Latest / Best of Business / Peter Lewis: Asia Business Correspondent on Donald Trump reportedly considering slashing tariffs on China
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks. They'd be
- 0:12Speaker 1: follow this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Now, the Wall Street Journal is reporting that Donald Trump
- 0:19Speaker 2: is considering slashing tariffs on Chinese goods by more than half. Now.
- 0:23Speaker 2: No decisions have been made just yet, reportedly, but that
- 0:26Speaker 2: would mean that tariffs could come down to between fifty
- 0:28Speaker 2: and sixty five percent. China, on the other hand, has
- 0:30Speaker 2: signal it's open to trade talks but won't negotiate under
- 0:33Speaker 2: juris now. Peter Lewis is our Asia business correspondent with
- 0:36Speaker 2: US Now have.
- 0:37Speaker 3: Peter Good Evening, Heather.
- 0:40Speaker 2: It doesn't I meaning nothing is set in stone just yet,
- 0:42Speaker 2: but it feels like things are calming down.
- 0:44Speaker 3: Yet they are calming down, But I think from China's perspective,
- 0:50Speaker 3: the way they're presenting this, particularly that Wall Street Journal
- 0:54Speaker 3: reports which suggested tariff's on China could be halved, they
- 0:58Speaker 3: say it as Trump blinking first and it being a
- 1:01Speaker 3: vindication of presidency's strategy, which is to hang tough there,
- 1:06Speaker 3: as you said earlier, not to be bullied, and not
- 1:08Speaker 3: to negotiate under juss Now. Scott Besson's the US Treasury
- 1:13Speaker 3: Secretary yesterday said that Trump hasn't offered to just remove
- 1:18Speaker 3: tariffs on his own. There has to be a mutual
- 1:21Speaker 3: the escalation and tariffs sort of come off together. Well,
- 1:25Speaker 3: China has made it very clear that that isn't going
- 1:28Speaker 3: to happen, and it does appear that the White House
- 1:31Speaker 3: is misreading the room again here, China's view has been
- 1:35Speaker 3: very much, you put these tariffs on. We didn't ask
- 1:38Speaker 3: for this, we didn't start this trade war. Therefore, you
- 1:42Speaker 3: are going to have to take them off, and once
- 1:44Speaker 3: you do that, we are then open to negotiations. But
- 1:47Speaker 3: this idea that there's going to be some mutual reduction
- 1:51Speaker 3: in tariffs over time is not what China has been saying.
- 1:56Speaker 3: And furthermore, they sort of see it as a sign
- 1:58Speaker 3: that this is an administration in the US that is
- 2:01Speaker 3: in some disarray. It doesn't have a trade or economic policy.
- 2:06Speaker 3: You have taris put on one day, then spended the next,
- 2:09Speaker 3: then exemptions, a whole bewildering array of exemptions announced. This
- 2:14Speaker 3: is very much giving the impression to China that there
- 2:17Speaker 3: isn't a coherent trade policy or strategy. It's being made
- 2:21Speaker 3: up as they go along on the whim of one
- 2:23Speaker 3: man in the White House.
- 2:25Speaker 2: What is China prepared to give.
- 2:28Speaker 3: Well, it's prepared to try and see if there can
- 2:32Speaker 3: be some more balanced trade. It agrees that, you know,
- 2:37Speaker 3: there are some problems in the global economy, and it
- 2:40Speaker 3: can offer to buy more things from the US. But
- 2:44Speaker 3: the problem is that if the ultimate aim here is
- 2:49Speaker 3: to reduce the US trade deficit with China and either
- 2:53Speaker 3: put it into balance or bring it in somehow into surplus,
- 2:57Speaker 3: China has made the calculation quite correctly in my view,
- 3:00Speaker 3: that there is going to be pain on both sides,
- 3:03Speaker 3: but China and its consumers are far more willing and
- 3:07Speaker 3: far more able to bear that pain. Because if you
- 3:10Speaker 3: want to reduce the trade deficit, you have to bear
- 3:12Speaker 3: in mind that trade is one side of the coin.
- 3:15Speaker 3: On the other side of the coin, they are all
- 3:17Speaker 3: the capital flows, and these have to balance. So if
- 3:21Speaker 3: you reduce the trade deficits, what it means is that
- 3:24Speaker 3: there is less money going into the US, So Americans
- 3:28Speaker 3: are going to have to save more. They're going to
- 3:31Speaker 3: have to buy less not just the foreign goods but
- 3:34Speaker 3: of their own but of their own goods, and there's
- 3:36Speaker 3: going to have to be more domestic investment into manufacturing
- 3:40Speaker 3: in the US. Now, we know that Americans love to spend,
- 3:44Speaker 3: and they love to spend on borrowed money. They've been
- 3:46Speaker 3: doing it for years, So this is going to be
- 3:49Speaker 3: a major change if they want to reduce the trade deficits.
- 3:53Speaker 3: And it's also going to have implications for the dollar
- 3:55Speaker 3: because I said that capital flows are the other side
- 3:58Speaker 3: of this. If you have a lower trade deficit, then
- 4:01Speaker 3: there is less demand for the dollar around the world,
- 4:05Speaker 3: and you cannot damage China's trading care abilities without also
- 4:09Speaker 3: damaging its ability to either want or require US dollars.
- 4:14Speaker 3: So this is going to weaken the US dollar over
- 4:16Speaker 3: time and ultimately threaten its status as the world's reserve currency.
- 4:21Speaker 3: Is the US really prepared to pay that price? I
- 4:24Speaker 3: suspect not.
- 4:25Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 4:25Speaker 2: Peter, Hey, thank you as always really appreciated. Look after yourself.
- 4:28Speaker 2: That's Peter Lewis, our Asia Business correspondence.
- 4:31Speaker 1: For more from News TALKSB listen live on air or online,
- 4:35Speaker 1: and keep our shows with you wherever you go with
- 4:37Speaker 1: our podcasts on iHeartRadio.