Latest / The Science of Leading / The Question Nobody's Answering
Transcript
- 0:00Welcome back to Science of Leading, I'm Claire Monroe with Edwin Carrington.
- 0:04Edwin, we've covered sponsorship and measurable goals.
- 0:07Today I want to start with a line from the piece that reframed something for me.
- 0:11Leadership tends to communicate the what and the why, but employees are silently
- 0:16asking something else entirely.
- 0:18They're asking what changes in my day, and what happens if I don't get it right.
- 0:23That's it, Claire.
- 0:24Not the strategic rationale, the personal stakes.
- 0:28And most change communication fails because it answers a question nobody actually
- 0:32asked.
- 0:33So engagement isn't really about making people excited about the change.
- 0:36It's about reducing uncertainty.
- 0:39Enthusiasm is a nice byproduct, not the goal.
- 0:42If someone knows exactly what's changing, what stays the same,
- 0:46and what they need to do next, they don't need to be inspired,
- 0:50they need to not be confused.
- 0:52There's a communication spine in the piece I really liked, five plain lines.
- 0:55What's changing and when.
- 0:57What stays the same.
- 0:58What I need you to do next.
- 0:59Where to get help.
- 1:00How we'll measure progress.
- 1:02And the trap is thinking more messages equals more clarity.
- 1:06It doesn't.
- 1:07More vague messages just increases anxiety.
- 1:10Finance needs different detail than frontline ops.
- 1:13Managers need reinforcement scripts they can actually use in a room,
- 1:17not an inspirational email forwarded down the chain.
- 1:20That leads into stakeholder mapping, which I think a lot of teams skip because it
- 1:24sounds like extra process on top of an already stressful rollout.
- 1:28It's the opposite of extra process, it's how you avoid wasting your limited
- 1:32attention.
- 1:33Segment people by two things.
- 1:36Influence, can they accelerate or block adoption for others.
- 1:40And impact, how much does their actual work change.
- 1:44High influence, high impact, that's where the sponsor's time goes first.
- 1:49Everyone else gets triaged from there, who needs training and job aids,
- 1:54who needs a watchlist because resistance risk is real.
- 1:57And this is where champions come in, but I want to push on something,
- 2:00because "change champion" can sound like corporate speak for cheerleader.
- 2:04It's the opposite of a cheerleader, and that's an important distinction.
- 2:08A real champion translates the change into local context, surfaces real blockers
- 2:13early, reinforces new behaviors peer to peer, and gives feedback without it getting
- 2:18filtered through five layers of management first.
- 2:21You recruit them deliberately, for being trusted and steady under stress,
- 2:25not for being enthusiastic in meetings.
- 2:27So how do you actually keep a champion network alive past the first month,
- 2:31because I've seen these fizzle out fast.
- 2:33Short enablement sessions, thirty to forty-five minutes, nothing longer.
- 2:38A weekly feedback pulse, what's confusing, what's breaking,
- 2:41what's improving.
- 2:43Quick resources, scripts and mini job aids they can actually use.
- 2:47And recognition tied to outcomes, not popularity.
- 2:51Do that well, and champions become your early warning system,
- 2:55which means HR isn't the only place blockers surface.
- 2:58Okay, so let's say communication and champions are working,
- 3:01adoption's happening.
- 3:02What actually locks that in for good, because I know initiatives that looked
- 3:05successful at launch and quietly reverted six months later.
- 3:08That's the fifth element, governance and sustainment, and it's where successful
- 3:13change either becomes normal work or dies quietly.
- 3:17Governance isn't bureaucracy, it's decision clarity.
- 3:21Who decides what, how tradeoffs get made, how issues escalate,
- 3:26what gets measured and how often.
- 3:28And there's a specific stat here that surprised me, sixty-seven percent of
- 3:32respondents pointed to clear organization-wide ownership and commitment,
- 3:36across every level, as the actual key factor in a successful initiative.
- 3:40Which tells you governance isn't a top-down thing alone, it has to be felt at every
- 3:44level or it's theater again.
- 3:47Practically, that means a named team, an executive sponsor who owns priority and
- 3:52resourcing, a change lead who owns the process end to end, functional owners for
- 3:57adoption in their areas, an HR partner for role impact and manager support,
- 4:02and a project lead for the plan and risk tracking.
- 4:05And resourcing is where I think leaders quietly set themselves up to fail,
- 4:09they approve the change but not the capacity to actually do it.
- 4:12"People will figure it out" is not a resourcing plan, it's scheduling failure.
- 4:17What work stops to make room for this.
- 4:20How many manager hours a week does rollout actually require.
- 4:24What training exists and how will you validate it actually landed,
- 4:28not just that someone watched a video.
- 4:30And the last piece, sustainment, is really about not letting the old way stay
- 4:34comfortable.
- 4:34Exactly.
- 4:36Update job descriptions to reflect the new process.
- 4:39Update performance metrics to match new expectations.
- 4:43Remove the workarounds that let the old process limp along.
- 4:46If you don't align the systems around people, you're asking them to swim upstream
- 4:50permanently, and eventually they'll stop trying.
- 4:53If you want real signal on which of your people are steady enough under stress to be
- 4:57one of those champions, OAD's free Top Performer Profile surfaces that in about
- 5:02seven minutes, results in twenty-four hours, no credit card.
- 5:05That's O-A-D dot A-I.
- 5:08Answer the question people are actually asking, and build the governance so the
- 5:12answer still holds six months later.
- 5:14Perfect place to leave it.
- 5:15Thanks, Edwin.
- 5:16Always, Claire.