Latest / The Lancaster Patriot Podcast
185. Kings, Customs, and Matt Doyle's Argument
In this episode of The Lancaster Patriot Podcast, Chris Hume responds to feedback from Matt Doyle regarding 1 Samuel 30:25, Greg Bahnsen, and the distinction between historic theonomy and Lancastrian theonomy.
The core argument of this episode comes down to one fundamental sentence: We are arguing for general equity adjudication, not general equity legislation. A legislature attempts to pre-adjudicate every case in advance—imposing human-made rules on everyone before an event occurs and stripping judges of the biblical wisdom required for individual cases. By contrast, biblical adjudication…
The skinny
The skinny isn't ready yet — notes appear once the transcript is processed.