Latest / Inside Politics / Will the Coalition split or stay together? We explain the dramatic about-face
Transcript
- 0:01S1: From the newsrooms of the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.
- 0:03S1: This is inside politics. I'm Jacqueline Maley, it's Thursday, May 22nd.
- 0:10S1: It was high drama this week, with the nationals telling
- 0:13S1: the liberals that they wanted a political divorce, a possible
- 0:16S1: split in the coalition, which has existed in some form
- 0:19S1: or another since 1923, was sparked by nationals leader David
- 0:23S1: Littleproud insisting on certain policies, notably an ongoing commitment to
- 0:28S1: nuclear power, which Liberal leader Sussan Ley felt she could
- 0:31S1: not agree to. But by Thursday afternoon the separation, like
- 0:35S1: a marriage on the rocks, was placed on hold while
- 0:37S1: further conversations took place. So what happened and what's going
- 0:41S1: to be better for both parties and indeed for the
- 0:44S1: political health of the nation? Here to discuss all this drama,
- 0:48S1: we have our freshly minted chief political commentator, James Massola,
- 0:52S1: and also freshly minted, our political correspondent Natassia Chrysanthos. Welcome
- 0:56S1: to you both. James, tell us how these dramatic events
- 0:59S1: came about. We know that nationals leader David Littleproud drove
- 1:02S1: to Albury on Wednesday last week to negotiate the coalition
- 1:05S1: agreement with the new Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, who was
- 1:08S1: with her dying mother. What did Littleproud want? What were
- 1:11S1: his demands?
- 1:13S2: Look, the starting point for the demands, jacki, was four
- 1:17S2: things he wanted the coalition or the nationals, one of
- 1:21S2: the coalition, to remain committed to nuclear power, to remain
- 1:25S2: committed to laws that could potentially force supermarkets to sell
- 1:30S2: some of their outlets if they were found to be,
- 1:32S2: you know, engaged in anti-competitive conduct, um, you know, to divest, um,
- 1:38S2: they wanted a $20 billion regional future fund, uh, which
- 1:43S2: they'd taken to the last election to be kept in place.
- 1:46S2: And they wanted basically updated provisions for the universal service
- 1:50S2: obligation that, uh, telecoms providers are obligated to provide, which means,
- 1:57S2: you know, decent reception essentially for your mobile phone in
- 2:00S2: the bush, Decent mail service, those sorts of things.
- 2:03S1: And they also were asking for basically no cabinet solidarity
- 2:07S1: that they wouldn't have to be bound by cabinet solidarity
- 2:09S1: with the liberals. Right?
- 2:11S2: Yeah. Which look, quite frankly, is an extraordinary request and
- 2:15S2: unprecedented request and one that, you know, no leader could
- 2:18S2: ever agree to. But yes, that was the final thing.
- 2:21S2: It's something that David Littleproud didn't mention at all during
- 2:25S2: his sort of, you know, the big press conference announcing
- 2:28S2: the split, but which the liberals have been very keen
- 2:30S2: to say, well, hang on, there was this other thing
- 2:32S2: and it's kind of a non-negotiable.
- 2:33S1: So they're basically saying we demand these four key policies, which,
- 2:37S1: to be fair, are nationalist policies that they're obviously they've
- 2:39S1: developed and they stand by. But we also want the
- 2:43S1: right to speak out against any other policies within the
- 2:46S1: coalition that we don't agree with.
- 2:48S2: Yeah. And, you know, to my exact point like that
- 2:50S2: would be unprecedented, Jack. You don't get the luxury of
- 2:54S2: doing that. You have the argument in the cabinet room
- 2:56S2: or the shadow Cabinet Room. This is how politics has
- 2:59S2: worked for, you know, You know, 130, whatever it is,
- 3:01S2: years you have the arguments in the room, you settle
- 3:04S2: the position, you come out and you present a united front.
- 3:07S2: So for the Nats and the libs to be sort
- 3:09S2: of if, if it were to have been approved for
- 3:12S2: them to be coming out saying, well, we take a
- 3:14S2: different position on this, it would be without precedent.
- 3:17S1: Yeah. It was almost like a sort of a demand
- 3:18S1: that there was no way that Susan Lee was ever
- 3:20S1: going to be able to take it up to us.
- 3:23S1: How did Lee respond to those demands? So there in
- 3:25S1: Albury and Susan Lee, we should say, is having the
- 3:27S1: worst week of her life or one of the worst
- 3:29S1: weeks of her life, because she's nursing her mother through
- 3:31S1: her last days of her life and then having to
- 3:33S1: arrange a funeral. So all of this is happening in
- 3:36S1: tandem with that, um, Littleproud comes to her with these demands.
- 3:40S1: What does she say?
- 3:41S3: She says no. In short, um, and that's for a
- 3:46S3: kind of two main reasons. On the cabinet solidarity point.
- 3:49S3: As James just mentioned, it's untenable to have shadow ministers
- 3:53S3: who disagree with the position of the party. Um, so
- 3:57S3: that was never going to work. And then on the
- 3:59S3: policy points. So these were coalition policies going into the election.
- 4:03S3: The National's argument were these are the policies we promised
- 4:06S3: voters who elected us. We owe it to them. But
- 4:10S3: Lee came out on her first day as leader and
- 4:13S3: said no policies adopted, no policies abandoned. We are going
- 4:16S3: to start from scratch on everything. And she made that
- 4:19S3: as an undertaking to her party room, and she made
- 4:21S3: that as an undertaking to the Australian people. Um, and so,
- 4:26S3: you know, you can see both of their interests coming
- 4:28S3: through here. Um, the nationals have fought hard for these policies.
- 4:31S3: They said, we want to go forward and build on them.
- 4:33S3: We don't have to want to have to relitigate all
- 4:35S3: of those things. That's a reasonable point from their perspective.
- 4:39S1: I mean, in defence of the Nat's position, I suppose
- 4:41S1: they're saying that they want to keep faith with the
- 4:42S1: voters that have just elected them on the back of
- 4:45S1: these policies. But the liberals have a divergent sort of interest,
- 4:48S1: which is we just got roundly sort of executed at
- 4:52S1: the polls because of our policies. So we obviously need
- 4:55S1: to rebuild and remake those policies to keep faith with
- 4:58S1: our voters.
- 4:59S3: Yeah, and that was the point that Zoe McKenzie, um,
- 5:02S3: a Liberal moderate MP made this week, which is, I think,
- 5:06S3: why a few liberals are saying, you know, this is
- 5:08S3: kind of the way it is those policies let the
- 5:10S3: nationals keep all of their seats. And those policies potentially
- 5:15S3: contributed to the loss of dozens of Liberal seats. So
- 5:17S3: they've got very different interests here.
- 5:19S1: Therein lies the entire sort of dilemma. Lee, after this,
- 5:22S1: she said no to those demands. The Nats had a
- 5:25S1: party room meeting and they decided they were not going
- 5:27S1: to back down. Lee put a counter offer, I think,
- 5:30S1: in the following days, and said she just wanted to
- 5:31S1: sort the frontbench out first and, you know, her shadow ministry.
- 5:35S1: And then the Nats had another meeting, I think, on
- 5:37S1: Tuesday morning. And that was when they decided to formally
- 5:39S1: break with the liberals. But how much notice, James, did
- 5:42S1: David Littleproud give uh, give Sussan Ley before he announced
- 5:46S1: it publicly.
- 5:47S2: It was about 45 minutes. Um, yeah. They met Tuesday
- 5:50S2: morning at around 1015, 1030. I just happened to be
- 5:54S2: walking around the corridors of Parliament and saw Littleproud walking
- 5:57S2: into Lee's office. Um, we know it was from what
- 6:00S2: Susan said, a 30 minute meeting, pretty quick and fairly
- 6:03S2: pro forma. And then he walked out and said, right,
- 6:05S2: you know, 45 minutes notice.
- 6:07S4: Our party room has got to a position where we
- 6:10S4: will not be reentering a coalition agreement with the Liberal
- 6:13S4: Party after this election.
- 6:16S2: So she convened Sussan Ley an emergency meeting of the
- 6:19S2: Liberal Party party room to let them know what had happened.
- 6:23S5: And while I have enormous respect for David and his team,
- 6:27S5: it is disappointing that the National Party has decided today
- 6:33S5: to leave the coalition. But the most important thing I
- 6:36S5: want to say is this the nationals door remains open
- 6:40S5: and our door remains open, and we look forward with
- 6:43S5: optimism to rejoining at some point in the future.
- 6:47S2: If we could just dial back one step here, Jackie.
- 6:49S2: I want to make a couple of points. Susan Lee's
- 6:52S2: been the leader of the Liberal Party for. I think
- 6:54S2: it's nine days now. This happened on the seventh day.
- 6:57S2: Her mum had died three days earlier. She was in Albury,
- 7:02S2: you know, beginning to make the arrangements for, um, for
- 7:04S2: a funeral. Um, she had said very clearly and very publicly,
- 7:08S2: we are going to take our time and digest this
- 7:11S2: election result because, you know, as Tarr said, it was
- 7:13S2: a thumping.
- 7:14S5: Can I firstly thank David Littleproud for driving down the
- 7:17S5: Hume Highway to meet me in my office in my
- 7:20S5: home town so that I could spend my mum's final
- 7:24S5: days close to her.
- 7:26S2: The Liberal Party hadn't even had a chance to meet
- 7:29S2: to consider the National Party's demands. Those four main demands,
- 7:33S2: all four of them, are probably likely to have been
- 7:36S2: supported by the Liberal Party.
- 7:37S1: The policies?
- 7:38S2: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sorry. Yes. The policies. Yeah. But it
- 7:40S2: was a timing thing. The Nats wanted it immediately. It was, um,
- 7:44S2: you know, in my view, uh confected demands. I mean,
- 7:47S2: it's not like, um, the liberals suddenly going to completely
- 7:50S2: change what they believe and say, no, we're not going
- 7:52S2: to do any of this stuff that we've believed in until,
- 7:55S2: you know, six weeks ago or whenever the election was.
- 7:57S2: It's a confected set of reasons to leave. I think
- 8:01S2: the real reason why the Nats have left is because
- 8:03S2: of net zero. Now they deny that.
- 8:05S1: And just remind listeners that the coalition remains formally committed
- 8:09S1: to net zero emissions by 2050. But obviously, we know
- 8:13S1: that the nationals have been very keen to abandon that
- 8:16S1: arrangement and want the liberals to do so, too. So
- 8:18S1: that's sort of been a key tension point in the
- 8:21S1: climate wars over the last ten years, you could say.
- 8:24S1: Let's turn to what happened on Thursday afternoon. Now, it's
- 8:28S1: hard to keep up, actually, with what seems to be
- 8:30S1: like a toxic marriage, where one minute there's a breakup,
- 8:33S1: the next minute there's a make up, just like the
- 8:35S1: Katy Perry song. Tell us what's happened on Thursday afternoon.
- 8:38S3: So, quite remarkably, 48 hours after David Littleproud said the
- 8:43S3: nationals would be leaving the coalition for the first time
- 8:45S3: in 38 years, that is no longer definitely the case.
- 8:49S3: So Littleproud on Thursday gave a sudden press conference in
- 8:53S3: the corridors of parliament.
- 8:55S6: All good.
- 8:57S4: Thank you. We've, uh you're right.
- 9:00S3: In which he said that the breakup was basically a
- 9:03S3: break and they were on pause.
- 9:05S4: In a mature and sensible way. And I'm proud of
- 9:08S4: the fact that our guys are prepared to to accept
- 9:13S4: that in being sent home today, despite the fact that
- 9:15S4: I was about to announce to you all this afternoon,
- 9:18S4: our shadow spokesman, because I think this is a far
- 9:21S4: more important.
- 9:22S3: Littleproud and Lee had planned, uh, on Thursday afternoon to
- 9:27S3: reveal their respective shadow cabinets. So they're the spokespeople that
- 9:30S3: talk about things like Treasury and Foreign Affairs and whatnot.
- 9:33S3: And they were going to go it alone, but they
- 9:35S3: had both decided to call that off while they tried
- 9:39S3: to broker some kind of agreement. And basically where we
- 9:43S3: got to was that this these sticking points around the
- 9:47S3: four policies that the nationals wanted, they would give the
- 9:50S3: liberals time to at least have a conversation about those
- 9:54S3: before pulling the plug.
- 9:56S7: Or getting back together.
- 9:57S4: After. Hold on, hold on. I'm sorry.
- 9:58S8: So you're getting back together?
- 9:59S4: No. This will allow time for a process for Susan
- 10:04S4: Lee to call her party room together to discuss those
- 10:07S4: four policy areas.
- 10:09S3: Quite interestingly, this all played out over the ABC. Um,
- 10:13S3: because on Wednesday night, you had national Senator Bridget McKenzie
- 10:17S3: go on Sarah Ferguson's 730 program and say the only
- 10:20S3: thing we care about is the four policies. Um, Sarah
- 10:24S3: Ferguson asked her, well, what about Susan Lee's claim about
- 10:27S3: this shadow cabinet confidentiality point? McKenzie said, that's not a
- 10:32S3: problem for us. Someone in Lee's office was watching and
- 10:35S3: quite displeased by that version of events, so they texted
- 10:37S3: in to the ABC. Um, and so by the end
- 10:40S3: of the program, Sarah Ferguson's there saying, you know, Lee's
- 10:43S3: contacted us to dispute this basically, and says they've got
- 10:46S3: in writing that the Knights did want this shadow cabinet
- 10:49S3: confidentiality exemption.
- 10:50S9: Now, as that interview played, we've just received a note
- 10:53S9: from Susan Lee's office saying it is not correct to
- 10:56S9: suggest that Shadow Cabinet solidarity was not a sticking point
- 11:00S9: and they that is Susan Lee's office have that in writing.
- 11:04S3: So everyone went to bed on Wednesday night and then
- 11:07S3: lo and behold, Thursday morning David Littleproud is again on
- 11:10S3: the ABC. He's asked what's the go basically. And he says, no,
- 11:15S3: Susan didn't agree to this shadow cabinet confidentiality thing. And
- 11:19S3: that's perfectly reasonable. That's fine with us. We just want
- 11:23S3: our four policies. And so apparently Lee's office heard this
- 11:26S3: and they were like la di da great. Come back in,
- 11:29S3: let's talk about it. And as simply as that, um,
- 11:32S3: the the backtrack was done.
- 11:36S2: It's great to see the national broadcaster playing such an
- 11:39S2: important role in the lives of our conservative parties. Indeed,
- 11:43S2: they often criticise aunty, but yeah.
- 11:46S1: I know they're actually mediating. It's mediating this dispute between
- 11:49S1: the two conservative parties. Um, I mean, I keep sort
- 11:53S1: of coming back to this metaphor of the toxic marriage
- 11:55S1: which everybody is going for, but it feels like that
- 11:57S1: felt like gaslighting to me. what David Littleproud did. Um, anyway, James,
- 12:02S1: is it possible to predict where this is going to go?
- 12:05S2: Yeah. I mean, I thought the whole way through that, um,
- 12:09S2: they'll get back together at some point, but not, you know,
- 12:12S2: given what we've heard from Susan Lee and what have you,
- 12:15S2: not in this term or only towards the end of
- 12:17S2: this term. I mean, I've straight after this, uh, you know,
- 12:20S2: recordings done. Jack, I've got to go to my physio
- 12:22S2: and get this whiplash treated. It's, um, it's just the
- 12:26S2: events of the last couple of days are quite extraordinary.
- 12:29S2: And look, um, put aside what David Littleproud and Bridget
- 12:33S2: McKenzie are saying. You know, put aside the posturing. This
- 12:37S2: is a win for Sussan Ley. And she was right
- 12:40S2: to say shadow cabinet confidentiality must be maintained. I mean
- 12:44S2: she she didn't give ground. That's the right thing to do.
- 12:47S2: Now we're seeing a back down. And, you know, quite
- 12:50S2: frankly a very embarrassing backdown for the nationals and for me, Jacqui,
- 12:54S2: the question then becomes, uh, one about David Littleproud's Judgment
- 12:59S2: and the judgment of the leadership team in the nets.
- 13:02S2: What were they doing if they get back together two
- 13:04S2: days after this breakup or whatever you want to call it?
- 13:07S2: It's it's it's ludicrous. Frankly, I don't have another word
- 13:10S2: for it. So yes, they can get back together, but
- 13:12S2: can he stay?
- 13:14S3: And realistically, they're not going to get those four demands
- 13:17S3: set in stone by the time that a shadow cabinet
- 13:19S3: needs to be named in July when Parliament returns. So
- 13:22S3: he said that on Thursday. He said, you know, ideally
- 13:25S3: we walk back into Parliament with our shadow cabinet. So
- 13:28S3: you have, you know, you know, who's who in the
- 13:30S3: zoo when you sit in your first Question time.
- 13:31S1: Was he saying, just to clarify, sorry to interrupt. Was
- 13:34S1: he saying that they want a coalition shadow cabinet.
- 13:38S3: Ideally a coalition shadow cabinet back together. They want that
- 13:42S3: ideally by July 22nd. So they look they look like
- 13:46S3: they know what they're doing. And then, you know, the
- 13:48S3: nuts don't have to go sit with the teals and
- 13:50S3: the greens. They can sit on their coalition side. But
- 13:54S3: there is no way that the liberals form their energy
- 13:57S3: policy and decide what they're doing on that by the
- 14:00S3: 22nd of July. And similarly, they've committed to a root
- 14:03S3: and branch review of all their policies. Um, that's probably
- 14:06S3: going to take half a year. So either way, I
- 14:09S3: think the nationals are coming back probably knowing that baking
- 14:13S3: in for policies into all four policies, into a coalition
- 14:18S3: agreement within the next six weeks is probably not going
- 14:21S3: to happen.
- 14:22S2: But it's not without precedent either. Look, it's important to
- 14:25S2: make this point for the listeners here. Some coalition agreements
- 14:28S2: do have specific policy demands written into them. 2016 When
- 14:32S2: Malcolm Turnbull just snuck back into government, there was a
- 14:35S2: protracted negotiation then over what the nationals wanted. And, you know,
- 14:39S2: Malcolm Turnbull did give some ground. There were some policies,
- 14:42S2: as I understand it written in, but on other occasions
- 14:45S2: it's just a sort of bare bones agreement. This is
- 14:48S2: how many, um, you know, shadow cabinet or cabinet spots.
- 14:51S2: We're entitled. This is how many you get. We'll work
- 14:54S2: together and that's it basically. Then they work it out
- 14:56S2: on a piecemeal basis.
- 14:58S1: It's not always an ironclad prenup. It's more of a
- 15:00S1: kind of broad brushstrokes, agreement in a lot of cases.
- 15:03S2: Precisely.
- 15:04S1: Listen, guys, this is fascinating. It's going to keep playing out.
- 15:06S1: So we're going to come back to you whenever we
- 15:08S1: need to. Probably next week to get the next installment.
- 15:11S1: And who knows where this crazy ride will end. So
- 15:14S1: thanks very much.
- 15:15S2: Thanks very much, Jack.
- 15:16S3: Thanks.
- 15:18S1: Today's episode was produced by Tammy Mills with technical assistance
- 15:21S1: from Debbie Harrington and Belen Sanchez. Tom McKendrick is our
- 15:26S1: head of audio. To listen to our episodes as soon
- 15:29S1: as they drop, follow Inside Politics on Apple, Spotify or
- 15:33S1: anywhere else you listen to your podcasts. To stay up
- 15:36S1: to date with all of our political coverage and exclusives,
- 15:38S1: visit The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald websites to
- 15:41S1: support our journalism. Subscribe to us by visiting The Age
- 15:45S1: or smh.com.au. I'm Jacqueline Maley. Thank you for listening.