Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Mega Edition: Who Approved Jeffrey Epstein's Fake Science Foundation Hustle? (7/28/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Who Approved Jeffrey Epstein's Fake Science Foundation Hustle? (7/28/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. Now picture this if you will, folks, a
0:07
Speaker 1: convicted sex offender strolling into his science office every morning
0:11
Speaker 1: like he's running NASA. Except the only thing this guy
0:13
Speaker 1: ever launched was another scam. Jeffrey Freakin Epstein supposedly serving time,
0:20
Speaker 1: supposedly under probation, and what does Florida let him do?
0:23
Speaker 1: Open up a science foundation right next door to his
0:26
Speaker 1: lawyer's office. It's hard to even say that with a
0:29
Speaker 1: straight face. It's like letting a bank robber run the
0:32
Speaker 1: vault as long as he promises to wear a name tag.
0:36
Speaker 1: This man turned his probation into a part time job
0:39
Speaker 1: in deceit, and the state of Florida just nodded along.
0:42
Speaker 1: Seems legit. I mean, you'd think that somebody, anybody would
0:46
Speaker 1: have said, hold up, this feels off, but nope, Instead
0:50
Speaker 1: they treated him like some misunderstood genius on a mission
0:53
Speaker 1: to save humanity instead of the predator that he was.
0:56
Speaker 1: He wasn't researching quantum physics. He was researching how to
0:59
Speaker 1: keep the grip. And the best part, the office didn't
1:03
Speaker 1: do a damn thing. No employees, no grants, no discoveries,
1:07
Speaker 1: no purpose, unless, of course, you count being upfront for
1:12
Speaker 1: his movements and his ego. The whole thing was a
1:15
Speaker 1: glorified permission slip stamped by the very system that was
1:18
Speaker 1: supposed to be watching them. Now we're supposed to believe
1:21
Speaker 1: it was all just a coincidence. The Science Foundation was
1:24
Speaker 1: a cover story, soapaper thin. It should have come with
1:27
Speaker 1: a Florida State seal. He was out here playing scientists,
1:30
Speaker 1: playing philanthropist, playing the whole damned system like a fiddle,
1:34
Speaker 1: while the survivors watched the same people who are meant
1:36
Speaker 1: to protect them sign off on his field trips. It's disgusting,
1:41
Speaker 1: it's infuriating, and it's exactly what happens when money becomes
1:45
Speaker 1: the cure all for a morality. Because make no mistake,
1:48
Speaker 1: this was not an accident. It wasn't some bureaucratic mix up.
1:52
Speaker 1: It was corruption in khakis, smiling for the cameras, pretending
1:55
Speaker 1: it was rehabilitation. The same justice system that throws kids
1:58
Speaker 1: in jail for skipping probabation meetings let Epstein run a
2:01
Speaker 1: fake lab next to his lawyer's office, and nobody, not
2:05
Speaker 1: the judge, not probation, not the state attorney lifted a finger.
2:10
Speaker 1: They all just pretended this was fine, Like the rules
2:12
Speaker 1: don't apply if your bank account comes with a few
2:15
Speaker 1: zeros and the vault full of dossiers full of names
2:18
Speaker 1: that scare politicians. So yeah, before Congress pats itself on
2:22
Speaker 1: the back for looking into Epstein again, maybe they should
2:24
Speaker 1: start there, you know, with the Florida officials who greenlit
2:28
Speaker 1: a con man's science foundation. Maybe they should ask why
2:31
Speaker 1: a predator was allowed to play scientists while his survivors
2:34
Speaker 1: were trying to piece their lives back together. Because until
2:38
Speaker 1: someone answers that, the rest of this show is just noise,
2:41
Speaker 1: the fix wasn't just in. It was built right into
2:44
Speaker 1: the foundation, literally, And that's why, if we're being real,
2:48
Speaker 1: the whole Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation thing was never about science.
2:52
Speaker 1: It was about bullshitting the state of Florida into thinking
2:55
Speaker 1: he was some noble intellectual instead of a sex offending
2:58
Speaker 1: dirtbag with friends and I play, you know, the type,
3:02
Speaker 1: rich guy in a bad suit who talks about curing
3:04
Speaker 1: cancer when he's really curing his own boredom. And the
3:07
Speaker 1: kicker his foundation just happened to be right next door
3:10
Speaker 1: to his lawyer Jack Goldberger's office. Real subtle, because when
3:15
Speaker 1: I think rehabilitation, I think, let's set up a research
3:18
Speaker 1: foundation next door to the guy defending me in court.
3:22
Speaker 1: The whole thing stank worse than weak old shrimp left
3:24
Speaker 1: in the Florida Sun. Epstein was supposedly serving time, right,
3:29
Speaker 1: except his version of probation looked more like a networking retreat.
3:32
Speaker 1: He'd stroll in and out of that so called science
3:35
Speaker 1: office like he was Einstein reincarnated. Only difference is Einstein
3:40
Speaker 1: actually did something with his brain. Epstein's greatest discovery was
3:44
Speaker 1: figuring out how far he could stretch the law before
3:46
Speaker 1: it snapped, and surprise, surprise, it never did, because the
3:50
Speaker 1: people who were supposed to enforce it bend over backwards
3:53
Speaker 1: to accommodate him. He was under watch, sure, but it
3:57
Speaker 1: must have been the kind of watch you buy at
3:58
Speaker 1: a gas station for five buzz, because it clearly didn't work.
4:03
Speaker 1: The Science Foundation itself was about as scientific as a
4:06
Speaker 1: magic gate ball. No research, no staff, no labs, just
4:11
Speaker 1: a fancy sign on the door and an excuse to say, see,
4:14
Speaker 1: I'm working, and the state bought it. The probation officers
4:17
Speaker 1: nodded along like bobbleheads signing paperwork while this creep came
4:21
Speaker 1: and went like he owned the courthouse. Meanwhile, survivors, hey
4:26
Speaker 1: remember them? They were left wondering how the hell the
4:29
Speaker 1: justice system could be so stupid or so corrupt. Take
4:32
Speaker 1: your pick. Either one fits and right next door to
4:36
Speaker 1: Jack Goldberger, Huh, you got to hand it to Epstein. The
4:38
Speaker 1: guy had guts. Who else sets up shop right next
4:41
Speaker 1: to their lawyer and calls it a foundation Bro's like
4:45
Speaker 1: Robin the Bank then running the apartment above it. Every
4:48
Speaker 1: inch of that set up screamed inside job, but nobody blinked,
4:51
Speaker 1: not the judge, not probation, not even the press. Everyone
4:55
Speaker 1: acted like it was normal for a convicted sex offender
4:57
Speaker 1: to have cushy work release gig in an offen that
5:00
Speaker 1: didn't even do any work. Barry Krisher's office should have
5:04
Speaker 1: been the first to blow the whistle, but instead they
5:06
Speaker 1: handed him a megaphone. They knew damn well what was
5:09
Speaker 1: going on, and they didn't care. Epstein wasn't some first
5:13
Speaker 1: defender trying to turn his life around. He was a
5:15
Speaker 1: predator who never stopped hunting, and Florida handed him the camouflage.
5:20
Speaker 1: They said, sure, jeff you can run your little science thing,
5:23
Speaker 1: just make sure you check in once in a while.
5:25
Speaker 1: And he did, right before heading back to do whatever
5:29
Speaker 1: he wanted. Real tight supervision there, boys, And you know
5:33
Speaker 1: what makes the blood boil, the sheer arrogance of it all.
5:37
Speaker 1: None of this shit was subtle. It wasn't buried. The
5:39
Speaker 1: man had an entire fake foundation operating under the state's nose.
5:43
Speaker 1: People saw it, knew it, and shrugged. You'd think after
5:47
Speaker 1: the scandal broke, someone, anyone would step forward and say, yeah,
5:50
Speaker 1: we messed up, But no, everyone suddenly struck with selective
5:54
Speaker 1: memory loss. Who approved that address? I don't recall who
5:58
Speaker 1: checked on him. I'd have to review the foot while
6:00
Speaker 1: they all sound like they've been coached by the same
6:02
Speaker 1: PR firm. And let's not pretend the foundation fooled anyone.
6:06
Speaker 1: It was just a glorified permission slip, a get out
6:09
Speaker 1: of jail. Whenever Card dressed up in a charity talk.
6:12
Speaker 1: Epstein knew the system was built to protect guys like him.
6:16
Speaker 1: He'd flash a few checks to the right people, mumble
6:19
Speaker 1: something about science and education, and boom, probation signed off.
6:23
Speaker 1: He could have called it the Jeffrey Epstein Dolphin smiles initiative,
6:27
Speaker 1: and they'd have still had let them waltz out the door,
6:29
Speaker 1: because when you're rich enough, everything's a nonprofit. Now. Look,
6:34
Speaker 1: if a regular guy tried that, say, opened a construction
6:38
Speaker 1: charity while on probation and just used it to hang
6:41
Speaker 1: out with his buddies, he'd be back behind bars before
6:43
Speaker 1: he finished his coffee. But Epstein, he got treated like
6:47
Speaker 1: a misunderstood genius. He's contributing to the community, they said,
6:52
Speaker 1: if you mean by community the pombach elite. The guy
6:56
Speaker 1: couldn't spell redemption if you spotted him the first date letters.
6:59
Speaker 1: And at this point, if you don't laugh, you're gonna
7:01
Speaker 1: cry at how they dressed it up. They called it
7:04
Speaker 1: a philanthropic initiative to promote science. What science the science
7:08
Speaker 1: of probation loopholes, the science of pretending to serve time
7:11
Speaker 1: while living like a king. The only experiments happening there
7:14
Speaker 1: involved seeing how far the Florida justice system could bend
7:17
Speaker 1: before it broke. Spoiler alert, That shit snapped clean in half,
7:22
Speaker 1: and that office next to Goldberger's. We all know it
7:25
Speaker 1: wasn't an accident. It was a tactical move. Epstein knew
7:28
Speaker 1: that proximity meant protection. If anyone ever dropped by to
7:32
Speaker 1: check on him, his lawyer was right there to run interference.
7:35
Speaker 1: It was like having a built in firewall between his
7:37
Speaker 1: lives and the law. Look, I'm not saying Coldberger was
7:40
Speaker 1: in on it, but come on, the guy had to
7:42
Speaker 1: know what was happening next door. The smell of hypocrisy
7:45
Speaker 1: must have wafted through the drywall the probation officers. Meanwhile,
7:50
Speaker 1: we're out here playing see no evil here, no evil.
7:52
Speaker 1: They'd show up, take a few boxes, maybe ask a
7:55
Speaker 1: question or two, and leave as long as Epstein looked
7:58
Speaker 1: like he was doing something a fish. Nobody wanted to
8:01
Speaker 1: rock the boat because rocking the boat in Florida apparently
8:04
Speaker 1: means you stop getting invited to fundraisers. And we can't
8:07
Speaker 1: have that now, can we. And the optics, boy, let's
8:11
Speaker 1: talk about the optics. A convicted pedophile claiming to run
8:15
Speaker 1: a science foundation. It's like putting a fox in charge
8:18
Speaker 1: of a henhouse and calling it poultry management. The sheer
8:22
Speaker 1: audacity of it should have made headlines daily, but instead
8:25
Speaker 1: the media yawned. They called them a financier with scientific interests. Yeah,
8:29
Speaker 1: and I'm a rocket scientist because I once fixed a toaster.
8:33
Speaker 1: The bigger picture here is what it says about power.
8:37
Speaker 1: Epstein didn't have superpowers. He had leverage, the kind of
8:40
Speaker 1: leverage that made cops, lawyers, and politicians suddenly forget how
8:44
Speaker 1: to do their jobs, the kind of leverage that made
8:47
Speaker 1: probation look more like a business arrangement. The Science Foundation
8:51
Speaker 1: was just a mask, one of many he wore to
8:53
Speaker 1: keep the machine running, and now years later, we're still
8:57
Speaker 1: wondering who was behind the curtain. Soone signed off that foundation,
9:01
Speaker 1: so one approved those work hours, soone decided it was
9:03
Speaker 1: perfectly fine for him to keep mingling with the same
9:06
Speaker 1: crowd that helped them offend in the first place. And
9:08
Speaker 1: guess what, none of them have been held accountable. They're
9:12
Speaker 1: probably all retired somewhere sipping Margarita's, pretended they didn't play
9:16
Speaker 1: a part and enabling one of the worst predators of
9:18
Speaker 1: our time. Meanwhile, Congress has the nerve to hold hearings
9:22
Speaker 1: about Epstein while letting the Clinton skip their depositions to
9:26
Speaker 1: go raise money for a friend's campaign. You could make
9:29
Speaker 1: a bigger mockery of justice if you tried the same
9:32
Speaker 1: people who claimed to be fighting corruption. Are out here
9:34
Speaker 1: protecting the very network that made Epstein untouchable. The whole case,
9:39
Speaker 1: the science foundation, the probation force, the state's complicity. It's
9:44
Speaker 1: all one big reminder that the system isn't broken. It's
9:47
Speaker 1: working exactly as designed. It's built to protect the wealthy
9:51
Speaker 1: and grind the rest of us into dust. Epstein just
9:54
Speaker 1: happened to be the one arrogant enough to flaunt it
9:56
Speaker 1: in public, and even then it took years for anyone
9:59
Speaker 1: to care. Look, the thing is, the survivors have never
10:03
Speaker 1: got a break. While Epstein was working next to his lawyer,
10:06
Speaker 1: they were trying to rebuild their lives. Oh, they were
10:09
Speaker 1: told justice was being served, that he was being watched,
10:12
Speaker 1: that the system was keeping tabs. But all along it
10:16
Speaker 1: was just theater. The only thing being watched was the
10:18
Speaker 1: clock ticking down until everyone could pretend it never happened.
10:23
Speaker 1: And the Florida officials, well, they're still out here acting
10:26
Speaker 1: like it was all above board. We followed procedure. They say, oh,
10:29
Speaker 1: I bet you did just the wrong damp procedure, the
10:32
Speaker 1: one that billionaires write their own rules with and everyone
10:35
Speaker 1: else plays along. If there was any real oversight, half
10:39
Speaker 1: those people would have lost their jobs. The second Epstein
10:41
Speaker 1: Sham Foundation opened its doors. So yeah, the fix was
10:45
Speaker 1: in from the very start. I mean it. The Science
10:49
Speaker 1: Foundation wasn't just some side note. It was exhibit A
10:52
Speaker 1: in the case against our so called justice system. It
10:55
Speaker 1: proved that if you've got enough money, you can turn
10:57
Speaker 1: punishment into performance art. And look, at the end of
11:00
Speaker 1: the day, that's the real science experiment Jeffrey Epstein conducted,
11:04
Speaker 1: not in biology, not in physics, but in corruption. He
11:07
Speaker 1: tested the limits of privilege, and the results are conclusive.
11:11
Speaker 1: The law does not apply equally. And as long as
11:14
Speaker 1: the people who made that possible keep dodging accountability, nothing's
11:18
Speaker 1: ever going to change. Same script, same actors, same ending.
11:22
Speaker 1: The only thing that evolves is the excuse. All of
11:27
Speaker 1: the information that goes with this episode can be found
11:30
Speaker 1: in the description box back to the Epstein chronicles. You
11:35
Speaker 1: can't talk about Jeffrey Epstein unless you're talking about all
11:38
Speaker 1: of the money he was pumping into the world of
11:41
Speaker 1: academia and into the pockets of scientists. Yet all we've
11:46
Speaker 1: had is silence from these people. None of them have
11:49
Speaker 1: come forward and said, well, you know what, we saw
11:51
Speaker 1: some goofy shit going on down at Epstein's Island. When
11:54
Speaker 1: we were there for the Edge Foundation, none of them
11:57
Speaker 1: said anything like that. And I have said from the beginning,
12:01
Speaker 1: you know how these scientists are. For the most part,
12:03
Speaker 1: None of these dudes were picked first in Pe. None
12:05
Speaker 1: of these dudes were playing football or baseball or popular
12:09
Speaker 1: for the most part, I would guess. And then they
12:12
Speaker 1: get to this island with all of these beautiful girls,
12:16
Speaker 1: and they think they literally just hit the lottery. Well,
12:19
Speaker 1: guess what. For the smartest people amongst us, you're pretty
12:23
Speaker 1: damn stupid. And it's laughable to me that the scientific
12:28
Speaker 1: community still won't take responsibility, still won't step up to
12:32
Speaker 1: the plate. You have very very few people from the
12:35
Speaker 1: world of academia who have stepped up and pointed out
12:39
Speaker 1: the wrongdoings here and how the science community in general
12:43
Speaker 1: was wrong accepting Jeffrey Epstein as a patron. And let's
12:47
Speaker 1: not act like it was just one or two people
12:49
Speaker 1: he was donating to. Let's not act like it was
12:51
Speaker 1: just one or two campuses. This dude was trolling. This
12:56
Speaker 1: man had many fingers in many pies, and and it's
13:00
Speaker 1: an embarrassment, honestly, that there hasn't been more of a
13:03
Speaker 1: spotlight put on academia, put on these scientists that took
13:08
Speaker 1: his money. Now, how many of these scientists were working
13:11
Speaker 1: on private projects, secure projects, and how much of that
13:15
Speaker 1: information found its way into Jeffrey Epstein's hands. Now, again, look,
13:19
Speaker 1: maybe none of it did, right, maybe none of it did.
13:22
Speaker 1: But that's a question that surely has to be asked.
13:25
Speaker 1: When you're dealing with sensitive material, you're dealing with places
13:29
Speaker 1: like the Santa Fe Institute, you're dealing with Los Alamos.
13:33
Speaker 1: There's a lot of sensitive projects that are going on
13:36
Speaker 1: in places such as that, And when you have a
13:38
Speaker 1: patron like Jeffrey Epstein who is donating hundreds and hundreds
13:42
Speaker 1: of thousands of dollars, that opens a lot of doors
13:45
Speaker 1: for these people. And that was Jeffrey Epstein's goal. What
13:49
Speaker 1: you thought he was just some great patron of science.
13:51
Speaker 1: He just wanted to make humanity better. That was never
13:55
Speaker 1: his goal. You heard what Maria said the other night
13:58
Speaker 1: about Jeffrey Epstein. It was always about how he could
14:01
Speaker 1: increase his own wealth, his own power. He never just
14:03
Speaker 1: gave freely. He wasn't some charitable man. We've talked about
14:07
Speaker 1: this a million times on the podcast how these people
14:10
Speaker 1: wrap themselves up in charity like its armor, and then
14:13
Speaker 1: they expect us all to believe that, well, since I
14:15
Speaker 1: donated to this charity or started this charity, I can't
14:18
Speaker 1: be involved in any of this. Well, newsflash, We're not
14:22
Speaker 1: buying the bullshit anymore. And it's about time that the
14:25
Speaker 1: world of academia gets called out onto the carpet for
14:29
Speaker 1: their bullshit as well. All right, today we have an
14:32
Speaker 1: article from Evolution News and Science today. Now, this one
14:37
Speaker 1: I pulled out of the catalog considering we're a little
14:39
Speaker 1: slow as far as what's going on with Juror fifty
14:43
Speaker 1: and the rest of the stuff that is currently going on.
14:46
Speaker 1: So we yanked this one out of the archive because
14:48
Speaker 1: it's still very very relevant. Considering there has not been
14:53
Speaker 1: enough done here with these scientists and they continued to
14:56
Speaker 1: just go on with their business. How many of them
14:58
Speaker 1: have been swooped up by another Jeffrey Epstein. Again, I
15:02
Speaker 1: don't have that evidence to prove that. That's just a question.
15:06
Speaker 1: Headline Jeffrey Epstein and the Silence of Scientists. This article
15:11
Speaker 1: was authored by Michael Egner. Literary scholars have an adage
15:18
Speaker 1: about the interpretation of texts They point out that the
15:22
Speaker 1: really important things in a text are often what is
15:25
Speaker 1: not said more so than what is said, And we
15:28
Speaker 1: talk about that a lot too, right, the lies of omission.
15:32
Speaker 1: When you're omitting things, it's still a lie. And there's
15:35
Speaker 1: a lot of omission when it comes to the history
15:38
Speaker 1: of scientists and Jeffrey Epstein. To really understand the story,
15:44
Speaker 1: you have to read between the lines. What should be
15:47
Speaker 1: in this story but was left out? What was the
15:50
Speaker 1: motive for the emissions? This often reveals deep purposes and
15:54
Speaker 1: themes that are obscured in the explicit words on the page.
15:59
Speaker 1: It's comparable to Sherlock Holmes's dog that didn't bark. Silence
16:05
Speaker 1: is often the real meaning in a story, and that
16:09
Speaker 1: is for sure, right. A lot of times you'll see
16:11
Speaker 1: these journalists or these print editors or whatever, beat around
16:15
Speaker 1: the bush. They'll dance around the edges, they'll play touch
16:18
Speaker 1: butt in the park, but they'll never get down to it,
16:21
Speaker 1: will they. And those are lies of omission. They know
16:26
Speaker 1: the deal, they know what's going on, but for whatever reason,
16:29
Speaker 1: they refuse to put pen to paper and let everybody
16:33
Speaker 1: else know the deal. The scientific scandal involving pedophile Jeffrey
16:38
Speaker 1: Epstein is horrifying, but it's vital that we understand the
16:42
Speaker 1: real meaning of the collaboration between Epstein and the science elites.
16:47
Speaker 1: And this is very crucial, right because these scientists, these
16:50
Speaker 1: very scientists, are the ones that are dictating public policy
16:54
Speaker 1: at this point. And I don't know about you, folks,
16:57
Speaker 1: but I'm not comfortable with that. I'm certainly not comfortable
17:00
Speaker 1: with a bunch of Jeffrey Epstein's friends dictating my future
17:03
Speaker 1: or what's right or what's wrong. Now. I'm not saying
17:06
Speaker 1: everybody who's in the scientific community who's making policy is
17:10
Speaker 1: friends with Epstein, but you gotta believe that some of
17:13
Speaker 1: these people that were close to Epstein, these people that
17:16
Speaker 1: were at the edge conferences with them, Brockman's friends. I'm
17:19
Speaker 1: not comfortable with it at all, folks. Honestly, the most
17:24
Speaker 1: important meaning in the partnership between Epstein and the leading
17:27
Speaker 1: Darwinists and computer scientists isn't the depravity of the man
17:32
Speaker 1: in his elite scientific friends. The most important meaning is
17:36
Speaker 1: in the silence in the scientific community in the midst
17:39
Speaker 1: of this atrocity. And honestly, one of the only people
17:44
Speaker 1: to speak out as far as academia. Goes is doctor
17:47
Speaker 1: Stephen Delay, and he has been very very forceful with
17:51
Speaker 1: his pushback against his colleagues in academia and their behavior.
17:57
Speaker 1: There is no reason that these people should be taking
18:01
Speaker 1: money from Epstein. There's no reason that Epstein should have
18:04
Speaker 1: the access to the campus or an office on a campus.
18:09
Speaker 1: None of that should have occurred. But these people that
18:13
Speaker 1: are working on these projects, or these scientists, they're like
18:16
Speaker 1: anyone else, right, They can be manipulated and a few
18:20
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars is a good salve to put on
18:24
Speaker 1: the wound. What didn't happen. What didn't happen is this,
18:30
Speaker 1: There was no dissent in the scientific profession about taking
18:33
Speaker 1: guidance and money from a convicted pedophile who was obviously
18:37
Speaker 1: trafficking children for sex. Not a word, and he is
18:41
Speaker 1: one hundred percent right. I mean, let's not cut corners here. Okay.
18:46
Speaker 1: All of these people who acted like they had no
18:48
Speaker 1: idea what Epstein was up to, especially after the first arrest,
18:52
Speaker 1: are allying now. The people that were associated with him
18:57
Speaker 1: before his first arrest. I still don't believe they they
19:00
Speaker 1: had no idea what was going on, but at least
19:02
Speaker 1: they can say, hey, look, this guy wasn't convicted. At
19:05
Speaker 1: the time, I had no idea, But after the fact,
19:08
Speaker 1: I have zero time to listen to any excuse you
19:12
Speaker 1: have about how you had no idea, what was going on?
19:15
Speaker 1: What Google didn't work for you. You didn't have a
19:18
Speaker 1: search engine that you could type his name into and
19:20
Speaker 1: see what was up. And for some of the smartest
19:23
Speaker 1: people in the world, you mofos look pretty damn stupid
19:28
Speaker 1: right now. At every stage of this repellent saga, from
19:35
Speaker 1: Epstein's early forays into scientific patronage twenty years ago, through
19:39
Speaker 1: his conviction for child prostitution in two thousand and eight,
19:43
Speaker 1: to his largest as a patron of elite Darwinists and
19:46
Speaker 1: computer scientists at MIT, Harvard, the Santa Fe Institute, the
19:51
Speaker 1: Transhumanist Project, Humanity Plus, and many others. In the decade
19:55
Speaker 1: that followed, there was from the scientific community abject silence.
20:01
Speaker 1: And why do you think if these scientists would have
20:03
Speaker 1: spoke up, they would have lost their patronage, They would
20:06
Speaker 1: have lost this money, this funding. And nobody wanted to
20:09
Speaker 1: step on Epstein's toes. They were all terrified of this guy.
20:14
Speaker 1: And it's sad, right because now when you look back
20:17
Speaker 1: on it, and you look at all of these scientists
20:20
Speaker 1: and all of these big shots who were complicit. It
20:22
Speaker 1: leaves a real bad taste in your mouth, doesn't it.
20:25
Speaker 1: How is it that the only person that is being
20:28
Speaker 1: held responsible for this is Glaine Maxwell. Now, don't get
20:31
Speaker 1: me wrong, she is the most disgusting of the group
20:34
Speaker 1: and she should be in prison for the rest of
20:36
Speaker 1: her life. But what about these other people that these
20:38
Speaker 1: girls were being trafficked to. They don't hold any responsibility
20:41
Speaker 1: for their decisions or their actions, no self responsibility whatsoever.
20:45
Speaker 1: We should just forget that it happened. Huh. Sorry, that
20:49
Speaker 1: is not going to occur. And these scientists that were
20:51
Speaker 1: here harboring Epstein's image and enabling his behavior, they all
20:57
Speaker 1: need to be called out on the carpet. Thousands of
21:02
Speaker 1: elite and pedestrian scientists benefited from Epstein's philanthropy and camaraderie.
21:08
Speaker 1: Thousands more are knew of Epstein's courtship rituals with scientists
21:12
Speaker 1: and with children and said absolutely nothing. What happened on
21:16
Speaker 1: the Lolita Express and Pedophile Island. While probably known to many,
21:20
Speaker 1: Epstein's elite science pals were known as well. At least
21:23
Speaker 1: an outline to the thousands of ordinary scientists and administrators
21:27
Speaker 1: who cashed his checks and worked in his labs. And
21:31
Speaker 1: again what they'll say is, oh, we had no idea.
21:34
Speaker 1: They'll distance themselves from all of this, and then they'll
21:37
Speaker 1: just go on their merry way like it never happened.
21:40
Speaker 1: But that's not gonna work. There needs to be accountability, right,
21:44
Speaker 1: All of these people that were involved in this shit
21:46
Speaker 1: need to be held accountable so it doesn't happen again.
21:49
Speaker 1: What you think Epstein's the only one out there, the
21:51
Speaker 1: only sick fuck running around right now, Unfortunately, we're sharing
21:55
Speaker 1: air with a lot of sick and twisted people, folks,
21:58
Speaker 1: and there's garan to be another Epstein out there as
22:02
Speaker 1: we speak. And in your own communities, you don't have
22:06
Speaker 1: to look too far for Mini Epstein's dudes that are
22:09
Speaker 1: doing this to hookers. Right now on whatever the track
22:12
Speaker 1: is in your city or your neighborhood or whatever. I
22:15
Speaker 1: can leave my house right now and go three four
22:18
Speaker 1: miles and find the whole area with nothing but hookers.
22:23
Speaker 1: Poor people who are you know, stuck doing what they
22:28
Speaker 1: have to do to provide for themselves, whether it be
22:30
Speaker 1: they have a drug habit or whatever the fact is,
22:33
Speaker 1: they're out on the street, they're in that circumstance. They're
22:36
Speaker 1: in the clutches of human traffickers. Only whispered questions. There
22:43
Speaker 1: were whispered questions, undeniably obvious questions. There must have been
22:48
Speaker 1: daily whispers and labs and hallways and coffee rooms. Why
22:51
Speaker 1: is doctors so and so taking trips with this guy?
22:54
Speaker 1: What do you think is happening with all those little girls?
22:57
Speaker 1: Where does the money come from? It's these are all
23:00
Speaker 1: jgitimate questions that even you know, basic folk like us
23:04
Speaker 1: would ask. You mean to tell me that all of
23:06
Speaker 1: these scientists and all of these big wigs, big shots,
23:09
Speaker 1: had no idea. They didn't ask these questions. They weren't
23:13
Speaker 1: interested in where this money came from. The answers were
23:18
Speaker 1: in broad daylight. Epstein's life was an open Internet page.
23:22
Speaker 1: Thousands of scientists and administrators, even those not directly involved
23:26
Speaker 1: with Epstein and the children eat trafficked, asked these questions
23:30
Speaker 1: and knew the answers. No one said a word. Why. Well,
23:35
Speaker 1: in my opinion, it's because Epstein was so highly placed
23:38
Speaker 1: in society. And when you're best friends with Billy boy Clinton, eh,
23:43
Speaker 1: you know, it's kind of intimidating for people to think
23:46
Speaker 1: that they can go against you. You know, you walk
23:49
Speaker 1: into Epstein's office and you see pictures of Clinton, Trump,
23:52
Speaker 1: al Wood, Barock. The list goes on of powerful people.
23:56
Speaker 1: That's intimidating. And he wasn't afraid, Jeffrey to point out
24:01
Speaker 1: that he could end your career, end your life. So
24:04
Speaker 1: a lot of these scientists were probably a little scared,
24:08
Speaker 1: but that doesn't excuse it. You need to have some
24:10
Speaker 1: backbone in life. Certain things are worth fighting for, certain
24:14
Speaker 1: things are worth losing your career over, in my opinion,
24:17
Speaker 1: and this certainly is that right. Look, if dying on
24:20
Speaker 1: the hill of protecting children isn't worth it to you,
24:23
Speaker 1: then you're just a scumbag in my opinion. And I
24:26
Speaker 1: don't even have kids, folks, right, I don't have no
24:29
Speaker 1: I have no desire to have children. I'm not a
24:31
Speaker 1: big fan of little kids running around crying, snotty nosed up.
24:35
Speaker 1: But as a society, that's our future. Those kids are
24:39
Speaker 1: going to carry the torch. They're gonna be the ones
24:41
Speaker 1: to make this world a better place, hopefully. And these
24:43
Speaker 1: sick fucking people like Epstein abusing them, molesting them, and
24:47
Speaker 1: these scientists keeping quiet about it. Well, you know, my
24:50
Speaker 1: big fat mouth is going to be moving. We can
24:53
Speaker 1: only do what we can do right to try and
24:55
Speaker 1: enact change. And I can only do my small little
24:58
Speaker 1: part here talking on this podcast to bring some awareness
25:04
Speaker 1: to what's going on. But like I always say, they
25:08
Speaker 1: can avoid one nat right, swat it away. But when
25:11
Speaker 1: there's ten million of us, now it's time for these
25:13
Speaker 1: people to suffocate a pariah for life. Some years ago,
25:20
Speaker 1: at a scientific conference, I had a private chat with
25:22
Speaker 1: a colleague from another university. His research was in a
25:26
Speaker 1: rather obscure topic in biology, but he was a scientist
25:30
Speaker 1: of the first rank. He was a superb investigator and
25:33
Speaker 1: quite senior and widely respected. He told me that he
25:37
Speaker 1: knew that I was involved in intelligent design, and he
25:40
Speaker 1: thanked me for what I was doing. He told me
25:43
Speaker 1: that he was a Christian. He said that a lot
25:45
Speaker 1: of the scientists know that Darwinism is a charad, and
25:48
Speaker 1: he was thankful for scientists who were speaking out, but
25:51
Speaker 1: he couldn't do so, although he desperately wanted to. He
25:55
Speaker 1: said his wife was sick and that if he spoke
25:57
Speaker 1: out he would never get another grant. Hey Look, I
26:00
Speaker 1: don't know one way or the other about any of that.
26:02
Speaker 1: I'm not a scientist, right. The point of this story
26:05
Speaker 1: is Jeffrey Epstein was an absolute scumbag, and the scientific
26:09
Speaker 1: community knew a single public statement endorsing id or critiquing
26:17
Speaker 1: Darwinism in any meaningful way would make him a pariah
26:20
Speaker 1: for the rest of his life. My career would end
26:23
Speaker 1: the day I spoke out. He told me. He said
26:25
Speaker 1: that his wife's life depended on her current medical care,
26:28
Speaker 1: and that he would be unable to afford her care
26:30
Speaker 1: if he lost his position. He said he felt terrible
26:33
Speaker 1: that he couldn't speak out publicly, but he had a
26:35
Speaker 1: responsibility to his family and that they would suffer if
26:39
Speaker 1: his career went into the abyss. That's terrible, man. Look,
26:42
Speaker 1: people should be able to speak their mind, right. I
26:44
Speaker 1: don't understand how things can be so corrosive, so corrupted.
26:50
Speaker 1: It's okay that people have different opinions as long as
26:53
Speaker 1: as long as when you have a conversation about it,
26:55
Speaker 1: you can defend your opinion in a meaningful way. Scientists,
27:02
Speaker 1: especially scientists in academia, are uniquely vulnerable to professional destruction
27:07
Speaker 1: if they stray from the herd. Their life hangs on
27:10
Speaker 1: peer review. Just look at the ostracism, ridicule, and even
27:14
Speaker 1: hate reigned upon by Mike Beehe or Jonathan Wells or
27:17
Speaker 1: Guillarmo Gonzalez or Bill Demski or Richard Sternberg or any
27:22
Speaker 1: of the other courageous scientists who had the integrity to
27:25
Speaker 1: question the Darwinian consensus. I mean, isn't that what science
27:29
Speaker 1: is about, really questioning what the norms are and trying to,
27:33
Speaker 1: you know, challenge those. I mean, I don't think science
27:37
Speaker 1: should just be all right, well, the science is settled,
27:39
Speaker 1: let's move on now. Again, I'm not a scientist, and
27:43
Speaker 1: I'm certainly not somebody who is strong enough in biology,
27:48
Speaker 1: human biology, or whatever evolutionary biology to offer an opinion
27:52
Speaker 1: one way or the other. I mean, I'm lucky I
27:55
Speaker 1: can tie my shoes in the morning, folks. As the
28:02
Speaker 1: Epstein scandal shows with striking clarity, dissent on matters of
28:07
Speaker 1: importance is forbidden in the scientific community. Scientists will engage
28:11
Speaker 1: in or tolerate all manner of lie and vice to
28:15
Speaker 1: protect their careers. They go along to get along. They
28:18
Speaker 1: join the consensus that Jeffrey Epstein is a wonderful patron
28:22
Speaker 1: and his money is untainted. Just as they join the
28:25
Speaker 1: consensus that Darwinian evolution is a fact, many, perhaps even most,
28:30
Speaker 1: do not do it because they believe it. They do
28:32
Speaker 1: it for professional survival. All right. Well again, I don't
28:36
Speaker 1: know anything about any of that. I don't know about
28:38
Speaker 1: the infighting and the scientific community about Darwinism or evolution.
28:42
Speaker 1: To me, it looks like evolution is the proper way
28:46
Speaker 1: things came about, right, I mean, it seems logical. But
28:49
Speaker 1: what do I know. I'm agnostic, folks. I don't know
28:51
Speaker 1: shit about theology or if there's a god or if
28:55
Speaker 1: we were created by aliens. Again, you know, I have
28:58
Speaker 1: enough problems on my I played here talking about the
29:01
Speaker 1: worldly problems that we can see. I'll leave all of
29:04
Speaker 1: that spiritual stuff up to other people. That is way
29:08
Speaker 1: above my pay grade. The profound revelation from the Epstein
29:17
Speaker 1: scandal is that the scientific community is silent in the
29:21
Speaker 1: face of obvious lies, criminality, and moral atrocities. Scientists at
29:25
Speaker 1: MIT and Harvard and the institutions on whom Epstein reigned
29:30
Speaker 1: Largesse obviously knew enough about Epstein to know that association
29:34
Speaker 1: with him was a moral and his money probably came
29:37
Speaker 1: from child sex trafficking. They could know with a mouse
29:40
Speaker 1: click that Epstein had no college degree and sketchy experience
29:44
Speaker 1: in finance. His primary enterprise seemed to be making little
29:48
Speaker 1: girls available to rich men. But they stuck with the
29:51
Speaker 1: consensus and said nothing. Their scientific careers, of course, came first.
29:58
Speaker 1: And you see this paralleled in other industry, right, especially
30:01
Speaker 1: the media industry. Jeffrey Epstein and his friends, and you know,
30:05
Speaker 1: they have a lot of power. So a lot of
30:08
Speaker 1: these media companies don't want to deal with that. They
30:10
Speaker 1: don't want to tangle with people like Epstein kept in
30:14
Speaker 1: the club. There was a scientific consensus held by thousands
30:18
Speaker 1: of scientists at all levels of the profession that Jeffrey
30:21
Speaker 1: Epstein was a great patron. Any doubts, and there must
30:25
Speaker 1: have been agonizing doubts for twenty years were kept in
30:28
Speaker 1: the club. And this is a big problem. This is
30:30
Speaker 1: my biggest problem. Sometimes you have to be willing to
30:33
Speaker 1: break away from the herd. Sometimes you have to be
30:36
Speaker 1: willing to, you know, go your own way, forge your
30:38
Speaker 1: own path and figure things out for yourself. But when
30:43
Speaker 1: you're a part of one of these exclusive scientific clubs,
30:46
Speaker 1: your whole life depends on getting on to go along, right,
30:51
Speaker 1: And for me, that's just a moral I don't like it.
30:53
Speaker 1: I'll never be part of the herd mentality, you know,
30:57
Speaker 1: and I won't be put into a box either. Have
31:00
Speaker 1: my own opinions, my own outlook on life that has
31:03
Speaker 1: been shaped by my own life experiences. So when you
31:07
Speaker 1: look at people like these scientists who have no sort
31:10
Speaker 1: of moral compass and are willing to sacrifice basically their souls,
31:17
Speaker 1: well it's a very very disturbing and disgusting scenario to
31:22
Speaker 1: think that these people are so highly respected in society
31:26
Speaker 1: and on these campuses. There is also a scientific consensus
31:34
Speaker 1: that nothing makes sense except in light of Darwinian evolution,
31:38
Speaker 1: held as it turns out, by the man of the
31:40
Speaker 1: same scientists who cashed Epstein's checks. There was and is
31:45
Speaker 1: no dissent. Well, look again, I have no idea about
31:49
Speaker 1: that debate and that argument. People are gonna have to
31:55
Speaker 1: make up their own minds, right, I'm not going to
31:57
Speaker 1: sit here and tell anybody, oh, well, you shouldn't believe
31:59
Speaker 1: in God, or you shouldn't believe in evolution, believe in
32:01
Speaker 1: whatever you believe in. I mean, really doesn't affect me.
32:05
Speaker 1: One way or the other. This is the lesson from
32:10
Speaker 1: the Epstein scandal. Scientists are first and foremost devoted to
32:14
Speaker 1: their own professional survival, and they will tow any line
32:19
Speaker 1: to survive. They will lie, cheat, and steal for professional security.
32:23
Speaker 1: They will even tacitly endorse child rape and gild sex
32:26
Speaker 1: trafficking and personally profit from it to avoid the professional abyss.
32:32
Speaker 1: Science is conducted under a code of OMERTA dissent is
32:36
Speaker 1: punished mercilessly as a measure of scientific and moral truth.
32:41
Speaker 1: Scientific consensus is worthless. Like I said, this article was
32:46
Speaker 1: authored by Michael Egner. He's a professor of neurosurgery at
32:51
Speaker 1: uh the State University of New York Stonybrook, the director
32:55
Speaker 1: of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah,
32:58
Speaker 1: a guy who's a scientist and abviously somebody who's you know,
33:01
Speaker 1: moved in these circles. The thing about this article and
33:06
Speaker 1: why I wanted to share it, is that Jeffrey Epstein
33:09
Speaker 1: was well well respected in the scientific community. He was
33:12
Speaker 1: somebody who was a patron of a lot of these
33:15
Speaker 1: people and still a lot of these scientists, A lot
33:19
Speaker 1: of these people that took his money have found a
33:21
Speaker 1: way to fly under the radar. So if they were
33:25
Speaker 1: taking money from Jeffrey Epstein, my question is this, who
33:29
Speaker 1: else are they taking money from? All Right, folks, that's
33:34
Speaker 1: gonna do it for this morning's update. Obviously a lot
33:37
Speaker 1: more is on the way. If you'd like to contact me,
33:40
Speaker 1: you can do that at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com.
33:43
Speaker 1: That's bo bby c ap you Cci at ProtonMail dot com.
33:49
Speaker 1: You can also find me on Twitter at bo bby
33:53
Speaker 1: underscore cap you Cci. The link that we discussed can
33:57
Speaker 1: be found in the description box. All Right, flop into
34:00
Speaker 1: these articles. The first one is from the Daily Beast
34:05
Speaker 1: and the headline is Epstein funded scientist George Church is
34:09
Speaker 1: creating a genetics based dating app. Oh, that sounds like
34:12
Speaker 1: that'll be pleasant. That's going to be lovely. I'm sure
34:14
Speaker 1: everybody has their pen and paper route getting ready to
34:17
Speaker 1: jot down this idea. Right, Yeah, where where could I
34:20
Speaker 1: sign up for this? Bah? It sounds like a was
34:24
Speaker 1: this farmer's only type of deal? I mean, what in
34:27
Speaker 1: the world. Harvard biologist George Church already had to apologize
34:32
Speaker 1: for paling around with Jeffrey Epstein, even after the financier
34:36
Speaker 1: pleaded guilty to praying on minors a decade ago. Okay,
34:39
Speaker 1: so another one right off the bat. Even after Epstein
34:42
Speaker 1: was convicted, he took his money, he hung out with him,
34:46
Speaker 1: he palled around with him, and he knew that Jeffrey
34:50
Speaker 1: Epstein abused these girls. So what do we call that, folks? Ah,
34:54
Speaker 1: that's an enabler. Now he's raising eyebrows again with plans
34:59
Speaker 1: for a genetic based dating app. That just sounds gross
35:02
Speaker 1: to me. Genetics based dating app that sounds like like
35:05
Speaker 1: something the Nazis would be involved in, sounds like something
35:07
Speaker 1: those sick bastards would have been involved in. Genetics and eugenics,
35:11
Speaker 1: and oh god, lee's gross. Why would anyone want to
35:14
Speaker 1: be involved in that? So let nature take its course,
35:17
Speaker 1: all right. I don't understand these these like weird scientists,
35:21
Speaker 1: like these guys uh in China, the scientists who just
35:26
Speaker 1: they spliced like a pig and like I don't know,
35:30
Speaker 1: a mi, a mouse or whatever the hell it was.
35:32
Speaker 1: It was weird, though. I don't understand any of that stuff.
35:34
Speaker 1: Maybe I'm just you know, maybe it's something I'm not
35:36
Speaker 1: meant to understand, because Lord knows, there's a lot of
35:38
Speaker 1: stuff I don't understand, and that's certainly this whole eugenics
35:42
Speaker 1: thing and the craze for eugenics and genetics and you know,
35:46
Speaker 1: the whole like human modifying thing is just weird to me.
35:52
Speaker 1: In an interview with sixty Minutes, Church set his technology
35:55
Speaker 1: would pair people based on the propensity of their genes
35:57
Speaker 1: when combined in children to eliminate hereditary diseases. Oh boy, yikes,
36:04
Speaker 1: that sounds like eugenics. Fordham Adjunct ethics professor and science
36:08
Speaker 1: journalist Elizabeth Yuko, who studies bioethics, told The Daily Beast
36:12
Speaker 1: on Monday, that's what I just said. It sounds the
36:14
Speaker 1: same to me. And I am certainly not a scientist
36:17
Speaker 1: or a science journalist, that's by any means. I'm, you know,
36:21
Speaker 1: just a regular average guy. But that certainly sounded like
36:24
Speaker 1: eugenics to me. And that stuff is creepy. You want
36:27
Speaker 1: to go down a rabbit hole do some research on eugenics.
36:31
Speaker 1: The tech and science news site Gizmoto called Church's idea
36:34
Speaker 1: an app only eugenicists could love. Wow, that sounds great.
36:39
Speaker 1: Yuko compared the app as described to the Nazi goal
36:42
Speaker 1: of cultivating a master race. I thought we realized after
36:45
Speaker 1: World War Two that we weren't going to be doing
36:47
Speaker 1: that stuff. She said. Here. Yeah, I think we probably
36:51
Speaker 1: learned a few lessons from World War Two where we
36:53
Speaker 1: should have. And you know, eugenics is probably one of
36:57
Speaker 1: those things that we shouldn't be messing with. And that's
36:59
Speaker 1: my personal opinion. But I could always be swayed. Like
37:02
Speaker 1: I always say, I follow the evidence. If you know,
37:04
Speaker 1: I'm sure there are some scientific uses for it as well.
37:08
Speaker 1: Of course there are, you know, if you can, you know,
37:11
Speaker 1: predict disease and stuff like that, then okay, great, it's
37:15
Speaker 1: maybe a further look is warranted. But from just you know,
37:19
Speaker 1: the taste I have of it in my mouth, from
37:22
Speaker 1: the studying I've done of eugenics, it's creepy as hell.
37:28
Speaker 1: Church was part of a group of scientists with whom
37:30
Speaker 1: Epstein ingratiated himself via large donations, and Epstein helped bankroll
37:34
Speaker 1: his lab from two thousand and five to two thousand
37:36
Speaker 1: and seven, Church has admitted. Church has admitted he repeatedly
37:42
Speaker 1: met and spoke with Epstein for years after the two
37:44
Speaker 1: thousand and eight Plea deal. That landed him on the
37:47
Speaker 1: sex offender registry. So this guy, this scientist, is such
37:51
Speaker 1: an enabler it's not even funny. Right, So you're obviously
37:54
Speaker 1: a scumbag if you're hanging out with him after the conviction.
37:58
Speaker 1: There's really no moral leg tocy stand on. Before he
38:01
Speaker 1: was convicted. At least, at the very least, you could
38:04
Speaker 1: provide the optics of, look, I didn't know this guy
38:07
Speaker 1: wasn't convicted. How am I supposed to know what the
38:09
Speaker 1: hell he's doing? All Right, Well, at the you could
38:11
Speaker 1: at the very least have an argument that holds a
38:16
Speaker 1: little bit of water. But afterwards, after the guy was
38:19
Speaker 1: already part of a sex offender registry, et cetera, et cetera,
38:23
Speaker 1: you're still hanging out with him. You, my friend, you're
38:25
Speaker 1: a scumbag. Epstein had a twisted take on genetics, hosting
38:30
Speaker 1: scientific conferences at which he expressed his desire to propagate
38:34
Speaker 1: his own genome by impregnating up to twenty women at
38:37
Speaker 1: a time at a time at his New York at
38:39
Speaker 1: his New Mexico ranch like cattle stock. You know, there
38:43
Speaker 1: are some creepy shit going on at that ranch too.
38:45
Speaker 1: There are some definitely some creepy stuff. And there is
38:48
Speaker 1: a whole story to be told in Stanley where that
38:52
Speaker 1: Zoro ranch is at. And after the first of the year,
38:54
Speaker 1: I'm putting in and I'm putting it into play as
38:56
Speaker 1: we speak. I'm getting my ducks in a row. I'm
38:59
Speaker 1: gonna be taking a few days and going down to
39:01
Speaker 1: Stanley and doing some groundwork and talking to people myself
39:05
Speaker 1: and getting some you know, firsthand information as opposed to
39:09
Speaker 1: just you know, some hearsay. I want to talk to
39:12
Speaker 1: the people there and see what the hell was going
39:14
Speaker 1: on at that ranch and if people saw anybody coming
39:16
Speaker 1: in and out who hasn't been reported in the news.
39:19
Speaker 1: That kind of stuff, you know, actual journalist work, you know, journalism.
39:22
Speaker 1: We don't get much of that anymore. In the sixty
39:26
Speaker 1: minute interview, Church called his ties to Epstein unfortunate and added,
39:30
Speaker 1: you don't always know your donors as well as you
39:32
Speaker 1: would like. Bro, he was already convicted, you dumb asshole.
39:35
Speaker 1: Excuse my French, but geez, Louise, you were He was
39:38
Speaker 1: already convicted and you were taking his money, you sicko.
39:42
Speaker 1: So don't tell me you didn't know him as well
39:44
Speaker 1: as you'd like, or you well, there was no idea.
39:47
Speaker 1: Nobody had any idea. Helly guys bloasted, hell oh buy
39:51
Speaker 1: me blah blah blah. Yeah right, you knew you took
39:55
Speaker 1: his money, you enabled his abuse of those young girls.
39:59
Speaker 1: Live with it, because we're not gonna let you forget it.
40:01
Speaker 1: You are on the radar, just like a bunch of
40:03
Speaker 1: the other sick academics. We're gonna get to eventually around
40:06
Speaker 1: the around on this podcast because there is so much
40:09
Speaker 1: to get to, right, we want to get to the academics.
40:12
Speaker 1: But how could we We It's hard to deviate unless
40:15
Speaker 1: I do five episodes a day because there's literally that
40:18
Speaker 1: much information. If I could, I could literally do five
40:21
Speaker 1: episodes a day or one episode an hour for eight
40:23
Speaker 1: hours a day, and we still couldn't cover all the
40:25
Speaker 1: ground we need to in this case. And that's not
40:29
Speaker 1: even that's not even, it's not even hyperbole. That's legit
40:32
Speaker 1: true story stuff right there. There is so much to
40:35
Speaker 1: cover in this case, and so many players in this case,
40:37
Speaker 1: and then you have the inner ring, the outer ring,
40:40
Speaker 1: all of this other stuff, and it's hard. There's no
40:43
Speaker 1: way that we can cover it in a little bit
40:45
Speaker 1: of time that we spend so you know, as the
40:47
Speaker 1: as the story blooms more, I'm gonna have to add
40:50
Speaker 1: more content. I'm gonna have to add more shows, because
40:53
Speaker 1: that's the only way we're gonna be able to follow
40:54
Speaker 1: this incorrectly. But much of the segment was devoted to
40:59
Speaker 1: churches engineering work at Harvard Medical School, including the app
41:03
Speaker 1: that would theoretically screen out potential mates with the wrong DNA.
41:07
Speaker 1: So that's gonna go over well with a woke crowd, right, Yeah,
41:12
Speaker 1: that's gonna go over real. Well, So you're screening out
41:15
Speaker 1: DNA of mates, screening out the DNA if people have
41:18
Speaker 1: the wrong DNA? What does that even mean? What is
41:21
Speaker 1: the wrong DNA? How do you even know just because
41:24
Speaker 1: your DNA you're not compatible because of your DNA strands.
41:28
Speaker 1: That's this stuff is all foreign to me, folks. This
41:30
Speaker 1: is like some Michael Crichton Jurassic Park with humans type stuff.
41:35
Speaker 1: You wouldn't find out, you wouldn't find out who you're
41:37
Speaker 1: not compatible with. You'll just find out who you are
41:40
Speaker 1: compatible with. Church said, all right, well, who's gonna store
41:43
Speaker 1: the rest of the stuff. Who's storing that information and
41:45
Speaker 1: who's gonna have access to it? You have to ask that, right,
41:48
Speaker 1: Am I the only one that's sitting here wondering who
41:50
Speaker 1: the hell would have access to my genome pattern or
41:53
Speaker 1: whatever the hell these guys are mapping. I mean, bro,
41:56
Speaker 1: come on, really, what a what a joke? You're suggesting
42:01
Speaker 1: that if everyone has their genome sequence and the correct
42:04
Speaker 1: matches are made, that all of the diseases could be eliminated.
42:07
Speaker 1: Sixty minutes, Scott Pelly asked, right, it's seven thousand diseases.
42:11
Speaker 1: It's about five percent of the population. It's about a
42:14
Speaker 1: trillion dollars a year worldwide. Church said the geneticist didn't
42:18
Speaker 1: drop the app's name, Punnett Square anyone or how far
42:21
Speaker 1: along it is in development. He also didn't respond for
42:24
Speaker 1: a to a request for comment. So why did he
42:28
Speaker 1: have this interview? Then? Is it because he's trying to
42:30
Speaker 1: get out in front of the Epstein stuff again, because
42:32
Speaker 1: he still wants that money to come pouring in from
42:34
Speaker 1: other donors. If he has nothing to add, then why
42:37
Speaker 1: don't you just go shut up and play with your
42:39
Speaker 1: your science project? Beaker add something to the conversation here.
42:45
Speaker 1: In the interview, Church acknowledged the drawbacks of genetic sorting
42:49
Speaker 1: he suffers from dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, and narcolepsy disorders
42:54
Speaker 1: that might render him an incompatible match to many. So
42:57
Speaker 1: he's gonna make himself look human. Well, I have all
42:59
Speaker 1: of these problem so that justifies me making this wacky
43:02
Speaker 1: ass genetics app. If somebody had sequenced your genomes some
43:07
Speaker 1: years ago, you might not have made the grade in
43:09
Speaker 1: some way, Pelly said, I mean that's true. Church replied,
43:13
Speaker 1: I would hope that society sees the benefit of diversity,
43:16
Speaker 1: not just ancestral diversity, but in our abilities. There's no
43:19
Speaker 1: perfect person. Yuko said the selection criteria would be a
43:23
Speaker 1: sticking point for Church's app idea. It's not clear what
43:27
Speaker 1: conditions or diseases will be screened for. Who makes that
43:30
Speaker 1: list what's undesirable? She said, that's classifying people into acceptable
43:34
Speaker 1: humans and others. So I guess we'll be like the
43:39
Speaker 1: We'll have like a cast system in America like they
43:42
Speaker 1: have in India, so it would be the untouchables, et cetera,
43:45
Speaker 1: et cetera. If you vote one way or the other,
43:47
Speaker 1: you'll be a you'll be untouchable, or your genomes won't
43:50
Speaker 1: match up. What the I mean? What in the is
43:54
Speaker 1: this real? Life. Hold on, knock knock knock? Is this
43:56
Speaker 1: real life? Am I did? Honestly when that's when this
44:00
Speaker 1: con the collider came on, did we get like blasted
44:03
Speaker 1: into a different reality and nobody told me? And I'm
44:05
Speaker 1: just floating around and you know, just hanging out, because
44:09
Speaker 1: that's certainly what it seems like to me. I don't
44:11
Speaker 1: even understand what's going on at this point. The whole
44:14
Speaker 1: world is screwy. It is just absolutely screwy, absolutely screwy,
44:20
Speaker 1: and especially when those pop ups jump up onto your
44:22
Speaker 1: screen and screw everything up and make noise. All right.
44:26
Speaker 1: So our next article is from Radar Online, and uh
44:31
Speaker 1: it is, well, I guess I'll tell you some more
44:33
Speaker 1: when it, you know, the pop up goes away. Hum.
44:37
Speaker 1: So it's uh, it's one of these articles that looks
44:42
Speaker 1: relatively short, but the headline's pretty catchy. Top secret inside
44:47
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's Orgy Island summit with Stephen Hawking, financier and
44:52
Speaker 1: sex offender sold scientific secrets to Israeli military. Huh. Well,
44:57
Speaker 1: I wonder who said that. I might have been saying
44:59
Speaker 1: that for quite sometime, and I don't think it's just
45:02
Speaker 1: the Israelis folks, I don't think that as powerful as
45:05
Speaker 1: the macade is, I don't think they're running that kind
45:07
Speaker 1: of operation on American soil without the okay of the CIA.
45:11
Speaker 1: The CIA is not gonna let another dog eat in
45:14
Speaker 1: their yard without them getting a bite. Are you kidding me? This?
45:18
Speaker 1: This evidence, is this blackmail evidence? This is worth its
45:21
Speaker 1: weighting goal. Folks. Imagine you have the goods on these
45:24
Speaker 1: dudes messing around with kids and girls that are underage
45:27
Speaker 1: and sex trafficking victims. You could have these dudes making
45:31
Speaker 1: literally wrapped around your finger on multiple continents, making public
45:35
Speaker 1: decision and swaying it in your favor to enrich you
45:38
Speaker 1: and to make your handlers happy. I don't know if
45:41
Speaker 1: that makes you comfortable, but that certainly doesn't make me comfortable. Folks.
45:47
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein wasn't just the most horrifying sexual predator the
45:50
Speaker 1: world has ever known, and org Island wasn't just a
45:53
Speaker 1: perverted playground for his high powered friends. A new book
45:56
Speaker 1: reveals that mad scientist Epstein hosted leaders of the science world,
46:01
Speaker 1: only to turn around and spill their secrets to the massad.
46:04
Speaker 1: All right, this is reading like a tabloid, but it's
46:06
Speaker 1: radar online. And you know what, in a world where
46:09
Speaker 1: everything seems make believe, who the hell knows about anything anymore?
46:15
Speaker 1: I have to be honest with you. Like I said,
46:17
Speaker 1: I don't think it's just the Masad. I'm not gonna
46:19
Speaker 1: just single the Masade out, even though they're one of
46:20
Speaker 1: the top intelligence agencies in the world. But let's be honest,
46:24
Speaker 1: the CIA is the big dog, especially in America. None
46:27
Speaker 1: of this is happening without the CIA knowing. And I
46:30
Speaker 1: don't mean the rank and file agent. This isn't like
46:33
Speaker 1: something they're sitting around and they're talking about. Hey, Jim,
46:35
Speaker 1: did you catch that latest episode a Game of Thrones? Man?
46:38
Speaker 1: I really can't believe what happened with John snow Oh.
46:40
Speaker 1: And by the way, do you know that the Massad's
46:42
Speaker 1: running a you know, a blackmail operation in America. I
46:46
Speaker 1: don't believe that that's occurring, but the higher ups, of course,
46:50
Speaker 1: I guarantee whoever's assigned to this sector knows exactly what's
46:55
Speaker 1: going on, and not only knows what's going on, but
46:57
Speaker 1: is involved. Do I have evidence of this. I do not.
47:01
Speaker 1: That is my opinion, and like I said, that is
47:04
Speaker 1: where the evidence has led me thus far. Epstein. Dead
47:10
Speaker 1: Men Tell No Tales reveals for the first time shocking
47:13
Speaker 1: details about Epstein's connection to the global academic and scientific elite.
47:18
Speaker 1: When I first started this podcast, I was talking about
47:20
Speaker 1: people like this, the academics, and a lot of people
47:23
Speaker 1: weren't really interested in it. But we're gonna swivel back
47:25
Speaker 1: and we're gonna pivot back because it's a crucial part
47:27
Speaker 1: of the story. You know, it's a very important part
47:30
Speaker 1: of this story because these people not only not only
47:35
Speaker 1: do they lend credence to Jeffrey Epstein as a person,
47:38
Speaker 1: but these people were working on some of the most
47:40
Speaker 1: high profile projects that had to do with national security.
47:44
Speaker 1: Who were they feeding those that information to? Did he
47:46
Speaker 1: have information on them from their trysts with these young
47:50
Speaker 1: ladies at his island or his residence, and then did
47:53
Speaker 1: he use that to blackmail them into giving him information
47:56
Speaker 1: which in turn he passed on to his handlers in
47:59
Speaker 1: foreign intelligence? Because, like I said, just because I think
48:02
Speaker 1: the Massad was working with the CIA, in the regard
48:05
Speaker 1: of the CIA knew what was going on, don't think
48:08
Speaker 1: the Massade wasn't running their own little you know, Well,
48:11
Speaker 1: they're gonna worry about the you know their own little
48:13
Speaker 1: skim operation like in Casino. Authors Dylan Howard, Melissa Cronnin,
48:19
Speaker 1: and James Robertson found that in two thousand and six,
48:23
Speaker 1: Epstein hosted a conference at the Ritz Carlton on Saint
48:25
Speaker 1: Thomas which attracted the likes of Stephen Hawking. This is factual,
48:29
Speaker 1: for sure. I know that that occurred. I've reported on
48:32
Speaker 1: this as well. I've seen the evidence of this. I've
48:35
Speaker 1: you know, I've seen all the statements of the people
48:38
Speaker 1: that were there, et cetera, et cetera. This definitely occurred.
48:42
Speaker 1: During one night of the conference, guests were shuttled over
48:44
Speaker 1: to Little Saint James aka org Island for a barbecue
48:48
Speaker 1: and submarine tour. According to reports, the sub was custom
48:51
Speaker 1: fitted for Hawkings wheelchair. A photo of the event shows
48:54
Speaker 1: him being personally attended by a young blonde with her
48:57
Speaker 1: hair in a ponytail. So I've seen those pictures before.
49:00
Speaker 1: And do I think Stephen Hawking was involved in any
49:02
Speaker 1: sort of sex trafficking. No, Like I've said a million times,
49:06
Speaker 1: just because people were in this man's atmosphere or at
49:09
Speaker 1: his party, that doesn't automatically make you guilty. And if
49:13
Speaker 1: that's the case, then if that's the level that you're
49:17
Speaker 1: going to use of evidence, then there's a whole black
49:20
Speaker 1: book of people that we could go through, and you
49:23
Speaker 1: need to be just as critical of them as you
49:25
Speaker 1: would be of say, Stephen Hawking. Now, would I say
49:31
Speaker 1: the same if you Stephen Hawking was there and he
49:35
Speaker 1: was accused, credibly accused by one of these girls of abuse, No,
49:39
Speaker 1: of course not. But just being at one of these
49:43
Speaker 1: summits alone is not enough for us to paint you
49:46
Speaker 1: as a sex abuser. Now, the argument can be made
49:52
Speaker 1: that if you were obviously, if you were around him
49:54
Speaker 1: after two thousand and eight, forget the argument being made.
49:56
Speaker 1: The argument has been made. If you've been around him
49:58
Speaker 1: after two thousand and eight, well you're an enabler for
50:01
Speaker 1: sure at that point, because you knew what he was,
50:04
Speaker 1: you knew what he did, you knew what he liked,
50:06
Speaker 1: and you still spent your time with him. So yeah,
50:09
Speaker 1: you're an enabler. Despite the tech luminaries who visited Little
50:14
Speaker 1: Saint James, however, it was never really the hub of
50:16
Speaker 1: Epstein's scientific pursuits. Instead, Epstein cultivated scientific connections at his
50:23
Speaker 1: ten thousand acres Zoro ranch outside of Santa Fe, New Mexico.
50:27
Speaker 1: Our important people were mostly scientists. Deirdre Stratton, the woman
50:31
Speaker 1: tasked with recruiting young massage therapists for Epstein and New Mexico,
50:35
Speaker 1: revealed in Epstein's Dead Men Tell No Tales. Jeffrey helped.
50:40
Speaker 1: Jeffrey helped back their research. He would often have you know,
50:44
Speaker 1: like the guy that won the Noel, the Nobel Prize
50:47
Speaker 1: for discovering the quark and quantum physics, She continued, a
50:50
Speaker 1: guy that won the Nobel Prize for a DNA discovery.
50:53
Speaker 1: People that helped have found Microsoft. Those were the kind
50:55
Speaker 1: of people that were there, scientific and brilliant. They would
50:59
Speaker 1: have very deep conversations over meals. You would pick up
51:03
Speaker 1: a word here and there. Obviously you couldn't really hear
51:06
Speaker 1: the whole thing, Stratton said. They would invite them to
51:09
Speaker 1: lunch and ge Laine would have this tablet and she
51:11
Speaker 1: would write down the facts and they would tell them.
51:14
Speaker 1: At one point she told me, well, you get the
51:16
Speaker 1: information from an expert, and then you get rid of them.
51:21
Speaker 1: Uh wow, you get the expert the information from an expert,
51:25
Speaker 1: and then you get rid of them. That definitely sounds
51:27
Speaker 1: like Gilann Maxwell as an agent of the massade, Epstein
51:31
Speaker 1: shared highly sensitive scientific developments with the Israeli government. For
51:36
Speaker 1: more chilling details on his ring of international espionage, pick
51:39
Speaker 1: up Epstein Dead Men Tell No Tales Now. Well, I
51:43
Speaker 1: highly suggest everybody picks up that book. I just ordered
51:46
Speaker 1: my copy, which mine should be here next couple of days.
51:52
Speaker 1: Like I said, I'm going camping tomorrow, so it might
51:54
Speaker 1: even arrive tomorrow, so when I get home on Wednesday,
51:57
Speaker 1: I might be able to just dive right in and
51:59
Speaker 1: see what's what. Yeah, so that's a pretty telling article, right,
52:04
Speaker 1: That's definitely the strand we've been pulling. We've been down
52:08
Speaker 1: this road. This is something that we've discussed here for
52:10
Speaker 1: a very long time, and I know that the audience
52:12
Speaker 1: is hip to that. From the emails, we're pretty much
52:15
Speaker 1: I don't think I've gotten I haven't received one email
52:18
Speaker 1: of people of someone saying that they don't believe the
52:21
Speaker 1: intelligence angle, and that just shows you the distrust that
52:25
Speaker 1: all of us in the Western world have with these agencies,
52:28
Speaker 1: and they do nothing to help build any trust within
52:32
Speaker 1: the public. They just continue to erode the trust that
52:35
Speaker 1: they have and it's pretty sad to see, right. So
52:40
Speaker 1: I don't know. I really don't know what to say.
52:42
Speaker 1: All I can tell you is I've been following the evidence,
52:44
Speaker 1: and this is exactly where the evidence has brought me. There,
52:47
Speaker 1: the blackmail ring, the Jeffrey Epstein being run by intelligence,
52:52
Speaker 1: and most importantly, though the most important part is the
52:54
Speaker 1: whole entire cover up. It's the sickest part of the
52:57
Speaker 1: whole entire thing that all of these people knew and
53:00
Speaker 1: nobody has done. Squat, nobody has done, undats n A nothing.
53:08
Speaker 1: But now the pushback is on. Now. If you like
53:14
Speaker 1: to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi
53:16
Speaker 1: at ProtonMail dot com. That's b O B B Y
53:19
Speaker 1: c A p U c c I at ProtonMail dot com.
53:23
Speaker 1: You can also find me on Twitter at b O
53:26
Speaker 1: B B y underscore c A p U C c I.
53:30
Speaker 1: The link that we discussed can be found in the
53:32
Speaker 1: description box. All right, folks, I will catch you all
53:35
Speaker 1: later on