Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Two Men He Relied On Most (9/3/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The Two Men He Relied On Most (9/3/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

0:01
Speaker 1: Today's article from the Daily Beast is an overview of
0:05
Speaker 1: who the two men are, what they are about, and
0:10
Speaker 1: just exactly what their role was within Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise.
0:17
Speaker 1: And again, I know I was gushing about the Daily
0:20
Speaker 1: Beast recently, but here they are again doing that good work.
0:25
Speaker 1: Not many people have picked up the baton and went
0:27
Speaker 1: after Indyke and Khan. But they should have. These are
0:34
Speaker 1: two men that played a very intricate part in what
0:37
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was doing for decades. And the fact that
0:41
Speaker 1: they ended up as executors of the estate is disgusting
0:46
Speaker 1: at best. These two dudes should be worried about not
0:51
Speaker 1: going to prison for the rest of their lives for
0:53
Speaker 1: being accomplices to Jeffrey Epstein and helping facilitate his crimes.
0:58
Speaker 1: But yet, here they are. in charge of the fortune
1:02
Speaker 1: that is supposed to be dispersed to these same survivors
1:07
Speaker 1: who they took part in abusing the first time. Maybe
1:10
Speaker 1: not the physical abuse, right? I've never heard that they
1:13
Speaker 1: were actually partaking in the sex trafficking portion, but they
1:17
Speaker 1: most assuredly facilitated this. They most assuredly helped it go
1:20
Speaker 1: on for years and years and years. And today, Kate
1:25
Speaker 1: Bricklett and the Daily Beast is letting them have it.
1:31
Speaker 1: So this is, like I said, this is a pretty
1:32
Speaker 1: long article, so I won't waste any more time with
1:36
Speaker 1: my opening monologue here, and we'll jump right in. This
1:40
Speaker 1: article is from the Daily Beast. The author is Kate Bricklett,
1:45
Speaker 1: and the researcher on the project was William Bretterman. Headline,
1:53
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's right-hand mystery men, the lawyer and the accountant.
1:59
Speaker 1: One of the men was described by a source as
2:01
Speaker 1: Epstein's confidant and aide for decades. The other was his
2:05
Speaker 1: longtime accountant. Both could soon be questioned. And we know
2:09
Speaker 1: that Indyk wiggled off the hook as far as the
2:12
Speaker 1: deposition goes that he was supposed to give on Wednesday. Now,
2:18
Speaker 1: one thing I will say for Indyk and Khan is
2:21
Speaker 1: these guys know the game as well. They're hip to
2:23
Speaker 1: the game. They understand the loopholes. And they know that
2:28
Speaker 1: if they can avoid sitting down under oath and talking
2:31
Speaker 1: about what occurred while they were in Jeffrey Epstein's employ,
2:35
Speaker 1: then they have a much better chance at denial. So
2:40
Speaker 1: the idea is to never get sat down under oath.
2:43
Speaker 1: And you see that from a lot of these people.
2:45
Speaker 1: They don't want to get sat down. They don't want
2:47
Speaker 1: to be in front of an investigator. They don't want
2:49
Speaker 1: to have their name on one of those sheets. They
2:53
Speaker 1: don't want to deal with that. Because now, Anything you
2:57
Speaker 1: say about this case or have said about this case,
3:00
Speaker 1: you could get yourself caught in a nice perjury trap.
3:03
Speaker 1: And Indyk and Kahn understand that probably better than anybody else.
3:09
Speaker 1: The day after Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, allegedly, a man
3:13
Speaker 1: wearing a hoodie and L.A. Dodgers cap emerged from the
3:17
Speaker 1: dead sex offender's Manhattan mansion. His hat and shades obscured
3:21
Speaker 1: his face as he hauled a hefty blue gift bag
3:24
Speaker 1: and out of the massive townhouse where Epstein abused scores
3:28
Speaker 1: of underage girls for years. I mean, right away, you're
3:33
Speaker 1: left questioning, what is this guy doing at Jeffrey Epstein's
3:37
Speaker 1: house the day after, right? And then he walks out
3:41
Speaker 1: with a blue gift bag. What was in that gift bag?
3:45
Speaker 1: What was so important that he had to go to
3:48
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's house the day after he died and get
3:52
Speaker 1: that bag? Why would Richard Kahn need to do that,
3:55
Speaker 1: the accountant? A photographer captured the scene that day in
4:00
Speaker 1: August 2019, and the pictures were published by the Daily Mail,
4:05
Speaker 1: which identified the mystery man as Epstein's longtime accountant and
4:10
Speaker 1: co-executor of his $ 634 million estate, 47-year-old Richard Kahn. The
4:17
Speaker 1: bag he was carrying, a source with close ties to
4:20
Speaker 1: Kahn said, contained Epstein's funeral clothes. What? So, his accountant
4:28
Speaker 1: goes to get the funeral clothes? That's a little odd, right?
4:32
Speaker 1: Why wouldn't his brother go get the funeral clothes or
4:35
Speaker 1: one of the assistants? The accountant goes, huh? I'm sure
4:38
Speaker 1: that's all that was in that bag was funeral clothes. Look,
4:41
Speaker 1: I don't know for sure what was in that bag, right?
4:45
Speaker 1: I wasn't there. I didn't take a look at the
4:47
Speaker 1: bag myself. But chances are that That bag contained a
4:52
Speaker 1: lot more than funeral clothes, folks. Alright, I'm not stupid.
4:56
Speaker 1: I'm not naive. I might be a moron at times. But,
5:00
Speaker 1: come on. Why would the accountant go to get his
5:04
Speaker 1: funeral clothes? Little is known about Kahn outside his work
5:10
Speaker 1: for Epstein. Or about his co-executor, 55-year-old Darren Indyke, who
5:16
Speaker 1: served as Epstein's personal attorney for more than two decades
5:20
Speaker 1: and was apparently so close to Epstein that the money
5:23
Speaker 1: manager paid for fertility treatments for Indyke and his wife.
5:27
Speaker 1: Neither man has a public social media account and both
5:31
Speaker 1: shun press interviews. And you see that a lot with
5:34
Speaker 1: these kinds of people, right? They don't have a social
5:37
Speaker 1: media imprint or footprint, I should say. And anytime people
5:42
Speaker 1: don't have a social media footprint, it rings alarm bells
5:45
Speaker 1: in my head. Most people have social media of some kind,
5:49
Speaker 1: a Twitter, a Facebook, Instagram, something. Even old people, all right?
5:56
Speaker 1: These people like this, they don't have this sort of
5:59
Speaker 1: thing because they don't want to be tracked down. They
6:02
Speaker 1: don't want to answer questions and they don't want a
6:05
Speaker 1: trail of information leading back to them. So they... They
6:09
Speaker 1: go the route of no social footprint, but it automatically
6:14
Speaker 1: rings alarm bells in my head. You know who else
6:16
Speaker 1: didn't have an internet footprint? Steven Paddock, the guy that
6:23
Speaker 1: opened fire in Las Vegas on October 1st. Those are
6:27
Speaker 1: the kind of people that really terrify me these days.
6:33
Speaker 1: But both could soon be questioned as part of a
6:36
Speaker 1: lawsuit filed by Jane Doe, who alleges she was 14
6:39
Speaker 1: when Epstein and his former girlfriend, co-conspirator, fellow child abuser,
6:45
Speaker 1: general all-around scumbag, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, began to groom
6:50
Speaker 1: and sexually abuse her in 1994. Doe is suing Indyk
6:54
Speaker 1: and Khan in their capacity as co-executors and Maxwell individually.
7:00
Speaker 1: And I think we're going to see a lot more
7:01
Speaker 1: of this, right? I think we're going to see Darren
7:06
Speaker 1: Indyke and Richard Kahn's names brought up more in these
7:09
Speaker 1: lawsuits because it's very apparent that they played a critical
7:14
Speaker 1: and crucial role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's crimes for all
7:18
Speaker 1: of these years. And the survivors have talked about it.
7:21
Speaker 1: People in the know have talked about it. The only
7:24
Speaker 1: people who are late to the party once again is
7:27
Speaker 1: the legacy media. So again... A tip of the hat
7:33
Speaker 1: to the Daily Beast and especially Kate. They take on
7:36
Speaker 1: these stories that are, you know, pretty controversial, right? Coming
7:42
Speaker 1: out and talking about Alexander Derossi, that's a big step.
7:46
Speaker 1: You would never see the New York Times doing that
7:48
Speaker 1: or the Post, even though it's all factual, it's all real,
7:51
Speaker 1: it's all the truth. They don't want to give ammunition
7:56
Speaker 1: to the so-called quote-unquote other side. And that's how you
7:59
Speaker 1: know who you're dealing with. If somebody is afraid to
8:02
Speaker 1: tell the truth to you because it might affect a politician,
8:06
Speaker 1: then that person is not somebody you should trust. I'm
8:12
Speaker 1: at the point in my life right now where anything
8:15
Speaker 1: any politician says, I have to check at least three
8:18
Speaker 1: times to make sure it's the truth because all they
8:20
Speaker 1: do is lie to us at this point. So if
8:22
Speaker 1: anyone's rallying around one side or the other, acting like
8:26
Speaker 1: that side cares about the people or that they're going
8:30
Speaker 1: to do the best job possible for the citizens, you're
8:34
Speaker 1: not really paying attention and you're being gaslit. Maxwell, who
8:41
Speaker 1: was in federal prison in Brooklyn awaiting trial for her
8:44
Speaker 1: alleged role in Epstein's teen sex ring, could also sit
8:47
Speaker 1: for a deposition in Doe's lawsuit. Oh boy, to be
8:51
Speaker 1: a roach in the rushes, huh? Imagine being a fly
8:54
Speaker 1: on the wall. Imagine being in that room and hearing
8:57
Speaker 1: the deposition from Maxwell. I'll tell you. And I think
9:00
Speaker 1: that she should have to sit for the deposition, right?
9:03
Speaker 1: She should have to do whatever it takes to make
9:06
Speaker 1: sure that justice is served. Her days of doing what
9:10
Speaker 1: she wants, Ghislaine Maxwell's days of doing what she wants,
9:13
Speaker 1: are over. She is now a ward of the state
9:16
Speaker 1: and she will do as directed. Last week, Doe's attorney
9:22
Speaker 1: wrote the federal judge overseeing the case and indicated Indyke
9:25
Speaker 1: would be deposed in both his personal capacity and as
9:29
Speaker 1: a co-executor of the Epstein estate and would offer extremely
9:33
Speaker 1: relevant testimony relating to her claims. For sure. Look, Darren
9:38
Speaker 1: Indyke had a deep knowledge of what was going on
9:42
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein. Now, again, I'm not going to sit
9:46
Speaker 1: here and say to you, Darren Indyke was involved in
9:49
Speaker 1: abusing anybody. I don't know that, right? And nobody has
9:51
Speaker 1: come forward saying that. But what I will say is this.
9:56
Speaker 1: You can't facilitate crimes like this for people. What? Because
9:59
Speaker 1: you're the money man in the mafia? You don't go
10:03
Speaker 1: to prison? What, because you're the guy that handles the
10:07
Speaker 1: in-house law duties for the cartel? You don't go to prison?
10:12
Speaker 1: The hell you don't. And Darren Indyk is one of
10:17
Speaker 1: these guys, in my opinion... that was a lot more
10:21
Speaker 1: than just an in-house lawyer. Indeed, we have reason to
10:26
Speaker 1: believe he has first-hand knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with
10:30
Speaker 1: plaintiff while she was a minor and even acted on
10:33
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's behalf to communicate with plaintiff on several occasions.
10:38
Speaker 1: The lawyer, Robert Glassman, wrote to U.S. District Judge Deborah Freeman,
10:43
Speaker 1: responding to the estate's push to delay the under oath grilling.
10:47
Speaker 1: And This is a big deal, right? He's saying that
10:54
Speaker 1: Indyke had first-hand knowledge of the abuse and did nothing
10:59
Speaker 1: with it. He's saying that Indyke knew this little girl
11:04
Speaker 1: was being abused by Jeffrey Epstein and just continued on
11:08
Speaker 1: with his regular life like nothing was wrong. And as
11:13
Speaker 1: far as Judge Deborah Freeman, I am not a fan.
11:17
Speaker 1: I do not trust her as far as we can
11:19
Speaker 1: throw her, and I really don't trust her motivations at
11:24
Speaker 1: this point. Doe also plans to depose Kahn. In an
11:30
Speaker 1: email thread attached to this letter, Glassman told the lawyer
11:34
Speaker 1: for Epstein's estate, with respect to Mr. Kahn testifying in
11:38
Speaker 1: his personal capacity, we would like to know to what
11:41
Speaker 1: extent he knew about Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell's criminal enterprise.
11:46
Speaker 1: We would like to know if Mr. Epstein had ever
11:49
Speaker 1: told him that he sexually abused and raped my client
11:53
Speaker 1: and other minor victims. And again, very important, right? The
11:57
Speaker 1: verbiage matters here. The words matter here. And the fact
12:00
Speaker 1: that the lawyers are calling it a criminal enterprise as
12:02
Speaker 1: well is a big deal. Everybody knows that this is
12:08
Speaker 1: a criminal effing conspiracy, okay? Everybody understands that there were
12:13
Speaker 1: plenty of moving parts here. And anybody who's been paying
12:17
Speaker 1: attention also understands that this should be a RICO case yesterday.
12:23
Speaker 1: How are you going to slap R. Kelly with a
12:26
Speaker 1: RICO case, but not these people? It defies logic. And
12:32
Speaker 1: in fact, we're going to read a couple of articles
12:36
Speaker 1: about the R. Kelly case at some point to give
12:38
Speaker 1: you a bit of an idea of how the RICO
12:42
Speaker 1: law has been used in his case today. but for
12:45
Speaker 1: some reason is being ignored here, at least as of now.
12:51
Speaker 1: I trust you would agree that even if Mr. Kahn
12:53
Speaker 1: started working for Mr. Epstein after Mr. Epstein stopped abusing
12:57
Speaker 1: my client, that doesn't mean Mr. Kahn wouldn't or doesn't
13:01
Speaker 1: know anything about it, right? Glassman added. And that's right.
13:05
Speaker 1: He could have heard something about it. They could have
13:06
Speaker 1: talked about it. Look, that's why we have depositions. That's
13:09
Speaker 1: why we have this ability in the country to to
13:12
Speaker 1: bring people in and get to the bottom of things.
13:16
Speaker 1: The estate asks that the judge postpone Kahn and Indyk's depositions,
13:20
Speaker 1: not only because they've yet to provide discovery materials requested
13:24
Speaker 1: by Doe, but also because Maxwell is requesting a stay
13:28
Speaker 1: in the case pending her criminal trial. And remember, again,
13:32
Speaker 1: I have to point it out, when Maxwell made her
13:35
Speaker 1: statements in The Sun... about Epstein paying for her defense, etc., etc.,
13:40
Speaker 1: the stuff about the hacked emails, the stuff about the estate,
13:44
Speaker 1: it was all calculated. And they were all warning shots
13:47
Speaker 1: to Indyk and Khan. So I highly doubt that Indyk
13:52
Speaker 1: and Khan's legal team is not working behind the scenes
13:56
Speaker 1: with Maxwell's legal team to try and get the brakes
13:59
Speaker 1: put on all of this. Again, I don't have direct
14:02
Speaker 1: evidence of that. Nobody's talked about it in the media yet.
14:04
Speaker 1: Nobody said that to me, but it would make sense.
14:10
Speaker 1: Last week, the judge put the depositions on hold until
14:13
Speaker 1: the court resolves Maxwell's request and directed Doe's legal team
14:17
Speaker 1: to find a new deposition date for Indyke in September
14:20
Speaker 1: should Maxwell's motion be denied. I think it's very crucial
14:26
Speaker 1: that Indyke sits down for this deposition in September. He's
14:29
Speaker 1: run long enough, he's been able to avoid this long enough,
14:33
Speaker 1: and it's time to that he sits down and answers
14:36
Speaker 1: some hard questions about his relationship with his boss and friend,
14:40
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. Doe isn't the only survivor who tried to
14:44
Speaker 1: get sworn testimony from Indyke. Survivors in other lawsuits, including
14:50
Speaker 1: a case brought by Annie Farmer, were scheduled to depose him,
14:53
Speaker 1: but their participation in a victim's compensation fund put their
14:57
Speaker 1: cases on hold. And again, this is playing right into
15:02
Speaker 1: Indyke's hands, right? Indyk does not want to sit down
15:06
Speaker 1: for a deposition. That's why I'm so happy that Glassman
15:11
Speaker 1: is going so hard after the deposition, because we need
15:14
Speaker 1: to get this guy on wax, right? Let's get him
15:16
Speaker 1: down on the record. Let's hear what he has to say,
15:18
Speaker 1: and then let the investigators do their work. One of
15:24
Speaker 1: the ironies is that as an Epstein executor, by agreeing
15:27
Speaker 1: to set up this claims process, he may succeed in
15:31
Speaker 1: insulating himself from discovery. One source familiar with the survivor's
15:35
Speaker 1: litigation told the Daily Beast. The source said Indyke was
15:39
Speaker 1: plucked out of obscurity by Epstein and described him as
15:42
Speaker 1: an in-house counsel to Epstein's enterprise. 100%. How long have
15:46
Speaker 1: I been telling you guys that? Right? Look, all you
15:49
Speaker 1: have to do is pay a little bit of attention
15:51
Speaker 1: to what's going on. What are we, 640 articles deep
15:55
Speaker 1: at this point? We have covered just about everything there
15:58
Speaker 1: is to cover when it comes to this case. And...
16:04
Speaker 1: Darren Indyke was built by Jeffrey Epstein. He's been working
16:08
Speaker 1: for Jeffrey Epstein since forever. And he was Jeffrey Epstein's
16:13
Speaker 1: in-house counsel. He was there so Jeffrey Epstein can run
16:17
Speaker 1: all of the legal problems off of him. Any questions, any,
16:20
Speaker 1: how do we find this loophole? How do we navigate
16:22
Speaker 1: that loophole? And then if shit got too serious, then
16:27
Speaker 1: of course you bring in the big gun trial attorneys
16:29
Speaker 1: like Dershowitz, etc. But your day-to-day duties, your day-to-day mundane
16:35
Speaker 1: business activities, well, those are handled by your in-house counsel.
16:40
Speaker 1: And Darren Indyk was that in-house counsel for decades. He
16:46
Speaker 1: was involved in virtually all of the legal work Epstein had,
16:50
Speaker 1: the source added. He's probably the person with the most
16:53
Speaker 1: knowledge about Epstein's money, business relationships, assets, and legal affairs. Again,
16:59
Speaker 1: all this stuff we've talked about. This guy has his
17:02
Speaker 1: finger on the pulse when it comes to the financials.
17:06
Speaker 1: His name is littered on receipts for shell companies, transactions,
17:10
Speaker 1: you name it. How is he not a target? He's
17:14
Speaker 1: a mystery in part because he's been with Epstein for
17:17
Speaker 1: so long, the source said. He's been Epstein's confidant and
17:20
Speaker 1: aide for decades. If he had a life outside of Epstein,
17:24
Speaker 1: it was a very private life. Another sycophant, right? Another
17:29
Speaker 1: guy who bought into the Epstein narrative hook, line, and sinker.
17:33
Speaker 1: Epstein was like a demigod to Indyke, I bet. Pulled
17:37
Speaker 1: Indyke from obscurity, gave him this fancy job as his
17:41
Speaker 1: in-house counsel. access to a bunch of young models if
17:46
Speaker 1: he wanted. Boy, the world was great for Indyke, wasn't it? Meanwhile,
17:50
Speaker 1: he was helping facilitate this monster's horrible decades-long run of crimes.
17:56
Speaker 1: And yet, somehow he doesn't even get a deposition? Indyke
18:03
Speaker 1: was his criminal defense lawyer. Indyke and his criminal defense lawyer,
18:08
Speaker 1: Mark Agnifilo, hired amid the government's ongoing probe of Epstein
18:12
Speaker 1: and his companies, did not return messages left by the
18:15
Speaker 1: Daily Beast. His relatives also declined to comment. The father
18:20
Speaker 1: of two worked as Epstein's personal attorney since the 1990s,
18:25
Speaker 1: serving as an officer for the financier, pedophiles, charities, handling
18:30
Speaker 1: feuds with unpaid contractors, and representing the businesses of women
18:34
Speaker 1: in Epstein's circle. In 2012, he signed corporation paperwork for
18:40
Speaker 1: the design business of Sarah Kellen, an alleged co-conspirator of Epstein,
18:44
Speaker 1: whom Palm Beach cops were ready to charge in their
18:47
Speaker 1: 2006 probe. Kellen was named accomplice in Epstein's 2008 plea deal,
18:52
Speaker 1: which shielded her from prosecution. So again, look, it wasn't like,
18:58
Speaker 1: Indyk is some, you know, just guy that happened to
19:02
Speaker 1: get caught up in this. He was around after Epstein
19:06
Speaker 1: was convicted, before Epstein was convicted, and helped facilitate companies
19:11
Speaker 1: for people such as Sarah Kellen Vickers. This is a
19:16
Speaker 1: man who has all the secrets. This is a man
19:20
Speaker 1: who needs to be arrested. As the Daily Beast has
19:26
Speaker 1: previously revealed, Indyke also represented the women's empowerment business of
19:31
Speaker 1: Lana Pozdaiva, a Russian model in Epstein's orbit. In 2018,
19:37
Speaker 1: Indyke filed trademark paperwork and registered the website for Pozdaiva's business, WeTalks.
19:43
Speaker 1: Records show that weeks after Epstein's suicide, Posadiva swapped Indyke
19:48
Speaker 1: for another lawyer. Again, it's all about Epstein, right? Epstein
19:52
Speaker 1: facilitated all of that. Epstein set Indyke up with her, obviously.
19:57
Speaker 1: And once Epstein was out of the picture, well, she
20:00
Speaker 1: decided to hop on to another lawyer because her relationship
20:03
Speaker 1: with Indyke probably wasn't that tight. The tie that binded
20:07
Speaker 1: was Epstein, obviously. But Indyke has his fingers in many pies,
20:13
Speaker 1: and all of them smell like Jeffrey Epstein. Indyke's name
20:20
Speaker 1: is also on a corporation filing for the anonymous company
20:23
Speaker 1: that owned Maxwell's East 65th Street townhouse. In 2000, Epstein's friend,
20:29
Speaker 1: Lynn Forrester, sold the residence to the LLC for $ 4. 95 million,
20:34
Speaker 1: according to reports. Now, remember, Lynn Forrester is now a Rothschild.
20:39
Speaker 1: That family is another family full of snakes and serpents, huh?
20:45
Speaker 1: He served as a trustee of Maxwell's Max Foundation from
20:47
Speaker 1: 2001 to 2010 until he was replaced by Dana Burns,
20:53
Speaker 1: a woman pictured in society photos with Epstein and who
20:57
Speaker 1: also worked for Maxwell's ocean nonprofit, the Terramar Project. Again,
21:03
Speaker 1: the Terramar Project was just another front company, in my opinion.
21:07
Speaker 1: Just another way for them to wash their money and
21:11
Speaker 1: for them to grift. It is absolutely mind-boggling that they
21:18
Speaker 1: were able to operate the way they were for so long.
21:22
Speaker 1: Indyke was not only involved with Jeffrey Epstein, convicted sex offender,
21:28
Speaker 1: but now also has his name all over Maxwell's shit
21:30
Speaker 1: as well. Accused sex offender, child abuser. But you mean
21:36
Speaker 1: to tell me Indyke is clean, stop it. Meanwhile, Indyke
21:45
Speaker 1: was listed as secretary of the Wexner Foundation, a non-profit
21:49
Speaker 1: founded by Epstein's only known clients, ex-Victoria's Secret mogul Leslie
21:54
Speaker 1: Wexner and his wife Abigail, in SEC filings from 1998
21:59
Speaker 1: to 2001. The non-profit's tax forms also listed Indyke as
22:04
Speaker 1: secretary through 2006. Two years later, Abigail Wexner gave Indyke
22:09
Speaker 1: power of attorney over her condominium at 15 Central Park
22:14
Speaker 1: West property records show. So not only was Jeffrey Epstein
22:20
Speaker 1: dicking around with Wexner's money, well, they thought it would
22:23
Speaker 1: be a good idea to have Indyke involved as well. Now, remember,
22:28
Speaker 1: we're talking about Leslie Wexner, head of L Brands, maestro
22:34
Speaker 1: of Of Victoria's Secret. What does he and his wife.
22:38
Speaker 1: Need Darren Indyke. To have power of attorney. Over their
22:43
Speaker 1: condominium for. Why do they need Darren Indyke. As the secretary.
22:49
Speaker 1: Of the Wexner Foundation. Can anybody explain that. To me.
22:55
Speaker 1: What has Indyke done in his life. Or up to
22:58
Speaker 1: that point in his life. To garner such. A high
23:02
Speaker 1: place at the table. Friends from high school and throughout
23:08
Speaker 1: Indyke's life were surprised to see his name connected to
23:11
Speaker 1: Epstein in the press after the hedge funder died. Indyke
23:14
Speaker 1: grew up in a middle-class family in Glen Cove, a
23:17
Speaker 1: small city on the north shore of Long Island. Childhood
23:20
Speaker 1: pals told the Daily Beast he was a sweet, normal
23:23
Speaker 1: guy who was actively involved with theater from a young
23:26
Speaker 1: age through high school. Yeah, so, okay, great. In high school,
23:29
Speaker 1: he was a normal cat. No doubt about it. Great. Perfect.
23:33
Speaker 1: What happens? Money, folks. How many times do we talk
23:36
Speaker 1: about it? Greed. Greed, greed, greed. In his 1982 senior yearbook,
23:45
Speaker 1: Indyk wrote that in 20 years he would be performing
23:48
Speaker 1: his first case for the Supreme Court, quoting Al Pacino,
23:51
Speaker 1: Yahoo Finance reported. Little did he know that what he
23:55
Speaker 1: really meant was in 2022 he'd be in court defending himself.
24:01
Speaker 1: He graduated from Colgate College in 1986 and Cornell Law
24:04
Speaker 1: School five years later. One former friend who grew up
24:08
Speaker 1: on his block said, even when he was in high school,
24:10
Speaker 1: he knew he was going to law school. He was driven.
24:14
Speaker 1: Everything he did was towards becoming an attorney. It was
24:17
Speaker 1: something his parents wanted, the friend added. When the acquaintance
24:20
Speaker 1: got in trouble for selling ice cream at Jones Beach
24:23
Speaker 1: in the early 80s, he panicked and told an officer
24:25
Speaker 1: his name was something like Daryl Endyke and gave an
24:28
Speaker 1: address that was slightly off. Somehow, the pal told the
24:33
Speaker 1: Daily Beast officials discovered the correct spelling and address for Indyke,
24:36
Speaker 1: and appeared at his doorstep over the illegal vending. His father, Bernie,
24:41
Speaker 1: was furious, the friend said, adding that he marched over
24:45
Speaker 1: to my house and confronted my father. I got into
24:48
Speaker 1: all kinds of trouble. The point was that Indyke needed
24:52
Speaker 1: an unblemished record because he wanted to go to law school,
24:55
Speaker 1: and something like this could have hurt him in some way,
24:57
Speaker 1: his chances going to a top law school. Ha ha! Alright,
25:01
Speaker 1: so I don't know about you folks, but I can't
25:04
Speaker 1: even imagine living a childhood where the most trouble you're
25:09
Speaker 1: going to get is for selling illegal ice cream at
25:11
Speaker 1: the beach. I grew up in the inner city, and
25:14
Speaker 1: let me tell you what, there was a lot more
25:17
Speaker 1: going on where I grew up than selling illegal ice cream.
25:23
Speaker 1: And that's why I say these people weren't built for
25:25
Speaker 1: this shit. Even someone like the Zendite cat. What, you
25:28
Speaker 1: think he gets... under the thumb of an investigator. He
25:32
Speaker 1: gets under the thumb of an interrogator. He's going to
25:36
Speaker 1: be quiet. He's going to shut down and not rat
25:38
Speaker 1: anybody out. Please, please. I think I apologized to him
25:45
Speaker 1: for sure, the friend said, but it was really his
25:47
Speaker 1: father who was most upset. After law school, Indyk did
25:51
Speaker 1: a four-year stint with Golden Wachtel, a now-defunct boutique law firm,
25:55
Speaker 1: and represented several clients in copyright lawsuits. Gold and Wachtell
26:00
Speaker 1: represented Epstein at least as far back as 1988. Firm
26:04
Speaker 1: principal William Wachtell declined to discuss that, but said he
26:08
Speaker 1: hired Indyke as a favor to the younger man's father,
26:11
Speaker 1: Bernard Indyke, whom he described as a mailroom employee at
26:15
Speaker 1: a financial company that had retained Gold and Wachtell. So
26:20
Speaker 1: a mailroom employee has enough pull to get this lawyer,
26:25
Speaker 1: William Wachtell, to hire his son? Must be one hell
26:30
Speaker 1: of a mail sorter, folks. Again, there's more that's going
26:34
Speaker 1: on here. That needs a deeper look. All of these
26:36
Speaker 1: ties most certainly need a deeper look. Court records indicate
26:41
Speaker 1: Indyke's father was in fact a manager and member of
26:44
Speaker 1: the board at Jackie Fine Arts, a gold and Wachtel
26:47
Speaker 1: client that sold low-value art reproduction rights to the rich
26:52
Speaker 1: at high prices as a calculated tax dodge. Well, there
26:56
Speaker 1: you go. Of course, it was a little bit more
26:59
Speaker 1: than that. He wasn't just a member of the mailroom.
27:02
Speaker 1: He was a manager and a member of the board
27:05
Speaker 1: at Jackie Fine Arts. So, of course, it looked a
27:08
Speaker 1: little funny, that last paragraph, right? Why would this big-time
27:12
Speaker 1: lawyer show up in a mailroom and give somebody's son
27:15
Speaker 1: a job? That does not make sense. This, on the
27:20
Speaker 1: other hand, makes a lot more sense. Jackie Fine Arts, another...
27:26
Speaker 1: Calculated tax dodge, another way for them to launder money.
27:30
Speaker 1: That strikes closer to home for me. Efforts to reach
27:36
Speaker 1: the founder of the company, Herman Feinsod, once held as
27:40
Speaker 1: the king of tax shelters, were unsuccessful. Look, a lot
27:45
Speaker 1: of this that we talk about here, folks, is based
27:48
Speaker 1: on the financials. These guys are up to their ears now.
27:53
Speaker 1: in financial irregularities and financial crimes. It is apparent. You
28:01
Speaker 1: find someone successful and hit your wagon to them, a
28:04
Speaker 1: childhood friend of Indyke's, who last saw him when they
28:07
Speaker 1: were in their 20s, told the Daily Beast. People fall
28:10
Speaker 1: into these situations and they can't extricate themselves. That's the
28:13
Speaker 1: benefit of the doubt I would give him. Nope, sorry,
28:16
Speaker 1: no benefit of the doubt from somebody who hasn't seen
28:18
Speaker 1: him since they were in their 20s. I'm sorry, I
28:21
Speaker 1: can't give him that benefit of the doubt. He didn't
28:23
Speaker 1: fall into this. If anything, it was his greed that
28:26
Speaker 1: got him caught up in this. And again, that is
28:28
Speaker 1: his fault. Indyk perhaps felt indebted to Epstein for his largesse.
28:35
Speaker 1: As Indyk wrote in a glowing biography of his boss,
28:38
Speaker 1: prepared for Florida prosecutors, Epstein paid for prohibitively expensive in
28:44
Speaker 1: vitro fertilization cycles for him and his wife. Okay, so...
28:49
Speaker 1: On the face of that, that's cool, right? I know
28:51
Speaker 1: if I had a bunch of money and I had
28:54
Speaker 1: a friend who was having problems getting his wife pregnant
28:57
Speaker 1: and they needed some in vitro fertilization cycles, I would
29:01
Speaker 1: be more than happy to help them out. Zero doubt
29:06
Speaker 1: about it. Whatever my friends needed, I would be there
29:09
Speaker 1: if I had this kind of money. No strings attached.
29:13
Speaker 1: But do you think that Jeffrey Epstein... ever did anything
29:18
Speaker 1: without strings attached? Of course he didn't. But this wasn't
29:23
Speaker 1: a situation where Indyke was indebted to him because of that.
29:28
Speaker 1: Indyke worked hand in hand knowingly with Jeffrey Epstein as
29:32
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein went on a decades long run of a
29:35
Speaker 1: sex trafficking operation. That is who Indyke is. Shortly after
29:43
Speaker 1: I began working for Jeffrey, I experienced a personal and
29:46
Speaker 1: unexpected tragedy. After five years of marriage, my wife and
29:50
Speaker 1: I learned that I was infertile and we could not
29:53
Speaker 1: have children in the traditional manner, Indyke wrote in his
29:56
Speaker 1: bio first reported by the Palm Beach Post. I meekly
30:00
Speaker 1: approached Jeffrey and asked him if it would be possible
30:02
Speaker 1: to drop my wife and me from the company's medical
30:04
Speaker 1: policy in exchange for a different one or cash payment.
30:10
Speaker 1: Indyke continued. Puzzled by my request, Jeffrey naturally asked why.
30:15
Speaker 1: When I told him, he was visibly affected and without
30:18
Speaker 1: even a moment's consideration, he told me to go for
30:21
Speaker 1: treatment and send him the bills. Having been with Jeffrey
30:24
Speaker 1: only a few months, I was astounded by his generosity
30:27
Speaker 1: and and hurried to my desk to call my wife
30:29
Speaker 1: to share the amazing news. Of course, that's what Jeffrey
30:33
Speaker 1: Epstein would do for these people, right? That was all
30:35
Speaker 1: part of their package. That was part of your silence.
30:39
Speaker 1: Indy claimed Epstein paid for five cycles of in vitro,
30:43
Speaker 1: and that Maxwell even offered to look into adoption for
30:45
Speaker 1: his family. Aw, isn't that cute? I guess that settles
30:49
Speaker 1: it too. I mean, Epstein offered to pay for the
30:53
Speaker 1: in vitro and Maxwell offered to look for adoption. So
30:56
Speaker 1: they're obviously good people and we should just forget everything
30:59
Speaker 1: else they have done. At the unsuccessful completion of our
31:04
Speaker 1: fourth cycle and a failed adoption attempt, my wife and
31:08
Speaker 1: I were at the end of our rope and did
31:09
Speaker 1: not want to continue and I declared without Jeffrey's support
31:13
Speaker 1: and stubborn daily encouragement, we would not have. He even
31:17
Speaker 1: recruited his then girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, to meet with us
31:21
Speaker 1: to offer assistance with local adoption and oversee adoption procedures
31:25
Speaker 1: and to encourage us to try again. That shit's terrifying
31:29
Speaker 1: on its face. All right. All right. Most people read
31:32
Speaker 1: that and they think, oh, yeah, it's about adoption. I
31:34
Speaker 1: read that and say to myself, how does Ghislaine Maxwell
31:36
Speaker 1: know all the ins and outs of this sort of shit?
31:39
Speaker 1: How many kids were adopted by Ghislaine or with Ghislaine's
31:43
Speaker 1: help for other people? Can we look into that? Is
31:46
Speaker 1: anybody digging into that? I think that's a story that
31:49
Speaker 1: might have legs there for all you investigative journalists out there.
31:54
Speaker 1: The fact that she knows all the ins and outs
31:56
Speaker 1: of this adoption is terrifying to me, folks, okay? This
31:59
Speaker 1: is not a lady that should be adopting kids or
32:03
Speaker 1: advising anybody on the steps that need to be taken
32:06
Speaker 1: to do so. Thankfully, after our fifth cycle, my wife
32:12
Speaker 1: and I were blessed with twin daughters. Although Jeffrey was
32:15
Speaker 1: adamant that we owed him nothing, Jeffrey honored us by
32:19
Speaker 1: agreeing to be the godfather of our children. How many
32:22
Speaker 1: times was Jeffrey Epstein is the godfather of a lot
32:26
Speaker 1: of children, isn't he? Now I could understand if his
32:30
Speaker 1: name was Gotti, all right, or Casso, or Gambino, but
32:38
Speaker 1: this guy sure is a godfather to a lot of children.
32:42
Speaker 1: which on its face is absolutely disgusting, by the way.
32:47
Speaker 1: In the past decade, Indyke and his wife have owned
32:50
Speaker 1: two different properties in Boca Raton, Florida, one of which
32:53
Speaker 1: they still own, having acquired it for $ 3. 1 million without
32:57
Speaker 1: a mortgage in 2015. Another bought in 2014 and sold
33:02
Speaker 1: four years after sat in the exclusive enclave of Boca
33:06
Speaker 1: Grove Plantation. It required the pair to shell out at
33:09
Speaker 1: least $ 70, 000 beyond the $ 460, 000 purchase price for a social
33:16
Speaker 1: equity membership in the Boca Grove Golf and Tennis Club. Oh,
33:20
Speaker 1: I'm sure that was fun. Stan, do you have my
33:24
Speaker 1: tea and crumpets? We're going to the Boca Raton Grove
33:28
Speaker 1: Golf and Tennis Club to meet Buffy and Biff. Give
33:33
Speaker 1: me an absolute break. $ 70, 000 to go noodle around with
33:37
Speaker 1: a bunch of moronic, archaic-ass, so-called elite society members? No thanks,
33:45
Speaker 1: I'll take that $ 70, 000 and go on a fantastic vacation.
33:50
Speaker 1: All the while, they maintained a residence in Livingston, New Jersey,
33:53
Speaker 1: which they purchased through an LLC for $ 1. 75 million in 2003.
33:59
Speaker 1: In his recent book, Relentless Pursuit, longtime survivor's lawyer Brad
34:03
Speaker 1: Edwards described Indyke as Epstein's fixer, who had attended important
34:07
Speaker 1: hearings as well as my depositions of Epstein over the years. Yeah,
34:12
Speaker 1: hell yeah, of course he did because he was Epstein's
34:14
Speaker 1: numeral uno, number one, top hitter, big dog. I'm the lawyer.
34:20
Speaker 1: I'm the House representative. It all comes through me. That
34:26
Speaker 1: was Indyke's role. That's what he did. He acted as
34:30
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's Tom Hagen, folks. When Edwards sat for a
34:37
Speaker 1: 2017 deposition with his years-long court battle with Epstein, Indyke
34:44
Speaker 1: was there to take notes. Darren Indyke, who was a
34:47
Speaker 1: staple at every Epstein event, was situated in his normal
34:51
Speaker 1: spot at the far end of the table in order
34:53
Speaker 1: to monitor and report back to Epstein everything that happened,
34:57
Speaker 1: Edwards wrote. He wasn't a litigator. He was more like
35:00
Speaker 1: a fixer. Edwards noted at another point, Indyke had one client,
35:05
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, is the Tom Hagen comparison perfect
35:11
Speaker 1: or what, folks? Now, obviously, Indyke is nowhere near as
35:14
Speaker 1: cool as Tom Hagen was, right? Tom Hagen was the man,
35:18
Speaker 1: but I'm talking about their function, right? Edwards represents a
35:23
Speaker 1: client referred to as Caitlin Doe, who alleges in a
35:26
Speaker 1: lawsuit that Epstein forced her to marry one of his
35:29
Speaker 1: non-citizen female recruiters, nuptials arranged, she says, through Epstein's longtime
35:34
Speaker 1: New York attorney. That would be Darren Indyke, all right?
35:38
Speaker 1: So now Darren Indyke has his name all over Lord
35:42
Speaker 1: knows what documents, but he also facilitated the marriage of
35:47
Speaker 1: a girl who was a non-citizen, probably trafficked, to one
35:54
Speaker 1: of his female recruiters. They organized that marriage of a
35:59
Speaker 1: probably sex-trafficked girl with Indyk acting as the facilitator. How
36:04
Speaker 1: is he not arrested? How is he not indicted? The
36:10
Speaker 1: ceremony included not only signing the necessary legal paperwork prepared
36:13
Speaker 1: by the attorney, but also posing for photographs to give
36:17
Speaker 1: the appearance that the marriage was legitimate, the complaint states.
36:20
Speaker 1: Whether Indyke was this attorney hasn't been publicly confirmed. Edwards
36:24
Speaker 1: cannot be reached for comment. It's obviously Indyke. I mean, look,
36:29
Speaker 1: I don't, again, I don't have that for sure 100%,
36:32
Speaker 1: but we're talking about Epstein's in-house lawyer, the man that
36:34
Speaker 1: Epstein trusts the most. and it's rather obvious that it
36:39
Speaker 1: was Indyk who was the one involved here. Khan is
36:44
Speaker 1: a lesser-known figure in Epstein's world, and his name is
36:48
Speaker 1: hardly mentioned in litigation related to the sex offender's survivors.
36:52
Speaker 1: There was no public images of the accountant until the
36:55
Speaker 1: Daily Mail's photo of him transporting the gift bag in
36:58
Speaker 1: August 2019 along with snapshots of him leaving Epstein's home
37:03
Speaker 1: in February 2019 following a two-hour visit. Ooh, an international
37:08
Speaker 1: man of mystery. No public photos of this guy? I mean, really?
37:16
Speaker 1: Days after the mail published the images, an attorney for
37:20
Speaker 1: one survivor wrote to Kahn's lawyers demanding materials to be preserved.
37:24
Speaker 1: Is it true that Mr. Kahn entered Mr. Epstein's townhouse
37:28
Speaker 1: and removed documents the lawyers wrote before requesting a list
37:32
Speaker 1: of documents and or materials Mr. Kahn removed from Mr.
37:36
Speaker 1: Epstein's townhouse that day and on any other occasion after Mr.
37:41
Speaker 1: Epstein's death? Well, that's a pretty fair request, right? What
37:44
Speaker 1: are you doing in his house? Why is anybody in
37:48
Speaker 1: this man's house? Why doesn't it have some of that
37:51
Speaker 1: yellow ribbon over it calling it a crime scene? Shouldn't
37:56
Speaker 1: it be a crime scene? I mean, shouldn't you preserve
37:58
Speaker 1: a crime scene? Isn't that how this all works? Counsel
38:03
Speaker 1: for the Epstein estate dismissed the mail report and told
38:06
Speaker 1: the survivors team via email, our clients take their preservation
38:10
Speaker 1: obligation seriously. They do, huh? They do? They haven't taken
38:14
Speaker 1: anything seriously in this whole case, but now they take
38:17
Speaker 1: the preservation part seriously? Okay. A person with knowledge told
38:22
Speaker 1: the Daily Beast that the bag contained funeral attire and
38:25
Speaker 1: that Khan was doing his obligation as an executor, which
38:29
Speaker 1: is to attend to the burial details. Yeah, that's fine.
38:35
Speaker 1: Attend to the burial details. But let's get real, okay? Okay.
38:41
Speaker 1: Somebody like Khan isn't going to get an outfit for
38:45
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's funeral. They have assistants. They have underlings. They
38:49
Speaker 1: have coffee getters. So don't tell me he showed up
38:52
Speaker 1: there to get an outfit. Ridiculous. The source said Khan
38:58
Speaker 1: has never socialized with Epstein and wasn't aware of Epstein's
39:01
Speaker 1: alleged abuse. Kahn first met Epstein when he began working
39:05
Speaker 1: for him in 2005 out of a Madison Avenue office
39:08
Speaker 1: he shared with Indyke. An accountant named Bella Klein and
39:12
Speaker 1: Epstein's personal assistant and alleged co-conspirator Leslie Groff also routinely
39:17
Speaker 1: worked in the New York office. That's nice, huh? What
39:22
Speaker 1: a group of scoundrels. Richard worked out of the office,
39:26
Speaker 1: the source added. Did Epstein appear at those offices? Yes.
39:30
Speaker 1: Did Richard see any of the activities that were the
39:33
Speaker 1: focus of press attention? No. Kahn's name appears throughout records
39:38
Speaker 1: for Epstein's non-profits and corporations and was mentioned in the
39:42
Speaker 1: 2010 deposition of Epstein's Palm Beach house manager Janus Banasiak.
39:49
Speaker 1: who described him as a senior accountant. Would you say
39:52
Speaker 1: that Mr. Kahn is a key employee, like a right-hand
39:55
Speaker 1: man of Mr. Epstein? One survivor's lawyer asked. Banasiak replied
40:00
Speaker 1: in the affirmative. Kahn is listed as treasurer for Epstein's
40:04
Speaker 1: financial strategy group, LTD, FSG, which filed an application in
40:09
Speaker 1: 2013 to become an international banking entity based in the U.S.
40:15
Speaker 1: Virgin Islands. Indyk was secretary-general an Epstein president record show. Okay,
40:21
Speaker 1: so here you go again. His name is on one
40:24
Speaker 1: of these front companies that was involved at the very
40:27
Speaker 1: least in fraud and money laundering. So that itself should
40:32
Speaker 1: earn him an indictment. FSG, which changed its name to
40:37
Speaker 1: Southern Country International, was approved in 2014 to run a
40:41
Speaker 1: bank specializing only in offshore clients. In 2018, Erica Kellerhals,
40:48
Speaker 1: Epstein's tax lawyer based in St. Thomas, told territory officials
40:52
Speaker 1: the bank's operations hadn't yet begun. According to the New
40:56
Speaker 1: York Times, whether the bank actively pursued customers is unclear.
41:01
Speaker 1: But months after Epstein died, the estate transferred more than
41:04
Speaker 1: $ 12 million to southern countries' coffers. The bank's year-end value
41:10
Speaker 1: was $ 499, 759. Two weeks after the transfer, the Times reported,
41:17
Speaker 1: and what happened to the money isn't clear. And there
41:21
Speaker 1: is the big rub, right? Where is this money? Where
41:24
Speaker 1: did it go? Who's involved with it? Who was in
41:27
Speaker 1: charge of it? Who facilitated the transaction? We don't know
41:31
Speaker 1: any of this, but you can rest assured that the
41:34
Speaker 1: prosecutors most certainly do. According to FSG's articles of incorporation,
41:42
Speaker 1: Kahn became a certified public accountant in 1995. He graduated
41:47
Speaker 1: from Syracuse University in 94 and got a master's in
41:50
Speaker 1: taxation from Pace University in 1999. Oh, so he got
41:54
Speaker 1: a master's in theft? That's cool, because we all know
41:57
Speaker 1: taxation is theft. Kahn and his wife, Lisa, purchased a $ 2. 8
42:02
Speaker 1: million co-op apartment on the Upper East Side in 2008
42:05
Speaker 1: property record show. and they took out a mortgage on
42:10
Speaker 1: the residence in 2016. The couple also owns a six-bedroom
42:15
Speaker 1: Hamptons mansion purchased for $ 1. 5 million in 2015. Boy, it
42:21
Speaker 1: sure does pay to work for Jeffrey Epstein, doesn't it?
42:24
Speaker 1: While all of these people were amassing their fortunes, while
42:27
Speaker 1: they were having their houses in the Hamptons right next
42:30
Speaker 1: to Ramona Singers, the survivors were struggling for air. The
42:36
Speaker 1: survivors were battling to be heard. And the survivors were
42:41
Speaker 1: still being abused by the system and people like Indyk
42:47
Speaker 1: and Khan. How is that even possibly acceptable? Khan, who
42:56
Speaker 1: declined to comment for this article, has been an executive
42:59
Speaker 1: with Epstein's shadowy non-profits since at least 2007. That year,
43:04
Speaker 1: Khan replaced Maxwell as treasurer of the COUQ Foundation and
43:10
Speaker 1: held the role until the charity was dissolved five years later.
43:14
Speaker 1: And that, folks, also was a calculated move in my opinion.
43:18
Speaker 1: They knew that they were going to be facing the
43:20
Speaker 1: legal portion of Jeffrey Epstein's actions and they wanted to
43:25
Speaker 1: try and shade Maxwell from the fallout. So they moved
43:30
Speaker 1: Khan in there as a preemptive move because Khan is a...
43:35
Speaker 1: an accountant anyway, so they could just use that as
43:39
Speaker 1: their cover and give Maxwell a little bit of shadowy
43:43
Speaker 1: protection in the process. COUQ contributed $ 46 million in stock
43:50
Speaker 1: and other assets to Wexner's YLK Charitable Fund in 2008,
43:55
Speaker 1: just before Epstein started his Palm Beach jail sentence. According
44:00
Speaker 1: to one CNBC report, Epstein's nonprofit gave $ 14 million to
44:04
Speaker 1: YLK in 2007. Before COUQ shut down in November 2012,
44:10
Speaker 1: Epstein created another murky entity called Gratitude America LTD. All
44:17
Speaker 1: of these places, folks, were laundering money and sheltering laundered money.
44:25
Speaker 1: That's what all of these front companies' purposes were. The
44:30
Speaker 1: charity's tax filings didn't show revenues until 2015, when Kahn
44:35
Speaker 1: replaced Epstein as president of the group, and investor Leon
44:38
Speaker 1: Black donated $ 10 million through an anonymous LLC. The Attorney
44:43
Speaker 1: General of the U.S. Virgin Islands recently issued civil subpoenas
44:46
Speaker 1: to Black over his relationship to Epstein. And we've been
44:50
Speaker 1: discussing that at length, right? Leon Black has a lot
44:53
Speaker 1: to answer for here. Deutsche Bank, where Gratitude America had
45:04
Speaker 1: an account, is also under fire over its relationship with Epstein.
45:08
Speaker 1: In July, the bank was fined $ 150 million for failing
45:12
Speaker 1: to detect millions in suspicious transactions, including payments to Epstein's
45:17
Speaker 1: alleged co-conspirators and more than $ 800, 000 in withdrawals made by
45:23
Speaker 1: Epstein's personal attorney. So that alone right there shows you
45:30
Speaker 1: just a little look at the financial screwery that was
45:36
Speaker 1: occurring on a daily basis within Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise.
45:42
Speaker 1: Similar to Indyk, Kahn made political donations to the same
45:45
Speaker 1: candidates Epstein backed throughout the years. In 2007, Kahn and
45:50
Speaker 1: his wife each made $ 2, 300 donations to the presidential campaign
45:55
Speaker 1: of former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, a friend of Epstein.
46:00
Speaker 1: Indyk and his wife, Michelle Safer, also donated $ 2, 300 apiece
46:05
Speaker 1: to Richardson that year. One of Epstein's survivors, Virginia Roberts,
46:09
Speaker 1: claims Maxwell directed her to have sex with Richardson. He
46:13
Speaker 1: has denied involvement with Epstein's trafficking scheme. And it just
46:17
Speaker 1: goes to show you, folks, follow the money, right? That's
46:20
Speaker 1: what everyone wants to say. But I warn you, if
46:23
Speaker 1: you're biased in this case and you're worried about upsetting
46:28
Speaker 1: the apple cart and the other side getting ammunition, you
46:31
Speaker 1: might not want to look into it. You might want
46:33
Speaker 1: to stay in your own little echo chamber because when
46:37
Speaker 1: you take a look at who was donating money in
46:41
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's name, basically, and who they were donating it to,
46:45
Speaker 1: your jaw will hit the floor. Kahn donated a total
46:50
Speaker 1: of $ 5, 400 to the campaign of Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett of
46:55
Speaker 1: the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2016 and $ 2, 700 in 2018.
47:01
Speaker 1: He shelled out $ 2, 600 to Plaskett in 2014, as did
47:06
Speaker 1: fellow Epstein accountant Bella Klein. After Epstein's July 2019 arrest,
47:12
Speaker 1: Plaskett said she'd returned Epstein's money, though it is unknown
47:15
Speaker 1: whether she planned to return the funds of his associates.
47:19
Speaker 1: And I think that's a good angle that Kate is
47:22
Speaker 1: working here, right? Kate is doing a good job here.
47:25
Speaker 1: It's important to follow this money. It's important to see
47:28
Speaker 1: not only who Epstein donated to, but his confidants. In
47:33
Speaker 1: the itemized receipts for the 2016 and 2018 donations, Kahn's
47:38
Speaker 1: occupation is listed as attorney. He's never been registered, however,
47:42
Speaker 1: as a lawyer in New York State. Boy, folks, that
47:47
Speaker 1: was a pretty good encompassing look at Indyk and Khan
47:51
Speaker 1: and their role within Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. And the
47:57
Speaker 1: question remains, why are these two men co-executors of the
48:03
Speaker 1: estate rather than guests of the state? If you'd like
48:10
Speaker 1: to contact me, you can do that at bobbycapucci at protonmail.com.
48:14
Speaker 1: That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. You can also find me on
48:22
Speaker 1: Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. All of the links that
48:28
Speaker 1: go with this episode can be found in the description box.
48:32
Speaker 1: All right, everybody. What's up, everyone? And welcome to another
48:35
Speaker 1: episode of the Epstein Chronicles. The congressional investigation into Jeffrey
48:41
Speaker 1: Epstein continued yesterday as the committee deposed Darren Indyke, Jeffrey
48:47
Speaker 1: Epstein's longtime lawyer. And of course, Darren Indyke said he
48:52
Speaker 1: had no idea about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and that he
48:56
Speaker 1: never saw anything that would even come close to what
49:00
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was accused of. Oh, and those withdrawals that
49:04
Speaker 1: he made when he was structuring and avoiding Title 31? Well,
49:08
Speaker 1: that's because he had trouble getting a credit card. Meanwhile,
49:11
Speaker 1: the withdrawals were coming from Epstein's account. And if Indyke
49:17
Speaker 1: was having trouble getting a credit card, he could have
49:20
Speaker 1: easily just got one of Epstein's. He was conducting Epstein's business,
49:23
Speaker 1: not his own. And I don't need the transcript to
49:26
Speaker 1: tell you that if that's what he said, he perjured himself.
49:29
Speaker 1: And considering who we're talking about here, my guess is
49:33
Speaker 1: it wasn't the only time that he was playing loose
49:35
Speaker 1: with the truth. If Darren Indyke tells the truth, he
49:40
Speaker 1: is going to implicate himself. And obviously, that's the last
49:44
Speaker 1: thing he wants to do. So, let's dive into this
49:47
Speaker 1: article from CNN and let's see what they have to
49:49
Speaker 1: say about the deposition of Darren Indyke. Headline, longtime Epstein
49:55
Speaker 1: attorney says he didn't know of the financier's sexual abuse.
50:00
Speaker 1: This article was authored by M. Steck and Annie Greyer.
50:06
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's longtime employee and attorney Darren Indyke testified to
50:10
Speaker 1: lawmakers on Thursday that he had no knowledge whatsoever of
50:14
Speaker 1: the convicted sex offender's wrongdoing and rejected any suggestion he
50:19
Speaker 1: assisted or facilitated his former boss's crimes, according to a
50:23
Speaker 1: copy of his opening statement. Well, that settles it. Darren
50:28
Speaker 1: Indyk told you he had nothing to do with it,
50:30
Speaker 1: so we should just move on, right? Find somebody else
50:33
Speaker 1: to talk to. It's not me, babe. It's not me.
50:38
Speaker 1: Had I known that he was abusing or trafficking women,
50:41
Speaker 1: I would have quit working for him at once and
50:43
Speaker 1: severed all ties to him, Indyke said in an opening
50:46
Speaker 1: statement to the House Oversight Committee, a copy of which
50:49
Speaker 1: CNN obtained. The truth is that I did not know
50:54
Speaker 1: what Mr. Epstein did after hours behind closed doors and
50:57
Speaker 1: in places where I was not present. You sure signed
51:01
Speaker 1: a lot of paperwork though, didn't you? How many lawsuits
51:04
Speaker 1: did you settle? How much hush money did you pay?
51:08
Speaker 1: How many sham marriages did you set up? How much
51:11
Speaker 1: immigration fraud was involved? And if Darren Indyke says none,
51:18
Speaker 1: then I'm going to say, in my opinion, he's lying.
51:21
Speaker 1: And I don't just pull that out of my hat.
51:24
Speaker 1: I think we have reams of evidence that point to
51:28
Speaker 1: Darren Indyke being a major cog in the Epstein machine.
51:32
Speaker 1: And if Epstein would have been charged with RICO like
51:34
Speaker 1: he should have been, Indyke would have been charged as well. Indyke,
51:39
Speaker 1: one of Epstein's longest-serving employees, worked as an attorney for
51:43
Speaker 1: him for more than 20 years on corporate, transactional, and
51:47
Speaker 1: general legal services. He described his work as a consulting
51:50
Speaker 1: role for an entirely legitimate purpose. The closed-door deposition lasted
51:56
Speaker 1: for roughly eight hours. An entirely legitimate purpose, huh? I'm
52:01
Speaker 1: pretty sure that all the people that were wronged wouldn't
52:04
Speaker 1: feel the same way. Whether it's financially, whether it's physically...
52:08
Speaker 1: or anything in between, I highly doubt legitimate, is involved.
52:14
Speaker 1: Democrats said they believe that Indyk is not credible for
52:17
Speaker 1: saying he had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes and said
52:21
Speaker 1: Indyk may have perjured himself in his deposition. Well, I
52:24
Speaker 1: haven't seen the transcript, so I'll take the same stance
52:27
Speaker 1: I always do until we look at that. But I
52:30
Speaker 1: have no doubt that Indyk was telling stories. He has to.
52:35
Speaker 1: If not, he's going to incriminate himself, right? So, Indyke
52:40
Speaker 1: is in a spot. Now, do I think he's ever
52:43
Speaker 1: going to be charged with perjury or lying to Congress?
52:46
Speaker 1: Hell no. They don't have the guts. And remember, this
52:51
Speaker 1: whole entire procedure is nothing more than procedural. If you
52:56
Speaker 1: think that James Comer and his band of merry men
53:00
Speaker 1: are going to do anything as far as real oversight here,
53:04
Speaker 1: or really hold anyone accountable, you have not been paying attention.
53:08
Speaker 1: If it wasn't for the discharge petition, forget it. Democratic
53:14
Speaker 1: Representative Dave Min, a lawyer and former law professor, said
53:18
Speaker 1: of the deposition, it's just not credible to claim that
53:21
Speaker 1: you had no knowledge of what was happening. I'm very
53:24
Speaker 1: surprised that he did not take the Fifth Amendment. I
53:27
Speaker 1: think it's very likely that he perjured himself over and
53:30
Speaker 1: over and over again, the congressman said. And look, I
53:34
Speaker 1: wasn't in the room, right? So I'm not going to
53:36
Speaker 1: sit here and tell you That Dave Minn's telling the truth,
53:38
Speaker 1: I don't know. But one thing I definitely do know,
53:41
Speaker 1: after all these years, is that Darren Indyke is not
53:44
Speaker 1: exactly what I would call a truthful person. So if
53:48
Speaker 1: Dave Minn is saying that he perjured himself, he probably did.
53:53
Speaker 1: And if I was a betting man, and you were
53:56
Speaker 1: laying odds, I would take the bet that he perjured himself.
54:01
Speaker 1: Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett said, I can tell you that
54:05
Speaker 1: he has been quite defensive of Jeffrey Epstein, almost as
54:09
Speaker 1: if he still doesn't believe Jeffrey Epstein to be who
54:12
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was. Well, that's because fellow travelers and all, right?
54:16
Speaker 1: A lot of these people that come out and say, oh, well,
54:20
Speaker 1: I'm abhorred by what Jeffrey Epstein was up to, were
54:24
Speaker 1: actually in on it. They were there. They were around.
54:27
Speaker 1: They knew. They heard. They didn't care. Why should they?
54:32
Speaker 1: Some vulnerable girl from West Palm Beach? What does that
54:35
Speaker 1: matter to them? Hey, Jeffrey, you got that $ 500, 000 for me?
54:40
Speaker 1: That's what matters. Not poor people. Not vulnerable girls. Not
54:45
Speaker 1: you or me. More money. More power. More, more, more, more, more, more.
54:51
Speaker 1: It's always more. And inevitably, that more comes from you.
54:57
Speaker 1: Lawmakers are seeking answers on Indyke's work. and his knowledge
55:01
Speaker 1: of Epstein's financial dealings. The testimony occurred behind closed doors,
55:06
Speaker 1: though lawmakers are expected to release a video later. Well,
55:10
Speaker 1: I want the transcript. What's up with the videos? Let's
55:12
Speaker 1: get the transcripts. Videos are great, but the transcripts are
55:16
Speaker 1: important too. So hopefully we get the actual written portion
55:19
Speaker 1: of this, the transcript, so that we can dive into it.
55:24
Speaker 1: In his opening statement, Indyk pushed back on allegations that
55:27
Speaker 1: he withdrew thousands of dollars in cash on Epstein's behalf
55:31
Speaker 1: to avoid triggering bank suspicions. He said the cash was
55:35
Speaker 1: not used for any improper purposes. Bro, you were structuring.
55:39
Speaker 1: Stop the nonsense. We talked about this years ago. All
55:44
Speaker 1: of a sudden, you weren't structuring? I mean, that might
55:47
Speaker 1: work on somebody else, but not me. I used to
55:50
Speaker 1: manage a sportsbook in Las Vegas. I know all about
55:53
Speaker 1: Title 31. And if any of my players were trying
55:57
Speaker 1: to do what Darren Indyke did, they'd be hit with
56:01
Speaker 1: a SAR so quick that it would make your head spin.
56:05
Speaker 1: Police investigators found that Epstein often paid young girls and
56:08
Speaker 1: women between $ 200 and $ 300 that the woman said came
56:13
Speaker 1: after he abused them under the guise of performing massages
56:17
Speaker 1: in the mid-2000s. Min said he asked Indyke about a $ 725, 000
56:21
Speaker 1: cash withdrawal he made using a maximum of of $ 7, 500
56:27
Speaker 1: per withdrawal to not trigger federal reporting and said that
56:31
Speaker 1: Indyk couldn't describe what that was for. Well, Epstein said
56:35
Speaker 1: it was for gas for the plane, remember? Oh, this
56:38
Speaker 1: is for fuel. And of course, the bank was happy
56:42
Speaker 1: to help him out. But now Indyk has no idea?
56:46
Speaker 1: He has no clue what's going on? I guess it's
56:49
Speaker 1: just another case of Epstein amnesia. In his opening statement,
56:56
Speaker 1: Indyke also categorically denied that he helped coerce young women
57:00
Speaker 1: into same-sex sham marriages with each other to circumvent immigration,
57:04
Speaker 1: calling it 100% untrue. Well, I think he's lying. And
57:10
Speaker 1: I think the evidence backs it up. And all it's
57:14
Speaker 1: going to take is one of these girls to come
57:16
Speaker 1: forward and say, yeah, this happened, and Indyke is cooked.
57:20
Speaker 1: And I have a sneaking suspicion that's going to happen.
57:26
Speaker 1: These allegations were made in a 2024 class action civil
57:30
Speaker 1: lawsuit filed by Epstein victims against Indyk and his fellow
57:33
Speaker 1: co-executor of Epstein's estate, Richard Kahn. The suit alleged that
57:39
Speaker 1: the two were facilitators in Epstein's sex trafficking operation and
57:43
Speaker 1: were also integral in allowing Epstein to escape justice for
57:47
Speaker 1: years by concealing his litany of crimes. The pair strongly
57:51
Speaker 1: denied the allegations. Recently, the estate agreed to settle the
57:55
Speaker 1: lawsuit for up to $ 35 million, but admitted no wrongdoing.
57:59
Speaker 1: The court preliminarily approved the settlement earlier this month. It's
58:04
Speaker 1: always accept the suit, but with no wrongdoing, right? Hell
58:08
Speaker 1: of a system we have set up here in America,
58:10
Speaker 1: when you can buy your way out of allegations like these.
58:15
Speaker 1: Addressing the committee, Indyk also said that after Epstein was
58:19
Speaker 1: convicted in 2008 on state charges, For soliciting prostitution from
58:24
Speaker 1: a minor, his former boss appeared devastated and extremely contrite. Yeah,
58:30
Speaker 1: devastated and contrite he got caught. What, you think he
58:33
Speaker 1: had remorse for what he did? We all know the
58:37
Speaker 1: answer to that. Listen to him explain it himself. Oh,
58:40
Speaker 1: it's like stealing a bagel. What? You abused literally thousands
58:45
Speaker 1: of people, you sick degenerate fuck. What do you mean
58:48
Speaker 1: it's like stealing a bagel? He was adamant that he
58:50
Speaker 1: had no idea that anyone involved was underage, and personally
58:54
Speaker 1: assured me he would never again let himself be in
58:57
Speaker 1: that position. I believed him. And I made the mistake
59:00
Speaker 1: of believing, Mr. Epstein, that he would not again commit
59:03
Speaker 1: a crime. I deeply regret doing so. Most importantly, I
59:07
Speaker 1: feel horrible for those women who Mr. Epstein abused, said Indyke.
59:12
Speaker 1: Does he mean the women whose abuse he facilitated? Is
59:14
Speaker 1: that what he means? Because from where I'm sitting here
59:17
Speaker 1: in the peanut gallery, I think that the evidence certainly
59:20
Speaker 1: points in that direction. House Oversight Chair James Comer said
59:25
Speaker 1: that Republicans asked Den Dyke why he continued to work
59:28
Speaker 1: with Epstein after he was convicted in 2008. Well, maybe
59:33
Speaker 1: someone should ask Comer why he didn't show up to
59:36
Speaker 1: talk to Les Wexner. That might have been an important deposition, no?
59:42
Speaker 1: But they're done with Les Wexner. They have nothing left
59:44
Speaker 1: to ask him. He said that Epstein told him it
59:49
Speaker 1: was a mistake. It was a one-time deal. He didn't
59:51
Speaker 1: know the girl was underage, the one that he got
59:54
Speaker 1: convicted of in West Palm Beach. And Dindyke said he
59:57
Speaker 1: convinced him that he would never do it again and
59:59
Speaker 1: said that he had remorse. So that was about it,
1:00:02
Speaker 1: Comer said. Wow. Imagine sitting on that committee and listening
1:00:08
Speaker 1: to that nonsense. I would be seething. Democrats also said
1:00:13
Speaker 1: that Indyk could not give a straight answer about whether
1:00:16
Speaker 1: an accuser of President Donald Trump was given a settlement,
1:00:19
Speaker 1: which was an issue that came up during the panel's
1:00:21
Speaker 1: deposition last week with Epstein's accountant, Richard Kahn. It's very
1:00:26
Speaker 1: concerning that the story around Jane Doe 4, as it
1:00:29
Speaker 1: relates to the executors of the estate, has now changed
1:00:33
Speaker 1: four or five times, whether there was ever a settlement.
1:00:36
Speaker 1: So until we get an answer on that question, we
1:00:39
Speaker 1: will not be satisfied. Democratic Representative Robert Garcia said, Well,
1:00:45
Speaker 1: I can agree with that. Like, we need to know
1:00:48
Speaker 1: the deal. Was the settlement paid out or wasn't it?
1:00:51
Speaker 1: It shouldn't be this big of a deal to find out.
1:00:55
Speaker 1: Democratic Representative Melanie Stansbury said that she believes that there
1:00:59
Speaker 1: are two separate women who have made allegations against Trump
1:01:02
Speaker 1: because in the deposition on Thursday, Indyke would not confirm
1:01:06
Speaker 1: if the woman who filed the lawsuit and restraining order
1:01:09
Speaker 1: against Trump that appeared in the Epstein estate files was
1:01:13
Speaker 1: a separate individual from Jane Doe 4 who appears in
1:01:17
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice Epstein files. I asked today if
1:01:21
Speaker 1: these were two different individuals and he cannot confirm. I
1:01:25
Speaker 1: believe that these are two different allegations involving two different minors,
1:01:29
Speaker 1: Stansbury said. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing in connection with
1:01:34
Speaker 1: Epstein and and the name appearing in the Epstein case
1:01:38
Speaker 1: files is not evidence of wrongdoing. Well, that's true. But
1:01:44
Speaker 1: when you're mentioned, what, 38,000 times or something? People are
1:01:48
Speaker 1: going to have some questions. And then, of course, you
1:01:50
Speaker 1: have this war that just happens to kick off, coincidentally,
1:01:53
Speaker 1: in the middle of all of this. People are going
1:01:56
Speaker 1: to have some questions. In his opening statement, Endike pointed
1:02:00
Speaker 1: to his work as co-executor of Epstein's estate, which has
1:02:04
Speaker 1: cooperated with the committee's requests, for evidence and material. As
1:02:08
Speaker 1: if they had any choice. I mean, come on. The
1:02:12
Speaker 1: estate also established a restitution program for Epstein victims called
1:02:16
Speaker 1: the Epstein Victim Compensation Program, which doled out $ 121 million
1:02:22
Speaker 1: to 136 women. The estate has also settled multiple civil
1:02:28
Speaker 1: lawsuits filed by victims and agreed to pay $ 48 million
1:02:32
Speaker 1: to an additional 59 women. And that compensation fund didn't
1:02:36
Speaker 1: even pay out the amount of money to all those women,
1:02:40
Speaker 1: 136 of them, as they did to the USVI. But
1:02:45
Speaker 1: go ahead and tell me how this is all a
1:02:47
Speaker 1: cash grab. Less than a million dollars each is what
1:02:50
Speaker 1: these women got when you look at the aggregate total.
1:02:53
Speaker 1: All of that for a lifetime of pain. Sounds like
1:02:56
Speaker 1: a great deal, huh? Garcia said that there are two
1:03:00
Speaker 1: areas of the committee's subpoena to the Epstein estate, which
1:03:03
Speaker 1: Endike helps oversee. that have not been provided to the committee.
1:03:07
Speaker 1: The missing documents include court records in the case between
1:03:10
Speaker 1: Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as various documents
1:03:14
Speaker 1: related to businesses, firms, and organizations that had communications with Epstein.
1:03:22
Speaker 1: Garcia claimed that the estate has asked oversight Republicans for
1:03:25
Speaker 1: clarity on which documents they need, but Republicans are stalling.
1:03:30
Speaker 1: Of course they are. That's the whole entire trick. Comer
1:03:35
Speaker 1: defended the Epstein's estate compliance with his subpoena and said
1:03:38
Speaker 1: the reason they haven't pushed to get the remaining documents
1:03:42
Speaker 1: is because they overlap with other subpoenas the committee has
1:03:45
Speaker 1: issued and is receiving documents for. Oh, this guy is
1:03:48
Speaker 1: just too much. This guy is way too much to
1:03:52
Speaker 1: deal with. James Comer, you're going to go down as
1:03:55
Speaker 1: one of the biggest clowns maybe in history. When all
1:03:59
Speaker 1: is said and done and this story is written, You're
1:04:03
Speaker 1: going to go down as a big time clown, my friend.
1:04:05
Speaker 1: And don't think this is over for you because that
1:04:08
Speaker 1: boomerang is going to come back around. At some point,
1:04:12
Speaker 1: my hope is that James Comer is on the other
1:04:15
Speaker 1: end of one of these depositions about his behavior during
1:04:19
Speaker 1: his investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Because enough is enough. And
1:04:25
Speaker 1: at this point, my question is, who's watching the watchers?
1:04:30
Speaker 1: In February, Tim Parlator, who previously worked with Indyk and
1:04:34
Speaker 1: is a former attorney for President Donald Trump, told CNN,
1:04:38
Speaker 1: Randy Kay, that Indyk worked on the legitimate side of
1:04:41
Speaker 1: Epstein's business. Oh, of course. Of course he did. Another
1:04:45
Speaker 1: Trump friend. Are you guys catching on yet? A lawyer
1:04:49
Speaker 1: for Indyk told CNN in a statement at the time,
1:04:52
Speaker 1: not a single woman has ever accused Mr. Indyk or Mr.
1:04:55
Speaker 1: Khan of committing sexual abuse or witnessing sexual abuse. nor
1:05:00
Speaker 1: claimed at any time that she reported to them any
1:05:03
Speaker 1: allegation of Mr. Epstein's abuse. Notice they don't talk about enabling.
1:05:08
Speaker 1: Notice they don't talk about being co-conspirators or committing financial crimes.
1:05:12
Speaker 1: Because that's what they did. Nobody ever said Indyk and
1:05:15
Speaker 1: Khan were abusing girls or they were sitting around in
1:05:18
Speaker 1: the corner in the cuck chair watching. Nobody ever said that.
1:05:23
Speaker 1: Notice how they don't ask about any of the serious issues.
1:05:26
Speaker 1: They don't really dive in and dig deep. and then
1:05:29
Speaker 1: you have Comer coming out and defending it? The lawyer
1:05:34
Speaker 1: added that both men have denied they knowingly facilitated or
1:05:37
Speaker 1: assisted Mr. Epstein in his sexual abuse or trafficking of women,
1:05:41
Speaker 1: or that they were aware of Mr. Epstein's actions. Knowingly facilitated.
1:05:46
Speaker 1: I mean, they might have, but they didn't know. Could
1:05:49
Speaker 1: have been on the slide. Ah, you know what? Maybe
1:05:51
Speaker 1: I did facilitate him now that I think about it. Folks,
1:05:56
Speaker 1: these people think you're stupid. And they think this sham
1:05:59
Speaker 1: of a committee is going to help them help you
1:06:02
Speaker 1: move on. But the more they want us to move on,
1:06:05
Speaker 1: the more we dig in. And that's exactly what I
1:06:09
Speaker 1: plan on doing here on the podcast. So, like usual,
1:06:12
Speaker 1: we'll keep an eye on things. And when we get
1:06:15
Speaker 1: a transcript to add to the catalog, we most certainly
1:06:18
Speaker 1: will do that. Until then, that's going to do it
1:06:21
Speaker 1: for this one. All the information that goes with this
1:06:24
Speaker 1: episode can be found in the description box.