Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Gifted Teen Strangled By Friend Who Wanted To Become A Serial Killer
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: I want you to take a second and imagine someone
- 0:04Speaker 1: you trust implicitly.
- 0:05Speaker 2: Yeah, like a really close friend.
- 0:07Speaker 1: Right. Not just an acquaintance or, you know, a coworker
- 0:10Speaker 1: you grab coffee with. I mean, someone you grew up alongside.
- 0:13Speaker 2: Someone who really knows you.
- 0:14Speaker 1: Exactly. Imagine the person you sat next to in school,
- 0:16Speaker 1: like every single day. The person you made art with.
- 0:19Speaker 2: The one you wrote music with.
- 0:21Speaker 1: Yeah. The one who knows your family, your daily habits,
- 0:23Speaker 1: your deepest secrets.
- 0:24Speaker 2: That kind of bond is so rare.
- 0:26Speaker 1: It is. It is. Now, I want you to look
- 0:28Speaker 1: at that perfectly familiar, comforting face in your mind's eye,
- 0:32Speaker 1: and I want you to imagine that they are harboring
- 0:34Speaker 1: a lethal agenda.
- 0:36Speaker 2: Oh, wow. That is just, that's terrifying to even think about.
- 0:40Speaker 1: Right. It completely upends your sense of reality. The idea
- 0:44Speaker 1: that the ultimate betrayal, like the most profound violence imaginable,
- 0:48Speaker 1: could come wearing the face of a trusted friend.
- 0:51Speaker 2: I mean, that kind of betrayal, it shatters the foundational
- 0:54Speaker 2: trust we all need just to function in society.
- 0:56Speaker 1: Yeah, because we rely on that.
- 0:58Speaker 2: We do. We all operate on this basic assumption that
- 1:01Speaker 2: we can accurately read the people closest to us.
- 1:03Speaker 1: Right. For our own survival.
- 1:05Speaker 2: Exactly. So when that proximity, you know, when that intimacy
- 1:08Speaker 2: is weaponized against us, it doesn't just create fear. It
- 1:12Speaker 2: creates a complete psychological freefall.
- 1:14Speaker 1: You start questioning everything.
- 1:16Speaker 2: You have to. You're forced to question every interaction, every smile,
- 1:21Speaker 2: every shared memory you ever had with that person.
- 1:23Speaker 1: Which really brings us to the core of today's deep dive.
- 1:26Speaker 2: Uh-huh.
- 1:27Speaker 1: We are looking at this staggering investigation out of Wisconsin today. Yeah.
- 1:32Speaker 2: Drawing from some incredible extensive reporting by True Crime News
- 1:37Speaker 2: and Crime Watch Daily.
- 1:38Speaker 1: We really are. Our mission for this deep dive is
- 1:41Speaker 1: to deconstruct a real-life thriller. We want to understand the
- 1:45Speaker 1: terrifying psychology of a true chameleon.
- 1:48Speaker 2: Someone who weaponized that exact kind of familiarity we were
- 1:51Speaker 2: just talking about.
- 1:51Speaker 1: Exactly. So for a quick roadmap of where we're headed,
- 1:54Speaker 1: we are going to be tracking two seemingly unconnected crimes
- 1:58Speaker 1: that happen just days apart.
- 2:00Speaker 2: Right, in neighboring towns.
- 2:01Speaker 1: Yeah. We're going to dissect the psychological warfare of a
- 2:04Speaker 1: police interrogation room, too.
- 2:05Speaker 2: Oh, that slip up in the interrogation room is unbelievable.
- 2:08Speaker 1: It really is.
- 2:08Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 2:09Speaker 1: And ultimately, we are going to examine... A response to
- 2:12Speaker 1: pure evil that is so profound, it just, well, it
- 2:17Speaker 1: forces you to rethink the entire capacity of the human heart.
- 2:20Speaker 2: It really does. But to truly grasp how devastating this
- 2:25Speaker 2: case is, we have to understand the environment it happened in.
- 2:28Speaker 1: Right. The setting is so important.
- 2:30Speaker 2: It's crucial. So we are looking at Hartford, Wisconsin. This
- 2:34Speaker 2: is a very tight-knit community.
- 2:35Speaker 1: Yeah, it's the kind of town where standing out is
- 2:37Speaker 1: actually pretty difficult.
- 2:38Speaker 2: But if you do stand out, you become a fixture
- 2:41Speaker 2: in the town. And Jessie Blahat was absolutely a fixture.
- 2:44Speaker 1: She really was. So Jessie was 19 years old. She
- 2:46Speaker 1: was an aspiring actress, a singer-songwriter, and just, you know,
- 2:50Speaker 1: someone who seemed to vibrate on a completely higher frequency
- 2:53Speaker 1: than everyone else around her.
- 2:55Speaker 2: She was remarkable. And she wasn't just locally talented. She was, like,
- 2:58Speaker 2: quantifiably brilliant from a very young age.
- 3:01Speaker 1: Yeah, I wanted to bring that up. There is a
- 3:03Speaker 1: specific detail from the source material. that really anchors who
- 3:06Speaker 1: Jessie was.
- 3:07Speaker 2: The first grade story.
- 3:09Speaker 1: Yes. So when she was in the first grade, the
- 3:11Speaker 1: standard curriculum completely failed her. Yeah. Because she was just
- 3:15Speaker 1: so far ahead of the other kids.
- 3:16Speaker 2: They didn't know what to do with her. Right.
- 3:18Speaker 1: Her teacher actually had to create a custom curriculum just
- 3:20Speaker 1: to keep her engaged.
- 3:21Speaker 2: Which is wild to think about.
- 3:23Speaker 1: It is. So, I mean, picture a classroom of six-year-olds, right?
- 3:28Speaker 1: And they are learning to spell basic words like and
- 3:31Speaker 1: or the.
- 3:32Speaker 2: Normal first grade stuff. Exactly.
- 3:33Speaker 1: Exactly. But then there's Jesse sitting at her little desk
- 3:37Speaker 1: and she is spelling words like metamorphosis and anesthesiologist.
- 3:41Speaker 2: Six years old.
- 3:42Speaker 1: Yeah. It's just staggering.
- 3:44Speaker 2: But the crucial element here, I think, is what she
- 3:47Speaker 2: actually did with that intellectual capacity as she matured.
- 3:51Speaker 1: Right. Because that can go a lot of different ways.
- 3:53Speaker 2: It really can. Often, you know, highly gifted children can
- 3:55Speaker 2: turn inward. They can become isolated or just purely focused
- 3:58Speaker 2: on academics.
- 3:59Speaker 1: But Jesse didn't do that.
- 4:00Speaker 2: No, she took the exact opposite route. She externalized that
- 4:04Speaker 2: brilliance into empathy.
- 4:05Speaker 1: Which is so rare. It is.
- 4:08Speaker 2: She used her intelligence to identify the vulnerabilities in the
- 4:11Speaker 2: world around her, and she used her voice to advocate
- 4:15Speaker 2: for those who couldn't speak for themselves.
- 4:17Speaker 1: Right, like her animal rights advocacy.
- 4:19Speaker 2: Exactly. She was a fierce advocate for animal rights, and
- 4:23Speaker 2: she was deeply, deeply passionate about ending violence against women.
- 4:28Speaker 1: And she didn't just, like, post about these things online,
- 4:31Speaker 1: and call it a day. She was out there actively
- 4:33Speaker 1: trying to change her corner of the world.
- 4:36Speaker 2: Through her music and everything?
- 4:37Speaker 1: Yeah, through her art. And she was even tutoring local kids.
- 4:40Speaker 1: She was actively building a community in Hartford.
- 4:43Speaker 2: But she wasn't the only prodigy in town.
- 4:45Speaker 1: No, she wasn't. And that brings us to Dan Bartelt. Right.
- 4:49Speaker 1: Dan is 20 years old, and his life is just
- 4:52Speaker 1: inextricably braided with Jessie's life.
- 4:54Speaker 2: They were always together.
- 4:55Speaker 1: Yeah, they sat next to each other all through high school.
- 4:58Speaker 1: Dan was a highly gifted musician in his own right.
- 5:01Speaker 2: He was the first chair violinist in the school orchestra,
- 5:04Speaker 2: wasn't he?
- 5:04Speaker 1: He was. And Jesse was the second chair. So they
- 5:08Speaker 1: were literally sitting side by side making music.
- 5:10Speaker 2: They were like parallel rising stars in this small town.
- 5:13Speaker 1: Exactly. And Dan, he had this persona of the charismatic
- 5:17Speaker 1: golden boy.
- 5:17Speaker 2: He was very outgoing.
- 5:19Speaker 1: Outgoing, hilarious, whip smart. On paper... They just looked like
- 5:24Speaker 1: this idyllic, small-town, artistic powerhouse duo.
- 5:28Speaker 2: And they actually did date for a brief period, right?
- 5:31Speaker 1: They did, yeah. It was about three or four months
- 5:33Speaker 1: during their freshman year of high school.
- 5:34Speaker 2: But Dan was the one who initiated the breakup.
- 5:37Speaker 1: Right. Which, as Jesse's parents pointed out in the sources,
- 5:40Speaker 1: isn't exactly front-page news when you were 14 years old.
- 5:43Speaker 2: No. Freshman relationships end all the time.
- 5:46Speaker 1: Exactly. You don't need some complex philosophical thesis to end
- 5:50Speaker 1: a high school romance. The important part here is really
- 5:54Speaker 1: the aftermath of that breakup.
- 5:55Speaker 2: Right, because they didn't fracture.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Not at all. They stayed incredibly close friends. They continued
- 6:00Speaker 1: to collaborate on their art.
- 6:01Speaker 2: They even wrote a song together recently.
- 6:03Speaker 1: Yeah, they wrote and recorded a song together and posted
- 6:06Speaker 1: it on YouTube just weeks before the events we are
- 6:09Speaker 1: unpacking today.
- 6:10Speaker 2: Wow. So the trajectory for both of them just seemed
- 6:13Speaker 2: completely limitless.
- 6:15Speaker 1: It did. They graduate. They go off to different colleges.
- 6:18Speaker 1: But then the summer of this deep dive, the narrative...
- 6:21Speaker 1: just violently splinters.
- 6:23Speaker 2: Right, when Dan comes back to Hartford.
- 6:25Speaker 1: Yeah. Dan comes home, and that golden boy facade we
- 6:29Speaker 1: talked about begins to show these massive, unexplainable cracks.
- 6:33Speaker 2: Because he drops out of college.
- 6:34Speaker 1: Right. And for a straight-A student who had so much
- 6:37Speaker 1: going for him, that is a really jarring pivot.
- 6:40Speaker 2: It's a huge red flag.
- 6:41Speaker 1: But dropping out isn't even the most alarming part. It's
- 6:44Speaker 1: what he decides to do next.
- 6:45Speaker 2: This is where things get really dark.
- 6:47Speaker 1: Yeah. Dan doesn't come home, sit on the couch... and
- 6:52Speaker 1: try to figure out his next move like a normal
- 6:53Speaker 1: college dropout would.
- 6:54Speaker 2: No, he constructs this elaborate, exhausting lie.
- 6:58Speaker 1: It's wild. Every single morning, he wakes up, puts on
- 7:02Speaker 1: his work clothes, packs a lunch, gets into his parents' van,
- 7:05Speaker 1: and drives off to a job that does not exist.
- 7:07Speaker 2: I mean, just think about the psychological mechanics required to
- 7:09Speaker 2: maintain that specific type of deception. It is incredibly taxing.
- 7:14Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely.
- 7:15Speaker 2: Think about the cognitive load. You aren't just telling a single,
- 7:19Speaker 2: isolated lie. You are embodying a total fiction for eight
- 7:23Speaker 2: hours a day.
- 7:24Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not a passive secret at all. It's highly,
- 7:28Speaker 1: highly active.
- 7:29Speaker 2: You see this kind of deception described sometimes as, like,
- 7:32Speaker 2: someone gliding smoothly on the surface of the water while
- 7:35Speaker 2: paddling furiously underneath.
- 7:37Speaker 1: Right, the duck analogy. But I actually think it was
- 7:41Speaker 1: much more violent than that.
- 7:42Speaker 2: How do you mean?
- 7:43Speaker 1: Well, I think it's more like trying to hold a
- 7:45Speaker 1: fully inflated beach ball underwater in a crowded swimming pool.
- 7:49Speaker 2: Oh, wow. Yeah.
- 7:51Speaker 1: Because it requires this constant draining physical and mental tension
- 7:55Speaker 1: to keep it hidden. Every single muscle is engaged in
- 7:58Speaker 1: maintaining that illusion.
- 8:00Speaker 2: And you can't ever let your guard down.
- 8:01Speaker 1: Exactly. Because what do you even do for those eight hours?
- 8:04Speaker 1: He's just sitting in a van in a parking lot
- 8:06Speaker 1: entirely alone with his own mind.
- 8:08Speaker 2: Just reinforcing the fact that his entire outward existence is
- 8:12Speaker 2: a complete fabrication.
- 8:13Speaker 1: Right. And the second his focus slips, that beach ball
- 8:16Speaker 1: is going to violently breach the surface for everyone to see.
- 8:19Speaker 2: That kind of isolation is just the perfect incubator for
- 8:23Speaker 2: dark ideation.
- 8:24Speaker 1: It really is.
- 8:25Speaker 2: Because when someone severs their tether to reality to that degree,
- 8:30Speaker 2: you know, when their primary daily objective is to lie
- 8:33Speaker 2: to the people they love without flinching, they are rehearsing
- 8:36Speaker 2: a kind of sociopathic detachment.
- 8:38Speaker 1: That makes a lot of sense.
- 8:39Speaker 2: Yeah. They are basically proving to themselves that they can
- 8:42Speaker 2: manipulate reality and get away with it on a daily basis.
- 8:46Speaker 1: And that rehearsed detachment... ends up colliding with the absolute
- 8:49Speaker 1: peak of their artistic lives on the weekend of July 15th.
- 8:53Speaker 2: The theater weekend.
- 8:54Speaker 1: Right. So Dan had just landed the lead role in
- 8:57Speaker 1: the local production of Bye Bye Birdie.
- 8:59Speaker 2: And Jessie was in a play, too.
- 9:01Speaker 1: Yeah, Jessie had just finished starring as the Fiddler in
- 9:03Speaker 1: Fiddler on the Roof. She played to a packed, sold-out
- 9:06Speaker 1: house that entire opening weekend.
- 9:08Speaker 2: Such a high point for her.
- 9:10Speaker 1: It was. So following the final curtain call on Sunday night,
- 9:13Speaker 1: Jessie attends a cast party.
- 9:15Speaker 2: Which is pretty standard.
- 9:16Speaker 1: Yeah, very normal. She goes home in the early hours
- 9:19Speaker 1: of Monday morning where she runs into her mother, Joy.
- 9:22Speaker 2: But Jessie is visibly unsettled when she gets home.
- 9:25Speaker 1: Very much so. She confides in her mom that two
- 9:28Speaker 1: older men at the party had been acting really inappropriately.
- 9:30Speaker 2: Just aggressively flirting with her.
- 9:32Speaker 1: Yeah, and one of her friends even noted that one
- 9:35Speaker 1: of these older men had actually pulled Jessie onto his lap.
- 9:38Speaker 2: Ugh, that is so uncomfortable.
- 9:40Speaker 1: It's awful. But Jessie's response to this isn't just, you know, discomfort.
- 9:45Speaker 1: It is this profound analytical disgust.
- 9:47Speaker 2: Because she was so smart.
- 9:49Speaker 1: Exactly. And we know exactly what was going through her
- 9:52Speaker 1: mind that night because she immediately went to her diary.
- 9:54Speaker 2: And what she wrote is incredibly revealing.
- 9:57Speaker 1: It really is. She wrote, I think I'm being corrupted.
- 10:00Speaker 1: I think certain men are taking what should be platonic
- 10:03Speaker 1: love and perverting it into a competition.
- 10:06Speaker 2: The emotional intelligence in that single sentence is just staggering.
- 10:09Speaker 1: It's beyond her years. Truly.
- 10:11Speaker 2: She isn't just complaining about a creepy encounter at a party.
- 10:15Speaker 2: She is diagnosing the toxic psychology of the men involved.
- 10:18Speaker 1: Right.
- 10:19Speaker 2: She recognizes that they are weaponizing a safe space, you know,
- 10:22Speaker 2: the theater community, platonic love, and turning it into an
- 10:26Speaker 2: arena for their own dominance.
- 10:28Speaker 1: But the thing I love about Jessie is that she
- 10:30Speaker 1: refuses to just be a passive observer of her own victimization.
- 10:34Speaker 2: She fights back in her own way.
- 10:35Speaker 1: She does. She follows that brilliant analysis with a declaration.
- 10:39Speaker 1: She writes in the diary, I am not helpless. I
- 10:42Speaker 1: will recognize problems and confront them without fear. God be
- 10:46Speaker 1: with me.
- 10:47Speaker 2: Wow.
- 10:48Speaker 1: Yeah. She writes those words, closes the diary, and goes
- 10:51Speaker 1: to sleep.
- 10:52Speaker 2: And that brings us to the morning. Fast forward just
- 10:55Speaker 2: a few hours to 8 a.m. on Monday.
- 10:57Speaker 1: Right.
- 10:58Speaker 2: Jesse's mom, Joy, pops into Jesse's bedroom to drop off
- 11:01Speaker 2: some laundry before heading to work.
- 11:03Speaker 1: And Jesse's dad, Buck, had already left for the day, right?
- 11:06Speaker 2: Exactly. So Joy sees Jesse asleep in bed. Everything looks
- 11:10Speaker 2: completely peaceful, entirely undisturbed. So Joy leaves for the office.
- 11:15Speaker 1: But then Joy comes back home for her lunch break
- 11:17Speaker 1: around noon. And the house is completely quiet.
- 11:21Speaker 2: Which, I mean, if you are the parent of a
- 11:22Speaker 2: teenager on summer break, a quiet house at noon isn't
- 11:25Speaker 2: necessarily a huge red flag.
- 11:27Speaker 1: No, you just assume they are sleeping in after a
- 11:29Speaker 1: late gas party. Right. So Joy walks into the bedroom
- 11:31Speaker 1: to wake her up, probably feeling a bit frustrated that
- 11:34Speaker 1: Jesse is still in bed at noon. Joy reaches out
- 11:38Speaker 1: and touches her daughter.
- 11:39Speaker 2: And Jesse is cold to the touch.
- 11:41Speaker 1: Yeah. The 911 call from this exact moment is one
- 11:46Speaker 1: of the most harrowing things you can ever listen to.
- 11:48Speaker 2: I can't even imagine.
- 11:49Speaker 1: It's brutal because you are hearing a human brain violently
- 11:53Speaker 1: rejecting reality in real time.
- 11:55Speaker 2: Joy is just in a state of absolute cognitive dissonance.
- 11:59Speaker 1: She is. She's frantically telling the dispatcher, my daughter is blue.
- 12:03Speaker 1: She's cold, she's cold, she's cold.
- 12:05Speaker 2: And the dispatcher, you know, they're just following protocol, so
- 12:07Speaker 2: they ask if she knows CPR.
- 12:09Speaker 1: Right. But you can hear the realization crushing this mother.
- 12:12Speaker 1: It is far, far too late for CPR.
- 12:15Speaker 2: And the scene becomes even more horrific when Joy actually
- 12:18Speaker 2: rolls Jesse over.
- 12:20Speaker 1: Yeah. She notices that Jesse's pants are wet. And then
- 12:24Speaker 1: she sees the unmistakable deep ligature marks around her daughter's neck.
- 12:28Speaker 2: So she had been strangled.
- 12:30Speaker 1: Yes.
- 12:30Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 12:30Speaker 1: The police are dispatched immediately, of course. Detective Richard Thickens
- 12:34Speaker 1: from the Hartford Police Department arrives and begins assessing the room.
- 12:37Speaker 2: And he immediately notes those ligature marks on the neck.
- 12:40Speaker 1: He does.
- 12:41Speaker 2: Yes.
- 12:41Speaker 1: But he also spots something else. Faint binding marks on
- 12:46Speaker 1: Jesse's wrists. She had been tied up.
- 12:49Speaker 2: Yet the most critical piece of evidence at this initial
- 12:52Speaker 2: stage is actually a negative one.
- 12:54Speaker 1: What do you mean?
- 12:54Speaker 2: Well, it's the total absence of forced entry into the home.
- 12:57Speaker 1: Ah, right. Meaning the doors weren't kicked in.
- 13:00Speaker 2: Exactly. The windows weren't smashed. The killer didn't pry their
- 13:04Speaker 2: way into this house.
- 13:05Speaker 1: Which eliminates the whole random home invasion gone wrong theory
- 13:09Speaker 1: almost entirely.
- 13:11Speaker 2: It does. It points the investigation towards someone who either
- 13:14Speaker 2: had a key, was let in by Jessie herself, or
- 13:18Speaker 2: knew the family schedule so intimately that they knew exactly
- 13:21Speaker 2: when the house would be vulnerable. Right.
- 13:23Speaker 1: Because they knew Buck left early for work.
- 13:25Speaker 2: They knew Joy would be at the office.
- 13:27Speaker 1: And they knew Jessie would be alone, asleep, and probably
- 13:30Speaker 1: exhausted from the cast party the night before.
- 13:33Speaker 2: But the detail that elevates this from a tragic murder
- 13:36Speaker 2: to something deeply psychologically disturbing... is what the killer did
- 13:40Speaker 2: after the murder.
- 13:40Speaker 1: Yeah, this part is chilling. They didn't just flee.
- 13:43Speaker 2: No, they stayed. Detective Thickens observes that Jesse's hair and
- 13:48Speaker 2: clothing are actually damp.
- 13:50Speaker 1: Which means what?
- 13:51Speaker 2: The evidence indicates the killer actually took the time to
- 13:54Speaker 2: wash her body, dress her, place her back into her bed,
- 13:57Speaker 2: and pull the covers up over her.
- 13:59Speaker 1: They recreated the scene.
- 14:00Speaker 2: Exactly. They recreated the exact peaceful scene her mother had witnessed.
- 14:05Speaker 1: At 8 a.m., Let's pause and really unpack the mechanics
- 14:08Speaker 1: of that decision.
- 14:09Speaker 2: Yeah, it's important.
- 14:10Speaker 1: Because from a behavioral analysis standpoint, why on earth would
- 14:13Speaker 1: you take that risk? You have just committed a loud, violent,
- 14:17Speaker 1: messy crime.
- 14:18Speaker 2: Your adrenaline has to be pumping.
- 14:20Speaker 1: Exactly. The natural human instinct, even for a hardened criminal,
- 14:25Speaker 1: is self-preservation, which means running away as fast as possible.
- 14:29Speaker 1: To stay, to draw a bath or use a shower,
- 14:32Speaker 1: to handle the body, dress it, and carefully tuck it in.
- 14:35Speaker 1: That requires a terrifying amount of time and comfort in
- 14:38Speaker 1: a crime scene.
- 14:38Speaker 2: It speaks volumes about the offender's state of mind. You
- 14:41Speaker 2: are absolutely right about the instinct for flight.
- 14:44Speaker 1: It's primal.
- 14:44Speaker 2: Right. A burglar who gets surprised and strikes out in
- 14:48Speaker 2: a panic, they just drop the weapon and sprint out
- 14:50Speaker 2: the back door. Yeah. Staging a body in this manner...
- 14:53Speaker 2: you know, washing and tucking it in is often a
- 14:55Speaker 2: signature of a highly organized offender who is acting out
- 14:59Speaker 2: a specific premeditated fantasy.
- 15:02Speaker 1: So it wasn't a panic move?
- 15:03Speaker 2: Not at all. The washing act can actually serve a
- 15:06Speaker 2: dual purpose. Yes, it can be a forensic countermeasure, like
- 15:10Speaker 2: a crude attempt to wash away DNA or trace evidence.
- 15:13Speaker 1: Sure, that makes sense.
- 15:14Speaker 2: But placing the victim back in bed, covering them up,
- 15:17Speaker 2: that is an act of what profilers call Undoing.
- 15:21Speaker 1: Undoing, like they try and pretend it just didn't happen.
- 15:23Speaker 2: Yes, exactly. Now, it can stem from remorse in some
- 15:26Speaker 2: cases where the killer just can't stand to look at
- 15:29Speaker 2: the violence they've wrought.
- 15:30Speaker 1: But in this case?
- 15:31Speaker 2: In organized predatory killers, it is almost always about total
- 15:35Speaker 2: psychological control.
- 15:36Speaker 1: They want to control the aftermath.
- 15:37Speaker 2: Yes. They want to leave the scene exactly as they
- 15:41Speaker 2: envision it in their minds. They are treating the victim
- 15:44Speaker 2: not as a human being, but as a prop in
- 15:46Speaker 2: their own personal theater.
- 15:48Speaker 1: That is sickening.
- 15:48Speaker 2: It is. They want the final image to reflect their
- 15:52Speaker 2: absolute dominance over the entire situation.
- 15:54Speaker 1: So Hartford PD knows immediately that they're dealing with an organized, comfortable,
- 16:00Speaker 1: highly dangerous predator. Right. And right there, sitting in the bedroom,
- 16:04Speaker 1: they find the diary.
- 16:05Speaker 2: The one Jesse wrote in just hours earlier.
- 16:07Speaker 1: Yes. They open it up and they read an entry
- 16:10Speaker 1: detailing aggressive, inappropriate behavior by specific older men at a party.
- 16:16Speaker 2: I mean, it is the brightest, loudest red flag imaginable
- 16:19Speaker 2: in a homicide investigation.
- 16:20Speaker 1: It really is. Now, I want to explore how the
- 16:22Speaker 1: police handle this, because the temptation for tunnel vision here
- 16:25Speaker 1: must be absolutely astronomical. Oh, definitely. If you watch any
- 16:29Speaker 1: procedural drama on TV, a victim documenting a confrontation with
- 16:33Speaker 1: a creepy guy hours before her death is the ultimate
- 16:37Speaker 1: smoking gun.
- 16:38Speaker 2: The episode would be over right there.
- 16:39Speaker 1: Exactly. The police go arrest the guy. And to compound
- 16:43Speaker 1: the suspicion in this real-life case... The primary man mentioned
- 16:46Speaker 1: in the diary didn't even show up for work that
- 16:49Speaker 1: Monday morning.
- 16:49Speaker 2: Wow. That looks incredibly suspicious.
- 16:53Speaker 1: He is a total ghost on the exact morning she
- 16:56Speaker 1: is killed. So how does a detective look at that
- 16:59Speaker 1: and not immediately decide they had their killer?
- 17:01Speaker 2: It requires immense investigative discipline. I mean, confirmation bias is
- 17:05Speaker 2: the deadliest enemy of a detective.
- 17:07Speaker 1: Because you want the pieces to fit.
- 17:09Speaker 2: Exactly. When you have a piece of evidence that perfectly
- 17:12Speaker 2: fits a narrative you're building... Your brain naturally wants to
- 17:15Speaker 2: ignore anything that contradicts it.
- 17:17Speaker 1: Right.
- 17:18Speaker 2: The Hartford police absolutely focus on this older man at first.
- 17:21Speaker 2: They bring him in for questioning. But the mechanics of
- 17:25Speaker 2: clearing a suspect are just as rigorous as the mechanics
- 17:28Speaker 2: of building a case against one.
- 17:30Speaker 1: So what does that clearing process actually look like in practice?
- 17:33Speaker 2: Well, it starts with the suspect's demeanor. This older man,
- 17:36Speaker 2: he doesn't lawyer up. He doesn't deflect. He fully on
- 17:39Speaker 2: 100 percent cooperates.
- 17:41Speaker 1: Which is a good sign. It is.
- 17:43Speaker 2: And the police don't just ask him where he was
- 17:45Speaker 2: and take his word for it. They demand verifiable corroborating proof.
- 17:50Speaker 1: Right. They need facts.
- 17:51Speaker 2: They check his phone records for cell tower pings to
- 17:54Speaker 2: establish his physical location. They interview the people he claims
- 17:57Speaker 2: to have been with.
- 17:58Speaker 1: And they keep them separated, right?
- 17:59Speaker 2: Yes. Keeping them separated so they can't coordinate their stories.
- 18:03Speaker 2: They check receipt timestamps. Surveillance cameras on the routes he
- 18:07Speaker 2: claimed to travel.
- 18:08Speaker 1: Every single detail.
- 18:09Speaker 2: Every single alibi point is heavily stress tested.
- 18:13Speaker 1: And he actually passes the stress test.
- 18:15Speaker 2: He does.
- 18:15Speaker 1: He skipped work, which looked terrible on paper, but his
- 18:19Speaker 1: alibi for the actual window of the murder is completely airtight.
- 18:22Speaker 2: The police verify his whereabouts and they clear him.
- 18:26Speaker 1: They clear the second man mentioned in the diary as well.
- 18:28Speaker 2: Which is really a testament to the Hartford PD's restraint.
- 18:32Speaker 2: They didn't try to force a puzzle piece into the
- 18:34Speaker 2: wrong spot just to close a high-profile case quickly? No.
- 18:38Speaker 1: They did the real work. But that restraint comes with
- 18:41Speaker 1: a heavy cost.
- 18:42Speaker 2: Because now they have nothing.
- 18:43Speaker 1: Exactly. It leaves them at a total, agonizing dead end.
- 18:47Speaker 1: They have a staged, horrific crime scene. They know the
- 18:51Speaker 1: killer likely had intimate knowledge of Jesse's routine.
- 18:54Speaker 2: But their only tangible leads have just evaporated.
- 18:57Speaker 1: They are completely stalled. But what Hartford PD doesn't realize
- 19:00Speaker 1: at this exact moment is that the killer had actually
- 19:04Speaker 1: made a massive, sloppy mistake just three days prior.
- 19:08Speaker 2: Not in Hartford, though.
- 19:09Speaker 1: Right, not in Hartford, but 12 miles away in the
- 19:12Speaker 1: neighboring town of Richfield.
- 19:14Speaker 2: This is where the scope of the investigation fractures and
- 19:17Speaker 2: widens significantly.
- 19:19Speaker 1: Let's look at July 12th, which is three days before
- 19:21Speaker 1: Jesse's final curtain call in the play. Okay. A young
- 19:24Speaker 1: woman named Melissa Etzler is out walking her dog in
- 19:28Speaker 1: a local Richfield park. It's just a beautiful, normal morning.
- 19:32Speaker 2: Nothing seems out of place.
- 19:33Speaker 1: No. She is wrapping up her walk, heading back toward
- 19:36Speaker 1: the parking lot, when she hears heavy footsteps accelerating behind her.
- 19:39Speaker 2: But she doesn't assume she's being hunted, right?
- 19:42Speaker 1: No, because our brains just aren't wired to anticipate random
- 19:45Speaker 1: lethal violence on a sunny morning in a public park. Right.
- 19:48Speaker 2: You think it's a jogger.
- 19:50Speaker 1: Exactly. She turns around completely relaxed and actually laughs. She says, oh,
- 19:55Speaker 1: you scared me. Assuming it's just a friendly guy running past.
- 19:58Speaker 2: But then she turns back around.
- 19:59Speaker 1: She turns back around and the reality of the situation
- 20:02Speaker 1: just violently snaps into focus. The man isn't a jogger.
- 20:05Speaker 2: He's armed.
- 20:06Speaker 1: He is holding a fish fillet knife in his right hand. Yeah.
- 20:10Speaker 1: And he lunges, tackling Melissa from behind.
- 20:12Speaker 2: Oh, my God.
- 20:13Speaker 1: She hits the ground, stomach down, with this armed man
- 20:17Speaker 1: on top of her. But Melissa does not freeze.
- 20:20Speaker 2: She fights back.
- 20:22Speaker 1: She does not succumb to panic. Yes. She engages in
- 20:25Speaker 1: an absolute fight for her life. She is wrestling this man,
- 20:29Speaker 1: reaching back, grabbing the blade of the Foley knife with
- 20:31Speaker 1: her bare hands.
- 20:32Speaker 2: She grabs the blade.
- 20:33Speaker 1: Yes, slicing her own fingers open in the process. But
- 20:36Speaker 1: she actually manages to wrench the weapon out of his grip.
- 20:40Speaker 2: She disarms him.
- 20:41Speaker 1: She does.
- 20:41Speaker 2: And this is the moment where the interaction shifts from
- 20:44Speaker 2: a brutal physical assault to a deeply bizarre, chilling psychological exchange.
- 20:49Speaker 1: Yeah, this part is so strange.
- 20:51Speaker 2: The attacker, realizing the knife has been taken from him,
- 20:53Speaker 2: doesn't panic. He just looks down at Melissa and says, nice.
- 20:57Speaker 1: Nice. Like she just sank a difficult putt on a
- 21:00Speaker 1: golf course or something.
- 21:01Speaker 2: It's so casual.
- 21:02Speaker 1: Who reacts to a life or death struggle by complementing
- 21:05Speaker 1: the victim's defensive technique?
- 21:08Speaker 2: Someone who is completely, entirely detached from the gravity of
- 21:12Speaker 2: their own violence.
- 21:14Speaker 1: Yeah, that makes sense.
- 21:14Speaker 2: He isn't viewing this as a human being fighting for survival.
- 21:19Speaker 2: He is viewing it as a simulation, like a game
- 21:22Speaker 2: where he is just keeping score.
- 21:24Speaker 1: He is emotionally insulated from it.
- 21:25Speaker 2: Exactly. He's insulated from the reality of the terror he
- 21:29Speaker 2: is causing.
- 21:30Speaker 1: But the simulation is breaking down for him. He tries
- 21:33Speaker 1: to wrestle the knife back. But Melissa is holding on tight.
- 21:36Speaker 1: She tells him, No, you're going to go. I'm taking
- 21:39Speaker 1: this with me.
- 21:39Speaker 2: Good for her.
- 21:40Speaker 1: And then the attacker says something even more absurd than nice.
- 21:45Speaker 1: He literally asks her, can I just go?
- 21:47Speaker 2: He is asking for permission to flee the crime scene
- 21:50Speaker 2: he created. It's wild.
- 21:52Speaker 1: It really is. And Melissa, who possesses just an incredible
- 21:56Speaker 1: presence of mind, despite bleeding and being pinned to the dirt,
- 21:59Speaker 1: points out the ridiculousness of the question.
- 22:01Speaker 2: What does she say?
- 22:02Speaker 1: She says, well, you're the one on top of me.
- 22:04Speaker 1: What are you doing exactly?
- 22:05Speaker 2: The power dynamic has entirely inverted at this point. He
- 22:08Speaker 2: realizes his script has failed. He cannot regain control of
- 22:12Speaker 2: the weapon, so he simply gets off of her and
- 22:14Speaker 2: runs away.
- 22:15Speaker 1: Melissa goes straight to the hospital to have the lacerations
- 22:18Speaker 1: on her hands treated. And this is where Washington County
- 22:20Speaker 1: Detective Joel Clausing enters the narrative.
- 22:23Speaker 2: He comes to the hospital.
- 22:24Speaker 1: Yeah, he arrives to interview her while the adrenaline is
- 22:27Speaker 1: still coursing through her system. And he quickly realizes he
- 22:31Speaker 1: isn't just dealing with a brave survivor. He is dealing
- 22:33Speaker 1: with a once-in-a-career star witness.
- 22:35Speaker 2: And to understand why Melissa's testimony was so extraordinary, we
- 22:39Speaker 2: have to look at the neurological phenomenon of what we
- 22:41Speaker 2: call weapon focus.
- 22:43Speaker 1: Weapon focus. What is that?
- 22:44Speaker 2: Well, in highly traumatic, life-threatening situations, the human brain is
- 22:48Speaker 2: hijacked by the amygdala, which is our threat processing center.
- 22:52Speaker 1: Okay.
- 22:52Speaker 2: The brain literally narrows its processing power to focus entirely
- 22:56Speaker 2: on the source of the danger, the gun, the knife,
- 22:59Speaker 2: whatever it is.
- 23:00Speaker 1: Because it wants you to survive.
- 23:01Speaker 2: Exactly. So it sacrifices peripheral details like the attacker's facial features,
- 23:06Speaker 2: eye color, or clothing pattern in order to survive the
- 23:08Speaker 2: immediate threat.
- 23:10Speaker 1: That makes biological sense.
- 23:11Speaker 2: It does. Most victims of armed assault struggle to provide
- 23:14Speaker 2: anything more than a vague description of the perpetrator.
- 23:17Speaker 1: But Melissa somehow completely bypassed that neurological hijack.
- 23:21Speaker 2: She did.
- 23:22Speaker 1: She gives Detective Clausing a description that is surgical in
- 23:25Speaker 1: its precision. She tells him the attacker is a white male,
- 23:29Speaker 1: 18 to 20 years old, 6 foot 2, roughly 210 pounds,
- 23:34Speaker 1: with light blonde hair, very fair skin, and wearing checkered
- 23:37Speaker 1: or plaid shorts.
- 23:39Speaker 2: That is an unbelievable level of detail.
- 23:41Speaker 1: And she doesn't even stop at physical attributes. She mentally
- 23:45Speaker 1: mapped the environment during the attack.
- 23:47Speaker 2: While fighting for her life. Yes.
- 23:49Speaker 1: She tells Clausing exactly where the attacker was parked in
- 23:51Speaker 1: the lot, and describes the vehicle perfectly. An older model,
- 23:56Speaker 1: dark blue Dodge Caravan.
- 23:58Speaker 2: Wow. Clausing later said she was the absolute best witness
- 24:01Speaker 2: he had encountered in his entire career in law enforcement.
- 24:04Speaker 1: I can see why.
- 24:05Speaker 2: And beyond the description, what Detective Clausing is looking at
- 24:07Speaker 2: here is a classic dry run.
- 24:10Speaker 1: Walk us through what a dry run actually entails in
- 24:13Speaker 1: criminal profiling, because we hear that term a lot. Right.
- 24:16Speaker 2: A dry run is a major escalation point. When an
- 24:20Speaker 2: offender is moving from dark fantasies into reality, they rarely
- 24:24Speaker 2: start with a flawless, complex murder.
- 24:27Speaker 1: They have to practice.
- 24:28Speaker 2: Exactly. They test their boundaries. They test their methodology. This
- 24:31Speaker 2: attacker chose a specific secluded environment. He brought a specific weapon.
- 24:36Speaker 1: The Philadelphia. Yes. Yeah.
- 24:39Speaker 2: He practiced his approach, which was attacking from behind, to
- 24:42Speaker 2: rely on the element of surprise.
- 24:44Speaker 1: But it didn't work.
- 24:45Speaker 2: Because it was a dry run, he lacked the operational
- 24:48Speaker 2: experience to adapt when things went wrong. When Melissa fought back,
- 24:52Speaker 2: his fantasy script shattered and he aborted.
- 24:54Speaker 1: But that's incredibly dangerous for the future.
- 24:57Speaker 2: Very. The chilling takeaway for law enforcement is that an
- 25:00Speaker 2: offender who attempts a dry run is almost guaranteed to
- 25:03Speaker 2: strike again.
- 25:04Speaker 1: Right, because they learn from their mistakes.
- 25:05Speaker 2: They will learn from their failure, they will refine their approach,
- 25:08Speaker 2: and the next time, they will not let the victim
- 25:11Speaker 2: gain the upper hand.
- 25:12Speaker 1: Which makes that Dodge Caravan description an absolute ticking clock.
- 25:16Speaker 2: They have to find him fast.
- 25:17Speaker 1: The Richfield police blast this composite sketch and the Eagle
- 25:21Speaker 1: description out to the media and to all surrounding law
- 25:25Speaker 1: enforcement agencies, just praying for a hit.
- 25:28Speaker 2: And they get one, thanks to some incredible police work.
- 25:31Speaker 1: They really do, through an amazing display of memory. By
- 25:34Speaker 1: a local deputy named Muir.
- 25:36Speaker 2: Deputy Muir sees the bulletin and he recalls a highly
- 25:39Speaker 2: specific memory from months prior.
- 25:41Speaker 1: Just from routine patrol.
- 25:42Speaker 2: Yeah. He remembers being on patrol, driving through that exact
- 25:46Speaker 2: same park and spotting a dark blue minivan parked in
- 25:50Speaker 2: the exact spot Melissa described.
- 25:52Speaker 1: Wow.
- 25:53Speaker 2: He had found it slightly suspicious at the time, so
- 25:55Speaker 2: he had actually run the license plate.
- 25:57Speaker 1: The mechanics of retrieving that information are just old school,
- 26:00Speaker 1: gritty police work. He doesn't just punch a name into
- 26:04Speaker 1: a magical computer database.
- 26:05Speaker 2: He has to dig for it.
- 26:07Speaker 1: He physically digs back through his own patrol logs, sifting
- 26:10Speaker 1: through hundreds of plates he had run over the past
- 26:12Speaker 1: few months, cross-referencing dates and vehicle types.
- 26:15Speaker 2: That takes dedication.
- 26:16Speaker 1: It does. And he finds the match. He hands Detective
- 26:19Speaker 1: Clausing the license plate of the dark blue Dodge Caravan.
- 26:22Speaker 2: So Clausing runs the plate through the DMV database. But initially,
- 26:27Speaker 2: it feels like a dead end.
- 26:28Speaker 1: Why?
- 26:29Speaker 2: Because the vehicle isn't registered to a towering, blonde, 20-year-old kid.
- 26:34Speaker 2: It has registered to a middle-aged married couple.
- 26:36Speaker 1: But Clausing knows young men often drive their parents' cars.
- 26:40Speaker 2: Exactly.
- 26:40Speaker 1: So they do the legwork, they contact the couple, and
- 26:43Speaker 1: the puzzle pieces just violently snap together.
- 26:46Speaker 2: They finally find him.
- 26:47Speaker 1: The couple confirms they have a 20-year-old son who drives
- 26:49Speaker 1: that van. He is roughly 6'1, 200 pounds, fair skin,
- 26:54Speaker 1: blonde hair. His name is Dan Bartelt.
- 26:57Speaker 2: The golden boy.
- 26:57Speaker 1: The actor who has been faking his daily commute.
- 27:00Speaker 2: It all connects.
- 27:01Speaker 1: It does. So the parents give Detective Clausing Dan's cell
- 27:04Speaker 1: phone number. And as Clausing is driving away from the
- 27:07Speaker 1: parents' house, he decides to dial the number right then
- 27:10Speaker 1: and there.
- 27:10Speaker 2: Now, to grasp the sheer psychopathic audacity of what happens next,
- 27:15Speaker 2: we really have to put ourselves in the room where
- 27:17Speaker 2: Dana's phone begins to ring.
- 27:18Speaker 1: Right. This is unfolding shortly after Jesse's murder. Her family
- 27:23Speaker 1: has organized a vigil.
- 27:24Speaker 2: Picture the Blafahet family living room. It is packed with mourners.
- 27:28Speaker 1: You have Justy's parents, Buck and Joy, absolutely shattered by grief.
- 27:33Speaker 2: You have her theater friends, her classmates.
- 27:35Speaker 1: They are sitting in a circle, crying, holding on to
- 27:39Speaker 1: each other, sharing these beautiful, heartbreaking memories of this 19-year-old
- 27:44Speaker 1: girl whose future was just erased.
- 27:46Speaker 2: And sitting right in the middle of this circle of grief,
- 27:48Speaker 2: actively consoling the parents... is Dan Bartelt.
- 27:52Speaker 1: It makes you sick to your stomach.
- 27:53Speaker 2: He is physically absorbing the devastation he caused. He is
- 27:57Speaker 2: performing empathy on a microscopic level.
- 28:00Speaker 1: It's an acting job.
- 28:01Speaker 2: It is a terrifying display of his ability to detach
- 28:04Speaker 2: his actions from his emotions.
- 28:06Speaker 1: So Dan phone rings. He sees it's a number he
- 28:09Speaker 1: doesn't recognize. He answers. It's Detective Clausing identifying himself as
- 28:14Speaker 1: law enforcement, saying they need to speak with him down
- 28:17Speaker 1: at the station.
- 28:18Speaker 2: Now, Monitor Dan's reaction here. Because he doesn't start sweating.
- 28:22Speaker 2: He doesn't stammer. No. He doesn't frantically excuse himself to
- 28:25Speaker 2: take the call in private.
- 28:26Speaker 1: She just casually says into the phone, oh, okay, I'll
- 28:28Speaker 1: be right over there.
- 28:29Speaker 2: Just like that.
- 28:30Speaker 1: Just like that. He hangs up, turns to the grieving
- 28:33Speaker 1: parents of the girl he just slaughtered, and calmly explains
- 28:37Speaker 1: that he has to go down to the police station
- 28:38Speaker 1: for a bit.
- 28:39Speaker 2: But Detective Clausing, sitting in his car, immediately recognizes a
- 28:43Speaker 2: glaring anomaly in that phone call.
- 28:46Speaker 1: What did he notice?
- 28:47Speaker 2: He turns to his partner, Detective Walsh, and points out
- 28:50Speaker 2: a massive red flag. Dan never asked what the phone
- 28:53Speaker 2: call was about.
- 28:54Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Yeah. If a homicide detective calls you out
- 28:57Speaker 1: of nowhere and says, come to the station, we need
- 28:59Speaker 1: to talk, your blood pressure spikes.
- 29:02Speaker 2: Right.
- 29:02Speaker 1: Your immediate involuntary response is, am I in trouble? Did
- 29:06Speaker 1: something happen to my family? What is this regarding?
- 29:09Speaker 2: Exactly. An innocent person demands context because unexpected police intervention
- 29:14Speaker 2: is inherently threatening.
- 29:16Speaker 1: But a guilty person already knows the context. Yes.
- 29:19Speaker 2: Their entire cognitive focus is devoted to not appearing canicked.
- 29:23Speaker 2: Dan thought he was playing the role of the helpful,
- 29:25Speaker 2: unbothered citizen perfectly.
- 29:27Speaker 1: But he overplayed it.
- 29:28Speaker 2: He didn't realize that his lack of curiosity was the
- 29:30Speaker 2: loudest admission of guilt.
- 29:32Speaker 1: So Dan leaves the vigil, leaving Jesse's weeping parents behind,
- 29:37Speaker 1: and drives to the police station, fully believing... he is
- 29:40Speaker 1: going to out-act these detectives.
- 29:42Speaker 2: But he is walking right into a trap.
- 29:44Speaker 1: Because he doesn't realize the detectives are operating on a
- 29:47Speaker 1: completely separate track.
- 29:48Speaker 2: Right. And this brings us to the interrogation room, which
- 29:51Speaker 2: just serves as a master class in psychological leverage.
- 29:54Speaker 1: It really is.
- 29:55Speaker 2: Dan sits down with Detective Clausing and Detective Walsh. And
- 29:59Speaker 2: the detectives are playing their cards incredibly close.
- 30:02Speaker 1: To the vest. They don't show their hand.
- 30:04Speaker 2: Not at all. They are only there to question him
- 30:06Speaker 2: about the park assault on Melissa. They have not mentioned
- 30:09Speaker 2: Jesse Blahat at all.
- 30:10Speaker 1: They don't even know officially that Dan is connected to
- 30:13Speaker 1: her murder yet.
- 30:14Speaker 2: Exactly. Clausing starts with standard rapport building. He keeps his
- 30:18Speaker 2: tone conversational, unthreatening. He asks Dan casually where he was
- 30:23Speaker 2: when they called him on a cell phone.
- 30:25Speaker 1: And Dan answers truthfully about his location. But he spins
- 30:29Speaker 1: it to show his proximity to the tragedy.
- 30:31Speaker 2: To play the sympathetic friend.
- 30:33Speaker 1: Right. He says, I was at a house in Hartford.
- 30:35Speaker 2: Right.
- 30:36Speaker 1: The girl that just passed. Yeah, we were visiting her.
- 30:38Speaker 2: And Clausing leans into this perfectly. He acts like a
- 30:41Speaker 2: curious local just gossiping about a town tragedy.
- 30:44Speaker 1: He plays along.
- 30:45Speaker 2: Yeah. He says, oh man, that's terrible. Whatever happened with her?
- 30:48Speaker 1: And right there, less than two minutes into the interview,
- 30:52Speaker 1: Dan Bartelt makes a fatal, unforced error.
- 30:55Speaker 2: He completely slips up.
- 30:57Speaker 1: He looks at the detectives playing the role of the
- 30:59Speaker 1: sympathetic friend and says, I think she was raped and murdered.
- 31:04Speaker 2: That single sentence irrevocably changed the trajectory of both of
- 31:08Speaker 2: these investigations.
- 31:09Speaker 1: Wait, let's look at the timeline of evidence here. If
- 31:11Speaker 1: he says raped and murdered. Hmm. He just put himself
- 31:15Speaker 1: in that bedroom.
- 31:16Speaker 2: He did.
- 31:16Speaker 1: He just confessed without realizing it.
- 31:18Speaker 2: Precisely. At that exact moment in time, the Hartford police
- 31:21Speaker 2: had absolutely zero indication of a sexual assault.
- 31:24Speaker 1: The public didn't know.
- 31:26Speaker 2: Nobody knew. The preliminary crime scene analysis only showed ligature
- 31:29Speaker 2: marks and faint binding on the wrists. The medical examiner
- 31:33Speaker 2: had not completed the autopsy yet.
- 31:35Speaker 1: So it wasn't public knowledge at all.
- 31:36Speaker 2: The concept of sexual assault wasn't even police knowledge. There
- 31:40Speaker 2: was only one human being on the planet who knew
- 31:43Speaker 2: that Jesse Blahat had been sexually assaulted before she was strangled.
- 31:47Speaker 1: The man who did it.
- 31:48Speaker 2: Exactly.
- 31:48Speaker 1: The M thought he was tossing out a sympathetic theory,
- 31:51Speaker 1: maybe trying to fan the flames of the creepy older
- 31:53Speaker 1: men at the party, rumor to deflect suspicion off himself.
- 31:58Speaker 2: But instead, he handed the detectives the murder weapon on
- 32:01Speaker 2: a silver platter.
- 32:02Speaker 1: But the brilliance of Clausing and Walsh is that they
- 32:05Speaker 1: don't react.
- 32:05Speaker 2: You don't flinch.
- 32:06Speaker 1: They don't slam their hands on the table and yell, gotcha.
- 32:09Speaker 1: They just let the comment evaporate into the air, and
- 32:12Speaker 1: they calmly pivot back to the reason they brought him in.
- 32:16Speaker 1: The Richfield Park assault.
- 32:17Speaker 2: And as they are talking, Clausing hones in on Dan's hands.
- 32:21Speaker 1: What does he see?
- 32:22Speaker 2: He notices a fresh puncture wound on Dan's thumb, a
- 32:26Speaker 2: cut that perfectly aligns with Melissa's account of a man
- 32:29Speaker 2: wrestling for a fish fillet knife and having it ripped
- 32:32Speaker 2: from his grip.
- 32:32Speaker 1: And Clausing asks him about the cut. Right.
- 32:35Speaker 2: And this is where the beach ball slips out from
- 32:37Speaker 2: under the water.
- 32:38Speaker 1: The facade crumbles.
- 32:39Speaker 2: The intricate web of lies Dan has been living starts
- 32:42Speaker 2: to collapse in real time. Dan first claims he cut
- 32:45Speaker 2: his thumb on a stray screw while at work.
- 32:48Speaker 1: But the detectives, they've already done their homework.
- 32:50Speaker 2: They know he dropped out of college. They know he
- 32:52Speaker 2: doesn't have a job.
- 32:54Speaker 1: So Clausing calls his bluff very calmly. He asks, if
- 32:58Speaker 1: we call your employer right now, are they going to
- 33:00Speaker 1: confirm that you were at work and cut your hand
- 33:03Speaker 1: on a screw?
- 33:04Speaker 2: Dan's brain just misfires. He realizes the lie is verifiable
- 33:08Speaker 2: and false, so he immediately pivots to a new one.
- 33:11Speaker 1: What does he say?
- 33:12Speaker 2: He stammers and says, oh, actually, I was cooking at
- 33:15Speaker 2: home and I slipped and cut my finger on a knife.
- 33:18Speaker 1: And clausing seizes the opening. He uses a classic interrogation technique.
- 33:23Speaker 1: He doesn't yell. He actually lowers his voice.
- 33:25Speaker 2: He leans in.
- 33:26Speaker 1: He leans in and says, let's talk. He points out
- 33:28Speaker 1: the absurdity of the pivot. He tells Dan that nobody
- 33:31Speaker 1: in their right mind lies to the police about cutting
- 33:35Speaker 1: themselves on a kitchen knife if it was truly an
- 33:37Speaker 1: innocent accident.
- 33:38Speaker 2: He corners him with his own deception.
- 33:40Speaker 1: And Dan breaks. He puts his head down, he starts
- 33:42Speaker 1: making the sounds of crying, and he confesses to attacking
- 33:45Speaker 1: Melissa in the park.
- 33:46Speaker 2: But we really have to analyze the specific motive he
- 33:49Speaker 2: offers for this attack because it is deeply revealing of
- 33:51Speaker 2: his pathology.
- 33:52Speaker 1: Right, because he doesn't say he did it for money
- 33:54Speaker 1: or because he was angry.
- 33:55Speaker 2: No, he offers this bizarre, pseudo-philosophical justification.
- 34:00Speaker 1: What did he say?
- 34:01Speaker 2: He tells the detectives that ever since he dropped out
- 34:03Speaker 2: of college, he felt frightened of life. He felt this
- 34:06Speaker 2: deep existential dread. And he says, I just wanted someone
- 34:10Speaker 2: else to feel the same. I scared someone.
- 34:12Speaker 1: It is entirely theatrical. It is.
- 34:14Speaker 2: This is a common tactic in the Reed technique of interrogation,
- 34:17Speaker 2: offering the suspect a socially acceptable or sympathetic excuse for
- 34:21Speaker 2: their crime to lower the barrier to a confession.
- 34:24Speaker 1: So Dan is trying to manipulate him, even while confessing. Yes.
- 34:28Speaker 2: Dan thinks he is generating this narrative himself.
- 34:30Speaker 1: Hmm.
- 34:31Speaker 2: He is attempting to control the damage. He is confessing
- 34:34Speaker 2: to a lesser crime aggravated assault using an excuse of
- 34:37Speaker 2: existential angst, hoping the police will view him as a
- 34:41Speaker 2: troubled lost kid rather than a predator.
- 34:44Speaker 1: He thinks that by giving them this confession, they will
- 34:46Speaker 1: close the book, stop digging and let him go back
- 34:50Speaker 1: to his life.
- 34:51Speaker 2: But he has no idea that he just permanently locked
- 34:53Speaker 2: himself in the crosshairs of a homicide investigation.
- 34:56Speaker 1: He is booked into jail for the assault on Melissa. Meanwhile,
- 35:01Speaker 1: The Hartford police, armed with that devastating slip-up about the
- 35:04Speaker 1: sexual assault, turn their full, undivided attention to Dan Bartelt.
- 35:09Speaker 2: And when they start tearing into his life, they uncover
- 35:12Speaker 2: a mountain of evidence that completely obliterates that golden boy
- 35:16Speaker 2: persona forever.
- 35:17Speaker 1: They execute a search warrant on his home and his electronics.
- 35:20Speaker 1: They start by pulling his digital footprint.
- 35:23Speaker 2: Which is always revealing.
- 35:24Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely. Forensic data recovery is incredibly thorough. Deleting your
- 35:29Speaker 1: browser history does nothing. They pull the cash, and what
- 35:32Speaker 1: they find is a terrifying descent into his psychological preparations.
- 35:36Speaker 2: He wasn't just casually browsing the internet. He was conducting
- 35:39Speaker 2: deep systemic searches on Wikipedia and search engines for spree
- 35:42Speaker 2: killers and serial killers.
- 35:44Speaker 1: He was studying them?
- 35:45Speaker 2: He was actively studying their methodologies.
- 35:47Speaker 1: But the digital forensics reveal something much darker than that.
- 35:51Speaker 1: Investigators uncover a vast cache of bondage pornography, and specifically,
- 35:57Speaker 1: targeted searches for pornographic snuff films.
- 36:00Speaker 2: And the content of those searches is the crucial link.
- 36:03Speaker 2: It connects the digital ether to the physical reality of
- 36:06Speaker 2: Jesse's bedroom.
- 36:07Speaker 1: Because of the staging. Yes.
- 36:09Speaker 2: The specific parameters of his searches perfectly mirrored the staging
- 36:12Speaker 2: of Jesse's body. He was actively seeking out material that
- 36:16Speaker 2: depicted a victim being strangled and then explicitly being washed
- 36:20Speaker 2: by the perpetrator afterward.
- 36:21Speaker 1: It's sickening.
- 36:23Speaker 2: This proves that the washing of Jesse's body wasn't a
- 36:26Speaker 2: panicked afterthought or a clumsy attempt to hide evidence. It
- 36:30Speaker 2: was the physical enactment of a highly specific, cultivated dark fantasy.
- 36:35Speaker 1: When detectives confront Dan with this digital evidence, his narcissism
- 36:39Speaker 1: flares up again. He tries to intellectualize his way out
- 36:42Speaker 1: of it.
- 36:42Speaker 2: He tries to explain it away.
- 36:43Speaker 1: Yeah, he tells him, oh, I was just doing research.
- 36:45Speaker 1: I'm writing a story.
- 36:46Speaker 2: And the detail that turns your stomach is what he
- 36:48Speaker 2: names the character.
- 36:49Speaker 1: Right. He claims the story is about a young girl
- 36:52Speaker 1: who gets murdered. And he literally named the fictional main
- 36:55Speaker 1: character Jessica.
- 36:57Speaker 2: It is the ultimate sociopathic arrogance. He believes he is
- 37:00Speaker 2: so much smarter than the detectives that he can explain
- 37:03Speaker 2: away forensic-level digital premeditation by claiming it is character research,
- 37:08Speaker 2: mocking them by using his actual victim's name.
- 37:11Speaker 1: But the digital trail is just the preamble. Dan had
- 37:16Speaker 1: attempted to build an alibi for the morning of Jesse's murder.
- 37:19Speaker 2: Right, his fake job routine.
- 37:20Speaker 1: Yeah. He told the police that during the time Jesse
- 37:23Speaker 1: was killed, he was doing his usual routine, driving around
- 37:26Speaker 1: in his parents' van, pretending to be at work. He
- 37:29Speaker 1: claimed he spent the entire morning parked at Woodland Park.
- 37:32Speaker 2: And this is where physical surveillance comes into play. The
- 37:35Speaker 2: police don't just take his word for it.
- 37:36Speaker 1: They pull the tape.
- 37:37Speaker 2: They pull the CCTV footage from Woodland Park. And sure enough,
- 37:41Speaker 2: there is Dan on tape wearing red shorts, proving he
- 37:44Speaker 2: was physically at the park that morning.
- 37:46Speaker 1: Dan probably thought this footage was his airtight salvation.
- 37:49Speaker 2: But the police don't just verify the tape and walk away.
- 37:52Speaker 2: They go to Woodland Park. They walk the grounds. They
- 37:54Speaker 2: meticulously search the public trash bins.
- 37:57Speaker 1: And buried in one of those bins, they find an
- 38:00Speaker 1: empty cereal box.
- 38:01Speaker 2: And inside that mundane cereal box is a fully assembled
- 38:05Speaker 2: murder kit.
- 38:05Speaker 1: They pull out a ball gag, they pull out alcohol wipes,
- 38:09Speaker 1: they pull out ligatures, and a very specific type of rope.
- 38:12Speaker 2: And the Chimelab analyzes the rope found in the trash bin,
- 38:16Speaker 2: and it is a perfect forensic match to the distinct
- 38:20Speaker 2: ligature marks left on Jesse's neck.
- 38:22Speaker 1: And the physical links just keep multiplying. Police execute a
- 38:26Speaker 1: search warrant on Dan's house, and in his garage, they
- 38:29Speaker 1: find a spool of that exact same rope.
- 38:31Speaker 2: But the piece of evidence that truly seals the timeline
- 38:34Speaker 2: of horror involves a roll of heating duct tape.
- 38:37Speaker 1: Explain the duct tape.
- 38:39Speaker 2: During the dry run assault on Melissa Etzler when Dan
- 38:41Speaker 2: was wrestling for the knife, a roll of silver heating
- 38:44Speaker 2: duct tape fell out of his pocket and was left
- 38:46Speaker 2: at the scene. When police searched Dan's house, they found
- 38:49Speaker 2: tape matching that exact roll.
- 38:51Speaker 1: Which links him firmly to the park assault. But a
- 38:55Speaker 1: full week after Jesse's murder, the Hartford investigators go back
- 38:58Speaker 1: to Jesse's bedroom for a secondary exhaustive sweep.
- 39:02Speaker 2: They are looking for anything they might have missed in
- 39:04Speaker 2: the initial chaos.
- 39:05Speaker 1: Right. And shoved deep under Jesse's bed, they find that
- 39:09Speaker 1: exact same type of heating duct tape.
- 39:11Speaker 2: And the crime lab lifts latent fingerprints off the sticky
- 39:15Speaker 2: side of that tape found under Jesse's bed.
- 39:17Speaker 1: And they match.
- 39:18Speaker 2: The prints are a perfect match to Dan Bartelt.
- 39:20Speaker 1: When you combine the tape, the faint binding marks on
- 39:23Speaker 1: her wrists, and the ball gag from the murder kit,
- 39:26Speaker 1: it paints a devastating picture of her final moments.
- 39:28Speaker 2: It destroys any narrative of a quick, impulsive crime of passion.
- 39:33Speaker 2: It reveals a prolonged, methodical act of torture and absolute control.
- 39:37Speaker 1: It's horrific.
- 39:38Speaker 2: He hogtied her. He forced the ball gag into her
- 39:41Speaker 2: mouth to silence her screams. And he used that heating
- 39:43Speaker 2: duct tape to wrap around her head to secure the
- 39:45Speaker 2: gag so she couldn't push it out. He wanted her
- 39:48Speaker 2: completely helpless, terrified, and entirely at his mercy.
- 39:52Speaker 1: And then the undeniable science of DNA arrives to completely
- 39:55Speaker 1: close the trap.
- 39:56Speaker 2: The final nail in the coffin.
- 39:58Speaker 1: The crime lab confirms Dan's blood and DNA are on
- 40:01Speaker 1: the ligatures. Most powerfully, his DNA is found under Jesse's fingernails.
- 40:07Speaker 2: She fought him.
- 40:08Speaker 1: She did. Just like she promised herself in her diary
- 40:11Speaker 1: hours earlier, she confronted the threat without fear.
- 40:14Speaker 2: She fought back as hard as she could.
- 40:16Speaker 1: And tragically, the DNA analysis confirmed the sexual assault, proving
- 40:19Speaker 1: that his sympathetic guest in the interrogation room was actually
- 40:23Speaker 1: a confession of his own actions.
- 40:25Speaker 2: The evidence is just a sheer cliff face at this point.
- 40:27Speaker 2: Dan the chameleon had completely run out of colors to
- 40:30Speaker 2: hide behind.
- 40:31Speaker 1: He is charged with first-degree intentional homicide. And this brings
- 40:35Speaker 1: us to the final, most profound segment of this deep dive,
- 40:39Speaker 1: the trial.
- 40:40Speaker 2: The courtroom is where everything comes to a head.
- 40:42Speaker 1: We move from the sterile analysis of a crime scene
- 40:44Speaker 1: to a courtroom where we are going to witness the
- 40:47Speaker 1: absolute starkest contrast of human nature you can possibly imagine.
- 40:51Speaker 2: Given the overwhelming convergence of digital forensics, physical evidence, CCTV footage,
- 40:56Speaker 2: and DNA, the trial's outcome is a foregone conclusion.
- 41:00Speaker 1: Dan Bartelt is found guilty and is sentenced to life
- 41:02Speaker 1: in prison with absolutely no chance of parole.
- 41:04Speaker 2: But before the gavel falls, the judge offers Dan the
- 41:07Speaker 2: standard opportunity to address the court.
- 41:10Speaker 1: This is the moment where the killer usually turns to
- 41:12Speaker 1: the gallery, right?
- 41:12Speaker 2: Yes. It's all's the moment to look at Buck and Joy,
- 41:16Speaker 2: the parents who welcomed him into their home, the parents
- 41:19Speaker 2: he hugged at the vigil, and offer some shred of humanity.
- 41:23Speaker 1: An apology, a plea for forgiveness, or even just an
- 41:26Speaker 1: acknowledgement of the reality of what he did.
- 41:28Speaker 2: But Dan refuses to break character. Instead of humanity, he
- 41:32Speaker 2: delivers a bizarre, deeply narcissistic monologue. That attempts to rewrite
- 41:38Speaker 2: reality one last time.
- 41:39Speaker 1: He stands up in his prison uniform, looks around the
- 41:42Speaker 1: courtroom and says, these shackles that I'm put in don't
- 41:45Speaker 1: make me guilty. I can't prove that I'm innocent to anyone,
- 41:48Speaker 1: not even myself. I can't prove that son that I
- 41:50Speaker 1: haven't seen for over 400 days still even rises and sets.
- 41:54Speaker 2: And then he addresses the judge directly.
- 41:56Speaker 1: He looks directly at the judge who just handed down
- 41:58Speaker 1: his life sentence and says, I pity you.
- 42:00Speaker 2: If you deconstruct the verdiage of that speech, you see
- 42:03Speaker 2: the absolute pinnacle of malignant narcissism.
- 42:06Speaker 1: He sounds completely unhinged.
- 42:08Speaker 2: He is speaking in philosophical whittles, questioning if the sun
- 42:12Speaker 2: even exists because he hasn't seen it. He is centering
- 42:15Speaker 2: the entire universe on his own perception.
- 42:18Speaker 1: He's not talking to the victims at all.
- 42:20Speaker 2: No, he isn't speaking to the grieving parents. He is
- 42:23Speaker 2: delivering a soliloquy for an audience of one himself.
- 42:27Speaker 1: He's still performing.
- 42:28Speaker 2: He is desperately trying to maintain his theatrical dominance, asserting
- 42:32Speaker 2: that his internal reality is superior to the physical evidence
- 42:36Speaker 2: and the court's judgment. He wants to leave the room confused, defiant,
- 42:41Speaker 2: and shrouded in his own manufactured mystery.
- 42:44Speaker 1: He wants to retain control. But he doesn't get the
- 42:47Speaker 1: last word. Because Jesse's father, Buck Blahat, stands up to
- 42:51Speaker 1: give his victim impact statement.
- 42:53Speaker 2: This part is so powerful.
- 42:55Speaker 1: Put yourself in Buck's shoes for a second. The man
- 42:57Speaker 1: standing across from you is the monster who brutally tortured
- 43:00Speaker 1: and murdered your only child and then had the gall
- 43:02Speaker 1: to come to your living room and hold you while
- 43:04Speaker 1: you cried.
- 43:05Speaker 2: The human expectation here is visceral rage.
- 43:08Speaker 1: It is. You expect a father to unleash every ounce
- 43:10Speaker 1: of fury, hatred, and venom he possesses.
- 43:13Speaker 2: And it would be entirely justified. Society expects and understands
- 43:17Speaker 2: that rage. It is the natural neurological response to having
- 43:21Speaker 2: your world violently destroyed.
- 43:24Speaker 1: But Buck doesn't do that. Buck looks directly at Dan
- 43:27Speaker 1: Bartelt and he speaks with a quiet, unimaginable strength.
- 43:31Speaker 2: What does he say?
- 43:32Speaker 1: He says, I forgive you as I have every single
- 43:35Speaker 1: day since we found out it was you. I believe
- 43:38Speaker 1: there's good and bad in every one of us, so
- 43:39Speaker 1: I don't demonize or vilify you.
- 43:41Speaker 2: It is a breathtaking choice.
- 43:43Speaker 1: It really is.
- 43:43Speaker 2: And Buck is careful to explain that he isn't living
- 43:46Speaker 2: in denial. He acknowledges the crushing weight of the pain
- 43:49Speaker 2: and the anger. But he says that stronger than all
- 43:52Speaker 2: of that darkness is an unexplainable, resolute peace And a
- 43:56Speaker 2: conscious choice to forgive.
- 43:57Speaker 1: Look at the mechanics of what Buck achieves in that moment, too.
- 44:00Speaker 2: It's incredible.
- 44:01Speaker 1: Dan's entire goal from the murder to the staging to
- 44:04Speaker 1: the narcissistic speech was to inject fear, darkness, and chaos
- 44:08Speaker 1: into the world. He wanted to be the architect of
- 44:11Speaker 1: a nightmare.
- 44:12Speaker 2: He wanted to own the Blah family's trauma forever.
- 44:15Speaker 1: Exactly. And with a single sentence, Buck completely severs Dan's control.
- 44:20Speaker 1: By weaponizing radical love, Buck... neutralizes the sociopath.
- 44:24Speaker 2: He takes away his power entirely.
- 44:26Speaker 1: He looks at Dan and essentially says, you took my daughter,
- 44:29Speaker 1: but you do not get to dictate the architecture of
- 44:31Speaker 1: my soul. You do not get to turn me into
- 44:34Speaker 1: a monster too.
- 44:35Speaker 2: And Buck doesn't just leave that forgiveness in the courtroom
- 44:37Speaker 2: as an abstract concept. He operationalizes it.
- 44:40Speaker 1: He turns it into action.
- 44:41Speaker 2: Yes. To honor Jesse's vibrant spirit, her intelligence, and her
- 44:46Speaker 2: fierce activism, Buck founds a nonprofit organization called the Love
- 44:50Speaker 2: is Greater Than Hate Project.
- 44:52Speaker 1: What a beautiful legacy.
- 44:53Speaker 2: The dual mission is to actively work to end violence
- 44:56Speaker 2: against women and girls and to inspire people in their
- 44:59Speaker 2: daily lives to consciously choose love, empathy, and community over
- 45:04Speaker 2: hatred and isolation.
- 45:05Speaker 1: It is the ultimate tangible triumph over evil. Dan is
- 45:08Speaker 1: locked away in a concrete box pretending the sun doesn't
- 45:11Speaker 1: exist while Jessie's family is out in the world literally
- 45:14Speaker 1: generating light in her name.
- 45:16Speaker 2: Which brings up a final provocative thought that I think
- 45:18Speaker 2: we all need to mull over as we wrap up.
- 45:20Speaker 1: What's that?
- 45:20Speaker 2: In the true crime space, in psychology, and in the media,
- 45:24Speaker 2: we spend an inordinate amount of time fascinated by the
- 45:27Speaker 2: dark pathology of people like Dan Bartelt.
- 45:30Speaker 1: We really do.
- 45:30Speaker 2: We endlessly study the chameleons who can hide in plain sight,
- 45:34Speaker 2: dissecting their sociopathy and their deceit. But perhaps we are
- 45:38Speaker 2: looking in the wrong direction.
- 45:40Speaker 1: How so?
- 45:41Speaker 2: Perhaps the true anomaly... The real profound mystery of the
- 45:44Speaker 2: human mind that we should be dedicating our time to
- 45:46Speaker 2: studying is Buckbladet.
- 45:48Speaker 1: How does the human heart generate that level of grace
- 45:51Speaker 1: in the face of absolute unadulterated evil?
- 45:54Speaker 2: Exactly that. We can map out the cognitive failures that
- 45:57Speaker 2: create a killer. We understand narcissism. We understand compartmentalization.
- 46:02Speaker 1: The psychology is pretty well documented.
- 46:03Speaker 2: But mapping out the architecture of radical forgiveness, understanding how
- 46:07Speaker 2: a grieving father can look at his daughter's killer and
- 46:10Speaker 2: choose grace over vengeance... That is a profound, miraculous mystery
- 46:14Speaker 2: that defies standard psychology.
- 46:16Speaker 1: It truly does. At the start of this deep dive,
- 46:18Speaker 1: we asked you to imagine the sheer terror of a
- 46:20Speaker 1: trusted friend hiding a lethal agenda.
- 46:23Speaker 2: And that darkness is very real and terrifying.
- 46:26Speaker 1: But the response from Buck Blackhead and his family proves
- 46:29Speaker 1: that an even more powerful, enduring force exists in the
- 46:32Speaker 1: human spirit. Thank you for joining us on this deep dive.
- 46:35Speaker 1: Stay curious, stay aware, and remember that even when confronted
- 46:38Speaker 1: with the unthinkable, sometimes love truly is greater than hate.