Latest / The conspiracy / The CHARLIE KIRK Cover-Up_ the darkest rabbit hole I_ve ever investigated

Transcript

The CHARLIE KIRK Cover-Up_ the darkest rabbit hole I_ve ever investigated · The conspiracy

0:02
Speaker 1: I mean, there's just no way.
0:04
Speaker 2: In the turbulent landscape of American conservatism, the assassination of
0:08
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk has turned into a pivotal moment that has
0:11
Speaker 2: not only shaken the foundations of our country, but has
0:14
Speaker 2: also served to further unite and divide the people of America.
0:18
Speaker 2: One thing, though, that I think we can all agree on,
0:21
Speaker 2: is that a government will always lie to its people.
0:24
Speaker 2: A government will always seek to preserve itself, and if
0:26
Speaker 2: that means lying directly to the faces of its own constituents.
0:30
Speaker 1: That's what it will do.
0:32
Speaker 2: And that's what I believe is happening right here, that's
0:35
Speaker 2: playing out right in front of our very eyes. If
0:38
Speaker 2: you want to check where I got the information for
0:39
Speaker 2: this video, there's a resources document. In the description, all
0:43
Speaker 2: parties are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court
0:45
Speaker 2: of law. But without further ado, let's just dig right
0:48
Speaker 2: into the story. So this video is not gonna be political.
0:50
Speaker 2: I'm not going to include any opinions whatsoever about politics.
0:54
Speaker 2: But I think that by the end of this rundown,
0:56
Speaker 2: you are going to believe not only that the government's
0:59
Speaker 2: lying to you, but that the United States government mainly
1:03
Speaker 2: the FBI under Cash Pattel thinks that you are a stupid,
1:07
Speaker 2: bumbling idiot who cannot possibly tell true from false. I mean,
1:13
Speaker 2: some of the facts that I'm about to present you
1:15
Speaker 2: with are comical. And it doesn't matter if you loved
1:19
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk or if you hated Charlie Kirk. This story,
1:22
Speaker 2: what we're talking about right now, is about deep, deep
1:26
Speaker 2: corruption within the United States government and it flows into
1:29
Speaker 2: all other aspects of the US government and our daily lives.
1:33
Speaker 2: Really quick shout out. If you want to watch these
1:35
Speaker 2: videos fully uncensored, please consider joining me on Patreon. There's
1:39
Speaker 2: a link in the description. YouTube frequently demonetizes, age restricts,
1:42
Speaker 2: or even removes my videos. So thank you to everybody
1:45
Speaker 2: on Patreon who is helping to keep this show running.
1:48
Speaker 2: So the official story of Charlie Kirk's shooting goes as follows.
1:52
Speaker 2: If you're somehow unaware at this point. On August twenty
1:54
Speaker 2: seventh of this year, Turning Point USA, Charlie Kirk's organization
1:58
Speaker 2: announced the America Comeback Tour, with the inaugural or first
2:02
Speaker 2: event scheduled for September tenth at Utah Valley University UVU
2:07
Speaker 2: in Orum Utah, expecting around three thousand attendees. Charlie Kirk,
2:12
Speaker 2: a thirty one year old conservative activist and Trump ally,
2:15
Speaker 2: had voiced concerns for his own safety in a speech
2:18
Speaker 2: that he delivered in June of this year, and in
2:21
Speaker 2: that speech eerily he had highlighted what he believed were
2:24
Speaker 2: the risks that came with holding these campus events, the
2:27
Speaker 2: dangers of appearing on college campuses, talking to kids, and
2:31
Speaker 2: just being out there in the open. Meanwhile, at around
2:34
Speaker 2: that same time, according to the FBI, twenty two year
2:37
Speaker 2: old Tyler James Robinson, an electrical apprentice from Saint George,
2:40
Speaker 2: Utah with no criminal history, began fixating on Charlie Kirk
2:45
Speaker 2: for reasons at this point that are yet to be
2:47
Speaker 2: fully explained in the official story. However, at some point,
2:51
Speaker 2: according to officials, Tyler Robinson decided that he was going
2:55
Speaker 2: to kill Charlie Kirk. So he allegedly came in possession
2:58
Speaker 2: of a budget hunting rifle in early September and began
3:02
Speaker 2: scouting Utah Valley University via social media videos. Now in
3:06
Speaker 2: early September twenty twenty five, a week or so before
3:09
Speaker 2: the shooting, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson acquires that
3:13
Speaker 2: rifle that he would allegedly go on to use in
3:16
Speaker 2: the shooting and engrave the casings with taunts like hay
3:19
Speaker 2: fascist catch and other references to online memes. On the
3:24
Speaker 2: evening of September ninth, twenty and twenty five, Charlie Kirk
3:28
Speaker 2: arrived in Utah. However, it should be noted that no
3:31
Speaker 2: metal detectors were implemented at the outdoor amphitheater. Early that
3:34
Speaker 2: next morning, Tyler Robinson, the future Shooter takes off from
3:38
Speaker 2: his home over three hundred miles away and drives his
3:41
Speaker 2: gray Dodge Challenger towards Orum. On September tenth, twenty twenty five,
3:45
Speaker 2: at eight twenty nine am, Tyler Robinson parks on the
3:49
Speaker 2: UVU campus dressed in a black T shirt with an
3:51
Speaker 2: American flag in eagle jeans, a baseball cap, sunglasses, and backpack,
3:56
Speaker 2: and attempts to blend into the student crowd. The FBI
3:59
Speaker 2: lay stated that at some point, while he was on
4:02
Speaker 2: the roof of the building preparing to take the fatal
4:05
Speaker 2: shot at Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson changes his clothing into
4:08
Speaker 2: a different set of clothes. They said that he arrived
4:11
Speaker 2: on scene wearing something different. The fatal shooting occurred during
4:14
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk's midday address, shattering the event's patriotic atmosphere and
4:19
Speaker 2: triggering a rapid security response amidst screams from the crowd
4:22
Speaker 2: and rapid evacuations. When the shooting occurred, Charlie Kirk was
4:26
Speaker 2: mid sentence discussing mass shootings with a student when allegedly
4:30
Speaker 2: a single supersonic round from Tyler Robinson's rifle fired from
4:35
Speaker 2: a rooftop struck him right in the neck. So, do
4:40
Speaker 2: you know how many transgender Americans have been mass.
4:43
Speaker 3: Shooters over the last ten years? Too many? America's fine? Okay,
4:53
Speaker 3: now buy us along, right, I'm gonna give you, gonna
4:55
Speaker 3: give his credit. Do you know how many masshooters.
4:57
Speaker 2: There have been in America.
4:59
Speaker 3: Over the last time, counting or not counting gang violence?
5:02
Speaker 2: Great The time was twelve twenty three PM, and when
5:09
Speaker 2: the bullet struck Kirk in the neck, it caused him
5:11
Speaker 2: to immediately collapse and almost instantly die, despite bystanders and
5:15
Speaker 2: members of Charlie Kirk's team performing on stage CPR and
5:19
Speaker 2: later taking a metavac to a hospital. According to the
5:22
Speaker 2: official story, after shooting Charlie Kirk. Tyler Robinson then changed
5:26
Speaker 2: back into his original clothing, disassembled his rifle, stuffed all
5:29
Speaker 2: of that in his backpack, then fled the scene. According
5:32
Speaker 2: to the FBI, Robinson left evidence that the scene, like
5:35
Speaker 2: palm prints and a Converse footprint and a screwdriver.
5:39
Speaker 1: With his DNA on it.
5:40
Speaker 2: Immediately, a UVU campus lockdown ensued and the FBI launched
5:44
Speaker 2: a national manhunt, offering up a one hundred thousand dollars
5:48
Speaker 2: reward leading to the capture of the shooter. Videos of
5:51
Speaker 2: that graphic moment immediately went viral, which obviously amplified the
5:55
Speaker 2: shock to people all across the world felt when they
5:58
Speaker 2: first heard the story and heard of Charlie Kirk's death.
6:01
Speaker 2: The thirty three hour pursuit of Tyler Robinson, according to
6:05
Speaker 2: the FBI, involved over two hundred interviews and seven thousand tips,
6:09
Speaker 2: culminating in Tyler's surrender on September eleventh. But what led
6:13
Speaker 2: to his surrender, While according to the official story, Tyler's
6:17
Speaker 2: mother recognized him in FBI released suspect photos that began
6:21
Speaker 2: to circulate around midday on September eleventh, despite his earlier
6:25
Speaker 2: text to his mom claiming he was homesick in Saint George, Utah,
6:29
Speaker 2: the previous day. This discrepancy that Tyler's mother noticed prompted
6:33
Speaker 2: her to confront him on the phone, which led to
6:35
Speaker 2: a partial confession, where Robinson admitted that he killed Charlie
6:39
Speaker 2: Kirk and expressed fears of a violent police confrontation, and
6:43
Speaker 2: even told his mom that he was thinking of self deletion.
6:45
Speaker 2: Tyler's parents, registered Republicans, with no prior indication of their
6:49
Speaker 2: son's radicalization, immediately sought help from a trusted family friend
6:54
Speaker 2: who just so happened to be a retired deputy sheriff
6:57
Speaker 2: and a youth pastor to de escalate the situation and
7:00
Speaker 2: negotiate safe terms for Tyler's surrender, emphasizing that they did
7:04
Speaker 2: not want a SWAT raid on their home, and from
7:07
Speaker 2: that point on, the FBI knew that they had their man,
7:10
Speaker 2: and they then swept in and arrested him. Now interestingly,
7:13
Speaker 2: Tyler Robinson's words after his arrest have revealed no distinct
7:18
Speaker 2: ties to any organized groups, but his alleged online paper
7:22
Speaker 2: trail has revealed personal ideological grievances. After Tyler's arrest, charges
7:27
Speaker 2: followed swiftly with prosecutors publicly saying they want the death
7:30
Speaker 2: penalty for the politically motivated Act, which has sparked debates
7:34
Speaker 2: here in America on assassination, culture, security lapses, and violent rhetoric.
7:39
Speaker 1: Vigils.
7:39
Speaker 2: Trump's Medal of Freedom award and Charlie Kirk's September twenty
7:43
Speaker 2: first memorial have drawn massive crowds. Will polls in America
7:46
Speaker 2: show that people are becoming more receptive to partisan political violence.
7:51
Speaker 2: As of September twenty fourth, the day that I'm recording
7:53
Speaker 2: this video, investigations are continuing into the potential online radicalization
7:58
Speaker 2: of Tyler Robinson.
7:59
Speaker 1: So it's very long winded. I'm sorry.
8:01
Speaker 2: I know you guys probably know that story and the
8:04
Speaker 2: facts are facts are familiar, but it's very important to
8:09
Speaker 2: stress to you the clear and concise version of the
8:12
Speaker 2: story that the FBI is going with, so that now,
8:16
Speaker 2: like a vulture on a corpse, we can go in
8:18
Speaker 2: and pick it apart piece by piece. And yes, that
8:21
Speaker 2: is the official story. So according to those around him,
8:25
Speaker 2: like his friend, family members, people like that, but most
8:28
Speaker 2: importantly not according to Tyler himself. Tyler Robinson essentially rated
8:33
Speaker 2: on himself after planning and executing a perfect getaway and
8:37
Speaker 2: then was taken into custody. But curiously, here's one of
8:40
Speaker 2: the first things that sticks out to me. Tyler Robinson
8:43
Speaker 2: to date has not admitted to the authorities that he
8:46
Speaker 2: is the shooter. He has not spoken to them during
8:49
Speaker 2: interrogations or interviews, and he's provided them with no official
8:53
Speaker 2: corroboration of the story or timeline. He has not stated
8:57
Speaker 2: that it was him that pulled this whole thing off.
9:00
Speaker 2: He is not the shooter, he said, I couldn't find
9:03
Speaker 2: anything that he said, Like, I don't think he's spoken
9:05
Speaker 2: to the authorities at all. Kind of like not to
9:08
Speaker 2: draw comparison, but Lee Harvey Oswald was kind of pulling
9:11
Speaker 2: similar stuff. He was more denying that he was a shooter.
9:15
Speaker 2: But it's just kind of a similar vibe to me.
9:17
Speaker 2: In the wake of the JFK shooting, this is where
9:19
Speaker 2: the cracks and the official story, in my opinion, really
9:22
Speaker 2: begin to surface. So I do want to state this
9:25
Speaker 2: is all opinion. This is just what I'm pointing out.
9:28
Speaker 2: These are the factual things that I believe do not
9:32
Speaker 2: make any sense and point to some sort of more,
9:35
Speaker 2: some sort of larger, more malignant narrative that could exist
9:40
Speaker 2: surrounding the shooting of Charlie Kirk. I'm not gonna suggest
9:44
Speaker 2: to you a person who I think did this, or
9:47
Speaker 2: a group or a country. I am simply gonna put
9:50
Speaker 2: the facts in front of your face. Then you can
9:52
Speaker 2: decide does this make sense to you or does it not?
9:56
Speaker 2: And if you want to verify everything that I'm saying,
9:58
Speaker 2: I always post a resources document in the description of
10:01
Speaker 2: this show. So go access the resources document and check
10:05
Speaker 2: out all this evidence draw your own conclusions yourself. Before
10:08
Speaker 2: we get into all the strangeness, though, I want to
10:10
Speaker 2: show you a somewhat unrelated clip, so I want you
10:14
Speaker 2: to remember all of this evidence, this theory, this story
10:18
Speaker 2: has been presented mainly by the FBI, which is led
10:21
Speaker 2: currently by a man named Cash Patel. Now, interestingly, the
10:25
Speaker 2: FBI immediately took almost all the credit for the investigation
10:28
Speaker 2: and for Tyler Robinson's capture, even though they really didn't
10:32
Speaker 2: even do.
10:32
Speaker 1: All that much.
10:33
Speaker 2: It was Tyler Robinson's you know, parents or family friend
10:36
Speaker 2: according to the story, who turned him in.
10:38
Speaker 1: They gave the solid lead.
10:39
Speaker 2: The FBI was way behind trying to figure out who
10:42
Speaker 2: he was. But for a moment, let's focus on Cash Patel. Now,
10:46
Speaker 2: a lot of people I know online are just naturally
10:49
Speaker 2: going to trust the FBI, They're going to trust the government.
10:52
Speaker 2: They think that the government cannot lie to them, that
10:54
Speaker 2: they would never lie to them, that they do no wrong.
10:57
Speaker 2: But I think in recent years we've seen I mean,
11:00
Speaker 2: you know, conspiratorial thought used to be more of like
11:04
Speaker 2: a right leaning, right wing thing that people were slammed
11:08
Speaker 2: for believing in. You know, it was like almost a
11:10
Speaker 2: derogatory term to be called a conspiracy theorist, and it
11:13
Speaker 2: still is for some a very small group of people.
11:16
Speaker 2: It's still a slanderous term when you call someone, oh,
11:20
Speaker 2: conspiracy theorist.
11:22
Speaker 1: But as we're seeing.
11:23
Speaker 2: With Epstein, how many videos have I made on Epstein,
11:25
Speaker 2: I've got so many more coming. That issue is uniting
11:29
Speaker 2: the right and the left because you can clearly see
11:32
Speaker 2: in real time a government cover up being put into place.
11:37
Speaker 1: You aren't.
11:38
Speaker 2: Actually it's unprecedented. We are watching these as these events transpire,
11:44
Speaker 2: the cover up not only form but gets sealed into place,
11:49
Speaker 2: glued into place, whatever you'd say, Like you're seeing these
11:51
Speaker 2: people put the puzzle pieces in and then apply epoxy
11:55
Speaker 2: or I don't know, whatever the hell resident over the
11:57
Speaker 2: top so that it can never be broken again. Absolutely crazy,
12:01
Speaker 2: And the guy in charge of the FBI right now
12:03
Speaker 2: is obviously Cash Pattel. Back in when was it July,
12:08
Speaker 2: early July or mid July? Whenever, that was Cash Pattel,
12:12
Speaker 2: the FBI, the DOJ, Pambondi released that infamous document that
12:17
Speaker 2: Presser released whatever it was, whatever you'd call that, the
12:20
Speaker 2: memo I guess, saying that Epstein never trafficked anybody, He
12:24
Speaker 2: was essentially completely innocent, He never trafficked a soul that
12:28
Speaker 2: he definitively self deleted, and a number of other things,
12:32
Speaker 2: but basically just saying that all the evidence that shows
12:35
Speaker 2: that Epstein was a trafficker is basically fabricated or doesn't exist.
12:40
Speaker 2: Now with all of this evidence that, I mean, there's
12:43
Speaker 2: a ton of evidence that has existed surrounding Epstein before
12:46
Speaker 2: that memo was released by the DOJ and FBI, But
12:50
Speaker 2: in the months after they stated Epstein never trafficked anyone,
12:54
Speaker 2: there's been a ton more evidence that's emerged, like so
12:57
Speaker 2: much more evidence, and they have committees investing getting all
13:00
Speaker 2: of this and by partisan groups trying to bring some
13:03
Speaker 2: sort of truth to the Epstein situation and yet Cash Battel,
13:07
Speaker 2: just a few days ago. This isn't a long time ago.
13:10
Speaker 2: I think this was on This was last maybe Friday
13:13
Speaker 2: or Monday. It's Wednesday right now. I can't remember how
13:16
Speaker 2: long ago this was, but it was just a few
13:18
Speaker 2: days ago. Cash Battel actually said this.
13:21
Speaker 1: Check this out now.
13:22
Speaker 4: I know that there's a lot of talk about Epstein,
13:25
Speaker 4: and I'm here to testify that the original sin in
13:27
Speaker 4: the Epstein case was the way it was initially brought
13:29
Speaker 4: by mister Acosta back in two thousand and six. The
13:32
Speaker 4: original case involved a very limited search warrant or set
13:34
Speaker 4: of search warrants, and didn't take as much investigatory material.
13:37
Speaker 5: It should have ceased. If I were the FBI director,
13:39
Speaker 5: then it wouldn't have happened.
13:40
Speaker 3: You've seen most of the files.
13:42
Speaker 6: Who, if any one, did Epstein traffic these young women too?
13:47
Speaker 1: Besides himself himself.
13:49
Speaker 5: There is no credible information none. If there were, I
13:52
Speaker 5: would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.
13:56
Speaker 5: And the information we have, again is limited.
13:58
Speaker 3: So the answer is no one for the.
14:00
Speaker 5: Information that we have in the file, in the case file.
14:04
Speaker 2: Okay, that's right, as you're seeing right there, Cash Patel,
14:08
Speaker 2: the damn stooge himself, is still sitting there saying that
14:12
Speaker 2: Epstein never trafficked anyone, saying there's no credible evidence, which.
14:17
Speaker 1: Is just it's just mind blowing.
14:20
Speaker 2: There is actually so much evidence, whether it's paper trails
14:24
Speaker 2: and financial documents and associations and flight logs and victim
14:29
Speaker 2: testimonies and corroborating evidence and things found in Epstein's homes
14:34
Speaker 2: and the goddamn fact that Glenne Maxwell was convicted of trafficking.
14:38
Speaker 2: He's just ignoring that little factoid. It's just like it's
14:42
Speaker 2: such a bold faced lie that everybody knows is a lie.
14:45
Speaker 1: We all know that that's a lie.
14:47
Speaker 2: Cash, everybody knows it's a lie, and yet he says
14:50
Speaker 2: it with that shit eating expression on his face and
14:53
Speaker 2: just forces it down your throat as if just saying
14:56
Speaker 2: it a bunch of times is gonna make it true.
14:57
Speaker 2: But that to you should show you straight off the
15:00
Speaker 2: bat the kind of FBI that we're dealing with.
15:03
Speaker 1: Now. I know a lot of people.
15:04
Speaker 2: I never thought that there was gonna be really transparency
15:07
Speaker 2: with this administration, obviously, but I know a lot of
15:10
Speaker 2: people out there thought. Cash Pattel seems like a guy
15:13
Speaker 2: who's not been involved in whatever you want to call it,
15:16
Speaker 2: the swamp, and he's gonna come in and be honest
15:19
Speaker 2: and transparent. And Dan Bongino two and Pam Bondi, all
15:22
Speaker 2: these guys are They're like the dream team of heroes
15:25
Speaker 2: that are gonna bring light to the Epstein situation and
15:27
Speaker 2: do this and that. All of them have been corrupted,
15:30
Speaker 2: and you could tell. I mean, once they got in there,
15:32
Speaker 2: they probably got threatened. They were told, you know, you're
15:34
Speaker 2: gonna lose everything, We're gonna blackmail you, we're gonna plant
15:38
Speaker 2: evidence on your devices, we're gonna kill you. I don't
15:40
Speaker 2: know what they what they would have said, but you
15:42
Speaker 2: see from all of them now that they there for
15:45
Speaker 2: years were saying the government is lying, and then the
15:48
Speaker 2: moment they joined the government, they're like, yeah, the lie
15:52
Speaker 2: is the truth and they just started lying. So once
15:55
Speaker 2: a lie is told, a person's credibility begins to crumble.
15:58
Speaker 2: The legitimacy and the integrity of the institution itself also
16:02
Speaker 2: begins to crumble with that of its leader.
16:05
Speaker 1: So if kash.
16:06
Speaker 2: Fittell's lying to you about Epstein, and I don't know
16:08
Speaker 2: how you could believe what he said there, what else
16:10
Speaker 2: is he lying about? If Cash and his crew can
16:13
Speaker 2: lie about Epstein trafficking kids, why couldn't they lie about
16:17
Speaker 2: Tyler Robinson and a event that has completely fundamentally rearranged
16:23
Speaker 2: and reshaped the American political landscape in so many, so
16:27
Speaker 2: many ways.
16:28
Speaker 1: Why couldn't they lie about that? And why wonn't they?
16:30
Speaker 2: Well, before we get any further, let's take a look
16:32
Speaker 2: at the absolute mountain of evidence found within the Kirk
16:36
Speaker 2: assassination story that makes no sense. So the origins of
16:40
Speaker 2: the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, formed the bedrock upon which
16:45
Speaker 2: the FBI's timeline and sequence of events teeters, and yet
16:49
Speaker 2: even this foundation cracks under just a small amount of scrutiny. So,
16:53
Speaker 2: right after the shooting occurred, media reports and initial leaks
16:56
Speaker 2: from law enforcement painted Tyler Robinson known back then just
17:00
Speaker 2: as the suspect out to have been a local student
17:03
Speaker 2: at Utah Valley University. Everyone was saying in the news,
17:06
Speaker 2: this guy had to be a student here, he was
17:08
Speaker 2: so familiar with the campus. It was stated repeatedly that
17:11
Speaker 2: he had to have been a student because he seemingly
17:13
Speaker 2: had an incredibly intimate familiarity with the campus layout. He
17:17
Speaker 2: knew the campus, the ins and outs of the campus
17:20
Speaker 2: like the.
17:20
Speaker 1: Back of his hand.
17:21
Speaker 2: News anchors and federal law enforcement agents publicly emphasized that
17:25
Speaker 2: this could really be the only way to possibly explain
17:29
Speaker 2: how the shooter had ascended completely undetected, through off limits
17:33
Speaker 2: areas in school buildings, through restricted corridors, and through seemingly
17:37
Speaker 2: hidden hallways up to that rooftop vantage point. I mean,
17:41
Speaker 2: to get up to that area. I've read and heard
17:43
Speaker 2: from individuals that have reported on this story. It's really hard.
17:46
Speaker 2: Like normal students, if you're just a student at UVU,
17:50
Speaker 2: you can't just walk up to that rooftop. You can't
17:53
Speaker 2: just access that rooftop if you want to go up there.
17:56
Speaker 2: I don't know exactly what it is. Maybe key cards
17:58
Speaker 2: you have to scan to open up doors. There's no
18:01
Speaker 2: way that you can just walk up there. I mean,
18:03
Speaker 2: I went to school at UT in Austin, and it's
18:06
Speaker 2: like I can't just get up to the rooftop of
18:08
Speaker 2: a building if I want to. Like it's a college campus,
18:11
Speaker 2: they are very secure places and.
18:14
Speaker 1: They think of these things.
18:15
Speaker 2: So when it comes to Tyler Robinson, a lot of
18:17
Speaker 2: people have said that the shooter wouldn't really have known
18:20
Speaker 2: how to get up there unless they had really studied
18:23
Speaker 2: the area for themselves, step by step walking through the process.
18:27
Speaker 2: But according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson only used online
18:31
Speaker 2: resources to construct his assassination plan. He, according to the FBI,
18:36
Speaker 2: never physically visited the university to scope out this area
18:40
Speaker 2: prior to the shooting. Now that may change. They may
18:42
Speaker 2: find a video that they purport shows Tyler Robinson four
18:46
Speaker 2: months ago looking at the area or something like that.
18:49
Speaker 2: I don't know what they will say in the future,
18:50
Speaker 2: but as of right now, they're saying he figured out
18:53
Speaker 2: how to get to the rooftop going through these restricted
18:56
Speaker 2: areas simply by looking online. So that initial version of
19:00
Speaker 2: the story that was being told throughout the news implied
19:04
Speaker 2: that the shooting itself was simply a spontaneous act of
19:07
Speaker 2: violence born out of proximity and opportunity, suggesting that the
19:11
Speaker 2: shooter that day was perhaps a disgruntled attendee that had
19:15
Speaker 2: been at Charlie Kirk's rally that had been radicalized by
19:18
Speaker 2: hearing Charlie Kirk's fiery rhetoric and decided to kill him.
19:22
Speaker 1: Basically, the initial theory.
19:24
Speaker 2: Was that this was somebody who went to the school,
19:26
Speaker 2: who knew how to get up there, who had been
19:27
Speaker 2: to the building hundreds of times, who knew it inside
19:30
Speaker 2: and out, who had just snapped that day and decided,
19:33
Speaker 2: you know what, I'm just going to go kill him. However,
19:35
Speaker 2: as the investigation unfolded, this detail was abruptly revised and
19:40
Speaker 2: the official story began to change. You see, Tyler Robinson
19:43
Speaker 2: himself had attended a different school approximately three hours away
19:47
Speaker 2: from UVU, in the middle of very rural Utah, nowhere
19:52
Speaker 2: near UVU. To carry out the attack, for example, he
19:55
Speaker 2: would have had to have planned an extremely deliberate, meticulously
19:58
Speaker 2: planned out road trip. A journey like this from where
20:01
Speaker 2: Tyler Robinson lived to the UVU campus would require not
20:05
Speaker 2: just a intense logistical planning like planning for fuel stops, aiding, security.
20:11
Speaker 1: Checkpoints, etc.
20:12
Speaker 2: But also an almost prescient reconnaissance of the venue. How
20:16
Speaker 2: ask yourself this question, How did a twenty two year
20:20
Speaker 2: old who was ostensibly operating completely alone by himself, map
20:24
Speaker 2: out parking spots that were obscured from the main entrances,
20:28
Speaker 2: identify a low slung building that he would be able
20:31
Speaker 2: to climb, and pinpoint the exact spot on the rooftop
20:35
Speaker 2: and necessary angle for him to take a clean one
20:38
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty to two hundred yard shot. Online forums,
20:42
Speaker 2: particularly a viral Reddit thread in r slash conspiracy, have
20:46
Speaker 2: been buzzing with user submitted maps showing the campus's high
20:50
Speaker 2: traffic zones and have argued that any outsider who crossed
20:54
Speaker 2: through some of these restricted areas required to cross through
20:57
Speaker 2: to get to that rooftop would have triggered some of
21:00
Speaker 2: alert or notification from the event's security detail, a security
21:04
Speaker 2: detail that day which included off duty officers and private contractors.
21:09
Speaker 2: The FBI's pivot on Robinson's school affiliation, which was reported
21:13
Speaker 2: by Al Jazeera in a September twelfth fact check, underscores
21:17
Speaker 2: a pattern of fluidity when dealing with the facts of
21:19
Speaker 2: this case, seemed to erode trust straight from the jump.
21:23
Speaker 2: The facts are changing back and forth and going forward
21:27
Speaker 2: and backwards. And he was here, now he wasn't here,
21:29
Speaker 2: And he was a student, now he wasn't a student.
21:31
Speaker 1: And I get it. It's confusing at.
21:32
Speaker 2: First when it comes to a case like this, and
21:34
Speaker 2: reporters want to report anything and everything, any lead that
21:37
Speaker 2: pops up.
21:38
Speaker 1: But this doesn't to me.
21:40
Speaker 2: Seem like a mere investigational oversight. This seems to be
21:44
Speaker 2: a narrative sleight of hand that requires us, the viewer
21:47
Speaker 2: or the reader, or whatever, to assume that Tyler Robinson's
21:51
Speaker 2: virtual scouting of his sniper hideout was one hundred percent,
21:55
Speaker 2: absolutely flawless without any mistakes, his drive to the location
22:00
Speaker 2: was unremarkable and on time, and his execution of every
22:04
Speaker 2: event that day was seamless, assumptions that multiply like unchecked
22:09
Speaker 2: variables in a deeply flawed equation. Now, one thing that
22:12
Speaker 2: I find extremely strange about this narrative is Tyler Robinson's
22:16
Speaker 2: alleged clothing odyssey, a series of clothing swaps that to
22:20
Speaker 2: me almost seem comedic because they're just so damn hard
22:24
Speaker 2: to even believe. In the first place, you see eyewitness
22:27
Speaker 2: accounts and grainy CCTV stills first captured Tyler Robinson that day,
22:33
Speaker 2: arriving to the UVU campus in casual genes and a
22:36
Speaker 2: shirt emblazoned with an eagle and an American flag, wearing
22:40
Speaker 2: a hat and glasses, easily blending into the student crowd
22:43
Speaker 2: milling about the amphitheater waiting for Charlie Kirk to arrive yet,
22:47
Speaker 2: according to the FBI, Affid Davits released in Utah's Fourth
22:51
Speaker 2: District Court, after Tyler's somehow inexplicably makes his way all
22:56
Speaker 2: the way up to the roof without being seen by anybody,
22:58
Speaker 2: keep in mind, making his way up there without raising
23:00
Speaker 2: a single eyebrow or raising any suspicion while he's on
23:04
Speaker 2: the rooftop. According to the FBI, Tyler Robinson then sheds
23:08
Speaker 2: this outfit and puts on a nondescript gray tracksuit. Now,
23:12
Speaker 2: people have said that he probably put this gray tracksuit on,
23:16
Speaker 2: presumably to hide his silhouette so that when he was
23:19
Speaker 2: on the roof itself no one would see him. But
23:21
Speaker 2: then this is where gets weird. After taking that single fatal,
23:25
Speaker 2: perfect shot at Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson completely changes his
23:29
Speaker 2: clothing again while he's still on the roof and then
23:32
Speaker 2: changes back into the clothing that he was wearing when
23:35
Speaker 2: he had first arrived on campus before leaping down from
23:39
Speaker 2: the rooftop. That's a very very important detail. So he
23:42
Speaker 2: gets on the roof, changes clothes into this gray tracksuit,
23:45
Speaker 2: kills Charlie Kirk, then changes back into his other clothes,
23:49
Speaker 2: all before leaving the roof. Again, keep in mind, this
23:52
Speaker 2: change of clothing was stored in a tiny little backpack
23:55
Speaker 2: that Tyler Robinson carried up to the rooftop with him,
23:58
Speaker 2: a backpack that was no larger than a school satchel,
24:01
Speaker 2: a backpack which also, according to the FBI, purportedly housed
24:06
Speaker 2: the disassembled rifle, his tools, and perhaps even more. And this,
24:11
Speaker 2: to me is where the timeline makes no sense. And
24:14
Speaker 2: that's because, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson brought the
24:18
Speaker 2: thirty odd to six rifle up there with him to
24:20
Speaker 2: the rooftop, stored in that same backpack. The gun was
24:24
Speaker 2: broken down in the backpack when he brought that up
24:27
Speaker 2: to the rooftop with him. So he goes up there
24:29
Speaker 2: with the change of clothes and the fully disassembled rifle.
24:34
Speaker 2: Then on the rooftop he changes into that other outfit
24:37
Speaker 2: and then fully assembles the rifle while he's up there,
24:41
Speaker 2: takes the shot and kills Charlie Kirk. Then, after killing
24:44
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk and before hopping off of the rooftop, Tyler
24:48
Speaker 2: Robinson fully disassembles his rifle and changes his clothing and
24:53
Speaker 2: stores the change of clothes and the rifle in that
24:55
Speaker 2: small backpack, all before running across the roof and leaping
24:59
Speaker 2: back down to the ground to escape. So to put
25:02
Speaker 2: that into perspective, according to the FBI, Tyler Robinson performed
25:06
Speaker 2: an entire full body clothing change twice and assembled and
25:11
Speaker 2: disassembled a large rifle, then stored everything in that tiny
25:16
Speaker 2: little bag in how long would that be? Well, at maximum,
25:21
Speaker 2: what I'm finding out here after doing some research, in
25:24
Speaker 2: just thirty four seconds, and that's at maximum, So thirty
25:29
Speaker 2: four seconds, that's the amount of time that Tyler Robinson
25:32
Speaker 2: had to change his clothing, put the clothing in the backpack,
25:36
Speaker 2: fully disassemble an entire rifle, a huge rifle, and store
25:41
Speaker 2: that rifle in that small backpack, end zip the macpack
25:44
Speaker 2: up in.
25:46
Speaker 1: Just thirty four seconds.
25:47
Speaker 2: You see news sources report that Charlie Kirk was shot
25:50
Speaker 2: and killed at twelve twenty three PM that day. That's
25:53
Speaker 2: the time given for the moment that the shot rang out.
25:56
Speaker 2: And I couldn't track down an exact second for when
25:59
Speaker 2: that happened or anything like that, but it's twelve twenty
26:03
Speaker 2: three pm. However, according to the video footage that was
26:06
Speaker 2: released by the FBI, you can see at twelve twenty
26:10
Speaker 2: three and thirty four seconds, you can see Tyler Robinson
26:14
Speaker 2: running across the rooftop to make his escape, with the
26:17
Speaker 2: rifle already fully disassembled and his clothing already fully changed
26:22
Speaker 2: and everything stored in the backpack. So bear with me
26:25
Speaker 2: for a second. Let's just assume right here that Charlie
26:28
Speaker 2: Kirk that day was shot immediately at twelve twenty three PM,
26:32
Speaker 2: right on the dot, twelve twenty three and zero seconds.
26:36
Speaker 2: That would give, according to the FBI and the released footage,
26:41
Speaker 2: that would give Tyler Robinson only thirty four seconds to
26:45
Speaker 2: fully change his clothing, like full body clothing, fully disassemble
26:49
Speaker 2: his rifle, stuff all that into a tiny backpack, and
26:53
Speaker 2: then take off running. I just personally don't see how
26:57
Speaker 2: that can physically be possible. But also there's something else
27:00
Speaker 2: curious that I noticed. So there's also a video that
27:02
Speaker 2: was released taken by somebody that was present that day
27:05
Speaker 2: when the shooting erupted, a bystander that was filming the crowd,
27:10
Speaker 2: that shows the suspect just moments seconds after shooting Charlie
27:14
Speaker 2: Kirk running across the rooftop. But that doesn't make much
27:18
Speaker 2: sense to me. If the suspect was already running. That
27:21
Speaker 2: further shaves down the time that he would have needed
27:23
Speaker 2: to change the clothing and disassemble the rifle. Now, he
27:26
Speaker 2: probably had maybe twenty to twenty five seconds to change
27:30
Speaker 2: clothes and break down the gun. But also he was
27:32
Speaker 2: already running immediately after the shooting. When did he stop
27:35
Speaker 2: to do all of this? Where did he stop to
27:37
Speaker 2: change clothes and break down the gun? None of this
27:40
Speaker 2: really adds up to me, but I wanted to go
27:43
Speaker 2: even further, so I asked an AI program, grock to
27:46
Speaker 2: be specific, to help me figure out the exact approximate
27:50
Speaker 2: length between where Tyler Robinson would have taken that fatal
27:53
Speaker 2: shot and the location on the rooftop where he seems
27:56
Speaker 2: to jump off of the roof in the footage released
27:59
Speaker 2: by the FBI. Are a bunch of maps online that
28:01
Speaker 2: people have posted and news outlets have posted showing, you know,
28:05
Speaker 2: an aerial view of where he took the shot, where
28:08
Speaker 2: he left the roof. All of that and GROC my
28:10
Speaker 2: AI program used resources to figure all this out at
28:14
Speaker 2: analyzed maps, and at the end it gave me an
28:17
Speaker 2: approximate distance of two hundred and forty six feet two
28:21
Speaker 2: hundred and forty six feet from where the shot was
28:23
Speaker 2: taken at Charlie Kirk and from where the shooter eventually
28:26
Speaker 2: jumped from the roof to the ground. I then asked
28:29
Speaker 2: Grok how long it would take an adult male to
28:32
Speaker 2: run that full distance two hundred and forty six feet,
28:35
Speaker 2: and the results were interesting. For an average adult male,
28:38
Speaker 2: Grock theorized that it would take them twenty four or
28:41
Speaker 2: so seconds, But for a trained sprinter, Grock theorized it
28:44
Speaker 2: would have taken them about twelve point one five seconds. Now,
28:48
Speaker 2: I haven't seen any information stating that Tyler Robinson was
28:51
Speaker 2: a trained sprinter or that he physically trained for this shooting,
28:55
Speaker 2: but I do also think that he was running faster
28:58
Speaker 2: than just an average jogging pace.
29:00
Speaker 1: He was in a bit of a rush.
29:01
Speaker 2: So let's just for this kind of equation figure out
29:05
Speaker 2: a number in the middle there. So, going off of
29:07
Speaker 2: this data, the run Tyler's run from the shooting location
29:11
Speaker 2: to the location on the roof where the shooter jumped
29:13
Speaker 2: down would have taken Tyler approximately and this is just
29:16
Speaker 2: according to my calculations, about eighteen and a half seconds.
29:20
Speaker 1: So in the footage that's.
29:21
Speaker 2: Released, Tyler or the shooter arrives to that corner on
29:25
Speaker 2: the rooftop where he eventually jumps down at about twelve twenty.
29:29
Speaker 1: Three and fifty seconds.
29:31
Speaker 2: So if you subtract eighteen point five seconds from fifty
29:35
Speaker 2: you get about thirty one and a half seconds, So
29:38
Speaker 2: that is thirty one and a half seconds past twelve
29:41
Speaker 2: twenty three PM, so thirty one and a half seconds
29:44
Speaker 2: after Charlie Kirk was shot and killed. If you're going
29:48
Speaker 2: with the theory that Charlie Kirk was shot right at
29:50
Speaker 2: twelve twenty three in the afternoon and zero seconds, I
29:53
Speaker 2: think that it was probably more like twelve twenty three and.
29:56
Speaker 1: Five seconds or something like that.
29:57
Speaker 2: Now, Interestingly, in the footage released by the FB, we
30:00
Speaker 2: first see Tyler Robinson or the shooter on the rooftop
30:03
Speaker 2: at twelve twenty three and thirty four seconds, So if
30:07
Speaker 2: we go back about three seconds from then, that's when
30:10
Speaker 2: he would have had to start running from the location
30:14
Speaker 2: to get to the rooftop to make the timeline of
30:16
Speaker 2: the video make sense. So when you subtract all these
30:19
Speaker 2: numbers and make sense of all of this, that leaves
30:22
Speaker 2: you with about thirty seconds in order to make this
30:25
Speaker 2: timeline work. That means that Tyler Robinson after taking the
30:28
Speaker 2: shot at Charlie Kirk would have had to have fully
30:31
Speaker 2: changed his clothing, fully disassembled his rifle, and fully stored
30:35
Speaker 2: all of those components in his backpack before zipping it
30:38
Speaker 2: up in just under thirty seconds. We know that he
30:41
Speaker 2: wasn't doing this as he ran because we can clearly
30:44
Speaker 2: see that when he enters the frame at twelve twenty
30:47
Speaker 2: three thirty four in that footage released by the authorities,
30:50
Speaker 2: Tyler or the shooter isn't fiddling with anything. He isn't
30:54
Speaker 2: changing clothing, he isn't storing anything in his bag. So
30:57
Speaker 2: all of this would have had to have happened before
31:00
Speaker 2: for that. In addition, I don't know, like I just said,
31:03
Speaker 2: exactly when Charlie Kirk was shot exactly. I mean down
31:06
Speaker 2: to the second. He could have been shot at twelve
31:08
Speaker 2: twenty three and zero seconds, twelve twenty three and five seconds,
31:12
Speaker 2: twelve twenty three and ten seconds. I just don't know,
31:15
Speaker 2: But it is important when you consider the timeline. Every
31:18
Speaker 2: second counts here. But also I don't believe that he
31:20
Speaker 2: was shot exactly at twelve twenty three on the dot.
31:23
Speaker 2: And so if that's true and he was shot a
31:25
Speaker 2: little after twelve twenty three. That would give Tyler Robinson
31:28
Speaker 2: even less time to be able to pull off this
31:31
Speaker 2: magic trick. You're gonna go down from thirty seconds to
31:34
Speaker 2: probably twenty seconds, twenty seconds to change his clothing, store
31:37
Speaker 2: that gun, zip it up, and then take off running
31:40
Speaker 2: to make it on camera at twelve twenty three and
31:42
Speaker 2: thirty four seconds. Now, this doesn't make a lot of sense,
31:46
Speaker 2: does it. Well, it gets even crazier. Once again, I
31:50
Speaker 2: asked my AI program Grock a different question. This time,
31:53
Speaker 2: I asked Grock how long would it take for someone
31:56
Speaker 2: to fully disassemble a Mouser thirty out to six bolt
31:59
Speaker 2: action rifle, the gun that Tyler Robinson allegedly used to
32:03
Speaker 2: kill Charlie Kirk, And Groc's answer was shocking to me. Initially,
32:07
Speaker 2: the AI program told me that it would most likely
32:10
Speaker 2: for someone with familiarity with the weapon itself take someone
32:13
Speaker 2: somewhere between six to eleven minutes to fully disassemble the
32:17
Speaker 2: gun and store it in a small backpack. But you know,
32:20
Speaker 2: I thought, maybe I should ask GROC again. What if
32:23
Speaker 2: the person disassembling the rifle is in an extreme hurry,
32:26
Speaker 2: like they're in a really big rush, and the answer
32:29
Speaker 2: to me was still shocking. After regenerating an answer, Grox
32:34
Speaker 2: stated that it would have taken at minimum somewhere between
32:37
Speaker 2: three to five minutes to fully break down the gun
32:40
Speaker 2: and store it in a backpack. Three to five minutes,
32:44
Speaker 2: and that's going extremely fast, Like you know exactly what
32:48
Speaker 2: you're doing, exactly what screw to unscrew, exactly what to
32:51
Speaker 2: put where. I mean, we're talking about a large rifle
32:54
Speaker 2: here that just fired a fatal shot at someone, and
32:57
Speaker 2: according to the official timeline of events, that that weapon
33:00
Speaker 2: was fully broken down, fully stored, and Tyler Robinson completely
33:04
Speaker 2: head to toe had changed his outfit in just under
33:07
Speaker 2: thirty seconds, probably more like fifteen to twenty seconds if
33:11
Speaker 2: you account for the fact that Charlie Kirk was probably
33:13
Speaker 2: shot a little after twelve twenty three. Yeah, it's pretty unbelievable.
33:18
Speaker 3: Right.
33:18
Speaker 2: By the way, if you want to read through the
33:20
Speaker 2: detailed breakdowns of this information that I received from Rock,
33:23
Speaker 2: I'm going to include the full text of this analysis
33:25
Speaker 2: and these breakdowns in the resources document that can be
33:28
Speaker 2: found in the show description. And just keep that in mind.
33:32
Speaker 2: You just killed somebody and you have somewhere between fifteen
33:36
Speaker 2: and thirty seconds to fully deconstruct a weapon that you
33:41
Speaker 2: just used to kill somebody, to fully change your clothing
33:44
Speaker 2: head to toe, and to stuff all that store in
33:46
Speaker 2: a backpack that you zip up in about fifteen to
33:49
Speaker 2: thirty seconds somewhere in there before you're seen on camera
33:53
Speaker 2: running across a rooftop to make an escape. It's just
33:56
Speaker 2: so highly improbable to me.
33:58
Speaker 1: It's just it's weird. It's really weird.
34:01
Speaker 3: Man.
34:01
Speaker 2: After learning this information about those clothing changes and the
34:04
Speaker 2: rifle deconstruction, the news station Newsmax ran a segment on
34:08
Speaker 2: September fifteenth where they interviewed a former FBI profiler who
34:13
Speaker 2: likened the FBI's timeline of events to a quote spy
34:16
Speaker 2: novel plot end quote, and question the physical feasibility of
34:20
Speaker 2: this explanation amidst the sweat inducing September heat you see
34:23
Speaker 2: according to acuweather dot com, on that day in Saint George, Utah,
34:27
Speaker 2: when the shooting happened, the high was ninety five degrees
34:30
Speaker 2: and as we can see in that footage, the sun
34:33
Speaker 2: was shining bright that day. It was also almost exactly
34:36
Speaker 2: midday when the shooting happened, meaning that it would have
34:39
Speaker 2: been incredibly hot outside and in my opinion, sweat would
34:42
Speaker 2: have definitely served to further complicate Tyler Robinson's plan of
34:46
Speaker 2: changing clothing and disassembling the rifle. I mean, I'm assuming
34:50
Speaker 2: that he was already sweaty from just being nervous about
34:52
Speaker 2: killing someone and stuff like that. I mean, sweaty clothes
34:55
Speaker 2: are just having slippery hands. All that could lead to
34:58
Speaker 2: losing one or two seconds in the timeline. But every
35:02
Speaker 2: second here is so important because it just gets more
35:04
Speaker 2: and more unbelievable. X users under the hashtag Kirk clothes
35:08
Speaker 2: swap have memed this piece of information relentlessly. It should
35:12
Speaker 2: also be stated here that the FBI claims that they
35:15
Speaker 2: found no pieces of fabric, no clothing left behind, no
35:19
Speaker 2: broken zipper, no sock, nothing left over from Tyler Robinson's
35:23
Speaker 2: clothing changes, meaning if you really think about it, that
35:26
Speaker 2: he pulled off these stunning clothing swapping feats with zero error.
35:32
Speaker 2: He didn't break a button, he didn't snap a zipper,
35:34
Speaker 2: he didn't rip a piece of clothing. He left not
35:37
Speaker 2: even a single shred of fabric behind. He was immaculately
35:41
Speaker 2: clean and immaculately precise. Such details when fully fleshed out
35:45
Speaker 2: transform in my opinion, the FBI's lone gunman narrative to
35:49
Speaker 2: some into a logistical comedy of errors, which begs the
35:53
Speaker 2: question was this shooting really the result of a premeditated
35:56
Speaker 2: precision or were all of these details added in after
36:00
Speaker 2: the fact, after the shooting had happened, quickly, without any afterthought,
36:04
Speaker 2: in order to cover somebody else's tracks. But now we
36:07
Speaker 2: have to get into one of the angles that I
36:08
Speaker 2: find to be the most damning, and that's the discussion
36:11
Speaker 2: surrounding the rifle itself. The murder weapon, a Mauser thirty
36:15
Speaker 2: out to six bolt action rifle, a weapon typically used
36:18
Speaker 2: by big game hunters or even back in the day,
36:21
Speaker 2: used by soldiers in war, is the real anchor of
36:24
Speaker 2: the FBI's physical evidence. It's the literal smoking gun, yet
36:28
Speaker 2: its handling in the narrative seems to defy reality. So,
36:31
Speaker 2: according to the official story, as you probably know by now,
36:35
Speaker 2: after shooting Charlie Kirk Tyler Robinson fled the scene and,
36:39
Speaker 2: according to the FBI, almost immediately ended up in a
36:42
Speaker 2: nearby wooded area very close to where the shooting happened,
36:45
Speaker 2: where he for some reason fully reassembled the rifle and
36:50
Speaker 2: then just left it there. He left the fully reassembled
36:53
Speaker 2: rifle in the woods along with those engraved bullet casings,
36:58
Speaker 2: and happened that he left a towel with his DNA on.
37:02
Speaker 2: The official story states that Tyler Robinson assembled the rifle
37:06
Speaker 2: on the roof, then disassembled it and stuffed the pieces
37:09
Speaker 2: of the rifle into his backpack. The barrel detached, stocks separated,
37:13
Speaker 2: all nestled in that small backpack alongside his change of
37:16
Speaker 2: clothing before hopping off the roof for transport. But the
37:20
Speaker 2: reasoning isn't clear at all as to why Tyler Robinson,
37:24
Speaker 2: when attempting to flee the scene of the world's most
37:27
Speaker 2: high profile crime that day, would then take the time
37:30
Speaker 2: to reassemble the rifle fully when he was out in
37:33
Speaker 2: the woods, and then leave it somewhere where it could
37:35
Speaker 2: be easily found and seen and photographed by FBI agents
37:40
Speaker 2: who just so happened to be looking for it. This
37:42
Speaker 2: to me seems to be a fabrication of some sort
37:44
Speaker 2: by the FBI or someone else.
37:47
Speaker 1: I mean, think about it.
37:48
Speaker 2: If the rifle was still disassembled, it would have been
37:51
Speaker 2: nearly impossible for agents to find it in the middle
37:55
Speaker 2: of a dense wooded area. However, I mean, just imagine
37:59
Speaker 2: they're looking. How would they find a disassembled little chunk
38:02
Speaker 2: of metal in the middle of a wooded area. There's
38:04
Speaker 2: no way, even if you're walking doing a ground search,
38:07
Speaker 2: it would be much harder to find pieces and parts
38:10
Speaker 2: of a broken down gun that he could have. Tyler
38:13
Speaker 2: could have easily hid anywhere in the wooded area. However,
38:17
Speaker 2: the fact that the large gun, big gun was fully assembled,
38:21
Speaker 2: in my opinion, made it much easier for the FBI
38:25
Speaker 2: to find if that makes sense. Like I'm not saying
38:29
Speaker 2: that in my opinion, they actually found it, like, oh,
38:32
Speaker 2: we're searching, look at here's a gun. I think it
38:34
Speaker 2: was more like, in my opinion, let's put this here
38:38
Speaker 2: and act like we found it.
38:39
Speaker 1: If that makes sense.
38:40
Speaker 2: And it's made me question, and I want you to
38:43
Speaker 2: ask yourself this question, what a guy like Tyler Robinson
38:47
Speaker 2: think about it? What a guy like Tyler Robinson, who
38:49
Speaker 2: up until this point had perfectly executed the assassination, perfectly
38:55
Speaker 2: obscured his identity, and had pulled off under your perfect
38:58
Speaker 2: escape from the crime scene undetected, and had preplanned all
39:02
Speaker 2: of this for a long period of time, would he
39:04
Speaker 2: really take the extra time to stop in the woods
39:07
Speaker 2: in the midst of his escape, reassemble, fully reassemble the rifle,
39:11
Speaker 2: and then leave it practically gift wrapped with a DNA
39:15
Speaker 2: stained towel in a nearby wooded area for federal agents
39:19
Speaker 2: to just so happen to find it. Makes truly no sense.
39:23
Speaker 2: And then there's the screwdriver. Now, according to the FBI
39:27
Speaker 2: and official reporting, while he was on the roof, Tyler
39:30
Speaker 2: Robinson used a screwdriver that he brought with him to
39:33
Speaker 2: meticulously reassemble the rifle, threading pins and torquing screws under
39:38
Speaker 2: the scorching midday sun. Remember when he went up to
39:41
Speaker 2: the roof. According to the FBI, Robinson carried with him
39:44
Speaker 2: that backpack full of gun parts, then put it together
39:47
Speaker 2: while he was up there. Then he took the shot
39:49
Speaker 2: and somehow took the rifle apart, changed the clothes, and
39:52
Speaker 2: stored all of that in his backpack in somewhere from fifteen.
39:55
Speaker 1: To thirty seconds. The screwdriver, though, that Tyler.
39:59
Speaker 2: Used to assemble and disassemble the rifle. According to FBI
40:03
Speaker 2: Director Cash Pattel in a statement on September eleventh, that
40:06
Speaker 2: screwdriver was later recovered from the rooftop itself and serendipitously,
40:12
Speaker 2: for the FBI, the screwdriver was found with Tyler Robinson's
40:16
Speaker 2: DNA on it.
40:18
Speaker 1: But this makes no sense.
40:19
Speaker 2: Remember, after fleeing the scene, and according to the FBI,
40:23
Speaker 2: immediately after carrying out the shooting, Tyler Robinson then heads
40:27
Speaker 2: to a wooded area and fully reassembles the rifle in
40:30
Speaker 2: the woods. But how would he do this without a screwdriver?
40:34
Speaker 2: If he left the screwdriver that he used to put
40:38
Speaker 2: the gun together and break it down up on the roof,
40:40
Speaker 2: If he left it there and made the escape without
40:42
Speaker 2: the screwdriver, well what happened? Did a screwdriver magically appear
40:47
Speaker 2: in his backpack? Could he have possibly brought a second
40:51
Speaker 2: screwdriver with him? Did he really plan that far ahead?
40:54
Speaker 2: I mean, it's known that he left his trustee screwdriver,
40:58
Speaker 2: which once again conveniently he had his DNA on it,
41:01
Speaker 2: on the rooftop, but there was no screwdriver left on
41:05
Speaker 2: scene when they found his rifle. This also begs the
41:08
Speaker 2: question if Tyler really did take the time to assemble
41:11
Speaker 2: this rifle in the woods, to throw some ammunition, some
41:15
Speaker 2: carved ammunition on the ground, and even conveniently took the
41:19
Speaker 2: time to leave a DNA covered towel near all of this.
41:23
Speaker 2: Why would Tyler Robinson not just leave the screwdriver that
41:27
Speaker 2: he used to assemble the gun in the woods there
41:29
Speaker 2: with all that stuff too? I mean, think about it.
41:31
Speaker 2: He had already taken everything out of his backpack, like
41:35
Speaker 2: the carved casings and whatever this towel is, wherever this
41:38
Speaker 2: towel came from, and the gun, and he already left
41:41
Speaker 2: his other screwdriver. If we're going with the two screwdrivers
41:45
Speaker 2: theory on the rooftop, and since he was and like
41:47
Speaker 2: I said, since he was using it to reassemble the
41:49
Speaker 2: gun in the woods, we can assume that he would
41:52
Speaker 2: have grabbed that second screwdriver from his backpack in order
41:56
Speaker 2: to use it to build the gun again. But why
41:58
Speaker 2: wouldn't you just leave it there? Why not just throw
42:00
Speaker 2: it on the ground with his other extremely and conveniently
42:03
Speaker 2: incriminating items.
42:05
Speaker 1: I mean, it just makes no sense.
42:06
Speaker 2: If he actually had a screwdriver in his hand and
42:08
Speaker 2: he's just throwing all this stuff down, why wouldn't you
42:11
Speaker 2: just throw the screwdriver down too. Why wouldn't you pack
42:13
Speaker 2: up the bullets? Why wouldn't he pack up the towel
42:16
Speaker 2: if he's going to take the time to pack up
42:18
Speaker 2: the screwdriver, And why would he not just throw the
42:20
Speaker 2: screwdriver on the ground.
42:21
Speaker 1: I mean, it just makes no sense.
42:24
Speaker 2: And it is important to note that to date, the
42:27
Speaker 2: FBI has not claimed that they have located another screwdriver.
42:31
Speaker 2: They haven't even explained this inconsistency in the official story.
42:34
Speaker 2: They've made no comment on it. I think they know
42:36
Speaker 2: that people are pointing this out, but they haven't said anything.
42:39
Speaker 2: I think that they just are realizing that they dub
42:41
Speaker 2: the story.
42:42
Speaker 7: Now.
42:42
Speaker 2: People online have spent hours analyzing footage of the shooting,
42:46
Speaker 2: the footage of the killing itself, and the footage of
42:49
Speaker 2: the alleged perpetrator on the roof, and many have pointed
42:52
Speaker 2: out that after viewing the footage, when looking at Tyler
42:55
Speaker 2: Robinson's rooftop sprint, they see no telltale bulge of a
42:59
Speaker 2: slung rifle, just a light backpack over his shoulder. He
43:03
Speaker 2: doesn't appear to be holding a rifle on his person,
43:06
Speaker 2: and he doesn't appear to have a rifle in his
43:08
Speaker 2: pants or under his clothing, as it definitely would have
43:11
Speaker 2: been visible in that footage, meaning he had to have
43:14
Speaker 2: broken down the rifle, or maybe the rifle was left
43:17
Speaker 2: on the roof and later confiscated and planted by the FBI.
43:21
Speaker 2: I don't know, that's just a theory. One person online
43:23
Speaker 2: even posted a photo for comparison showing what a thirty
43:27
Speaker 2: out to six crammed into loose jens would look like,
43:29
Speaker 2: and it's very noticeable. And this image almost underscores the
43:33
Speaker 2: absurdity of all of these claims. Hiding an entire rifle
43:37
Speaker 2: in skinny jeans or a tiny backpack. It's just unbelievable
43:41
Speaker 2: to me that he would have been able to get
43:43
Speaker 2: the rifle off of the roof without being noticed unless
43:46
Speaker 2: it was either in his backpack or he.
43:49
Speaker 1: Didn't even have it on his person.
43:51
Speaker 2: Then there's the fact that in all the announcements that
43:54
Speaker 2: Cash Pattel made with the DNA on the towel and
43:57
Speaker 2: the screwdriver, it was not announced that there was any
44:01
Speaker 2: DNA found on the rifle. Yeah, there's no DNA on
44:05
Speaker 2: the rifle. Instead, the DNA was found on that towel,
44:08
Speaker 2: random ass towel in the woods, and the screwdriver, which
44:12
Speaker 2: is again incredibly bizarre. How could Tyler Robinson's DNA have
44:17
Speaker 2: been found on a towel and a screwdriver, but nowhere
44:21
Speaker 2: on the gun itself. Think about that, to build the gun,
44:25
Speaker 2: he would have been sweating all over the gun. He
44:27
Speaker 2: would have screwed it all in. He would have been
44:29
Speaker 2: touching all the parts over and over again. He would
44:31
Speaker 2: have carried it with him, been touching it at his home,
44:35
Speaker 2: probably been shooting it before the shooting training. If he
44:39
Speaker 2: did that, his DNA would have been all over that thing.
44:42
Speaker 2: But apparently they didn't find any DNA on the gun itself. Recently,
44:46
Speaker 2: Newsweek reported on September twenty first that Cash Pattel is
44:49
Speaker 2: currently questioning potential accomplices of Tyler Robinson's, hinting at some
44:54
Speaker 2: sort of weapon handover scenario where an accomplice of Tyler's
44:58
Speaker 2: may have taken it from him, reassembled it which makes
45:01
Speaker 2: no sense still, and dumped it in the woods or
45:04
Speaker 2: something like that. Once again, though, absolutely none of this
45:06
Speaker 2: makes sense when you actually look at it beyond the
45:09
Speaker 2: surface level. It's great to have a little easy explanation
45:13
Speaker 2: that says, yeah, yeah, this is what happened, and I'm
45:15
Speaker 2: just gonna believe it. But when you poke and product.
45:18
Speaker 2: These things, they just fall apart. Cash Ptel's broader conduct
45:21
Speaker 2: during this investigation has also invited scorn from both parties,
45:25
Speaker 2: Republicans and Democrats, as NBC News detailed in an article
45:30
Speaker 2: posted on September fifteenth. For example, Cash Pattel, the leader
45:34
Speaker 2: of the FBI, was posting in real time on x
45:38
Speaker 2: throughout the rapidly unfolding investigation, speculating and taking guesses about
45:43
Speaker 2: the shooter's motives before a single piece of evidence materialized. Critics,
45:48
Speaker 2: including former DOJ officials, have publicly argued that these actions
45:52
Speaker 2: performed by cash Pattel only served to prejudice the case.
45:56
Speaker 2: Echoing whispers of the Epstein cover up, forums like our
45:59
Speaker 2: Slafe True Crime discussion have overflowed with timelines charting these missteps.
46:04
Speaker 2: Now fully fleshed out, the rifle saga reveals not only
46:08
Speaker 2: would seemed to be mechanical impossibilities, but also a deep
46:12
Speaker 2: institutional hubris, where evidence is forced and bent to fit
46:16
Speaker 2: an inventive narrative or story that was dreamt up before
46:20
Speaker 2: a shooter.
46:20
Speaker 1: Was even in custody. But things get even.
46:22
Speaker 2: Weirder and weirder as we go down the rabbit hole.
46:25
Speaker 2: Now I Initially I was like, yeah, there's some weird
46:29
Speaker 2: things about this. But one of the things that kind
46:32
Speaker 2: of incentivized me to make this video was a rabbit
46:35
Speaker 2: hole I fell down on TikTok a few nights ago
46:39
Speaker 2: and on YouTube where I've been watching these people, these
46:42
Speaker 2: guys who run like gun weapon YouTube channels, hunting YouTube channels,
46:48
Speaker 2: hunting tiktoks, these guys that have channels where they use
46:52
Speaker 2: guns frequently, and they have a lot of knowledge about weaponry,
46:55
Speaker 2: and they've all been saying the thirty odd to six
46:59
Speaker 2: that if that was really fired at Charlie Kirk from
47:01
Speaker 2: that distance, it would have absolutely blown him away and
47:06
Speaker 2: the damage would have been much greater than what we
47:10
Speaker 2: saw with the footage.
47:12
Speaker 1: If you've seen that clip of the.
47:13
Speaker 2: Actual wound appearing on Charlie Kirk's neck, every person that
47:17
Speaker 2: I've seen that has had actual experience with these guns,
47:20
Speaker 2: whether through hunting or just recreational shooting, has said, yeah,
47:24
Speaker 2: he should have been way more by that shot.
47:27
Speaker 1: And you see.
47:28
Speaker 2: To me, the ballistic enigma of the wound on Charlie
47:31
Speaker 2: Kirk's neck constitutes the cover story's most egregious affront to science.
47:37
Speaker 2: A miracle that physicists and surgeons alike have stated is
47:41
Speaker 2: complete and utter to be frank bullshit. This essentially is
47:45
Speaker 2: the FBI's core claim. A thirty odd to six slug,
47:48
Speaker 2: screaming through the air at twenty seven hundred to three
47:51
Speaker 2: thousand feet per second, fired from a distance of approximately
47:55
Speaker 2: one hundred and fifty to two hundred yards, strikes Charlie
47:58
Speaker 2: Kirk's neck soft tissue approximate to the carotid artery, piercing
48:02
Speaker 2: his skin with a modest entry wound but no visible
48:05
Speaker 2: exit wound, the round lodging harmlessly within Kirk's neck where
48:10
Speaker 2: it came to a halt. Still frames from the viral
48:12
Speaker 2: footage Charlie kirk mid gesture after being shot with his
48:15
Speaker 2: head snapping backwards, according to some eagle eyed firearms experts,
48:20
Speaker 2: appears to show a bullet wound similar to a wound
48:23
Speaker 2: that most likely would have come from a twenty two
48:26
Speaker 2: caliber rifle, not the cavernous, extremely gruesome trauma that would
48:30
Speaker 2: be expected from a weapon and round designed for shooting
48:34
Speaker 2: and killing elk at twice the distance. To put this
48:36
Speaker 2: in layman's terms, the shot itself, if this round was
48:40
Speaker 2: really fired from that exact spot by Tyler Robinson and
48:43
Speaker 2: really fired from that exact rifle should have, according to
48:47
Speaker 2: many experts, done a lot more damage. I mean, I've
48:51
Speaker 2: seen a video where a guy describes how they used
48:53
Speaker 2: this gun and rounds like this specifically to hunt larger
48:57
Speaker 2: game like elk, and let's sign. He explained it on
49:00
Speaker 2: his video, But let me explain it to you here.
49:02
Speaker 2: Let's think about this for a second. Elk have extremely
49:05
Speaker 2: thick and heavy bones. Their bones, in fact, are one
49:08
Speaker 2: and a half to two times thicker than human bones.
49:12
Speaker 2: After all, their frames typically have to support anywhere from
49:15
Speaker 2: six hundred to twelve hundred pounds of weight. But if
49:18
Speaker 2: a Mouser thirty odd six bolt action rifle is fired
49:22
Speaker 2: at an elk from around the same distance that Charlie
49:25
Speaker 2: Kirk was shot at, according to what I've seen people
49:27
Speaker 2: say online, the elk's bones will completely shatter. I'm talking
49:32
Speaker 2: the bones practically disintegrate, not like a little crack. The
49:36
Speaker 2: bones are evaporated inside of the elk's body. The Mauser
49:39
Speaker 2: thirty odd six bolt action rifle is in fact a
49:42
Speaker 2: rifle designed for power and for deadliness. All you have
49:46
Speaker 2: to do is look at some of the videos that
49:48
Speaker 2: people have posted online after the shooting, replicating the exact
49:52
Speaker 2: shot taken at Charlie Kirk, taken from approximately the same
49:55
Speaker 2: distance using the same rifle. And you can see almost
49:59
Speaker 2: immediately that it if you really was shot with that weapon,
50:02
Speaker 2: the damage should have been so much greater. Just take
50:06
Speaker 2: a look at these clips.
50:08
Speaker 8: So today on Due Liberty Firearms, we're gonna be showing
50:11
Speaker 8: you what a thirty odd six does to a ballistics
50:14
Speaker 8: gel skull. So we have a realistic human head here,
50:18
Speaker 8: made with ballistics gelatine and a resin skull, and it's
50:22
Speaker 8: got a filling in there, so hopefully you'll be able
50:24
Speaker 8: to see what happens. All right, So now we're gonna
50:38
Speaker 8: throw it in about a ten percent slow mo for you.
50:41
Speaker 8: This is gonna look super cool. Now, what happened was
50:45
Speaker 8: when the thirty odd six projectile hit the head. I
50:48
Speaker 8: had predicted it would go through the front side and
50:50
Speaker 8: just blow a big hole in the backside. But what
50:53
Speaker 8: actually happened was the large projectile of the thirty odd
50:55
Speaker 8: six went through the skull and impacted all the liquid
50:59
Speaker 8: blood that I had on the inside.
51:11
Speaker 6: All right, will it's gonna try some thirty odd six
51:14
Speaker 6: in a rifle to see what it does is full
51:16
Speaker 6: metal jacket thirty odd six.
51:24
Speaker 3: M.
51:27
Speaker 1: Yeah, wow, what happened there? That coming backwards? It tumbled?
51:34
Speaker 7: Yeah, dude, this is a Winchester MINS seventy chambered in
51:46
Speaker 7: thirty yard six.
51:47
Speaker 9: Ready right out the back though completely unstopped, straight through
52:02
Speaker 9: filled the whole frame.
52:06
Speaker 1: You see the bullet got straight through.
52:07
Speaker 9: I didn't care the watermelon didn't know it was shot
52:11
Speaker 9: until there was already an exit wound.
52:15
Speaker 7: See that blue two by four and a half.
52:17
Speaker 3: That was the coolest part. That is cool.
52:24
Speaker 9: Easy, that's almost the entire bullet there.
52:27
Speaker 4: Oh wait, is that the steel core?
52:28
Speaker 8: Steel core?
52:29
Speaker 6: And that's copper?
52:30
Speaker 1: Oh I bet it is?
52:31
Speaker 3: Yeah?
52:31
Speaker 1: Good, Hi, that is wild. It's still barely slowed down.
52:42
Speaker 7: I feel like it's crazy how much it diverted the
52:45
Speaker 7: steel core up.
52:47
Speaker 1: Yeah, coming out.
52:49
Speaker 10: Of it demonstrates again just how much bigger exit wounds
52:53
Speaker 10: are than entrance wounds.
52:54
Speaker 6: Welcome back to Ballistics Nation. Today we're taking the two
52:57
Speaker 6: hundred yard shot. But in today's video, so we wanted
53:00
Speaker 6: to take a look at just how difficult it is
53:03
Speaker 6: to hit a shot from two hundred yards, especially on
53:06
Speaker 6: a roof. Well, so I definitely missed, which is kind
53:20
Speaker 6: of the point I was trying to make.
53:23
Speaker 3: There's so many things that come into factor here. There's
53:26
Speaker 3: a lot.
53:26
Speaker 6: Of things that come into play, and you would just
53:29
Speaker 6: have to be a phenomenal marksman to have one shot
53:32
Speaker 6: with a bunch of people around. We're going to go
53:34
Speaker 6: ahead and shoot a couple more rounds down range, see
53:36
Speaker 6: if we can get lucky and hit the target.
53:38
Speaker 3: There is a lot of scopes on the market right.
53:41
Speaker 6: Some are for close range, some are for far range,
53:43
Speaker 6: some are red dots I learned for super long range,
53:45
Speaker 6: what have you. So you're going to have to plan
53:47
Speaker 6: out in advance what's a good scope for two hundred
53:50
Speaker 6: yards At that distance you have to know how to
53:52
Speaker 6: make certain adjustments with the windage and that the elevation
53:55
Speaker 6: changes how far to be zoomed in and zoomed out
53:58
Speaker 6: in the scope. So someone to make this shot would
54:02
Speaker 6: really have to know what they were doing.
54:07
Speaker 10: Definitely missed again, unfortunately, But honestly, that kind of goes
54:11
Speaker 10: to show you that with the setup that we did,
54:14
Speaker 10: we shot this guy in at fifty yards and then
54:16
Speaker 10: one hundred yards and we were right on a little
54:18
Speaker 10: bit low, So obviously making those.
54:20
Speaker 6: Adjustments for this distance and I still can't even hit that.
54:23
Speaker 6: And I bet when we got to look down there,
54:24
Speaker 6: I'm going to be kind of all over the place, right,
54:26
Speaker 6: because you have to think about this. I had to
54:28
Speaker 6: climb up a ladder to get up here. It's hot,
54:30
Speaker 6: kind of zip it up, it down, the little stressed
54:32
Speaker 6: kind of film and stuff like, all those things you
54:34
Speaker 6: have to think about when you're going to take a shot.
54:36
Speaker 6: So for somebody to be able to hop on a
54:38
Speaker 6: roof in the hot sun and lower their heart rate
54:42
Speaker 6: down right, Because every time you go to breathe through
54:44
Speaker 6: this scope, right, everything's connected. So basically, when I breathe,
54:48
Speaker 6: the gun is going to move slightly right. Might not
54:50
Speaker 6: make a difference this close, but you know, extend that
54:54
Speaker 6: movement one hundred two hundred yards down range and you're
54:57
Speaker 6: going to be off by you know, huge margin. So again,
55:00
Speaker 6: you gotta know how to control your breath. You gotta
55:02
Speaker 6: know a scope to use, you gotta know what bullets
55:04
Speaker 6: to use, what gun is the right power. Yeah, well
55:07
Speaker 6: I did a lot better than I thought I was
55:09
Speaker 6: gonna do from that distance away.
55:11
Speaker 3: A couple things to think about.
55:13
Speaker 6: This is a stationary target. Think about trying to hit
55:16
Speaker 6: a target that's moving around unpredictably.
55:18
Speaker 3: Think about that.
55:19
Speaker 6: Also, you gotta think about how I missed off to
55:22
Speaker 6: the right, Because when I'm shooting, I'm pulling my trigger
55:25
Speaker 6: finger and the gun's jerking to the right.
55:26
Speaker 3: I would have to train.
55:28
Speaker 6: For years to be able to hit a shot this
55:30
Speaker 6: precise consistently at two hundred yards.
55:33
Speaker 8: All right.
55:34
Speaker 11: For the next part of this theory or conspiracy theories
55:36
Speaker 11: that we're learning about, Charlie stood about six to five
55:38
Speaker 11: You take his body mass, if it was proportional, his
55:41
Speaker 11: neck would have been about five and a half maybe
55:43
Speaker 11: five to seven five in diameter, giving him a circumference
55:46
Speaker 11: so maybe anywhere between fifteen to seventeen inches of his neck.
55:50
Speaker 11: So what we're going to do is we're gonna simulate
55:51
Speaker 11: that for the pork neck. So we have pretty hefty
55:55
Speaker 11: pork neck here, solid bone, a couple inches of meat.
55:58
Speaker 11: We're gonna see if we can get a bolt stop
56:00
Speaker 11: in it at one hundred and this time I'm pushing out.
56:02
Speaker 11: I'm going to go to one hundred and seventy five
56:04
Speaker 11: meters and we're going to see if we can hit
56:06
Speaker 11: this right square in center and get a one hundred
56:09
Speaker 11: and fifty grain bullet to stop. Now, I remember it's
56:11
Speaker 11: a core lock. It is designed to stop, that's what
56:13
Speaker 11: it's designed to do. But it's not designed to stop.
56:15
Speaker 11: Here on just ballistics jel alone, the one hundred and
56:18
Speaker 11: fifty grain corlock from a thirty out six is going
56:21
Speaker 11: to have almost twenty four inches of penetration. There we go.
56:23
Speaker 11: That's our close approximation to a deer neck.
56:25
Speaker 1: Well too, Charlie's necker.
56:27
Speaker 11: So and again for size of reference, see what we.
56:30
Speaker 1: Got On the day that he was shot.
56:35
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk was not wearing body armor, a fact that
56:38
Speaker 2: has been corroborated by timeline reconstructions placing Charlie Kirk in
56:41
Speaker 2: a T shirt that day without a vest, which implies
56:44
Speaker 2: that the round fired at Charlie that day would have
56:47
Speaker 2: had a direct soft tissue impact. Now, if this impact
56:51
Speaker 2: was applied to Charlie Kirk's slender frame, this round fired
56:55
Speaker 2: from this rifle, according to the official story, should have
56:58
Speaker 2: absolutely not to be too graphic, but it should have
57:01
Speaker 2: eviscerated his vertebrae, his spinal cord. It should have severed
57:05
Speaker 2: multiple arteries and caused a hemorrhagic cascade, and it should
57:09
Speaker 2: have painted the tense canvas rear the material behind Charlie
57:14
Speaker 2: Kirk with a large, bloody red arterial spray, and it also,
57:18
Speaker 2: at the same time, would have endangered the cluster of
57:20
Speaker 2: aids and guests that sat just a few feet away
57:23
Speaker 2: from Charlie.
57:24
Speaker 1: When he was shot.
57:24
Speaker 2: Instead, though as you can see in the footage, there's
57:27
Speaker 2: no blood. There's zero blood that sprays out behind Charlie.
57:32
Speaker 2: In fact, it's been cleaned now that there was never
57:35
Speaker 2: even an exit wound at all. It just gets even
57:37
Speaker 2: more unbelievable by the day. So on September twentieth, a
57:40
Speaker 2: close friend of Charlie's and one of the most powerful
57:43
Speaker 2: people at Turning Point USA Charlie's organization, a man named
57:47
Speaker 2: Andrew Colvett, posted the following on x saying, quote, I
57:51
Speaker 2: want to address some of the discussion about the lack
57:53
Speaker 2: of an exit wound with Charlie. I'm usually not interested
57:56
Speaker 2: in delving into most of this kind of online chatter,
57:59
Speaker 2: and I apologie this is somewhat graphic, but in this case,
58:02
Speaker 2: the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably
58:05
Speaker 2: another miracle, and I want people to know I just
58:07
Speaker 2: spoke with a surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital.
58:10
Speaker 1: He said, the.
58:10
Speaker 2: Bullet quote absolutely should have gone through, which is very,
58:14
Speaker 2: very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I've
58:17
Speaker 2: seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always
58:20
Speaker 2: just go through everything. This would have taken a moose
58:22
Speaker 2: or two down in elk et cetera.
58:24
Speaker 1: End quote.
58:25
Speaker 2: But it didn't go through. Charlie's body stopped it. I
58:28
Speaker 2: mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students,
58:31
Speaker 2: and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other
58:35
Speaker 2: side of the tent, and he replied, quote it was
58:38
Speaker 2: an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed. His
58:41
Speaker 2: bone was so healthy and the density was so so
58:43
Speaker 2: impressive that he's like the man of Steel. It should
58:46
Speaker 2: have just gone through and through. It likely would have
58:48
Speaker 2: killed those standing behind him too.
58:50
Speaker 1: End quote.
58:50
Speaker 2: In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just
58:53
Speaker 2: beneath the skin. Even in death, Charlie managed to save
58:56
Speaker 2: the lives of those around him. Remarkable, miraculous end quote.
59:03
Speaker 2: And this is I know I keep saying it, but
59:06
Speaker 2: this is incredibly bizarre. I mean, you're actually claiming now
59:11
Speaker 2: think of those videos that I just showed you. Think
59:13
Speaker 2: about all the experienced hunters that I've showed you in
59:16
Speaker 2: this video, and weapons experts talking about how damn powerful
59:21
Speaker 2: a thirty out to six bolt action rifle is. Think
59:24
Speaker 2: of how in you know, in relativity, how close the
59:28
Speaker 2: shooter was to Charlie Kirk. This wasn't like an extremely
59:31
Speaker 2: far shot. He was pretty close to him. And just
59:34
Speaker 2: think of what it actually looks like when you fire
59:37
Speaker 2: rounds from this gun at targets. You've seen those videos.
59:41
Speaker 2: Now you have a guy from Turning Point claiming that
59:44
Speaker 2: it was literally some sort of heaven sent miracle that
59:48
Speaker 2: the bullet stopped in his neck, which I mean, I'm sorry,
59:53
Speaker 2: but it's just physically impossible. A bullet fired from a
59:56
Speaker 2: gun of that caliber, of that size w.
1:00:00
Speaker 1: Have destroyed his neck.
1:00:01
Speaker 2: It would have blown blown a whole through them. It
1:00:03
Speaker 2: would have chattered and destroyed vertebrae and other parts of
1:00:08
Speaker 2: Charlie's neck and body. And come on, guys, clearly, with
1:00:13
Speaker 2: the weapon that powerful, we would have seen an exit
1:00:16
Speaker 2: room if that, really, I believe was the actual weapon.
1:00:19
Speaker 2: I could be wrong about all this. I'm just reporting
1:00:22
Speaker 2: on what all these other people are saying. And you know,
1:00:25
Speaker 2: questioning the narrative with just it makes no sense whatsoever
1:00:29
Speaker 2: that the bullet would just stop on his neck and
1:00:30
Speaker 2: it wouldn't even exit his neck if it's going twenty
1:00:33
Speaker 2: seven hundred to three thousand yards feet per second. I
1:00:39
Speaker 2: don't think I don't think you really can grasp how
1:00:43
Speaker 2: powerful and really fast that is. But I mean the
1:00:47
Speaker 2: inconsistency and the thing that just makes no sense about
1:00:50
Speaker 2: the shooting whatsoever, that all these people are saying this
1:00:52
Speaker 2: seems like bullshit and this official story makes no sense.
1:00:56
Speaker 2: Now that all these people started questioning all this stuff
1:00:59
Speaker 2: and making videos about it online and talking about it,
1:01:02
Speaker 2: Turning Point USA, one of the main guys comes out
1:01:05
Speaker 2: and says, you know, it seems like bullshit. It seems
1:01:09
Speaker 2: incredibly fake, and it seems like it's a totally different weapon.
1:01:12
Speaker 1: But don't worry. It was a miracle.
1:01:14
Speaker 2: This was an actual This was a divine miracle. And
1:01:18
Speaker 2: I'm not making fun of religious people. I believe in miracles.
1:01:21
Speaker 2: I've been to places where miracles have happened. I was
1:01:23
Speaker 2: just in Italy at multiple places where miracles have happened.
1:01:26
Speaker 2: I was filming for an upcoming video that's going to
1:01:29
Speaker 2: be going on my other channel. I walked through the
1:01:32
Speaker 2: Virgin Mary's water at a spring that she in a
1:01:35
Speaker 2: miracle created. I gathered holy water from a miracle well
1:01:41
Speaker 2: that flows with water in the center of Rome. I
1:01:44
Speaker 2: just I've read so much about miracles, and I understand
1:01:46
Speaker 2: and I do believe in them. But this to me
1:01:49
Speaker 2: seems like a very very easy way to try to
1:01:52
Speaker 2: explain a very core fact of the FBI's official story
1:01:56
Speaker 2: that makes no sense. It's like an easy get out
1:01:59
Speaker 2: of jail free card.
1:02:00
Speaker 1: I mean, what is it?
1:02:01
Speaker 2: Is it more likely that Charlie Kirk experienced a miracle
1:02:04
Speaker 2: when he was shot in the neck or that an
1:02:07
Speaker 2: entirely different weapon was used. Also, no autopsy report or
1:02:11
Speaker 2: anything like that has been released so far, and reportedly
1:02:14
Speaker 2: the coroner seems to be stonewalling efforts to get that
1:02:18
Speaker 2: report released, which has left a void where science and
1:02:21
Speaker 2: evidence should illuminate.
1:02:23
Speaker 1: Now.
1:02:23
Speaker 2: I also saw another YouTuber when I was watching a
1:02:26
Speaker 2: video about Charlie Kirk's assassination and the theories behind it.
1:02:29
Speaker 2: I saw him talk about Akham's razor, and I think
1:02:32
Speaker 2: that that concept is really prescient and relevant here. Essentially,
1:02:36
Speaker 2: Okham's razor is a simple idea used to figure out
1:02:40
Speaker 2: the best explanation for something. It says that when you
1:02:43
Speaker 2: have a few possible explanations for a situation, the simplest one,
1:02:47
Speaker 2: the one that makes the fewest assumptions or adds the
1:02:50
Speaker 2: least complexity, is usually the right one. Now, imagine you're
1:02:53
Speaker 2: trying to solve a puzzle and you have two solutions,
1:02:56
Speaker 2: one solution that needs just a few pieces to fit perfectly,
1:03:00
Speaker 2: and another solution that requires a bunch of extra pieces
1:03:03
Speaker 2: and complicated steps. Okham's razor suggests picking the simpler solution
1:03:09
Speaker 2: because it's more likely to be correct as it doesn't
1:03:11
Speaker 2: rely on unnecessary guesses or complications. This principle is often
1:03:16
Speaker 2: used in science, problem solving and even everyday life to
1:03:19
Speaker 2: avoid overthinking things. For example, if your car won't start,
1:03:22
Speaker 2: it's probably just a dead battery rather than some sort
1:03:25
Speaker 2: of rare, complex engine failure, because the battery explanation is
1:03:29
Speaker 2: simpler and more common. However, Okham's razor isn't a strict rule.
1:03:34
Speaker 2: It's just a guideline. Sometimes sometimes the more complicated explanation
1:03:39
Speaker 2: is true, but by starting with the simplest one, that
1:03:42
Speaker 2: helps you focus on what's most likely without getting lost
1:03:45
Speaker 2: in wild theories or extra details, So apply that principle here.
1:03:50
Speaker 2: Either Tyler Robinson is some form of a patsy and
1:03:54
Speaker 2: this assassination was set up by somebody or some government
1:04:00
Speaker 2: or some group and the cover up was very, very sloppy.
1:04:05
Speaker 2: Or Tyler Robinson did do this, but he had no
1:04:10
Speaker 2: prior history, he had no real motivation. He confessed to
1:04:14
Speaker 2: everything over the texts that we're going to cover. In
1:04:15
Speaker 2: a second, he changed his clothing and disassembled the gun
1:04:19
Speaker 2: in fifteen to thirty seconds. He then reassembled the rifle
1:04:21
Speaker 2: in the woods to leave it as evidence with a
1:04:23
Speaker 2: DNA soak towel. He also confessed, and yet he's not
1:04:27
Speaker 2: talking about it. The official story is much more complicated
1:04:31
Speaker 2: than this other story. Ockham's razor, same thing with Charlie
1:04:35
Speaker 2: Kirk's wound. Was it really a miracle and the doctors
1:04:39
Speaker 2: can't explain it. And he was hit at the perfect
1:04:41
Speaker 2: angle and something stopped the bullet in his body because
1:04:45
Speaker 2: the gun would have completely destroyed his neck and it
1:04:48
Speaker 2: was a complete this and that and that, or was
1:04:51
Speaker 2: it just a different weapon though was used. I'll let
1:04:53
Speaker 2: you think on that one. We also can't forget about
1:04:56
Speaker 2: the guy who claimed immediately after.
1:04:58
Speaker 1: The shooting then he was the shooter.
1:05:00
Speaker 2: Post shot chaos right after Charlie Kirk was shot literally,
1:05:03
Speaker 2: in my opinion, unfolded almost like a conspiracy script, with
1:05:08
Speaker 2: immediate loud and visible distractions and false positives piling quickly.
1:05:12
Speaker 2: For example, right after the shooting occurred, there was an
1:05:15
Speaker 2: elderly man seen and heard running around the scene screaming
1:05:18
Speaker 2: out I did it and trying to take credit for
1:05:21
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk's killing. Obviously, this guy was immediately tackled and
1:05:24
Speaker 2: arrested and taken in by the police, even though it
1:05:27
Speaker 2: was later determined that he had nothing to do with
1:05:29
Speaker 2: the shooting.
1:05:30
Speaker 1: But who was this guy? Well?
1:05:32
Speaker 2: The elderly attendee was later identified as local retiree and
1:05:36
Speaker 2: semi famous Utah political figure George Zinn. Now it's known
1:05:41
Speaker 2: that George Zinn is innocent and obviously that he didn't
1:05:44
Speaker 2: carry out the shooting, But who exactly is George Zinn Well.
1:05:47
Speaker 2: George zin is a seventy one year old Utah political
1:05:51
Speaker 2: gadfly known for his decades long presence at Republican events, protests,
1:05:55
Speaker 2: and even cultural gatherings like the Sun Dance film festival.
1:05:59
Speaker 2: This guy is like a pretty well known political figure
1:06:02
Speaker 2: in the Utah political scene who just pops up at
1:06:04
Speaker 2: all these notable events and protests and notable times when
1:06:08
Speaker 2: notable things are happening. It's like George Zinn is always there.
1:06:11
Speaker 2: It's like where's Waldo type of thing, Where's George Zinn?
1:06:14
Speaker 2: And interestingly, George zin is known for frequently disrupting proceedings
1:06:19
Speaker 2: with his libertarian leaning conservative views. It is interesting, though,
1:06:23
Speaker 2: so let's imagine that there really was something weird going
1:06:26
Speaker 2: on that day, that something bigger, darker was really playing out.
1:06:31
Speaker 2: Immediately after the shot was taken at Charlie Kirk, while
1:06:34
Speaker 2: the guy on the roof is attempting to escape, someone
1:06:37
Speaker 2: down in the crowd area begins to scream out that
1:06:39
Speaker 2: he did it, that he's the guy who killed Charlie Kirk,
1:06:42
Speaker 2: and he starts begging the police to come arrest him. Immediately,
1:06:46
Speaker 2: chatter goes out across all law enforcement radios in the
1:06:49
Speaker 2: nearby area stating that they found the guy, that they
1:06:52
Speaker 2: were taking him into custody, and at least for a
1:06:54
Speaker 2: moment there, the police and the authorities are fully distracted.
1:06:58
Speaker 2: They believe even if it's momentarily that they already have
1:07:02
Speaker 2: their guy, and so their attention turns from finding the
1:07:05
Speaker 2: shooter to treating the wounded and clearing the scene. And
1:07:08
Speaker 2: this gives the real shooter, whether that's Tyler Robinson or not,
1:07:11
Speaker 2: ample time to escape the scene completely undetected, which they
1:07:15
Speaker 2: did while law enforcement officers in the area are already
1:07:19
Speaker 2: preoccupied with their suspect. It couldn't have been more serendipitous.
1:07:23
Speaker 2: Could It have been a distraction popped up in the
1:07:26
Speaker 2: crowd and it worked. People concert attendees and law enforcement
1:07:30
Speaker 2: officers alike were completely distracted, and it gave the shooter
1:07:34
Speaker 2: just enough time to get away. I mean, I remember
1:07:36
Speaker 2: my wife telling me about everything that was going on.
1:07:38
Speaker 2: I was actually recording an episode of the show when
1:07:40
Speaker 2: I found out about all this, and I remember her
1:07:42
Speaker 2: telling me they got the guy. They already got the guy.
1:07:44
Speaker 2: He's some older guy. And then throughout the day it's like, hmm,
1:07:47
Speaker 2: it's actually not the guy. But then you see the
1:07:49
Speaker 2: videos where he's I'm him, I'm the shooter, I'm the guy,
1:07:52
Speaker 2: and everyone's just running towards him, and I'd imagine the police, Yeah.
1:07:56
Speaker 1: We got him, we got him. He's over here in
1:07:57
Speaker 1: the courtyard.
1:07:58
Speaker 2: It's like all the all the enforcement officers are going
1:08:02
Speaker 2: to be plugged into that radio signal and they're gonna
1:08:04
Speaker 2: think he's over here. We don't need to look up here,
1:08:06
Speaker 2: and it helped the guy get away. Now, even more interestingly,
1:08:10
Speaker 2: after he was arrested for obstruction amongst other charges, George
1:08:14
Speaker 2: Zen was actually charged with the possession of CSAM materials
1:08:18
Speaker 2: that were found on his phone, meaning that, yes, this guy,
1:08:21
Speaker 2: George Zinn, is also a Could this material have been
1:08:26
Speaker 2: planted on his phone to keep him silent? Was George
1:08:29
Speaker 2: Zinn silenced? Was this stuff found on his phone to
1:08:33
Speaker 2: make him look crazy or untrustable in the eyes of
1:08:36
Speaker 2: the masses in case he were to ever spill the
1:08:39
Speaker 2: true story about what happened? Who may have hired him
1:08:41
Speaker 2: to create the distraction? Or is this guy really just
1:08:44
Speaker 2: some crazy kook that actually wanted to take credit for
1:08:47
Speaker 2: the shooting.
1:08:47
Speaker 1: For some reason?
1:08:48
Speaker 2: And is I don't know, but it's really also strange. Now,
1:08:54
Speaker 2: after the Charlie Kirk shooting, a one million dollar reward
1:08:58
Speaker 2: was posted for information really relating to the capture of
1:09:01
Speaker 2: the shooter by a guy named Bill Ackman. Bill Ackman
1:09:05
Speaker 2: is a name that regularly pops up in conspiracy circles,
1:09:08
Speaker 2: but in short, he's a billionaire businessman. And interestingly enough,
1:09:13
Speaker 2: Bill Ackman's wife, Nary AxMan, has been under fire for
1:09:17
Speaker 2: the last few years. Why well, in twenty fifteen, she
1:09:21
Speaker 2: accepted a one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars donation
1:09:24
Speaker 2: to her Mit Lab, which funded research from none other
1:09:29
Speaker 2: than drum roll please our favorite guy, Jeffrey Epstein. Kind
1:09:34
Speaker 2: of strange, right, Jeffrey Epstein is even popping up in
1:09:37
Speaker 2: the story, even if it's through some sort of six
1:09:40
Speaker 2: degrees of separation connection. Epstein's connected to this guy's wife
1:09:44
Speaker 2: who's offering the reward. It's kind of strange, right, Nah,
1:09:49
Speaker 2: must just be some big, weird coincidence. But one of
1:09:52
Speaker 2: the biggest inconsistencies in all of this that people constantly
1:09:55
Speaker 2: point out are the text messages that were released by
1:09:58
Speaker 2: the FBI alleged sent between Tyler Robinson and his lover
1:10:02
Speaker 2: slash roommate. These text messages, the prosecutors supposed smoking gun
1:10:06
Speaker 2: evidence unfold as a sort of Thespian tragedy, with their
1:10:10
Speaker 2: verbosity seeming to clash with gen Z's brevity, humor, and
1:10:14
Speaker 2: lingo released in Utah court. The following is the full
1:10:17
Speaker 2: transcript of the text exchange between Tyler Robinson and his
1:10:21
Speaker 2: romantic partner slash roommate Lance Twigs, as released in court
1:10:25
Speaker 2: documents and reported by Newsweek on September sixteenth, twenty twenty five.
1:10:30
Speaker 2: The messages occurred shortly after the shooting on September tenth,
1:10:33
Speaker 2: but there are no specific timestams provided in the sources.
1:10:37
Speaker 2: They're formatted as a dialogue, separated by speaker, and note
1:10:41
Speaker 2: that some of these messages from Robinson are multipart or
1:10:44
Speaker 2: run on as they were originally reported and released. So
1:10:48
Speaker 2: the texts went as follows, Lance, what you're joking, right, Tyler?
1:10:54
Speaker 2: I am still okay, my love, but am stuck in
1:10:56
Speaker 2: Orum for a little while longer yet, shouldn't be long
1:10:59
Speaker 2: until I can come home, But I gotta grab my
1:11:01
Speaker 2: rifle still. To be honest, I'd hoped to keep this
1:11:03
Speaker 2: secret till I died of old age. I am sorry
1:11:06
Speaker 2: to involve you, Lance. You weren't the one who did it, right, Tyler,
1:11:12
Speaker 2: I am, I'm sorry.
1:11:14
Speaker 1: Lance.
1:11:15
Speaker 2: I thought they caught the person, Tyler. No, they grabbed
1:11:19
Speaker 2: some crazy old dude that interrogated someone in similar clothing.
1:11:23
Speaker 2: I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop
1:11:25
Speaker 2: points shortly after, but most of that side of town
1:11:28
Speaker 2: got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out,
1:11:31
Speaker 2: but there's one vehicle lingering Lance.
1:11:34
Speaker 1: Why Tyler? Why did I do it? Lance?
1:11:39
Speaker 2: Yeah, Tyler, I had enough of his hatred. Some hate
1:11:43
Speaker 2: can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab
1:11:46
Speaker 2: my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence going
1:11:49
Speaker 2: to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on.
1:11:52
Speaker 2: I haven't seen anything about them finding it.
1:11:55
Speaker 1: Lance.
1:11:56
Speaker 2: How long have you been planning this, Tyler? A bit
1:11:59
Speaker 2: over week. I believe I can get close to it,
1:12:02
Speaker 2: but there is a squad car parked right by it.
1:12:04
Speaker 2: I think they already swept that spot, but I don't
1:12:06
Speaker 2: want to chance it.
1:12:07
Speaker 1: Tyler.
1:12:08
Speaker 2: I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as
1:12:10
Speaker 2: soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what
1:12:12
Speaker 2: my old man would do if I didn't bring back
1:12:14
Speaker 2: Grandpa's rifle. I don't even know if it had a
1:12:17
Speaker 2: serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me.
1:12:19
Speaker 1: I worry about Prince.
1:12:20
Speaker 2: I had to leave it in a bush where I
1:12:22
Speaker 2: changed outfits, didn't have the ability or time to bring
1:12:25
Speaker 2: it with I might have to abandon it and hope
1:12:27
Speaker 2: they don't find prints. How the fuck will I explain
1:12:29
Speaker 2: losing it to my old man. Only thing I left
1:12:32
Speaker 2: was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how I
1:12:35
Speaker 2: was engraving bullets. The messages are mostly a big meme.
1:12:39
Speaker 2: If I see notices bulge ou Wu on Fox News,
1:12:42
Speaker 2: I might have a stroke.
1:12:44
Speaker 1: All right, I'm gonna have to leave it. That really sucks.
1:12:48
Speaker 2: Judging from today, I'd say Grandpa's gun does just fine.
1:12:51
Speaker 1: I don't know.
1:12:52
Speaker 2: I think that was a two thousand dollars scope. Delete
1:12:55
Speaker 2: this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle, he says,
1:12:58
Speaker 2: Grandpa wants to know who has what.
1:13:00
Speaker 1: But the Fens released a photo of.
1:13:01
Speaker 2: The rifle and it is very unique. He's calling me
1:13:04
Speaker 2: right now, not answering. Since Trump got into office, my
1:13:08
Speaker 2: dad has been pretty diehard.
1:13:09
Speaker 1: Maga.
1:13:10
Speaker 2: I'm gonna turn myself in Willingly. One of my neighbors
1:13:13
Speaker 2: here is a deputy for the sheriff. You are all
1:13:15
Speaker 2: I worry about, love Lance. I'm much more worried about you, Tyler.
1:13:21
Speaker 2: Don't talk to the media. Please don't take any interviews
1:13:24
Speaker 2: or make any comments. If any police ask you questions,
1:13:27
Speaker 2: ask for a lawyer, and stay silent.
1:13:29
Speaker 1: So those are the messages.
1:13:31
Speaker 2: And many many people across the political spectrum have stated
1:13:35
Speaker 2: that these texts seem fake or fabricated. For starters, what's
1:13:40
Speaker 2: the template here? These are the actual documents that show
1:13:43
Speaker 2: how they release these texts. Like this is like on screen,
1:13:47
Speaker 2: an actual document from the government showing these text messages.
1:13:52
Speaker 2: Like why do these messages look like this? I've never
1:13:54
Speaker 2: seen text messages released by law enforcement that look like
1:13:57
Speaker 2: these do They just straight off the bat literally look fake.
1:14:01
Speaker 2: There are also no timestamps provided in the original source.
1:14:05
Speaker 2: This is literally just words on paper.
1:14:07
Speaker 12: Now.
1:14:08
Speaker 2: Many people have pointed out that this conversation doesn't feel
1:14:11
Speaker 2: like a conversation that two younger people would have with
1:14:13
Speaker 2: one another. It feels, I mean, really really scripted. The
1:14:18
Speaker 2: lingo used also seems to be from an older generation,
1:14:21
Speaker 2: and as many have pointed out, it doesn't really sound
1:14:23
Speaker 2: like something a Gen Z person would type. As one
1:14:26
Speaker 2: user on Reddit pointed out, there are many reasons why
1:14:28
Speaker 2: people believe that these messages were fabricated, and many questions
1:14:32
Speaker 2: that people have about the messages themselves, questions like, as
1:14:36
Speaker 2: many have pointed out already.
1:14:37
Speaker 1: Who talks like this?
1:14:39
Speaker 2: There's a ton of cop language in here, like squad car, sweep, etc.
1:14:44
Speaker 2: Perhaps the most damning is the texts say ooh wu
1:14:47
Speaker 2: instead of oh wu, which is the meme and what
1:14:50
Speaker 2: was written on the bullets. Why would Robinson mess up
1:14:52
Speaker 2: his own meme?
1:14:54
Speaker 1: This makes no sense.
1:14:55
Speaker 2: It's super improbable that this internet troll who was refusing
1:14:58
Speaker 2: to cooperate with law enforcement would conveniently send messages to
1:15:02
Speaker 2: his roommate slash partner, slash whatever that contain everything they
1:15:06
Speaker 2: need to pin a motive on the far left? Why
1:15:09
Speaker 2: were these court documents released at all? That doesn't usually happen, right,
1:15:13
Speaker 2: Quote Remember when I was engraving bullets?
1:15:15
Speaker 1: End quote?
1:15:16
Speaker 2: And he didn't explain why, Like, he didn't really say
1:15:20
Speaker 2: anything about that. He just put that information into text
1:15:23
Speaker 2: and he didn't even say anything afterwards.
1:15:25
Speaker 1: It makes no sense.
1:15:26
Speaker 2: He's like, hm, remember when I was doing this highly
1:15:29
Speaker 2: incriminating thing. Anyways, let's talk about the weather. If Tyler
1:15:33
Speaker 2: and his roommate are so close, why does he need
1:15:36
Speaker 2: to tell them that his dad is a die hard
1:15:38
Speaker 2: maga seemingly telling them for the first time. The idea
1:15:41
Speaker 2: that the FBI would falsify evidence like this would normally
1:15:44
Speaker 2: be so stupid as to be unbelievable. But Cash Pttel
1:15:47
Speaker 2: is an extraordinarily stupid man. So those are just questions
1:15:50
Speaker 2: from one person online. And I mean, the messages are
1:15:54
Speaker 2: literally too perfect in my opinion. And the messages you
1:15:57
Speaker 2: have the shooter admitting to being the shito, describing exactly
1:16:01
Speaker 2: where he left the murder weapon, describing how much the
1:16:04
Speaker 2: scope on the gun costs, describing his motivations, describing elements
1:16:09
Speaker 2: from the scene of the shooting, describing how long he's
1:16:12
Speaker 2: been planning the attack for, and so much more.
1:16:15
Speaker 1: I mean, these text.
1:16:16
Speaker 2: Messages are practically a full on written confession, a confession
1:16:20
Speaker 2: to every single element of the crime, from the escape
1:16:24
Speaker 2: to the weapon drop to the motivations. It's incredibly and
1:16:27
Speaker 2: I want to overstate this, incredibly convenient for Cash Patel
1:16:32
Speaker 2: and the FBI. I mean, the texts even talk about
1:16:35
Speaker 2: the goddamn engraved bullets and it just seems so fake,
1:16:39
Speaker 2: like you saw me engraving those bullets, right, Like, what
1:16:42
Speaker 2: the hell? The story on its face seems improbable, But
1:16:46
Speaker 2: Lucky day. Here are some text messages that seem to
1:16:48
Speaker 2: confirm every element of our story, written out plain his
1:16:52
Speaker 2: day and incredibly easy to understand, yet bizarre, not almost
1:16:58
Speaker 2: human sounding language. It just really is so strange. The
1:17:01
Speaker 2: shooter who actually took the shot seems to have been
1:17:04
Speaker 2: incredibly meticulous, incredibly precise, and incredibly smart. They got in
1:17:09
Speaker 2: and out of the scene with an almost laser focused precision,
1:17:12
Speaker 2: and they really avoided all detection. So does it make
1:17:15
Speaker 2: sense to you that the same guy who did all
1:17:18
Speaker 2: of that and went through all that effort, disassembling the rifle,
1:17:21
Speaker 2: reassembling the rifle, changing clothing, sneaking out the back, escaping
1:17:25
Speaker 2: the scene, the same guy that went through all that
1:17:27
Speaker 2: effort to get away with the crime, would then leave
1:17:30
Speaker 2: the smoking gun evidence literally the gun gift rapped with
1:17:34
Speaker 2: a DNA soaked towel directly near the crime scene, and
1:17:38
Speaker 2: then text his partner a full on confession to almost
1:17:42
Speaker 2: every element of the crime itself, and then confess to
1:17:45
Speaker 2: his parents. Add in the fact that Tyler Robinson still
1:17:48
Speaker 2: has not admitted guilt or even talked to investigators, and
1:17:52
Speaker 2: it seems like we have some sort of cover up brewing.
1:17:55
Speaker 2: I've even seen posts where people have asked AI to
1:17:58
Speaker 2: analyze those text exchanges, and AI models actually stated that
1:18:02
Speaker 2: they believed that, due to some of the wording and verbiage,
1:18:05
Speaker 2: these texts were likely AI generated. But we'll leave that
1:18:09
Speaker 2: rabbit hole for another day. Then there's the camera gate controversy,
1:18:13
Speaker 2: which featured two mysterious figures. The first mysterious figure seen
1:18:17
Speaker 2: in footage on the day of the shooting was one
1:18:19
Speaker 2: initially positioned on nearby rocks, seen on video recording with
1:18:23
Speaker 2: a phone pressed to his ear, looking chillingly calm, as
1:18:26
Speaker 2: if he's contacting his handler or his boss that wants
1:18:30
Speaker 2: an update on the crime itself amidst the surrounding pandemonium.
1:18:34
Speaker 2: That mysterious figure, who was just on the phone, then
1:18:37
Speaker 2: quickly runs over to the stage and onto Charlie Kirk's
1:18:40
Speaker 2: chair in order to retrieve a camera from the stage
1:18:43
Speaker 2: setup that was facing the crowd at the time that
1:18:45
Speaker 2: the shot was fired, the camera obviously being an item
1:18:48
Speaker 2: that should have remained untouched as a staple of crime
1:18:51
Speaker 2: scene preservation. The same mysterious figure was then seen on
1:18:54
Speaker 2: video removing the SD card from the camera and taking
1:18:57
Speaker 2: the footage recorded on that camera with him. The individual
1:19:00
Speaker 2: was identified as being a longtime Turning Point USA member
1:19:04
Speaker 2: according to Candace Owen's September seventeenth podcast, and his reasoning
1:19:09
Speaker 2: for grabbing the camera and camera card, as relayed to
1:19:12
Speaker 2: Candace during their alleged conversation, was to secure the footage
1:19:16
Speaker 2: for handover to federal authorities following the post chaos check
1:19:20
Speaker 2: in with his colleagues. Now Candace herself actually claims that
1:19:24
Speaker 2: this employee allowed her to take a look at the
1:19:26
Speaker 2: footage from that camera over FaceTime, and during that private
1:19:30
Speaker 2: FaceTime peek at the footage, Candace stated that she saw
1:19:33
Speaker 2: no blood and no gore coming from Charlie Kirk's neck
1:19:36
Speaker 2: from the back angle, which clashed starkly with the frontal
1:19:40
Speaker 2: trauma depicted in public videos and raised questions about the
1:19:44
Speaker 2: initial hunts for a loose bullet. This is interesting, So clearly,
1:19:48
Speaker 2: according to Kansas, according to now, we're saying the surgeon
1:19:52
Speaker 2: and Turning Point, clearly, Charlie Kirk did not have an
1:19:56
Speaker 2: exit wound on the back of his neck after the shooting,
1:19:59
Speaker 2: and the federal effe authorities like the FBI, after taking
1:20:02
Speaker 2: just one simple look at Charlie Kirk's body would have
1:20:06
Speaker 2: and should have known that there was no exit wound
1:20:08
Speaker 2: and that the bullet was more than likely still lodged
1:20:11
Speaker 2: within Charlie Kirk's neck. Yet, initially the FBI stated that
1:20:15
Speaker 2: they were searching the area near where Charlie's body fell
1:20:19
Speaker 2: for the bullet, and this creates yet another discrepancy in
1:20:22
Speaker 2: the investigative approach. I mean, if they had looked at
1:20:25
Speaker 2: Charlie's body, they would have seen that the bullet was
1:20:28
Speaker 2: still in his body. Yet they publicly stated that they
1:20:32
Speaker 2: were still desperately searching for the bullet in that area.
1:20:35
Speaker 1: It makes no sense. You're the FBI.
1:20:38
Speaker 2: Are you not going to examine both sides of the
1:20:40
Speaker 2: corpse look for an exit wound before trying to find
1:20:43
Speaker 2: the bullet. You're the Federal Bureau of Investigation. That seems
1:20:47
Speaker 2: like it should be the first point of your investigation.
1:20:49
Speaker 2: If you're looking for a damn bullet, check the bullet
1:20:52
Speaker 2: wound to make sure it's not still in there. Yet
1:20:54
Speaker 2: they publicly announced that they're looking for the bullet, assumably
1:20:58
Speaker 2: showing that they I guess.
1:20:59
Speaker 1: Just didn't look for didn't check the bullet.
1:21:02
Speaker 3: Mom.
1:21:02
Speaker 2: There's also a CNN report from September twentieth that highlights
1:21:05
Speaker 2: a potential hip a breach, a hippo breach that may
1:21:08
Speaker 2: have occurred when Charlie Kirk's surgeon leaked statements about Charlie
1:21:12
Speaker 2: Kirk's wounds to the press and to members of Turning
1:21:14
Speaker 2: Point USA. There's also TMZ's release of doorbell camera footage
1:21:18
Speaker 2: that they obtained that shows Tyler Robinson walking down a
1:21:22
Speaker 2: street near a business called Caldera Engineering, a valve firm
1:21:25
Speaker 2: with reported Israeli ties and SCADA monitored systems that are
1:21:30
Speaker 2: vulnerable to cyber threats. And the reveal of this business
1:21:33
Speaker 2: being in close proximity to Tyler Robinson sparked a flurry
1:21:36
Speaker 2: of emails to Kandace Owens's inbox emails that discussed CISA
1:21:41
Speaker 2: and NSA oversight and the CIA slash Intelligence communities connections
1:21:46
Speaker 2: to the valve industry, the valve industry being associated with
1:21:49
Speaker 2: that Caldera Engineering that was close to Tyler Robinson, and
1:21:53
Speaker 2: according to Kansas, I haven't verified this information, but there
1:21:56
Speaker 2: were people on that street that Tyler Robinson was walking
1:22:00
Speaker 2: down that had connections themselves to the valve industry, which
1:22:04
Speaker 2: is highly connected to the CIA, and that in itself
1:22:06
Speaker 2: is an extremely strange little rabbit hole. The niche piping
1:22:09
Speaker 2: industry's government contracts, including alleged CIA pipelines that had been
1:22:14
Speaker 2: installed at or near Utah Valley University where the shooting
1:22:18
Speaker 2: took place, have only added layers to the intrigue around
1:22:21
Speaker 2: all this. There's also a bizarre image captured after the
1:22:24
Speaker 2: shooting that shows Tyler Robinson inside of a dairy queen,
1:22:27
Speaker 2: just fifteen minutes away from the UVU campus. The snapshot
1:22:31
Speaker 2: was taken at six thirty eight pm that day, over
1:22:34
Speaker 2: six hours after the shooting took place, just fifteen minutes away,
1:22:37
Speaker 2: and he.
1:22:38
Speaker 1: Seems so chill.
1:22:39
Speaker 2: It doesn't look like this guy just assassinated one of
1:22:41
Speaker 2: the most high profile figures in America a few hours ago.
1:22:45
Speaker 2: But there's also an even stranger connection in this photograph.
1:22:48
Speaker 2: Remember how Charlie Kirk's friend and others have claimed that
1:22:52
Speaker 2: he was a man of steel. Then that's a direct
1:22:54
Speaker 2: quote because his body stopped that high powered bullet from
1:22:58
Speaker 2: exiting his body and heard others they literally call him
1:23:01
Speaker 2: a man of steel. Well, if you look closely at
1:23:04
Speaker 2: the photo of Tyler Robinson inside of the dairy queen,
1:23:07
Speaker 2: he appears to be standing in front of a poster
1:23:09
Speaker 2: for the new Superman movie. If you don't know, Superman's
1:23:13
Speaker 2: nickname is the Man of Steel. And that movie came
1:23:16
Speaker 2: out back in July, and right now it's Wednesday, September
1:23:20
Speaker 2: twenty fourth. I don't know why they would still have
1:23:22
Speaker 2: a Superman poster in a dairy queen. And then there's
1:23:25
Speaker 2: the Man of Steel connection and the tweets and the posts.
1:23:27
Speaker 2: Is this just a connection or is this somebody laughing
1:23:30
Speaker 2: in our faces?
1:23:31
Speaker 1: I don't really know.
1:23:33
Speaker 2: I just I can't make any sort of judgment call,
1:23:35
Speaker 2: but it's incredibly weird. This synthesis reveals a flux in
1:23:39
Speaker 2: the origin story, magical feats with the rifle assembly, wonders
1:23:43
Speaker 2: defying ballistics in the wound, theatrical elements in the texts,
1:23:47
Speaker 2: chaos surrounding the camera handling, and intriguing ties to infrastructure,
1:23:51
Speaker 2: all of which demand the release of full reports and
1:23:54
Speaker 2: footage for verification. Occam's razor points to a narrative requiring
1:23:59
Speaker 2: maxim assumptions here rather than the simplest explanation. The maximal
1:24:04
Speaker 2: assumptions explanation, which Ockham's razor says is the least likely,
1:24:09
Speaker 2: is the FBI story where you have to jump through
1:24:12
Speaker 2: all these hoops and jump everywhere, all over the place
1:24:16
Speaker 2: to make this thing work. Like the timeline that doesn't
1:24:18
Speaker 2: make sense. The changing, the disassembling the rifle, the rebuilding
1:24:21
Speaker 2: and in the woods, the complete confessions over text message,
1:24:26
Speaker 2: the fact that he was really smart about what he
1:24:28
Speaker 2: was doing and then he was just like completely stupid
1:24:31
Speaker 2: as hell, the changes in behavior, the lack of a confession,
1:24:35
Speaker 2: an actual confession from Tyler Robinson, the conflicting evidence, the
1:24:39
Speaker 2: conflicting reports, just the strangeness, the distraction, George's in in
1:24:43
Speaker 2: the crowd, you have to All of that goes into
1:24:46
Speaker 2: the FBI story. But the simplest explanation would be that
1:24:52
Speaker 2: there's no exit wound, not because of a miracle, but
1:24:55
Speaker 2: because it was fired from a different weapon and instead
1:24:58
Speaker 2: of assembling and deassembling and doing this and that to
1:25:01
Speaker 2: the gun, maybe it was just a smaller gun from
1:25:03
Speaker 2: a different angle.
1:25:04
Speaker 1: I don't know.
1:25:05
Speaker 2: There's so much information here and so much that just
1:25:08
Speaker 2: doesn't really make sense. It would be hard to talk
1:25:10
Speaker 2: about it all. For example, there's also the fact that there
1:25:13
Speaker 2: were people recording as the shot rang out that day,
1:25:17
Speaker 2: people that didn't even flinch. They were standing in the
1:25:19
Speaker 2: immediate area. Yet the gun shot itself wasn't even loud
1:25:23
Speaker 2: enough to cause these individuals to really react.
1:25:26
Speaker 1: Just take a look.
1:25:30
Speaker 11: Was that.
1:25:37
Speaker 1: There's been a shooting?
1:25:38
Speaker 2: Heard shots?
1:25:39
Speaker 1: We heard shots?
1:25:41
Speaker 10: You guys?
1:25:41
Speaker 11: Okay, okay, let you say.
1:25:44
Speaker 2: Even in the initial videos of the shooting, when the
1:25:47
Speaker 2: shot rings out, it seems like most of the people
1:25:49
Speaker 2: in the crowd don't really even react.
1:25:54
Speaker 11: So do you don't how many transgender.
1:25:55
Speaker 2: Americans have been mass.
1:25:57
Speaker 3: Shooters over the last ten years? Too many?
1:26:00
Speaker 2: Looks fine?
1:26:07
Speaker 3: Now buys a lot, right, I'm gonna give you. I'm
1:26:08
Speaker 3: gonna give me some credit.
1:26:09
Speaker 6: Do you know how many mashers there have been in
1:26:12
Speaker 6: America over.
1:26:13
Speaker 3: The last ten years, counting or not counting gang violence?
1:26:16
Speaker 3: Of great?
1:26:21
Speaker 2: If it really was such a loud boom, a boom
1:26:24
Speaker 2: that was echoing down into an amphitheater where sound is
1:26:27
Speaker 2: gonna vibrate and shake and dart off of on those
1:26:31
Speaker 2: walls and kind of like amplify, wouldn't there be a
1:26:35
Speaker 2: great flinching type reaction from the entire crowd at the
1:26:38
Speaker 2: same time? These are just questions that I have, And also,
1:26:42
Speaker 2: where are all the other angles from that day. Where's
1:26:45
Speaker 2: the other footage? I could assume that there were a
1:26:47
Speaker 2: lot more people that were recording that afternoon at the
1:26:51
Speaker 2: moment that Charlie Kirk was shot. You can see in
1:26:53
Speaker 2: some of the clips that a lot of people in
1:26:55
Speaker 2: the crowd actually had their phones out and appeared to
1:26:58
Speaker 2: have been recording at the exact time that Kirk was shot.
1:27:01
Speaker 2: But why haven't we seen their angles? Are they being suppressed?
1:27:04
Speaker 2: It's so strange to me.
1:27:06
Speaker 12: I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom.
1:27:09
Speaker 12: I saw him, I heard the shot ring out. I
1:27:12
Speaker 12: looked to my left, and then I looked over to
1:27:14
Speaker 12: my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward.
1:27:18
Speaker 12: He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left
1:27:21
Speaker 12: side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over,
1:27:25
Speaker 12: and he was carried off.
1:27:29
Speaker 6: Get off me off.
1:27:34
Speaker 11: Running high right now.
1:27:41
Speaker 2: Usually, as with any other tragic event, those other angles
1:27:45
Speaker 2: would have been posted right after the shooting itself directly
1:27:48
Speaker 2: to all social media platforms.
1:27:50
Speaker 1: People usually post.
1:27:51
Speaker 2: That stuff, and I would imagine that they would have,
1:27:53
Speaker 2: with the event they caught on camera being international news.
1:27:57
Speaker 2: And yet I've really only seen a few select angles
1:28:01
Speaker 2: out of the dozens, if not hundreds that were being
1:28:04
Speaker 2: recorded at the time, and so yeah, at the end
1:28:07
Speaker 2: of the day, you also have to look at what
1:28:09
Speaker 2: else was going on that day in the world.
1:28:11
Speaker 1: What were they doing.
1:28:12
Speaker 2: Well they voted against releasing the Epstein files that day,
1:28:16
Speaker 2: That would have been the biggest news story of the
1:28:18
Speaker 2: day and would have looked really bad on Trump, really
1:28:21
Speaker 2: bad on the administration. People would have just continued to
1:28:24
Speaker 2: get pissed, and they would have been talking about Epstein
1:28:26
Speaker 2: for days and weeks again, and Epstein would have been
1:28:29
Speaker 2: dominating the news cycle. But then all of a sudden,
1:28:31
Speaker 2: this happens to Charlie Kirk, and you're not hearing anything
1:28:34
Speaker 2: about Epstein anymore. Epstein's out of the news cycle again.
1:28:37
Speaker 2: Now I'm not going to get into who could have
1:28:40
Speaker 2: shot Charlie Kirk, who wanted him dead, or my personal
1:28:43
Speaker 2: thoughts and everything, But could he have been shot to
1:28:46
Speaker 2: push a political agenda, to unite a political party? Could
1:28:50
Speaker 2: he have been shot to distract people from something? Could
1:28:53
Speaker 2: he have been killed because he was going to come
1:28:55
Speaker 2: out against a certain nation or foreign government? Was he
1:28:58
Speaker 2: killed for his views? Was hell because someone disliked him?
1:29:01
Speaker 2: All this that you've seen today is just evidence this
1:29:04
Speaker 2: is real evidence that makes no sense to me. Now,
1:29:07
Speaker 2: one more thing that I'm going to add in here
1:29:09
Speaker 2: that I didn't see, or I guess it hadn't happened
1:29:13
Speaker 2: at the time that I recorded this video. Initially, recently
1:29:16
Speaker 2: it was announced by Cash Pattel himself that now they
1:29:20
Speaker 2: are looking into potential conspiracies surrounding the murder of Charlie Kirk,
1:29:25
Speaker 2: which I find to be incredibly interesting. It's essentially, I mean,
1:29:30
Speaker 2: the conspiracy is that the FBI is covering this up,
1:29:33
Speaker 2: so it's asking the murderer to solve his victim's crime.
1:29:37
Speaker 2: It's like the fire extinguisher is on fire, that sort
1:29:42
Speaker 2: of a thing where it's just kind of bizarre to
1:29:45
Speaker 2: me because the FBI are the ones that are accused
1:29:48
Speaker 2: of facilitating this cover up and this conspiracy, and I
1:29:52
Speaker 2: guess he's like investigating himself.
1:29:54
Speaker 1: I don't really know.
1:29:55
Speaker 2: Also, I do have to tell you about this really
1:29:58
Speaker 2: really strange either coincidence or I've seen some people online
1:30:03
Speaker 2: state that this could be a legitimate case of some
1:30:06
Speaker 2: sort of predictive programming. There was this movie released in
1:30:10
Speaker 2: the late nineties called Snake Eyes featuring Nicholas Cage, and
1:30:16
Speaker 2: this is pretty freaky. So in that film, this speaker
1:30:20
Speaker 2: politician is shot in the neck at this event that
1:30:25
Speaker 2: they're holding. The speaker's name in the film is Charles Kirkland.
1:30:31
Speaker 2: And yeah, that's pretty bizarre that there's somebody named Charles
1:30:34
Speaker 2: Kirkland Charlie kirk getting shot in the neck assassinated. But
1:30:39
Speaker 2: it gets even weirder because if you look at right here,
1:30:42
Speaker 2: like there's this screenshot here of a billboard that you
1:30:46
Speaker 2: can see in the film, the actual day in the
1:30:49
Speaker 2: film that Charles Kirkland is shot and killed is September tenth, which, obviously,
1:30:57
Speaker 2: as we know, is the same day that Charlie kirk
1:30:59
Speaker 2: was shot and killed on. And then if you look
1:31:01
Speaker 2: on that same billboard, you find a couple very strange
1:31:04
Speaker 2: words tyler and executioner on the billboard stating September tenth,
1:31:11
Speaker 2: and that event would go on to be the death
1:31:14
Speaker 2: of Charles Kirkland. So make of that what you will.
1:31:18
Speaker 2: I find it to be incredibly eerie and bizarre. But yeah,
1:31:23
Speaker 2: I'm sure everybody online is going to have their own theories.
1:31:26
Speaker 1: All right.
1:31:26
Speaker 13: I got to add in one more thing now. I
1:31:29
Speaker 13: just saw that they've actually torn down the area where
1:31:34
Speaker 13: the shooting happened, and they poured new concrete there and
1:31:38
Speaker 13: I guess remodeled the area. It's incredibly bizarre top to
1:31:43
Speaker 13: bottom this entire story. But it's all these little details
1:31:47
Speaker 13: that surround the story that just don't add up, that
1:31:50
Speaker 13: are ridiculously strange, like this, Look at this picture.
1:31:55
Speaker 2: Does this make sense to you? But today, just today,
1:31:58
Speaker 2: we're actually seeing something ex extremely familiar, playing out the
1:32:01
Speaker 2: common trope that we've already seen before in this very
1:32:04
Speaker 2: story that I've seen people already questioning. Just this morning
1:32:07
Speaker 2: in Dallas, Texas. I live in Houston and my sister
1:32:10
Speaker 2: lives in Dallas, so I heard about this pretty quickly.
1:32:13
Speaker 2: A man opened fire on an ICE facility, coincidentally a
1:32:17
Speaker 2: sniper once again, from the top of a building. He
1:32:20
Speaker 2: killed two detainees in the ICE center and injured one
1:32:24
Speaker 2: more who was now in critical condition. However, this should
1:32:28
Speaker 2: be stressed no ICE agents were hurt. Once again. The
1:32:32
Speaker 2: shooter left conveniently engraved messages on the bullets, letting the
1:32:37
Speaker 2: people of America know why he was shooting and what
1:32:40
Speaker 2: party or people to get angry at. He spelled it
1:32:43
Speaker 2: out very quickly so that it could be easily used
1:32:45
Speaker 2: for some sort of political motivation. And then before the
1:32:48
Speaker 2: man could be taken in for any questioning or asked
1:32:51
Speaker 2: any questions at all, he self deleted himself right up
1:32:54
Speaker 2: there on the rooftop. And what do you know, just
1:32:57
Speaker 2: hours after the shooting was finished, here we have one
1:33:00
Speaker 2: once again, Cash Petel, the paragon of truth, once again
1:33:03
Speaker 2: stoking the flames, tweeting out pictures of bullets and sharing
1:33:07
Speaker 2: crucial evidence before a full investigation has really even begun.
1:33:11
Speaker 2: Now is this information being shared because he wants to
1:33:14
Speaker 2: sway the narrative, because he wants people to get upset?
1:33:17
Speaker 1: What is the point of all this? I'll let you
1:33:20
Speaker 1: decide that for yourselves.
1:33:23
Speaker 2: Now, why don't you let me know. I don't like
1:33:25
Speaker 2: the government either way. I mean, I just I don't
1:33:29
Speaker 2: trust any of them. And I think that the government
1:33:31
Speaker 2: is always going to act in its own interests, and
1:33:33
Speaker 2: right now that's the current administration, and I think that
1:33:36
Speaker 2: that can be said about any administration. So there are
1:33:39
Speaker 2: a lot of motivations to unpack here, and potential characters
1:33:42
Speaker 2: in the story, and lots of angles that I didn't explore.
1:33:44
Speaker 1: But I didn't want.
1:33:45
Speaker 2: This to go down like the true rabbit hole of
1:33:48
Speaker 2: conspiratorial thought. I wanted this to be a video that
1:33:51
Speaker 2: anybody who's on the edge could watch and then say, yeah.
1:33:55
Speaker 1: It just doesn't make sense, you know, So let me
1:33:58
Speaker 1: know your thoughts.
1:33:59
Speaker 2: I'm really eager already hear what everyone else has to
1:34:01
Speaker 2: say in the comment section of this video, because I'm
1:34:04
Speaker 2: sure people are pretty passionate about what they believe really
1:34:08
Speaker 2: happened here and what we're gonna find out in the future.
1:34:11
Speaker 2: Thank you guys for watching. As always, if you want
1:34:13
Speaker 2: to listen to the fully uncensored version of this show,
1:34:16
Speaker 2: please consider joining me on Patreon. And yeah, I know
1:34:19
Speaker 2: I've put out a lot of videos lately, but there's
1:34:21
Speaker 2: just so much I want to cover and just so
1:34:23
Speaker 2: many things I want to talk about. So I hope
1:34:25
Speaker 2: you weren't bored by this one. I hope it made sense.
1:34:27
Speaker 2: I've been writing all these last few episodes so been
1:34:30
Speaker 2: on me and it's been a lot of work, but
1:34:32
Speaker 2: I really care about this stuff. And yeah, to all
1:34:35
Speaker 2: of you who have subscribed, thank you for joining the family.
1:34:39
Speaker 2: And to those of you who watched one of my
1:34:41
Speaker 2: videos for the first time with this video, thank you
1:34:43
Speaker 2: for watching and welcome on in. My name is Colin Brown.
1:34:47
Speaker 2: You can check out my podcast Murder in America that
1:34:49
Speaker 2: I co hosted my wife Courtney, or watch my other
1:34:51
Speaker 2: YouTube channel, The Paranormal Files. Make sure to like the video,
1:34:54
Speaker 2: leave me a comment with your thoughts, share the video out.
1:34:57
Speaker 2: These videos depend on you, guys. Stay Suspen, just keep
1:35:00
Speaker 2: that tinfoil hat on, always question everything, and I'll see
1:35:04
Speaker 2: you guys next week