Latest / Finance TL;DR Daily / Fed Odds Flip as Jobs Miss and Cooling Inflation Push Stocks to Record Highs
Transcript
- Fed Odds Flip as Jobs Miss and Cooling Inflation Push Stocks to Record Highs 2026-08-18 Alex: Welcome to Finance TL;DR Daily, the podcast where we break down the biggest stories in finance. It's Tuesday, August eighteenth. Today, a weak jobs report and cooling inflation have flipped the script on the Fed, and stocks just hit an all-time high because of it. Riley: Here's what's moving today. Alex: So let's start with the Fed, because the odds have really moved this week. July payrolls came in at a loss of twenty-three thousand jobs — that's a surprise miss, not a slowdown, an actual contraction. Unemployment ticked down to four point one percent, but wholesale inflation cooled to four point seven percent year-over-year in July, down from five point five the month before. Riley: And the prediction markets have noticed. Kalshi's got a sixty-five percent chance of a hold at the September meeting, CME FedWatch is at sixty percent. That's a meaningful swing from where things stood just a couple of days ago. Alex: Right, and the Fed meets September fifteenth and sixteenth. Morgan Stanley's Ellen Zentner put it well — she said the weak payrolls print eases the pressure, but next week's inflation data is still likely the deciding factor. Riley: That's the caveat that matters, isn't it. One soft jobs number doesn't lock in a hold. If inflation surprises the other way next week, this whole narrative could unwind rather quickly. Alex: Exactly. But for now, Treasury yields fell on the news, which tells you the market's leaning into the hold story. Riley: What I keep coming back to is the jobs loss itself. Twenty-three thousand jobs gone isn't just a rate-decision input, it's a signal the labor market's actually softening, not just cooling gently. Alex: That's fair — good news for rate-watchers, less obviously good news for anyone tracking the real economy underneath it. Riley: Which brings us straight into what that did to stocks, because the market clearly liked the rate story more than it worried about the jobs story. Thursday's session pushed the S&P 500 up zero point seven percent, a new record, on top of the one it had already set the week before. The Dow added sixty-nine points, better than a tenth of a percent, and the Nasdaq climbed zero point eight percent. Alex: And oil prices dropping helped too, from what I saw. Riley: They did — a retreat in oil prices alongside that softer wholesale inflation print gave investors two reasons to like the tape at once. And on the rate-odds side specifically, CME data showed the probability of a September hike falling to thirty-five percent, down from roughly fifty percent just two days earlier. Alex: That's a big two-day swing. Riley: It is, and it shows how sensitive this market is right now to any single data point. One PPI report and hike odds nearly halve. That's not a market with settled convictions — that's one trading headline to headline. Alex: Which does raise the question of how durable a record high built on that kind of whiplash really is. Riley: Worth watching, certainly. For now though, the record stands, and investors are clearly voting with their money that a pause is more likely than not. Alex: Let's shift away from Wall Street for a moment, because there's a story out of Moscow that's worth flagging for anyone tracking the economics of the war in Ukraine. Russia's state development corporation, VEB.RF, fired its chief economist, Andrei Klepach, on August seventeenth. Riley: And the reason, even though VEB.RF didn't officially confirm it, seems pretty clearly tied to comments he made back in May at the Nikitsky Club. Alex: Right, he said, quote, we will not win the competition in this war of attrition. We have the illusion that everything there — meaning Ukraine — will collapse. It has not collapsed and will not collapse. Our costs are mounting. Riley: That's a remarkably blunt thing for a senior state economist to say out loud, even in a closed-door speech that later leaked. Alex: He went further too — he said Russia is losing the global technological and economic competition not just to the U.S. and China, but in some respects to Ukraine itself. Riley: Which is the line that would really sting inside the Kremlin's narrative machine. This isn't a dissident blogger, this is someone who was inside the state financial apparatus, presumably with real access to the numbers. Alex: So why does this matter for markets specifically, beyond the geopolitics? Riley: Because it's a crack in the official story of resilience. Investors and analysts trying to price Russian sovereign risk, sanctions exposure, or the durability of the war economy have mostly had to rely on official statistics that are widely assumed to be managed. When someone that senior says the costs are mounting and gets sacked for it, that's a data point in itself — an admission by proxy. Alex: It's also a reminder that firing the messenger doesn't fix the message. Riley: No, it just tells you the message landed somewhere uncomfortable. Alex: Now, staying with rates for a moment, because there's a wrinkle here that doesn't fit neatly with the record-highs, hold-is-coming story we just laid out. Riley: There is — earlier this week, before Thursday's softer data, the thirty-year Treasury yield actually hit five point three one five percent on Monday. That's its highest level since June of two thousand seven, nineteen years. The ten-year climbed to four point seven two four percent alongside it. Alex: So what was driving that spike, if it wasn't the jobs and inflation story we've been talking about? Riley: A few things stacked together — rising oil prices tied to an expiring U.S.-Iran peace deal deadline, persistent inflation worries, and a genuine concern about the federal deficit and how much borrowing the Treasury needs to do. Barclays strategists said it plainly — these pressures are now strong enough to overwhelm individual soft-data releases. Alex: And the deficit numbers back that up, don't they. Riley: They do. The Treasury reported the highest monthly budget deficit in over five years, with net interest on the debt up fourteen percent year-on-year to nine hundred sixty-three billion dollars for the first ten months of the fiscal year. That's the government paying nearly a trillion dollars just in interest. Alex: So even with Thursday's rally on cooler inflation, that underlying structural pressure from the deficit hasn't gone anywhere. Riley: Exactly — it explains why higher long-term yields and record stock highs can coexist in the same week. The short end is trading off the Fed's next move, but the long end is trading off how much debt Washington actually needs to sell, and that's a much slower-moving, harder problem. Alex: Which means higher mortgage and corporate borrowing costs regardless of what the Fed does in September. Riley: Right, and that's the bit that matters for anyone financing a mortgage or a corporate bond right now — the Fed pausing doesn't necessarily mean borrowing gets cheaper if the long end keeps grinding higher on deficit worries. Alex: So today in one line — the Fed looks more likely to hold, and the market's cheering for it. Riley: But the deficit and long-term yields are quietly telling a less comfortable story underneath that cheer. Alex: This has been Finance TL;DR Daily. We'll see you tomorrow.