Latest / Reformed Thinking / Short-Term Missions: Impact or Illusion?

Transcript

Short-Term Missions: Impact or Illusion? · Reformed Thinking

0:00
So a Peruvian pastor recently looked at an American mission
0:03
team and told them something that should honestly stop the
0:08
modern church in its tracks. Yeah, it is a fairly jarring
0:11
quote to read. It really is, he said.
0:15
If you just send us the money you spend on your plane tickets,
0:17
we could build more churches. We could feed more children and
0:20
train more pastors. Ouch.
0:22
I mean, that is just a brutal mirror to hold up.
0:24
Right. So welcome to Reform Thinking.
0:27
I'm so glad you decided to join us for this deep dive.
0:30
You know, usually when we talk about a medical diagnosis, there
0:33
is this expectation of precision.
0:35
Right, like engineering or something?
0:36
Yeah, like you break your arm. The X-ray shows that jagged
0:39
white line, and the doctor points to the screen and says,
0:41
well, there is the problem. It is binary, you know, broken
0:45
or not broken. It is a clean visible
0:47
categorization. But then you step into the world
0:49
of church practice and missiology, and suddenly that
0:52
X-ray machine is just totally busted.
0:54
Oh yeah, the water gets very muddy.
0:56
We are looking at a landscape of global ministry that is
0:59
incredibly murky. We are evaluating options that
1:02
look fantastic on the surface, things that get applauded on
1:06
Sunday mornings but require a much sharper lens to truly
1:10
understand. It is the absolute definition of
1:12
diagnostic Muddy Waters. I mean, when you look at the
1:15
sheer volume of activity happening under the banner of
1:19
Christian ministry today, you have to ask what is actually
1:22
going on beneath the surface. Right, because we see the photos
1:25
of youth groups in matching T-shirts.
1:28
Always the matching T-shirts. Always.
1:30
And we hear the emotional recaps, but we rarely stop to
1:33
run the entire system through a rigorous theological evaluation.
1:36
And we really need to. Which brings us to our mission.
1:39
For this deep dive, we're looking at a highly debated
1:42
topic within the modern church. We have a stack of excerpts for
1:45
the textbook Biblical Missions Principles, Priorities, and
1:47
Practices, and we're going to focus specifically on a chapter
1:51
written by Lisa Lee George. Yeah, and the subject is short
1:54
term missions. And since we operate from a
1:56
reformed theological perspective, adhering to the
1:59
Westminster Confession, we have to establish our lens right out
2:02
of the gate. That is crucial.
2:03
For you listening, you might wonder what that actually means
2:07
in practice. It means we view the Bible as
2:10
the final, supreme authority for how the church should operate.
2:13
We believe in the sovereignty of God over all things, and we
2:16
believe the church has a specific mandate, which is the
2:19
precise, faithful declaration of the gospel.
2:22
Yes. We do not evaluate a church
2:24
program by asking did the youth group have a good time?
2:28
We ask, is this activity faithfully executing what
2:31
scripture commands? That is a critical standard to
2:34
set. I mean, the Westminster
2:35
Confession places a massive premium on the authority of
2:38
Scripture and the faithful proclamation of the Gospel.
2:40
Right, it is the primary thing. So when we assess any form of
2:43
missions, we are asking a very specific question.
2:46
Is this practice faithfully executing the biblical mandate
2:49
for genuine gospel proclamation and making disciples, or has it
2:54
drifted into something else entirely?
2:56
We have to evaluate the doctor, the theology, and the intent
2:59
behind the action of getting on an airplane.
3:01
Yes, we do. Let's unpack the terminology
3:03
first because words matter and Lisa Lajorge draws a very sharp
3:08
line here. She makes a distinction between
3:11
biblical missions and what we call STM, or short term
3:14
missions. The nomenclature is vital for
3:17
this conversation. According to the textbook.
3:18
When we say biblical missions, we are talking about a long
3:22
term, cross cultural and often transnational lifestyle.
3:26
It is a vocation. Right.
3:28
It is a lifelong vocation. The entire purpose of this
3:31
lifestyle is gospel proclamation and disciple making.
3:35
The individual is embedding themselves into a new culture
3:38
for the long haul. They are living there.
3:39
Yeah, they are learning the language, they're understanding
3:42
the cultural idioms and building decades of trust.
3:44
And then we have STM, which stands for Short Term Missions,
3:47
or as the broader textbook identifies it, Volunteer short
3:50
term Ministry Trips. Though they stick with short
3:53
term missions because that is what all the data uses.
3:56
Right. We want to retain that term so
3:57
we do not misrepresent the research.
4:00
Let me try to put an analogy to this for you listening Think of
4:04
vocational missions as moving to a new country, buying a house,
4:08
learning the local zoning laws, and becoming a permanent part of
4:11
the neighborhood fabric. You are all in.
4:13
You were there for the good years, the bad years, the
4:16
political upheavals and the quiet moments.
4:19
STM on the other hand, is more like booking an Airbnb for a
4:21
week. That is a good way to look at
4:23
it. You interact with locals, you
4:25
might even help paint a Community Center while you were
4:27
there, but your bags are always packed for the return flight.
4:31
One requires permanent routing and the other is inherently
4:34
transient. The distinction comes down to
4:36
lifelong vocation versus temporary volunteerism.
4:40
And the scale of this transient movement is what makes this
4:43
topic so urgent. Let me read you these statistics
4:46
from the research because they are staggering.
4:48
They really are. If we look at North American STM
4:50
travelers, the numbers exploded from just 22,000 people in 1979
4:56
to 1.6 million by 2005. From 22,000 to 1.6 million.
5:00
That is an astronomical increase in a very brief window of time.
5:04
It gets bigger. Another study in the text
5:07
suggests that 8 million adults from the United States
5:09
participated in at least one STM trip between 2003 and 2008. 8
5:15
million. 8 million people. And then, of course, these
5:17
numbers diminished slightly in the following decade and were
5:20
brought to a screeching hard stop by COVID-19 in 2020.
5:24
Everything just froze. International travel froze
5:26
completely. And, you know, the pause forced
5:29
by the pandemic created an unprecedented opportunity for
5:32
reflection. We suddenly had a global time
5:35
out to look at the massive machinery we have built.
5:38
That is the central question we are posing to you today.
5:41
Now that travel has resumed across the globe, should local
5:44
churches simply dust off the old playbooks and replicate the pre
5:47
2020 model or is a massive structural evaluation required?
5:52
To answer that, we have to understand how we arrived at 8
5:54
million travelers in the 1st place.
5:56
This massive scale of the 2000s is actually a historical
5:59
anomaly. If we look backward, we can see
6:01
how atypical this movement is in the broader context of Church
6:05
history. Let's talk about the era before
6:07
1950. If you grew up in the modern
6:10
evangelical church, going on a short trip feels as normal as
6:14
going to Sunday school. But prior to 1950, very few
6:18
people travel under the banner of missions unless they were
6:21
relocating for life. The sheer logistical and
6:24
theological reality of the pre 1950s era dictated this.
6:28
International travel was arduous.
6:30
It was expensive and slow. Right.
6:32
You could not just hop on a jet. No.
6:34
If you were getting on a boat to go to a foreign field, you were
6:37
packing your belongings in a coffin.
6:40
Metaphorically, and sometimes literally.
6:43
With like actually using a coffin as a trunk.
6:45
Yes, because you were buying buying a one way ticket.
6:47
You were saying goodbye to your family knowing you would likely
6:49
never see them again in this life.
6:51
You were going to stay until you died and were buried in the soil
6:54
of your host country. That is heavy, but there are a
6:56
couple of very rare exceptions prior to 1950 mentioned in the
7:00
research which are fascinating. Robert Cleaver Chapman is 1.
7:03
Oh yes, the pastor from England. Right.
7:05
He lived from eighteen O 3 to 19 O 2A pastor from Barnstable,
7:09
England. He would take a sabbatical
7:10
periods and travel to Ireland and Spain.
7:13
But his goal was very specific, intentional seasons of gospel
7:17
proclamation. He was not going to build a
7:19
wall. No, you was not going to hand
7:21
out shoes either. He's going to preach.
7:22
Notice the intense focus there. It was highly intentional,
7:26
highly theological, and focused entirely on verbal proclamation.
7:31
The other historical exception provided is Lilius Trotter, who
7:35
lived from 1853 to 1928. She was in Algeria, right?
7:39
Yes, a missionary to Algeria, she encouraged self funded young
7:42
women from England to volunteer as what she called short
7:46
servicers in the early 1900s. Short servicers, what an
7:49
interesting term. But again, look at their
7:51
function. They temporarily assisted the
7:53
long term missionaries in their homes.
7:55
They were support staff. Think about what that actually
7:57
looks like. A wealthy young woman from
7:59
England travels to Algeria in 1910.
8:03
She does not set up a stage in the town square.
8:05
She goes to the home of the vocational missionary and she
8:07
washes the dishes. She tutors the missionary's
8:10
children. She does the laundry, she does
8:12
the menial daily tasks to free up the long term worker to
8:16
preach and translate scripture. Right.
8:17
They were not flying in to hold an autonomous evangelistic
8:21
rally. They were coming to support the
8:23
vocational workers who are already embedded.
8:26
The historical exceptions were structured entirely around
8:29
supporting the established long term vocational work.
8:32
The volunteers submitted themselves completely to the
8:35
authority and the strategy of the permanent missionary.
8:37
But then the culture shifts dramatically.
8:40
A massive societal shift occurs. We hit the 1960s and the STM
8:44
movement catches serious momentum.
8:47
Entire Partridge agency sprouted up with the explicit focus of
8:50
mobilizing young adults for short term field work.
8:53
This is when we see youth with a mission or Why Wham begin in
8:56
1960. You go Ministries in 1964, Team
9:00
Missions International in 1970. We have to ask why this
9:03
happened. Then you have the post World War
9:05
2 economic boom, the advent of commercial jet travel making the
9:08
globe accessible, and the rise of the teenager as a distinct
9:12
cultural demographic with disposable income and free time.
9:15
These para church agencies represented a totally new
9:18
methodology. They created the infrastructure
9:21
to send many thousands of participants into the field
9:23
quickly and efficiently. They made it a system.
9:26
Yeah, they standardized the application process, the
9:29
fundraising and the travel logistics.
9:31
It did not stay contained to para church agencies, though a
9:34
massive institutional shift followed.
9:36
The movement shifted from specialized agencies to massive
9:40
denominational involvement. The data from a 2009 examination
9:45
is illuminating. The Southern Baptist Convention
9:48
was sending 150 thousand of its members abroad annually as STM
9:52
team members. That is wild.
9:53
And the United Methodist Church was sending more than 100,000 a.
9:56
Quarter of a million people from just two denominations in a
9:59
single year. The demographics changed right
10:02
alongside the numbers. Earlier STMS focused on adult
10:05
participants who had identifiable technical skills.
10:07
Doctors, engineers, builders, dentists.
10:10
People who could offer a highly specialized service that the
10:13
local community could not easily replicate.
10:15
But over the past 50 years, there has been an exponential
10:18
involvement of teenagers and young adults.
10:21
The statistics show that young adults and teenagers are nearly
10:24
twice as likely to go on a trip as middle-aged adults.
10:27
It became an expected normal function of Christian higher
10:30
education and youth groups. By the 1st decade of the 21st
10:34
century, STM became a standard part of almost every church,
10:38
high school, youth group. College students got heavily
10:40
involved, too. While many Christian schools
10:42
offer study abroad programs, few sponsor any mission trip lasting
10:46
more than a month. The New Paradigm became the one
10:49
week trip over spring break. We see a complete structural
10:52
redesign of how the Church approaches global outreach.
10:55
We moved from skilled adults providing targeted support for
10:58
vocational workers to thousands of high school and college
11:02
students taking one week spring break trips.
11:04
I am going to push back here, or at least pose a major structural
11:07
question for you listening. If this practice of mass short
11:11
term unskilled travel was almost non existent for the 1st 1900
11:15
years of church history, what are we actually looking at?
11:18
That is the big question. Are we looking at an
11:20
unprecedented modern blessing? A brand new tool given to the
11:24
church? Or are we looking at a byproduct
11:27
of Western affluence masquerading as messiology?
11:31
That is the tension A Reformed perspective forces us to
11:34
confront. We believe in Providence.
11:37
God certainly ordains the times and the seasons and the advent
11:40
of modern aviation as part of that Providence.
11:43
God uses various means to spread His word.
11:46
However, our theology also demands that we do not blindly
11:49
accept a practice simply because it is popular or pragmatic.
11:53
The modern STM industry and researchers explicitly note it
11:56
has become a lucrative industry requires strict theological
11:59
scrutiny. We cannot just assume it is good
12:01
because it's big. Right, we have to evaluate if
12:03
this is a faithful execution of the Great Commission or an
12:06
adaptation of consumer culture. Which transitions us to the next
12:09
logical question. If the demographic shifted so
12:11
drastically toward youth, why did millions of teenagers and
12:15
young adults suddenly feel compelled to go overseas?
12:18
Why do we pack our bags? The motivations are incredibly
12:20
complex. Researcher David Livermore
12:22
outlines attention in the intentions of the participants.
12:25
Livermore points out the participants often provide
12:28
multiple reasons for going. On one hand they claim a
12:31
biblical motivation, which is obedience to the Great
12:33
Commission, but on the other hand there is a massive appeal
12:37
to the sense of adventure. This raises a critical question
12:40
about the human heart. It is very easy to wrap a desire
12:44
for international travel in the language of spiritual obedience.
12:47
Livermore points to the personal tension involved in this
12:50
combination of motives. There is a dynamic here that
12:53
anyone who has ever been in a modern church will instantly
12:56
recognize. Livermore talks about the stark
12:59
disconnect between the reports and the reality.
13:02
Oh, this Sunday morning recap. Yes, he contrasts the reports
13:05
given by participants to their sending churches, which are
13:08
usually framed as these sweeping spiritual victories, standing at
13:12
the pulpit on a Sunday morning, talking about how many hands
13:15
were raised with the personal conversations they have in
13:18
private. The private conversations reveal
13:20
a lot about the actual focal point of the experience.
13:23
The private conversations are filled with stories about who
13:26
got stopped going through customs, what it was like to eat
13:29
the strange food, bartering A shopkeeper down to a ridiculous
13:32
price for a souvenir, and experiencing the wild driving
13:36
habits of the locals. Notice what is missing from that
13:39
list of private conversations. Jesus.
13:41
Yeah, it is heavy on tourism and light on theological engagement.
13:46
The focus shifts from the proclamation of the gospel to
13:49
the acquisition of a novel cultural experience.
13:53
The setting agencies know this. Some missions agencies advertise
13:56
the fun nature of these trips, their marketing and experience
13:59
to a consumer. Other motivations cited include
14:01
young people wanting an opportunity to mature personally
14:04
or to prove themselves worthy of respect and responsibility.
14:07
Some want an eclectic lifestyle and diversity or they want to be
14:10
globally aware and cause oriented.
14:12
This is where we must apply a rigorous theological evaluation.
14:16
Edwin Zaner examines the rhetorical appeal of STM to
14:19
North Americans. He notes that over the last half
14:22
century, the evangelical motivation has shifted
14:24
dramatically away from the proclamation of the gospel and
14:27
toward basic humanitarian relief.
14:29
Through a Reformed lens, this is a severe theological drift.
14:33
Let me explain this clearly. Providing physical care and
14:37
humanitarian relief is absolutely a biblical mandate.
14:40
The church is called to care for the vulnerable, to feed the
14:44
hungry and to clothe the naked. Amen to that.
14:46
However, substituting humanitarian relief for the
14:49
verbal, articulate proclamation of the gospel is a theological
14:53
failure. If a group of high schoolers
14:56
builds a medical clinic in a remote village, that is a good
14:59
thing. A very good.
15:00
Thing. But if they leave without ever
15:01
explaining justification by faith, the truth that we are
15:04
declared righteous before God solely by trusting in Jesus
15:08
Christ, not by our own good works, have they done missions.
15:11
If they never articulate the doctrines of grace, that God
15:14
mercifully saves rebellious sinners through Christ alone,
15:17
then they have functioned as a humanitarian aid organization, a
15:20
Christian NGO. But they've not fulfilled the
15:22
Great Commission. No, they have not.
15:24
The Great Commission commands us to make disciples, teaching them
15:26
to observe all that Christ commanded.
15:29
A1 week trip focused heavily on adventure, personal maturation,
15:33
and humanitarian relief often lacks the structural capacity to
15:37
fulfill that specific biblical mandate.
15:39
But wait. Proponents of the STM industry
15:42
vigorously defend the practice. They point to real, tangible
15:46
fruits. If the motivations are this
15:48
murky, how on earth did 8 million people justify going?
15:52
They must be seeing something we haven't talked about yet.
15:54
Let us look at the perceived benefits reported by
15:56
participants and the sending agencies, because we cannot
16:01
ignore the data they present. The literature certainly
16:04
outlines A robust, defensive STM's focusing heavily on what
16:07
happens to the person who goes on the trip.
16:09
Let us start with participant life change.
16:12
The Barna Group has data on this.
16:14
They state that most people who embark on a service adventure
16:16
describe the trips as life altering.
16:18
Specifically, 3/4 of trip goers report that the experience
16:21
changed their life in some way. Authors Chris Eaton and Kim
16:24
Hurst wrote a book tellingly titled Vacations with a Purpose.
16:28
That title alone says so much about the mindset.
16:31
It does. They suggest that the
16:32
participant is personally stretched, they are exposed to
16:35
spiritual and human needs, enlightened by learning first
16:38
hand about the world, and they encounter God through the
16:41
experience of change and trust. The research lists other
16:44
personal benefits, like discovering spiritual gifts,
16:47
receiving ministry training or growing spiritually.
16:50
It supposedly expands their understanding of the global
16:52
church, increasing enthusiasm for the Missio Day.
16:55
And for you listening, Missio day is a Latin theological term
16:59
that simply means the mission of God.
17:01
Right. It is the idea that God is
17:03
already at work reconciling the world to himself, and we're
17:07
joining Him in that specific ongoing work.
17:10
STM supposedly opened a teenager's eyes to this massive
17:13
global reality, and practically, it might give the Sending Church
17:17
a clearer understanding of the spiritual and physical needs of
17:19
Christians around the world. It also offers an Ave. for
17:23
individuals from underrepresented socioeconomic
17:25
and ethnic backgrounds to experience other cultures since,
17:28
as one survey noted, STMS are relatively inexpensive compared
17:31
to international tourism or study abroad programs.
17:35
Let us talk about the big long term argument proponents make.
17:39
Robertson Mcquilkin, an elder missionary statesman, suggests
17:42
that STMS can function as a gateway to vocational ministry.
17:46
The idea is that an STM experience can become a
17:49
milestone, propelling participants to return long term
17:52
to the mission field. It has been noted as a common
17:55
factor in increasing full time and part time mission staff.
17:58
If short term exposure recruits the next generation of lifelong
18:01
vocational workers, then the initial investment could be
18:04
viewed as highly beneficial for the global church.
18:07
It functions as an expansive recruitment tool.
18:10
And it isn't just about the participant.
18:12
Researchers Enoch Wan and Jeffrey Hart gathered a list
18:14
regarding the benefits for the receiving host missionaries.
18:17
They list things like delivering resources to the field,
18:20
extending a long term missionary reach, providing access to
18:23
restricted areas, providing encouragement to long term
18:26
staff, supporting missionary kids, meeting physical needs,
18:29
providing administrative support, and enabling evangelism
18:32
at public events closed to missionaries.
18:34
That list paints a picture of STM teams acting as an auxiliary
18:38
support mechanism for the vocational worker.
18:40
Let me use another analogy. It sounds like STMS act as a
18:44
massive supply drop for frontline workers.
18:47
You have a vocational missionary dug in, doing the hard work of
18:51
learning the language and building relationships, and
18:53
suddenly a plane arise with resources hands to help with
18:56
administration and encouragement.
18:58
When it functions properly, the host congregations benefit by
19:01
building relationships, receiving affirmation in their
19:04
faith, and gaining financial support.
19:06
I have to push back on this though.
19:08
Let us weigh the bar in a data about the participant against
19:12
the supply drop analogy. What if the supply drop is full
19:15
of items the frontline workers never asked for and do not need?
19:18
That happens quite a bit. If the primary benefit, the most
19:21
publicized outcome, is worldview expansion for the Western
19:24
teenager? If 3/4 say it changed their
19:27
life, are we using the developing world as a spiritual
19:30
training ground for our own kids?
19:32
Are we centering the entire expensive logistical operation
19:35
on the American teenager rather than focusing entirely on the
19:38
target community? Validating both sides is
19:41
necessary here. Affordable exposure to global
19:43
Christianity is valuable. It is good for believers to see
19:47
the universal nature of the Church.
19:49
However, the intention must remain thoroughly God centered
19:52
and focused on faithful ministry, not participant
19:56
centered. When the focus shifts to the
19:58
personal enlightenment of the traveller, we run into severe
20:02
structural and financial critiques.
20:04
Which brings us back to the unintended consequences.
20:07
If STMS are this helpful supply drop, why did that Peruvian
20:11
pastor express such sharp frustration with the entire
20:14
model? Let us transition to the
20:16
structural shortcomings outlined by researchers.
20:18
The financial argument is often the 1st and most jarring
20:21
critique raised by those in the host countries.
20:24
The Peruvian pastors words are piercing.
20:26
If they sent us the money they spend on their international
20:28
travel, we could build more churches, feed more children,
20:32
train more pastors. When you calculate the aggregate
20:35
cost of airplane tickets, visas, lodging, travel insurance and
20:38
food for a team of 20 teenagers, you are looking at 10s of
20:42
thousands of dollars. From an efficiency standpoint,
20:45
the Peruvian pastor is correct. The capital could be deployed
20:49
much more effectively by local leaders who already know the
20:52
language and the culture, and who do not require translators
20:55
or expensive bottled water. I'm going to fight you on this
20:57
point, though I want to play devil's advocate for a minute.
21:00
If I am sitting in my local church and we just decide to
21:03
wire a check to Peru, do we lose the relational solidarity of the
21:08
global body of Christ? We are commanded in scripture to
21:12
weep with those who weep to be members of 1 body.
21:16
You cannot weep with someone over Venmo or a bank transfer.
21:19
Is physical presence worth the price of a plane ticket?
21:22
You cannot weep with them if you do not know their language,
21:24
their history, or the cultural context of their weeping.
21:27
That is fair. Wiring money is deeply
21:29
impersonal, yes. The danger, however, is assuming
21:32
that a one week trip actually achieves genuine relational
21:35
solidarity. This is where sociology
21:37
professor Richard Slimbach's critique enters the picture.
21:40
Slimbach, an advocate of cross cultural learning, summarizes
21:43
the concerns of multiple researchers.
21:45
He points out that trips under 2 weeks only allow for transitory,
21:49
non repetitive encounters. Transitory and non repetitive,
21:52
meaning you show up, you interact briefly through a
21:55
translator, and you leave, never to return.
21:58
And Slimbuck argues this leads to a superficial and usually
22:01
stereotypic view of a community culture.
22:03
He points out severe structural flaws in the typical STM model,
22:07
large teams, majority white participants, lack of cultural
22:11
training and egoistic expectations.
22:14
When a large team arrives without cultural fluency, they
22:16
cannot engage in substantive theological dialogue.
22:20
They cannot weep with those who weep because they are entirely
22:22
insulated from the actual daily struggles of the community.
22:25
They stay in their bubble. They are left with superficial
22:28
interactions that often reinforce pre-existing
22:30
stereotypes rather than breaking them down.
22:32
Which ties back to Mccoolkin. He's the elder statesman we
22:35
mentioned earlier who said STMS could be a gateway to vocational
22:39
work, But even he provides a sharp critique.
22:43
He states that because of its temporary nature, STM is not
22:46
valid for finishing the task of world evangelism or fulfilling
22:50
one's call to missionary service.
22:51
It is structurally incapable of finishing the task.
22:55
World evangelism requires massive language acquisition,
22:58
cultural integration, and long term patient discipleship.
23:01
You cannot do that in a week. A one week trip can do none of
23:04
those things. It can only ever be an auxiliary
23:06
effort, and when it is treated as the primary vehicle for
23:10
missions by a local church, the church's global strategy becomes
23:13
fundamentally crippled. Beyond the structural and
23:15
financial flaws, the sources revealed deep psychological and
23:19
theological critiques regarding the actual individuals going on
23:22
these trips. We need to look at peak
23:23
experiences versus actual sanctification.
23:26
This requires us to look at the intersection of modern culture
23:29
and church practice. Slimbach introduces the concept
23:31
of the mindful missioner and his analysis of the consumerism of
23:35
missions is quite revealing. Slimbach correlates the high
23:38
volume of STMS with the rise of the simplified tourism industry
23:42
and increased Western wealth. He points out a massive societal
23:46
shift from production to consumerism.
23:49
The West craves what he calls peak experiences.
23:53
The term peak experience is highly illustrative.
23:55
A consumer society trains individuals to constantly seek
23:58
the next emotional high, the next novel event, the next
24:02
photogenic moment to share with their social circle.
24:04
For some participants, STM trips are an adventurous alternative
24:07
vacation, and they are even advertised as such.
24:11
It is a way to fill some sort of void in their lives.
24:14
The critique is that the motivation is solely to derive
24:16
personal benefit with little or no consideration of the impact
24:19
on the receiving community. It becomes all about the
24:21
traveler. The trips resulted a little more
24:23
than braided hair, souvenirs, pictures with dark skinned
24:26
children and stories of strange foods.
24:28
This represents A catastrophic failure of theological intent.
24:31
Missions is relegated to a commodity consumed by the
24:34
Western church member for their own psychological gratification.
24:37
The focus is entirely inward. But Wade earlier we talked about
24:40
the Barna data where 3/4 of people said the trip changed
24:43
their life. Here is where the empirical data
24:45
crashes into those self reported feelings.
24:48
We have to look at the degeneration of impact.
24:51
The self reported feelings of life change often fail to
24:53
materialize into long term fruit.
24:56
Sociologist and former missionary Kurt Verbeek studied
24:59
200 N Americans who participated in a week long building project
25:03
in Honduras. He challenged the concept of any
25:06
tangible or intangible impact on the participant.
25:09
This study is fascinating. Let us imagine a team goes to
25:12
Honduras to build a wall. Barna tells us 3/4 of these
25:16
people will come home and say the trip altered the trajectory
25:19
of their life. Verbeek followed up.
25:21
He looked at the data weeks later.
25:23
Did they start giving more of their income to the poor?
25:26
No. Did they start volunteering in
25:27
their local neighborhoods? No.
25:29
Did they commit to long term vocational ministry?
25:31
No. The research indicates that mere
25:34
weeks post trip, many participants experienced little
25:37
or no significant change. David Livermore's research
25:41
demonstrates the same thing. So the peak experience fades.
25:45
The emotional high of the trip dissipates mere weeks after
25:48
returning home, leaving no lasting sanctification, no
25:52
change in habit, no increased dedication to local evangelism.
25:56
They go back to normal. They go back to living the
25:58
identical lifestyle they lived before they boarded the plane.
26:02
Why does it happen? The research points to
26:04
theological poverty on the field.
26:07
Miriam Adney warns that many short term workers have a heart
26:10
for the Lord, but they possess only a sketchy knowledge of
26:13
Scripture, little experience in evangelism or apologetics, and a
26:17
lackadaisical practice of spiritual discipline.
26:20
Having a heart for the Lord is not a substitute for sound
26:23
doctrine. Say that again.
26:24
Having a heart for the Lord is not a substitute for sound
26:27
doctrine. If you send a team that lacks
26:29
scriptural knowledge and apologetic skill, they have
26:31
nothing of substance to offer the host community.
26:34
They are physically present but theologically vacant.
26:37
They cannot answer complex questions about the faith,
26:40
defend the resurrection, or explain the necessity of the
26:42
atonement. Which?
26:44
Perfectly sets up Alex Smith's 7 Dangers.
26:47
The text provides A devastating list of concerns and warnings
26:51
for the future of STMSI don't know, We'll just read a list.
26:55
I want us to really analyze how these manifest in real life.
26:58
Let's look at a few of the most impactful ones.
27:01
Let us start with what Smith calls intense activity without
27:05
deliberate purpose. Activity does not equal
27:07
productivity in the Kingdom of God.
27:09
Let us talk about painting the role.
27:11
I have heard stories and researchers document this, of
27:14
teams going down to an orphanage in Central America and spending
27:18
five days painting a massive exterior wall.
27:21
They take photos. They feel exhausted.
27:23
They feel they have worked hard for the Lord.
27:25
Then the next week, another youth group from a different
27:27
American church flies down and the orphanage director hands
27:30
them paintbrushes to paint the very same wall a different
27:33
color. It is Madden.
27:34
The activities intense, the teenagers are sweating, but the
27:37
purpose is completely manufactured.
27:40
It is busy work designed to make the visitor feel useful rather
27:44
than actually assisting the host community.
27:46
That is a perfect example of activity devoid of significant
27:49
eternal goals. It is Masonry, or in this case
27:53
painting, not missions. Another danger Smith highlights
27:56
is social service participation without evangelistic
27:59
proclamation. We touched on this was Zaynor's
28:02
critique earlier, but it bears repeating if the outcome is just
28:05
a dug well or a painted wall. But the Gospel is never spoken.
28:09
Spiritual duty is short circuited.
28:11
A well provides clean water for a generation, which is a
28:14
wonderful blessing, but it does not reconcile A sinful human
28:17
being to a holy God. Without the verbal proclamation
28:21
of Christ, the social service is incomplete from a mythological
28:24
standpoint. Let us look at one more of
28:26
Smith's dangers, which I think is the most devastating
28:29
humanistic self-sufficiency without theological reflection
28:32
and analysis. This perfectly describes how
28:34
modern pragmatism has infected the church.
28:36
We have created a system where the logistics of travel,
28:39
fundraising and project management vastly outpace sound
28:42
biblical reflection. This is the spreadsheet problem.
28:46
We have youth pastors who are brilliant at organizing A
28:48
GoFundMe campaign. They can coordinate 50
28:51
passports, book 15 connecting flights, negotiate group rates
28:54
at hotels, and organize a complex daily itinerary.
28:57
They are completely self-sufficient in the
28:59
logistics. We trust our spreadsheets more
29:02
than our theology. We rely on our own humanistic
29:05
capability to organize a trip, assuming that God is honored
29:09
simply because we are busy. We are sending teenagers who
29:12
cannot articulate the basic tenets of the Christian faith
29:15
into complex cross cultural environments led by leaders who
29:18
prioritize logistics over doctrine.
29:21
The research points out a massive leadership gap here.
29:23
Robert Priest observes that youth pastors are typically
29:26
expected to lead STM, sometimes on an annual basis.
29:30
Yet he notes that nothing in the curriculum of most seminaries is
29:33
oriented toward instructing youth pastors in what is needed
29:36
to conduct an STM properly. We are sending our youth led by
29:39
pastors who have received 0 academic or theological training
29:43
in cross cultural missiology. They have not been taught how to
29:46
navigate cultural barriers, how to avoid paternalism, or how to
29:50
integrate short term work into long term church planting
29:53
strategies. It is a blind spot.
29:55
It is a recipe for the exact types of failures Limbach and
29:58
Smith warn about. We have dissected the traveller.
30:01
We have looked at their motives, their lack of training and their
30:05
fading emotional highs. Now we have to shift our focus
30:08
entirely away from the traveller.
30:11
We need to look at the view from the beach.
30:13
What happens to the people actually living in the target
30:15
communities when the STM team finally packs up and leaves?
30:19
The impact on the host community is arguably the most critical
30:22
metric for evaluating STMS, yet it is often the most overlooked
30:25
by sending churches. The research begins by detailing
30:28
the disruption factor. It states that the STM team will
30:30
definitely cause a disruption in the normal flow of life and
30:34
ministry for the host missionary.
30:35
Imagine being a vocational worker.
30:38
You have spent years building trust, learning the nuances of
30:41
the language, navigating local politics, and establishing A
30:44
fragile reputation in a community that might be hostile
30:47
to the Gospel. You are walking on egg shells.
30:50
Then a team of 20 untrained teenagers arrives.
30:54
Through a single cultural or political blunder, a visiting
30:58
team can instantly damage the reputation and status of the
31:01
missionary. A single inappropriate joke, a
31:03
misunderstanding of local gender dynamics, taking a photograph of
31:07
something sacred without permission, or violating A
31:10
cultural taboo by an untrained visitor can destroy years of
31:13
vocational work in an afternoon. Absolutely.
31:16
Furthermore, team complaints and conflicts may heavily discourage
31:19
the hosts. The strength of the host
31:21
missionary can be completely depleted just by caring for the
31:24
short term work. The logistics of housing,
31:26
feeding, arranging, transportation and translating
31:29
for 20 people is exhausting. It turns the vocational
31:32
missionary into a tour guide, a hotel manager and a babysitter.
31:36
The author of the chapter we are studying, Lisa George, shares a
31:39
personal competition here that is incredibly revealing and we
31:43
need to pause and really dwell on this.
31:46
She's a former missionary who hosted STM teams in a remote
31:49
location. This part hit hard.
31:51
She writes I I can attest to the sense of physical relief
31:54
occasionally brought about by watching the last boat of STM
31:57
workers pull away from the beach.
31:59
Wait, stop right there. A vocational missionary, Someone
32:04
who has dedicated her entire adult life to living in a remote
32:07
location to share the Gospel, literally felt physical relief
32:11
watching the American church group leave.
32:13
It is wild to think about. We have to unpack that.
32:16
Put yourself in her shoes for a. Minute It is a staggering
32:18
admission. The very people who were
32:20
supposed to be the supply drop in the source of encouragement
32:23
became a source of immense physical and emotional
32:26
exhaustion. I want to ask you, the listener,
32:28
have you ever considered that your mission trip might actually
32:31
be exhausting the very people you went to assist?
32:34
That your presence required so much management, so much
32:37
translation, so much hand holding through cultural faux
32:40
pas and dietary complaints that the hosts breathed a massive
32:43
sigh of relief when your boat finally pulled away from the
32:46
beach. It forces a severe reevaluation
32:49
of our utility. Are we going to work or are we
32:51
going to be catered to under the guise of missions?
32:54
The damage extends beyond exhausting the missionary.
32:58
The research lists residual effects on the host community
33:00
itself. It talks about confusing
33:02
religious communication. If you have untrained visitors
33:05
trying to share complex theological concepts across a
33:08
language barrier, often through a tired translator, the
33:12
potential for syncretism or outright heresy is massive.
33:15
Let. Me, explain syncretism for your
33:17
listening because it is a vital concept here.
33:19
Think of it like spiritual mixing.
33:21
It is taking the local folk religion with its local deities
33:24
and superstitions and just placing Jesus on the same shelf
33:27
is another good option. If an untrained teenager is
33:30
trying to share the Gospel across a language barrier, they
33:33
might think they are communicating that Jesus is the
33:36
exclusive only way to salvation. But because they lack the
33:40
theological vocabulary, the local listener might just hear
33:43
that Jesus is a helpful addition to their current religious
33:46
practices. It is a total miscommunication.
33:49
The teenager goes home thinking they saved us all, but they
33:52
actually just created deep theological confusion.
33:55
And the vocational missionary is left to spend the next five
33:57
years untangling that confusion. The research also mentions
34:01
financial dependency caused by influxes of foreign money.
34:05
When Westerners arrive and simply hand out cash, clothes or
34:08
goods. It bypasses local economic
34:10
structures. It creates a reliance on the
34:12
visiting teams rather than fostering local industry and
34:16
self deficiency. It creates A paternalistic
34:19
dynamic, the assumption that we, the wealthy Westerners, are the
34:22
saviors arriving to rescue the impoverished locals.
34:25
It can also violently displace local labor.
34:28
If you fly a youth group down to build a church building and you
34:31
bring your own tools and buy your own materials, you just
34:34
took a paying job away from a local Carpenter or Mason who
34:38
desperately needed that income to feed his family.
34:40
These are the structural realities of global economics
34:43
crashing into unexamined pragmatic missiology.
34:47
Good intentions do not mitigate economic damage.
34:50
The final critique is perhaps the most spiritually dangerous,
34:54
the creation of a spiritual vacuum.
34:56
The short duration of STM's may create a spiritual vacuum if no
35:01
follow through discipleship is provided.
35:03
This brings us right back to our Reformed theological lens and
35:06
the Great Commission. Evangelism without discipleship
35:09
contradicts the command of Christ, He said to make
35:12
disciples, baptizing them and teaching them to observe all he
35:15
commanded. If an STM team holds a massive
35:17
rally, plays loud music, records hundreds of supposed
35:20
conversions, and then flies home the next day with no mechanism
35:24
for gathering those individuals into a local church,
35:26
administering the sacraments, and teaching them sound
35:28
doctrine, they have failed biblically.
35:30
They have stirred the emotional pot, created a temporary
35:33
spiritual high and then vanished, leaving a dangerous
35:36
vacuum. As we synthesize this deep dive
35:38
into the research, the overarching conclusion is clear.
35:42
The world desperately needs the knowledge of Christ, and
35:45
believers are indeed the primary instruments for making Him
35:48
known. Millions of people are impacted
35:51
annually, for better or for worse.
35:53
The rapid, unexamined growth of the STM industry requires urgent
35:57
evaluation by every local church.
35:59
The practice demands robust theological training, a critical
36:02
look at motives, and a refusal to let consumerism dictate our
36:06
ecclesiology. We cannot substitute a week of
36:08
adventure for a lifetime of faithful gospel proclamation.
36:11
I want to leave you with a final lingering thought.
36:13
Build right out of the source material.
36:15
If the evidence shows the short term trips without intensive
36:18
theological and cultural training often cause more harm
36:21
than good, what would happen if your local church implemented
36:24
drastic new policy? Imagine this.
36:26
What if your church mandated A rigorous theological exam,
36:30
required a demonstration of apologetic skill, and demanded a
36:33
six month localized service requirement right in your own
36:36
city before anyone was allowed to board an airplane for an
36:39
international mission trip? Would your youth group empty
36:42
out, or would you finally start producing vocational, lifelong
36:45
gospel workers who understand the true weight of the Great
36:48
Commission? Thank you for joining us for
36:50
this deep dive on Reformed thinking.
36:52
Keep reading, keep asking the hard questions, and keep
36:55
thinking critically and biblically.
36:57
It all comes down to the Muddy Waters.
36:58
The diagnostic reality is never quite as clean as the Sunday
37:02
morning slide presentation, but recognizing the murkiness is the
37:05
first step toward true biblical clarity.