Latest / The Slippery Slope / Adelaide Pushes Back Against Smart Cities and Facial Recognition

Transcript

Adelaide Pushes Back Against Smart Cities and Facial Recognition · The Slippery Slope

• 0:04
  They fell in here, thanks for listening to the slippery slope.
• 0:07
  So, look last year I bought up not last year.
• 0:09
  It was my he bought up a story about smart Cities.
• 0:12
  A lot of people quite a few people weren't weren't agreeing
• 0:17
  with me. They couldn't see the point I
• 0:18
  was trying to make, they thought, well, you know, this
• 0:20
  part. See, these are good or what are
• 0:21
  you talking about? The city is miles away.
• 0:23
  It's not going to work here, but what they're trying to do was
• 0:26
  make each little section. Its own little smart City, smart
• 0:31
  cities are coming, they are not good there.
• 0:33
  Are going to be used by governments to restrict our
• 0:38
  movement, to restrict your movement.
• 0:40
  That is what it is all about. And now we are seeing this
• 0:43
  starting to play out in South. Australia will bring this
• 0:47
  article up for you to read, if you're watching this on YouTube,
• 0:53
  YouTube, which are constantly just They are really pushing
• 0:59
  back their really censoring big-time at the moment.
• 1:03
  But anyway, so if you're watching this on YouTube, just
• 1:06
  please like and share. So in this article is talking
• 1:10
  about, it's talking about stress, South Australian police
• 1:14
  are critical of protesters at Council meetings, diverting
• 1:17
  officers from fighting crime, okay?
• 1:19
  Well, what do you know? People don't want facial
• 1:23
  recognition cameras in the area. People are concerned about Big
• 1:26
  Brother. Watching them back, government's
• 1:28
  overreach. Okay, so with this mean, so last
• 1:31
  year, the Adelaide city council, voted unanimously.
• 1:34
  Not to include facial recognition, technology and new
• 1:37
  security cameras being installed across the CBD.
• 1:41
  The council had written to South Australian.
• 1:43
  Police asking if they could delay using facial recognition
• 1:47
  technology, if it was installed in City cameras until Safeguard
• 1:52
  measures were in place, but police indicated that they would
• 1:56
  would likely still use the technology.
• 2:00
  There you go. So another attorney general, Kim
• 2:03
  mayor told parliament in July that CCTV, Vision collected by
• 2:08
  one agency, could not be used for another purpose.
• 2:12
  Unless, unless the agency has reason to suspect that unlawful
• 2:18
  activity has been is being or maybe engaged in.
• 2:23
  That's very important with the wording of any of this kind of
• 2:26
  Legislation that comes through. You got to look at the way they
• 2:30
  word everything. So he's saying that, you know,
• 2:34
  one agency can collect all this information but it can't be used
• 2:37
  for another purpose. Makes you feel confident in it
• 2:40
  until you look at the the fine print.
• 2:42
  So unless that agency has reason to suspect so it's not even that
• 2:46
  they have to have a suspicion, they have to have a reason to
• 2:50
  suspect. That's all they need and it's
• 2:53
  just the reason to suspect unlawful activity has Has been
• 2:57
  is being or may just it may. It's very vague, it just may be
• 3:05
  engaged in. We have a reason.
• 3:08
  What's that reason? So they talked about hooning.
• 3:10
  Well, yeah, of course, we have reasons to just to suspect that
• 3:14
  there's been humans in this area because we can see, there's been
• 3:18
  burnouts on the street. Now, they can Overlook the fact
• 3:22
  that there's burnouts have been there for, well, over 12 months,
• 3:25
  and there has been no recent Aunt.
• 3:28
  Learning activity. But all I say is we've got a
• 3:31
  reason we can see the skid marks on the ground.
• 3:34
  So that's our reason that it may be engaged in.
• 3:38
  Therefore, we can access that CCTV.
• 3:41
  They can justify it as long as they can write it out in
• 3:44
  Justified on paper. They can so don't be deceived
• 3:48
  when they Place everything, the way they were doing so
• 3:52
  commission. Stevens on Wednesday said there
• 3:54
  was no facial recognition in use.
• 3:57
  In Council CC TV networks, that alert police if a person appears
• 4:02
  on CCTV on the street but they can put images through their
• 4:07
  system to check them against a database or faces.
• 4:11
  He agreed. This was a fundamental
• 4:14
  difference to being alerted to someone's presence, in an area.
• 4:17
  We have to upload an image and search the database.
• 4:20
  He said, local residents are Elven Warren.
• 4:24
  He's told to count the Salisbury council meeting.
• 4:26
  He had widespread Red concerns about the smart cities proposal.
• 4:31
  So I'll share here the next story about the same articles.
• 4:35
  The headline says, Big Brother battle, develops, a Salisbury
• 4:39
  and it's talking about the flyers that were sent out by
• 4:41
  this group. Yeah, regarding Alec antic.
• 4:46
  But what I really want to talk about is this Salisbury mere
• 4:49
  Jillian Aldridge. Okay.
• 4:51
  So this group has sent out, you know they've called for
• 4:56
  residents to come. And attend this kind of protest.
• 4:58
  So Salisbury mere Julian Aldridge.
• 5:00
  She believed tens of thousands of pamphlets objecting to the,
• 5:03
  the council's, smart cities initiative had been distributed
• 5:07
  some of which, with the stamp of the no, smart cities Action
• 5:11
  Group. The whole idea is what she says.
• 5:15
  This is the mayor, the whole idea of a big brother thing is
• 5:19
  really quite ridiculous. Okay, really quite ridiculous
• 5:24
  that you would have big brother watching over you.
• 5:27
  That Council will be watching you government would be watching
• 5:30
  it. That's what you says, that's
• 5:31
  what she tells the ABC radio. And then she goes on further on
• 5:36
  down here and says, Miss old rejected suggestions that the
• 5:40
  smart cities program involve listening devices, and facial
• 5:43
  recognition, recognition technology that they do in a way
• 5:47
  habit and they can be implemented later on, but right
• 5:51
  now maybe they do. Instead she goes on to say the
• 5:54
  community was on board with more CCTV.
• 5:58
  She says here now this is she is just said, the whole idea of big
• 6:03
  brother is quite ridiculous. That's what she just said.
• 6:06
  Now she says smart cities is all about using technology to
• 6:10
  improve the quality of the life of residents.
• 6:14
  This includes things like pedestrian.
• 6:16
  Monitoring an older person walks across the street and the lights
• 6:20
  change too quickly. We'd recognize that in the
• 6:23
  lights could be charged so that people could comfortably
• 6:27
  changed. So people could comfortably go
• 6:29
  across the road, how can you argue with that?
• 6:32
  We we all want people older people to cross the road safely
• 6:37
  but still this idea that big brother is watching you That's
• 6:43
  ridiculous. She says it's a program to
• 6:46
  increase your safety because where we heard in history that
• 6:50
  it's for your safety and it's for your benefit that we're
• 6:53
  implementing things. Has it been another time?
• 6:56
  It may be the previous Century where we've heard groups say
• 6:59
  that kind of thing it's for your benefit for your safety.
• 7:02
  That's why we implementing all those rules for your safety when
• 7:06
  people start saying, is for your safety.
• 7:09
  That I'm going to bring in these rules these laws.
• 7:12
  It's for your safety in your benefit.
• 7:14
  You better be looking around for someone else to come along and
• 7:17
  smack in the back of the head. With the log, say says it's a
• 7:20
  program to increase your safety and that includes the ability
• 7:24
  for us to know what your needs are.
• 7:27
  So they want the ability to know what your needs are.
• 7:31
  The same person that just said that the the idea of Big Brother
• 7:36
  watching you is ridiculous. That's ridiculous.
• 7:40
  What'd she say, the whole idea of a big brother thing is really
• 7:44
  quite ridiculous down here. It's a program to increase your
• 7:50
  safety. And that includes the ability
• 7:51
  for us to know. She's a part of the Big Brother.
• 7:55
  That's why she doesn't see a problem with it.
• 7:57
  It's a part of their ability to know what your needs are.
• 8:00
  And that's not invading. Your privacy with anything at
• 8:03
  all. Nothing at all.
• 8:05
  She says, it's not invading your privacy because she knows about
• 8:08
  it. She's a part of the system.
• 8:11
  Last week, the city of on come a ringer, council meeting
• 8:14
  descended into chaos when protesters allegedly tried to
• 8:17
  enter the chamber. Mrs. Aldrich said she was
• 8:22
  alarmed at the prospect of similar scenes in Adelaide's
• 8:25
  North. I'm concerned for the safety of
• 8:28
  my counsel in the staff. She said, So, there you go.
• 8:36
  They say that they don't want or they're not going to implement
• 8:39
  facial recognition, just yet. They're going to delay it.
• 8:43
  They say that. Well, we can we will have this
• 8:46
  technology but it can't be shared with anyone else.
• 8:49
  Well actually can be shared with other agencies but they need a
• 8:52
  reason. Well, yeah, they need a reason
• 8:54
  and they don't really need much of a reason.
• 8:58
  Not much of a reason at all. They just need to be able to
• 9:00
  justify an excuse. They just need the thought of a
• 9:04
  reason is what they need. And, you know, the idea of Big
• 9:08
  Brother watching you is absolutely ridiculous.
• 9:10
  Except big brother is going to watch you, but as for your
• 9:13
  benefit, and it really doesn't matter because we're big brother
• 9:16
  and we can be trusted. So it's all good, the police
• 9:20
  commissioner, the police, because police police have
• 9:23
  never, never never miss used technology, so what does it
• 9:26
  matter now? This is all coming from south
• 9:29
  Australia and I just want to remind you of what South
• 9:32
  Australia implemented last year last year or the year before
• 9:36
  during the epidemic. The pandemic that we had to have
• 9:40
  the plan plan demick that we had to have just so you know, Here
• 9:51
  we go. South Australia, facial
• 9:53
  recognition, trial, covid, app blasted by Fox and Breitbart
• 9:57
  criticized over lack of safeguards.
• 9:59
  Civil liberty groups, say an app, being trialled in South
• 10:04
  Australia, that uses facial recognition, and geolocation to
• 10:09
  enforce home quarantine during the covid-19.
• 10:11
  Pandemic should not be used until the proper safeguards are
• 10:17
  in place. So, South Australia's currently
• 10:20
  using a government develop app. Remember the mayor saying this
• 10:25
  idea of Big Brother watching, you is ridiculous.
• 10:27
  South Australia. Using a government developed app
• 10:31
  to enforce home quarantine compliance for a small cohort of
• 10:35
  returning Interstate Travelers, who opt into the trial uses a
• 10:39
  sent a message at random times and must respond within 15
• 10:43
  minutes, verifying their location, and identifying, and
• 10:47
  identity, using facial recognition, And geolocation if
• 10:52
  they fail to do. So, South Australian Health
• 10:55
  notifies police. Who then attend the person's
• 10:59
  home for a physical check, But yeah.
• 11:05
  We don't have to worry about it. If they have the smart cities,
• 11:07
  we don't need to worry about facial recognition cameras.
• 11:12
  We the idea of Big Brother watching, you is just a joke.
• 11:15
  It's nothing to be worried about.
• 11:17
  It's all for your safety. Nothing to be concerned of
• 11:22
  nothing to be concerned about when people start saying, when
• 11:27
  governments agencies, please start saying this is for your
• 11:32
  safety for your protection. We are bringing in these laws
• 11:36
  for your safety and your protection and you can trust us.
• 11:40
  We're taking away your Liberty with taking away your freedom
• 11:44
  But it's because we can be trusted and is for your benefit.
• 11:50
  You need to watch what's coming down the road as I've said
• 11:54
  before and I know a lot of people don't like me talking
• 11:56
  about bible stuff but the Bible predicted a long time ago.
• 12:01
  Revelation 13 also in Daniel but in Revelation 13 describes in
• 12:06
  graphic detail. It says that we will have a one
• 12:08
  world. Government says that we will
• 12:10
  have a one world, basically a currency in that, no one will be
• 12:14
  able to buy or sell, unless you have the mark of the beast.
• 12:19
  The only way you can, Have this kind of system in place that you
• 12:23
  can determine who in the whole world.
• 12:28
  Can buy or sell, unless you have some kind of Mark on you.
• 12:34
  Is if you have this kind of system in place, this kind of
• 12:37
  smart system in place where you are, monitoring everyone 24
• 12:43
  hours a day. That is why I am so against the
• 12:48
  smart cities that they're trying to force upon us.
• 12:53
  Don't be deceived into thinking that this is all just for your
• 12:57
  benefit. Just sit back and watch, just
• 13:00
  sit back and allow us to take control of your life.
• 13:04
  Just have an electric car. We can dictate when you can
• 13:07
  charge it and when you can drive, it's all good.
• 13:10
  Nothing to see here. We're big brother, but don't be
• 13:13
  concerned, don't be concerned. My opinion.
• 13:19
  This is something to be concerned about with everything
• 13:22
  else that is happening in Australia at the moment.
• 13:25
  These this, this, what's happening in South Australia,
• 13:28
  with these smart cities, this is the big story.
• 13:31
  That's my opinion. Thank you for listening to the
• 13:34
  slippery slope.