Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Ruth Money: Chief Victims Advisor on National's promise to remove the right to remain silent
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: So National wants to scrap the right to silence in
- 0:04Speaker 1: child murder cases if re-elected. We've had instances where a
- 0:08Speaker 1: child has died, has been killed, no question, and three
- 0:11Speaker 1: or four people have been on the property at the
- 0:13Speaker 1: time and have collectively refused to comment. And that is
- 0:17Speaker 1: Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. Adults present when a child aged
- 0:21Speaker 1: 12 or under is killed would face up to 10
- 0:23Speaker 1: years in prison for withholding information from police. So child
- 0:27Speaker 1: advocate Ruth Money is with me this morning. Good morning
- 0:29Speaker 1: to you, Ruth.
- 0:30Speaker 2: Good morning.
- 0:31Speaker 1: This would be news to you, good news to you.
- 0:33Speaker 1: You'd welcome this, wouldn't you?
- 0:34Speaker 2: I absolutely welcome this. These four children, people are getting
- 0:38Speaker 2: away with killing children. It's hardly good enough.
- 0:42Speaker 1: So here we go. We're going to have a fundamental change.
- 0:43Speaker 1: I'll talk about this more later, but can you actually
- 0:45Speaker 1: force people to comment? How do you think this is
- 0:47Speaker 1: going to work?
- 0:49Speaker 2: Well, no. So at the moment we have, you know,
- 0:52Speaker 2: obviously the right to silence is kind of enshrined in
- 0:54Speaker 2: the Bill of Rights. So New Zealand, and this is
- 0:57Speaker 2: the problem, New Zealand authorities can't compel people to talk.
- 1:01Speaker 2: And so there's not a lot of detail in terms
- 1:06Speaker 2: of how this proposal would be written. But if you
- 1:10Speaker 2: look at the UK, for example, they have a slightly
- 1:13Speaker 2: different what's called the police caution when you are arrested here.
- 1:17Speaker 2: And basically it says that you would be harming or
- 1:20Speaker 2: you may harm your defence if you choose to rely
- 1:24Speaker 2: on something in court that you don't say now.
- 1:27Speaker 1: Can we talk about that more? Because here the police
- 1:30Speaker 1: arrest you and they say to you, you have the
- 1:32Speaker 1: right to silence and they have a little stick. But
- 1:36Speaker 1: you're saying in the UK they have a different stick
- 1:38Speaker 1: which says you may actually, you know, you may incriminate yourself.
- 1:42Speaker 1: But that's not saying you have a right to silence.
- 1:44Speaker 2: That's right. It says you don't have to say anything,
- 1:47Speaker 2: but it may harm your defence if you do not
- 1:50Speaker 2: mention when questioned something which you may rely on later
- 1:55Speaker 2: in court. So the difference there is basically that it's
- 2:00Speaker 2: an evidential threshold. And so if New Zealand was to
- 2:04Speaker 2: introduce something similar to that, it means that it could
- 2:08Speaker 2: be relied on. We're basically swapping... How do I word this?
- 2:13Speaker 2: We're kind of reversing the evidential burden of proof. So
- 2:17Speaker 2: we're saying that each person present will be required to
- 2:21Speaker 2: explain what they were doing when the child was murdered.
- 2:26Speaker 1: Been a lot of talk back about this already, and
- 2:27Speaker 1: already people are saying, well, why limit this to children
- 2:30Speaker 1: who are age 12 and under who have been murdered?
- 2:32Speaker 1: I mean, a 13-year-old needs advocacy as well.
- 2:37Speaker 2: Look, I agree. My advice would be that this should
- 2:40Speaker 2: be actually significant child abuse, certainly child homicide. But we
- 2:45Speaker 2: also have a number of adult murder cases where the
- 2:50Speaker 2: same thing. There are two people in a house at
- 2:54Speaker 2: the same time. The person is killed, but because they
- 2:57Speaker 2: remain schnum, they play off against each other and there
- 3:02Speaker 2: is no justice for that family or that community either.
- 3:05Speaker 2: So it'll be interesting as this progresses.
- 3:08Speaker 1: But then the legal people come out and say, well,
- 3:11Speaker 1: this is the problem. There's a slippery slope. And eventually
- 3:14Speaker 1: the entire right to silence is gone. And then those
- 3:16Speaker 1: people who have been accused of a crime who are
- 3:18Speaker 1: actually innocent and should actually get a right to silence
- 3:21Speaker 1: might not have it. So how do we prevent that
- 3:23Speaker 1: sort of slippery slope?
- 3:25Speaker 2: Yeah, of course. And, you know, Bill of Rights and
- 3:27Speaker 2: the right to silence is important. However, the death of
- 3:31Speaker 2: a child is more important. The abuse of a child.
- 3:34Speaker 2: You know, if you think about some of these children,
- 3:37Speaker 2: for example, three months old Sol in 2014, three months old,
- 3:43Speaker 2: head injuries, dies the next day. No one, still no
- 3:47Speaker 2: one has been held to account. Fourteen months old, 20
- 3:52Speaker 2: injuries to her head and neck. catastrophic and fatal head injury.
- 3:57Speaker 2: Same thing, three days later, the police are all in
- 4:00Speaker 2: there trying to sort things out. Still no justice for soul.
- 4:04Speaker 2: Baby Roo, we know. So we need to privilege the
- 4:08Speaker 2: rights of these people and certainly these children who are
- 4:12Speaker 2: being assaulted and killed and literally people are getting away
- 4:17Speaker 2: with murder. There are ways to change it.
- 4:20Speaker 1: Risa, thank you for your advocacy and thank you for
- 4:22Speaker 1: your time this morning. That's Ruth Marnie. For more from
- 4:25Speaker 1: Early Edition with Ryan Bridge, listen live to News Talk
- 4:28Speaker 1: ZB from 5 a.m. weekdays or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.