Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Wisdom of the Cross: Why God Speaks in Contradictions to Confound the Wise

Transcript

The Wisdom of the Cross: Why God Speaks in Contradictions to Confound the Wise · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome back to the Deep Dive. This is the place where we take
0:03
a closer look at sources for you, the learner, especially in
0:06
the world of Reformed thinking. We sift through articles,
0:10
essays, commentaries, and we try to pull out the essential
0:12
insights. And today our sources are
0:14
pointing us to something, well, something really peculiar about
0:17
how the Bible speaks. We're looking at these strange
0:20
phrases that just sort of, you know, stop you in your tracks,
0:23
Things that sound almost impossible when you first hear
0:25
them in English. I'm talking about phrases like
0:27
living sacrifice or, or being sorrowful yet always rejoicing,
0:32
or Paul's just staggering claim that when I am weak, then I am
0:35
strong. These aren't just, you know,
0:37
oddities or sources say they're very calculated.
0:40
So our mission today is to unpack this idea of holy
0:42
tensions, these oxymorons and paradoxes, and we want to see
0:46
them not as flaws or confusion in the text, but as a deliberate
0:51
strategy, a way to arrest the mind, really to humble the
0:54
heart, so the gospel can become clear.
0:55
That's the key right there. The world runs on a very
0:58
different kind of logic, a very simple, almost transactional
1:01
logic. How so?
1:02
Well, the world just assumes that, you know, blessing means
1:04
you have an easy life, you're wealthy, joy means there's no
1:07
pain. And freedom, you know, freedom
1:09
is all about self rule, total autonomy.
1:11
Right, doing what I want. Exactly.
1:13
But Scripture doesn't just disagree with that it it
1:16
violently interrupts it. It speaks with what we could
1:19
call a cross shaped logic that flips every single one of those
1:23
assumptions upside down. So these tensions, they're not
1:26
just riddles for the sake of it. They're like windows into
1:29
Kingdom realities. Realities that you just can't
1:32
squeeze into our flat, worldly categories.
1:35
They force us to redefine words we thought we already knew.
1:38
So we have to ask a different set of questions.
1:40
We have to What does God mean by blessing?
1:42
If you can include mourning, what kind of strength is
1:45
actually perfected in weakness? OK, so let's get our tools in
1:48
order. Before we dive into the big
1:50
claims, we need to be precise with our language.
1:52
If we're going to talk about holy tensions, we should
1:55
probably define the two main things we're seeing.
1:59
Let's start with the oxymoron, the more compact one.
2:02
In literary terms, I guess you could call the oxymoron a kind
2:05
of rhetorical spark. It's usually just two words or a
2:08
very tight phrase, joining terms that seem to just cancel each
2:11
other out. But the point isn't
2:13
cancellation, is it? The collision is meant to create
2:16
a single new idea. It's like it short circuits your
2:19
brain a little, forces you to stop and figure out a new
2:22
meaning. Yes, and the classic example
2:24
from our sources and maybe one of the most doctrinally dense is
2:27
living sacrifice from Romans 12.1.
2:31
When you hear those two words, living and sacrifice, they pull
2:34
against each other. Finally, in the Old Testament, A
2:37
sacrifice was by definition slain.
2:39
It was dead offered on an altar, of course.
2:41
So to command a living sacrifice, thusi is a ton.
2:44
That's bringing 2 opposites into a very purposeful tension.
2:47
And what's the purpose? What does that tension get
2:49
across that a simpler phrase would miss?
2:52
It communicates a state of consecration that is ongoing.
2:58
It's continuous. It's embodied in your daily
3:00
life, not just a one off ceremony.
3:02
So it's not just something you do at the temple.
3:04
Right. If Paul had just said, hey,
3:06
offer your bodies as an ongoing service to God, the force of it,
3:10
the call to die to yourself, it would be lost.
3:12
The oxymoron acts like a rhetorical pressure point.
3:14
It's saying you must offer yourself completely to God.
3:17
That's the sacrifice part. But you have to do all the time
3:20
in your real life. That's the living part.
3:22
They come together to create this whole new category of
3:25
spiritual existence. OK, that makes sense for the
3:27
oxymoron. It's a compact collision
3:29
creating a new single meaning. But then you have the paradox,
3:33
which people often confuse with it, but it's different in scale.
3:38
What's the distinction there? The paradox is usually bigger.
3:40
It's a whole proposition, a full statement, maybe even a few
3:43
clauses, not just two words smashed together.
3:46
It's a claim that on the searches looks totally self
3:48
contradictory, logically absurd even.
3:51
But it's not. But it proves to be true once
3:53
you understand the author's whole theological framework.
3:56
The context is everything. So we're moving from a spark to
3:59
the proposition. It lights up.
4:00
Precisely. Take when I am weak, then I am
4:03
strong. That's Second Corinthians 12.10.
4:06
That's not a fusion of two terms into one thing.
4:09
It's a complete, startling claim that turns our expectations on
4:12
their head. Yeah, because we expect strength
4:14
to come from being capable, from having resources.
4:17
Of course, and Pulse is the exact opposite.
4:20
His inability becomes the very thing needed to experience God's
4:23
capability. The claim is held together not
4:26
by the words themselves, but by the whole theology of grace that
4:30
surrounds it. Or what about Jesus?
4:31
Sayings like whoever would save his life will lose it.
4:35
But whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
4:38
Yes, that sounds like a Riddle. Right?
4:40
But the solution is found when you grasp his redefinition of
4:44
what life even means. It's not about temporary self
4:47
preservation, it's about eternal discipleship.
4:49
So if I'm hearing you right, the oxymoron is the rhetorical
4:53
shock, that compressed language to grab your attention, and the
4:56
paradox is the theological proposition that the shock
4:59
points to. And you need the surrounding
5:01
biblical wisdom, the theological air, to resolve it and see the
5:05
deeper truth. And this is so critical because
5:08
as Reformed thinkers, we hold that the Bible is God's inspired
5:12
word. It can't be incoherent.
5:14
So we have to be careful not to celebrate genuine contradiction.
5:17
Where do we draw that line? What are the guardrails here?
5:19
We have to keep saying that these holy tensions are apparent
5:22
conflicts that resolve when you respect the context.
5:26
We're not talking about logical contradiction where a is true
5:29
and not a is true in the same way at the same time.
5:32
And we have to distinguish them from a few other rhetorical
5:34
devices that can look similar but work differently.
5:37
Like what? The first is just a simple
5:40
antithesis. That's just a contrast.
5:42
Think of the proverbs A wise son makes a glad father, but a
5:46
foolish son is a mother's grief. Right, they're just opposites
5:49
placed side by side. Exactly.
5:51
They stay in their own lanes. But an oxymoron fuses those
5:56
opposing ideas into a new unit. It's not just contrast, it's
6:00
contract in Unity. Got it.
6:02
And it's also not hyperbole, right?
6:04
Which is just intentional exaggeration.
6:06
Correct. When Jesus says to pluck out
6:08
your eye if it causes you to sin, he's using hyperbolic force
6:12
to jolt someone into seeing how serious obedience is.
6:16
He's stretching the literal meaning for urgency.
6:18
That mechanism, exaggeration, is different from the mechanism of
6:22
tension, which fuses opposites to make a new category.
6:25
And it's not irony either. Not at all.
6:27
Irony is saying one thing but meaning the opposite.
6:30
You know when Elijah is mocking the prophets of Baal, telling
6:33
them to shout louder because maybe their God is busy?
6:35
He's saying one thing, but implying it's reverse.
6:37
Yeah, a paradox advertises its tension openly and asks you to
6:41
resolve it. Irony asks you to assume the
6:43
literal statement is false. There are a couple of other
6:46
distinctions that seem really important, especially for
6:48
someone who might just pull a verse out of context.
6:50
First, these tensions are not just ambiguity created by
6:53
flattening A metaphor or yanking a phrase out of its historical
6:56
setting. We see that all the time.
6:58
If someone today insists that freedom can only mean modern
7:01
absolute autonomy, then Paul's phrase slave of Christ sounds,
7:06
well, it sounds nonsensical or even awful.
7:09
But the incoherence isn't in the text, it's in the definition you
7:12
brought to the text, the world, the dictionary you're using.
7:15
The tension is there to force you to throw that dictionary
7:18
out. And the final point, this isn't
7:20
the same as a doctrinal mystery like the Trinity.
7:23
That's a crucial distinction. Christianity absolutely has
7:26
truths that are finite minds can't fully grasp.
7:30
But the rhetorical impossibility in these phrases, like God
7:33
justifying the ungodly, is actually designed to lead us
7:36
into a deeper understanding of a revealed truth.
7:39
Like substitution, it's not meant to suspend your mind in
7:42
some irrational fog. The tension is supposed to be
7:45
resolved by biblical theology, not just celebrated as a
7:48
permanent Riddle. That's a really helpful set of
7:50
guardrails. It keeps us from just slapping
7:51
the paradox label on anything that feels a bit tricky.
7:54
So what's the method then? How do we responsibly identify
7:57
and interpret these? It takes discipline, which our
8:00
sources stress is a hallmark of good reformed exegesis.
8:04
Step 1 is just to locate the semantic clash.
8:07
You're reading along and a phrase just makes you stop.
8:10
It creates friction. Like blessed mourn.
8:13
You're just noticing where the text puts 2 repelling ideas
8:17
together. That's the candidate stage.
8:18
OK, so you've identified a candidate.
8:20
What's next? Step 2 is to apply the semantic
8:23
test. Does the clash happen in a tight
8:26
unit and form a single coherent new meaning?
8:28
Does bittersweet create a single new flavor?
8:31
Yes. Does living sacrifice create a
8:33
single new category of offering? Yes.
8:36
This helps you tell the difference between a tight
8:38
oxymoron and a broader paradox. And then the third and most
8:41
important step, the one that keeps us from just admiring the
8:43
word play you. Have to resolve the tension by
8:46
tracing the contextual logic. You have to ask what is the
8:49
author arguing? What problem is he trying to
8:52
solve? Paul's weak strong statement is
8:55
the climax of a whole argument about grace and affliction in
8:58
his ministry. It's not just some abstract
9:01
thought about self help. And if you can't paraphrase it
9:03
without losing the point. Then you haven't resolved the
9:05
tension yet. And we have to be sensitive to
9:07
genre too. The songs use tension
9:09
differently than the epistles do.
9:11
Jesus uses shock and reversal in the beatitudes to expose self
9:14
righteousness. Paul uses paradox to argue for
9:17
the cross against human boasting.
9:19
The big question is always how is the author using this tension
9:24
to persuade you to accept the Gospel's logic?
9:26
OK, with those tools we can now move to the theological center
9:30
of it all. Our sources are insistent that
9:32
every one of these tensions points back to two huge
9:35
fundamental contradictions, the Christological one and the
9:38
soteriological one, the twin pillars of the Gospel.
9:41
Let's start with the Christological scandal.
9:43
The crucified Lord Paul says it in First Corinthians one we
9:46
preach Christ crucified, A stumbling block to Jews and
9:49
foolishness to Gentiles. The ultimate original oxymoron
9:52
here is Christos Astaraminos, the Messiah, the anointed king
9:56
juxtaposed with crucified, the most shameful accursed death you
9:59
could imagine. It's almost impossible for us
10:01
today to feel the full weight of that collision.
10:04
For a 1st century Jew, the Christos was the triumphant
10:07
conquering king promised in the Psalms.
10:10
In Isaiah, he was supposed to rescue Israel.
10:12
The conquering Hero. Yes, for that king to be put on
10:15
a cross, the very symbol of the curse from Deuteronomy curse.
10:19
It is everyone who is hanged on a tree.
10:22
That wasn't just a political let down, it was theological
10:24
blasphemy. It was a scandal on a stumbling
10:26
block because it offended every religious expectation they had.
10:29
And for the Greeks? For the Greeks, who valued
10:32
reason and philosophy and Stoicism, the idea of a God
10:36
suffering A brutal public execution like that was just
10:40
ridiculous. It was more your foolishness,
10:42
intellectual nonsense. So this one phrase, the cursed
10:45
king, is like a doctrinal explosive.
10:47
It shatters Jewish religious pride and Greco Roman
10:49
intellectual pride at the same time.
10:51
It leaves no room for human boasting at all.
10:53
The sources also point to something deeper.
10:55
Even in the grammar you're talking about the word
10:57
astaraminos. Yes, the grammar in the Greek is
10:59
so specific here. Paul uses the perfect passive
11:03
tense. This detail is so crucial and
11:05
frankly it's easy to miss. He doesn't use the tense that
11:08
would just say Christ was crucified as if it were a past
11:11
event he moved on from. Wait, so the choice of tense
11:14
itself carries a permanent theological meaning?
11:17
What's the significance of that? Absolutely.
11:19
The perfect passive tense means the crucifixion was a real past
11:23
act, but its results and consequences continue right into
11:26
the present and into eternity. He isn't just the Christ who is
11:29
crucified, He remains forever the crucified 1.
11:33
So the cross isn't something he just left behind.
11:35
No, it's the permanent definition of his identity and
11:38
his glory in Revelation. He's the Lamb who stands as
11:42
though it had been slain. The marks of his suffering
11:45
aren't scars from a defeat he recovered from.
11:47
They are the badges of a V1 through a completely redefined
11:50
kind of power. That single point on grammar
11:52
really challenges every definition of success our
11:54
culture has. So Christ's glory is actually
11:57
defined by his suffering, not just something that came after
11:59
it. That is the central, unavoidable
12:02
point. The cross isn't a hurdle he had
12:04
to get over to get back to being powerful.
12:06
It's the very method of his saving work, and it confronts
12:10
any glory theology, ancient or modern, that wants blessing
12:14
without weakness. It demolishes any attempt to
12:17
reduce Jesus to just a moral example.
12:20
The grammar insists his identity as the Christos is forever tied
12:24
to the Staros, his atoning death.
12:26
And that has huge implications for the Church.
12:28
If the King reigns through the weakness of the cross, it
12:31
refutes any kind of triumphalism that expects the Church to win
12:35
through worldly strength or money or success.
12:37
It forces us to abandon all of that.
12:39
We're left with nothing but the cross to boast in, realizing
12:42
that God's way of working is clearest when we stop relying on
12:45
our own strength. So that Christological tension,
12:47
the king on the cross, that's the foundation, and flowing from
12:50
that we get the soteriological miracle, the judicial
12:53
impossibility of our salvation, God justifying the ungod.
12:57
That's Romans 4.5, and on its face, that phrase seems to tear
13:00
apart the moral fabric of the universe.
13:02
You. Called it a judicial crisis.
13:04
Why is it so jarring from an Old Testament perspective?
13:07
Because it seems to be in direct conflict with Old Testament law.
13:11
Proverbs 17.15 says it plainly. He who justifies the wicked and
13:16
he who condemns the righteous are both alike and abomination
13:19
to the Lord. So how can God do the very thing
13:22
he calls an abomination? Doesn't that make him unjust?
13:25
That's the tension, and we have to be clear about who God is
13:28
justifying. The Greek word Paul uses is
13:31
asteobi, the ungodly. We can't water that down.
13:34
This isn't someone who just made a few mistakes, it's someone in
13:36
active, open rebellion against God.
13:39
And the text says he justifies them while they are still in
13:42
that state. Yes, that's the radical break
13:44
from any religion based on merit.
13:46
You don't clean yourself up first.
13:47
So the question our reform sources answer so clearly is how
13:51
does a perfectly just guide justify the actively unjust?
13:54
And this is where the doctrine of substitution and double
13:56
imputation comes in, providing the legal solution to this
13:59
paradox. It's the heart of the Gospels
14:01
logic. The Westminster Confession
14:03
reflects this perfectly. God doesn't just lower his
14:06
standards or look the other way. He transfers the guilty verdict
14:10
that belongs to the isebo on to the sinless Christ, and at the
14:14
same time he transfers the perfect righteous verdict that
14:17
belongs to Christ onto the believer.
14:20
It is a glorious, legal, great exchange.
14:23
The word legal is key there. It's a forensic declaration.
14:27
It's not that we suddenly become good enough, but we are declared
14:30
righteous because of what someone else did.
14:32
And that's what keeps the tension intact.
14:34
The resolution safeguards grace. It's what Paul says in 2nd
14:37
Corinthians 5.21. He made him who knew no sin to
14:40
be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness
14:44
of God. Salvation is a legal declaration
14:46
based on a finished atonement, not on our moral improvement.
14:50
And that paradox justifying the rebellious?
14:52
It works as a powerful weapon, doesn't it?
14:53
It's a bulwark against legalism. It shatters it.
14:56
The moralist who thinks they can bring their own good works to
14:58
God has to come as ungodly to be saved.
15:01
Their pride is crushed. And what about today's more
15:04
therapeutic ideas about God? It confronts those two, the ones
15:08
that redefine justification as God just recognizing our
15:11
inherent worth or giving us some kind of therapy.
15:15
This paradox insists that justification is a non
15:17
negotiable legal act that required a substitutionary
15:20
sacrifice. Our standing before God rests
15:23
entirely on Christ's righteousness, A righteousness
15:26
that is alien to us, not on our feelings or performance.
15:30
So if we're saved by this ultimate contradiction, that
15:33
logic has to start reshaping how we live.
15:35
That brings us to the paradoxes of sanctification.
15:38
We can start by going back to that living sacrifice in Romans
15:41
12.1. Exactly.
15:42
That clash between enthusiast sacrifice and Zeusan living is
15:46
meant to be profound. It's a shocking.
15:48
Image and Paul calls this the only rational response to God's
15:51
mercy, not a one time thing, but a continuous daily existence.
15:54
This is where mortification and vivification come in.
15:57
The sacrifice part is the daily killing of the old man, our
16:00
desire for self rule, and the living part is the vivification
16:04
allowing the new man to live for God by the Spirit's power.
16:07
You have to die to yourself every day to truly live for God.
16:10
That sounds exhausting though. How do we keep this from
16:13
becoming just another form of legalism?
16:15
Hearing daily execution of the old man could just feel like
16:19
another impossible burden. That's such an important
16:22
question, and the text answers it.
16:24
It's all grounded in God's mercies.
16:26
I appeal to you, therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God,
16:30
this isn't about earning merit. It's the only rational response
16:33
to having already been justified while we were enemies.
16:36
So the. Motivation is different.
16:38
Completely. The legalist sacrifices to get
16:40
mercy. The justified believer
16:42
sacrifices because of mercy. It's grateful surrender, not
16:46
frantic performance. And this just obliterates the
16:48
modern idol of autonomy, the idea that my life is my own.
16:53
It does, and that pattern of glory through weakness continues
16:55
right into Paul's own struggle. In 2nd Corinthians 12, he has
16:59
this thorn. He pleads for it to be removed,
17:01
and the Lord's answer is just so counterintuitive.
17:04
My grace is sufficient for you, for My power is made perfect in
17:07
weakness. Made perfect in weakness, How is
17:09
divine power perfected in our inability that goes against
17:12
everything we think. It's a statement about God's
17:14
methodology. The Greek word for made perfect
17:17
is teleti. It means brought to its full
17:20
goal or consummated. God's power isn't just present
17:23
in our weakness. It's brought to its highest,
17:25
most visible display when our own ability is stripped away and
17:28
we are utterly dependent. Like the jar of clay image Paul
17:31
uses. Exactly.
17:33
The jar itself is cracked, unimpressive, fragile.
17:36
If the jar is perfect, the treasure inside the glory of
17:39
Christ is hidden. But it's when the vessel is
17:42
cracked by affliction or weakness that the light of the
17:44
treasure shines out, and no one can mistake the jar for the
17:47
treasure. So the weakness isn't a failure,
17:49
it's the stage where grace does its greatest work.
17:52
This is a direct assault on the prosperity gospel and any idea
17:55
that success is the only sign of God's blessing.
17:58
It completely shatters it. The world's logic is capability
18:01
plus resources equals success. Lacrosse's logic is weakness
18:06
plus grace equals manifest power.
18:08
The thorns day is not because God is cruel, but because
18:11
removing it would remove the stage for the Talati of His
18:13
power. Our strength is measured by our
18:15
dependence. And this theme of coexisting
18:18
opposites moves right into our emotional lives with the tension
18:21
in 2nd Corinthians 6.1. Sorrowful yet always rejoicing.
18:26
Paul describes himself as being both sorrowful and rejoicing
18:28
continuously at the same time. For anyone listening who's in
18:32
real pain from loss or illness, those two states just seem
18:36
impossible to hold together. How can they exist in the same
18:38
heart at the same time? This paradox defines the
18:41
Christian life in the already, not yet.
18:43
The already is the deep, stabilizing joy of a
18:46
reconciliation with God that's secure, but that has to coexist
18:50
with the not yet the groaning of a fallen world, the presence of
18:53
our own sin, the waiting for glorification.
18:56
So the sorrow is real, and it's legitimate.
18:58
We're told to mourn with those who mourn, but the joy isn't a
19:01
feeling based on our circumstances.
19:03
It's a theological conviction anchored in Christ's finished
19:06
work and His certain return. The joy hold us in the sorrow,
19:10
and keeps the sorrow from being the final word.
19:12
That has huge pastoral value. It validates honest lament.
19:16
It tells people that sorrow isn't a failure of faith.
19:18
It protects us from Stoicism, where you just deny pain, and
19:21
from despair, where pain becomes everything.
19:24
And we see it again in the same passage, having nothing and yet
19:28
possessing all things. The early church was poor,
19:31
marginalized, powerless, but as giant heirs with Christ, they
19:35
possess the title deed to the universe.
19:37
We have nothing in the world, but we possess everything in
19:40
Christ. Which guards US against thinking
19:42
we can have the full perfection of the Kingdom right now.
19:45
It keeps our eyes fixed on what's to come.
19:47
Our tears and struggles here deepen our longing for that day.
19:51
It proves this world isn't our home.
19:54
OK, let's bring this home in our final segment.
19:56
How does all this high level theology connect to our daily
19:59
lives, starting with how we even read these things in our English
20:02
Bibles? Well, translation choices
20:04
definitely affect the rhetorical punch, but they can't change the
20:07
underlying truth. And sometimes English can
20:10
actually sharpen the tension, can't it?
20:12
Phrases like living sacrifice or slave of Christ are so forceful
20:17
for us because those words carry such starkly different meanings
20:20
in our culture. They do, and translators also
20:23
use connectors like yet, but and when then to signal that we're
20:28
looking at a contrast in unity, not a flat contradiction.
20:32
When Paul writes, sorrowful yet always rejoicing, that little
20:35
word yet is the glue holding the paradox together.
20:38
But the biggest danger for us as modern readers is the dictionary
20:42
we bring to the text. We read blessed and think
20:45
comfortable. We read freedom and think
20:47
autonomy when we do that. The Bible's phrases sound
20:50
impossible not because the text is incoherent, but because our
20:53
cultural dictionary is wrong. And the tension is there
20:56
precisely to overthrow that false dictionary.
20:59
Which brings us back to the big question.
21:01
Why does God speak this way at all?
21:03
What's the point of being so jarring?
21:05
Well, first, it's rhetorical. It wakes you up.
21:07
A flat sentence just slides by. But a phrase that creates
21:10
friction justifying the ungodly lodges itself in your memory.
21:14
It forces you to stop and think. But there's a deeper spiritual
21:18
reason. The deeper reason is that it
21:20
humbles our pride. It denies us the comfort of
21:24
thinking we already understand God's categories for what is
21:27
good or strong or free. It stops the proud person in
21:32
their tracks. It prepares the soil for grace,
21:35
because grace only makes sense to a humble heart.
21:37
And all these paradoxes, they're just echoing the pattern of the
21:40
cross itself. Exactly.
21:42
Life through death, glory through shame, victory through
21:46
defeat. They are the verbal footprints
21:48
of the crucified and risen Lord, training us to think His
21:51
thoughts after Him. So what's the pastoral payoff?
21:53
Why does knowing the difference between an oxymoron and an
21:56
antithesis matter for a regular person in the church?
22:00
First, it gives us tools for endurance.
22:02
Preachers can use these phrases to give their sermons clarity
22:05
and the shock of unexpected truth.
22:07
And for discipleship, for counseling.
22:09
Gives us categories for perseverance.
22:11
It keeps believers from swinging between denial of their pain and
22:14
despair in their pain. Sorrowful yet always rejoicing.
22:17
Just normalizes the complex reality of the Christian life.
22:20
And it serves as armor against distortions of the faith.
22:22
It does. It rebukes the prosperity
22:25
gospel, which can't handle the idea that God's favor can
22:28
coexist with suffering. It rebukes success driven
22:31
evangelicalism, reminding as God uses weak, unimpressive
22:35
instruments so that no one can boast in human achievement.
22:38
And it rebukes therapeutic moralism.
22:41
Yes, the substitutionary tension.
22:42
God justifying the ungodly won't let the cross become just a
22:46
symbol for self acceptance. It keeps the sharp judicial
22:49
edges of the gospel intact. So when a church really lives in
22:53
this paradoxical reality that the first will be last, that we
22:56
gain life by losing it, it changes the community.
23:00
It dismantles the pecking orders.
23:01
It promotes humility, the living sacrifice, calls everyone to
23:05
OfferUp their whole lives, schedules, money, relationship
23:07
as an act of worship. And this kind of faith, because
23:10
it's so realistic about struggle and yet so hopeful in Christ, it
23:13
has this strange, quiet radiance to a watching world.
23:16
So to synthesize all of this, what's the bottom line?
23:19
The synthesis is simply that all these holy tensions point back
23:22
to the logic of the cross, the pattern of humiliation leading
23:26
to exaltation, death leading to life.
23:29
We are forced again and again to trade in the world's comfortable
23:33
categories for God's strange inverted ones.
23:36
The world says protect yourself, assert your strength and you'll
23:40
live. Christ says lose your life for
23:42
my sick to find it. The world says success proves
23:46
God's approval. Scripture says my strength is
23:49
perfected in weakness. The gospel isn't just an
23:51
extension of our own reason. It's an invasion of alien grace.
23:55
We have to resist the temptation to smooth out these rough edges,
23:58
to make it more palatable. To do that is to preach a
24:00
different gospel. So these jarring phrases, they
24:03
don't leave us in a Riddle, they remake our minds.
24:06
They do. They are divine shizzles,
24:08
reshaping us into a people who can worship and endure with a
24:11
strange, steady strength of the gospel.
24:13
So here's a final thought for you to take with you.
24:16
If the King of the universe, the Christo sister Romanos conquered
24:20
by dying, if he reigns through weakness, what impossible
24:24
tension in your life right now might God be using as the
24:27
precise stage to show his greatest strength?
24:29
May we live in that tension of the already in the not yet
24:33
always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life
24:36
of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies.
24:38
Soli deo Gloria.