Latest / The Rita Panahi Show / The Rita Panahi Show | 17 February

Transcript

The Rita Panahi Show | 17 February · The Rita Panahi Show

0:02
Speaker 1: On scoring MS Australia.
0:05
Speaker 2: This is the Winner, Paney Show, Good evening.
0:09
Speaker 3: And Welcome to the reader. Patahy Show. Coming up tonight,
0:12
Speaker 3: revelations that prison authorities ignored repeated warnings about moving a
0:16
Speaker 3: dangerous transgender inmate into a woman's prison. Patrick Carline and
0:21
Speaker 3: Colin Harken will discuss that. In the day's other top headlines,
0:25
Speaker 3: a labor senator embarrasses herself with her ill founded claims
0:29
Speaker 3: about renewables. Professor Ian Plimer will weigh in on that
0:33
Speaker 3: remarkable exchange. Kosher Gator will have the latest from the US,
0:37
Speaker 3: including the Epstein files backfiring on a number of Democrat luminaries,
0:43
Speaker 3: and later in the hour, Drew padlu joins me after
0:46
Speaker 3: being kicked out of the US after he tried to
0:49
Speaker 3: visit Billie Eilish's Malibu mansion built on stolen land and
0:54
Speaker 3: left is Losing It features this feisy ice agent putting
0:58
Speaker 3: a disheveled Karen in her place.
1:01
Speaker 4: This is not a good look plan.
1:03
Speaker 2: You think I care about my look?
1:06
Speaker 4: Oh no, no, don't trust me. When you guys are He's
1:07
Speaker 4: evident by how you don't care. We get that trust me.
1:11
Speaker 3: But first has been revealed that prison bosses were warned
1:14
Speaker 3: about moving transgender murder at Clinton Rentole to a woman's
1:18
Speaker 3: prison before he sexually assaulted a rape survivor. The Herald
1:22
Speaker 3: Sun reports that senior prison staffers had warned authorities that
1:26
Speaker 3: Brintool would post an unacceptable risk to female prisoners. High
1:30
Speaker 3: level discussions about the transfer allegedly placed all focus on
1:34
Speaker 3: Rentool's gender preference, with no regard for female prisoner safety,
1:40
Speaker 3: and it took just two months with his character to
1:42
Speaker 3: offend against a vulnerable female prisoner. After the transfer took
1:47
Speaker 3: place in April twenty twenty two. He was then transferred
1:51
Speaker 3: back to a male prison in June of that year.
1:54
Speaker 3: One insider raised concerns about the leniency of the prison authorities,
1:59
Speaker 3: saying she was allowed to come into the staff office
2:03
Speaker 3: to shop online for underwear and makeup. She demanded to
2:07
Speaker 3: be allowed to swim in the male prison pool in
2:10
Speaker 3: a bikini. She threw fits if prison bosses got her
2:14
Speaker 3: the wrong color scrunches. Questions have to be asked. Also,
2:20
Speaker 3: questions need to be asked. Why this prison insider refers
2:23
Speaker 3: to this male predator as a she. Why is this
2:27
Speaker 3: prisoner insider going along with this nonsense along with the
2:32
Speaker 3: journalists that's got to be said, who are so eager
2:36
Speaker 3: to repeat the preferred pronouns of a killer and sexual predator.
2:42
Speaker 3: Now head of the transfer, one insiders said they pleaded
2:45
Speaker 3: with authorities to deny Rentl's request. Prison bosses were given
2:50
Speaker 3: plenty of warnings by multiple people. The insider said. All
2:55
Speaker 3: the officers were asking how long do you think it
2:58
Speaker 3: will take? A day? A week? They knew. Joining me
3:02
Speaker 3: now is NEWSCORPS senior writer Patrick Carlin and Institute of
3:06
Speaker 3: Public Affairs Research fellow Colleen Hark And Patrick, this is
3:11
Speaker 3: a travis still a labor government, the prison authorities, they
3:14
Speaker 3: are also preoccupied with what's in the interest of this
3:19
Speaker 3: killer then protecting vulnerable female prisoners.
3:23
Speaker 5: It's ideology gone mad. I mean, and you look at
3:26
Speaker 5: mister Rintoul. He's one of seven biological men who have
3:30
Speaker 5: been transferred to female prisons since I think about two
3:33
Speaker 5: thousand and three in Victoria because of their gender preferences.
3:36
Speaker 5: Now that puts at risk, and some of them had
3:39
Speaker 5: been convicted of sexual assaults. What the hell is happening?
3:42
Speaker 5: Where is common sense here? You're putting women at risk?
3:45
Speaker 3: I wrote about this back in twenty twenty two when
3:50
Speaker 3: female prisoners from Melbourne's biggest female prison, Dame Phyllis Frost Center,
3:56
Speaker 3: contacted me. They had a petition put together because prison
4:00
Speaker 3: authorities were ignoring them. They did not feel safe with
4:03
Speaker 3: a male sexual predator being put in their prison. Patrick.
4:07
Speaker 3: Nobody was listening to them, not the labor government, not
4:10
Speaker 3: prison authorities, and not even the liberal opposition.
4:13
Speaker 5: It is ideology gone mad. I mean to put women
4:16
Speaker 5: at risk. You're talking about dangerous men, biological men who
4:21
Speaker 5: have been convicted of terrible crimes. And in this case,
4:25
Speaker 5: mister Rintle can we call him mister Rintl.
4:28
Speaker 3: Well, he's a killer. He killed someone with an iron pole.
4:32
Speaker 3: It was a brutal killing. And to put someone like
4:36
Speaker 3: that and is now free. So this is the sort
4:37
Speaker 3: of state, Colleen, where you can be sentenced. I think
4:43
Speaker 3: it was back in two thousand and nine, if I
4:44
Speaker 3: remember correctly, it was sentenced for that killing. You can
4:47
Speaker 3: commit a sexual assault in prison and still you're free
4:51
Speaker 3: in twenty twenty six to Walk the Streets. In fact,
4:53
Speaker 3: it was released some time ago. But the media is
4:56
Speaker 3: part of the problem here, Colleen. They deemed and women
5:00
Speaker 3: who raise this as an issue calling them anti trans
5:03
Speaker 3: as opposed to women's rights campaigners, and they will mangle
5:09
Speaker 3: the English language to respect. They then pronouns instead of
5:13
Speaker 3: actually just being accurate and calling this man what he is.
5:19
Speaker 1: Look and I find it quite difficult reading an article
5:21
Speaker 1: when they're using they them because of the individual right.
5:24
Speaker 6: It just doesn't it doesn't flow.
5:25
Speaker 1: It's quite difficult to understand the context of what's going on.
5:28
Speaker 6: But this I agree with you, Richard.
5:30
Speaker 1: This is absolutely ideology gone mad, and too many people
5:33
Speaker 1: acquiesce to ideology above everything else, even above obviously above
5:39
Speaker 1: women's rights to safety, but even above prison rights. You know,
5:44
Speaker 1: our prisons are not places for social experiments or radical
5:47
Speaker 1: experiments where women are vulnerable in those places.
5:50
Speaker 3: So there are a lot of those women, sorry to interrupt,
5:52
Speaker 3: call me, are already victims of sexual sex violence, so
5:57
Speaker 3: they are particularly vulnerable. Well, they locked up with a
6:00
Speaker 3: predator with male body parts, and they're already been victimized.
6:04
Speaker 3: In this case, it was a survivor of rape who
6:07
Speaker 3: was assaulted at a place she should have been safe,
6:10
Speaker 3: and we don't still know how much of taxpayer funds
6:14
Speaker 3: went into compensating this victim for that particular crime. So
6:19
Speaker 3: then this be a little bit of transparency in this area.
6:22
Speaker 3: Now let's move on to some federal issues. The architect
6:26
Speaker 3: of the capital gains tax discount has worn Labor. There
6:29
Speaker 3: will be consequences if they alter it for eight revenue grab.
6:33
Speaker 3: John Ralph organized the first review into the discount for
6:36
Speaker 3: the Howard government back in nineteen ninety nine. There are
6:39
Speaker 3: reports Jim Chalmers is expected to use his May budget
6:42
Speaker 3: to reduce the discount from fifty percent. John Ralph has
6:46
Speaker 3: worn the capital gains tax changes could have an effect
6:49
Speaker 3: on housing supply, telling the Australian newspaper, if you make
6:52
Speaker 3: it unattractive to hold a property, whether it's existing or new,
6:56
Speaker 3: the consequences of that are a reduction in rentalties and
7:00
Speaker 3: that would mean the price of rents would go up. Colleen,
7:04
Speaker 3: this is going to have all sorts of ugly unintended consequences.
7:09
Speaker 3: But it seems like the Treasurer is quite keen on
7:12
Speaker 3: this particular proposal. Ideologically, Labor loves this sort of st Yeah, I.
7:16
Speaker 6: Don't know that it's unintended.
7:17
Speaker 7: Very that was actually.
7:21
Speaker 6: I mean, this is a revenue grab.
7:22
Speaker 1: It's an obvious revenue grab from Ozzie's who are just
7:26
Speaker 1: trying to get ahead. You know, they put enough money
7:28
Speaker 1: together to get an investment property. They're trying to make
7:30
Speaker 1: themselves completely independent of government dependency and all power too.
7:34
Speaker 1: Then we should be celebrating these people, not penalizing them
7:37
Speaker 1: for having done the right thing for years to save
7:40
Speaker 1: up to get that deposit to get ahead. Look, I
7:43
Speaker 1: think that there's a fundamental problem here that the Treasurer
7:46
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to understand economics one oh one that you know,
7:50
Speaker 1: government spending is part of a very much part of
7:53
Speaker 1: the accrued spending. Therefore it's a contributor, a large contributor
7:57
Speaker 1: to inflation, which is what's causing the problem. So they
8:00
Speaker 1: want to just go and grab money from somewhere else.
8:02
Speaker 6: I seriously wonder if there's a better portfolio for the
8:04
Speaker 6: treasure because he doesn't seem to you.
8:07
Speaker 3: I'd say we give him sport. You can't do muchach there.
8:10
Speaker 3: You can go along to all sorts of sporting events.
8:13
Speaker 3: It's fun and events. His school set more because I
8:17
Speaker 3: think he likes to jog occasionally, so he's got some
8:20
Speaker 3: sort of expertise more so than economics. I think it
8:23
Speaker 3: was absent the day they taught economics at school. But
8:27
Speaker 3: this is classic labor indulging in the politics of envy.
8:30
Speaker 3: And we've seen right here in Victoria what happens when
8:33
Speaker 3: you have a disincentive for every day mum and dad
8:36
Speaker 3: investors to invest in property. We've got enormous landacs here,
8:40
Speaker 3: all sorts of tendancy laws that are in favor of tenants,
8:45
Speaker 3: and people are selling up a record numbers. Rents are
8:49
Speaker 3: going up. And also you're going to have less supply
8:52
Speaker 3: of property because less incentive for people to build because
8:56
Speaker 3: you've got you've got investors out of the market.
8:59
Speaker 5: That's right, I think Peter Costello and John how I'd
9:01
Speaker 5: probably say the best. It's anti aspirational to actually punish
9:04
Speaker 5: people for doing well. And as Collleen says, another ten
9:09
Speaker 5: b and bucks in revenue for the government to spend
9:11
Speaker 5: to push up inflation and the effects of it. No
9:15
Speaker 5: one's actually the experts disagree. Will it mean less houses?
9:18
Speaker 5: Will it mean rents will go up because there's a
9:20
Speaker 5: few of rental properties. It could have all sorts of
9:24
Speaker 5: intended and unintended consequences that no one really seems to
9:28
Speaker 5: agree on.
9:29
Speaker 3: And it seems to just be this hang up labor
9:32
Speaker 3: have about property investment. You can invest in all sorts
9:35
Speaker 3: of other vehicles, share portfolios, businesses, and you get all
9:40
Speaker 3: sorts of tax breaks there that they're quite comfortable with,
9:45
Speaker 3: it seems, but when it comes to property they have
9:48
Speaker 3: a real sort of chip on their shoulder about that. Now,
9:51
Speaker 3: let's have a look at this incredible story that I'm
9:55
Speaker 3: going to play you in exchange. That's going to shock you.
9:58
Speaker 3: Last year, multiple people were arrested and charged after allegedly
10:02
Speaker 3: defrauding tax payers of at least eight million dollars by
10:05
Speaker 3: impersonating sick Australians to steal their Medicare benefits. Among those
10:10
Speaker 3: arrested were men awaiting deportation in Immigration Detention Services Australia
10:16
Speaker 3: officials face sent at estimates last week where they confirmed
10:20
Speaker 3: the accused fraudsters are no longer in detention nor in
10:24
Speaker 3: the prison system. Instead, they have been released into the
10:28
Speaker 3: Victorian community.
10:29
Speaker 8: Have a listen those three individuals who have been charged.
10:35
Speaker 8: Are they just remaining in immigration detention or have they
10:39
Speaker 8: been incarcerated in the prison system? What is their status?
10:44
Speaker 8: My understanding is they've been released on bail and been
10:48
Speaker 8: given visas as persons prosecuted or alleged prosecutions before the court. Wait,
10:54
Speaker 8: so they're out of immigration detention after allegedly committing an
10:57
Speaker 8: eight million dollar medicare reform out of.
10:59
Speaker 3: The Department of Home Affairs.
11:02
Speaker 8: I'm not suggesting you're responsible, but if you're aware of
11:04
Speaker 8: the facts, they're important. So they commit immigration alleged fraud
11:09
Speaker 8: in immigration detention and then they're released on bail on visas.
11:12
Speaker 9: That's correct.
11:14
Speaker 8: That seems again not your responsibility, but surprising, have you
11:22
Speaker 8: can I just say they are on bail conditions for sure,
11:25
Speaker 8: one would hope, one would hope in Victoria not very
11:30
Speaker 8: strict generally speaking.
11:33
Speaker 3: Surprising Indeed, I'm lost for words like James Patterson, their Patrick.
11:38
Speaker 10: That's an example, doesn't it.
11:39
Speaker 5: You want to get out of detention, you commit a
11:41
Speaker 5: crime available crime, and then you're two days later, you're
11:45
Speaker 5: out on the strange You've got exactly what you wanted
11:48
Speaker 5: because you're committed a crime.
11:49
Speaker 11: That's ludicrous.
11:50
Speaker 3: And if they have actually committed eight millions eight million
11:55
Speaker 3: in fraud, Colleen, that's that's a lot of money to
12:00
Speaker 3: to use to perhaps escape any careers punish hument.
12:04
Speaker 1: Surprising just doesn't deal with the word like it's outrageous.
12:09
Speaker 1: But it also it's indicative of the weakness and the
12:12
Speaker 1: immigration attention center situation because you know, how long were
12:17
Speaker 1: they there for and how quickly should they have been
12:20
Speaker 1: removed from Australia. They should have been gone, They should
12:22
Speaker 1: have been able to do this. What is going on
12:24
Speaker 1: in the immigration system that they can do that? And
12:27
Speaker 1: I agree with you, what's a flight race? We've got
12:29
Speaker 1: eight million bucks of our money allegedly.
12:33
Speaker 3: Now before you go, Colleen, I no education is your
12:36
Speaker 3: area of expertise. I've got to ask you about this.
12:38
Speaker 3: Victorian Teachers Union has called for a four day working week.
12:43
Speaker 3: They want a trial for education staff. The Australian Education
12:47
Speaker 3: Union is recommending a thirty hour job share model in
12:50
Speaker 3: state schools that would expand working from home options for
12:54
Speaker 3: teachers while keeping students at school five days a week.
12:57
Speaker 3: Thank god. The union says it will be making teaching
13:00
Speaker 3: a more attractive industry and it will address barriers to
13:05
Speaker 3: women's participation in the workforce and the gender pay gap. Yes,
13:09
Speaker 3: because there's not enough female teachers. I mean, it's obviously
13:11
Speaker 3: a profession overrun by white men, privilege, male privileged males'
13:17
Speaker 3: or that toxic masculinity that they are just taking. I
13:22
Speaker 3: should can't sit they're extracting the urine here, Colleen. I
13:25
Speaker 3: mean Australian teachers are well paid by international standards, and
13:31
Speaker 3: don't get me started on the holidays.
13:33
Speaker 6: Yeah.
13:33
Speaker 1: Look, this is a different problem, I think, Greta, because
13:36
Speaker 1: if they were talking about going to four days a
13:38
Speaker 1: week because they're going to get all the rubbish out
13:40
Speaker 1: of the curriculum and just focus on core skills development
13:43
Speaker 1: and making sure we've got you know, well educated kids,
13:46
Speaker 1: I'd have a different conversation.
13:47
Speaker 6: But that's not what they're doing.
13:49
Speaker 1: This is trying to backfill the government's promise of two
13:52
Speaker 1: day working week and they're trying to manipulate the system
13:55
Speaker 1: to say, well, now we have to work out a
13:56
Speaker 1: way that it is appropriate for teachers. Yeah, we want
14:00
Speaker 1: in on this, we want in on this right. So
14:02
Speaker 1: the unions and the government need to actually focus on
14:05
Speaker 1: what is the purpose of school.
14:07
Speaker 6: It's a core service to the community.
14:10
Speaker 1: It is not about union ambition or government's politicizing election campaigns.
14:15
Speaker 1: It's supposed to be about looking after kids and students
14:18
Speaker 1: and that's exactly what they're not interested in doing.
14:21
Speaker 3: Well. The unions as We know, Patrick, have a lot
14:25
Speaker 3: of power of a labor particularly in Victoria. Can you
14:29
Speaker 3: see them giving into this demand.
14:31
Speaker 5: Look, it's basically a twenty percent pay rise, it is
14:35
Speaker 5: actually twenty percent less working it paid the same. We're
14:38
Speaker 5: seeing this a lot, and it does go back to
14:40
Speaker 5: the work from home legislation, which I think is a
14:43
Speaker 5: political employ by Alan government. As popular with women, there
14:48
Speaker 5: is no need for it. It actually will have unintended consequences,
14:52
Speaker 5: perhaps with teachers, and perhaps the Police Union were saying
14:55
Speaker 5: the same thing. Jobs where you have to be on
14:57
Speaker 5: the ground to do your core job suddenly a lot
15:01
Speaker 5: less appealing. Yeah, if most jobs are three days a
15:04
Speaker 5: week in the office.
15:05
Speaker 3: That is a very good point. And the Police Association
15:08
Speaker 3: has said that it's going to make it harder for
15:10
Speaker 3: them to recruit quality staff because there are some jobs
15:13
Speaker 3: where you need to be there, like police officers, ambulance officers,
15:17
Speaker 3: and you will think teachers as well. Patrick, Carly and
15:20
Speaker 3: Colleen Harkin, thank you so much for your time. Let's
15:23
Speaker 3: bring in esteem geologist and author Professor Ian pimer In.
15:28
Speaker 3: We're going to start with sened estimates yesterday where Labor
15:31
Speaker 3: Senator Michelle Andada Rajah was schooled by Jared Holland about
15:37
Speaker 3: the cost of coal, renewables and batteries.
15:41
Speaker 12: The KOL five power stations in this country are still
15:43
Speaker 12: making money because we've squashed out in the middle and
15:45
Speaker 12: essentially what's happened is we plummet.
15:47
Speaker 13: They're costing us money because they keep breaking down. Then
15:51
Speaker 13: we're having to use gas or something expensive to kind
15:53
Speaker 13: of back up energy that's costing a lot of price moolotility.
15:57
Speaker 12: The volatility is the fact the sun goes down every
15:59
Speaker 12: day about the same time and there is a shapatry.
16:01
Speaker 13: It's called batteries that austrillions of embraced.
16:04
Speaker 12: Senator can explain that a system is very different to
16:07
Speaker 12: a market. So the way a market works is it's
16:11
Speaker 12: not just the cost of generating the electricity that feeds
16:13
Speaker 12: into the price, it's also the demand for that electricity
16:16
Speaker 12: and its availability. So what happens is when the sun
16:19
Speaker 12: goes down and you have that huge reduction of electricity
16:22
Speaker 12: from the grid, it goes down at the same time
16:24
Speaker 12: that everyone comes home from work, they turn on their TV,
16:26
Speaker 12: they put on their washing machine, they put in their microwave.
16:30
Speaker 12: You still have that increased if anything, a spike in demand.
16:33
Speaker 12: Now that power has to come from somewhere. Now, if
16:35
Speaker 12: I've got a battery that only operates for half an
16:37
Speaker 12: hour an hour a day, and it's cost me tens
16:40
Speaker 12: of millions of dollars in order to produce, I have
16:42
Speaker 12: to make back the costs of my capital expenditure in
16:45
Speaker 12: that very compressed window. And because there isn't any other
16:48
Speaker 12: electricity in the market, I can charge whatever I want now.
16:51
Speaker 12: Battery set the price over twenty three percent of the
16:54
Speaker 12: time last year despite producing less than two percent of
16:57
Speaker 12: the electricity in the market. So introducing these technologies that
17:02
Speaker 12: only operate in tiny weeny increments does not suppress prices,
17:07
Speaker 12: it creates the volume.
17:07
Speaker 2: You can have to agree to disagree on this one.
17:10
Speaker 3: Agree to disagree, really, senator, you're disagreeing with facts and figures,
17:15
Speaker 3: and she was not backing down yet in the next exchange.
17:19
Speaker 3: Is astonishing.
17:21
Speaker 13: I think that the sticking point here is that that
17:23
Speaker 13: eighty two dollars per mega what our figure that you're
17:26
Speaker 13: talking about is not the levelized cost of energy, because
17:29
Speaker 13: you're not you know, it's that's the cost once the
17:33
Speaker 13: plant has been either built. No figure I've got to
17:37
Speaker 13: see is a fantasy, so it ain't going to happen.
17:40
Speaker 12: I would encourage you to go to our report that
17:42
Speaker 12: we produced in January twenty five. Actually it goes into
17:45
Speaker 12: that includes paying off capital expenditure, It includes a seven
17:49
Speaker 12: percent return for investors. It includes the calorific value of
17:52
Speaker 12: the core investor, includes operations.
17:54
Speaker 13: Pass to our door to refurb our clapped out cull five.
17:58
Speaker 12: We had Matt Keen and you so way government policy
18:02
Speaker 12: to shut them down.
18:04
Speaker 14: Ian.
18:04
Speaker 3: I must say this, Jared Holland has the patience of
18:08
Speaker 3: a saint. What more can you say about that exchange?
18:13
Speaker 15: Well, Jared certainly is very patient. He's dealing with an
18:17
Speaker 15: absolute drongo who doesn't actually understand basic economics. He's dealing
18:22
Speaker 15: with someone who's quite happy to double up a system.
18:25
Speaker 15: And in Victoria, they once had the cheapest, most reliable
18:29
Speaker 15: power in Australia. That's why they had a manufacturing industry.
18:33
Speaker 15: And that manufacturing industry was destroyed by people like the
18:37
Speaker 15: Senator who are pushing up the price of power, who
18:41
Speaker 15: do not understand simple facts, who need training in economics
18:45
Speaker 15: one oh one. And the training is so basic. She
18:48
Speaker 15: has to learn that the sunsets and rises, the wind
18:51
Speaker 15: actually stopped. Batteries have a short life. We are led
18:55
Speaker 15: by people like this. This is tragic. This country is
18:59
Speaker 15: a mess because of senators like that who just do
19:02
Speaker 15: not have a clue.
19:05
Speaker 3: No, do not have a clue, but also seem to
19:08
Speaker 3: be so wildly arrogant and smug about it. You know,
19:13
Speaker 3: there was just no moment there where you just listen
19:18
Speaker 3: to what he was saying. It was like agree to
19:20
Speaker 3: disagree and you're dreaming whatever you're saying is not reality
19:24
Speaker 3: and making points that have already been debunked. Now, let's
19:28
Speaker 3: talk about Transgrid wanting consumers to pay for one point
19:32
Speaker 3: one billion dollars of the cost blowout on the nine
19:36
Speaker 3: hundred kilometer power cable being built between South Australia and
19:40
Speaker 3: New South Wales. Only a few hundred million dollars would
19:43
Speaker 3: be shouldered by the shareholders of the New South Wales
19:47
Speaker 3: Grid company. And the cost of building major transmission into
19:51
Speaker 3: infrastructure has surge, it's doubled since twenty twenty four.
19:58
Speaker 15: Well, these are high voltage grids, they double up on
20:00
Speaker 15: existing grids, they actually add to your costs. And here
20:05
Speaker 15: we have a foreign and domestically owned company like Transgrid,
20:09
Speaker 15: who are only concerned about a profit. They're not concerned
20:12
Speaker 15: about giving us cheap electricity, which creates employment, which lows
20:17
Speaker 15: people's household bills, which actually flow through in every area
20:21
Speaker 15: of the economy. And if we don't have cheap electricity,
20:24
Speaker 15: we have inflation and we have high costs. But here
20:27
Speaker 15: we have transgrid who are totally stuffed up the cost
20:31
Speaker 15: of something that they should be skilled and building, and
20:35
Speaker 15: that's a high voltage grid. And so what do they
20:37
Speaker 15: want to do? They want the punter to pay for this.
20:40
Speaker 15: No one gets sacked. This is an appalling arrogance. If
20:44
Speaker 15: you were in any other industry, you would be sacked
20:47
Speaker 15: for such cost overruns.
20:49
Speaker 2: And to expect the.
20:50
Speaker 15: Average electricity user to pay for your stuff ups is
20:55
Speaker 15: just beyond the pale. We have to get rid of
20:58
Speaker 15: this multiple organization, the people who clip the tickets in
21:03
Speaker 15: our electricity system, and go back to what we had,
21:06
Speaker 15: and that was one organization giving us cheap, reliable electricity
21:10
Speaker 15: such that we can live and not struggle, such that
21:13
Speaker 15: we have jobs, and such that we're not exporting huge
21:17
Speaker 15: amounts of the punter's money outside the country.
21:21
Speaker 3: Now, before you go, I want to get your response
21:24
Speaker 3: to National Senator Macanavan. He's called out Labour's plan to
21:28
Speaker 3: shut down hectores of farmland to help reach net zero
21:32
Speaker 3: targets by twenty fifty. The government's Peak Agricultural Advisory Body
21:36
Speaker 3: has found that carbon farming projects would lock up eighteen
21:41
Speaker 3: million hectares of farmland. That's the size of three Tasmanias three.
21:46
Speaker 3: And it's also found the reduction in farming land would
21:50
Speaker 3: lower farm output by two point eight billion dollars by
21:54
Speaker 3: twenty fifty. Now, this would just be disastrous for the company.
21:58
Speaker 3: Surely we're not going to go down.
21:59
Speaker 15: There right well, we probably will because we are in
22:04
Speaker 15: the process of suicide. And this process of suicide is
22:08
Speaker 15: reducing the amount of food that we grow, enriching Chinese
22:12
Speaker 15: companies that make soul and win turbines, weakening our defense system,
22:16
Speaker 15: weakening our employment, weakening our manufacturing basis, all because of
22:21
Speaker 15: an ideology. Net zero is absolute nonsense. If you abide
22:26
Speaker 15: by net zero, you are breathing in zero point zero
22:29
Speaker 15: four percent carbon dioxide and you're breathing out one hundred
22:33
Speaker 15: times that amount. If you really were passionate about net zero,
22:36
Speaker 15: there's a simple solution, drop dead.
22:41
Speaker 3: That is not advice. The professor is giving. It's to
22:45
Speaker 3: not drop dead prefers supply, but thank you so much
22:48
Speaker 3: for your time tonight.
22:49
Speaker 2: Thank you.
22:51
Speaker 3: Steal to karma. Left is losing ad pass the latest
22:54
Speaker 3: from the US, including the Epstein files backfiring on a
22:58
Speaker 3: number of Democrat luminary preasure. Gator has the details. You're
23:13
Speaker 3: watching the Reader Paney Show, and it's time for lefties
23:16
Speaker 3: losing it. Let's have a look at what law enforcement
23:20
Speaker 3: have to deal with these days in blue cities where
23:22
Speaker 3: dim witted Karens with too much time on their hands
23:25
Speaker 3: and not enough functioning brain cells make a nuisance of themselves.
23:29
Speaker 3: And it's not just ice and Border patrol officers being harassed.
23:33
Speaker 3: A cop simply completing a collision report has to put
23:37
Speaker 3: up with this lunacy.
23:39
Speaker 16: What are you doing?
23:40
Speaker 10: What am I doing?
23:41
Speaker 7: Why are you here?
23:44
Speaker 10: I was just doing a collision report now, okay.
23:47
Speaker 6: Okay, are you guys going to be here much.
23:48
Speaker 10: Longer until I'm done doing my job?
23:52
Speaker 16: Because one of the tea shirts when I dropped off
23:54
Speaker 16: over there, I said, y'all been circling since about.
23:56
Speaker 10: Eight Okay, well, I'm just doing my job.
23:58
Speaker 16: So the quick about the elementary school since about eight am.
24:04
Speaker 10: I wasn't here.
24:05
Speaker 16: There was a collision here at the elementary school.
24:07
Speaker 10: You have a good day. I'm gonna continue to do my.
24:10
Speaker 16: Walk for us, and you're scaring these families.
24:14
Speaker 17: You should probably go do your job where your job lives.
24:18
Speaker 16: Because I don't see that it needs to be right
24:20
Speaker 16: here all morning.
24:21
Speaker 10: I'm gonna explain something.
24:22
Speaker 18: Mm hmm.
24:22
Speaker 12: The person that I was just working with left approximately
24:25
Speaker 12: five minutes ago.
24:27
Speaker 10: This was a collision report for them. I'm doing my job.
24:31
Speaker 16: Can you maybe, like for a second acknowledge that you
24:36
Speaker 16: could be a really upsetting site for people right now?
24:40
Speaker 16: If my understand my job, I get it, I do,
24:43
Speaker 16: I get it, But like for us to be able
24:45
Speaker 16: to collaborate with you all at all going forward, you're
24:48
Speaker 16: gonna have to show us some humanity. You're gonna have
24:51
Speaker 16: to show us that you understand the circumstances and the
24:55
Speaker 16: feelings that.
24:56
Speaker 17: You evoke, because like, it would be so rad to
24:59
Speaker 17: feel for us, It would be so rad. I feel
25:02
Speaker 17: like you guys get it and understand that you are
25:04
Speaker 17: actually the defending line between us and the fascism.
25:09
Speaker 3: You know what would be so rad if that woman
25:12
Speaker 3: was tasered until she came to her senses iest, of course,
25:17
Speaker 3: But fancy demanding a deputy sheriff show overt support for
25:24
Speaker 3: your delusions of living under some sort of a fascist regime.
25:28
Speaker 3: These people are nuts and they're dangerous. Now. I love
25:32
Speaker 3: this next Ice agent who roasts a Karen and you
25:36
Speaker 3: don't need to see her to imagine what she looks like.
25:40
Speaker 10: This isn't a good look for you.
25:42
Speaker 2: You think I care about my look?
25:44
Speaker 4: Oh no, no, trust me. When you guys say it's evident
25:47
Speaker 4: by how you you don't care.
25:48
Speaker 15: We get that.
25:48
Speaker 7: Trust me.
25:49
Speaker 4: No, that's all I'm saying. I'm saying this trying to
25:51
Speaker 4: be a social warrior.
25:53
Speaker 3: Ah, that is superb And, as Blair White pointed out
25:57
Speaker 3: on X, Eyes needs to hire more gays and they
26:00
Speaker 3: are the only ones that can defeat the white Karens. Indeed,
26:05
Speaker 3: but that exchange is far more sinister than that amusing line.
26:10
Speaker 3: Listen as the ICE agent tells this deranged Karen that
26:14
Speaker 3: she's impeding their efforts to capture a rapist, a child
26:18
Speaker 3: rapist and murderer. She says she doesn't care.
26:22
Speaker 2: How does it feel to be a race trader?
26:24
Speaker 4: You know we were trying to get a child my
26:27
Speaker 4: lista right, No, you weren't.
26:28
Speaker 7: Yes, we were.
26:29
Speaker 10: How would you know?
26:30
Speaker 2: Because it was a woman.
26:31
Speaker 10: You talked to his wife and then his plate came.
26:34
Speaker 4: Back calling someone a race trader.
26:38
Speaker 7: For you, guys, don't care.
26:39
Speaker 4: I hope you realize that is the most racist thing
26:40
Speaker 4: you can say as a wit woman.
26:42
Speaker 2: Of course it is.
26:44
Speaker 4: So you know this isn't a good look for you.
26:47
Speaker 2: You think I care about my look?
26:49
Speaker 4: Oh no, no, trust me. When you guys say, it's evident
26:51
Speaker 4: by how you you don't care, We get that.
26:53
Speaker 2: Trust me.
26:54
Speaker 4: No, that's all I'm saying. I'm just saying this trying
26:56
Speaker 4: to be a social warrior. If you actually cared, you
26:58
Speaker 4: probably would care about the who got raped and also
27:01
Speaker 4: the person got murdered by the person that we were
27:02
Speaker 4: looking for. But so you don't care.
27:04
Speaker 2: No, I don't care.
27:06
Speaker 3: She doesn't care, and she's happy to use racist language
27:10
Speaker 3: to attack an ICE agent. Just gross. Now let's go
27:13
Speaker 3: to Munich again and hear more discussions from the Munich
27:17
Speaker 3: Security Conference, which for some reason includes the likes of
27:21
Speaker 3: Democrats Sarah McBride formerly Tim McBride and male identifying as
27:26
Speaker 3: a woman who corrects himself here for saying boogieyman instead
27:31
Speaker 3: of boogie people. I wish I was kidding.
27:36
Speaker 18: And a strong man's greatest asset is scarcity. When there
27:42
Speaker 18: is scarcity in jobs, when there is scarcity of opportunity,
27:48
Speaker 18: they pick boogeymen or in this case, boogie people, and
27:53
Speaker 18: they blame them.
27:54
Speaker 3: Also, Munich was the perpetually miserable Hillary Clinton, who's hinge
28:00
Speaker 3: hatred for Donald Trump saw her repeatedly and rudely interrupt
28:04
Speaker 3: other paddlers who are trying to counter the hysterian hyperbole
28:09
Speaker 3: she was spewing with some sober facts and analysis.
28:13
Speaker 19: Well, first, I think you really don't like him.
28:18
Speaker 7: You know that is absolutely true.
28:19
Speaker 20: But I really not only do I not like him,
28:22
Speaker 20: I don't like him because of what he's doing to
28:24
Speaker 20: the United States and the world. And I think you
28:27
Speaker 20: should take a hard look at it if you think
28:28
Speaker 20: that there is something good that will come out of it.
28:30
Speaker 19: Peter, what I think what I think Trump Trump is
28:34
Speaker 19: doing in America? I think it is reaction, reaction, reaction
28:39
Speaker 19: for something that for some policies that really went too far.
28:44
Speaker 3: That's about all check. Foreign Minister Peter mckinka managed to
28:48
Speaker 3: get out before Hillary stepped up the rudeness, with the
28:53
Speaker 3: moderator having to step in repeatedly.
28:56
Speaker 19: I don't agree with the gender revolution. The climate are
29:00
Speaker 19: missing gender women? No, I think there are two genders.
29:06
Speaker 19: So but but some of some of us can some
29:09
Speaker 19: of us some of us think that there is more
29:12
Speaker 19: than one or more than two, sorry, more than two gender.
29:14
Speaker 19: I think there is male and female and the rest
29:18
Speaker 19: probably is a social construct. So this is something that
29:22
Speaker 19: went too far.
29:23
Speaker 20: But does that justify selling out the people of Ukraine
29:26
Speaker 20: who are on the front lines dying to say their
29:29
Speaker 20: freedom and their two genders and that's what your Can I.
29:33
Speaker 10: Please finish my points?
29:34
Speaker 19: I'm sorry that it makes you, makes you nervous. I'm
29:39
Speaker 19: really sorry for that be nervous, it makes me.
29:44
Speaker 6: Can finish to.
29:48
Speaker 3: Yes, can we let peyt the finish place? But even
29:51
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton had to admit that countries need strong borders
29:56
Speaker 3: and that immigration illegal and legal has gone too far.
30:00
Speaker 20: I think we need to call it for what it is,
30:03
Speaker 20: a legitimate reason to have a debate about things like migration.
30:09
Speaker 3: It went too far.
30:10
Speaker 20: It's been disruptive and destabilizing, and it needs to be
30:14
Speaker 20: fixed in a humane way with secure borders that don't
30:18
Speaker 20: torture and kill people.
30:20
Speaker 3: And that's what America has now. Hillary. No one has
30:23
Speaker 3: been killed or tortured on the border that was happening
30:27
Speaker 3: under the previous administration that was enriching evil human traffickers.
30:32
Speaker 3: Let's bring in Sky News contributor Kosher Gata Kosher Hillary Clinton,
30:37
Speaker 3: I mean, she has got some issues that teds is
30:41
Speaker 3: off the charts. What is she hoping to achieve attending
30:46
Speaker 3: conferences like this and pushing this agenda? I mean, at
30:51
Speaker 3: her age, she's done with politics. What exactly is the point?
30:57
Speaker 21: I can only guess that it's some kind of relevance
31:00
Speaker 21: deprivation syndrome, like she wants to be relevant. She's already
31:02
Speaker 21: been a senator first lady, then a senator in Psychotroy state.
31:06
Speaker 21: She's got grandkids, She's had an amazing life that ninety
31:10
Speaker 21: nine point nine percent of the people would never get
31:12
Speaker 21: to experience the things she's experienced. Leaving aside, you know
31:14
Speaker 21: what she's done policy wise, and she should bow out
31:18
Speaker 21: stage left, But why is she still there at this point?
31:20
Speaker 3: And she just seems like the most miserable human on earth,
31:25
Speaker 3: And throughout much of that experience that you just described,
31:29
Speaker 3: she hasn't seemed particularly happy, and I don't know you
31:32
Speaker 3: would think in these golden years she would be never
31:35
Speaker 3: enjoying life. Joe is off doing god knows what he's doing,
31:40
Speaker 3: having napps and eating ice cream. Now. I featured AOC
31:45
Speaker 3: Alexandria Orcazia Cortez on last night's Lefties Losing It, and
31:50
Speaker 3: she managed to humiliate herself again in Munich with another
31:54
Speaker 3: incoherent attempt to answer basic questions. I've already played you
31:58
Speaker 3: her trying to talk about I waron Mexico America, and
32:02
Speaker 3: she attempted to fact check Maco Rubio's one hundred percent
32:07
Speaker 3: factual comment about the origins of American cowboys. That didn't
32:10
Speaker 3: go too well, and she tries to make another profound
32:13
Speaker 3: point here that backfires.
32:16
Speaker 9: We look at what happened in Venezuela, for example.
32:20
Speaker 10: It is not a.
32:23
Speaker 9: Is It is not a remark on who Maduro was
32:29
Speaker 9: as a leader. He canceled elections, he was an anti
32:31
Speaker 9: democratic leader. That doesn't mean that we can kidnap ahead
32:35
Speaker 9: of state and engage in acts of war just because
32:39
Speaker 9: the nation is below the equator.
32:42
Speaker 3: And oh that was her big point. South of the equator.
32:49
Speaker 3: I mean I obviously not only needs to brush up
32:51
Speaker 3: on economics history, but also geography, it seems because she
32:58
Speaker 3: has no clue. And those idiots in the crowd clapping
33:02
Speaker 3: along like they just heard some brilliant point. What can
33:05
Speaker 3: you say?
33:06
Speaker 6: She was so close?
33:07
Speaker 21: She was so close because there is a legitimate critique,
33:11
Speaker 21: far more serious people than her make about the Maduro
33:14
Speaker 21: operation and leaving aside you know what the premise was,
33:17
Speaker 21: someone say the pretext of it, you are going in
33:19
Speaker 21: and taking out a head of state, illegitimate or otherwise.
33:22
Speaker 21: She could have left it there and actually had some legitimacy,
33:25
Speaker 21: But then she had to add in that south of
33:26
Speaker 21: the border, and I think that that's code for some
33:30
Speaker 21: kind of racial undertone because.
33:31
Speaker 3: It's surrounded blacks.
33:33
Speaker 21: And sorry to our friends in Australia who are south
33:35
Speaker 21: of the equator, they don't count or South Africa, or
33:37
Speaker 21: Chile or Argentina or many other countries that aren't black
33:40
Speaker 21: and brown dominant.
33:41
Speaker 6: To use their lingo.
33:42
Speaker 21: She forgot about that swept them under the rug and
33:45
Speaker 21: that is the only frame that she will fall into.
33:47
Speaker 3: Well, what is the broader point there? Are they still
33:51
Speaker 3: arguing that removing Maduro, this dictator, this man who's destroyed
33:57
Speaker 3: what was once a wealthy kind of tree into one
34:01
Speaker 3: where millions have fled. They're still arguing that's a bad thing,
34:06
Speaker 3: this audacious plan that they managed to pull off without
34:11
Speaker 3: losing a single American life. I mean, that argument in itself,
34:15
Speaker 3: I think is pretty silly.
34:17
Speaker 21: They can't criticize the operation because it really was just
34:19
Speaker 21: a feat and the whole world marveled at American military mate,
34:22
Speaker 21: which is still present even though it hadn't been used.
34:24
Speaker 10: In that way.
34:24
Speaker 21: And sometime so they try to argue on the policy
34:27
Speaker 21: of oh, you're going into sovereign countries and you know,
34:30
Speaker 21: trying to do something about it. But they're not even
34:33
Speaker 21: really loyal to that point either or justified because you
34:37
Speaker 21: check her record and she's voted for all sorts of
34:39
Speaker 21: intervention elsewhere. So it's only when it doesn't suit them.
34:42
Speaker 21: And I think this might be a shallow point, but
34:44
Speaker 21: I think they love to feign sophistication the Spanish speakers
34:47
Speaker 21: in America, especially with their pronunciations. She just wants to
34:52
Speaker 21: talk about that.
34:53
Speaker 3: Yeah, the pronunciations, I think is all she was interested
34:57
Speaker 3: in there, and oh yes, I've got some yeah, real
35:01
Speaker 3: insight because of that oh please, Now let's talk about
35:06
Speaker 3: the Epstein files. And the Democrats are not happy that,
35:11
Speaker 3: despite the media regurgitating their misinformation, the release of these
35:16
Speaker 3: files is damaging the left, including Democrat luminaries like Bill
35:22
Speaker 3: Clinton and billionaires like Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates. But
35:27
Speaker 3: Jensaki is still in denial.
35:30
Speaker 22: It is Trump, yes, and we should everybody should continue
35:33
Speaker 22: to dig more about that.
35:34
Speaker 3: But it is the wealthy, the elites.
35:36
Speaker 22: And basically every factor faction of the world. It's global leaders,
35:42
Speaker 22: it's people in the business sector, it is people in
35:45
Speaker 22: Hollywood probably who knows it is a bunch of people
35:48
Speaker 22: who think that they can get away with anything.
35:52
Speaker 3: Correct me if I'm wrong, kosher. But it wasn't that
35:55
Speaker 3: long ago to Jensaki was characterizing anybody who talked about
36:00
Speaker 3: an elite group of abuses running the show as pure
36:05
Speaker 3: non conspiracy theorists and wackos, and now she's pretty much
36:09
Speaker 3: repeating their lines.
36:10
Speaker 21: There, Absolutely, I think the dam has broken. So now
36:13
Speaker 21: there's no denying it. There's the eight million or so
36:16
Speaker 21: emails and all sorts of names, including very prominent Democrat
36:19
Speaker 21: names from her side, and other people from all around
36:21
Speaker 21: the world.
36:22
Speaker 10: Are in there.
36:22
Speaker 21: So she can to deny it anymore. So now they're
36:24
Speaker 21: all gloming on. We talked last week about the MSNBC host.
36:28
Speaker 21: Everybody's gloming on to that reality that there is a
36:30
Speaker 21: superstructure out there of elites that seemed to operate with
36:34
Speaker 21: impunity up until now. True, but nobody takes them seriously
36:39
Speaker 21: because her boss was in charge for four years. Many
36:42
Speaker 21: other people have been in charge for years and years before.
36:43
Speaker 21: It's been twenty years since he was convicted and nothing
36:46
Speaker 21: has happened. And even until now, I would note the
36:48
Speaker 21: emails are out, but no arrests have happened.
36:50
Speaker 3: Well, that to me seems remarkable because I haven't obviously
36:54
Speaker 3: read through the millions of documents, but I've read plenty
36:59
Speaker 3: that seem to call for at the very least a
37:03
Speaker 3: thorough investigation. But you would think when you're talking about
37:08
Speaker 3: I mean, some of the code words are just so obvious,
37:11
Speaker 3: where they're talking about beef jerky, for example, and they're
37:16
Speaker 3: not talking about beef jerky. But even in one exchange,
37:21
Speaker 3: Epstein refers to a torture video with someone quite prominent.
37:26
Speaker 3: How is that not being explored further? That just seems
37:30
Speaker 3: again to me remarkable why would that be. This is
37:34
Speaker 3: really undermining faith in the entire justice system.
37:38
Speaker 18: It really is.
37:39
Speaker 21: And I will say there's even that Jansaki missed that point.
37:43
Speaker 21: This really was an issue of the rate and the
37:45
Speaker 21: Trump campaign campaign on this most transparent administration history, drained
37:50
Speaker 21: the swamp and a big part of his Beast's not
37:52
Speaker 21: all on the beast, but a big part of the best.
37:53
Speaker 21: This was a number one issue for them, not because
37:55
Speaker 21: they don't necessarily care about Epstein or particular people that
37:58
Speaker 21: did things at one point in time, but they do
38:00
Speaker 21: care about that, But it's about what it says about
38:02
Speaker 21: the system and justice and equal justice for all, and
38:05
Speaker 21: given that that hasn't happened, either accidentally or by happens downce,
38:10
Speaker 21: the left seems to have sort of taken the issue
38:12
Speaker 21: away from Trump a little bit, and now it's sort
38:15
Speaker 21: of big and Morpho's blob and all sorts of people
38:17
Speaker 21: are implicated, and they have certainly lost the higher ground
38:20
Speaker 21: on the session.
38:21
Speaker 14: I think it's's biggest misstep by some margin when he
38:27
Speaker 14: allowed ham Bondi to say nothing to see here, there's
38:31
Speaker 14: no charges if the case is closed, and he kind
38:35
Speaker 14: of fumble lost like he said this was his issue.
38:39
Speaker 3: This was the issue that his base cared about, and
38:43
Speaker 3: by doing that, he also cast himself in a guilty light.
38:47
Speaker 3: People are wondering, well, why doesn't he want this investigated?
38:50
Speaker 3: Is it because he's in the files in a way
38:53
Speaker 3: that he doesn't want explored, And from what we've seen
38:57
Speaker 3: that is not the case. In fact, the files show
38:59
Speaker 3: that he was in contact with law enforcement encouraging them
39:04
Speaker 3: to investigate Jeffrey Epstein, encouraging them to investigate Gilain Maxwell
39:09
Speaker 3: being really grateful that that issue was being pursued. So
39:12
Speaker 3: it hasn't damaged him that way. But the narrative from
39:16
Speaker 3: the much of the media is still that he's been
39:19
Speaker 3: compromised and I think that's going.
39:21
Speaker 21: To hurt him and well, and I think a lot
39:22
Speaker 21: of the lower information voters who don't know all that,
39:25
Speaker 21: yeah exactly, they just see the headlines. They just think, Okay,
39:28
Speaker 21: he's a powerful person, he loves women. Everybody knows that
39:31
Speaker 21: about him, and they just lump him in to that category,
39:33
Speaker 21: or that he's protecting friends, famous and powerful friends. That's
39:37
Speaker 21: another issue where it's not him but guilt by association.
39:41
Speaker 21: It is a little bit of a head scratcher because
39:43
Speaker 21: this was.
39:43
Speaker 3: I think we're going need to have some clarity about
39:45
Speaker 3: the sort of protection Jeffrey Epstein enjoyed throughout his life.
39:49
Speaker 3: And it's been discussed, it's been talked about, and it's
39:52
Speaker 3: almost become now taboo issue to talk about that. But
39:56
Speaker 3: it's clear he had protection. It is clear that perhaps
39:59
Speaker 3: he was working with certain intelligence agencies that afforded him
40:04
Speaker 3: that protection, and that needs to be fully explored. Otherwise
40:08
Speaker 3: are you going to see people just completely lose faith
40:11
Speaker 3: in the justice system. Now, let's talk about the Winter
40:14
Speaker 3: Olympics without a few American athletes emoting incoherently about being
40:19
Speaker 3: conflicted about representing America, and incredibly American born Chinese Olympic
40:25
Speaker 3: star Eiland Gou has also weighed in. She's condemned President
40:29
Speaker 3: Trump's criticism of American skiers who are playing politics. Kosher
40:34
Speaker 3: I Wanda has Eileen, who's got an incredible amount of
40:38
Speaker 3: media attention. He must be said adulation. Has she ever
40:42
Speaker 3: been asked about China's human rights abuses like the mistreatment
40:47
Speaker 3: of their wigas, the way the Communist Party their lock
40:52
Speaker 3: up and kill political dissidents, And we're talking about real
40:54
Speaker 3: human rights abuses here, not imagined ones. Is that happening.
40:58
Speaker 21: I don't think we're going to be seeing anytime soon.
41:01
Speaker 21: Just the easy questions. It's easy to bash on the
41:04
Speaker 21: country that everybody wants to bash on. And with her
41:06
Speaker 21: there's even a bigger topic too, that she is American.
41:10
Speaker 21: She skis for China. She reportedly gets paid a lot
41:14
Speaker 21: of money from China. China does not allow dual citizenship.
41:17
Speaker 21: She's always been cagy. Actually she hasn't directly been asked
41:20
Speaker 21: what is your citizenship status at some point and doesn't
41:22
Speaker 21: really answer it though. People don't ask them tough questions
41:24
Speaker 21: too often, and so just that makes it even worse
41:27
Speaker 21: that you're on that stage criticizing America where you grew up.
41:30
Speaker 6: She grew up in the Bay Area.
41:32
Speaker 21: And it also, I think reminds us that the Olympics
41:35
Speaker 21: is an institution, are not what they once were. In
41:38
Speaker 21: this world, just anything goes and you've got immigration and
41:41
Speaker 21: mass migration and people from one place playing for another place.
41:44
Speaker 21: It doesn't have that sort of national pride mystique anymore
41:48
Speaker 21: the way it probably did one hundred years ago.
41:49
Speaker 3: Now, and according to the National Review, a Land gets
41:54
Speaker 3: millions from the Chinese government. So I guess it's not
41:58
Speaker 3: surprising that she is not criticized them and saving that
42:01
Speaker 3: criticism from the Trump administration. Now, before you go kosher,
42:06
Speaker 3: the President has posted quite a die tribe mocking Bill Maher.
42:10
Speaker 3: The leftis too he broke bread with last year. The
42:13
Speaker 3: President wrote, it was a total waste of time for
42:16
Speaker 3: me to have this jerk at the White House. He
42:19
Speaker 3: came into the famed Oval office much different than I
42:23
Speaker 3: thought he would be. He was extremely nervous, had zero
42:26
Speaker 3: confidence in himself, and to soothe his nerves immediately within seconds,
42:31
Speaker 3: asked for a vodkatonic and he also wrote, fortunately his
42:34
Speaker 3: television ratings are so low that nobody will learn about
42:38
Speaker 3: his various fake news statements about me. He is no
42:41
Speaker 3: different than Kimmel, Fallon or Colbert, but I must admit
42:45
Speaker 3: slightly more talented. We Go gave him that. It was
42:49
Speaker 3: quite a spray. What do you think is behind this?
42:55
Speaker 3: Is he just upset that Bill Maher still has TDS?
42:58
Speaker 3: Or did he expect him to become some conservative fire
43:03
Speaker 3: brand after one?
43:04
Speaker 21: Maybe it was funny. This definitely goes in the Trumball
43:07
Speaker 21: Hall of Fame. I didn't want it to end. Reportedly,
43:11
Speaker 21: in the previous episode of the Day Before of Bill Marshaw,
43:14
Speaker 21: he mocked Trump for a joke that he made on
43:17
Speaker 21: True Social about Canada and China and China's going to
43:19
Speaker 21: take away the Stanley Cup if Canada cozies up to them,
43:22
Speaker 21: and he was like, well, that was a joke. He
43:23
Speaker 21: didn't get it, and somehow that set him off. Who knows,
43:26
Speaker 21: maybe there's something else behind the scenes. Maybe I'm just speculating,
43:29
Speaker 21: but the right side often celebrates every time Bill Maher
43:34
Speaker 21: says something.
43:34
Speaker 3: I've always seen this. I think it's almost the bigotry
43:37
Speaker 3: of low expectations. He will repeat something conservatives have said
43:41
Speaker 3: for years, and then you'll clap him like he's has
43:43
Speaker 3: said something bound when it's the most obvious thing ever.
43:46
Speaker 3: And that's why it's a thank you, so much better
43:49
Speaker 3: thank you Bill to come. Drew Hadler kicked out of
43:53
Speaker 3: the US after trying to visit Billie Eilish's Malibu mansion
43:57
Speaker 3: built on stolen land me next Welcome Back Now. A
44:12
Speaker 3: couple of weeks ago, we had political activists and commentator
44:15
Speaker 3: Drew Pavlo on the show after he declared he was
44:18
Speaker 3: moving into pop star Billie Eilish's Malibu mansion after she
44:22
Speaker 3: had this to say at the Grammys, no one is
44:26
Speaker 3: illegal on stolen Land. That saw Drew immediately start a
44:32
Speaker 3: fundraising campaign to fly to Malibu and move into Billy's
44:36
Speaker 3: multimillion dollar mansion. After all, no human is illegal on
44:40
Speaker 3: stolen Land. However, Drew's plan was ruined when border authorities
44:45
Speaker 3: detained him for thirty hours before sending him home. Drew
44:49
Speaker 3: Pavlou joins me, Now, Drew, you were essentially detained and deported.
44:54
Speaker 3: Worse than that, you weren't even allowed into the country.
44:58
Speaker 3: Appears you were deemed a li eagle. Did you tell
45:01
Speaker 3: them that no one is illegal on stolen Land?
45:05
Speaker 7: I tried. What a disaster.
45:06
Speaker 11: I was made into a martyr, a victim of a
45:08
Speaker 11: conspiracy by Billie Eilish.
45:11
Speaker 7: I suffered for my art. It was very funny performance art.
45:13
Speaker 11: Honestly, I was somehow able to make Billie Eilish and
45:18
Speaker 11: all these liberals and leftists in America fully support Ice,
45:21
Speaker 11: fully support border controls, fully support deportations.
45:24
Speaker 7: You should have seen it online.
45:25
Speaker 11: There were literally tens of thousands of commons from leftists
45:28
Speaker 11: and Democrats supporters saying where Glad Drew got deported.
45:31
Speaker 7: So I made it.
45:32
Speaker 11: I managed to make these people see the light. And honestly,
45:35
Speaker 11: I hope Trump maybe gives me a medal or something
45:37
Speaker 11: like that for allowing the liberals to see the light.
45:40
Speaker 11: They celebrated when I got deported, And it's very unfair
45:43
Speaker 11: because I thought no one was illegal on stolen land.
45:47
Speaker 3: Now they alleged that you didn't have the right visa.
45:50
Speaker 3: I mean, what sort of visa does one need to
45:53
Speaker 3: move into Billie Eilish's mansion that's built on stolen land.
45:57
Speaker 7: Look, that's a good question.
46:00
Speaker 11: They told me that the main reason I was being
46:02
Speaker 11: denied entry was because of my post about Billie Eilish.
46:05
Speaker 7: They fully interrogated me about that. They wanted me.
46:08
Speaker 11: They wanted me to detail my relationship with Billy Eilish,
46:12
Speaker 11: whether I'd ever come into contact with her before. They
46:15
Speaker 11: were asking whether I wanted to see her in person
46:17
Speaker 11: and try to talk to her in person.
46:18
Speaker 7: I was trying to say, this is literally just a meme,
46:21
Speaker 7: it's literally just a joke.
46:23
Speaker 11: And unfortunately, yeah, like a lot of the border agents
46:26
Speaker 11: were actually pretty funny and they were laughing at what.
46:28
Speaker 7: I was doing.
46:29
Speaker 11: But I guess there was somebody in the higher ups
46:32
Speaker 11: who just made the decision, and honestly, I think I
46:36
Speaker 11: think if they I think, if it got a proper review,
46:39
Speaker 11: I would be allowed in.
46:40
Speaker 7: I think honestly, I didn't do anything illegal.
46:43
Speaker 11: I made very clear I didn't actually want to go
46:45
Speaker 11: to her house or anything like that. I was hoping
46:47
Speaker 11: to try higher a Native American professional dance group, and
46:50
Speaker 11: that was my actual plan, and I came close. I
46:53
Speaker 11: was using like big hiring websites. I was literally in
46:57
Speaker 11: contact with three or four different performers, and We're going
46:59
Speaker 11: to try to do a smokey and yeah, Unfortunately, I
47:03
Speaker 11: was deemed an a legal immigrant and sent back, which
47:05
Speaker 11: is very unfair because, you know, democratics.
47:08
Speaker 3: You were treated very poorly. You were treated very poorly,
47:12
Speaker 3: you were locked up for thirty hours, you were escorted
47:15
Speaker 3: back onto the plane to be sent home in disgrace.
47:19
Speaker 3: Are you going to try again? I mean, these celebrities
47:22
Speaker 3: cannot make these wild claims, these contradictory claims without consequences,
47:27
Speaker 3: because one of the funniest things about that line of
47:29
Speaker 3: hers no one is illegal on Stolen Land is that
47:33
Speaker 3: she's at the same time simultaneously advocating for open borders.
47:38
Speaker 3: And the concept of stolen land. I mean Pickett argument, Billy,
47:42
Speaker 3: but are you going to try again? Are you going
47:45
Speaker 3: to do another crowdfunding effort and get to Malibu and
47:49
Speaker 3: get to see Billie Eilish's mansion.
47:52
Speaker 7: Look, the dream is still there, reader.
47:54
Speaker 11: I would still like to do it one day, but
47:55
Speaker 11: they've told me that I have to try and go
47:57
Speaker 11: to the US embassy and camera and get a pro visa.
48:00
Speaker 7: And that may take a long time.
48:02
Speaker 11: So look, I'm appealing to anybody in the US government.
48:06
Speaker 7: I'm a very pro American guy.
48:07
Speaker 11: Honestly, please like consider letting me into the country.
48:11
Speaker 7: I'm not going to do anything illegal. I love America.
48:13
Speaker 11: I'm a big fan of you know, the beautiful country
48:17
Speaker 11: that is the United States of America.
48:18
Speaker 7: Please let me in.
48:19
Speaker 11: It seems Billy Eilish's lawyers like potentially reported me. There
48:23
Speaker 11: was like a full dossier on me. I was in
48:25
Speaker 11: the US in January and there was no problem. I
48:26
Speaker 11: got off the plane, walked right in, and suddenly they
48:29
Speaker 11: were integrating me on my social media history going back
48:31
Speaker 11: to twenty twenty two.
48:32
Speaker 7: They were asking me about whether I had protested it.
48:35
Speaker 11: They were asking me whether I tried to threaten the
48:37
Speaker 11: Chinese government before and stuff like that, which is crazy.
48:40
Speaker 7: So I honestly think they potentially, you.
48:42
Speaker 11: Know, Billy Eilish's lawyers maybe put together this kind of
48:45
Speaker 11: dossier on me all my past activism. I think it's
48:48
Speaker 11: very unfair. I call on the US government to please
48:50
Speaker 11: consider my case and don't let these terrible people on
48:54
Speaker 11: the far left win.
48:57
Speaker 3: Yes, we need justice for Drew and we need a
49:00
Speaker 3: to you to be at the mansion in Malibu.
49:03
Speaker 7: Yes, before you go justice on home lend.
49:09
Speaker 3: What do we know about Billie Eilish's set up? Because
49:14
Speaker 3: the traditional owners of that land came out and said
49:17
Speaker 3: that she'd never been in contact with them. They were
49:19
Speaker 3: happy to talk to her. Do we know if it's
49:23
Speaker 3: a gated community, if she's got security, she's obviously or
49:29
Speaker 3: her supporters have played a part in having you banned
49:33
Speaker 3: from the country on this trip. What do we know
49:36
Speaker 3: about what she preaches compared to how she actually lives.
49:40
Speaker 7: Well, look, it's a massive gated mansion. You might have
49:44
Speaker 7: seen gb.
49:44
Speaker 11: News, which is I think is like a you know,
49:46
Speaker 11: a big news broadcaster in Britain. They had their correspondent
49:50
Speaker 11: go out to a mansion and knock on the door.
49:52
Speaker 7: There was nothing. Nothing happened to him. He's a British guy.
49:54
Speaker 7: I didn't think he's an American citizen. Nothing happened to
49:56
Speaker 7: him when he knocked on the door. But I was
49:58
Speaker 7: persecuted and I was victimized by this Billy Eilish conspiracy.
50:01
Speaker 7: So it's very sad.
50:03
Speaker 11: It's this huge gated mansion and I still look. My
50:07
Speaker 11: offer is still there. If Billy Eilish wants to transfer
50:10
Speaker 11: the property into my name, I will take it. I'm
50:12
Speaker 11: happy to live there free. I mean, it is stolen land.
50:15
Speaker 11: It is stolen so I'm happy to live there free
50:16
Speaker 11: if she wants to transfer the property.
50:19
Speaker 7: Until that time, I will be here in Australia until
50:21
Speaker 7: the US government allows me to go back to the
50:24
Speaker 7: United States on holiday. Hopefully one day.
50:26
Speaker 11: I hope someone in the Trump administration conceive this and say,
50:29
Speaker 11: Drew's a good guy, please let him in.
50:31
Speaker 18: Yeah.
50:32
Speaker 3: I hope you're not on a no flight list now,
50:34
Speaker 3: because that would make it very difficult to I don't
50:36
Speaker 3: run back into the US. Well, let's just see if
50:40
Speaker 3: we can get you back in there. Drew Pavlou, thank
50:42
Speaker 3: you so much for your time and you know, if
50:45
Speaker 3: that video of yours didn't have tens of millions of views,
50:48
Speaker 3: maybe Billy's people wouldn't be aware of what your scheme
50:51
Speaker 3: was and you would have been banned. And you're a
50:54
Speaker 3: victim of your own success. Drew Pavlou, thanks for your time.
50:58
Speaker 7: Thank you reader, Justice on Stolo Land.
51:00
Speaker 3: And that's all the time we have tonight. I'll see
51:02
Speaker 3: you at eleven tomorrow night. Don't go anywhere. Newsnight is
51:05
Speaker 3: up next.