Latest / The Talent Brief / When Understanding Becomes an Excuse
Transcript
- When Understanding Becomes an Excuse : What if understanding why you are the way you are has become the very reason you stop trying to change? We've become pretty good at explaining ourselves why we react the way we do, why we avoid difficult conversations, why we repeat behaviors even when we know they aren't working. And sometimes those explanations matter. They help us understand where our behaviors began. But here's my question. When does understanding our behavior become an excuse for continuing it? Welcome back to the Talent Brief. I'm Jeff Gantor. Today we're talking about accountability. Not just the kind we expect from others, the kind we're willing to practice ourselves. And that includes the organizations we work for, the people who lead them, and the relationships we're a part of. Because accountability is a two-way street, or at least it should be. I've been reflecting on my own behaviors lately, and I've realized something uncomfortable. I can explain why I avoid conflict, why I sometimes feel the need to justify myself, why I hesitate before saying something that might disappoint someone else. Those behaviors didn't appear out of nowhere. They're connected to experiences that shaped me. But here's what I've had to confront. Knowing where a behavior came from doesn't automatically change what that behavior is doing today. And sometimes the person most affected isn't us. It's someone on the receiving end. How often have we heard someone say, that is just how I am? But what are we really saying? That we understand ourselves, or that everyone else needs to adjust. I'm not suggesting we dismiss our experiences or the circumstances that shaped us. Understanding matters. But understanding should create an opportunity to grow, not become a permanent defense for why we won't. Now let's bring this into the workplace. Organizations talk consistently about accountability, they expect employees to take ownership. Embrace change, accept feedback, demonstrate resilience, and continuously improve. Fair enough. But why do those expectations so often travel in only one direction? An organization loses talented employees and blames the labor market. Leadership struggles with engagement and decides employees need another training program. People raise concerns about communication, but nothing changes. And when employees become frustrated, they're told to be more adaptable. Really? At what point does the organization examine its own behavior, its leadership, its decisions, the environment it's created? You can't keep asking people to take responsibility for their performance while refusing to examine the conditions shaping it. We've always done it this way. Isn't a strategy? It's just our culture. Isn't accountability? And announcing organizational values means very little if those values disappear when someone challenges a decision. If an organization can explain why a problem exists, but refuses to examine its role in perpetuating it, is that accountability or simply a more sophisticated excuse? But employees aren't. Exempt either. Now before anyone starts applauding and pointing toward the executive offices, there's another side to this conversation. Employees have responsibilities too. It's easy to blame a manager for every frustration, to criticize communication while avoiding difficult conversations ourselves, or to expect recognition without examining how we've communicated. Our contributions. That doesn't mean every employee has the authority to fix what's wrong. They don't. Organizations hold considerably more power over policies, resources, and working conditions. But where ha but where we have choices, we also have responsibilities. Accountability isn't about accepting blame for everything. It's about recognizing what actually belongs to us and being willing to do something about it that doesn't stop at the office. Think about our personal relationships. We withdraw because we've been hurt. We avoid difficult conversations because conflict makes us uncomfortable. We become defensive because criticism criticism feels personal. And sometimes we justify by saying, that's just how I am. But what happens when the people around us are repeatedly affected by behaviors we've stopped questioning? Your intentions may explain your actions, but they don't erase their impact. And that goes both ways. We shouldn't be expected to accept harmful behavior simply because we understand where it came from. Empathy and accountability aren't opposites. We need both. Here's where this becomes personal. I don't believe accountability begins with asking who's to blame. I think it begins with a harder question. What am I contributing to a situation that I keep saying needs to change? For a leader, that might mean asking whether people feel safe. Telling you the truth for an organization, whether its decisions actually reflect its values. For an employee, having a conversation they've been avoiding. For a partner or friend, listening to how their behaviors affect someone without immediately defending their intentions. And for me, it might mean recognizing that explaining why I avoid conflict doesn't give me permission. To keep avoiding conversations that matter. And maybe the hardest part of accountability isn't admitting we got something wrong. Maybe it's accepting that we can be good people with good intentions who still need to change. The same is true of organizations. Having good values doesn't mean every decision reflects them. Being willing to recognize that. Difference isn't weakness. It's where accountability begins. One last signal. Here's my challenge this week. Identify one behavior you've been explaining for a long time. Maybe it's yours. Maybe it's something happening within your team, your organization, or a relationship that matters to you. Ask yourself, what keeps happening? Who is being affected? And what responsibility am I actually willing and able to take for changing it? Then do something, have a conversation, ask for feedback, acknowledge the impact, change a decision, or stop defending something you already know isn't working. Because understanding why something happens is valuable. But understanding without a willingness to examine what happens next. can be another excuse to stay exactly where we are. I'm Jeff Gantor, and this has been the Talent Brief. Trust the signal, question the script. Thanks for listening. See you soon. Bye bye.