Latest / The conspiracy / They Are LYING To You About CHARLIE KIRK_S Death

Transcript

They Are LYING To You About CHARLIE KIRK_S Death · The conspiracy

0:00
Speaker 1: Two shooters and a magic bullet. Those words echo with
0:03
Speaker 1: their simplicity, but when examined together, paint a damning portrait,
0:07
Speaker 1: a picture of a cover up, so bold, so in
0:10
Speaker 1: your face, that it seems almost impossible. But for some
0:13
Speaker 1: people this theory is more than that. It's a cold,
0:17
Speaker 1: dark reality. Charlie Kirk, to many in America was a
0:20
Speaker 1: beloved figure, and so naturally, when they watched his publicly
0:24
Speaker 1: televised execution on their phone screens about a month ago,
0:28
Speaker 1: they reacted with pure horror, and immediately people tried to
0:31
Speaker 1: make sense of what had happened. Who could have wanted
0:34
Speaker 1: Charlie dead? Who was able to pull this thing off quickly?
0:38
Speaker 1: The government provided a narrative, a narrative that's been debunked,
0:41
Speaker 1: but a narrative nonetheless. A young man named Tyler Robinson
0:45
Speaker 1: had seemingly snapped, committed the crime, dumped the evidence near
0:49
Speaker 1: the crime scene, and had texted someone a detailed confession
0:52
Speaker 1: which corroborated every detail that the FBI had presented. It
0:57
Speaker 1: seemed almost too perfect. Well, that's because in the eyes
1:01
Speaker 1: of many people, it was the FBI's timeline on folds.
1:05
Speaker 1: As we talked about already, in another recent video with
1:08
Speaker 1: a mechanical precision that approximately twelve twenty three and thirty seconds.
1:13
Speaker 1: On September tenth, Charlie Kirk, seated on stage sustains a
1:17
Speaker 1: neck wound from a thirty sixth round fired by Tyler
1:20
Speaker 1: Robinson from the rooftop roughly one hundred and forty two
1:23
Speaker 1: yards away. Tyler Robinson, a twenty two year old gamer
1:26
Speaker 1: with a family heirloom Mouser Model ninety eight rifle, allegedly
1:30
Speaker 1: etched anti fascist slogans on his casings and confessed in
1:34
Speaker 1: messages to his partner about planning the hit amid frustration
1:38
Speaker 1: with Charlie Kirk's hatred. The weapon, modified with a modern
1:41
Speaker 1: barrel for thirty out six compatibility, was recovered in the
1:44
Speaker 1: woods near the crime scene later that day, wrapped in
1:47
Speaker 1: a towel which coincidentally and very luckily for the FBI,
1:51
Speaker 1: had Tyler Robinson's DNA on it. Now. Utah Governor Spencer
1:56
Speaker 1: Cox later described Tyler Robinson's shift from a family of
1:59
Speaker 1: res publicanism to leftist politics as potentially having been a
2:03
Speaker 1: radicalization arc. According to the authorities, though there were no accomplices,
2:08
Speaker 1: there was no broader plot. All this was was a
2:11
Speaker 1: lone gunman exploiting the lack of security on a public
2:14
Speaker 1: campus to carry out a singular, rash evil deed. This narrative, however,
2:20
Speaker 1: hinges exclusively on unchallenged assumptions the rifle's traceability, the bullet
2:26
Speaker 1: wound and trajectory, and Tyler Robinson's sole culpability. Yet, as
2:30
Speaker 1: independent voices like firearms analysts Gary of Paramount Recovery have noted, quote,
2:36
Speaker 1: every time new information comes out, we get more questions
2:39
Speaker 1: than answers end quote. Stephen Gardner, another credible source per Gary,
2:44
Speaker 1: has publicly echoed the sentiment as well, drawing from testimony
2:48
Speaker 1: given to him by witnesses close to Turning Point USA
2:51
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk's organization. According to many, the bullet's fragmentation and
2:56
Speaker 1: lodging in Charlie's body seems to defy against odds standard
3:01
Speaker 1: thirty out six behavior. A little more context though, The
3:04
Speaker 1: thirty out six springfield, a century old cartridge born from
3:08
Speaker 1: World War I battlefields, is renowned for its versatility in
3:12
Speaker 1: hunting and long range shooting. Loaded with a one hundred
3:15
Speaker 1: and fifty grain nozzlear ballistic tip, the weapon can achieve
3:18
Speaker 1: potential muzzle velocities of two nine hundred and ten feet
3:22
Speaker 1: per second, delivering two eight hundred and twenty foot pounds
3:25
Speaker 1: of energy, which, to put it plainly, is enough forced
3:29
Speaker 1: to kill a massive elk from five hundred yards away.
3:32
Speaker 1: In ballistic gelatin tests, rounds fired from a thirty odd
3:35
Speaker 1: six springfield penetrate a whopping twenty to thirty inches through
3:40
Speaker 1: the gelatin before exiting, and most of the time they
3:43
Speaker 1: do exit the gelatin block after penetrating that distance, often
3:48
Speaker 1: with a yawing that creates cavities up to twelve inches wide. So,
3:53
Speaker 1: according to many people online, I talked about this a
3:55
Speaker 1: lot in my last video. If the gun used really
3:58
Speaker 1: was a thirty odd six, and if the shot really
4:01
Speaker 1: was taken from that distance and really did hit with
4:03
Speaker 1: that precision, the death of Charlie Kirk should have looked
4:07
Speaker 1: a lot different. There should have been blood, a lot
4:10
Speaker 1: more blood, I should say, There should have been a
4:12
Speaker 1: much larger wound. There should have been a spray of
4:14
Speaker 1: blood behind Charlie, splattering across the canvas backdrop which hung
4:18
Speaker 1: behind him. There also, as many people have noted, should
4:22
Speaker 1: have been an exit wound. However, none of that happened.
4:25
Speaker 1: According to the FBI and eyewitnesses along with Charlie's surgeon,
4:29
Speaker 1: there was no exit wound. Obviously, there was no blood
4:32
Speaker 1: sprayed behind him. There was only a small wound up front.
4:36
Speaker 1: So when looking at the gun and looking at the
4:39
Speaker 1: wound and analyzing the distance, how does this make any sense?
4:43
Speaker 1: You have experts that have worked with these weapons for
4:45
Speaker 1: their entire lives, hunters, people that have served tours, people
4:49
Speaker 1: that just love guns and know them inside out, and
4:52
Speaker 1: they're all saying that this clearly wasn't the weapon used
4:55
Speaker 1: in the shooting, and then it had to have been
4:57
Speaker 1: something smaller, that it had to have been fired from
5:01
Speaker 1: a different angle. But on the flip side of the coin,
5:04
Speaker 1: you have the FBI and the authorities who we all
5:07
Speaker 1: know have lied to the American people thousands, if not
5:10
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of times, saying that their story is
5:13
Speaker 1: the truth and that you should just never question it.
5:16
Speaker 1: It was a thirty out six and that's just what
5:18
Speaker 1: it looked like. So who are we supposed to believe.
5:22
Speaker 1: There's also the fact that Andrew Culvert, a man associated
5:25
Speaker 1: with Turning Point USA, publicly claimed after the assassination that
5:29
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk was essentially struck by a magic bullet. Yes,
5:34
Speaker 1: he claimed that the result of the assassination was a miracle,
5:38
Speaker 1: some sort of spiritual intervention. Instead of the bullet going
5:41
Speaker 1: straight through Charlie, potentially hitting someone else and sending blood
5:44
Speaker 1: and gore flying, that day, a miracle happened and Charlie
5:48
Speaker 1: Kirk's body actually managed to stop the bullet. Andrew even
5:52
Speaker 1: referred to Charlie as the Man of Steel, claiming that
5:55
Speaker 1: he was almost like Superman in his ability to stop bullets. However,
6:00
Speaker 1: this conclusion defies all known science and research surrounding these
6:04
Speaker 1: weapons and bullets and is frankly just unbelievable. I want
6:09
Speaker 1: you to consider, if you're watching or listening, which possibility
6:12
Speaker 1: is more realistic. That Charlie Kirk experienced some sort of
6:16
Speaker 1: magical religious miracle stopped the bullet with his body and
6:19
Speaker 1: prevented anyone else from getting hurt. Or that the FBI
6:23
Speaker 1: and of the authorities have been lying about just what
6:25
Speaker 1: type of bullet was fired at Charlie Kirk and where
6:28
Speaker 1: that bullet was fired from. I'll leave that up to
6:30
Speaker 1: you to decide. I'm not talking down on or minimizing
6:33
Speaker 1: any sort of religion that you guys might hold close
6:36
Speaker 1: to your hearts or any sort of spiritual belief system
6:39
Speaker 1: you might have. I just want you to consider what
6:41
Speaker 1: is more realistic in this case. Now, this is where
6:45
Speaker 1: things get really interesting. By the way, before we get
6:47
Speaker 1: into this, please make sure you comment on this video,
6:50
Speaker 1: tell me what you think of this whole thing, like
6:52
Speaker 1: this video, subscribe to the channel, or share the video
6:55
Speaker 1: out on your social media. YouTube does not like these
6:58
Speaker 1: sorts of videos. They do not put these sorts of videos.
7:01
Speaker 1: So this entire channel, what we've built here has been
7:04
Speaker 1: entirely grassroots. And I'm so thankful to every single person
7:07
Speaker 1: who has joined me along the way on this journey.
7:09
Speaker 1: And yeah, just if you could, if you could please
7:12
Speaker 1: leave a comment or alike, I would really appreciate it.
7:15
Speaker 1: But let's dig into it. Charlie Kirk's autopsy, per leaked
7:18
Speaker 1: details that have been corroborated by Turning Point USA insiders,
7:22
Speaker 1: tells a completely different story of what may have happened
7:26
Speaker 1: that day. Just take a look at this.
7:28
Speaker 2: My understanding from speaking with a couple of people high
7:31
Speaker 2: up at Turning Point USA, they let me know that
7:35
Speaker 2: the injury took place right below the jaw in the
7:38
Speaker 2: C two. Uh oh, the bullet crashed through C two
7:42
Speaker 2: all the way through C seven, and then they found
7:45
Speaker 2: the bullet lodged in that meaty area around T one,
7:50
Speaker 2: the thoracic first vertebrae.
7:52
Speaker 3: I confirmed, obviously because I have connections, and I confirmed
7:56
Speaker 3: that the autosy was done. I don't want to say
7:57
Speaker 3: too much, but the autopsy yielded where the entry wound
8:01
Speaker 3: was and how the bullet killed him. It's already been determined.
8:06
Speaker 3: They found a bullet lodged in his body. They can
8:09
Speaker 3: tell you exactly where what was severed, what killed him,
8:13
Speaker 3: where the bullet traveled from his neck down through his body.
8:16
Speaker 3: They have it all. Fragmentation of the round that has
8:20
Speaker 3: spouted through his body, they have all of that.
8:23
Speaker 1: As of October eighth, twenty twenty five, the full autopsy
8:27
Speaker 1: report on Charlie Kirk's death remains sealed and unreleased to
8:30
Speaker 1: the public by the Utah Office of the Medical Examiner,
8:33
Speaker 1: despite state law Utah Code twenty six B eight two
8:36
Speaker 1: one seven, effective May seventh of this year, mandating autopsies
8:41
Speaker 1: for all homicides and allowing limited public access under certain conditions.
8:46
Speaker 1: This opacity, or rather lack of transparency has fueled public speculation,
8:51
Speaker 1: but partial details have emerged through official statements, prosecutorial filings,
8:56
Speaker 1: and insider medical disclosures. According to officials and insiders, and
9:00
Speaker 1: autopsy was indeed performed shortly after Charlie Kirk's death on
9:04
Speaker 1: September tenth, at the State Medical Examiner's office in Salt
9:08
Speaker 1: Lake City, involving one of eight boards certified forensic pathologists
9:12
Speaker 1: on staff. The procedure was expedited, though lasting only approximately
9:16
Speaker 1: one to two hours, due to the high profile nature
9:19
Speaker 1: of the case and the involvement of the FBI. The
9:21
Speaker 1: hasty autopsy was performed in order to allow Charlie Kirk's
9:25
Speaker 1: body to be released and transported to Phoenix, Arizona, for
9:29
Speaker 1: his eventual embalming and memorial services. Now, contrary to early
9:33
Speaker 1: rumors amplified on social media, such as a false circulated
9:37
Speaker 1: nine one one audio clip falsely claiming now autopsy was
9:40
Speaker 1: performed before the death certificate was issued, this was debunked
9:44
Speaker 1: as misinformation. The most detailed publicly available insights come from
9:48
Speaker 1: statements by Turning Point USA spokesman Andrew Colvett and the
9:52
Speaker 1: attending trauma surgeon at Inner Mountain, Utah. Valley Hospital, where
9:56
Speaker 1: Kirk was pronounced dead approximately ten to fifteen minutes host shooting.
10:00
Speaker 1: These statements, which I already talked about before about the
10:03
Speaker 1: magic bullet that Charlie's body miraculously stopped, aligned with preliminary
10:08
Speaker 1: medical summaries referenced in the charging documents filed on September
10:12
Speaker 1: sixteenth of this year by Utah County Prosecutors, which describe
10:16
Speaker 1: a single entry wound to the front left of Charlie's neck,
10:20
Speaker 1: but curiously they omit granular pathology and instead choose to
10:24
Speaker 1: focus almost solely on evidentiary links to suspect Tyler Robinson.
10:28
Speaker 1: The entry point where the bullet entered Charlie's body is
10:31
Speaker 1: consistently reported as having been the front left neck area,
10:34
Speaker 1: approximately at or below the level of the Adams Apple,
10:38
Speaker 1: based on video evidence which shows blood emanating from that
10:41
Speaker 1: precise location after Charlie was shot. I have indeed seen
10:45
Speaker 1: that video many times at this point, and there's no
10:47
Speaker 1: denying that that was right where he was struck, right
10:50
Speaker 1: about here. No exit wound, though, was observed. As I
10:53
Speaker 1: stated before, the thirty six Springfield round fired from a
10:57
Speaker 1: bolt action rifle which was recovered near the room roof
11:00
Speaker 1: top seemed to have lodged itself subcutaneously or just beneath
11:04
Speaker 1: the skin at the back of Charlie's neck, without fully
11:07
Speaker 1: traversing the body. Well, that's at least according to the report. Pathologically,
11:12
Speaker 1: the bullet's trajectory is described as having been shallow and
11:15
Speaker 1: destructive within the neck tissues, causing severe vascular damage, likely
11:20
Speaker 1: damage to the jugular vein or carotid artery, which led
11:23
Speaker 1: to rapid exsanguination, hemorrhage, and hypovolemic shock. Charlie Kirk's surgeon
11:28
Speaker 1: actually attributed the round's failure to penetrate more to an
11:32
Speaker 1: alleged exceptional bone density in Charlie Kirk's cervical vertebrae, which
11:37
Speaker 1: slowed and fragmented the projectile upon impact with the C
11:40
Speaker 1: three to five region of the spine, preventing spinal cord
11:43
Speaker 1: transaction but still inducing catastrophic soft tissue trauma. This analysis
11:49
Speaker 1: is supposedly supported by EMS records noting non pulsatile blood
11:53
Speaker 1: flow from Charlie's wound, indicating venus involvement rather than arterial spurning,
11:58
Speaker 1: and Charlie Kirk's pupils b being fixed and dilated. While
12:01
Speaker 1: en route to the hospital are a sign of terminal
12:04
Speaker 1: brain innoxia from blood loss. The official cause of death
12:07
Speaker 1: is gunshot wound to the neck with massive internal hemorrhage.
12:10
Speaker 1: The toxicology results weren't negative, and no pre existing conditions
12:14
Speaker 1: contributed to Charlie's death, according to those leaks that were
12:18
Speaker 1: made to media outlets. Now these details, I should say,
12:21
Speaker 1: and there's a lot of dense terminology here, but we're
12:24
Speaker 1: going to get to some visuals in a second. These
12:26
Speaker 1: details emerged one at a time. First, there were the
12:29
Speaker 1: initial hospital statements on September eleventh, focused on Charlie's neck
12:33
Speaker 1: trauma and death, and by September twenty first, Andrew Colvett
12:37
Speaker 1: had tweeted and referenced the surgeon's miracle comment about the
12:40
Speaker 1: magical bullet and no exit wound. And on October second,
12:44
Speaker 1: fact checks consolidated conflicting reports that had been spread in
12:48
Speaker 1: the media into a cohesive narrative of shallow bullet penetration. Essentially,
12:53
Speaker 1: everyone seemed to come together in the end and stick
12:55
Speaker 1: to a very specific story. Charlie Kirk was shot from
12:59
Speaker 1: the front. The bullet barely penetrated him. It hit an
13:02
Speaker 1: artery or a vein, and he died. According to the leaks,
13:06
Speaker 1: the slug that actually killed Charlie was indeed recovered during
13:09
Speaker 1: his autopsy, and it was found to have been intact
13:12
Speaker 1: enough for rifling analysis, though its exact deformation like yawing
13:17
Speaker 1: or fragmentation, remains officially undisclosed. But to many, this leaked
13:23
Speaker 1: information makes no sense at all. To contextualize the autopsy findings,
13:28
Speaker 1: consider the thirty out six springfield's established performance in both
13:32
Speaker 1: battles and hunting excursions, which starkly contrasts with the reported
13:36
Speaker 1: shallow path and limited penetration in Charlie Kirk's case. Developed
13:40
Speaker 1: in nineteen oh six for US military use and refined
13:43
Speaker 1: during World War One, this cartridge is prized and once
13:47
Speaker 1: again typically utilized for big game hunting due to its
13:50
Speaker 1: flat trajectory and terminal ballistics. Essentially, all this everything that
13:54
Speaker 1: I've said so far, is a very long winded way
13:57
Speaker 1: of saying that typically this round fired from this weapon
14:02
Speaker 1: creates much more carnage when it hits a target. For example,
14:05
Speaker 1: when elk are shot from hundreds of yards away, much
14:08
Speaker 1: further away than the distance that Charlie Kirk was shot from,
14:13
Speaker 1: its bones shatter. It's a gruesome sight, and elk are
14:17
Speaker 1: massive creatures with one and a half to two times
14:20
Speaker 1: the bone density of humans. It really makes you think,
14:23
Speaker 1: doesn't it. This same gun and same round can take
14:27
Speaker 1: down a one thousand plus pound elk from more than
14:31
Speaker 1: double the distance, and it still hits with such power
14:35
Speaker 1: that it shatters the elk's bones leaves massive, gaping, bloody wounds,
14:40
Speaker 1: which looks nothing like what happened to Charlie. At around
14:42
Speaker 1: one hundred and forty two yards the estimated distance from
14:45
Speaker 1: the lossy Center rooftop to Charlie Kirk's position where he
14:49
Speaker 1: was shot, the round fired from the rifle should have
14:52
Speaker 1: retained a velocity of eighteen hundred to two thousand feet
14:55
Speaker 1: per second and a power of twelve hundred to fifteen
14:58
Speaker 1: hundred feet per pound, far exceeding thresholds for full tissue
15:03
Speaker 1: traversal in a human torso you see, typically a round
15:06
Speaker 1: will penetrate anywhere from twelve to eighteen inches through a
15:09
Speaker 1: human neck or chest. Yet the autopsy of Charlie's body
15:13
Speaker 1: indicates that only around six to eight inches of flesh
15:16
Speaker 1: were penetrated. There was entry at the anterior neck deflection
15:20
Speaker 1: off of cervical vertebrae and lodgment posture riorly without spinal
15:24
Speaker 1: severance or an exit wound. Forensic pathologists online have noted
15:28
Speaker 1: this fact as being extremely anomalous and bizarre, but technically
15:32
Speaker 1: plausible if the bullet struck Charlie at a shallow angle
15:36
Speaker 1: like thirty to forty five degrees downward from the elevated rooftop,
15:40
Speaker 1: thus maximizing bone interaction. The surgeon's bone density explanation, though
15:45
Speaker 1: well anecdotal, echoes cases where atypical skeletal robustness fragments high
15:51
Speaker 1: velocity projectiles as seen in historical military autopsies, basically saying that,
15:56
Speaker 1: according to historical records and previously document incidents, human bones
16:02
Speaker 1: have at times been strong enough to cause a bullet
16:05
Speaker 1: to sort of behave in a similar fashion. Charlie Kirk,
16:09
Speaker 1: at age thirty one and physically active, fit the profile
16:12
Speaker 1: of someone whose bones could have been dense enough to
16:14
Speaker 1: cause the sort of activity. However, no quantitative densitometry scans
16:18
Speaker 1: from the autopsy have been released to substantiate the claim
16:22
Speaker 1: that Charlie's bones were incredibly dense, irregularly unnaturally dense, dense
16:27
Speaker 1: enough to stop a magical bullet. They haven't released any
16:30
Speaker 1: information stating, yeah, you know what, we said that his
16:32
Speaker 1: bullets are dense. But here we've run the tests and
16:35
Speaker 1: check this out. They're actually dense. It's essentially their word
16:39
Speaker 1: against ours at this point. But before we get into
16:42
Speaker 1: the next portion of this theory, you need to understand
16:44
Speaker 1: a few basic things about the human skeleton and human anatomy.
16:48
Speaker 1: The human spine consists of thirty three vertebrae, divided into
16:52
Speaker 1: five regions. There is the cervical vertebrae C one through
16:56
Speaker 1: C seven, the top seven vertebrate in the neck, which
16:59
Speaker 1: support the skull and allow head movement. There's the thoracic
17:02
Speaker 1: vertebrae T one through T twelve, the twelve vertebrae in
17:06
Speaker 1: the upper and mid back connected to the rib cage.
17:09
Speaker 1: There's the lumbar L one to L five, the five
17:12
Speaker 1: vertebrae in the lower back, bearing much of the body's weight.
17:16
Speaker 1: There's the sacral S one through S five, five fused
17:20
Speaker 1: vertebrae forming the sacrum part of the pelvis, and the
17:23
Speaker 1: cocgeal or tailbone. Each vertebrate is named by its region
17:27
Speaker 1: and number. For example, the C one is the first
17:31
Speaker 1: cervical vertebrae and the spinal cord, A bundle of nerves
17:34
Speaker 1: running through the vertebrae carries signals between the brain and
17:38
Speaker 1: your body. A bullet hitting the spine can damage the
17:41
Speaker 1: vertebrae or bones, the spinal cord and nerves, or both,
17:45
Speaker 1: leading to varying degrees of disability or death. Now the
17:50
Speaker 1: cervical vertebrae, or the C one C two vertebrae are
17:54
Speaker 1: critical because they're closest to the brain and they control
17:57
Speaker 1: vital functions. A bullet that hits this area is often
18:00
Speaker 1: life threatening or catastrophic due to the spinal cord's role
18:04
Speaker 1: in breathing, heart rate, and movement. C one Atlas is
18:08
Speaker 1: the first cervical vertebrae, named after the mythological figure who
18:12
Speaker 1: carried the world. As it supports the skull, it forms
18:15
Speaker 1: a ring like structure that allows the head to nod
18:18
Speaker 1: like when you're saying yes, and a bullet hitting SEA
18:21
Speaker 1: one could fracture the bone, destabilize the skull spine connection,
18:25
Speaker 1: or sever the spinal cord, often causing instant death or
18:28
Speaker 1: high level paralysis like quadriplegia. Due to its proximity to
18:32
Speaker 1: the brain step. Then there's the C two vertebrae the axis,
18:36
Speaker 1: the second cervical vertebrae, which has a peg like projection
18:39
Speaker 1: that allows the head to rotate like when you're saying no.
18:43
Speaker 1: A bullet to the C two can fracture the dens
18:46
Speaker 1: or vertebral body, potentially damaging the spinal cord and leading
18:49
Speaker 1: to paralysis or loss of functions like breathing if the
18:53
Speaker 1: injury is severe. The other cervical vertebrate C three through
18:56
Speaker 1: C seven protect the spinal cord and support your neck movement.
19:00
Speaker 1: Injuries here can cause partial paralysis or disrupt nerve signals
19:04
Speaker 1: to the body, depending on the level of damage. Now,
19:08
Speaker 1: this all might be a little confusing, and it's definitely
19:10
Speaker 1: some dense information, but that explanation and knowledge will come
19:14
Speaker 1: in handy in just a second, So let's move into
19:17
Speaker 1: a few examples. I recently came across a video here
19:20
Speaker 1: on YouTube from the creator Valhalla VFT. I've actually seen
19:23
Speaker 1: some of his content before. If he's watching this, what's
19:26
Speaker 1: up dude, and I absolutely loved it. So I have
19:29
Speaker 1: to give a massive shout out to him and his channel,
19:32
Speaker 1: and I need to tell you hell to go subscribe
19:34
Speaker 1: to him if you aren't subscribed already. He's been on
19:36
Speaker 1: top of this Charlie kirkstuff since day one, and I
19:38
Speaker 1: have to give him lots of credit for the work
19:40
Speaker 1: that he's done. But right now, we're going to take
19:43
Speaker 1: a look at a few clips from a recent video
19:45
Speaker 1: that he released where he actually went through and analyzed
19:48
Speaker 1: what the autopsy reports say about the magical bullet that
19:52
Speaker 1: struck Charlie, the proposed trajectory of the round, and the
19:55
Speaker 1: truth behind the claims. The first clip is him analyzing
19:58
Speaker 1: the official story and report.
20:00
Speaker 4: Just take a look, all right, guys, So basically a
20:02
Speaker 4: middle school math problem. This isn't that hard to figure out.
20:05
Speaker 4: We know that according to the Nical Examiner report, this
20:07
Speaker 4: thirty odd six round came in, hit him in the
20:09
Speaker 4: sea two, traveled down. All Right, you guys are gonna
20:12
Speaker 4: notice some huge problems with this right away. But let's
20:16
Speaker 4: go ahead, and you know, just look at this objectively.
20:19
Speaker 4: All right, we got a pro tractor out. Let's put
20:21
Speaker 4: that right here on the C two. Okay, we do
20:25
Speaker 4: know again from where Tyler Robinson was shooting, it was
20:27
Speaker 4: a nine degree slope with a nine degree offset, essentially
20:30
Speaker 4: meaning almost directly on at a nine degree slope, which
20:34
Speaker 4: we can travel out from our protractor from the C
20:36
Speaker 4: two here at nine degrees perfect right as we pulled
20:40
Speaker 4: a protractor off. What's the first huge glaring issue you
20:43
Speaker 4: guys are going to see here? Oh, well, if Charlie
20:47
Speaker 4: Kirk was sitting level sort of parallel to the ground
20:50
Speaker 4: with his jaw, which he was, let me show you
20:52
Speaker 4: that real quick, all right, so we can see Charlie
20:54
Speaker 4: Kirk is not got his head all the way back
20:57
Speaker 4: like this. He's sitting pretty much flat looking at the crowd,
21:01
Speaker 4: sort of jaw parallel to the ground as he gets
21:04
Speaker 4: hit boom hit. So you can see that, right, it's
21:06
Speaker 4: actually a little bit of a tilt down even. Okay,
21:08
Speaker 4: so let's look at this anatomically right, this is essentially
21:11
Speaker 4: exactly how Charlie Kirk is sitting. And they want to
21:14
Speaker 4: tell you the medical examiner report confirms he was first
21:17
Speaker 4: hit in the C two vertebrae, right below the base
21:20
Speaker 4: of the skull. Biggest problem I see with that from
21:23
Speaker 4: the angle Tyler Robinson shoots him from, is that would
21:27
Speaker 4: have hit him in the teeth or even above the teeth.
21:32
Speaker 4: There is no possible way that this round came from
21:35
Speaker 4: a nine degree angle and a nine degree slope and
21:38
Speaker 4: hit the C two while not blowing through Charlie Kirk's face.
21:43
Speaker 4: It's not a thing. We also can see the C
21:45
Speaker 4: two is not where that gunshot wound is. I can
21:48
Speaker 4: show you that right here, all right, as you can
21:49
Speaker 4: see here. Yeah, he's got some tilt back now after
21:51
Speaker 4: he's been hit. But that round, sorry for my beard,
21:54
Speaker 4: that round is two three inches below his chinky. This
21:58
Speaker 4: round is not all the way up just underneath the
22:01
Speaker 4: base of the jaw. It's pretty far down. I would
22:03
Speaker 4: say that's closer to the C four the C five
22:07
Speaker 4: to where that round to me, looks like he got hit.
22:10
Speaker 4: So big problems right away with this medical examiner report.
22:13
Speaker 4: But let's keep looking at that, all right, so we
22:15
Speaker 4: know this is not possible. Okay, this definitely didn't happen.
22:18
Speaker 4: But if we look at the actual sort of injury
22:21
Speaker 4: to Kirk, looks like he's shot closer to about right here, okay,
22:25
Speaker 4: on that left side of the neck. Now we look
22:28
Speaker 4: at it this way. Now, we can make this work
22:31
Speaker 4: for the location of the shot if it entrants and
22:34
Speaker 4: hits the C five. But that's not what they're saying.
22:36
Speaker 4: They're saying it hit the C two, traveled down all
22:39
Speaker 4: his vertebrae. It doesn't work.
22:41
Speaker 1: So as you can see there, just based on the
22:43
Speaker 1: initial analysis, to make this theory work, according to the
22:46
Speaker 1: leaked autopsy results and report, Charlie Kirk would have had
22:50
Speaker 1: to have been shot through the teeth to make the
22:52
Speaker 1: angle and spine strike location work, which clearly is not
22:56
Speaker 1: what happened. We've seen the footage, we know where Charlie
22:59
Speaker 1: was hit and how he reacted. But as Valhalla VFT
23:03
Speaker 1: continues to analyze all this, things just get stranger and stranger.
23:08
Speaker 4: Next thing with this, we're talking about a thirty odd
23:10
Speaker 4: six round. Right now, you have this thirty odd six
23:12
Speaker 4: round traveling at twenty four to twenty seven hundred feet
23:14
Speaker 4: per second or even less, doesn't even matter hits him,
23:17
Speaker 4: let's say hits him in the sea two. If this
23:19
Speaker 4: magic bullet that doesn't go through his face somehow, that
23:22
Speaker 4: then refracts straight down into the T one. Yeah, that's
23:28
Speaker 4: not what a thirty odd six round is going to
23:30
Speaker 4: do if it hits a human neckword right, we know
23:33
Speaker 4: it's gonna blow right through. But even if there was
23:35
Speaker 4: some weird refraction. Bullets aren't gonna refract almost ninety degrees.
23:38
Speaker 4: We've talked about that and then keep their actual velocity
23:40
Speaker 4: to be able to do that much damage. Not really
23:42
Speaker 4: a thing.
23:43
Speaker 1: So, as you're seeing there, the proposed trajectory of the bullet,
23:46
Speaker 1: based on the leaked alleged autopsy reporting, makes absolutely no sense.
23:50
Speaker 1: A bullet traveling almost three thousand feet per second, delivering
23:54
Speaker 1: almost three thousand pounds of power, it wouldn't have done
23:58
Speaker 1: what they're saying that it did. In the path of
24:00
Speaker 1: the bullet makes absolutely no sense. The path that they're
24:04
Speaker 1: saying the bullet traveled in. I mean, it's absolutely egregious.
24:07
Speaker 1: When you actually look at a visual depiction of this,
24:10
Speaker 1: like the one Valhalla VFT created and it becomes incredibly unbelievable.
24:15
Speaker 1: In his video, he then begins to theorize and hypothesize
24:18
Speaker 1: based on the alleged leaked data on what potentially actually
24:22
Speaker 1: could have happened that day, and based on his analysis,
24:25
Speaker 1: the resultso nothing short of disturbing, all.
24:27
Speaker 4: Right, So, I've seen a bunch of different people talking
24:29
Speaker 4: about now because of this report, this has to prove
24:33
Speaker 4: that Charlie Kirk had body armor, because again, this is
24:36
Speaker 4: it's an impossible shot, it's an impossible angle that it
24:38
Speaker 4: didn't hit him in the face, which, okay, that's kind
24:41
Speaker 4: of an interesting theory, but let's talk about that right now.
24:43
Speaker 4: We're talking about body armour, which again is going to
24:45
Speaker 4: be down here on the chest again, nine degree slope.
24:47
Speaker 4: This is still where the shot came from. Here's the
24:50
Speaker 4: entrance to him. Okay, let's talk about the possibility that
24:53
Speaker 4: the bullet refracted off his body armor. First. Let's also
24:56
Speaker 4: make sure that we acknowledge it's been disproven he hadody
25:00
Speaker 4: armour on. And not only that, TPUSA has publicly stated
25:03
Speaker 4: he had no body armor on. So if you're going
25:06
Speaker 4: to operate under the assumption he has body armour on,
25:08
Speaker 4: you are calling TPUSA nefarious liars. I'm not prepared to
25:12
Speaker 4: do that because why would they purposefully lie about him
25:15
Speaker 4: having body armour on? That seems bizarre to me. But
25:18
Speaker 4: hypothetically TPUSA is lying about this and he had body
25:22
Speaker 4: armour on. Let's look at it now. We're still talking
25:25
Speaker 4: about a thirty odd six round. Okay, a thirty out
25:27
Speaker 4: six round that supposedly comes down hits him in the
25:29
Speaker 4: body armour, which, by the way. If he had body
25:31
Speaker 4: armor on so small that you couldn't see it through
25:33
Speaker 4: that tiny little shirt, it wouldn't be strong enough to
25:36
Speaker 4: stop a thirty out six round to begin with. But
25:37
Speaker 4: we're in hypothetics here. That then, okay, this almost makes
25:42
Speaker 4: me laugh doing this. That then refracts off the body armor,
25:47
Speaker 4: comes all the way up here at a ninety degree
25:50
Speaker 4: angle to hit this C two, and then re refracts
25:55
Speaker 4: straight back down down to the T one. Guys, bullets
26:02
Speaker 4: are not pinballs. They don't do this. Okay, they refract
26:06
Speaker 4: and do weird things as they move through, but changing
26:08
Speaker 4: total direction in almost one hundred and eighty degrees is
26:11
Speaker 4: not possible. This Newtonian physics says, that's not a thing.
26:15
Speaker 1: That's interesting because in a lot of discourse surrounding the
26:18
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk case, I've read people theorizing that he potentially
26:22
Speaker 1: might have had body armor on. But like the original
26:24
Speaker 1: creator of that video stated turning point, USA has consistently
26:28
Speaker 1: denied that Charlie had any body armor on his body
26:31
Speaker 1: that day. And it also just doesn't make any logical sense.
26:35
Speaker 1: The whole thing makes absolutely no sense to me, But
26:37
Speaker 1: especially in this context, when you see this whole thing,
26:40
Speaker 1: bullet path, velocity, angles, all of it mapped out. It
26:44
Speaker 1: just seems to be almost impossible.
26:47
Speaker 4: Again, we know he supposedly gets hit in the C
26:50
Speaker 4: two first by the medical examiner support, Well, let's look
26:54
Speaker 4: at that. We know where the actual wound is, which
26:56
Speaker 4: is here. Okay, well for it. We know it can't
27:00
Speaker 4: from that slope again and goes straight through his teeth.
27:02
Speaker 4: Not a thing unless his head was like literally all
27:05
Speaker 4: the way back. So what would it take for this
27:08
Speaker 4: round to have hit him where it hint to him
27:10
Speaker 4: as an entrance wound and hit him in the C
27:13
Speaker 4: two first? We can find that out pretty easily. We
27:15
Speaker 4: can start at the sea two. We can come down
27:17
Speaker 4: with our angle here, and we can see that it
27:20
Speaker 4: actually would take a thirty eight degree upward angle for
27:28
Speaker 4: this to have potentially hit him where it hit him
27:31
Speaker 4: and then also hit the C two first if he
27:33
Speaker 4: was shot from the front. Does that make a whole
27:35
Speaker 4: lot of sense? Well maybe if the tunnel theory works.
27:38
Speaker 4: I don't know. That one seemed weird at the time.
27:41
Speaker 4: And then also keep in mind the round still has
27:44
Speaker 4: to travel then straight back down, which bullets don't do.
27:49
Speaker 4: They don't do this. Okay, guys, you would expect a
27:51
Speaker 4: bullet to refract out this way, refract up this way.
27:56
Speaker 4: It's not going to reverse this massive direction back the other.
28:00
Speaker 1: This, to me is the most interesting portion of the
28:03
Speaker 1: argument that a hall of VFT actually presents. To make
28:06
Speaker 1: this work, to make the alleged findings of the autopsy work,
28:10
Speaker 1: and to make this whole thing really makes sense. Charlie. Technically,
28:13
Speaker 1: according to this analysis, would have had to have been
28:16
Speaker 1: shot from below. If his body were to have been
28:19
Speaker 1: struck initially at the sea two near the top of
28:22
Speaker 1: the spine, the angle in theory would have had to
28:25
Speaker 1: have been drastically different than the one being presented in
28:29
Speaker 1: the alleged autopsy and medical findings. I mean, really, when
28:33
Speaker 1: you actually take a look at all of this and
28:35
Speaker 1: analyze the information gathered and presented, it seems like what
28:38
Speaker 1: they suggested happened is the most improbable series of events.
28:43
Speaker 1: Think about that. If this is the real autopsy, they're
28:46
Speaker 1: saying he was struck in the C two near the
28:49
Speaker 1: very top of your spine, So imagine that, touch the
28:51
Speaker 1: back of your neck, feel how high up your spine
28:54
Speaker 1: goes up here, And they're saying that he was shot
28:57
Speaker 1: from above directly into the that C two area, which,
29:03
Speaker 1: like he pointed out, would mean that you would have
29:05
Speaker 1: had to have been shot through the teeth to go
29:08
Speaker 1: straight back to his neck there. Because you're shooting up
29:13
Speaker 1: according to the official story, you're not shooting down. Now,
29:16
Speaker 1: if you're shooting below and the bullet goes up, that
29:20
Speaker 1: makes more sense. But just looking at it from the
29:24
Speaker 1: official story side of things, it's just lunacy.
29:28
Speaker 4: Now. The really popular theory that Rob O'Neil just talked
29:31
Speaker 4: about range DA Bros talked about a lot of people
29:33
Speaker 4: have talked about, which I have not discounted at all,
29:36
Speaker 4: have talked about him being shot from up and behind him.
29:40
Speaker 4: This is very interesting because this actually, besides one little
29:44
Speaker 4: piece which is that they found around inside of him,
29:47
Speaker 4: this actually potentially makes the medical examiner report work, with
29:52
Speaker 4: the injury and ballistics that all potentially work. Let's take
29:54
Speaker 4: a look at that The C two is going to
29:56
Speaker 4: be just behind the jaw there as we've seen it
29:58
Speaker 4: right now, if he gets shot from the back up
30:00
Speaker 4: or right, and again we don't know what that angle
30:03
Speaker 4: would be because this is all hypothetical, right, we don't
30:05
Speaker 4: know where that shooter was, but anything anywhere you would
30:07
Speaker 4: think around the way the buildings were. They're all about
30:09
Speaker 4: that height, anywhere from like a ten to maybe fifteen
30:12
Speaker 4: degree angle.
30:12
Speaker 5: Here.
30:13
Speaker 4: Now, all of a sudden, if he's getting shot in
30:16
Speaker 4: the back right of the head, that comes beneath the skull. Anatomically,
30:22
Speaker 4: this actually works. It comes in the back underneath his skull,
30:26
Speaker 4: hits him in the sea two, and then blows out
30:30
Speaker 4: at a normal refraction angle exactly where we expect to
30:35
Speaker 4: see the exit wound in this case. That actually works
30:40
Speaker 4: perfectly ballistically anatomically to have created that initial impact into
30:45
Speaker 4: the sea too. It probably blows down here through the
30:47
Speaker 4: C four, does some damage through C five, C six, three,
30:51
Speaker 4: C seven through cavitation. The biggest issue here is this
30:55
Speaker 4: is an exit wound, which means there would be no
30:58
Speaker 4: bullet found inside Charlie's body. That goes against the medical
31:02
Speaker 4: examiner's report.
31:03
Speaker 1: So the behind the back to the side shot actually
31:05
Speaker 1: makes sense in the scenario, which would imply a second
31:08
Speaker 1: shooter who has yet to be identified. But what makes
31:11
Speaker 1: this hypothetical situation also fall apart is that, like he
31:15
Speaker 1: just said, that would make the wound on Charlie's neck
31:18
Speaker 1: an exit wound, which would mean that a bullet would
31:20
Speaker 1: not have been found in Charlie's neck during the autopsy.
31:23
Speaker 1: And also there would have been a wound on the
31:25
Speaker 1: back of his neck, which goes against all published information.
31:29
Speaker 1: So it's highly unlikely, but it is possible in the
31:32
Speaker 1: context of this analysis. I mean, who knows. Maybe the
31:36
Speaker 1: bullet wasn't there in the first place. Maybe it's just
31:38
Speaker 1: a cover up of a cover up. You never really know.
31:41
Speaker 1: Things aren't just strange in this story if you couldn't
31:44
Speaker 1: tell by now, very very strange.
31:47
Speaker 4: All right. And then there's one final potential here, and
31:50
Speaker 4: that was actually brought forward by Peak Prosperity. This is
31:53
Speaker 4: a fantastic video if you haven't seen it either. And
31:55
Speaker 4: he actually had the theory that the shot came from
31:58
Speaker 4: technically the front, but from a much more drastic angle,
32:01
Speaker 4: almost like a forty five degree angle. So we can
32:04
Speaker 4: look at that here too, right now, So this theory
32:06
Speaker 4: states that it must have come from a far more
32:09
Speaker 4: horizontal angle, right because the front angle doesn't work at all,
32:12
Speaker 4: which I agree with, to come maybe up underneath the jaw.
32:15
Speaker 4: Even then, it's going to be tough where this comes
32:16
Speaker 4: to get to the Sea two. I don't think you do.
32:18
Speaker 4: I still think the in the C four, but to
32:20
Speaker 4: cause the actual damage at a much more steep angle. Now,
32:24
Speaker 4: all of a sudden, the refraction as this comes in
32:28
Speaker 4: and hits comes through here, the refraction comes down and
32:31
Speaker 4: potentially works that way. That's actually a bullet refraction. That
32:34
Speaker 4: makes sense, right, But then the biggest problem we have
32:36
Speaker 4: with this is then this probably doesn't hit him in
32:38
Speaker 4: the Sea two either. So where we left what's the problem? Well,
32:43
Speaker 4: the problem is is that the official narrative with Tyler Robinson,
32:47
Speaker 4: where he took the shot from from the angle he
32:48
Speaker 4: took the shot like I told you at the start
32:50
Speaker 4: of the video, with the type of weapon that he used,
32:53
Speaker 4: is not possible and does not match the medical examiner's
32:56
Speaker 4: report anatomically or mathematically. It doesn't work. So you have
33:02
Speaker 4: to then either say the medical examiner report can't be
33:05
Speaker 4: right or Tyler Robinson isn't the shooter. These things cannot
33:08
Speaker 4: be true at the same time as far as we're
33:10
Speaker 4: sort of understanding it with science and math and physics.
33:13
Speaker 4: So what's the real story?
33:16
Speaker 1: No, no, So none of this really makes sense. As
33:19
Speaker 1: you can see, there are a lot of theories floating
33:21
Speaker 1: around out there, a lot of people claiming that a
33:24
Speaker 1: lot of different people or parties were responsible for the shooting.
33:27
Speaker 1: But what we don't really have a lot of right
33:29
Speaker 1: now is truth and clarity. We just have questions, unanswered
33:33
Speaker 1: questions with no real answers seemingly in sight. There's also
33:37
Speaker 1: something I want to show you right here.
33:39
Speaker 6: One thing I wanted to bring up to you. I
33:41
Speaker 6: didn't know if you know this, but Utah is actually
33:44
Speaker 6: want one of the very few states that does not
33:47
Speaker 6: They don't have to release public records about autopsies. Oh okay,
33:52
Speaker 6: so they could cherry pick what gets released. So if
33:58
Speaker 6: you have a contact at Turning Point, essay, that might be.
34:03
Speaker 6: I also have someone who sent me a message from
34:06
Speaker 6: Fox and they have already tried to request autopsy documentation
34:10
Speaker 6: and they were told no that in the state of
34:12
Speaker 6: Utah they do not release them to the public. So
34:16
Speaker 6: if we get information during the trial or if whatever
34:20
Speaker 6: Turning Point USA decides to release, that will be the
34:23
Speaker 6: extent of what the public is given.
34:25
Speaker 1: Yes, you heard that right. In Utah, they seem to
34:28
Speaker 1: have a specific law, or really a specific sort of loophole,
34:32
Speaker 1: which essentially in boiled down format makes it to where
34:35
Speaker 1: the authorities technically do not have to release autopsy reports
34:40
Speaker 1: or reports of that manner, And that's when you have
34:42
Speaker 1: to start asking questions yourself. Could this event have potentially
34:45
Speaker 1: been pre planned by some group, some foreign body, some
34:48
Speaker 1: intelligence service to take place in a state where the
34:52
Speaker 1: cover up would be easier to execute than in other states?
34:55
Speaker 1: Or was this really just coincidence? In this line of work,
34:59
Speaker 1: I don't believe in coincidences, and you shouldn't either. But
35:03
Speaker 1: what does all of this leave us with? Will the
35:05
Speaker 1: autopsy which officially remains sealed to this day, and the
35:09
Speaker 1: video ambiguities and irregularities, for example, the graphic footage showing
35:13
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk's slow backwards collapse with limited initial blood, which
35:18
Speaker 1: defies the logic of what they're saying happen, have spawned
35:21
Speaker 1: a proliferation of theories on the Internet, with theories being
35:24
Speaker 1: built from ballistic inconsistencies withheld evidence and Charlie Kirk's political
35:29
Speaker 1: profile and decisions like for example, his recent anti Israel
35:33
Speaker 1: donor critiques. One of the biggest theories that I've seen
35:36
Speaker 1: floating around is the mic pack explosion or ied theory.
35:39
Speaker 1: This viral hypothesis posits that an improvised explosive device or
35:44
Speaker 1: ied was concealed that day within Charlie Kirk's road wireless
35:48
Speaker 1: pro Lapel microphone, which you can visibly see planted on
35:52
Speaker 1: his chest before the shooting. The theory claims that this
35:54
Speaker 1: miniature explosive device was detonated remotely via an acoustic trigger
35:59
Speaker 1: like an audible rifle crack, as a signal, or potentially
36:02
Speaker 1: it was even triggered by someone who was there in
36:04
Speaker 1: the audience that day. I've seen videos of the shooting
36:07
Speaker 1: and I do have to admit there's one specific angle
36:10
Speaker 1: that shows a member of Charlie Kirk's team seemingly clicking
36:14
Speaker 1: or messing with something in his chest pocket right as
36:17
Speaker 1: the fatal shot is fired. That almost looks like he
36:20
Speaker 1: clicks something in his pocket and then Kirk is shot.
36:23
Speaker 1: The timing, just visually, upon looking at it, appears to
36:26
Speaker 1: be incredibly suspicious. Proponents of this theory constantly cite evidence
36:31
Speaker 1: that can be observed in video footage from that day.
36:34
Speaker 1: For example, there's the omnidirectional fabric displacement on Charlie's T shirt.
36:38
Speaker 1: You know how his shirt jumps right as he's shot,
36:41
Speaker 1: suggesting a spherical blast over pressure, not linear bullet. Yaw,
36:44
Speaker 1: I've seen this come up a lot. Why did Kirk's
36:47
Speaker 1: shirt seem to explode on its own in a completely
36:49
Speaker 1: different area than where the bullet allegedly struck him in
36:52
Speaker 1: the neck. Also, they point out the fact that there's
36:55
Speaker 1: no shock plume visible in pixel flow of vector mapping
36:58
Speaker 1: across multi angle footage, which theorists claim should have been
37:02
Speaker 1: visible if the official story is really what happened. Talking
37:05
Speaker 1: in more detail, researchers have used online pixel flow vector mapping,
37:10
Speaker 1: a technique that tracks down pixel movement in videos, to
37:14
Speaker 1: analyze the multi angle footage of Kirk's assassination, and they
37:17
Speaker 1: claim that the absence of a shock plume or a
37:20
Speaker 1: visible air distortion from a high velocity bullet suggests that
37:24
Speaker 1: the shooting may not have involved a real bullet fired
37:27
Speaker 1: from that same claimed location. It's very interesting, for sure,
37:31
Speaker 1: and I could potentially talk more about all this analysis
37:34
Speaker 1: in another video, but we can save that discussion for
37:37
Speaker 1: another day. To put it plainly, the video doesn't show
37:39
Speaker 1: to some people what it's supposed to show. Analysis of
37:42
Speaker 1: the video shows to them a bold faced lie. However,
37:46
Speaker 1: a little bit of factual rebuttal to this theory and
37:48
Speaker 1: why I'm not so sure that this would have been possible.
37:51
Speaker 1: There was no explosive residue like, for example, see four
37:54
Speaker 1: traces in any of the preliminary forensic sweeps that were
37:58
Speaker 1: performed and then referenced in the fa BI affid davits,
38:01
Speaker 1: and the full microphone and mic pack itself was recovered
38:04
Speaker 1: from the scene intact, allegedly for analysis. Now you do
38:09
Speaker 1: have to take all of that with a grain of salt, because,
38:11
Speaker 1: after all, this is the FBI telling us this, who
38:15
Speaker 1: we in this video are saying are lying. But it's
38:19
Speaker 1: also important to note that fact Also, independent journalists and
38:22
Speaker 1: hawkeyed viewers online have enhanced the footage of the moment
38:25
Speaker 1: that Kirk was shot for themselves, and they claimed that
38:28
Speaker 1: in their analysis they found micro vibrations in the video
38:32
Speaker 1: consistent with bullet aired displacement, not any sort of controlled detonation.
38:36
Speaker 1: The theory persists, though, due to the T shirt ruffle
38:39
Speaker 1: and obviously the angle at which Charlie really had to
38:42
Speaker 1: have been shot at if the autopsy report is going
38:45
Speaker 1: to make any sense. But it should be noted that
38:47
Speaker 1: high velocity shock waves can disturb light fabric via something
38:51
Speaker 1: called bow wave pressure, which can be observed in hydrodynamic models.
38:56
Speaker 1: Another theory proposed by some online to explain what really happened,
39:00
Speaker 1: suggests that the round actually first struck Charlie Kirk's chest, which,
39:03
Speaker 1: according to this theory, was protected by an AR five
39:06
Speaker 1: hundred steel plate vest that he reported the war routinely,
39:10
Speaker 1: and then the bullet after striking this armor, ricocheted upwards
39:13
Speaker 1: into his neck, which would in theory, explain the shallow
39:17
Speaker 1: path and entry wound, appearing to some as an exit wound.
39:20
Speaker 1: Eyewitnesses and frame by frame breakdowns highlight that four inch
39:24
Speaker 1: chest impact puff, that thing that comes off his chest
39:27
Speaker 1: that can be seen on Charlie's shirt before the neck
39:29
Speaker 1: begins bleeding, with something called the rifleman's rule being sighted
39:33
Speaker 1: as deflecting the shot high digging into the rifleman's rule.
39:37
Speaker 1: When you shoot at an angle uphill or downhill, the
39:39
Speaker 1: effective gravitational pull on the bullet is reduced. Compared to
39:43
Speaker 1: shooting on a level plane, gravity acts perpendicular to the
39:46
Speaker 1: Earth's surface, but when shooting at an angle, only a
39:50
Speaker 1: component of gravity proportional to the coatsign of the angle
39:53
Speaker 1: affects the bullet's drop along the line of sight to
39:56
Speaker 1: the target. This reduced gravitational effect means the bullet doesn't
40:00
Speaker 1: as much as it would on flat ground, causing the
40:03
Speaker 1: shot to impact higher than the shooter might expect if
40:06
Speaker 1: they use the same aim for a level shot. This,
40:09
Speaker 1: to some is evidence used to justify this theory that
40:13
Speaker 1: the shooter really missed a shot. It hit a chest
40:15
Speaker 1: plate that Charlie was wearing, and then it bounced upwards
40:18
Speaker 1: into his neck at an angle. However, debunking this for
40:21
Speaker 1: a moment, we do have to mention the fact that
40:23
Speaker 1: it has been confirmed by multiple sources that Charlie Kirk
40:26
Speaker 1: was not wearing a bullet proof vest or any protection
40:29
Speaker 1: like that on the day he was killed. If he
40:32
Speaker 1: was wearing one, though, and maybe once again we're being
40:34
Speaker 1: lied to, this would indeed fit the damage profile. For example,
40:38
Speaker 1: the deformed slug recovered from Charlie's body would match the
40:42
Speaker 1: ricochet tumbling seen in the autopsy report. Ricochet tumbling occurs
40:46
Speaker 1: when a bullet, after striking a surface, deflects and vibrates
40:49
Speaker 1: and shakes around unpredictably and spins or tumbles within the
40:53
Speaker 1: object that it was shot inside of due to the impact,
40:56
Speaker 1: altering its stability and trajectory. However, vector NAS performed on
41:00
Speaker 1: footage of the shooting from three different angles shows no
41:04
Speaker 1: primary chest vector, only secondary neck displacement, and so due
41:08
Speaker 1: to these factors, many have counted this theory as false. Now,
41:13
Speaker 1: the theory that I find to be one of the
41:14
Speaker 1: most believable would be the low velocity or close range
41:17
Speaker 1: shot potentially from behind theory. This theory theorizes that a
41:21
Speaker 1: suppressed fifty caliber PCP airgun or pistol could have been
41:26
Speaker 1: fired at Charlie from somewhere in the crowd or from
41:28
Speaker 1: behind him. Proponents of this theory cite the minimal blood
41:31
Speaker 1: loss scene when Charlie is shot, the small entry wound,
41:35
Speaker 1: the lack of an exit wound, Charlie's slow collapse, and
41:38
Speaker 1: the fact that there was no forward snap from Charlie
41:41
Speaker 1: going forward after suffering a high velocity rifle shot from
41:45
Speaker 1: the front. There are a lot of mysterious characters in
41:48
Speaker 1: the Charlie Kirk assassination story. There's the distraction, the immediate
41:52
Speaker 1: fall guide George Zinn. There are the employees that acted strange,
41:56
Speaker 1: that day. There's the guy who ran to snatch the
41:58
Speaker 1: camera card from the camera mounted behind Charlie, the security
42:02
Speaker 1: guard who seemed to grab something from Charlie's pocket after
42:04
Speaker 1: he was shot and handed to someone. There's so much
42:07
Speaker 1: to talk about, so many suspicious individuals involved, but focusing
42:12
Speaker 1: in on this theory, the main facet I would say
42:15
Speaker 1: is the fact that most people online seem to agree
42:18
Speaker 1: that a true thirty out six Grizzly round would definitely
42:21
Speaker 1: have left an exit wound on Charlie's body, which, as
42:24
Speaker 1: we all know, according to the official story, it didn't.
42:28
Speaker 1: This theory suggests that Charlie had to have been struck
42:31
Speaker 1: by a low velocity projectile fired from a much smaller weapon,
42:35
Speaker 1: traveling roughly around eight hundred to one thousand feet per second,
42:39
Speaker 1: and it's claimed that these conditions would have had to
42:41
Speaker 1: have been met in order for the observed one to
42:44
Speaker 1: two pints of blood that Charlie lost to really make sense.
42:47
Speaker 1: People have spent time endlessly analyzing the footage from that day.
42:50
Speaker 1: There are some people who claim they can visually see
42:53
Speaker 1: a second shooter. There are people saying there's other evidence
42:56
Speaker 1: that they noticed. Like I said, the security guys acting weird,
42:58
Speaker 1: the hand signals, all that stuff, but none of it
43:02
Speaker 1: is really conclusive, and this whole rabbit hole is indeed
43:06
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. Diverging for a second, we have to talk
43:09
Speaker 1: about the fact that Charlie Kirk for years had been
43:11
Speaker 1: a vocal pro Israel advocate, frequently defending the Jewish state
43:15
Speaker 1: against campus anti Semitism and social media disinformation. However, in
43:20
Speaker 1: the lead up to his death, some conservatives, including podcaster
43:23
Speaker 1: Candace Owens, have stated that Charlie had been souring on
43:27
Speaker 1: Israel and Netan Yahoo's leadership, fueling conspiracy theories that Israel
43:31
Speaker 1: might have been involved in his death. And I do
43:34
Speaker 1: think that it's all a little bit strange. It is known,
43:37
Speaker 1: based on leaked group chat messages, that just before his death,
43:40
Speaker 1: literally a few days before he was shot and killed,
43:43
Speaker 1: in a message with influential members of the Turning Point
43:46
Speaker 1: USA team and other leaders in his life, stated the following.
43:50
Speaker 1: This is the exact text exchange, which has been confirmed
43:53
Speaker 1: to be true by Turning Point USA. Charlie Kirk just
43:57
Speaker 1: lost another huge Jewish donor two million a year. Because
44:00
Speaker 1: we won't cancel Tucker, I'm thinking of inviting Candice Uugh
44:05
Speaker 1: Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and
44:08
Speaker 1: will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice
44:11
Speaker 1: but to leave the pro Israel cause. Now that's pretty bizarre.
44:15
Speaker 1: We know that Israel as a political state has committed
44:18
Speaker 1: countless crimes over the years and been given a free
44:21
Speaker 1: pass by American leadership. For example, there's the Promise scandal,
44:25
Speaker 1: which I've talked about many times on the show, where
44:27
Speaker 1: Israel was involved in the sale of technology in America
44:30
Speaker 1: that had a virtual back door built into it which
44:33
Speaker 1: allowed Israeli intelligence to spy on American agencies and government bodies.
44:38
Speaker 1: There's obviously the Epstein scandal, which I've talked about extensively
44:42
Speaker 1: on the Channel. It's known that Epstein had deep ties
44:45
Speaker 1: to both Israeli political figures and the Israeli intelligence apparatus.
44:50
Speaker 1: Epstein was no doubt operating as an intelligence asset, not
44:54
Speaker 1: only for Israel, but also for America. There's also the
44:58
Speaker 1: USS Liberty incident, which WHI occurred on June eighth, nineteen
45:01
Speaker 1: sixty seven, during the Six Day War, when Israeli air
45:05
Speaker 1: and naval forces attacked the American intelligence ship the USS
45:10
Speaker 1: Liberty in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula, killing thirty
45:15
Speaker 1: four crew members and injuring one hundred and seventy one.
45:19
Speaker 1: That's right, Israeli air and naval forces attacked a US ship,
45:24
Speaker 1: killed thirty four crew members American gis, and injured one
45:29
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy one more. Now, Israel claimed that this
45:33
Speaker 1: was nothing more than a case of mistaken identity. They
45:36
Speaker 1: had mistaken the American vessel for an Egyptian ship, but
45:39
Speaker 1: survivors and some US officials have alleged that this was
45:42
Speaker 1: a deliberate attack to prevent the United States from intercepting
45:47
Speaker 1: sensitive Israeli communications. The incident remains controversial, with ongoing debates
45:52
Speaker 1: about the motives and the lack of a definitive resolution,
45:55
Speaker 1: though both governments eventually settled on the accidental attack narrative.
46:00
Speaker 1: Accidental attack.
46:01
Speaker 5: That's right.
46:02
Speaker 1: Any other nation that attacked US killed thirty four sailors
46:05
Speaker 1: and one hundred and seventy one were wounded, they'd be
46:07
Speaker 1: an immediate enemy of America. But it was just an accident.
46:11
Speaker 1: Those thirty four people killed in one hundred and seventy
46:14
Speaker 1: one injured, just an accident. I'm sorry, guys. Let's just
46:17
Speaker 1: let isdall get away with it. I'm sorry, they didn't
46:20
Speaker 1: mean to do it, you know, it's a total accident,
46:22
Speaker 1: which is bullshit. I'm gonna do a whole episode on
46:25
Speaker 1: that soon. It is crazy, the actual stories of people survivors,
46:30
Speaker 1: seeing them specifically hone into attack and hearing communications from
46:34
Speaker 1: them that day talking about how they're knowingly attacking the
46:37
Speaker 1: US thing like it's a massive cover up. And obviously,
46:40
Speaker 1: above all, I fullheartedly, wholeheartedly condemned the genocide currently occurring
46:46
Speaker 1: in Gaza. What is happening over there to innocent men, women,
46:50
Speaker 1: and most of all children is morally abhorrent and completely despicable.
46:57
Speaker 1: So the motive in my mind is almost there. Charlie
47:01
Speaker 1: Kirk one of the largest most influential voices in all
47:04
Speaker 1: of American conservatism. It would be really hard to find
47:08
Speaker 1: someone in the conservative world in America that had a
47:12
Speaker 1: larger megaphone. He was about to begin speaking out against
47:16
Speaker 1: the genocide in Gaza, and the pro Israeli lobby was
47:19
Speaker 1: about to lose Charlie Kirk as one of their mouthpieces.
47:23
Speaker 1: Charlie had actually talked about his loss of faith and
47:25
Speaker 1: support for Israel pretty extensively in private and public in
47:30
Speaker 1: the months before his death, and then bam, before he
47:33
Speaker 1: can flip signs and warn his followers about what's really
47:35
Speaker 1: happening over there, he's silenced forever. Now, this theory is interesting,
47:40
Speaker 1: but it gets even stranger when you consider that shortly
47:43
Speaker 1: after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Benjamin Netanyahoo himself, Israel's Prime Minister,
47:48
Speaker 1: got in front of a camera and said this.
47:51
Speaker 5: Well, somebody is fabricated a monstrous, big lie that Israel
47:55
Speaker 5: had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder. This
47:59
Speaker 5: is insane, it is false, it is outrageous. Charlie Kirk
48:05
Speaker 5: was a giant, a once in a century talent who
48:08
Speaker 5: defended freedom, defended America, defended our common Judaeo Christian civilization.
48:14
Speaker 5: Charlie loved Israel. He loved the Jewish people. He told
48:18
Speaker 5: me so in a letter that he sent me just
48:19
Speaker 5: a few months ago. One of my greatest joys as
48:22
Speaker 5: a Christian, he said, is advocating for Israel and forming
48:26
Speaker 5: alliances with Jews to protect Judao Christian civilization. He encouraged
48:31
Speaker 5: me to make the case directly to the American people
48:34
Speaker 5: about how vital Israel is to us national security. He
48:38
Speaker 5: told me the Holy Land is so important to my life.
48:42
Speaker 5: It pains me to see support for Israel's slip away. Now,
48:46
Speaker 5: if Charlie disagreed with the policy of mine or a
48:48
Speaker 5: decision here and there, not only did I not mind,
48:52
Speaker 5: I welcomed it. This is the essence of Charlie. This
48:55
Speaker 5: is the essence of a free country. It's exactly what
48:58
Speaker 5: Charlie stood for, that his suggestions always came from the heart,
49:03
Speaker 5: from his love for Israel, and from his love for
49:05
Speaker 5: the Jewish people. A few weeks before his death, I
49:09
Speaker 5: spoke to Charlie. I invited him to visit Israel again,
49:13
Speaker 5: and sadly that won't happen. Now some are peddling these
49:18
Speaker 5: disgusting rumors, perhaps out of obsession, perhaps with Katari funding.
49:24
Speaker 5: What I do know is this, Charlie Kirk was a
49:28
Speaker 5: great man, and a great man deserves honor, not lies.
49:33
Speaker 5: Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk, mayor your memory be a blessing.
49:38
Speaker 1: So this was posted just shortly after Charlie Kirk's death,
49:41
Speaker 1: a message from the prime minister of a foreign country
49:45
Speaker 1: publicly claiming and asserting that they had absolutely nothing to
49:48
Speaker 1: do with an assassination doesn't that seem kind of odd
49:51
Speaker 1: to you. There's also the fact that Israeli Prime Minister
49:54
Speaker 1: net And Yahoo invited Charlie Kirk to come to Israel
49:58
Speaker 1: just a few weeks prior to his public assassination, and
50:01
Speaker 1: Charlie reportedly declined the invite. Then, about a month before
50:05
Speaker 1: his death, Charlie vented his frustration on Megan Kelly's show
50:08
Speaker 1: that Israeli and Jewish donors were texting him calling him
50:11
Speaker 1: anti Semitic, for mentioning Epstein's connections to the Massad and
50:16
Speaker 1: hosting israel critic Dave Smith at a recent TPUSA event.
50:20
Speaker 1: There's also the fact that Netanyahoo posted his condolences to
50:23
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk and his family before US officials or major
50:27
Speaker 1: news outlets had announced formally Charlie Kirk's death, which has
50:31
Speaker 1: fueled speculation of forek knowledge or potential Israeli intelligence involvement
50:36
Speaker 1: in Kirk's killing. Then there's the letter following Kirk's assassination.
50:40
Speaker 1: Netanyahu selectively quoted from a supportive letter that Charlie Kirk
50:44
Speaker 1: had sent him on May second of this year, in
50:47
Speaker 1: order to counter emerging claims of Charlie's growing criticism of
50:50
Speaker 1: his leadership at Israel in general. In releasing selected portions
50:54
Speaker 1: of this letter, Netan Nyahoo strategically framed Charlie Kirk as
50:58
Speaker 1: an unwavering ally of Israel in order to assumingly bolster
51:03
Speaker 1: Israel's image amongst US conservatives. This partial disclosure of the
51:08
Speaker 1: truth highlighted in Benjamin Ntanyahu's September eighteenth video statement and
51:12
Speaker 1: ex posts, delayed the full release of the seven page
51:16
Speaker 1: letter amidst mounting demands for transparency, a move perceived by
51:20
Speaker 1: critics as an attempt to control the narrative and to
51:23
Speaker 1: suppress Charlie Kirk's more candid concerns with Netanyahu and Israel. Notably,
51:28
Speaker 1: Netanyahu's selective presentation ignored Charlie Kirk's explicit warnings that he
51:33
Speaker 1: wrote down in the letter about Israel's faltering pr strategy,
51:36
Speaker 1: particularly discussing the risk of losing support amongst the magabase
51:41
Speaker 1: and younger conservatives, which fueled accusations that the Israeli leader
51:45
Speaker 1: was prioritizing political expediency over addressing the substantive issues Charlie
51:50
Speaker 1: had raised. The eventual full release of the letter by
51:52
Speaker 1: Netanyahu's office to The New York Post on September thirtieth
51:56
Speaker 1: only intensified the controversy as it revealed Charlie Kirk's bat
52:00
Speaker 1: balanced critique support laced with urgent advice, leaving others to
52:04
Speaker 1: question the timing and the intent behind Netanyahu's initial selective
52:08
Speaker 1: quotation releases. So he was basically putting out parts of
52:12
Speaker 1: the letter that made Charlie Kirk out to be a
52:14
Speaker 1: fervent supporter of Israel with no critiques and only love.
52:18
Speaker 1: But when the full letter was released, it shows that
52:20
Speaker 1: he was basically critiquing them right to their faces. So
52:24
Speaker 1: could Israel potentially play a hand in this? Could this
52:26
Speaker 1: have been an assassination by a foreign government? Keep in
52:30
Speaker 1: mind people who are viewing this video, and I want
52:32
Speaker 1: to keep this very very very clear. Critiques of Israel,
52:36
Speaker 1: critiques of Israel that I make on any of my
52:38
Speaker 1: social media or on my shows have nothing to do
52:42
Speaker 1: with critiques of Judaism or anybody's religion or any ethnic
52:47
Speaker 1: group or people. The critiques that I am making are
52:50
Speaker 1: critiques of a highly corrupted, violent foreign government that is
52:54
Speaker 1: currently committing a genocide against innocent men, women and children,
52:59
Speaker 1: actively in the public eye, in front of everybody, and
53:03
Speaker 1: no one's doing anything about it. It's food for thought
53:05
Speaker 1: for sure. And finally, there is the magic bullet theory.
53:08
Speaker 1: The magic bullet doubts echo JFK's assassination lore. How does
53:12
Speaker 1: a high energy round stop before doing any deeper damage
53:16
Speaker 1: to Charlie Kirk's body or hitting any bystanders or Charlie's surroundings.
53:20
Speaker 1: In the end, these theories thrive on what we do
53:23
Speaker 1: or do not know regarding the official sealed autopsy, and
53:26
Speaker 1: this has all eroded trust in the government, as seen
53:29
Speaker 1: in trends on platforms like x for the hashtag Charlie
53:32
Speaker 1: Kirk autopsy garnered over fifty thousand posts. The full release
53:36
Speaker 1: of this autopsy could answer some burning questions and provide
53:39
Speaker 1: clarity as to what really happened here, But, as officials
53:42
Speaker 1: and commenters online have noted, unchecked speculation and independent analysis
53:47
Speaker 1: of evidence could potentially, according to officials, put the trial
53:51
Speaker 1: and the legitimacy of alleged shooter Tyler Robinson at risk.
53:55
Speaker 1: Something else interesting, though, is that on Tyler Robinson's legal
53:58
Speaker 1: team is a Michael bert, a lawyer who famously previously
54:02
Speaker 1: defended Joseph Lyle Menendez during the Menendez brothers first trial
54:07
Speaker 1: in nineteen ninety three. So if you really are guilty,
54:11
Speaker 1: and you admitted to the crime over text and all
54:13
Speaker 1: the evidence, the DNA, all the video, all the surveillance,
54:17
Speaker 1: everything connects you to the crime an extremely solid, extremely
54:21
Speaker 1: detailed detail. Why would you have a high profile, very experienced,
54:25
Speaker 1: infamous lawyer added to your case if you didn't intend
54:29
Speaker 1: to try and fight it. It makes no sense. Shockingly though,
54:32
Speaker 1: Kirk's assassination has some disturbing historical parallels. For example, on
54:36
Speaker 1: April fourth, nineteen sixty eight, doctor Martin Luther King, Junior
54:40
Speaker 1: was assassinated at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, while
54:44
Speaker 1: standing on the balcony. He also was struck by a
54:46
Speaker 1: single thirty odd to sixth round fired from a Remington
54:50
Speaker 1: Model seven sixty game Master rifle. Allegedly. We know that
54:54
Speaker 1: that's not true, but according to the story, fired by
54:57
Speaker 1: James Earl Ray from a boarding house a across the
55:00
Speaker 1: street approximately two hundred to three hundred feet away, the
55:03
Speaker 1: bullet entered the right side of doctor King's face, fracturing
55:07
Speaker 1: the mandible and traveled downward through the neck, damaging multiple
55:10
Speaker 1: blood vessels, including the jugular and subclavian arteries and severing
55:14
Speaker 1: the spinal cord at the lower cervical slash upper thoracic
55:18
Speaker 1: level before lodging in the left shoulder area. The trajectory
55:22
Speaker 1: was front to back, right to left, and slightly downward,
55:25
Speaker 1: seemingly consistent with these shooter's elevated position. The autopsy at
55:30
Speaker 1: the time, conducted by a doctor Jerry Francisco, the Shelby
55:33
Speaker 1: County Medical Examiner, confirmed that the fatal wound caused immediate
55:37
Speaker 1: paralysis due to spinal cord transaction and led to death
55:41
Speaker 1: from hemorrhagic shock due to severe blood loss from damaged vessels.
55:45
Speaker 1: A single bullet was recovered from the body, with no
55:48
Speaker 1: evidence of multiple fragments or unusual ballistic behavior. Beyond the
55:52
Speaker 1: expected effects, The injury would likely have caused quadriplegia if
55:57
Speaker 1: doctor King had survived. And here again lie an anomaly.
56:01
Speaker 1: High velocity thirty out six round fired from across the
56:04
Speaker 1: street executed a near ninety degree redirection inside of Martin
56:09
Speaker 1: Luther King Junior's body, fragmenting without ever leaving his body.
56:14
Speaker 1: Its remnants contained wholly within MLK Junior's body and his clothing.
56:19
Speaker 1: This defied clean penetration expectations, and once again harkins forward
56:24
Speaker 1: to Charlie Kirk's lodged round and the alleged scattered shards
56:28
Speaker 1: throughout his body, prompting whispers of ballistic and probabilities that
56:32
Speaker 1: have echoed through decades of conspiracy debates. So you got
56:35
Speaker 1: thirty out six with Martin Luther King Junior also hitting
56:39
Speaker 1: his body at a close range, not doing what people
56:42
Speaker 1: thought it should do or would have done, bouncing around
56:46
Speaker 1: at all these unprobable angles, shattering his inerts and his
56:49
Speaker 1: skeletal structure in a similar way that Charlie Kirk. And
56:53
Speaker 1: there's no exit. Wouder never leaves his body. It's very,
56:56
Speaker 1: very similar to Charlie Kirk. And just consider this. We
57:01
Speaker 1: know for a fact if you read into the story,
57:03
Speaker 1: that James Earl Ray was not the guy who killed
57:06
Speaker 1: Martin Luther King Junior. In fact, if you do some
57:09
Speaker 1: research yourself, you will see that Martin Luther King Junior's
57:13
Speaker 1: own family members became friends with James Earl Ray because
57:17
Speaker 1: they wholeheartedly based on independent investigations people they had talked
57:21
Speaker 1: to in evidence that they collected over the years, They
57:24
Speaker 1: for the most part, all believed that James Earl Ray
57:27
Speaker 1: was innocent. He was a patsy, a sort of fall guy.
57:29
Speaker 1: I could do an entire episode on that in the future,
57:32
Speaker 1: but there's so much wrong with that story. It isn't
57:34
Speaker 1: even funny. But we see that same similar bullet travel
57:37
Speaker 1: in his body as we also see in Charlie Kirk's,
57:40
Speaker 1: so it's definitely a little odd. Similarly, the November twenty second,
57:44
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty three assassination of President John F. Kennedy in
57:48
Speaker 1: Dallas presents a tapestry of ballistic riddles. The fatal shot
57:52
Speaker 1: taken at JFK, captured in the Zepruder film, propelled John F.
57:56
Speaker 1: Kennedy's head backwards, like this emotion longside as being evidence
58:01
Speaker 1: of there having been a shooter in the front, which
58:04
Speaker 1: has fueled countless theories of multiple gunmen the Grassy Knoll.
58:08
Speaker 1: Yet dynamical models, according to officials, reveal this as having
58:12
Speaker 1: been consistent with a rear impact. The infamous magic bullet
58:17
Speaker 1: Commission Exhibit three ninety nine allegedly passed through JFK's neck
58:21
Speaker 1: and Governor Connolly's body, tumbling and deforming in various ways
58:25
Speaker 1: that strain credulity. Yet forensic recreations attribute its zigzagging path
58:30
Speaker 1: to yaw and bone deflection. I mean, obviously, we could
58:34
Speaker 1: talk about JFK all day, the dozens, if not over
58:38
Speaker 1: one hundred people that were killed. There's a whole book
58:41
Speaker 1: written about this, the hit List, talking about all the
58:43
Speaker 1: witnesses and people who knew something that ended up dead
58:46
Speaker 1: in mysterious ways, all based on the JFK assassination. But yeah,
58:50
Speaker 1: there's just a lot to talk about there. I even
58:53
Speaker 1: have a seventy page script ready to go that I'm
58:56
Speaker 1: going to be releasing in November about the JFK assassination
58:59
Speaker 1: that is truly mind blowing. Needless to say that, there
59:02
Speaker 1: are hundreds, if not thousands of unexplained circumstances and pieces
59:06
Speaker 1: of evidence in the JFK assassination, but also in the
59:10
Speaker 1: MLK assassination and now in the Kirk assassination. None of
59:14
Speaker 1: this makes sense. Magic Bullets appear and disappear, bullets and
59:18
Speaker 1: fragments travel through bodies in bizarre, almost unexplainable ways, and
59:22
Speaker 1: mystery abounds. This seems to be an observable pattern where
59:26
Speaker 1: official explanations stretch to accommodate inconvenient forensic evidence. Where these
59:31
Speaker 1: deflections and inconsistencies mere quirks of fate or signs of
59:35
Speaker 1: an engineered deception and deeper plot, The echoes grow louder,
59:39
Speaker 1: urging us to question if Charlie Kirk's death followed a
59:42
Speaker 1: scripted path taken directly from the pages of American historical tragedy.
59:47
Speaker 1: As twilight descends over the Utah Value where Charlie Kirk
59:50
Speaker 1: met his untimely end, the official narrative continues to unravel,
59:54
Speaker 1: like a frayed thread in a grand tapestry of deception.
59:57
Speaker 1: What began as a seemingly straightforward a of lone wolf
1:00:01
Speaker 1: extremism morphs under the relentless gaze of inquiry into eight
1:00:05
Speaker 1: labyrinth of impossibilities, a bullet that dances through vertebrate with
1:00:09
Speaker 1: acrobatic defiance, Shadows that flicker and fade in the digital
1:00:13
Speaker 1: eff motives that whisper of foreign intrigue and domestic betrayal.
1:00:17
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk, though effectively silenced, now beckons at us from
1:00:20
Speaker 1: beyond his silence, voice a clarion call to peel back
1:00:24
Speaker 1: the layers of this mystery. Yet the quest does not
1:00:27
Speaker 1: end here, It merely pauses. Why did the thirty odd six,
1:00:30
Speaker 1: a cartridge forged in the fires of war and tested
1:00:33
Speaker 1: on battlefields, choose this moment to forsake its penetrating destiny.
1:00:37
Speaker 1: How could a rooftop perch yield a trajectory that mocks
1:00:40
Speaker 1: geometry unless unseen hands guided its arc? And in the
1:00:44
Speaker 1: echoes of Mlk's fragmented round lodged in his shoulder after
1:00:48
Speaker 1: a serpentine journey through his john neck or JFK's backward
1:00:52
Speaker 1: snap which defied frontal illusions, do we glimpse a blueprint
1:00:56
Speaker 1: for engineered ambiguity? Folks, these aren't just historical footnotes. They
1:01:00
Speaker 1: seem to be spectral guides, illuminating the possibility that Charlie
1:01:04
Speaker 1: Kirk's assassination was no random thunderbolt, but a meticulously orchestrated
1:01:09
Speaker 1: strike against the heart of future and potential dissent. Imagine
1:01:13
Speaker 1: if you will, the dimly lit rooms where decisions are
1:01:16
Speaker 1: made in whispers, Epstein's ghosts mingling with geopolitical chess pieces.
1:01:21
Speaker 1: It was in these secret rooms where conservative firebrands like
1:01:24
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk and others were seemingly deemed to have been
1:01:27
Speaker 1: threats to the fragile systems that enabled the rooms in
1:01:30
Speaker 1: the first place, the leaked texts, the foreign funding probes,
1:01:34
Speaker 1: the internal rifts within Turning Point USA. When viewed as
1:01:37
Speaker 1: a whole, each of these facts, a puzzle piece of
1:01:39
Speaker 1: their own, helps to formate mosaic of motive, each tile
1:01:43
Speaker 1: a clue in this non fiction thriller where truth is
1:01:46
Speaker 1: the ultimate prize. As investigators cluster on the perimeters of
1:01:49
Speaker 1: this equation, avoiding the core like guardians of forbidden knowledge,
1:01:53
Speaker 1: one wonders what secrets lie buried in unredacted reports, raw footage,
1:01:57
Speaker 1: and the silenced witnesses. In this air of fractured trust,
1:02:01
Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk's death demands more than a eulogy. It cries
1:02:04
Speaker 1: out for a revelation. The prosecution's path to conviction, paved
1:02:08
Speaker 1: with eighth grade math fallacies, teeters on the brink of collapse,
1:02:11
Speaker 1: much like the American nation's faith in its own sacred institutions.
1:02:15
Speaker 1: Will the Menendez Brothers legal titan expose the charade or
1:02:18
Speaker 1: will the deep state shadows prevail? Unfortunately for us at home,
1:02:22
Speaker 1: the veil seems to be lifting, slowly, revealing not closure
1:02:26
Speaker 1: in the case, but a deeper abyss of intrigue and evil,
1:02:29
Speaker 1: and what are we left with here? Well, what seems
1:02:32
Speaker 1: to be an enduring mystery, a testament to the power
1:02:35
Speaker 1: and frequency of unanswered questions in the American experiment. Thank
1:02:40
Speaker 1: you guys for watching today. I cannot thank you all
1:02:43
Speaker 1: enough for joining me for this week's episode. Clearly I
1:02:47
Speaker 1: did not align with Charlie politically on almost everything, but
1:02:51
Speaker 1: that's its own thing. I try to not make my
1:02:54
Speaker 1: politics a thing here on this channel, but I do
1:02:57
Speaker 1: believe that there's definitely something more nefarious that to them.
1:03:00
Speaker 1: So if you've enjoyed today's video, please be sure to
1:03:04
Speaker 1: leave me a like, share this video out and comment
1:03:08
Speaker 1: what you think of this whole thing. Your comments, your likes,
1:03:11
Speaker 1: your subscribes, your shares help boost this channel's visibility. I
1:03:15
Speaker 1: cannot thank all of you guys enough for joining me
1:03:17
Speaker 1: on this journey. We're almost at three hundred thousand subscribers,
1:03:20
Speaker 1: which is absolutely incredible. But anyways, y'all, I'm gonna let
1:03:24
Speaker 1: y'all get going have a great rest of your week.
1:03:26
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening or watching. If you're
1:03:30
Speaker 1: listening to the show, be sure to leave a five
1:03:31
Speaker 1: star review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Please, as always,
1:03:35
Speaker 1: everybody stay suspicious, Always question everything, Keep that tinfoil hat on,
1:03:40
Speaker 1: and I'll see you next week.