Latest / The Occult Rejects / Homunculus: The Occult History of Creating Artificial Life

Transcript

Homunculus: The Occult History of Creating Artificial Life · The Occult Rejects

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the Occult Rejects.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: For centuries, one of the.
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Strangest ideas associated with Western alchemy was has been the
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: claim that a human being might somehow be manufactured outside
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: the human body, not conceived and carried through ordinary reproduction,
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: but grown artificially inside a vessel through some controlled combination
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: of reproductive material, blood, heat, putrefaction, nourishment, and secret knowledge. Eventually,
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: this creature became associated with one of the most recognizable
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: words in occult history, the homunculus. derived from Latin and
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: usually translated as something like little man or little human,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: an artificial miniature person supposedly brought into existence through human
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: art rather than through the ordinary reproductive process of nature.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Most versions of the story immediately lead to Paracelsus, the
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: 16th century physician, natural philosopher, and alchemical writer who became
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: so closely associated with the homunculus that the two are
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: almost inseparable in popular occult history. According to the famous
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: recipe attributed to him, male semen was sealed inside a
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: vessel and maintained with a warm environment associated with horse
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: manure for approximately 40 days, after which something resembling a
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: small transparent human form was supposed to appear. That developing
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: creature was then allegedly nourished with an arcanum prepared from
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: human blood and kept under carefully maintained conditions until, after
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: a period roughly comparable to human gestation, the operator obtained
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: a miniature living human being. But following the artificial human
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: backward takes us long before Paracelsus. Arabic natural magic texts,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: Jewish mystical traditions, and European mandrake folklore all develop strikingly
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: different accounts of human-like forms supposedly produced through art, sacred language,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: or hidden natural powers. And the idea did not disappear
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: with alchemy. Later writers, embryologists, and neuroscientists gave the little
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: human entirely new meanings. Following those changes reveals a history
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: much stranger than one recipe in a flask. Modern biology
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: has pushed the question into territory none of those earlier
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: traditions could have anticipated, because researchers can now grow three-dimensional
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: organoids from living stem cells, produce living biological constructs from
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: reorganized animal and human cells, construct stem-cell-based models of portions
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: of embryonic development, and support developing fetal animals for extended
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: periods in extra-uterine environments. None of these achievements is a homunculus,
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: and treating them as though medieval alchemists somehow predicted stem
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: cell biology would distort both the history and the science.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: But they return to us the same underlying problem that
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: kept artificial human traditions alive for so long. If living
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: matter develops according to discoverable processes, and human beings eventually
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: learn enough about those processes to reproduce some of the
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: conditions nature ordinarily provides … Where exactly does imitation end
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: and creation begin? That is the real history we are
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: dealing with today, because the homunculus was never only a
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: tiny man in a bottle. It became one of the
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: shapes humans repeatedly gave to the mystery, separating matter from organism,
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: organism from person, and reproduction from creation. Long before anyone
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: used the Latin word homunculus for an artificial human, ancient
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: mythology was already populated by beings that complicated the boundary
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: between between manufactured objects and living organisms. These figures should
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: not be retroactively renamed homoculi because they belong to completely
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: different religious and literary environments, but they demonstrate that the
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: conceptual problem behind the later artificial human is considerably older
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: than alchemy. One of the clearest examples appears in the Iliad,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: where the divine craftsman Hephaestus is assisted by golden female
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: attendants described as possessing qualities normally associated with living beings.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: including intelligence, speech, strength, and learned skill. They are not
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: simply decorative statues positioned around a divine workshop, because they
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: assist Hephaestus and participate in the world around them as
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: creations that have somehow crossed the line separating shaped material
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: from functional agency. The mythology surrounding Hephaestus contains other examples
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: of self-moving craftsmanship as well, including automated tripods capable of
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: traveling through the halls of the gods, And although describing
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: these devices as robots would impose modern technological categories on
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: ancient material, the underlying imagination is unmistakable. Greek mythology could
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: conceive of techne, craft or technical skill, becoming sophisticated enough
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: that fabricated matter no longer behaved like something entirely inert.
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: Talos offers another version of the problem. In the Argonautica,
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: he appears as the enormous bronze guardian of Crete. an
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: anthropomorphic metallic being whose body contains a vital fluid generally
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: identified as ichor. Talos patrols the island, attacks intruders, and
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: possesses both extraordinary strength and his specific bodily vulnerability, giving
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: him something resembling the internal organization of an organism rather
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: than the simple solidity of a statue. Again, this is
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: not a homunculus, but the logic becomes important much later.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: If the correct body can be constructed and some animating
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: principle can be placed or maintained within it, then the
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: difference between manufactured form and living being becomes considerably less secure.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: The Pygmalion story approaches the same problem from another direction,
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: because the artist produces a human form of such perfection
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: that he falls in love with it, yet craftsmanship alone
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: does not provide the final transition into biological life. The
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: art supplies the form while divine intervention supplies animation, establishing
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: one of the oldest versions of a question that will
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: follow artificial generation traditions for centuries. Human beings may be
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: capable of shaping matter into something that resembles us, but
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: what supplies the final principle that transforms resemblance into life?
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: Later traditions propose almost every answer imaginable. Heat, semen, blood,
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: celestial influence, sacred language, soul, the organization of matter, and
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: eventually biological information and developmental systems. The proposed mechanism changed constantly.
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: but the ambition beneath it remained remarkably stable. Human beings
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: wanted to know whether whatever process turns matter into living
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: form could be understood well enough to be repeated. For
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: artificial generation to become something more than divine mythology, natural
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: philosophy needed to provide a world in which life itself
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: could emerge through processes that human beings might conceivably observe, understand,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: and reproduce. Ancient and medieval theories of spontaneous generation created
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: exactly that possibility. Aristotle and many later natural philosophers believed
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: that at least some organisms could arise without ordinary sexual
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: reproduction when matter encountered the proper environmental conditions. Mud, standing water,
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: decaying organic material, moisture, warmth, putrefaction, and decomposition seemed capable
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: of producing living creatures. Maggots appeared on meat without anyone
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: observing flies depositing eggs. Insects emerged seemingly from soil. and
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: animals could appear in temporary bodies of water that had
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: recently seemed empty. Without knowledge of microorganisms, hidden eggs, microscopic
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: reproductive cells, or the life cycles later biology would reveal,
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: the belief that certain forms of life could arise directly
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: from prepared matter was not irrational within the observational limits
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: of the period. Modern biology eventually demonstrated that spontaneous generation
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: in this classical sense was wrong. but historically its importance
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: lies in what it made intellectually possible. If nature itself
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: appeared capable of generating organisms whenever the correct combinations of material, moisture, heat,
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: and environment occurred, an experimenter attempting artificial life did not
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: necessarily need to imagine creating something from absolute nothingness. He
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: needed to discover what nature was already doing and reproduce
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: the relevant conditions deliberately. That possibility fit remarkably well with
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: a major problem in medieval and early modern alchemy, the
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: relationship between art and nature. If metals were believed to
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: develop within the earth through combinations of mineral seeds, vapors,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: elemental qualities, celestial influences, heat, and time, an alchemist could
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: argue that the laboratory did not violate nature by producing
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: metals artificially. It might instead reproduce, accelerate, concentrate, or perfect
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: processes nature already performed. Once that logic existed, extending into
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: the living world was almost inevitable. If natural processes operated
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: through identifiable causes, and if human art could imitate those causes,
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: the boundary between manipulating minerals and manipulating generation demanded explanation.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: The artificial human could now become a natural philosophical problem
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: rather than simply a mythological miracle. Before the medieval grimoires,
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: we find miniature humanity in a very different kind of
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: alchemical source. a vision rather than a laboratory account. Around
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: the beginning of the 4th century, the Egyptian alchemist Zosimos
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: of Panopolis recorded a set of extraordinarily disturbing dream visions.
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: They contained priests subjected to dismemberment and burning, bodies transformed
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: through sacrificial apparatus, and a small mutilated man designated in
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: Greek as Anthroparion, or Little Human figure. Zosimos was trying
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: to express the transformation of matter and spirit through images
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: in which the human body itself became an alchemical vessel.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: He was not reporting that he successfully produced a miniature
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: biological human, and the little figure in his vision should
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: not be silently converted into an experimental specimen. but the
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: resemblance to later homunculus imagery is close enough to explain
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: why historians of alchemy and psychologists have repeatedly returned to it.
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: Carl Gustav Jung took a particular interest in Zosimos and
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: later interpreted his visions in relation to psychic transformation and
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: the symbolic operation of alchemy. Jung was interpreting an earlier
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: author's symbolic text, not verifying that the alchemist had manufactured
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: a creature. Here the little man is an image of
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: transformation rather than an alleged specimen. That distinction will matter
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: as we follow the homunculus from physical recipes into spiritual practices, literature,
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: and finally the brain. This is where the popular history
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: of the homunculus becomes considerably stranger, because centuries before the
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: famous recipe associated with Paracelsus, an Arabic work of natural
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: magic was already describing procedures for the artificial production of
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: bizarre organisms, animal-human combinations, and anthropoid beings. The work eventually
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: circulated through medieval Europe under the title The Book of
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: the Cow, although it existed under several names and was
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: pseudonymously associated with Plato. Its Arabic antecedent is generally identified
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: as the Kitab al-Nawamis, and scholars usually place the material
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: somewhere around the late 9th century. Although the surviving manuscript
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: history is complicated and the Arabic tradition is not preserved
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: in exactly the same complete form later available to Latin readers.
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: The work eventually traveled into Western Europe, probably through the
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: translation cultures of medieval Spain, and a Latin version appears
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: to have circulated by approximately the 12th century. One of
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: the oldest surviving Latin witnesses, the Munich Manuscript, CLM 22292,
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: dates from around the end of the 12th or beginning
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: of the 13th century, placing written procedures for artificial anthropoid
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: generation in European circulation centuries before the period normally associated
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: with the Renaissance homunculus. Libra Vecchiae, Book of the Cow,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: is one of those historical texts that becomes difficult to
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: describe without sounding as though several completely different genres have
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: been stitched together. It contains elements resembling natural philosophy, alchemical experimentation,
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: veterinary manipulation, pharmacology, ritual magic, and what a modern reader
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: would probably experience as body horror, because the procedures employ
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: combinations of reproductive material, blood, animal bodies, plant substances, minerals,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: bodily tissues, controlled incubation, and manipulations of gestation that deliberately
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: violate ordinary reproductive boundaries between species. Some of its best-known
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: operations use female animals as gestational environments after introducing manipulated
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: reproductive material, after which whatever supposedly develops may undergo additional
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: procedures involving feeding, blood, tissue, or specialized preparations. Some recipes
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: seek anthropoid or rational creatures, while others concern strange animals,
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: hybrid organisms, bees, or substances supposedly possessing magical properties extracted
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: from whatever the procedure has produced. There is no credible
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: evidence that any of these experiments generated creatures described, but
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: historically that is almost beside the point. What makes the
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: text extraordinary is the way reproduction is treated as though
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: it contains variables that can be deliberately rearranged. Reproductive material
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: can be altered, the normal gestational environment can supposedly be substituted,
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: substances can be introduced during development, and warmth, timing, nourishment,
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: and bodily environment can theoretically influence what the organism becomes.
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: Calling this medieval synthetic biology would be wrong if we
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: intended a literal scientific identification, but the intellectual ambition is unmistakable.
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: Generation is being imagined as a process whose mechanisms might
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: be interfered with, Medieval thinkers understood how dangerous that possibility
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: could become because natural magic occupied an unstable border between
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: acceptable investigation of hidden properties and operations suspected of depending
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: upon demonic intervention. William of Avernay, the 13th century Bishop
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: of Paris and the theologian, knew the Book of the
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: Cow and attacked parts of the magical literature surrounding it,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: while the broader intellectual culture struggled to determine what an
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: artificially generated organism would even represent. If something living emerged
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: after an operation of this kind, had the practitioner manipulated
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: legitimate natural causes, produced a monstrous but nevertheless natural creature,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: or merely supplied matter through which a demon could imitate life?
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: That distinction mattered because medieval natural philosophy could accommodate extraordinary
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: causes without automatically classifying them as supernatural in the modern sense.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: Stones might possess hidden properties. Herbs could contain virtues placed
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: within nature by God. and celestial bodies were thought capable
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: of influencing material processes within the divinely ordered cosmos. An
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: operation could therefore appear astonishing while remaining natural. If the
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: result depended upon spirits or demons, however, the entire theological
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: category changed. Libra Vaccai sits directly inside that uncertainty. Historians
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: including William R. Newman has emphasized that artificial generation traditions
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: can be understood partly as attempts to manipulate natural processes,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: rather than merely as demonic magic. And that distinction makes
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: the text much more interesting than a collection of monster recipes.
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: The real problem was not simply whether somebody could manufacture
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: a creature. It was what kind of universe would make
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: manufactured life possible in the first place. Even the manuscript
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: tradition contributes to the strangeness. The Hebrew translation derived from
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: the Latin tradition survives in Munich while apparently omitting some
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: of the most disturbing artificial generation experiments. including material involving
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: rational or anthropoid creatures. There is no secure explanation for
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: the absence. The translator may have possessed a different exemplar,
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: material may have disappeared through ordinary manuscript loss, religious concerns
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: may have influenced transmission, or someone may have deliberately have
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: excluded the recipes. Whatever happened somewhere during the movement of
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: this material from Arabic magic into Latin Europe and then
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: Hebrew transmission is one branch of the textual tradition arise
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: with some of its most extreme experiments missing. The Book
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: of the Cow was not the only medieval Islamicate tradition
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: to imagine human beings reproducing nature's generative powers, because the
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: enormous body of alchemical writing attributed to Jabir ibn Hayyan
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: contains one of the most ambitious theoretical programs of artificial
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: generation in pre-modern intellectual history. Popular historians often speak of
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: Jabir as as though one identifiable 8th century alchemist personally
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: composed the enormous collection transmitted beneath his name. But modern
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: scholarship makes the picture considerably more complicated. The Jiberian corpus
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: is internally diverse and chronologically difficult, with Paul Krauss famously
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: arguing that substantial portions were produced by a later school
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: working around the late 9th and early 10th centuries, while
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: scholars including Syed Nomenal Haqq have challenged parts of that reconstruction.
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: It is therefore safer to speak of the Tiberian corpus
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: than to casually assign every surviving text to one historical individual.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: Within that corpus appears the concept of taquin, involving generation
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: or bringing into being and, without chemical context, the possibility
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: that living forms might be produced artificially through human art.
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: What makes the material especially important is the natural philosophy
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: surrounding it. Tiberian texts repeatedly concern themselves with balances between proportions,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: elemental qualities, structures, and the idea that material bodies can
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: be understood through organized relationships among underlying properties. Artificial generation
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: therefore becomes more sophisticated than simply mixing bizarre ingredients and
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: expecting a magical creature to emerge. If plants, animals, minerals,
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: and other natural bodies possess particular balances of qualities, and
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: if their formation results from lawful relationships among matter and environment,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: celestial conditions, and formative processes, then a sufficiently knowledgeable alchemist
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: might theoretically reproduce those relationships deliberately. That is one of
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: the most radical ideas hiding inside this entire history. Once
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: nature is understood as operating through discoverable rules, creation becomes
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: vulnerable to reverse engineering. The alchemist does not necessarily need
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: to suspend nature. He needs enough knowledge to make nature
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: perform its own operations under human direction. Nothing in the
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: historical records suggests that Jaberian alchemists succeeded in manufacturing viable
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: new species, and scholars have identified important differences between Jaberian
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: artificial generation theories and the practices contained in the texts
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: like the Book of the Cow. What matters is that
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: medieval intellectual culture already contained arguments over whether generation could
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: be technologically manipulated, what mechanisms might make that possible, and
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: where legitimate natural philosophy ended. Once that argument exists, another
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: question follows immediately. Even if an artificial human could be made,
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: what exactly would it be? Jewish mystical traditions approach artificial
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: humanity through a completely different route. One built not around
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: manipulated gestation, but around earth. Hebrew letters, divine names, sacred language,
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: and the cosmology associated with Sefer Yetzirah, the book of formation.
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: The resulting figure eventually became associated with the broad history
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: of the Golem, although reducing the Golem to a Jewish
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: version of the homunculus would erase the differences that make
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: the comparison worthwhile. One of the most important early passages
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: appear in the Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 65b, where the sage
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: Rava creates a man and sends him to Rabbi Zeidah.
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: Zeidah addresses the artificial being, but it cannot answer, after
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: which he recognizes what stands before him and commands it
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: to return to dust. The episode is remarkably brief, yet
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: it contains one of the deepest artificial human problems in
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: this entire history. The being possesses enough human form and animation,
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: to be mistaken for a person until it fails to speak.
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: That silence forces the question, if something looks human, moves
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: through the world, and can stand before another human being
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: without immediately revealing itself as artificial, what exactly is missing
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: when it cannot answer? Speech might represent language, reason, intellect, soul,
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: or some uniquely human participation in divine creation depending upon
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: the interpretation. But whatever explanation we choose, artificial humanity has
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: forced the culture to identify which quality transforms animated human
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: form into human personhood. Later mystical traditions expanded the relationship
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: between creation and Sefa Yetzirah through practices involving Hebrew letters,
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: divine names, permutations of language, purified states, bodily movements, numbers,
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: and earth. Moshe Idel's scholarship on the Golem has shown
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: how diverse these traditions were compared with the famous modern
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: legend of the Golem of Prague. whose rabbi supposedly creates
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: a clay protector that eventually becomes uncontrollable. Earlier Gollum traditions
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: were not always stories about magical servants at all. In
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: certain contexts, artificial creation could function as a demonstration that
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: the practitioner had penetrated deeply enough into the hidden structures
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: of creation to reproduce, within extremely limited boundaries, something resembling
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: divine formative activity. The contrast with the Libra Vekai is
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: almost perfect. One tradition interferes with reproductive bodies, gestational environments, fluids,
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: and organic matter. Jiberian Taqwan places greater emphasis on balances
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: and natural causes. Gollum traditions emphasize sacred information, because letters
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: and divine names do not merely describe reality, but participate
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: in the structure through which reality is understood to have
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: been formed. Modern comparisons with DNA or computer code are suggestive,
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: but sacred letters in the Gollum tradition are not historical
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: anticipation of genetics or software.
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: Or maybe it is.
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: The tradition of manufacturing a miniature person also has to
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: be separated from a quite different idea found in Chinese
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: Taoist internal alchemy, or Nidan. In a number of these texts,
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: the practitioner's body becomes a symbolic furnace and the accomplishment
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: of inner transformation is expressed through the imagery of conceiving, gestating, nourishing,
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: and eventually giving birth to an inner embryo or an
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: accomplished spiritual body. The language of generation is deliberate, but
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: the intended product is not a tiny biological person grown
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: in a physical bottle. Scholars such as Fabrizio Pregadio has
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: emphasized how the embryo imagery belongs to different stages and
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: lineages of Taoist cultivation, including the refinement and reintegration of essence, breath,
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: and spirit. Some traditions speak of generating a self outside oneself,
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: language that can sound uncannily like a homunculus until its
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: religious and cosmological context is restored. That comparison is useful
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: because it exposes a distinction running through the entire episode.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: The Paracelsian operator allegedly prepares a vessel outside the body
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: and attempts to make a separate living person. A practitioner
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: of internal alchemy cultivates transformation within the person, using gestation
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: as a model for spiritual attainment. The accounts are not
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: proof that Taoists in 2300 BCE manufactured miniature beings, nor
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: can we automatically translate Chinese inner embryo practices into European pre-formationism.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: They are separate traditions, and the evidence for their surviving
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: text has to be dated on its own terms. What
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: unites them is a startling intellectual possibility. Creation can be
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: imagined not only as something done to matter in a vessel,
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: but as a transformation the practitioner attempts to undergo in
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: the body and consciousness. Another miniature human tradition developed not
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: through laboratory alchemy or formal theology, but through one of
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: the strangest plants in medieval magical folklore. The mandrake had
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: been known since antiquity as a medicinal and dangerous plant,
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: and writers including Dioscorides and Pliny discussed it within Medicine
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: and Natural History. Plants associated with mandrake contain tropine alkaloids,
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: capable of producing powerful anticholinergic effects, including sedation, delirium, hallucination, confusion,
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: and potentially severe poisoning, giving the plant an entirely real
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: pharmacological foundation upon which increasingly bizarre folklore could accumulate. Its
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: mythology eventually moved far beyond pharmacology because mandrake roots sometimes
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: branch into forms that resemble crude human limbs. European imagination
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: transformed those roots into miniature bodies. and in German-language traditions,
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: the anthropomorphic Mandrake became associated with terms including.
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: Alron, A-L-R-A-U-N, Alron, A-L-R-A-U-N-E.
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: And Galga Manlein, the latter carrying the unsettling meaning of
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: something like a little gallows man. Later stories claimed that
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: these human-shaped roots could grow beneath the place where an
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: executed criminal had died, nourished by blood, urine, semen, or
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: other bodily fluids released from the corpse into the soil.
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: Under that mythology, the ground itself becomes something resembling a womb,
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: receiving a remnant of human generative vitality and returning it
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: to a vegetal form as a miniature anthropomorphic organism. Once obtained,
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: an alrun could be treated less like an ordinary plant
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: than a small magical being. Folklore describes roots being washed,
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: dressed in miniature clothing, hidden inside boxes or containers, ritually tended,
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: occasionally fed, inherited, and credited with powers involving money, fertility, luck, divination,
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: and hidden knowledge. Source criticism becomes particularly important here because
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: later occult literature often compresses centuries of Mandrake mythology into
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: one supposedly continuous ancient tradition. Some early modern writers who
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: preserved these stories were actually recording them to reject them.
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: Hieronymus Brunschrig, writing around 1500, mentioned claims connecting Mandrakes with
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: Gallo sites while explicitly dismissing them, reminding us that finding
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: a legend inside an old book does not automatically mean
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: the writer believed it.
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: William R.
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: Newman has nevertheless drawn attention to similarities between Mandrake folklore
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: and the cultural environment surrounding later artificial human recipes. Male
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: reproductive material, earth or dung, concealed incubation, anthropomorphic results, Containment
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: and magical usefulness appear in configurations similar enough to be
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: historically interesting, even though no surviving document proves that the
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: famous Paracelsian recipe was copied directly from an Elrune tradition.
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: The important point is that the miniature artificial person was
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: already moving through European imagination in multiple forms before it
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: permanently entered the alchemical flask. Once artificial generation became even
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: theoretically possible, the question could not remain confined to medicine
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: or natural philosophy. A human-like organism immediately created a theological
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: problem involving animation, rationality, personhood, and soul. Within Christian frameworks
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: in which the rational soul ultimately came from God, an
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: artificially produced human body raised an uncomfortable distinction between making
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: the body and making the person. Human art might manipulate matter, reproduction, heat, nutrition,
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: or other natural causes. But could an alchemist manufacture whatever
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: spiritual principle made the resulting organism generally human? Would God
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: provide a rational soul to a body produced through an
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: abnormal process? Would the result remain some kind of sophisticated animal?
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: Or could a demon animate fabricated matter and create the
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: appearance of humanity without the reality? Those possibilities intersected with
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: broader medieval arguments over substantial form, monstrous generation, natural versus
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: demonic magic, and the limits of human art. They also
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: explain why artificial humanity becomes increasingly disturbing the closer the
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: creature approaches ordinary personhood. Producing some bizarre worm from putrefying
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: matter is one thing. Producing something that looks like its maker, speaks, remembers, learns, suffers,
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: or recognizes itself immediately changes the argument from how was this.
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: Produced to what do we owe it.
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: The vocabulary changed, but the questions of personhood and obligation
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: followed later artificial human stories into literature and science. By
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: the 16th century, we finally reached a figure whose name
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: became almost inseparable from the homunculus, Paracelsus. He was a physician,
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: medical reformer, natural philosopher, and one of the most influential
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: figures in the history of Western alchemy. He challenged established
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: medical authorities and university traditions, promoted chemically prepared medicines, developed
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: an enormous and frequently difficult natural philosophy, and inspired a
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: Paracelsian movement that continued expanding long after his death. That
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: final point matters enormously, because Paracelsus died in 1541, while
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: the reputation surrounding him continued generating books, interpretations, adaptations, compilations,
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: and texts circulated beneath his name for decades afterward. Some
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: were authentic, some edited or expanded uncertain material, and others
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: appear synonymous or forged. Calling something Paracelsian therefore does not
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: automatically prove that Paracelsus personally wrote it. The famous homunculus
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: recipe appears in the work called On the Nature of Things,
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: which older histories frequently assigned to Paracelsus and dated approximately 1537.
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: Within that work, male semen is removed from ordinary sexual
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: reproduction and sealed inside a vessel, where it is maintained
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: under sustained warmth for approximately 40 days until a strange,
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: initially transparent or ghost-like human form is supposedly produced. The
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: developing creature is then nourished using an arcanum of human
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: blood and continues developing under controlled warmth for a period
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: of approaching 40 weeks, eventually resulting, according to the text,
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: in a miniature human being. Read only as a grotesque
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: magical recipe, the procedure sounds absurd, but the historical concepts
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: beneath it are considerably more revealing. One of the most
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: famous expressions associated with the operation is the ventre equinus,
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: usually translated as a horse's belly or horse's womb, which
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: has encouraged retellings claiming that the reproductive material was literally
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: supposed to gestate inside a horse. In alchemical practice, however,
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: terminology of this kind could refer to the sustained low-level
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: heat produced by fermenting horse manure, historically useful as a
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: relatively stable warm environment. That interpretation transforms the image from
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: bizarre animal impregnation into an imagined system of artificial incubation.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: A sealed vessel assumes the role normally performed by the uterus.
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: Fermenting organic matter supplies steady warmth, blood becomes nourishment, and
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: controlled time replaces the stages of pregnancy. The experiment remains
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: biologically impossible, but its internal logic suddenly becomes recognizable because
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: the laboratory is being constructed as an artificial reproductive body.
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: The gender dimension is equally difficult to ignore. The experiment
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: does not simply fantasize about creating life through technology. It
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: imagines male reproductive material continuing toward human development after the
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: female reproductive body has been removed from the process. Within
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: all the theories of generation that often credited semen with
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: an especially powerful formative principle, it became conceivable that the
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: laboratory might provide the remaining conditions necessary for the seed
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: to complete its work. Alchemy was already saturated with reproductive metaphors.
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: Vessels became wombs, substances married, compounds conceived, materials were born,
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: and transformations were described as generations. The homunculus pushes that
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: symbolism toward literal biological ambition. The vessel is no longer
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: merely like a womb. It is supposed to replace one. Now,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: did Paracelsus actually write the homunculus recipe? This is where
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: the familiar story begins to unravel. because modern manuscript scholarship
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: has made the confident attribution of On the Nature of
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: Things to Paracelsus extremely difficult to maintain. Paracelsus died in 1541,
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: yet the earliest presently identified manuscript evidence from The Nature
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: of Things dates to 1571, approximately 30 years later. The
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: first printed edition containing its initial seven books appeared in 1572,
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: after which later editions expanded the material further. That chronological
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: gap does not automatically prove that every portion is forged,
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: because authentic writings can survive only in later copies, but
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: the problem becomes considerably more serious when combined with linguistic, structural,
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: and textual evidence suggesting that the work is not the
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: unified production of one author. In 2020, historian Urs Leo
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: Gattenbein published a major study on the textual history and
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: authorship of On the Nature of Things. examining manuscript evidence,
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: internal structure, language, and relationships with other Paracelsian material. His
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: analysis points toward multiple authors, with portions appearing demonstrably spurious,
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: others remaining uncertain, and the work as a whole resisting
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: the traditional assumption that it can simply be treated as
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: a book personally completed by Paracelsus in 1537. Research by
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: Hiro Hirai into the publication history likewise places the work
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: within the much larger expansion of pseudo-Paracelsian literature following Paracelsus' death.
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: The historically responsible version is therefore more cautious than the
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: one repeated in generations of occult books. The famous recipe
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: appears in the disputed or pseudo-Paracelsian On the Nature of Things,
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: whose surviving textual history becomes securely visible only decades after
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: Paracelsus had died. There is a wonderful irony in that possibility,
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: because the most famous artificial creation attributed to Paracelsus may
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: itself reach us through something artificially constructed. A text shaped
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: in the image of Paracelsus, circulated beneath his authority, and
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: eventually accepted by generations of readers as authentically his. A
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: book about manufacturing a human may have acquired much of
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: its historical power through the manufacture of authorship, which is
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: almost too perfect. The situation becomes even stranger because the
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: flash-grown biological creature was not the only form of the
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: homunculus circulating within the broader Paracelsian textual world. Research by
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: Amadeo Moraes has identified multiple homunculus concepts in works written
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: by or attributed to Paracelsus, including pathological or monstrous formations
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: and magical forms involving images, imagination, celestial influence, and artificial anthropoids.
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: Early Paracelsian readers were therefore dealing with a much broader
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: and less stable category than the single little man in
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: a bottle remembered by popular culture. Eventually, the laboratory homunculus
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: swallowed those alternatives and became permanently attached to Paracelsus' reputation.
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: Whether the recipe was authentic stopped mattering to its cultural influence.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: Later readers encountered it beneath Paracelsus' name, treated it as Paracelsian,
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: and carried the creature forward. Whatever its authorship, a text
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: received as Paracelsian could still shape the practice and imagination
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: of later magicians. During the 17th century, improvements in microscopy
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: transformed the artificial human problem because reproductive material itself became
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: visible in ways earlier generations could never have experienced. Spermatozoa
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: could be observed, eggs became objects of increasingly careful investigation,
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: and embryonic development began moving from inherited philosophical speculation towards
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: something investigators could attempt to follow through instruments. Better observation
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: did not instantly produce modern embryology, because new evidence was
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: interpreted through older assumptions about how generation occurred. One influential
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: family of theories became known as pre-formationism, according to which
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: the developing organism was not understood as gradually producing genuinely
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: new structures, but as already existing in some miniature or
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: pre-organized form that unfolded, enlarged, or became progressively visible during development.
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: Different pre-formationists disagreed about where the pre-formed organism resided. Ovis
• 37:07
  Speaker 1: emphasized the egg, while spermists placed the formative organism within sperm.
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: And in 1694.
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: The Dutch specialist Nicholas Hartsoeker produced the image that became
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: one of the most famous illustrations in the entire history
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: of reproductive biology. A tiny curled human figure imagined inside
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: the head of a spermatozoan. Popular stories have repeatedly claimed
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: that Hartsoeker actually observed a microscopic human being through his instrument,
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: as though 17th century investigators looked into semen and literally
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: saw miniature people crouching inside sperm cells.
• 37:40
  Speaker 2: That is not what happened.
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: Hartzucker's figure was speculative, illustrating a theoretical possibility rather than
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: documenting a directly observed tiny human, and similar caution applies
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: to Anton van Leeuwenhoek, whose pioneering observations of spermatozoa did
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: not constitute the discovery of miniature men. Even calling Hartzucker's
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: figure a homunculus can be misleading if it suggests an
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: uninterrupted continuation of the Paracelsian Flash creature. The two belong
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: to radically different theories. The alchemical homunculus is supposedly manufactured,
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: while the pre-formationist organism is imagined to be already present
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: within normal reproduction. What connects them is the recurring temptation
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: to explain the complete human by placing another smaller human-like
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: form inside some hidden container. Pre-formationism could become stranger still
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: when applied to future generations. If an organism already existed
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: performed inside reproductive material, and that miniature organism already contained
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: the reproductive structures responsible for its descendants, then generations could
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: theoretically be nested with one another through a concept associated
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: with embo-whitement, or encasement. Future children could be imagined inside
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: their ancestors in a biological chain extending backward toward creation.
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: Not every pre-formationist accepted the same version of this model,
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: but the conceptual problem is perfect for our larger history.
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: When a complete human is explained by proposing another complete
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: but smaller human hidden inside the mechanism, the mystery has
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: not necessarily been solved. The proposed explanation has simply moved
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: somewhere harder to see. The story takes another extraordinary turn
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: in an 18th century legend. A later occult account claimed
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: that in 1775, the Austrian nobleman, Johann Ferdinand, Count of Kofstein,
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: working with an Italian mystic called Eberhard, Abe Geloni, produced
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: not one homunculus, but ten. The account is not contemporary
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: scientific evidence and should not be treated as proof that
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: anyone actually manufactured miniature humans in 18th century Tyrol. What
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: survives comes through much later occult literature. In the 19th century,
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: Franz Hartmann repeated the story while pointing to a work
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: called Die Sphinx, edited by Emil Bezetzny and published in
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: Vienna in 1873, which supposedly drew from Masonic manuscripts and
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: particularly from a diary attributed to Kofstein's servant and assistant, Camara.
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: According to that study, Kofstein and Jaloni spent approximately five
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: weeks producing ten entities described as prophesying spirits. They supposedly
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: included a king, a queen, a knight, a monk, a nun,
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: an architect, a miner, a seraph, and two stranger beings
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: identified simply as a blue spirit and a red spirit.
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: Each was kept inside a strong bottle filled with water.
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: The vessels were sealed, and the miniature creatures were said
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: to measure roughly a span in height. Then the story
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: returns to imagery that should sound extremely familiar. Kofstein supposedly
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: wanted the entities to grow. so their bottles were buried
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: beneath enormous quantities of horse manure, whose fermentation produced sustained
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: heat while the pile was periodically treated with a specifically
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: prepared liquid. Later, when the bottles were removed, the creatures
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: were allegedly larger, the males had grown heavier beards, and
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: their fingernails and toenails had lengthened. The narrative became almost
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: absurdly specific. The miniature beings supposedly possessed prophetic abilities and
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: were periodically consulted. One account says the bottle containing the
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: monk was accidentally dropped and shattered, leaving the creature to
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: die shortly afterward. Another claims that the little king escaped
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: because his vessel had not been properly secured, climbed onto
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: the queen's bottle and attempted to break her seal before
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: being chased down by Kufstein and returned to captivity. It
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: is exactly the kind of detail that makes occult legends
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: irresistible and historical evidence dangerous.
• 41:36
  Speaker 2: The important thing is the provenance.
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: We are dealing with a story publicized almost a century
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: after the alleged events, filtered through occult publishing and attributed
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: to documentary materials whose chain of transmission is far more
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: difficult to establish than the dramatic narrative itself. The Kofstein
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: homunculi therefore belong to the history of homunculus lore, not
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: to a history of experimentally verified artificial life. Yet the
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: legend reveals how completely the Paracelsian image had entered Western
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: occult imaginations. The vessel, controlled warmth, manure, growth, miniature human form,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: secret nourishment, and concealed laboratory all return. Except now, the
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: solitary artificial man has become an entire bottled society, complete
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: with royalty, clergy, professions, personalities, desire, injury, death, and supposedly
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: even prophecy. The homunculus was no longer merely a recipe.
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: In this legend, it had become an entire population. By
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: the 19th century, artificial human traditions were moving decisively into literature,
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: where the problem of manufactured life became less concerned with
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: reproducing a biological recipe and more concerned with what responsibility
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: a creator owes to something brought into existence through human knowledge.
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein appeared in 1818 and deliberately placed Victor
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: Frankenstein's intellectual development in conversation with older occult natural philosophers,
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: including Cornelius Agrippa and Paracelsus. Victor's creature is not a homunculus,
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: and Shelley deliberately refuses to provide a practical recipe that
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: readers could reproduce. What the novel inherits from the older
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: artificial life tradition is the deeper argument about whether human
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: art can cross into generation, and what happens morally once
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: it succeeds. The central question is no longer simply whether
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: life can be manufactured. Shelley forces the reader to ask
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: whether artificial origin changes moral status, whether creators acquire obligations
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: toward what they create, and whether something produced through technical
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: intervention can legitimately be treated as an object simply because
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: a human intentionally made it. Then in 1832, Goethe's Faust
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: Part II brought the homunculus itself directly into modern literature.
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: Goethe had deep interest in alchemy, natural philosophy, morphology, and
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: the relationship between mechanical explanation and organic development. And within
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: the laboratory sequence of Faust II, Wagner succeeds in producing
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: an intelligent homunculus inside a glass vessel. Goethe changes the
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: older legend in a fascinating way because his homunculus possesses
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: intelligence while remaining incompletely embodied. He exists as a manufactured
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: intellectual being contained within glass and seeks full participation in nature,
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: turning the traditional alchemical fantasy almost inside out. The old
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: laboratory problem asks whether the flesh could successfully replace natural generations.
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: Goethe asks whether something created inside the flask because its
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: artificial production has separated it from the broader processes through
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: which embodied life ordinarily develops. The comparison with modern artificial
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: intelligence debates is retrospective and should remain one, but the
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: philosophical resemblance is difficult to miss. Goethe imagines manufactured intelligence
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: existing inside an artificial container without the ordinary embodied history
• 45:00
  Speaker 1: accompanying life. and then asks what such intelligence might lack
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: and what it would seek in order to become complete.
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: The homunculus has moved again. Instead of a miniature biological body,
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: it can now represent intelligence without ordinary embodiment. Western occult
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: writing also offered another version of artificially created life that
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: did not require semen, blood, or a reproductive vessel. In
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: The Astral Plane, published in 1895, The theosophical author C.W.
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: Ludbeater devoted a section to what he called artificial elementals.
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: His claim was that the force thought could shape subtle
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: matter into a temporary entity, and that magical practitioners could
• 45:42
  Speaker 1: deliberately create and direct such forms. That was an occult
• 45:46
  Speaker 1: theory about an unseen plane, not an experimentally established feature
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: of physics or cognition. But it provides a documented ancestor
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: for modern talk about thought forms, magical servitors, and related
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: constructed entities. A late modern magician describing a servitor as
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: a homunculus may be drawing an analogy between two things
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: regarded as made rather than born, not referring to the
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: same biological creature described in pseudo-paracelsian literature. What changes here
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: is the supposed raw material. The bottle-bound homunculus requires reproductive
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: matter and an incubating apparatus. The artificial elemental supposedly requires
• 46:26
  Speaker 1: concentrated imagination and will. A person interested in the psychology
• 46:30
  Speaker 1: of ritual might ask how repeated visualization, attention, and expectation
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: shaped a practitioner's experience. A historian can show that occult
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: authors really made these claims. Neither discipline has to accept
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: that a conscious independent being was created. Once we distinguish
• 46:47
  Speaker 1: biological generation from imagined astral generation, the history becomes clearer,
• 46:52
  Speaker 1: not less strange. Here the investigation reaches Aleister Crowley. who
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: did more than mention homunculi in passing. In a work
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: generally dated to 1914, in Lieber 367, Crowley set out
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: a theory of artificially produced humanity. He imagined the manipulation
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: of reproduction and argued that a developing fetus might be
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: made to receive a non-human intelligence rather than what he
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: called a reincarnating human ego. His discussion was built around
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: a hypothetical occult premise. He wrote, supposing that a reincarnation
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: ego exists enters during the third month of gestation rather
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: than demonstrating that it does. This is not established embryology,
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: nor is this evidence that the procedure produced the living homunculus.
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: It is nonetheless a surviving text in which a major
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: 20th century magician explicitly speculated about controlled gestation, soul, identity,
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: and the deliberate creation of a being treated as something
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: other than an ordinary conceived human person. That gives Crowley's
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: homunculus a disturbing ethical dimension. Instead of merely wondering whether
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: a creature could be produced, the author entertains the possibility
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: of controlling what kind of intelligence would inhabit the result.
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: The issue is no longer only whether a vessel can
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: be made to imitate the womb. It is whether the
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: operator can claim ownership over the character or destiny of
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: whatever emerges. Those ideas belong to Crowley's magical cosmology, and
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: their more troubling assumptions should be described as his assumptions,
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: not smuggled into a modern account of prenatal development. Then
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: there is The Moon Child, written in 1917 and published
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: in 1929. Crowley's occult novel contains a chapter explicitly titled
• 48:35
  Speaker 1: Of the Homunculus. Its characters discuss shaping a child's nature
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: by controlling the environment of a pregnancy through sympathetic symbols,
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: planetary associations, ritual implements, and deliberate exclusions of unwanted influences.
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: That is fiction informed by ceremonial ideas, not a medical
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: case report. but it demonstrates how the alchemical dream of
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: consulting a small human had changed. The magician now imagined
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: shaping a human birth through a carefully designed field of
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: symbolic influences. The claim of control had moved from heat
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: and blood in a flask to the proposed manipulation of gestation, personality,
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: and soul. There is a later historical afterlife worth distinguishing
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: from both the novel and the treaties. In 1946, the
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: American rocket researcher and occultist Jack Parsons, working with L.
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: Ron Hubbard and later with the artist Major Cameron, undertook
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: the series of rituals remembered as the Babylon Working. Their
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: surviving accounts and subsequent scholarship describe efforts to manifest or
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: incarnate a divine feminine presence. The participants' claims about the
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: outcome varied, and there is no established evidence that they
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: manufactured a biological child or created an elemental person. Nor
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: should Cameron be described as a laboratory-produced human being simply
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: because an occultist interpreted her arrival through a ritual framework.
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: What this episode documents is the continuation of a magical
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: ambition to summon an intelligence into the world by controlling
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: the conditions of its manifestations. That continuity is historically real
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: even when the claimed supernatural result is not. The 20th
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: century produced one of the strangest transformations of all. Homunculus
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: became part of legitimate neuroscientific vocabulary. Canadian-American neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield,
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: working with Edwin Baldry, used electrical stimulation during operations in
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: which patients could remain awake enough to report sensations or respond.
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: In 1937, they published a landmark study of motor and
• 50:37
  Speaker 1: sensory representation, drawing on observations from 126 patients operated on
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: between 1928 and 1936. Stimulating one cortical site might produce
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: movement of the hand, another might trigger a movement of
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: the mouth, or a sensation referred to a particular part
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: of the body. Their observation helped establish somatotopy. Parts of
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: the body are represented in an organized, though far from
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: perfectly fixed, arrangement across regions of the cerebral cortex. That
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: information became famous through a grotesquely distorted little person whose hands, lips,
• 51:13
  Speaker 1: and tongue appeared enormous while much of the trunk seemed tiny.
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: Its proportions referred to the relative extent of cortical representation,
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: not to the anatomical size of the body parts. There
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: is a detail often missing from retellings of this image.
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: The original 1937 homunculus illustrated by Hortense Cantley, appeared as
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: an unusual segmented figure rather than the familiar pair of
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: little bodies stretched around cross-sections of a brain. The widely
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: reproduced separate sensory and motor homunculi came in 1950, when
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: Penfield and Theodore Rasmussen presented the revised maps in The
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: Cerebral Cortex of Man. The motor homunculus corresponds broadly to
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: the precentral gyrus of the frontal lobe, involved in a
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: controlling voluntary movement. The sensory homunculus corresponds broadly to the
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: postcentral gyrus of the parietal lobe, involved in processing bodily sensation.
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: The ordering of body regions runs along these strips, with
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: much of each hemisphere representing the opposite side of the body.
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: That makes the word homunculus almost absurdly appropriate. Our story
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: began with people trying to manufacture a little person in
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: a vessel. And centuries later, neuroscience used another little person
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: to summarize the relationship.
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: Between brain and body.
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: Yet neither the 1937 figure nor its 1950 successors should
• 52:43
  Speaker 1: be mistaken for a literal miniature organism hiding in the head.
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: The maps combine observations across patients, and later neuroscience has
• 52:52
  Speaker 1: shown overlapping representations, individual differences, plasticity, and more distributed sensory
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: motor organization features then a clean classroom picture can fully express.
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: The image is a powerful teaching model, not a complete
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: diagram of how a human brain works. That usefulness also
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: reveals another problem. Sometimes imagining a smaller person inside a
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: complex system makes the system easier to picture without explaining
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: how it operates. Imagine explaining human vision by saying that
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: light enters the eyes, the nervous system processes incoming information,
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: and the brain eventually constructs an internal picture that is
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: somehow presented to consciousness. It sounds intuitive until we ask
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: a simple question. Who exactly sees the picture? If the
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: explanation requires another observer somewhere inside the brain, then that
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: observer would itself require eyes, visual processing, interpretation, and some
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: mechanisms through which its own experience becomes conscious. If we
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: solve that by putting another little observer inside the first observer,
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: the process continues forever. This is the basic structure of
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: the homunculus fallacy, a problem given influential modern formulation by
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Anthony Kenny and developed throughout philosophy of mind and cognitive science.
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: The mistake is not that complicated abilities cannot be broken
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: into simpler mechanisms. Modern science does exactly that. The mistake
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: appears when the supposedly simpler mechanism secretly possesses the same
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: unexplained intelligence as the thing it was supposed to explain.
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: Explaining understanding by inventing an inner entity that already understands,
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: decision-making through an inner decider that already knows how to decide,
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: or interpretation through an interpreter that somehow already understands the
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: information does not solve anything. It relocates the mystery, then
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: solving it. Daniel Dennett later attacked a closely related intuition
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: through its criticism of the Cardiocin Theater. The idea that
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: consciousness ultimately requires some privileged internal location where all sensory
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: and cognitive information comes together and is presented to a
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: central experiencer. The image is seductive because human experience feels
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: as though somebody is sitting behind the eyes receiving the show.
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: But a theater requires an audience, and putting that audience
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: inside the brain merely reproduces the problem. This explains the
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: homunculus' extraordinary afterlife. When we find it difficult to explain
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: a complicated system, We attempted to imagine a smaller agent
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: somewhere inside it, directing the operation. The ancient practitioner imagined
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: building that little person outside the body. Modern philosophers showed
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: how easily we invent one inside ourselves. At this point,
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: the history can become sensational very quickly. So precision matters.
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: Modern scientists have not created Paracelsian homoculi. Nobody has grown
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: a miniature human being from semen and blood inside horse
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: manure and no laboratory has assembled a complete human organism
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: from inert chemicals and watched it awaken. What modern biology
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: has revealed is stranger in a different way. Living cells
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: possess extraordinary capacities of self-organization, and changing the environment surrounding
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: those cells can sometimes reveal forms and behaviors that were
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: not obvious from the structures they occupied inside the original organism.
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: A major example appeared in 2013 when Madeline Lancaster and
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: colleagues published landmark work involving cerebral organoids, three-dimensional structures generated
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: from pluripotent stem cells that reproduce selective features associated with
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: early human brain development. Popular media often call these structures mini-brains,
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: but the phrase easily creates an image more dramatic than
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: the biology. Cerebral organoids do not possess the complete architecture,
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: vascular organization, and sensory environment, bodily integration, developmental history, or
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: systems-level organization of a human brain. Their importance lies in
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: what living cells can do. Cells can differentiate, migrate, communicate
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: through molecular signals, organize into layers, and produce recognizable tissue
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: structures without a scientist individually placing each cell into position.
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: Researchers construct and manipulate the environment, while enormous portions of
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: the developmental organization emerge from capacities already contained within the
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: living cells themselves. That relationship between imposed conditions and self-organizing
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: living matter becomes even stranger when we look at xenobots.
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: Beginning in 2020, researchers working with cells from an African
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: clawed frog demonstrated living multicellular constructs capable of movement and
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: other coordinated behaviors despite possessing body configurations unlike an ordinary frog.
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: Later work showed xenobots capable of self-healing and collective behavior,
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: while a 2021 study demonstrated what the researchers called kinematic self-replication.
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: Under particular experimental conditions, moving xenobots could gather loose cells
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: into aggregates that subsequently developed into additional motile constructs. That
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: does not mean tiny frogs had learned to manufacture babies
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: in a petri dish, and it is not reproduction in
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: the familiar genetic or reproductive sense. What makes this experiment
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: important for our story is that living cells were being
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: organized into a configuration where their existing biological abilities combined
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: into behavior that did not resemble the normal body plan
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: from which those cells originated. Related research then moved from
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: amphibian cells to adult human tissue. Researchers led by Michael
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: Levin developed what they called anthrobots, multicellular biological constructs originating
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: from adult human airway cells. Under altered culture conditions, cells
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: whose ordinary existence had been spent forming part of a
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: flat tracheal epithelium self-organized into tiny three-dimensional bodies covered in
• 58:51
  Speaker 1: configuration of cilia that allowed some of them to move
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: through their environment. Nothing had been transformed into miniature humans.
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: No foreign genome was inserted to provide some secret new
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: body plan, and the researchers were not sculpting each cell
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: into position. The striking part was precisely that ordinary adult
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: human cells removed from their usual anatomical context and placed
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: into different conditions, could express a completely different collective morphology
• 59:18
  Speaker 1: and behavior. In experiments using simplified cultured human neural tissue,
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: Aggregates of anthrobots were also associated with closure across experimentally
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: produced gaps in neuronal cell layers. That does not mean
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: anthrobots have been demonstrated to crawl through damaged human brains
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: repairing injuries, because the experiment involved an in vitro tissue
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: model rather than a living patient. What it demonstrates is
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: that cells whose normal biological job involved the human airway
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: could participate in collective behaviors that would have been extremely
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: difficult to predict simply by looking at what those cells
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: normally do inside a body. For the history of the homunculus,
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: the contrast is significant. Older, artificial generation traditions repeatedly search
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: for a hidden substance carrying the secret of form. Semen, blood,
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: elemental balance, celestial influence, secret language, and some formative spirit.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: Modern developmental biology increasingly reveals something more distributed. The cell
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: possesses genetic information. But genes operate inside regulatory networks. Cells
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: communicate with neighboring cells. You have electrical states, mechanical forces,
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: chemical gradients, geometry, timing, and environmental context all participate in
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: determining what a collective of cells actually becomes. The developmental
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: process cannot be located in one ingredient waiting to unfold
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: as a tiny performed body. It arises through interactions among
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: living components. That becomes even more provocative with stem cell-based
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: embryo models in which pluripotent stem cells are organized into
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: three-dimensional systems modeling selected stages and features of embryonic development.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: By 2023, several teams have reported increasingly sophisticated human stem
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 1: cell-derived models reproducing features associated with post-implantation development, prompting widespread
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 1: headlines about synthetic embryos. That phrase can easily suggest scientists
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: are mixing inner chemicals together and building complete human embryos
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 1: from nothing.
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: They are not.
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 1: These systems begin with living cells and are experimental models
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: of developmental processes rather than straightforward equivalents of natural fertilized embryos.
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 1: But the field is advancing quickly enough that the ethical
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: language surrounding it has already changed. In August of 2025,
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: the International Society for Stem Cell Research issued a targeted
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: update to its guidelines, specifically addressing stem cell-based embryo models.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: The new guidance retired the older distinction between integrated and
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: non-integrated models, recommended appropriate oversight for three-dimensional SCBEM research based
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: upon the complexity of the model, reiterated that human SCBEMs
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 1: must be transferred into the uterus of either a human
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: or an animal. and added an explicit prohibition against culturing
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 1: such models ex vivo to the point of potential viability.
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: What would amount to ectogenesis? There is something historically remarkable
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: about reaching a point where the discussion is no longer
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: merely whether developmental organization could be manipulated, but where scientific
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: organizations need increasingly precise terminology to distinguish different models and
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: define boundaries around what researchers should not attempt. Artificial womb
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: research pushes the comparison into another sensitive area. In 2017,
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: researchers reported an extrauterine system capable of supporting extremely premature
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: fetal lambs for periods reaching approximately four weeks inside a
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: fluid-filled environment designed to maintain oxygen exchange, physiological stability, and
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: conditions closer to fetal life than conventional neonatal ventilations. Headlines
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: quickly described the system as an artificial womb, although that
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: language can imply something the experiment did not accomplish. Researchers
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: did not begin with sperm and egg and conduct an
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: entire pregnancy outside the body. They began with an already
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 1: developing fetus and attempted to continue a portion of fetal
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: development outside the uterus, making terms such as partial ectogestation
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: or extrauterine fetal support more precise. Once the Paracelsian recipe
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: is sitting in the back of your mind, the comparison
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: is impossible to ignore. The pseudo-Paracelsian experiment imagines gestation reconstructed
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: through enclosure, reproductive material, warmth, nourishment, and controlled time. Modern
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 1: experimental medicine attempts to reproduce very specific physiological functions through
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: sterile fluid environments, circulation, oxygen exchange, nutrition, temperature regulation, infection control,
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: and continuous monitoring. One belongs to an impossible early modern
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 1: reproductive theory and the other to modern physiology, but they
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: share the question of whether the environment ordinarily supplied by
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: gestation can be separated into functions and reconstructed technologically. Modern
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: biology reveals why the older recipe never stood a chance.
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: A uterus was never simply a warm container. It would
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: be easy to end this history by declaring that ancient
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: magicians were primitive scientists who somehow predicted biotechnology. The surviving
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: evidence tells a different story. The Book of the Cow
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: did not contain embryology. Jabirian Taquin was not genetic engineering.
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: Gollum traditions were not computer programming. And the pseudo-paracelsian recipe
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: could never have produced a miniature human from semen, blood,
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: and warmth. Human development involves fertilization, cellular signaling, tissue formation,
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: placental exchange, and a remarkably complex interaction between an organism
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 1: and its environment. These are not minor details the alchemists overlooked.
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: They are the biological mechanisms the recipe did not possess.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: What persisted was the underlying question. How does living form arise?
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: And could a person learn enough about the conditions of
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: development to reproduce some part of the process deliberately? The
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: imagined answer varied enormously. Sometimes a little human was supposedly
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: concealed in reproductive material. Sometimes it emerged from a magical
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: vessel or root. Sometimes sacred letters animated a figure of Earth.
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 1: In Goethe, it became intelligence confined to glass. In neuroscience,
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: an exaggerated human figure represented the body's organization across the
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: cerebral cortex. In philosophy, a hidden observer inside the head
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: became a warning against explanations that quietly assumed the very
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: understanding they were supposed to account for. These were different
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 1: intellectual projects, not successive discoveries of the same creature. Modern
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: biology supplies an entirely different level of evidence. Researchers grow
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: cerebral organoids, reorganize living cells into xenobots and anthropobots, develop
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: stem cell-based models of limited embryonic processes, and experimentally support
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: already developing fetal animals outside the uterus. Such systems begin
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: with the living cells or living fetuses, and none is
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: a miniature artificial person. Yet each forces us to be
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: more precise about what researchers can manipulate. Genetic activity, chemical signals,
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: electrical states, mechanical forces, tissue geometry, nourishment, and developmental timing.
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: Scientists do not place a preformed little person inside a
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: vessel and wait for it to enlarge. They work with
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: biological systems whose capacities depend on the interaction of many parts.
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: This is also why the ethical questions have become more demanding.
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: If we can arrange conditions that allow living tissues to
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: organize themselves in unfamiliar ways, what moral responsibilities follow? The
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: answer depends on the specific organism or model, its capacities,
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: its developmental potential, and what the research actually establishes. It
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: cannot be settled by calling an organoid a mini-brain, a
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: cellular construct, a synthetic creature, or every form of artificial
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: gestation a homunculus. The alchemists imagine creation in the modern
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: laboratory are not scientifically continuous, but they confront a related
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: philosophical boundary. The difference between imitating conditions found in nature
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: and claiming to create the life those conditions support. Crowley's
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: magical child, the golem, Goethe's thinking flesh being, and Penfield's
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: cortical map each made that boundary mean something different. Exploring
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: those differences is more revealing than collapsing them into one
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: supernatural legend. After centuries of little men in grimoires, flasks,
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: sperm cells, paintings, and brain diagrams, we have not discovered
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: the secret person hidden inside nature. We have discovered increasingly
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: complicated systems that make that imagined person unnecessary. Yet the
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: old question remains, if we understand more and more of
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: the process through which living organization emerges, what does it
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: mean to say we have made something alive? And what
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: are we really trying to cure? And that's the end
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: of another Occult Rejects. And until the next one.