Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Platner; Far Left; ICE; Cronyism; Rent Control; Freya; Climate; Kirk; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Platner; Far Left; ICE; Cronyism; Rent Control; Freya; Climate; Kirk; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: A whole lot of them funds. I'll love what the
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: latte and the individual lots. This is the show, Oh right,
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: everybody welcome d One book Show on this fighting July tenth.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: I know it's a bit of an unusual time for
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: the show one o'clock, but I want to catch the
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: three o'clock spein Belgium game, so I figured i'd do
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: it a little early. Hopefully this will match up with
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: with some people's schedule, but I do expect anyway. Let's see,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: so let's jump. I guess we'll just jump into the news.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: I did want to mention something I was I meant
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: to mention this yesterday, but I want to mention the
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: passing of Bunnie Tyler. Bunny Tyler, the singer. She died
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: at the age of seventy five. And the reason I mentioned,
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: I mean, she had two famous songs that I like.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: I have to admit that I like them. This is
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: from the nineteen eighties, Total Eclipse and Holding Out for
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: a Hero. And the reason I mentioned it is it's
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: not because I'm a huge Bunny Tyler fan. I'm not.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: I like those two songs, but I'm not a huge
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: pop music fan. But The reason I mentioned is primarily
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: because I used holding Out for a Hero Bunny Tyler
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: song in performed by Bunny Tyler. I used a segment
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: of that song as my opening music for the early
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: days of the Iran Book Show. So the Iran Book
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Show in when it started and for many years afterwards,
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: had Bunny Tyler's holding Out for a Hero as our
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: intro music. And I want to take this opportunity to
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: say thank you to Ronnie Tyler for a fun song,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: a really really fun song, and for creating a song
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: that I could use a pop song. There very few
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: pop songs I think I would use for the opening
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: of the one Book Show, but I did choose that
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: one and and and and I like it. It's from
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: a I think it's from a movie that that that
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: I liked. I can't share out which one. Maybe somebody
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: on the chat remembers the movie from which holding Out
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: for a Hero h is is Farm or was used
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: was used in the movie. All right, let's get to
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: the serious news. But I guess that's serious. Let's uh hmm,
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: what happened here? Uh yeah, I mean the big story
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: I think of this week politically, at least, was the
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: fact that Graham Platinum, Graham platinw who we talked about
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: on this show, was a rising star in the Democratic
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: Party and particularly on the Bernie Sanders Uh fall Left.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: We'll talk more about fall left in a minute. Fall
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: left wing of the Democratic Party, the populist uh, socialist
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: uh Israel hating America, really hating wing of the Democratic Party.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: He was a rising star. This this is the wing
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: the party that wants to you know, a tax, a
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: wealth tax on billionaires. It's the political party that wants
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: medicare for all. Uh. We'll see some other policies, you know,
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: like like I don't know, we're leaving everybody who has
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: medical debt from ever having to pay it back in
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: my student debt. Now we can. We can forgive medical
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: debt as well. It's also the political the part of
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: the political party that you know, really just despises Israel
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: and everything about it and would would basically turn America
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: against Israel. You make it, make it, make Israel an
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: enemy of the United States, and take on complete support
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: of the Palestinian cause and generally the Uranian cause and
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: the Islamist cause. There's an alignment which I talked about
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: with Nikos and one of our shows between the Fall
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: Left and the slamest ideology anyway, that the Palatin was
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: one of the rising stars in this anyway, you and
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: a hugely popular campaign. He a very viable campaign. There
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: was some possibility he would defeat Susan Collins and become
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: Senator from the state of Maine. And again Bernie Sanders,
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: AOC that wing of the Democratic Party was super excited
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: about him. Now, several weeks ago, maybe even several months ago,
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: by now, there were a number of accusations that came
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: out from former women, former women, no women, former go
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: friends and women who knew him about you know, a
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: sexual impropriet tease, you know, a sexual harassment, a bad behavior.
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: And you would think that the Democratic Party, the the
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: the the party of me too, the party of you
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: always believe the woman would rally behind against a planter
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: and a platina and and you know, attack him and
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: go after him and and and get rid of him.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: But indeed the opposite happens. These accuisitions came out, and
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: you know, they were self pedaled, there were half pedal.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: This is so an article in the Free Press today, uh,
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: free press. So the you know, The New York Times
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: had a had a published a story about about these
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: sexual harassment and sexual assault even accusations again against him,
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: you know. So the New York Times published a ASEX
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: scandal story, but they softened it. They made it really
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: really soft. So for example, it didn't include what ultimately
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: brought Platinum down, which is an accusation of rape. We'll
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: get to that in a minute. It didn't include that. Uh.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: And of course the New York Times says that the
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: woman who accused him as rape didn't want to at
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: the time gone on the record with it, but she
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: told the New York Times senior Times had in the background,
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: he raped this woman, or at least she's accusing him
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: of rape, and we're not going to report that. But
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: we're also going to take all the other accusations against
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: them and go soft, go soft, even though we know,
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: we know that there's other rape accusation. I mean, the
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: story kind of was set up as a kind of
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: catch and kill. You get, you get the facts, but
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: you don't play them in order to protect Platinum. He
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: is the rising star, after all, They knew, they knew
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: they'd be told about the sexual assault. I mean, uh,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: other Other accusers were also mistreated by The New York Times,
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: For example, Lindsey fie Field, since she offered the New
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: York Times corroborating story for corroborating sources for her story
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: that plantners about Planter's abusive behavior, but the paper in
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: the article simply wrote that the Times could not independently
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: corroborate Miss Firefield's accounts of the of the altercations. But
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Firefield role an ax. Why would it say nobody could
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: corroborate when I offered them sources that could corroborate. I mean,
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: the whole point of the Time story was to stop,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: pedal it and bury it. And then you have a
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: New York Times supporter, Jody Cant, you know, one of
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: the big voices of the Me too movement, go on
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: CNN to defend Platinum and to explain to what Platina
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: did was not at all as bad as what Trump
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: has done. Uh, she said on CNN. Quote the way
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: my colleagues at the New York Times reported them, they
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: were not like classic abuse allegation. They are mostly like
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: being his boyfriend. Gave me a view into him, and
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: I did not like what I saw, unquote, And there
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: was one allegation of crossing a line physically. But I
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: think that means that there are pretty different accusations. And
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: say the one that the ones that President Trump faced,
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: what's the relevance he was physical against a woman and
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: somebody who headed up to me too. Movement is ignoring
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: that is not looking more deeply into it. One allegation
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: of crossing the line physically, that sounds so lame. Crossing
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: line physically means, crossing the line physically means using force
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: against somebody just unbelievable. Yeah, it's I mean, even Stephen King, right,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: the author famous author explained that Platina should not drop out. Quote,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: tell you what, if you knew the whole truth about
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: everyone in the Senate in the House of Representatives, those
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: chambers would be dead empty, Jesus said, let him without
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: sin cast the first stone. You know you you got
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: Stephen King citing Jesus. And if it's true that the
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: Senate in the House of Representatives would be empty, then
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: maybe they should be empty. Right. If we've got a
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: bunch of rapists, sexual abuses in two thousand Senate, then yeah,
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: let's replace them. And is it true that basically all
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: man a rapists. I mean, I know some feminist theologe,
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: some feminist theoreticians think that, but really anyway, this week
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: the ex girlfriend came out and said that Platna had
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: entered her rule main home uninvited, forced himself on her
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: while she repeatedly told him to stop forcing herself on her,
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: while she repeatedly told him to stop. Does a name
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: for that? It's called wape, It's called rape. He raped her,
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: at least that's what she's claiming, right meet you says
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: you have to believe the woman. Now, this straightforward, you know,
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: unhandged accusation of rape was too much even for the left,
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: and they did force him to resign. He is no
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: longer running for the Senate, so Planter will not be
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: the senator for me. He still wanted input into who
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: Maine would who the Democratic Party would nominate to replace him,
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: because the primaries have already happened. That I guess the
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: Democratic Party said no, but we'll see who they nominate
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: to go up against Susan Collins the Republican and the
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: Republican right anyway, this is uh, this is the ugliness
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: of the tribal mentality that we now have in this country,
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: the mindless. We got to beat the other side, no
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: matter what. The mindless. Ooh. I like everything that he says,
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: So what if he's a complete monster or asshole or whatever.
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: I mean that that was true of Trump, and here
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: we are. It's it's true on the left as well.
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: So Platform posted an eleven minute video from his Portune,
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: Maine talking about how it's the media and political establishment's fault.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: He isn't able to take his campaign to the finish line.
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: He denied doing any of the things he was accused of.
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: Uh and and he is suggesting that he will. You know,
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: he's not. This is not his last nast gig in politics.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: In politics, yeah, I mean this is kind of a
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: the tribal get the other guy. But also, we live
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: in a we live in a world. We'll see this repeated,
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: I think repeatedly in the show today because I think
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: this is a theme here. We live in a culture
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: with a religious mentality, with the religious epistemology, with a
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: basically a religious orientation, and what is that? What does
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: that mean? Because they're not religious, you can't accuse the
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: fall lift of being religious in the conventional sense, And
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: many of the examples I give examples I give later
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: on are not conventionally religious. But what does religion teach us.
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: It teaches to believe the dogma, to justify stuff in
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: spite of the evidence of our senses, to ignoring thee
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: the evidence of our senses, to ignore evidence improve, and
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: ultimately to go by emotion, to raalue a on the cause,
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: no matter what, even a cause where there is no
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: evidence to supported. I don't know, something like God, for example,
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: And you've seen that on left and right, A tribalism,
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: a elevation of personalities above all, a defend of those personalities,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: no matter what they do. I mean. Trump is been
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: accused of rape, he was found, he was found in
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: a civil court, he was found guilty of a clear
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: sexual violence and sexual abuse. Did that hurt his popularity?
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: Not at all, Not at all. He is a he
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: leads a quasi religious movement. And what option is there?
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: You know, you either vote for him or you believe
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: that all the acquisitions against him are part of a
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: massive global metaphysical lead driven conspiracy by the agents and
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: the the what you call demons of evil. And that
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: way you can justify anything. Trump can do anything, because
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: any acquisition against him, it doesn't fit into the religious framework.
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: Is the work of the devil, and therefore you can
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: discount and ignore completely exactly what happens constantly, everything, everything
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: that comes up against him. And Platna made it through
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: a lot. But then they couldn't quite they couldn't quite
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: handle a woman actually accusing him a rape. After all
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: the other accusations have made an acquisition of rape reasonable.
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: I guess as legit. All right. So Platner's star is
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: fading and he is disappearing, but a new star is
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: raising within the Democratic Party, and another candidate for the
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: Senate seems to be dominating the debate. And he is
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: about us far left, maybe even further left than a
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: Platner ever was. And his name is Abdul el Sayad
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: say Ye. And look, I don't want to discriminate against
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: him because of his name. His name suggests that he's Muslim.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: He's Muslim and religious, and yet he is likely to
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: be likely to be the candidate the Democratic Party's candidate
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: for senator in the state of Michigan. He's a forty
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: one year old public health EFFI show. Now that sounds
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: like nothing, nothing, really, you know, this guy's A, this
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: guy's and nobody. But this guy's not not dumb. This
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: guy's not dumb at least he has academic credentials up
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: the kazoo. I mean, this guy is is is serious.
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: He's got a let's see, he's got a pH d
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: in public health. I think from like, uh, he gotta
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: let me just find this some way here we I
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: had his Uh yeah, he got a Rhodes scholarship. Now
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: that that's not easy to get. That is very competitive.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: He got a Rhodes scholarship which allowed him to get
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: a doctorate in public health. I'm not sure where he
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: got that Rhodes scholarship. I'm way he got that, but
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: I assume Oxford of Cambridge. Then he came back to
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: the United States and got an MD. A. He's a
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: he's a doctor from Columbia University. He never practiced medicine,
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: but he's got a medical degree from Colombia. Now that's
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: not easy Colombia hard University, even with the Firmative Action,
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: Hardy University to get into and Hardy University to get
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: to complete a medical degree. He's a Rhodes scholar. He's
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: a PhD in public health. I mean, this is a
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: highly educated man who is now running. So no, you
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: can't argue he's stupid as an explanation for his views. Anyway,
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: he is running against a moderate congresswoman by the name
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: of Haley Stevens for the Democratic nomination for Senate, after
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: which he was running in the election in November against
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: a Republican. But this is a guy who, first of all,
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: you know, I guess, consistent with his Islamic name, is
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: a practicing Muslim and emphasizes the fact that he is religious,
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: but has you know, just despises Israel. After Chrisabella inspired
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: attacker rammed a truck into Temple Israel in West Bloomingfield, Michigan,
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: in March earlier this year. I'll say you had statement
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: framed the violence which targeted a Jewish preschool, preschool, not
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: a military base, as downstream effect of Israeli a strikes
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: in Lebanon. It's like, hoot people, hoot people. Violence is
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: a cycle. So it was just a fight because you know,
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: Israel initiates the violence. It's Israel. Violence in the Middle
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: East is Israel's fault, and all these people are doing
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: are lashing out in response at Israel's violence. They started
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: the following month, he told CNN this is from a
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: story in the Finite and Free Press. He considers Israeli
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: government to be just as evil as Kamas. You know
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: that government to protects the rights of Muslims to live
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: in the country, and protects their their rights to free
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: speech and so on, and protects the ways of Christians
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: and the property rights, and that you know, a free country,
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: gaze and all of that, you know, all the attributes
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: of a free country. Uh. He he thinks that just
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: as evil as Hamas, a theocracy to throws throws gays
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: off roofs, oppresses its people, oppresses people to the point
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: of shooting them in the street. If they think they
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: are they're not in line with a dogma and a
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: regime that enforces a theocracy on them. That is, they're
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: the same, right. He added that quote killing tens of
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: thousands of people makes you pity, damn evil. Oh self
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: defense doesn't count. October seventh, unmentioned, they're the same. I mean,
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: I don't. I think he really thinks of the same.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: I think he thinks Ramas is superior. And he told
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: his campaign staff to stay silent on the killing of
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: Iran's Ramini during the Iran War because quote, there are
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: a lot of people in Deerbone who are sad today.
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: So a monstrous man who killed forty thousand of his
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: own people, who oppressed women. I mean maybe my guess
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: is that Elsaid would also like to oppress women, and
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: who tortured and killed women for showing a little bit
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: of hair. Yeah, we don't want to offend a few
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: people who might think that's sad that he died. If
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: you look at it's domestic policy. Right, he campaigns with
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, right, he is proposing a five percent billionaire
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: wealth tax. He supports the abolition of you know, US
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: Immigration and Customer Enforcement Agency. So why so in this
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: I agree, But my guess is he's you know, defund
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: the police and stuff like that, although probably doesn't make
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: a big deal out of that because that one's not
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: very popular in America. But he is for cancellation of
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: all American medical debts, all Americans medical debt, which total
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: is about two hundred and twenty five billion dollars. I'm
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: pretty sure he would argue four Medicare for all, and
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: he is rallying support and it's not I don't know
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: what the Muslim population of Michigan is somebody might look
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: it up and let me know. But I don't think
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: it's just getting Muslims. He denies me a socialist. But
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: the reason he thinks he's not a socialist, the reason
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: he claims he's not a socialist, is because he defines
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: himself as a Muslim first and formal, he says, I'm
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: a man, I'm a person of faith. Socialism is secular.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: Now that should worry you and scare you. What kind
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: of a Muslim is he? How he slamised? Is he
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: Husharia law inclient? Is he? Obviously he's the kind of
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: Muslim who has developed a vicious evil hatred of Israel
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: and probably Jews. So yeah, I mean, he continues to campaign.
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: He was a Gugernatoria candidate in twenty eighteen and lost,
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: and he's basically saying, look, I'm campaigning on the same
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: issues today as I did in twenty eighteen. The differences today,
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: they resonate today, there's an audience for them. It's more
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: likely when out then back then, the democratic establishment Shuma
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: for example, uh rallying around his opponents and they are
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: what just happened? Yeah, they're rallying around his opponent that
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: they hope he loses. But look, he has got an
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: endorsement of the United Auto Workers, which is a little surprising,
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: but anyway, the United Auto Workers, you think they'd be
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: more establishment. And of course he got a glowing endorsement
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: from Congresswoman Rashid Teleb as well as see and Silicon
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: Valley Congressmen Co Rocannor so he's rallied the entire left
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: wing of the leftist Democratic Party to his cause. So yeah,
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: and people excited, people excited. People cannot differentiate him really
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: from the Democratic Socialists of American in terms of his
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: actual opinions, his stands, except that he's a Muslim and
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: he's religious. And so they had a debate, He and
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: the mainstream Democrat had a debate. And you would think
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: that his opponents would talk about his equification regarding islamach terrorism,
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: or his dismissal and critique of American capitalism, which she
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: claims she is a supporter of. But no, she refused
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: to attack him on anything of substance. Why well, we'll
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: get to that in a minute. But she refused to
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: attack him on anything of stance. What it was a
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: critique Oh, he lacks legislative experience, and he delayed his
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: disclosure of his tax returns. I mean, that's going to
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: beat him. That's going to do it. That's going to
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: do it right. Why can't she attack him on the issues.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: Why can't he she challenge his actual beliefs. Why is
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: the fall left in within the Democratic Party ultimately untouchables
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: as a client basically endorsed us on pikers part of
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: the big tent? Why because the fall left is just
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: a more consistent version of the Democratic I mean, they're
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: much more principles. What is she going to attack him
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: for Medicare for all even if she doesn't completely support that.
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: Doesn't she want to see an expansion? Doesn't Is she
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: a huge critic of privatized healthcare? Of course she is.
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: Is she going to attack him on his position in Israel?
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: Isn't the Democratic Party position now pretty anti Israel? Already?
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: All he's doing is expressing the consistent view around it.
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: You see, he's consistent, she is not. And when you
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: have somebody who's consistent as somebody who's not, who wins
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: the one that's more consistent? And they're both in the
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: same direction, but one is more consistent. So you know,
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: she can't argue consistently again as any of his positions,
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: because ultimately she kind of at some point understands that
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: she probably supports them. She just doesn't want to, you know,
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: she just they don't feel right to her. But intellectually
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: she has no argument against them. She has no argument
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: against She constantly evades any questions about the radicalness of
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: her opponent. You know, a part of it she doesn't
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: want to alienate voters, but I think much more of
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: that is she can't make the argument. She cannot make
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: the argument. This is the point about who ultimately is
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: going to run the Democratic Party long term, and if
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: trends continue the way they are, it's a Democratic Socialist
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: of America. And who ultimately is going to run the
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: Republican Party. It's JD. Evans because he's the more consistent one.
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: Now it might not be literally JD. Evans because he
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: has no charisma, but it's somebody like JD. Events Maybe
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: it's Tucker Carson, you know, maybe it's some character in
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: between Tucker and Jdvans. But that is the direction. Both
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: political parties are drifting towards they're better, not they're better
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: they're more consistent application, the more consistent application of the
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: nuttiness that's in them. The center is gone, The center
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: has lost the more rational elements, and within both political
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: parties are losing. You see that in the kind of
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: candidates Trump is pushing Republicans to nominate for prime you know,
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: in primary races all across the country. You still it
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: in Texas where Paxson wins. Not that the other candidates
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: whose name I've forgotten for a minute. You know, Carson
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: versus AOC is Iran's personal health in consists. I mean,
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: it's not very personal. Hell, it's it's a manifestation of
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: exactly what I knew you would get once you voted
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: for Trump. That's the world. That's the world that Trump
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: is created. People ask me Trump is going to end America. Yes,
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: if Trump makes possible in AOC versus Carson, then it's
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: Trump who ended America because he's made that possible. So
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: the establishment on the Republican Party and the establishment of
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: the Democratic they're finished. They should be finished. They deserve
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: to be finished. They betrayed this country for one hundred years.
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: They betrayed the principles of the founding, and it created
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: the existential angst that exists in so much of this
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: country that causes people to gravitate to the crazy left
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: of the crazy right. But we, the same people in
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: the country don't deserve the consequence of that. And the
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: consequence of that is not a new center, if you will,
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: not a new political party were sane and rational and
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: founding farther based constitution, declaration, independence based ideas. No, it's
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: the collapse of the center as it should collapse, with
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: nothing rising into place and with the aoc techer costs
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: an alternative left for us to struggle through and struggle.
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: The struggle is an understatement. Uh. That is that is
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: where we are. That is, sadly where where we are heading. Right.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: Here's here's what the by the way, this is interesting.
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: This is what the UAW wrote about. Uh, sayd. UAW
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: members in Michigan want a fighter in Washington, DC who
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: isn't afraid to push forward a strong working class agenda
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: with morrow morrow clarity. Having never taken a dime from
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: corporate packs, Doctor Abdul el Sayad is someone we can
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: trust to have our backs, including when we needed most,
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: like come May Day twenty twenty eight, May Day eight
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: for medicare for all to banning stock buybacks. Doctor Abdul
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: el Sayad is the eger and well equipped to move
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: our core issues in the US Senate. Yeah, this is
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: what they want. They want mall clarity, they want uncompromising.
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: They want their agenda. They don't want. It's a stop pedaled.
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: Their agenda is suicidal even for them. It'll hurt them
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: as working class Americans. Banning stock op stock buybacks will
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: not help a single worker anywhere in the United States.
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: And you know Michigan is up for grabs. It's it's
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: not clear Mike Rodgers is running against them. I think
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: Mike Rodgers and I once got Mike Rodgers, a former congressman.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: I think and I Mike Rodgers and I got into
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: a yelling match once in New York over dinner. But
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: I think that was him. But I'm not going to
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: say definitively because I can't remember exactly. But yeah, Senator
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: Senator Johnson had a step in UH two to try
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: to moderate because we were really going at it at
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: a dinner in New York with about twenty people around
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: the table. Anyway, as for another day that story, but
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: he will he'll be going up against my job, Mike Rodgers.
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure Mike Rodgers can beat him. Mike Rodgers
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: will be labeled with Trump. Trump is very unpopular right now.
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: And this crazy Abdul el Sayed could be the senator
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: representing you guys, all you guys from Michigan. Oh all right,
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: more information is coming out about the ICE shooting in Houston.
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: The ICE shooting in Houston. It turns out that ICE
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: was looking for somebody else. They were actually looking for
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: a I guess somebody affiliated with criminal activity that drove
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: a similar truck. And you know, they landed up shooting.
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: They landed up shooting this guy who happened to be
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: an illegal imminent Lorenzo Sargado Araujo. By the way, if
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: you're an illegal immigrant, it doesn't mean you lose your
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: right to life, liberty, and a pursuit of happiness. Those
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: are rights that are unalienable. They cannot be taken away
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: from you. Even if you happen to be an illegal alien.
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: You have to literally violate somebody else's rights to lose rights.
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: You can't lose rights right just living by crossing a
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: border without documents. Anyway. Now, if you remember from yesterday,
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: First we had totally unsubstantiated ICE claim that h Ruho
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: had weaponized this vehicle, and then we had kind of
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: the normal ICE stone Walling refused to release any actual
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: information and you know, and and unwillingness to cooperate with
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: local law enforcement Houston PD. Uh. Then we learned I guess,
• 36:40
  Speaker 1: I guess I've learned this since that ICE officers had
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: taken Lorenzo's personal property from him, including his wallet and phone,
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: before putting him in an ambulance to a hospital, which
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: is why he was admitted as a John Doe and
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: why his family was not contacted. Just the indecency of
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: that should make you angry. I guess that bought them
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: time to organize the cover up. Then today we learned
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: that ICE thought Oho was someone else when they tried
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: to stop his work truck. They actually admitted that themselves.
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: Maybe they figured out that if they did that, it
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: would just be chucked down to his competence rather than
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: maliciousness malevolence. And then the ore reports which I report
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: it on yesterday, that they were holding the three other
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: people that were in the van and encouraging them to
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: self deport so that they would never testify about this,
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: but they weren't successful. The three refused to self deport,
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: signed the documents, and indeed all three spoke to attorneys yesterday,
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: signed statements. Those transcripts, the signed statements and the recordings
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: of the conversations were transferred by the attorney to the
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: Washington Post. Each conversation was done separately. The three men
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: are held separately. They had no time to coordinate their stories. Supposedly, again,
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: all this we don't know, partially because there's no investigation. Anyway,
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: this was reported to the This was reporting today in
• 38:30
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post, and I'm going to read you from
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post story. The three men who were arrested
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: during an immigration operation resulted in the fatal shooting of
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: Lorenzo Saldado. Arajo said a federal officer fired at them
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: almost immediately after exiting his vehicle, and at that no
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: point did the driver veer in his direction. They spoke
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: from immigration detention with attorney Hugo Bill Dallas Ibarra, who
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: shared their in all all accounts with the Washington Post.
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: DHS released a statement hours after the deadly shooting, saying
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: that sagado Jo had rammed an Immigration and Customs enforcement
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: vehicle and weaponized his white van in an attempt to
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: run over an ICE law enforcement So first, if you
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: remember I told you this yesterday, video of that van
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: shows no indication of ramming. But here's what one of
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: their handwritten statements says. That is a lie, wrote Jose
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: Trinidad Rojas, fifty one, in a handwritten statement. It is
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: impossible for them to say that they were going to
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: get run over. There were no officers in front of
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: or behind the vehicle. They were on the sides. But
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: Daris a Vera spoke to Rojas, Daniel Tirado Pontostja, who's
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: forty three, and the shooting victim's brother, Victor Sergado forty four,
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: and said he heard the same story from each as
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: he interviewed themselve the men are not being housed together,
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: the attorney said quote. All of them reiterated that there
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: were never any ICE agent in front of the van.
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: They came in and started shooting from the side. After
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: being shot by the agent, Sagado Alajo was able to
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: stop the van and place it in park. The man said,
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: so he was shot while he was driving, but the
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: officer and officers continue to unload additional rounds on the
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: sides of the vehicles, so obaciently you find out how
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: many rounds were dispersed, how much shooting actually happened, when
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: did it happen. Rojas described the agents violently pulling Sagado
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: out of the driver's seat and throwing him to the ground.
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: They put handcuffs on their wrists and feet. Victor Sagado
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: said his brother was yelling for help as he was
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: bleeding out. The three men lay helpless as they boss
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: ly dying. The police thinking suppose there was somebody else,
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: said to them something you wanted to escape, right in
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: a dismissive voice. Now, consistent with ICE, none of the
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: officers have been identified, none a step forward to contradict
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: the witness accounts. No video, witness accounts, or evidence of
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: any sort have been provided by ICE. Body cameras were
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: not on the officers, even though even though ICE has
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: a massive budget that has been recently increased partially to
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: provide them with body cameras. That was part of the
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: deal to fund ICE, was to make some of the
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: funding go to body cams. Just outrageous and and what's
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: what makes it so, you know, is nobody really cares
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: in our government. Nobody on the Republican side is going
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: to say a word and people are being shot. Now, look,
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: police shoot people not all the time, but it happens.
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: But when police do it, it's investigated. You have some
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: sense that there's some objective law going to be applied
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: to the issue, and that if they did it in
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: a completely unjust way, they will be prosecuted at least somewhat,
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: at least fired, laid off. So police shootings are bad enough,
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: but here no investigation. And if there is an investigation,
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: there will be an investigation by ICE or buy an
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: FBI that is only going to exonerate ICE because it's
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: a politicized it's just the lack of objective law. I mean,
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: we still don't have any outcome, any any anything from
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: the two shootings in Minnesota. In Minneapolis, we have no uh,
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: there's no legal proceedings, there's no investigation, there's no evidence,
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: there's no conclusion, there's no we don't know. Nothing has
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: been reported to any of us about the conclusion if
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: there has been an investigation, and then there was videos,
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: so we all kind of know what happened. At least
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: I think I know what happened, Kia. There's nothing. There's
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: no video, so we don't know. All we know is
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: that ICE is not providing any information, and the information
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: that is coming out contradicts at least the initial statements.
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: So again, you know, the guy shot has no criminal history,
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: I mean no, no criminalized, A hard working guy by
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: all accounts, started business in construction, did well, lived in
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: the United States for thirty five years, gets shot in
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: the middle of the street, and it doesn't look like
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: anything is happening, or that anything will happen, or that
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: the people who shot him will suffer any consequences for
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: doing it, or that we will ever get a straight
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: story about what actually happened. This is what happens when
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: you establish a in a sense paramilitary group that covers
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: its face, does an idea itself and is not counter
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: to what some people claim out there, is not just
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: focused on criminals, does not practice law enforcement procedures, is
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: not bound by what police have to do, by their
• 45:12
  Speaker 1: limitations of police. They're running rough shot and you're seeing
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: that all over the place, violating people's rights, abusing people,
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: and then you know, who knows what's happening in these
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: detention centers. And how they're being treated there. Breaking into
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: that country is a misdemeanor. It's not a crime. It's
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: not and it's certainly not a violation of anybody's rights
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: to come into the country is not a criminal offense.
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: So you know it is and it shouldn't be even
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: a misdemeanor. But okay, it's a misdemeanor. Slap them on
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: the wrist. Bad for you for not getting the right documentation.
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: And by the way, the reason they don't get the
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: right docommentation is nobody will give them the documentation. We've
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: made legal immigration so impossible in this country that we've
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: given people good people. Good people want to make a
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: better life. We want to come on work, want to
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: improve their condition in life. We've given them no option
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: but to come here illegally. But it's okay. The Trumpet
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: administration is doing everything in its power. Stephen Miller and
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: the Trumpet administration are doing everything in their power to
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: send a message to all those people, if you come here,
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: we'll shoot you. This guy had no convictions anyway, and
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: was not charged with any crime. Being undocumented in the
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: United States is not a criminal offense, is not a
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: criminal defense. Oh and he wasn't a communist. He wasn't
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: a communist, Lorenzo sidago A Wajo. You know, we've got
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: somebody in the chet claiming it was a communist, not
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: a communist. What the hell justify justify the shooting of
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: innocent people. That's where we are today. You know, people
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: who are claiming to be rational claiming justifying the shootings
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: of rational people. All right now, you know it's gonna
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: get worse. The Supreme Court earlier, I think a week ago,
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: and it's Mullin versus dough paved the way for the
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: Trumpet administration to deport from the United States behalf, perhaps
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of Haitian refugeestions. Right not because they
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: came seeking political asylum. This has been caught probably justifiably.
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: I'm not challenging the court's decision, probably justifiably said. The
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: Trumpet administration has a right to decide what political what
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: counts as political asylum? What does it that is within
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: the executive branches ProView, and it can decide that they
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: are you know that the Biden's liberal approach the political
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: asylum is inappropriate, and they can shut that Dough down
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: and they can deport hundreds of thousands, and that's going
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: to start happening. A lot of Haitians are given the
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: timing that they came here, they work permits about to expire,
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: work permits they got into the Biden administration. Hard working
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: Patians are not going to lose the ability to work.
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: Employers have a choice. They can either keep them on
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: illegally and risk the wrath of the government, or they
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: can fire them. These many of them are long time employees,
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: so fire or violate federal law is the choice given
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: to employers. And I just have to respond to one thing.
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: Canda says, there's a worldview, the politics of which we
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: call communism. He comes from a culture where you feel
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: it reality. That's probably why he didn't think he had
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: to stop a law enforcement He did stop for law enforcement,
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: and there's no reason to believe he didn't. And there's
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: absolutely no reasonab believe he comes from a communist country.
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: He comes from Mexico, which is not a communist country.
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: But beyond that, who did come from a communist country?
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: Who did come from a communist country? And by the way,
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: he was shot before he was established. He was an
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: illegal immigrant who came from a communist country, somebody prominent
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: that you might know who came and became more American
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: than any any of the dissenters on my chat. Ironman.
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: Ironman came from a communist country. So I guess we
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: should just shoot her in the streets. And you know,
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: she came arguably illegally. She lied on a visa application,
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: which is which qualifies her as being illegal. So you
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: want Ironmand, he says, Oh, we don't want to shoot them.
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: We just want them to go home. So you want
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: you want to send iron Man home, a twenty four
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: year old, twenty one year old invand you want to
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: ship her up, send her home. She's illegal. She saw
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: a communist country, a communist country. I mean, don't stop
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: to ask what her actual opinions are. No, she saw
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: a communist country, therefore she must go. I mean, I'm sorry, guys,
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: but your arguments are disgrace. They're un American, anti American,
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: anti American, anti their very nature and very essence of
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: what this country stands for and what this country is about.
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: To defend these actions of ice, to defend without any information,
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: but to defend it because it's ice and they're doing
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: God's work. This is again you know the religious mentality
• 51:45
  Speaker 1: of so many out there. Not everybody who supports ICE,
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: I guess, but of a lot. Yeah, okay, knows at
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: least honest. He says, If letting her in means having
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: to let everyone in, well yes, maybe we should have
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: kicked her out. All right, Well, I know that I
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: would oppose that. I believe most of you would oppose that.
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: I consider that, you know, beneath contempt. It is so
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: freaking disgusting to hold a position like that. That is
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: just that is just disgusting. That is just disgusting. And again,
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: anti American, anti American. And I ran right, think about
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: what you contributed to this country, what she contributed our lives.
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: But hell, if it's going to mean other people coming in,
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: oh my god, I can't have that. And maybe, you know,
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: you know, maybe if it was more honest, he'd say,
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: welland it was white. She came from a white country.
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: That's okay. These people come from countries where everybody's brown.
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: That's unacceptable. Anyway, We're now looking at hundreds of thousands
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: of people. Many of them are going to lose their
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: driver's licenses that they got again temporary driver's licenses legally
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: they're going to lose them because now they're not off
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: for sylum anymore. Some of them will leave, but many
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: of them will be rounded up. Some of them won't
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: survive the rounding up. Some of them won't survive that.
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: All right, let's see, oh right, a few of the
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: stories here. Another example of cronyism that I wanted to
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: bring to your attention, want to kind of funny, I
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: guess in a sick way. Bear the German, the German
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: what do you call it? Pharmaceutical company? The German pharmaceutical
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: company actually secured a favorable Supreme Quote ruling a couple
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: of weeks ago. They let the company off the hook
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: for a for a wave of state lawsuits claiming it
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: failed to warn users that the weak killer that they produced,
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: the weed killer that's called what is the weed killer called?
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: It's called round up? Uh, that the weed killer could
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: cause cancer. Bear CEO called it a win. That quote
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: provides a regulator of clouity necessary for innovation innovators like
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: us to develop the agricultural tools that guarantee an affordable
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: food supply. As part of the case, twelve agricultural organizations
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: led by the American f On Bureau and included the
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: National Corn Growers Association and other farming is Association. Fire
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: the friend of the quote brief backing Bear, warning that
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: the loss could jeopardize farmers access to a product they
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: described that's central to modern weed control. Now Bear is
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: asking the US government. Bear is asking the US government
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: to to place tariffs, to place tariffs on Chinese made glyphosate,
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: which is a key ingredient in the weedkiller roundup. And
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: they're alleging that the japan the Chinese are dumping glyphosate
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: in the US and that they're selling it below quote
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: fair value. Guess who's freaking out over this? All the
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: farm groups that just help Bear keep the product, farm
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: groups that helped it defend round up in front of
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court, and now are saying that the move would
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: throw already squeezed farmers into real challenge because the reality
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: is that glypha say Chinese guyphacait, is a lot cheaper
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: than Bear or American produced glyphasay. A recent Texas A
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: and M study found that the types of Judy's Bear
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: is seeking already cost crop goes six point nine billion
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: dollars from twenty one to twenty twenty five. The Bear
• 56:49
  Speaker 1: claims that the domestic glyphasay business as it stands today
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: is not sustainable. This action is needed to support long
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: term use production for American farmers. Production that is expensive.
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: American farmers need cheap. They can get it cheap from China.
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: Why shouldn't they get a chief from China? Uh so? Yep. So,
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: it turns out that Monsanto, which is Bear's US subsidiary,
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: have petitioned the Commerce Department and the US International Trade
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: Commission to seeking anti dumping and contravailing duties tariffs on
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: glyphos said imputation from China. The company is asking for
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: duicies a steep as sixty eight point nine percent to
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: four hundred and forty six percent. Imagine how much the
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: cost is going to rise for American farmers. Bear is
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: the only company still manufacturing glypher sid in the US,
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: though it supplies to off the sixty percent of what's
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: sold domestically, meaning a large share of the market, including
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: Chinese supply, would be directly affected by the new duties. Yeah,
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's the That's what happens once you
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: give the government power to choose winners and losers to place,
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: you know, to decide, look at the list policies and
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: what can come in what mustn't. It provides a massive
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: incentive for companies like Bayer or Monsanto to go after
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: the competitors in other countries, particularly if they're Chinese, because
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: we all hate China to do it. All, right, give
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: me a second. It's pretty stunning. It's pretty stunning. His candle.
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: He says, if if glyphys Say causes one death, we
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: should ban it, no matter how good it does, how
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: much good it does. Just like Ice. Yeah, if Glypha
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: Said violated the rights of Americans generally and made a
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: bunch of Americans sick, a bunch of people living in
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: America sick, and one person died of that sickness, then yeah,
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: they'd be a massive lawsuit and you would sue the
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: hell out of them, and you would ultimately ban it.
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: Ice violates the rights of hundreds of thousands of immigrants
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: of this country, puts them in detention centers, kills some
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: of them, and yeah, it should be banned. We have
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: a country of laws, a country of rights. If you
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: violate the individual rights of people living in America, yeah, you,
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: as an organization, you should be banned. We don't live
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: in analchy. We don't live in fascism, where you know,
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: the government can do whatever the hell it wants as
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: long a it's for the greater good, as long as
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: we have some utility function that shows that ice overall
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: does good. No, it's viol any rights banned, and it's
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: not violating rights just by killing somebody. It's violating rights
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: by handcuffing them and abusing them and banging somebody's head
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: against the wall, which is a story you we put
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: it on yesterday, and treating them like they're not human beings,
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: putting them in detention centers without actual treating them with
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 1: the idea of they have rights. They're not animals. Now,
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: if they criminals, great, criminals lose some amount of number
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: of their rights, okay, but these are not criminals. Criminals
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: are defined as people who violate other people's rights. They steal,
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: they motor they threaten. Yeah, those real criminals. Yeah, they
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: should go to jail. It's okay to handcuff them and
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: treat them like that. But these are hard working people
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: who came to Mexico thirty five years ago and have
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: been living in the American dream and have become Americans
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: by all the intent. They just don't have the papers.
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 1: And it's okay to shoot them for the great good
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 1: because ICE generally is doing good work. It's okay to
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: shoot them once in a while, not all the time.
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: All Right, I've been told not to look at the comments,
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: so I'm going to ignore you. Now. Let's see if
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: I can pull that off, all right, quickly, on rent
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: control on on Twitter, this graph is circulating. It's basically
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: a graph of UH basically looking at polls, looking at
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: whether Americans support rent control. These are the Americans who
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: who are not communists supposedly anyway, right, these are the
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: Americans who believe in you know, individual rights and capitalism anyway.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: They look at support among Americans from Atlanta, Georgia, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Detroit,
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: you know, all the way to Washington, d C. All
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: the major cities in the United States, to what extent
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: do they support rent control? And they look at it.
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: They segregate the data from Democrats, lean liberal, lean conservative.
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: And what's astounding from this graph. What's astounding is, then
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: no matter whether you lean liberal or lean conservative, more
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: than fifty percent support wink control. More than fifty percent
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: of conservatives and way more than fifty percent of liberals
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 1: people lean in that direction support wink control. Rein control
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 1: is one of the most popular policies in the country.
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: This is why Mamdani is not being hood politically by
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: his you know, strong enforcement and advocacy of end control.
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: So this is astounding because of all the kind of
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: economic questions that we have out there, the one that
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: the experts, the economists you know, kind of agree on left,
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: right and center leaning, liberal leaning conservative, they all agree
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: the ring control is incredibly damaging. All the experience we
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 1: have from all over the world, and this experiment has
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: been run thousands of times, is all consistent. It's a failure.
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: So the literature, the experts, repeated experiments, all show that
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 1: rein control is horrible. It hurts the people that's supposed
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: to help, and yet people still support it. It's people
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: don't care about facts. They don't care about reality. You
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: don't care about what works and what doesn't. This is
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 1: you know, altruism driving people. You know, people can't afford rent,
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: we need to help them. This is populism, the complete
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: rejection of expert opinion. This is why direct democracy would
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: be an unmitigated disaster. But even representational democracy is a
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: challenge when the overwhelming majority of people like this support
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: bad policy. People are unbelievably ignorant and driven by a
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: morality towards policies. I mean now, the one that is
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: very popular both by almost everybody's minium wage, even though
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: it's a disaster for the people you're trying to help.
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 1: So we've got we've got a population that ignores the science,
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: the data, the evidence, reality in order to appease their
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: altruistic guilt. We really have a population driven by again
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: this religious mentality. What is a religious mentality? You believe
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: things by faith. To hell with evidence, t with facts
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: that with science, tell with experts. We just believe this
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: on faith. All right, give me one second. Fraya fay
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: faya completely different when moving uh from possi for a minute,
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: or that we'll come back to the United States. Oh
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: we're going along. Faya Freya is a Ukrainian anti ballistic
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: missile system which is in development in Ukraine. It is
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: analogous to the Patriots Patriots system, but just is a
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: lot cheaper, easier to mass produce, because you know it's
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: easy to mass produce there for it's cheaper, and it's
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: something the Ukrainians are developing and working with other countries
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: in Europe to put together. It's it's in the works.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: You know. It's clear that Europe needs massive air defense systems,
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: given the pounding Ukraine is getting from Russia. And yet
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: they they cannot rely in the United States because the
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: United States takes forever to produce one Patriot missile. And
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: they can't rely in the United States because the United
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: States could be Europe's enemy's best friend. It's not to
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: be trusted. So, as Zelenski says, Patriots a number one.
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: We're grateful to the United States and to Europeans who
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: have helped us with those systems. And there are also,
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: i guess, an next generation French systems, but what we
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: need is something cheaper, simpler that can be produced in mass.
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 1: For both the French system and the Patriots, production is
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: limited and the wait lists are very long. So Europe
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 1: is going to build something called Freia. And generally what
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: you're seeing around the world is a great emphasis on
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: air defense systems. A rejection of the Russian and Chinese
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: air defense systems is not very good. Well, it's pathetically bad.
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 1: See Venezuela, see Iran, see Syria, and therefore a search
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: for alternatives really across the entire globe. So we're seeing
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: that in Ukraine and Europe. We're seeing that in Israel
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: as all as now developing the Hour four and Hour five.
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: They have one, two and three in operation in Israel.
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 1: These are going to be even more sophisticated air defense
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: systems than what Israel already has and what the Patriot offers.
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: They are also going to these are these are really
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: the highest end missile defense systems probably in the world,
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: and they are you know, giving to go to a
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: build them and to develop the productive ability, the production
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: ability to produce all the missiles in house so they
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: don't have to rely on the Americans. Germany has already
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: bought arrow systems for its own defense, but as well
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: expects many more countries to order these defense systems. As
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: you know, as the threat of ballistic missiles, the threat
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: of drones becomes more and more real from many countries
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: out there. So Germany is only European country to have
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: bought this. My guess is other countries are buying this,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: they're just not advertising it. They don't want their enemies
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: to know that they have it. Maybe they don't even
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: want their population to know that they're buying stuff from Israel.
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: Israel also has developed the iron Beam, the laser system
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: against drones. I'm sure there's a lot of demand for
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: that around the world, as well as doing very well
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: in exporting defense technology. And just today it was reported
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: that Raphael Rafael is the company that develops some, not all,
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: many of the high tech defense systems that Israel has.
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: It is developer I think of the arrow and is
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 1: definitely developer of the iron dome that Raphael is in
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: talks with Indian defense companies in India to set up
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 1: production lines in India for iron Dome interceptors. Right now,
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: there are production lines in Israel and the production lines
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: in the United States, but they have limited capacity. India
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: has the potential to produce vast numbers of these interceptors,
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: and at the same time, this would allow Israel to
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: start exporting these systems because the launcher and the computer
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: that manages the launcher, that's the real tech. And then
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: you know, but where Israel's limited is in the number
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: of interceptors that can be outsourced to India to produce.
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: And I expect against iron domes to be in high
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: demand all over the world, all over the world. All right,
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: this is kind of the climate change story that you know,
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: This stuff about climate change is still out there anyway.
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: There was a ruling by the International Court of Justice,
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: International Court of Justice which the United States is not
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: a significant or, but European countries are. Are they issould
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: a landmark a landmark unanimous decision. It was an advisory opinion,
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: advisory opinion that clarified the nations have binding legal obligations
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: to protect the climate. It stated that failing to regulate emissions,
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: granting new fossil fuel licenses, or providing subsidies a constitute.
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: Subsidies to fossil fuel constitute an internationally wrongful act, making
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: states liable for reparations. Do you get that? So the
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: country allows people to drove for oil, the liable for
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: reparations called victims of climate change. I guess the poor
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: countries in the world who could sue them in international court.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: It's the state's responsibility to mitigate emissions and if they
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: do act in an opposite way, then they are libel
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: liable for reparations. Well, according to a report from a
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: UK think tank called Policy Exchange. Two writers, a former
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court justice in the UK and a former Lord
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: Chief Justice, have criticized the worlding by International Court, saying
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: it had gone too far and straight into issues beyond
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: it to remit now. This advisory opinion was published about
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: a year ago, again stated that countries had a binding
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: legal duty to prevent climate harm and could be sued
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: for compensation if they failed. The You and General Assembly
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: has seen has since endorsed opinion in a non binding resolution,
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: which the UK Government, by the way, supported, But Policy
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: Exchange says this is going to generate a massive new
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: wave of litigation with significant risks to the UK government.
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: They're analyzed the exposure of the UK government because of
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: drilling in the North Sea and they estimate that the
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: UK government would be responsible for four trillion trillion trillion
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: dollars of reparations to low carbon countries supposedly harmed by
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: the emissions by UK phossuth yus h uh anyway, this
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: is uh, this is crazy stuff. I'm waiting to see
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: if any government ever pays anything for this. But this
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: is really crazy stuff. The uh, the the the the
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: paper that came out criticizing the i c J verdict
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: says radical that that this was a radical departure from
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: its proper role in some of its recent decisions undermines
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: the whole basis on which it can continue to claim
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: the respect of the international community community. The function of
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: the court of law, whether the international domestic, is to
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: declare the law as it is and not as a
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 1: judges as the judge. Its judges conceive that it ought
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: to be for any tribunal which respects the rule of law.
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: Necessity cannot be the mother of invention anyway for trillion dollars.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: That that that is uh fascinating, and of course that
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: gives even more impetus to those who would like to
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: stop any drilling for phossil fuels. All Right, I have
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: to I have to read you something from Candice Ow.
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: I know, I I I try to minimize this, but
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: you know this this week we've seen, uh, the the
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: preliminary hearings for the murderer of Charlie Cook Tyler Robinson's
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: uh and there being preliminary hearings where his roommates and
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: maybe lover has said that he hadmitted to doing it
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: and expressed regrets. But basically is confessed to it anyway.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: Candice Owen, who is committed to the idea that Charlie
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: Coke the Tyler Robinson, the accused killer, did not kill
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: Charlie Cooke uh and uh basically is committed to other
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: interpretations of who killed Charlie Cooke. She said this week
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: that if Tyler Robbins quote, if Tyler Robins defense would
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: like to contact me, then suppose she's convinced. She has
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: a bunch of stuff for them to show that it
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: wasn't Tyler Robbinson, even though he thinks it was him.
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: He confessed to his roommate. He turned himself in. But
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: according to Canadas, the real villains behind Cooke's death are
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: some kind of dark cabal that includes Israel, Ben Shapiro
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: and Charlie Cooke's wife, Everic Cook. Cook. Uh, it's just
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: it's just, you know, this is really amazing. And then
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: you know, in part of this ranch, she posts the
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: following This is from her Twitter accountant, this is this
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: your daily reminder that Charlie Cook always hated Ben Shapiro.
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: He thought he was an israel first Jew supremacist, and
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: for years Andrew Covert pretended to hate Ben as well
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: until the moment Charlie died. Andrew Covert encompasses the spirit
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: of Judas, she continues, people who worship the Prince of
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: Darkness cannot create. Creation can only come from the Creator.
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: When you turn your back to God and god Ness,
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: your only option is to lie, steal, cheat, ensue others
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: who embody true and good, truth and goodness. Every day Ben,
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: this is Ben Shapiro wakes up and focuses on who
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: and what he can destroy and take from. He is
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: filled with satisfaction when children in the Middle East are
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: ruthlessly murdered so his people can steal from them. Charlie
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: sensed that darkness early. Ben envied that Charlie had natural
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: light within him. He plotted to stifle it while Charlie
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: was alive and in death, and it seems evident he
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: wanted to steal what Charlie had built in death, just
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: as he did to Andrew Breitbod. Oh, so maybe he
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: killed but Andrew Bitbod as well. Unbelievable and what's fascinating
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: he is? Then? Of course, her conspiracy theory is not
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: the only one out there. There's whole industry around Charlie
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: Coke conspiracy theories who killed Charlie Cooke? One turning point,
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: USA Erica Cooke or the mocade is always involved in
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: the in the murder. I mean this is primarily Candice owned,
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: but other people have suggested the same thing, right, and
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: uh A peddling it constantly. Other ones the CIA programmed
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 1: Robinson as part of a mind control mission. Uh, there
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: are people out there, uh, you know, Tormonial and that
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: that claimed that the CIA programs people to do this.
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: Maybe even Charlie Manson, Charles Manson was was influenced by
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 1: these experiments. Right, and Cook's murder was also mentioned by
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 1: O'Neill recently as maybe this was a product of the
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: CIA's mind experiments. A third option is that it's a
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: false flag, deep state inside job. You know, maybe Trump
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: ordered the murder to distract us off from the Epstein files, Right,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: who knows, Maybe that's it. Maybe it's part of a
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: vast domestic terror movement, and maybe it's just the state's hoax,
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: a psychop or fake death. There's a YouTube out there,
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 1: Jesse something and a bunch of others who've claimed that
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: Cook faked his death as indeed alive and well and
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: self sustaining in a doomsday home in Montana with his family.
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: Now you got to ask the question, why, you know,
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: what is it about Charlie Cooks the death? I mean,
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: there are lots of conspiracy theories out there. What is
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 1: it about Charlie Cook's death that just ASO explains the
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: number of people in the the frequency and the number
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: of different conspiracy theories around it. And you know the
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: same thing with were JFK and other prominent murders. And
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: one explanation of it is that people can't comprehend in
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: a sense the banality of it. Some idiot who was
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: radicalized online but you know, has has I don't know,
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 1: left wing ideas and and and thought Charlie Cooke was
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: obnoxious and evil and bad decided one day to take
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: us to his rifle and climb a roof and shoot
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: the guy. And he he's probably psychologically screwed up and
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 1: messed up and probably thought, you know, maybe he was
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: saying civilization from this evil of Charlie Cooke. But it
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: wasn't planned, you know, sophisticated planning. And and and that
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: this is not a conspiracy and there's not a bunch
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: of people involved, just a guy. The same with JFK.
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: It's just a guy. Just like when right wing radicalized
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: extremists go out and mass shoot people, which happens actually
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: more often than radicalized left wing people at least did
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: until this last year. It yeah, I mean these things,
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: these people are crazy. But that's a tough explanation. You mean,
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: so much of life is dependent on sometimes these flu
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: crazy events which have no you know, grand explanation. Religion
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: teaches us that can't happen. Religion teaches us as again
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: the religious mentality right. Religion teaches us that. Religion teaches
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: us that everything has a purpose, that everything is guided,
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: that everything has an angle, that God has a purpose
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: for every death, that God has something in mind. The
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: universe is ordered up to every person's decision. There is
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: no real free will. It's all Peter determined. God knows
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: it all. It's very difficult then, to explain these kind
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: of almost random events where people make decisions and go
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: and act as independent agents and do really horrible things.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 1: There has to be something behind it. There has to
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: be some bigger reason, There has to be some bigger purpose.
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: It's stunning. Oh, this is why you get conspiracies as
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: things that happen that we don't like, Well, we need
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 1: to blame somebody, and the blame has to be concrete
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: and real, so it's understandable by not very smart people,
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: not very smart people. And so you need the Jews,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: you need something concrete, You need something simple. Some conspiracy,
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: some cabal, some you know, meeting somewhere that where they
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: run the world from. That's easy to understand. Yep. All right,
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: Finally a piece of good news, a piece of good news,
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: and then I'll go to your questions running long today.
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: And there's a soccer game soon, although we are short
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: on the super check question. So if we have anybody
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: out there with some fifty dollars or twenty dollars questions,
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: now's the time, now's the time. All right. The good
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 1: news is us life expectancy is going to reach a
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: record high because deaths are falling to record lows right now.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: In twenty twenty five, actually fell in twenty twenty five.
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: You have death rate dropped to a record low in
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. Now, why why is this? Well, it's
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 1: because of the stuff I've kind of be tolding you.
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 1: First of all, murders are way down. People are dying
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 1: less because they're murdered less. Over those deaths way down.
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 1: People overdosing less. I don't think they're using drugs less,
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: but they're overdosing less. Maybe they're being more picky about
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: who they buy their drugs from. If drugs were legal,
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: a lot fewer people would die because then you'd have
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 1: ways to verify the quality of the drugs. Now, it's
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 1: still true that the leading cause of death in twenty
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: twenty five continues to be heart disease, followed closely by
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: cancer than unintentional injuries, which include drug overdoses. But drug
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: overdoses is way down. They're still high, but less from
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: the peaks in uh, you know, a few years ago.
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 1: This is one experts is expectancy is going to be
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: affected a lot by what's happening at younger age groups
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: more than at older age groups. As we see a
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 1: dramatic decline in drug overdose among young adults, that will
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: have a more measurable impact on life expectancy at old
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 1: ages and overall life expectancy of the population. Yeah, so
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: we're seeing a few people die in America. Even though
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: the number of old people is at record highs. The
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: number dying is at record lows, which is great. Of
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: course that ember dying. You know, the years death rate
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 1: is a rate per one hundred thousand, per one hundred thousand,
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: it's the lowest I think recorded in this graph goes
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: back to the nineties, but supposely it's the lowest recorded
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 1: death rate on a basis of two hundred thousand. So yeah,
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: people are maybe eating healthier, sleeping better, exercising more. We
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: have more drugs, the legal kind to help prevent people
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: from dying, keep them alive, and as I said, less
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: drug overdoses, less murders, and even less accidents on the road.
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: And I think that's going to decline dramatically as we
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: get self driving. Cause so yeah, it's uh, this is
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 1: this is good news. This is good news, and it's
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: it's potentially is going to get much better. Potentially is
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 1: going to get much better. Uh. I love this. Canvas
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 1: says in arguing that it's the left, it commits more violence.
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 1: How many times have they tried to kill Trump? But
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: you see this is the conspiracy mentality. They haven't tried
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 1: to kill Trump. Some crazy people who are leftists. All
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: of them are leftists, we assume, or quite crazy I've
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: tried to kill Trump, but there's no conspiracy to kill Trump.
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: I mean, there may be an Iranian conspiracy to kill Trump,
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: but there's no leftist conspiracy to kill Trump. But when
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 1: you say how many times have they moments and the
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: reality is that people motivated by leftist ideas, if you
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: take out the last year, people motivated by right wing
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 1: ideas have killed more people than people motivated by left
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 1: wing ideas. This has been tried over and over and
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: over and over and over again. You get the data
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 1: and it's clear now that's not true. In twenty twenty five.
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: In twenty twenty five, the left overtook the right. But
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 1: if you look at all those manifestos against Jews and
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 1: against immigrants, they go to know Walmart and they shoot
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: it up, or they go into synagogue and they shoot
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 1: it up, or they go into a church and they
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: shoot people motivated at black church because the motivated by racism,
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: those are motivated very right wing ideas, and those overwhelmingly
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: are larger numbers on a year a year basis than
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: people motivate by left wing ideas. And that's just the reality.
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 1: That's just the reality. You can pretend it isn't. But
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: that's okay because you know that's again part of the
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: religious mentality is data doesn't matter. Facts don't matter. My beliefs,
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 1: which are intrinsic, that's what matter. I know that the
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 1: left is more violent than the right if I know
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 1: what is true and what is not, and God forbid
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: you actually bring data to the picture. Islamism doesn't kill
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: a lot of people in the United States. It does
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 1: once in a while you get a terrorist at tech
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 1: in the US, but it's small. With the exclusion of
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: nine to eleven, you had very few Islamist terrorist attacks
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: in the US that have killed relatively few people. You know,
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 1: certainly has compared to Europe and certainly as compared to
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 1: what the right and the left do to ourselves in
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: the United States. What right wing ideas tell a Christian
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 1: to go into a church and kill people racism. Racism
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 1: is generally considered a right wing idea anti immigration, in
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 1: blaming the Jews for conspiring to bring immigrants in associated
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 1: with right wing groups. Right wing ideas. Again, it's not
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 1: those groups have a conspiracy to do that, but they
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: radicalize people around those ideas, and those people go and
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: they act on them. Just like it happens on the left.
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: To pretend that none of that is right wing, it's ridiculous.
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 1: Why exclude nine to eleven only because it's an outlier.
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: Clearly it's an outlier, not in terms of the intention
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 1: of the Islamists. They would love to having a nine
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: to eleven every day, but practically there haven't been that
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 1: many service attacks on US soil with exception of nine
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 1: to eleven. That's a big gin uh. And the only
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 1: reason they've been some attacks on US soil and in
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: Europe since then is because our response was so weak.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: Our response was so weak. Anyway, I don't want to
• 1:34:20
  Speaker 1: debate this, all right, Uh, that is the news for
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 1: this July tenth, Friday, July tenth. All right, let's go
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: to your super chat questions. I'll remind you that I'm
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 1: raising money for a series of documentaries that will feature
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 1: me and in London. We've got a production team. It's
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: gonna be it's gonna be high quality, uh video. It's
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: this is an attempt to grow the round book channel
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 1: with high quality videos out there. Hopefully they will increase,
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 1: significantly increase subscribers, as I've said, as subscriptions are increasing
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: right now at a really really really high pace. I
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: don't think it's sustainable, but right now that really going
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: gangbusters at about a pace of over one thousand a month,
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: which is great. Hopefully this will go back to that
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 1: or maybe even be bigger than that, So that is
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: that is something we're doing. I'm hoping that you guys
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: will consider supporting my efforts in that regard by contributing
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: to this effort. We're trying to raise fifteen thousand dollars
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: one to five and we've already raised ten, so we're
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 1: looking for five thousand dollars. Maybe five people do one
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars each, or maybe ten people do five hundred
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: dollars or some combination, maybe to fifteen, maybe seventy five, whatever,
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: whatever you guys think you can do. You can go
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: to patreon dot com, look up your on book show
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: and look at the posts, and you'll find a post
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: describing the project and giving you links to how to
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: actually contribute to it. There you can use a credit card,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: you can use PayPal. Either way is works, so please
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 1: consider doing that. Sunday we'll have a show with Nikos.
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: We will be talking about egalitarianism and Cambodia, the Kama
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: Rouge in Cambodia as being the ultimate, the ultimate manifestation
• 1:36:20
  Speaker 1: of egalitarianism. And we'll give you that history. I don't
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: think that history is very well known, and we'll tie
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: it to the thinkers of the time. And so that
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: is good. That is good. Philosophical detections is more subscribers
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: is good. Yes, it is good. But for that I
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: need to be able to raise the money. I need
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: to do some new projects. We need to create some
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: new product and get it out there. Anyway, Nikos and
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 1: I will be on a three pm East Coast time
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: on Sunday talking about egalitarianism and Cambodia Kame Rouge. So
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: check that out. Somebody was asking of the we've got
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: the Nico show. On tomorrow, there will be a show.
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: The show will be again at like today at one
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: pm East Coast time, and the show tomorrow will be
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: focused on let me see some some segments. I'll be
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: analyzing some segments from doctor Mike Israel's interview with doctor
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: Mike whoever that is. Mike Israel is a fitness coach,
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: but he has a few segments talk the way he
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 1: talks about he talks about capitalism, he talks about altruism,
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 1: he he talks about a few other things. What else
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: does he talk about? So a few other philosophical issues
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: that he raises that I'm going to talk about. So
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 1: I're going to play his video and comment on it,
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 1: and uh it should be fun, it should be interesting.
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 1: He's entertaining, he's very articulate. He's an Ironman fan. He
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 1: has in the path past commented on Iineman. So we're
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 1: not gonna discuss his views on health. When to discuss
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: his views on capitalism and pharma and uh other other
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: stuff other stuff anyway, Yeah, I'm just looking once second.
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: What I'm trying to look at what the other stuff was?
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: I know it was here and I had it in
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: an email and I can't find it anyway, Uh it is,
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: Oh there it is all right. Uh M, you'll find
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: out tomorrow going to talk about all that stuff. We'll
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: talk about all that stuff, all right. That is about
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: one o'clock. Let's jump into this. Let's see Andrew Fouit
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: for thought regarding your rant course, her passion for individualism. Quote.
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: If life could have a theme, Sung, mine would be individualism, selfishness.
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 1: See virtual selfishness into capitalism. High time for the choice
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 1: between altruism and freedom to be made clear. Yeah, I
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 1: mean absolutely. You know, as I said, ethics will be
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: at the centerpiece of this. So individualism is really the
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: morality of egoism and its political manifestation individual liberty, individual freedom,
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: individual rights, and that'll be my focus when talking about capitalism.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: We're not going to do a whole thing on capitalism
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: because I've got a course on the Pedison Academy that's
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 1: eight hours on capitalism. So I will devote this discussion
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: of her politics to the idea of the application of
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 1: morality in politics, which means the liberation of the mind,
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 1: individual rights, individualism, which is what capitalism really means, and
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: why it's incompatible with altruism, why she believed it was incompatible.
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: So that will be the focus. But thank you Andrew.
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: Keep giving me ideas. You never know what you'll stimulate,
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: and I'm always always looking for ways to improve. All right, Chris,
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: you're on a music reviewer, I follow? I follow with
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: Wayne Cancer? What's this you on a music reviewer? I
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: follow with Wayne Cancer? Was told stop reviewing music, read
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: the Bible, and ask forgiveness because you'll be dead soon,
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: he replied, No, I'm choosing to live. How should someone
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: respond to that. I mean, it depends what he meant
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: exactly right, But I think it's the right response. I
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: think what he means by that is I'm choosing to
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: spend every day of my life while I'm alive, pursuing
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 1: my values. In other words, continue to review music. This
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 1: is my life. I'm not gonna stop living because I'm
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: about to die, like I would say, yeah, I'm about
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: to die, but I'm not going to stop living in
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: the process that, I think in what he means, and
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe not, but that's what how you
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: would interpret him. That is the benevolent interpretation, the right interpretation.
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 1: So it's not so much a response to it, it's
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 1: an articulation of what that actually involves. So if you
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 1: knew you had a week to live, would you stop living?
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: Would you stop pursuing your values? Would you stop enjoying life?
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 1: Would you stop doing the thing that is your life
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 1: in this case of viewing music, No, I don't think
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 1: you will. You should so I think it's a beautiful thing.
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: I think it's a beautiful thing. Argentinian in Taiwan seven
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: hundred Taiwanese dollars new Taiwanese dollars. All right, Hi, doctor Brook,
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: Finally I can tune into your show live staying up
• 1:42:27
  Speaker 1: for the game. What's your opinion on Michael Jackson with
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: a new movie. A lot of people are defending him,
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 1: even if he didn't do it, he was an absolute
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 1: creep geting for Taiwan. Yeah, I mean, I think he's creepy.
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 1: He had an amazing voice, and obviously those who know
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 1: popular music attribute a lot of whatever changes, whatever happened
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 1: at popular music over the last a few decades to him.
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: So he was clearly influential and important in that regard.
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: And I guess he could dance and all of that.
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: But his relationship with children is creepy. He seems like
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: a creep Beyond that, I don't know. I haven't studied it,
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: I haven't looked into it. I don't have a legalistic
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 1: opinion because I haven't done the you'd have to really
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 1: delve into it and figure it out. I'm not interested
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: in seeing the movie because I'm not interested in Michael Jackson.
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 1: I didn't find him music entertaining. I didn't find him entertaining.
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: As you said, I find him to be a creep.
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't go see a movie about him. All right,
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 1: let's move to the two and five dollars questions Loan Descenter.
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: Maybe a show on i RAN's man's rights and the
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: nature of governments. Some chatters here could use an introduction
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 1: or reminded iron RAN's views. I think that that you're
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 1: talking about a beyond hope. I mean, I don't mind
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 1: doing that show for other people who are who I
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 1: think have hope. But the two chatters that that you're
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 1: talking about that beyond hope, they're Ironran. They don't care
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 1: about Iran. They have been infected by a tribe from
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 1: the right and a tribe from the left, and that's
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: what drives them and motivates them. And they're not interested
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 1: in reality, or certainly not in the nine van and
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 1: who ideas? Uh and am I saw on cause talk
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 1: about religious mentality at okon two. But can it become
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 1: non falsifiable to say good means secular and bad means religious? Well, no,
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 1: because I mean I don't know what non fal survivable
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 1: means here. But you know, if you understand where what
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: generates good reason, then good is secular. And if you
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: understand that, mysticism, faith, a rejection of facts and reality,
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: is the source of badness in the world. It generates
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: bad outcomes. It does. You can see it everywhere throughout history,
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 1: and you can see it in your own mind. Play
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 1: it out in your own mind, going by faith, trying
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 1: to build that product on faith, trying to have a
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: relationship on faith. That is, the more you reject reason,
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: the worst life is. The more you reject reason, the
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 1: worst civilization is. That's very falsifiable. The evidence is all
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: around us. It's in your own it's in your own
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 1: experience of your own life, and it's in the history
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 1: of civilization. You can be religious, You can be religious
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: and rational up to a point. By being religious u
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: negating rationality. Thomas the Coin who was rational to a point,
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: and whatever good he produced came from the rational, and
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: ultimately the bad comes from the religion. But you know
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 1: he could not be fully rational. He was not fully
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 1: rational because he sustained his religion. But again, you can
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 1: see what are the origins of good, what are the
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 1: origins of success? And you can see that the origins
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: are in your own life as well as in the culture.
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 1: In your own life as well as in the culture.
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: The origins are reason, reality, facts, evidence, and when you
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 1: ignore that for whatever reason, that's when trouble happens. Canada
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 1: like all people who are not open to the truth,
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 1: says I'm always open to the truth. No, he's not.
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 1: He has no interest in the truth. He is only
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: interested in defending his position, his tribe. Facts matter, not tame.
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 1: Sunday Show with Nico still schedules. Yes, it is tame,
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: like UK police. I don't blame ordinary officers. I blame leadership.
• 1:47:27
  Speaker 1: Can the same be said about ICE leadership and its culture. Yeah? Absolutely,
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: I mean I blame the individuals. Individuals have to take
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: responsibility for their actions. But yes, it's the culture, it's
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 1: the leadership, it's the mission, it's the goals, it's the
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 1: hiving practices, it's the training. ICE is hiving people who
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 1: unqualified for law enforcement work, and it's under training them
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 1: because it needs to ramp up because it got this
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: massive budget. It has so much money that how to
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 1: spend it time. Should ICE agent face criminal prosecution if
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: they act like criminals, Yes they should. You don't give
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: immunity to people tame. What makes Mamdani more popular than
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 1: San Francisco leftist. Is it that he's more policy savvy,
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: economically economic popularis not extremists on crime or CRT. I
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 1: think that's part of it, But I think the rest
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: I think the other part of it is it hasn't
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 1: been tested yet. I mean, if things really deteriorate in
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: New York, if the rental situation goes to hell, if
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 1: everything he promised, you know, the opposite happens like it
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 1: did in San Francisco, Homeless everywhere, crime rising, just becoming
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: a horrible, horrible place, then he will become unpopular. It
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 1: happened to the Blasio in New York City, and it
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 1: will happen to m'mdani. People respond to the state of
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: things as it is perception oriented rather than conception rather
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: than abstract oriented time. People serving in Trump's administration, especially
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 1: pam Bondi, look unseerious, although the Obama administration was bad,
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 1: Eric Holder seemed respectable. Do you agree, Yeah, I mean Pambondi,
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 1: and think about Kash Patel or Heick Seth, Secretary of
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: the of War Secretary. I mean, he's a not serious
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: human being. He's done nothing to justify being Secretary of Defense,
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: and yet there he is so yes, I think, completely unseerious,
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: worse than the Obama administration, even though that wasn't that
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 1: was a really bad administration. By Time says it is
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: Kashpartel the biggest joke in this administration. I know it's
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 1: hard him or Pambondi or what's her name no more,
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 1: but he is a joke. Says you should speak with
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 1: Richard Hernanya. I like Richard Rananya, but you know, we
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: have our differences. And he doesn't seem to take objectivism seriously,
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 1: even though he's been exposed to it and had a
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 1: lengthy conversation I guess with Don Watkins about it, and
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 1: with Alex Epstein. Epstein, Michael, does Japan have a similar
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: attitude towards failure as Europe, whereas China has more like
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 1: Silicon Valley? I think so. I think that's right. China
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: has more of an entrepreneurial and more of a failure
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 1: culture than Japan. Although if you look at Japan in
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 1: the post war period, there were a lot of entrepreneurs.
• 1:50:38
  Speaker 1: I mean, somebody founded all those great Japanese businesses that
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: have done phenomenally well. They had a very innovative, entrepreneurial culture,
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: at least for a while. I think regulations have driven
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 1: that out of them. Suddenly in the post World War
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: two era, they had that, Michael. In an objectivist world,
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 1: there will be no more weirdos, say a few generations
• 1:51:04
  Speaker 1: of objectivism. No, I don't think that's true. Again, free
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 1: will people can, people can make bad choices, become become weirdos.
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 1: There will always be widos. There will always be rational
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 1: people always. We're not programmed by objectivism, and therefore it
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 1: will always be people who choose to go against reality. Michael.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 1: In terms of degrees of evil, would you say gulags
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: were not as bad as concentration camps? Yeah, I guess.
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: I mean there's something uniquely evil, uniquely monstrous about constitution
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 1: camps in the sense that it was industrialized murder, industrialized
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: murder in a way that we've never seen in human history.
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: Kim Michael knows just that a video on why the
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 1: indust Revolution was the wrong thing, worst thing ever? What
• 1:52:03
  Speaker 1: a clown? Really that I have to check out? What
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 1: an unseious human being? If that, if you're if what
• 1:52:12
  Speaker 1: you're describing is right? What what a god? All right?
• 1:52:16
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna check that out with and I will have
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 1: commentary in that once I find the video. Chris, Yes,
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 1: that is what the music reviewer meant. I thought it
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 1: was inspiring. I thought you might have something clever to say.
• 1:52:30
  Speaker 1: If someone told you to quit living and read the Bible,
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 1: well I would have. I would be a lot more
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: angry with the person than that. But that is a
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 1: clever thing to say, and it's it's it's one hundred
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 1: percent right. Good for him, all right, guys, I am
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 1: off to see the soccer. Uh. You know, this weekend
• 1:52:52
  Speaker 1: we have to make up for missed targets on the fundraising,
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 1: on the super chat and the stick aside. We've gone
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 1: four or five days without getting to our target for
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 1: two hour shows, which we have done to our shows,
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 1: So hopefully on Saturday and Sunday we can make up
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 1: the difference. All next week. There will be shows the
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 1: last few days, you know. Then then I start traveling
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 1: later in July. Well, there we know shows, but we
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: need to make it up otherwise we don't want to
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 1: make up. We don't want to make July. We want
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 1: to make sure July is an okay month financially for
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 1: the run book show uh and and keep the momentum
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: going in terms of growth in every aspect. So I
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 1: will see you tomorrow with some you know, some commentary
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 1: and we will meet up on Sunday with Nikos. Bye, everybody,