Latest / Best of Business / Susan St John: Auckland University Associate Professor of Economics on Labour ruling out changes to retirement age
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks'd be follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio
- 0:16Speaker 1: Good Afternoon.
- 0:17Speaker 2: Labor has ruled out any changes to superannuation if it's
- 0:20Speaker 2: re elected this year. The National Party looks like a
- 0:22Speaker 2: wool campaign on lifting the age, and for a little
- 0:24Speaker 2: while there as seen Labour was up for some sort
- 0:26Speaker 2: of change because Chris Hepkins seemed open to means testing
- 0:30Speaker 2: when he was on air with Kerry Woodham in April.
- 0:32Speaker 2: You know, there are questions about whether somebody who is
- 0:35Speaker 2: still working full time earning a sex figure salary should
- 0:37Speaker 2: be claiming superannuation.
- 0:39Speaker 3: Susan st.
- 0:40Speaker 2: John is an honorary Associate Professor of Economics at Auckland
- 0:42Speaker 2: University and a social policy advocate and with US High
- 0:45Speaker 2: Susan Hi Heather Susan, given how expensive superannuation is becoming
- 0:50Speaker 2: and quite rapidly, is it an option for Labor not
- 0:53Speaker 2: to do anything.
- 0:55Speaker 3: Well, I think they've got to identify what the problem
- 0:58Speaker 3: is and I think that's one of the issues. People
- 1:02Speaker 3: have put the emphasis on the cost the expense without
- 1:06Speaker 3: thinking about what is the X issue right now and
- 1:10Speaker 3: the actual issue. As I would say it is that
- 1:12Speaker 3: there's an unfairness, an intergenerational inequity in paying a generous
- 1:20Speaker 3: or still taxed, but nevertheless a lot after tax pension
- 1:26Speaker 3: to people who are in full time work or who
- 1:28Speaker 3: have considerable wealth. And if we don't grapple with that
- 1:35Speaker 3: into generational equity issue, we're going to find increasingly that
- 1:39Speaker 3: social cohesion is going to widen, that younger people are
- 1:44Speaker 3: going to become ever more disinterested in remaining in New Zealand.
- 1:48Speaker 3: They'll see nothing for them. It's a really important we
- 1:52Speaker 3: deal with some of the very complex social issues that
- 1:55Speaker 3: are emerging by redirecting some of the money from superannuation.
- 2:00Speaker 4: Okay, so if your problem is that we are paying
- 2:02Speaker 4: for the pension for people who are still in work,
- 2:04Speaker 4: then is means testing not the solution there?
- 2:08Speaker 3: Well, means testing is an ugly way of doing it.
- 2:13Speaker 3: And really we've got to be proud of what we
- 2:15Speaker 3: do and having a universal pension that provides a basic
- 2:19Speaker 3: flaw for everyone and a cushion that even the wealthy
- 2:23Speaker 3: can fall back on if they need it. So that idea,
- 2:27Speaker 3: that unique idea, is a very precious one and we
- 2:30Speaker 3: don't want to go down the path of a complicated
- 2:33Speaker 3: welfare benefit type income test or an asset and income test,
- 2:39Speaker 3: which is the men's testing. It introduces all sorts of
- 2:44Speaker 3: disincentives to work to save and it could be really ugly,
- 2:50Speaker 3: like involve a joint test as they do in Australia,
- 2:54Speaker 3: which New Zealanders would not like at all.
- 2:56Speaker 4: So do we get back to the cytax.
- 2:59Speaker 3: Well, it is a compromised position and people forget that.
- 3:04Speaker 3: For thirteen years we did operate a surcharge on New
- 3:08Speaker 3: zealand'superannuation recipients and it worked well and it was cemented
- 3:14Speaker 3: into the accord between the three major political parties in
- 3:18Speaker 3: nineteen ninety three. Now, eventually it did fall apart. Winston
- 3:24Speaker 3: Peter's had a role in that, but being on the
- 3:28Speaker 3: Todd Task Force in nineteen ninety seven, we bemoaned that
- 3:32Speaker 3: we really thought it was a big mistake and said
- 3:35Speaker 3: in the last report that New Zealand will have to
- 3:37Speaker 3: revisit this issue one day, and I think that day
- 3:41Speaker 3: is now, and I think again it could be the
- 3:44Speaker 3: way in which we can get political agreement from both
- 3:48Speaker 3: extremes of men's testing on the one hand, raising the
- 3:52Speaker 3: age on the other hand, or even cutting the level
- 3:58Speaker 3: by not indexing properly. A middle ground could be the surcharge.
- 4:02Speaker 4: Has anybody done any numbers to find out how much
- 4:04Speaker 4: it would save us?
- 4:06Speaker 3: Yes, we've costed it. We've been working with treat hum
- 4:10Speaker 3: much over about the last five years. We've worked out
- 4:13Speaker 3: it depends how you set the increase in tax on
- 4:17Speaker 3: the superannuans, other income, or even total income including New
- 4:23Speaker 3: Zealand supper. You can structure it in various different ways,
- 4:27Speaker 3: but we did it in a way that would mean
- 4:29Speaker 3: that the bulk of supernutants, maybe a fifty sixty percent,
- 4:34Speaker 3: would be very little affected and you would only be
- 4:37Speaker 3: getting it back from the top two thirds or so.
- 4:42Speaker 3: And in doing that, with a modest increase in taxes
- 4:46Speaker 3: on those people, you could generate easily two to three
- 4:50Speaker 3: billion dollars.
- 4:51Speaker 2: All right, okay, Susan, thank you very much. Interesting idea, Susan.
- 4:54Speaker 2: Listen John Who's an honorary Associate Professor of economics at
- 4:56Speaker 2: Auckland Universities.
- 4:58Speaker 1: For more from News Talks b listen live on air
- 5:01Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 5:04Speaker 1: go with our podcasts on IR Radio