Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Where did Women's Studies come from? | HBR Talk 300

Transcript

Where did Women's Studies come from? | HBR Talk 300 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Hello, guys, welcome to HBr. Talk continues despite tornado warning. I'm
• 0:08
  actually live streaming from my bathroom right now, not turning onto camera. In
• 0:12
  fact, there's tape over it. But and there's a cat in here with
• 0:17
  me who does not live with us, but he doesn't live with anybody else
• 0:21
  e there's so he's in here with me. If you hear the tornado warning
• 0:26
  siren go on off on my phone. Sorry, I know it's loud,
• 0:31
  but it's the circumstances. So after twenty nineteen, when I hear tornado warning,
• 0:38
  I seek shelter, So here we go. So sorry if you get
• 0:44
  interrupted by me ows and sirens, and you can probably hear mister Rory the
• 0:51
  cat here purring because I'm keeping him distracted. Not to mention the potential tornado.
• 0:59
  Yeah, the tornado. Well last the last time a tornado came through
• 1:03
  here. So just just to be clear, you know, I've I've been
• 1:07
  in buildings hit by tornadoes multiple times for Ohio. That's that's pretty interesting because
• 1:15
  we I mean, we get tornadoes, but they're not usually that bad.
• 1:19
  You know, one's in a blue moon like the like on my wedding day,
• 1:25
  my wedding day we got married in Bowling Green, and my brother and
• 1:30
  his wife came from Van Wert, which is like halfway across the state.
• 1:38
  But in any case, there was a thunderstorm that spanned the whole state.
• 1:42
  It was a major, major thunderstorm. And so you know, they they
• 1:48
  left for the wedding, they stop, they get fuel on the way,
• 1:51
  they uh, you know, head over to Bowling Green, they want to
• 1:55
  just get married. They drive back. They missed their turn, and you
• 2:00
  know they're going back looking. I'm like, well, obviously they missed their
• 2:04
  turn because they didn't see the landmark for it, which was the gas station
• 2:07
  they had stopped at on the way to the wedding. The reason they didn't
• 2:12
  see it was because nothing of it was left except for the foundation of the
• 2:16
  convenience store and the foundation on which the pumps had been sitting before the tornado,
• 2:22
  the F five tornado ate them. So I saw a video on Twitter
• 2:30
  not long ago. You may have seen it too, that Amazon is now
• 2:32
  delivering houses to people. A house that can be flat packed in a like
• 2:38
  twelve foot by thirty six foot. People go, oh, this is so
• 2:42
  cool. It's it's it's twelve thirty six in the package, but you can
• 2:46
  unfold it into something that's bigger than that, right, but it's not nailed
• 2:51
  into the ground in any way. No, no tornadoes, just land you
• 2:55
  in a in a munch in paradise, I mean witches and magic spells and
• 3:01
  stuff, and you'll be just We have houses. We have houses on wheels
• 3:06
  here in the United States. There there are several trailer parks right here in
• 3:09
  the Dayton area where you know. Most of the people that live there their
• 3:15
  houses up on blocks and they go to a central building. In this circumstance,
• 3:20
  like right now where I'm sitting on the floor in my little we have
• 3:23
  a little half bath. This room I'm in is like I can't. I
• 3:28
  can't lay down in it on the floor if I want to, you know,
• 3:30
  not not. I'm longer than any of the walls in this room.
• 3:37
  And jeez, cat, you're so demanding. He's like climbing into my lap.
• 3:42
  He didn't have very many places to go either in here. So no
• 3:46
  this we have no basement here. This is an apartment. So so that's
• 3:50
  what's going on. Like twenty nineteen when the when when the city was yes,
• 3:58
  we know here we go m S. I sorry, about your ears.
• 4:12
  It's it's a distance sound from wellwis thank goodness because it's like right next
• 4:15
  to my head. I'm terrifying right there with it. Yeah, well it's
• 4:18
  supposed to be terrifying. I mean, so, just to remind everybody,
• 4:23
  in twenty nineteen, when we uh, when we had the cluster of angry
• 4:27
  aerial elementals that attacked Dayton, there was a The Bachelorette TV showed episode that
• 4:38
  was preempted by News Center seven's Jamie Simpson telling people to you know, get
• 4:45
  get into the basement, get into their safe space for tornadoes whatever, you
• 4:48
  know, follow their protocol. And there were people on Twitter bitching about it,
• 4:54
  like they interrupted my show. Oh my gosh, they interrupted my show.
• 4:58
  Like there were seven tornadoes that got sort of trapped in the valley and
• 5:05
  ping ponged around in the valley like it was some sort of a game.
• 5:11
  And you know, my building got hit. We didn't have a whole lot
• 5:15
  of damage, but my neighbor in their building in the same apartment complex,
• 5:20
  their roof got ripped off, like the whole building, and the tornado carried
• 5:26
  it down the street. The roof dropped half of it in the parking lot
• 5:31
  of one shopping complex and the other half in the parking lot of another.
• 5:38
  So that's why I'm in here. When they say tornado warning, Allison.
• 5:44
  When they say it's done and over with, then I'll go be plugged into
• 5:47
  the walls and shaid I. Actually one of the homes I worked at is
• 5:53
  in an apartment building that got struck by lightning while I was at work,
• 5:58
  and I was plugged into the wall at that point, and all of a
• 6:03
  sudden, it it looked like somebody set off a bomb outside, like it
• 6:10
  was broad daylight for a split second. And at the same time, you
• 6:14
  know, there was this boom of epic proportions, just unbelievable and uh.
• 6:20
  And then of course all the power went off and everything. And I go
• 6:25
  into the room that has the breakers in It used to be what you'd call
• 6:30
  a fuse box, but we don't use fuses anymore, and every single one
• 6:35
  of them was tripped except the one for the wall that I was plugged into.
• 6:41
  So they play when when the warning is over. They just took place
• 6:46
  some some old school country like Bob Dylan or something that would be so nice.
• 6:51
  They they actually just send out a little text announcement. So you guys
• 6:58
  might not hear ANADO warning is oversound. You know, you go about your
• 7:01
  day. I might be in here for half an hour and then suddenly realize
• 7:05
  that, you know, it's quiet or whatever. But we'll see. But
• 7:12
  that's the situation at the moment, guys. So sorry to open like this,
• 7:17
  but it didn't stop me from starting the show. So let's get into
• 7:24
  my little opening spiel our show tonight, which I didn't introduce yet. This
• 7:32
  is HBr talks three hundred slightly different kind of technical difficulty. Sometimes it's convenient
• 7:40
  that we didn't have the other kind as well. Yeah, you really can't
• 7:43
  do anything about technical difficulties from God, there's no preempting that. But yeah,
• 7:50
  so we're going back to the where did Women's Studies come from? Show?
• 7:55
  So we're looking at that article again and I have my I am streaming
• 8:01
  in Discord as well, so you guys can see what I'm looking at in
• 8:05
  terms of the article. But as always, you know, we do gotta
• 8:11
  do what we gotta do before we do anything else. So now that I've
• 8:16
  blasted your ears with a siren and shit, as always, Honey Badger Radio
• 8:20
  dishes out ace morgas board of thought provoking discussions, and as experiences both recent
• 8:26
  and long past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts are fighting back, they've made it
• 8:31
  clear that for people like us, relying on third party payment platforms like Patreon
• 8:35
  to fund our work is treading on san ice or building our house in the
• 8:39
  path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In light of this, we strongly encourage
• 8:45
  our supporters to switch at least their support for us to Feed the Badger dot
• 8:48
  com the most stable way to help us out, and if you want to
• 8:52
  tip us directly instead of relying on any social media platforms, tip jar.
• 8:56
  The link for that is feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip and
• 9:01
  as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms, which is
• 9:05
  why you should further provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions on
• 9:09
  Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where you can find your way to all of our
• 9:13
  content, as well as a link to feed the Badger dot com in the
• 9:16
  dropdown menu at the top of the page. So, in our last reading
• 9:22
  from this article, we kind of learned about how some of the institutional and
• 9:26
  government connections behind the spread of women's studies through academia had paved the way.
• 9:35
  And you know, this, this totally organic, totally totally not manipulated situation
• 9:45
  had played out. We I think we finished up by noting that in nineteen
• 9:50
  ninety two, By nineteen ninety two, in this article was written, about
• 9:54
  two thirds of post secondary academic institution in the United States had women studies classes
• 10:03
  or women studies departments. And you know, the article pointed out, you
• 10:09
  know, this differed between four year and two years, so there were more
• 10:13
  four year universities than two year universities with this this infection. But and I
• 10:20
  think I even pointed out my university wasn't one of them. The university I
• 10:24
  attended at the time this was written wasn't one of them. It I guess
• 10:31
  our women's studies department would have been you know, home mech the home economics
• 10:37
  department, because that's that's basically it was very conservative as universities go. But
• 10:46
  that only took us to the first page. We have another page. So
• 10:50
  that's what we're going to get into tonight is the second page. And the
• 10:56
  second page gets in I think a little more to the process as as to
• 11:03
  how how it took place with all that funding. So I think the we
• 11:13
  had read let's see the end of the previous page, started the sentence at
• 11:18
  the top here and the next paragraph. Schmid's was particularly glad to see that
• 11:24
  the effort was funded without having to go to the campus senate. This is
• 11:28
  about a particular university. So yeah, I go back and take a look
• 11:33
  at the last sentence here. How do account for this triumph? Was the
• 11:39
  question. Partisans of women's studies, of course, feel that the discipline has
• 11:43
  succeeded simply because of its intellectual power, because you know, women's studies is
• 11:50
  totally based on intellectual power. Other St I laughed, I know you.
• 11:56
  The intellectual power of my victorm would right. Others say that it's growing influence
• 12:05
  has been created, not earned, that the power of Let's switch to the
• 12:09
  next page, and we are actually and I'm gonna double check and make sure
• 12:22
  we are where we should be here. Yeah, the power of women studies
• 12:26
  is political rather than intellectual. That this is a synthesize, a synthesized revolution
• 12:35
  brought into being by the big bucks of philanthropic thropic organizations like the one or
• 12:41
  six point one billion dollar Ford Foundation and that. That's something that I think
• 12:48
  a lot of people don't understand. In regard to feminism, we hear all
• 12:52
  the time the line that feminism only happened because women were dissatisfied with the way
• 13:01
  men were treating them. Women were dissatisfied with their lot in life, women
• 13:07
  were dissatisfied with their their legal standing, and women fought for that and persuaded
• 13:15
  men to treat them as human beings. But then when you look into feminist
• 13:22
  history, it's always shit like this. There's always a bunch of organizations with
• 13:28
  a lot of money, government grants, and you know, a media campaign
• 13:35
  trying to make it happen, not organically but against the will of the people
• 13:41
  that it's being whose areas it's being inserted into, like universities. Sorry,
• 13:50
  in case you guys didn't know, there's a tornado real In other news,
• 14:05
  this cat is well tolerant of sirens. He's amazingly tolerant of sirens. It's
• 14:09
  not scaring him at all like my previous cats. Go here we go again.
• 14:16
  Okay, it must be like right on top of me or close by.
• 14:20
  I can't fucking let me see if I can turn this down. Can
• 14:24
  you hear the wind, like I can't hear anything outside the building. You
• 14:30
  would think you'd be able to hear the wind if it's that important. When
• 14:33
  the tornado, the F three hit hit our building, we heard nothing except
• 14:41
  before when it picked up the base for our little greenhouse, which was four
• 14:46
  four by fours and slammed it into the bricks on the side of the building.
• 14:52
  It really didn't do any other damage like it ate that greenhouse, but
• 14:56
  it was ensured. Not a big deal. But we're probably if it's coming
• 15:00
  through here, we're gonna lose this one too. We gotta we got the
• 15:03
  replacement one that we're probably gonna lose that. But but there are worse things
• 15:11
  that could happen. So but in any case, so here we go.
• 15:16
  And I don't want to make sure I didn't read this before. If you
• 15:28
  scroll down, you can see, Yeah, that's that that nightmare field picture
• 15:33
  that. Yeah, we did see that picture weeks ago. Yeah, so
• 15:35
  we looked at that. We looked at that. Okay once again, for
• 15:39
  it has been instrumental. Yeah, we read that, I remember that.
• 15:41
  Okay. University of Maryland hired Betty Schmidt's author of integrating women's studies into in
• 15:48
  the curriculum published by the feminist press. Can you imagine any other group with
• 15:56
  publications like that, the being taken seriously saying you have to study our philosophies
• 16:04
  and theories in university and insert them into all of your other coursework. What
• 16:08
  if we had, well, let's say Christian studies, say oh, you
• 16:12
  got to have Christian studies in your business major? Why? Well, because
• 16:21
  Christians have rights, Yes, Christians have rights, But why do I have
• 16:23
  to have Christian studies in my business major? And like that conversation would not
• 16:27
  go well for the person making a suggestion. Women's studies, though, seems
• 16:32
  to be uh perfectly able to do that. So. At a nineteen eighty
• 16:38
  nine panel discussion of the National Network of Women's Caucuses on the subject of transforming
• 16:44
  the Knowledge base, Schmidt's spoke enthusiastically about the university's willingness to put five hundred
• 16:49
  thousand dollars of its own money into a curriculum transformation project and enhancement of women's
• 16:55
  studies. She pointed out that Maryland was the first research institution or comprehensive university
• 17:03
  that has done this, certainly the first campus to put that amount of money
• 17:07
  into this effort, and unfortunately they were not the last. Schmitz was particularly
• 17:15
  glad to see that the effort was funded without having to go to the campus
• 17:21
  senate because if it had had if it had gone to the campus senate,
• 17:26
  it would not have come out with five hundred thousand dollars. And read that
• 17:30
  part again, Schmitz was particularly glad to see that the effort was funded without
• 17:37
  having to go to the campus senate, because if it had gone to the
• 17:42
  campus senate, it would not have come out with five hundred thousand dollars.
• 17:47
  So they bypassed the students' interests, They bypassed the campus senate, They bypassed
• 17:56
  the democratic process to get the money and bragged about it, and they never
• 18:04
  did get held accountable for that. That doesn't sound vaguely familiar at all.
• 18:14
  Yeah, seriously, bypassed everything. How did Schmidz pull off the trick of
• 18:25
  bragging a cool million while avoiding the democratic process? Was simple? The administrator
• 18:30
  and administration was in her corner all along. But patriarchy, how what this?
• 18:40
  None of this? How why schmid brags that the president or that President
• 18:47
  William Kerwin quote took the heat she and her colleagues and women said, He's
• 18:52
  apparently see themselves as ventriloquists as well as revolutionaries. It is wonderful, Schmidt
• 18:57
  says, to be able to supply appropriate words to the head of an institution.
• 19:04
  Yeah, because he wasn't already planning on trying to make that happen.
• 19:10
  Right, they're supplying appropriate words. Okay, cat, you cannot do that
• 19:18
  my headphones if the space I'm in is small enough that the cat is like
• 19:27
  wandering around sniffing things, goes across my lap and like hooks my headphones with
• 19:33
  his tail. So in any case, Yeah, this happened in universities all
• 19:42
  over the country where women's studies. Imperialists came along with their backing from organizations
• 19:51
  like the Ford Foundation and rich rich families like the Rothschilds and government grants and
• 19:59
  stuff like that, said hey, we're doing this thing, and the universities
• 20:03
  are like, well, yeah, that can help us make more money by
• 20:07
  adding more things that people have to take classes for, and and also it
• 20:11
  suits our political ideology. So here you go. Here's here's a whole department
• 20:19
  for your your little subversive class work. Women's studies has grown at a prodigious
• 20:30
  rate because private, corporate and public organizations have regularly injected the movement with huge
• 20:37
  doses of financial steroids. Not because it was needed, not because the ideas
• 20:49
  involved in it were popular and adopted by a wide spectrum of people, not
• 20:57
  because they were right about any thing, but because they were funded by the
• 21:04
  patriarchy. The people they call the patriarchy, the so called evil men that
• 21:11
  hold women back, decided feminism would be what your kids study in school.
• 21:19
  But in spite of all the financial services, says Ford consultant Beverly Guy,
• 21:25
  cheft all that's cheft all, not shaft all. Sorry, women's studies is
• 21:30
  at a critical juncture in its evolution and still requires substantial external funding. And
• 21:37
  at the time this article was published, you know, I know what the
• 21:42
  deal was. But in the mid nineties was when they started transitioning from being
• 21:49
  called women's studies to being called gender studies. They started inserting a lot of
• 21:57
  Rawan Connell's forhilosophies on masculinity and the whole toxic masculinity narrative. They started going
• 22:08
  from having just a women's studies department in a women's studies set of coursework to
• 22:17
  women's studies being part of your psychology classes. If you're studying to be a
• 22:23
  medical professional in the field of psychology, women's studies being part of your coursework.
• 22:30
  If you are going to be an educator, women's studies being part of
• 22:33
  your coursework. If you're going into business administration, into finance, into basically
• 22:42
  anything in the social services, if you're going to be a not caseworker,
• 22:48
  but social worker, you know, or anything like that. If you're going
• 22:52
  to be a medical doctor, you had to take some women's studies and so
• 22:56
  on. That was becoming pretty much universal by the time you Know this came
• 23:07
  out, and a lot of these universities were emphasizing the importance of injecting this
• 23:15
  into everything. And by the time I switched from that university to the state
• 23:22
  university outlet that I went to that did have a women's studies department, they
• 23:27
  were already referring to one class as women's studies, but the whole department as
• 23:33
  gender studies. See that funding appears to be on the way from old and
• 23:41
  news sources, so as soon as they wanted to do something, they got
• 23:44
  money. Last year, Old Reliable Ford gave the National Council for Research on
• 23:51
  Women a grant of one hundred thousand dollars for a National Conference for scholars,
• 23:56
  policymakers, and journalists on Educational Diversity, a conference one hundred thousand dollars in
• 24:03
  nineteen ninety two. So I have a question seeing is how D keeps pumping
• 24:14
  money into this, these these this in the endeavor? Where's the return on
• 24:22
  investment? Oh, we're seeing it today, yeah, But like, like,
• 24:29
  why anybody who would invest that amount of money would I would think that
• 24:34
  they would want to see some kind of return. And if it's only happening
• 24:40
  now, I mean, geez, this is how many thirty years ago that
• 24:44
  this was going on. You know, what kind of reasoning could they have
• 24:52
  had on the on, you know, to make it make sense to them
• 24:56
  to do this, And I don't know there were The return is publicity,
• 25:02
  much much like the modern equivalent, which is ESG and what haven't it When
• 25:07
  they advertise themselves they say, look, we put one hundred grand into women's
• 25:14
  rights. You should buy our products. And it's it's it's that's the closest
• 25:19
  thing they can get to. You scratch your back and I'll scratch your mind.
• 25:22
  Now I scratch your it doesn't even matter. It's it's generally assumed that
• 25:30
  if you're doing your bit for the whomen's then your customers are going to are
• 25:34
  going to appreciate that because so many of your customers are women, and women
• 25:41
  only care about women, so they will buy your products not because they're good
• 25:45
  products, but because you care about the women's And I say this has only
• 25:53
  become more official in modern times forty years after this has happened because it didn't
• 26:03
  work on a voluntary basis, and now they've made it somewhat less voluntary and
• 26:07
  called it es g where because just doing that and expecting your customers to to
• 26:15
  respond positivity to that didn't work, and so they've set up set up this
• 26:21
  whole system where you get also financially incentivized for doing your bit for for the
• 26:27
  waman's. Sorry about the noise, guys, apparently my cat is allergic to
• 26:33
  humans. Don't worry about the cat. We can't like I thought he was
• 26:40
  going to have a hair ball in the metal shell. But yeah. The
• 26:45
  Ford Foundation has a shitload of customers, and some of their interesting customers are
• 26:49
  other financial institutions. They get donations from big banks, they get donations from
• 26:55
  uh, you know, other large organizations. There's a whole nepotistic network of
• 27:03
  circular donation that takes place with these organizations. And then you know, at
• 27:07
  the same time, some of these organizations also get either tax you know,
• 27:12
  tax exemption or grant money from the government or both. And so you might
• 27:21
  find yourself being a customer of the Ford Foundation and other similar organizations. But
• 27:30
  yeah, one hundred thousand bucks, you think about that. In nineteen ninety
• 27:37
  two, it was I'm trying to think that that's a couple that's a few
• 27:45
  years salary. I want to say that's two or three years salary for a
• 27:48
  school teacher. And university professors most of them didn't make. The ones that
• 27:55
  I've known haven't made as much as teachers in the public school system, and
• 28:00
  for what they did. In fact, most of them were retired from some
• 28:03
  other professional profession or had a secondary profession in addition to what they did in
• 28:12
  the university system. So I'm gonna check and see, are we still on
• 28:18
  tornado? Warning? It can't it's not telling me, but well, crap,
• 28:26
  we are, okay, Well that sucks. Usually it doesn't last this
• 28:30
  long, Like we're half an hour now of having a tornado on the ground
• 28:34
  in the area. I'm just looking at my battery, going this sucks.
• 28:41
  I might have to go out there and plug in or get my plug and
• 28:45
  plug into the wall and here shortly. So there might be an interruption to
• 28:48
  the show if that happens. But yeah, so it goes on. Let's
• 28:56
  see, this conference was on educational diversity, so they were using the term
• 29:07
  diversity even back then, including controversies arising from efforts to include material on women
• 29:14
  and ethnic minorities in the undergraduate curricula. So here's where like they they're conferencing
• 29:22
  on how to strong arm their way into including the female victim narrative of feminism
• 29:30
  in undergrad studies. The only thing that's changed now is they don't say women
• 29:34
  and ethnic minorities. Now they just say women and other minorities. Yeah,
• 29:40
  as if, because at this point it's just assumed that women are a minority,
• 29:44
  even though everyone knows they're not a minority. Technically they are a majority,
• 29:48
  but they are what's it called a minoritized group. Yeah, women are
• 29:56
  a majority. Women are also the primary focus of society. We live in
• 30:00
  a guy in eccentric world, which is how you know all of this Originally
• 30:07
  came from this phenomenon we call women's studies, this phenomenon we call feminism because
• 30:15
  because the left reluctantly call it the left, but I'll do it for a
• 30:19
  short hand. They didn't, they didn't start giving all these ships about ethnic
• 30:26
  minorities or what they now call other minorities until it was already very well settled
• 30:32
  that women are better than men, or you know, that we should that
• 30:36
  we should give more gibbs to women than we should to men, and what's
• 30:41
  that. Once that was established, they had nothing else to do because people
• 30:45
  started asking, well, what rights to men have that women don't have?
• 30:48
  And they went, well, the that's not the point. Look at look
• 30:55
  at the black people's and the Muslims and the trans people. And it just
• 30:59
  started ggging into all the minorities that were actually minorities, you know, to
• 31:03
  to sort of virtue single to people that that they really do care about minorities,
• 31:08
  even though all they had ever focused on before that was whamon's who are
• 31:12
  not a minority. It was their way of of culturally appropriating actual minorities in
• 31:25
  order to make it look as though women are are a minority when they never
• 31:30
  were. But when when when when the same group of shisters start focusing on
• 31:37
  actual minorities, they can justify the idea that the thing they've always focused on
• 31:44
  and have always meant to focus on, must therefore also be a minority.
• 31:48
  No, it isn't. As a matter of fact, you just hate men,
• 31:55
  and you decided to call men a majority so that you could hate on
• 31:59
  all the other majorities. It's likeophobia. I know, I keep beating this
• 32:05
  dead horse as much as I can. Yeah, but it's great, I
• 32:07
  mean it is. And it's organized, systematic, institutionalized like aphobia, which
• 32:17
  is crazy. You kind of have to start wondering why, and the answer
• 32:25
  is because it makes people easier to control. Eventually, governments realize, like,
• 32:37
  why would they enslave the minority for the sake of the majority when they
• 32:43
  can exact so much more control if they enslave the majority on behalf of the
• 32:47
  minority, because then you can enslave ninety percent of the population rather than ten.
• 32:53
  Yeah, yep, And that's basically what they're what they're striving for.
• 33:00
  You know. It's it's part of the you know, the whole conspiracy theory
• 33:06
  that you know, which isn't really a theory. They've talked about it in
• 33:10
  public and everything about fifteen minute cities and substituting bugs for food and all of
• 33:20
  the different things that they're trying to talk about. It is essentially an effort
• 33:23
  to reinstitute feudalism, but to call it something else. And women are falling
• 33:31
  for it, or women are participating in it because it will make them feel
• 33:38
  powerful. They'll feel like they you know, they a lot of women deal
• 33:43
  in safety nets differently than men do. Like guys, if they're going to
• 33:49
  be on a tightrope, will accept a safety net, but not rely on
• 33:52
  it. And women have to surround themselves with safety netting and bubble wrap and
• 33:59
  they're fine with the fact that it limits their movement. Right, And it
• 34:04
  goes clear back to childhood boys and girls. If I had been a boy,
• 34:10
  my behavior would not have been viewed as weird as a kid, you
• 34:15
  know, my tendency to climb on things and put myself in circumstances where a
• 34:22
  fall could could be incredibly dangerous and damaging, where it could break my neck,
• 34:27
  you know, and that kind of stuff. All of that. People
• 34:30
  would have been like, yeah, boys will be boys, But other girls
• 34:34
  didn't do stuff like that very much, and other mothers frequently would contact my
• 34:43
  mom with you know, what your daughter was doing at the park today,
• 34:45
  And you know, my mom finally was like, what was she climbing this
• 34:49
  time? Was she close to any any power lines? Okay, no power
• 34:53
  lines, no worries. You know, she kind of had to get it
• 34:57
  across to everybody that I just played like a little boy, and I did.
• 35:02
  I played football with the boys. I played baseball with the boys.
• 35:06
  I lifted and carried and wrestled and you know, got into fist fights with
• 35:14
  other girls and all kinds of stuff because that's I grew up mostly with boys.
• 35:20
  But girls mostly don't grow up that way. They play with their dolls,
• 35:25
  they're quiet. They maybe they do a little bit of rough and tumble.
• 35:30
  Maybe they do a little bit of getting dirty. They don't try to
• 35:31
  dig to China because they heard about it on television and thought it might be
• 35:38
  real. You know. They don't climb on top of their treehouse. They
• 35:43
  don't pick up wild animals and stuff like that. You know, it's all
• 35:47
  it just fairly safe things that the girls will do. They don't take a
• 35:54
  lot of risks until they start getting interested in sex, and then they forget
• 36:00
  that that can also be dangerous, right, But when they hit adulthood,
• 36:07
  that pattern of behavior manifests in things like voting for laws that take away part
• 36:15
  of your income to create a presumed safety net for economic failure. If you
• 36:23
  end up in financial dire straits, you know that you're supposed to be able
• 36:27
  to latch onto Oh I can get these food stamps. Oh I could get
• 36:30
  this rental assistance and stuff at other people's expense if I need it. And
• 36:37
  it manifests in them voting for all kinds of rules and regulations about their cities.
• 36:45
  I wouldn't be surprised if homeowners and associations were, if not totally invented
• 36:51
  by women, at least mostly invented on behalf of women. They're currently mostly
• 36:57
  run by women. When you hear horror stories about the president of a homeowner's
• 37:01
  association being a profound asshole, it's almost always a woman. Oh you can't
• 37:07
  paint your house that color. Oh you can't look at you can't have this
• 37:09
  in your driveway. Oh you can't have your trash can too close to the
• 37:13
  curb. You can't put your trash cans out more than this. Many hours
• 37:16
  before trash collection. Oh you work at night. Sorry, you can't do
• 37:20
  it anyway. You know, all of that is feminine protection, feminine safety
• 37:27
  netism, and it does result in women adopting these victim narratives and these victim
• 37:38
  solution narratives and projects to force society into complying with women's victimhood victim narratives and
• 37:50
  interests basically, but not all women's interests, right, just the interests of
• 37:54
  women who have these victim narratives going on. So and so that's where we
• 38:00
  are. The complex process by let's see, and I skipped a paragraph here,
• 38:12
  So they were working on transforming the curriculum. The target of this part
• 38:16
  of the movement is heterosexism and hetero patriarchy, which one participant at a women
• 38:23
  studies conference described as the complex process by which bisexual infants are transformed into male
• 38:30
  and female gender personalities. Oh shit, so prescient. Yeah, let's like,
• 38:40
  what are what we're dealing with today in the education system. Let's let's
• 38:45
  go back to that. The target of this part of the movement is hetero
• 38:51
  sexism and hetero patriarchy, which one participant at a women studies conference described as
• 38:57
  the complex process by which bisexual infant are transformed into male and female gender personality
• 39:01
  bi sexual influence. Right. Yeah, Now they're describing bisexual as gender neutral
• 39:15
  as oh shit, what do they call themselves by something else? Because bisexual
• 39:21
  describes a sexuality not fuck why can't I think of it? I mean there's
• 39:30
  seventy two different ones. Oneer you can't think of it? The one where
• 39:34
  you identify as one gender sometimes and as another gender some other. Gender fluid.
• 39:39
  Yeah, they identify or as gender fluid. They they are telling us
• 39:45
  that babies are born gender fluid and can be manipulated. So this is this
• 39:51
  is by the way, remember this is the movement that in asserted feminism into
• 40:00
  all of your coursework, right, the movement that taught the generation of educators
• 40:09
  that is teaching that this generation of students, and that taught the younger education
• 40:17
  majors coming into the system now, like people who are in their twenties now
• 40:23
  studied under the people who graduated when I was in college. Right, that's
• 40:30
  where they're getting all of the beliefs on which they base the evangelistic behavior,
• 40:44
  the evangelistic conversion therapy process that they are inflicting on students in the public school
• 40:51
  system today that started in the early nineties in education with the target of this
• 41:00
  part of the movement is hetero sexism and heteropatriarchy, which one participant at a
• 41:07
  women's studies conference described is the complex process by which gender fluid infants in today's
• 41:14
  language are transformed into male and female gender personalities. So you know, you
• 41:21
  can trace that back to feminism. It's not just all Marxism, it's specifically
• 41:28
  the Marxism that took the feminist path. I often scoff at the Johnny cum
• 41:35
  latelies who turned up two years ago and started doing this this junk food version
• 41:43
  of men's issues advocacy and then and then suddenly became huge because somehow they worked
• 41:51
  their way around the algorithm, God knows how. And I'm here going we've
• 41:54
  been talking about this in public on this platform since ten years ago, and
• 42:00
  we haven't. But it's it's it's humbling to think that there must have been
• 42:07
  people in the university system thirty two years ago, judging by this article,
• 42:16
  and presumably since the mid eighties when when this rot first set in and they
• 42:22
  were trying to speak against it, but they didn't have the privilege of the
• 42:28
  Internet. They were just stuck in these in these universities trying to push push
• 42:34
  back against the same ship that was going on in the very early nineties that
• 42:38
  we're trying to we've been trying to push back against since ten years ago.
• 42:44
  But they didn't they didn't have any any platforms on which to do it.
• 42:47
  They were just trying to do it in university, but they couldn't because because
• 42:52
  the rot had already set in. Everything they said was was just memory old
• 42:59
  instantaneously, like because the the only wide way of broadcasting anything was through the
• 43:07
  television and the radio and the press, and god knows none of them.
• 43:10
  We're going to do it because you know, because the TV and the radio
• 43:16
  and the press have have have been ensnared in this communist nonsense for just as
• 43:28
  long as the university. Well, there've been one step behind the universities this
• 43:31
  whole time. The long march through the institutions started in universities in I want
• 43:38
  to say the sixties, and even that's probably low balling it. It's it's
• 43:44
  probably it goes back like at least a century, yeah, to be honest,
• 43:49
  And by the time it got to the mid eighties, the point at
• 43:52
  which the number of women in universities and the number of men in universities met
• 43:59
  each other in the middle. And that's not to say that that's when it
• 44:02
  was in the middle, as this one of the consequences of feminism spreading this
• 44:08
  rot, that that just that happened many decades after did the feminism rot had
• 44:17
  already set in, and like we're living in in in an age a century
• 44:25
  after this rot had already set in, and it's yeah, so yeah,
• 44:34
  I'm like, I say, it's quite humbling. So I am less tempted
• 44:40
  to say that to judge other people for being Johnny cum lately is because because
• 44:46
  we're all Johnny cumplate is the people we should really be appreciating are the people
• 44:52
  are fucking hundred years ago who tried to speak out against this because because because
• 44:59
  God knows, they had they're the weight of the world on their shoulders,
• 45:02
  and and and and they had nothing they can do because because they will they
• 45:08
  were working against I'm going to say the gov mint well, because because we
• 45:20
  were already at that point where the government had already been doing what a government
• 45:27
  necessarily does, which is which is which is preying on human nature. Not
• 45:35
  not just human nature, but the unholy basilisk that human nature had become when
• 45:44
  uh, traditional conservatism had mutated into feminism. Let's let's not let's not pretend
• 45:52
  that there is any significant divide conservatism and feminism. Feminism is just because trad
• 46:00
  conism above the speed limit. People like to say that late conservativism is just
• 46:12
  labor below the speed limit, or Democrats are just Republicans below the speed limit.
• 46:21
  But it's it's not. Feminism has always been trad conism above the speed
• 46:28
  limits. This is what people don't seem to understand the feminism. Isn't this
• 46:35
  that this ideology that just came completely out of left field. No, it's
• 46:39
  not. It's it's it's people exploiting human nature and taking it above the speed
• 46:49
  limit, because it is human nature to protect women at the expense of men.
• 46:55
  I don't want to call it kind of centrism, because I anything we
• 47:01
  understand as kind of centrism nowadays, it isn't natural. It's it's not something
• 47:07
  that existed in human nature. Yeah, that's like to refer to it more
• 47:14
  as gene central gene centrism or child centrism, because the protection that is in
• 47:21
  human nature stems more from like trying to protect and preserve the human race's ability
• 47:30
  to continue to produce children, nurture them into adulthood, to to have essentially
• 47:38
  a a continuation a safe human race, not so much like that we never
• 47:47
  have any danger, we never have any problems, but that we're always equipped
• 47:52
  to handle them, and that even if disaster occurs and we do lose people
• 47:58
  that are offspring, may tain the human race and continues to go on.
• 48:02
  That's instinctive for every life form, and those that produce sexually end up,
• 48:08
  to some degree or another favoring the female animal over the male animal of their
• 48:15
  species in terms of reproduction and strictly in terms of reproduction and reproductive ability.
• 48:23
  But beyond that, it doesn't necessarily manifest. But in our situation, because
• 48:31
  we have the ability to intellectually basically walk ourselves down down the wrong path in
• 48:43
  the woods right, and we say, oh, well, we have idea
• 48:46
  A, and we bounce off idea A with idea B. And idea B
• 48:51
  is unnatural and not quite as well thought out as idea A. But we
• 48:57
  go down that road and we get farther and farther away from the course of
• 49:00
  idea A, and suddenly we are suggesting that, you know, women are
• 49:08
  victimized by things that happen to everybody, but when it happens to women,
• 49:13
  it happens just because they're women, even though there's no evidence of that.
• 49:16
  And therefore women are oppressed, even though they're not uniquely disadvantaged, uniquely discriminated
• 49:23
  against, or uniquely mistreated in any way. There's just you know, oppressed
• 49:31
  because they're women, right that we end up in that we go down that
• 49:37
  road, and we go down the road of instead of saying, you know,
• 49:42
  maybe women are a little weaker than men, so therefore when men do
• 49:46
  rough and tumble things, it should be up to women whether they get involved
• 49:52
  or not. It becomes women are exempt and no matter what they do,
• 49:59
  you can't hold them accountable under these circumstances. So as she beats on you,
• 50:04
  you can't defend yourself, even by restraining her, because if you do,
• 50:09
  you're the bad guy. If you brush against her shoulder on your way
• 50:13
  out the door as she's throwing heavy objects at you, you're the abuser.
• 50:19
  If she breaks a nail trying to rip your face off, you hurt her,
• 50:23
  you go to jail. Like that's unnatural, and that's kind of centrism.
• 50:29
  It has absolutely nothing to do with women's reproductive capacity and everything to do
• 50:34
  with us just getting into the weeds in terms of who our race is and
• 50:39
  what helps us continue to the next generation in the next And this shit that
• 50:46
  we're looking at here does the opposite, right when you start teaching children that
• 50:52
  they are their gender and sex are separate things, and and that that you
• 51:00
  can just mold and manipulate someone's gender to be different from their sex and you're
• 51:05
  not doing them any harm and there's nothing wrong with that, And it's not
• 51:09
  a disfunction that needs to be treated when it happens to them organically in rare
• 51:15
  circumstances, but a lifestyle that they need to embrace. Then then you know
• 51:22
  you're going to start reducing the number of births, reducing the success of child
• 51:29
  rearing, and increasing the level of dysfunction and damage in our society to the
• 51:35
  point where we start dying out. And it's almost like that's the goal,
• 51:39
  that getting rid of humanity is the goal, and feminism was designed with that
• 51:45
  in mind primarily and just you know, exploited kind of centrism, and it's
• 51:52
  its root cause of gene centrism to do that. This is why, this
• 51:59
  is why I I can't get behind the dichotomy of left and right, or
• 52:04
  the dichotomy of conservative and progressive. If you were really being progressive, if
• 52:10
  you were really trying to advance something that's never been advanced before, you would
• 52:17
  advance men's rights, because that's never happened. To my knowledge, it's not
• 52:25
  anywhere in the world, not even those places where you're convinced that women have
• 52:31
  it worse than men. That there is a certain nature to human beings that
• 52:38
  has always protected women at the expense of men. And if you were really
• 52:43
  trying to be different, just for the sake of being different, you would
• 52:47
  consider advancing the idea that men should be protected, not even necessarily the expense
• 52:55
  of women, but to see, you see if you can take that zero
• 53:00
  or some game and and and turn it into a positive some game, and
• 53:04
  actually see what happens if if you if you protect men. And conservatives,
• 53:13
  on the other hand, don't seem to be at all bothered in conserving whatever
• 53:17
  rights men ever had or or whatever social protections men ever had. Like both
• 53:25
  sides of this argument, I just different camps in the protect women at the
• 53:32
  expensive men side and and and and both of them will push back on anyone
• 53:39
  who says, well, you guys seem to be all about equality, and
• 53:46
  you guys seem to be all about I don't even I don't even know what
• 53:53
  the conservative equivalent of equality is, but it's it's traditionalism. Equal equality as
• 54:00
  described by those who who advocate for it, and traditionalism as described by those
• 54:06
  who who advocate for it are both you know, women, women need to
• 54:14
  preserve themselves and men need be punched in the face. That both of them
• 54:20
  just slightly different descriptions of the same thing. And yeah, it's and it's
• 54:24
  and it's not just conservative and progressive. It's not just left and right.
• 54:29
  It's not even just libertarian and authoritarian. Every edge and every part of of
• 54:37
  the of the political spectrum has been infected with missionry, with let's let's blame
• 54:47
  men and punish men for everything so that we can help the women's and that
• 54:52
  will help, that will that will help to destroy society so that my ideology
• 54:59
  can rise from in the ashes. And every ideology they're talking about is one
• 55:07
  where we protect the women's and the expense of men, whether it's the brown
• 55:14
  men or the white men or men or the men who aren't men and the
• 55:19
  women who are who are who aren't women anything. Yeah, I realize I'm
• 55:25
  preaching to the crowd, But hopefully there's one or two people who are listening
• 55:30
  to this stream who haven't thought of these things before. But I thoroughly doubt
• 55:36
  it. It's it's a it's a tough thing. I think a lot of
• 55:39
  people don't understand because they hear they hear equality from feminists all the time.
• 55:46
  But feminism's version of equality has always been every every freedom, every right,
• 55:54
  every privilege, every positive that men have, women should also have, but
• 56:00
  without all of the negatives, without the obligations, without the accountability, without
• 56:05
  the limitations, without the restrictions, and most of all without the risk right
• 56:13
  because they're risk averse. So it's not really a quality. It's being held
• 56:21
  up by men and men who are treading water themselves and now have to also
• 56:28
  hold on to the female population and hold the female populations head above water while
• 56:35
  they're treading it because women decided to jump into the section of water that men
• 56:40
  are in and uh and didn't didn't want to be prepared to to to swim,
• 56:47
  right, But yeah, let's let's look at the next paragraph here,
• 56:53
  because this is interesting too. And I hope our friend who had alerted us
• 56:59
  to the concept of something he used to call the lesbian cabal is listening,
• 57:05
  because this gives you a little bit of right to say I told you so.
• 57:13
  The Women's Studies program at San Diego State University, California's larg the largest
• 57:17
  public campus, with thirty five thousand students at that time, offers a course
• 57:23
  in the historical, cultural, and social exploration of Lesbianism in Western Civilization.
• 57:30
  At the University of Minnesota, a class in lesbian culture exists alongside offerings such
• 57:37
  as Women in Liberation Struggles, which deals with the social transformation in communist dictatorships
• 57:45
  such as China and Cuba. The women Studies director, Jacqueline Zita herself teaches
• 57:51
  a course in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender studies with books such
• 57:54
  as The Bathroom Line, butch Fem's Relationships and Lesbian Sex Wars in the Eighties,
• 58:02
  which sounds like a splitation movie. Lesbian Sex Wars of the eighties.
• 58:09
  China and Cuba is two big red flags right there. Well, they both
• 58:14
  have red in their flag. Yeah, I say, there's a lot of
• 58:16
  red to be had there. Oh my gosh. But yeah, a big
• 58:23
  part of the push in universities for feminist feminist infiltration into other areas of study
• 58:35
  or for the feministization of all of academia came from lesbians. It's it's it's
• 58:44
  quite frustrating that people refer to anyone who advocates for men's issues as fascist,
• 58:52
  but it doesn't occur to them conversely that anyone who advocates for women's rights as
• 58:59
  communists. All it's not like it's not like fascism and communism are opposite the
• 59:06
  well, except when it comes to the same coin. But yeah, people
• 59:12
  are quite ready to throw a thought terminating political cliche based on earlier, early
• 59:20
  twentieth century politics on on anyone who's who doesn't approve of advancing women in any
• 59:30
  way possible. But they don't. They don't offer the equal and opposite to
• 59:36
  anyone who's it's determined to advance women's whatever in all these things, Like it's
• 59:45
  if women's rights is if if men's rights is fascism, then why they're women's
• 59:54
  the opposite the opposite. Yeah, well, it's difficult think about it.
• 1:00:01
  You know, the research shows that women have in group bias as sort of
• 1:00:07
  an ingrained thing that it is. It's just part of the female makeupur our
• 1:00:15
  in group bias is. It's not necessarily genetic in terms of like you inherit
• 1:00:23
  it generationally, but it's genetic in terms of the conditions that cause in group
• 1:00:34
  bias seem to be associated with having two X chromosomes instead of an X and
• 1:00:38
  a Y. And it's probably partly the safety net thing. Uh, it's
• 1:00:45
  it's probably partly the women have a tendency to want to be perceived as being
• 1:00:52
  very cooperative with each other. Men are actually very good at it. You
• 1:00:55
  can tell because we have things like skyscrapers and pyramids throughout history that men built
• 1:01:04
  without any women involved, and historically men of diverse economic status, diverse backgrounds,
• 1:01:17
  and diverse attitudes toward each other outside of the workplace managed to collaborate to
• 1:01:25
  do these things. Railroads spanning countries the size of the United States or entire
• 1:01:30
  continents to get people to and from places that otherwise they would not be able
• 1:01:37
  to reach without much more difficult modes of travel and dangerous modes. As well.
• 1:01:44
  We've sent people into outer space. We have managed to find ways to
• 1:01:49
  treat medical conditions that people didn't even use to understand historically, and it's all
• 1:01:57
  been predicated or propped up on the backs of male labor and male cooperation.
• 1:02:06
  Women were sometimes involved in projects like this. Women may have done side work,
• 1:02:15
  they didn't. They're not the ones that you see pictured sitting having lunch
• 1:02:22
  on a steel beam sticking out of the framework of a building many stories above
• 1:02:29
  the ground, because it would take too long to go back down to ground
• 1:02:31
  level to eat. All right, although that picture was posed, but at
• 1:02:38
  the same time, like it was posed because it was something that regularly happened,
• 1:02:45
  so you know, that's it's just not the same type of cooperation.
• 1:02:52
  And women will stick with other women in a conflict between women and men,
• 1:03:00
  and they'll stick with their own in a conflict between their tribe and another tribe
• 1:03:05
  till their tribe loses, and then they join the other tribe, right when
• 1:03:08
  men, when their tribe loses, they die or they get enslaved like that's
• 1:03:15
  they don't they don't join the other tribe for the most part. But at
• 1:03:21
  the same time, I was told that women were the biggest victims of war,
• 1:03:25
  Hannah. Yeah, until they joined the other side, right, Yeah,
• 1:03:30
  you know, and at the same time, you know, men in
• 1:03:36
  a in a conflict between theirs and others will try to be more fair,
• 1:03:42
  and that it's part of the reason that we have the ability as nations to
• 1:03:47
  create treaties with other interests even when there's profound conflict between the two interests.
• 1:03:58
  So it's it's very sad that we see this difference between men and women and
• 1:04:02
  have for centuries done pretty much nothing to change it, like not not worked
• 1:04:11
  at getting women to be a little less biased and a little more capable of
• 1:04:17
  standing up for right versus the crowd and uh, and men to be a
• 1:04:26
  little more self interested because they're they're really not, and that's part of the
• 1:04:30
  reason, a big part of the reason why men face such discriminatory law and
• 1:04:35
  policy, because they don't act in their own self interest first. But yeah,
• 1:04:44
  so there we have the confirmation of the lesbian cabal. Then it goes
• 1:04:47
  on among those organizations striving for trans transformation, there is some concern that lesbian
• 1:04:54
  issues are underfunded. Last year, the National Network of Women's Funds set sent
• 1:05:01
  out a lesbian survey, So that would have been nineteen ninety one, the
• 1:05:04
  year I graduated high school to its member organizations. Questions included do you fund
• 1:05:11
  lesbian projects? Do you intend to include lesbian projects in your funding priorities?
• 1:05:17
  Total grants versus lesbian grants? How many lesbians participate in your fund do do
• 1:05:25
  you outreach the Board for Representation of Lesbians? Do you outreach the lesbian community?
• 1:05:30
  Do you target funding in the lesbian community? So this whole what is
• 1:05:39
  it about the lesbian community that requires funding? I don't know. Obviously up
• 1:05:44
  here and died, I'm like, what are they making a porn? What?
• 1:05:48
  Lets? Yeah, lesbian's funding for lesbian sidewalks. Yes, obviously you
• 1:05:59
  have to. You have to. You have to pay a toll. You're
• 1:06:00
  on the lesbian road. It'll be five dildos please. Uh So, if
• 1:06:10
  you look at historical radical feminism and like like the sort of the scaffolding under
• 1:06:19
  which feminism of every other variety is built, it is primarily a uh an
• 1:06:29
  environment of lesbian networking. Like when you get into radical feminist groups, you
• 1:06:38
  have two kinds of lesbians in these groups. You have women who are just
• 1:06:42
  naturally lesbians, and then you have women who have decided that they are political
• 1:06:45
  lesbians. And the existence of political lesbians is why I think female nature is
• 1:06:53
  more bisexual than male nature, like bisexuality happens in men, but between political
• 1:07:00
  lesbianism and drunk lesbianism, where chicks that are completely straight when they're sober have
• 1:07:09
  lesbian moments when they're drunk. It's led me to believe that that the female
• 1:07:17
  sex has a more of a predisposition, or a more widespread predisposition within itself
• 1:07:29
  to be either bisexual or primarily lesbian, especially when reproductive issues have been dealt
• 1:07:38
  with, like either they have had the babies they're going to have and they're
• 1:07:43
  done, or they don't plan on it. And it doesn't mean that there's
• 1:07:46
  no such thing as a straight girl, right or a straight woman. What
• 1:07:51
  I'm saying is, if you look for bisexuality, you're more likely to find
• 1:07:57
  it in women, and if you look for slight bisexuality and a mostly straight
• 1:08:02
  person, you're exponentially more likely to find it in women. In my opinion,
• 1:08:13
  women love each other romantically, and I specify romantically, and it's a
• 1:08:20
  whole cattle fish and the kind of worms as to what romantically even means.
• 1:08:25
  It's sort of related to chivalry, and it's difficult to separate the idea of
• 1:08:30
  romantic love as it relates to the Romans, and chivalry as it relates to
• 1:08:38
  medieval people, and feminism as it relates to modern people. I think there
• 1:08:43
  are all different actions of each other. Romantic love is idealistic love as opposed
• 1:08:50
  to pragmatic love. Pragmatic love is what has driven men and women to form
• 1:08:59
  relationships with each other and to form families as a result through all that time.
• 1:09:04
  The things we call romantic love and children are corruptions of these things,
• 1:09:12
  corruptions that have always been there to undermine the notion or indeed the notionless reality
• 1:09:23
  of pragmatic love. And so it's in that sense it makes it makes perfect
• 1:09:30
  sense that in modern times women would feel more romantically drawn to each other because
• 1:09:39
  they're not interested in forming important relationships or familiar relationships that can result in family
• 1:09:47
  and the extension of the human race. Because women have been taught for centuries,
• 1:09:57
  maybe even millennia, that love is just this frivolous thing that that you've
• 1:10:03
  indulge in on a wimen that's far more important than than forming families, whereas
• 1:10:11
  men haven't haven't been drawn into this for all the attempts of romantic love and
• 1:10:16
  chivalry and feminism and stuff. Uh, men have always associated love, the
• 1:10:26
  love they have for women with not just indulgence. Men have always seen the
• 1:10:33
  love they have for women not just as as a pleasure, but as a
• 1:10:38
  duty. Because throughout all the changes throughout history, they they've they've still kept
• 1:10:47
  this idea that as as much as we love women as an indulgence, it's
• 1:10:54
  not just an indulgence. We love women because it's important and to love women
• 1:11:00
  because if we didn't, then society would fall apart. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:11:08
  yeah. You know. One of the things that I noticed in relationships,
• 1:11:13
  and you know, women spend an unfortunate amount of time with their friends talking
• 1:11:24
  about relationships and particular their relationships and how their relationships are going, and what
• 1:11:30
  they think of their relationships. And it gets tedious if it's not something that
• 1:11:35
  you like to focus on discussing. But it's it's hard to find a group
• 1:11:41
  of female friends that talks about anything else. Most of the time. Women
• 1:11:45
  fail to bechdel Test miserably in real life. Yes, And as a result,
• 1:11:53
  one of the things that I have figured out is a very stark difference
• 1:11:58
  between how men and women view dedication to each other, and I'd sum it
• 1:12:03
  up this way. Women see a man as dedicated if he's willing to die
• 1:12:10
  for his partner. Men see a woman as dedicated if she's willing to live
• 1:12:15
  for hers. And that's that's a huge difference, and it's heartbreaking because I
• 1:12:26
  want a relationship where we live for each other and our mutual interests and our
• 1:12:32
  mutual relationship to each other, where we live for our family and our happiness
• 1:12:40
  as a couple, and even having an individual pursuits. You know, our
• 1:12:45
  main focus is we have built ourselves a safe place, a partnership, a
• 1:12:53
  relationship, care, camaraderie, and dedication to live for each other as much
• 1:13:01
  as we live for ourselves. And it's when I hear women talk about the
• 1:13:09
  romance of self sacrifice as if it's something that just men should do for just
• 1:13:14
  women and they don't have anything else as part of their description for their relationship,
• 1:13:23
  I feel bad for them and their partners. And it took me years
• 1:13:27
  to build a friend group and my personal set of friends, you know,
• 1:13:32
  my local friends that think more like me about relationships and not like your average
• 1:13:43
  woman. And it just I don't know, I guess that's just me bouncing
• 1:13:48
  off of what Mike said. It's a huge difference between you know, men
• 1:13:55
  understand dedication. I think women expect not dedication, but subservience. And it's
• 1:14:03
  one of the reasons why women are unsatisfied in marriage today, and it's one
• 1:14:10
  of the reasons why there's so much divorce and why women are hurting men in
• 1:14:15
  divorce court today. Yeah, and it doesn't help when, you know,
• 1:14:20
  when you look in media, in your popular music and you get songs like
• 1:14:27
  Janna Jackson, what have you done for me lately? You know, and
• 1:14:31
  it's just reverberated everywhere. You know, it's it's exactly that you haven't done
• 1:14:39
  enough, what have you done for me? And it only ever goes one
• 1:14:43
  way, you know, it's women have just fed into it to the point
• 1:14:49
  where now we're just dysfunctional, like they don't know how to interact with each
• 1:14:57
  other because you've got one saying well, look here I expect the world,
• 1:15:01
  and men are just saying, well, you know, I don't know how
• 1:15:04
  to give you all of that, but here's what I got. Is that
• 1:15:09
  good enough? Is that a fair trade? You know, And it's just
• 1:15:14
  never good enough for them. You know, because there's always in a woman's
• 1:15:17
  mind, there's always someone else better coming around the corner, you know,
• 1:15:20
  and it's just not always the case. It's not the case. I don't
• 1:15:26
  know. Yeah, there's never been a time when women are out on the
• 1:15:30
  dance floor shaking their asses to the tune of I hope I make you as
• 1:15:33
  happy as you make me? What can I do for you lately? But
• 1:15:45
  you know what the thing is, you know, there's this conversation that's being
• 1:15:48
  had about messaging and music and is there really messaging happening? Are we being
• 1:15:56
  sciowed by the music that we're listening to? And obviously the obvious answer is,
• 1:16:00
  of course we are, you know, because it is easy to make
• 1:16:04
  to write a pop song like that, that would just be that would be
• 1:16:10
  just as much of a hit as any kind of Janet Jackson's or any pop
• 1:16:15
  eighty song or not whatever song, you know what I mean. But they
• 1:16:18
  don't do that. Why because they don't want that to sell. They want
• 1:16:24
  to continue to perpetuate this idea that women should be able to have whatever it
• 1:16:30
  is, because you know why, it makes men then have to feel like,
• 1:16:36
  well not have to feel like but men feel like they have to go
• 1:16:40
  out and do whatever it takes to provide that thing for that woman, whatever
• 1:16:46
  that thing is at that particular moment in time. You know, music,
• 1:16:55
  music reflects emotions necessarily. You can lyrics that are logically driven, but there's
• 1:17:03
  no logic to music other than the mathematics that sort of makes it work.
• 1:17:09
  But people who write music, for the most part, aren't aware of the
• 1:17:13
  mathematics that makes it work until they look into it. This is why so
• 1:17:16
  many songs are love songs, because music is so inherently emotional. It drives
• 1:17:24
  people towards their inherent emotions, and inherently men are emotionally drawn to women,
• 1:17:30
  and women are emotionally drawn to children, and children are emotionally drawn to toys.
• 1:17:38
  Yea. As as we become more decadent and well more comfortable as a
• 1:17:53
  society, people rely less on the logic that draws them to an infrastructure that
• 1:18:01
  works and more drawn to just their base emotions. I did h Yeah.
• 1:18:13
  Yes, Men only have one thing that's that they're emotionally drawn to, and
• 1:18:18
  it's women. Women have only one thing that are mostly drawn to, and
• 1:18:23
  it's children, and and and and so and so. The stacks down through
• 1:18:29
  through these things, uh, to the point where, uh, well,
• 1:18:38
  you think the people on top of the progressive stack would be the toys that
• 1:18:42
  children like. You think you think that children would become more important than women.
• 1:18:47
  But we found ourselves in this situation where women are more important, that
• 1:18:53
  are more important than anything, even children like. We're quite happy to murder
• 1:18:58
  children in their millions because men want us to. And that's because that's because
• 1:19:01
  society is run by men, not for men, but by men. And
• 1:19:08
  so obviously every everything gravitates towards the things to which men are most emotionally drawn
• 1:19:15
  to, and that's women. And and the way we break out of this
• 1:19:20
  is for men to snap out of that and realize that there are things more
• 1:19:27
  important in this world than women, and or at least equally as important as
• 1:19:31
  women, such as men and children. That's a phrase you don't hear very
• 1:19:36
  often men. It's because it's because there's this dam in between the two called
• 1:19:43
  women. The idea of categorizing such a such a phenomenon as men and children
• 1:19:51
  is you don't hear it, ever. Do you hear women and children?
• 1:19:56
  And you hear men, You hear men and women, you hear women,
• 1:20:00
  and children. You never hear men and children. We have departments and agencies
• 1:20:08
  for women and families all over the government in the United States, but nothing
• 1:20:15
  that says men and families. Nothing that says men and children. Yeah,
• 1:20:19
  and everything I do with men is separate. Yeah. I think that's the
• 1:20:27
  major point of failure with the conservative right. And you know, outlets like
• 1:20:32
  the Daily Wire, and you know when it comes to marriage, right,
• 1:20:38
  it's like they just want to gloss over everything. Just get married and have
• 1:20:42
  kids and everything will be fine. Right. It did completely overlook the male
• 1:20:48
  part of that whole scenario, you know, to their own detriment. You
• 1:20:55
  know, it's like, if you could just acknowledge that the men are here
• 1:21:00
  too, they are affected by the things that happen that that women do to
• 1:21:04
  them, and how women and children affect their lives. And let's go deeper
• 1:21:12
  than that layer, right, because it's not just let's get married and have
• 1:21:15
  kids. Oh there's the government. Excuse me, Oh no, the government
• 1:21:20
  that can also potentially step in and ruin your life, you know. So
• 1:21:27
  you know Twitter trolls, the old it's the big, big goverment. Well,
• 1:21:32
  yes, that's exactly what it is, you know, because if it
• 1:21:36
  was just uh, you know, if the government never got involved in it
• 1:21:42
  was just an agreement between men and women, we wouldn't we would be having
• 1:21:45
  very different conversations right now totally, you know, you know, one of
• 1:21:49
  the biggest conversation or one of the biggest mistakes I should say that the conservative
• 1:21:57
  Christian in particular, but most conservatives and most fundamentalists, right whether it's a
• 1:22:04
  Christian faith or other very very conservative religions, make when they're lecturing men's rights
• 1:22:13
  activists about we'll just do this, just do that, and you'll be okay.
• 1:22:17
  Is that well, while they're sitting back telling men to just get married
• 1:22:21
  and raise a family and you'll be okay, and you know, pick pick
• 1:22:26
  the right woman, and these bad things won't happen to you, right,
• 1:22:30
  which which entails vetting women for character. Men are being not only condemned for
• 1:22:36
  things like slut shaming and dating in a manner so as to be able to
• 1:22:44
  judge a woman's character rather than settling down with one right away or getting getting
• 1:22:48
  into a parental situation before they're prepared right. Men are being demonized for that
• 1:22:56
  and even accused of crimes like sexualris and other forms of sexual misconduct even if
• 1:23:02
  they weren't engaged in sexual activity. So right, and this is all supported
• 1:23:09
  by law and policy that the conservative right collectively not only didn't stop the left
• 1:23:18
  from promoting and passing, but actually got right on board with it. Right,
• 1:23:24
  Violence Against Women Act. It it didn't pass unilaterally as a Democrat gig
• 1:23:31
  Republicans voted for that, Independents voted for that. Libertarians voted for that.
• 1:23:36
  That shit, and it is shit. That is a shit law. It
• 1:23:42
  genders the state's response to abuse in the home. So if the abuser is
• 1:23:47
  female, she has a much higher chance of getting away with it, and
• 1:23:53
  when the victim is male, he has a much lower chance of getting any
• 1:23:56
  help with his situation. Right, That is what the Violence Against Women Act
• 1:24:00
  did. And you fuckers that criticize us for being just like foonists went along
• 1:24:11
  with it, helped it along. And the only thing that you have argued
• 1:24:15
  with in the last twenty years thirty years since since that passed, right tis
• 1:24:24
  this year is the thirtieth anniversary of the Violence Against Women Act is what applies
• 1:24:30
  to Oh, we want to make it apply to Native American reservations, you
• 1:24:35
  know that are supposed to be their own nation and we're not supposed to be
• 1:24:39
  interfering with them. But we're going to federalize the Native American reservations in terms
• 1:24:45
  of this particular thing, because that's important. We got to control our relationships,
• 1:24:50
  right, that's the kind of things. How much money are we going
• 1:24:53
  to throw at which feminist organizations and so on? Not? Maybe we shouldn't
• 1:25:00
  be gendering this, like maybe abuse should be treated as abuse regardless of who
• 1:25:06
  the abuser is, and maybe we should be helping victims of abuse regardless of
• 1:25:12
  their gender. Nope, even the best politicians in Washington have done absolutely nothing,
• 1:25:23
  nothing to equalize this, nothing to take the discrimination out of it,
• 1:25:30
  nothing to bring down its interference in marriage and its facilitation of malicious prosecution and
• 1:25:41
  vexatious litigation in divorce cases by women using it to get more money, more
• 1:25:47
  property, and more limitations on the father's access to his children and his ability
• 1:25:54
  to nurture them. So, I you know, I was raised in a
• 1:26:01
  Christian conservative family, very traditionalist, not traditionalist in the style of neo trad
• 1:26:09
  cons that look like imitations of TV shows from the fifties, but real tradition
• 1:26:17
  based on loving your neighbor and basing your morality on the consequences of your choices,
• 1:26:28
  recognizing that you know, it's not just about trying to be viewed as
• 1:26:32
  good, but actually paying attention to the mark that you leave on the world.
• 1:26:39
  Right, that's that's where I was raised. Nothing that takes place in
• 1:26:44
  DC, nothing that takes place in Columbus or any other state capital comes from
• 1:26:53
  that. No matter whether your politicians are called themselves fundamentalists or not concerned it
• 1:27:00
  or not, various religious backgrounds are not. It's They're not what I saw
• 1:27:05
  when I was growing up. They're not what any of the churches that I've
• 1:27:09
  been involved with have ever done. It's bullshit, right, and it needs
• 1:27:15
  to stop. So while they're sitting there lecturing men about well, you know,
• 1:27:19
  you just need to be more mindful of your actions and this won't happen
• 1:27:24
  and we're gonna blame you for it when women pullshit that the laws we passed
• 1:27:30
  facilitate. My opinion on that is fuck you. Guys, get it right,
• 1:27:35
  and men won't have to try to make up for both their own vulnerability
• 1:27:41
  and women's malice. Going on in the article the most outstanding program of transform
• 1:27:51
  Transformation say Bernstein and Chamberlain is the New Jersey Project. So now we're going
• 1:27:56
  to read about an an actual siop here the New Jersey Project. Right since
• 1:28:05
  nineteen eighty six, so that would be almost forty years ago, the state
• 1:28:13
  of New Jersey has poured over fifty or forty grants totaling over one point five
• 1:28:18
  million dollars into this project of integrating the scholarship on gender. The director of
• 1:28:26
  the program is a self proclaimed Marxist feminist named Paula Rothensburg of William Patterson College.
• 1:28:34
  Rothenberg has made no effort to hire hide her commitments, which are a
• 1:28:41
  Marxist rehash with an ad mixture of gender radicalism. The nature of American democracy,
• 1:28:48
  she has said, in lieu of economic democracy, Americans are about the
• 1:28:55
  nature of American democracy. In lieu of economic democracy, Americans are encouraged to
• 1:29:00
  freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and a host of other political
• 1:29:02
  and intellectual freedoms, which are robbed of their content by the unequal distribution of
• 1:29:10
  wealth and power in America. That's about the nature of the American family,
• 1:29:16
  She says. It is biased in terms of both patriarchy and heterosexuality. Neither
• 1:29:24
  property rights nor patriarchy, says Rothenberg. Will yield, let's see top of
• 1:29:30
  this paragraph to extend feminist ideology. Oh nope, we got more up here.
• 1:29:35
  I hate it that the picture of the middle does this without a struggle.
• 1:29:39
  So she's trying to they will yield, not yield without a struggle.
• 1:29:42
  So sorry, I keep having to go past the ugly titty picture. She's
• 1:29:47
  talking about property rights and patriarchy yielding she wants to get rid of. Now,
• 1:29:57
  property rights is capitalism, Capitalism is property rights. Those are synonymous.
• 1:30:03
  There is no such Capitalism was a term invented really by Marxists to demonize the
• 1:30:11
  concept of actually owning your own your own stuff. Yeah, and to categorize
• 1:30:18
  such a thing as a Marxist feminist is the wrong way around, is to
• 1:30:24
  say that Marxism is a subset of feminism is a subset of Marxism. M
• 1:30:29
  Yeah, it's kind of redundant to say Marxist feminist. Really, you could
• 1:30:32
  be a Marxist without being a feminist, because it did originate plus struggle.
• 1:30:39
  Yeah, but feminism is a development of that that there's dug far deeper than
• 1:30:46
  the original plus based marxism ever did. Yeah, it's a It's basically,
• 1:30:53
  you know, you can say Marxist all you want without feminism and be completely
• 1:30:58
  accurate. If you say feminist, you're saying Marxist feminists, because there is
• 1:31:01
  no other kind. Even libertarian feminists and conservative feminists are Marxists, they just
• 1:31:09
  don't openly admit it. Rothenberg's New Jersey Project is that struggle. It tries
• 1:31:16
  for intellectual respectability by saying that it seeks a curriculum which integrates issues of women
• 1:31:23
  and gender, race, classic ethnicity, homophobia, and hetero sexism the project.
• 1:31:30
  And when you think about that, though, sorry, integrates issues of
• 1:31:32
  women and gender. Okay, okay, race, Well wait a minute,
• 1:31:40
  there's there's women in every race. But that doesn't necessarily mean that racial issues
• 1:31:48
  are affected by a gender or gender issues are affected by race. You know,
• 1:31:55
  that's intersectionality, the belief that you have to to discuss it that way.
• 1:32:01
  Class. So now they're into upper class and lower class women and their
• 1:32:08
  struggle against each other, but they won't talk about the difference in attitude toward
• 1:32:15
  suffrage. For instance, when the Suffragettes were doing their thing, between the
• 1:32:23
  upper class women of the Suffragette movement and the poor and lower class women that
• 1:32:31
  opposed them didn't want to vote. Ethnicity and homophobia and heterosexualism, heterosexism.
• 1:32:43
  So ethnicity is kind of sort of a back door way of sneaking the concept
• 1:32:50
  of race, in where a group that has a national identity or a religious
• 1:32:59
  based identity or a historical community identity, I guess doesn't necessarily identify as a
• 1:33:10
  race or isn't necessarily a race. But in reality, it's just another way
• 1:33:18
  of adding to the victimhood. And as we've always said, intersectionality is feminism's
• 1:33:27
  way of portraying women as the bigger victims on every step of the progressive stack.
• 1:33:33
  So integrating feminism with all of these different things, of course, is
• 1:33:39
  necessary for them. And so kit Astro asks, if women's suffrage is bad,
• 1:33:47
  well, let me put it this way. In the history of suffrage,
• 1:33:56
  up until women got their voting rights, Up until that point, the
• 1:34:02
  history of suffrage was a history of people with responsibilities gaining asay in a relationship
• 1:34:14
  between their government and their obligations right, and that mostly involved men. There
• 1:34:23
  were women who could vote prior to women's suffrage, but mostly voting rights had
• 1:34:33
  to do with sorting out the relationship between your government and your obligations as a
• 1:34:43
  knight, and then as a lord or a baron, then as a landowner,
• 1:34:49
  then as the head of a household. And it wasn't until well and
• 1:34:56
  as a person who could be drafted and sent to war, right, And
• 1:35:00
  it wasn't until women got voting rights that the vote was divorced from that concept.
• 1:35:10
  And suddenly we get a bunch of politicians elected on promises of gibbs where
• 1:35:19
  they're going to take tax dollars by force or threat of force from earners and
• 1:35:28
  use them to pay people who do not fulfill their obligation in their community to
• 1:35:33
  support themselves and their families. So whether or not that's a bad thing,
• 1:35:42
  maybe maybe you can decide for yourself. Yeah, but it didn't make sounds
• 1:35:46
  very good to me. It depends on which set of chromosomes you have.
• 1:35:54
  I suppose things will get better if women viewed voting as that that relationship that
• 1:36:00
  it used to be and not the relationship that it is now. Yeah,
• 1:36:05
  you know, I'm a very big I'm a proponent of for peel the nineteenth
• 1:36:13
  for you know, for the very same reasons that that the women and the
• 1:36:20
  people who were against suffrage, the suffrage of women, women's suffrage, which
• 1:36:28
  is such a weird word, right, because it sounds like they're suffering.
• 1:36:31
  Right, Well, you know, you suffer somebody to you to do something,
• 1:36:38
  you are giving them the opportunity to open space that you're you're tolerating it,
• 1:36:44
  condoning it, and you're extending your not necessarily suffering, but but you're
• 1:36:54
  putting yourself out for them to be able to do it. So I think
• 1:36:58
  suffrage probably is a social with that, I will, I will. I
• 1:37:01
  think we're gonna have to do an episode on the history of suffrage because the
• 1:37:08
  persistent myth that women couldn't vote before the Suffragettes came along it needs to die.
• 1:37:15
  Women couldn't for the suffragettes. It. Yes, it wasn't all women,
• 1:37:19
  right, but it wasn't all men either. So I'm gonna say it
• 1:37:24
  again, much to the annoyance of anyone who doesn't like it. It's not
• 1:37:29
  just that women shouldn't have the vote. Nobody should have the vote. We
• 1:37:34
  talked about this last week and yeah, no, but what good has it
• 1:37:40
  done society since we gave people the vote? It seemed like a good idea
• 1:37:45
  at first, but after a couple of centuries, everything seems to have gone
• 1:37:50
  to shit, doesn't it. Yeah. The issue of voting is that you're
• 1:37:56
  not just voting for what's happening to you. You're all so voting for what
• 1:38:00
  you could impose on your neighbors, and nobody's really You might be qualified to
• 1:38:09
  make all the decisions in the world in regard to your own life, right,
• 1:38:13
  but who's qualified to to impose their will on their neighbor in my opinion,
• 1:38:20
  nobody? But but yeah, And that's so in terms of voting.
• 1:38:29
  You know, I kit asks the question, you know, do it would
• 1:38:33
  I would I rather not have to vote? Yeah, I would rather not
• 1:38:35
  have to vote. I don't think that people should should be put in a
• 1:38:43
  position where we are tolerating tyranny because some people voted for it. Right,
• 1:38:56
  If you don't get what you voted for, and you're neighbor, it finds
• 1:39:01
  a way to outnumber you with with more people. You know, it doesn't
• 1:39:08
  necessarily make what's happening right. If they all vote to take your property and
• 1:39:14
  use it for their interests and their gain without compensating you, that's still democracy
• 1:39:21
  if the country, If the country is led by people who can just scarper
• 1:39:26
  after four years with as much money as they can grab. That's not necessarily
• 1:39:32
  going to do you any better than if your country was led by someone who
• 1:39:36
  was in there for life, who has who has been installed through means that
• 1:39:45
  they didn't necessarily want. There's a reason that juries are selected in the way
• 1:39:50
  they're selected. You don't apply for jury, You are selected people. People
• 1:39:58
  who appear on juries didn't want to appear on those juries. This this is
• 1:40:02
  this has been a system that's existed ever since the ancient Greeks. I know,
• 1:40:08
  we like to think that this is society built entirely on Christian values,
• 1:40:13
  but it's not. It's it's largely based on values that have existed ever since
• 1:40:18
  the ancient Greeks. When there are when there are important decisions to be made,
• 1:40:25
  as unintuitive as it sounds, it makes sense to put those decisions in
• 1:40:30
  the hands of people who didn't want to be making them. Because systems,
• 1:40:40
  the systems of power, attract they're completely the wrong kinds of people. Anyone
• 1:40:48
  who wants to be a politician should not be a politician because it attracts the
• 1:40:54
  worst kinds of people. The people who aren't who aren't in it to actually
• 1:41:00
  prove life for their fellow man, but to to grab as much money as
• 1:41:04
  they can in the game show wind chamber, that is democracy, especially if
• 1:41:12
  they if they do is do it for four years or indeed eight years and
• 1:41:17
  in the terms of some countries, and then they could just escape with all
• 1:41:21
  that money and never have to face any consequences. Like I know, it's
• 1:41:29
  not feudal times anymore. I know it's not the days of of of kings.
• 1:41:35
  But well, now now that now that we're in a situation where privatized
• 1:41:49
  endeavors can be centralized, and now now that we're in a situation right five
• 1:42:00
  hundred years ago, people couldn't communicate with each other across long distances, so
• 1:42:04
  it made sense for things to be centralized, you know, just for the
• 1:42:11
  for the very idea of the creation of a nation. You can't create a
• 1:42:15
  nation unless you have a centralized communication network. But this is one of these
• 1:42:25
  areas in which communication has made far more possible. We can communicate with people
• 1:42:31
  on the other side of the world instantaneously. We're doing it right now,
• 1:42:35
  Hi, guys, got we've got listeners all over the world. One of
• 1:42:41
  the things I noticed, we've got listeners on every populated continent exactly, so
• 1:42:46
  it's perfectly it's perfect, it's perfectly possible to to bring people together for industrial
• 1:42:55
  and agricultural and communicatory endeavors, endeavors on all kinds of scales. So I
• 1:43:03
  uh, we don't need we don't need that kind of thing for governance anymore.
• 1:43:11
  And you would think with the advancement of technology, government would therefore shrink
• 1:43:15
  in its in its abilities, in its scope of influence. But weirdly that
• 1:43:21
  hasn't happened. Governments have only got bigger and more powerful and tyrannical. So
• 1:43:29
  you would think there's there's room open for a possibility that governments should be shrunk.
• 1:43:39
  So there's not just thousands of people, indeed, tens of thousands of
• 1:43:44
  people depending on the population, who make up this frankly a machine. When
• 1:43:50
  there's tens of thousands of people involved in the governance of a nation, it's
• 1:43:57
  it's no longer controlled by people. It's controlled by that those people make up.
• 1:44:02
  You know, one person is a person, two people are a couple,
• 1:44:08
  five people are a family, A thousand people as a village, ten
• 1:44:12
  thousand people as a town, one hundred thousand people as a city millions of
• 1:44:15
  people is a government. We don't need that many people to run what we're
• 1:44:23
  now calling a country. You can actually drink that back down. It's quite
• 1:44:28
  possible for one person to be the figurehead of a country. We call it
• 1:44:34
  monarchy. It's I know, it's not popular. It certainly not in republics
• 1:44:40
  that have been proudly republican. For when I say republican, I don't mean
• 1:44:46
  the party. I mean the idea of the rule of law. But it's
• 1:44:51
  possible to have a republican monarchy. It is it. That's that's something we
• 1:45:00
  could throw open to the comments, is that such a thing as a republican
• 1:45:06
  monarchy? Because I live in a constitutional monarchy, and and even that's not
• 1:45:12
  good enough, because the monarchy has no power. And I'm glad it doesn't
• 1:45:16
  because Charles is, Oh my god, and Charles in George, yeah,
• 1:45:26
  I got I get what you're doing that and and you'r and you'll are a
• 1:45:32
  constitutional republic. But in either case, we both have massively bloated governments are
• 1:45:43
  far bigger than than they need to be. And and I'm not saying we
• 1:45:45
  need to reduce it all the way down to a monarchy. That's that's that's
• 1:45:49
  that's pie in the sky. And in the meantime, we we all need
• 1:45:56
  to vote into power some kind of of an arco capitalists like have a malay
• 1:46:06
  after that that we can do that we can do democratically. Those of you
• 1:46:11
  who are very averse to what I'm saying, I'm I'm quite happy with that
• 1:46:16
  with the middle road. I'm quite happy with with with the bit in the
• 1:46:19
  middle of that where we don't have an absolutely enormous government that fucking hates us
• 1:46:26
  and we'll do anything it can to enslave us. And I don't necessarily want
• 1:46:30
  a monarchy either where there's just one person in charge of The stop gap in
• 1:46:35
  between these things is having ourselves out. So please, somebody fucking fucking present
• 1:46:45
  themselves as as an a narcho capitalist leader who will promise to fucking awear up
• 1:46:53
  all of these things, and we will and we will. We will vote
• 1:46:56
  for you, absolutely, we will voting and we'll take it from them.
• 1:47:00
  We got a discussion going on in the chat that's kind of interesting about whether
• 1:47:05
  or not the community has the right to impose speed limits on the roads.
• 1:47:10
  And I'm gonna put it this way, all right, either the roads are
• 1:47:13
  public or they're not. Either they're owned by somebody or or anybody can use
• 1:47:19
  them. Right. And of course if they're not public, they're only not
• 1:47:25
  public in so far as as it can be enforced that they're not public.
• 1:47:30
  So if you claim ownership of a road, but then you don't have the
• 1:47:33
  power to keep people off of it, well you know it sucks to be
• 1:47:38
  you, right, That's that's the way it would work in an anarchist situation.
• 1:47:43
  And I will say it's it's YouTube chat. For people who are looking
• 1:47:47
  at their chat going on, we'll see that. It's because if you're not
• 1:47:50
  on YouTube, you won't. I'm seeing it in restream. But in terms
• 1:47:57
  of speed limits, and and I will point out that speed limits aren't the
• 1:48:02
  same thing in the US where the discussion is originating as say some other countries
• 1:48:11
  where there are roads that don't have speed limits or Germany, yeah, or
• 1:48:15
  they have a minimum speed limits but no maximum speed limit. Here's the thing
• 1:48:20
  about speed limits, right, you had a vehicle that is going super fast
• 1:48:26
  and endangering other vehicles, and you've got a pattern of that happening on your
• 1:48:32
  roads. The tendency of the public is going to be to either conform with
• 1:48:40
  that, so most people are going to develop higher skillet driving fast, or
• 1:48:45
  they're going to seek vehicles with safer manufacturing standards independently. They don't need the
• 1:48:53
  government to tell them what to do there. They they can decide that,
• 1:48:57
  gosh, the risk of this or that happening is more like, at these
• 1:49:00
  speeds, we need vehicles that give us the power to control them better at
• 1:49:06
  these speeds and avoid death in an accident at these speeds. People will seek
• 1:49:11
  that out and they will spend their money on that. But if you have
• 1:49:15
  government imposing speed limits, you know that's a safety net. People will be
• 1:49:21
  less fearful of what might happen because they are lulled into safety by the idea
• 1:49:28
  that you know, slamming into something at seventy miles an hour is just not
• 1:49:33
  as dangerous to the human body as slamming into it at one hundred miles an
• 1:49:38
  hour. I can tell you personally that you know you can slam into something
• 1:49:45
  at twenty miles an hour and actually suffer significant injury. But that's a story
• 1:49:51
  for another time. In any case, that safety net causes people to become
• 1:50:00
  complacent with the idea that you know they're they're safe in this dangerous situation,
• 1:50:08
  and maybe they don't use safety precautions that they could use. Maybe they don't
• 1:50:13
  pressure car companies to make safer cars. Maybe they don't spend their money on
• 1:50:18
  companies that are being more innovative with their the benefit of greater control over a
• 1:50:28
  vehicle at higher speeds and less likelihood of death in an accident. Maybe they
• 1:50:32
  demand more things like fuel efficiency, efficiency and shit like that, and they
• 1:50:38
  don't care as much about what might happen because they don't think they're going to
• 1:50:42
  get into an accident, or they don't think it's going to be that bad
• 1:50:45
  because they don't think seventy miles an hours is that fast, right, or
• 1:50:49
  thirty five miles an hour not that fast. And the sad thing is the
• 1:50:57
  result ends up being that if you're in an accident in that circumstance, you're
• 1:51:01
  more likely to die because you do have less control over your vehicle, you
• 1:51:05
  do have a less safe vehicle, and you have a tendency of people to
• 1:51:14
  feel like you are doing something wrong and they need to stop you, so
• 1:51:18
  they get in your way and they act ridiculous about it. If you want
• 1:51:25
  to drive slow on the highway. You can. I do. I drive
• 1:51:27
  slow everywhere. I get over to the right so people can pass me,
• 1:51:30
  because it's not my job to decide how they're going to drive. But if
• 1:51:36
  the state is imposing these safety nets on people, it's ultimate function ends up
• 1:51:46
  being you know, because the result is the function, the result is the
• 1:51:51
  goal. It's ultimate function is lulling people into a false sense of safety so
• 1:51:59
  that they will do things that are actually very high risk without thinking about it,
• 1:52:04
  and that that's not good for people. It's actually very damaging. So
• 1:52:12
  yeah, it's not a good example to use the speed limit because it's demonstrably
• 1:52:19
  the opposite effect of what people think it has. You can't have safety without
• 1:52:26
  freedom, can have freedom with safety? Yeah, freedom freedom can bring safety
• 1:52:32
  because people have mutual trust when they have freedom. I know, it's hard
• 1:52:39
  to imagine now that we've had several generations of this nanny state. It depends
• 1:52:45
  to different degrees depending on what country you're living in, but we're all drawing
• 1:52:50
  towards this point where safety is more important than freedom, and it's becoming more
• 1:52:57
  and more controversial to say no, freedom comes first, safety comes second,
• 1:53:02
  but it does. It works out like that. Everyone's just forgotten that it
• 1:53:06
  can work like that. But it has worked like that for ages. Yep,
• 1:53:18
  so we have David Lowboy says, storm is here. Handed should I
• 1:53:21
  get into the basement if you've got a tornado warning? Yeah, you know,
• 1:53:26
  like, if there's a tornado on the ground in your area, get
• 1:53:30
  in the basement or wherever your tornado safe spaces. I by the way,
• 1:53:38
  I'm back out in the living room and plugged in and everything. So and
• 1:53:43
  and the cat has been kicked out of the apartment because I'm actually allergic to
• 1:53:47
  him. I'm amazed that I spend all that time in that little tiny space
• 1:53:50
  with that cat, and I'm not having a worse allergic reaction, especially like
• 1:53:56
  I'm just covered in cat here right now. But I look like a feminist.
• 1:54:04
  But you know, we didn't. I didn't hear anything from outside.
• 1:54:09
  It doesn't look like it hit my area, my neighborhood, so hopefully that's
• 1:54:15
  a good sign. So but in any case, I'm going to read a
• 1:54:19
  little bit more and then let's see how much of this is even left.
• 1:54:26
  Oh yeah, we may be continuing this one more week, even if we
• 1:54:34
  get all the way through women's history months without talking about the history of suffrage.
• 1:54:43
  I'm still going to do a show on that because it's there are a
• 1:54:48
  lot of misconceptions about the way voting evolved in Western civilization. So the discussion
• 1:55:02
  needs to happen, like we need to get through to people. You know,
• 1:55:09
  this isn't what people are talking about today, and how people are talking
• 1:55:13
  about it today is completely again I'm going to use the word it's completely divorced
• 1:55:18
  from the reality of the evolution of voting in Western history. So, yeah,
• 1:55:25
  hairless cats are expensive, Richard. I think they're like a thousand bucks.
• 1:55:30
  I don't even see that much on a vehicle. And the best thing
• 1:55:35
  about cats is that cute. Hairless cats are not cute. Are no the
• 1:55:44
  fucking demons That's what makes them so cute. They're these itty bitty, little,
• 1:55:47
  fucking demonic looking, undignified creatures. Well, you might as well get
• 1:55:54
  a snake and I pretend that's cute. They are. Snakes are adorable.
• 1:56:00
  What have you ever picked up a garter snake? They're just they have the
• 1:56:04
  cutest little beady eyes. I like you. No, as far as I
• 1:56:08
  know, cute means small and round and defenseless. Well, they're just defenseless.
• 1:56:14
  But that does not describes snakes in any way. Then thin fucking dangerous.
• 1:56:21
  There's nothing cute about a snake. What is wrong with you? Oh?
• 1:56:26
  I think they're adorable, but I would definitely not put one in a
• 1:56:30
  captive situation. They weren't made for that and it's not fair to them.
• 1:56:36
  And and like that, Like I said, that cat that was inside here
• 1:56:41
  is back outside because he has I think spent the majority of his life as
• 1:56:45
  an outdoor only cat, homeless cat, and they're you know, I wouldn't
• 1:56:51
  try to keep him like that. That's not his life. I do what
• 1:56:58
  I can to make it easier, and I'd get in trouble if I try
• 1:57:00
  to keep them anyway. But but yeah, snakes are adorable. Like I
• 1:57:05
  don't know, I guess I'm different about that. You know, people post
• 1:57:10
  pictures of ugly babies and I look at them and and like, there's this
• 1:57:15
  there's this circular thing that happens to me with ugliness and cut cuteness, where
• 1:57:20
  something can be so ugly it's cute. And I think ugly babies are adorable,
• 1:57:28
  but they're adorable in an amusing way. You know. There's like there's
• 1:57:35
  Puss in boots with big eyes cute. Right, Oh, he's too cute,
• 1:57:41
  you know, like you're you're in awe and you're you're you can't say
• 1:57:45
  no or whatever. But then there's there's funny cute, there's amusing cute,
• 1:57:53
  and see, frankly, I think I think little snakes in particular are amusing
• 1:57:58
  cute. Don't know, they're maybe memeworthy. Cute snakes are not cute.
• 1:58:04
  Snakes are cool. They're not cute. Snakes are cool because they eat cute
• 1:58:10
  things like mice. They're fucking adorable. But I think spiders are cute.
• 1:58:18
  They're these the goofy, goofy little, tiny, googly eyed, hairy monsters
• 1:58:25
  the size of your thumb, you know, or smaller for the most part.
• 1:58:29
  Like I know some spiders are much bigger than that, but even then
• 1:58:31
  they still have these cute, funny bucktooth googly eyed muppet faces. I don't
• 1:58:36
  want to get bit by one. I still get the cut hebgb's if one
• 1:58:40
  is on me, but it's it's it's if you take pictures of their faces
• 1:58:45
  and show them to me, the awe reaction is gonna happen, and I
• 1:58:49
  might laugh there's really something wrong with you. Well, I mean, women
• 1:58:56
  will often see a picture of a gigachad and just ribe him as cute.
• 1:59:01
  I guess it's not beyond the realm of possibility that you can show silverback gorilla
• 1:59:08
  and they go, oh, he's so cute. So what does Q even
• 1:59:11
  mean? It just means attractive, and attractive is just anything that attracts you
• 1:59:15
  to its image. And at that point, Q is it means nothing.
• 1:59:20
  It's it's just a synonym for anything that attracts you to it. It's this
• 1:59:30
  is why men are so much more consistent than women, because because because men
• 1:59:33
  are just like, yeah, any anything and I guess more defenseless than me
• 1:59:41
  is cute, whereas women not defenseless, piss one off sometime and you'll find
• 1:59:45
  out, yeah, but yeah, where whereas women will be like, babies
• 1:59:49
  are cute, and giga chads are cute, and well, what the fuck
• 1:59:54
  does c even mean? Then giga chads are cute though they're handsome, right,
• 2:00:00
  and they can be sexy. Now, dad bods are cute because dad
• 2:00:04
  bods are cuddly, but gigachads, gigachads are handsome, but many women will
• 2:00:13
  describe them as cute because they, to them is synonymous with attractive. Yeah,
• 2:00:19
  so what does anything even mean anymore? I don't even So back to
• 2:00:26
  the New Jersey Project, the struggle to integrate intersectionality into feminism. Right.
• 2:00:35
  The project conducts conferences, workshops, and regional network meetings throughout the school year
• 2:00:43
  and holds a residential summer institute designed to bring together the best scholars in the
• 2:00:48
  state and the nation. So it is literally a conspiracy that happened back in
• 2:00:56
  the nineties to integrate intersectionality into feminist studies. Yet it is gender radicalism,
• 2:01:05
  backed with state money and unleashed not only on students at the university, but
• 2:01:12
  also those on those captive in the public education system. Right, And that
• 2:01:17
  is the intersectionality started making its way into the public education system when I was
• 2:01:21
  in high school, and we didn't really understand it, and eventually it became
• 2:01:31
  pretty much a mainstream thing. And Derek Workman says, lions, tigers,
• 2:01:39
  and bears are cute. I will say bears are only cute when they are
• 2:01:43
  covered in hair. If you have ever seen a picture of a hairless bear,
• 2:01:45
  that's fucking night maar material right, just what I'm saying about that.
• 2:01:50
  That's exactly what I'm saying about cats. We know the big difference between cats
• 2:01:55
  and bears, right, well, at least house cats, not lions and
• 2:02:00
  tigers. But you're, you know, American, short hair, You're Persian,
• 2:02:04
  you're you know all those cats. You can pick up your cat by
• 2:02:11
  the scruff of its neck and it will curl up into a little ball because
• 2:02:15
  it can't help it, and you can throw it out the door that way,
• 2:02:18
  shut the door, and the cat cannot get back in the house,
• 2:02:24
  right because you're bigger and stronger and it's tiny and weak. It may not
• 2:02:28
  be defenseless. It may scratch the hell out of you while you're trying to
• 2:02:32
  get a hold of that scruff, but it can't eat you. But you
• 2:02:39
  try getting a hold of the scruff of a bear's neck, just once.
• 2:02:45
  Like the when I wrestled Caesar, A the wrestling bear back in the nineties,
• 2:02:50
  and I use that term loosely wrestled. I got into the ring with
• 2:02:55
  that thing and my friend, because women were not allowed to wrestle by themselves
• 2:02:59
  to dangerous and he he looked at me, and I looked at him,
• 2:03:03
  and he took one paw and knocked my legs out from under me so fast
• 2:03:09
  that I didn't know it happened until I realized I was looking up at the
• 2:03:13
  ceiling. And then other people had to roll me over because I couldn't get
• 2:03:18
  rolled over fast enough. The bear sat on my back and spent five minutes
• 2:03:23
  chewing on my butt. And that was a bear that wasn't trying to eat
• 2:03:30
  me. I would have been dead. And if Caesar had no hair before
• 2:03:35
  you even went in the ring with it, would have gone, no,
• 2:03:39
  fuck that that thing's a demon. It was. It was. It was
• 2:03:42
  only it was Keith. It was only the fact that it was governed head
• 2:03:45
  that you thought, oh, it's a teddy bear. I'm well, honestly,
• 2:03:49
  it was. It was the fact that it was captive. And I
• 2:03:54
  did not have the experience of having read multiple news stories about captive bears going
• 2:04:00
  back to their wild roots and eating their owners, any interim that I that
• 2:04:03
  have read since then going oh my god, why did I get into a
• 2:04:08
  wrestling ring with a bear? But you know I was. I was nineteen
• 2:04:14
  nineteen year olds make stupid choices. Uh so my power just I just had
• 2:04:20
  a brown out. I still have internet, Okay, good Uh, that
• 2:04:28
  was fun. I wonder what the heck happened there? But I thought for
• 2:04:32
  a minute that I lost Wi Fi, but I didn't. It looks like
• 2:04:34
  everything's still good. You all can still hear me. Yeah, yeah,
• 2:04:38
  yeah, we're still here. Any there's nothing going on out there right now.
• 2:04:44
  There's no storm, there's no tornado, there's no nothing. It's all
• 2:04:47
  good. I don't know why all the like the what the power didn't blip
• 2:04:50
  the whole time I was in the bathroom, Like the storm has passed.
• 2:04:56
  Now I get a brown out, but okay. To help stretch the mandate
• 2:05:00
  for women's studies to public schools, Rothenberg has sponsored a conference that will deal
• 2:05:06
  with grades kindergarten through twelve. Rothenberg is not the only one to take seriously
• 2:05:15
  the mandate that went too fast to extend feminist ideology to every educational level and
• 2:05:24
  setting various public schools now boast gender equity officials. The American Association of University
• 2:05:34
  Women, I bet there's not an American Association of University Men even offers an
• 2:05:43
  action guide on gender equity in schools. So there we go. It's so
• 2:05:50
  annoying that people talk about this shit like has only been around a couple of
• 2:05:54
  years. Mm, like, please, this is why we're here, This
• 2:05:58
  is why we do our to go like this it again. I can't even
• 2:06:04
  blame the Johnny gum latelies for only talking about this for the last couple of
• 2:06:10
  years, when we've only been talking about this for the past ten years,
• 2:06:13
  when it's been going on since most of us we're still sucking our thumbs and
• 2:06:18
  eating the fucking processed turkey dinner. Yeah. Most of the people who even
• 2:06:30
  had any ability to push back on this are already dead. Yeah. Yeah,
• 2:06:38
  So next week we will start if we don't get something that has to
• 2:06:42
  be talked about. Instead, next week we'll start with the the paragraph the
• 2:06:51
  Miriam Chamberlain notes with joy that Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation is bank rolling women
• 2:06:57
  studies programs at the high school level. So we'll start, We'll talk a
• 2:07:01
  bit about that and then continue on. We should be able to hopefully finish
• 2:07:09
  this article next week. But yeah, as as you've seen here, this
• 2:07:16
  isn't ongoing a conspiracy, and I'll call it a conspiracy. You can call
• 2:07:24
  me a conspiracy theorist, but this is documented. This article isn't from last
• 2:07:30
  week. It's from last century. It's from when I was in high school.
• 2:07:36
  In college, I started. I graduated high school in nineteen ninety one,
• 2:07:43
  started university the next fall, and was attending that university when this was
• 2:07:48
  published. This was published before the Violence Against Women Act was passed. Wow,
• 2:07:59
  you can find articles from the fifties just as eerily pressing and as this
• 2:08:07
  one is. I'm I saw one on Twitter quite recently. I'm scrolling down
• 2:08:13
  looking for Yeah, I'll look for it and maybe I'll bring it up next
• 2:08:18
  time we talk about this. But yeah, definitely, yeah, there there
• 2:08:22
  there have been true there have been people trying to warn us about this since
• 2:08:28
  before even the Boomers were born. Yep, it's just that they've they've been
• 2:08:35
  just as censored as we would more so in fact, because yeah, I'm
• 2:08:43
  repeating myself at this point, you'll get the idea Boomers signed on for it.
• 2:08:50
  Yeah. H So, don't be blaming everything on the Zoomers or even
• 2:08:58
  the gen x Is like us. This is, this has been going on.
• 2:09:05
  This is even before the Boomers, like even even the tiny minority of
• 2:09:09
  the Sun put this ship in effect. You can't blame this on any given
• 2:09:15
  generation. It's it's it's something far deeper than any of that. It's Noah,
• 2:09:24
  it largely has, well or at least partially has human nature to blame
• 2:09:31
  for it. There's that there is there's been no one there to push back
• 2:09:35
  on what seems so obvious about human nature. But it's the fact that it
• 2:09:41
  seems so obvious that's made it so insidious and so beyond question. Well,
• 2:09:48
  I think it's it's it's the human nature that is the very thing that was
• 2:09:56
  used by the Marxists too be able to so effectively implement feminism into the minds
• 2:10:05
  of society. Yeah, it's the same thing. It's the same thing that
• 2:10:11
  caused the collapses. When any empire gets so successful that it can afford so
• 2:10:20
  much decadence that that it falls behind itself, it goes, well, we're
• 2:10:28
  in charge of a good portion of the world. We have nothing else to
• 2:10:31
  fight for, so let's fight ourselves. Yep mm hmm. And with that,
• 2:10:39
  well, thank everybody for listening to This has been a weird episode brought
• 2:10:46
  to you by the National Weather Service. Not really, they didn't sponsor us.
• 2:10:50
  They just helped me get into the bastery at the right time. And
• 2:10:56
  and and the neighborhood vagrant cat. Uh and uh. Thanks to listening to
• 2:11:05
  this old article because, in my opinion, this piece of history is very
• 2:11:09
  important for people to still understand today in order to understand what's really going on
• 2:11:16
  right now. And thanks to my two co hosts for dealing with my scatterbrainedness
• 2:11:22
  today. And thanks to everybody who works in the background to help make HBr
• 2:11:28
  talk happen. Good night, All good now, y'all. See you next
• 2:11:33
  Thursday. See you next Thursday.