Latest / The Science of Leading / Culture Is a Symptom, Not a Strategy
Transcript
- 0:00Welcome back to Science of Leading, I'm Claire Monroe with Edwin Carrington.
- 0:03Edwin, we've covered structure, coordination, and the redesign process.
- 0:08Today I want to talk about something almost every leadership team says they care
- 0:12about and almost none of them actually fix: culture.
- 0:15Here's the uncomfortable part, Claire.
- 0:17Culture isn't something you fix directly.
- 0:20It's the output of everything else we've talked about.
- 0:23Roles that make sense, decisions that are fair and fast, goals that are clear,
- 0:28feedback that's consistent.
- 0:30Get those right and culture improves as a byproduct.
- 0:34Try to install culture on top of a broken structure, and you get a poster in the
- 0:38break room and nothing else.
- 0:39So when a company hires a culture consultant instead of fixing decision rights,
- 0:43they're treating the symptom and ignoring the disease.
- 0:46Precisely.
- 0:47And leadership is either reinforcing the structure or quietly undermining it,
- 0:52there's no neutral setting.
- 0:54Two behaviors matter most.
- 0:56Making decisions with clear criteria, and holding accountability without ambiguity.
- 1:02If leaders override the system every time it's inconvenient,
- 1:05the system stops meaning anything, and everyone learns the real rule is whoever's in
- 1:10the room with the most authority wins the argument.
- 1:12That tracks with something McKinsey's pointed out too, that decision-making
- 1:16excellence is a lot rarer than most leadership teams assume.
- 1:19Everyone thinks their org decides well until you actually measure it.
- 1:23Which is exactly why decision rights architecture isn't optional.
- 1:27It's the thing that turns "we're aligned" from a slogan into something that's
- 1:31actually true on a Tuesday afternoon when two departments disagree.
- 1:35And this gets harder, not easier, when companies flatten layers or widen spans of
- 1:40control to move faster.
- 1:41Much harder, because now each manager is carrying more people with less bandwidth
- 1:46per person.
- 1:47So the routines have to get stronger to compensate.
- 1:50A real one-on-one cadence, actual coaching skill, clear performance expectations
- 1:55stated out loud instead of assumed, and early intervention the moment burnout risk
- 2:00shows up, not three months after someone's already checked out.
- 2:04Early intervention is the piece I think gets skipped most, because by the time it's
- 2:08obvious someone's burning out, you're already in damage control instead of
- 2:11prevention.
- 2:12Which is why the signal has to come from data, not from waiting for someone to say
- 2:16something.
- 2:17Across OAD's own client base, the teams that catch friction and burnout risk early
- 2:22through behavioral data consistently avoid the turnover spiral that hits everyone
- 2:27else.
- 2:28You can't coach your way out of a problem you found too late.
- 2:31Okay, so let's talk about the operating cadence that ties all of this together,
- 2:35because I don't think most leadership teams have an actual rhythm,
- 2:38they just react.
- 2:40There's a minimum viable cadence, and it's simpler than people expect.
- 2:43Weekly, a team execution review, KPIs, blockers, decisions that need to get made.
- 2:50Monthly, a cross-functional operating review, handoffs, dependencies,
- 2:55resource shifts between teams.
- 2:57Quarterly, a strategy-to-execution review, priorities, capacity,
- 3:02talent risks.
- 3:03And semiannual, an actual org design review, structure adjustments,
- 3:08role clarity, decision rights.
- 3:10And McKinsey's transformation research backs up why that rhythm matters more than
- 3:14any single big initiative, that embedding organizational health as an ongoing effort
- 3:19outperforms treating change like a one-time event.
- 3:22A one-time event fades.
- 3:24A cadence compounds.
- 3:26And that's the difference between the four failure modes we see over and over,
- 3:30and companies that quietly avoid them.
- 3:32Let's go through those, because I think a lot of listeners will recognize at least
- 3:36one.
- 3:36First, slow decisions, fixed by naming decision owners, cutting approval layers,
- 3:41and setting decision SLAs for the choices that recur.
- 3:45Second, role overlap and internal conflict, fixed by rewriting roles around outcomes
- 3:51instead of tasks, and removing duplicated ownership.
- 3:55Third, KPI clutter with no real signal, fixed by cutting to the handful of KPIs
- 4:01actually tied to strategy and adding leading indicators like decision time and
- 4:05handoff failures.
- 4:07And fourth, reorg fatigue, fixed by piloting before scaling,
- 4:11keeping structural changes semiannual instead of monthly, and focusing on mechanisms
- 4:16over chart reshuffles.
- 4:17That last one, reorg fatigue, feels like the one that erodes trust the most.
- 4:22If people have lived through three reorgs in two years, they stop believing the
- 4:25fourth one will fix anything.
- 4:27And they're often right not to believe it, if it's another chart reshuffle with no
- 4:31new mechanism underneath it.
- 4:33That's why leaders keep debating structure in circles, they're missing reliable
- 4:37signal on role fit, leadership style, and team dynamics.
- 4:42Without that data, every redesign conversation is just opinion against opinion.
- 4:47Which is exactly the gap a structured behavioral assessment closes.
- 4:50If you want that signal before your next reorg conversation instead of another round
- 4:54of opinions, OAD has a free Top Performer Profile, real data on your team in about
- 5:00seven minutes, results in twenty-four hours, no credit card.
- 5:03That's O-A-D dot A-I.
- 5:05Fix the structure, and the culture takes care of itself.
- 5:08Perfect place to end the series.
- 5:09Thanks, Edwin.
- 5:10Always, Claire.