Latest / The Paul Barron Crypto Show / Ethereum Fusaka Upgrade This Week!🔥BEAST MODE Coming 🚨Justin Drake ETH Foundation
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Let's dive into beast mode today.
- 0:01Speaker 2: We're going to be looking at Ethereum and the Fusaka
- 0:04Speaker 2: upgrade that is pending. It's all going to be broken
- 0:06Speaker 2: down for you don't want to miss it. Let's get
- 0:08Speaker 2: into the sponsor and that is I Trust Capital. This
- 0:11Speaker 2: is the place where you guys can begin your whole
- 0:14Speaker 2: crypto journey. You can do it in a way that
- 0:16Speaker 2: you'll feel much more comfortable in, and that of course
- 0:18Speaker 2: is getting into a CRYPTOIRA. It's good timing too, because
- 0:21Speaker 2: you're starting to near your year in position to where
- 0:25Speaker 2: you can start adding to your CRYPTOIRA. Always consult your
- 0:28Speaker 2: tax advisor out there before you do these things, but
- 0:30Speaker 2: you can use our link to get a one hundred
- 0:32Speaker 2: dollars funding ruleward just to get started.
- 0:35Speaker 1: Try it out.
- 0:35Speaker 2: I think you guys might be intrigued with it. And
- 0:37Speaker 2: they've been a longtime sponsor of our channel supporting us. So,
- 0:41Speaker 2: as you guys know, Fusaka is on the UH. I
- 0:45Speaker 2: guess we'll call it on the beginning of a new era.
- 0:49Speaker 2: And what we're talking about here, of course, is the
- 0:51Speaker 2: next Ethereum upgrade. If you don't know what that means, well,
- 0:54Speaker 2: we thought let's bring in one of the experts out there,
- 0:57Speaker 2: and of course that is Justin Drake to break it
- 0:59Speaker 2: all down.
- 1:00Speaker 1: Justin, welcome back into the show.
- 1:01Speaker 3: Absolutely, thanks for having me.
- 1:03Speaker 2: I was on your Twitter account and I love the
- 1:06Speaker 2: description here the bitcoin security researcher.
- 1:12Speaker 1: That's a good one.
- 1:13Speaker 2: I love you got to keep a little tongue in
- 1:15Speaker 2: cheek there, Justin, So this is a good one. Give
- 1:18Speaker 2: me a framework of where Fusaka is. Are we on
- 1:22Speaker 2: par for getting this done by December third? What are
- 1:24Speaker 2: the things we can expect?
- 1:26Speaker 3: Yees, So, Fusaka is indeed scheduled for December third, and
- 1:30Speaker 3: there's several things that we can expect. The first one
- 1:33Speaker 3: is some scalability improvements, most notably for the l twos.
- 1:38Speaker 3: We will be increasing by more than a factor of
- 1:41Speaker 3: two the blob capacity. So that's the data availability through
- 1:46Speaker 3: an grade called peer DAS. The DAA stands for data
- 1:49Speaker 3: availability Sampling. It's some cryptographic magic in order to safely
- 1:55Speaker 3: scale the l twos. We also have a bunch of
- 1:58Speaker 3: EAPs to help scale d L one and just a
- 2:01Speaker 3: few days ago we actually increased the gas limit from
- 2:04Speaker 3: forty five million to sixty million.
- 2:06Speaker 2: What would be the most important part of FUSAKA that
- 2:10Speaker 2: we really need to pay attention to both as eth
- 2:13Speaker 2: enthusiasts as crypto investors. What makes the most sense for this.
- 2:18Speaker 3: So Fusaka is made out of nine EPs and EPs
- 2:21Speaker 3: and the Theoreum Improvement Proposal. Five of those are related
- 2:25Speaker 3: to scaling, and most notably Peodesk. That's probably the headliner.
- 2:29Speaker 3: We also have two other exciting airps. The first one
- 2:34Speaker 3: has to do with support for a new curve called
- 2:38Speaker 3: sec P two, five, six or one, and this is
- 2:41Speaker 3: technical mumbo jumbo for hardware wallets, so we'll have better
- 2:46Speaker 3: support for hardware wallets infhones, so it means a more
- 2:50Speaker 3: secure user experience. We also have another EAP, which is
- 2:55Speaker 3: also a technical called the Terministic Proposal look Ahead, but
- 2:58Speaker 3: that basically gives US infrastructure to build pre confirmations on
- 3:03Speaker 3: L one. So today, if you want to do an
- 3:04Speaker 3: L one transaction, you have to wait the twelve second slot.
- 3:08Speaker 3: We have pre confirmations coming hopefully soon.
- 3:11Speaker 2: So that's even more speed when you look at this
- 3:14Speaker 2: kind of speed, this kind of throughput Now with FUSAKA,
- 3:17Speaker 2: and we'll talk about the next upgrade coming and what
- 3:20Speaker 2: that matters. But I'm kind of curious, how does this
- 3:23Speaker 2: apply to things like payment systems, whether this is credit card,
- 3:27Speaker 2: you could look at Visa, et cetera that have large throughputs.
- 3:31Speaker 1: Does this enable the web three.
- 3:33Speaker 2: The next Internet of Value kind of moving in that
- 3:37Speaker 2: direction to kind of go at these light speeds now through.
- 3:40Speaker 3: For SOCCA, not yet unfortunately. So the fruit of that
- 3:44Speaker 3: we have right now is about two point five mega
- 3:47Speaker 3: gas per second and the average transaction is one hundred
- 3:50Speaker 3: thousand guests, so we're talking about twenty five transactions per second,
- 3:54Speaker 3: roughly speaking. And there's another issue with payments, which is
- 3:57Speaker 3: the twelve second slot is a bit too long from
- 3:59Speaker 3: a u X standpoint. So a lot of the payments
- 4:02Speaker 3: I expect to happen on the L twos, where they
- 4:05Speaker 3: can already support hundreds, if not thousands of transactions per second,
- 4:09Speaker 3: and they have much faster confirmation times on the order
- 4:13Speaker 3: of hundreds of millionseconds.
- 4:14Speaker 2: So okay, so within that is building on L one's
- 4:18Speaker 2: practical I mean, with those kind of demands, I was
- 4:21Speaker 2: just looking at Italics tweet right here. Do you feel
- 4:24Speaker 2: like that's going to be the case or do you
- 4:26Speaker 2: feel like L two's are still going to have a
- 4:29Speaker 2: large contribution to what's happening on their theorem.
- 4:33Speaker 3: Yeah, so my vision for the endgame, if you will,
- 4:36Speaker 3: is ten million transactions per second on all of the
- 4:40Speaker 3: L twos combined, and ten thousand transactions per second on
- 4:43Speaker 3: the L one. Now ten thousand transactions per second, there's
- 4:46Speaker 3: a good start for high value transactions. It's about zero
- 4:50Speaker 3: point one transaction per day per human. So if you're
- 4:53Speaker 3: doing a very high value transaction maybe once a week
- 4:57Speaker 3: or so, the L one is going to be the
- 4:59Speaker 3: place for that. We're already seeing the L one being
- 5:01Speaker 3: the center for defile liquidity for example, it's where all
- 5:05Speaker 3: of the loner origination on AVE.
- 5:07Speaker 2: Has right, Glamsterdam is the next upgrade. What does Fusaka
- 5:13Speaker 2: not do that Glamsterdam will do?
- 5:15Speaker 1: Can you give me some insights on this?
- 5:17Speaker 3: So I think for the next few forks, we're going
- 5:19Speaker 3: to have a focus on increasing scalability, both for the
- 5:23Speaker 3: L two's and for d L one, So it's going
- 5:25Speaker 3: to be more of the same. GLAMs to them does
- 5:28Speaker 3: have one specific headliner called EPBS, which is a way
- 5:33Speaker 3: to remove some of the trust assumptions that we have
- 5:37Speaker 3: in the so called MeTV pipeline, So this is just
- 5:39Speaker 3: a technical term for the process of taking transactions and
- 5:43Speaker 3: forming blocks. Right now, there's a few centralized entities called relays.
- 5:48Speaker 3: The idea is to provide infrastructure so that in the
- 5:50Speaker 3: worst case, we don't have to rely so much on
- 5:53Speaker 3: these relays and also epbs. What it gives us is
- 5:57Speaker 3: so called pipelining, which basically buys us a bit more
- 6:00Speaker 3: time in order to process transactions, which in and of
- 6:03Speaker 3: itself should help with scalability of the l one as well.
- 6:07Speaker 2: Is that going to open things up for the institutional
- 6:12Speaker 2: capital to take a look at ethereum, maybe in some
- 6:15Speaker 2: new ways.
- 6:15Speaker 1: What would be your analysis of that.
- 6:18Speaker 3: I think a large subset of applications need some form
- 6:21Speaker 3: of predictability as to what will happen in the future
- 6:24Speaker 3: so that they can start planning ahead for the next
- 6:26Speaker 3: few years. My hope is that we can set up
- 6:30Speaker 3: automatic gas limit increases at roughly three x per year.
- 6:36Speaker 3: There's a specific proposal from Dankrat which increases the gas
- 6:41Speaker 3: limit automatically over a period of four years, so that
- 6:45Speaker 3: would be three to the power four, which is roughly
- 6:48Speaker 3: one hundred x increase. That amount of predictability will allow
- 6:53Speaker 3: institutions who are not doing a crazy amount of fruit
- 6:56Speaker 3: but not payments, but other lower fruit put applications to
- 7:02Speaker 3: plan ahead.
- 7:03Speaker 2: So that's going to open it up, I would think,
- 7:04Speaker 2: you know, when you look at like you mentioned, especially
- 7:07Speaker 2: on high value transactions. The key there, of course is
- 7:10Speaker 2: if we see mass adoption. So back to your point scalability,
- 7:14Speaker 2: you feel like, what's going to happen with Lampstrom is
- 7:17Speaker 2: that going to be required to see eth at scale,
- 7:20Speaker 2: especially with Wall Street coming into the market at the
- 7:23Speaker 2: pace in which they're coming in.
- 7:25Speaker 3: So what I'm hoping can happen is that, in addition
- 7:28Speaker 3: to the incremental upgrades that we're doing every six months
- 7:32Speaker 3: now with hart Falks, we can start thinking of doing
- 7:36Speaker 3: more ambitious things in parallel. And there's this whole effort
- 7:39Speaker 3: that I'm involved with called zk EVMS or snockification of
- 7:43Speaker 3: DL one, and that is a whole new paradigm for
- 7:47Speaker 3: processing blockchains where you verify short mathematical or cryptographic proofs
- 7:52Speaker 3: of validity of the blocks as opposed to re executing transactions.
- 7:55Speaker 3: And this opens up orders of magnitude improvements, and you
- 8:01Speaker 3: can think of it in some sense as being a
- 8:03Speaker 3: parallel track to all core deevs ACD, which is what
- 8:07Speaker 3: does the incremental upgrades. Quite recently at depth Connect we
- 8:12Speaker 3: did this demo where we showed that real time proving,
- 8:17Speaker 3: meaning the ability to provide a proof at every single
- 8:21Speaker 3: block before the next block arrives, is something that can
- 8:25Speaker 3: be achieved at L one, and this will lay the
- 8:28Speaker 3: foundations for dramatically increasing the gas limit to what I
- 8:32Speaker 3: hope we can eventually reach, which is one giga gas
- 8:36Speaker 3: per second the ten thousand tps and I'm hopeful.
- 8:40Speaker 2: I see, I'm looking at eth proofs here. Race to
- 8:43Speaker 2: prove theorem in real time? Is this similar to what
- 8:46Speaker 2: you're talking about right now?
- 8:47Speaker 3: That's exactly it. You can see here you have proofs
- 8:51Speaker 3: arriving in real time for every single slot. The proofs
- 8:54Speaker 3: are being downloaded in your browser and verified locally. And
- 9:00Speaker 3: what you can what you should imagine is a very
- 9:02Speaker 3: weak device, for example a phone or laptop being able
- 9:06Speaker 3: to process every single film block even if the gas
- 9:09Speaker 3: limit is extremely large.
- 9:12Speaker 2: So, based on this, would this be a threat to
- 9:16Speaker 2: Solana or even Suite of in terms of how they're
- 9:20Speaker 2: managing transactions versus what you're talking about now.
- 9:23Speaker 3: Yeah, So Solana processes on average one thousand user transactions
- 9:28Speaker 3: per second. What I'm hoping we can do is ten
- 9:30Speaker 3: thousand transactions per second, so ten times Solana over a
- 9:34Speaker 3: period of six years, incrementally increasing three x per year.
- 9:40Speaker 3: But I think the real challenge with Solana is that
- 9:43Speaker 3: it's going to hit a bottleneck with its monolithic approach.
- 9:47Speaker 3: You can only process so many transactions on a single server.
- 9:51Speaker 3: You have to scale horizontally, and this is what blobs
- 9:54Speaker 3: and dataty sampling is all about.
- 9:56Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure, what's more important right now in terms
- 9:59Speaker 2: of versus volume?
- 10:01Speaker 1: What would you say.
- 10:02Speaker 3: You mean in the context of stable coins.
- 10:04Speaker 1: Yeah, stable coin velocity versus volume.
- 10:07Speaker 3: I mean, I think both metrics are very important, but
- 10:09Speaker 3: one is easier to fake than the other. So if
- 10:13Speaker 3: you have free transactions, it's very easy to fake velocity.
- 10:18Speaker 3: On the other hand, total value locked is something that's
- 10:21Speaker 3: very very hard to fake. And here's a very striking statistic.
- 10:24Speaker 3: There's one hundred billion dollars of USDT so tever on Ethereum,
- 10:29Speaker 3: there's two billion dollars on Solana, So there's a fifty
- 10:33Speaker 3: x delta there, and that really shows that there's very
- 10:38Speaker 3: strong network effects on ethereum for stable coins and virtually
- 10:42Speaker 3: not for Solana.
- 10:44Speaker 1: Why are we seeing this then?
- 10:46Speaker 2: What the chart I'm showing you right here is just
- 10:48Speaker 2: the ability for Solana to outpace most of the rest
- 10:52Speaker 2: of the market in terms of stable coin movement right now?
- 10:56Speaker 1: Is this what you're talking about?
- 10:58Speaker 3: So I'm talking about total value locked, which.
- 11:01Speaker 1: Yes, all right, versus transactions.
- 11:05Speaker 3: Yes, transactions can be essentially faked. When you have free,
- 11:09Speaker 3: free transactions, you can take a million dollars and you
- 11:11Speaker 3: can just keep protecting them at infinitum, and that will
- 11:14Speaker 3: that will pump your numbers. And Solana has a history
- 11:17Speaker 3: of pumping numbers with.
- 11:19Speaker 1: Which you're essentially that this is being faked right now.
- 11:23Speaker 3: It could be. There have been cases over the years
- 11:26Speaker 3: where provably Solana was faking its numbers. I haven't looked
- 11:30Speaker 3: personally into the most recent ones, but I wouldn't be
- 11:33Speaker 3: surprised if those are indeed effect.
- 11:36Speaker 2: All right, we got to talk about security also, the
- 11:39Speaker 2: scenario and attack vector that could be coming from China.
- 11:43Speaker 2: China is doubling down on crypto band now after some
- 11:46Speaker 2: new you know activity, They're probably going to continue to
- 11:49Speaker 2: go in after Bitcoin in the coming years. What is
- 11:52Speaker 2: your your assessment of this in terms of a nation
- 11:56Speaker 2: state starting to decide, hey, we're not going the route.
- 11:59Speaker 2: We've gone the rout of gold as our asset. Obviously
- 12:03Speaker 2: the United States has gone the rout of digital assets,
- 12:05Speaker 2: especially with the Genius Act in play. What would you say,
- 12:08Speaker 2: could could be a problem here?
- 12:10Speaker 3: Yeah, So the fundamental problem is that when you zoom out,
- 12:14Speaker 3: bitcoin is not secure against the most powerful nation states.
- 12:19Speaker 3: And the reason is that the total budget to permanently
- 12:22Speaker 3: fifty one percent attack bitcoin is on the order of
- 12:24Speaker 3: ten billion dollars and on the order of ten gigawatts
- 12:28Speaker 3: of power. Now, if you look at China specifically, just
- 12:31Speaker 3: in twenty twenty four, they deployed two hundred gigawatts of
- 12:36Speaker 3: solar and so that's that's twenty x the amount of
- 12:40Speaker 3: power to attack bitcoin. And for them, ten billion dollars
- 12:45Speaker 3: is nothing. It's less than ten percent of their annual
- 12:49Speaker 3: defense budgets. Now, why would China be interested in attacking bitcoin? Well,
- 12:55Speaker 3: part of the reason is that they are structurally short bitcoin. Right,
- 12:58Speaker 3: They've prevented their popular from holding bitcoin, from trading it,
- 13:02Speaker 3: et cetera. And so the rest of the world stands
- 13:06Speaker 3: to gain relative to China, and so in some sense,
- 13:09Speaker 3: China has an incentive if Bitcoin were to become successful,
- 13:12Speaker 3: to go attack it.
- 13:14Speaker 2: I see, okay, and I think that's the thing. You
- 13:16Speaker 2: got to look at the attack vectors. Obviously China has
- 13:18Speaker 2: gone the route of gold. This of course is one
- 13:21Speaker 2: of the contention issues that we're faced right now. But
- 13:24Speaker 2: with your attack vector thesis, you're looking at someone like
- 13:29Speaker 2: a black Rock. Most of Wall Street all investing in
- 13:32Speaker 2: terms of ETFs and Bitcoin. You've got strategy which is,
- 13:36Speaker 2: you know, doubling down and continuing to reposition now holding
- 13:41Speaker 2: i think three percent, on track for over the next
- 13:43Speaker 2: decade to possibly hold five percent of bitcoin. And that's
- 13:47Speaker 2: with some of the bitcoin scenarios that play out in
- 13:50Speaker 2: terms of people losing their keys. You know that would
- 13:53Speaker 2: never be achieved again. So it starts to reduce the amount.
- 13:56Speaker 2: Would that not position at least mostly the US in
- 14:01Speaker 2: a position of defense against what potentially could happen here
- 14:04Speaker 2: with China.
- 14:04Speaker 3: Yeah, so you could imagine potentially the US government stepping
- 14:08Speaker 3: in with its military potentially to go defend bitcoin. But
- 14:12Speaker 3: in my opinion, that means that bitcoin has lost its neutrality.
- 14:15Speaker 3: It's no longer a credibly neutral global money. It's a
- 14:20Speaker 3: US money at that point right now. One of the
- 14:22Speaker 3: things that we've seen with you ETFs and Sailor and
- 14:25Speaker 3: the like is a dramatic decrease in transactions on the
- 14:32Speaker 3: bitcoin chain, which has led to a dramatic decrease in
- 14:35Speaker 3: transaction fees. So yesterday we saw two bitcoin of transaction fees,
- 14:41Speaker 3: which is definitely not enough to go secure bitcoin, and
- 14:46Speaker 3: the issuance is decaying exponentially. It's about two hundred times
- 14:50Speaker 3: larger than fees, so fees represent only half a percent
- 14:54Speaker 3: unless fees grow dramatically over the next ten years, I
- 14:59Speaker 3: don't see how bitcoin can secure itself with two bitcoin
- 15:03Speaker 3: per day.
- 15:03Speaker 1: Yeah, well, that's on the current status. You know.
- 15:06Speaker 2: Obviously I'm not arguing for or against. But if you
- 15:09Speaker 2: look at market demand right now, which has been I
- 15:12Speaker 2: would say moderate at best, because we haven't really seen
- 15:16Speaker 2: a market blowoff top and definitely not Wall Street jumping
- 15:19Speaker 2: and outside the ETFs, would market demand not increase that
- 15:23Speaker 2: capacity in terms of.
- 15:24Speaker 3: Reput Yes, So the transaction fees are at a fifteen
- 15:28Speaker 3: year low. Now, what tends to happen, You're right, is
- 15:31Speaker 3: that during ball markets there's more interest and therefore transaction
- 15:34Speaker 3: fees go up. But you know, bitcoin needs to be
- 15:37Speaker 3: secure even in bad markets. And another observation is that
- 15:43Speaker 3: as the price of bitcoin increases, it's harder and harder
- 15:46Speaker 3: to generate BTC denominated fees. And so what I expect
- 15:50Speaker 3: what happened is actually the two bitcoin per day to
- 15:53Speaker 3: decrease over time if the price of bitcoin was to increase.
- 15:57Speaker 3: And one of the fee cs is that transaction fees
- 16:01Speaker 3: are going to replace issuance after every successive happening. But
- 16:07Speaker 3: what we're seeing is that the transaction fees are happening
- 16:10Speaker 3: faster than issuance, meaning that BTC transaction fees are decreasing
- 16:15Speaker 3: more than a factor of two every four years.
- 16:18Speaker 2: Interesting, all right, Well you take that and you also
- 16:21Speaker 2: look at quantum, and I know many people would say,
- 16:23Speaker 2: I don't know if quantum is even Yes, a lot
- 16:26Speaker 2: of people would say yes, there are AI advancements that
- 16:29Speaker 2: we've seen, but now quantum potentially could be powerful enough
- 16:33Speaker 2: in a few years. Some people say this could happen
- 16:35Speaker 2: even faster with the acceleration of it.
- 16:37Speaker 1: What do you think do you think this is a
- 16:39Speaker 1: risk right now?
- 16:40Speaker 3: So my date is twenty thirty two for when we'll
- 16:43Speaker 3: have a cryptographically relevant quantum computer, basically a quantum computer
- 16:47Speaker 3: that can break our cryptography, so we have seven years
- 16:50Speaker 3: roughly to upgrade. I do think it's a threat, and
- 16:54Speaker 3: I think it's more of a threat to change that
- 16:58Speaker 3: can't upgrade easily. Example, Bitcoin Etheroreum has a whole R
- 17:02Speaker 3: and D process that has been in operation for several years.
- 17:07Speaker 3: I think where the number one in the market in
- 17:10Speaker 3: terms of potential solutions. I am a little bit worried
- 17:14Speaker 3: about bitcoin specifically because it's not just a technical problem,
- 17:18Speaker 3: it's also a social one. The reason is that a
- 17:21Speaker 3: very large fraction of the bitcoin keys have been lost,
- 17:25Speaker 3: and so if you take Satochi's coins, that represents about
- 17:29Speaker 3: five percent of the circulating supply. The community is in
- 17:33Speaker 3: the conundrum either they let quantum computer steal those one
- 17:38Speaker 3: million coins, in which case that's very problematic for a
- 17:42Speaker 3: global me or you know, they will burn Satochi's coins.
- 17:47Speaker 3: But that's also problematic because bitcoin is meant to represent
- 17:50Speaker 3: strong property rights.
- 17:51Speaker 2: If it is capable, it would go after a lot
- 17:54Speaker 2: of these dormant wallets that are either untouched or incapacitated
- 17:58Speaker 2: right now, which could present a big issue because that's
- 18:01Speaker 2: a lot of bitcoiners kind of argue that is that
- 18:03Speaker 2: that's lost coin that will never be recovered unless we
- 18:08Speaker 2: were to see a true quantum cryptographic solution in play.
- 18:13Speaker 2: So interesting analysis there. Beyond that, I want to go
- 18:16Speaker 2: to a couple other points right now, This, of course
- 18:19Speaker 2: is in general when you kind of look at why
- 18:22Speaker 2: aren't we only seeing First of all, we only see
- 18:24Speaker 2: a couple of stage twos most of everything Stage one?
- 18:28Speaker 2: Why only stage two L twos in terms of decentralized
- 18:31Speaker 2: L twos?
- 18:32Speaker 3: Right, So building a stage two L two is very
- 18:37Speaker 3: difficult because you're putting a lot of pressure on the
- 18:40Speaker 3: so called proof system. So either that's a proof game
- 18:44Speaker 3: in the case of optimistic roll ups, or it's a
- 18:46Speaker 3: snock in the case of a ZK roll up. If
- 18:48Speaker 3: there's bugs in these systems, which there are, then you know,
- 18:53Speaker 3: stage two roll ups are arguably more exposed from a
- 18:56Speaker 3: security standpoint then other roll ups Stage one and Stage
- 19:00Speaker 3: GERO that can lean more aggressively on their security councils.
- 19:04Speaker 3: Now we have this proposal called native ulups which addresses
- 19:10Speaker 3: the core of the problem, which is the bugs in
- 19:13Speaker 3: these proof systems, and it basically allows you to inherit
- 19:17Speaker 3: the same proof system as d L one, so you
- 19:20Speaker 3: have an exact copy of the EVM, and if the
- 19:25Speaker 3: L one is secure, then your L two will also
- 19:27Speaker 3: be secure and you won't need a security council to
- 19:30Speaker 3: intervene in case of a bug, and you also won't
- 19:33Speaker 3: need governance in order to stay in sync with the
- 19:37Speaker 3: L one every time the L one does a hart
- 19:39Speaker 3: fork which changes the EVM.
- 19:41Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 19:42Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm looking at the two champions of the markets
- 19:46Speaker 2: right now. When it comes to what most investors are
- 19:48Speaker 2: looking at. You look at Tom Lee, you know, I
- 19:51Speaker 2: would say he is pretty much the ethereum champion out there,
- 19:55Speaker 2: even though he's also a bitcoin I won't say he's
- 19:59Speaker 2: a bitcoin investor, but he also has made many calls
- 20:01Speaker 2: around bitcoin. Then you have Michael Saylor, who is just,
- 20:04Speaker 2: you know, always on bitcoin and never ending bitcoin. Which
- 20:08Speaker 2: one do you think does a better job in terms
- 20:10Speaker 2: of getting the masses educated on how to invest in
- 20:14Speaker 2: crypto in general?
- 20:16Speaker 1: If you had a pick one, Yeah.
- 20:17Speaker 3: I mean I would obviously pick Tom Lee. I think
- 20:22Speaker 3: the thing with Michael Saylor is that he is very
- 20:27Speaker 3: narrow minded in the sense that he's only looking at
- 20:30Speaker 3: one thing, which is bitcoin, and within bitcoin, he's only
- 20:33Speaker 3: talking about the good things. You never see him talking
- 20:36Speaker 3: about the security issue. You never really see him talking
- 20:39Speaker 3: about quantum. On the other hand, you know, Tom Lee,
- 20:43Speaker 3: as you said, he came first from bitcoin, that in
- 20:46Speaker 3: of itself shows some openness.
- 20:49Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well I would agree with that.
- 20:51Speaker 2: I think the fact that he has looked at, you know,
- 20:54Speaker 2: two variations of crypto has started to make his way
- 20:57Speaker 2: onto the theorym ecosystem, obviously with what he's doing with
- 21:00Speaker 2: BM and R.
- 21:02Speaker 1: For sure.
- 21:02Speaker 3: I've publicly challenged Michael Saylor several times to have an
- 21:06Speaker 3: open debate on bitcoin security. He has every time ignored me,
- 21:11Speaker 3: and so I'm hoping to use this show all right
- 21:13Speaker 3: again reiterate that I'd like to debate him on another
- 21:17Speaker 3: Chobe is, in my opinion, the number one issue in
- 21:20Speaker 3: the long term survival of them of bitcoin. That one.
- 21:24Speaker 1: Okay, well, there you go.
- 21:25Speaker 2: Another challenge coming in from the Theorem Foundation with Justin
- 21:28Speaker 2: Drake there, Michael Saylor.
- 21:29Speaker 1: Hopefully if you're.
- 21:30Speaker 2: Listening, we'll be happy to host that too, you know,
- 21:32Speaker 2: if you guys want to bring it on here or
- 21:34Speaker 2: co host it with another pro bitcoiner, you know, someone
- 21:38Speaker 2: like a Mark Moss. I mean, he's very friendly with
- 21:40Speaker 2: our network. There's several out there that I think would
- 21:43Speaker 2: easily jump at this, So that would be a possibility. Sailor,
- 21:45Speaker 2: if you're listening, hopefully you'll take us up on that. Hey,
- 21:48Speaker 2: justin I want to talk about you mentioned you're mentioning security,
- 21:51Speaker 2: and this is another thing that we continue to look
- 21:53Speaker 2: at other chains out there that claim to have large
- 21:57Speaker 2: amounts of security. One of them, because of most recent
- 22:01Speaker 2: is Cardono. Can you give me any insight to what's
- 22:04Speaker 2: happening over there?
- 22:05Speaker 3: I don't follow Cardona like. All I know is that
- 22:08Speaker 3: they had a consensus bug recently which caused a chain split.
- 22:13Speaker 3: That's all I know.
- 22:14Speaker 2: One other question before we get you out of here,
- 22:16Speaker 2: and that of course, the last time we saw an
- 22:18Speaker 2: upgrade Pectra, there was the kind of market move that
- 22:22Speaker 2: we experienced. Obviously, eth is now depressed slightly with based
- 22:26Speaker 2: on where we are in market condition. What's your anticipation
- 22:29Speaker 2: or do you have an anticipation of how it might
- 22:31Speaker 2: move based on Fusaka releasing this week.
- 22:35Speaker 3: What I have found as a researcher over the last
- 22:37Speaker 3: eight years is that in the short term, my work
- 22:41Speaker 3: and various upgrades or various announcements have no significant impact
- 22:47Speaker 3: on the market. What gives me, solis I guess is
- 22:51Speaker 3: that over long periods of time, over five ten years,
- 22:55Speaker 3: we're trying to build something that's extremely meaningful. And my
- 22:58Speaker 3: thesis is that blockchains are winner take most, and that's
- 23:02Speaker 3: Eftherium is in a position to gobble up all the
- 23:05Speaker 3: incentive value.
- 23:06Speaker 1: There you go.
- 23:06Speaker 2: I like that one, winner take most. Justin has been
- 23:09Speaker 2: great having you back on to get an update on this.
- 23:11Speaker 2: As we start to see the great go and play
- 23:15Speaker 2: with Usaka and going into the next one being glamstered in,
- 23:19Speaker 2: We'll be watching your work very closely. So thanks for
- 23:21Speaker 2: coming in today. We appreciate it.
- 23:22Speaker 3: Thank you.
- 23:23Speaker 1: Pol.
- 23:23Speaker 2: All right, guys, you know what to do if you're
- 23:24Speaker 2: not in our own private member group that's the baron
- 23:27Speaker 2: Market Edge.
- 23:27Speaker 1: I'd drop an email each week. You can join.
- 23:30Speaker 2: It's absolutely free. We do free research over their insights.
- 23:32Speaker 2: We cover a lot of the different projects that are
- 23:34Speaker 2: out there, including a variety of what's happening. Whether it's
- 23:37Speaker 2: eight Bitcoin, Salona Suite, you name it. We're looking at
- 23:40Speaker 2: all the tech moving in the space. Make sure and
- 23:43Speaker 2: subscribe we'll leave a link down below. You know what
- 23:45Speaker 2: to do. Follow me on x at Paul Baron. We'll
- 23:47Speaker 2: catch you next time, right here on The Paul Baron Show.