Latest / Bloomberg Intelligence / Junk Market Isn't a Buy Unless it Drops Another Five Percent, Loomis' Eagan Says

Transcript

Junk Market Isn't a Buy Unless it Drops Another Five Percent, Loomis' Eagan Says · Bloomberg Intelligence

• 0:05
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. As
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: we have been talking about today, there has been some
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: escalating weakness in the US hiled bond market, and here
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: to talk about that with us is Matt Egan, vice
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: president and portfolio manager for Loomis Sales and Company, which
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: is based in Boston and overseas forty billion dollars. Matt,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us. First, I just
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: want to get your sense of the weakness that we're seeing.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: Is this harbinger of greater pain to come? Or is
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: this simple just some idiosyncratic stories and an opportunity to
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: buy the dip. I think it's a little bit of both.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: To me, it seems like simply the buyers have stepped
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: away from the market. It's it almost seems like anybody
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: wanted to own high yield was already invested and on
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: the margin. We've seen flows come out. UM. This is
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: we're in a we're in the late expansion phase of
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: the of the economic cycle, and you know, obviously the
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: next step would be a downturn. Nobody knows when that's uh,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: when that should be coming, but uh, you know, typically
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: at this stage, how yield becomes a bit more choppy
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: and you end up trading in a range. In other words,
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: the backdrop, the fundamental backdrop, UH is pretty supportive and
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: the range that you trade and is relatively narrow, and
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: it tends to be driven by flows. And I think
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: that's what we're seeing here now, is is flows that
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: are are pushing the market down a bit. Well, but
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: what's behind that, right, I mean, is there is there
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: a reason why investors are not coming in to buy
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: and who who's pulling out? Well, we've seen flows out
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: of the ETFs recently. Um, there's been a lot of
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: money flowing into et f s. We've also seen a
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: strong bid from overseas investors. And I think, you know,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: towards the end of the year, maybe that allocations have
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: been full or or just on the on the sidelines
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: for now, UM, but we've seen you know, this thirst
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: for yields. So while you know, hiled yield in absolute terms,
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: that say, you know, a little over five per cents
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: don't seem very high from historical perspective. When you look
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: around at fixed income ass that's around the world, it
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: is still the highest yielding, one of the highest heeling
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: options out there for global investors. So so given that, Matt,
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: are you in there buying? Is this is this weakness
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: that you see as an opportunity. We've been on this,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: We've been on the sidelines. Uh, you know, this is
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: a very much a bond pickers market. You mentioned spursion
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: and the index, and it's definitely picking up and I
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: think that has contributed to, you know, to spooking some
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: of some investors. We can talk a little bit about that,
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: but um, we've been on the sidelines. You know this market.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: I always say, uh, you know, high yield, the best
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: you get is par plus half a coupon because there's
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: a lot of call option embedded in high yield bonds
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: and when you start trading up above pars. So if
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: you look at the index, the price on the index
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: is one oh one, the coupon is six, so your
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: upside is one oh three and at that point you
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: get called out. So you know, when you're trading up,
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: you know, we've come off a little bit even that
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: your upside is maybe one oh three and on the downside,
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: just flow driven downside, you you could go down to
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: the mid to low nineties. So you get this negative distribution.
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: You want to be buying on the on the dips. So, um,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: given that you said that you're on the sidelines, you're
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: not coming in yet, is that correct? Not? With uh? Not?
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: With uh? Yeah, I wouldn't be buying the market with
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: reserves currently we're only out as smidge So what would
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: it take for you to come in and buy. I
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: would like to see the market down around the level
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: to get a little bit more so, say stay down
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: five percent, which is a normal trading training range um
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: for the market. Uh, you know, but again I think
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: we would stay high quality. I would not try to
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: reach down the credit spectrum for for for yield at
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: this stage we've seen, you know, just on this recent
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: episode of weakness. What happens is those disfavorite names. It's
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: sort of like the equity market, right, there's a lot
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: of idiosyncratic sector and and you know, the correlations are
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: very disparate in the equity section. It's very much like
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: that in high yield. So you look at healthcare, you
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: look at telecom um, you look at retail. Some of
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: those bonds from just the third course of say September
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: are down, uh, you know, ten to fifteen price points. Uh.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: So you have to really be laser focused on the
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: bonds that you're picking. You don't want to step into
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: those really deteriorating f the mental credits because you'll find
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: out a little bit about liquidity in the market where
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: you know, apparently when there's all buyers stepping in, it
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: seems like liquidity is available in the high market. But
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: it but it's a bit of a mirage. And once
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: you see, particularly when you go to sell, I would
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: imagine that if you try to sell it all at once,
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the waters has a way of
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: the tide has a way of sweeping you out with it.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: Thanks very much, mack Egan. He is a vice president
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: portfolio manager for Loomas Sales, telling us about the sell
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: off in high yield debt. Coming up on Bloomberg. President
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump is set to deliver remarks to the APEC
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: summit that is taking place in De Nang, Vietnam, and
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: the topic there has to do with protectionism, trade and
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: also security threats in the guise of North Korea. Here
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: to help us understand more about this is Ariel Cohen.
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: He is a senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: a principle at International Market Analysis. Ariel, thank you very
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: much for being with us. Um. I wonder if you
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: could just sort of set us up for what you
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: believe will result from this APEC meeting, because simultaneously with
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: the meeting taking place in Da Nang, wonderful irony that Uh,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: the U S S. Ronald Reagan, the U S S.
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: Theodore Roosevelt, and the U S S Nimits three aircraft
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: carriers are holding military exercises in the Western Pacific. And
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: that's unusual, is it not? Uh? It is, and it
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: isn't taking into account our deteriorating situation in the Korean Peninsula.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: I am not sure Mr Trout resolved anything going forward
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: visa in North Korea. And for clear reasons, the Chinese
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: influence in Pyongyang is limited. The relationship between Presidency and
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: Kim John On is pretty bad, and there's only so
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: much and I can do to change Kim's mind, and
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: Kim's mind has hell bent on achieving deliverable nuclear warhead
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: on a ballistic missile that can hit at least western
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: United States, if not all of the United States. And
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: that's where we're going with that. Having said that, on trade, also,
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: unfortunately pretty little was achieved. So once we walked away
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: from tit TIP Trans Pacific Trade Agreement, we are no
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: longer leading on trade in the Pacific, and we are
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: in a whole visa the China in trade three billion
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: dollars and signing memoranda of understanding of this trip and
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: the Secretary of Commerce and it's nine billion, the memorand
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: of understanding donative TOI billion. Nevertheless, this is um a
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: drop in the bucket. This is very little in terms
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: of changing the dynamic of this trade around and walking
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: away from the gaping deficit between the United States and China. Ariel,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: can you just give us a sense of what's been
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: accomplished with a President Trump's trip overseason? And I would
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: ask that not only in substantive terms, but also in
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: sort of soft relationships that the US can build on. Absolutely. Uh,
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: in terms of relationships with Japan. Uh, his strengths in
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: the relationship. We probably are going to be supportive in
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: the rearmament of Japan and possible to make a buck
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: of that. Possibly us UM made your military gear corporations
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: are going to sell technology or sell systems to the Japanese.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: In terms of South Korea, Uh, you saw a hundred
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: and eighty degrees turned around in so when President Trump
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: was not sounding belly coost but his instincts are to
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: threaten to use force visa in North Korea. Will he
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: across the red line? Will he use force? I do
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: not know, but he wants to look like he is
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: going to use force to bring Kim to the negotiating table.
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: China can help by redheading up sanctions even more. Whether
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: it's going to be effective or not, we don't know.
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: In the past, the majority of economic sanctions against countries failed.
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: The case everybody quotes in South Africa, but I would
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: argue it was too generous. It was a specific case.
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: So we are in a very precarious situation. Uh. In
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: the Korean peninsula. This is why the three aircraft battle
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: groups are there. And in terms of trade, Uh, you
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: heard what I said. I'm not terribly impressed it's better
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: than nothing, and I hope we will be in the
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: position to move the don on that. But we're coming
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: to this UH negotiating table visa EA China as a beggar.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: Um Our imports either not competitive or blocked by non
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: economic means by China, um Our I P is being
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: ripped off. And on Koreer, we're coming asking China. We
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: have an ask on career, we have an ask on
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: South China. See we have an ask on trade. What
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: is the Chinese ask? Here's the answer, Ariel. Just to
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: give us your quick thoughts though on the relationship. I'd
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: like to know between China and South Korea in the
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: military context, because those FAD missiles that are being deployed,
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: they're made by Lockheed Martin and we might see themselves
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: quite a bit more of them now, I hope. So
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: we need missile defense. We need missile defense on the
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: current peninsula. We need missile defense that can intercept i
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: C b MS international intercontinental bolitic missiles. In the US
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: we have altogether three thirty six missiles that can intercept,
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: give or take, and that is totally totally insufficient against
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: a possible North Korean attack. I've written about that we
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: need many more UH intercept interceptors in the US as well. Yeah,
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: Ariel Cohen, thank you so much for joining US. Arial.
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: Cohen is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, also
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: a principle with International Market Analysis in Washington, d C.
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: Talking about President Trump's trip to China, this is well,
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: for the holidays, a lot of people are going to
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: want different technological gadgets. And here to tell us what
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: the most popular among them is Steve Koenig, Senior director
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: of market research for the Consumer Technology Association, which is
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: based in Washington, but is here in our Bloomberg eleven
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: three studios right now with us. Steve, So, what do
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: people want? Do they want drones? Do they want Apple watches?
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: Do they want I don't know, brain readers? What what's
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: hot this year? Well, good morning, and consumers want it all.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: Tech is really become a mainstay for holiday. In fact, UH,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: this year, we're expecting a hundred and seventy million adults
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: across the US will be looking for some type of
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: technology product to give or given to themselves as a
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: holiday gift. And you mentioned drones and everything. Yes, I
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: mean certainly that long tail of all these connected products,
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: smart home, robotic vacuums. There's so much innovation out there
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: that's really inspiring and exciting folks. But sometimes it's just
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: the good old products like TVs, anything with a screen. Uh,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: these products do really well, whether it's the the wish
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: list or the gift list. Him. You know, I'm just remembering.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: I went on vacation once and saw somebody set up
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: a drone and they were so excited, and it took
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: a while for them to set it up, and then
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: they started using it and it got caught in a
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: tree promptly, and they needed a ladder, an old fashioned
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: ladder to get it out of the tree and retrieve it.
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: Are you getting a drone this year? No? I I
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: don't think a drone would be great flying around the
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: streets of Manhattan. But having said that, let's talk about
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: what's on the screen, because I note that the screens
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: that you talk about could be larger, they could be small, right,
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: I want to know about the large screens first. Are
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: we talking about things like, uh, you know, in any
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: c I mean, is there any particular model or any
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: particular technology. Is it backlit l C D S and oh, lead,
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: what what kind of stuff is popular? Well, four K
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: TVs are really front and center. TVs are a perennial
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: holiday tech gift, and a lot of people look to
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: holiday time to to upgrade their flagship display or just
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: add to the TVs in their home. But this year
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: we're seeing, really, on balance, just a massive wave of
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: four K t vs, four K HDR TVs that deliver
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: just an incredible entertainment experience. And as usual, the deals
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: for these TVs are better than ever. The best deal
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: that I've heard of so far this season is going
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: to be a best buy, and that's a fifty four
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: K TV for one seventy nine in store only. So
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: that just kind of underscores the kinds of deals right television,
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: that's right, And if you want to go bigger, of course, Uh,
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: there are lots of deals out there heard of like
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: up to seventy inch TVs for under two thousand dollars.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: I hope my husband is not listening to this. I
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: don't want that in my home. Do you mean for this? Okay?
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: So all right, So having said that, what about all
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: the accessories that go with this, whether it is the
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: sound bar and the uh, you know, base enhancer for audio,
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: and what about things like even home theater equipment as well.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: Holiday is all about deals, and so it doesn't really
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: matter what tech segment or category. Wherever you're looking, you're
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: gonna find some amazing deals. You know, in store with
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: the proverbial door busters that that we often hear about,
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: but also online and yeah, audio is certainly part of that.
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: We we always we see these bundling deals that that
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: the retailers put together really curating packages, uh, for like
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: say home theater. So yeah, those deals are going to
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: be out there in abundance. When you talk about deals,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: I think about the other side and some of the
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: retailers that are selling these as well as some of
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: the electronics makers. Does the fact that you are seeing
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: such good deal as a d seventy nine dollars for
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: a fifty inch television, do you get the sense that
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: they're hurting that that they're having to slash prices that
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: much to get people in the door. Well, actually, our
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: forecast call for a one percent gain in tech spending
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: over the holiday quarter, so we look at the entire
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: fourth quarter for holiday one percent gain up to nine
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: billion dollars uh. And that may sound you know, lackluster,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: but it's actually quite healthy when you consider we had
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: three point eight percent gain in spending in TwixT up
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: to nine billion. So it's hard to repeat that kind
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: of gain year over year over year. But yeah, the
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: deals are out there, but still people are planning to
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: spend more on tech this year. Just quickly give you
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: twenty seconds. You said that you're a car guy. What
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: in the car do you want? Well, I'll start with
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: a new car because my car is about I drive
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: a truck and it's about thirteen years old. But yeah,
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: I'm really excited by a lot of the the advanced
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: UH driver assistance features, you know, adaptive cruise control, blind
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: spot detection, forward collision avoidance, a lot of these safety
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: features that are that are helping us drive safer and
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: avoid those nasty collisions. But also all the connectivity in
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: the car so I can bring all my content in Wilders.
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: It's great. If it would only give us all free parking, right,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: thanks very much for being televisions. My husband would totally
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: want that. Steve Koenick, thanks very much, Senior director, Market Research,
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: Consumer Technology Association, based in Washington, d C. Yesterday we
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: got news that dropped on the market like a bomb shell.
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: It was revealed that the Department of Justice was saying
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: that it would not prove the merger between A T
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: and T and Time Warner unless A T and T
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: agreed to subsequently subsequently sell CNN. Here to discuss this,
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: whether there's any precedent for this, whether this is likely
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: to go through is Jennifer Re litigation analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence,
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: as well as Paul Sweeney, US director of Research and
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: senior Media and Internet analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Paul, let's
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: start with you what happened here? Uh, you know, big surprise.
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: We saw a Time Warner trade off over six percent yesterday,
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: down another couple of percent today. So the market and
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: particularly art traders clearly or not expecting, uh this type
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: of news here. So uh, you know, as Jen can
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: talk about more detailed, you know, the d o J
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: kind of kind of dropped the bombshell, as you mentioned,
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: and said, you know, they're really gonna take a much
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: harder look at this transaction than the market had had
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: been anticipating. And uh, you know, I think the market
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: felt like this deal looked an awful lot like Comcast
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: acquisition of NBC Universal, and that was approved with some
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: minor modifications. So the marketplace fell like that was kind
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: of the expectation, and that was kind of built into
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: the timing. Uh, and now the timing remains, as the
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: company's CFO mentioned, kind of uncertain, and so that really
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: brought a lot of our pain out there. Jennifer, as
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: an expert in the world of antitrust law, I know
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: that Mr Sweeney, he's trying to be a little bit
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: diplomatic here, and you know, because he's because we don't
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: know what's going to happen. But I'm wondering, from the
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: legal perspective, what is different about this particular situation compared
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: to all the other situations that you've seen. That is
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: the question, I mean, that's the question that d o
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: J would have to grapple with if they actually go
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: to court to try to suit a block this deal,
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: because there is a very long history, very strong precedents
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: for this kind of deal um in the same space,
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: as well as other vertical deals in different spaces that
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: raise the same kinds of concerns and and possible harms,
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: in which behavioral concessions were just fine to fix these problems. Jennifer,
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: let's just zoom out, mean is this legal? Is this okay?
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: I mean, let's say that the real issue here is
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: that President Trump, uh and this is just delving into
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: the conspiracy theories. This is what everybody talks about when
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: they're not on air, which is that President Trump doesn't
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: like CNN and basically instructed the Department of Justice not
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: to sign off on this agreement unless CNN was was
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: sort of left out of this deal. First of all,
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: is that a plausible reading of this or is that
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: vastly misinterpreting the issue number one and number two? If
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: that is the case, is it legal? Well start by saying,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: I certainly think it's plausible. And the reason I think
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: it's plausible is because this is such a departure. It's it's,
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: it's and and this is something that there's sort of
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: bipartisan agreement on amongst both Democratic and Republican um antitrust
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: practitioners and officials that this kind of deal doesn't generally
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: cause significant harm, and usually that harm you can fix
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: with the behavioral remedy. But here's the difficulty that the
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: complexity of this is that there is an argument in court,
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: There is an argument period, that there is some harm
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: that can be caused by this deal. If there was
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: no harm, you would need no remedy at all. So
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: when you look at Comcast NBCU, these are probably the
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: same kind of harms they're thinking about and grappling with now,
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: and you needed a remedy there um. So you can
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: go into court and you can say, well, well, there
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: is a harm here, and we do have concerns and
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: we are trying to protect consumers, and that is what
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: we're supposed to do under the antitrust laws. The question
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: is going to be why what's different about this? As
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: Pim already raised, why don't these behavioral remedies which the
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: parties appear to be willing to agree with. What is
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: a behavior What is an example of a behavioral remedy.
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: It's it's making commitments and signing onto an agreement that
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: you will behave in a certain way. So for for example,
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: not discriminate against your rivals, not try to try to
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: try to use your leverage by owning great content or
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: owning a lot of distribution to somehow raise the costs
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: of your rivals who are trying to get their content
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: on your distribution or harm other distributors that you compete
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: with by using your own content. It's really just don't
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: discriminate license on fair terms. So, Paul, given the market
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: risk sponse, do you get the sense that people are
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: taking this seriously and thinking, Wow, this deal really may
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: not go through. I think what the markets telling us
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: here is that at the very least there's going to
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: be delay in the closing of this deal. It is
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: not going to close by a year end. It looks
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: like it's gonna be pushed into um. You know, I
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: think most investors that I've spoken to over the last
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: couple of days continue believe that the deal will close
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: with modest modifications, if any, but that this may go
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: to court, which then pushes the timing out of this
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: deal out well into, if not beyond, And that is
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: what we're seeing in the art spreads today. Jennifer, just quickly,
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: let's say you were a lawyer at the Department of
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: Justice and you didn't receive any telephone call or communication,
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: but you knew the perspective and attitude of people in
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: the executive branch. Could that influence you well, certainly, And
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: that's another complication here. This may not have been a
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: direct communication, but it just could be a desire to
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: you know. Yeah, alright, well we're gonna be following this.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: And just to give you an update, the shares of
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: A T and T they're higher right now by one
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: and a quarter percent. Shares of Time Warner they are
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: down by more than one and a quarter per cent.
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: Thank you very much for joining us. Jennifer ree any Trust,
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: the analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and of course Paul Sweeney,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: us director of Research and our senior media and Internet
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. And I will just add you know,
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: I've seen conflicting reports about what the motivation was and
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: how this is being spun, so it is there still
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: is a lot of question about what exactly is going
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: on here in the d J stands yes, and well,
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: we won't know until we know. Thanks for listening to
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio.