Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3587 NY Times COVER UP Just PROVED Letitia James’ FRAUD!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_00]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_00]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_00]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:21[SPEAKER_00]: Hey guys, it's me, Dr. Steve, your back porch professor, I hope you're all having a wonderful week and we're having such beautiful weather out here in the Northeast.
- 0:31[SPEAKER_00]: And you know, if you're a Latisha James, you may want to enjoy the outdoors while you can.
- 0:37[SPEAKER_00]: We have an absolutely mind-blowing development that at least Tisha James Saga, as you all know by now, this New York Attorney General, who built her entire career on getting Trump, right?
- 0:49[SPEAKER_00]: She literally campaigned on the promise that she would be the one who would finally bankrupt Trump with a fabricated charge at no one in the history of jurisprudence was ever charged with, right?
- 1:00[SPEAKER_00]: Yet, at that very same New York Attorney,
- 1:03[SPEAKER_00]: She's now facing federal bank fraud and mortgage fraud charges of her own, and I kid you not.
- 1:09[SPEAKER_00]: The Legacy Media's desperate attempts to save her have actually just inadvertently sunk her.
- 1:16[SPEAKER_00]: The Legacy Media's pathetic attempts at gaslighting
- 1:19[SPEAKER_00]: They're rapidly dwindling audience just backfired spectacularly.
- 1:24[SPEAKER_00]: I want to give a huge shout out to a fellow YouTuber by the name of Nellie Miranda, who first discovered this.
- 1:29[SPEAKER_00]: She has a brilliant analysis of this on her own channel that you want to check out.
- 1:34[SPEAKER_00]: She gets into it much more depth interacting with the investigative work of fraud investigator, Sam Antar.
- 1:41[SPEAKER_00]: But bottom line.
- 1:43[SPEAKER_00]: According to this investigation, Lutisha James owns a house in Norfolk, Virginia.
- 1:49[SPEAKER_00]: Now on her mortgage application to OVM Financial, this is back in 2020.
- 1:55[SPEAKER_00]: She's saying what's called a second home writer under penalty of perjury.
- 1:59[SPEAKER_00]: So a second home writer explicitly states, she will occupy the home as a personal residence and not rent it out.
- 2:06[SPEAKER_00]: Okay, so this is a sworn legal statement, very black and white,
- 2:10[SPEAKER_00]: But on an IRS Schedule E tax return, which is the specific one you file for rental property, she listed zero personal uses for that Norfolk home, and she classified that very sane property is generating rental income.
- 2:26[SPEAKER_00]: That's exactly what a Schedule E is for.
- 2:28[SPEAKER_00]: Now, as the fraud investigator pointed out, obviously these two documents cannot both be true.
- 2:34[SPEAKER_00]: I velity should James lied to the bank to get more favorable loan terms, or she lied to the IRS about rental income.
- 2:42[SPEAKER_00]: It's one or the other.
- 2:43[SPEAKER_00]: One of these is federal fraud.
- 2:45[SPEAKER_00]: It gets worse.
- 2:47[SPEAKER_00]: you also have her insurance application, which describes the very same Norfolk property as owner occupied a residential property.
- 2:56[SPEAKER_00]: But in New York State financial disclosure forms, she calls it an investment property.
- 3:02[SPEAKER_00]: So you literally have on these four legal forms
- 3:05[SPEAKER_00]: four different legal designations, so it's a second home for her bank in order to secure more favorable mortgage.
- 3:13[SPEAKER_00]: It's a rental property for the IRS.
- 3:17[SPEAKER_00]: It's owner occupied for insurance, and it's an investment property in her New York financial disclosure forms.
- 3:23[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, you cannot make this stuff up.
- 3:26[SPEAKER_00]: And again, according to this fraud and investigator that Nellie Miranda references in her wonderful video, at least two of these sworn statements are criminally
- 3:36[SPEAKER_00]: then can all be true.
- 3:38[SPEAKER_00]: Now, if you can believe it, it actually gets worse.
- 3:42[SPEAKER_00]: On those same New York state disclosure forms that claimed that the Norfolk home was an investment property.
- 3:49[SPEAKER_00]: James reported the property was worth between 100,000 and 150,000.
- 3:55[SPEAKER_00]: And yet at the same time, she also disclosed mortgages totaling between 250,000 and 400,000 dollars.
- 4:02[SPEAKER_00]: So that's a loan to value ratio of up to 400 percent.
- 4:05[SPEAKER_00]: Now no legitimate bank on earth would issue loans at 400 percent of a property's value.
- 4:12[SPEAKER_00]: unless they've been deceived about what they're actually lending against.
- 4:16[SPEAKER_00]: And again, that's where this gets stranger when this fraud investigator pulled the title report on the Virginia home, he apparently found something quite odd.
- 4:26[SPEAKER_00]: Those mortgages that Latisha James disclosed on her New York state forms, the ones that have a loan of value ratio, about the 400%.
- 4:36[SPEAKER_00]: those obviously were not the loans associated with the property title.
- 4:39[SPEAKER_00]: They didn't exist in the public records for the Virginia property.
- 4:44[SPEAKER_00]: So when you get a mortgage, it gets recorded in the title of report of your home.
- 4:49[SPEAKER_00]: Take a guess which mortgage was recorded in the title report of her Virginia home.
- 4:54[SPEAKER_00]: It was that original mortgage at 2020 OVM financial loan for 109,600, whatever it was.
- 5:01[SPEAKER_00]: That doesn't allow, it's attached to her home with a signed agreement that does not allow that home to be used for rental property.
- 5:11[SPEAKER_00]: So she insisted on putting mortgages that appear to be more consistent with a rental property in her New York disclosure, but she hid the actual one that's associated with a property.
- 5:24[SPEAKER_00]: Why would she do that?
- 5:24[SPEAKER_00]: Now, this is precisely where the New York Times kind of stepped into it.
- 5:29[SPEAKER_00]: Two days after Trump's indictment, the Pan-Bondies indictment, they wrote this pathetically pandering pop piece on Latisha James.
- 5:37[SPEAKER_00]: describing her great niece living in that Virginia house rent free with her children.
- 5:42[SPEAKER_00]: And of course, we're supposed to think, oh, what a kind, so what a wonderful compassionate, caring person, Latisha James, is right?
- 5:50[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, the times article, yeah, it was I wateringly embarrassing, okay, it read like a bedtime story, you know, the small modest little yellow house at the center of the fire store, but whatever.
- 6:01[SPEAKER_00]: You know, she's all she's trying to do is provide shelter and respite for her family, but that single phrase, you'll note, rent free that the New York Times use, prove the fraud.
- 6:13[SPEAKER_00]: If the niece lived there rent free as the times reported, then James committed tax fraud by filing our reforms claiming rent window income.
- 6:22[SPEAKER_00]: If James did collect rent, but didn't report his required on schedule E, that's also tax fraud.
- 6:28[SPEAKER_00]: And if she collected any rent at all, then the second home rider she signed for the banks, where she wouldn't lend it out or rent it out is a fraud.
- 6:38[SPEAKER_00]: So the times tried to humanize Latisha James and ended up stepping on a rate in the process, act to accidentally disclosing or closing off any escape routes you might have.
- 6:50[SPEAKER_00]: Now, we'll have to see how the judge and jury handle this, but one thing's for absolutely sure.
- 6:56[SPEAKER_00]: Latisha James prosecuted Donald Trump for allegedly misrepresenting property values on financial documents.
- 7:03[SPEAKER_00]: This despite the fact that Trump's lender had no complaints.
- 7:07[SPEAKER_00]: Every lung was paid back and for there were no victims.
- 7:11[SPEAKER_00]: And yet as it turns out, she was the one who appears to have actually committed bank fraud and mortgage fraud.
- 7:19[SPEAKER_00]: She has an entire contradictory paper trail, all with her signature, with discrepan claims that cannot all possibly be true, either the property was a rental property or it wasn't.
- 7:31[SPEAKER_00]: Either the people living there were paying rent or it was rent free.
- 7:36[SPEAKER_00]: The evidence isn't confusing, it's her signatures, her sworn statements, her IRS filings.
- 7:43[SPEAKER_00]: And the media's defense isn't journalism, it's damage control that actually ended up becoming a confession.
- 7:51[SPEAKER_00]: Truth is truly stranger than fiction, my amy, enjoy your weekend, love you all, God bless.
- 8:00[SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
- 8:04[SPEAKER_00]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 8:09[SPEAKER_00]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 8:16[SPEAKER_00]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.