Latest / Predictable with Stu Burguiere / Ep 944 | The Kamala Harris Bubble of Popularity Is About to BURST! | Guest: Harrison Tinsley

Transcript

Ep 944 | The Kamala Harris Bubble of Popularity Is About to BURST! | Guest: Harrison Tinsley · Predictable with Stu Burguiere

• 0:03
  And now
• 0:04
  Deep Thoughts
• 0:06
  by Kamala Harris.
• 0:10
  I think that
• 0:12
  There can be no higher priority
• 0:14
  than what we have been clear is our highest priority.
• 0:21
  This has been
• 0:22
  Veep Thoughts
• 0:24
  by Kamala Harris.
• 0:27
  Stu does America.
• 0:32
  Kamala,
• 0:33
  nahla,
• 0:35
  get your Kamala Namala merch
• 0:37
  at stuosmerch.com today
• 0:39
  and use the code stew 10 and save 10% off your entire order.
• 0:43
  Follow us on YouTube as well if you don't already.
• 0:45
  Youtube.com/SudosAmerica.
• 0:46
  We've got this show.
• 0:47
  We've got comedy skits.
• 0:48
  We've got live story reaction,
• 0:50
  and a ton more.
• 0:51
  Just hit the bell for notifications anytime,
• 0:53
  uh,
• 0:53
  that we post,
• 0:53
  and I will tell you specifically,
• 0:55
  tomorrow night we have debate coverage right here on Blaze TV.
• 1:00
  So you will get the Blaze TV coverage that we're going to be doing.
• 1:03
  Have a great panel of guests,
• 1:04
  really good conversations following up after the debate
• 1:07
  to kind of see what went on there.
• 1:09
  And then after that
• 1:11
  coverage is over,
• 1:11
  we're going to go live on YouTube.com/studiosAmerica.
• 1:14
  So join us.
• 1:15
  We were getting a lot done,
• 1:16
  I think,
• 1:17
  talking about everything as it kind of happens.
• 1:20
  And trying to focus on what it means
• 1:22
  and to solve at least a tiny bit of the insanity going on right now.
• 1:27
  And of course YouTube is the place to go to stop
• 1:30
  and solve insanity,
• 1:31
  I think,
• 1:32
  or something.
• 1:32
  It's also the place to go for very expensive football and baseball cards,
• 1:36
  which is what my son uses it for.
• 1:37
  But that's a totally different story.
• 1:38
  You may remember Harrison Tinsley.
• 1:40
  He's been on the show before when he was fighting to save his son
• 1:43
  from some truly terrifying radicalization.
• 1:45
  Uh,
• 1:46
  well,
• 1:46
  he's back on the show today,
• 1:47
  and he's got an amazing update to his story.
• 1:49
  Bernie Sanders is saying the quiet part out loud when it comes to Kamala Harris.
• 1:52
  We'll go over his comments.
• 1:54
  We're going to start by doing Kamala's popularity
• 1:57
  Illusion,
• 1:57
  which
• 1:58
  mainly reminds me of the Dua Lipa song Illusion,
• 2:01
  and you should know this about me.
• 2:02
  This is,
• 2:02
  this has nothing to do with,
• 2:03
  with the,
• 2:03
  with the news,
• 2:04
  but I am in my Dua Lipa era.
• 2:06
  It's important for you to understand,
• 2:07
  I only listen to Dua Lipa songs now.
• 2:08
  I think it's the right thing to do
• 2:10
  for me,
• 2:10
  for America,
• 2:11
  uh,
• 2:11
  and if you have any questions about my judgment on particular things,
• 2:14
  that might be the reason.
• 2:15
  Just so you know,
• 2:17
  only Dua Lipa
• 2:18
  from now until like 2030.
• 2:21
  That's all I'm doing
• 2:22
  Particularly illusion over and over again.
• 2:24
  That's just the way I am now.
• 2:26
  That's,
• 2:26
  that's who you're watching.
• 2:27
  You should know who you're watching and that's who you're watching.
• 2:30
  OK,
• 2:30
  um,
• 2:31
  you should also know who your president is.
• 2:33
  This is a kind of a crazy idea,
• 2:35
  but like sometimes people like to know the policies
• 2:38
  of their presidential candidates,
• 2:40
  and we could ask you,
• 2:42
  maybe Kamala in an interview or something,
• 2:44
  but it has been now 74 days
• 2:47
  without
• 2:48
  an interview,
• 2:49
  and I want people to remember
• 2:51
  exactly why I say this
• 2:52
  because it wasn't since the.
• 2:53
  Start of her campaign.
• 2:55
  It was since debate night.
• 2:57
  Debate night was the last time she did an interview.
• 2:59
  She did it with Anderson Cooper.
• 3:00
  It was about 12 minutes long,
• 3:02
  if I remember correctly.
• 3:03
  She was the,
• 3:04
  the topic of this interview is why Joe Biden is absolutely fine,
• 3:08
  and he's a great president and should remain
• 3:11
  on the ticket because he's so wonderful.
• 3:13
  OK.
• 3:13
  So she was lying throughout the entire interview.
• 3:16
  Then you may notice,
• 3:17
  she did a little bit of back and forth with RuPaul.
• 3:20
  She talked,
• 3:21
  she did,
• 3:21
  she got interviewed by her vice presidential pick,
• 3:23
  Tim Walls.
• 3:24
  That doesn't count.
• 3:25
  None of that counts.
• 3:26
  Oh well,
• 3:26
  she did that interview with Dana Bash.
• 3:27
  No,
• 3:28
  she didn't.
• 3:28
  She did an interview with Tim Walls and Dana Bash.
• 3:30
  I want a one on one interview,
• 3:32
  that one doesn't count.
• 3:34
  So 74 days now,
• 3:35
  and of course now she can't do an interview because she's in debate prep mode.
• 3:40
  So you've got that going on.
• 3:41
  Now,
• 3:41
  Kamala Harris is,
• 3:42
  I want to bring you back to kind of where this was,
• 3:45
  if you've forgotten who Kamala Harris was,
• 3:47
  and this is not by us.
• 3:48
  Yes,
• 3:49
  of course,
• 3:49
  I've been doing Veep thoughts forever,
• 3:51
  making fun of her.
• 3:52
  Of course I don't like her very much and I think she would be a terrible president,
• 3:54
  but it was.
• 3:55
  It wasn't just me.
• 3:56
  The entire Democratic establishment had lost faith in Kamala Harris.
• 4:00
  Let me bring you back
• 4:01
  to 2023.
• 4:03
  A New York Times story.
• 4:04
  Kamala Harris is trying to define her vice presidency
• 4:07
  even if her allies are tired
• 4:09
  of waiting.
• 4:11
  The painful reality for Ms.
• 4:13
  Harris
• 4:14
  is that in private conversations over the past few months,
• 4:17
  dozens,
• 4:18
  dozens of Democrats in the White House,
• 4:21
  on Capitol Hill,
• 4:22
  and around the nation,
• 4:23
  including some who helped out,
• 4:25
  uh,
• 4:25
  helped her out on the party's 2020 ticket.
• 4:27
  Said she had not risen to the challenge of
• 4:30
  proving herself as a future leader of the party,
• 4:33
  much less the country.
• 4:35
  Even some Democrats whom her own advisers referred reporters to for
• 4:39
  supportive quotes confided privately they had lost hope in her.
• 4:44
  I mean,
• 4:44
  let's say you're having trouble at work and then
• 4:46
  your boss comes to you and she's like,
• 4:47
  hey,
• 4:48
  look.
• 4:48
  I gotta say,
• 4:49
  I don't think your performance is up to,
• 4:50
  to snuff,
• 4:51
  and you say,
• 4:51
  well,
• 4:51
  I'm doing lots of great stuff behind the scenes.
• 4:53
  Um,
• 4:54
  talk to Bill.
• 4:55
  Bill knows all the stuff I've been doing.
• 4:56
  And then they go to Bill and Bill says,
• 4:58
  oh,
• 4:58
  yeah,
• 4:59
  they're doing great stuff.
• 5:01
  Um,
• 5:02
  Off the record though,
• 5:02
  they're terrible.
• 5:03
  They don't know what they're doing,
• 5:04
  they're not the leader that you think they are.
• 5:06
  If they're trying to like boost themselves with me,
• 5:08
  that's a terrible sign.
• 5:09
  Because it is a terrible sign.
• 5:11
  If the people you point to to give you positive feedback,
• 5:15
  abandon you and go off record and say,
• 5:17
  God,
• 5:17
  she sucks.
• 5:19
  You really,
• 5:20
  really have lost this crew.
• 5:22
  And that's kind of where we were
• 5:24
  throughout the entire vice presidency
• 5:27
  of Kamala Harris till the second they needed her.
• 5:30
  The second they needed her,
• 5:32
  they all flipped and we're supposed to believe it.
• 5:34
  Do you believe it?
• 5:36
  Do you?
• 5:37
  I don't think you do,
• 5:38
  but man,
• 5:38
  I wonder about the country sometimes.
• 5:40
  And,
• 5:41
  you know,
• 5:41
  we did a,
• 5:41
  a show,
• 5:43
  I wanna say it was maybe 2 weeks ago
• 5:45
  today,
• 5:45
  and the title of it was Stu Does Kamala's Peak.
• 5:49
  And it was a question mark as to whether this was kind of the peak.
• 5:52
  Are we gonna start seeing a fade here?
• 5:53
  Cause I kind of felt like that was about the time.
• 5:56
  You're gonna have the,
• 5:56
  uh,
• 5:57
  convention,
• 5:57
  of course,
• 5:57
  go on,
• 5:58
  that's usually wonderful coverage,
• 5:59
  and then maybe you see a little crest and maybe some fading
• 6:02
  in Kamala's numbers.
• 6:03
  Well,
• 6:04
  we have this out from the New York Times,
• 6:06
  State of the Race,
• 6:07
  a dead heat with 8 weeks to go.
• 6:08
  How dare they steal the phrase,
• 6:11
  which is also the name
• 6:13
  of my sub podcast available on the Studios America.
• 6:17
  A stream called the state of the Race
• 6:19
  with Stu Burgear,
• 6:21
  a phrase that I came up with
• 6:23
  approximately 174 years ago,
• 6:26
  state of the race.
• 6:27
  It's mine,
• 6:28
  it's copyrighted or something.
• 6:30
  Don't look into that,
• 6:31
  but it's,
• 6:32
  uh,
• 6:32
  that,
• 6:32
  that is available and we're going to do one.
• 6:34
  I,
• 6:34
  last week we wound up getting too busy with other things.
• 6:36
  We're going to get to some,
• 6:37
  uh,
• 6:37
  this week because there's a lot of polling.
• 6:39
  We've got the debate stuff going on.
• 6:41
  We've got to get to some state of the race.
• 6:42
  Probably tomorrow morning we'll do something.
• 6:44
  Uh,
• 6:44
  on this,
• 6:45
  uh,
• 6:45
  national polling average from The New York Times has 49 for Harris and 47 for Trump.
• 6:52
  And what's interesting about that,
• 6:54
  of course.
• 6:56
  you got to kind of look at
• 6:58
  the way the electoral college plays out.
• 7:00
  What what Democrats like to do is they like to talk about the popular vote,
• 7:02
  which of course,
• 7:03
  as you know,
• 7:03
  means nothing in this country.
• 7:05
  It's not a,
• 7:05
  it's not a metric that matters.
• 7:07
  You know,
• 7:08
  we're going to our fantasy league playoffs,
• 7:09
  which by the way,
• 7:09
  I made.
• 7:10
  I want you to make sure I made the fantasy baseball playoffs.
• 7:13
  However,
• 7:13
  my son won the division.
• 7:15
  In our fantasy league,
• 7:17
  uh,
• 7:17
  it's a father-son league.
• 7:18
  He won the division,
• 7:19
  and I was arguing he should get a bye in the playoffs.
• 7:22
  However,
• 7:23
  the bylaws of our league say the divisions don't matter.
• 7:27
  And I said,
• 7:28
  Well,
• 7:28
  why do we have divisions then if the divisions don't matter?
• 7:30
  And they said for fun.
• 7:32
  Now I don't know why that's fun to have a division that if you win it,
• 7:35
  you don't get anything out of,
• 7:36
  but what I will say about that whole fantasy
• 7:39
  football or fantasy baseball perfect analogy I just made,
• 7:42
  is that our popular vote also means nothing.
• 7:44
  You could sit here and argue about what you think it should do,
• 7:47
  but it doesn't do the things you want it to do.
• 7:50
  So it doesn't matter what you think.
• 7:51
  Just like it didn't matter what I thought about the division in our fantasy league.
• 7:54
  The point I'm trying to make here
• 7:56
  is that
• 7:57
  California,
• 7:58
  New York,
• 7:58
  Illinois,
• 7:59
  they run the numbers up for the Democrats.
• 8:01
  So yes,
• 8:02
  they get massive numbers and big,
• 8:04
  big
• 8:05
  wins in places like California and New York,
• 8:08
  but it doesn't really matter.
• 8:09
  So if you win by 1.5,
• 8:11
  2 points,
• 8:12
  if you're a Democrat,
• 8:13
  you very well might be the underdog
• 8:15
  in the electoral college.
• 8:17
  It's just the way the system is set up.
• 8:18
  If you don't like it,
• 8:19
  you can amend the constitution.
• 8:20
  You can go through your little speaking of fantasy leagues,
• 8:23
  your fantasy league game of trying to get enough states
• 8:27
  to change the rules on the
• 8:30
  national popular vote thing,
• 8:31
  which is something they're trying to do and we've talked about before.
• 8:33
  But at the end of the day,
• 8:34
  popular vote doesn't mean all that much.
• 8:36
  It just is kind of an indication of the state
• 8:39
  of the race,
• 8:39
  which by the way.
• 8:40
  My copyrighted phrase.
• 8:42
  Let me show you some
• 8:43
  some interesting breakdowns the Times had real quick.
• 8:46
  If you,
• 8:47
  you know,
• 8:47
  polls miss,
• 8:48
  they do.
• 8:48
  They may miss every time.
• 8:50
  They're not perfect.
• 8:50
  They are general instruments.
• 8:52
  I have this rant all the time.
• 8:53
  If you've been to the show around the show for a long time,
• 8:56
  I apologize for
• 8:57
  repeating a bit of it,
• 8:58
  but basically polls just tell you generalities.
• 9:00
  They don't tell you specifics.
• 9:02
  They tell you.
• 9:03
  Things that are in the area,
• 9:04
  usually they miss by a few points.
• 9:06
  It is not always consistent which way they miss.
• 9:08
  It has been consistent when Donald Trump has been in the race.
• 9:10
  However,
• 9:11
  in 2016 and 2020,
• 9:13
  both polling misses went toward the Republicans.
• 9:15
  It favored the Republicans.
• 9:17
  So when you looked at the polls,
• 9:18
  they looked better for Democrats than the results actually were.
• 9:21
  2022 was the opposite.
• 9:23
  2012 was also the opposite.
• 9:25
  So it does go back and forth.
• 9:27
  Right now,
• 9:28
  if you look like,
• 9:29
  if you look at the race where it stands now.
• 9:31
  Um,
• 9:32
  of the 1234567,
• 9:35
  highlighted swing states,
• 9:36
  if,
• 9:37
  uh,
• 9:37
  right now,
• 9:38
  Harris leads in 3,
• 9:40
  there are 3 that are tied and Arizona goes to Donald Trump.
• 9:44
  So in that scenario,
• 9:45
  um,
• 9:46
  uh,
• 9:46
  you can see that Harris would be favored.
• 9:48
  If the polling missed like it did
• 9:51
  back in 2022.
• 9:53
  Most of those states moved toward Harris,
• 9:54
  so Harris would win.
• 9:56
  Six of the seven states,
• 9:58
  if they moved towards Trump like they did in 2020,
• 10:01
  Trump would win the election easily.
• 10:02
  So what we are is in a very,
• 10:04
  very close election.
• 10:05
  They broke it down this way as well.
• 10:07
  If the electoral votes counted only in states where a candidate leads by 3 or more,
• 10:11
  it's 226 to 219.
• 10:14
  Harris,
• 10:14
  remember you need to get to 270 electoral votes if you want
• 10:17
  to win.
• 10:18
  By the way,
• 10:18
  that 226 to 219 margin is exactly what we had on our chalkboard that we did
• 10:23
  I guess a couple of weeks ago.
• 10:25
  If you don't go into the swing state stuff,
• 10:27
  that's basically the state of the race.
• 10:29
  Electoral votes,
• 10:30
  if current polling translates perfectly to the results,
• 10:33
  of course that won't be true,
• 10:34
  but if it did,
• 10:35
  Harris would win 292 to 246.
• 10:38
  If the miss of the polls were the same way it was in 2020,
• 10:42
  Trump would win easily,
• 10:42
  312 to 226.
• 10:44
  If it went the other way and went the way that it went in 2022 on the polling miss,
• 10:48
  Harris wins 303 to 235.
• 10:50
  A lot of that is to kind of give you a
• 10:53
  A little bit,
• 10:54
  maybe too heavy numbers
• 10:56
  focused account of where we are in the state of the race.
• 11:00
  So let me give you to Harry Anton.
• 11:02
  He's the data
• 11:04
  political guy over at
• 11:05
  Uh,
• 11:05
  CNN,
• 11:06
  and you might say,
• 11:06
  oh God,
• 11:07
  CNN,
• 11:07
  but Harry actually does a lot of good work.
• 11:09
  Also tweets a lot about diet cream soda,
• 11:11
  which by the way,
• 11:12
  uh,
• 11:12
  Doctor Brown's,
• 11:13
  if you want to go that direction.
• 11:14
  I will get on my friends over at Hank's to make a diet cream soda.
• 11:17
  They have,
• 11:18
  they have all their sodas are fantastic.
• 11:19
  I would love a diet cream from Hank's.
• 11:21
  I don't have that right now,
• 11:22
  so I'm going to give you Doctor Brown's.
• 11:24
  Diet Doctor Brown,
• 11:24
  you want a great one?
• 11:25
  Diet Doctor Brown's cream soda.
• 11:27
  OK,
• 11:27
  uh,
• 11:27
  here is Harry Enton.
• 11:29
  Look right now,
• 11:30
  Kamala Harris up get this
• 11:32
  by just 0.6
• 11:35
  points on average,
• 11:37
  only about half a point,
• 11:38
  6.1 of a point.
• 11:40
  My goodness gracious,
• 11:41
  that is how tight
• 11:42
  we are talking right now
• 11:44
  across these seven battleground states.
• 11:46
  It is a race,
• 11:46
  Mr.
• 11:47
  Berman,
• 11:47
  that is well
• 11:49
  within
• 11:49
  the margin of error.
• 11:50
  When you look across the seven key
• 11:51
  battleground states that will determine this election,
• 11:54
  you look at this,
• 11:55
  you go 0.3%,
• 11:56
  you know,
• 11:57
  they're basically the same,
• 11:59
  but you're talking about actual vote margins that were so small.
• 12:03
  So show us
• 12:04
  the difference that a
• 12:06
  polling margin can make.
• 12:07
  All right,
• 12:08
  so let's just say the polls match up perfectly.
• 12:11
  To what the results end up being,
• 12:13
  Kamala Harris would win this election
• 12:14
  with 292 electoral votes to Donald Trump's 246.
• 12:18
  But let's just say we move the current polls and let's
• 12:22
  say the result differs by them by a single percentage point
• 12:25
  and Donald Trump is the beneficiary of it.
• 12:27
  Look at this.
• 12:28
  If Trump outperforms his current polls by just a single.
• 12:31
  Single point.
• 12:31
  You take that Kamala Harris win and look at this.
• 12:34
  Donald Trump gets 287 electoral votes because the
• 12:37
  bottom line is Pennsylvania would flip up here
• 12:41
  and you would also get this flip out
• 12:42
  in Nevada over here,
• 12:44
  and that,
• 12:45
  my friends,
• 12:45
  is what we're talking about.
• 12:46
  I mean there's almost,
• 12:47
  I mean this is basically the closest election that I can remember
• 12:51
  and you go back to 2000.
• 12:53
  Obviously that one was the closest one of all time
• 12:55
  really when it comes down to the election results,
• 12:57
  but that was also
• 12:58
  sort of a situation where
• 13:01
  you know the
• 13:02
  the polls weren't necessarily
• 13:04
  as close as this one is.
• 13:06
  Now who knows what's going to happen?
• 13:07
  Nate Silver
• 13:08
  says this latest poll from The New York Times I want to go through.
• 13:12
  Confirms the shift in Donald Trump Kamala Harris' race.
• 13:15
  He's got,
• 13:16
  I think it's 64 to 36%,
• 13:17
  a percentage chance to win.
• 13:19
  Donald Trump with the favorite.
• 13:20
  He's been getting some heat because of some
• 13:23
  nerdy parts of his electoral model that give you a bounce for the convention.
• 13:28
  That didn't really show up for Kamala Harris.
• 13:29
  I think largely that was probably biased in earlier,
• 13:33
  but I do think,
• 13:34
  as I said a couple of weeks ago,
• 13:35
  I think we've seen the peak at least of this particular
• 13:38
  Kamala Harris boomlet.
• 13:39
  I think that it's already fading,
• 13:40
  and I think
• 13:41
  it's true.
• 13:42
  New polls suggests Harris's support has stalled after a euphoric
• 13:45
  August.
• 13:46
  This is from The New York Times.
• 13:49
  Let me give you some of the details of
• 13:50
  this particular poll.
• 13:52
  Is Kamala Harris's surge beginning to ebb?
• 13:54
  That's the question raised by the New York Times Sierra College poll,
• 13:57
  which finds Donald J.
• 13:58
  Trump narrowly ahead
• 13:59
  of her among likely voters nationwide,
• 14:01
  48 to 47.
• 14:03
  Why?
• 14:03
  Why is that happening?
• 14:04
  Well,
• 14:05
  here's part of it.
• 14:05
  Trump is more popular than before.
• 14:08
  Overall,
• 14:08
  46% of likely voters say they have a favorable view of the former president.
• 14:12
  That's down a tick from our last national poll.
• 14:15
  When 47% had a favorable view,
• 14:17
  it makes makes him more popular than he was in 2016 or
• 14:21
  2020.
• 14:22
  Trump has an advantage on the issues as well.
• 14:24
  We asked voters a two-part question.
• 14:26
  First,
• 14:27
  what's the most important issue to you?
• 14:29
  Second,
• 14:29
  who do you think Ms.
• 14:30
  Harris or Mr.
• 14:31
  Trump
• 14:31
  is better on that issue?
• 14:33
  By that measure,
• 14:34
  Trump has a 5 point lead on the issue that matters most to voters,
• 14:37
  whatever that may be for them.
• 14:39
  So you might think it's the border.
• 14:40
  You might think it's inflation,
• 14:41
  you might think it's the economy,
• 14:43
  you might think it's abortion,
• 14:44
  and people have all sorts of different ideas,
• 14:47
  but
• 14:47
  Trump actually wins when it comes to the actual issues.
• 14:50
  This is one reason to avoid talking about issues if you're Kamala Harris,
• 14:54
  right?
• 14:55
  Minimize the opportunities you have to actually say things of substance.
• 14:59
  This is why the debate tomorrow night is so
• 15:01
  important that I mention we're covering it on Blaze TV
• 15:03
  and coverage after YouTube.com/studiosAmerica.
• 15:07
  Trump occupies the center is another advantage for Donald Trump,
• 15:09
  says The New York Times.
• 15:11
  A majority of voters say Mr.
• 15:12
  Trump is not too far to the left or the right on issues,
• 15:15
  while only around 1/3 say he's too far to the right.
• 15:18
  Nearly half of voters,
• 15:19
  in contrast,
• 15:20
  say Ms.
• 15:20
  Harris is too far to the left.
• 15:22
  Only 41% say
• 15:24
  she's not too far.
• 15:25
  So basically,
• 15:27
  Trump kind of,
• 15:28
  I mean,
• 15:28
  and look.
• 15:30
  If I have a complaint about the current Trump campaign,
• 15:33
  it would be he's not far enough to the right for me.
• 15:36
  I mean that's been the story with me and Donald Trump really since the beginning.
• 15:39
  He doesn't,
• 15:40
  you know,
• 15:40
  he
• 15:41
  has a policy platform
• 15:44
  that isn't always consistent to
• 15:46
  the way
• 15:48
  conservative values
• 15:50
  personify themselves in my particular mind.
• 15:53
  Now I might be wrong on that.
• 15:54
  In fact,
• 15:54
  I find out,
• 15:55
  I talked to a lot of conservative.
• 15:56
  who think they really like his policy platform
• 15:58
  better than what I would define as conservatism,
• 16:00
  that's of course their right,
• 16:01
  and that's why he wins primaries.
• 16:03
  But I will say,
• 16:04
  when it comes to Donald Trump,
• 16:05
  the way he's emphasized his particular platform here,
• 16:07
  it has been a lot of really moderate stuff.
• 16:10
  I mean,
• 16:10
  look,
• 16:11
  IVF is not a particular passion issue for me.
• 16:14
  I know some people are really opposed to it.
• 16:17
  Overwhelmingly it's a popular polling
• 16:20
  item
• 16:20
  if you ask people about IVF.
• 16:23
  But like separate that from the conversation.
• 16:26
  I do not want the President of the United States advocating for a
• 16:29
  platform idea of paying for IDF from the federal
• 16:31
  government or mandating insurance companies to pay for it.
• 16:34
  That's to me not conservative at all.
• 16:37
  It is something that did successfully politically wrestle away this narrative
• 16:42
  the left had saying that Donald Trump wanted to ban IVF.
• 16:45
  He's
• 16:46
  breaking every
• 16:48
  conservative policy platform that.
• 16:50
  Existed for 50 years to say he wants it so badly the government is going to pay for it.
• 16:54
  So like
• 16:55
  Donald Trump has
• 16:56
  come up with,
• 16:57
  and this is the same thing with no taxes on tips,
• 16:59
  it's the same thing with the idea of a 25th Amendment
• 17:03
  to modify the 25th Amendment to
• 17:07
  stop
• 17:09
  vice presidential candidates from hiding
• 17:12
  the
• 17:13
  dementia of the of the actual president.
• 17:16
  He's found a way to
• 17:18
  put bold
• 17:19
  policy platforms out there in the ether
• 17:22
  and wrestle away issues from the left.
• 17:24
  He's been very successful with this on all three of those counts,
• 17:28
  and it's been interesting to watch.
• 17:29
  I feel like he's found a new tool in his toolbox.
• 17:32
  That being said,
• 17:32
  I don't necessarily love all those policies,
• 17:34
  and so
• 17:36
  my issue would be,
• 17:37
  hey,
• 17:37
  I don't know,
• 17:37
  is he far enough to the right?
• 17:38
  Certainly,
• 17:39
  and I'll give you the abortion example as one we've talked about previously.
• 17:42
  You know,
• 17:43
  I don't like those policies,
• 17:45
  but
• 17:45
  there's a reason he's doing that for sort of pragmatic
• 17:50
  uses,
• 17:51
  and we'll get to more of that here in a little bit.
• 17:52
  An overwhelming majority of voters still say that the economy is poor
• 17:56
  and that the nation is heading in the wrong direction.
• 17:57
  A clear majority,
• 17:58
  61% of voters,
• 18:00
  say they want the next president
• 18:01
  to bring a major change for Mr.
• 18:02
  Biden
• 18:03
  compared to 34% who want a minor change and 3% who don't want a change.
• 18:07
  Can we just stop on that one for just a second?
• 18:09
  How many times have we been told
• 18:10
  that actually Bidennomics is working?
• 18:13
  Actually,
• 18:14
  people love Joe Biden.
• 18:15
  Actually,
• 18:15
  this has been an amazingly successful presidency.
• 18:18
  He just got a little bit old and couldn't debate anymore,
• 18:20
  and we're so sorry about that.
• 18:21
  That's why I just take Kamala,
• 18:22
  don't worry about it.
• 18:23
  The American people,
• 18:24
  2 to 1,
• 18:25
  are rejecting this presidency.
• 18:28
  A presidency,
• 18:28
  I might note,
• 18:29
  and this is something that not everybody knows,
• 18:31
  Kamala Harris is the current vice president in that administration.
• 18:36
  She owns this like Biden owns this.
• 18:38
  Her name,
• 18:39
  Biden Harris administra.
• 18:40
  Her name's the Harris.
• 18:42
  Kamala Harris is the Harris in Biden Harris.
• 18:45
  Did you know that?
• 18:46
  Does,
• 18:46
  does anybody know it?
• 18:49
  It's amazing.
• 18:50
  Only 40% of likely voters said Ms.
• 18:53
  Harris represented change,
• 18:55
  while 55%
• 18:56
  said she represented more of the same.
• 18:57
  How can it be 40%?
• 18:59
  She's the current vice president of the United States.
• 19:03
  Mr.
• 19:03
  Trump,
• 19:03
  in contrast,
• 19:04
  was seen as representing change by 61% of voters,
• 19:07
  while only 34% said he was more of the same.
• 19:10
  Yeah,
• 19:10
  he's changing back to what he was,
• 19:12
  what is it,
• 19:12
  Make America Great Again,
• 19:14
  and then it was Keep America great,
• 19:15
  and now it's like
• 19:16
  Keep America,
• 19:16
  I don't know what the new one is,
• 19:17
  but it's basically Make America
• 19:19
  Great Again again.
• 19:20
  And that's what he wants to do.
• 19:22
  He's going to change back to what we had
• 19:24
  previously.
• 19:25
  Uh,
• 19:25
  it's something that obviously the American people are
• 19:27
  seeing as different than the current administration.
• 19:30
  Obviously,
• 19:31
  This shouldn't,
• 19:32
  this isn't a tough part of the quiz.
• 19:35
  She's the vice president of the United States.
• 19:37
  Uh,
• 19:38
  Politics on the border.
• 19:39
  Well,
• 19:39
  nearly half of voters say Harris is too liberal or progressive.
• 19:43
  A majority of voters see her as at least somewhat responsible for the
• 19:47
  problems along the border,
• 19:48
  and a majority of voters say she is a risky choice
• 19:50
  and more of the same,
• 19:52
  hardly an enviable combination.
• 19:54
  Despite a month of favorable coverage,
• 19:57
  voters still don't know enough about Harris.
• 19:59
  Huh.
• 20:00
  28% of voters said they needed to learn more compared
• 20:02
  to only 9% who said the same about Trump.
• 20:05
  More than anything,
• 20:06
  voters say they want to hear more about where she stands on the issues.
• 20:10
  She doesn't even know where she stands on the issues.
• 20:12
  Something that her campaign has seemed to struggle to lay out.
• 20:14
  They haven't struggled to lay it out.
• 20:16
  They're intentionally doing this.
• 20:20
  We haven't heard
• 20:22
  anything from her of value when it comes to her actual positions.
• 20:25
  Does she,
• 20:26
  uh,
• 20:26
  can we check on this?
• 20:27
  Has she put a policy platform up on her website yet?
• 20:30
  I know she didn't as of a week or two ago.
• 20:32
  Does she still not have a policy section on her own website?
• 20:35
  This is incredible.
• 20:36
  How is the media not freaking out about this?
• 20:38
  If they,
• 20:39
  if they were doing their jobs at all,
• 20:40
  they'd be losing their mind
• 20:42
  at this candidacy.
• 20:43
  Well,
• 20:43
  she's still hiding.
• 20:44
  I will remind you,
• 20:45
  it's what,
• 20:45
  74 days,
• 20:46
  yeah,
• 20:47
  74 days
• 20:48
  without
• 20:49
  an interview.
• 20:52
  The closest we might get to a fair interview could come tomorrow night though.
• 20:56
  Why?
• 20:58
  The debate,
• 20:59
  and this is the chance not to get a real interview from ABC News.
• 21:02
  I don't expect that,
• 21:04
  unfortunately,
• 21:05
  but I do expect Donald Trump to try to hold her responsible.
• 21:09
  If I were Trump and I were preparing for this debate,
• 21:11
  what I would have in my mind are 5 different ways,
• 21:13
  5 questions
• 21:14
  that can,
• 21:15
  that you can ask her specifically
• 21:17
  and try to force her to answer,
• 21:18
  and if she won't answer,
• 21:19
  she'll look like she's avoiding it.
• 21:20
  That will put her
• 21:22
  on the defensive,
• 21:22
  that will put her
• 21:23
  in a situation she's uncomfortable answering.
• 21:26
  I wouldn't make it like,
• 21:28
  why did you change your mind on this,
• 21:30
  right?
• 21:30
  If you have a different way of asking that,
• 21:32
  maybe on one of those issues you can get to it.
• 21:34
  But trying to put her in a position where
• 21:36
  she is off balance and not prepared,
• 21:39
  because if you can find those moments,
• 21:40
  she's likely to just give you a word salad of Veep thoughts.
• 21:44
  That's what we need.
• 21:45
  We need first of all,
• 21:45
  we need more material for new Veep thoughts,
• 21:48
  and thoughts isn't the way to say that,
• 21:49
  but whatever,
• 21:50
  you know what I'm saying.
• 21:51
  We need new Veep thoughts
• 21:52
  to go up on
• 21:53
  Veepthoughts.com.
• 21:54
  So first of all,
• 21:55
  put her in the position for us,
• 21:56
  but secondly,
• 21:57
  do it for America
• 21:58
  because people need to see her trying to think on her feet
• 22:02
  and
• 22:03
  What she normally will do is give you word salad,
• 22:05
  but hidden in there is usually a nugget of how crazy liberal she is.
• 22:10
  Those are her values,
• 22:11
  as she's reminded you
• 22:13
  over and over again.
• 22:14
  He values have not changed.
• 22:16
  She won't answer specifics
• 22:18
  because you know what's going to happen
• 22:19
  after the election when they say,
• 22:21
  hey,
• 22:22
  Kamala,
• 22:22
  you seem to be going for
• 22:24
  getting rid of private insurance and going for Medicare for all.
• 22:27
  You said you wouldn't do that in the campaign,
• 22:29
  and you know what she'll say?
• 22:30
  No,
• 22:30
  I didn't.
• 22:31
  Where'd you get that from?
• 22:35
  Well,
• 22:35
  there's a statement from one of your campaign aides.
• 22:37
  Which aide?
• 22:38
  Put a name on it.
• 22:38
  What are you talking about?
• 22:39
  The fact that you're just communicating with some campaign aide and they're
• 22:42
  saying something that has nothing to do with what I'm doing.
• 22:44
  What I'm doing is trying to make it better for the
• 22:46
  American people and the best way to do that is,
• 22:48
  uh,
• 22:49
  this is a semi-quote,
• 22:50
  socialism,
• 22:51
  OK.
• 22:53
  It's a crazy,
• 22:53
  crazy path they're trying to go down,
• 22:55
  and they think,
• 22:55
  they think they can run the clock out on you.
• 22:57
  Can they?
• 22:58
  We will see,
• 22:58
  and it will start
• 23:00
  tomorrow night.
• 23:00
  Blaze TV coverage starts when we're going to be showing the entire debate.
• 23:03
  I think there's going to be a pre-show,
• 23:05
  uh,
• 23:05
  the debate,
• 23:05
  and then afterwards we'll be there to analyze,
• 23:08
  and I will be there to analyze after that on Youtube.com/studentsAmerica.
• 23:12
  Join us.
• 23:23
  If you're like me,
• 23:24
  you have a tendency maybe to put things off until the very last minute,
• 23:27
  and while,
• 23:28
  you know,
• 23:28
  a lot of times that works out,
• 23:30
  it's it can be fine,
• 23:31
  you know,
• 23:31
  like dinner,
• 23:32
  you didn't make anything,
• 23:33
  you stop at a fast food restaurant,
• 23:35
  maybe you can pull that off.
• 23:36
  Now,
• 23:37
  the amount that I talk about fast food might uh might
• 23:40
  indicate that I should probably have some life insurance.
• 23:43
  And,
• 23:43
  and you know,
• 23:43
  life insurance is the type of thing you can't wait on,
• 23:45
  right?
• 23:45
  You gotta get that done.
• 23:47
  Life insurance through Ladder is the easy way to do this.
• 23:49
  Ladder is 100% digital,
• 23:51
  no doctors,
• 23:51
  no needles,
• 23:52
  no paperwork.
• 23:53
  When you apply for $3 million in coverage or less,
• 23:56
  it's got to answer a few questions about your health in an application.
• 23:59
  You need just a few minutes and a phone or laptop to apply.
• 24:02
  Get ladder's smart algorithms because they work in real time to
• 24:06
  help you find exactly the type of coverage that you need.
• 24:08
  No hidden fees.
• 24:09
  Cancel any time.
• 24:10
  Get a full refund if you change your mind in the 1st 30 days.
• 24:14
  Latter policies are issued by insurers with
• 24:15
  long proven histories of paying claims.
• 24:18
  They are rated A and A plus by A.M.vest.
• 24:20
  You don't have to worry about those.
• 24:21
  Just go to ladderlife.com/Stew Ladderlife.com/Stew,
• 24:25
  see if you're instantly approved.
• 24:26
  It's L A D D E Rlife.com/Stew,
• 24:31
  Ladderlife.com/Stew.
• 24:35
  I'm joined now by Harrison Tinsley.
• 24:37
  He's a parental rights advocate and a father himself,
• 24:40
  and he's been on this program before.
• 24:41
  Harrison,
• 24:41
  how's it going?
• 24:43
  I'm doing wonderful,
• 24:43
  Stu.
• 24:44
  Thanks for having me.
• 24:44
  I appreciate you coming back on.
• 24:46
  Before we get to the update of your story,
• 24:48
  I want to take people back to the very beginning of it because
• 24:52
  I'll be honest,
• 24:52
  it's a,
• 24:52
  it's a quite a roller coaster ride.
• 24:54
  Can you tell me how all of this started?
• 24:57
  It's been a battle,
• 24:58
  man,
• 24:58
  4.5 years,
• 24:59
  but I was dating a girl in the Bay Area,
• 25:01
  we fell in love,
• 25:03
  and she got pregnant super quickly into our relationship,
• 25:05
  and we were both stoked about that.
• 25:07
  We were both stoked when we found out it was a boy.
• 25:09
  We agreed upon the name Sawyer and we're super happy.
• 25:13
  And she made a post on social media when she announced that she was pregnant saying,
• 25:17
  baby Sawyer due in December,
• 25:18
  I'll love you whether you're a boy or a girl or neither.
• 25:21
  And that was concerning,
• 25:22
  and me and her never agreed politically and.
• 25:24
  You know,
• 25:24
  that caused some tension in the relationship
• 25:26
  and essentially as her pregnancy went on,
• 25:28
  she kind of became hostile towards me and
• 25:30
  was threatening me often that I wouldn't see Sawyer
• 25:33
  because,
• 25:33
  because of our politicals
• 25:35
  and saying that to my mom and sister and
• 25:37
  got to a point where she broke up with me and
• 25:40
  sent me a cease and desist letter and actually kept him from me.
• 25:42
  So I missed his birth.
• 25:44
  I found out about a week after from social media,
• 25:46
  and in 2 months after that,
• 25:48
  I filed in court.
• 25:50
  Foley for paternity custody visitation.
• 25:53
  It took 13 more months just to meet him.
• 25:55
  So in spite of being enthusiastic and excited about him since pregnancy,
• 25:58
  I didn't meet him till he was 15 months old.
• 26:00
  And that was a tragedy,
• 26:02
  uh,
• 26:02
  but it built character,
• 26:03
  made me a stronger man,
• 26:04
  better man to be a better father and
• 26:06
  for Sawyer
• 26:07
  and for helping children in this world.
• 26:10
  And you know,
• 26:11
  from there,
• 26:11
  I started my visits with him,
• 26:13
  and
• 26:13
  they made it as difficult as possible,
• 26:15
  but I kept my head high,
• 26:16
  I did the right thing.
• 26:17
  And then I moved to the Bay Area.
• 26:19
  I was boarded half custody almost immediately,
• 26:21
  and I'm extremely grateful for that.
• 26:23
  And it was around that time that his mom.
• 26:26
  Started to harass and defame me horrendously.
• 26:28
  It was very untrue.
• 26:29
  The court gave me a temporary restraining order because of it,
• 26:32
  and she started to call Sawyer,
• 26:34
  they,
• 26:34
  them,
• 26:35
  put dresses and girly clothes on him.
• 26:37
  And she was arrested for child endangerment.
• 26:40
  And placed on a 5150 hold during that arrest.
• 26:43
  So
• 26:43
  all of those things and some other minor things I brought to court,
• 26:46
  I was awarded a trial.
• 26:48
  It ended up being a five day trial,
• 26:50
  and I felt like I finally had my chance to
• 26:52
  tell the court everything that's going on and how Sawyer's not safe and how he,
• 26:56
  he needs to be with me so I can protect him and love him and guide him.
• 27:00
  And
• 27:01
  I did this trial and I felt good about it.
• 27:04
  Uh,
• 27:04
  but after the trial,
• 27:04
  the court decided to keep custody 50/50.
• 27:07
  And essentially,
• 27:08
  I was devastated by that,
• 27:10
  and I decided that I had to do something to save Sawyer,
• 27:13
  so I decided I was going to appeal that decision.
• 27:15
  And you know,
• 27:16
  I.
• 27:17
  I decided to come out publicly and speak about it,
• 27:19
  tell my story,
• 27:20
  to just,
• 27:21
  you know,
• 27:21
  tell the world what's going on so people
• 27:23
  understand that this is happening to children and
• 27:26
  And I was
• 27:27
  fortunate enough that,
• 27:28
  you know,
• 27:28
  Matt Walsh and stuff broke my story and it took off and I did all these interviews,
• 27:32
  including with you,
• 27:33
  and I became part of this incredible movement
• 27:36
  to protect children and protect families' rights.
• 27:38
  And I'm just so thankful for all the people I've
• 27:41
  met and all the good we've been able to do.
• 27:43
  We fight the crazy bills in California that are attacking families
• 27:47
  like AB 957 and,
• 27:49
  you know,
• 27:49
  AB 1955 this year and.
• 27:52
  Uh,
• 27:53
  I was
• 27:54
  basically
• 27:55
  became
• 27:56
  like my life's purpose to,
• 27:58
  I decided that I,
• 27:59
  I'm going to save Sawyer and that I'm going to protect
• 28:01
  all children from gender ideology because it belongs nowhere near them.
• 28:04
  They're the most amazing,
• 28:06
  wonderful,
• 28:06
  innocent amongst us.
• 28:07
  They deserve love and protection.
• 28:09
  They don't deserve,
• 28:10
  you know,
• 28:10
  ideology and propaganda or talking about sex in any way,
• 28:13
  shape or form.
• 28:15
  And I'm just so thankful to
• 28:18
  Have this purpose
• 28:19
  and I'm going to fight till the end,
• 28:21
  till we destroy this until children are saved.
• 28:24
  Give me a sense of what it's like before we get to the updates in your case,
• 28:27
  which are really significant,
• 28:28
  but give me a sense of what it's like trying to go through this process in California.
• 28:33
  I,
• 28:33
  I,
• 28:33
  I feel like a lot of us,
• 28:34
  you know,
• 28:35
  we live,
• 28:35
  I live in Texas,
• 28:36
  and there's enough crazy stories in Texas,
• 28:38
  don't,
• 28:39
  you know,
• 28:39
  don't get me wrong,
• 28:40
  there's plenty of them.
• 28:41
  But you know,
• 28:41
  I do feel a bit sheltered from the Gavin Newsoms of the world here.
• 28:45
  What is it like trying to go through
• 28:46
  this when you're dealing with the California system?
• 28:49
  You know,
• 28:50
  California is obviously the heart of it,
• 28:51
  and my court case is actually in San Francisco.
• 28:53
  So I'd say that's like the very,
• 28:55
  very heart of all of this.
• 28:56
  Um,
• 28:57
  so it's tough,
• 28:57
  you know,
• 28:58
  I feel sometimes there's
• 29:00
  political bias and
• 29:01
  things like that that affect,
• 29:03
  you know,
• 29:03
  whether it's court or CPS or people involved.
• 29:06
  But at the end of the day,
• 29:07
  I've been fortunate enough to find that some people,
• 29:10
  whether it's in CPS or attorneys,
• 29:13
  etc.
• 29:13
  really do care about children more than anything.
• 29:16
  And I'm also,
• 29:17
  where I live in the Bay Area is more of the San Jose,
• 29:18
  Santa Cruz area,
• 29:19
  and
• 29:20
  I don't know anyone who supports any of this.
• 29:22
  No parents,
• 29:23
  no people want,
• 29:24
  you know,
• 29:24
  secrets kept from parents,
• 29:26
  from schools.
• 29:26
  They don't want kids taking irreversible hormones
• 29:29
  blockers and surgeries,
• 29:31
  and they do not want men and women's sports.
• 29:33
  These are three,
• 29:34
  you know,
• 29:34
  issues that
• 29:35
  most Americans agree with,
• 29:37
  even in California,
• 29:38
  and our representatives are not representing us,
• 29:41
  and we need to put a stop to it.
• 29:43
  So you've gone through this,
• 29:44
  you know,
• 29:45
  multi-year saga.
• 29:46
  You've had to deal with,
• 29:48
  I mean,
• 29:48
  you know,
• 29:49
  a heartbreak,
• 29:49
  right?
• 29:50
  Like as a father,
• 29:50
  I can't imagine going through something like that.
• 29:53
  You have a situation where I think,
• 29:54
  you know,
• 29:54
  in the country,
• 29:55
  we have a problem with
• 29:56
  fathers
• 29:57
  just wanting to leave and not take care of their parents.
• 30:00
  You're you're in the opposite of the kids.
• 30:02
  You're in the opposite situation.
• 30:03
  You're you're doing everything you can to try to take care of your child.
• 30:07
  So you've gone through this whole process.
• 30:09
  And we finally have,
• 30:11
  it seems like a little bit of resolution in your case.
• 30:14
  Can you talk about what happened?
• 30:16
  Yeah,
• 30:16
  so essentially I was,
• 30:18
  you know,
• 30:18
  laying there with my wife and I had to realized I had a bunch of missed
• 30:21
  calls and it was the San Francisco police telling me to come pick up my son and
• 30:25
  So I called him back and I went there immediately.
• 30:26
  I got him and it was,
• 30:28
  you know,
• 30:28
  a police officer who I'd spoken to before because restraining
• 30:31
  order stuff and so he gave me some of the details
• 30:34
  and it was a pretty horrifying scenario that my son had to deal with.
• 30:37
  His mother got into a confrontation with her father,
• 30:40
  physical confrontation that was very serious.
• 30:43
  There was blood and she allegedly broke his nose and all these things and Sawyer.
• 30:47
  Had to bear witness to this,
• 30:48
  I guess he snuck up,
• 30:49
  you know,
• 30:50
  probably wanting to see what's happening,
• 30:51
  who's hiding it first,
• 30:52
  and he snuck up with uh something similar to a kid's baseball bat.
• 30:56
  And he,
• 30:57
  uh,
• 30:58
  according to Sawyer,
• 30:58
  his mom said,
• 30:59
  you know,
• 30:59
  hit him in the face,
• 31:00
  hit him in the face.
• 31:01
  According to her,
• 31:01
  he did it on his own.
• 31:02
  I tend to believe Sawyer,
• 31:03
  but either way,
• 31:04
  I think that in that scenario,
• 31:05
  most adults would just tell a child to run away.
• 31:08
  And so Sawyer unfortunately had to be involved in it,
• 31:11
  and I've seen the police evidence of the kid's baseball,
• 31:13
  a bloodied
• 31:14
  kid's baseball bat
• 31:15
  in photo evidence.
• 31:16
  I don't think he actually did that damage,
• 31:17
  but to him,
• 31:18
  I don't
• 31:19
  think there's a difference.
• 31:20
  Sounds like a horrific thing that the child would go through,
• 31:23
  particularly when I've been warning the courts and
• 31:25
  showing them evidence that something like this could happen
• 31:28
  with the instability,
• 31:29
  you know,
• 31:29
  of his mother,
• 31:30
  and I pray that she,
• 31:31
  you know,
• 31:31
  get.
• 31:32
  The help she needs and becomes better to be a better mother for him,
• 31:35
  but it's not fair to keep
• 31:36
  children away from a safe parent
• 31:39
  when the other parent has serious,
• 31:40
  you know,
• 31:41
  problems and concerns.
• 31:42
  Wow,
• 31:42
  that's incredible.
• 31:43
  So there's a violent incident.
• 31:44
  He actually
• 31:45
  either was told to or tried to step in and do something about it,
• 31:48
  which is actually incredible.
• 31:50
  I mean,
• 31:50
  it's an
• 31:51
  admirable,
• 31:51
  yeah,
• 31:52
  an admirable thing to defend his mom.
• 31:54
  I mean that's an incredible thing.
• 31:55
  And so obviously
• 31:58
  the point here is there's turmoil in
• 32:03
  the mother's home in some way,
• 32:05
  one that maybe
• 32:06
  a kid should not be around allegedly.
• 32:08
  So
• 32:10
  what happens here?
• 32:11
  What's the outcome?
• 32:12
  Is Sawyer going to be in a safe environment?
• 32:15
  Sawyer was safe with me,
• 32:16
  but it wasn't particularly easy.
• 32:18
  So I actually filed an ex parte immediately in court,
• 32:20
  and they denied it,
• 32:22
  which was,
• 32:23
  I mean,
• 32:23
  just mind blowing to me and my attorney.
• 32:25
  The court,
• 32:25
  to my understanding,
• 32:26
  had to grant that at least on a temporary basis.
• 32:29
  But they denied it,
• 32:30
  but thankfully CPS in San Francisco stepped up and said,
• 32:32
  Don't worry,
• 32:33
  we're going to keep him safe with you.
• 32:35
  And they did a very thorough investigation.
• 32:37
  I feel blessed by God that I got the CPS workers I did
• 32:40
  that put politics aside and cared about the child's safety more than anything.
• 32:44
  You know,
• 32:44
  and his mom tried to use politics and every dirty trick in the book,
• 32:48
  even though I was under no investigation,
• 32:50
  but just tried to use that to sway bias,
• 32:52
  and they really put that aside
• 32:54
  and just did the right thing,
• 32:55
  did a good investigation,
• 32:56
  kept him safe the whole time with supervised visits,
• 32:59
  and we came to a resolution before the trial,
• 33:01
  and it's,
• 33:01
  this is called dependency court.
• 33:03
  It's essentially
• 33:04
  CPS's court.
• 33:05
  It's a step above family court,
• 33:06
  and
• 33:07
  We came to an agreement that I would have full physical custody of Sawyer.
• 33:12
  We'd have split legal custody,
• 33:13
  but I had the joint I had the decision making ability
• 33:16
  if there's no agreement,
• 33:18
  which I'm extremely thankful for,
• 33:19
  and that was a,
• 33:20
  you know,
• 33:20
  a must-have for me,
• 33:22
  and then just a bunch of safety precautions for when she gets to visit him.
• 33:25
  And she signed that,
• 33:26
  so this is,
• 33:27
  this is a done deal,
• 33:28
  at least for now.
• 33:29
  I mean that's a very,
• 33:31
  I mean it's,
• 33:32
  I don't want to say it's a good outcome because
• 33:34
  it's been such a rough road to get there,
• 33:36
  but
• 33:37
  the other thing I think is important to point out here is
• 33:40
  you're getting custody of Sawyer,
• 33:42
  which is great,
• 33:43
  but also you're not getting Sawyer custody of Sawyer because.
• 33:46
  His mom was trying to make him into a girl.
• 33:50
  That's not really the reasoning here,
• 33:52
  right?
• 33:52
  This is just
• 33:54
  a physical violence situation,
• 33:55
  very,
• 33:55
  very sad and unfortunate and necessary
• 33:59
  for him to be out of that situation,
• 34:00
  but
• 34:01
  this is not a resolution where California suddenly came to their senses on gender.
• 34:06
  Correct,
• 34:06
  so I,
• 34:07
  I did make sure to of course bring it up in that trial as well as bring it up to CPS etc.
• 34:11
  in all of these examples,
• 34:13
  um,
• 34:13
  just to show them because I don't believe anyone that would do that to a child,
• 34:17
  to push that on a child,
• 34:18
  particularly when like Sawyer,
• 34:19
  who
• 34:20
  adamantly says he's a boy and fights against it,
• 34:22
  he'll scream at you,
• 34:23
  I'm a boy,
• 34:23
  not a girl.
• 34:24
  He gets very upset,
• 34:25
  you know,
• 34:25
  there's a time where
• 34:26
  he went to Disneyland with his mom and he's like,
• 34:28
  Dad,
• 34:28
  when I went to Disneyland,
• 34:29
  I couldn't go on the rides unless I wore my princess shoes.
• 34:31
  I didn't want to wear princess shoes,
• 34:32
  I wanted to wear boys shoes.
• 34:34
  So I mean it's being forced upon him.
• 34:36
  And I don't think that anyone
• 34:38
  with a sane mental mind and stability.
• 34:41
  You know,
• 34:42
  would like nobody that doesn't have those problems would push that on a kid,
• 34:46
  and that's not a safe home for a kid with
• 34:48
  someone with those kind of problems in their head,
• 34:50
  because children just deserve love.
• 34:52
  They don't care about sex and all these weird abstract ideas that aren't true.
• 34:56
  And also,
• 34:57
  you know,
• 34:57
  he says he's a boy,
• 34:58
  so it's ridiculous,
• 34:59
  and he can tell every human being,
• 35:01
  every cartoon,
• 35:01
  whether they're a boy or girl.
• 35:03
  With complete accuracy,
• 35:04
  and this is unacceptable that people are doing this to children.
• 35:08
  That part of it is very,
• 35:09
  very true.
• 35:10
  Harrison Tinsley,
• 35:11
  I mean,
• 35:12
  you're a parental rights advocate.
• 35:13
  I mean that's not how you started this though.
• 35:15
  You started just getting into a relationship and wanting to be a dad.
• 35:18
  Is it weird to think of yourself as a parental rights advocate?
• 35:22
  It's very weird,
• 35:23
  you know,
• 35:23
  if you'd asked me this 5 years ago,
• 35:24
  I'd have been like,
• 35:25
  what are you talking about,
• 35:26
  stup politics or
• 35:27
  like what gender on kids?
• 35:29
  I would have just
• 35:30
  been like,
• 35:30
  I like playing my guitar and like building decks and
• 35:34
  like
• 35:35
  going snowboarding.
• 35:36
  I,
• 35:36
  I would never
• 35:37
  have ever thought I'd be in this situation,
• 35:39
  but I've embraced it.
• 35:40
  And I know that we're on,
• 35:42
  you know,
• 35:42
  the right side of history,
• 35:43
  that this is a real moment in time
• 35:45
  where we're going to put a stop to something evil.
• 35:47
  I would call it the lobotomy of our time.
• 35:50
  And this is going to be over within the next 10 years,
• 35:52
  and I really think everyone at home needs to start digging deep within themselves
• 35:56
  and realizing that they're going to have to look their kids in the eyes,
• 35:58
  look their grandkids in the eyes,
• 35:59
  look themselves in the mirror,
• 36:01
  and,
• 36:01
  you know,
• 36:02
  say what they did in this moment
• 36:04
  when we put a stop to this.
• 36:07
  Man,
• 36:07
  it's a,
• 36:07
  it's a,
• 36:08
  it's an incredible story.
• 36:09
  Harrison Tinsley,
• 36:10
  uh,
• 36:10
  it's a parental rights advocate,
• 36:11
  Harrison Tinsley,
• 36:12
  and also just a dad trying to do the best for his kid.
• 36:15
  Harrison,
• 36:15
  thanks so much for coming on the program and updating us on the situation.
• 36:19
  Thank you so much,
• 36:19
  Stu,
• 36:20
  be brave,
• 36:20
  everyone,
• 36:20
  speak up,
• 36:21
  now's the time.
• 36:32
  So according to a new report,
• 36:33
  President Biden has signed off on a
• 36:35
  highly classified plan that shifts America's nuclear strategy
• 36:38
  to focus on China as a nuclear threat and to prepare for the possibility.
• 36:42
  That the communist nation could team up with
• 36:44
  North Korea and Russia against the United States.
• 36:46
  That's a wonderful
• 36:47
  possibility of the future.
• 36:49
  If it doesn't make you nervous,
• 36:50
  you probably
• 36:52
  should be a little nervous about it and at the very least for any outcome,
• 36:55
  you don't know what it's going to be,
• 36:56
  but prepare your family.
• 36:58
  We talk about the basics a lot,
• 36:59
  and it's important to do all of those water and food and
• 37:03
  alarm.
• 37:03
  System on your house and all these things,
• 37:05
  but one thing you probably haven't considered is the Jace case from Jace Medical.
• 37:10
  Why?
• 37:10
  Because you don't think about your medication not being hard to find.
• 37:13
  But I mean,
• 37:14
  I,
• 37:15
  I bet you either you or somebody you know
• 37:17
  has tried to get the medication they need from a pharmacy and it's
• 37:20
  been delayed or really difficult to get for a long period of time.
• 37:25
  And that's really troubling for people.
• 37:27
  The Jace case kind of solves this in a lot of different ways.
• 37:30
  It's a personalized emergency kit that contains
• 37:33
  the antibiotics and medications that treat
• 37:35
  the most common deadly bacterial infections.
• 37:37
  It provides 5 life saving antibiotics for emergency use,
• 37:41
  and you just fill out a simple form online and they'll help you get it all set up.
• 37:44
  You just go to jace.com.
• 37:46
  They have a bunch of add-ons too you can do.
• 37:48
  They can really customize this for you and your family.
• 37:50
  Jace.com.
• 37:50
  Enter the code stew at checkout for a discount on your order.
• 37:53
  The code is stew at Jace.com,
• 37:56
  JASE.com,
• 37:58
  code stew.
• 38:01
  If you want to understand the 2024 Kamala Harris campaign,
• 38:04
  you need to go back to a fine feature film
• 38:08
  starring James Halpers of uh of The Office,
• 38:12
  and it's called A Quiet Place.
• 38:13
  And in A Quiet Place,
• 38:15
  you have to be
• 38:16
  absolutely silent because if you say anything.
• 38:19
  Aliens will come and attack you.
• 38:21
  Uh,
• 38:21
  that's pretty much the way they're running the campaign right now.
• 38:23
  They're trying to say absolutely nothing,
• 38:25
  and certainly you don't say the quiet part out loud,
• 38:27
  you never ever do that.
• 38:29
  But of course,
• 38:29
  Bernie Sanders is like an old curmudgeon,
• 38:31
  he doesn't know
• 38:32
  what's going on in the world.
• 38:33
  So he just blurts stuff out,
• 38:34
  and I want you to listen to this because he
• 38:37
  is
• 38:37
  telling you
• 38:38
  in advance,
• 38:41
  don't come back to me in 2026 and be like,
• 38:43
  wow,
• 38:43
  I can't believe how liberal Kamala Harris was on everything.
• 38:46
  He's telling you now.
• 38:48
  Bernie Sanders is telling you in advance,
• 38:51
  please listen.
• 38:52
  Vice President Kamala Harris as a progressive.
• 38:55
  She has previously supported Medicare for all.
• 38:58
  Now
• 38:59
  she does not.
• 38:59
  She's previously supported a ban on fracking.
• 39:02
  Now
• 39:02
  she does not.
• 39:04
  These,
• 39:04
  Senator,
• 39:05
  are ideas that you have campaigned on.
• 39:07
  Do you think that she is abandoning her progressive ideals?
• 39:13
  No,
• 39:13
  I don't think she's abandoning her ideals.
• 39:16
  I think she's trying to be pragmatic and
• 39:19
  doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election.
• 39:22
  Mm,
• 39:24
  interesting,
• 39:24
  she's trying to be pragmatic,
• 39:25
  which is,
• 39:26
  I didn't know it was a word,
• 39:26
  but pragmatic,
• 39:28
  and uh just trying to win the election.
• 39:31
  That's what she's doing.
• 39:32
  We've talked about this on the flip flop shows.
• 39:34
  There's 3 of them so far,
• 39:35
  we have another one already coming,
• 39:37
  probably 2 more coming,
• 39:38
  but they're not technical flip flops.
• 39:40
  She's not actually changing her position.
• 39:42
  She is just
• 39:43
  hiding her actual position and telling you more moderate things that poll better.
• 39:48
  That's a Kamala Harris flip flop.
• 39:50
  And I want to remind you,
• 39:51
  we've talked about several of these,
• 39:52
  but I'll give you this one at least because this one popped into my mind immediately.
• 39:55
  Edward Markey,
• 39:55
  he is Massachusetts,
• 39:57
  probably the
• 39:58
  arguably the most extreme
• 40:00
  of the environmentalist wacko types
• 40:03
  in the US Senate.
• 40:04
  He
• 40:05
  has wanted the Green New Deal.
• 40:06
  He co-sponsored it.
• 40:08
  Kamala Harris was on board with his bill.
• 40:10
  And he said you know she hasn't,
• 40:13
  The New York Times said,
• 40:13
  hey,
• 40:14
  she hasn't really talked about any climate issues in depth at all.
• 40:16
  She hasn't really mentioned it.
• 40:18
  Edward Markey said,
• 40:19
  quote,
• 40:19
  I know it's in her DNA to be a historic environmental leader.
• 40:23
  The first agenda
• 40:24
  has to be to win.
• 40:26
  In other words,
• 40:27
  don't tell the American people what she's going to do.
• 40:30
  It is a disgrace.
• 40:31
  They're actually telling us
• 40:33
  in advance,
• 40:34
  it's amazing.
• 40:35
  Um,
• 40:35
  also,
• 40:36
  by the way,
• 40:36
  in case you were looking for something to do,
• 40:38
  I wanna make sure you know the schedule of events.
• 40:40
  Sure,
• 40:40
  we have our Blaze TV coverage,
• 40:41
  blah blah blah blah blah,
• 40:43
  but you can also get on a Zoom call
• 40:44
  with Robert De Niro for.
• 40:47
  Pisans for Kamala.
• 40:51
  Steve Buscemi,
• 40:52
  Marisa Tomei,
• 40:53
  John Torturro,
• 40:54
  Mark Ruffalo,
• 40:55
  and Lorraine Brocco
• 40:57
  joined uh,
• 40:57
  Bill de Blasio,
• 40:59
  uh,
• 40:59
  Nancy Pelosi,
• 41:00
  and Leon Panetta to raise money for Kamala Harris.
• 41:02
  So I guess that's already happened,
• 41:03
  so you can't.
• 41:04
  I'm sorry.
• 41:05
  It's not that I wasn't up on my on my Pythons for
• 41:08
  Kamala news,
• 41:09
  but
• 41:10
  apparently it's already happened.
• 41:11
  You cannot get involved in that.
• 41:13
  I know it's sad,
• 41:14
  I know it's upsetting to you,
• 41:15
  but um,
• 41:16
  I guess you can watch it back on the YouTubes.
• 41:18
  All right,
• 41:18
  back in a second.
• 41:32
  Would it not be great if we had,
• 41:35
  let's say,
• 41:35
  political elections that were based on policy
• 41:39
  principles,
• 41:40
  and understanding of the things that are actually
• 41:43
  real and important in the world history,
• 41:45
  economics,
• 41:46
  the great works of literature,
• 41:48
  the meaning of the US Constitution.
• 41:51
  If that doesn't sound like it's coming in the next few months,
• 41:54
  you're probably right,
• 41:55
  but
• 41:55
  you can still know about these things.
• 41:57
  Did you study them in school?
• 41:58
  Probably not,
• 41:59
  but
• 42:00
  even if you did,
• 42:00
  it's maybe a time for a refresher.
• 42:02
  Time and technology have changed a lot of things,
• 42:04
  but they have not changed basic fundamental truths
• 42:06
  about the world and our place in it.
• 42:08
  And that's why I love the Hillsdale College program that they're doing right now.
• 42:11
  They're offering over 40,
• 42:13
  40.
• 42:14
  Free online courses in the most important and enduring subjects you can imagine.
• 42:19
  Think of the world,
• 42:20
  the works of CS Lewis or the stories of Genesis,
• 42:24
  the meaning of the US Constitution,
• 42:26
  the rise and fall of the Roman Republic,
• 42:27
  a requirement,
• 42:28
  I think,
• 42:28
  for every male in our society now.
• 42:31
  The history of the ancient Christian church.
• 42:33
  Do all this with Hillsdale's online courses.
• 42:35
  They're all available for free.
• 42:37
  For free right now.
• 42:38
  Hillsdale.edu/stew.
• 42:40
  Hillsdale.edu/do.
• 42:42
  It's free to get started.
• 42:43
  It's easy to get started.
• 42:45
  They will walk you through the whole thing and you know,
• 42:47
  like this is an incredible resource.
• 42:49
  We talk about technology improving the world all the time.
• 42:51
  Man,
• 42:51
  Hillsdale is doing something incredible here.
• 42:53
  Hillsdale.edu/ste to start.
• 42:55
  Hillsdale.edu/stew.
• 43:00
  Alright,
• 43:00
  tomorrow is debate night,
• 43:02
  September 10th,
• 43:03
  8:00 p.m. Eastern right here on Blaze TV.
• 43:04
  It's Blaze Live presents the second presidential debate.
• 43:08
  Glenn Beck,
• 43:09
  Liz Wheeler,
• 43:09
  Steve Dace,
• 43:10
  Alibeth Stuckey,
• 43:11
  Dave Landau,
• 43:13
  and,
• 43:13
  uh,
• 43:14
  myself,
• 43:15
  I'm gonna be there as well.
• 43:16
  Go to blazetv.com/debate
• 43:18
  for over $40 off with code debate.
• 43:21
  It's the largest discount we've ever offered,
• 43:23
  $40 off right now.
• 43:24
  Don't wait.
• 43:25
  Make sure you can take advantage of this discount and never miss a moment of Blaze TV.
• 43:28
  Blaze TV Plus,
• 43:30
  become a subscriber
• 43:31
  today.