Latest / The SME Stream / The Country 01/12/25: David Seymour talks to Jamie Mackay
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: David Seymour is the Deputy Prime Minister. When he's not
- 0:02Speaker 1: doing that, he's the act party leader. I read a
- 0:04Speaker 1: story in the Herald this morning David about the government's
- 0:09Speaker 1: Key we Save a Farm withdrawal plan. Raises sphares over
- 0:13Speaker 1: scheme credibility. Of course the government wants to lift key
- 0:18Speaker 1: We Saver contributions. What's wrong with taking some of that
- 0:21Speaker 1: out to buy a farm.
- 0:23Speaker 2: Well, I don't see any problem with it at all.
- 0:26Speaker 2: I've always made the point that compulsory key we Save
- 0:30Speaker 2: a compulsory super compulsory whatever, you have to have an
- 0:35Speaker 2: answer for where does that money come from? And it
- 0:38Speaker 2: comes from other savings and investment opportunities. If you force
- 0:43Speaker 2: people to put money into key we Saver, or of
- 0:45Speaker 2: course that takes away money that you could have been
- 0:47Speaker 2: using to pay debts on a farm, or that you
- 0:51Speaker 2: could have been using to invest in buying a second farm.
- 0:54Speaker 2: If you're going really well, it means that people will
- 0:58Speaker 2: jump up and down and say, oh, look, there's all
- 0:59Speaker 2: this money in this fund because we forced everyone to
- 1:02Speaker 2: put their money into it. But when people do that,
- 1:05Speaker 2: they often forget all of the other opportunities that people
- 1:09Speaker 2: gave up and this comes back to the old lesson
- 1:13Speaker 2: by Henry Hazlet in nineteen forty five. The good economist
- 1:17Speaker 2: looks at all the impacts on everyone in the long term.
- 1:20Speaker 2: The bad economist looks only at the short term impacts
- 1:23Speaker 2: on some.
- 1:24Speaker 1: I take it that acts totally in support of raising
- 1:28Speaker 1: key we saver contributions from employers and employees.
- 1:33Speaker 2: We're in favor of what the government's done, which is
- 1:36Speaker 2: to reduce the amount of taxpayer money that is going
- 1:39Speaker 2: into the key we saver because basically, the government's been
- 1:43Speaker 2: borrowing money on the international debt markets, giving it to
- 1:46Speaker 2: people five hundred bucks a year, so you can put
- 1:48Speaker 2: it back into the international debt markets and your kei
- 1:51Speaker 2: we saver, which has been a crazy thing to do
- 1:53Speaker 2: because as a retiree you just live in a country
- 1:56Speaker 2: that has more government debt. You know what I would.
- 1:59Speaker 2: But what we did as a compromise there is say, well,
- 2:03Speaker 2: because people will be worried about this reduction, we've increase
- 2:07Speaker 2: the amount of contributions required by employers and employees. So
- 2:12Speaker 2: in so far as it's a trade off that saves
- 2:14Speaker 2: the taxpayer and ultimately saves the next generation from more
- 2:17Speaker 2: government debt. Yeh, we support that, but generally speaking, forcing
- 2:22Speaker 2: people to do more compulsory saving has been shown around
- 2:26Speaker 2: the world not to increase savings rates because it reduces
- 2:31Speaker 2: savings elsewhere, because the money has to come from somewhere.
- 2:35Speaker 1: When will a government, either yours or the next lot
- 2:37Speaker 1: be brave enough to take a stand on the age
- 2:40Speaker 1: of eligibility for national super It would seem to me,
- 2:43Speaker 1: on the face of it, to be the quickest fix
- 2:46Speaker 1: for some of our financial woes and this problem. You
- 2:49Speaker 1: move the age of our eligibility to sixty seven over
- 2:52Speaker 1: a period of time and save billions.
- 2:56Speaker 2: Well, I say this every election, and I get the
- 2:59Speaker 2: Jesus kicked out out of me because people get angry
- 3:01Speaker 2: and say, you know, how dare you say that? So
- 3:04Speaker 2: in terms of bravery, as my grandfather used to say,
- 3:07Speaker 2: you're either brave or stupid. But I've definitely done one
- 3:10Speaker 2: of them every election on this issue, because I think
- 3:13Speaker 2: honesty is an important value, and the honest truth is
- 3:17Speaker 2: that if this change is not made, then it's going
- 3:22Speaker 2: to be forced upon us. And the way that will
- 3:25Speaker 2: happen is there'll be an earthquake or a pandemic, or
- 3:28Speaker 2: a big flood or perhaps Heaven forbid on this show
- 3:32Speaker 2: a biosecurity issue, and the government of the day will
- 3:37Speaker 2: find itself in big trouble. It will go to the
- 3:39Speaker 2: international debt markets and must say, yeah, we're not sure
- 3:42Speaker 2: about you. Guys are going to put up your interest
- 3:44Speaker 2: rate because you're borrowed enough. And then with higher interest
- 3:47Speaker 2: rates it'll be even harder to balance the books. And
- 3:49Speaker 2: guess what they'll do. They'll say, oh, we think we've
- 3:51Speaker 2: got to put up your interest rates again. That's the
- 3:53Speaker 2: spiral that South American countries have a habit of getting into.
- 3:57Speaker 2: And there's no law that says it can't happen there now.
- 4:00Speaker 2: If and when that happens, one of the first things
- 4:02Speaker 2: they'll do is say, right, we're putting up the age
- 4:04Speaker 2: of super not you know, at two months a year
- 4:07Speaker 2: over the next twelve years. So it's manageable and people
- 4:10Speaker 2: can plan for it. We're doing it tomorrow. That is
- 4:12Speaker 2: what will happen. A similar thing happened when we went
- 4:14Speaker 2: from sixty to sixty five in the early nineties. In
- 4:17Speaker 2: a way, so I've always been honest say, guys, you know,
- 4:21Speaker 2: we have fewer children, that means less tax payers. We
- 4:24Speaker 2: live longer. That means more super innuitance. That mathematical reality
- 4:29Speaker 2: is being confronted by countries all over the world that
- 4:32Speaker 2: are raising their ages. New Zealand cannot keep its head
- 4:35Speaker 2: in the sand. And I know there'll be people listening
- 4:37Speaker 2: saying we're not voting for that guy. But you know,
- 4:39Speaker 2: I'm not going to run for office on a falsehood,
- 4:42Speaker 2: which too many have for too long.
- 4:44Speaker 1: This is a die in the ditch thing for winstance.
- 4:46Speaker 1: He would walk across the aisle and go into government
- 4:50Speaker 1: with labor ahead of raising the age of eligibility for
- 4:54Speaker 1: national super So until such time as he no longer
- 4:57Speaker 1: isn't a position of power, we are stuck.
- 5:02Speaker 2: Well, that may be true so far as it goes,
- 5:05Speaker 2: but here's a bigger reality. The numbers need to add
- 5:09Speaker 2: up financially. You're talking about the political numbers. I'm worried
- 5:13Speaker 2: about the financial numbers for the long term good of
- 5:15Speaker 2: our country and that's what I'd urged the voters, who
- 5:18Speaker 2: are the truly powerful actors and an election to consider.
- 5:22Speaker 1: Have you been surprised at how well Chippy's capital gains
- 5:25Speaker 1: tax proposal has been received?
- 5:30Speaker 2: No, because I wasn't aware it had been well received,
- 5:32Speaker 2: and most people recognize that this country only succeeds because
- 5:38Speaker 2: we build it. And when a political party comes out
- 5:41Speaker 2: and says, hey, there's a shortcut. We'll just take money
- 5:44Speaker 2: off a builder and you don't have to do anything,
- 5:46Speaker 2: you just get it for free, there will always be
- 5:48Speaker 2: a constituency for that. That's how you know the Greens
- 5:51Speaker 2: in tier party Mari and Labor and Bear. I say
- 5:54Speaker 2: it sometimes New Zealand first get into pour. However, you know,
- 5:58Speaker 2: we actually want to see society that is successful, and
- 6:03Speaker 2: in order to do that, we need to keep the
- 6:06Speaker 2: values of building and making, not taking and destroying.
- 6:11Speaker 1: Monde I'm playing devil's advocate here, but most countries around
- 6:14Speaker 1: the world do have a capital gains tax, a broader
- 6:17Speaker 1: tax bace than we have.
- 6:20Speaker 2: Well, at one point most countries had slavery, but that
- 6:22Speaker 2: wasn't a good idea, so we stopped. Just because a
- 6:25Speaker 2: lot of people do something doesn't mean it's a good idea.
- 6:27Speaker 1: Is chip be going to get much money out of
- 6:29Speaker 1: us capital gains tax? As capital gains a thing of
- 6:32Speaker 1: the past, is it something that the boomers have enjoyed
- 6:35Speaker 1: and the following generations aren't going to enjoy as much.
- 6:39Speaker 1: And if he can get his capital gains tax past
- 6:42Speaker 1: the post, gee, he's already allocated a hell of a
- 6:45Speaker 1: lot of spending to the proceeds.
- 6:49Speaker 2: Well, it'll be one of those dollars that get spent many,
- 6:52Speaker 2: many times in the campaign. It's a solution to everything.
- 6:55Speaker 2: I mean, it doesn't generate as much money as people think,
- 6:59Speaker 2: and that's why it'll expand because they have infinite needs
- 7:03Speaker 2: and they will need to extend it to more people.
- 7:05Speaker 2: That's before you consider they'll be in a coalition with
- 7:08Speaker 2: the Greens and two Party Mari almost certainly part of
- 7:11Speaker 2: their mix, so that's going to put more pressure to
- 7:14Speaker 2: expand it. And I just say to people, if you
- 7:17Speaker 2: vote for a capital gains tax because you think it's
- 7:20Speaker 2: a tax that will go on other people, then shame
- 7:23Speaker 2: on you because you know sooner or later other people
- 7:27Speaker 2: becomes you and you wonder why you didn't speak up
- 7:29Speaker 2: when you had the chance.
- 7:31Speaker 1: David Seymour, Deputy Prime Minister, Act Party Leader, thanks for
- 7:34Speaker 1: your time. We'll catch up once more before Christmas in
- 7:36Speaker 1: our final week of broadcast, and I'm just giving you
- 7:39Speaker 1: some advance warning here. You need to think of your
- 7:41Speaker 1: ag person of the year.
- 7:43Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, can it be? It can't be a mart Cameron.
- 7:47Speaker 2: Is that worth the rule?
- 7:48Speaker 1: No, it can be whoever you want. It could be Marked,
- 7:50Speaker 1: It could be Mark Patterson, although you're more likely to
- 7:53Speaker 1: vote for Mark Cameron, I'm sure. But anyhow you think
- 7:56Speaker 1: on your ag. Person of the Air will chat again
- 7:58Speaker 1: in a couple of weeks. Thanks for your time.
- 8:00Speaker 2: Thanks Joming