Latest / Why We Do What We Do / Mini: What is the Point of Science?
Transcript
- 0:03Speaker 1: You're listening to Why we do what we do. Welcome
- 0:15Speaker 1: to Why we Do what we do Mini. I'm your
- 0:18Speaker 1: host Abraham.
- 0:20Speaker 2: And I'm your host Shane.
- 0:22Speaker 1: We are a psychology podcast. We talk about the things
- 0:25Speaker 1: that humans and non human animals do. And today we're
- 0:29Speaker 1: doing a mini So we're a short psychology podcast, trying
- 0:33Speaker 1: to get this done in fifteen minutes or less. And
- 0:36Speaker 1: you're probably going to desire that even more today because
- 0:39Speaker 1: we're getting into some philosophy, some arguments, some sollipsisms, not really,
- 0:45Speaker 1: but a little bit of rhetoric here, and I don't know,
- 0:47Speaker 1: it's a discussion. It's like we're asking a question that
- 0:50Speaker 1: we hope makes you think a little bit more, a
- 0:52Speaker 1: little bit differently about these things and piques your curiosity.
- 0:56Speaker 1: That's what we're doing.
- 0:57Speaker 2: Yeah, And we love curiosity. We love it.
- 0:59Speaker 3: We love curiosity and asking questions, and that's what we've
- 1:02Speaker 3: been doing on this podcast for several years.
- 1:04Speaker 1: Indeed, And if you're joining us for the first time,
- 1:07Speaker 1: then welcome. It seems like you are also curious, and
- 1:09Speaker 1: I hope that you continue to seek us out and
- 1:12Speaker 1: explore that curiosity further. And here you're a returning person,
- 1:15Speaker 1: then you definitely are curious and we appreciate you. Thank
- 1:18Speaker 1: you for coming back. And either way, if you like
- 1:21Speaker 1: to support us, you can leave us a rating and
- 1:22Speaker 1: a review like subscribe, tell a friend, join us on Patreon.
- 1:27Speaker 1: I'll talk more about those things at the end of
- 1:29Speaker 1: this discussion, but this is a mini which means we
- 1:32Speaker 1: kind of got to get into it so that we
- 1:34Speaker 1: can get out of there. I'll let you go about
- 1:36Speaker 1: your day, yes, with a little bit more, a little
- 1:39Speaker 1: bit more thoughts going on, something percolating up there. Just
- 1:42Speaker 1: gonna ask the question, So, all right, is there anything
- 1:45Speaker 1: that I forgot or that you'd like to add as
- 1:47Speaker 1: part of our preamble before we jump into our topic.
- 1:50Speaker 2: D joure no, I think we're ready to go.
- 1:53Speaker 1: Okay, people, buckle in, it's happening. We the collect If Royal.
- 2:00Speaker 1: We people actually know. We it's actually just Shane and I.
- 2:04Speaker 1: We generally take for granted that science is good. Inherently
- 2:07Speaker 1: it's a good and that we should be doing science.
- 2:10Speaker 1: That's the thing we take for granted. And I do
- 2:12Speaker 1: mean we, as in Shane and I. I understand that
- 2:14Speaker 1: there are people who disagree with us, but also most
- 2:18Speaker 1: people do seem to have a general appreciation for science,
- 2:21Speaker 1: like most people seem to have that in some capacity,
- 2:25Speaker 1: in some way.
- 2:26Speaker 3: Yes, Yet sometimes it is worth revisiting the discussion about
- 2:30Speaker 3: what is the point of the things we do? And
- 2:33Speaker 3: science is one of those things we do? Science, So
- 2:35Speaker 3: what is the point of science? We're going to unpack
- 2:37Speaker 3: what philosophers have said and propose some different ways to
- 2:40Speaker 3: ask that question that might illustrate the question a little bit.
- 2:43Speaker 1: Better and also therefore illustrates the potential answers a little
- 2:48Speaker 1: bit better.
- 2:49Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 2:49Speaker 1: So first, if we're asking, if someone's asking, and someone
- 2:54Speaker 1: is asking, not us, but we're asking for the point
- 2:57Speaker 1: of this, someone's asking, what's the point of sci? I
- 3:00Speaker 1: think the first retort to that is, what do you mean?
- 3:03Speaker 1: What is the point of science?
- 3:04Speaker 2: Yeah? What does that mean?
- 3:05Speaker 1: What does that question mean?
- 3:06Speaker 2: Yeah?
- 3:06Speaker 1: There are different ways to ask the question, and those
- 3:09Speaker 1: different ways of asking the question inspire different answers and
- 3:12Speaker 1: different ways to think about what the answer might be.
- 3:17Speaker 1: But I'm jumping ahead just a little bit.
- 3:19Speaker 3: Yeah, I think we can start with what is the
- 3:22Speaker 3: point of science? And probably suggests the point of science
- 3:25Speaker 3: is to discover things? But this further begs the question
- 3:28Speaker 3: what is the point of discovering.
- 3:30Speaker 1: Things exactly like what you sort of regress, like you
- 3:33Speaker 1: keep going. Perhaps the answer is the point is of
- 3:37Speaker 1: science or of discovering things is to chase our curiosity.
- 3:40Speaker 1: But that also then begs a new question, which is
- 3:43Speaker 1: what's the point of our chasing curiosity? And also is
- 3:47Speaker 1: satisfying our curiosity a reasonable purpose to do something? I
- 3:51Speaker 1: think you could easily point to situations where satisfying curiosity
- 3:55Speaker 1: is not a good enough reason to have done the
- 3:57Speaker 1: thing about what you were curious. So maybe in some
- 4:01Speaker 1: cases it is, some cases it isn't. Maybe that's never
- 4:03Speaker 1: a good answer, but you know, again, it does then
- 4:05Speaker 1: ask like what does it mean? What's the point of
- 4:07Speaker 1: chasing our curiosity? How far do we go with that?
- 4:10Speaker 2: Right?
- 4:10Speaker 3: So, French philosopher August Kompt distrusted that science was even
- 4:15Speaker 3: capable of describing the underlying reality and nature of things,
- 4:17Speaker 3: and instead that the point of science was to make
- 4:20Speaker 3: predictions about things that will happen. That is that the
- 4:23Speaker 3: point of science is in its utility, Yeah, what can accomplish?
- 4:27Speaker 1: That's essentially what he cared about is like, I don't
- 4:29Speaker 1: really think that you can do what you think you
- 4:31Speaker 1: can do, but you can be helpful. So as long
- 4:34Speaker 1: as you're helpful, you have a purpose. That seemed to
- 4:36Speaker 1: be his orientation to it.
- 4:38Speaker 2: Now.
- 4:38Speaker 1: Francis Bacon and Renee Descartes were both philosophers, and they wrote, essentially,
- 4:43Speaker 1: if you distill down their points, that the point the
- 4:45Speaker 1: purpose of science, The point here is to remove bias
- 4:48Speaker 1: from how we tend to try and describe and understand
- 4:51Speaker 1: things and expose fundamental truths in some capacity. That the
- 4:55Speaker 1: point was to be able to describe things with mathematical precision,
- 5:00Speaker 1: and that is, to them, the point of science is
- 5:02Speaker 1: the ability to develop rules that remain consistent in all circumstances.
- 5:06Speaker 1: That's kind of what describing means here, is like, can
- 5:09Speaker 1: I say something about this phenomenon that will be true
- 5:12Speaker 1: the next time it happens, and the time after that,
- 5:14Speaker 1: and then every variation that might exist about this phenomenon
- 5:19Speaker 1: the way that I've described it always accurately describes what happens,
- 5:23Speaker 1: and in a way also maybe make some predictions about that.
- 5:26Speaker 1: But that's essentially it is like, can I describe this
- 5:28Speaker 1: thing in a way that's really consistent those rules about
- 5:31Speaker 1: what my description they maintain and hold yes.
- 5:34Speaker 3: Now, another way to approach this question is to rephrase
- 5:36Speaker 3: the question what is the utility of science?
- 5:38Speaker 2: That is, to what end do we do science?
- 5:41Speaker 3: And, as proposed by Compte, compt to predict things that
- 5:44Speaker 3: will happen, both natural events in the world and the
- 5:46Speaker 3: behavior of other humans and non human animals. Prediction allows
- 5:49Speaker 3: the preparation to benefit maximally from advantagious circumstances and sometimes
- 5:54Speaker 3: to make further predictions.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Yeah, so like maybe instead of asking what's the point
- 6:00Speaker 1: of science, you say, what's the utility of science? To
- 6:02Speaker 1: what end do we do this? Like? What are we
- 6:03Speaker 1: trying to get out of this? And when we're talking
- 6:06Speaker 1: about utility, we're not usually talking about ads. Okay, we're
- 6:16Speaker 1: back what we're talking about utility and we're describing like
- 6:19Speaker 1: potentially if you're thinking about it. One of the ways
- 6:22Speaker 1: that we can ask that question instead of like, what's
- 6:24Speaker 1: the point is what's the utility? What do we get
- 6:26Speaker 1: out of it? And this can also refer to not
- 6:28Speaker 1: just like the fact that it can allow us to
- 6:31Speaker 1: predict things that will happen, to make predictions about behavior,
- 6:34Speaker 1: to make more predictions. Es actually, like at one leads
- 6:37Speaker 1: to another, it can also refer to tangible benefits that
- 6:39Speaker 1: science might produce. Medications is something we could get out
- 6:42Speaker 1: of it. That could be utility, medical solutions to health problems,
- 6:45Speaker 1: effective weapons, more effective tools, more effective food production and
- 6:50Speaker 1: food storage and food creation, better construction techniques. There's like
- 6:55Speaker 1: all these other things that we can get out of
- 6:57Speaker 1: the scientific process that essentially reflect it's utility, the kind
- 7:01Speaker 1: of use that we get out of that process, And
- 7:03Speaker 1: maybe that's the point or a way to answer what's
- 7:06Speaker 1: the point of science is like what's the utility of science?
- 7:09Speaker 2: Right?
- 7:10Speaker 3: And another way to approach this is to rephrase the question.
- 7:13Speaker 3: Perhaps instead of asking what is the point of science,
- 7:15Speaker 3: we say it slightly differently, which is why do we
- 7:18Speaker 3: do science? And that is under what conditions do we
- 7:21Speaker 3: do science?
- 7:22Speaker 1: So, yeah, if we want to say, like, rather than
- 7:24Speaker 1: say what's the point, we say why do we do it?
- 7:26Speaker 1: And when you say why, you can always replace that
- 7:28Speaker 1: with under what circumstances? And that again creates a slightly
- 7:32Speaker 1: different context to think about this. So, under what conditions
- 7:34Speaker 1: do we do science? Often when there's a problem to
- 7:37Speaker 1: be solved, when there's an arms race between warring states,
- 7:40Speaker 1: when we're observing a phenomenon that we don't understand and
- 7:44Speaker 1: we can't seem to be able to explain. Those are
- 7:46Speaker 1: definitely conditions under which people have attempted to do science,
- 7:49Speaker 1: for sure.
- 7:49Speaker 3: Yeah, and so in these situations the point of science
- 7:51Speaker 3: is somewhat circumstantial. In all ways, there is some external
- 7:54Speaker 3: motivation and pressure to solve something, either describing produces an
- 7:58Speaker 3: outcome that resolves a problem, to u the most efficient
- 8:01Speaker 3: means of destruction or defense in some cases, and to
- 8:04Speaker 3: describe something satisfactorily enough that people are satisfied with the answer.
- 8:08Speaker 3: So all of those are different kinds of outcomes in
- 8:11Speaker 3: those situations that specific to those circumstances that we're trying
- 8:14Speaker 3: to solve. Yeah.
- 8:15Speaker 1: Yeah, if we go back to sort of under what
- 8:16Speaker 1: conditions do we do science, like, it addresses some aspect
- 8:20Speaker 1: of those things right now. Of course, simple curiosity has
- 8:23Speaker 1: led to a lot of important discoveries, and see our
- 8:26Speaker 1: episode on the Golden Goose Awards for the list of
- 8:28Speaker 1: some of what those might be. So there's also this
- 8:31Speaker 1: just like people just observe things around them and go
- 8:35Speaker 1: like huh, I wonder how that is or why that is,
- 8:39Speaker 1: or what's going on with that thing? And they just
- 8:41Speaker 1: want to just understand it better, which really means again,
- 8:44Speaker 1: like describe it in a way that feels satisfactory.
- 8:47Speaker 3: Right, right, right, So the question is kind of silly
- 8:49Speaker 3: no matter how you ask it. Humans use language to
- 8:52Speaker 3: coordinate and cooperate, and science as an organized way to
- 8:54Speaker 3: use that language while avoiding psychological biases, or at least
- 8:57Speaker 3: removing them as much as possible.
- 8:59Speaker 1: Yeah, So essentially the point here being that, like, what's
- 9:04Speaker 1: the point of science? I feel like that's kind of
- 9:06Speaker 1: a silly question. We have tried a lot of ways
- 9:09Speaker 1: to interact with the world and with each other over
- 9:11Speaker 1: the history of mankind. Many of them suck a lot.
- 9:15Speaker 1: War failure, like, that's not a good way to do it.
- 9:17Speaker 1: Superstition failure, that's not a good way to do it.
- 9:19Speaker 1: Religion epic, colossal, massive failure. That's like the worst way
- 9:23Speaker 1: you could possibly do it. The best way we have
- 9:27Speaker 1: ever come up with to interact with the world and
- 9:30Speaker 1: each other is through science. Like, we've done it a
- 9:32Speaker 1: lot of ways. I only listed a few, but the
- 9:34Speaker 1: best way we've done it to science, that's been the
- 9:36Speaker 1: most productive. It's allowed us to avoid the most mistakes.
- 9:39Speaker 1: It doesn't really need to have a point, because it's
- 9:41Speaker 1: not like a doesn't need to be a thing. The
- 9:43Speaker 1: best way that we have found to coordinate and cooperate
- 9:45Speaker 1: with each other while ruling out cognitive psychological biases is
- 9:51Speaker 1: through scientific processes. And I understand, like people are going
- 9:55Speaker 1: to point to all the terrible things that scientists have done,
- 9:57Speaker 1: and that's true. There have been a lot of problems
- 10:00Speaker 1: and the name of science that have happened. But it
- 10:03Speaker 1: is the self correcting machine that like it eventually got
- 10:06Speaker 1: to a better and better place over time, because that's
- 10:09Speaker 1: kind of the nature of the inquiry of science. Like it,
- 10:12Speaker 1: it begets things like ethics, it begets things like morals,
- 10:15Speaker 1: it begets things like progress. That's kind of what it does.
- 10:19Speaker 1: And it has been used to horrible ends and it
- 10:21Speaker 1: will be used to horrible ends again in the future,
- 10:23Speaker 1: but it will get better and improve. The other ways
- 10:26Speaker 1: that we've done this, they only get worse, Like they
- 10:28Speaker 1: pretty much never solve anything, and they create a lot
- 10:30Speaker 1: more problems and they make things worse. Right, So like,
- 10:33Speaker 1: until there's something better than science, that's just the best
- 10:36Speaker 1: wave we've got to like go, you know, like to
- 10:38Speaker 1: do this thing.
- 10:39Speaker 3: I agree, I agree it's it's more unifying than anything
- 10:42Speaker 3: else that we've done so far exactly.
- 10:44Speaker 1: So that's that's the point, I guess. If you have to,
- 10:47Speaker 1: if you have to put a label on it, if
- 10:48Speaker 1: you have to put a fine point on the thing,
- 10:49Speaker 1: that's what's going on there. So Yeah, if you'd like
- 10:51Speaker 1: to tell us your thoughts on the point of science
- 10:54Speaker 1: or anything that we said in here, you can email
- 10:55Speaker 1: us directly and we'd love to hear from you. You can
- 10:57Speaker 1: reach us at our email at info atwwdwdpodcast dot com,
- 11:02Speaker 1: and on the social media platforms and we look forward
- 11:04Speaker 1: to hearing from you there. As I mentioned at the beginning,
- 11:06Speaker 1: if you like to support us, you can leave us
- 11:08Speaker 1: a rating and a review. Take a friend's phone, subscribe
- 11:12Speaker 1: for them, maybe leave a rating and review from their profile,
- 11:14Speaker 1: give us five stars, ten stars, whatever the maximum number
- 11:16Speaker 1: of stars.
- 11:17Speaker 2: You can do.
- 11:18Speaker 1: And then if you have some constructive criticism, we're happy
- 11:20Speaker 1: to hear that. Just email us and talk to us
- 11:22Speaker 1: about it. You don't need to like make it hard
- 11:23Speaker 1: for us to be a podcast by leaving us poor reviews. Yeah,
- 11:26Speaker 1: it helps us to leave us reviews, And if you'd
- 11:28Speaker 1: really like to support us, you can join us over
- 11:30Speaker 1: on Patreon, and if you do that then you'll get
- 11:32Speaker 1: bonus content, add free episodes, early episodes, and I'll read
- 11:35Speaker 1: your name and our list of supporters at the end
- 11:37Speaker 1: of our full length discussions because we've got time for
- 11:39Speaker 1: it over there. We don't really have time for that.
- 11:41Speaker 1: At the end of a mini, thank you to my
- 11:42Speaker 1: team of people. Thank you for recording with me today, Shane,
- 11:45Speaker 1: thank you for having me, Thank you all for listening.
- 11:47Speaker 1: Is there anything that I forgot you'd like to add
- 11:50Speaker 1: before we wrap up? No, perfect, Go forth and do science.
- 11:54Speaker 1: This is Abraham, This is Shane. Why we do what
- 11:57Speaker 1: we do? Mini is out.
- 11:58Speaker 2: Bye. You've been listening to Why We Do what We Do.
- 12:02Speaker 3: You can learn more about this and other episodes by
- 12:05Speaker 3: going to WWDWWD podcast dot com. Thanks for listening and
- 12:10Speaker 3: we hope you have an awesome day.