Latest / Crime Night / The 47 Slipper: How One Shoe Unraveled a 27-Stab Revenge Plot and Pre-Mortem Torture

Transcript

The 47 Slipper: How One Shoe Unraveled a 27-Stab Revenge Plot and Pre-Mortem Torture · Crime Night

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: It's a quiet morning two thousand and nine. We're in Abumana,
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: a small village in Egypt's Kina Governorate. You got these
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: peaceful agricultural fields the zerra, but that piece is just shattered.
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: Locals stumble upon the body of young man.
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: And the scene is well, it's horrific. He's drenched in blood,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: fully clothed.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: But the really shocking part his face. It's been deliberately,
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: meticulously mutilated.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah, just erase, Yeah, completely disfigured, making identification impossible right
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: off the bat. This wasn't just murder. It felt like
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: someone wanted to obliterate his very existence.
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: So police, criminal investigation teams, they all arrive. Initial look
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: confirms okay, male probably in his twenties.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: No idea, and multiple stab wounds, a lot of them
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: concentrated in the chest and back. It's screams personal hatred,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: you know, not some random act.
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: The crime scene itself is huge, this massive field, and
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: amidst all the chaos, the blood, they find just one
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: thing about forty meters away from the body.
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: One single object, slipper, a.
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: Rubber slibber, brand new size forty seven seven. Yeh yah. Huge,
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: So let's just pause here we've got this incredibly violent
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: personal attack. The killer goes to extreme lengths to hide
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: the victim's identity. Yeah, and yet this one item, this, ok,
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: this slipper is left behind. How does that become the key,
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: the thing that unravels this whole brutal story.
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: It's really where the brilliance of the investigation starts. The
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: case goes straight to forensic medicine for a deep dive. Literally,
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: they start piecing together the narrative just from the body
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: and the scene. First thing, time of death. Okay, the
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: report confirms it happened less than ten hours before the
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: body was found, so a relatively tight window.
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: Right, and the wounds you said there were many.
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: Many as an understatement, they cataloged twenty seven separate stab ones.
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: Twenty seven Yeah.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Concentrated as you said, chest and back. That sheer number,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: that overkill. It tells you immediately this wasn't quick, It
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: wasn't opportunistic.
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: Driven by intense emotion rage.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: Exactly, extreme personal motivation. But then comes a really crucial
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: forensic finding about where it happened.
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: All right, was he killed there or moved?
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: The evidence was definitive. The death occurred right there at
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: the scene where he was found. It wasn't a body dump.
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: Okay, so that changes things. It means he was brought
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: there somehow precisely.
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: It strongly suggested he was lured. The term is istadrage
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: enticed to that specific isolated spot, which implies he.
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: Knew his attackers. He walked right into it.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: It certainly looks that way. And he didn't go down
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: without a fight, not at all.
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: Defense wounds, lots.
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: Of them, numerous cuts, wounds on his hands, his legs, random,
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: desperate classic signs of a long, hard struggle for survival.
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: Isn't terrrific.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: But here's perhaps the most shilling detail from the forensic report.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: It's really disturbing here.
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: They determined that the facial disfigurement the attempt to erase
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: his identity that happened.
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: Before he died before, So torture.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: Yes, it elevates the crime beyond murder. This was prolonged torture,
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: a deliberate act confirming a motive Rooms did deep impersonal revenge,
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: carried out slowly.
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: Wow. Okay, so the forensics are painting this incredibly detailed,
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: terrifying picture, planned torture, deep hatred, a desperate struggle. Two
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: attackers maybe.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: M well, that's the next piece. Even before they had
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: an ID, the forensic team noticed something about the wounds themselves.
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: What was that?
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: Variations, the shapes, the sizes of the stab wounds differed slightly.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: Even though the type of knife seemed consistent, The details
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: suggested two different blades were used. Two knives, yeah, meaning
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: two attackers exactly, And that lined up perfectly with what
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: the crime scene unit found on the ground.
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: Footprints, multiple sets of footprints that didn't belong to the victim,
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: So the physical evidence corroborated it. Two killers, the whole
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: scenario alluring to attackers, revenge, torture. It was becoming incredibly clear,
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: maybe ninety percent accurate just from the forensics. Incredible, But
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: they still didn't know who he was. How did they
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: get from the body in the scene to an actual name.
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: That brings us back to the slipper, That single size
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: forty seven.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: Rubber slipper the only real clue, right.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: The police confirmed it fit the victim's foot, so it
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: was his, or at least he was wearing it or
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: carrying it. The focus then shifts entirely.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: From the body to the shoe stores.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: Pretty much detectives started this painstaking process, contacting every single
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: shoe seller in the nearby district Nagamadi.
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: Asking about a size forty seven slipper must have stood out.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: It did, and they got lucky. A vendor recognized the
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: specific type, remembered selling a pair recently.
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: And knew the buyer.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Yes, he identified the purchaser as a man named Ontar,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: a resident of Abumana, the same village.
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: Antar. Okay, the first concrete lead, the first name.
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: So police go to Atar's home. They speak to his brother.
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: What did the brother say?
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: He confirmed Atar had left the house the evening before,
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: said he was going to visit his fiance. Apparently her father,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: who worked abroad in the Gulf, had just returned unexpectedly early.
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: Okay, that sounds plause. What was the brother worried?
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: Not particularly, He mentioned Antar often stayed out late with friends,
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: so his absence overnight wasn't immediately alarming.
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: But the police now have a name on Tar, and
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: they have the body.
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: Right, so they take fingerprints from the victim. Despite the mutilation,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: they could still get prints and run them against national records.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: And it's a match.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: It's a match. The tortured young man is confirmed as
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: a tar, So the investigation immediately zeros in on the
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: last place he was reportedly heading.
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: His fiance's house, the family whose father just got back
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: from the Gulf exactly.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: Police go to question the fiances family and what's their story?
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: Total denial. They express shock, sadness, They praise Atar, say
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: the relationship was great, everything was fine, and crucially, they
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: insist adamantly that he never showed up at their house
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: the previous night, never.
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: Arrived, a solid wall an alibi.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: Essentially seems like it. But this is where good old
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: fashioned police work comes in, checking with neighbors, people in
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: the area, witnesses, witnesses, and their accounts come completely blow
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: the family story apart.
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: Oh so, multiple witnesses confirm yes, Antar did arrive at
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: the fiancees home around five zero s PM, just as
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: the brother had initially suggested. Okay, so the family lied
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: about him not showing up. Big lie. But he gets worse.
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: Other witnesses saw Antar leaving the house again around eight
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: pm PM.
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: Okay, but he wasn't alone. He was seen leaving in
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: the company of the fiance's brother.
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: The brother, the one whose family said Antar never even
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: came over.
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: The very same The timeline is now contradictory, and the
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: family's denial looks like a coordinated.
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: Cover up, So the police move in.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: They bring in the father, the one just back from
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: the Gulf, Antar's potential father in law, and they bring
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: in the brother for questioning and under pressure, the father
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: breaks almost immediately, but he tries to protect his son.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: He confesses, says he was the killer, claims the son
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: was just there, you know, helping him.
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: Out, taking the fall, or trying.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: To trying to minimize his son's role. But the damn
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: had burst. The real motive, the dark story behind the
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: rage starts pouring out, and.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: It wasn't just about wedding plans.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: Clearly, not even close. This goes back to why the
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: father returned early from the Gulf in the first place.
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: Right the brother mentioned that unexpectedly early.
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: It wasn't unexpected for the father. He'd received a strange
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: call while he was still abroad from a trusted neighbor
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: back home. What kind of call the neighbor was hinting delicately,
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: maybe that Antar had been seen visiting the father's house
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: at odd times, suspicious times when the father wasn't there,
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: and crucially, when the fiance and the brother also weren't there,
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: implying Atar was visiting the mother, the father's wife. Oh boy,
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: the father's mind immediately goes there. He calls his daughter,
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: the fiancee from abroad, tries to ask her about it.
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: How did she react?
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: She initially dodged the subject, scared probably, but eventually, under
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: pressure from her father, she admits her own terrible fear,
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: which was she believed Atar was having an affair with
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: her mother.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Wow. So the father hears this, He.
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: Gets on the first flight back, returns home immediately confronts
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: his wife. She must have denied it at first, yes,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: vehemently denied everything, but the father kept pushing, and finally
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: she breaks down reveals the actual horrifying.
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: Truth, which was even worse than an affair.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Much worse. She confessed that Antar had initially come to
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: the house when she was alone, and he hadn't seduced her.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: He had forcibly assaulted her, raped her.
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: Oh my god.
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: And after that initial assault, he used the threat of
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: exposing her, the threat of scandal, public shame, basically blackmail,
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: to force her into an ongoing abusive relationship.
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: For a long for eight months.
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he timed his visits precisely for when the children,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: the fiance, and the brother were out of the house.
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: So the father learns his daughter's fiance assaulted his wife
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: and then blackmailed her for months.
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: The humiliation, the betrayal, the rage, it's unimaginable. He felt
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: his family's honor was destroyed, and in that moment, with
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: that revelation, he decided on murder. This wasn't going to
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: be reported, this was going to be revenge.
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: A calculated plan forms.
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: Absolutely calculated. He sets a trap. He contacts on Tar.
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: Himself under what pretext.
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: Says he wants to discuss the wedding arrangements now that
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: he's back, invites him over to the house.
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: And Antar goes. Does he suspect anything?
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: He goes, maybe sends some tension, who knows, But clearly
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: he had no idea the depth of the fury he'd
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: unleashed or what was waiting for him.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: So he arrives at the house, The father.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Speaks with him, briefly, keeps up the pretense, then excuses himself.
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: That's the signal for the brother to step in, right.
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: The brother approaches on Tar asks him to come with
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: him on some made up errand just need to pop.
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: Out for something, and leads him away from the house.
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: Needs him directly out towards those agricultural fields, the zirat
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: where we began this whole.
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: Story, blocking him right into it.
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: Literally walking him to his death. Out in the fields,
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: Antar finds the father waiting, knife already in hand.
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: And the brother.
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: As the father attacks, the brother pulls out a second
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: knife hidden under his clothes, just as the forensics indicated.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: Two attackers, two knives, and then the torture began.
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: It lasted, according to the confessions, which matched the forensics,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: for about two hours, a slow, agonizing.
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: Death, confirming everything the forensic report suggested about the prolonged suffering,
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: the pre mortem mutilation.
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: Exactly they inflicted those twenty seven stab wounds. They carried
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: out the facial disfigurement while he was still alive, an
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: act of ultimate.
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: Vengeance, and after he was finally dead.
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: Their focus shifted to the cover up. They took all
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: his official papers, his ID, anything that could identify him.
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: They completed the facial mutilation, trying to ensure the body
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: would remain anonymous if found, then just left him there,
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: left him in the field covered in blood, and walked away,
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: believing they'd committed the perfect, untraceable revenge killing.
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: But they forgot one thing.
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: They forgot the slipper, the brand new size forty seven
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: slipper forty meters away, the single thread that unraveled everything.
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: So the confessions confirmed the entire forensic picture. Yeah, father
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: and son.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: Arrested, apprehended, confessed, and subsequently both were sentenced to death
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: for the murder.
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: It really brings up a stark point though, the motive
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: stemming from such a horrific violation against their family, yet
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: the outcome is the ultimate penalty for them. It's a
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: powerful illustration of how the legal system functions, isn't it.
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: The case highlights the incredible accuracy of the investigation. Think
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: about it. The police and forensics built a ninety percent
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: accurate scenario, the luring, the two killers, the revenge motive,
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: the torture, based only on the physical evidence, the flipper,
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: the wounds, the defense marks. They practically knew the whole
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: story before the confessions.
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: Almost entirely, But the sentencing wasn't about why they killed Antar.
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: Even acknowledging the terrible things antar did. The law doesn't
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: permit vigilantism. They were sentenced for taking the law into
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: their own hands, for carrying out a brutal revenge killing.
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: It underscores that society has to operate under the rule
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: of law, not individual acts of vengeance, no matter how
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: strong the perceived justification.
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: It's a chilling reminder of forensic precision. They knew it
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: was torture, knew there were two killers, knew the motive
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: was intense personal hatred. All deduced from a mutilated body,
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: and one forgotten shoe makes you wonder, doesn't it. What
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: if they had remembered that slipper? What if they disposed
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: of that one seemingly mundane piece of evidence. How often
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: does justice hinge entirely on a single mistake, overlooked in
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: a moment of extreme calculated rage. Something to think about.