Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / How big is the smallest habitable planet?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Kelly, do you prefer to have like a huge,
- 0:11Speaker 1: spacious house with lots of rooms or a cozy little house?
- 0:15Speaker 2: Oh? So I like to have spacious land, but the
- 0:18Speaker 2: house can be like whatever size we've got, like a
- 0:21Speaker 2: nice size house. It's not huge or anything, but we've
- 0:24Speaker 2: got a lot of land and we love that space.
- 0:26Speaker 2: What about you?
- 0:27Speaker 1: I agree, I think big houses can be too big.
- 0:30Speaker 1: We moved here from a little Chicago apartment into a
- 0:34Speaker 1: huge southern California house where like the bedroom was as
- 0:37Speaker 1: big as our old apartment. It just feels like too
- 0:39Speaker 1: much space.
- 0:39Speaker 2: How can a house be too big? What do you mean?
- 0:42Speaker 2: That sounds great?
- 0:43Speaker 1: It's like too big to have a conversation across you know,
- 0:46Speaker 1: we want the kids to come down for dinner, we
- 0:48Speaker 1: end up like texting them. It's ridiculous, all right.
- 0:50Speaker 2: Well, so even in my tiny house, I text Zach
- 0:54Speaker 2: from like the other room. But we don't have to
- 0:56Speaker 2: worry about that with our kids because they're like younger
- 0:59Speaker 2: and super andredic so they're more like quantum particles. They're
- 1:03Speaker 2: like simultaneously in every part of the house at once.
- 1:07Speaker 1: That's a great analogy because kids also have their wave
- 1:10Speaker 1: functions collapse eventually when they're exhausted.
- 1:14Speaker 2: You know, Usually it's my wave function that collapses first,
- 1:18Speaker 2: and I can just hopefully get them in the like
- 1:20Speaker 2: area of their bedroom beforehand. But lots of collapsing, Yes.
- 1:25Speaker 1: Check out our upcoming book, Quantum Parenting by Daniel and.
- 1:28Speaker 2: Count I'm not sure anyone should be following my lead
- 1:33Speaker 2: or at least paying for my advice, but but hopefully
- 1:35Speaker 2: I'm doing something right.
- 1:52Speaker 1: Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor
- 1:55Speaker 1: at UC Irvine.
- 1:56Speaker 2: And I'm Kelly Wienersmith. I'm a parasitologist adjunct with Race University.
- 2:02Speaker 1: And as much as I used to like to travel
- 2:04Speaker 1: all around the world, these days, I really like being
- 2:07Speaker 1: a homebody. I like having a comfortable place to sit
- 2:10Speaker 1: on my couch and read great novels and look at
- 2:13Speaker 1: pictures of my travels around the world. How about you, Kelly,
- 2:17Speaker 1: are you traveling a lot these days? Are you sticking
- 2:19Speaker 1: close to home?
- 2:20Speaker 2: You know, COVID squashed a bunch of my travels and
- 2:23Speaker 2: they haven't picked up too much. Again. I like getting
- 2:25Speaker 2: out of the house, but I also just really like
- 2:27Speaker 2: being at home with my family and my bugs.
- 2:30Speaker 1: And As much as I like looking up at the
- 2:31Speaker 1: stars and thinking about space travel, I'm not really very
- 2:34Speaker 1: excited about going into space myself. I'd rather stay here
- 2:38Speaker 1: where the atmosphere is nice and warm and there's plenty
- 2:41Speaker 1: of fresh water while other people break new ground. Amen,
- 2:46Speaker 1: and welcome to the podcast. Daniel and Jorge explain the
- 2:49Speaker 1: universe in which we mostly cast our minds, not our bodies,
- 2:53Speaker 1: out into the universe to try to understand what's out there,
- 2:57Speaker 1: how does it all work, and is it possible to
- 2:59Speaker 1: sustain in life anywhere else in this vast and glittering
- 3:03Speaker 1: cosmos other than our cozy couches. My friend Jorge and
- 3:07Speaker 1: usual co host can't be here today, but I'm very
- 3:09Speaker 1: happy to be talking to our regular guest host, Kelly. Kelly,
- 3:13Speaker 1: thank you very much for connecting to us from your
- 3:15Speaker 1: comfortable couch.
- 3:16Speaker 2: Well, thanks, I'm actually in my comfortable barn, but I'm
- 3:19Speaker 2: excited to be connecting on such an interesting topic.
- 3:22Speaker 1: And today we are thinking about couches and barns, but
- 3:25Speaker 1: not here on Earth where everybody's comfortable. We're thinking about
- 3:29Speaker 1: out in space. It feels like the standard trope in
- 3:32Speaker 1: science fiction is to think about the future of humanity
- 3:35Speaker 1: as out in the stars, And of course lots of
- 3:38Speaker 1: people talk about how it's vital that humans get off
- 3:41Speaker 1: this planet and establish colonies or outposts in other places
- 3:45Speaker 1: in the Solar System and maybe even around the galaxy
- 3:48Speaker 1: to avoid being extinguished by one single rock from space.
- 3:53Speaker 2: Do you think that's a good argument I'm going to
- 3:55Speaker 2: derail us real early.
- 3:57Speaker 1: I think that depends on whether you mean good for
- 3:59Speaker 1: humanity or like good for the galaxy. It might be
- 4:02Speaker 1: best if we're knocked out at the table early on
- 4:05Speaker 1: before we do any more damage.
- 4:07Speaker 2: M fair enough. I hear that argument from ecologists a lot.
- 4:11Speaker 1: I mean, there might be fascinating bits of life here,
- 4:14Speaker 1: and they're all over the Solar System or all over
- 4:16Speaker 1: the galaxy, and we don't exactly have the greatest history
- 4:19Speaker 1: about treating local ecosystems with respect. So from the point
- 4:23Speaker 1: of view of like nascent life in other places of
- 4:26Speaker 1: the galaxy, it might be best if we just stay
- 4:28Speaker 1: where we are.
- 4:29Speaker 2: It might be especially if they're bacteria, since I'm not
- 4:31Speaker 2: sure we would have a ton of respect for bacteria
- 4:35Speaker 2: on another planet.
- 4:36Speaker 1: But as a booster for humanity, of course, I want
- 4:39Speaker 1: my kids to survive and their kids to survive, and
- 4:42Speaker 1: also your kids, and you know other people's kids too,
- 4:45Speaker 1: And I want us to all have cozy places to
- 4:47Speaker 1: live and fun places to run around. Then yeah, I
- 4:50Speaker 1: think it makes absolute sense for us to think about
- 4:52Speaker 1: places to live other than Earth, because our time here
- 4:56Speaker 1: is limited, even if we do take good care of it.
- 4:58Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, humans make a lot of misis, but
- 5:00Speaker 2: I still remain pro human. So yes, I like this
- 5:04Speaker 2: plant b argument.
- 5:06Speaker 1: Way to take a really controversial opinion there.
- 5:12Speaker 2: I know people who aren't super pro human, but I
- 5:15Speaker 2: think my species has some good features.
- 5:19Speaker 1: I think so too. I've got a soft spot for
- 5:20Speaker 1: humanity over here, and Earth does seem like a very
- 5:23Speaker 1: wonderful and comfortable place to live. But it's important that
- 5:26Speaker 1: we think about other places that we might be able
- 5:29Speaker 1: to survive, places where humanity might be able to get
- 5:32Speaker 1: a foothold and even flourish. Places of course, other than Earth.
- 5:36Speaker 1: Even if a meteor doesn't hit the planet, and even
- 5:39Speaker 1: if we don't boil the oceans with climate change, eventually
- 5:42Speaker 1: the Sun will get brighter and larger and will boil
- 5:45Speaker 1: our oceans for us and may even envelop the Earth
- 5:48Speaker 1: in its outer layers. So if we're thinking really really
- 5:51Speaker 1: long term. It's important that we find another place for
- 5:54Speaker 1: humans to run around.
- 5:56Speaker 2: Well, so, just before we scare everybody, because I think
- 5:59Speaker 2: a theme is going to be that technology is nowhere
- 6:02Speaker 2: near or prepared for us to inhabit another planet. We've
- 6:05Speaker 2: got like a couple billion years before the Sun consumes
- 6:08Speaker 2: the Earth or whatever.
- 6:10Speaker 1: Right, calculations vary, but we have at least a cool
- 6:12Speaker 1: billion years. So yeah, this is not something we need
- 6:15Speaker 1: to plan for next week. You don't need to cancel
- 6:17Speaker 1: your travel plans, your kids can finish high school, all
- 6:20Speaker 1: that kind of stuff, but it is something that we
- 6:22Speaker 1: need to be thinking about. You know, humans also have
- 6:25Speaker 1: a record for kicking the can down the road, so
- 6:28Speaker 1: it's important to be aware of these things well before
- 6:30Speaker 1: we actually need to take any action.
- 6:32Speaker 2: Well and frankly, it's fun, what a fun project to
- 6:35Speaker 2: start on. So yeah, let's let's get started for the
- 6:37Speaker 2: fun of it.
- 6:38Speaker 1: That's right. And something that's very exciting in the last
- 6:40Speaker 1: couple of decades is that we've been able to discover
- 6:43Speaker 1: planets around other stars. Until about twenty years ago, we
- 6:47Speaker 1: only really knew about planets in our Solar system. Out
- 6:51Speaker 1: of all the stars out there in the cosmos. We'd
- 6:53Speaker 1: never seen a planet orbiting another star. But now we
- 6:56Speaker 1: have the technology to discover those planets and to think
- 6:59Speaker 1: about which ones might actually be homes for humanity. A
- 7:03Speaker 1: common way of thinking about this is identifying the habitable zone,
- 7:07Speaker 1: a region around those stars where there's enough heat enough
- 7:10Speaker 1: solar radiation to keep people warm and toasty on the surface.
- 7:15Speaker 2: Fun aside here the people who think about how many
- 7:18Speaker 2: generations you would need to get to one of these
- 7:21Speaker 2: habitable planets outside of our you know, neighbors, you know,
- 7:25Speaker 2: farther out past Mars or whatever they call their field
- 7:28Speaker 2: arc eology, because it's like your arc to get there
- 7:33Speaker 2: you're or maybe Zach is the one who came up
- 7:36Speaker 2: with that name. Anyway, it makes me laugh.
- 7:38Speaker 1: So you're not sure if that's a scientific term or
- 7:40Speaker 1: just a joke invented by your husband, whose job is
- 7:43Speaker 1: control science.
- 7:44Speaker 2: This is my life. Everything blurs. I don't know, but
- 7:49Speaker 2: I'm always having fun.
- 7:50Speaker 1: Well. A lot of the planets that we have found
- 7:52Speaker 1: about in other stars are pretty big, because big planets
- 7:56Speaker 1: are easier to find. A lot of these planets are
- 7:59Speaker 1: close to their Sun or very very massive, and so
- 8:02Speaker 1: it makes some of us wonder like, is it possible
- 8:04Speaker 1: to live on a really big planet or are there
- 8:07Speaker 1: other small planets out there that we might live on.
- 8:10Speaker 2: Is it the case that the smaller the planets we
- 8:12Speaker 2: can live on, the more options we would have, or
- 8:14Speaker 2: is it more complicated because science.
- 8:16Speaker 1: We'll get into that at the end of the episode,
- 8:18Speaker 1: whether there are more small or large planets available. But
- 8:22Speaker 1: today on the podcast, we're going to be digging deep
- 8:24Speaker 1: into one extreme of possible habitats for humanity. So on
- 8:29Speaker 1: today's episode, we'll be answering the question what's the smallest
- 8:38Speaker 1: habitable planet size?
- 8:40Speaker 2: Ooh, you know what I'm wondering.
- 8:42Speaker 1: Are you thinking about The Little Prince?
- 8:44Speaker 2: No, I have no idea what you're talking about. That's
- 8:46Speaker 2: not what I'm thinking about at all.
- 8:47Speaker 1: Well, you've never read the book The Little Prince.
- 8:49Speaker 3: No.
- 8:50Speaker 1: This is a famous story about a little prince who
- 8:52Speaker 1: lives on a tiny little planet. He can like see
- 8:55Speaker 1: the curvae, he can like run around the whole planet
- 8:57Speaker 1: in about two minutes.
- 8:58Speaker 2: WHOA, that sounds lonely.
- 9:05Speaker 1: Wow, waited just like pan famous literature Crime and Punishment
- 9:09Speaker 1: sounds depressing.
- 9:13Speaker 2: I mean that's Russian literature, right you don't need to
- 9:15Speaker 2: take the class. It's just that's depressing.
- 9:18Speaker 1: You know. I think you should put out a book
- 9:19Speaker 1: with one word reviews of famous literature.
- 9:22Speaker 2: Well, you know, if you're interested in brief reviews, you
- 9:24Speaker 2: can check out zax a Bridge Beyond the Point of
- 9:26Speaker 2: Usefulness series where he did that for Shakespeare and it
- 9:29Speaker 2: was hilarious.
- 9:32Speaker 1: All right, But today we are talking about tiny little
- 9:35Speaker 1: places to live. The Earth is small compared to many
- 9:37Speaker 1: planets like Jupiter and many planets we've discovered around other stars.
- 9:42Speaker 1: But it's really also very, very big, and there's lots
- 9:45Speaker 1: of much smaller chunks of rock, even in our Solar system,
- 9:49Speaker 1: and you might wonder whether it's possible to have life
- 9:51Speaker 1: on those little bits of carbon. And so, as usual,
- 9:55Speaker 1: I was wondering what people had thought about this question,
- 9:58Speaker 1: if people imagine living on tiny little rocks, or if
- 10:00Speaker 1: people thought that Earth was basically the smallest thing that
- 10:03Speaker 1: could keep an atmosphere and maintain habitable conditions. So I
- 10:07Speaker 1: went out there and asked folks who listen to the
- 10:10Speaker 1: podcast their thoughts on this question. I really value hearing
- 10:13Speaker 1: everybody's opinions before I prepare the podcast helps me align
- 10:17Speaker 1: the episode with what people already know. If you would
- 10:19Speaker 1: like to share your thoughts for an upcoming episode, please
- 10:22Speaker 1: don't be shy. We want to hear your voice right
- 10:25Speaker 1: to me. Two questions at Danielandjorge dot com. So think
- 10:28Speaker 1: about it for a moment before you hear these answers.
- 10:30Speaker 1: What do you think is the smallest habitable planet size?
- 10:34Speaker 1: Here's what some listeners had to say.
- 10:36Speaker 3: I think that the smallest planet for humans to inhabit
- 10:39Speaker 3: would be one that would support our kind of life
- 10:44Speaker 3: without a need of lots of artificial equipment like astronaut suits.
- 10:52Speaker 3: So it would need to be big enough to hold
- 10:54Speaker 3: its atmosphere only through gravity.
- 10:57Speaker 1: It's on gravity.
- 10:58Speaker 4: This question gives me real the little Prince vibes. If
- 11:01Speaker 4: we're talking habitable in terms of life as we know it,
- 11:04Speaker 4: then I believe we have to have an atmosphere, which
- 11:07Speaker 4: means it has to have the mass to retain one
- 11:09Speaker 4: like Mars is about half our mask, but it has
- 11:12Speaker 4: lost that atmosphere due to solar wind or sheer mass issues.
- 11:17Speaker 4: So maybe there's a way to have a smaller mass
- 11:21Speaker 4: where it lives something lives deep in the rock or whatnot.
- 11:24Speaker 4: But I believe you would need some sort of liquid water,
- 11:27Speaker 4: liquid methane or whatnot, which would require again an atmosphere.
- 11:30Speaker 4: So my thing would be the requirement of an atmosphere
- 11:33Speaker 4: would be a minimum.
- 11:34Speaker 2: So those were some great answers, and I think that
- 11:37Speaker 2: they point to an important question that you need to
- 11:41Speaker 2: clarify before we move on. Does smallest habitable planets? How
- 11:46Speaker 2: much technology and equipment are we allowed to use? Do
- 11:48Speaker 2: we make it habitable by like making pressurized domes where
- 11:53Speaker 2: we provide the atmosphere, or are you talking about habitable
- 11:56Speaker 2: with like no help from technology. You could PLoP a
- 11:59Speaker 2: naked person down and they would survive.
- 12:02Speaker 1: Yeah, you're right, And we could spend like forty five
- 12:04Speaker 1: minutes even just discussing like the definition of habitable. And
- 12:07Speaker 1: as we'll discover, the literature on this question is begetting
- 12:10Speaker 1: more and more sophisticated as people add more conditions to
- 12:13Speaker 1: the definition of habitable. You know, people when they were
- 12:17Speaker 1: first thinking about habitable planet, they were just like, is
- 12:19Speaker 1: there roughly the sun's amount of sunlight? And then as
- 12:22Speaker 1: time goes on and on, they add conditions like, you know,
- 12:24Speaker 1: is the gravity okay? And is there liquid water on
- 12:27Speaker 1: the surface, and can you breathe. And you know, personally,
- 12:30Speaker 1: when I think about a habitable planet, I'm imagining my
- 12:33Speaker 1: kids running around and touching grass. You know. I can't
- 12:37Speaker 1: really imagine raising kids and living in like a glass
- 12:41Speaker 1: bubble on the surface of a desolate asteroid. Though technically
- 12:45Speaker 1: that does make something habitable, right You put down a
- 12:48Speaker 1: habitat on something, and principle you can inhabit it. But
- 12:53Speaker 1: I'm imagining sort of a warmer, cozier future for humanity,
- 12:57Speaker 1: one where you can like grow crops and go outside
- 13:00Speaker 1: that a breathing apparatus. What do you think that is.
- 13:02Speaker 2: The future I would want to inhabit if I was
- 13:04Speaker 2: not living on the Earth, But I wouldn't want to
- 13:07Speaker 2: leave all the amazing tiny little signipet gall wasps that
- 13:10Speaker 2: we have on Earth. But maybe that makes me weird,
- 13:13Speaker 2: But certainly I've talked to a lot of people who
- 13:15Speaker 2: would be totally fine living in pressurized habitats and going
- 13:18Speaker 2: outside only after like breathing oxygen and putting on a spacesuit.
- 13:22Speaker 2: So I think there's a lot of variability and what
- 13:24Speaker 2: people think they would be happy dealing with, although I'd
- 13:28Speaker 2: argue that maybe those people after like three or four
- 13:30Speaker 2: years of living like that might not be so enamored
- 13:33Speaker 2: of the idea anymore. But maybe I'm wrong, and maybe
- 13:36Speaker 2: I just have very high standards. I do like a
- 13:38Speaker 2: lot of space.
- 13:38Speaker 1: I suspect you're right. And I notice in science fiction
- 13:42Speaker 1: where people do live in like glass bubbles, they are
- 13:44Speaker 1: all these like soft focus memories of walking through fields
- 13:49Speaker 1: of wheat on Earth, you know, or dipping their toes
- 13:52Speaker 1: in water, or in that recent show Silo where everybody
- 13:55Speaker 1: lives underground in this survival tube, they're all like nostalgia
- 14:00Speaker 1: about walking along the beach, And you know, I get
- 14:02Speaker 1: it that sounds pretty terrible. But you know, if we
- 14:05Speaker 1: are thinking about just technically habitable, like could we put
- 14:09Speaker 1: a colony there and have people survive, Like for example,
- 14:12Speaker 1: Elon Musk, I think is imagining on Mars. He might
- 14:16Speaker 1: have like longer term plans to terraform Mars by nuking
- 14:19Speaker 1: the polar ice caps and releasing more atmosphere.
- 14:21Speaker 2: Such a good idea, Yeah, but he's.
- 14:23Speaker 1: Always thinking shorter term, right, can't we get people there
- 14:26Speaker 1: in the next ten years or so. He's definitely not
- 14:28Speaker 1: planning to have people be able to walk around, And
- 14:30Speaker 1: of course we're lucky enough to know somebody who's something
- 14:33Speaker 1: of an expert on whether it's possible to build habitats
- 14:36Speaker 1: on Mars or other Solar System bodies. That's you, Kelly,
- 14:40Speaker 1: that's right you and zactually has wrote a book about
- 14:42Speaker 1: this called Literally a City on Mars. So tell me,
- 14:46Speaker 1: do you think it's possible with current or near future
- 14:49Speaker 1: technology to build something so that humans could make essentially,
- 14:52Speaker 1: you know, any rock out there habitable? No? Is that
- 14:56Speaker 1: the whole book? No, it's a short pamphlet, a bridge
- 14:59Speaker 1: to beyond usefulness.
- 15:01Speaker 2: Now, actually the book is over four hundred pages long,
- 15:04Speaker 2: so that's a much more nuanced argument.
- 15:06Speaker 1: Is it, just like no on four hundred different pages? No, no, no, no.
- 15:09Speaker 2: No no no no no no no no no no
- 15:11Speaker 2: no no no no no no.
- 15:13Speaker 1: What are the major obstacles?
- 15:15Speaker 2: Well, so it depends on who you talk to. Everybody
- 15:17Speaker 2: has their favorite obstacle. And actually it was very interesting
- 15:20Speaker 2: going through the space medicine literature because you'd find multiple
- 15:24Speaker 2: different titles that were of the form blank is the
- 15:27Speaker 2: biggest barrier to living on space. But everybody would have
- 15:30Speaker 2: different blanks, and one of them would be like, you know,
- 15:33Speaker 2: the way microgravity messes with vision, and another would be
- 15:36Speaker 2: space radiation. And so there's like a lot that we
- 15:39Speaker 2: don't know. But in terms of technology, in my mind,
- 15:43Speaker 2: the thing that we really don't know is how to
- 15:45Speaker 2: create closed loop ecosystems that don't break and are like
- 15:50Speaker 2: reliable on a planet like Mars. So you know, for example,
- 15:54Speaker 2: so you want to be able to grow food on Mars,
- 15:57Speaker 2: and you want to be able to like use those
- 15:59Speaker 2: plans to sort of clean your atmosphere. But right now,
- 16:02Speaker 2: you know, we don't have ecological systems figured out to
- 16:05Speaker 2: the right level of detail to know exactly how many
- 16:08Speaker 2: plants you need. For example, there was this simulation that
- 16:10Speaker 2: happened in China that had the amazing acronym Lunar Palace.
- 16:14Speaker 2: Like they are clearly rivaling NASA's acronym game Watch out, guys.
- 16:18Speaker 1: Wait, Lunar Palace is the name of it. And also
- 16:21Speaker 1: every letter stands for something.
- 16:22Speaker 2: So Lunar No, this was a simulation for the Moon,
- 16:26Speaker 2: but palace it all stood for something.
- 16:28Speaker 1: So just to be clear, you're not just talking about
- 16:30Speaker 1: having an outpost where we're sending supplies from Earth. You're
- 16:33Speaker 1: talking about like a self sustaining colony. Is that right?
- 16:36Speaker 2: Well, so you know, if you're talking about Mars, for example,
- 16:39Speaker 2: habitable kind of requires self sustaining because the orbital window
- 16:43Speaker 2: only opens every two years and a lot of food
- 16:46Speaker 2: is not shelf stable for that long, and like so
- 16:49Speaker 2: you sort of need to be able to pack as
- 16:51Speaker 2: little as possible because it's still pretty expensive to ship
- 16:54Speaker 2: stuff to Mars, and you need to have redundancy, and
- 16:57Speaker 2: you need to have you know, you need to have
- 16:59Speaker 2: all of this stuff working in a way that won't break.
- 17:02Speaker 2: And at the moment, you know, resupplies to the ISS
- 17:04Speaker 2: happened pretty often when things break, but that's not going
- 17:07Speaker 2: to happen on Mars. So you need to make sure
- 17:09Speaker 2: that you've got this all figured out before you leave. Otherwise,
- 17:11Speaker 2: y'all did so like.
- 17:12Speaker 1: A big fancier version in the ISS would not qualify
- 17:15Speaker 1: as a real habitat right, We like outfitted an asteroid
- 17:19Speaker 1: with a bigger version of the ISS and space panels,
- 17:21Speaker 1: but still required a lot of resupply from Earth. That
- 17:24Speaker 1: feels like just an extension of Earth, right, because then
- 17:27Speaker 1: if Earth goes out, if Earth gets hit by a meteor,
- 17:29Speaker 1: then obviously that's going to die out.
- 17:31Speaker 2: Well, and I don't think that's a problem. Initially, I
- 17:33Speaker 2: think relying on resupply from Earth for a while is fine,
- 17:36Speaker 2: and you're certainly going to need that as you're trying
- 17:38Speaker 2: to get towards self sustaining. But when you're out as
- 17:41Speaker 2: far as Mars, you already need to have a lot
- 17:43Speaker 2: of this stuff figured out because you are going to
- 17:45Speaker 2: be on your own for years. And at the moment,
- 17:48Speaker 2: we don't have that kind of stuff figured out. And so,
- 17:50Speaker 2: like you know, that Lunar Palace sim that I was
- 17:52Speaker 2: talking about, they actually had they had a crew of
- 17:55Speaker 2: three guys, and they didn't have enough oxygen for the
- 17:58Speaker 2: three guys, so they had to swap out of the
- 18:00Speaker 2: guys for smaller women, and then they had enough oxygen
- 18:03Speaker 2: for everybody. And like that's where we are right now. Like,
- 18:07Speaker 2: if you're on Mars and you're like, shoot, we should
- 18:09Speaker 2: have brought two shorter people, like you're just out of luck.
- 18:12Speaker 2: You can't just be like breathe less guys.
- 18:14Speaker 1: You can make people shorter. I guess you know. Sorry,
- 18:16Speaker 1: you gotta lose some height there, buddy.
- 18:18Speaker 2: We got to take off one of your arms. Pal
- 18:20Speaker 2: too much aerobic respiration happening. So anyway, that's where we
- 18:23Speaker 2: are right now, Like, we don't know how to keep
- 18:25Speaker 2: these systems stable, even on Earth for periods of time
- 18:29Speaker 2: of less than two years and so, and there's not
- 18:31Speaker 2: a lot of money going into that because it's not
- 18:33Speaker 2: like exciting science, and so I don't think we can
- 18:36Speaker 2: do this now if we start investing in it heavily
- 18:39Speaker 2: and then your future I think we could, And some
- 18:41Speaker 2: people are doing that science, but not on the scale.
- 18:43Speaker 2: I think we need to be like creating settlements on Mars,
- 18:46Speaker 2: for example.
- 18:47Speaker 1: How much of that is the context and how much
- 18:49Speaker 1: of that is just like we don't know how to
- 18:50Speaker 1: get things started. Say, for example, we found a copy
- 18:54Speaker 1: of Earth, you know, a rocky planet with our atmosphere
- 18:58Speaker 1: and our temperature and flowing water and all that kind
- 19:00Speaker 1: of stuff, but barren of life, completely sterile. Could we
- 19:04Speaker 1: get agriculture, etc. Started? Or is it just really hard
- 19:08Speaker 1: to boot up a whole ecosystem?
- 19:10Speaker 2: I mean, it's hard to boot up a whole ecosystem.
- 19:12Speaker 2: So for example, in Biosphere Too, they tried to boot
- 19:15Speaker 2: up a whole ecosystem and in some cases it went
- 19:18Speaker 2: like hilariously wrong. I'm sure it wasn't hilarious for them,
- 19:22Speaker 2: but so like these scorpions that they didn't mean to
- 19:24Speaker 2: bring along, they did bring along, and it turns out
- 19:27Speaker 2: that these scorpions are like deadly, and so they had
- 19:31Speaker 2: to figure out what to do with the scorpion.
- 19:33Speaker 1: Wait, doesn't that problem solve itself? I mean, scorpions are
- 19:35Speaker 1: eaten in some parts of the world, right, can't you
- 19:38Speaker 1: turn that problem into your afternoon snack?
- 19:40Speaker 2: Sure, but like I would rather that my snacks didn't
- 19:44Speaker 2: have the chance to kill me. You know, like if
- 19:46Speaker 2: I had to choose between meal worms and scorpions that
- 19:49Speaker 2: could kill me, I'd go with the meal worms. And
- 19:51Speaker 2: those are probably gonna be your early choices for protein
- 19:53Speaker 2: on space something like that. I mean, so like, for example,
- 19:56Speaker 2: agriculture on the Moon would be hard because there's hardly
- 19:58Speaker 2: any carbon there. And so in our theoretical or hypothetical situation,
- 20:03Speaker 2: are you saying that all of the stuff that plants
- 20:06Speaker 2: need to grow is already on Earth, but just like
- 20:09Speaker 2: microbes haven't shown up yet.
- 20:10Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, I'm wondering, in like the best case scenario,
- 20:13Speaker 1: a planet with all the resources we need, but without
- 20:16Speaker 1: life having gotten started, could we like bring enough of
- 20:20Speaker 1: our ecosystem with us to actually make that livable.
- 20:23Speaker 2: I would bet we could. I bet that there would
- 20:27Speaker 2: be some things that get sort of out of balance,
- 20:29Speaker 2: and there could be some difficult moments where, you know,
- 20:32Speaker 2: like an insect that we brought to help us out
- 20:34Speaker 2: sort of does something we weren't expecting, and then we
- 20:36Speaker 2: have to figure out how to control it. Like I
- 20:38Speaker 2: imagine there'd be some tense moments. But that sounds like
- 20:41Speaker 2: a much easier project to me than trying to like
- 20:45Speaker 2: garden in the perchlorate laden soil that you find on Mars. Yeah,
- 20:49Speaker 2: that would be better, but that doesn't happen in our
- 20:51Speaker 2: solar system, I.
- 20:52Speaker 1: Don't think, all right, So it sounds like building a
- 20:54Speaker 1: technological habitat in an otherwise completely unfriendly to life situation
- 21:00Speaker 1: is currently far outside of our technical abilities. Though you know,
- 21:04Speaker 1: maybe in one hundred or five hundred years or a
- 21:06Speaker 1: thousand years, we would be able to build habitable bubbles
- 21:09Speaker 1: that could go anywhere, and making this question of habitability
- 21:12Speaker 1: sort of irrelevant. Until then, though, we do need to
- 21:15Speaker 1: find places where we can get a foothold where we
- 21:18Speaker 1: could bring our ecosystem and boot it up and provide
- 21:22Speaker 1: you know, fields for playing baseball and soccer for our
- 21:25Speaker 1: great great grandchildren, so that can have some kind of life.
- 21:29Speaker 2: Okay, so let's take a break and then we'll move
- 21:31Speaker 2: on to talking about what kind of characteristics this small
- 21:35Speaker 2: habitable planet would need to have in order for us
- 21:38Speaker 2: to be able to dip our toes in the ocean
- 21:40Speaker 2: or run our hands through fields of wheat. Okay, we're back,
- 21:57Speaker 2: soll right, Daniel, smallest habitable planet, tell me more about
- 22:01Speaker 2: what kind of characteristics it would need to have. So
- 22:04Speaker 2: I'm usually thinking about things like, you know, can you
- 22:07Speaker 2: grow plants? But as a non biologist, I bet you're
- 22:10Speaker 2: going to tell me that's something other than biology matters,
- 22:13Speaker 2: which is hard to imagine, but give me a shot.
- 22:16Speaker 1: No, I think that can you grow plants is essentially
- 22:20Speaker 1: the requirement number one, because that brings together a lot
- 22:22Speaker 1: of the other issues. I think the basic requirements for
- 22:25Speaker 1: building a habitat are like liquid water on the surface,
- 22:29Speaker 1: meaning you have water and it's not presently being boiled
- 22:32Speaker 1: off the surface into the atmosphere or freezing into giant
- 22:36Speaker 1: ice sheets. Right. You want that water to last for
- 22:40Speaker 1: like a long time, things like billions of years, so
- 22:45Speaker 1: that either life can evolve or so that we can
- 22:47Speaker 1: like detect it and travel to it and have it
- 22:49Speaker 1: like still be there. We don't want to find some
- 22:52Speaker 1: planet with water on it and then when we get
- 22:54Speaker 1: there it's a frozen wasteland.
- 22:55Speaker 2: But does it need to be flowing? So like on
- 22:57Speaker 2: Mars it was flowing at some point and near the equator,
- 23:01Speaker 2: you definitely might under ground have water that isn't frozen.
- 23:06Speaker 2: Is flowing important or just like water that is accessible.
- 23:09Speaker 1: I think if we're making a wish list, then definitely
- 23:11Speaker 1: flowing water is a lot easier. I mean, if you
- 23:14Speaker 1: need to burn energy and use technology just to get
- 23:17Speaker 1: frozen water out of the ground and available to your crops,
- 23:21Speaker 1: then it's going to make everything much much more difficult.
- 23:24Speaker 1: So I think it might be possible with places on
- 23:25Speaker 1: frozen water, but I think that sounds a lot less comfortable.
- 23:28Speaker 1: So let's put flowing water on our wish list.
- 23:30Speaker 2: And from the perspective of psychology, we all love flowing water.
- 23:34Speaker 1: We do exactly. Nobody wants to dip their toes in
- 23:37Speaker 1: a frozen.
- 23:38Speaker 2: Lake, right, That's right, that's right.
- 23:41Speaker 1: So we need flowing water on the surface. We also
- 23:43Speaker 1: need an atmosphere. We need this planet to have an atmosphere,
- 23:47Speaker 1: meaning there's an envelope of gas that surrounds it, and
- 23:50Speaker 1: that envelope is sticking around. It's not like boiling off
- 23:53Speaker 1: into space or getting zapped off by solar radiation. You
- 23:57Speaker 1: know that it's going to be there for us to breathe.
- 23:59Speaker 2: It needs to be a certain composition, right, Like if
- 24:02Speaker 2: it's all carbon dioxide, it doesn't matter if it's being
- 24:04Speaker 2: held to the surface exactly.
- 24:06Speaker 1: All of carbon dioxide will poison us and also lead
- 24:08Speaker 1: to a runaway greenhouse effect. So we need a certain
- 24:12Speaker 1: mixture of atmosphere to be there. And all this in
- 24:15Speaker 1: the end comes down to gravity on the planet. Like
- 24:18Speaker 1: in order to have liquid water, you need temperature. In
- 24:20Speaker 1: order to have that temperature, you need an atmosphere because
- 24:23Speaker 1: the atmosphere is what keeps the solar radiation on the surface.
- 24:27Speaker 1: You know. I see this on Twitter from politicians who
- 24:29Speaker 1: don't understand any better. They're confusion about like why space
- 24:33Speaker 1: is cold because you're going towards the Sun. Like if
- 24:36Speaker 1: you lift off the surface of the Earth, why does
- 24:38Speaker 1: it get colder and colder if you're getting closer and
- 24:40Speaker 1: closer to the Sun. Right? Is this confusuency sometimes on
- 24:44Speaker 1: social media. And the answer is that space is very
- 24:46Speaker 1: very cold. It just happens to be warm here because
- 24:49Speaker 1: we're under a blanket. So imagine that you're like camping
- 24:52Speaker 1: and you're under a thick blanket and there is a
- 24:54Speaker 1: fire there. But if you crawl a lot from under
- 24:56Speaker 1: your blanket, you're going to get very very cold before
- 24:58Speaker 1: you get close to the fire.
- 25:00Speaker 2: But you got to be careful about that planket. Because
- 25:02Speaker 2: Venus got too many blankets, they overheated exactly.
- 25:06Speaker 1: So you need that atmosphere and you have to have
- 25:08Speaker 1: that atmosphere be the right situation, not too thick, not
- 25:11Speaker 1: too thin. And to keep that atmosphere on your planet,
- 25:14Speaker 1: what you need is gravity, right, You need gravity to
- 25:18Speaker 1: hold that gas to the planet because in the end,
- 25:20Speaker 1: what else is keeping it there. Atmospheres don't hang out
- 25:23Speaker 1: just because they think the planet is cool. They don't
- 25:25Speaker 1: like hop from planet a planet looking for the best
- 25:28Speaker 1: place to hang out.
- 25:29Speaker 2: Ours would have left us a long time ago.
- 25:32Speaker 1: It's gravity that keeps our atmosphere here, and it's gravity
- 25:35Speaker 1: that determines its composition. What's going to boil off into space?
- 25:38Speaker 1: What isn't going to boil off into space? And gravity
- 25:41Speaker 1: is also directly important, Right, you can't live in a
- 25:43Speaker 1: place with too high gravity. If we land on a
- 25:46Speaker 1: planet that has like ten g of gravity, ten times
- 25:49Speaker 1: our normal surface gravity, it's not going to be a
- 25:51Speaker 1: lot of fun. You can't like walk through that field
- 25:53Speaker 1: of wheat and when you're grassed through it, right.
- 25:56Speaker 2: No smoosh.
- 25:57Speaker 1: And so in the end, it all comes down to gravity.
- 26:00Speaker 1: If you have enough gravity, then you can have a
- 26:02Speaker 1: blanket of an atmosphere, and you can keep enough solar radiation,
- 26:05Speaker 1: and then you can keep your water liquid. And so
- 26:08Speaker 1: the gravity of the planet really is crucial, which is
- 26:11Speaker 1: why I think this question is interesting the smallest habitable planet,
- 26:14Speaker 1: because often when people think about the habitable zones the
- 26:18Speaker 1: goldilocks region around a star, they imagine that it's defined
- 26:21Speaker 1: by the star. Right, you find the star, You know
- 26:24Speaker 1: the brightness of the star. Now you can calculate the
- 26:26Speaker 1: region in which that star gives off about as much
- 26:29Speaker 1: solar radiation as our star. And so when you talk
- 26:33Speaker 1: about the habitable zone of a star, you're kind of
- 26:35Speaker 1: ignoring the planetary characteristics. But it turns out the planetary
- 26:39Speaker 1: characteristics are super important. Right if you're on a tiny,
- 26:42Speaker 1: little rock inhabitable zone. It's not going to have an atmosphere,
- 26:46Speaker 1: it's not going to be habitable.
- 26:47Speaker 2: And so, because science is never straightforward, is there an
- 26:51Speaker 2: interaction between like the size to get the gravity right
- 26:55Speaker 2: and how close you are, So like, if you are
- 26:58Speaker 2: too close, you need to have more gravity because the
- 27:02Speaker 2: solar wind is trying to kick your atmosphere away, and
- 27:05Speaker 2: so like size varies depending on how close you are,
- 27:08Speaker 2: or is this one of those amazing instances in science
- 27:11Speaker 2: where it's not that complicated.
- 27:12Speaker 1: Unfortunately, your pessimistic instincts I think are correct here. For
- 27:16Speaker 1: a given mass and volume of planet, it's sort of
- 27:19Speaker 1: a little window where it's well suited. If you look
- 27:22Speaker 1: at the Earth, for example, the Earth, if it was
- 27:25Speaker 1: like five percent closer to the Sun, it would not
- 27:28Speaker 1: have liquid oceans. The Sun would boil away our oceans
- 27:31Speaker 1: and we'd get a runaway green house effect sort of
- 27:34Speaker 1: like Venus. And if we were a couple percent further
- 27:36Speaker 1: from the Sun, then our oceans would freeze and we
- 27:39Speaker 1: would be globally glaciated. So the size and mass of
- 27:42Speaker 1: your planet really does determine where around that star you
- 27:46Speaker 1: can survive dikes.
- 27:48Speaker 2: Okay, so it's complicated. Is it even more complicated?
- 27:53Speaker 1: There is one additional crazy complication, which is that the
- 27:57Speaker 1: mass of a planet and its volume are not a
- 28:00Speaker 1: simple connection. It's not like if you want a bigger planet,
- 28:04Speaker 1: you just got to like add more stuff to it.
- 28:06Speaker 1: Like if you want to make Earth bigger, you couldn't
- 28:08Speaker 1: just like add a layer of rock to the Earth
- 28:11Speaker 1: and then you'd have like a larger planet, because adding
- 28:14Speaker 1: more stuff means more gravity, and more gravity means it
- 28:18Speaker 1: gets more compressed. So in order to make the Earth bigger,
- 28:21Speaker 1: you need to add a lot more stuff because then
- 28:24Speaker 1: the Earth gets more and more dense. So this is
- 28:27Speaker 1: complicated relationship between the mass and the density of a
- 28:30Speaker 1: planet that determines in the end the surface gravity, which
- 28:33Speaker 1: remember is the crucial thing to determining whether you can
- 28:36Speaker 1: hold an atmosphere and keep liquid water.
- 28:38Speaker 2: Okay, so the answer to this episode, what is the
- 28:42Speaker 2: smallest habitable planet is going to be It's complicated, and
- 28:47Speaker 2: I'm totally down for that answer as a scientist. Okay,
- 28:50Speaker 2: So it depends then probably also like what you know,
- 28:53Speaker 2: if you have mostly metals versus if you have other stuff,
- 28:57Speaker 2: that probably determines the size that can hold an atmosphe.
- 29:00Speaker 1: Right, it does exactly. It depends on how much the
- 29:03Speaker 1: atoms squeeze together. What is like the structural strength. Because
- 29:07Speaker 1: if you're building a planet out of like diamond, for example,
- 29:10Speaker 1: it wouldn't take as much diamond to make a large
- 29:12Speaker 1: planet because diamond is super duper strong. And if you're
- 29:16Speaker 1: building that planet out of like oatmeal or something much
- 29:19Speaker 1: more compressible, or helium, which is very compressible, right, then
- 29:23Speaker 1: it takes a lot more. And it's really fascinating if
- 29:26Speaker 1: you look at the connection between the mass of planets
- 29:29Speaker 1: and their density, a very weird relationship. Like Earth turns
- 29:33Speaker 1: out to be the densest planet in the Solar System
- 29:36Speaker 1: because it's close to the largest rocky planet size. As
- 29:41Speaker 1: you keep adding stuff to rocky planets, they get denser
- 29:44Speaker 1: faster than they get larger, and so it's hard to
- 29:47Speaker 1: grow a rocky planet a lot bigger than Earth. It's
- 29:50Speaker 1: like this maximum size probably around ten thousand kilometer in radius,
- 29:54Speaker 1: which is only like an Earth and a half. So
- 29:57Speaker 1: we're like up there, sort of closest to the limit
- 29:59Speaker 1: of the life largest possible rocky planet you could ever build.
- 30:03Speaker 1: The other planets like Jupiter, they're much more massive, but
- 30:06Speaker 1: they're much less dense than the Earth because they're made
- 30:09Speaker 1: of really compressible stuff.
- 30:11Speaker 2: You know, I was prepared to be impressed by all
- 30:13Speaker 2: of that, but now that you've mentioned that you could
- 30:15Speaker 2: have a planet made out of compressed oatmeal, I'm totally
- 30:18Speaker 2: depressed because I'd rather live there. But okay, all right,
- 30:21Speaker 2: that's all interesting.
- 30:22Speaker 1: And so what you want to do in the end
- 30:24Speaker 1: is have the right surface gravity, and so you need
- 30:27Speaker 1: enough gravity to hold onto your atmosphere. But there's also
- 30:30Speaker 1: a maximum amount of gravity, right, Like, if you have
- 30:32Speaker 1: too much gravity for people, then they just can't even
- 30:35Speaker 1: walk around and live on the planet. And studies I
- 30:37Speaker 1: read suggest that people could live comfortably up to like
- 30:40Speaker 1: one and a half G, like one and a half
- 30:43Speaker 1: times Earth's gravity would be comfortable for people to live on.
- 30:46Speaker 2: How about in the other direction, My sense is that
- 30:48Speaker 2: we don't know what the lowest gravity humans could remain
- 30:52Speaker 2: healthy in. Is Is that your sense as well?
- 30:55Speaker 1: I think biologically you're right, we know something about the
- 30:58Speaker 1: highest gravity people could tolerate, but we don't know anything
- 31:01Speaker 1: about this lower end. People wonder if we could live
- 31:04Speaker 1: in basically zero G for a lifetime and I know
- 31:07Speaker 1: in your book you guys talk about like whether you
- 31:09Speaker 1: can reproduce and whether babies can develop and all this
- 31:11Speaker 1: fun stuff in space. But I think here we should
- 31:14Speaker 1: just focus on, like could you build a planet that
- 31:17Speaker 1: has lower than Earth gravity and still keep water on
- 31:21Speaker 1: the surface and an atmosphere and high enough temperatures and
- 31:25Speaker 1: all that kind of stuff.
- 31:26Speaker 2: We'll put those rails on the conversation. Okay, So we're
- 31:29Speaker 2: gonna focus on how do you maintain an atmosphere and
- 31:33Speaker 2: what gravity do you need before humans are squished or
- 31:37Speaker 2: their will to live is squished, And after we get
- 31:41Speaker 2: back from the break, let's talk about the history of
- 31:43Speaker 2: how we've thought about that and the what we know
- 31:46Speaker 2: so far about the math behind this question. All right, Daniels, So,
- 32:01Speaker 2: I have been reading books from decades and decades ago
- 32:05Speaker 2: where people talk about going out and inhabiting space. When
- 32:08Speaker 2: did we start thinking about this question mathematically as opposed
- 32:11Speaker 2: to just sort of like chatting about it over beer
- 32:13Speaker 2: or tea.
- 32:14Speaker 1: It's really interesting to dig into that history and think
- 32:16Speaker 1: about what people were thinking about decades and decades ago.
- 32:19Speaker 1: I love that the earliest study that I found is
- 32:22Speaker 1: a book from nineteen sixty four written by a guy
- 32:26Speaker 1: Dole at Rand Corporation thinking about habitable planets for man.
- 32:31Speaker 1: So this is, you know, very early space age. We
- 32:33Speaker 1: hadn't even landed on the Moon. He's already like thinking
- 32:37Speaker 1: about these calculations. And this book is really fun because
- 32:40Speaker 1: he brings together a lot of really early science from
- 32:42Speaker 1: all sorts of different areas, you know, atmosphere, chemistry, and
- 32:46Speaker 1: planetary geology to think about how to put a planet together.
- 32:50Speaker 1: And so it's very forward thinking for its time. It's
- 32:53Speaker 1: also sort of simplistic from the point of view of
- 32:55Speaker 1: modern studies, which have gone progressively more and more sophisticated
- 32:58Speaker 1: as time goes on. But you know, you got to
- 33:00Speaker 1: start from somewhere.
- 33:01Speaker 2: And this is so sixty four. That would be like
- 33:03Speaker 2: before the Venera probes that the Soviet Union sent out
- 33:07Speaker 2: landed on Venus and like immediately got squished and boiled.
- 33:10Speaker 2: So is this like back when we still thought like
- 33:13Speaker 2: Venus could potentially be habitable. Is that sort of playing
- 33:16Speaker 2: into the way he thinks about things?
- 33:17Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. I think his question was like, how does
- 33:20Speaker 1: this work? What do our calculations suggest? And he started
- 33:23Speaker 1: from a pretty simple model. He was like, let's just
- 33:25Speaker 1: imagine a big blob of rock, and let's calculate the
- 33:28Speaker 1: gravity on the surface and then try to estimate whether
- 33:31Speaker 1: it can hold onto an atmosphere. Then think about the
- 33:34Speaker 1: solar radiation, how much energy would be absorbed by that atmosphere,
- 33:37Speaker 1: and could you have liquid water on the surface. So
- 33:40Speaker 1: he makes this specific list of requirements in his book
- 33:43Speaker 1: about what it would take to be habitable, and he
- 33:45Speaker 1: requires basically what we've been talking about, which is reasonable
- 33:47Speaker 1: amount of gravity, a reasonable temperature, and liquid water on
- 33:51Speaker 1: the surface.
- 33:52Speaker 2: Okay, cool. And what does he decide what is the
- 33:53Speaker 2: smallest tabitable planet.
- 33:55Speaker 1: His model suggests that a planet a little bit smaller
- 33:58Speaker 1: than Earth, something with like half of Earth's gravity, only
- 34:02Speaker 1: like twenty percent of Earth's mass and like sixty percent
- 34:06Speaker 1: of Earth's radius would be sufficient to maintain those conditions
- 34:10Speaker 1: that you would have an atmosphere on the surface, and
- 34:13Speaker 1: you would have enough atmosphere to keep the solar radiation
- 34:17Speaker 1: so that water could be liquid on the surface. So
- 34:20Speaker 1: this is something pretty small.
- 34:21Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, that's cool. So that probably opens up a
- 34:24Speaker 2: lot of possibilities when we get out past our solar system.
- 34:28Speaker 2: How have his calculations held up over time.
- 34:31Speaker 1: So his calculations were a great first step of course
- 34:34Speaker 1: in this field. But as always when you make a
- 34:35Speaker 1: first step, you make approximations, and so later studies have
- 34:39Speaker 1: dug into some of those approximations and those assumptions and
- 34:42Speaker 1: try to make them more realistic. For example, he assumes
- 34:44Speaker 1: a very simple atmosphere. He assumes it's optically very thin,
- 34:48Speaker 1: has a very fixed amount of reflection, and that like
- 34:51Speaker 1: what's happening on the surface in terms of clouds and
- 34:54Speaker 1: water vapor being formed isn't changing the reflection at all.
- 34:58Speaker 1: So he for example, ignores you know, greenhouse feedback effects
- 35:02Speaker 1: and all sorts of stuff like that, which really do
- 35:04Speaker 1: change the answer.
- 35:05Speaker 2: Yeah, I wouldn't want to move to another planet based
- 35:08Speaker 2: on these calculations. I remain impressed, but I'm not going
- 35:13Speaker 2: to sell my house.
- 35:14Speaker 1: So then in the nineties this was picked back up again,
- 35:16Speaker 1: and there's a paper by Casting at All that really
- 35:19Speaker 1: do consider the presence of liquid water and this greenhouse
- 35:22Speaker 1: effect and allow the possibility of a runaway greenhouse effect
- 35:25Speaker 1: in their calculations, and they rule out some of the
- 35:28Speaker 1: possibilities that Dole allowed. But more recently there was a
- 35:31Speaker 1: really fascinating study by a group at MIT and Harvard
- 35:35Speaker 1: that trying to make these calculations much more realistic.
- 35:38Speaker 2: And does that mean that they needed supercomputers and all
- 35:40Speaker 2: kinds of fancy stuff. How did they make it more realistic?
- 35:43Speaker 1: You don't really need fancy computers. You just need to
- 35:46Speaker 1: take this model that you're building in your mind and
- 35:48Speaker 1: make it more realistic, add more wizzes and bangs to it.
- 35:52Speaker 1: This is a really interesting and sort of philosophically important
- 35:55Speaker 1: step in science. When you're trying to answer a question,
- 35:57Speaker 1: you have to decide like which details are important and
- 36:00Speaker 1: which details are irrelevant. And in the end, when we're
- 36:02Speaker 1: doing science, we're never answering questions about like the actual
- 36:05Speaker 1: universe out there, some specific planet. We're always building a
- 36:09Speaker 1: little POI model in our mind, one where we have
- 36:11Speaker 1: mathematical equations that we know how to wrangle with and
- 36:15Speaker 1: answering questions about that and then wondering how well does
- 36:18Speaker 1: that apply to the real universe out there. And so
- 36:21Speaker 1: the history of this field is like making those models
- 36:24Speaker 1: more and more sophisticated, bringing them what we think is
- 36:27Speaker 1: closer and closer to reality. And so, for example, the
- 36:30Speaker 1: recent study by MIT and Harvard include an important effect,
- 36:34Speaker 1: which is that as the planet gets lower and lower mass,
- 36:38Speaker 1: the atmosphere grows in size, Like you can have the
- 36:42Speaker 1: same amount of atmosphere, but it can get more fluffy.
- 36:44Speaker 1: And as the atmosphere gets hotter, it can also get
- 36:47Speaker 1: large because a hot atmosphere means those little particles are
- 36:51Speaker 1: moving around faster, which means that they can get further
- 36:54Speaker 1: from the planet. And this that's important effect on the
- 36:56Speaker 1: temperature of the planet because like a larger atmosphere more
- 37:00Speaker 1: solar radiation and also emits more solar radiation. So they
- 37:04Speaker 1: have this more nuanced model of how planetary atmospheres work,
- 37:09Speaker 1: how they grow and shrink, how they emit and absorb radiation,
- 37:13Speaker 1: and this lets them do more realistic modeling of what
- 37:15Speaker 1: these planets would actually be like.
- 37:17Speaker 2: Oh so, I wonder how much research on the greenhouse
- 37:19Speaker 2: effect on Earth has helped with being able to do
- 37:22Speaker 2: models like this, or maybe even the other way around.
- 37:24Speaker 2: Maybe studying the greenhouse effect on Venus helps with our
- 37:27Speaker 2: greenhouse effect models on Earth, or maybe they're both helping
- 37:29Speaker 2: each other.
- 37:30Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. It's really fascinating. What they found is that
- 37:34Speaker 1: Earth mass planets can also get too hot. You can
- 37:37Speaker 1: get this runaway greenhouse effect if you're too close to
- 37:40Speaker 1: the Sun, even if you're Earth mass, right. But there's
- 37:43Speaker 1: this interesting wrinkle which is that smaller planets can actually
- 37:46Speaker 1: avoid this runaway greenhouse effect because their atmospheres can get
- 37:50Speaker 1: bigger and they can emit more. So this helps balance
- 37:53Speaker 1: the absorption. As the temperature on the planet goes up,
- 37:56Speaker 1: the sort of the gap between how much you're emitting
- 37:58Speaker 1: and how much you're absorbing also goes up, and so
- 38:01Speaker 1: it helps like release some of that energy into space.
- 38:04Speaker 2: That's really interesting. Could we blow part of Venus off
- 38:08Speaker 2: and make it habitable?
- 38:09Speaker 1: Yeah, that's exactly the point. So if Venus was smaller,
- 38:12Speaker 1: it might not have this greenhouse effect because it would
- 38:15Speaker 1: allow its atmosphere to be a little fluffier because the
- 38:17Speaker 1: gravity would be weaker, and that would help it radiate
- 38:20Speaker 1: more energy out into space.
- 38:22Speaker 2: Well, okay, so I'm definitely not recommending that we do this,
- 38:25Speaker 2: but maybe Elon Musk you could imagine him saying something like,
- 38:29Speaker 2: what if we blow off a part of Venus to
- 38:32Speaker 2: make it smaller, and then maybe it would become habitable
- 38:35Speaker 2: at enough time, although you'd have to make sure that
- 38:36Speaker 2: none of the parts of Venus you blew off it Earth.
- 38:38Speaker 2: That would be embarrassing exactly.
- 38:41Speaker 1: And then you also have to worry about like disrupting
- 38:43Speaker 1: the atmosphere with your planet exploding nuclear weapons. I think
- 38:47Speaker 1: there's a lot of details to nail down there before
- 38:49Speaker 1: you pitch that to investors.
- 38:51Speaker 2: Yeah, but none of those details are fun.
- 38:56Speaker 1: And in this paper they do this fun calculation where
- 38:59Speaker 1: they think about how long water can exist on the
- 39:01Speaker 1: surface of this planet. Because as the planet gets really
- 39:04Speaker 1: really small, it's not as good at holding onto its water.
- 39:07Speaker 1: The water then becomes vapor and then increases the greenhouse effect.
- 39:11Speaker 1: So they do this calculation where they determine like how
- 39:13Speaker 1: long water will be liquid on the surface for these planets,
- 39:16Speaker 1: and they do it at a whole range of sizes
- 39:19Speaker 1: and distances from the star and local surface temperature. It's
- 39:23Speaker 1: really fascinating.
- 39:24Speaker 2: So if they were to find a planet in another
- 39:27Speaker 2: solar system and they ran this model on it to
- 39:30Speaker 2: give you a yes, no, this is going to be habitable,
- 39:33Speaker 2: would you sell your house and trust these calculations and
- 39:38Speaker 2: go move out there, or do you think we need
- 39:41Speaker 2: a couple more decades of adding additional variables to these models.
- 39:44Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure the authors of this paper would not
- 39:47Speaker 1: bank on these results. Ok No, I mean I think so.
- 39:50Speaker 1: I think this is part of the process, you know,
- 39:52Speaker 1: and it's informing our understanding, and it's giving us a
- 39:54Speaker 1: sense for what's out there, and it's also helping to
- 39:57Speaker 1: inform what we're looking for deciding. What they find in
- 40:01Speaker 1: this paper is that you can live on a pretty
- 40:04Speaker 1: small planet if your planet is like forty percent water
- 40:07Speaker 1: by mass. They do a calculation and they suggest that
- 40:09Speaker 1: a local gravity of just one and a half meters
- 40:12Speaker 1: per second squared, which is like, you know, fifteen twenty
- 40:16Speaker 1: percent of Earth gravity, would be enough to keep liquid
- 40:19Speaker 1: water on the surface and the atmosphere and everything else
- 40:22Speaker 1: we need.
- 40:22Speaker 2: Wow, that's pretty tiny. That's very cool.
- 40:25Speaker 1: It's pretty small. I mean, it's like fifty percent of
- 40:28Speaker 1: the size of mercury. It's about twice the size of
- 40:31Speaker 1: our moon. So that's a lot smaller than the earlier calculations.
- 40:35Speaker 1: These planets benefit from having the like fluffy atmosphere effect,
- 40:38Speaker 1: which helps prevent the runaway greenhouse effect.
- 40:41Speaker 2: Interesting, So did the authors note that there's like anything
- 40:45Speaker 2: that they know they should have included in the model,
- 40:47Speaker 2: but it was just getting too complicated, or are they like,
- 40:50Speaker 2: this is all the stuff that we think is important
- 40:52Speaker 2: so far.
- 40:53Speaker 1: No, they definitely understand that this is just one step
- 40:55Speaker 1: in the process of building more and more sophisticated models
- 40:59Speaker 1: of alien planet atmospheres. You know, for example, they ignore clouds, right,
- 41:04Speaker 1: They're only thinking about a few atmospheric species and they're
- 41:08Speaker 1: not including the effect of like having clouds in the atmosphere. Also,
- 41:11Speaker 1: for example, not thinking about tidal forces. Tile forces are
- 41:15Speaker 1: the effect of having a different gravitational force from the
- 41:19Speaker 1: Sun on one side of the planet and the other.
- 41:22Speaker 1: So mercury, for example, is very close to the Sun,
- 41:24Speaker 1: it is much stronger gravity on one side of mercury
- 41:27Speaker 1: than on the other side of mercury, which squeezes and
- 41:30Speaker 1: compresses mercury and gets internal heating the same way like
- 41:33Speaker 1: Jupiter has tidal heating of all of its moons. And
- 41:36Speaker 1: so this is something they completely ignore in their calculations,
- 41:40Speaker 1: and they're very upfront about that, and in their paper
- 41:42Speaker 1: they're like, here's you know, future work. And so there's
- 41:45Speaker 1: definitely going to be more studies of this kind of thing,
- 41:47Speaker 1: especially as we discover alien planets and learn about their
- 41:51Speaker 1: atmospheric signatures by looking through telescopes and seeing what kind
- 41:55Speaker 1: of light they emit and looking at that spectra, we're
- 41:57Speaker 1: going to be discovering planets that probably disagree with all
- 42:01Speaker 1: these calculations that are going to make us go back
- 42:03Speaker 1: and figure out how to modify them.
- 42:04Speaker 2: And have we identified any planets yet that meet the criteria,
- 42:08Speaker 2: for example, that are laid out in this particular paper
- 42:11Speaker 2: that might be habitable.
- 42:12Speaker 1: So one disadvantage of our methods for finding exoplanets is
- 42:16Speaker 1: that they're very good at finding really big planets and
- 42:19Speaker 1: very good at finding planets close to their star, because
- 42:23Speaker 1: those are the ones that like block the light from
- 42:25Speaker 1: the star of the most or make that star wiggle
- 42:27Speaker 1: the most, and those are two best techniques for finding exoplanets.
- 42:31Speaker 1: So what that means is that a lot of the
- 42:32Speaker 1: exoplanets we have found are really big and really close
- 42:36Speaker 1: to their star, which is like, not what we're looking
- 42:38Speaker 1: for at all. Nobody wants to move to like a
- 42:40Speaker 1: hot jupiter, even though that sounds like a fun dance club.
- 42:44Speaker 2: It does, I'd go there.
- 42:46Speaker 1: But there's a lot of work in understanding what are
- 42:49Speaker 1: the exoplanets that are out there that we're not as
- 42:51Speaker 1: good at finding. We had astronomers on the show recently
- 42:55Speaker 1: talking about like how to extrapolate. If you know that
- 42:57Speaker 1: you have a bias in your sort of sampling method,
- 43:00Speaker 1: then you can try to unfold that bias and say, well,
- 43:02Speaker 1: what's out there that I'm not seeing? Like if you
- 43:04Speaker 1: walk through the woods and write down all the animals
- 43:06Speaker 1: you see, that's not necessarily all the animals that are
- 43:08Speaker 1: in your woods, right, because you imagine there's something that
- 43:11Speaker 1: you can't see or something that run away from you.
- 43:13Speaker 1: And so if you know that the scale of that effect,
- 43:15Speaker 1: you can like invert it to try to estimate, like
- 43:18Speaker 1: what's out there that you're not seeing. So we do
- 43:20Speaker 1: the same thing with planets and try to estimate, like,
- 43:22Speaker 1: what is the true population of planets, not just the
- 43:25Speaker 1: ones that we can.
- 43:27Speaker 2: See, And is it additionally complicated by the fact that
- 43:30Speaker 2: they're far away and the light takes a long time
- 43:32Speaker 2: to get to us, and by the time we're analyzing it,
- 43:35Speaker 2: maybe the planet is no longer habitable.
- 43:37Speaker 1: It is in fact complicated by that and the fact
- 43:39Speaker 1: that we don't really understand how solar systems form. Right,
- 43:42Speaker 1: if we had a great model for solar system formation,
- 43:46Speaker 1: then we could make a very confident prediction for what
- 43:48Speaker 1: the distribution of planets are out there. But it's very chaotic,
- 43:51Speaker 1: very complicated. You and I have talked about it. Even
- 43:54Speaker 1: the history of our own Solar system is not one
- 43:56Speaker 1: that we understand very well. We think Jupiter moved in
- 43:59Speaker 1: and then got pulled out again, and Saturn followed it,
- 44:01Speaker 1: and there may have been another planet that was lost.
- 44:03Speaker 1: It's very chaotic and sensitive to initial conditions, which makes
- 44:07Speaker 1: it very hard to model, sort of ab initio, what
- 44:10Speaker 1: these solar systems should look like. But we have found
- 44:12Speaker 1: some small planets. There's a planet called Kepler thirty seven B,
- 44:16Speaker 1: which is like the smallest exoplanet ever found. Its radius
- 44:20Speaker 1: is like thirty five percent of the Earth's radius, so
- 44:23Speaker 1: it's like a little bit larger than the Moon. Though
- 44:26Speaker 1: based on its orbit around its Sun, they estimate its
- 44:29Speaker 1: service temperature is like seven hundred kelvin, which is like
- 44:32Speaker 1: eight hundred degrees fahrenheit, So there'll be no dipping your
- 44:36Speaker 1: toes in the water around on Kepler thirty seven B.
- 44:39Speaker 2: There no toes on Kepler thirty seven B's.
- 44:43Speaker 1: Right, yeah, exactly, But you know, it is fascinating to
- 44:48Speaker 1: think that there might be smaller planets than we ever
- 44:51Speaker 1: imagined possible that are habitable. Then when we look out
- 44:54Speaker 1: into those solar systems and imagine where we might live,
- 44:57Speaker 1: we don't just have to look for other earth bigger earths,
- 45:01Speaker 1: or slightly smaller earth. That there might be a whole
- 45:03Speaker 1: range of planets out there, and you know, the experience
- 45:06Speaker 1: of living on those planets could be very different. Imagine
- 45:09Speaker 1: living on a planet where like the curvature is much
- 45:12Speaker 1: more visible. Right, You're like out on the ocean and
- 45:14Speaker 1: you could like see the curvature of your planet.
- 45:17Speaker 2: I think Phil Plait recently wrote a book that's all
- 45:19Speaker 2: about like imagining what it would be like if you
- 45:21Speaker 2: were living on another planet and sort of looked out
- 45:23Speaker 2: at like their atmosphere that has different color sunsets and
- 45:26Speaker 2: different curvatures.
- 45:27Speaker 1: Yeah, that sounds super awesome. Imagine if you lived on
- 45:30Speaker 1: a small planet that had a moon, and that moon
- 45:32Speaker 1: was tidly locked, and you were tidally locked tho would
- 45:35Speaker 1: mean you could only see the moon from like one
- 45:37Speaker 1: side of the planet. These effects are much more likely
- 45:40Speaker 1: on a small planet than a larger planet with small moons,
- 45:44Speaker 1: and so the whole experience of living on those planets
- 45:46Speaker 1: could really be very different.
- 45:47Speaker 2: You are maybe sort of kind of making me think
- 45:51Speaker 2: that it might be fun to leave my house for
- 45:53Speaker 2: another planet. That does all sound pretty awesome. Now, now,
- 45:57Speaker 2: do these planets have different wasps that haven't been described yet?
- 46:01Speaker 1: Because then I'm in you mean, like, are there weird
- 46:03Speaker 1: alien parasites that might suck the brains out of your children?
- 46:05Speaker 1: Is that you're asking?
- 46:06Speaker 2: No, No, not at all. I'm hoping that they're sucking
- 46:10Speaker 2: the brains out of each other and I can take notes,
- 46:12Speaker 2: but that they're not well adapted to me. I would
- 46:15Speaker 2: like to be at the top of the food chain
- 46:17Speaker 2: there as well.
- 46:17Speaker 1: Well, maybe you'll enjoy spicy wasps, you know, on your salad.
- 46:20Speaker 1: We all have to make compromises when we're camping on exoplanets.
- 46:24Speaker 1: So so far we found about five thousand planets, mostly
- 46:27Speaker 1: hot Jupiters, but a smattering of smaller ones. And we
- 46:30Speaker 1: hope that as our ability to find these planets improves,
- 46:33Speaker 1: we might find smaller and smaller, rocky planets, maybe even
- 46:37Speaker 1: ones that have everything we need to travel there and
- 46:40Speaker 1: boot up our ecosystem on its surface. Let's hope that
- 46:44Speaker 1: we bring small enough people so they don't use up
- 46:46Speaker 1: all the oxygen.
- 46:49Speaker 2: Yes, it would be nice if we could have interchangeable people,
- 46:51Speaker 2: but yes, small people is a good decision.
- 46:54Speaker 1: And thanks all the listeners for coming along with us
- 46:56Speaker 1: on this journey to imagine small habitable planets might one
- 47:00Speaker 1: day send our great great great great great grandkids to
- 47:04Speaker 1: run along in And thanks Kelly for joining us on
- 47:06Speaker 1: today's episode.
- 47:07Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. As always, it was a ton
- 47:09Speaker 2: of fun.
- 47:09Speaker 1: All right, tune in next time. Thanks for listening, and
- 47:20Speaker 1: remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a
- 47:22Speaker 1: production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the
- 47:27Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your
- 47:31Speaker 1: favorite shows.