Latest / IndieNewsNow LIVE! Clips / Canada's Patriot Act, FB Wants Website Data, Starlink Bandwidth Cap. Who's Meddling in UK Politics
Transcript
- 0:00[music]
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: Who are these people?
- 0:09SPEAKER_01: So something happened this past week that we kind of been warning about.
- 0:14SPEAKER_01: And, you know, it's funny.
- 0:15SPEAKER_01: I was thinking at one point about signing up for Starlink because they had like
- 0:21SPEAKER_01: a plan that seemed equivalent to what I was paying for my download bandwidth.
- 0:27SPEAKER_01: Um, For about $120 a month, which is less than I pay for cable internet, believe it or not.
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: And I called up
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: the cable company, and I told
- 0:35SPEAKER_01: them what happened, and they lowered my bill.
- 0:37SPEAKER_01: But I did give Starlink a consideration.
- 0:40SPEAKER_01: However,
- 0:41SPEAKER_01: this has led me to not regret my decision to stick with my cable company,
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: Hardwired,
- 0:49SPEAKER_01: and not rely on Elon and his satellite company,
- 0:52SPEAKER_01: because I believe, and we're going to get to it, at the request of Trump, possibly.
- 0:57SPEAKER_01: Starlink throttled the internet for all of Ukraine.
- 1:01SPEAKER_01: Now, you know how I feel about Ukraine.
- 1:05SPEAKER_01: Citizens are trapped in a Zionist globalist game for resources around the world,
- 1:12SPEAKER_01: and Ukraine is being used as a pawn and a battering ram in a proxy war by NATO
- 1:18SPEAKER_01: against Russia.
- 1:20SPEAKER_01: There is definitely a neo-Nazi element to Ukraine as well, and that's been exploited heavily.
- 1:27SPEAKER_01: That's one of the reasons why NATO aligned with them and is using them in that way,
- 1:33SPEAKER_01: is that they were incredibly corrupt.
- 1:35SPEAKER_01: Their leadership could be bought off and controlled.
- 1:40SPEAKER_01: But Zelensky,
- 1:43SPEAKER_01: their president who was elected and has now suspended elections and is now
- 1:50SPEAKER_01: a dictator by all means.
- 1:52SPEAKER_01: Descriptions,
- 1:53SPEAKER_01: self-appointed because he's not left office or held elections using the war as
- 1:59SPEAKER_01: an excuse,
- 2:02SPEAKER_01: saw that the internet,
- 2:03SPEAKER_01: because they've had a lot of their hard lines cut throughout the country,
- 2:08SPEAKER_01: they've been reliant on Starlink basically since 2022.
- 2:13SPEAKER_01: Trump turned to Elon Musk,
- 2:16SPEAKER_01: apparently,
- 2:16SPEAKER_01: through these negotiations to try to bring some kind of a resolution to
- 2:21SPEAKER_01: the Ukraine-Russia thing, maybe, or at least have the appearance of that happening.
- 2:30SPEAKER_01: Musk has now throttled Internet for the entire country.
- 2:34SPEAKER_01: So what happened here?
- 2:35SPEAKER_01: This is Simplicius.
- 2:37SPEAKER_01: Simplicius' Garden of...
- 2:40SPEAKER_01: Treats, I believe,
- 2:41SPEAKER_01: at simplicius76.substack.com Days after the Starlink fiasco,
- 2:48SPEAKER_01: we finally have gotten some clarification as to what really transpired behind
- 2:52SPEAKER_01: the scenes.
- 2:54SPEAKER_01: Reuters broke the news that the order to shut down the military-grade variant
- 2:59SPEAKER_01: of Starlink,
- 3:00SPEAKER_01: which is called Starshield,
- 3:02SPEAKER_01: did in fact come from the White House,
- 3:05SPEAKER_01: according to the usual anonymous officials that spoke to the Bureau.
- 3:10SPEAKER_01: Again, I don't believe anything Reuters said.
- 3:12SPEAKER_01: That's propaganda that gets spread around the world.
- 3:17SPEAKER_01: Okay, what they said was the order to limit a satellite system used by Ukraine
- 3:21SPEAKER_01: for battlefield communications and drone operations came from inside
- 3:25SPEAKER_01: the White House,
- 3:26SPEAKER_01: according to two U.S. officials and a Western official briefed on the matter.
- 3:30SPEAKER_01: I don't believe that for a second.
- 3:33SPEAKER_01: The officials said leaders at the DOD received a message that
- 3:36SPEAKER_01: the SpaceX Star Shield service for the Ukrainian military needed to be slowed.
- 3:42SPEAKER_01: Why?
- 3:44SPEAKER_01: The Telegraph dropped their own bombshell that it was actually Musk who came
- 3:48SPEAKER_01: to Trump with the idea to turn off Starlink.
- 3:53SPEAKER_01: That's weird.
- 3:55SPEAKER_01: I don't believe the Telegraph either.
- 3:59SPEAKER_01: This version makes the most sense as it accords with both the coincidental fact
- 4:03SPEAKER_01: that Musk made strong statements of repudiation against Zelensky
- 4:07SPEAKER_01: with Trump's well-known suggestibility, which we mentioned last time.
- 4:13SPEAKER_01: Zelensky also added his own bit of clarification with a side of begging,
- 4:17SPEAKER_01: admitting that the U.S. threatened to pull intelligence.
- 4:19SPEAKER_01: I'm not going to play that.
- 4:21SPEAKER_01: The jury's still out on whether the throttled speeds have been fully restored yet.
- 4:26SPEAKER_01: Zelensky himself explained why they were not yet restored,
- 4:29SPEAKER_01: but are going to soon be according to the signals he received from the White House,
- 4:34SPEAKER_01: quote unquote.
- 4:36SPEAKER_01: He clarified further an official post on Twitter,
- 4:39SPEAKER_01: which is funny,
- 4:40SPEAKER_01: that's Elon Musk's outlet, or SpaceX's outlet, same company that owns Star Shield.
- 4:48SPEAKER_01: The most interesting developments came from the wheeling and dealing behind
- 4:51SPEAKER_01: the scenes,
- 4:52SPEAKER_01: wherein Zelensky's intermediaries have tried to pressure Trump to make
- 4:56SPEAKER_01: a major concession in exchange for Ukraine temporarily halting strikes
- 5:02SPEAKER_01: on Russian refineries.
- 5:04SPEAKER_00: Weird.
- 5:07SPEAKER_01: Which, huh?
- 5:08SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 5:09SPEAKER_01: Zelensky wants Starlink privileges up to 300 kilometers deep into Russia in exchange
- 5:15SPEAKER_01: for cessation of strikes against Russian energy assets for up to three months.
- 5:22SPEAKER_01: Weird.
- 5:24SPEAKER_01: Such a deal isn't advantageous to the U.S.
- 5:26SPEAKER_01: and essentially represents the strong-arming and blackmailing of Trump by Zelensky,
- 5:31SPEAKER_01: which we know isn't going to happen.
- 5:34SPEAKER_01: What the U.S.
- 5:34SPEAKER_01: gets is ruined relations with Russia in exchange for Ukraine,
- 5:38SPEAKER_01: allowing, quote-unquote, the U.S. to improve its energy and economic outlook.
- 5:43SPEAKER_01: Everyone knows Trump doesn't take kindly to people allowing him to do anything.
- 5:48SPEAKER_01: The strongman relies on him being the one to dictate terms.
- 5:53SPEAKER_01: So there's a little bit more.
- 5:54SPEAKER_01: I, again, encourage everyone to go read this article over at Simplicious 76.
- 6:03SPEAKER_01: That's Substack.com.
- 6:06SPEAKER_01: Go start.
- 6:07SPEAKER_01: Google lost power in London this morning and Revolut,
- 6:10SPEAKER_01: a bank with 80 million customers, went with it.
- 6:13SPEAKER_01: People stranded at gas stations, unable to pay for fuel or a taxi to the airport.
- 6:20SPEAKER_01: Unrest everywhere, you say.
- 6:22SPEAKER_01: Huh.
- 6:22SPEAKER_01: Sounds like a narrative being formed.
- 6:26SPEAKER_01: Next, another Indie Media Award honoree, Jonathan Cook.
- 6:29SPEAKER_01: We don't go to him very much because he writes a lot of long articles
- 6:34SPEAKER_01: that are really good,
- 6:35SPEAKER_01: but it just doesn't, it's not a great fit because it's a lot of reading.
- 6:40SPEAKER_01: So I'm going to drop it in the lightning round here and let you guys go read it.
- 6:47SPEAKER_01: But I did want to make mention of it and give him a shout out because he is
- 6:50SPEAKER_01: an outstanding independent anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist journalist from the UK.
- 6:56SPEAKER_01: Worried about Russian meddling in UK politics,
- 6:58SPEAKER_01: which has been this big fear-mongering happening?
- 7:01SPEAKER_01: Wait till you see what Israel's up to.
- 7:05SPEAKER_01: Sub-headline reads,
- 7:06SPEAKER_01: Andy Burnham's government is rolling out a new Center for Information Defense,
- 7:13SPEAKER_01: but the outside actors most aggressively undermining what little remains
- 7:17SPEAKER_01: of British democracy are nowhere in its sights.
- 7:22SPEAKER_01: There's been,
- 7:24SPEAKER_01: Burnham admitted or went on TV and claimed that, yes, Russia interfered in
- 7:34SPEAKER_01: Brexit.
- 7:36SPEAKER_01: It's the first time that any prime minister had publicly acknowledged any kind
- 7:41SPEAKER_01: of Russian meddling.
- 7:42SPEAKER_01: But, of course, we all believe that that's bullshit to begin with.
- 7:47SPEAKER_01: And again, if there is no Russian meddling, the meddling is coming from Russia.
- 7:55SPEAKER_01: Here's, again,
- 7:56SPEAKER_01: starting,
- 7:56SPEAKER_01: just read the first couple paragraphs, Russia,
- 7:59SPEAKER_01: quote-unquote,
- 7:59SPEAKER_01: interfered in the 2016 Brexit vote by running some anti-EU articles
- 8:06SPEAKER_01: on its RT channel and promoting a few internet trolls.
- 8:10SPEAKER_01: Even MI5 has to admit that this activity had no tangible impact on
- 8:15SPEAKER_01: the referendum campaign,
- 8:17SPEAKER_01: but no matter,
- 8:18SPEAKER_01: it British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has once again revived the incendiary claim
- 8:24SPEAKER_01: that Russian disinformation is a special threat to British democracy.
- 8:29SPEAKER_01: At the UN a few weeks ago,
- 8:31SPEAKER_01: he announced plans for a National Center for Information Defense to, quote, detect,
- 8:36SPEAKER_01: attribute, and disrupt these kinds of hostile state information attacks, unquote.
- 8:44SPEAKER_01: For the new British Prime Minister,
- 8:45SPEAKER_01: as for his predecessors,
- 8:47SPEAKER_01: this is all about Moscow and the UK's favorite boogeyman, Vladimir Putin.
- 8:53SPEAKER_01: At the UN,
- 8:54SPEAKER_01: Burnham promised British expertise to other European nations to protect them
- 9:00SPEAKER_01: from Kremlin disinformation, which is hilarious.
- 9:04SPEAKER_01: Meanwhile,
- 9:04SPEAKER_01: evidence continues to mount
- 9:06SPEAKER_01: that another foreign actor is meddling even more aggressively in British politics,
- 9:11SPEAKER_01: and neither Burnham nor MI5
- 9:14SPEAKER_00: has a word to say about it.
- 9:17SPEAKER_01: Any evidence of Russia disinformation peddling in the UK pales in comparison
- 9:23SPEAKER_01: to Israeli influence operations.
- 9:26SPEAKER_01: And that's just the ones we know about.
- 9:29SPEAKER_01: The head of MI5,
- 9:31SPEAKER_01: Ken McCallum,
- 9:32SPEAKER_01: noted that Russian disinformation was neither sophisticated nor successful.
- 9:37SPEAKER_01: The same cannot be said for Israel's handiwork.
- 9:41SPEAKER_01: And again, this is a long article that I encourage everyone to read.
- 9:46SPEAKER_01: And I will link to that in the description afterwards.
- 9:48SPEAKER_01: And again,
- 9:49SPEAKER_01: as a reminder,
- 9:50SPEAKER_01: Jonathan K.
- 9:51SPEAKER_01: Cook is also an Indie Media Award honoree,
- 9:56SPEAKER_01: initial class, and just a little inside baseball.
- 10:00SPEAKER_01: When I first commissioned all of the Indie Media Award honorees to have
- 10:05SPEAKER_01: an illustration drawn of them by Zago,
- 10:09SPEAKER_01: Jonathan Cook was the very first one that he gave me.
- 10:13SPEAKER_01: Now, he had a bunch of them that had already been done that had been on his poster
- 10:18SPEAKER_01: of anti-imperialists.
- 10:19SPEAKER_01: But when I gave him a whole bunch,
- 10:22SPEAKER_01: a whole set of actual photos of journalists and people I wanted to have depicted
- 10:26SPEAKER_01: as part of that project in 2024,
- 10:30SPEAKER_01: Jonathan was the first one I got back, and I loved it.
- 10:33SPEAKER_01: And I sent it to him, and he was very appreciative of it.
- 10:36SPEAKER_01: And a big fan of Jonathan and his work.
- 10:38SPEAKER_01: Jonathan Cook.
- 10:40SPEAKER_01: It's actually now called...
- 10:44SPEAKER_01: I thought he changed it to like something.
- 10:47SPEAKER_01: I know it's jonathancook.substack.com is his publication.
- 10:53SPEAKER_01: And again, you can find all of that at indiemediaawards.substack.com.
- 10:58SPEAKER_01: And then if you search the Jonathan Cook and you can find his page with all
- 11:02SPEAKER_01: the links to find him on all these different social platforms.
- 11:07SPEAKER_00: Next.
- 11:08SPEAKER_01: Um...
- 11:10SPEAKER_01: Propaganda in Focus, another outlet I like quite a bit.
- 11:17SPEAKER_01: I saw this article,
- 11:19SPEAKER_01: which kind of dovetailed and fed into Jonathan's article talking about propaganda
- 11:26SPEAKER_01: and Britain's long war on Russia.
- 11:28SPEAKER_01: This, again,
- 11:29SPEAKER_01: is a very long and incredibly long Incredibly well-sourced
- 11:32SPEAKER_01: and documented article laying out all of the different elements and history
- 11:41SPEAKER_01: of how Britain has fear-mongered and turned Russia into the boogeyman and an enemy
- 11:50SPEAKER_01: that never wanted to attack Britain or the British Empire.
- 11:55SPEAKER_01: It's quite the opposite.
- 11:57SPEAKER_01: And Britain uses them in order to ramp up their military,
- 12:02SPEAKER_01: in order to fearmonger internationally,
- 12:05SPEAKER_01: in order to get the United States involved because there's been a Cold War,
- 12:10SPEAKER_01: and that goes back to World War II Cold War times.
- 12:15SPEAKER_01: The official account of Britain's relationship with Russia inverts the truth.
- 12:20SPEAKER_01: Britain is consistently not the victim of Russian aggression.
- 12:26SPEAKER_00: Where are we here?
- 12:27SPEAKER_00: I missed it.
- 12:31SPEAKER_00: Here we go.
- 12:32SPEAKER_01: But the instigator of conflicts between the two countries,
- 12:37SPEAKER_01: or initiator,
- 12:38SPEAKER_01: despite its small size,
- 12:40SPEAKER_01: Britain maintains seven times as many overseas military sites as Russia,
- 12:45SPEAKER_01: many of them close to Russian borders.
- 12:48SPEAKER_01: Britain trained the Ukrainian army in offensive capabilities in Kiev's war with
- 12:52SPEAKER_01: the Russian-speaking regions of eastern Ukraine through the years in which
- 12:56SPEAKER_01: the Minsk agreements went unimplemented.
- 13:00SPEAKER_01: Britain advised Kiev against a peace settlement in 2022.
- 13:04SPEAKER_01: That's been documented.
- 13:06SPEAKER_01: Britain stationed special forces and planners inside the war zone.
- 13:11SPEAKER_01: And Britain now manufactures at home the drones that fly against Moscow.
- 13:16SPEAKER_01: When Russia answers with threats against British factories,
- 13:20SPEAKER_01: ministers and generals cite those threats as proof of the Russian danger and as
- 13:25SPEAKER_01: the reason for further rearmament.
- 13:27SPEAKER_01: It's crazy!
- 13:28SPEAKER_01: And the laws passed since 2018 narrow the space in
- 13:32SPEAKER_01: which any citizen can understand what's really going on or mobilize to challenge it
- 13:37SPEAKER_01: through democratic channels.
- 13:39SPEAKER_01: There's a lot more there.
- 13:41SPEAKER_01: Again,
- 13:42SPEAKER_01: highly encourage everyone to read this piece at propagandainfocus.substack.com about
- 13:50SPEAKER_01: the long war.
- 13:51SPEAKER_01: Again, with references up and down, dozens of references and links and rabbit holes to go down.
- 14:00SPEAKER_00: Give that one a like.
- 14:01SPEAKER_01: Now, in addition to that,
- 14:04SPEAKER_01: shout out to our friend,
- 14:06SPEAKER_01: The Dissident,
- 14:07SPEAKER_01: who is an INN co-founder,
- 14:08SPEAKER_01: and we include The Dissident's articles in our weekly INN update.
- 14:13SPEAKER_01: He commented when I shared it to say that Sanaa Saeed was asking about
- 14:19SPEAKER_01: who does Britain consider the enemy.
- 14:21SPEAKER_01: This is who they consider the enemy.
- 14:23SPEAKER_01: This is a comprehensive piece laying out why they've been setting this play up,
- 14:27SPEAKER_01: fear-mongering And the dissident points out that this is a really good read,
- 14:31SPEAKER_01: but the only thing that he would add is
- 14:33SPEAKER_01: the likely CIA orchestrated false flag massacre in Maidan in 2014.
- 14:39SPEAKER_01: And I'm pretty sure actually this article did in the table
- 14:43SPEAKER_01: of contents mention Ukraine, Maidan coup in Minsk.
- 14:47SPEAKER_01: It actually is there.
- 14:50SPEAKER_01: But there was also the involvement of the CIA.
- 14:52SPEAKER_01: I see Victoria Nuland's name.
- 14:54SPEAKER_01: It better be if you're talking about Ukraine and the Maidan coup.
- 14:59SPEAKER_01: And I said in response that I agree.
- 15:02SPEAKER_01: I was actually making a point to a writer from Common Dreams yesterday on Blue Sky,
- 15:08SPEAKER_01: believe it or not,
- 15:10SPEAKER_01: that the U.S. pushed this via the Maidan coup, an eastern expansion of NATO.
- 15:16SPEAKER_01: Russia had no interest in expanding to Ukraine.
- 15:20SPEAKER_01: Listen to on-the-ground journalists like Eva Bartlett,
- 15:22SPEAKER_01: who've been in the Donbass and spoke with the residents that were being bombed
- 15:26SPEAKER_01: by Ukraine.
- 15:28SPEAKER_01: Ukraine was openly corrupt with a serious neo-Nazi element.
- 15:32SPEAKER_01: Victoria Nuland and NED helped lead the Orange Revolution in 2014.
- 15:37SPEAKER_01: Go back and learn what actually happened,
- 15:40SPEAKER_01: not according to corporate media or CIA-friendly outlets like Bellingcrap.
- 15:45SPEAKER_01: And there's a tweet that I had included which supported that as well.
- 15:52SPEAKER_01: So again...
- 15:54SPEAKER_01: Britain has been fear-mongering,
- 15:56SPEAKER_01: ramping up against Russia to prepare,
- 16:00SPEAKER_01: and now they're literally telling their troops to prepare for an attack.
- 16:05SPEAKER_01: Frightening.
- 16:06SPEAKER_01: Thank you for the raid, Six, and for those over at TNP,
- 16:11SPEAKER_00: over on Rumble.
- 16:13SPEAKER_01: Speaking of our friend,
- 16:14SPEAKER_01: the dissident,
- 16:15SPEAKER_01: he also published an article that I did not see anywhere else published.
- 16:20SPEAKER_01: And I'm sure he's got references and sources that he pulls in.
- 16:22SPEAKER_01: That's what he does.
- 16:25SPEAKER_01: Justin wrote this article inside Bill C-22, Canada's Patriot Act.
- 16:30SPEAKER_01: He's from Ontario.
- 16:33SPEAKER_01: Canadian civil liberties organizations are ringing the alarm bells
- 16:37SPEAKER_01: over unprecedented surveillance powers given to Canada's security state.
- 16:42SPEAKER_01: So, yeah, that's not good.
- 16:45SPEAKER_01: All right.
- 16:46SPEAKER_01: Read this article over at the307.substack.com.
- 16:53SPEAKER_01: And then finally, I wanted to mention this other thing.
- 16:56SPEAKER_01: This is really scary.
- 16:59SPEAKER_01: If you have a business and you have a business page on Facebook,
- 17:03SPEAKER_01: on Instagram, on WhatsApp, Meta has made a change to their terms of service.
- 17:10SPEAKER_01: This is the man that I consider to be the mayor of Substack, Ted Joya, the honest broker.
- 17:15SPEAKER_01: He's the number one music publication on Substack.
- 17:21SPEAKER_01: An orange chick, I believe.
- 17:25SPEAKER_01: I guess he hit it.
- 17:26SPEAKER_01: Meta now insists on the right to scrape your website if you have a business account with it.
- 17:33SPEAKER_01: It's shocking to see how manipulative this company has become.
- 17:36SPEAKER_01: It doesn't even pretend to serve customers or users anymore.
- 17:41SPEAKER_01: Many of us are just walking away at this stage.
- 17:44SPEAKER_01: And he shares an article from Neiman Lab that starts out that starting October 30th,
- 17:49SPEAKER_01: business accounts will automatically consent to metas scraping their websites
- 17:54SPEAKER_01: if they continue using Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp.
- 17:59SPEAKER_01: They can't opt out.
- 18:02SPEAKER_01: What's going on here?
- 18:03SPEAKER_01: Again, most of us are not using Facebook.
- 18:08SPEAKER_01: We actually have a page.
- 18:09SPEAKER_01: I've got a Facebook page for Indie Media Today that's got 1,300 subscribers.
- 18:14SPEAKER_01: INN has over 300 on both Instagram and Facebook.
- 18:21SPEAKER_01: I've got over 1,000 on my Instagram.
- 18:24SPEAKER_01: Meta can use web scrapers now to crawl and collect content from websites, quote,
- 18:29SPEAKER_01: associated with business accounts on its platforms,
- 18:33SPEAKER_01: according to its new commercial terms of use.
- 18:37SPEAKER_01: The update set to go into effect in nine days
- 18:40SPEAKER_01: on October 30th will include news publishers with business accounts.
- 18:46SPEAKER_01: These accounts allow companies or public figures to manage Facebook pages,
- 18:50SPEAKER_01: Messenger accounts, Instagram profiles, or WhatsApp channels from one place.
- 18:55SPEAKER_01: While journalism isn't the only industry affected by this update,
- 18:59SPEAKER_01: virtually every news organization has at least one meta-business account according
- 19:04SPEAKER_01: to Neiman Lab.
- 19:07SPEAKER_01: The new terms broadly cover business accounts that manage pages and groups,
- 19:11SPEAKER_01: run advertisements,
- 19:12SPEAKER_01: push marketing messages,
- 19:14SPEAKER_01: and use the platform's business account dashboard, which I do.
- 19:19SPEAKER_01: As written...
- 19:20SPEAKER_01: The new terms could be used to argue that Meta can scrape content from news sites
- 19:27SPEAKER_01: and use that content to train the company's AI products,
- 19:31SPEAKER_01: according to three legal experts who reviewed the terms at Neiman Labs' request.
- 19:38SPEAKER_01: Quote, This is a remarkable provision to bury in the TOS,
- 19:43SPEAKER_01: given that this would give Meta access to material
- 19:46SPEAKER_01: that would likely cost many millions of dollars in a licensing market.
- 19:52SPEAKER_01: It's not clear whether a court would enforce this,
- 19:55SPEAKER_01: but publishers should assume that it would be enforceable,
- 20:00SPEAKER_01: says a media and intellectual property attorney.
- 20:04SPEAKER_01: Are you listening?
- 20:05SPEAKER_01: This is really important shit.
- 20:09SPEAKER_01: If you have intellectual property,
- 20:11SPEAKER_01: if you have articles that are exclusive that you own the rights to publish,
- 20:16SPEAKER_01: you better get them off a website that Meta can scrape.
- 20:20SPEAKER_01: In early October, Meta alerted users to the update in a blog post on the Meta Business Suite.
- 20:26SPEAKER_01: The updated terms explicitly state that Meta can use the content it collects
- 20:30SPEAKER_01: from associated websites to train Meta products.
- 20:34SPEAKER_01: Elsewhere in its terms of service, the company defines AI at Meta as one of those products.
- 20:42SPEAKER_01: Metamuse would be another one.
- 20:45SPEAKER_01: Which has been pushed heavily in my feed lately.
- 20:48SPEAKER_01: People are, try Muse.
- 20:50SPEAKER_01: It's a different kind of AI.
- 20:53SPEAKER_01: It's an agent.
- 20:54SPEAKER_01: It can actually do things.
- 20:56SPEAKER_01: So like they basically got a hang of open claw or clawed and created some kind of
- 21:04SPEAKER_01: an agent that actually will open browsers and do things on your behalf.
- 21:08SPEAKER_01: Whatever you give it permission to do.
- 21:11SPEAKER_01: Frightening.
- 21:12SPEAKER_01: I have a friend that loves it.
- 21:16SPEAKER_01: It scares the shit out of me.
- 21:17SPEAKER_01: I won't sign up for it.
- 21:20SPEAKER_01: Okay, so here's the actual terms of service.
- 21:23SPEAKER_01: For news publishers,
- 21:24SPEAKER_01: this clearly represents permission to meta to train AI on any content
- 21:29SPEAKER_01: from their sites and possibly to deploy some of that content even in competition
- 21:36SPEAKER_01: with the publishers themselves,
- 21:39SPEAKER_01: said James Grimmelman, a professor of digital information and law at Cornell.
- 21:44SPEAKER_01: On the broadest possible interpretation,
- 21:46SPEAKER_01: this would be used to develop a comprehensive archive of all content that Meta would
- 21:52SPEAKER_01: then serve as it wanted directly or through AI.
- 21:56SPEAKER_01: Now I'm going to get back to Ted's post here because I replied to Ted.
- 22:02SPEAKER_01: And I said,
- 22:03SPEAKER_01: I've seen three female comedians post videos
- 22:07SPEAKER_01: about how Meta's AI is ripping off their sets and showing shorts
- 22:12SPEAKER_01: of AI women delivering their original material.
- 22:16SPEAKER_01: That's insane.
- 22:18SPEAKER_01: So, in the context of that, here's...
- 22:23SPEAKER_01: The Hollywood Reporter from two weeks ago,
- 22:25SPEAKER_01: from four days ago,
- 22:27SPEAKER_01: comics accused hot AI fakes of stealing their jokes word for word and inflection
- 22:35SPEAKER_01: for inflection to push OnlyFans pages.
- 22:40SPEAKER_01: Quote, stand-up comics are calling out accounts that have sexy female comics,
- 22:45SPEAKER_01: quote-unquote, plagiarizing their jokes.
- 22:48SPEAKER_01: AI stole my joke and my outfit.
- 22:51SPEAKER_01: Look at this guy.
- 22:52SPEAKER_01: He's wearing the pink shirt with the khakis.
- 22:54SPEAKER_01: He's got a pink shirt and khakis,
- 22:56SPEAKER_01: but it's an awful tight pink shirt and an awful tight pair of khakis.
- 23:02SPEAKER_01: ThisPersonDoesNotExist.com.
- 23:08SPEAKER_01: Fucking scary.
- 23:09SPEAKER_01: So if you have a Facebook page and a business Instagram account,
- 23:15SPEAKER_01: take it down or understand that your website will be scraped and used for AI
- 23:21SPEAKER_01: and there ain't nothing you can do about it according to legal experts.
- 23:26SPEAKER_01: And Facebook or Meta has not indicated that they're interested in fixing this
- 23:33SPEAKER_01: in advance of that October 30th deadline.
- 23:36SPEAKER_01: Their answer is, Just unplug if you don't like it.
- 23:42SPEAKER_01: Okay, I saw somebody else had commented something,
- 23:46SPEAKER_01: but they basically said that they tried to,
- 23:50SPEAKER_01: that the terms of service say there really is no opt-out to this,
- 23:54SPEAKER_01: that the only answer,
- 23:56SPEAKER_01: if you don't want them scraping your website, is to delete all your meta accounts.
- 24:02SPEAKER_01: So...
- 24:05SPEAKER_01: That concludes all the content that I had brought for tonight.
- 24:08SPEAKER_01: Thank you so much, everybody.
- 24:10SPEAKER_01: I appreciate you sticking with me through all that.
- 24:13SPEAKER_01: I figured it would be a little more than two hours, and I was right.
- 24:20SPEAKER_01: I'm going to ask you to support independent media with a $5 or $8
- 24:25SPEAKER_01: or more annual contribution or monthly contribution or one time over at one
- 24:31SPEAKER_01: of these places,
- 24:35SPEAKER_01: cashapp.com, cash.app, dollar sign, Indie News Networks are handled.
- 24:39SPEAKER_01: Or you can go to co-fee.com slash Indie News Network.
- 24:43SPEAKER_01: We've got our website,
- 24:44SPEAKER_01: indienewsnow.com,
- 24:45SPEAKER_01: where you can buy merch,
- 24:47SPEAKER_01: or you can leave a tip at our Stripe link for keep the news free.
- 24:51SPEAKER_01: Or you can go to Substack and subscribe monthly or annually there.
- 24:59SPEAKER_01: And you can do that at indiemediatoday.com,
- 25:01SPEAKER_01: that's mine, or at innnewsletter.com for the network.
- 25:05SPEAKER_01: And again, thank you to R.H. McCluskey and Kurt Boss and Seth Peck and Nihilio Ostrom.
- 25:12SPEAKER_01: There he is on the board.
- 25:13SPEAKER_01: Thank you so much.
- 25:14SPEAKER_01: I love you for that, man.
- 25:15SPEAKER_01: Really appreciate it.
- 25:16SPEAKER_01: Maggie Joy and Golden Monarch, John Simonian.
- 25:20SPEAKER_01: These are some of our 2026 new contributors.
- 25:24SPEAKER_01: And I appreciate everybody for supporting the media you want to see.
- 25:28SPEAKER_01: On the media you want to see.
- 25:30SPEAKER_01: Value for Value System.
- 25:32SPEAKER_01: That's Steve Poikin,
- 25:33SPEAKER_01: an indie media award honoree,
- 25:35SPEAKER_01: says every day on AM Wake Up,
- 25:37SPEAKER_01: which we co-stream to this network over on Twitter, over on Twitch, and over on Kik.
- 25:43SPEAKER_01: Like I say at the end of every week,
- 25:45SPEAKER_01: support independent media because we need it more than ever.
- 25:50SPEAKER_01: I will see you next Thursday.
- 25:53SPEAKER_01: That's what she said.
- 25:56SPEAKER_01: Not see you next Tuesday.
- 25:57SPEAKER_01: It's still cunt.
- 25:57SPEAKER_01: See you next Thursday.
- 25:59SPEAKER_01: C-U-N-T.
- 26:01SPEAKER_01: But goodnight, everyone.
- 26:03SPEAKER_01: I love you, fam.
- 26:03SPEAKER_01: Goodnight, everybody.
- 26:04SPEAKER_00: No!
- 26:05SPEAKER_00: We just fucking lost the stream!
- 26:09SPEAKER_00: I guess this isn't such an awful place Is that what you want me to say?
- 26:17SPEAKER_00: You'll prove it's possible to sleep for days And I still think you're right here away.
- 26:25SPEAKER_00: The cost of living isn't much to make.
- 26:29SPEAKER_00: But God, it's so hard to save.
- 26:32SPEAKER_00: And when they told you everything you were safe, were you safe?
- 26:39Were
- 26:39[music]