Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Meta's Threads App Is Failing

Transcript

Meta's Threads App Is Failing · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  As you know, there is nothing that enrages the modern leftist more than free
• 0:05
  speech. And so the left, and that includes much of the journalistic class,
• 0:09
  and of course establishment figures were apoplectic with rage when Elon Musk bought Twitter
• 0:15
  and announced that it would be a free speech platform. Now, although Elon
• 0:20
  has not been absolutely perfect on that front, he has still delivered more free
• 0:25
  speech than they are comfortable with. And so when Mark Zuckerberg announced a new
• 0:30
  social media platform, they dubbed it the Twitter Killer. A place where left
• 0:35
  wing narratives and magical thinking would conquer all, a place where everything that the
• 0:41
  government tells you is true, everybody's been triple boosted, and red hats are
• 0:46
  illegal. And so the celebrations began here from the Guardian, Twitter Killer,
• 0:53
  thread zapp hits one hundred million sign ups in less than five days. Now.
• 0:58
  I made a video about why threads would fail when this all started,
• 1:02
  and by fail, I meant it would not overtake, it would not displace
• 1:06
  Twitter as the digital public square. And it looks like I was right.
• 1:11
  Threads unraveling Traffic on Zuckerberg's Twitter alternative plummets in second week, says on Friday,
• 1:18
  as Threads suffered. Musk announced that Twitter usage was up three point five
• 1:23
  percent week over week. Says within forty eight hours of launching on July fifth,
• 1:27
  Mark Zuckerberg's Threads managed to bring in one hundred million users, making it
• 1:33
  the fastest growing application in history. The initial fanfare was short lived, however,
• 1:38
  and Meta's Twitter alternative has been on a downward spiral ever since. Data
• 1:45
  collected by similar Web has revealed that traffic on Threads has decreased by more than
• 1:51
  fifty percent in its second week of operation, though the numbers only reflect Android
• 1:57
  users, Apple is scheduled to provide figures for Eiffel users in the coming weeks.
• 2:00
  I wouldn't expect it to be any different. And it says that Threads
• 2:05
  had more than forty nine million active daily users on its busiest day, July
• 2:09
  seventh, but by the following Friday that number had dipped to just twenty three
• 2:15
  point six million. Time spent also decreased from twenty minutes to five minutes over
• 2:21
  that same time period. So it had a huge start, one hundred million
• 2:23
  users. And why is that? Well, it's part of Meta. Meta
• 2:27
  owns Instagram and they made it very easy to sign up from Instagram, and
• 2:31
  that's one of the advantages of having this huge, developed infrastructure. But even
• 2:37
  with all of that, you still have to have something that people want.
• 2:40
  You have to offer something they're not getting anywhere else. So Threads signs up
• 2:46
  mostly Instagram users and a few rejects from Twitter, where they were desperate to
• 2:51
  find an echo chamber where they wouldn't hear anything that offended them ever again.
• 2:54
  But most of the people were Instagram users. And what do you do on
• 2:59
  Instagram, Well, you post photos of your lunch and your ass, and
• 3:02
  they've already got an app for that Instagram. If Threads wants to become the
• 3:07
  new public square for news and opinion, and remember Threads was supposed to displace
• 3:14
  Twitter, then the user base has to be interested in news and opinion,
• 3:17
  and they're not. They're interested in lunch and asses and I guess pictures of
• 3:23
  people on yachts. Now. The head of Instagram and Threads, Adam Mosseri,
• 3:28
  has said on many occasions that Threads has no plan to boaster news and
• 3:31
  political content, and I don't believe that at all. I think a big
• 3:37
  part of the plan for Threads is to install it as a reliable propaganda outlet
• 3:42
  for government agencies and legacy media. It says it's guidelines also force strict adherence
• 3:49
  to rules that stifle the explicit dark humor that most dedicated Twitter users enjoy.
• 3:54
  Now you want to see why it's not getting engagement where people aren't you using
• 4:00
  it? Well, it's not too difficult to see why. Additionally, users
• 4:03
  have complained that Thread's algorithm turns them off from using the app. Users can't
• 4:09
  customize their feed, They can't customize their feed, and can only peruse content
• 4:15
  from random accounts they don't follow. Even worse, there's no way to change
• 4:18
  this issue within the app. Threads algorithm shows uses a mix of content from
• 4:24
  people they follow and from people they don't to keep users engaged with the app,
• 4:29
  But for some the algorithm maybe having the opposite effect. Because everyone hopped
• 4:33
  on Threads at once with no real understanding of the app, there wasn't a
• 4:36
  lot of content to interact with. Of course, it was not surprising to
• 4:41
  see stories like this immediately as soon as Threads went online. Metta's Threads app
• 4:46
  already facing backlash for silencing conservatives days after launch. Metta also includes a message
• 4:53
  warning users when they follow certain accounts, including Donald Trump Junior. So yeah,
• 4:58
  you're not going to see many conservatives decide that this is the way forward.
• 5:01
  And without conservatives, well you've just got a left wing echo chamber.
• 5:04
  And like with Mastodon, which a few million at Twitter users went to after
• 5:09
  Elon Musk bought Twitter, it will just turn into a circular firing squad because
• 5:15
  without anybody else to hate, they will just turn on each other in a
• 5:18
  feedback loop of escalating virtue signals. And while that may be funny to watch,
• 5:24
  that's not a good business model anyway. That's all I got to say
• 5:26
  about that. Please subscribe, like and share. Sharing really helps me out.
• 5:30
  I thank you for doing that. I will see you next time.