Latest / 360 with Katie Woolf / Katie spoke with Lord Mayor Kon Vatskalis who gave an update on the Lee Point development
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Now we know that there has been I guess you'd
- 0:03Speaker 1: say a bit of discussion about the development at Lee Point,
- 0:07Speaker 1: and we know that quite a few people turned up
- 0:10Speaker 1: apparently to councils meeting overnight to watch Darwin Council pass
- 0:15Speaker 1: emotion urging the Northern Territory government to freeze the development
- 0:20Speaker 1: at Lee Point. Now joining me in the studio right
- 0:22Speaker 1: now is the one person who actually does want to
- 0:26Speaker 1: see this development still continue ahead, and that is the
- 0:29Speaker 1: Lord Mayor of Darwin convat Scarlets.
- 0:31Speaker 2: Good morning to Yukon.
- 0:32Speaker 3: Good morning Katie. The issue is not about me want
- 0:35Speaker 3: to see the development going ahead. The issue is that
- 0:37Speaker 3: the development is going ahead because it's been done by
- 0:41Speaker 3: the DHA, has been assessed by the Federal Environmental Protection Authority,
- 0:46Speaker 3: has been assessed by the Anti Development Consent Authority, and
- 0:50Speaker 3: just last week the Chief Minister said is going to
- 0:52Speaker 3: go ahead and the minis they're responsible for that process
- 0:55Speaker 3: is going.
- 0:55Speaker 4: To go ahead.
- 0:56Speaker 1: Well, on that note, let's take a listen to what
- 0:58Speaker 1: Eva Laula told us on the show last week in
- 1:01Speaker 1: relation to Lee Point being a done deal.
- 1:04Speaker 5: Yeah, it is actually too far gone. First of all,
- 1:07Speaker 5: this development has followed all the right processes through the
- 1:10Speaker 5: planning decisions were made many years ago in the DCA
- 1:15Speaker 5: was involved. It has been through the independent EPA and
- 1:18Speaker 5: it has also been through the Federal EPBC, so it
- 1:22Speaker 5: has gone through all of those processes. As a minister,
- 1:25Speaker 5: I am not going to start overturning decisions that are
- 1:28Speaker 5: being made by independent statute boards. Otherwise we will have
- 1:32Speaker 5: chaos in the Northern territory.
- 1:33Speaker 2: Con does that? Is that good enough? Do you think?
- 1:37Speaker 1: And or do we need to actually take another look
- 1:39Speaker 1: at this development.
- 1:41Speaker 3: The ministers have made it clear it's been assessed by
- 1:44Speaker 3: independent statue authorities. Now can you imagine if every minister
- 1:48Speaker 3: overturns every decision made by dependent statuy authority?
- 1:51Speaker 4: What will happen?
- 1:52Speaker 3: The same people complain about the point today, we'll complain
- 1:55Speaker 3: for everything else. Now let's go back to the history
- 1:58Speaker 3: that first came to Dow on twenty four the proponent
- 2:02Speaker 3: Rebecca de Rowe, It was the seconder in the motion
- 2:04Speaker 3: to accept it. It was accepted. It came back in
- 2:07Speaker 3: twenty fifteen, it was accepted. It came back in twenty
- 2:10Speaker 3: eighteen for a change of the plan. It was accepted
- 2:12Speaker 3: by council and just as late as July, we were
- 2:16Speaker 3: actually discussing the name of the parks on the streets.
- 2:19Speaker 3: Nobody raised an issue. Then about the point, all of
- 2:22Speaker 3: a sudden become an issue, asking now to stop the
- 2:25Speaker 3: development and create a master plan.
- 2:27Speaker 4: Let me give you a heart. What are you sign?
- 2:30Speaker 1: Do you think that the other alderman hadn't read those papers?
- 2:33Speaker 1: Do you think that they didn't understand or do you
- 2:36Speaker 1: think that I've listened to the community.
- 2:37Speaker 4: Now well about the papers?
- 2:39Speaker 3: You might have to ask them because we've got a
- 2:41Speaker 3: situations where all the might come in make decisions and
- 2:43Speaker 3: then oh I didn't know what I was voting for,
- 2:45Speaker 3: which is really bad. Now listen to the community. Which
- 2:48Speaker 3: community listen? You can choose to listen parts of the
- 2:51Speaker 3: community or the community.
- 2:53Speaker 4: Now.
- 2:53Speaker 3: My point, sorry, my opponent opposition to the point is
- 2:59Speaker 3: the density of the developed the small blocks.
- 3:01Speaker 4: And I've said made clear time after time.
- 3:04Speaker 3: But yesterday I sat there and watch all my fellow
- 3:07Speaker 3: oldermen coming out and giving reason why they've voted for it,
- 3:11Speaker 3: and I thought, doesn't anybody has a spine stand up
- 3:14Speaker 3: and says, guys, we discussed that one for seven years.
- 3:17Speaker 3: We accept it all along, all of a sudden now
- 3:20Speaker 3: we are opposing it, and on what grounds? Because you
- 3:24Speaker 3: change your mind, that's not a valid ground. I would
- 3:26Speaker 3: have an issue if EPA came express concerns, then I'll
- 3:30Speaker 3: be behind it that says, yes, we have to go back,
- 3:32Speaker 3: but there isn't any issues.
- 3:33Speaker 1: Well, I would assume that you know the reasons that
- 3:36Speaker 1: the old women have said. And I know I've spoken
- 3:38Speaker 1: to Justin and Glover on the show a little while
- 3:40Speaker 1: back and she had said that obviously it's the environment
- 3:43Speaker 1: that there is also concern from a lot of the
- 3:46Speaker 1: residents that.
- 3:46Speaker 2: Live in that area.
- 3:48Speaker 1: What would you say to those people that are worried
- 3:51Speaker 1: that live in that area and they are worried about
- 3:53Speaker 1: the impact that this is going to have.
- 3:55Speaker 3: Well, there's a letter of the newspaper today that's very
- 3:58Speaker 3: clearly outlined some of the issues about the residents living
- 4:01Speaker 3: in the area, raigeteries, living in lions and near here.
- 4:04Speaker 3: That was defense Housing Authority cleared up from not neat
- 4:07Speaker 3: vegetation to heather houses.
- 4:09Speaker 4: That happened everywhere in Darwin.
- 4:11Speaker 3: But again, I'm not the one who says, yes, I'm
- 4:14Speaker 3: supporting the development. What I'm saying is it's the wrong
- 4:17Speaker 3: time it. We should have done that one if we
- 4:20Speaker 3: had to do it in twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen before
- 4:23Speaker 3: and during the assessment process by EPA and DCA. When
- 4:27Speaker 3: you develop in the territory, you have to put the
- 4:30Speaker 3: pink signs out there so everybody knows going to be development.
- 4:33Speaker 3: Where were all these people that came yesterday, one hundred
- 4:36Speaker 3: and ten of them? Where the one hundred and ten
- 4:38Speaker 3: submissions against LEEPOINT There was seventeen submissions against it, or
- 4:41Speaker 3: not all of them against, there were seventeen submissions. And
- 4:44Speaker 3: that's what I'm saying is do we really want to
- 4:46Speaker 3: fight the fight we already know it's lost and present
- 4:49Speaker 3: ourselves as antidevelopment an orderback. I went to great lengths
- 4:52Speaker 3: to say it's not under development, but trying to stop
- 4:54Speaker 3: a development now, that's what it is.
- 4:56Speaker 4: It's aunted development. It doesn't matter how many excuses you make.
- 5:00Speaker 2: What is going to happen now?
- 5:01Speaker 1: Because it seems as though, based on what the Minister
- 5:04Speaker 1: Evil Lawler had said to us on the show last week,
- 5:06Speaker 1: it's a done deal. It's going a hit. So what's
- 5:09Speaker 1: going to happen now? What does this vote last night
- 5:13Speaker 1: by council actually.
- 5:14Speaker 3: Mean to put it bluntly, people voted for Rebecca's motion
- 5:18Speaker 3: because they knew very well nothing's going to change.
- 5:21Speaker 4: So it's very easy to be brave when you know
- 5:22Speaker 4: something is going to change. All right.
- 5:24Speaker 3: The reality is it doesn't matter what Rebecca said or
- 5:26Speaker 3: just think Glover or to all the other eleven councilors,
- 5:29Speaker 3: because Mick Palmer was not there, it was away. Nothing
- 5:33Speaker 3: is going to change. And that's why I vote against it,
- 5:36Speaker 3: because nothing is going to change. And let me make
- 5:38Speaker 3: it clear, this is my personal opinion. I haven't received
- 5:41Speaker 3: any pressure from Ivalola or my gun for the same reason.
- 5:45Speaker 3: We're too small to oppose this development because already been approved,
- 5:49Speaker 3: been assessed, is been ticked by statute authorities. Council has
- 5:53Speaker 3: only an opinion on that process, not the final award
- 5:59Speaker 3: that developed men unfortunately has been approved.
- 6:02Speaker 4: Council missed the boat. All these bavigous they.
- 6:05Speaker 3: Were demonstrating that should he have act in twenty fourteen,
- 6:07Speaker 3: twenty fifteen or twenty sixteen, they didn't.
- 6:10Speaker 4: It's a lesson we have to learn be early.
- 6:13Speaker 3: Put your proposals or position or submissions early when things
- 6:17Speaker 3: about to happen, not at the end of the process.
- 6:20Speaker 2: You're early in the process. Now would you still go
- 6:23Speaker 2: down this pathcorn I will actually.
- 6:25Speaker 3: Ask for the development to be relooked, not to be
- 6:27Speaker 3: so dense, and the blocks of land not to be
- 6:29Speaker 3: so small and more green space.
- 6:32Speaker 4: Now it's already decided.
- 6:34Speaker 1: But I mean, really do we need to actually like
- 6:37Speaker 1: the reality of this is there isn't huge parcels of
- 6:41Speaker 1: land around Darwin right now that can be developed that
- 6:44Speaker 1: people can actually you know, for young people wanting to
- 6:46Speaker 1: buy a block of land.
- 6:48Speaker 3: Another a lot of young people listening to you today
- 6:50Speaker 3: if they want to buy a block of land. Guys,
- 6:52Speaker 3: you got buck list. The next releass you Collie will
- 6:54Speaker 3: be in twenty twenty two Christmas. That what I hear
- 6:57Speaker 3: from the industry. All the blocks in you are here
- 7:00Speaker 3: now have been sold. A one hundred blocks were put
- 7:02Speaker 3: out for the new development North New York Head recently
- 7:05Speaker 3: were snapped in a matter of hours.
- 7:07Speaker 4: So there is demand for land.
- 7:09Speaker 3: And again I guess that we heard stories like if
- 7:12Speaker 3: we do Lipoint would be urban sprawl. What do you
- 7:15Speaker 3: think is Rucoli We had yesterday that if we developed,
- 7:18Speaker 3: if the ear lip Point is developed, they turtle not
- 7:21Speaker 3: lay eggs. The development is two kilometers from the coastline
- 7:24Speaker 3: house that's going to be affected. Were also heard by
- 7:26Speaker 3: some people that that told us that President Akia people. However,
- 7:30Speaker 3: today the Latakia nation tell me that they are speaking
- 7:32Speaker 3: for themselves, not Akia nation that told us that's going
- 7:35Speaker 3: to affect Old Man Rock.
- 7:37Speaker 4: Well, I've been down with thirty years.
- 7:39Speaker 3: I always knew Old Monrock was actually off the Casarina coastline,
- 7:42Speaker 3: not a lip point.
- 7:43Speaker 4: You know. If you want to make a case, you
- 7:45Speaker 4: put all the stories here.
- 7:46Speaker 1: Presumably though this has all gone through like I would
- 7:49Speaker 1: have thought, there's this all had to go through. I
- 7:52Speaker 1: can't think of what the actual authority is called, but
- 7:55Speaker 1: the aboriginal you know, a sacred size authority in that
- 7:58Speaker 1: kind of thing already.
- 8:00Speaker 4: That's what said. It's been through all the processes you
- 8:03Speaker 4: know in past.
- 8:04Speaker 3: Now we want actually to go back and undo it,
- 8:07Speaker 3: which is it creates a situation where nobody is going
- 8:10Speaker 3: to actually do anything in the territory because there's no certainly.
- 8:13Speaker 3: But again I said, I voted against it because I
- 8:17Speaker 3: know it's not going to change. It doesn't matter what
- 8:19Speaker 3: I want, what you want, what Rebecca wants. This is
- 8:21Speaker 3: going to go ahead because it's been already done.
- 8:24Speaker 4: Not a done deal. It's not a deal.
- 8:26Speaker 3: It followed a certain process and jumped all the hurdles.
- 8:31Speaker 1: Well, I'll tell you what it is. Something there. I
- 8:32Speaker 1: know some people are quite concerned about. Others, though, are
- 8:35Speaker 1: worried about plenty of other things. I've got a couple
- 8:37Speaker 1: of messages over the course of the weekend corn people
- 8:40Speaker 1: worried and quite frankly annoyed that the council rangers were
- 8:45Speaker 1: booking people at the pro markets on Saturday. Should we
- 8:50Speaker 1: be doing this or should we just be letting people
- 8:52Speaker 1: enjoy their time at the markets?
- 8:54Speaker 4: Well, we should let people enjoy the time at the market.
- 8:57Speaker 3: But the people actually do something wrong there should know
- 8:59Speaker 3: that other people they want to park where they parked.
- 9:01Speaker 3: If the parking indicator says park for fifteen minutes or
- 9:04Speaker 3: two hours, that's the time limit. Because we decided you
- 9:07Speaker 3: want to stay for four hours, somebody else is going
- 9:09Speaker 3: to miss out the arranges. Do not do anything else
- 9:12Speaker 3: but applying to the legislation as it stands, you can
- 9:15Speaker 3: park in a disabled parking spot. I don't care if
- 9:18Speaker 3: you want to enjoy the markets or not. This is
- 9:20Speaker 3: a no no. If it says fifteen minutes, stay fifteen minutes.
- 9:23Speaker 3: If you say to ours, stay two hours. If you
- 9:26Speaker 3: double park, you're going to be booked. Just follow the rules.
- 9:28Speaker 3: I mean, it's not rules for one person and nothing
- 9:32Speaker 3: for the other. If you want to enjoy the markets,
- 9:34Speaker 3: by all means, enjoy the markets, but let other people
- 9:37Speaker 3: enjoy the market store.
- 9:38Speaker 1: I know there's plenty on the gender at the moment,
- 9:40Speaker 1: and over the course of the weekend.
- 9:42Speaker 2: I think you had your plan give a way. How
- 9:44Speaker 2: did this one guy?
- 9:45Speaker 3: Well, two days we gave seventeen hundred plans to three
- 9:49Speaker 3: hundred and fifty people.
- 9:50Speaker 4: It's mayhem.
- 9:51Speaker 3: We had people queueing in the sun to get some plans.
- 9:55Speaker 3: There is demand of the plants, and of course you
- 9:57Speaker 3: have to remember giving out four thousand lands, it puts
- 10:01Speaker 3: four thousand plus the ground and people would plant them
- 10:03Speaker 3: and look after them. So that adds to the fifteen
- 10:06Speaker 3: thousand plants were already planted and more than more coming.
- 10:09Speaker 3: We've got another six times to give out plans. Find
- 10:13Speaker 3: out from the council website where the time is, where
- 10:16Speaker 3: the location is, and come early.
- 10:19Speaker 4: I heard that there were people queuing from seven o'clock.
- 10:21Speaker 2: Yeah, I get in there early. Can anything else on
- 10:24Speaker 2: your agenda that we should be aware of. Briefly, well,
- 10:26Speaker 2: let me tell you.
- 10:27Speaker 3: Apart from the plants, we had a number of walkways closures.
- 10:31Speaker 3: Now there are some issues with walkwayte especially in we
- 10:34Speaker 3: close one in Karama, one in Coconut Grove. They become
- 10:39Speaker 3: high of anti social activity late at night. We close
- 10:43Speaker 3: the more trial based. It did seem to work because
- 10:46Speaker 3: people seem to break logs jam defense. So now close
- 10:50Speaker 3: it and probably which we'll offer them. One who was
- 10:53Speaker 3: in Craig Street in a Coconut grove and the other
- 10:56Speaker 3: was in Karama.
- 10:58Speaker 4: Heem got in front of me the Carrol Crest and
- 11:01Speaker 4: Newly Road in Malach.
- 11:02Speaker 2: Sorry, and so they're now closing permanent, but we probably.
- 11:05Speaker 3: Offer them to the neighbors if they want to buy
- 11:07Speaker 3: it to incorporate to their land.
- 11:09Speaker 1: Right, So closing permanently, and that is because of the
- 11:11Speaker 1: anti social behavior in those areas.
- 11:13Speaker 4: It's incredible.
- 11:14Speaker 3: I remember when I was in Caserina, I had to
- 11:16Speaker 3: close walkways either partially or completely because kids know anyway
- 11:22Speaker 3: to escape, and of course the walkways are so narrow
- 11:24Speaker 3: you can't put a car if you chased. So they
- 11:27Speaker 3: found them at escape roots so by close them completely
- 11:30Speaker 3: and given to the neighbors. Then create a new situation
- 11:32Speaker 3: because don't forget people might have dogs in their backyards.
- 11:35Speaker 4: Yah, and kids will not jump in the backyard.
- 11:37Speaker 2: What kind of things were you saying in those walkwise.
- 11:39Speaker 3: Well, smashing the house and then run away shop lifting
- 11:42Speaker 3: and then run away getting running from one area to another,
- 11:46Speaker 3: and of course they know every single walkway in their
- 11:49Speaker 3: neighborhood and the police by the time they go around
- 11:51Speaker 3: to the other exit point of the walkway, the kids
- 11:54Speaker 3: have disappeared.
- 11:55Speaker 1: Well, Convat Scarlas it sounds like a move that hopefully
- 11:58Speaker 1: those residents who live nearby are happy with as well.
- 12:01Speaker 3: We always make sure that we ask the neighbors if
- 12:03Speaker 3: they're happy with it, and you'd be surprised the response
- 12:06Speaker 3: we get.
- 12:07Speaker 4: Most people says yes, please not soon enough.
- 12:09Speaker 2: Yeah, there you go.
- 12:10Speaker 1: Oh well, Convat Scolus, Lord Mayor of Darwin, always appreciate
- 12:14Speaker 1: your time. And for those out there listening wondering why
- 12:16Speaker 1: we talk to conn on a Wednesday, now that is
- 12:18Speaker 1: what we do. It's a Wednesday morning from now on.
- 12:20Speaker 1: We used to do it on a Tuesday.
- 12:22Speaker 4: Happy to talk to you even on Saturday.
- 12:23Speaker 2: If you want good on your corn. Thank you,