Latest / New Teacher Talk / Ep 161: Mistake-Friendly Classrooms Build a Culture Where Errors Fuel Growth

Transcript

Ep 161: Mistake-Friendly Classrooms Build a Culture Where Errors Fuel Growth · New Teacher Talk

Welcome to New Teacher Talk.
My name is Ken King,
and I am an education professor at Aurora University in
Aurora, Illinois.
Children often find making mistakes while learning
frustrating for deep-seated emotional and social reasons.
You may find yourself frustrated by errors as adult
learners as well.
Much of this frustration is not natural to learning itself.
It's rather shaped by how schools are organized,
how adults respond to mistakes,
and how students learn to associate mistakes with shame or
judgment rather than growth.
In this podcast,
I'm going to address why learners find mistakes
frustrating, why learning from mistakes is essential,
and provide three examples of things you can do as a
teacher to present mistakes as an opportunity for learning
to take place.
Whether you're teaching reading, math, art, or science,
one thing is always consistent.
Students will make errors,
but how we as teachers respond to those moments can
powerfully shape how students experience learning.
Trying from a number of research studies,
I wanna walk you through three things.
Why children often find mistakes frustrating,
how addressing errors can support learning,
and what you can do to turn mistakes into meaningful growth
opportunities.
Part one, why do children find mistakes frustrating?
Well,
it turns out there are emotional and cognitive reasons why
mistakes are hard for students.
Well, let's unpack them.
First one is the fear of judgment and failure.
Many students worry about how others,
especially their peers and teachers,
will react if they get something wrong.
In whole-class settings,
being wrong can feel like a public failure.
That fear is even stronger in environments where
performance is emphasized more than process.
In research on making errors,
evidence shows that fear of blame leads to defensiveness
and avoidance.
For children, it plays out like this.
If mistakes are followed by shame and anxiety,
disengagement with learning activities grow.
So what's the thing we can do?
Well, first of all,
we can create a classroom culture where mistakes are
expected and accepted.
When we provide feedback,
we use it in a way that makes it warm and supportive rather
than punitive.
Also,
show students your own errors and how you learn from them.
Avoid public correction or a harsh and punitive tone and
create an emotional and psychologically supportive space so
that students could say, I'm not sure,
or I need help without fear of being ridiculed.
In addition, mistakes feel personal.
For many children,
especially those who equate success with intelligence,
mistake feels like proof of I'm not smart.
This is why reframing mistakes is the key.
Instead of focusing only on outcomes,
we can offer these considerations.
You can praise the thinking behind the error.
You can use mistakes as entry points for understanding
misconceptions and show that intelligence isn't fixed.
It grows with effort.
When we emphasize the process over perfection,
we shift mindsets.
Students learn that being wrong is just one part of being
on the way to being right.
And that leads to the idea of fixed versus growth mindset.
Students with a fixed mindset see intelligence as
unchangeable.
For them,
mistakes mean that they don't have what it takes.
People who have a fixed mindset see people as binary.
For instance,
they're either good at math or they are bad at math with no
role for effort as a way of changing things.
Students with a growth mindset, however,
see mistakes as opportunities.
They believe that effort matters,
but mindsets don't change immediately.
One study showed that even when students said they had a
growth mindset, they didn't always seek help.
Mindset development is gradual.
It's shaped by experience, modeling, and support.
Some things that teachers can do to help encourage a growth
mindset is to praise persistence and logical reasoning even
if the answers are not yet complete.
Teachers can also allow space for students to try to
struggle and to revise their answers.
It's important to encourage approximation and partial
correctness and also value how students get to their
answer.
Emphasize the process is a critical part of understanding
the answer.
Let's consider the role of emotional regulation.
Mistakes don't just trigger thoughts.
They trigger feelings, frustration, embarrassment,
confusion.
Children are still learning how to manage those feelings,
but there is good news in this instance.
When students are guided to reflect and learn how effort
can change errors into accurate statements,
their emotional response improves.
They become more focused rather than being overwhelmed.
In this way,
we can approach reflection as a powerful emotional tool as
well as a cognitive tool.
A second part is how to mistake support learning.
So contrary to what many think,
mistakes aren't just detours,
they're essential drivers of deep learning.
Let's start off by looking into cognitive conflict and how
it leads to deeper thinking.
When students realize that they've made a mistake,
especially through clear, non-shaming feedback,
they tend to slow down.
They enter a phase where it's, wait,
something is not right.
That moment activates deeper processing.
This is called cognitive conflict.
It's also referred to as cognitive dissonance or productive
struggle.
And it occurs when learners encounter new information that
contradicts their existing beliefs, understandings,
or expectations.
This conflict can be uncomfortable,
but it's a useful tool for deep learning.
Major parts of the brain become involved in dealing with
this sensation.
The anterior cingulate cortex is the brain region most
associated with conflict monitoring.
It acts like a mental alarm system detecting when something
doesn't match expectations,
such that within a student's answer leads to an unexpected
result.
Once the conflict is detected,
the prefrontal cortex helps focus attention and manage
responses.
This brain region is responsible for executive functioning,
which includes functions such as inhibiting incorrect
responses,
shifting thinking to new ways of interpreting information,
considering alternative explanations,
and updating beliefs based on new evidence.
That struggle often results in better understanding and
memory retention of four ways.
The first one is deeper processing.
Students must rethink their assumptions and not just
memorize the facts.
This also supports conceptual change.
Especially in science and math,
conflict helps students replace misconceptions with
accurate models.
This leads to a motivation to resolve the conflict.
The discomfort motivates students to ask questions,
to make investigations,
and to reflect on their understanding.
Finally, long-term retention is also improved here.
Effortful,
emotionally charged learning sticks better in memory.
So dealing with that change and resolving it increases its
retention in long-term memory.
As a teacher,
you should know that research shows that mistakes followed
by feedback lead to better retention than error-free
performance.
So a little bit more on errors.
They just aren't mistakes or wrong turns.
They're what you might call diagnostic clues.
They show us what a student understands and what is still
unclear.
So if we treat mistakes as data rather than failures,
we gain some advantages.
First of all,
we get insight into student thinking that alerts you to
what they understand or possible misconceptions that need
to be addressed.
We also have an opportunity to adjust instruction in real
time based on this sort of formative assessment we get from
student responses.
It also lets us know the specific topics and ways to
approach what students don't understand well as part of the
process.
An example of this targeted support might look like this.
There's a strategy called my favorite no.
And this is an example from a math lesson.
In this example,
the teacher collects student responses to a math problem.
The teacher selects one incorrect answer that contains a
common or interesting mistake.
This becomes my favorite no.
The class looks at the work anonymously and the teacher
asks, what's good about this work?
Where did the error happen?
And what might the student have been thinking?
Asking about what other people's errors are helps students
understand that they are not solely capable of errors,
that that's something that everybody goes through in the
process of learning.
So students analyze the error in a systematic way in a
supportive environment, which helps with three things.
Helps them develop metacognition,
thinking about their own thinking,
how they solve the problem.
Clarifies misunderstandings.
They see that errors are ways to grow in the way we're
learning.
And finally,
it gives teachers a diagnostic insight that can spot
patterns of thinking or instruction that might need
additional attention.
Scholars would describe errors as an opportunity for system
insight.
A way of thinking that with that in a classroom is that
means we don't just correct,
we listen to what the mistake is telling us and move on
from there.
Like to return a little bit to the idea of a growth mindset
and expand on it a bit more.
A growth mindset,
it serves the purpose of encouraging learning from
mistakes.
Students who see errors as part of learning are more
resilient.
Carol Dweck has done a lot of research on this topic.
Her research supports this.
Learners who believe that ability grows with effort tend to
take on harder and harder tasks and they persist at it
longer.
Interestingly,
students who reflect on their mistakes are also more likely
to seek help.
That's called intellectual humility.
That's something we want to cultivate.
Overall, we know that growth takes time.
Just like learning to read or learning to do math,
learning to reflect and revise is a skill.
It develops over time with consistent modeling and
encouragement, our students can get there.
Just as we want our students to persist,
we need to persist in our efforts to help them learn from
their behavior and increasing their rate of success.
And finally, to part three.
What can teachers do to turn mistakes into learning
opportunities?
Here are some practical research-based strategies that you
can use in your own classroom.
First one is to normalize mistakes.
One way of doing that is to share your own learning
struggles.
Say things like, oh, oops,
I thought it would work that way.
Let's figure out why it didn't.
Learners benefit when teachers say things like,
that was a fantastic attempt,
or I see where your thinking is headed.
And teachers should model that errors are part of
everyone's learning journey.
Next thing teachers can do is promote productive struggle.
Let students wrestle with problems before offering to help.
Resist that temptation to rush in and fix things.
Support them in working through uncertainty.
When you design tasks, make sure that they're challenging,
but make sure that they're also within reach.
And frame struggle is productive,
not as a sign of failure.
There's an advantage also.
Building an opportunities for revision should be
considered.
Number of tools are available to teachers.
For instance,
simply making corrections on errors on tests or exams or
quizzes is a helpful way to help students learn from
mistakes.
Another opportunity is a second chance learning journal
when students can write at length at how they solve
problems and how they recover from an error.
A more structured approach might be a peer feedback
station.
This is a structured classroom activity where students
rotate through different stations to give and receive
feedback on each other's work.
This method encourages thoughtful critique,
collaborative learning, and course revision skills.
It's commonly used in writing, art, science, reports,
and project-based learning.
Each station focuses on a different type of feedback.
At one station,
the focus might be on asking reflective questions such as,
what did you expect to happen?
What changed your thinking?
At the next station,
giving students a chance to rework their ideas and
celebrate that process and the success that comes from that
would be a helpful outcome.
Finally,
making use of reflective questions and reworking ideas that
support metacognition, thinking about your own thinking,
as I mentioned before,
is a great topic for another station.
Talk moves and discourse are an important part of learning
and drawing from mistakes.
Talk moves are described as intentional teacher or student
-use prompts that guide and structure classroom discussion
to promote deeper thinking, engagement, and understanding.
Commonly, they're used in math, science, and literacy,
where students need to reason, explain,
and build eyes together.
Talk moves make thinking visible by drawing out students'
ideas,
helping both teachers and students understand how they're
developing their ideas and reasoning,
and they also help in identifying and diagnosing
misconceptions.
This helps teachers identify errors in foundational ideas
or in students' reasoning processes,
not just in their answers,
which helps them target instruction.
And by building a learning community, students listen,
respond, and build on each other's thinking.
The classroom becomes a safe and collaborative space for
reasoning.
Some prompts you can use.
When students are wrong,
you can ask questions such as these that focus on
explanation and reasoning.
First of all, does anyone see it differently?
What makes you think that?
Can you explain your thinking?
Talk moves encourage and support peer discussion.
Mistakes shouldn't end the conversation.
They should start it.
I'd encourage you to visit a previous podcast on talk moves
that explores them in greater detail.
Another action teachers can take is to provide specific
timely feedback.
General praise like good job isn't enough.
Explicit and focused feedback is essential for supporting
learning because it helps students understand what they're
doing well, where they're going wrong,
and what they can do to improve.
When feedback is clear, specific,
and directly tied to learning goals,
it becomes an essential tool for growth.
Building on those three questions generate responses such
as these.
First of all, be clear.
Let's say you used great logic here,
but this part doesn't line up.
What do you think happened?
Be immediate.
Feedback loses its power when it's delayed.
Be constructive.
Focus on the process, not just on correctness.
And lastly,
tailor your tone to the child's emotional state.
Or to encourage and not to break down.
In summary, mistakes are frustrating for students,
but they're also incredibly valuable.
As early career teachers start building actions into your
teaching that improves your response to student errors.
This can make a tremendous difference in how learning takes
place.
When you foster a classroom culture where mistakes are
expected, explored, and enforced, you build trust,
you support reflection, you cultivate resilience,
and you develop a growth mindset that can last a lifetime.
Thank you for being the kind of educators who lean into
these powerful moments.
Keep encouraging your students to think, reflect,
and try again.
You're not just teaching content, you're shaping learners.
Thank you for listening.
I hope you become a regular follower of this podcast
channel.
And remember, as a new teacher, we are here to help you.