Latest / Yaron Brook Show / War?; The Epstein Class; Mamdani; Indians; Flattering Trump; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

War?; The Epstein Class; Mamdani; Indians; Flattering Trump; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: A lot of them, fundamental principles of edom Act.
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: And the individual ONTs. This is the show. Oh right, everybody,
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: welcome to your one book show on this Tuesday May.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Everybody is having a good, good week, good week. It's
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: ready Tuesday. Groops, what happened there? I don't know what
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: happened there? All right, let's jump right into it. So
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: I have no idea what's going on with Iran negotiations
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: or not. Nobody does. Rumors are flying all over the place.
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: One thing is for sure. If there's no deal, it
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: will be the Jew's fault, particularly Nataniel. They're already priming it.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: It's all over it's all over the internet. The Jews
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: are trying to do everything in their power, everything they
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: can to prevent the deal. So it's their fault no
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: matter what, you know, if if, if, if the deal fails,
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: if the war starts over, it's it's Nataniel's fault anyway,
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: you know, it's back and forth. Now, what happened yesterday
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: was interesting because what happened yesterday is suddenly, out of nowhere,
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: the United States attacks a couple of these speedboats, these
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: Iranian speedboats, and starts bombing along the shore. You know
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: in the Homo States, and according to one version of events,
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: this is according to the US at least uh Iran
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: was laying minds. Now, I don't know. I just don't
• 2:01
  Speaker 2: understand it. If you hot is laying minds, they have
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: violated the cease fire again. I mean they're violated the
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: ceasefire by keeping the home Moost Straits closed. That's already
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: a violation. But now they're laying minds. Oh no, no,
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: but we're still negotiating. We're still negotiating because we believe
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: what they say, and we'll sign a deal. And if
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: they sign a deal, they'll stick to it because they're
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: trustworthy people, and you've got to have trust in your enemy.
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: This is about as christian as again, love your enemy.
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: What the hell? If they're lay minds, that's it, no negotiation,
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: all out destroy them. What is the Again, they're violating
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: the deal that they supposedly have. So what is Trump doing?
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: There's no ceasefire. Iran is doing whatever the hell it wants.
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: It doesn't want to lob bibilistic misself, although it did
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: that to the UE because it's wide about US response.
• 3:10
  Speaker 2: But it's testing, it's potting, it's sending out boats that
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: put in minds and testing and potting. And this time
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: the US responded, who a yippie. But it also the
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: US also said, oh no, this response don't this is
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: not our response does not mean the ceasefire is over.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: Talk about double speak. So the ceasefire means opening the
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: states of whome was, They haven't opened it. The ceasefire
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: means no laying of minds. They lay minds. The ceasefire
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: means no US attack on Iran. We do, but none
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: of that should interrupt having a ceasefire. Now, why did
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: we ever have a ceasefire. The whole point of the
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: cease fire was to open the Homeost Straits. We were
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: going to stop bombing Iran and they were going to
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: open the Homo Straits, and that was going to cure
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: the global economy. We stopped bombing and they did not
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: open the streets of homotes. Anyway, where we are right
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: now is they continue to negotiate, continue to negotiate. Earlier
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: today there were reports that the US had resumed you
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: know Operation Freedom, You remember Operation Freedom, that is escorting
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: ships out of the Homo Straits, and that American destroyers
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: were going in and helping ships come out. I was
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: excited as always to see the United States do something.
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: Within what a couple of hours maybe less, US Central
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: Command came out and said, deny their report completely. They're
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: not resuming Project Freedom. It's not assisting commercial vessels through
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: the streets of Hoemoes. In other words, the straits of
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: Homos remained closed in spite of the fact that they're
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: supposed to be open because of these five You know,
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: if you remember the goals of the war, nuclear nuclear
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: is not being negotiated right now. The other goal was
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: to destroy Euron's missile capability, not being negotiated right now
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: and not even mentioned as something that will be negotiated.
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: In other words, Iran will resume building missiles again. They're
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: not that hard to build and they were. You know,
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: they'll fix their factories. They're going to get all this
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: unfrozen money, unfrozen money, you know.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: So uh.
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: So, Yeah, anyway, as far as I know, nothing's really happening.
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: Uh The negotiating rumors have it that JD Vance is out,
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: has been sidelined, A Rubio is taken over. Uh, Rubio
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: is going to cut a deal. Rubio is the is
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: the is the is the hero. Five hours ago there
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: was somebody said Ian in the United States have signal
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: they are closing it on the end an agreement. Any
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: minute now, any minute now. Nothing has happened. Nobody knows.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: What I can tell you is these valleys are panicking
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: for whatever that's worth. Israel's convinced that Trump's gonna sign
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: a bad deal. There will do nothing about the missiles,
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: ballistic missiles, will do nothing about you. And support for
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: terrorism around the Middle Least, which was supposed to be
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: another one of the goals, will be nothing to make
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: to solve israel security problems visa of Iran. I might
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: do something symbolic around the nuclear program that seems to
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: be the one thing Trump is committed to doing, but
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: nothing substantive and lasting. Israel is particularly worried that the
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: deal that Trump cuts with Iran also freezes or hampers
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: Israel's ability to defend itself visa Virisbela. That's why yesterday
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: Israel launched an all our campaign against Grisabella. Rumors have
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: it that the Iranians are saying that if Israel bomb's
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: bey Ut, it deals off. Israel has told people in
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: Beirut to evacuate because it is going to bomb. And
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: they've also said that assassinations of leading his figures are approved,
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: which means by root. So Israel's trying to get as
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: much done quickly as it can before Trump signs a
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: deal that basically stops them from defending themselves. I wonder
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: if Trump's popularity in Israel is declined at all. It
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: was very very high, has been very very high since
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: he became president. I wonder if it's declining right now.
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: I guess we'll just see what the final outcome actually
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: actually is. It is as also heading towards an election,
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: and this is going to affect the election to the
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: extent that Trump betrays Israel or Trump does things that
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: Israel views as counter to his interest, israelis likely to
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: take that out on Anteniao. In the polls, part of
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: his appeal was a special relationship with Trump. If that
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: special relationship is not leading to victory, then what is
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: the point? All right, on the good news fund is
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: all did eliminate this morning, eliminate Hamasa's military wing chief,
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: Mahmad Mahmad Muhammad Mohammad Ode. He's the new Haramas military
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: chief because the previous one was killed last week, so
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: this is the new one. And he was one of
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: the architecture of October seventh massacre. But they're slowly eliminating
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: anybody associated with that massacre. Uh, and he slowly eliminating
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: the Ramas leadership. Of course, they've been doing this for
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: years and years and years. Somehow Hamas keeps finding new
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: people to elevate to these physicians is all maxim now.
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: But this is like within a week they've taken out two.
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: So that's good. And it's gonna be interesting to see
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: who they eliminate in Montchresbella leadership.
• 9:59
  Speaker 3: In.
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: In be Roots and in UH in Lebanon. Anyway, I'll
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: keep monitoring, keep updating you on UH on what is
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: going on? All right. So, one of the ways in
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: which Democrats are now capturing the corruption of the billionaires,
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: not just economic corruption but cultural corruption and uh, you know,
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: model corruption is this new phrase that they're using, and
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: you're gonna hear a lot of this. It's going to
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: be repeated constantly during between now and the midterm election.
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: And that is this idea of the Epstein class. The
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: Epstein class the people you know, who are rich enough
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: to have schmoozed and done maybe other things, some of
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: them might even be being illegal with which with Epstein,
• 11:02
  Speaker 2: with Jeffrey Epstein. Uh so this is a smear. Uh,
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: it's not. It's not targeted at it's specific people who
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: might have actually been at Epstein parties and might actually
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: have done things that we were not like or even
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: as I said, even things that are you know, illegal. No,
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: this is now a class, a class of people a
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: whole the rich. But the rich is kind of boring,
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: even billionaires, it's kind of boring. But the Epstein class,
• 11:34
  Speaker 2: who that conscious images of pedophiles, of of of of
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: you know, parties on islands, of not caring about Americans,
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: not caring about about human beings, not caring about the women,
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: not caring about the girls, of this detached class that
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: just is filled with hatred. I mean, this is this
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: is a term that was coined, I guess by Conna,
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: a Democratic lawmaker from California. This is what he says
• 12:06
  Speaker 2: about this. It's the sense that this is an elite
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: class who has been responsible for creating one of the
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: most lopsided and unfair economic and political systems that America
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: has had in its history. It's not bandied around by
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: politicians on the left and on the right, and even
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Hollywood celebrities like Robert de Niro have talked about the
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: Epstein class. Conna says he came up with the idea
• 12:41
  Speaker 2: after waiting through the voluptuous, voluminous, not volumptious, voluminous correspondence
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: contained in the Department of justic files between members of
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: a quote arrogant, self entitled elite who thought they were
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: above the rest of us. He came to realizing differ
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: that showed. The difference they showed the Epstein's sex traffick
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: victims mirrored the arrogance, arrogant disregard for all ordinary Americans.
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: So expect to see this repeated constantly among Democrats. And
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: you know, the number one theme of the next few months.
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: The number one theme of the next few months is
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: going to be billionaires, billionaires, billionaires, tax the billionaires get
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: their money. You know, Epstein class. These are bad people.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: We got to get their money. They shouldn't have as
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: much money. Inequality billionaires, Epstein. That is going to be
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: the theme. Big story in the New York Times today,
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: guest essay by two economists who are being how you know,
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: just just constantly preaching the story of inequality and whose
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: data has been refuted, methodology being refuted. This stuff is
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: bs but they're a big story in the New York
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: Times today titled the Case for California's Billionaire Wealth Tax.
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: You're going to hear a lot about California's billionaires wealth
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: tax and why we need it at the federal level,
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: and why billionaires need to be tax tax tax, tax taxed.
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: And you'll see graphs and numbers, but a lot of it,
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: a lot of it is just you know, is again distorted,
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: made up, perverted by their methodology and by the way
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: they use the data, the which taxes they count in,
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: which taxes they don't count. There's a big Iceberg. They
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: show a Mark Zuckerberg's wealth and what's taxed and what
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: isn't tax and again filled and misconceptions and distortions to
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: try to get you on their side. A typical what
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: the left, What the left does? You know what the
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: left does? Anyway, So let's look at some videos of
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: kind of the lefts what they're pushing and uh the
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: new poster boy of the left is uh Graham uh
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: Platner Playtna Graham Playton, Platina, Playton and Platina, who is
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: running for Senate against Susan Collins in Maine, likely to win.
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: Maine is a is ultimately a blue state. Susan Collins
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: has managed to somehow survive there, but he probably won't
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: this time. Playtna is a leftist, populist go after the
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: rich type guy. He's a Bonnie Sander's Democrat. This is
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: the wing of the Democratic Party that is right now
• 15:56
  Speaker 2: on the ascend. They are rising. He might have a
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: Nazi something. He might be stupid enough not to know
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: what that even meant, but he's not. There's no reason
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: to believe he's racist. There's every reason to believe he is,
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: you know, economically illiterate, a a A an egalitarian economically,
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: and probably an anti semi. So let's take a look.
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look at him. You can see him there,
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: sitting next to Bernie Sanders, who does not look well.
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: I mean he's older. I guess he's getting old. We're
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: all getting old. But Bonnie does not look well. Anyway,
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: let's let's play this.
• 16:49
  Speaker 4: No.
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: I think it's abject nonsense. I think that's what somebody
• 16:53
  Speaker 3: says their taxes go up. There's absolutely no question that
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: if we target the wealth where it has been hoarded,
• 17:00
  Speaker 3: frankly for decades.
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: Hoarded billionaires hold their wealth. Scooge mcdock. They have a huge,
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: you know, like tank and they put all their dollar
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: bills in the tank and they go swimming in it
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: and they hold it. Or they have a big hole
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: in their backyard and it's all hoarded in the backyard.
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is bizarre, right. Their wealth is all invested.
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: It's in their company stock. It's most of their wealth.
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: It's company stock. If the company goes down, their wealth disappears.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: And you know it's if they sell the stock, somebody
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: else buys it, so they's stole money in the stock.
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: And the idea that people hold wealth is just economic illiterate, ignorance, stupidity,
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: well and a good sound bite because it conjures up
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: the image of Scooge mcdock, I mean in his gold coins.
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: But all these guys investing beats us as building a
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: space company. Most of his wealth is in Amazon, employing
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: hundreds of thousands of people. That's not holding, that's building, creating,
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: making moving America forward. Bes us. Like all the other
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: billionaires are invested in AI, they're investing in interesting, they're
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: investing in all kinds of things. And who who, who
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: you would ask is a better investor? Bets us a platina.
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: I mean, plant is so good in investing other people's money.
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: Why isn't he rich? Why isn't he a billionaire? And
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: that's who we want. Who the alternative is to be,
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: is us investing his own money. It's the government investing
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: in investing in quotation marks. It's giving it to politicians
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: and bureaucrats to do people who have no clue on
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: what to put the money in.
• 19:14
  Speaker 3: It's frankly for decades at this point, and we pull
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: it back into our system and put it into social
• 19:20
  Speaker 3: programs like healthcare, like childcare, like paying teachers what they are.
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: Worth like that, that is going to get you a
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: huge return on investment. I mean, the economy will boom
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: if you pay more welfare, if you pay teachers higher salaries.
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: I mean, think about it. Teachers are producing a lowsy product,
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: I mean a really losy product. Have you seen test
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: scores in American schools lately? And a declining product, the
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: product that's getting worse every year. We should reward them,
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: give them more money, Give them more money because they've
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: been doing They work so hard and they've been doing
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: such a good job. Give them more money. That's right.
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: We should, we should, We should rewarding competence.
• 20:10
  Speaker 3: It's what they are worth. We will absolutely improve the
• 20:14
  Speaker 3: lives of working Americans.
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: I mean, if you actually paid teachers what they were worth,
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: it would be I mean a lot of teachers, not
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: all teachers, Some teachers are good, but most teachers, given
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: the test scores and given you would pay them a
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: lot less than what they're getting. Sorry, but that's the reality.
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: Improve the lives of working Americans and quite frankly, improve
• 20:32
  Speaker 3: our society as a whole.
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: Wait a minute, Wait a minute, I need to think
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: about this in a second, working Americans. Where would working
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: Americans work if you got rid of billionaires? Who would
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: be building the businesses, who would be creating the jobs? Where? Where? Almighty?
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: Where do jobs come from? Where did jobs come from?
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: They come from entrepreneurs who build businesses. And if they're successful,
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: the business is go and they employ more people, and
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: they go even more and they employ even more people,
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: and then the billion is and they're employing a lot
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: of people. But I have to take that money away,
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: and you eliminate entrepreneurship, and you prevent them from growing
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: their businesses. Where is the money going to go? Where
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: working class people? Where's the worker going to come from?
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: I mean working class people work for Zus? What's the alternative?
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: I know they think they think it's workers who create
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: the business. They think Bezus is just a leech. The
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: Zus did nothing. But Zus created those jobs. Without visas,
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: without his investment, his quote holding, there would be no jobs.
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: I mean of education these people need to go through.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: It's it's it's it's gonna be tough, guys. It's going
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: to be really, really difficult to change the world, given
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: how pathetically stupid the ideas that these people hold.
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: Up asciety as a whole, it's I think what he
• 22:16
  Speaker 3: is pitching is propaganda. It's meant to protect himself and
• 22:20
  Speaker 3: protect his crowny friends, and uh, we're going to come
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: after them for it.
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: That's the message. We're coming after you. If you're successful
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: in America, if you made a lot of money, if
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: you employ a lot of people, and particularly if you
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: stand up and try to defend yourself, we are coming
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: after you. That is the message of our democratic friends.
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: You know, you got Trump on one side and the
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: stupid Republicans, and we've got this on the other side.
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: All right, let's uh, let's see this one. I can't
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: get it to pause, So I apologize for the noise.
• 22:59
  Speaker 2: This is going to create.
• 23:05
  Speaker 3: People where they are dining with you. I believe that
• 23:09
  Speaker 3: in our country, the voices.
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: Of working people, working people are.
• 23:13
  Speaker 3: Far more important than the voices of those who merely
• 23:17
  Speaker 3: have money. I believe that settling for scraps that they
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: throw to us, settling for scraps that they throw to up.
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: Oh now now now they pause works. But meley have money,
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: not money they created, not money that by creating it
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: they made the jobs of these working class people possible. No,
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: they melly had money. Some other money showed up in
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: their pockets, in their bank accounts, in them you know pools.
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: Though whatever it is that they imagine that the money
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: is being hoarded in the money just showed up. Merely
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: have money. Notice the woods that these people use, and
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: the kind of world that they assume exists out there,
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: and the kind of irrespect that they have to the
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: productive activities of individuals. Melody have money I believe.
• 24:13
  Speaker 3: That we should not be settling for scraps that they
• 24:17
  Speaker 3: throw to us from the table where they are dining
• 24:20
  Speaker 3: with the Epstein class.
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: Maybe it is the Epstein class. You hear it a lot,
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: You're gonna hear it a lot. I'm looking for their
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: audience loves it. They love the Epstein class. That's why
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: you hear it a lot.
• 24:33
  Speaker 3: I don't think that a CEO should have more power
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: than a union member. I don't think that private equity
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: deserves more time with the United States senator than someone
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: who works two jobs for a living.
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: I agree. I don't think any of them should have
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: any time with a US senator because I don't want
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: the US senator to have any power over the economy,
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: because most US senator is about as dumb as this guy,
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: and I don't want them to have any power over
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: the US economy. So yes, please stop giving them time.
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: I don't want the union guy to have power. I
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: don't want the CEO to have power. I don't want
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: private equity to have power. I don't want work as
• 25:15
  Speaker 2: to that power political power. They should all go back
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: and work, and we should separate economics from politics, separate
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: the political class from having any economic power. The only
• 25:34
  Speaker 2: way we get rid of cronyism of all kinds.
• 25:39
  Speaker 3: I believe that.
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: Right, that was one more. Now we got Bernie, we
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: got the original. We're going to the We're going to
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: to the original guy. And uh yeah, this is uh
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: five percent wealth tax billionaires, five percent wealth tax on billionaires.
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: Uh this is uh his uh his case for that.
• 26:09
  Speaker 4: My opponents, of which there are many, claim that this
• 26:14
  Speaker 4: legislation is putative and confiscate. All we're just picking on
• 26:18
  Speaker 4: these poor billionaires. I mean, my god, how cruel can
• 26:23
  Speaker 4: you be?
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, notice that they ridicule. And it's true if if
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: your only criticisms you're picking in billionaires. You know it's confiscatory. No,
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: it's immoral because it's their money and they're using that
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: money to create wealth. And then wealth is where we
• 26:44
  Speaker 2: get jobs from. The wealth is where we get economic
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: activity from. That wealth is where GDP comes from. And
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: it's theirs. They have a way to it. Who are
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: you to just take it?
• 27:02
  Speaker 4: But I want you to hear this. This shows you
• 27:04
  Speaker 4: how crazy the economy is today. If that bill were
• 27:07
  Speaker 4: in effect this year, Elon Musk would pay thirty nine
• 27:11
  Speaker 4: billion more.
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: In Texas thirty nine billion more in Texas thirty nine billion.
• 27:21
  Speaker 4: By what here's the punchline. This confiscatory, terrible, drastic, radical
• 27:27
  Speaker 4: piece of legislation would leave Musk with just seven hundred
• 27:31
  Speaker 4: and thirty seven billion dollars left to subuddance. Now, I
• 27:35
  Speaker 4: know you're worried about him, But what do you think
• 27:38
  Speaker 4: you could make it on seven hundred and thirty seven billion?
• 27:41
  Speaker 5: Yeah?
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: Maybe? And you see why this is effective. You see
• 27:45
  Speaker 2: why people respond to this. You see what you got
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: seven and forty four billion dollars. You know what is
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: he eat next to thirty something? You know we can
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: use that. We can feed some families with that. Now
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: we'll do it every year. You know is well who
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: declined And of course he won't have that thirty something
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: billion to actually invest and create more jobs and create
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: more economic vowthe But we don't really want that. We
• 28:11
  Speaker 2: just want to feed. We just want to provide it
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: to social problems. We want to redistribute it. We want
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: to help the poor. And if you have helping the
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: poor is one side, and you have billionaires worth hundreds
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: of billions of dollars, who do you think is going
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: to win that one? Who are the voters going to
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: go with. I mean, sacrifice a few billionaires and not
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: even sacrifice them, just penny pins them a little bit,
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: reduce the number of billions they have, just a little
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: bit to help the poor. I mean, this is a
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: slam dunk for the Democrats. It's a slam dunk. Who's
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: going to argue against this? Who's going to not vote
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: for this? This is the most Christian thing you can do,
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: because it's the most altruistic thing you can do. Well.
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: I mean, you could text all of their wealth just
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: five percent. God, that is a little bit. But this
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: is where we're heading, because this is a winning strategy
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: for the Democrats.
• 29:20
  Speaker 6: Yeah, Jeff Bezels with all about fourteen billion more in taxes,
• 29:29
  Speaker 6: but he would still have two hundred and sixty five
• 29:31
  Speaker 6: billion to put a roof over his home.
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: They laugh. You know, we get to decide how much
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: is enough for you, and we'll take the access to
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: do what we think needs to be done for the
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: common good, for the public interest, for the world out there.
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: You know, and you know they're gonna go after them.
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: You're gonna go after them in California, the billionaire They're
• 30:01
  Speaker 2: gonna go after them in Washington, they're gonna go after them.
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: In New York, they're gonna go after them at the
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: federal level. And billionaires will leave. But federal level where
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: you're gonna go, way, you're gonna escape too. I don't
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: know if the wealth tax will apply to Puerto Ricans.
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: Maybe they can come here. Maybe this is the next
• 30:22
  Speaker 2: next big thing is to come to California, where the
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: wealth tax will not apply. But you know, this is
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: a supposedly an easy way to make money, to bring
• 30:35
  Speaker 2: money in. People say a wealth tax caused billionaires to leave.
• 30:39
  Speaker 2: No way, Yeah, but that was no way. How many
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: billionaires can leave the United States? No, they will raise
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: money from this. They will hood the economy and and
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: and and cause real problems. But yeah, they will. They
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: will raise money. Yeah, some billionaires can go to the UE.
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: But the reality is that Americans attacked on their worldwide income.
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: So even if you live in the UIE, the United
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: States government still taxes you. So there's no way you
• 31:17
  Speaker 2: can go unless you give up your American citizenship. That
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: could be that some billionaires will give up their American citizenship,
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: but all of them and still run businesses in the US. No,
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: they're not going to so the United States, if you
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: have a federal level wealth tax, there only so many
• 31:35
  Speaker 2: billionaires who can leave. They will raise money. This is
• 31:39
  Speaker 2: the reality. And the Wall tax is such that even
• 31:50
  Speaker 2: if they stop working, they'll still pay it because it's
• 31:55
  Speaker 2: not their wealth, it's not in their income. It's a
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: really vicious tax which will raise money. And this is
• 32:03
  Speaker 2: why it's so appealing. The Democrats and maybe some Republicans.
• 32:08
  Speaker 2: I'm sure Josh Hally jd Vance would love a billion
• 32:11
  Speaker 2: are tacks. I mean, after all, we're in a debt
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: trap where where you know, the dollar is going to
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: go to hell, and we have to we have to
• 32:22
  Speaker 2: pay all those middle class benefits, so security and Medicare,
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: and where are we going to get the money. Well,
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: billionaires have a lot of money, and a simple simple tax,
• 32:29
  Speaker 2: like a five percent, well tax, it's not gonna cost
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: them that much from their perspective, and think of all
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: the beautiful things the government can do with that money.
• 32:40
  Speaker 2: It is it is scary. It is scary. The immorality
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: of it, the economic ignorance of it, the violation of
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: you know, the very nature of what it means to
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: be America of it is really horrific, all right, But
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: you know that's just one of the many plans Democratic
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: friends have entailed for us. Mum, Donnie is going full
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: on in New York City and is insistent on solving
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: the rent problem in New York City. He is going
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: to lower rents. You know, he's definitely gonna do this
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: and the rent controllers. Of course, the solution it's worked
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: so well in every other place that's been tried, but
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: it sounds really good. Here's here's from Donnie. Here's from
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: Donny about you know, uh, you know, solving the affordability
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: so called the full ability crisis and the ability of
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: politicians to actually get stuff done.
• 33:44
  Speaker 7: You talk about freezing rent, is that something freezing as
• 33:48
  Speaker 7: a bold new thing or, as you've also mentioned, something
• 33:52
  Speaker 7: that the mayor is the power to do the past.
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: Administrations have done.
• 33:55
  Speaker 8: I think it's it's a mixture and that this clearly
• 33:57
  Speaker 8: has precedent. We saw the previous administration.
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: To this times. How's that gone.
• 34:01
  Speaker 9: We are living in.
• 34:02
  Speaker 8: A time of politics where politicians try to convince the
• 34:04
  Speaker 8: public that there's nothing they can do, and so to
• 34:07
  Speaker 8: even have the idea that we could actually help people,
• 34:09
  Speaker 8: it's seen as a departure from what so many are
• 34:11
  Speaker 8: being told in this moment and freezing the rent right.
• 34:14
  Speaker 8: This is about two and a half million New Yorkers
• 34:16
  Speaker 8: in a city of eight and a half million. The
• 34:18
  Speaker 8: mayor has the power to freeze their rent.
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: I don't know how the mayor has that power. I
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: have to admit it seems unconstitutional to me. It seems
• 34:28
  Speaker 2: like a you know, a such a seizure right, the
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: seizing property. So I don't know how you have the
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: constitutional part of freeze rent. There has to be somebody
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: needs to challenge the constitutionality of this under some law
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: you know, I don't know. But what do we know
• 34:48
  Speaker 2: when rent control is imposed, When rent's are freezed, rents
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: go up elsewhere? And what happens that apartments who's rents
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: a freeze frozen for two and a half million, well
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: maintenance and taking care of those apartments plummets, I mean,
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: landloads can't afford to invest in those apartments. We also
• 35:09
  Speaker 2: know that would me lay did away within control in
• 35:12
  Speaker 2: buonos aires, rents dropped by more than forty percent, So
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: we know exactly what works, and yet these people continue
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: to try to tell us that the solution is price
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: controls when price controls never have worked, but it makes
• 35:30
  Speaker 2: them seem like they're doing something. Now, Momdoniosa plans to
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: build two hundred thousand new affordable rents, stabilizing homes, whatever
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: the hell that means. So let's listen to what he
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: also plans to do.
• 35:49
  Speaker 9: If the absence of good government created the conditions we
• 35:52
  Speaker 9: now face.
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: Really, is that the problem? No, yeah, it's it's the
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: it's the existence of bad government, and you're doubling up
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: in the policies. The problems we face in New York
• 36:03
  Speaker 2: is rent control. So can to double up on the
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: win control fascinating.
• 36:10
  Speaker 9: Created the conditions we now face. The presence of good
• 36:14
  Speaker 9: government can build the solutions we now need. I am
• 36:17
  Speaker 9: proud to announce that New York City will propose, pursue,
• 36:22
  Speaker 9: and deliver solutions to this crisis through our historic housing Plan,
• 36:27
  Speaker 9: block by block, a plan that matches not only our
• 36:30
  Speaker 9: city size, but the scale of our city's ambition.
• 36:33
  Speaker 2: If the abs So that was not this segment of
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: the speech I wanted, but anyway that I'll have to
• 36:44
  Speaker 2: do what he's proposing and what he explicitly says, not
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: in this one, but in the other talk is what
• 36:56
  Speaker 2: they're going to do is they want to construc TIW
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: hundred thousand affordable homes over the next ten years. All
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: you have to you know, I don't know who is
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: they and how are they going to make it possible.
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: All they have to do is lift the regulations in
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: the private sector will build those homes. But what he
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: actually does, you know when he says block by block,
• 37:16
  Speaker 2: what does he mean? What does he intend to do?
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: Let me just find this quote, all right. What he
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: said in the other clip that I don't have is
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: that they are going to identify buildings where the landlord
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: is neglecting the building with the landload, is mistreating his tenants,
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: and they are going to quote transfer ownership of those
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: buildings to nonprofits, to community whatever. In other words, they're
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: going to steal private property. Now, luckily we live in
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: a world where the constitution with regards to some private
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: property is still respected, and he probably cannot do this,
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: cannot do it. But he wants to basically confiscate private
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: property where he thinks, where he thinks that it's been
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: quote mismanaged, where the standard is the well being of
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: the tenants, and move it to This is to nonprofits.
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: I don't think he can do the government. But this
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: is a way fame to nationalize, right the building stock. Now,
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: imagine if you're developing New York and Mambney wants you
• 39:03
  Speaker 2: to build two hundred thousand affordable homes, and you know
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: there's gonna be rent control, and you know that if
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: you haven't controlled and then you don't fix the buildings,
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: they're just gonna take them from you. What are the
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: chances you're actually going to build those buildings? What incentive
• 39:23
  Speaker 2: does this provide? So you're seeing a you know, the
• 39:32
  Speaker 2: democratic program. We're going to pour resources into helping the
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: poor by basically eradicating property right protections. And we're going
• 39:44
  Speaker 2: to do it by taxing billionaires, by taking their wealth,
• 39:48
  Speaker 2: by demonizing them, taking their wealth and redistributing it. That's
• 39:55
  Speaker 2: the democratic agenda. The beneficiaries are going to be the
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: post of the poor and the bunch of middlemen who
• 40:06
  Speaker 2: will make money off of this, I'm sure, And the
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: victims will be everybody in the middle the billionaires on down,
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: because all of us will suffer. Our apartments will not
• 40:20
  Speaker 2: be maintained, our rents will go up, we won't be
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: able to afford at home, there won't be any jobs
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: because the investment capital will dry up, but the redistribution
• 40:33
  Speaker 2: machine will chuck forward and work. That is what we
• 40:37
  Speaker 2: have installed for us, because that is where you know
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: this political party is moving us. And I don't see
• 40:50
  Speaker 2: how they don't win given the performance of the Trump administration.
• 40:56
  Speaker 2: I don't see how they don't win, given that, I
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: think they've got the kind of messaging that a populist
• 41:02
  Speaker 2: public right and left is not going to jump on
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: our in house leftists says no. Yeah, So we'll say
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: whether New York. I think New York will survived, mum, donnie.
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: But will America survive a Democratic party that is led
• 41:36
  Speaker 2: by Bernie Sanders clone and a Republican party led by
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: a Donald Trump clone? That I have no idea how
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: the United States survives that combination. I just don't see it.
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: One of the things that are really astounding out there,
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: and you saw this last week. We talked about this
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: with the new immigration regulation. The new immigration regulation that requires, uh,
• 42:06
  Speaker 2: if you want to convert an H one, B or
• 42:08
  Speaker 2: one into a green card, you have to leave the
• 42:11
  Speaker 2: country first, leave the country first, which means that many
• 42:17
  Speaker 2: of those people will never become American citizens. Many of
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: those people will never get Green cards, and many those
• 42:22
  Speaker 2: jobs will not exist. They will base they were basically
• 42:26
  Speaker 2: kicking out. We're basically kicking out the most productive immigrants
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: we have, and immigrants who are creating the next generation
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: in businesses, immigrants that are building the next generation of
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: unicorn tech companies. We're basically telling and don't come. We
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: don't want you. And in particular, in particular, you're getting
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: this from four Indians. It's particularly targeted at Indians from India.
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: I mean, here's a tweet from a This guy is
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: a research fellow at the Artificial Intelligence Institute that's at
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: the Harvard Business School and at the Burning Glass Institute.
• 43:17
  Speaker 2: He is a leading artificial intelligence researcher and the economy
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: and applying it to into economics. You know, I don't
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: know how good his work is, but clearly a smart
• 43:27
  Speaker 2: guy who's named Sumitra Shukla. And this is what he
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: wrote today. The amount of anti Indian hates on this
• 43:38
  Speaker 2: platform is truly sickening. People need to stop worrying about
• 43:42
  Speaker 2: jobs being stolen and look deeper within as to why
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: they have such rotten souls to wish the worst on others,
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: to wish the worst on others, the amount of vitual
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: he got a nap post. The fuck are you getting
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: on about? Oh, we undercut your wages and to do
• 44:09
  Speaker 2: the jobs, the really shitty ability and fuck it all
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: up and weasel our way into hiring positions and I
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: only our own, But you dare get mad about it?
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: Get the fuck out of my country. I've seen your
• 44:26
  Speaker 2: kind in action, your kind being Indian, and I must
• 44:30
  Speaker 2: say I'm less than impressed. Also, it is rotten. Is
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: it rotten to wish for them to stay in their
• 44:35
  Speaker 2: own country?
• 44:37
  Speaker 4: Ye?
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: Geez, that's wishing the worst on them and just unbelievably stupid.
• 44:51
  Speaker 2: This is Elia Suman on this whole phenomena. I'm not
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: the first person to notice this, but amazing how much
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: anti Indian hate there is on this site, typified by
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: claims they are somehow monopolizing the tech industry, discriminating against whites, etc.
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: It's very similar to traditional antisemitic tropes and it's equally baseless.
• 45:14
  Speaker 2: I have dealt extensively with Indians and academia and some
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: in tech. My parents are both tech industry veterans, and
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: there is no real evidence to support these claims. They
• 45:25
  Speaker 2: like traditional anti Semitism, are also based on a flawed
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: zero some view of the economy that underlies a lot
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: of ethno nationalism and bigotry, as well as a lot
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: of awful left wing ideology. Yeah, I mean, and then
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: if you look, if you look at the number of
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: Indians who run major American corporations. Right, here's just a list,
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: a CEO of Microsoft, of Alphabet, Google, of Adobe, of IBM,
• 46:04
  Speaker 2: a FedEx, Palo Alta Ventures, of YouTube, of Micron Semiconductors,
• 46:11
  Speaker 2: of net App, of Arista, all all Indians. And that's
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: that's just a beginning, because actually you can flesh this
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: out and you'll get even more than that, right Honeywell
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: and Flex, and I'm looking at other companies T Mobile,
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: and I mean there's a lot of them Indians running
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: American businesses. What's the excuse. Here's the explanation. It's statistically
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: impossible for Indians to hold this many COEO positions in America.
• 46:50
  Speaker 2: They shared superpower, hiring an endless army of h one
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: b visa indians, outsourcing to India, and firing American citizens.
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: I mean, the conspiratorial nature of these things is so
• 47:05
  Speaker 2: bizarre and crazy. Microsoft really is firing American citizens left
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: and right, and it's all Indians and Microsoft employees. Nobody
• 47:18
  Speaker 2: in America IBM, and an American can't hire h one
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: b visa Indians, and an American can't outsource to India,
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: only Indians can do it. It Really, the hatred here
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: is truly sickening, and you can see it in Vivic's campaign.
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: Vivica is running for governor of Ohio and he is
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: the Republican candidate. He won the primary, but there was
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: a significant opposition, opposition from those Republicans who cannot tolerate
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: the idea of an Indian being the govern of Ohio
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: and he's going to run against a Democrat. Ohio is
• 48:07
  Speaker 2: a dark red state. He should be a shoeing as
• 48:14
  Speaker 2: a Republican candidate, but there are many Republicans who will
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: not come out and vote for him. And most polls
• 48:25
  Speaker 2: are showing a slight Democratic lead. That is, they would
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: rather Democrat be governor of their state. There's somebody who
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: they agree with mostly on the issues, but who looks
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: and has the heritage of an Indian. I mean, I
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: wouldn't vote against Vivic for governor of Ohio. I think
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: he has done really really well in the last few
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: months in terms of his positioning is you know, I
• 49:07
  Speaker 2: think he truly is a free market kind of guy.
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: And I think a lot of his really really really
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: dumb ideas were him catering to the populists to try
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: to out Maga Trump, And I think he's he doesn't
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: need that. He's discovered, or at least I hope he doesn't,
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: And I don't think that's really who he is. I
• 49:30
  Speaker 2: think he's better than that. But I've shown you some
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: videos of Vivic really standing up to Maga in an
• 49:38
  Speaker 2: impressive way, pressive way. Yeah, I would one hundred percent
• 49:48
  Speaker 2: vote for Vivic over what the alternative is right now
• 49:52
  Speaker 2: for governor, you know, president, he'd have to run the
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: campaign and see what he says. All right, this is
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: a funny one. So The New York Times reviewed over
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: a dozen hours of cabinet meeting footage of the cabinet
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: Trump's cabinet to analyze how his administration spoke to him.
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: On average, one in every six sentences was either aimed
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: at flattering Trump, give him credit, or criticize his political opponents.
• 50:35
  Speaker 2: So in cabinet meetings, one sixth of the time, A
• 50:40
  Speaker 2: significant portion of the time is spent on flattery. Now,
• 50:46
  Speaker 2: some it's much worse than that. For example, Marco Rubio
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: and John Radcliffe, the CIA director, basically most of what
• 50:59
  Speaker 2: they say is packed with praise of Donald Trump. JD.
• 51:05
  Speaker 2: Vance spends most of his time attacking Democrats. I guess
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: that's how they're trying to position themselves differently in an
• 51:15
  Speaker 2: attempt to win the election. In twenty twenty eight, Hexaith
• 51:25
  Speaker 2: gives him, give Trump's a lot of credit and flatters him.
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: He wills to spends quite a lot of time in
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: criticizing opponents. Michaela doesn't spend a lot of time on opponents,
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: you know. Doug Bergram spends a lot of time on opponents,
• 51:40
  Speaker 2: but also a lot of time on flattery, a lot
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: of time on flattery. Kennedy talks a lot. That's the
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: one thing you can conclude by looking at Kennedy. But yeah,
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: the percentage of flattery for some of these guys is
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: pretty in pressive. Dean Duffy, the transportation guy, not a
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: lot of time I'm on flattery. Good for Dean, so interesting.
• 52:07
  Speaker 2: One sixth of all communications is either flattery, attacking Democrats
• 52:14
  Speaker 2: or giving Trump credit for I don't know, wondrous things
• 52:17
  Speaker 2: that he's doing. It's a pretty it's a pretty funny analysis.
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: Pretty funny analysis. Let's see, all.
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: Right, finally our new segment on human achievements, Human achievements,
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: and let's see we got some different ones today, well
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: not all of them different, but but yeah, four different
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: achievements today, three in one video. And the first one
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: is there's a big audic call again the New York
• 52:59
  Speaker 2: Times a few days ago on Underhill Undurill, which is
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: this startup that Poma Lucky started. Andreld just raised five
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: billion dollars. The company is really pushing the American military
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: to modernize. It is a startup which makes AI backed weapons.
• 53:26
  Speaker 2: It is a brand new, relatively new company with evaluation
• 53:30
  Speaker 2: now sixty one billion dollars. It's drone technology is being
• 53:35
  Speaker 2: used right now in and tested right now in Ukraine,
• 53:41
  Speaker 2: and it is building some of the most exciting weapons
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: systems that I think the Pentagon has in the pipeline anywhere,
• 53:49
  Speaker 2: from submarine drones over the water, drones, flying drones all
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: guided by AI, you know all you know. They're also
• 54:04
  Speaker 2: creating surveillance software that I'm less excited about. But the
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: company has began testing AI drones on the battlefield in Ukraine.
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: It's working with Ukrainian companies to develop some of the
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: drone technology there. In March, they signed a ten year,
• 54:22
  Speaker 2: twenty billion dollar deal with the Army for its software
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: and AI backed weapons. That same one month, the company
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: announced that it was part of a consortium of companies
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: building one hundred and eighty five billion dollars space interceptor
• 54:37
  Speaker 2: missile system for the US government. So this is part
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: of Golden Dome. So this is exciting because this is
• 54:44
  Speaker 2: actual technology startup AI high tech tech being applied to
• 54:54
  Speaker 2: national security and defense, to the Pentagon. This is the
• 54:57
  Speaker 2: kind of stuff that I think makes the United States.
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: It's the strongest military in the world. It has a
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: private sector, it has access to entrepreneurs into innovation and competition.
• 55:10
  Speaker 2: And Pama Lucky is a young guy. You know, I
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: don't know, he might still be in his twenties, and
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: which is pretty amazing, right, pretty amazing that a young
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: guy like this in America can start a sixty one
• 55:28
  Speaker 2: billion dollar company. They just opened a one billion dollar
• 55:33
  Speaker 2: factory in Ohio to speed the production of its weapons systems.
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: There is a company creating jobs, creating value, self defense value.
• 55:46
  Speaker 2: And Pama Lucky is one of those billionaires that Bernie
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: Sanders would love to take all this money he's holding.
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: There's one kind of startup. I want to talk a
• 56:00
  Speaker 2: little bit about another kind of startup, and this is
• 56:03
  Speaker 2: a This is a company that was started about ten
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: years ago but is really really kicking in right now.
• 56:15
  Speaker 2: It's a school system. It's called Alpha School. Alpha School
• 56:24
  Speaker 2: off of school is an educational system that is based
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: on kids coming to school, but where the primary teachers
• 56:34
  Speaker 2: are AI. Students complete all their school work each morning
• 56:42
  Speaker 2: using AI powered apps and they do that in two hours.
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: The afternoons are all for life skills at workshops on
• 56:55
  Speaker 2: public speaking, entrepreneurship, product design. These schools are all private.
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: The first campus of the Office Schools was built in Austin, Texas.
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: Now they operate about twenty two locations nationwide. They recently
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: opened a campus in San Francisco. They have thirty students
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: their mixed age groups six to fourteen. Because they each
• 57:27
  Speaker 2: have an individualized teacher an AI program. The platform they
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: will in is called time Back, which teaches the same
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: content as the US Common co Curriculum but instead of
• 57:43
  Speaker 2: a teacher lecturing to thirty plus kids, an algorithm assesses
• 57:47
  Speaker 2: what each student knows, identifies their gaps, and builds a
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: lesson plan to fill them. The only adults in the
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: room are guides who get paid up to one hundred
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: and seventy five dollars a year, so good money to
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: essentially act as motivational coaches. So this is individualized, individualized learning.
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: I know some parents who are sending their kids there
• 58:18
  Speaker 2: or considering it. It seems like an amazing project. There
• 58:22
  Speaker 2: will be a lot of learning, There'll be failure and
• 58:25
  Speaker 2: learning and adapting. Two of the people responsible for curriculum
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: development right now, So not when it was founded, but
• 58:37
  Speaker 2: today curriculum development is the application of AI objectivists. Probably
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: have you know one or both of them come in
• 58:50
  Speaker 2: and do an interview here. They're trying to apply them
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: onto SURI for young kids within the context of an
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: Alpha school. I'm trying to merge kind of the philosophy
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: of both Maria Montssoui and the founders of the school.
• 59:07
  Speaker 2: The school. These schools are expensive, but they were all
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: you know, they're all privately funded by one entrepreneur. He
• 59:16
  Speaker 2: hasn't raised any capital from what I understand h and
• 59:25
  Speaker 2: you know, we will see, we will see how this evolves.
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: It's something to keep track of, to monitor to see
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: how it develops. And particularly excited about the involvement of
• 59:36
  Speaker 2: objectivists who from the educational space in the curriculum development here.
• 59:45
  Speaker 2: You know, you know, he's just a description. Every morning,
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: students grab the computer from a storage bind put on headphones,
• 59:51
  Speaker 2: settle into their desks and focus on work. Right they
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: they do reading assignments, math assignments, whatever it happens to be.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 2: That is part of the curriculum and again afternoons are
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: much more about skill oriented education. I mean, this is
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: going to be fascinating. Look forward to keeping you updated
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 2: on how this goes. But it's exciting to see people
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: thinking out of the box, people trying to innovate, people
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: trying to apply the latest, the latest technology to the
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: challenges that education poses to, trying to improve educational system. Okay,
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: to the healthcare sphace quickly. Everybody knows about GYP one drugs,
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: GP one drugs. If you know a weight loss drugs
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: that originally they will for a diabetes they lower blood sugar,
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 2: but they have been proved to be unbelievably effective, particularly
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: among obese people at reducing weight, but also you can
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: microdose jp ones and even people who are not obeste
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: can adjust their weight, can lose a few pounds taking
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: these drugs. Now you know, they they're mostly by injection,
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 2: but now you can get them in pill form, and
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 2: they used to be unbelievably expensive, but there has a
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: huge amount of competition around this and prices have come
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: down significantly. And we've talked about this in the past
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: that even independent of the weight loss effects, these drugs
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 2: seem to have all kinds of other health benefits for
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 2: hot disease you know, and and for other you know,
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: for for a whole variety of diseases.
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: Well.
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: In a recent study for new studies have suggested that
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 2: people taking gop one drugs so reductions in tumor progression cancer,
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 2: lower overall chance of death, and less risk of developing
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 2: breast cancer. As a quote from one of the scientists,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 2: it's really provocative that they showed in several cancers that
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: people who took these drugs seem to have a lower
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 2: risk of cancer. Returning one study from researchers, This is
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 2: from a Wall Seat Journal article. One study from researchers
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 2: is Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute tracked more than ten thousand
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: patients with early stage cancers who started gop one drugs
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: after diagnosis and compared their disease progression to those on
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 2: a different diabetic diabetes medication. Those on gop ones were
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: less likely to see their cancer spread. In lung cancer patients,
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 2: the rate of progress to advanced disease was cut roughly
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: in half ten percent in gop one users versus twenty
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: two percent in comparison group. Breast cancer pation showed a
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: similar pattern, with progression rates of ten percent versus twenty percent.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 2: Called Orectal and liver cancers also showed statistically significant reductions. Now,
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: millions of people already taking gop one's. If it really
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: means that this is going to reduce the prevalence of
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: cancer or that they have some kind of anti tumor effect,
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: we could see a real, dramatic, significant decline in cancer
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: over the next few years. I mean again, gop one's
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: already used to reduce blood sugar, to reduce weight loss,
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 2: to reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes. They've
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: also shown in tests to help with sleep apnea, again,
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: controlling for the weight loss, controlling for right and dampening
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: addictive behaviors. What can't these drugs? Do these really do
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: seem like miracle drugs? Somebody says, do they make Americans smarter?
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: That would really make them americal drugs. They have not
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: been shown to have an impact on Alzheimer's, so that
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: was a negative disappointment, But pretty much on everything else
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: they do, I'll take that pretty amazing stuff against something
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 2: to keep watching. But basically the news out of all
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: the GLP one research has been truly amazing, truly amazing.
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: All Right, finally, I'm gonna show you this video. I
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: think it's cool. Now. I know some of you will
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: be upset. Some of you will not like this. You
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: will think this is sacrilegious. I don't know. I was impressed.
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: This is an electric car, a new electric car design.
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 2: You'll see what company is from. I think it's pretty
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: I think it's amazing. If I had, if I could
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: afford it, I would consider buying one. Don't worry, even
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: your generous super chats are not going to get anywhere
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: near me being able to afford this. But here's the video.
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: It's gotten In the video before I shared it with you.
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: So let me back up a little bit. There we go,
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 2: there we go, blank screen, and here we.
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 5: Got got to get a bagame company an American concho
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 5: like fans.
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 10: I won't school school.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: I don't know how you pronounced it, lusey loose, lucy, lucy,
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: lucy whatever. That is a cool call. That is a
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: human achievement. And uh it has uh I think I
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: read it has one thousand and thirty five host power,
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: so it's and it's a battery, right, It's all on battery.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: So the token this thing is basically infinite, you know.
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: And the reason it has the shape that it has
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: is you don't need a big front for the or
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 2: a big back in the case front engine. It's just
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: a battery. It is a thousand and thirty five I
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: think something like that host power. So pretty cool, pretty good,
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 2: pretty good, pretty fast. I don't know zero to sixty
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: what it does? They you know, the news reports didn't
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: say it's very controversial because people think that's not right
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: for Ferrari. Ferrari should be making cause like that. But
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 2: it comes at a starting price, you know, this is
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 2: this is not this is uh, this is without the
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: frills and the and the customized whatever. The price is
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 2: five hundred and fifty thousand euro, five hundred and fifty
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: thousand euro. I don't know. I don't think. I don't
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: think the super Chatt will do it. I'm gonna have
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 2: to find another another venture so that I can afford this. Anyway,
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: I like it. I think it's cool. I think beautiful
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: things are beautiful things, and you gotta admire human creations
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: that are beautiful. That, my friends, is the news for
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: today May twenty six, and I apologize to all of
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: those of you who are only audio. You can check
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: out the Ferrari website look for the Luce new electric car.
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 2: So this is really this is really awesome. Alex says,
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: five and fifty K isn't that much for such a
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: for such a Ferrari. I agree, I agree, I agree.
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: I'm looking for super Chat for the sticker that Alex
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: is gonna provide here that gets me closer to the
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: to the dream, to being able to be able to
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 2: buy one. All right, guys, that is the news. Let's uh,
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: we will turn out to our super chat uh. And
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: I remind you that this is how you support the show.
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 2: You can ask questions which basically get you to decide
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: what I talk about. It's pretty cool. You get to
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: manipulate me, haha. And Alex Alex says, fair enough, I
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: still don't see a sticker, And so you can use
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 2: stickers and that you don't have to ask a question.
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 2: That's value for value. You can use the questions shape
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: the show.
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 4: Uh.
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: And also you can go to Patreon patreon dot com
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: put in your own book show and they you can
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: you can support the show on a monthly basis, like
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 2: a regular basis, And that's the best way because then
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: I know exactly how much money is coming in every month,
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: and it's the best way to be able to plan
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: the show and plan this out. Remember, you're paying for
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: my time, my time, my effort, I guess my knowledge,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: my ability, my entertaining qualities. That's what you're paying for.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: Value for value, it's called all right. The Island Institute
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: reminds you that they are hosting OCON the Objective's Conference.
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: It's going to be a phenomenal event celebrating the two
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the Declaration
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: of Independence. They are going to be social events, a pokaonight.
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: You get to pay poker with me and Ryan and
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: you get to play poker. And there's a talent show,
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: and there are galers and banquets and but most important,
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 2: there are a lot of lectures by some of the
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: leading objective speakers out there, and and you will learn
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 2: a lot and you'll be inspired. So join us in
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 2: New Orleans at the end of June. You can find
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 2: out more information. And don't forget you can get a
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: ten percent discount ten percent discount just for being a
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 2: listener of Droon book show.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 3: Just do.
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: Twenty six YBS ten twenty six ybs ten for the discount,
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: and you go to Iran dot org slash ybs, Ironman
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: dot slash ybs and you can find the information information there.
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: Alex Epstein is really the leading authority, I think in
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 2: the world right now on fossil fuels, on the on
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: the foss off you know, in the oil and gas
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 2: situation right now, on American and on a global scale.
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: He is also very much engaged in trying to get
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 2: this administration to be as pro freedom as possible when
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: it comes to these areas of energy, electricity, and AI.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: He's picked up on that so check out Alex Epstein
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: to substick dot com. All right, um, we might again
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 2: go to Patreon patreon dot com. All right, let's check
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: out our super chat questions. Let me just see who
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: we have on the sticker. We have Kim, Thank you, Kim.
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: And who else do we have? We have Roland? Thank you, Roland,
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 2: and Paul Thank you, Paul, and CP Milkin thank you.
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 2: And Stephen Harper thank you. Those are all stick of people.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: You too can be a sticker person that I think
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: and a trader with me value for value. Just press
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: that dollar sign at the bottom of the chat and
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: show your support selfie SUBSQUI. But thank you for the
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 2: fifty dollars. Really appreciate it and let's see. Okay, Michael
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: has a two part fifty fifty dollars part questions one
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: hundred dollars total. Thank you, Michael, Part one. I've heard
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: some objectivists denigrate joy as being something lesser than happiness.
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 2: They think that pursuing joy amounts to hedonism, because, in
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 2: their view, joy is essentially short term or ephemeral. I
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 2: think of joy as more abstract term of which happiness
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 2: is a kind. I also think fun means enjoyment, and
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 2: so fun and enjoy on near synonyms. All right, So
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: there's a lot here. So I don't know who denigrates joy.
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: I've not heard objectives denigret joy, fun. I have heard,
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: but joy I haven't heard. Because I defines happiness as
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 2: the state a non contradictory joy. So I'm ran us
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: for joy, and indeed defined happiness in terms of joy.
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: Happiness is non contradicted joy, the state of non country joy.
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 2: So joy is a state of positivity towards yourself and
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 2: the world, a state of no anxiety and and and
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: and and and you know, the state of of of
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: of confidence and and and benevolence. Uh so, uh yeah,
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 2: I I I can't imagine why objectives would be anti joy.
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 2: I think, you know, fun is a little different. Fun
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 2: is much more momentary and casual. And I don't consider
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: joy and fun joy I think is more substantive. Uh
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: and and uh you know, broad, I think fun is
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 2: you know, something that is much more short term and efemal. Again,
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: I'm not against fun. I think fun is great. I'm
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 2: all for joy, and I'm all ultimately for happiness. Now, remember,
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 2: happiness is a state, a state of mind a state
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 2: of consciousness. And you know, I think what they might
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: be worried about is, yes, an appeal to hedonism in
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 2: the appeal to joy or to fun, versus the idea
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 2: that happiness, the state of non contradict joy comes from
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 2: hard work. Hard which might not be fun in the moment,
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 2: but is hard work that leads to achievement of values,
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: which leads this to joy. Joy is achieved when you
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 2: achieve values, and happiness is the accumulation of that over time.
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: Friend of Harper says, I can borrow his is that
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 2: he's referring to the Ferrari I wonder. I think he's
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 2: behind the tide behind on the show. He hasn't caught
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 2: up yet. Anyway, I get, you know, working hard, for example,
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 2: on a on a project, meeting a deadline, getting a
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 2: getting your prototype out there of something new that you're inventing.
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 2: The work is not always going to be fun, but
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: it will generate happiness if you're successful, and to the
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: extent that you learn from it even if you're not successful. Michael,
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: there are people with very high IQs out there who
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 2: are not great thinkers. Yes? Is this because they are dishonest?
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 2: And who was in reality, or they being corrupted by
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 2: mystical conti in pistemology. Well, it could be any one
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 2: of those, right, It could be they have chosen not
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 2: to think. They evade regularly in that sense, they're dishonest,
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 2: the evasive. They don't focus their mind. They've got this
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 2: great mind, but they don't use it, or they use
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 2: it in a very very narrow sphere, and as soon
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 2: as they go out of that sphere they blank out.
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 2: They purposely don't look, they don't want to apply their
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 2: mind in other spheres. Think about what Einman wrote to
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 2: what is Aspasky the chess champion? It was obviously super
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: super smart, but applied as smart to chess and not
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 2: beyond that. But it could also be that they have
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 2: been corrupted by a bad epistemology or by religion. It
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 2: doesn't all have to be kant Oh you just say
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 2: by mister oh content epistology. Yes, it could be that
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 2: they've just been neuted by a bad episteology. All of
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 2: those options exist. I don't think there's one explanation, only
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 2: one explanation for all the cases of really smart people.
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: Brilliant genius is sometimes having bad ideas. Ryan I am
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 2: sickened by the irony that Trump is negotiating a deal
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 2: with Iran on Memorial Day weekend. Capitalism and surrender to
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 2: a capitulation and surrender to a regime that has systematically
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 2: murdered US soldiers on a weekend men to honor their memory. Absolutely,
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 2: it is truly horrific and disgusting. He should be ashamed
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 2: of himself negotiating any deal with that regime. He should
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: be ashamed of himself. And I agree with you, Memorial
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: Day weekend, it's just worse. It's just dramatically worse. Chasbat says,
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 2: what's the fond of saying that wealth is created by
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 2: manual labor? But is it safe to say that most
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 2: of them have never used a hammer before? I don't
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: know about most, but suddenly many of them, Bernie Sanders Mamdani,
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 2: I don't think are particularly handy with a hammer or
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: any kind of tool. They're not exactly manual laborer types.
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: And I think that's true of a lot a lot
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 2: of the leftists. You know, they tend to be rich,
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: and I mean, can you see hasan Pika with a
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 2: hammer other than maybe to beat up his dog. I
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: don't know. Mary Eleene, help people with your own damn dollars.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: But that's not what these guys want. They hate and
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 2: envy people like bezos. They want power and control of
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 2: other people's lives. Why do they get to choose what's
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: important for the rest of us? Absolutely, and look, yes,
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 2: it's the fact that they want power and control. And
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: they resent the fact that these billionaires have power, owned power,
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: economic power in this case. But who are they? I'm
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: smarter than them. I went to Harvard, I got a degree.
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: I know momoxism inside out. Who are these guys? What
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 2: did they do? Where did they study? What? You know?
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: Half of them are dropouts. How dare they have all
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 2: this power and influence and I not have it? They
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: resent the fact that the entrepreneurs are rich and they
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 2: are not. Or if they are rich, it's wealth they
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 2: didn't create. It's wealth they either inherited or or leached. Thomas,
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 2: what is your view of the immigration policy under Obama
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 2: and Biden? It is often called open borders, but both
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 2: actually deported a large number of people. It'd even Trump
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: opponents such as Samharis say they were border crisis. I mean,
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 2: it clearly was a border crisis. Under Biden, I mean
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 2: Biden basically had this nondescriptive immigration policy where he was
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 2: basically willing to provide and basically told the world, and
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: you know, what, do you call it asylum to anybody?
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 2: So tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people came
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 2: to the US border and he didn't know what to
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: do with them, and he let many of them in
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 2: and because they were asylum seekers, they now were eligible
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 2: for welfare, but they couldn't work for six to nine months.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: And it was just it was just bizarre, hundreds of
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: thousands of people showing up at the border thinking they
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 2: were going to get legal status because asylum, and it
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 2: was a mess. It had there was no policy. It
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 2: was kind of anarchist in a sense. There was no
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 2: you know, governing policy, governing way to do things. It
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 2: was just it was just an absolute I think disaster
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 2: and I think, you know, arguably Kamala has lost because
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: of Biden's immigration policy. He could have had more legal
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 2: immigration focused on workers on jobs. It wouldn't have been
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 2: a chaotic. But the whole idea of asylum just come
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: in here and ask for asylum and we'll give you
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 2: off it. That is a crazy system, a bad system,
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 2: a wrong system. Yeah, so yep. Anyway, so I don't
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 2: think he had a good Now, Obama's policy was better.
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 2: You know, yes, he did deport a lot of people, sadly,
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 2: but you know, there was much more clearer policy about
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: who comes in, who doesn't come in, who gets a sign,
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 2: who gets deported, who doesn't get deported than Biden. Biden
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: was a complete and outer mess and a disaster. It
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: wasn't open Voters, but it was. I mean, that would
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 2: have been an improvement. But because it was worse than
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 2: worse than open open voters is good. It was all
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 2: the wrong kind of immigrants, and we'll fell on top
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 2: of it because of the particular way in which they
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 2: came in. Wes fifty dollars stick. I thank you. Wes
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 2: really really appreciate that. Thank you, Alex. There he Goes,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 2: he did it. He actually came through with a super chat.
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Alex. My haranguing helped. I appreciate it. What
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 2: do you think of us on Pika being subpoenaed by
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 2: the U Treasury? Well, I mean you have to separate
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 2: out things here. I mean I hate us on Paika
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 2: and anything that harasses him abugs him or not anything,
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: but generally I'm all in supportive of that. I do
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 2: worry right now, and I and there's a good chance that,
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 2: given that the United States has a certain policy around
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 2: not supporting the Cuban regime, that when he went to Cuba,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 2: he did do stuff that was you know there wash
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 2: you know, bad for there was supportive of the Cuban regime.
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 2: So it could very well be that there's something real there,
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 2: that that there's a real coin being committed. But it
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 2: also could be the US government going after their political opponents.
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 2: So I don't know until we see the details. Again,
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 2: it couldn't happen to a nicer guy, But you know,
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 2: I believe in the rule of law, and if the
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 2: Treasury Department is going to go after somebody, they should
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 2: have the law behind them. And I hope that that
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 2: is indeed the case. And it wouldn't surprise me that
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 2: that's indeed the case. Piker seems I saw a clip
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 2: of him talking about this really really really scared. That
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 2: made my day. So a sun packer really looks scared
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 2: and worried about it, So maybe there's something there. Maybe
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 2: if he's worried, there really is something there. But yes,
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: if you're in violation of these sanctions, if you're in
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 2: violation of supporting a entity that is an enemy somehow
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: of the United States, then yeah, go after them. Absolutely
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 2: good for the Treasury, the Treasury Department. If there's really
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 2: a case there. I hope there is. I wouldn't mind
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 2: seeing us on Picker go to jail for, you know,
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: breaking the law, if he really broke the law. Noel,
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: thank you for the twenty Canadian dollars. Really appreciate that.
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 2: On only five dollars short of our second hour goal,
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: that would be great. Five dollars guys, all right, Moulten splendor,
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 2: thank you, thank you, thank you. Moulton's been great, a
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 2: great support of the show. Recently, doctor Dalgia has been
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: updating the population about current infectious diseases. He is doing
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 2: a great job and being very clear about risk levels.
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: I agree he has been doing an amazing job. Many
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 2: reactions are just hateful, saying he is a fiamonga or
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 2: being paid by big farmer. Why all these loud deniers, Well,
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 2: because there is a a new since COVID, Even before COVID,
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 2: but certainly since COVID, there's been this large group among
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 2: Americans who were anti science, anti expertise, i e. Scientists,
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: and this got a real boost from COVID and doctor
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 2: Jogia was very good in COVID. I thought brought together
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 2: real objective information and of course was a supporter of
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: the vaccines because the vaccines were good, and people developed
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 2: a real hatred of Amash as a consequence, he was
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: part of big farm, a part of the conspiracy to
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 2: get us all vaccinated, where he was just bringing objective
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: knowledge to all of us. And I think still is
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: people out there bought into the RFK, you know, idea
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: of health. He doesn't RFK doesn't believe in the germ theory.
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 2: He believes vaccines are killing us, or causing us autism,
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: are causing us whatever, you know, And they they refuse
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: to listen to actual knowledgeable people within the healthcare space.
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 2: There's also a huge anti farmer campaign out there that
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 2: people both on the left and on the right are
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 2: buying into farmers just interested in milking you for your money.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 2: Forget you know the fact that these gp ones seem
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 2: to be truly amazing. No, no, no, gp ones. They're
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: destroying human life. You know, they've got something negative about
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 2: anything that farmer does, partially because farmer is driven by
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 2: a profit motive and they are suspicious to say the
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: least of the profit motive, but partially because they they're cronies,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 2: so they they you know, they completely go So Amus
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 2: unfortunately has been vilified and these people are committing a
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: huge injustice against him. He's a real hero for what
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: he does and what he did during COVID and what
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: he does to educate us all and his reward is
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 2: vilification by people and the left, people and the right,
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 2: even people who call themselves objectivists. Stephen, have you seen
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: dream Loop cinema videos on YouTube? No, I haven't. I
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 2: enjoyed the Communist Friends episode and episodes where a character
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 2: finds an old, battered copy of Alice Shrugged, which has
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 2: been banned for centuries. Huh, No, I haven't seen this.
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 2: I'll have to look at him up. Dream Loop Cinema
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: cool sounds really good, Michael, bounty hunters a legitimate profession
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 2: or is that too much privatization of policing function? Yeah?
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 2: I don't like bounty hunters. I think it's fine to
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 2: issue rewards for information about but the enforcement of the
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: law should be done by authorized police. They are trained
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: in what is legal for them to do and what
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 2: is not. They are trained and applying and doing their
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 2: job and an objective fashion. Bounty hunters, I guess, could
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 2: be deputatized, trained and deputized by police. I guess that's possible,
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 2: But you would have to have the training and you
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: would have to be deputized. You know. One of the
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 2: things that the rule of law brings is objectivity. If
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: somebody is knocking at your door asking you questions about
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 2: a crime, they have to show a badge because then
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 2: you can tell they're legit. They're not just vigilantes. They're legit,
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: and you know your rights. That is, as soon as
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 2: they're legit, they are rights protected and you know your
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 2: rights visa VI. Them a bounty hunter roaming around the
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: streets armed looking for bad guys. You know, you don't
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 2: know who he is, what he is. He has cause
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 2: for friction, and and you don't know by what rules
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 2: he's functioning, what's guiding him. If there was such a thing,
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 2: they would have to be heavily regulated by the police itself.
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 2: Mary Aleen, So what if America Americans get fired and
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 2: replaced with Indians? If the Indian is better qualified and
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 2: could do a better job. There are no American jobs.
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: That's right, it's not a problem. If Americans get fired,
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: they should get fired. Immigrants do replace some American jobs
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 2: held by him Americans. That's the beauty of globalization. It's
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 2: the beauty of immigration. And what happens there is we
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: yet increase efficiency, increase wealth creation, increase productivity, and the
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: American is then free to go find another job. You
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 2: do not have a right to your job as an American,
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 2: as whites is whatever. There's no such thing as a
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 2: right to a job. Compete, have the cohunas to compete.
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 2: I mean, all these people are such cowards. There's such cowards.
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 2: They're afraid to compete. They claim to be Americans, but
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 2: in spirit they're damned socialists. Marylan says, I would love
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 2: to hear an Alpha School's interview. I've been following them
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: for several months. Amazing. Yeah, I know some of the
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 2: people involved, so we will try to make that happen. Opposite,
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: you can borrow one of my loose loose is the
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 2: car if you want sometime I'm not using them. I
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: let them borrow. I let them borrow the one you
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: see in that ad he has ten dollars towards you
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 2: getting one someday too. Yeah, I mean, the only reason
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: I know, the only reason I know friend Harper is
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 2: not serious is the fact that the car is just
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 2: been announced and none of them have sold yet, so
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 2: he doesn't have as munch a bunch of loose as yet.
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 2: I mean, he might get them in the future, and
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 2: I appreciate if he'd let me drive one when he
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 2: does get them, but he's full of it right now.
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: The car has not yet gone into production, but I'm
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 2: excited about, you know, an amazing super chats in the future,
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 2: so they can put my down payment on one, and
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: mine wouldn't be blue, even though I like blue enough
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: for car. I mean, farai, should you read at the
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 2: very least? Or gray with red leather inside, gray leather inside.
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: All right, guys, thank you. I will see you all tomorrow.
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: We will have another news show with I promise a
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 2: human achievements section it. You know you have to keep
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 2: looking for great human achievements. Will put in some arts
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 2: and stuff like that as well. Yeah, it'll be cool,
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 2: So I will see you all. I will see you
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: all tomorrow or if it says the car has got
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 2: an enormous amount of hate. I know, I've seen that
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 2: a lot of hate. People hate it. That's why I said.
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: It's very controversial and people might not like this, but
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 2: I like it. I would get one if I could
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 2: afford it. Can't afford it, won't get one. See tomorrow, Bye, everybody.