Latest / Blocked and Reported / Episode 294: What Ever Happened To Net Neutrality? Part 2
Transcript
- 0:12SPEAKER_03: Jessie,
- 0:12SPEAKER_03: so by the time people listen to this episode,
- 0:15we're going to know who won the first ever blocked and reported
- 0:18Super Bowl.
- 0:20SPEAKER_03: Who are you for?
- 0:21Someone pointed this out to me that I had not even thought of
- 0:23this because the idea
- 0:25of you watching a football game is like the idea of you
- 0:29treating me kindly.
- 0:30SPEAKER_01: It just doesn't go with Katie.
- 0:32SPEAKER_03: I am way more likely to watch a football game than to be nice to you.
- 0:35SPEAKER_01: Yeah, it's Seattle, New England.
- 0:37SPEAKER_01: I am actually an ardent New England Patriots fan.
- 0:39SPEAKER_01: I have been for decades.
- 0:40SPEAKER_01: You are?
- 0:41SPEAKER_01: Not my fault.
- 0:41SPEAKER_03: Really?
- 0:42SPEAKER_01: You knew this.
- 0:43SPEAKER_03: I have no idea.
- 0:45You've never watched a Seahawks game and you don't care about
- 0:46the Seahawks.
- 0:47SPEAKER_03: Not in person.
- 0:48SPEAKER_03: I have watched many a football game,
- 0:50or at least in part because I am related to men and boys and
- 0:56also a few women who
- 0:57SPEAKER_03: watch football.
- 0:59SPEAKER_03: So I did watch the last game.
- 1:01SPEAKER_01: NFC Championship.
- 1:02SPEAKER_03: Won the playoffs.
- 1:04SPEAKER_03: I did watch the one with the blue and yellow team.
- 1:07SPEAKER_01: The Rams.
- 1:09SPEAKER_03: Yes.
- 1:09SPEAKER_03: And I was very disappointed when the Seahawks won because,
- 1:13SPEAKER_03: one,
- 1:13SPEAKER_03: I hate their colors,
- 1:15SPEAKER_03: and two,
- 1:16SPEAKER_03: I hate Seattle.
- 1:17SPEAKER_03: So I'm for the Pats.
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: Really?
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: Just like that?
- 1:19SPEAKER_03: Well,
- 1:20SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 1:20SPEAKER_03: it's like I'm really torn on this because it's like on the one hand,
- 1:23SPEAKER_03: I want you to be unhappy,
- 1:24SPEAKER_03: but on the other hand,
- 1:24SPEAKER_03: I want all of Seattle to be unhappy.
- 1:26SPEAKER_03: So for me, it's a lose-lose either way.
- 1:28SPEAKER_01: But Seattle is going to be unhappy no matter what happens.
- 1:30SPEAKER_01: It's Seattle.
- 1:30SPEAKER_01: Although for that matter, so is New England.
- 1:32SPEAKER_01: That's a good point.
- 1:34SPEAKER_01: Not two particularly happy regions.
- 1:37SPEAKER_01: Sorry.
- 1:37SPEAKER_01: That's why I'm a Chiefs fan.
- 1:38SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 1:39SPEAKER_01: Well,
- 1:40SPEAKER_01: again,
- 1:41SPEAKER_01: we don't really know what to say here because the outcome,
- 1:43SPEAKER_01: by the time you hear our voice,
- 1:46SPEAKER_01: New England will have prevailed.
- 1:47Drake may have thrown for 500 yards,
- 1:48but I guess good luck to both teams or something.
- 1:51SPEAKER_01: Yeah, whatever.
- 1:52Before we get into part two,
- 1:55that's the part we're on of the net neutrality thing.
- 1:57SPEAKER_03: That's right.
- 1:57SPEAKER_03: Two of two.
- 1:58SPEAKER_03: This is the final one.
- 1:59SPEAKER_03: People are finally going to find out what happened with net neutrality.
- 2:02SPEAKER_01: Don't Google it.
- 2:05SPEAKER_01: No spoilers.
- 2:06SPEAKER_01: Before we get to that,
- 2:07SPEAKER_01: I have a very rare and weird thing,
- 2:09SPEAKER_01: which is I was involved in a missed connection.
- 2:12SPEAKER_03: No.
- 2:12SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 2:13SPEAKER_03: Can you believe that me?
- 2:14SPEAKER_03: Let me guess.
- 2:15SPEAKER_01: Little old me?
- 2:16SPEAKER_01: Oh, yeah.
- 2:16SPEAKER_01: You set the scene, what you think it is.
- 2:18SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 2:18SPEAKER_03: You were at a pizza shop.
- 2:20SPEAKER_03: Yep.
- 2:21Grease dripping down your face,
- 2:23beard covered in sauce,
- 2:25and somebody saw you.
- 2:26SPEAKER_01: Sauce if we're lucky.
- 2:27SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 2:27SPEAKER_03: And somebody saw you and was like, why is that disabled man?
- 2:31SPEAKER_03: Dang.
- 2:33SPEAKER_03: I'm not saying it.
- 2:34SPEAKER_03: Why is that disabled man allowed into this piece?
- 2:37SPEAKER_03: Somebody find his mother.
- 2:38SPEAKER_03: Somebody find his helper.
- 2:40SPEAKER_03: Was that it?
- 2:40SPEAKER_01: Wait, where's the misconnection?
- 2:42It was the person trying to...
- 2:43It was more like an Amber Alert than a misconnection.
- 2:46SPEAKER_01: Okay, I'm not sure you know what a misconnection is.
- 2:49SPEAKER_01: Okay, this was actually at the Bar Pod Gathering in LA on January 31st.
- 2:55SPEAKER_03: Oh, wait, wait, wait.
- 2:56SPEAKER_03: Before you do this, it's more important.
- 2:57SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 2:58SPEAKER_01: How was the sandwich?
- 2:59SPEAKER_01: Oh, my God.
- 3:01SPEAKER_01: It's so good.
- 3:01SPEAKER_01: It was so good.
- 3:02SPEAKER_01: I tried to get it again.
- 3:03SPEAKER_01: The timing didn't work out.
- 3:04SPEAKER_01: But the first thing I did when I got to L.A.
- 3:06SPEAKER_01: is I went to Dune.
- 3:07SPEAKER_01: I was staying in Atwater Village.
- 3:08SPEAKER_01: I went to Dune.
- 3:09SPEAKER_01: And listeners already know this because,
- 3:11SPEAKER_01: as I've said before,
- 3:12SPEAKER_01: this was the most excited I've ever been about anything –
- 3:15SPEAKER_01: Pickled beet sandwich from Dune with the Bulgarian,
- 3:18SPEAKER_01: Katie,
- 3:19SPEAKER_01: don't fuck this up,
- 3:20SPEAKER_01: the Bulgarian sheep's milk feta and whatever else.
- 3:24SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 3:24SPEAKER_03: Thank God it was Bulgarian.
- 3:26SPEAKER_03: I thought maybe it was Greek.
- 3:26SPEAKER_01: It was like Macedonia, but just slap it out of their hand.
- 3:29SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 3:30SPEAKER_03: Back to you.
- 3:30SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 3:31SPEAKER_01: So the event was great.
- 3:32We were at a place called the Hermosillo in Highland Park on
- 3:36Saturday,
- 3:37January 31st.
- 3:38SPEAKER_01: And so I go – I greet everyone in the back.
- 3:40I go to the bar to get a drink and this woman comes up to me
- 3:44and she sort of leans
- 3:45SPEAKER_01: into me in this way I'm not used to.
- 3:47SPEAKER_01: I don't get like hit on aggressively in public usually.
- 3:50SPEAKER_01: And she points to a projector that's sitting there.
- 3:53It's like an overhead projector you'd use in a school setting
- 3:56that the bar has as
- 3:56SPEAKER_01: part of its decor.
- 3:57SPEAKER_01: And she asked me about it.
- 3:59SPEAKER_01: And I'm sort of like taking a back.
- 4:00SPEAKER_03: Because she saw you and she was like, you are the tech guy.
- 4:05SPEAKER_01: She was the bartender.
- 4:06SPEAKER_01: She's like, can you fix this?
- 4:08And she like sort of leans into me and she's like awkward,
- 4:12but she's like tall and pretty.
- 4:13SPEAKER_01: And I'm like a little bit taken aback.
- 4:15SPEAKER_01: And I assume,
- 4:17because why else would anybody come up and talk to me that
- 4:19she's with the bar pod
- 4:20SPEAKER_01: group?
- 4:21SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 4:21SPEAKER_01: And I don't fully engage because I'm trying to order my drink.
- 4:24SPEAKER_01: I'm trying to juggle stuff.
- 4:25I'm like,
- 4:25when I go to the back of my drink,
- 4:27I'll talk to this woman,
- 4:28this tall woman.
- 4:30SPEAKER_01: I never see her again.
- 4:31SPEAKER_01: She just disappears.
- 4:32SPEAKER_03: So not with a crew.
- 4:34SPEAKER_01: Not with a crew.
- 4:35SPEAKER_01: And that's the whole story.
- 4:36SPEAKER_01: So I need someone to find the woman.
- 4:37SPEAKER_01: Oh, wait.
- 4:38SPEAKER_01: That's it.
- 4:39SPEAKER_01: That's it?
- 4:39SPEAKER_01: Hold on.
- 4:40SPEAKER_01: Hold on.
- 4:40SPEAKER_01: This is not what I thought at all.
- 4:42SPEAKER_01: Saturday.
- 4:44SPEAKER_01: I'm only doing this.
- 4:46SPEAKER_01: First of all,
- 4:46SPEAKER_01: also,
- 4:46this could just be a drunk and or spectrum-y person with no
- 4:49sense of personal
- 4:50SPEAKER_01: boundaries.
- 4:50SPEAKER_03: Likely.
- 4:51But if you know a tall woman who talked to me on January 31st
- 4:58at the Hermosillo in
- 4:59SPEAKER_01: Highland Park,
- 5:00SPEAKER_01: send her my way.
- 5:01SPEAKER_01: I have no real further description of her because I can't picture faces.
- 5:04SPEAKER_03: Okay,
- 5:05SPEAKER_03: so you said,
- 5:06SPEAKER_03: to set this up,
- 5:07SPEAKER_03: you said you were a part of a misconnection,
- 5:09SPEAKER_03: which made me think that someone left a misconnection for you somewhere.
- 5:14SPEAKER_01: No, oh, no, no.
- 5:15SPEAKER_01: This woman has no idea.
- 5:16SPEAKER_01: There is no way this woman has any memory of this event either.
- 5:20SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 5:21SPEAKER_03: Well, okay.
- 5:22SPEAKER_01: It was just, I don't know, man.
- 5:23SPEAKER_01: You can understand how I assume she was with the bar pod group.
- 5:25SPEAKER_01: Oh, if she was talking to you.
- 5:26SPEAKER_01: The bar pod group, however, was lovely.
- 5:28SPEAKER_01: And we had some very good conversations about various things.
- 5:31SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 5:31SPEAKER_03: So if anyone knows any tall women in LA.
- 5:34SPEAKER_01: Tall women.
- 5:35SPEAKER_01: If you know any tall woman in LA, I think she had dirty blonde hair.
- 5:38SPEAKER_01: This will narrow it down.
- 5:39SPEAKER_01: Tall LA, dirty blonde hair, attractive.
- 5:43SPEAKER_01: Possibly blind.
- 5:44SPEAKER_01: That's probably like only five or 10 women.
- 5:47SPEAKER_01: Probably blind or otherwise disabled.
- 5:51SPEAKER_03: I didn't see a wheelchair, but... It was a tall one.
- 5:53SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 5:54SPEAKER_03: Well, good luck, Jesse.
- 5:56SPEAKER_03: Good luck.
- 5:56SPEAKER_01: On to the arguably more important subject of net neutrality, part two.
- 6:01SPEAKER_03: So yes, this is part two of our series on net neutrality.
- 6:04SPEAKER_03: And yes,
- 6:05SPEAKER_03: we know there is a lot else going on in the world,
- 6:08but I think it's more important to explain the nuances of this
- 6:11decade-old policy
- 6:13SPEAKER_03: story than to talk about,
- 6:14SPEAKER_03: like,
- 6:14SPEAKER_03: I don't know.
- 6:15SPEAKER_01: Well, but...
- 6:16SPEAKER_01: You say there's other stuff going on in the world.
- 6:17SPEAKER_01: My internet tubes got clogged up by big tech,
- 6:20SPEAKER_01: so I can't even download video of it because there's no net neutrality.
- 6:23SPEAKER_03: Yes, I'm sure that happened, yes.
- 6:24This is why the misconnection isn't going to work for you is
- 6:27because there's no net neutrality.
- 6:29SPEAKER_01: Her tubes are clogged.
- 6:31So people might be expecting us to talk about Jeff Epstein and
- 6:34his emails or the
- 6:36SPEAKER_03: latest developments.
- 6:38in the race to replace ourselves with AI bots or whatever's
- 6:40happening with Will Stancil.
- 6:42SPEAKER_03: Not here.
- 6:43If you do want to hear us talk about those things,
- 6:44you can check out our latest Prima episode.
- 6:45SPEAKER_03: But today we are going back to net neutrality.
- 6:48SPEAKER_03: Before we get to the new stuff, I do have a few corrections.
- 6:50SPEAKER_03: Fewer than I thought.
- 6:51I thought there would be the whole show is going to be
- 6:53corrections on this one just
- 6:54SPEAKER_03: because it's so complex.
- 6:55SPEAKER_01: I think the Vegas over under on number of corrections,
- 6:59SPEAKER_01: no offense,
- 7:00SPEAKER_01: but you doing a tech heavy story was like nine and a half.
- 7:03SPEAKER_01: Is it under nine and a half?
- 7:04SPEAKER_03: It's three.
- 7:05SPEAKER_01: Damn it.
- 7:05SPEAKER_01: I had the over.
- 7:06SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 7:06SPEAKER_03: I think it's pretty good.
- 7:07SPEAKER_03: And they're small.
- 7:08SPEAKER_03: So yeah,
- 7:09I figured I thought I was going to get flooded with emails
- 7:11about how I like flubbed
- 7:12SPEAKER_03: the explanation of peering,
- 7:14SPEAKER_03: whatever that is.
- 7:15The only real corrections I got were A,
- 7:18one,
- 7:19Tim was at Columbia,
- 7:20not Harvard.
- 7:21SPEAKER_03: AT&T was a de facto monopoly by 1913.
- 7:23SPEAKER_03: I think I said the 1930s.
- 7:26SPEAKER_03: And John Oliver is apparently not short.
- 7:30SPEAKER_03: Huge shock there.
- 7:32SPEAKER_03: Jeff Maurer says that he's six feet,
- 7:34which I do have a hard time believing because he is British and
- 7:37John Oliver.
- 7:38SPEAKER_03: But it does explain a bit more about how he got the pretty wife.
- 7:42One of the first things one of the listeners said to me in the
- 7:45backyard at the
- 7:46SPEAKER_01: Hermosillo was,
- 7:48SPEAKER_01: you're skinnier than I thought you would be.
- 7:50SPEAKER_03: You do sound like a short, fat man.
- 7:52SPEAKER_01: No, I sound like a short, fat woman.
- 7:53Other people have said they were surprised I was a man when
- 7:56they met me with
- 7:57SPEAKER_01: testosterone issues.
- 7:58SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 7:58SPEAKER_03: So apologies to Tim Wu, AT&T, and John Oliver.
- 8:03SPEAKER_03: We stand corrected.
- 8:04There was some good discussion about the episode on our Substack
- 8:07page.
- 8:07SPEAKER_03: It turns out that a number of our listeners know a lot about this issue,
- 8:11and some of them even worked on policy or in big cable when
- 8:16this was happening.
- 8:17SPEAKER_03: So there were some interesting insights there.
- 8:19SPEAKER_03: One guy in particular, he says he worked in telecom.
- 8:22SPEAKER_03: I'm just going to take his word for it.
- 8:24SPEAKER_03: He said that net neutrality sounds good in theory,
- 8:27SPEAKER_03: but if ISPs weren't able to manage and prioritize some traffic,
- 8:31SPEAKER_03: basically throttle some people and not other,
- 8:33then Netflix would start glitching out on Friday nights when
- 8:36millions of teenagers
- 8:37SPEAKER_03: are busy checking out Pornhub's latest offerings.
- 8:40So he was basically saying that customers would actually hate
- 8:43true net neutrality if
- 8:44SPEAKER_03: if ISPs weren't allowed to manage traffic at all.
- 8:46SPEAKER_03: So good discussion on the Substack page.
- 8:48SPEAKER_03: This is always a good place for people who want to discuss the episodes.
- 8:51SPEAKER_03: That's a perk for our primos, by the way.
- 8:54And speaking of primos,
- 8:55reminder to everyone,
- 8:57personals are due by February 10th.
- 9:00You can look at our Substack page to get the link to submit your
- 9:02personal.
- 9:03And we also have a special treat this year for our bonus
- 9:06Valentine's episode.
- 9:07SPEAKER_03: It's a surprise.
- 9:09SPEAKER_01: It's a good surprise.
- 9:09SPEAKER_01: I can vouch for that.
- 9:10SPEAKER_03: Yes, this is going to be fun.
- 9:12SPEAKER_03: All right, Jesse, let's get to part two.
- 9:13SPEAKER_01: Wait,
- 9:14SPEAKER_01: one thing though,
- 9:14SPEAKER_01: someone at the meetup said that I had said,
- 9:18SPEAKER_01: where did we put the thing to submit your personals?
- 9:22It's on the subs,
- 9:23it's blocked and reported.org and it's pinned to the page.
- 9:25SPEAKER_03: And then there's a Google form within that.
- 9:28SPEAKER_01: Plus personals are back, baby.
- 9:30SPEAKER_01: That's where they want to click.
- 9:31SPEAKER_03: Yes.
- 9:32SPEAKER_01: Submit your personal idea.
- 9:33SPEAKER_01: Okay, cool.
- 9:33SPEAKER_01: Yeah, let's get to it.
- 9:34SPEAKER_03: It's been a week.
- 9:36SPEAKER_03: I would like you to sum up part one.
- 9:38SPEAKER_03: Do not use notes.
- 9:39SPEAKER_01: OK,
- 9:39SPEAKER_01: so this concerned,
- 9:42SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 9:42just the question of whether the big players would be able to
- 9:45control the Internet
- 9:46and offer greater speeds than the upstarts and the ma and pop
- 9:50Internet content
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: providers.
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: So in the 90s,
- 9:53legislators had decided to not treat Internet service providers
- 9:59as common carriers.
- 10:00SPEAKER_01: Common carriers are that's what phone companies are, right?
- 10:03SPEAKER_03: Yep, it's a utility.
- 10:04SPEAKER_01: It's a utility.
- 10:05SPEAKER_03: And these are heavily regulated.
- 10:07SPEAKER_03: So in the 90s,
- 10:08SPEAKER_03: Bill Clinton in Congress was like,
- 10:09SPEAKER_03: light touch regulation,
- 10:11SPEAKER_03: the internet will flourish without the heavy hand of the government.
- 10:14SPEAKER_01: Yes, absolutely.
- 10:15SPEAKER_01: And in the early 2000s,
- 10:16SPEAKER_01: Tim Wu,
- 10:17SPEAKER_01: this internet scholar who wrote a very good book about attention,
- 10:21wrote – he coined the term net neutrality and he argued that
- 10:26ISP shouldn't be
- 10:26SPEAKER_01: allowed to discriminate,
- 10:28SPEAKER_01: that we should have a fully open internet.
- 10:31SPEAKER_01: And the FCC agreed to like –
- 10:35have voluntarily have isps voluntarily comply with that so net
- 10:40neutrality was sort
- 10:41of the norm but not via regulation right yeah yeah basically
- 10:46okay and then a few
- 10:46years later comcast throttles bit torrent which was this
- 10:51service used to download
- 10:52like movies and games totally i'm sure none of those were
- 10:55instances of piracy or
- 10:57copyright infringement if memory serves that was what woo had
- 11:00warned against to
- 11:01Because,
- 11:02you know,
- 11:03Comcast is throttling one particular type of internet traffic.
- 11:06SPEAKER_01: That was exactly what Wu had warned against,
- 11:07because Comcast is discriminating and throttling one particular
- 11:10type of internet
- 11:12SPEAKER_01: content.
- 11:12SPEAKER_01: I think that's what it's called.
- 11:14SPEAKER_01: In the early 2010s,
- 11:15we had the Arab Spring activists realized they could harness
- 11:20the internet to change
- 11:21SPEAKER_01: public policy.
- 11:23SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 11:23SPEAKER_03: So in addition to the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall Street,
- 11:26SPEAKER_03: there were fights against SOPA and PIPA,
- 11:29which were these twin pieces of legislation that were pushed by
- 11:33the recording
- 11:33SPEAKER_03: industry,
- 11:34SPEAKER_03: the motion picture industry,
- 11:35SPEAKER_03: basically enhanced copyright laws.
- 11:38And internet activists very successfully made these sort of the
- 11:41cause du jour.
- 11:43SPEAKER_03: And these tech companies...
- 11:45SPEAKER_03: Companies like Wikipedia,
- 11:46SPEAKER_03: Reddit,
- 11:47they actually blacked out for a day in 2012 to encourage their
- 11:51users to contact
- 11:53SPEAKER_03: their congresspeople and make their voices heard.
- 11:55So they really effectively were sort of harnessing the power of
- 11:59the internet to get
- 12:00SPEAKER_03: people motivated.
- 12:01SPEAKER_01: And John Oliver played a role in this as well, right?
- 12:03SPEAKER_03: Yes, John Oliver played a very big role in this.
- 12:06SPEAKER_03: He did an episode in 2014 about net neutrality.
- 12:10SPEAKER_03: Unfortunately, got a few things wrong.
- 12:12SPEAKER_03: Just a few little things.
- 12:13SPEAKER_03: As we explained last week,
- 12:14the question at the FCC at the time was not if the FCC should
- 12:19end net neutrality.
- 12:20SPEAKER_03: It was whether they should codify it.
- 12:21SPEAKER_03: John Oliver got that wrong.
- 12:23SPEAKER_03: That little mistake aside, his segment went extremely viral.
- 12:27SPEAKER_03: And this was in part thanks to the media.
- 12:29SPEAKER_03: So this was the very beginning of last week tonight.
- 12:31SPEAKER_03: This was their first really big hit.
- 12:34SPEAKER_03: But for many years after this,
- 12:36SPEAKER_03: Every time John Oliver would do a show on Monday morning,
- 12:39content slop writers would watch last week tonight clips on
- 12:43YouTube because they
- 12:44SPEAKER_03: couldn't afford HBO or the entire show.
- 12:46They would put the whole show on YouTube and then write short
- 12:49blog posts about how
- 12:51John Oliver destroyed the FCC or destroyed transphobe or
- 12:54destroyed Donald Trump and
- 12:56SPEAKER_03: shit like that.
- 12:57SPEAKER_03: And I wrote many of those posts myself.
- 12:59SPEAKER_03: Did you were you ever in those particular content minds?
- 13:01SPEAKER_01: Oh, I'm sure at some point I wrote something along those lines.
- 13:04SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 13:04SPEAKER_03: It was very cheap and easy content and it played to the...
- 13:06SPEAKER_03: Well,
- 13:06SPEAKER_01: just because like they're idiots.
- 13:08SPEAKER_01: Like they're out there.
- 13:09SPEAKER_01: You mean the writers?
- 13:09SPEAKER_01: There's other people in the country.
- 13:11SPEAKER_01: No.
- 13:11SPEAKER_01: I was.
- 13:12SPEAKER_01: It's true.
- 13:12America is full of dumb idiots and we needed John Oliver to
- 13:16explain how they were
- 13:17SPEAKER_01: idiots and we needed to help spread the word that they were so dumb.
- 13:20SPEAKER_01: The people.
- 13:20SPEAKER_03: Do you think it's the accent?
- 13:22Do you think it would have worked if he had just like a New
- 13:25Jersey accent?
- 13:26SPEAKER_01: Absolutely not.
- 13:27SPEAKER_03: So that content,
- 13:28SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 13:28it played to the audience's preferences and posts like that
- 13:32would sometimes go
- 13:33SPEAKER_03: viral or at least get lots of likes on Facebook.
- 13:36And the fact that Last Week Tonight put entire segments on
- 13:39YouTube was really smart
- 13:40SPEAKER_03: because,
- 13:41SPEAKER_03: yes,
- 13:41SPEAKER_03: people got their content for free,
- 13:43SPEAKER_03: but it spread like wildfire.
- 13:45SPEAKER_03: So within two days of that net neutrality episode airing in 2014,
- 13:48the segment had 800,000 views on YouTube and the FCC was
- 13:52flooded with comments from
- 13:53SPEAKER_03: outraged viewers and
- 13:55SPEAKER_03: The FCC's online commenting system got nearly 45,000 comments.
- 13:59SPEAKER_03: It actually crashed.
- 14:01SPEAKER_03: That led to even more headlines and more comments.
- 14:03SPEAKER_03: But the funny thing is,
- 14:03SPEAKER_03: so friend of the pod,
- 14:04SPEAKER_03: Jeff Maurer,
- 14:05SPEAKER_03: he was actually,
- 14:06SPEAKER_03: he was a writer last week tonight.
- 14:07SPEAKER_03: He's been on this show before.
- 14:08SPEAKER_03: He was there at the time.
- 14:10And he told me that they later found out that the FCC website
- 14:13was just really
- 14:14SPEAKER_03: shitty and it crashed all the time.
- 14:16SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 14:16SPEAKER_03: So it might not have had anything to do with these comments.
- 14:19SPEAKER_03: But still, even more attention.
- 14:21SPEAKER_03: And everyone hated Big Cable for good reason.
- 14:23SPEAKER_03: They did suck.
- 14:24SPEAKER_03: They do suck.
- 14:25SPEAKER_03: And everyone wanted open internet.
- 14:26SPEAKER_03: So this was an obvious cause to get behind.
- 14:29SPEAKER_03: And all you had to do was email the FCC, send them a form letter.
- 14:31So it's much easier than coming up with a clever slogan for
- 14:34your protest sign.
- 14:35And net neutrality is specifically difficult to make a clever
- 14:38protest sign.
- 14:39SPEAKER_03: I mean, what the fuck rhymes with it?
- 14:41And did Jeff realize like that there were some perhaps factual
- 14:45issues with the way
- 14:46SPEAKER_01: they covered net neutrality?
- 14:48SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 14:48SPEAKER_03: So I asked him that.
- 14:49SPEAKER_03: And he said at the time, this is what he said in an email.
- 14:52SPEAKER_03: Oh, God, no.
- 14:52SPEAKER_03: People really kissed our asses at the time.
- 14:55SPEAKER_03: Said we were doing essential and important work in the years since,
- 14:58especially because the net neutrality switch has been flipped
- 15:01on and off and back
- 15:01SPEAKER_03: on again.
- 15:02SPEAKER_03: And it didn't seem to make much difference.
- 15:04SPEAKER_03: It's clear that we didn't portray things accurately.
- 15:06SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 15:07SPEAKER_03: The thing is,
- 15:08very few reporters or critics were knowledgeable about this
- 15:12issue to see what were
- 15:14SPEAKER_03: the problems with Oliver's segment.
- 15:17SPEAKER_01: Wait,
- 15:17so you're saying this was a situation where John Oliver did a
- 15:21long segment on a
- 15:22SPEAKER_01: complex issue and he got stuff wrong,
- 15:25but there weren't a lot of journalists who were in a position
- 15:27to be able to tell
- 15:27SPEAKER_01: how he got them wrong?
- 15:28SPEAKER_03: That's what I'm saying, Jesse.
- 15:29SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 15:30SPEAKER_01: Huh.
- 15:30It seems like that probably could have only happened like once,
- 15:32not multiple.
- 15:33SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 15:33SPEAKER_01: Anyway.
- 15:34SPEAKER_03: So there was one journalist who did understand the issue.
- 15:37SPEAKER_03: His name is John Healy.
- 15:38SPEAKER_03: He was at the LA Times.
- 15:40He wrote a piece called John Oliver finds humor and net
- 15:42neutrality,
- 15:43but loses the facts.
- 15:44SPEAKER_03: Let me read you a bit of that.
- 15:45SPEAKER_03: There was a grain of truth to his narrative,
- 15:48SPEAKER_03: but Oliver misled his audience badly on a couple of key points.
- 15:51SPEAKER_03: And then he explained the actual FCC proposal at hand,
- 15:54SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 15:54SPEAKER_03: reclassifying broadband as a common carrier and
- 15:58SPEAKER_03: And Healy writes, details, details, details.
- 16:01What you think about net neutrality and the FCC's proposed rule
- 16:04depends in large
- 16:04SPEAKER_03: measure on how hard you want to stick it to the cable companies.
- 16:07SPEAKER_03: And hey, who doesn't despise them and their abysmal customer service?
- 16:10One sure way to get people interested in a mind-numbingly
- 16:13complex public policy
- 16:15SPEAKER_03: issue is to characterize it as a favor to the evil cable guys.
- 16:18SPEAKER_03: So that's how Oliver played it.
- 16:20SPEAKER_03: Of course, this article did not go viral.
- 16:23It's lucky he wrote that before Blue Sky existed because he
- 16:25would be probably dead now.
- 16:27SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 16:27SPEAKER_03: John Oliver destroys John Healy.
- 16:30SPEAKER_03: So after the Oliver episode aired,
- 16:33internet advocacy groups like Fight for the Future and Free
- 16:35Press seized the
- 16:36SPEAKER_03: moment.
- 16:37SPEAKER_03: They organized an internet slowdown day.
- 16:39SPEAKER_03: It was to be held in September 2014.
- 16:41SPEAKER_03: They had a coalition named Battle for the Net.
- 16:45SPEAKER_03: And this was basically a redo of the SOPA PIPA blackout of 2012.
- 16:48SPEAKER_03: We talked about that in the last episode.
- 16:50This was when parts of the internet went dark in protest
- 16:53against those two bills.
- 16:54SPEAKER_03: So for internet slowdown day,
- 16:56SPEAKER_03: participating sites displayed the loading symbol,
- 16:59SPEAKER_03: so that spinning wheel of death,
- 17:00SPEAKER_03: they put that on their homepage,
- 17:02SPEAKER_03: and they asked users to send comments to the FCC,
- 17:05SPEAKER_03: to Congress,
- 17:06SPEAKER_03: to the White House.
- 17:07SPEAKER_03: And throughout the summer and into the fall of 2014, that coalition grew.
- 17:11SPEAKER_03: So Netflix, Vimeo, Imgur, Tumblr, Dig, Reddit, they all took the lead.
- 17:16SPEAKER_03: Colleges and libraries got involved in the fight,
- 17:18which is sort of funny because many colleges and libraries
- 17:22explicitly block
- 17:23SPEAKER_03: torrents and specific websites on their networks,
- 17:26SPEAKER_03: so they were fighting for an open internet for the but not for me.
- 17:30But all this attention generated even more public comments
- 17:33directed to the FCC,
- 17:34SPEAKER_03: and by the time the public comment period ended,
- 17:37SPEAKER_03: they had received nearly 3.7 million comments from the public,
- 17:41SPEAKER_03: more than they ever had on any other issue.
- 17:43SPEAKER_01: And I'm guessing these were mostly pro net neutrality.
- 17:46SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 17:46So the Sunlight Foundation conducted an analysis of the first
- 17:49batch of 800,000 comments.
- 17:52SPEAKER_03: Those were released by the FCC.
- 17:53And they found that 99% of those comments were in favor of net
- 17:56neutrality.
- 17:57They also found that at least 60% of those 800,000 comments
- 18:01were from form letters
- 18:02SPEAKER_03: written by organized campaigns.
- 18:04SPEAKER_03: So that report was released in September 2014.
- 18:07And then three months later,
- 18:08the Sunlight Foundation released another report.
- 18:11SPEAKER_03: And this one looked at the next batch of comments.
- 18:13SPEAKER_03: This was around 1.6 million.
- 18:15SPEAKER_03: And they found something very surprising.
- 18:16SPEAKER_03: So first batch, 99% in favor of net neutrality.
- 18:20SPEAKER_03: And the second batch, 40% were in favor of net neutrality.
- 18:24SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 18:25SPEAKER_01: What changed in the interim?
- 18:26SPEAKER_03: Conservatives got involved.
- 18:28SPEAKER_03: So there was a group called- Well, that's not legitimate.
- 18:30SPEAKER_01: They're not allowed to organize.
- 18:32SPEAKER_01: If conservative groups organize to get people to write,
- 18:36SPEAKER_01: send in form letters,
- 18:37SPEAKER_01: that's not legitimate.
- 18:38SPEAKER_01: That's a conspiracy.
- 18:38SPEAKER_01: Exactly.
- 18:39SPEAKER_03: So there was a group called American Commitment.
- 18:41Okay,
- 18:42that does sound either made up or like the name of a romantic
- 18:45dramedy.
- 18:46SPEAKER_03: So they started their own campaign against net neutrality.
- 18:49SPEAKER_03: Here's how the Sunlight Foundation put it.
- 18:50SPEAKER_03: Quote,
- 18:51A letter-writing campaign that appears to have been organized
- 18:54by a shadowy
- 18:55organization with ties to the Koch brothers inundated the
- 18:58Federal Communications
- 18:59SPEAKER_03: Commission with missives opposed to net neutrality.
- 19:02SPEAKER_03: An analysis of the Sunlight Foundation reveals.
- 19:04SPEAKER_03: This is so funny to me because the Sunlight Foundation,
- 19:06SPEAKER_03: they did not apparently have any issues with letter-writing campaigns,
- 19:10SPEAKER_03: organized letter-writing campaigns,
- 19:12SPEAKER_03: when they were coming from the pro-net neutrality side.
- 19:15SPEAKER_03: But now it was an issue.
- 19:16SPEAKER_01: Well, now it's shadowy.
- 19:17SPEAKER_01: I mean, I guess they would say that, like... It's shadowy.
- 19:21SPEAKER_01: If people get – yeah,
- 19:22I don't – I mean this is – this tendency I think has gotten
- 19:27worse to like pretend –
- 19:29SPEAKER_01: I'm trying to steelman it.
- 19:31If John Oliver like in the guise of a consumer activist gets
- 19:34people riled up about
- 19:35SPEAKER_01: that,
- 19:35SPEAKER_01: that is a little bit different from like AstroTurf stuff from –
- 19:39SPEAKER_01: But like there were liberal advocacy groups involved in this, too.
- 19:43SPEAKER_01: So it's not clear exactly what the difference is.
- 19:44SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 19:45a huge percentage of these letters were form letters organized
- 19:49by net neutrality
- 19:51SPEAKER_03: campaigns.
- 19:52SPEAKER_03: That was true in the first batch.
- 19:53SPEAKER_03: That was true in the second batch.
- 19:56SPEAKER_03: And this ties to the Koch brothers.
- 19:57SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 20:00SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 20:00SPEAKER_03: I don't know that you see this as much anymore,
- 20:02SPEAKER_03: maybe because one of the Koch brothers is dead.
- 20:04SPEAKER_03: But in this period, this was very common in progressive media.
- 20:08I am sure I am just as guilty as using Koch brothers as a slur
- 20:13as any other outlet
- 20:15SPEAKER_03: when I worked at places like Grist.
- 20:17SPEAKER_03: The Koch brothers were a symbol of evil.
- 20:19SPEAKER_03: It was like the Soros Foundation is a symbol of evil on the right.
- 20:24SPEAKER_03: If you are Koch brothers affiliated, you must be bad.
- 20:26SPEAKER_03: And I always find that amusing now because,
- 20:29SPEAKER_03: yes,
- 20:29SPEAKER_03: the Koch brothers or brother now,
- 20:31SPEAKER_03: they fund a lot of conservative and libertarian groups.
- 20:33SPEAKER_03: They are unabashedly capitalist,
- 20:35SPEAKER_03: but they also fund Lincoln Center,
- 20:37SPEAKER_03: the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
- 20:38SPEAKER_03: David Koch gave millions of dollars to PBS,
- 20:41SPEAKER_03: but you don't really hear PBS referred to as Koch funded.
- 20:45SPEAKER_03: It's only invoked if you want to discredit the cause itself.
- 20:48SPEAKER_01: Yeah,
- 20:48SPEAKER_01: and I think most notably,
- 20:49I think they do a lot of sort of anti-drug war stuff that a lot
- 20:53of leftists would
- 20:54SPEAKER_01: be in favor of.
- 20:55SPEAKER_03: Anyway,
- 20:56so American Commitment was one of a handful of groups that
- 20:59didn't want ISPs
- 21:01SPEAKER_03: reclassified.
- 21:02SPEAKER_03: Now, obviously, the ISPs themselves were opposed to reclassification.
- 21:06SPEAKER_03: The National Cable and Telecommunications Association,
- 21:09SPEAKER_03: they were donors to American Commitment,
- 21:11SPEAKER_03: and their members included companies like Comcast,
- 21:14SPEAKER_03: Charter,
- 21:14SPEAKER_03: Cox,
- 21:15SPEAKER_03: other internet providers.
- 21:16SPEAKER_03: Cox, by the way, this is the family of Fergie Chambers.
- 21:18SPEAKER_03: That's where he gets his allowance.
- 21:20SPEAKER_01: Nice.
- 21:20SPEAKER_03: So this is to be expected, right?
- 21:22SPEAKER_03: Corporate interests.
- 21:23SPEAKER_03: But the coalition was actually broader than you might imagine.
- 21:26SPEAKER_03: So on the last episode, I mentioned Danny Kimball.
- 21:29He wrote a book called Net Neutrality in the Battle for the
- 21:31Open Internet.
- 21:32Then he wrote that other groups that opposed the net neutrality
- 21:34effort included the
- 21:35SPEAKER_03: NAACP,
- 21:36SPEAKER_03: the National Urban League,
- 21:38SPEAKER_03: League of United Latin American Citizens,
- 21:40SPEAKER_03: the Rainbow Push Coalition,
- 21:42and most of the Congressional Black Caucus and the
- 21:44Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
- 21:46SPEAKER_03: They all lobbied against broadband being reclassified.
- 21:49SPEAKER_01: That's interesting.
- 21:50SPEAKER_01: Why were these groups opposed to such regulation?
- 21:54SPEAKER_03: I want you to guess, Jesse.
- 21:56SPEAKER_01: Jesse Jackson wanted to start... His own cable company?
- 22:03SPEAKER_03: Okay, so it was money.
- 22:05SPEAKER_03: Kimball writes that some of these groups received,
- 22:07SPEAKER_03: quote,
- 22:07millions of dollars from broadband providers during the net
- 22:10neutrality fight in the
- 22:11SPEAKER_03: form of donations,
- 22:12SPEAKER_03: contributions,
- 22:13SPEAKER_03: sponsorships,
- 22:14SPEAKER_03: and funding for community initiatives.
- 22:16SPEAKER_03: Civil rights groups were really split on this.
- 22:18SPEAKER_03: So the more grassroots group tended to be pro-net neutrality.
- 22:21They viewed internet service providers as gatekeepers without
- 22:25net neutrality.
- 22:26They might block or throttle content from activist
- 22:28organizations,
- 22:29independent media,
- 22:30et cetera.
- 22:31SPEAKER_03: The older,
- 22:32more established groups tended to be against it because they
- 22:35argued that regulation
- 22:36SPEAKER_03: could discourage broadband investment in underserved communities.
- 22:40SPEAKER_03: Now, was this a genuine concern or a pretext?
- 22:42SPEAKER_03: I don't know.
- 22:43SPEAKER_03: But telecom companies were giving these groups a lot of money.
- 22:46Did the flood of comments the FCC got,
- 22:49did that affect their decision making at all?
- 22:52SPEAKER_03: So not officially.
- 22:53SPEAKER_03: Federal agencies aren't required to take public comment into account.
- 22:57SPEAKER_03: And remember,
- 22:58SPEAKER_03: Comments were split thanks to this conservative letter writing campaign.
- 23:01But in November 2014,
- 23:03someone else did weigh in,
- 23:05then President Barack Obama.
- 23:07SPEAKER_03: And this was very unexpected.
- 23:08SPEAKER_01: Why was it unexpected?
- 23:10SPEAKER_01: I mean, I would imagine he was prone to neutrality.
- 23:12SPEAKER_01: So why is it unexpected for him to weigh in?
- 23:13So it's not illegal for presidents to weigh in on FCC
- 23:17proposals,
- 23:18but it's very rare.
- 23:20So the commissioners are appointed by the president,
- 23:23but the FCC is an independent agency.
- 23:26And unlike other agencies,
- 23:28commissioners do not serve at the pleasure of the president.
- 23:30SPEAKER_01: OK.
- 23:31SPEAKER_01: I can explain the rest of this.
- 23:32SPEAKER_01: So you know how back in the day Obama wearing a tan suit was a scandal?
- 23:37SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 23:38SPEAKER_01: Because it was unbecoming of the office?
- 23:39So you're pointing back to a much quainer time when people took
- 23:42things like the
- 23:44SPEAKER_01: independence of the FCC seriously.
- 23:45So people – versus the era of Brandon Carr where the FCC is a
- 23:49branch of Mar-a-Lago basically.
- 23:52SPEAKER_00: Yes.
- 23:54SPEAKER_01: So at the time,
- 23:54SPEAKER_01: I'm sure a lot of conservatives were outraged that President,
- 23:58SPEAKER_01: conservatives who now support Trump,
- 23:59SPEAKER_01: were outraged that Obama overstepped boundaries by weighing in on this.
- 24:04SPEAKER_03: I mean, not even just conservatives.
- 24:06SPEAKER_03: Democrats were also very surprised by this because it was so rare.
- 24:10SPEAKER_01: A lot of people catching the vapors on faking couches.
- 24:13And so the Wall Street Journal did some reporting on this later
- 24:16and explained what happened.
- 24:17SPEAKER_03: And basically,
- 24:18SPEAKER_03: the story is that Obama aides were meeting with companies like Etsy,
- 24:21SPEAKER_03: Kickstarter,
- 24:21SPEAKER_03: Tumblr.
- 24:22SPEAKER_03: So companies that at one time were startups,
- 24:25and they were able to convince the president himself to get
- 24:27behind the net
- 24:28SPEAKER_03: neutrality effort.
- 24:29SPEAKER_03: So around that time, Obama released this video.
- 24:32SPEAKER_02: Hi, everybody.
- 24:33SPEAKER_02: Ever since the Internet was created,
- 24:36SPEAKER_02: it's been organized around basic principles of openness,
- 24:39SPEAKER_02: fairness,
- 24:40SPEAKER_02: and freedom.
- 24:41SPEAKER_02: There are no gatekeepers deciding which sites you get to access.
- 24:45SPEAKER_02: There are no toll roads on the information superhighway.
- 24:49SPEAKER_02: This set of principles,
- 24:50SPEAKER_02: the idea of net neutrality,
- 24:52has unleashed the power of the Internet and given innovators
- 24:55the chance to thrive.
- 24:57Abandoning these principles would threaten to end the Internet
- 25:01as we know it.
- 25:03SPEAKER_02: That's why I'm laying out a plan to keep the internet free and open.
- 25:06And that's why I'm urging the Federal Communications Commission
- 25:08to do everything
- 25:09SPEAKER_02: they can to protect net neutrality for everyone.
- 25:12SPEAKER_03: That same day,
- 25:13SPEAKER_03: Tim Wu,
- 25:13SPEAKER_03: who you'll remember from episode one,
- 25:15SPEAKER_03: was one of the early ideological fathers of net neutrality.
- 25:19SPEAKER_03: He published a piece in The New Yorker about this FCC fight.
- 25:23SPEAKER_03: And also on that same day,
- 25:25SPEAKER_03: Activists showed up at the home of FCC chairman Tom Wheeler,
- 25:29blocked his driveway and demanded that he reclassify broadband
- 25:33or else they would
- 25:33SPEAKER_03: not let him leave.
- 25:34It's like he's like probably trying to go pick up his daughter
- 25:37for fucking soccer practice.
- 25:38SPEAKER_03: And they were like, not until you reclassify ISPs.
- 25:41SPEAKER_03: Wheeler, by the way, later blamed the White House for this.
- 25:44SPEAKER_01: So things are getting pretty intense.
- 25:45SPEAKER_03: Yes, but by now you have the media pretty much in lockstep.
- 25:49SPEAKER_03: The White House is explicitly endorsing reclassification.
- 25:53There's this mounting public pressure campaign,
- 25:55both online and real life.
- 25:57SPEAKER_03: So at an FCC meeting that December,
- 25:59SPEAKER_03: protesters rushed the dais and unfurled a banner that said,
- 26:04SPEAKER_03: reclassify now,
- 26:05SPEAKER_03: like a very dorky flash mob.
- 26:07SPEAKER_03: And altogether, this worked.
- 26:08SPEAKER_03: So in late February 2015,
- 26:10SPEAKER_03: Chairman Tom Wheeler opened the monthly FCC meeting by saying,
- 26:13SPEAKER_03: today is a red letter day.
- 26:15SPEAKER_03: And by that afternoon,
- 26:17the commission had reclassified broadband as a common carrier
- 26:20and adopted new net
- 26:20SPEAKER_03: neutrality rules.
- 26:22SPEAKER_03: And this was officially titled the Open Internet Report and Order.
- 26:25So net neutrality was finally,
- 26:27and for the first time,
- 26:28the law of the land as of 2015.
- 26:31SPEAKER_03: But as you will hear, it would not last.
- 26:34SPEAKER_01: What were like the specific rules they enacted at the time?
- 26:38SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 26:39So if you'll remember from last week,
- 26:41in 2010,
- 26:43the FCC passed the Open Internet Order of 2010.
- 26:46SPEAKER_03: And there were three main components to that rule.
- 26:48SPEAKER_03: Do you want to guess?
- 26:49SPEAKER_03: Can you remember?
- 26:50SPEAKER_03: Dig back?
- 26:50SPEAKER_03: Dig deep?
- 26:53SPEAKER_01: No fatties.
- 26:54SPEAKER_03: Yep.
- 26:56SPEAKER_01: You smoke them if you got them.
- 26:58SPEAKER_01: I don't know.
- 26:59SPEAKER_01: I don't know.
- 26:59SPEAKER_03: Okay.
- 27:00SPEAKER_03: It was transparency.
- 27:02SPEAKER_01: Yes, obviously.
- 27:03SPEAKER_01: No blocking.
- 27:05SPEAKER_03: Obviously.
- 27:05So ISPs couldn't block lawful websites,
- 27:07even if they really,
- 27:08really didn't like them.
- 27:10SPEAKER_03: And three, no unreasonable discrimination.
- 27:12SPEAKER_03: So you can favor some traffic over other traffic.
- 27:16SPEAKER_03: But as you'll also remember,
- 27:17SPEAKER_03: and you remember this,
- 27:18SPEAKER_03: I'm sure,
- 27:18SPEAKER_03: Jesse,
- 27:19that was later overturned by the courts because the FCC didn't
- 27:23have the authority
- 27:24SPEAKER_03: to regulate ISPs in that capacity.
- 27:26SPEAKER_03: So this was not enforceable.
- 27:27SPEAKER_01: The court said that they did not.
- 27:29SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 27:29SPEAKER_01: There was a fight over whether they had that authority.
- 27:31SPEAKER_01: The FCC said yes.
- 27:32SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 27:32SPEAKER_01: And the courts were like, nope.
- 27:33SPEAKER_01: Yes.
- 27:34SPEAKER_01: Sorry, bro.
- 27:34And that's why they had to reclassify them as common carriers
- 27:37so that they could
- 27:38SPEAKER_03: have the authority to enforce these rules.
- 27:41SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 27:41SPEAKER_01: So the court,
- 27:41SPEAKER_01: so it could have gone down that the FCC has this enforcement power,
- 27:45SPEAKER_01: whatever ISPs are.
- 27:46As it turned out,
- 27:47the court said you can only regulate them if they're common
- 27:52carriers.
- 27:52SPEAKER_03: Exactly.
- 27:53SPEAKER_03: Exactly.
- 27:53SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 27:54SPEAKER_03: So that's what they did in 2015.
- 27:56SPEAKER_03: And the 2015 rules,
- 27:57SPEAKER_03: they maintained those three core tenets,
- 27:59SPEAKER_03: transparency,
- 27:59SPEAKER_03: no blocking,
- 28:00SPEAKER_03: no unreasonable discrimination.
- 28:02SPEAKER_03: But they also introduced new regulations,
- 28:05SPEAKER_03: most notably a preemptive ban on paid prioritization arrangements.
- 28:09SPEAKER_03: So that's the fast lane thing.
- 28:11SPEAKER_03: There could be no fast lanes.
- 28:12SPEAKER_03: There could be no slow lanes.
- 28:14SPEAKER_03: They also extended the rules to wireless internet providers,
- 28:17SPEAKER_03: which hadn't been regulated by net neutrality up to that point.
- 28:20SPEAKER_01: Gotcha.
- 28:20SPEAKER_03: But the most controversial rule was
- 28:22was that the FCC gave itself sweeping authority to step in
- 28:26later if any future
- 28:27SPEAKER_03: broadband or business practice seemed to hurt users or websites.
- 28:31And this was so broad that it was actually opposed by pro-net
- 28:34neutrality groups,
- 28:35SPEAKER_03: including the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
- 28:38So basically,
- 28:39the net neutrality advocates got all they wanted and then some.
- 28:42SPEAKER_03: For telecommunications companies, this was the nightmare.
- 28:45So remember when I told you last week that the thing they most
- 28:47feared was price
- 28:48SPEAKER_03: control set by the government?
- 28:50SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 28:51SPEAKER_03: Well,
- 28:51SPEAKER_03: in the 2015 order,
- 28:52SPEAKER_03: the FCC didn't set rates,
- 28:53SPEAKER_03: but they retained the authority to do so in the future.
- 28:56SPEAKER_03: So this was a huge victory for internet activism.
- 29:00SPEAKER_03: And then in April 2015,
- 29:01activists scored another win when Comcast dropped their bid for
- 29:05Time Warner Cable.
- 29:06SPEAKER_03: We discussed that last week.
- 29:07SPEAKER_03: Again, this is a huge victory.
- 29:09Lobbyists had spent millions of dollars trying to push through
- 29:12this merger.
- 29:13SPEAKER_03: They failed.
- 29:14And this showed activists that these public pressure campaigns
- 29:16could really work.
- 29:17SPEAKER_03: So
- 29:18SPEAKER_03: Lee Fong,
- 29:18SPEAKER_03: he wrote a piece in The Intercept called Net Neutrality is Here,
- 29:21SPEAKER_03: thanks to an unprecedented guerrilla activism campaign.
- 29:24SPEAKER_03: That was the vibe.
- 29:26SPEAKER_03: David Haslade Comcast.
- 29:28SPEAKER_03: We were, I guess, still in the tech optimism era at the time.
- 29:31SPEAKER_01: God, very hard.
- 29:32SPEAKER_01: It wasn't that long ago.
- 29:34SPEAKER_01: Very hard to try to bring yourself back to that era.
- 29:36SPEAKER_03: And yet so many millions of years.
- 29:38Victory,
- 29:39however,
- 29:40was short-lived because,
- 29:41Jesse,
- 29:41something big happened in November 2016.
- 29:43SPEAKER_03: Any guesses?
- 29:45SPEAKER_01: My birthday?
- 29:46SPEAKER_03: I thought your birthday was in September.
- 29:47SPEAKER_03: Nope.
- 29:48SPEAKER_03: I'm pretty sure it is.
- 29:49SPEAKER_01: Oh, okay.
- 29:50SPEAKER_01: I guess I was wrong about when my birthday is.
- 29:52SPEAKER_01: Mm-hmm.
- 29:53SPEAKER_01: Anything else that big that happened in November 2016?
- 29:55SPEAKER_01: You know, nothing comes to mind.
- 29:57SPEAKER_01: Why don't you tell me?
- 29:58SPEAKER_03: Donald Trump happened.
- 30:00SPEAKER_01: Oh, okay.
- 30:01Yeah.
- 30:01SPEAKER_03: So when Trump took office for the first time.
- 30:06SPEAKER_01: The first of many.
- 30:07SPEAKER_03: Control...
- 30:09SPEAKER_03: control of the FCC transferred back to Republicans.
- 30:12SPEAKER_03: So as was expected, then Commissioner Ajit Pai was named as chairman.
- 30:16SPEAKER_03: Now, Ajit Pai is a lawyer with a background in telecommunications law.
- 30:19He's also a Republican and had been appointed to the FCC by
- 30:23Barack Obama in 2012.
- 30:24I mentioned this in the last episode,
- 30:26but again,
- 30:27the FCC has five commissioners.
- 30:29SPEAKER_03: By law, no more than three can be from the same party.
- 30:32SPEAKER_03: So in general,
- 30:33SPEAKER_03: the Democratic president will appoint three Dems and two Republicans,
- 30:36SPEAKER_03: and the Republican president will appoint three Republicans and two Dems.
- 30:39SPEAKER_03: And technically,
- 30:39SPEAKER_03: they could also appoint Libertarians or Greens or members of the DSA,
- 30:42SPEAKER_03: but they don't,
- 30:43SPEAKER_03: maybe during the AOC presidency.
- 30:45So Audrey Pye was a sitting member of the FCC,
- 30:48but he was confirmed as chair in October 2017.
- 30:52And anyone who was following policy at the time knew that the
- 30:55next Republican chair
- 30:57SPEAKER_03: was likely to repeal the 2015 rules.
- 31:00And Ajay Pai was really seen as a villain even before any sort
- 31:04of rule changes were announced.
- 31:06SPEAKER_03: So take this sentence.
- 31:07SPEAKER_03: This was published in a certain Seattle alt-weekly.
- 31:11SPEAKER_03: Net neutrality,
- 31:12a long-held principle of the internet that was established as
- 31:14an official rule
- 31:15SPEAKER_03: during the Obama administration,
- 31:17requires internet service providers to treat all content
- 31:20equally so they aren't
- 31:21SPEAKER_03: allowed to slow down,
- 31:22SPEAKER_03: say,
- 31:23this website just because we might write that FCC Chairman
- 31:26Ajepai looks like he
- 31:27SPEAKER_03: gargles Mitch McConnell's balls.
- 31:29SPEAKER_01: That's harsh.
- 31:30SPEAKER_03: I wrote that.
- 31:32SPEAKER_03: Apologies to Mr. Pie.
- 31:32SPEAKER_01: I knew it.
- 31:34SPEAKER_03: I want to correct the record here.
- 31:36SPEAKER_03: He does not look like he gargles Mitch McConnell's balls.
- 31:39SPEAKER_01: One of the first images of him, he has a giant mug.
- 31:42SPEAKER_01: Yes, the Reese's mug.
- 31:42SPEAKER_01: And he's sipping from Reese's mug.
- 31:44SPEAKER_01: Why?
- 31:45SPEAKER_03: I don't know.
- 31:45SPEAKER_03: John Oliver talked about the Reese's mug a lot on another episode.
- 31:50SPEAKER_03: He really loves the giant Reese's mug.
- 31:52SPEAKER_01: Interesting.
- 31:53SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 31:53So Ajapai took a ton of heat from activists,
- 31:56from the media,
- 31:56from the public,
- 31:57from me.
- 31:59SPEAKER_03: Particularly because this was in the midst of the hashtag resistance and,
- 32:03SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 32:03SPEAKER_03: widespread fears that Trump would usher in fascism.
- 32:07SPEAKER_03: I would say that that time those fears were overstated.
- 32:10SPEAKER_03: This time I'm a little more on board.
- 32:13SPEAKER_03: But here's an example of the rhetoric at the time.
- 32:15SPEAKER_03: So this was from the internet advocacy group Free Press.
- 32:18They published this in March 2017 before any changes had
- 32:21actually been announced.
- 32:22SPEAKER_03: So Jesse, please read this.
- 32:24From the women's marches that took place across the country and
- 32:27around the world to
- 32:28SPEAKER_01: the mass protests against the Muslim ban and immigration raids,
- 32:31people are resisting the neo-fascist agenda President Trump is
- 32:34unleashing on our
- 32:34SPEAKER_01: nation.
- 32:35The primary reason why millions have been able to mobilize so
- 32:37quickly is because
- 32:38they have the ability to use the open internet to communicate
- 32:41to the masses and
- 32:41SPEAKER_01: organize resistance.
- 32:43SPEAKER_01: Huh.
- 32:43SPEAKER_01: Huh.
- 33:12SPEAKER_03: Yes, it's a lot, you know?
- 33:14SPEAKER_03: So people didn't like Ajit Pai, and they immediately started protesting.
- 33:18SPEAKER_03: So like at the April 2017 FCC meeting,
- 33:21SPEAKER_03: protesters with Free Press,
- 33:22SPEAKER_03: they showed up,
- 33:23SPEAKER_03: they disrupted the meeting,
- 33:24SPEAKER_03: they rickrolled Ajit Pai.
- 33:26SPEAKER_03: So one protester wrote this later.
- 33:28SPEAKER_03: We interrupted a speech by FCC chairman Ajit Pai,
- 33:31SPEAKER_03: blasting the 1987 Rick Astley song,
- 33:33SPEAKER_03: Never Gonna Give You Up,
- 33:34SPEAKER_03: over a speaker,
- 33:36while we sang modified lyrics that drew attention to the
- 33:38present threat against net
- 33:39SPEAKER_03: neutrality protections.
- 33:40SPEAKER_03: Cool.
- 33:41SPEAKER_01: Could they get sued for copyright?
- 33:43SPEAKER_01: When did Rick Astley die?
- 33:44SPEAKER_01: Did they get his estate's permission?
- 33:46SPEAKER_01: I have so many questions.
- 33:47SPEAKER_03: I think if you don't monetize it, I think it's okay.
- 33:51SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 33:51SPEAKER_01: I was just concerned about it.
- 33:52SPEAKER_01: I've been thinking a lot about copyright stuff lately.
- 33:53SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 33:54SPEAKER_03: To continue.
- 33:55SPEAKER_03: We sang silly lyrics like, never going to give you up.
- 33:58SPEAKER_03: Net neutrality.
- 34:01SPEAKER_03: Never going to run around and hurt you.
- 34:01SPEAKER_03: Never going to give you up.
- 34:02SPEAKER_01: Never going to give you up.
- 34:04SPEAKER_01: Net neutrality.
- 34:07SPEAKER_01: That is really fucking bad.
- 34:09SPEAKER_03: It's bad.
- 34:10SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 34:10SPEAKER_03: They were escorted out of the building.
- 34:12Were they escorted out because they were disruptive or because
- 34:15their song was so dumb?
- 34:16SPEAKER_03: Well, it was Homeland Security, so probably because of the song.
- 34:19SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 34:20SPEAKER_03: Five of the protesters were also banned from the building.
- 34:23SPEAKER_03: So that same month,
- 34:24SPEAKER_03: April 2017,
- 34:25SPEAKER_03: Chairman Aja Pai announced that,
- 34:27SPEAKER_03: yes,
- 34:28SPEAKER_03: he was going to repeal the 2015 rules.
- 34:31ISPs would no longer be classified as common carriers and net
- 34:34neutrality would no
- 34:35SPEAKER_03: longer be enforceable.
- 34:37SPEAKER_03: Quoting Pai here,
- 34:38SPEAKER_03: going forward,
- 34:38we cannot stick with regulations from the Great Depression that
- 34:41were meant to
- 34:41SPEAKER_03: micromanage Ma Bell.
- 34:43SPEAKER_03: Nothing about the internet was broken in 2015.
- 34:46SPEAKER_03: Jesse,
- 34:47SPEAKER_03: you were alive in 2015,
- 34:48SPEAKER_03: knowing all that you know now about the fight over net neutrality.
- 34:52SPEAKER_03: What do you think about that statement?
- 34:54SPEAKER_01: That nothing about the internet was broken in 2015?
- 34:57SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 34:57SPEAKER_01: I mean, the internet was starting to suck in 2015.
- 35:00SPEAKER_03: Well, he's not talking about content.
- 35:03SPEAKER_03: He's talking about...
- 35:04SPEAKER_03: The actual, like the pipes, the tubes.
- 35:07SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 35:08SPEAKER_01: I guess a lot of this comes down to the question of like,
- 35:11SPEAKER_01: do you want to formalize rules to ensure this thing we already have?
- 35:15SPEAKER_01: But no, in 2015, other than like the BitTorrent throttling.
- 35:20SPEAKER_03: Which was like early 2000s.
- 35:21SPEAKER_01: When was the BitTorrent throttling?
- 35:24SPEAKER_03: Like, 2005.
- 35:26SPEAKER_03: I think he's pretty much right.
- 35:27SPEAKER_03: But back in 2017,
- 35:29SPEAKER_03: I was for sure convinced,
- 35:31SPEAKER_03: like everyone else,
- 35:31SPEAKER_03: that without net neutrality,
- 35:33SPEAKER_03: the free and open internet was dead.
- 35:36SPEAKER_03: You know, I believe John Oliver.
- 35:38I'm sure I wrote slop articles about how John Oliver was saving
- 35:43net neutrality.
- 35:44SPEAKER_03: And in May 2017,
- 35:46SPEAKER_03: the day before the FCC was scheduled to meet for their monthly meeting,
- 35:50SPEAKER_03: John Oliver ran a second segment on net neutrality.
- 35:53SPEAKER_03: And this one focused in large part on Ajit Pai, including his mug.
- 35:57SPEAKER_03: So let's watch a clip.
- 35:59SPEAKER_00: But for all of Pi's doofy,
- 36:01SPEAKER_00: hey,
- 36:01SPEAKER_00: I'm just like you guys,
- 36:02SPEAKER_00: persona,
- 36:03SPEAKER_00: there are some things about him that you should really know.
- 36:06SPEAKER_00: He's a former lawyer for Verizon,
- 36:08SPEAKER_00: and despite being a smart man,
- 36:10SPEAKER_00: he sure loves to play dumb over why ISPs were ever moved to Title II.
- 36:16SPEAKER_02: For decades before 2015, we had a free and open internet.
- 36:22Indeed,
- 36:22the free and open internet developed and flourished under light
- 36:25touch regulation.
- 36:26We weren't living in some digital dystopia before the partisan
- 36:29imposition of a
- 36:30SPEAKER_00: massive plan hatched in Washington saved all of us.
- 36:34SPEAKER_00: Now, that is true.
- 36:352015 was not a digital dystopia for anyone,
- 36:38with the possible exception of Pizza Rat.
- 36:40SPEAKER_00: Because think about it, the internet put that rat through hell.
- 36:44One cheat day in three months of eating paleo and she never
- 36:48hears the fucking end of it.
- 36:49SPEAKER_00: Oh, that's right.
- 36:50SPEAKER_00: I said she.
- 36:52SPEAKER_00: Hashtag greasy filth monster.
- 36:53SPEAKER_00: Hashtag feminism.
- 36:56SPEAKER_00: But Pye's larger argument there is deeply disingenuous,
- 37:00SPEAKER_00: because he has to know that Verizon,
- 37:03SPEAKER_00: his ex-employer,
- 37:04SPEAKER_00: won a lawsuit that meant if the FCC wanted strong,
- 37:07SPEAKER_00: enforceable protection,
- 37:08SPEAKER_00: its only real option was to reclassify the ISPs.
- 37:12SPEAKER_00: And yet,
- 37:13SPEAKER_00: he cheerily insists,
- 37:15SPEAKER_00: under questioning,
- 37:16that there is just no evidence that cable companies were
- 37:18engaging in rampant
- 37:19SPEAKER_00: wrongdoing.
- 37:20So Ajupai says in that clip that there was no rampant
- 37:23wrongdoing on the part of
- 37:24SPEAKER_03: ISPs,
- 37:25and there wasn't even before the 2015 open internet order
- 37:28codified net neutrality.
- 37:29SPEAKER_03: But Oliver is like, no, there was wrongdoing.
- 37:33SPEAKER_03: And as an example,
- 37:34SPEAKER_03: he pointed to a 2011 case where Google Wallet,
- 37:37SPEAKER_03: so that's a mobile payment system,
- 37:39SPEAKER_03: it was blocked by AT&T,
- 37:41SPEAKER_03: T-Mobile,
- 37:41SPEAKER_03: and Verizon.
- 37:42SPEAKER_03: And as Oliver explained it,
- 37:44The wireless companies were blocking Google Wallet because it
- 37:47competed with a
- 37:48SPEAKER_03: payment system named,
- 37:50SPEAKER_03: unfortunately,
- 37:51SPEAKER_03: ISIS that the three companies had launched as a joint venture.
- 37:54But once again,
- 37:55he simplified this complex technical issue to the point of
- 37:58inaccuracy.
- 37:59SPEAKER_03: So what actually happened...
- 38:01is that at the time Google Wallet needed to access a secure
- 38:05part of your phone,
- 38:06SPEAKER_03: basically like a chip or a SIM card in every individual phone,
- 38:09SPEAKER_03: the carriers controlled this.
- 38:11They didn't want to give Google access to this,
- 38:13both for security and for business reasons.
- 38:15But it wasn't about network traffic,
- 38:16which is what net neutrality rules govern.
- 38:19SPEAKER_03: So this would not have violated net neutrality rules.
- 38:21SPEAKER_03: Does that make sense?
- 38:22SPEAKER_01: Yeah,
- 38:22it sounds like almost on the verge of a non sequitur that would
- 38:25get people to think
- 38:26SPEAKER_01: it was about net neutrality when it just wasn't.
- 38:28SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 38:28SPEAKER_03: Let me give you a more modern parallel.
- 38:30So Apple refuses to allow third-party mobile payment apps to
- 38:34access my phone's NFC chip.
- 38:36And the NFC chip is the piece of hardware that's used for
- 38:39contactless payments like Apple Pay.
- 38:40SPEAKER_03: So the thing you tap, the NFC chip enables that.
- 38:44SPEAKER_03: And Apple prevents other apps from using it.
- 38:46SPEAKER_03: So if I want to tap, I'm using Apple Pay.
- 38:49SPEAKER_03: This is anti-competitive, to be sure.
- 38:51SPEAKER_03: And in Europe,
- 38:52SPEAKER_03: regulators have forced Apple to open the NFC chip to third-party apps,
- 38:56SPEAKER_03: but it has nothing to do with net neutrality.
- 38:58SPEAKER_03: So that's basically what happened in the 2011 case that Oliver mentioned.
- 39:02SPEAKER_03: Nothing to do with net neutrality.
- 39:04SPEAKER_03: Plus, Google figured out a workaround.
- 39:07SPEAKER_03: Google Wallet is very much alive today,
- 39:09SPEAKER_03: unlike ISIS,
- 39:11SPEAKER_03: which was actually acquired after a much-needed name change by,
- 39:14SPEAKER_03: you guessed it,
- 39:15SPEAKER_03: Google.
- 39:16SPEAKER_01: They changed the name to Al-Qaeda.
- 39:19SPEAKER_03: So once again, Oliver bastardized a real life case to make his point.
- 39:25SPEAKER_03: The Google Wallet case had nothing to do with net neutrality.
- 39:27SPEAKER_03: And once again,
- 39:28SPEAKER_03: at the end of his segment,
- 39:30SPEAKER_03: Oliver urged viewers to go to the website was go FCC yourself.com.
- 39:36SPEAKER_03: It redirected to the official page for the FCC to file a comment.
- 39:39SPEAKER_03: And of course, his viewers did.
- 39:40SPEAKER_03: So this was 2017.
- 39:42SPEAKER_03: And in 2017, social justice was all the rage.
- 39:45SPEAKER_03: And net neutrality advocacy groups leaned into this.
- 39:49SPEAKER_03: So Jesse, I want you to look at this web page from Public Knowledge.
- 39:52SPEAKER_03: This is a group that campaigned for net neutrality.
- 39:54SPEAKER_03: Read the headline there.
- 39:55SPEAKER_01: Net neutrality, the social justice issue of our time.
- 39:58SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 40:00SPEAKER_03: The social justice issue of our time.
- 40:02This seems to be making a lot of arguments that activist voices
- 40:07could be suppressed
- 40:08SPEAKER_01: in the absence of net neutrality.
- 40:10SPEAKER_01: They mentioned Black Lives Matter and Ferguson and stuff like that.
- 40:12SPEAKER_03: Exactly.
- 40:13SPEAKER_03: So this rhetorical shift,
- 40:15this was a fundamental change in how advocates had marketed net
- 40:19neutrality.
- 40:20SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 40:20SPEAKER_03: It was now a social justice issue, right?
- 40:22SPEAKER_03: A civil rights issue.
- 40:23SPEAKER_03: Net neutrality was anti-racist.
- 40:26And so Ajit Pai and the Trump FCC rolling back these 2015 rules
- 40:31was a step back,
- 40:32SPEAKER_03: not just for a free and open internet,
- 40:34SPEAKER_03: but a step back for civil rights.
- 40:36SPEAKER_03: And that became the focus.
- 40:37SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 40:38So there's like a chameleon-like nature to the debate where
- 40:41like whatever's going
- 40:41SPEAKER_01: on in the world at the moment,
- 40:42SPEAKER_01: it becomes about that.
- 40:44SPEAKER_03: Jesse, this is probably a good place for housekeeping.
- 40:46SPEAKER_03: Will you do it?
- 40:46SPEAKER_01: Yes.
- 40:47SPEAKER_01: We are a podcast.
- 40:48SPEAKER_01: You can find us at blockterimported.org.
- 40:50SPEAKER_01: There you can also find the best way to support us,
- 40:52which is to become a premium subscriber for a very affordable
- 40:57monthly fee.
- 40:58SPEAKER_01: $7.
- 40:58SPEAKER_01: You can get all sorts of extra stuff.
- 41:00SPEAKER_01: All sorts of extra stuff.
- 41:01SPEAKER_01: Extra episodes.
- 41:03SPEAKER_01: Access to hangouts.
- 41:05You can weekly open comment threads that run to the thousands
- 41:09of comments.
- 41:09SPEAKER_01: Personals.
- 41:10SPEAKER_01: Personals.
- 41:10SPEAKER_01: Book club.
- 41:11SPEAKER_01: Are coming up.
- 41:12Personals is a once a year thing we do in February for
- 41:14Valentine's Day that led to
- 41:16SPEAKER_01: at least one marriage.
- 41:17SPEAKER_01: No murders.
- 41:17SPEAKER_01: And no deaths that we are aware of.
- 41:19SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 41:20SPEAKER_01: Also, please rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
- 41:23And if you have tips or other feedback,
- 41:25blocked or imported podcast at gmail.com.
- 41:27SPEAKER_01: But Katie, let's get back to the story.
- 41:28So the refocus of net neutrality as a social justice issue came
- 41:32with some strategic
- 41:33SPEAKER_03: disagreements among activists.
- 41:35SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 41:36SPEAKER_03: This was documented by Brian Fung of The Washington Post,
- 41:39but two distinct factions emerged within the broader net
- 41:43neutrality coalition.
- 41:44So the first faction was dominated by public interest groups
- 41:47and consumer advocacy
- 41:48SPEAKER_03: groups,
- 41:49SPEAKER_03: so like free press and public knowledge.
- 41:51SPEAKER_03: Fung calls them the hardball faction.
- 41:53SPEAKER_03: They wanted a congressional resolution that would overrule the FCC.
- 41:56SPEAKER_03: They wanted to primary incumbents who didn't support net neutrality.
- 42:00They wanted to punish anyone who didn't support the cause,
- 42:02including Democrats.
- 42:04SPEAKER_03: And then you had the second faction,
- 42:05SPEAKER_03: which was largely made up of tech companies and trade associations,
- 42:08SPEAKER_03: and they were willing to compromise.
- 42:10SPEAKER_03: So ideological purity was less important to them than getting shit done.
- 42:14SPEAKER_01: So who won between these two factions?
- 42:15SPEAKER_03: The hardballers.
- 42:17And on July 12,
- 42:182017,
- 42:18they staged the Internet-wide Day of Action to Save Net
- 42:22Neutrality.
- 42:23So remember,
- 42:23this started with the battle over SOPA and PIPA in 2012,
- 42:26the Internet Blackout Day.
- 42:27SPEAKER_03: We talked about it last week.
- 42:29This time,
- 42:29advocacy groups mobilized over 125,000 websites and online
- 42:34platforms.
- 42:35SPEAKER_03: This included smaller websites and tech behemoths like Spotify,
- 42:39SPEAKER_03: 4chan,
- 42:39SPEAKER_03: Airbnb,
- 42:39SPEAKER_03: Mozilla,
- 42:40SPEAKER_03: OkCupid,
- 42:41SPEAKER_03: Vimeo,
- 42:41SPEAKER_03: Tinder,
- 42:42SPEAKER_03: Expedia,
- 42:42SPEAKER_03: Pornhub,
- 42:43SPEAKER_03: Yelp,
- 42:43SPEAKER_03: SoundCloud,
- 42:44All these companies displayed banners or pop-ups encouraging
- 42:48users to contact the
- 42:49SPEAKER_03: FCC and Congress and oppose the repeal of net neutrality.
- 42:53SPEAKER_03: So Congress received almost 3.5 million emails in a single day.
- 42:56SPEAKER_03: And during the FCC's full public comment period,
- 43:00SPEAKER_03: they received approximately 22 million comments.
- 43:03SPEAKER_01: And these were overwhelmingly pro-net neutrality?
- 43:05SPEAKER_03: Well, no.
- 43:06SPEAKER_03: And it turned out that the vast majority of them were fake.
- 43:09SPEAKER_03: So the New York Attorney General's office,
- 43:12SPEAKER_03: then and now headed by Letitia James,
- 43:14they conducted an- Who perpetrated one of the worst mortgage
- 43:17frauds in history.
- 43:19SPEAKER_01: Just a criminal.
- 43:20Sorry,
- 43:21I just had to break it and say that because I'm so mad about
- 43:22the mortgage fraud.
- 43:23So they conducted an investigation and found that nearly 18
- 43:27million submissions
- 43:28SPEAKER_03: were fraudulent and that this was happening on both sides.
- 43:31SPEAKER_03: So there was an anti-net neutrality group called Broadband for America.
- 43:34SPEAKER_03: This was an industry group.
- 43:36SPEAKER_03: They spent over $4 million on the campaign.
- 43:38SPEAKER_03: So they paid consulting firms,
- 43:40which then spent their money generating more than 8.5 million
- 43:44fake comments.
- 43:47SPEAKER_03: And then on the pro net neutrality side,
- 43:49one 19 year old computer science student generated 7.7 million
- 43:53fraudulent comments.
- 43:54And then another 1.6 million were generated from some other
- 43:57unknown source.
- 43:58SPEAKER_01: We don't need AI.
- 43:59SPEAKER_01: We already knew how to create terabytes of fake bullshit without AI.
- 44:04SPEAKER_01: It's unnecessary.
- 44:05SPEAKER_03: Exactly.
- 44:06So the official FCC vote on repealing the reclassification of
- 44:10ISPs as common
- 44:11SPEAKER_03: carriers and ending net neutrality,
- 44:13SPEAKER_03: that was scheduled for December 2017.
- 44:15SPEAKER_03: And advocates really ramped up their efforts throughout the year.
- 44:18SPEAKER_03: And the protests got more personal.
- 44:20SPEAKER_03: So Ajay Pai later told the Washington Examiner,
- 44:23SPEAKER_03: quote,
- 44:23SPEAKER_03: people were threatening to murder my children.
- 44:26SPEAKER_03: My son,
- 44:26SPEAKER_03: who was in kindergarten at the time,
- 44:27SPEAKER_03: couldn't take the school bus to school for an entire year.
- 44:31SPEAKER_03: He continued,
- 44:31I had to spend thousands of dollars out of my own pocket for a
- 44:33home security
- 44:34SPEAKER_03: system.
- 44:35SPEAKER_03: My personal email account was hacked.
- 44:36My in-laws would get calls at three in the morning,
- 44:38cursing them out for no reason at all.
- 44:40SPEAKER_01: There was a time when I would have been like,
- 44:42SPEAKER_01: maybe he's exaggerating,
- 44:44SPEAKER_01: but then I saw Blue Sky,
- 44:45SPEAKER_01: which is where all these people sort of...
- 44:48SPEAKER_01: congregate and feed off one another.
- 44:50SPEAKER_01: And if anything, it sounds like he got easier treatment than he could.
- 44:52So people would go to his home in Virginia and leave unmarked
- 44:56packages on his porch.
- 44:58SPEAKER_03: They would take photographs inside his house through the window.
- 45:01SPEAKER_03: Demonstrators put up signs and banners outside his home.
- 45:05SPEAKER_03: There was one handmade sign that named his kids.
- 45:07Quote,
- 45:07is this really the world you want Annabelle and Alexander to
- 45:10inherit?
- 45:11SPEAKER_03: Did I just talk some?
- 45:12SPEAKER_01: Oh my God.
- 45:13SPEAKER_03: Another said, they will come to know the truth.
- 45:15SPEAKER_03: Dad murdered democracy in cold blood.
- 45:19Activists sent pieces to his house every half hour,
- 45:21or at least that was the rumor.
- 45:23SPEAKER_03: It actually wasn't quite as dramatic as that.
- 45:25SPEAKER_03: So I confirmed this with Ajit Pai,
- 45:26and he said seven or eight of them were delivered to the house
- 45:29over the course of a
- 45:29SPEAKER_03: few days,
- 45:30but it pretty much ended there because I asked all the
- 45:32neighborhood pizza places to
- 45:33SPEAKER_03: ignore any further orders for delivery to my address.
- 45:36SPEAKER_01: Can you imagine if then he really wants a pizza?
- 45:39SPEAKER_01: He can't get it.
- 45:39SPEAKER_01: Like he's super hungry and they're like, you said, nope, you said not to.
- 45:43SPEAKER_01: It's like, I know, but it's different.
- 45:44SPEAKER_01: That would be so sad.
- 45:45SPEAKER_03: He also said,
- 45:46SPEAKER_03: after that,
- 45:46I still got plenty of unmarked mail and some people visiting or
- 45:49trying to visit as
- 45:50SPEAKER_03: a security team I eventually got usually block them.
- 45:52SPEAKER_03: The house, but no further pizzas.
- 45:54SPEAKER_03: Alas.
- 45:55And of course,
- 45:56there was a ton of bullshit online,
- 45:57like Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince.
- 46:00He said he was looking into a way to slow down just ObjectPie's
- 46:03internet connection
- 46:04SPEAKER_03: to dial up speeds.
- 46:06SPEAKER_03: I mean, that's kind of funny.
- 46:08Are we going to get into the huge about face on all this stuff
- 46:11in terms of Kiwi Farms?
- 46:13SPEAKER_03: We can.
- 46:13SPEAKER_03: Let's get into it now.
- 46:14SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 46:14I just – in thinking about the sorts of people who are really
- 46:18in favor of net
- 46:18neutrality and who are making all these arguments about how
- 46:21unpopular content
- 46:23SPEAKER_01: shouldn't be censored.
- 46:24SPEAKER_01: Yep.
- 46:25I'm guessing the Venn diagram is almost a circle of people who
- 46:28then said because
- 46:29SPEAKER_01: Kiwi Farms had very ugly but not –
- 46:33SPEAKER_01: Illegal stuff.
- 46:35They thought it was a no brainer that hackers should be allowed
- 46:38to take Kiwi Farms offline.
- 46:40SPEAKER_01: And of course,
- 46:41SPEAKER_01: Matthew Prince has Cloudflare CEO withdrew their protection of it,
- 46:45SPEAKER_01: letting that happen.
- 46:46So yes,
- 46:47none of these people actually believe in anything is what I'm
- 46:48saying.
- 46:49SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 46:49Like if I think of any website I can think of that I have been
- 46:53unable to access,
- 46:54SPEAKER_03: not because of some temporary tech glitch or something like this,
- 46:57SPEAKER_03: but something that was specifically blocked from the...
- 47:00SPEAKER_03: I am blocked from accessing this website.
- 47:03SPEAKER_03: It has never come from ISPs.
- 47:05SPEAKER_03: It has come from... Kiwi Farms is the only example I can think of.
- 47:09And not being blocked,
- 47:10but it being taken offline by like DDoS attacks and stuff.
- 47:13SPEAKER_01: But specifically because activists pressured Cloudflare not to say...
- 47:18SPEAKER_03: Not to protect it.
- 47:19SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 47:19SPEAKER_03: Yes.
- 47:20SPEAKER_03: Yes.
- 47:20SPEAKER_03: It has never come from Verizon.
- 47:23SPEAKER_03: It came from like trans activists, basically.
- 47:26SPEAKER_01: The call was coming from inside the house all along.
- 47:29SPEAKER_01: The threat to a free and open internet.
- 47:30SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 47:30SPEAKER_03: So in Ajit Pai, he was just also getting just a fuck ton of tweets.
- 47:34SPEAKER_03: Like, Jesse, I posted one in our show notes here.
- 47:38SPEAKER_03: Read this.
- 47:38SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 47:39SPEAKER_01: this is some random troll,
- 47:40SPEAKER_01: but at Ajit Pai FCC,
- 47:42SPEAKER_01: hey,
- 47:43SPEAKER_01: cutie,
- 47:43you look like you could take a steaming hot load to those
- 47:46pearly whites of yours.
- 47:47I'm curious how you managed to work your way up from Indian
- 47:49tech support to the
- 47:50SPEAKER_01: number one brain dead tortellini dick bitch in America.
- 47:53SPEAKER_01: It's a little bit racist.
- 47:54SPEAKER_01: A little bit racist.
- 47:55SPEAKER_01: Sort of like,
- 47:56SPEAKER_01: and it's sort of left,
- 47:57SPEAKER_01: it is lefty dirtbag leftist coded brain dead tortellini dick bitch.
- 48:02SPEAKER_01: Although who knows in this day and age.
- 48:04SPEAKER_03: Yeah,
- 48:04SPEAKER_03: so the hashtag,
- 48:05you can still search the hashtag Ajit Pai sucks and see some
- 48:09colorful insults
- 48:11SPEAKER_03: directed his way.
- 48:12SPEAKER_03: So there were also protests elsewhere,
- 48:14including at the Capitol and outside Verizon stores because Pai
- 48:18had been a lawyer
- 48:18SPEAKER_03: for Verizon.
- 48:19I guess they figured the minimum wage workers at Verizon would
- 48:22call him up and be
- 48:22SPEAKER_03: like,
- 48:22SPEAKER_03: brah,
- 48:23SPEAKER_03: please.
- 48:24SPEAKER_03: Celebrities got involved.
- 48:26SPEAKER_03: Michael Stipe, Tom Morello, Will Wheaton, Amanda Palmer.
- 48:29SPEAKER_01: Oh, Will Wheaton.
- 48:30SPEAKER_03: Yeah, he's come up on the show before.
- 48:32SPEAKER_01: Oh, man.
- 48:33SPEAKER_01: What an interesting character.
- 48:35SPEAKER_01: Well, he had like a minor role on Star Trek The Next Generation.
- 48:39And then I don't know if it's fair to say he reignited his
- 48:44career by becoming a
- 48:45SPEAKER_01: social justice advocate.
- 48:46SPEAKER_01: But like during Gamergate,
- 48:47he really became the just platonic ideal of the performative
- 48:53white male who's not
- 48:54SPEAKER_01: like the others.
- 48:55SPEAKER_03: So this is a huge thing on social media.
- 48:57SPEAKER_03: So Jesse, read this tweet from at the real Banksy.
- 49:00SPEAKER_03: It's not actually the real Banksy.
- 49:03It's the fake Banksy,
- 49:04which in a way I think makes it more Banksy than Banksy.
- 49:08SPEAKER_03: Anyway,
- 49:08SPEAKER_03: this tweet,
- 49:09SPEAKER_03: again,
- 49:10SPEAKER_03: not from the real Banksy,
- 49:11SPEAKER_03: but from someone people thought was the real Banksy,
- 49:13SPEAKER_03: got hundreds of thousands of retweets.
- 49:16SPEAKER_01: Twitter, $14.99 a month.
- 49:18SPEAKER_01: Snapchat, $9.99 a month.
- 49:19SPEAKER_01: YouTube, $19.99 a month.
- 49:21SPEAKER_01: Netflix, $9.99 per movie.
- 49:23SPEAKER_01: Google, $1.99 per search.
- 49:25SPEAKER_01: If you don't want to pay extra for your favorite sites,
- 49:27SPEAKER_01: you need to be supporting hashtag net neutrality.
- 49:30So he's basically portraying this world in which you need to
- 49:34pay $2 per Google search and –
- 49:37I think there's maybe a blind spot in the liberal or leftist
- 49:43mind here because this
- 49:44SPEAKER_01: would never happen.
- 49:46SPEAKER_01: No.
- 49:46SPEAKER_01: Because people wouldn't pay those amounts of competitors.
- 49:49SPEAKER_01: It's just, look, I'm actually not even...
- 49:54SPEAKER_01: There's part of me that's like,
- 49:55SPEAKER_01: okay,
- 49:55SPEAKER_01: why not have a rule dictating all traffic's treated equally?
- 49:57But these responses are so sort of divorced from reality and
- 50:01over the top just
- 50:02because in certain ways markets work pretty well to get people
- 50:06stuff they like.
- 50:08SPEAKER_03: People respond to incentives.
- 50:09SPEAKER_03: Companies also respond to incentives.
- 50:12But this really – so like Al Franken called net neutrality the
- 50:15free speech issue of our time.
- 50:17SPEAKER_03: That was the sort of rhetoric.
- 50:18SPEAKER_03: It was seen as this –
- 50:20SPEAKER_03: kind of life or death situation.
- 50:21You know,
- 50:22of course,
- 50:22Senators Warren and Bernie Sanders were fighting for it.
- 50:25Nancy Pelosi said repealing net neutrality was an attack on
- 50:28democracy itself.
- 50:30SPEAKER_03: On social media,
- 50:30the hashtag Stop the FCC and hashtag Save Net Neutrality were
- 50:34amplifying the
- 50:35SPEAKER_03: message.
- 50:36SPEAKER_03: Activists were urging followers to contact Congress.
- 50:39SPEAKER_03: And then right before the FCC was scheduled to vote in December 2017,
- 50:42net neutrality activists organized an online protest called
- 50:46Break the Internet.
- 50:47So starting December 12th that year,
- 50:49websites and Internet users across the U.S.
- 50:52SPEAKER_03: deliberately made their content appear broken.
- 50:55SPEAKER_03: The campaign ran through the eve of the FCC decision,
- 50:58SPEAKER_03: effectively serving as this internet-wide red alert.
- 51:01SPEAKER_03: And then the day of the vote itself,
- 51:02SPEAKER_03: activists stood outside the FCC headquarters,
- 51:05SPEAKER_03: ringing bells in protest.
- 51:07And yet,
- 51:07despite all of this,
- 51:08beside Banksy's tweet and Cher's tweet and Will Wheaton's
- 51:12tweet,
- 51:13SPEAKER_03: None of it worked.
- 51:13There was even a bomb called in during the meeting and they had
- 51:16to evacuate.
- 51:17SPEAKER_03: But in the end,
- 51:18the Trump FCC voted on what they called the restoring Internet
- 51:21freedom order and
- 51:22SPEAKER_03: repealed the Obama era rules.
- 51:24SPEAKER_03: So once again, net neutrality was dead.
- 51:27SPEAKER_01: OK.
- 51:27SPEAKER_01: And did anything happen?
- 51:29SPEAKER_03: No, not really.
- 51:29SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 51:31SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 51:31SPEAKER_01: I guess we don't know,
- 51:33SPEAKER_01: but...
- 51:33SPEAKER_03: So after the Trump FCC killed net neutrality,
- 51:36SPEAKER_03: the opposition immediately rallied.
- 51:38SPEAKER_03: Many groups, along with some states, announced plans to sue the FCC.
- 51:43In Congress,
- 51:43Dems began organizing a resolution to overturn the FCC's order.
- 51:48SPEAKER_03: None of this ultimately panned out,
- 51:49but what did happen was that a 33-year-old California man sent
- 51:54emails to Ajit Pai
- 51:55SPEAKER_03: threatening his children.
- 51:56SPEAKER_03: The man's name was very confusingly Makara Mann.
- 51:59SPEAKER_03: He was arrested...
- 52:00SPEAKER_01: Wait, Markara Man?
- 52:02SPEAKER_03: Markara Man.
- 52:03SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 52:04Sounds like there's a town named Markara and a man from there
- 52:08did something.
- 52:09SPEAKER_01: What a strange name.
- 52:09SPEAKER_01: That was his name.
- 52:10So he was arrested and he told the FBI that he had a message
- 52:13for Ajit Pai.
- 52:14SPEAKER_03: Quote, I'm sorry I made a threat against your kids.
- 52:17SPEAKER_03: That was crossing the line.
- 52:18SPEAKER_03: I hope you'll change your mind, but I doubt it.
- 52:21SPEAKER_03: Best regards, Mark.
- 52:22Markara Man,
- 52:24if he was on like a last name,
- 52:26first name list,
- 52:27it'd be Man,
- 52:28Markara Man.
- 52:29SPEAKER_01: And I find that pretty funny.
- 52:31SPEAKER_03: So at that time, Pi was really seen as public enemy number one.
- 52:35But the truth is,
- 52:36the net neutrality wars just sort of fizzled out after that.
- 52:40SPEAKER_03: Like there were still legal challenges in a few states,
- 52:42SPEAKER_03: including Washington state,
- 52:43SPEAKER_03: my own state,
- 52:44SPEAKER_03: enacted their own net neutrality rules,
- 52:46SPEAKER_03: rules that have,
- 52:46SPEAKER_03: by the way,
- 52:47SPEAKER_03: never been legally enforced.
- 52:49SPEAKER_03: But the public just sort of stopped caring.
- 52:51SPEAKER_03: There was other shit going on.
- 52:53SPEAKER_03: You know,
- 52:53the same companies that had supported net neutrality were being
- 52:56blamed for Trump's
- 52:57SPEAKER_03: election.
- 52:58SPEAKER_03: There was Cambridge Analytica.
- 52:59SPEAKER_03: There was fake news on Facebook.
- 53:01SPEAKER_03: Twitter giving Trump a megaphone directly to the public.
- 53:04All of these companies were seen as complicit in his election
- 53:07and his presidency.
- 53:09SPEAKER_03: And in response to that criticism,
- 53:11SPEAKER_03: these companies in turn started censoring conservative content.
- 53:14SPEAKER_03: And that is sort of ironic, right?
- 53:15SPEAKER_03: Like the companies that were fighting for net neutrality,
- 53:18SPEAKER_03: for no discrimination in web access,
- 53:20SPEAKER_03: were absolutely engaging in discrimination themselves.
- 53:24SPEAKER_01: Is that a fair comparison between individual platforms and
- 53:32SPEAKER_01: So I'll be it in an often heavy handed way.
- 53:34If an individual platform says we're not going to allow this
- 53:36sort of content on
- 53:36SPEAKER_01: here,
- 53:37that strikes me as different from Internet service providers
- 53:39being able to pick
- 53:40SPEAKER_01: winners and losers like who gets bandwidth lies.
- 53:44I think that if you advocate for a free and open Internet and
- 53:47then you censor
- 53:48SPEAKER_03: conservative voices because you don't like them,
- 53:50SPEAKER_03: I think you're it.
- 53:51SPEAKER_03: I mean, I think and I think they were doing this.
- 53:53They were they were advocating for net neutrality because of
- 53:57public pressure campaigns.
- 53:58SPEAKER_03: They were censoring conservatives because of public pressure campaigns.
- 54:02SPEAKER_03: They were just responding to what people like who the loudest yeller was.
- 54:06SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 54:07SPEAKER_03: Do you need some examples of the censorship I'm talking about?
- 54:10SPEAKER_01: Sure.
- 54:11SPEAKER_01: Okay, so... And then we can fight over whether it's actually censorship.
- 54:14SPEAKER_03: So Facebook labeled videos by Diamond and Silk.
- 54:17SPEAKER_03: Those are those Trump bloggers.
- 54:18SPEAKER_03: They labeled them as unsafe.
- 54:19SPEAKER_01: Unsafe.
- 54:20They then testified in Congress that the platform was
- 54:24suppressing their content.
- 54:26SPEAKER_03: In July 2018,
- 54:27SPEAKER_03: a Vice News report,
- 54:28SPEAKER_03: so this unimpeachable,
- 54:30they found that Twitter search function was not auto-suggesting
- 54:33Republican
- 54:34SPEAKER_03: officials' accounts.
- 54:35SPEAKER_03: This fueled claims of shadow banning.
- 54:37SPEAKER_03: In August 2018,
- 54:39SPEAKER_03: Apple,
- 54:39SPEAKER_03: Facebook,
- 54:40SPEAKER_03: YouTube,
- 54:40SPEAKER_03: and Spotify banned Alex Jones for repeated violations.
- 54:43SPEAKER_03: Around the same time, Twitter banned the Proud Boys and Gavin McInnes.
- 54:47SPEAKER_03: And then, of course, later banned Donald Trump after January 6th.
- 54:51And even if you think that these actions are totally fine and
- 54:54these are independent companies...
- 54:56SPEAKER_03: engaging in their own content moderation practices.
- 54:59SPEAKER_03: I think people can make that argument.
- 55:00SPEAKER_03: But the perception that social media was censoring conservative voices,
- 55:05SPEAKER_03: for one,
- 55:05SPEAKER_03: it kicked off the partisan debate over social media fairness.
- 55:08And two,
- 55:09more importantly,
- 55:10it led to Elon Musk's eventual purchase of Twitter.
- 55:13SPEAKER_03: I think all of that is downstream.
- 55:15SPEAKER_01: I agree.
- 55:16SPEAKER_03: And at the same time,
- 55:17all the predictions about this two-tiered internet with fast
- 55:20lanes and slow lanes
- 55:22SPEAKER_03: and mass censorship,
- 55:23SPEAKER_03: it just didn't materialize.
- 55:25So between the time that net neutrality protections were
- 55:27repealed in 2024,
- 55:29the only major incident often cited as a net neutrality
- 55:33violation was during the
- 55:34SPEAKER_03: 2018 Mendocino wildfire.
- 55:37SPEAKER_03: So the Santa Clara Fire Department's command vehicle hit its data cap,
- 55:40SPEAKER_03: and the carrier initially required them to upgrade their plan.
- 55:44SPEAKER_01: That's not a net neutrality thing.
- 55:45SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 55:46SPEAKER_03: So net neutrality activists point to this as a violation,
- 55:48but data caps are not a net neutrality issue because net
- 55:52neutrality is about equal
- 55:53SPEAKER_03: access to content,
- 55:54SPEAKER_03: not the amount of data a customer can use.
- 55:57So this is this thing that often happens where net neutrality
- 56:00activists will point
- 56:01SPEAKER_03: or John Oliver will point to these examples of net neutrality violations,
- 56:04SPEAKER_03: but they're not actually net neutrality violations.
- 56:06SPEAKER_01: Yeah, they seem to do that a lot.
- 56:09SPEAKER_03: Yeah,
- 56:09SPEAKER_03: so the repeal of net neutrality did not,
- 56:11SPEAKER_03: you might have noticed,
- 56:13SPEAKER_03: usher in the end of the free and open internet.
- 56:15SPEAKER_03: You know, we're all here.
- 56:17SPEAKER_03: We can see it now.
- 56:18SPEAKER_03: The internet has its flaws, but it's pretty open.
- 56:21And the censorship that I've seen in recent years was not from
- 56:24Comcast or Verizon.
- 56:26SPEAKER_03: It was from Twitter and Facebook and Reddit and YouTube.
- 56:29SPEAKER_03: It was from Cloudflare,
- 56:31SPEAKER_03: which didn't directly censor KiwiFarms,
- 56:34SPEAKER_03: but they did refuse to...
- 56:35SPEAKER_01: They took an action that anyone could have guessed what would happen.
- 56:38SPEAKER_01: Right.
- 56:39SPEAKER_03: But then in 2020, there was another election.
- 56:42So after Biden took office in 2021,
- 56:44he named FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel.
- 56:46SPEAKER_03: He named her chairman.
- 56:48SPEAKER_03: And she,
- 56:48SPEAKER_03: just like Ajit Pai,
- 56:49promised to overturn her predecessor's legacy and now reinstate
- 56:53net neutrality,
- 56:54SPEAKER_03: which the Biden FCC did in April 2024.
- 56:58But this time around,
- 57:00A,
- 57:00few people cared,
- 57:01and B,
- 57:02the legal landscape had changed dramatically.
- 57:05SPEAKER_03: So in July of 2024, the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron rule.
- 57:09This was the rule that let courts defer to federal agencies
- 57:12when laws were unclear.
- 57:14SPEAKER_03: And this significantly handcapped federal agencies.
- 57:17And it meant that the Biden FCC's net neutrality order was
- 57:20almost guaranteed to
- 57:21SPEAKER_03: lose in court,
- 57:22SPEAKER_03: which it did in January 2025.
- 57:24SPEAKER_03: So once again, net neutrality was dead.
- 57:27And the reaction could not have been more different than it was
- 57:30when Ajit Pai
- 57:31SPEAKER_03: killed it in 2017.
- 57:33SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 57:33SPEAKER_03: back then there were lawsuits,
- 57:35SPEAKER_03: massive campaigns,
- 57:36SPEAKER_03: viral outrage,
- 57:37SPEAKER_03: media coverage,
- 57:38SPEAKER_03: a John Oliver segment,
- 57:39SPEAKER_03: wasted pizzas,
- 57:40SPEAKER_03: people threatened his kids.
- 57:42But this time,
- 57:42I didn't even know that this happened until I started working
- 57:45on this segment.
- 57:45SPEAKER_03: Did you?
- 57:47SPEAKER_01: No, I did not.
- 57:48SPEAKER_03: Yeah, no one cared.
- 57:50SPEAKER_03: And the truth is,
- 57:51SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 57:51SPEAKER_03: in the long history of the internet,
- 57:52SPEAKER_03: or the short history of the internet,
- 57:54SPEAKER_03: network neutrality has only been official policy for about two years,
- 58:00SPEAKER_03: two years and change.
- 58:01SPEAKER_03: So Jesse,
- 58:01SPEAKER_03: I'm curious,
- 58:02SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 58:02do you think anything was different about the internet in those
- 58:05few years when net
- 58:06SPEAKER_03: neutrality was on the books?
- 58:07SPEAKER_01: No, I also don't think
- 58:11I think like whether or not we would notice it doesn't
- 58:13necessarily answer the question.
- 58:15I think it probably turns out – I mean obviously the worst like
- 58:18Banksy-esque fears
- 58:19of like you have to pay to do anything on the internet didn't
- 58:24come true and never
- 58:24were going to come true just because of how like competition
- 58:26and markets work.
- 58:28SPEAKER_01: Part of me is still not convinced.
- 58:30I guess I don't understand the downside of having some of these
- 58:33regulations.
- 58:34I think it's one thing if people really misunderstood the
- 58:36technical arguments and
- 58:37SPEAKER_01: if John Oliver was sloppy.
- 58:41SPEAKER_01: It seems like overall this didn't seem like an issue.
- 58:44I still don't like the idea of ISPs being able to pick winners
- 58:47and losers if they
- 58:48SPEAKER_01: could technically do that.
- 58:50SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 58:50SPEAKER_03: But the thing is, they don't.
- 58:51SPEAKER_03: So that's what the anti-net neutrality advocates argue.
- 58:56SPEAKER_03: This isn't something that happens.
- 58:58SPEAKER_03: ISPs don't do this.
- 59:00SPEAKER_03: Customers wouldn't like it.
- 59:01SPEAKER_03: They don't do it.
- 59:02SPEAKER_03: So the regulations themselves are unnecessary.
- 59:05It's not as though I don't think there are real threats to a
- 59:07free and open internet.
- 59:08SPEAKER_03: I do.
- 59:09SPEAKER_03: Like,
- 59:09Congress is currently closer to eliminating Section 230 of the
- 59:13Communications
- 59:13SPEAKER_03: Decency Act than ever before.
- 59:15SPEAKER_03: This would mean that websites are liable for what users post on them.
- 59:19And the implications for this are massive because if a company
- 59:22can be sued for what
- 59:23SPEAKER_03: people say on their app or in the comments section or on social media,
- 59:26SPEAKER_03: platforms will start censoring websites.
- 59:28SPEAKER_03: Much more.
- 59:29SPEAKER_03: And there would be some upsides to this, to be sure.
- 59:31SPEAKER_03: You know, if Facebook can get sued for scams posted on their platform.
- 59:35SPEAKER_03: I mean, a huge, a huge percentage of Facebook content is scams.
- 59:40SPEAKER_03: If they could be sued for that, they would crack down on scammers.
- 59:43SPEAKER_03: Yeah.
- 59:43SPEAKER_03: But the implications for free speech are enormous or maybe not.
- 59:47I mean,
- 59:47maybe it'll be just like net neutrality and we won't actually
- 59:50notice when it's gone.
- 59:51SPEAKER_03: I kind of doubt it, though.
- 59:52SPEAKER_01: This seems like much more specific and less hypothetical.
- 59:55SPEAKER_01: If Facebook was really held responsible for anything posted to it,
- 59:58SPEAKER_01: it's hard to see how that wouldn't be a disaster.
- 1:00:00SPEAKER_03: I mean,
- 1:00:00SPEAKER_03: if we were held responsible for what people said in our comments,
- 1:00:02SPEAKER_03: we would moderate the comments.
- 1:00:04SPEAKER_03: Yeah,
- 1:00:05SPEAKER_03: so my position where I land on this now,
- 1:00:07SPEAKER_03: which is not where I was in 2017,
- 1:00:10SPEAKER_03: 2018,
- 1:00:10SPEAKER_03: is that this was kind of much ado about nothing.
- 1:00:12But I wanted to check with people who were more directly
- 1:00:14involved in the fight.
- 1:00:15SPEAKER_03: So I emailed publicknowledge.com.
- 1:00:17SPEAKER_03: The Electronic Frontier Foundation,
- 1:00:19SPEAKER_03: pre-press,
- 1:00:19SPEAKER_03: Fight for Our Future,
- 1:00:20SPEAKER_03: Demand Progress,
- 1:00:22SPEAKER_03: half a dozen net neutrality activists.
- 1:00:24SPEAKER_03: I emailed Tim Wu.
- 1:00:25SPEAKER_03: I asked them all the same question.
- 1:00:27SPEAKER_03: Now that net neutrality is dead, what has changed for consumers?
- 1:00:31SPEAKER_01: Guess what they said?
- 1:00:34SPEAKER_01: I don't know.
- 1:00:35SPEAKER_01: You tell me.
- 1:00:36SPEAKER_03: Nothing.
- 1:00:37SPEAKER_03: No one wrote me back.
- 1:00:37SPEAKER_03: I didn't get a single fucking response.
- 1:00:41SPEAKER_03: I did have better luck with a scholar named David Chofniss.
- 1:00:44SPEAKER_03: He's at Northwestern.
- 1:00:46So he published a paper in 2019 that claimed that wireless
- 1:00:50networks are throttling
- 1:00:51SPEAKER_03: content all the time.
- 1:00:52SPEAKER_03: And to test this, he and his researchers built an app called WeHe.
- 1:00:57So people can download the app and it basically runs speed
- 1:00:59tests for different apps
- 1:01:01SPEAKER_03: on your phone.
- 1:01:01SPEAKER_03: So you can select like Instagram, Netflix, HBO Max, et cetera.
- 1:01:06SPEAKER_03: And it'll tell you if your network provider is throttling your speed.
- 1:01:10SPEAKER_03: You can download the app yourself to test this.
- 1:01:12SPEAKER_03: So I talked to Choffness on the phone.
- 1:01:15SPEAKER_03: And what he told me is that they found,
- 1:01:17what they found is that throttling basically does not happen on
- 1:01:21wired broadband
- 1:01:22SPEAKER_03: networks.
- 1:01:23SPEAKER_03: So your home Wi-Fi, fiber, whatever, they don't throttle content.
- 1:01:27SPEAKER_03: But they found that cellular networks do this all the time,
- 1:01:30SPEAKER_03: specifically when it comes to streaming video.
- 1:01:32So he named Verizon,
- 1:01:33AT&T,
- 1:01:34T-Mobile,
- 1:01:35Xfinity,
- 1:01:36prepaid carriers like Cricket and Boost,
- 1:01:38SPEAKER_03: And when I asked him why would they do this,
- 1:01:40SPEAKER_03: he said he doesn't know because a lot of these companies advertise,
- 1:01:43SPEAKER_03: you know,
- 1:01:44SPEAKER_03: lightning fast 5G,
- 1:01:45so why would they be slowing down streaming video if it
- 1:01:47degrades the quality of the
- 1:01:48SPEAKER_03: service for the customer?
- 1:01:49SPEAKER_03: He didn't have an answer to that.
- 1:01:51SPEAKER_03: But according to Choffness,
- 1:01:52these cell companies are constantly violating the principles of
- 1:01:55net neutrality,
- 1:01:55SPEAKER_03: not by blocking,
- 1:01:56SPEAKER_03: which would be obvious,
- 1:01:57SPEAKER_03: but by slowing down video streaming.
- 1:02:00So it sounds like it does have an impact on some consumers'
- 1:02:03experience,
- 1:02:04right?
- 1:02:05SPEAKER_03: Well, here's the thing.
- 1:02:05SPEAKER_03: So...
- 1:02:07There can be multiple reasons why you're having trouble
- 1:02:09streaming video on your phone.
- 1:02:10SPEAKER_03: So this happens all the time, right?
- 1:02:11SPEAKER_03: It could be your Wi-Fi signal,
- 1:02:13or it could be that your provider is intentionally lowering
- 1:02:16your download speeds
- 1:02:16SPEAKER_03: and you might not know which it is.
- 1:02:18SPEAKER_03: And even if your provider is throttling, you might not notice.
- 1:02:21SPEAKER_03: So I downloaded Wi-Fi.
- 1:02:23SPEAKER_03: I tested my home Wi-Fi.
- 1:02:25SPEAKER_03: It's through Spectrum, no throttling detective.
- 1:02:27SPEAKER_03: And then I turned off Wi-Fi and I got on 5G.
- 1:02:30SPEAKER_03: My cell provider is Mint.
- 1:02:31SPEAKER_03: And I ran the app again.
- 1:02:32SPEAKER_03: And WeHe did detect throttling on my HBO Max app.
- 1:02:36SPEAKER_03: Significant throttling, too.
- 1:02:37SPEAKER_03: It was like half the download speed it should have been.
- 1:02:39SPEAKER_03: So then I opened up HBO Max on my phone.
- 1:02:43SPEAKER_03: And I pulled up the first video.
- 1:02:45SPEAKER_03: And it was completely fine.
- 1:02:46SPEAKER_03: So no delay, no lags at all.
- 1:02:48SPEAKER_03: So were they throttling?
- 1:02:50SPEAKER_03: According to WeHe, yes.
- 1:02:51SPEAKER_03: But it didn't degrade my experience as a user.
- 1:02:54SPEAKER_01: OK.
- 1:02:54So – but I mean this basically suggests that the basic argument
- 1:03:00that these big
- 1:03:02SPEAKER_01: companies could pick winners and losers and choose to throttle,
- 1:03:06SPEAKER_01: that they do that.
- 1:03:07It's just you're just saying it hasn't affected your experience
- 1:03:09and you think it
- 1:03:10SPEAKER_01: might not affect other users' experiences.
- 1:03:12SPEAKER_03: Well, I have no idea.
- 1:03:13SPEAKER_03: I mean, people download the app.
- 1:03:14SPEAKER_03: Try it for yourself.
- 1:03:15SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 1:03:15So I also I ran this paper by Will Reinhart from the American
- 1:03:19Enterprise Institute.
- 1:03:20SPEAKER_03: Will has been following this issue for years.
- 1:03:22SPEAKER_03: He's a free market guy, low regulation guy.
- 1:03:24SPEAKER_03: He's a critic of net neutrality regulations,
- 1:03:27SPEAKER_03: not the principles of net neutrality,
- 1:03:29SPEAKER_03: but the regulations themselves.
- 1:03:30So he read Choffness's paper and he pointed out that if
- 1:03:34Choffness is correct,
- 1:03:35The companies were throttling video apps when the 2015 net
- 1:03:39neutrality order was in place.
- 1:03:41SPEAKER_03: So the researchers, their data set was from January 2018 to January 2019.
- 1:03:46SPEAKER_03: The net neutrality repeal wasn't in effect until June 2018.
- 1:03:51SPEAKER_03: So for the first half of the study,
- 1:03:53SPEAKER_03: there were net neutrality laws on the books,
- 1:03:55SPEAKER_03: and it doesn't appear to have changed the carrier's behavior whatsoever.
- 1:04:00So I suspect Troughton's would say,
- 1:04:01okay,
- 1:04:01well,
- 1:04:01then the problem is enforcement.
- 1:04:03SPEAKER_03: But Reinhart told me in an email, quote, if these policies, i.e.
- 1:04:06SPEAKER_03: the throttling,
- 1:04:07SPEAKER_03: predated the repeal of federal net neutrality rules,
- 1:04:10then the predictions about what ISPs would do absent regulation
- 1:04:15were demonstrably
- 1:04:15SPEAKER_03: wrong.
- 1:04:16SPEAKER_03: The behavior was already happening under the rules.
- 1:04:19SPEAKER_01: Gotcha.
- 1:04:20SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 1:04:20SPEAKER_03: So Will also told me that bigger picture,
- 1:04:23SPEAKER_03: when it comes to this years-long fight over net neutrality,
- 1:04:25SPEAKER_03: he said,
- 1:04:26SPEAKER_03: quote,
- 1:04:27SPEAKER_03: the real tragedy wasn't just the wasted resources,
- 1:04:29SPEAKER_03: but the opportunity cost.
- 1:04:31SPEAKER_03: While activists were celebrating their victory at the FCC,
- 1:04:34SPEAKER_03: they ignored the more difficult but durable path of legislative action.
- 1:04:38SPEAKER_03: Congress moves slowly, but when it acts, the results tend to stick.
- 1:04:42So he's saying that if activists had focused more on enshrining
- 1:04:45net neutrality in law,
- 1:04:47Rather than flooding the FCC with comments because John Oliver
- 1:04:50told them to,
- 1:04:51SPEAKER_03: maybe net neutrality would have become permanent,
- 1:04:54SPEAKER_03: but instead it shifted as the FCC did.
- 1:04:57SPEAKER_01: So it's just,
- 1:04:57SPEAKER_01: right,
- 1:04:57just a less durable way of seeking these changes because of the
- 1:05:00way the FCC
- 1:05:01SPEAKER_01: pingpongs back and forth.
- 1:05:02SPEAKER_03: Right.
- 1:05:03SPEAKER_03: I'm going to leave the last word on this to Will.
- 1:05:05SPEAKER_03: He also said this.
- 1:05:06SPEAKER_03: To me,
- 1:05:07this is a story about how a small group of organizations
- 1:05:10learned to weaponize
- 1:05:11public attention and regulatory capture to achieve policy goals
- 1:05:15that couldn't
- 1:05:15SPEAKER_03: survive the legislative process.
- 1:05:17It's about how the modern administrative state became a
- 1:05:20battlefield for competing
- 1:05:21SPEAKER_03: visions of information control,
- 1:05:23with both sides learning that viral moments and coordinated
- 1:05:26pressure campaigns
- 1:05:27SPEAKER_03: could override traditional democratic deliberation.
- 1:05:30SPEAKER_03: But most importantly,
- 1:05:32it's about the first major political movement to discover the
- 1:05:34power of mobilizing
- 1:05:36SPEAKER_03: online outrage.
- 1:05:37SPEAKER_03: So there you have it, Jesse, many hours later.
- 1:05:40SPEAKER_03: And basically where I land on this is that in many ways,
- 1:05:44SPEAKER_03: the net neutrality wars were a gigantic waste of time and energy.
- 1:05:48SPEAKER_03: But on the other hand, we got two podcasts out of it.
- 1:05:51SPEAKER_03: And I would say that is worth several million comments to the FCC.
- 1:05:55SPEAKER_01: We did.
- 1:05:55SPEAKER_01: Thank God for that.
- 1:05:56SPEAKER_01: Well, thank you, Katie.
- 1:05:57SPEAKER_01: That's like a really, really complicated subject.
- 1:06:00SPEAKER_03: Yes, it's so complicated.
- 1:06:01SPEAKER_03: I feel, I think a little bit smarter now.
- 1:06:04SPEAKER_03: I want to thank Will Reinhart.
- 1:06:06SPEAKER_03: He is like instrumental in helping me understand this.
- 1:06:09SPEAKER_03: And also Timothy B. Lee, who also was great help.
- 1:06:12SPEAKER_01: This has been Blocked Reported.
- 1:06:14SPEAKER_01: As always, we are produced with help from Jessica the 80s Baby.
- 1:06:17SPEAKER_01: Thank you for listening and goodbye.
- 1:06:19SPEAKER_01: I hope this isn't throttled.
- 1:06:20SPEAKER_03: Bye.
- 1:06:25Bye.