Latest / Pick Up and Deliver / Emptying the Dust Bin Q4 ’24

Transcript

Emptying the Dust Bin Q4 ’24 · Pick Up and Deliver

0:00
Welcome to Pick Up and Deliver, the podcast where I pick up my audio recorder as I head
0:06
out for a walk and deliver an episode to you while I stroll around.
0:10
I'm Brendan Riley.
0:12
[music]
0:22
Well good afternoon.
0:23
It is a cool day here in suburban Chicago.
0:27
My Google Home Hub said 50 degrees, but it feels like 40, maybe 45, perhaps, but it's
0:33
chilly.
0:34
It is cloudy.
0:35
It's that sort of slate gray washed look in the sky.
0:40
There's a cool breeze.
0:42
Not the best day to be out, but it's a fun day to talk to you about games.
0:45
So that's what I'm doing.
0:47
I was looking back at the games I played in the last few months and games I've talked
0:51
about.
0:52
And I realized that in the current pattern of the way that I talk about the games I've played,
0:56
I give you the overview once a month.
0:58
And then as I play new games, I talk about those in board game espresso episodes, and
1:03
I talk about games I've dusted off one at a time during those board game espresso episodes.
1:09
But the reality is I dust off a lot more games than I play new ones, or at least almost
1:14
the same.
1:15
So one of the things that happens is over time, since I'm doing three new games, one dusty
1:20
game, I discovered there's a big backlog of dusty games I haven't mentioned on the pod,
1:25
but I've played them.
1:26
So this felt like an opportune time to do a emptying the dust bin.
1:31
The new segment I'm trying in which I look back.
1:35
I think I'll probably do this quarterly.
1:37
I'll look back at the games that are in the out of the dust category that I have played,
1:45
but not talked about here on the pod from the last three months.
1:49
So looking at November, December, January, there are a bunch of games that I played that
1:54
and I dusted off, but I never talked about on the pod or I talked about like only obliquely.
1:59
They did not get a share of a board game espresso episode.
2:02
So today, this episode, I'm going to be covering them.
2:05
I'm going to kind of go roughly in the order that I played them, and we'll cover as many
2:09
as we can in the time I have.
2:13
This episode might be a little longer than usual, I think, unless it goes super fast, I'm probably
2:16
going to record this episode on the way to and from the library.
2:20
So it might be a little bit, might be a little bit longer than some of our others, but
2:23
it won't be outrageous.
2:24
So here we go.
2:25
So first one, this is a game that was more than 10 years dusty.
2:29
I can't, I literally can't remember the last time I played it.
2:32
Now I feel like I did talk about this on the pod.
2:34
Well, I'll cut this part out if I did.
2:36
And this is Rummy.
2:37
Rummy is a classic card game, of course.
2:40
From it, we have games like Gin Rummy, and later, Rummikub, which is actually probably
2:45
the way that I played Rummy the most.
2:47
Basically, when I played Rummy, I'm like, oh, this is like playing Rummikub with cards,
2:50
even though no, Rummy was first.
2:52
I actually prefer Gin to Rummy or Gin Rummy because I like the elegance and difficulty of
3:00
trying to hold the sets in your hand and having to make that decision about whether to dump
3:05
the card or go for what's in the stack, whereas Rummy, you're sort of laying sets out on
3:10
the table and you can manipulate other people's sets and do all the stuff you can do with
3:14
Rummikub.
3:15
But I hadn't played this game in years, and it's got to be more than 10 years.
3:18
It's definitely longer than I've been tracking games.
3:21
And so I just said more than 10 years, for sure.
3:24
I don't remember, for sure, the last time I played it, but if I had to ballpark in five-year
3:28
chunks, I would have said between 10 and 15 years ago, it was probably the last time I played
3:32
Rummy.
3:33
So, more than 10 years dusty.
3:34
That was a good time.
3:35
I played with a couple of students from my board game club, and we had a good time.
3:39
I mean, it's a solid game.
3:41
There's a reason it's still around.
3:43
Like I said, I prefer the Rummikub version.
3:45
I just like playing with the tiles better.
3:47
And doing stuff with cards, I like a tick-taking game with cards more than whatever it is you're
3:52
doing in Rummy.
3:53
Yeah, as far as classic games go, not bad.
3:56
I got to play Dixit Journey, and it had been two years and 25 days since last time I played
4:00
that.
4:01
Dixit is a classic game of a certain type.
4:04
I think it, for me, it's been overshadowed by Mysterium at this point.
4:07
If I'm going to play a game where somebody's handing out weird-looking, cool, surreal cards
4:12
and trying to figure out what to do with them, I think Mysterium's a more interesting
4:15
version of that.
4:16
But basically Dixit is a light party game where somebody gives a clue of some sort, and
4:22
then everybody's got these abstract, or not abstract, but sort of fantastical, surreal,
4:26
art cards in their hand.
4:28
And everyone's trying to trick, trying to put in a card to meet that clue so that other
4:32
people will think their card is the one that inspired the clue giver to give the clue.
4:38
It's kind of your standard.
4:39
Everybody puts a thing in, and then you vote on it, party game.
4:42
It's not a judge game, particularly, maybe it's a popularity contest game, but it's a fun
4:48
little one.
4:49
It's easy to explain.
4:50
It's easy for people to get into.
4:52
The rules aren't complicated, so, and people can kind of drop in and out.
4:55
So Dixit, often a winner, really good for the beginning or the night of a casual game
4:59
night.
5:00
And so, it won't surprise me again if this doesn't get dusty.
5:03
I'll probably end up playing it again at board game club at some point, but it was fun
5:07
to show it to students.
5:09
So, as Kahuna, Kahuna is, I played this on, I think, Yucata.
5:13
It is a two-player game where you are building bridges between these islands.
5:20
You have these cards that allow you to build the bridges, and I think you need two matching
5:23
cards to build a bridge or three matching cards to steal someone else's bridge and put
5:28
your own, your own, and down instead.
5:30
And basically, what you're trying to do is have the majority of the bridges going to
5:34
an island be your bridges, and then you get control of that island.
5:38
The game is played over three rounds, and after each round, you assess who has control of
5:43
how many islands, and then I think the person who had more control in two of the three rounds
5:48
wins.
5:49
I honestly don't remember the scoring that well, but it's a fun little two-player game.
5:54
It's the sort of thing that would be really fun to play over time and get good at.
5:58
Playing it every now and again is fine, but I just don't have the chops to be very good
6:03
at it.
6:04
And something about it, it's not a game I've been very good at.
6:06
I don't know if I've ever recorded a win.
6:08
I've played a couple times in person.
6:11
Rob has a copy or used to have a copy, and then several times on Yucata.
6:17
So Kahuna, it's fun.
6:19
It's the sort of game that I would enjoy playing a bunch of times, probably, to get good at.
6:24
If I had the chance to play it at like on the table, you know, at lunchtime with somebody
6:28
or something, seems like it would be a good game for that.
6:31
That's Kahuna.
6:32
So I played "Settlers of Catan" two year, one year, nine months, and 18 days, dusty.
6:38
This would be the...
6:40
I'm not going to talk about this much because this would be the play that led me to make
6:43
my "Nah, I'm Good" episode.
6:46
So you can go look at that one if you want to see why what happened to that play of guitar.
6:51
Grand Austria Hotel.
6:52
I played this one on board game arena, one year, nine months, 28 days.
6:57
I feel like this is the kind of game I could really enjoy if I played it on the table.
7:01
But playing it online, I've never really gotten it to click.
7:04
Maybe if I played it real time online, but the track's games, particularly Simone Luciani's
7:09
tracks games, I have a lot of trouble getting them to click in my head.
7:14
Even if I understand how they're supposed to work, keeping track of everything asymmetrically
7:18
over time when I don't have experience playing the game on the table, often means that I'm
7:23
just not playing them very well.
7:25
And that's my experience with Grand Austria Hotel.
7:26
It feels like when I play that, even if I feel like I'm kind of doing well, I'll look
7:30
and I'll see other people doing drastically better and I don't really understand how they're
7:35
doing that.
7:36
So there's either there's some essential pattern, a component I'm missing or it's just a
7:42
matter of keeping the architecture of the game in your head when you've never played it
7:45
on the table is harder or even in real time.
7:48
So maybe what I ought to do is some evening when I have an hour free or an hour and a half
7:53
free hop on and play a game of Grand Austria Hotel live online and see if that experience
8:01
clicks better.
8:02
I also probably should read the rules again, that's the trick.
8:05
But it was one year, nine months, 18 days dusty or 28 days dusty for that.
8:11
At toggle one night we had a few minutes and a bunch of people so we got out Concept, Concept
8:17
it had been seven years, ten months and 27 days since I played that and that's a fine
8:22
amount of time for me.
8:23
Concept is one of those games that game snobs find themselves saying, "Hello this is in
8:28
activity not a game."
8:30
There is a scoring component and you can win certainly and I was bad at it so maybe my
8:35
problem is I'm not good at it, not that it's not a good game.
8:39
But the people who... the play of it is that you are trying to convey an idea to other people
8:47
and you're doing that through conveying different qualities and different colors using this grid
8:53
of different abstractions.
8:54
It's an interesting idea and it's a kind of game that I feel like should in my head when
9:00
I hear about it, I'm like, "Yeah, that sounds really fun and then I go to play it and they
9:03
don't have as much fun as I was hoping I would."
9:05
So that's one of those plays where just it is a disconnect between my experience of play
9:11
and the experience of the table.
9:13
So that's concept.
9:14
It was seven years dusty, almost eight years dusty when I played it.
9:17
And sure, we can do that again.
9:20
By contrast, we play Gingerbread House and this is one I really enjoy.
9:24
Gingerbread House is a Phil Walker Harding game.
9:26
It was two years, 11 months, 29 days dusty for me.
9:30
In it you play a witch living in the fantasy forest of, I don't know, fairy tale land and
9:39
you just, you have a nice house and you want people to leave it alone.
9:42
But instead, all these people come by and try to eat parts of your house and that's
9:45
not nice.
9:46
So you capture them.
9:48
The way the game works is that you have these Gingerbread tiles with little icons on them
9:53
and some of the icons are symbols which represent sort of different currencies.
9:58
And then there's also a couple different icons that represent sort of special powers.
10:02
What you're doing is you're slowly building your house up by building it up in stories.
10:07
And as you're laying your Gingerbread tiles down, whenever you cover up a symbol, you get
10:12
that symbol.
10:13
And since your Gingerbread tile is sort of two pieces, it's like a domino kind of.
10:17
If you cover up two of the same symbol, then you get three of that symbol instead of two.
10:20
And that's basically the whole economy of the game is your, your drafting tiles and covering
10:26
up tiles or covering up spaces in your house.
10:29
And then the spaces that you cover up, you get resources from and then the resources you
10:34
use to do things.
10:35
So you can use the resources to buy scoring cards.
10:39
You can use the resources to fulfill objectives and you can use the resources to sort of capture
10:45
people coming by.
10:46
Those are kind of the three categories that you're scoring in and often these play off
10:50
to each other.
10:51
So the people who are coming by, some of them are, there's humans and then there's fairy
10:55
tale creatures.
10:57
There's, I think there's good and evil or I don't remember.
11:00
There's like two different, like nice and mean.
11:04
So there's like good and evil and human and fantasy.
11:08
So every creature has both of those characteristics in different combinations.
11:12
And so what you're trying to do is capture them because they're all worth points.
11:17
But then your scoring cards will also give you bonuses for capturing specific combinations
11:20
of them.
11:22
If you have like for everyone, everyone that's evil, you get an extra point or whatever.
11:26
So it's a relatively complex set of outcomes that emerge from a relatively simple set of
11:32
interactions, which is often the case with Philip Walker Harding's best games of his
11:37
simple tile placement games, putting it in the category of Llamaland and BarenPark and
11:44
Gingerbread House.
11:45
I think I would put Gingerbread House in the middle.
11:47
I like BarenPark better and Llamaland not as much.
11:50
But I think they're all good and interesting in different ways.
11:52
So they're all games that I've kept in my collection.
11:55
I think Llamaland has currently got the longest dust on it, although Barenpark has been
11:59
quite a while since I've had it on the table.
12:02
So I might be time to bust that one out again.
12:04
In the meantime, Gingerbread House is enjoyable and it does make it out usually in November
12:09
December because it's kind of a Christmasy theme, you know, Gingerbread, whatnot.
12:13
So I enjoy bringing it out at the Christmas time and it's an easy enough game to get back
12:19
onto the table that, yeah, but apparently it had been almost three years since we played
12:23
it, which is no good.
12:25
So that is Gingerbread House from Philip Walker Harding, another game dusted off.
12:30
And I recently had talked about an hour and a half or an hour and 15 minutes left and
12:34
I said, "I think that's time to play Isle of Skye."
12:37
And we did.
12:38
We got it done in time.
12:39
It was tight, but we made it.
12:43
That reminded me how much I like Isle of Skye as a relatively simple, tight little game.
12:49
So let's talk about it.
12:53
Isle of Skye is from Alexander Pfister and it's a game about being a Scottish chieftain
13:02
in the Highlands in, I don't know, Old Timey Times.
13:05
The idea is that you are acquiring land for your clan and you do so by buying tiles from
13:12
the other players.
13:13
The way the game works is very simple.
13:15
Each player has a little pile of money behind their screen and they have three, they have
13:20
room for three tiles in front of their screen.
13:23
On your, everybody at the same time draws three tiles from the bag and then they arrange those
13:30
three tiles in front of their screen.
13:32
And behind their screen they are going to put out little piles of money.
13:35
They also have an axe.
13:37
So they are going to put one, the axe behind one of the tiles and little piles of money
13:41
behind the other two tiles.
13:43
Then once everyone has done that, then you remove your screens or move your screens back and
13:48
you reveal which tile you have an axe up by and what the money piles are behind the other
13:54
two tiles.
13:55
The way it works is the axe, the tile that you gave the axe goes back in the bag or maybe
13:59
discarded, I'd have to check.
14:01
And the two piles where you put money, what you've said is here's how much money you
14:05
have to pay me to buy these tiles.
14:07
So there's an interesting thing where you can't price tiles higher than the money you have
14:12
and any money that you commit to selling the tiles, you can't spend until after someone
14:19
has bought that tile from you.
14:21
If they buy a tile from you, then that money comes back into your pot.
14:24
But unless someone, if someone doesn't buy the money, the tile from you, you can't spend
14:28
that money.
14:29
Then you go around the table, taking turns buying tiles from each other and then once everyone
14:36
has bought a tile going around the table, then anybody who has tiles left in front of
14:40
them buys those tiles with the money that they put out.
14:44
So that's the genius trick of this.
14:46
If you put out tiles with a very low price, you'll definitely be able to afford to buy someone
14:51
else's tile.
14:52
But there's a good chance other people will buy the tiles in front of you, you'll end up
14:54
with only one tile.
14:56
By contrast, if you put out tiles with very high prices, it's possible that no one else
14:59
will buy the tiles in front of you, but you might not have enough money to buy any tiles
15:03
that anyone else has put out.
15:05
Now there is an income phase before everyone prices the tiles, so it's pretty hard to get
15:10
stuck with no money or with very little money, usually enough.
15:13
But the interesting thing is the game has all of these different scoring conditions.
15:18
There are five different scoring conditions and in the first three rounds, two of the scoring
15:23
conditions trigger each round.
15:25
And the last two rounds, I think, three conditions trigger such that every scoring condition triggers
15:32
twice or three times, I believe.
15:34
So it's a really interesting game, very clever decision making, nice tension, quick playing.
15:42
I would say the hardest things for new players is that it's hard to know how much to price
15:47
tiles at, but the game has a relatively limited scope of money, so how much you price the
15:55
tiles at.
15:56
You can't really get too far off of what's possible.
15:59
Yeah, it's a really interesting game.
16:01
I like it a lot.
16:02
The scoring is fun.
16:03
There's a lot of luck involved in, you know, you might just not get the tiles you want to
16:07
complete the thing you want, or if you're late in the turn order, someone else will buy the
16:10
tile you wanted, and then you have to try to rethink.
16:13
So there is some of that, but that makes it interesting and it's short enough that you can't
16:18
get too upset if you're not getting what you want.
16:20
So that is Isle of Skye.
16:23
That was three years, four months, and 28 days, Dusty.
16:26
We played New York Zoo, which was one year, two months, and 25 days, Dusty.
16:30
This is a Uwe Rosenberg Light polyomino game.
16:33
It came out right in the middle of his polyomino spree, which included patchwork and summer
16:41
garden and, or Indian summer and cottage garden and spring meadow, I think it was called.
16:53
There's a bunch of them that all came out kind of around the same time.
16:56
New York Zoo is interestingly kind of a race game, which it doesn't appear to be a race
17:01
game at first, but it is.
17:03
The goal is to fill up your player board as fast as you can.
17:07
And the game has a couple of different elements you are buying polyamano tiles to put under
17:13
your board.
17:15
As the game goes along, they get smaller and smaller.
17:18
And then you're also breeding zoo animals.
17:21
There are five different kinds of zoo animals.
17:23
If you can get a good rhythm going on your zoo animal breeding, then you can acquire more
17:28
of the bonus tiles, which fills up your zoo faster.
17:31
It becomes a race to try to finish your zoo first.
17:34
And it's pretty interesting.
17:36
I like it a lot.
17:37
It plays, it's easy to play.
17:39
The rules about where you can put animals are a little bit complicated.
17:43
I just have to read them carefully before I teach it.
17:45
So that part is the only tricky part.
17:47
But yeah, it's cute.
17:48
It's fun.
17:49
It's easy to play worth a look if you get a chance that's New York Zoo.
17:52
I liked to play it about once a year, so one year or two months is about right.
17:55
We played Dungeon Mayhem, my son.
17:58
We played this once a long time ago.
18:00
My son decided he wanted it, so he picked up a set that had like four or five players worth
18:04
of stuff in it.
18:05
I think we played it two player game before.
18:07
Dungeon Mayhem is a pretty simple battling game where each player has a set of spells.
18:12
And then you turn, you're going to draw a card and then you could take an action.
18:16
And when you're taking an action, you're doing attacks against some people around the table.
18:22
It's a winner takes all last person standing kind of game.
18:26
And each player has a slightly different set of skills that they can do.
18:29
So you have to kind of lean into the things that you're good at and kind of read the table
18:33
about when to go.
18:34
But there is a fair amount of like pile on.
18:36
So if people think you're ahead, you might get a bunch of attacks that you didn't really
18:40
think you deserve or whatever.
18:41
So just some of that as well.
18:43
And of course, some luck if you have some health cards, but you never draw them or you don't
18:46
draw them when you meet them, that can be a real rough go as well.
18:50
So from that perspective, it's kind of silly, but it's not very long.
18:53
So it's fun as well.
18:54
That's Dungeon Mayhem.
18:56
It had been five years, four months and seven days since we played that one.
19:00
Next up, Marvel Dice Throne.
19:01
It had been a year and four months since I played that.
19:03
My son got two new Marvel Dice Throne characters for Christmas.
19:07
In fact, those were the last two that he didn't have.
19:10
So he now has the full set.
19:12
And basically we played those to try him out.
19:15
And because he likes a game a lot.
19:16
I like the game fine.
19:17
I think it's fun.
19:19
But I'm not great at it.
19:20
He wins almost every time.
19:22
It's funny.
19:23
Playing Doctor Strange and I was playing the Scarlet Witch or Black Widow.
19:28
And we played a couple times and he was kicking my butt.
19:31
And I kept wanting to play the Black Widow because I'm like, these characters are supposed
19:34
to be balanced.
19:35
Should be able to win.
19:36
Play two or three times.
19:37
I got kind of close to the third game.
19:38
I'm like, all right, well, let's switch it up.
19:40
I'll try to actor Strange.
19:41
You play Black Widow and then he won with Black Widow.
19:43
So it's just entirely possible I'm bad at the game.
19:46
Absolutely.
19:47
It is a dice roller, not unlike Yahtzee in terms of rolling dice three times and doing
19:54
stuff based on the results you get.
19:56
So it isn't surprising that he did better than I did.
20:00
It is bummer from the perspective of wishing to wanting to win, but minor, minor issue.
20:06
So yeah, that is Marvel Dice Throne.
20:09
Yahtzee, we got to play Yahtzee.
20:12
I actually played this one.
20:14
We played a PNP Homebrew Print and Play version of Yahtzee.
20:18
I found the Yahtzee scoring sheet because it turned out we didn't have a copy.
20:21
I thought we had a copy.
20:22
We did not.
20:23
So I printed out the score sheets and then you just play with dice because Yahtzee is a
20:28
pretty simple game.
20:30
In it, you are rolling dice trying to get basically poker hands or runs of cards or dice
20:35
results.
20:36
Each turn, you have to fill in one of the categories with the score that you got.
20:42
And over time, you get points for filling in different ones.
20:47
You get extra points if you get Yachtsy's and there were so many points that if somebody
20:51
gets a couple of Yahtzees more than everyone else, it's over, honestly.
20:55
But it's a pretty fun game as far as classic roll-and-writes go.
20:59
It is the classic roll-and-write in which you are choosing the most interesting thing is
21:04
that you have to fill in something every round.
21:06
So in a round where you don't get a good roll, it's interesting trying to decide.
21:10
Do you fill in something where you get a couple points or do you mark X in the category
21:16
where it's very hard to score points with the hope that later you'll score more points
21:20
in the easier category?
21:21
An interesting challenge and a fun choice to make.
21:24
That's Yahtzee.
21:25
It was probably at least 10 years since I played that.
21:28
I did get a chance to play Santa's workshop again.
21:30
That one just actually not quite dusty.
21:33
It was 360 days, but that's how once a year game for us around Christmas, it is fun.
21:38
It remains fun.
21:39
It's a classic worker placement game.
21:41
There's a little bit of strategy to it, but mostly it's just like which path do you take
21:45
to make your workers most efficient?
21:47
What materials do you lean into, etc, etc?
21:50
It's a classic, pretty easy to understand and easy to play and fun.
21:54
So that's Santa's workshop.
21:58
In our quest to finish our 10 for 10 last year, playing games that started with numbers.
22:02
We played 13 Dead End Drive and 221 B Baker Street.
22:06
13 Dead End Drive, it was dusty, three years, eight months, and 28 days dusty, but it's kind
22:13
of a cheat because I had also played 1313 Dead End Drive, which is a different game, but
22:19
very similar.
22:20
It's a re-implementation of the game.
22:22
They changed some of the rules enough that it is different, but a music nonetheless.
22:27
I really liked 13 Dead End Drive better than 1313 Dead End Drive, but they're very close.
22:33
So if you have access to one and not the other, don't feel bad.
22:36
Worth trying.
22:37
221 B Baker Street is a mystery solving game.
22:40
You run around, getting clues, and then you run back to Baker Street to try and tell us
22:44
your luck homes what you think the answer is.
22:46
It's pretty interesting.
22:47
There's a point where you have to decide, do I have enough clues to solve the mystery?
22:51
Then you run back and tell us your luck and find out if you're right or not.
22:55
The roll to move part kind of stinks because if you roll badly a couple times, you can
22:58
drop away behind the other players.
23:00
There's also an element of just like, did you pick the right combination of things to
23:04
really try and succeed?
23:07
Unless you're going to visit every clue thing, at some point you have to decide.
23:10
I probably have enough information, but if you miss that one person who eliminates somebody
23:13
or gives some piece of information you didn't have, that can be a real bummer.
23:17
So that's, yeah, 221B Baker Street.
23:20
Then saving the last for, best for last, I got to play Glory to Rome.
23:24
It had been one year, five months, and 12 days since I played that.
23:27
And man, that game's good.
23:28
I, boy, howdy, Carl Chudyk, it's not surprising that people still talk about that as his best
23:34
game.
23:35
It is so interesting, so weird.
23:38
The powers are so big and bombastic.
23:41
And the gameplay is so interconnected.
23:44
You're messing with each other a lot.
23:46
Boy, it's good.
23:48
There's a reason it's into my top 50.
23:50
And probably, I don't know that it would have been ahead, I not gotten this play in.
23:54
But getting this play in just reminded me how good it is.
23:57
And told me, Brendan, I need to get this table more because it is a great game and well worth
24:01
playing if you get a chance.
24:03
That's Glory to Rome.
24:05
Play it if you can.
24:06
Well, that's it for my emptying the dustbin episode.
24:09
Hopefully you have found this edifying and interesting.
24:12
I'm glad to talk to you about the games that I played, that I didn't get a chance to talk
24:16
about in another way.
24:18
Hopefully you've had a chance to play some of these.
24:20
If you have, head over to board game geekyhill3269 and let me know what you think of them.
24:24
I'd love to hear.
24:25
And otherwise, I want to say thanks for taking the game.
24:27
I'll be back with you in a little while.
24:28
I'll see you in a little while.
24:29
Bye bye.
24:30
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:31
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:33
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:35
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:37
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:39
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:41
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:43
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:45
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:47
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:50
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:51
[MUSIC PLAYING]
24:53
[MUSIC]