did not need to
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: hide proof of a financial transaction. He hid proof that
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: the book existed and that he had access to it,
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: proof he could produce privately or suppress entirely, depending on
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: what he needed. Laurie's victim impact statement identified this as
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: the detail that clarified everything, not the forged signature, not
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: the copyright timing the galley, because the galley proved he
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: had known from the beginning that the book was hers.
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: He had held a physical copy of her memoir under
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: a crawl space floor in a bag at an address
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: no one connected to him by name before the book
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: ever reached a single reader. That is not the act
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: of someone who made a clerical error. That is the
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: act of someone who planned to control what could be
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: known and by whom. And when the jury deliberated for
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: seven hours, they convicted on all counts. Robert Osborne was
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: arrested on the nineteenth of March two thousand nine, inside
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: the shared office suite he had operated from four years.
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: The arrest was quiet, in the way such things often are.
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: A door opened, his name was called, He did not run.
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: He was charged with fraud, forgery, identity theft, and two
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: counts of copyright fraud, one for Lorrie Ford, one for
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: Patricia Meade. His defense argued three positions. The pen name
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: had been Lourie's idea communicated verbally through him to the editor,
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: the signature on the publishing contract was a clerical error,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: and the copyright registration filed in Meade's false name had
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: been a protective measure on her ba. The jury heard
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: all of it. Forensic documents examiner William Tait had already
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: answered the signature question. He confirmed the signature on the
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: publishing contract was not Lori's. He noted the copied letter formations,
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: the capital L, the ligature between the O and the R,
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: indicating the forger had studied her handwriting and attempted to
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: replicate its specific shapes. That is not a clerical error,
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: that is practice. The verbal pen name rationale fared no better.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: Editor Paul Hennick confirmed he had heard the suggestion only
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: through Robert. There was no email, no letter, no written
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: record of any kind showing Laurie had ever agreed to
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: publish her memoir under a name that was not hers.
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: Seven hours, That is how long the jury deliberated before
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: returning a verdict of guilty on every count October two
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: thousand nine. The deliberation was not rushed, and it was
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: not prolonged. Seven hours suggested us a jury that moved
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: methodically through the evidence and found no point at which
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: the defense held. Robert was sentenced to four years. He
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: served two years and eight months. His literary agency license
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: was permanently revoked upon conviction. Osborne representation closed. Kendra Marsh,
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: his single assistant, was not charged. The court issued two
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: orders that mattered beyond the sentence itself. The first transferred
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: the copyright for a life in full to Laurie Ford.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: By judicial order, the name Margaret Claire Sutter, which had
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: existed only in documents Robert controlled, was formally severed from
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: the work. The book that had been published under a
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: non existent identity was now on paper, and by law hers.
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: The second followed from the first. A different imprint reissued
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: A Life in Full the following year under Laurie for
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: its name, the same words, the same memoir, the same
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: sentences she had written in her house on Weybridge Circle
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: while feeding Edgar at six in the morning, now with
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: her name on the cover. Patricia Meade's memoir was never published.
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: The copyright registration, filed in a false pen name at
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: Robert's po box, remained the only document her file produced.
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: No advance, no deal, no book. The record does not
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: confirm any financial gain from her case. What it confirms
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: is that Robert had control of her manuscript, her registration,
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: and the information she received about its progress, and that
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: she stopped asking questions when he told her it hadn't sold.
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: She did not learn what had been done until investigators
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: contacted her in early two thousand and nine. She had
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: believed for years that her book simply hadn't found a publisher.
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: She found out it had never been submitted in her
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: name at all. Brian Russo, the private investigator Diane Ford
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: had hired in January, attended the sentencing in October. He
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: had spent roughly two months tracing three anomalies, the copyright registration,
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: the contract names, the published book, and counting eleven uses
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: of the word patience in a single month of Robert's correspondence.
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: He did not testify he had done what he was
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: hired to do, and the court record carried it from there.
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: There is a specific kind of harm in what Robert
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: Osborne did that the legal categories do not fully name.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: Fraud names, the money, forgery names, the signature identity, theft names,
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: the false registration, copyright fraud names, the legal ownership. All
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: of those charges were accurate, and all of them were proven.
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: But the charges describe what he took. They do not
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: fully describe the method. He did not break into anything.
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: He did not threaten anyone. He constructed a situation in
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: which Laurie questioned her own perception. Before she questioned him,
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: he told her that her concern about the contract was
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: a symptom she began seeing someone she internalized the problem.
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: That is the mechanism that psychological research has spent decades
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: documenting the process by which a person's relationship to their
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: own judgment becomes the primary thing under attack, Not their property,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: not their safety, their certainty about what is real. Laurie
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: Ford's memoir was about her own life. That specificity matters.
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: The manuscript Robert filed under a false name was not
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: a business document or a financial instrument. It was a
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: record of her experience, in her words, shaped over years.
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: He took the story of her life and registered it
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: as belonging to someone who did not exist. Her victim
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: impact statement at sentencing named the galley as the detail
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: that clarified everything. Not the forged signature, which proved criminal intent,
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: not the copyright timing, which proved premeditation. The galley, because
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: the galley proved he had known from before the book
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: ever reached a single reader that it was hers. He
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: had held a physical copy of her memoir under a
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: crawl space floor, sealed in a bag at an address
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: connected to him only through a sublease in another person's name.
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: That is not a mistake that compounds. That is a
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: plan that holds Laurie Ford's book exists now under her name.
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: The court put it there. She was fifty four years
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: old when Robert was arrested, fifty five when he was convicted.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: She had already written two books before this. She wrote
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: this one. Whatever she does next, she wrote this one
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: that remains true, regardless of what Robert Osborne believed he controlled.
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: This show is made by Obo Media