Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Clemency Without Accountability: Who’s Really Backing Maxwell? (5/5/26)

Transcript

Clemency Without Accountability: Who’s Really Backing Maxwell? (5/5/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
0:03
Epstein Chronicles. For the past few weeks now, we've been
0:08
hearing that members of the GOP who sit on the
0:11
House committee that's overseeing the Epstein situation are divided on
0:17
whether President Trump should issue a pardon to Klaine Maxwell.
0:21
But isn't it odd that we don't have any names
0:24
to attach to this, Like, if these Republicans are backing
0:28
a pardon for Maxwell, shouldn't they go on the record.
0:31
I mean, they should explain why they think the way
0:34
they think. Right, what exactly do you hope to gain
0:39
from giving Lanne Maxwell a pardon? Considering she actually took
0:43
part in the abuse herself, considering she was somebody that
0:47
transported these girls to Jeffrey Epstein, and considering she's absolutely
0:51
decimated as a witness, what exactly are you trying to gain? Well,
0:56
they'll tell you they're looking to get her cooperation, But
0:59
the truth is, what they're really trying to do is
1:02
to continue with the cover up. That's the most important thing.
1:06
Not transparency, not justice, not shooting the American people straight,
1:11
but bullshitting, lying and protecting the very people that they
1:15
should be investigating and If they really believe that Glayn
1:19
Maxwell deserves a pardon, then put your name behind that
1:23
bullshit and quit attributing it to anonymous sources. Don't be
1:27
a coward. Instead stand ten To's down and stand on business.
1:32
But we all know that these cowards will never do that.
1:35
Today's article is from The Guardian and the headline Republicans
1:39
appear split an idea of clemency for Glenn Maxwell. This
1:44
article was authored by Victoria be kempests the possibility of
1:48
clemency for Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Glen Maxwell, however unlikely, has
1:53
long outrage survivors and their advocates, who view the former
1:56
British socialites lengthy jail sentence as giving them some justice
2:01
In the long running saga, Well, if you were one
2:04
of those girls and you were abused and the only
2:08
person that went to jail for it went to prison
2:11
for it is now being dangled as somebody that might
2:16
get a pardon, wouldn't you be a bit upset as well?
2:20
Wouldn't you be outspoken? Wouldn't you be raising Holy Hell?
2:25
We all know the answer to that, So why shouldn't
2:27
these women raise Holy hell? When this's bullshit? Right here
2:31
directly affects them, so maybe somebody should ask them how
2:35
they feel. Recent reporting that a pardon for Maxwell is
2:40
now being discussed supportively in some circles, however, has highlighted
2:44
how Epstein and Maxwell remain a political mind feel for
2:47
Republicans and Donald Trump, while presenting yet another blow to
2:51
Survivor's fight for transparency. News broke in late April that
2:55
representatives on the House Oversite and Government Reform Committee had
2:59
split opinion whether the president should pardon the convicted sex
3:03
trafficker Maxwell so she would cooperate with their investigation into Epstein.
3:08
Survivor's advocates responded with indignation, as they should have. Remember,
3:14
Maxwell isn't going to give you any evidence that's going
3:17
to be actionable. I know I've said this a million times,
3:22
but I guess it bears worth repeating. Glenn Maxwell as
3:26
a witness is cooked. And I know that some of
3:29
you follow trials out there, and I know that you've
3:31
seen witnesses get up on the stand and get absolutely
3:34
mrked by the lawyer and think about the worst instance
3:39
of that happening, and then times that by about one hundred,
3:42
and that's what would happen to Glenn Maxwell. I mean,
3:45
this lady is a known liar. Somebody that was charged
3:49
with perjury would have been convicted of it, but the
3:52
court dropped those charges to help streamline the main charges
3:55
of human trafficking and the Man Act. But I don't
3:58
think there's any lawyer in this country, even a terrible lawyer,
4:03
that wouldn't be able to utilize all of that as
4:05
a cudgel against Maxwell if she ever took the stand.
4:08
And remember, if she's going to be some kind of witness,
4:11
she asked to take the stand, so good luck. Any
4:17
talk of clemency for Glenn Maxwell in exchange for testimony
4:20
turns justice on its head. It risks rewarding the very
4:24
person who helped enable the abuse, said gold Cloth clo
4:28
and litigation director Spencer Couven, who's represented numerous Epstein survivors.
4:34
And Spencer Couven's been very outspoken this whole entire time.
4:38
And he's not one of those lawyers that sits in
4:39
a room right, looks at paperwork and makes phone calls.
4:43
He's a litigation specialist. That's somebody that actually goes into
4:47
the courtroom and fights it out. And this man has
4:50
been very vocal about what happened with Epstein, what happened
4:54
with the cover up, and certainly what happened with Prince Andrew.
4:59
While Congress says no power to grant a pardon, even
5:01
entertaining that conversation signals to victims that they're suffering, is
5:05
still being treated as secondary to political strategy. Justice should
5:10
never be transactional when it comes to crimes of this magnitude.
5:14
I agree one million percent there is no scenario under
5:19
this sun where GALLAINN. Maxwell should be pardoned, unless, of course,
5:23
you're looking to protect the administration. Because short of that,
5:27
Kahlain Maxwell has zero worth as a witness of any kind.
5:31
And I want you to remember what she told Todd
5:33
Blanche that she had no idea about Jeffrey Epstein's behavior,
5:37
that she wasn't around them, that she wasn't somebody that
5:40
was locked in with Epstein after two thousand and seven.
5:46
So if that's the case, then how could she have
5:48
any information to give anybody? So either way, she's a liar, right,
5:55
And if you think that that's going to fly inside
5:57
of a courtroom with the judge or the jurors, you
6:00
have not been paying attention Credibility is the currency inside
6:03
of a courtroom, and Glenn Maxwell has none of it.
6:09
Sigarette McAuley, a managing partner at Boys Schiller Flexner who
6:12
has long represented Epstein's survivors, voice similar sentiments in a statement,
6:16
saying there could be no greater injustice to survivors than
6:20
for President Trump to pardon Glenn Maxwell as Jeffrey Epstein's
6:24
co conspirator, she was found guilty and convicted by a
6:27
jury for incredibly serious sex crimes against miners. McCauley said,
6:33
there's nothing credible that she will offer the government, and
6:37
the assertion that she will provide information is simply a
6:40
smoke screen, and that's really what it comes down to.
6:45
If Maxwell had anything of note to offer up, she
6:48
would have done it when she was under suspicion and
6:52
facing prison. The second you're convicted, the second that that
6:57
gavel comes crashing down, that's it. You're now a convicted
7:01
felon with a lot to gain by lying, So why
7:04
should anyone ever believe you. Jennifer Freeman of Marsh Law Firm,
7:09
who represents Epstein and Maxwell survivor Annie Farmer, said that
7:13
no form of clemency could ever be justified. Any pardon
7:16
or a commutation of Glenn Maxwell's rightful sentence would betray
7:20
the survivors, mock the gravity of their suffering, and fundamentally
7:23
undermine the integrity of our judicial system. She added. The
7:28
survivor's advocates are by no means alone in their views,
7:32
with many Oversight members, including Republican chair James Comer, reportedly
7:37
opposing clemency. So who are the people that are supporting it?
7:41
Or is it just a made up story? Remember we
7:43
have to be mindful of that too. Look, there's a
7:46
lot going on here and a lot of people are
7:49
trying to control narratives. But I'm not interested in any
7:52
of that. I'm only interested in getting as close to
7:55
the truth as possible. So if people are out here
7:59
saying they're going to pork Lion Maxwell, put your name
8:01
behind it. Don't be a coward. If that's what you
8:06
truly feel, and that's what you believe, and you think
8:09
that we're gonna get something from it, let's hear your
8:11
side of the story. Or is it that nobody really
8:14
supports that kind of pardon and this is a made
8:17
up story by the legacy media? Very possible, I don't
8:21
discount anything. I've told you that from the very beginning.
8:24
The legacy media has been very duplicitous when it comes
8:27
to Jeffrey Epstein, this story and reporting on it the
8:31
right way. And look, they've done a better job recently,
8:34
but that doesn't forgive all of the deceit from the past, right.
8:38
And if they think I'm just gonna trust them, I'm not.
8:42
The days of trust us bro are long over. And
8:46
that's why I always show you, guys my work, give
8:47
you the source, and then show you where I'm getting
8:50
the information that I'm getting. And look, even if you
8:53
disagree with my opinion, at least you have the source
8:55
material to look at for yourself and for me, I
8:59
think that's the most important thing, opening the door. I'm
9:03
not some genius who knows everything about the story. I'm
9:06
not some you know, expert who never misses anything. And honestly,
9:10
I feel like my job, if you want to call
9:12
it that is to open doors for you folks, and
9:16
then if you walk through them, great, If you don't,
9:18
that's cool too. I'm not here to convince anybody of anything,
9:21
Like I always tell you, what I'm here to do
9:24
is shine a light and the best way to do
9:26
that is not to just give you my opinion, but
9:29
to show you how I got to that point. And
9:31
that's why we read the core documents all the way through,
9:34
even when they're boring. Sometimes I feel like you folks
9:37
deserve to have that information. And the only way you're
9:40
ever going to get to a point where you have
9:42
an educated opinion on anything is if you have the
9:45
information in front of you, right or whatever's available, and
9:49
then you dive into it and you figure out what's
9:51
what you know. There's facts, there's speculation, and then there's
9:57
what we know and what we can prove. And here
10:00
on the podcast, I've always tried to stick to the
10:02
things that I feel like we can prove. Now, that
10:04
doesn't mean that the other stuff isn't true or it
10:07
didn't happen, or I don't believe it, but I'm not
10:10
going to get caught in that snare, you know, the
10:12
snare of slaciousness, the snare of chasing things that might
10:15
be when there are so many things already sitting here
10:19
in front of us that are so if we devour
10:23
those things and prove that those things actually happened, it's
10:26
going to open the door for everything else. Trump vowed
10:29
while campaigning that he would release the Epstein files, and
10:32
this promise firmed up Trump's already extensive support among far
10:36
right Republicans, many of whom think that Epstein was among
10:39
a cabal of global elite who's sex traffic children with immunity.
10:44
So people who think that are far right, Victoria, have
10:47
you not been on the internet recently, because I assure
10:51
you there are people on the left that feel the
10:53
same exact way. There are people on the left that
10:58
sound very very much like QA non people now, and
11:03
I don't even blame them. People on the left were
11:06
lied to for a very long time by the legacy
11:09
media about this topic, and then when the reality hit
11:12
these people like a thousand pounds of bricks, it was unnerving.
11:17
And then of course you get to look at the
11:18
emails for yourself, and it's obvious that there's something going on. Now.
11:23
I'm not going to sit here and tell you that
11:24
it's a global cabal. You know, I've never prescribed to
11:27
that bullshit. But what I will tell you is this,
11:31
The financial sector is evil and all the people that
11:34
are wrapped up in it. As far as you know,
11:38
the big shots I don't mean the regular people day
11:40
to day, you know, processing your bank fees. I'm talking
11:44
about the big shots, the Jamie Diamonds of the world,
11:46
et cetera. Those are the people that are evil. In
11:49
my opinion. You want to talk about who runs the
11:53
whole world, it's not the WEF it's not the Rothchilds,
11:57
It's the financial institution as a whole. Trump's Justice Department
12:03
repeatedly failed to deliver these files as promised. Meanwhile, Maxwell
12:07
was moved to a low security prison camp in Texas
12:10
one week after her controversial interview with now acting Attorney
12:13
General Todd blanche fomenting conspiracy theories and cover up allegations. Well,
12:20
what else could it be, Victoria? Is Victoria going to
12:23
position herself as if this isn't a cover up? Is
12:27
that what she's really saying here, Because in my opinion,
12:30
there is more than enough evidence pointing to a cover up.
12:34
And I think the onus is on people who say
12:36
there's no cover up to provide the evidence to prove it. Sorry,
12:40
because that's what we're doing here on a daily basis,
12:43
providing receipts. Congress members then took it upon themselves to
12:48
seek answers on their own. These efforts culminated in the
12:52
bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandated that Justice release
12:56
all documents by December nineteenth, which they didn't do, which
13:00
is wild considering the Justice Department of law places should
13:03
be compliant with the law. While one tranch was released
13:07
on that date, other disclosures came past the deadline, and
13:11
these releases also contained numerous redactions. Trump and many Republicans
13:16
now face dizzying political fallout months before the midterms, as
13:20
well as party infighting that raises the stakes still more.
13:24
And look, it's a problem they created for themselves. Do
13:27
you know how many independents have dipped and jumped off
13:30
the boat? A whole lot of them. I know a
13:35
whole lot of people that are sitting out the midterms,
13:37
A whole lot of people, which is wild. Me personally,
13:41
I'm not setting anything out. I'm going to do what
13:43
I always do and vote against the incumbent until I
13:47
have an incumbent worthwhile, I'll be voting against them. Why
13:50
would I reward somebody by sending them back to office
13:52
who did a shitty job the first term because they
13:55
have a certain letter in front of their name, don't
13:58
give a shit about any of that. Republican congress members
14:03
comments suggest internal dissent. When asked by Politico if he
14:06
thought clemency with Maxwell for her testimony would be a
14:09
good agreement, Comer reportedly said a lot of people do,
14:13
and that my committee split on that. How come nobody's
14:16
tried to hammer down names here, like who are the
14:19
people that are backing up Glenn Maxwell getting a pardon?
14:22
How about we start there and then we could speak
14:25
to those people directly. Comer, who did not name the
14:29
potential pardon supporters, does not himself back such an idea,
14:33
telling the news outlet, I think it looks bad, and honestly,
14:36
other than Epstein, the worst person in this whole investigation
14:40
is Maxwell. Look, I don't really agree with Comer on much,
14:43
but I agree with that Maxwell is an absolutely smarmy,
14:47
evil person and she should be under the prison, not
14:51
sitting in a jail cell playing with puppies and eaton
14:54
chick fil a. Republican Congressman Thomas Massey, who co sponsored
14:58
the Epstein files transparen the Act, called out one of
15:01
Trump's closest allies when asked about reported congressional pardon talk.
15:06
I'm adamantly opposed to it, Massey said in a statement.
15:09
Blanche already inexplicably and inappropriately moved her to a country
15:13
club prison with no new information or indictments of co conspirators.
15:18
She didn't play ball at all. And remember she was
15:20
already in the honor dorm in Tallahassee. And can somebody
15:25
refresh my memory about how many people in the women's
15:28
prison in Tallahassee have been killed? Oh that's right, none,
15:31
got it, book Leanne Maxwell. She was under a lot
15:35
of stress, and you know she was in danger, so
15:37
they had to move her. Although he Republicans are opposed
15:41
to clemency and the White House has insisted Trump wasn't
15:43
thinking about it. Pardon mentions provide an opportunity for Democrats
15:47
to slam Republicans despite their joint fight for transparency. Look,
15:51
it's all about politics. Don't forget that both sides and
15:55
the Democrats are just as guilty as the Republicans of
15:58
trying to harness this issue into a weapon. And this
16:02
is what I warned about from the beginning. When people
16:04
start retreating to their bunkers and thinking, oh, it's the
16:07
other side, they're missing the HD picture, and that HD
16:11
picture tells us that it's all of them, all of
16:15
these scumbags. It's outrageous at Republicans on the Oversight Committee
16:22
are considering a pardon for Glenn Maxwell, said Democratic Congressman
16:25
Robert Garcia, the ranking member of Oversight. She's a sexual
16:30
abuser who facilitated the rape of women and children. This
16:34
is a shameful way to treat survivors. Oversight Democrats are
16:38
united in opposing any pardon. Well, she also took part
16:42
in the abuse herself. Let us not forget that part,
16:46
because that part is the most egregious of them all.
16:51
It goes very much against what Republicans stand for, which
16:54
is more law and order based on platform, said Hank Sheinkoff,
16:57
a veteran Democratic strategist. Clemency for someone who wasn't convicted
17:02
of such notorious crimes would be one thing, Shinkoff said,
17:06
but the Maxwell case is something that's burned into the
17:09
brains of a majority of the population of the country. Certainly, Now,
17:15
I honestly don't know one person that I've met in
17:17
real life that would be okay with Maxwell getting a pardon.
17:22
Discussions of clemency might also be an effort to game
17:25
out the next steps in addressing this controversy. Even if
17:28
most Americans wouldn't support a pardon, politicians will float an idea,
17:33
and it's like a balloon, Shinkoff said, it goes up
17:36
in the air and if it drops to the ground quickly,
17:39
it'll suddenly disappear. Brittany Martinez, executive director of Principle First
17:45
and a Republican strategist, called the reported mentions of a
17:48
pardon discussion absolutely detestable. Agreed, So again, who are these
17:53
people talking about it? Let's see some names. As for
18:00
the rationale behind having these discussions, Martinez said, I don't
18:04
know what the point is. I think it's terrible, a
18:07
terrible look for Republicans. Again, they were the party running
18:10
on releasing the Epstein files, Martinez said, noting how the
18:14
political article indicated it was just Republican members discussing clemency.
18:20
Not only have you not fully released the Epstein files,
18:23
but also you're willing to pardon the number two to
18:26
Jeffrey Epstein. Valid point, valid point. And I have no
18:32
idea how any of these Republicans sitting on the committee
18:37
could even entertain the idea That seems like political Sepaku
18:40
to me. Adding to the confusion or comments from Maxwell's
18:47
attorney David Oscar Marcus, I don't know what the percentages are.
18:50
Marcus recently told Politico there's a good chance and for
18:54
good reason, that she would get a pardon. This stands
18:57
in contrast to what the person who could grant clemency
18:59
is said. In response to a question last fall, I'll
19:03
pardon in Maxwell, Trump said, I haven't thought about it. Oh,
19:07
I'm sure not one thought about it, not at all.
19:10
Marcus did not respond to the Guardian's request for comment.
19:13
Maxwell has maintained her innocence. Let's remember she's not accused,
19:17
she's convicted, and you know who else maintained their innocence
19:20
until they were just put to death? That broadenact's character
19:23
down in Texas. So a convict claiming that they're innocent
19:29
is not really breaking news. Maxwell herself is not standing
19:37
idly by during these reported congressional discussions. Manhattan federal court
19:41
records last week revealed that she's once again challenging her
19:45
conviction for Nemo Rockmanni, a former federal prosecutor and founder
19:50
of West Coast Trial Lawyers. That effort seems slimsy. Here
19:54
you have Glenn Maxwell saying she's innocent. Rockmanni said, obviously,
19:58
twelve men and women on a jury disagreed. I think
20:02
there's no chance, or almost no chance, that she's going
20:05
to get out, and I don't think she's going to
20:07
either rite when everything is said and done. But there's
20:10
the possibility, and if you have people in Congress talking
20:14
about it, that possibility grows, and god knows what kind
20:18
of justification they'll come up with for it, but you
20:22
better believe they'll come up with something. So I think
20:24
the most important thing here obviously is Maxwell not getting
20:27
a pardon, But besides that, how about we get some
20:29
names of these Republicans who are backing Glenn Maxwell getting
20:33
a pardon, and then, of course we can ask them
20:35
directly why they feel that way. But as of now,
20:40
we don't have those names, and all we have are
20:42
allegations and unnamed sources saying that this is occurring. So,
20:47
like everything else, we'll keep an eye on it, and
20:50
when we get some more information one way or the other,
20:52
we'll get it added to the catalog. All the information
20:55
that goes with this episode can be found in the
20:59
description box.