Latest / Honey Badger Radio / X Under Cyber Attack, Infowars Journo Murdered, Trudeau is Out | HBR News 493

Transcript

X Under Cyber Attack, Infowars Journo Murdered, Trudeau is Out | HBR News 493 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:49
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four ninety three, texts under
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: cyber attack, info, War's journal, murdered Trudeau is out where
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: we discuss the news of the week and give it
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: the battery. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: I hope you guys are doing well this week and
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: that you're laughing and all of this absurdity so that
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: you are not consumed by it. I am your host, Brian.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: I am joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts,
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: Mike and Hannah. Yes, hello Mike, and hello Hannah, and
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: hello crowd. We have a great show line up for
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: you guys two week. Lots of this big news show,
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: actually lots of stories. I remember, like like last night,
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: I was like, man, I got to figure out some
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: stories and then I did a little bit of digging
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: and it looked like I couldn't find anything, and now
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: I have too much. So this might end up being
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: a longer than normal sausage, although I'm shooting for average
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: size sausage, so you size queens out there. It's a
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: five story show. Yeah, yeah, so please be sure to continue.
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: The conversation is both in the chat as well as
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: the comments section on this week's HBr news show, we're
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: gonna be talking about the the Canadian Prime Minister and
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: proud feminist Justin Trudeau's leaving the government of Canada and
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: he is being replaced by someone, and we're gonna talk
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: a little bit about who that someone might be in
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: said party and whether or not they are also a
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: proud feminist. Elon Musk's X had several outages, Oh I
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: believe yesterday, but maybe there are still issues and he
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: thinks it was being attacked. The Black Lives Matter mural
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: in DC is being removed, and more so stick around.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: It's gonna be a good time and we should have
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: Jonas afterwards for the Patron Only show. So Ever, since
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: Trump got into office, the left has been in a
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: complete hissy fit. And one of the things that usually
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: happens when this kind of thing goes on is we
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: have a blame game and you have people in fighting
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: in which which I'm I'm here for because you know,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: you got to figure it out. You got to figure
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: it out, guys. And one of the people who I
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: did not expect to punch left as it were, is
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: our friend from The Guardian are will Ma Dowie. Probably
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: the most prolific writer for The Guardian. Ever, I'm I'm
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: guessing an Ai. But AI don't.
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: Usually that mug shot with that glazed expression. But she's
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: just staring right for you.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: Yes, that's why she's real.
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: I'm not unusual for feminists like that's that's just kind
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: of par for the course. The glazed Either that or
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: they look like they've been possessed by the spirit of
• 3:38
  Speaker 3: a disembodied disembodied spirit of a dead bulldog.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well she is Angloman, so there you go. I
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: believe so, or at least she lives in the kind
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: of you. She lives in that area therefore. But yeah,
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: so she is not happy about the pink protest that
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: was going on during Trump's address to Congress speech that
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: was kind of making the rounds for a lot of
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: other reasons, but not that I did notice when I
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: watched it that there was like the you know, not
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: only were the Dems not getting up, not clapping, not
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: basically just being stone faced, they were all participating in
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: like different kinds of protests. Apparently they didn't quite get
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: under this, you know, all in line with the same theme,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: and they had different ones, and one of them was
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: there was a group of well they yeah, they didn't
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: like they didn't yeah, no, but they didn't like call
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: each other up and say, so what are we doing?
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: Are we wearing black? Are we dressing like ketchup bottles?
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: Or are we wearing pink? Or we're gonna have signs?
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: And so some of them had signs. Some of them
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: were west wearing pink and that was their protest. So
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: Arawa Madawi wrote about this, and she said the pink
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: protests a Trump's speech shows the Democrats aren't coming to
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: save us. So apparently when feminists.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: They're coming to tell you to lesbians, stupid cunt.
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: So she is not happy with her own side, and
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: I'm here for it. So let's find out. Maybe she'll
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: have like a come to Jesus moment, Maybe she'll actually
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: have a bit of introspect to say, you know what,
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: I may have backed the wrong, wrong horse, or I
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: didn't really understand what it was that I was for
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: and and now I do and I and I will
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: be taking your bets. No I'm not. I'm not holding
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: my breath. But we'll read about.
• 5:31
  Speaker 3: When have we ever seen how many times have we
• 5:33
  Speaker 3: seen feminists? It has been not happy with her own side,
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: and it's I only know one honestly who and and
• 5:42
  Speaker 3: she's I don't think feminism was ever a good fit
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: for her.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, who Alison? Oh Alison. Yeah No, I certainly don't.
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: Think she never once, once she got a good handle
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: on what patriarchy theory was, she was like, all right,
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: I'm out, No, this is stupid. Yeah, you know that.
• 6:00
  Speaker 3: That was the end of Alison arguing. And I'm not
• 6:03
  Speaker 3: even sure she ever really would have qualified, like if
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: other people that call themselves feminist would have been like, oh, yeah,
• 6:09
  Speaker 3: you're a feminist, because I don't think she ever really
• 6:12
  Speaker 3: was satisfied with feminism as an answer. She tried, she
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: tried to work with and what what she was told
• 6:19
  Speaker 3: women you know, had as there and then and it
• 6:22
  Speaker 3: didn't work. But the difference is obviously that Alison is
• 6:25
  Speaker 3: a rational person who who looks at evidence and assesses
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: it with logic and reason. I don't think most feminists
• 6:34
  Speaker 3: know how to do that.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, well because they are in danger of losing power,
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: which is ultimately all it's about. But maybe, again I
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: don't know, I will I'm always open to being proven
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: wrong by someone like Arwa Madwi. So we will look.
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: What you call yourself. I mean, I never called myself
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: a Mangina, but I kind of was, and until I
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: learned about just how evil feminism is. It's about how
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: you approach things well logically and rationally.
• 7:11
  Speaker 3: If I called myself a Muslim, but I didn't practice
• 7:15
  Speaker 3: any of the Muslim tenets of faith, and I didn't
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: have any of the Muslim beliefs, and I didn't have
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: any of the objections to any faiths that a lot
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: of Muslims view as opposing faiths, that would be it
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: would be a mischaracterization, right. And I think a lot
• 7:37
  Speaker 3: of times you get young men and young women who
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: are told feminism is about equality, feminism is about caring
• 7:47
  Speaker 3: about both sexes, it's about breaking down gender roles. Then
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: they get into gender studies or innerdisciplinary studies or whatever
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: they call it now that is basically feminist studies, or
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: they start reading feminist writing and feminist research, and they
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: start finding inconsistencies with reality, and they start finding obvious
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: miss andry, obvious victim narratives that are false, obvious wallowing
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: in victimhood, like obvious head burying, where like oh, I
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: can't look at this information because it contradicts my narrative,
• 8:25
  Speaker 3: and you get a lot of people who are logical
• 8:27
  Speaker 3: and rational are like, this isn't what I signed up for.
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: I'm out right, which I think is what happened with Alison,
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: and you know, with with her experience with feminism. And
• 8:38
  Speaker 3: I think a lot of people that would call themselves
• 8:41
  Speaker 3: a lot of young men they call themselves former feminists
• 8:45
  Speaker 3: or recovered feminists because they've realized it's kind of a
• 8:48
  Speaker 3: mental illness, like they're they've gotten into it thinking that
• 8:54
  Speaker 3: they're protecting women and helping women, and then they realize
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: that it's actually a load of horseshit and it doesn't
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: help anybody, and they leave because it's it's not functional.
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: But I don't I don't run into a lot like
• 9:07
  Speaker 3: our woman, Dowie. I don't think she's in her twenties.
• 9:10
  Speaker 3: Just looking at her picture, I don't. I don't think
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: she's in her twenties. I'm not in my twenties either,
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: so I'm not criticizing, right, But she's old enough to
• 9:19
  Speaker 3: know better. And I don't think people practice something like
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: that and wallow in it and and promote it to
• 9:29
  Speaker 3: other people in the face of counter evidence for decades
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: and then suddenly have an epiphany that oh they've been
• 9:38
  Speaker 3: wrong the whole time, and they're not gonna do it anymore.
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: Very often, I think it happens very rarely, so I
• 9:47
  Speaker 3: will be shocked if that's what's going on here.
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. Well, I still maintain that she's maybe like
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: not even real. I'm just.
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: Chance.
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: Do you remember, yeah, do you remember that heard that
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: man that created a fake account of a feminist and
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: she was like, it was like a picture the photo
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: was of a blonde woman problem glasses and he he
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: it wasn't a real person. He compiled it from several
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: different photos and he would post completely insane feminist ship.
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: But most people thought it was real. Yeah, Tatiana, Yes,
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: yes it was. Yeah, it was Andrew. It was Andrew Doyle.
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: That's right, it was Andrew. Yeah. I wonder if Oma
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Madali is that like for lefties. I just wonder because
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: it's always the same photo. I've never seen any other
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: image of her, so like, I mean that that.
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: Would be nice, but no, there's millions of these people, and.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and they all live in London. All right, anyway,
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: we're gonna look at this in the patron. So so
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: if you want to join us, become a Badger, go
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com force last subscribe to
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: join us for the additional content we need. We need
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: you to help us get through this. And yeah, that's it.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Tatiana McGrath, thank you. That was great. I loved it
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: and that we need more of that. We need more
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: of that, We need more parody and more hilarity. But anyway,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: so uh yeah, if you want to join us for that,
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: we will be checking out this article in after this
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: show is over. And if you don't want to wake
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: up on more to find that we have been yeaded
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: from the internet, please go to badgerfeed dot com or
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: honey Badger Radio dot com. That is where our content lives.
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: All right, So with all that said, let us get
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: into today's stories. So first up, we just a little
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: follow up. Uh Bonnie blue Is has revealed on the
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: Bad Friends podcast she's twenty five years old by the way,
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: twenty five year old only fans star from Derbyshire, Derbyshire. Uh,
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: had revealed on the Bad Friends podcast or her ongoing
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: divorce from child hood sweetheart Oliver Ali Davidson has nothing
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: to do with her controversial stunt of sleeping with one
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: fifty seven men in twelve hours. Despite public speculation, she
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: explained that the couple, who met as teenagers and married
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two before moving to Australia's Gold Coast,
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: naturally grew apart after years together, emphasizing that their split
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: predates her extreme career choice. Bonnie, whose real name is
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: tia Emma Billinger, noted that she and Ali remain on
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: good terms, with him occasionally assisting with editing her adult content,
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: and she dismissed claims linking her sex marathon to their separation. So, guys,
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: if you were wondering, like if this divorce had anything
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: to do with the one thousand dudes she banged in
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: twenty four hours, you can rest easy knowing that he
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: is not that shortsighted or intolerant, and that's not all
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: it was.
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: But less she said anything about whether the thousand dudes
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: that she banged had anything to do with the fact
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: that her relationship was breaking up.
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: Oh no, I don't know.
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: That might have been a factor in her decision.
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: Maybe unknown For her provocative films, including targeting students during
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: events like spring break, Bonnie continues to thrive financially, reportedly
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: earning one million dollars a month while planning future escapades,
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: despite accusations of faking her record breaking orgy.
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: Like before I start, I just like to regiterate that
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: I would rather not be talking about this person or
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: the drama they wish to weave. I still don't think
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: it's real. I don't think any of it's real. I
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: think I don't think she's real. I think they're all
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: publicity stunts, and I would rather not participate in the publicity. Luckily,
• 13:43
  Speaker 2: nobody watches this show anyway. That hardly even counts as publicity.
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: And you know, since divorce is a subject that is
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: in our wheelhouse and relevant to our interests, I suppose
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: I will proceed even in this age of no fault divorce.
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: I have to wonder if that option in practice is
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: only really available to women when it comes down to it,
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: If if she simply feels unsatisfied, she can go ahead
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: and steal his kids, and steal his house, and steal
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: at least half of his stuff. And there is scarcely
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: a judge in all the land who won't go ahead
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: and say fuck you, dickhead, and fuck your prenup. I
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: hereby order you to man up and give her everything
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: she wants. The same thing will happen if it is
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: the man who initiates the no fault divorce. So yeah,
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: why would why would he? Why would he even bother?
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: The question it begs is, if a man wants a
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: non no fault divorce, a fault divorce, or whatever it is,
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: is there any fault he can even cite that will
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: not result in the exact same outcome. I just illustrated.
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: She cheated on me, your honor. No mad up. She's
• 15:04
  Speaker 2: still cheating on me. She's already living in my house
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: with another man while I'm on the streets.
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: No mad up.
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: She's physically abusing my children. No man up.
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: She did try to stab me with a bread knife,
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: like in my sleep thirteen times.
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: Look, I have.
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: Pictures, let me see those. Uh well, what did you
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: do to deserve it? Nothing, your honor, As I said,
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: I was asleep at the time. Well, all right, but
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: she didn't actually kill you. Correct, No, your honor, I'm
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: clearly well, then stop being such an abusive gas lighter,
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: and man the fuck up, and so on and so forth.
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: Even if he is divorcing this hare on the grounds
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: that she allegedly fucked over one thousand men in twelve hours.
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: Is it even in his interests to say so? Will
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: the judge not just go, oh, so you're a filthy
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: slush shamer? I oh, I said, man up? And then
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: he just throws the gaveler's face orever I mean, I mean,
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: does this sound like a cartoonish depiction that I've painted here?
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: Are you gonna tell me this would never happen in Britain?
• 16:26
  Speaker 3: That happens all the time.
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know how you're gonna tell this when
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: no one is allowed to know what happens in British
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: family courts. It's all censored by a matter of legal course.
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: All we know is what happens after they are adjourned,
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: and it is almost always shut up, man up, give
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: her everything she wants. So it's by the pay. Even
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: if the case turns out to be a groundbreaking victory
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: for this man, which it almost certainly won't be, we
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: won't even be allowed to know about it anyway. So yeah,
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: fuck it, Fuck this hole, Fuck this cuck, fuck everyone,
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: fuck everyone you've already fucked. I don't give a fuck
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: fuck you. I'm just gonna say fuck a couple more times,
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: fuck fuck a tea cunt bollocks, all right, I'm done.
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: Yeah. Basically, the only the only wait for the system
• 17:18
  Speaker 3: to change. There's one way for the system to change,
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: and it's a long, hard road and we're on it.
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: But a lot of people are arguing that it can't
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: be changed. It can, It absolutely can, and it absolutely
• 17:33
  Speaker 3: must if the human race is not to die out.
• 17:36
  Speaker 3: And that is, uh, the the allowance that has been
• 17:40
  Speaker 3: given to kind of centrism. And I'm using that word
• 17:44
  Speaker 3: on purpose, Like I don't know how things are in
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: the UK, but there's this split among gen xers though.
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: There are those of us who grew up like baby boomers.
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: We had chores. And then on top of our chores,
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: you know, our parents gave us little jobs that we
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: could do for money if they had money to do
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: that with, because a lot of parents didn't. But or
• 18:12
  Speaker 3: we would get a paper route or babysitting job, or
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: molawns or shovel snow, or do other outdoor work or
• 18:20
  Speaker 3: indoor work, clean houses and stuff for other people's families
• 18:24
  Speaker 3: to earn money. On top of whatever chores we had
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: and then there were kids that grew up with something
• 18:29
  Speaker 3: called an allowance, which meant their parents gave them spending money,
• 18:33
  Speaker 3: but they gave it to them for them to steward
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: on a weekly basis, or however often the parents got
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: paid or whatever, and they were allowed to do whatever
• 18:43
  Speaker 3: they wanted with that money as long as they had
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: they followed their parents' rules for whatever care they had. Right.
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: Feminism is like that in that it gets women money
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: over and over and over again. It gets women money
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: for research initiatives that aren't real research. It gets women
• 19:06
  Speaker 3: money for educational initiatives that aren't real education. It gets
• 19:11
  Speaker 3: women money for family initiatives that aren't real family initiatives.
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: It gets women money over and over and over again,
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: and it creates an entitlement that women can always turn
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: around and say, for ginocentric reasons, for ginocentric reasons, you
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: have to give me money. For ginocentric reasons, you owe me.
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: Poor me, I'm the victim. If you're not paying me
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: to make stupid choices. Poor me, I'm the victim. If
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: you're not paying me to wreck my relationships. Poor me,
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: I'm the victim if you're not paying me to choose
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: the wrong guy and then spend fifteen years figuring it
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: out before I decide to leave. Oh, and you have
• 19:58
  Speaker 3: to make him pay me too, right, poor me, I'm
• 20:02
  Speaker 3: the victim if you're not paying me to be a
• 20:05
  Speaker 3: disloyal whore who has no consideration for the man that
• 20:11
  Speaker 3: I promise to love, honor, cherish, and obey. Poor me,
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: poor victim, poor woman rights. That's the allowance of guyocentrism,
• 20:23
  Speaker 3: and the reality is favoring women just because they are
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: women and for no other reason. Not because they are
• 20:35
  Speaker 3: taking care of children and there's some level of protection
• 20:38
  Speaker 3: they need, not because they are essential for the survival
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: of your DNA investment in orient and but just because
• 20:45
  Speaker 3: they're female, you know, favoring them in all circumstances instead
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: of in that one little circumstance that is not natural, right,
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: that is manufactured. It's been a oh gosh, since the
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: twelfth century or thirteenth century, so we're talking about like
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: eight or nine hundred years, I think syop. That's been
• 21:12
  Speaker 3: a syop for that long. Actually it's been longer than that,
• 21:16
  Speaker 3: but but that is and it was something that was
• 21:19
  Speaker 3: initiated by aristocrats, not commoners. Right, That's something that.
• 21:26
  Speaker 4: That the elite decided was politeness and good and right,
• 21:32
  Speaker 4: when in reality what it is is a great way
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: to manipulate the masses, the great way to manipulate you.
• 21:39
  Speaker 3: And until the masses wake up and decide that that
• 21:46
  Speaker 3: guynocentrism has fuck all to back it, and decide that
• 21:51
  Speaker 3: they are going to hold the leadership of their nations
• 21:54
  Speaker 3: accountable and impose change. This is going to continue. You're
• 22:02
  Speaker 3: going to get example after example after example of women
• 22:08
  Speaker 3: doing this shit. This woman is wealthy, and chances are
• 22:15
  Speaker 3: when this couple splits up, if this guy is not
• 22:18
  Speaker 3: also independently wealthy, there will be no discussion of any
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: exchange of value. She won't have to pay him anything,
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: even if she has maintained his status economically for years
• 22:34
  Speaker 3: or even you know, just a minimum amount of time
• 22:39
  Speaker 3: that it takes for a man to be in that
• 22:42
  Speaker 3: situation and suddenly have to pay maintenance. In the United States,
• 22:48
  Speaker 3: we've seen a little bit more equality imposed on that,
• 22:51
  Speaker 3: and feminists howled about it like Gollum with an elfin
• 22:55
  Speaker 3: rope around his neck. And you know this, this needs
• 23:00
  Speaker 3: to this needs to happen everywhere for these things to
• 23:04
  Speaker 3: be to be eliminated. It's not right for someone to
• 23:11
  Speaker 3: abandon a relationship and expect to get paid for that
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: without solid proof that they were pushed out by the
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: other party against their will. And it's not right for
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: someone to have fair notice where they know this is
• 23:29
  Speaker 3: coming and they stay in a relationship for a period
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: of time and then use a system to help them
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: get out and then make that claim either right, you
• 23:39
  Speaker 3: either get that system or you get to use financial
• 23:43
  Speaker 3: punishment from the family court system. But women get to
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: do both and men rarely, if ever get to do either,
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: probably never in the UK. Yeah, and it does need
• 23:55
  Speaker 3: to change, But in the meantime, you know, I'm with
• 24:00
  Speaker 3: with Mike on this. I think this is all publicity stunt.
• 24:03
  Speaker 3: I don't think anything about this woman is genuine or real.
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: There's a certain amount of detachment that you have to have.
• 24:10
  Speaker 3: And it's not that you can't have a genuine personality left,
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: because I have met and known people who do. But
• 24:20
  Speaker 3: they don't sleep with a thousand different guys like they
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: work with one partner or a small set of partners
• 24:26
  Speaker 3: that they've built trusting relationships with. But to do what
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: she does in porn where she's just slept with anybody,
• 24:33
  Speaker 3: and everybody done stunts like this. There's a certain amount
• 24:36
  Speaker 3: of emotional detachment from other people that you have to
• 24:39
  Speaker 3: cultivate or already have, and in both cases it's not
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: a good thing. It's very dangerous because it turns you
• 24:47
  Speaker 3: into a person who does not have empathy, sympathy, and compassion,
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: which are three different things that have a lot of
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: similarities and often get used interchangeably by mistake by other people.
• 25:01
  Speaker 3: That you don't have those things for the people around you,
• 25:05
  Speaker 3: and it becomes difficult to maintain your partnerships, and it
• 25:08
  Speaker 3: becomes difficult to be trustworthy under any circumstances, including well,
• 25:13
  Speaker 3: this thing i'm telling you is my true, real personality
• 25:16
  Speaker 3: and experience. Well how do we know that, right? Because
• 25:20
  Speaker 3: you had to maintain that detachment, You had to build
• 25:24
  Speaker 3: that detachment, And now you're suggesting that now we should
• 25:30
  Speaker 3: have a bond of trust with you when you're telling
• 25:33
  Speaker 3: us this about your experience and your actions, and oh, yes,
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: I'm totally genuine right now. You know I was faking
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: attachment for those thousand and fifty seven men in twelve hours,
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: but totally not when I'm talking to you. I'm sorry
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: but I'm not buying it. We're not going to buy
• 25:53
  Speaker 3: it in the future, not buying it now. I don't
• 25:56
  Speaker 3: have a whole lot of sympathy for her in this situation.
• 25:59
  Speaker 3: I think every thing that she's talking about now, the
• 26:03
  Speaker 3: judgment that she's facing from other people, the way that
• 26:06
  Speaker 3: she's not believed when she says that this has nothing
• 26:10
  Speaker 3: to do with that, and so on, I think that
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: all of that fallout is just her own creation falling unhurt.
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: She's being crushed under her own invention. And you know
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: that if you're guy and you see a woman heading
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: in this direction, like, oh, I have an OnlyFans, but
• 26:32
  Speaker 3: it's just for money. It's always just for money. Don't
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: trust that. Just don't stay away from these kind of women.
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: They're always going to do this.
• 26:44
  Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, And that explains the divorce. I think again,
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: when she says, oh, we just sort of drifted apart,
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: I mean, I think that's a self report. But we'll
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: see where it goes. I don't know. Maybe she's gonna
• 26:58
  Speaker 1: take all of his money too the divorce. Who knows.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: The system is all over the place. But let me
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think about this one. In the comments,
• 27:06
  Speaker 1: can you believe that she got wiped up? To begin with, yeah,
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: let me know what you guys think in the comments.
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: But that was just a short, little follow up. I'm
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: gonna move on to the next story now. So on
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: March tenth, that was yesterday, Elon Musk's social media platform
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: X experienced multiple outages, which Musk attributed to a quote
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: massive cyber attack end quote. According to outage tracking site
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: down Detector, the disruptions began around six am Eastern time,
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: with up to forty thousand users reporting issues at peak times,
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: including difficulties loading the app or accessing posts. Musk claimed, So,
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: the reason why I picked this as a story because,
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: like you know, websites go down all the time. We
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: always have problems with I have problems with YouTube sometimes.
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: But this was because of Musk's response and how bad
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: it was. Because I go to X to get my news.
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: It's like the first place I go looking for stuff
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: based on the people that I follow and the stuff
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: that they talk about, and it's usually the most sort
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: of current, you know, because it's constantly being posted on.
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: According to I'm Sorry must claim that the attack required
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: significant significant resources, suggesting involvement of a large coordinated group
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: and or a country, and later speculated on Fox Business
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: that IP addresses traced to the Ukraine area might be linked,
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: though he provided no concrete evidence. The pro Palestinian activist
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: group dark Storm team claimed responsibility via telegram, asserting they
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: executed a distributed denial of service ADDOS attack who overwhelm
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: X's servers, a tactic consistent with their history of targeting
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: entities supporting Israel. The incident's full scope remains unclear, as
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: X has not officially detailed the attacks nature beyond must statements,
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: and cybersecurity experts caution against assuming the origin based sol
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: on IP addresses, which can be spoofed or routed through
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: a compromise systems. Globally, dark Storm, emerging in twenty twenty three,
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: has ties to groups like Killnet, per some analyzes, though
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: they deny Ukrainian involvement. The outages, which span several hours,
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: globally underscore vulnerabilities and Ex's infrastructure, potentially exacerbated by staff
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: cuts under Musk's tenure, though no definitive link to internal
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: issues has been confirmed. Investigations are reportedly ongoing, but as
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: of March eleventh today. As of today specifics about the
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: perpetrators or methods remain unverified beyond claims from Musk and
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: dark Storm. And I want to say also Rumble was
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: also really having serious problems, and the reason why I
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: thought this was good to bring up as a topic,
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: regardless of where it came from or what's causing it
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: or what the reason might be. X for better or worse,
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: and places like Rumble are the most free speech like
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: free speech oriented platforms that have a decent amount of
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: reach that we have access to. And one of the
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: things that I always thought was important ever since I
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: started working at HBr was that we fight for freedom
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: of speech because obviously, like there's lots of different interest
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: groups that would like it if we just went away
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: or stopped talking about this stuff. And I think I'm
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: not saying they attack X because of us, but I
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: think the principle of free speech is what I'm you know,
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: drawing attention to. So as of right now, we don't know.
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk said, here's his tweet. There was still is
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: a massive cyber attack against X. We got attacked every day,
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: but this was done with a lot of resources, either
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: a large coordinator group or a country is involved.
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: Yeah, bro, bro, it's China. It's always China, well, not always,
• 30:51
  Speaker 2: but the odds are astronomical. The CCP is constantly hammering
• 30:58
  Speaker 2: against the walls of Jericho, the fire walls, if you will,
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: of Jericho that surround the American digital infrastructure. And it's
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: no coincidence that they didn't do it quite as much
• 31:13
  Speaker 2: when mister Burns was. When Joe Biden was sensibly in charge,
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: they didn't need to because it was they who installed him.
• 31:25
  Speaker 2: Joe Biden was their back door. And yes, they fucked
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: America in the back door, using Joe Biden as their
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: eighty year old prophylactic made from loosely woven hemp fiber
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: and pre chewed gum. They even bragged about it in
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: public in certain conferences. They were all, it's okay, now
• 31:50
  Speaker 2: we own that guy, We pay for him. In fact,
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: we talked all his son, We talked all his son.
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: We give him all the cheap Chinese prostitutes and crack
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: for you. I don't know why we even bother with
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: Elix swar How the fuck do you say, Eric Swoalwell
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: in a Chinese accent. I guess you don't. You just
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: fuck him silently up the ass, bro. Your name is
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: hilarious in every life, even like anyway. But yeah, it's
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: if it's a country doing this, then it's not like
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: Albania is not Bangladesh, it's not Zwatini. It's obviously a
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: very large, very powerful country, and it's very probably a
• 32:37
  Speaker 2: country that does this kind of ship all the time.
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: It's not Russia. If it was Russia, they would have
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: done it to the administration that declared proxy war against them.
• 32:52
  Speaker 2: And I mean, it's not India. Those guys are far
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: too busy scamming away everyone's life savings, one little old
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: lady at a time. It's not Brazil or Mexico. They're
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: far too busy killing each other. It's not Germany or
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: France or the UK. They're they're all far too busy
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: getting killed by other people. Yeah, I'm already running out
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: of large, powerful countries that have a beef against the
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: Trump administration and especially the DOGE. What with it, what
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: with the DOGE cutting off all the foreign quote unquote aid.
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Maybe it was Canada, No, get to that later. The
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: criterium is powerful countries, not feeble, anemic, shrunken hives of
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: feminist and competent. All right, yeah, I'll say it later
• 33:49
  Speaker 2: when we get to that story. Where was I Oh yeah, yeah,
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: I mean it might be Ukraine. It doesn't look like
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: a powerful country, and by its own it's not, but
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: it does still seem to be a vassal state of
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: the Democrat Party. Indeed, the whole country has been turned
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: into a weapon for the imperial communists of what we
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: call the West, so that's not completely off the table.
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: But still, Bro, it's China. It's fucking China. They do
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: this shit all the time. It's their modus operandi. Just
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: like if your country is using foreign funding to turn
• 34:31
  Speaker 2: everyone gay, it's probably coming from the USA, because that's
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: their modus operandi. At least it was until very recently.
• 34:41
  Speaker 2: Elon Musk is in the process of putting a stop
• 34:45
  Speaker 2: to this, to this foreign money laundering er I mean
• 34:51
  Speaker 2: international development. So it's no surprise that some kind of
• 34:58
  Speaker 2: international entity is trying to put a stop to him
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: and at least one of his various endeavors. I mean
• 35:08
  Speaker 2: to summarize, Bro, it's China. How do I know this?
• 35:14
  Speaker 2: I guess I don't. I'm just saying, if there's if
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: there's a missile heading in your direction, and there and
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: there's a note pinned to the side of that missile
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: saying hero Herro for the billianth time. I'm just saying
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: that looks suspiciously like a calling card. I'm just gonna
• 35:36
  Speaker 2: say this, and I I refuse to elaborate and I leave.
• 35:41
  Speaker 3: I will point out there there is one other powerful
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: country that does this. There's there's one that has not
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: been mentioned, and it's it's not even the country's he
• 35:54
  Speaker 3: lended government that does it. It's it's the the beerocracy
• 36:01
  Speaker 3: behind the elected government, the intelligence agencies and the military agencies,
• 36:10
  Speaker 3: that does this kind of thing. That's our own country
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: and our own bureaucracy here in the United States. And
• 36:19
  Speaker 3: there has been some speculation on x that this is
• 36:22
  Speaker 3: actually an attack by the bureaucracy that does is investigating
• 36:27
  Speaker 3: and haven't seen any evidence to refute that suggestion. I
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: haven't seen any direct evidence in support of that suggestion either,
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: only the fact that they do this kind of thing,
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: and they've done it to other organizations, so there is
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: that possibility as well. But what I'm noticing here is
• 36:54
  Speaker 3: you have an entrepreneur who has done great things, who
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: has created all kinds of stuff that the left should
• 37:03
  Speaker 3: be very happy to have. And he's actually done the
• 37:09
  Speaker 3: environmental work they say they're doing, whether it's sensible or not,
• 37:16
  Speaker 3: whether you know electric cars actually save the environment or not.
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: He's done what they've said. And suddenly you know, because
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: he's also engaging in accountability practices against the deep state,
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: against the bureaucracy, he's the bad guy, and they're making
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: fun of the situation rather than saying, oh, hey, we
• 37:41
  Speaker 3: shouldn't want anybody to be able to do this to
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: any American company, right, this is bad because if they
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: can do this to any American company, they can also
• 37:54
  Speaker 3: do this. And it's been done. It's happened multiple times.
• 37:57
  Speaker 3: It happened during I believe both the Trump the first
• 38:00
  Speaker 3: Trump and the Biden administrations. There were cyber attacks that
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: shut down the availability of utilities and or fuel. I
• 38:13
  Speaker 3: remember there was one on the East Coast that hit
• 38:17
  Speaker 3: in one state and affected distribution in another that people
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: were really panicked about. The United States should not be
• 38:24
  Speaker 3: vulnerable to cyber attacks from either foreign nations or our own.
• 38:33
  Speaker 3: It just should not be allowed. And there is the
• 38:36
  Speaker 3: capability of developing a system of defense against this. There
• 38:40
  Speaker 3: is the capability of getting a step ahead. And we
• 38:44
  Speaker 3: have spent the last probably fifteen years, maybe twenty years
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: ignoring the people who have been warning about this and
• 38:55
  Speaker 3: the threat of EMP attacks and electromagnetic pulse which if
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: you ever have any memory of someone in the education
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: system telling you not to put magnets on the side
• 39:09
  Speaker 3: of your computer back in the day when you're young,
• 39:11
  Speaker 3: and and uh, he had to be told those kind
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: of things. It's it's because they didn't understand the difference
• 39:20
  Speaker 3: between one little magnet, which which can still screw things
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: up if you leave it there for a long time,
• 39:25
  Speaker 3: and and an electromagnetic pulse, which actually really fucks the
• 39:30
  Speaker 3: hell out of everything. Uh. And and that we have
• 39:33
  Speaker 3: no defense against either right now. From from what whistleblowers
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: are saying, every nation in the world is vulnerable to that.
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: And since the sun does it to it on a
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: regular basis, you would think that we had would have
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: created some sort of system of defense. But nope, nope.
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: They're too busy attacking each other. They're too busy arguing
• 40:01
  Speaker 3: over whether or not it's okay to use oil while
• 40:04
  Speaker 3: trying to steal it from each other and creating fake
• 40:08
  Speaker 3: wars in order to use men's blood for the purpose
• 40:12
  Speaker 3: of money laundering and shit like that. These are the
• 40:21
  Speaker 3: ways in which bureaucratic stupidity will destroy our civilization. Everybody
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: thinks it's going to be the bomb. Everybody thinks we're
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: all going to die in a nuclear holocaust. Now we're
• 40:33
  Speaker 3: going to starve to death in freezing cold or during
• 40:38
  Speaker 3: an unusual heat wave or whatever, because we don't have
• 40:41
  Speaker 3: the resources to combat it, even though they're widely available.
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: Because the stupid electronics systems all over the country that
• 40:49
  Speaker 3: could have been protected from this kind of attack, if
• 40:53
  Speaker 3: our federal bureaucracy was doing what it's supposed to be doing,
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: we're completely vulnerable. And we're too busy funding feminist initiatives
• 41:05
  Speaker 3: instead of doing what men usually do in solving problems.
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: Right. Yeah, So we'll we'll see what is going on
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: with this as well as more unfolds. But I think
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: that Hannah and Mike covered the most important points, But
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: maybe there's something that we overlooked. Let us know what
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this in the comments section. What
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: country and or organization do you think is behind it?
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: I'd be curious to see your thoughts and theories. But anyway,
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: I guess China fu sake.
• 41:40
  Speaker 3: Well, what I just explained is that it doesn't matter. Well, yeah,
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: who's behind it. It absolutely doesn't matter if you have
• 41:47
  Speaker 3: if you have the energy dedicated to creating a defense,
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: instead of dedicating your energy to breaking up families and
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: coddling women and paying women to make stupid choices, take
• 42:01
  Speaker 3: all of the money, just all of the money that's
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: funded into paying women to make stupid choices, and dedicate
• 42:07
  Speaker 3: it to developing a defense against hackers and against EMP attacks.
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: We would have this problem solved. People would do the
• 42:17
  Speaker 3: work because they'd be getting paid to do the work.
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: You would have some genius out there. And I'm sure
• 42:22
  Speaker 3: that there is some genius out there who already has
• 42:25
  Speaker 3: some kind of solution to this problem in the works,
• 42:29
  Speaker 3: who has already started to figure it out, who is
• 42:31
  Speaker 3: already telling people start doing this, start looking into this,
• 42:35
  Speaker 3: and is being ignored. Start paying that genius. That's the solution.
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: It wouldn't matter who the attack came from. It wouldn't
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: matter where the attack came from, It wouldn't matter why
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: the attack happened. If you could just defend against it.
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's know what you guys think about
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments to take a look at
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: some super chats and then we're gonna move on to
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: the next story. So ZARANX gives us five dollars and
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: says it's a super chat. So according to that bias article,
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: the lack of severe drawdown of excess Trust and Safety
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: Council left holded in security. We should believe that. No,
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: obviously not. I think that's just a claim that's being
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: made by people who are dissenters, like, oh, look, you
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: fired all these people and now you know you're you're
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: getting dedos. It's like that would that those people weren't
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: doing anything.
• 43:27
  Speaker 3: That's why why didn't they leave a system in place
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: that would have defended against us? Yeah, so obviously group
• 43:33
  Speaker 3: of people could have used it.
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this is just cope from some people on X,
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: but it's not the story. So uh. Then Meredith G
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: gives us five dollars and says, ASPR News number four
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: ninety three, Honey for the badges. Thank you, Meredith. I
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: make sure I didn't miss anything, but I think that's it.
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: So let us know what you guys think about these
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: is this story in the comments? Let us move on now.
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: To the next one. This one is on apected I
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: will say so in early March that basically earlier this week,
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump es escalated a diplomatic dispute with South
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: Africa by offering a rapid pathway to US citizenship for
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: South African farmers and their families who wish to flee
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: the country for safety reasons. Putting it lightly, This announcement,
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: made via truth Social on March seventh, followed his decision
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: to halt all US federal funding to South Africa, citing
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: the country's Expropriation Act sniging into law in January of
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five by President Cyril rama Fosa as evidence
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: of land confiscation and mistreatment of white African or farmers.
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: Trump has repeatedly claimed, without substantiation, this is according to
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: the source, but obviously we know this is true that
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: South Africa govern the South African government is seizing farmland
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: and discriminating against white farmers. That's putting it lightly, Echoing
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: earlier statements from his first term in twenty eighteen. The
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: South African government nis these allegations no shit, asserting the law.
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: The law addresses historical inequities from apartheid by allowing land
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: expropriation in the public interest, with no seizures reported to date.
• 45:14
  Speaker 1: South African officials, including Ramaphos's spokesperson, have rejected Trump's approach
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: as counterproductive megaphone diplomacy, while some African or groups have
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: welcomed his support meeting with US officials to discuss resettlement
• 45:29
  Speaker 1: and sanctions against Pretoria. Critics, including historians and South African leaders,
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: labeled Trump's narrative as racially charged and rooted in debunked
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: white genocide theories, noting his administration's broader immigration crackdown contrasts
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: sharply with his selective offer.
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: Okay okay, okay, okay, okay okay. If you're looking for
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: a historical perspective or precedents, what's happening in southa South
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: Africa right now is exactly what happened in Zimbabwe formerly Rhodesia.
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: I'll try and put it in a nutshell. It was
• 46:11
  Speaker 2: a wasteland Zimbobe, and then Europeans settled there and figured
• 46:19
  Speaker 2: out how to farm it. They turned that wasteland into
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: a farm land and it thrived as a country. And
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: then some yahoo's rolled on into this wasteland, and they
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: this wasteland they weren't even using because they didn't even
• 46:41
  Speaker 2: know how to use it agriculturally, having not even independently
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: discovered what agriculture even is. And then they threatened to
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: murder these these European farmers, and lets they get the
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: hell out of the country as worthy as possible. And
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: so these yahoos and their demands were met. The Europeans
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: fled the country in fear of their lives, and they
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: left it to the political control of these I don't
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: know how to describe them without sounding a little bit racist,
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: but yeah, these fuck it, these retarded inbread, degenerate sheepskins
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: took over the country and within one generation it descended
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: into poverty and squalor and a downward spiral of monetary
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: inflation that quickly turned their currency into a black hole
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: of toilet paper worth less than dirt, and they became
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: one of the most destitute countries on the entire earth.
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: South Africa is a neighbor country of Zimbabwe. It too,
• 48:04
  Speaker 2: was a barely arable desert that was scarcely occupied by
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: anything but giraffes and hippos and whatnot. But European people
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: rolled on in and figured out how to agriculturalize it
• 48:19
  Speaker 2: and turn it into one of the richest, most prosperous
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: countries on the entire continent. And it is a big continent, folks.
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: Bertolt Brecht wrote a play about this sort of thing
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: once upon a time, called the Caucasian Chark Circle. It
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: involved a dispute between those who used the land to
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: produce cheese and those who used it to produce fruit.
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: He went around the houses to get to the moral
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: of the story, but the conclusion was, it doesn't matter
• 48:52
  Speaker 2: if the people in question are black or white, or
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: brown or yellow, or if they came from four thousand
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: miles away, or if they came from us down the
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: fucking road. What matters is what they are able to
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: do with the land. There is energy in nature that
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: nature can be harnessed, or it can be squandered and
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: left to regurgitate itself uselessly in a never ending cycle
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: of dirt and disease. There is a very important difference
• 49:24
  Speaker 2: between people who come to a country that is already
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: farmed and people who come to an unfarmed country to
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: farm it. There's a big difference between those who establish
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: those farms in the first place, and those who simply
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: use the spoils of those farms and turn it into
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: fucking curry.
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: Good for you.
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: We hadn't thought of curry. We just have ingredients that
• 49:56
  Speaker 2: already taste good with or without any fucking spices. And no,
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: I am not being racist. I am talking about economical
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: resourtfulness that helps everyone. But if the phenomenon we call
• 50:12
  Speaker 2: woke has taught us anything it's that helping everyone is
• 50:18
  Speaker 2: not good enough. We must only help people whose skin
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: resembles dark chocolate or milk chocolate, but definitely not white chocolate.
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: Well I disagree. I think what's important is the people
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: who can even farm the fucking chocolate in the first place.
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: And I will leave you with that.
• 50:47
  Speaker 3: The only thing I can add to this is if
• 50:50
  Speaker 3: you are in a relationship and the other person says
• 50:57
  Speaker 3: you're the bad guy and I'm going to mistreat you,
• 50:59
  Speaker 3: I don't want to hear get out and then objects
• 51:02
  Speaker 3: when somebody gives you the opportunity to get out, their
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: goal is not to live without you, and their reasoning
• 51:10
  Speaker 3: isn't because you're the bad guy, It's because they want
• 51:13
  Speaker 3: someone to abuse. So if white people people are being
• 51:19
  Speaker 3: villainized in South Africa, and if we are being told
• 51:26
  Speaker 3: by by the local authorities that white people are the problem,
• 51:31
  Speaker 3: and if it wasn't for white people in South Africa,
• 51:34
  Speaker 3: South Africa would be much better off. But then we
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: try to get white people out of South Africa and
• 51:41
  Speaker 3: they wail and scream as though they're they're very blood
• 51:46
  Speaker 3: is being taken away from them. There's there's obviously something
• 51:51
  Speaker 3: going on there besides white people being the villains. So
• 51:57
  Speaker 3: no matter what side of the conflict you fall on,
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: that's something that you should consider. And if you cannot
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: consider that, you might be one of the bad guys.
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: All right. I think that basically sums it up. I'm
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: glad it's happening. I know that the media is calling
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: out double standards, but this is an actual case where
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: extradition is a good idea because these people are like,
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: they're in real danger and this has been going on
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: for a while if you haven't seen it. I think
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: one of the things that Lauren Southern did that was
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: decent was a documentary about these farmlands, and I think
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: you can still find it on YouTube or something. It
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: was pretty well done, and she does interviews with South
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: African farmers. So this is like a real thing, some
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: real shit that's going on. So anyway, thanks for the rant,
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: appreciate it. Very based, and let me know what you
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments. Probably not
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: Kinna like make a lot of people happy that are
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: not aware of what's going on and still have that fucking,
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: you know, intersectional brain rop but normal human beings that
• 53:12
  Speaker 1: like do their homework probably know this is in fact
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: a good thing objectively. So anyway, we're gonna move on
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: to next story. Let us know what you guys think
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments section. Okay, we're gonna
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: let's jump to this next one. All right. So in
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: early twenty twenty of January twenty twenty five, Canadian Prime
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation as Liberal Party leader
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: and prime minister after nearly a decade in power. Yeah
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: I know, Oh, I was there for all of that.
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: It's because it's twenty fifteen. Is a meme for a reason,
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: citing internal party strife and declining popularity amid economic challenges
• 53:59
  Speaker 1: and a trade will or with the United States. According
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: to Trudeau, under President Donald Trump, his tenure marked by
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: progressive policies on climate change and indigenous rights, has been
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: overshadowed by rising costs of living, immigration debates, and political scandals,
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: including the abrupt exit of his deputy Christia Freeland in
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: December of last year. On March ninth, twenty twenty five,
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: the Liberal Party elected Mark Karney pictured here. A former
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: central banker. Yes, no history of politics, but he worked
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: in banking, actually worked for the Bank of England. He
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: was like the chair or like a very very high
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: ranking member of the Bank of England. So that's not
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: any bank, right anyway, where was I? So? Yeah, a
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: former central banker with no prior elected office experience as
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: its new leader in a landslide, with Carney secure eighty
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: six percent of the vote. He is set to be
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: sworn in as Prime Minister in the coming days, following
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: a swift transition meeting with Trudeau on March tenth, promising
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: a seamless handover. Carney's ascension signals continuity of liberal economic
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: and globalist leanings, with a focus on countering Trump's tariffs
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: and annexation threats. Not real, he was joking, but whatever,
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: take it serious if you want. Through a robust Canadian response,
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: leveraging his financial expertise from leading the banks of Canada
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: and England. For Canada. This shift could bolster nationalistic sentiment
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: and liberal polling now neck and neck with the Conservative
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: Party amid Trump's provocations, though Carney's lack of political experience
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: may pose challenges. A federal election due by October twentieth
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: of this year, is widely expected sooner, possibly within weeks,
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: as Carnee may call a snap vote to capitalize on
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: the current momentum, pitting him against Conservative leader Pierre pauliev
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: in a contest likely centered on economic sovereignty and US
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: relations and a couple of other things. About this guy,
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: you guys should know. He is big on the net,
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: zero goals, so super and like he's way worse than
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: Trudeau in terms of wokeness and he's more competent. So
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: this is gonna be a problem. In fact, I'm just
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: gonna put it out there. I love my Canadian friends,
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: you know, Alison, Karen, I know, and Jonathan. I notice
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: is it you're doing. You have nothing to do with this,
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: but Canada is gonna be like they are starting to
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: look like our enemy. I mean, I'm not saying we
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: need to go to war. But they're not people we
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: should be taking lightly. And this is going this guy
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: is gonna be a problem, and he's gonna be a
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: problem to Canadians. First, he's gonna make your lives harder.
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: He's a globalist. He comes from the banking class. He
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: goes to Davos, he wants to do net zero. He's
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: going to completely trash this country. He wants to bring
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: in UBI and all kinds of other socialist policies. He's
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: very chummy with China. So we're back on the the
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: this movie, and uh, I think it's gonna I think
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: it's gonna be a serious problems. So anyway, Canadians, guys,
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: stop comparing, like, stop thinking of yourself as the country
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: that's good because you're not us, and be us, God
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: damn it, like be American. Just like I'm not saying
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: join the country. I'm saying, take on a kind of
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: like sense of of livery liberty and pride in being
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: who you are, and stop like dealing with these global homos.
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: That's all. That's all I'm saying. This is gonna be
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: a very frustrating bit in the future.
• 57:45
  Speaker 2: You remember the South pop movie right Longer un cut.
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, not even a real country anyway.
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you might be in with a real chance this time.
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: Kind of glim chance, but still a chance. Obviously, there's
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: still a faction of died in the world communists who
• 58:04
  Speaker 2: will always vote communists no matter what, and in Canada
• 58:08
  Speaker 2: they are truly numerous. But by now there must be
• 58:13
  Speaker 2: some fence sitters who have had enough of this insufferable
• 58:18
  Speaker 2: communist Tosh, and there's a small window of opportunity where
• 58:23
  Speaker 2: where they're like, who the hell is this guy? I
• 58:26
  Speaker 2: know about? And I pronounce his name, but at least
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: I've heard of it. And I've never heard of this guy,
• 58:33
  Speaker 2: and I don't watch enough Canadian TV to have had
• 58:38
  Speaker 2: him washed into my brain. And more importantly, there's another
• 58:42
  Speaker 2: faction of voters who won't vote for this guy, even
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: though they did vote for Trudeau. It is, of course,
• 58:50
  Speaker 2: the women who only voted for Trudeau because he's so dreamy.
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: But Mike, surely there aren't that many Canadians who are
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: as shallow naive as that. Oh I think there are.
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: I really quite think that. Have you seen Canada? It's
• 59:07
  Speaker 2: the Western worlds, Canarian the coal mine. When it comes
• 59:10
  Speaker 2: to shallow, naive feminists. If you promise women gibbs and
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: you fill your cabinet with barely qualified Karens, that's already
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: sufficient to get them on your side for life. But
• 59:25
  Speaker 2: if you do it with piercing blue eyes and a
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: neatly quaff hairstyle, you can get away with anything. You
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: can forcibly lethally inject the entire population and freeze their
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: bank accounts and trample them with horses if they don't
• 59:40
  Speaker 2: like it. And these fucking airheaded cunts will still drop
• 59:46
  Speaker 2: to their knees and unhinge their jaws like a teenage
• 59:50
  Speaker 2: groupie backstage at a Jonas Brothers concert. I'm really in
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: my element when I'm ranting about Trudeau. It's so fun
• 59:59
  Speaker 2: and it's so easy. I wish I'd done it more
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: often in these last ten years, these last ten long,
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 2: long years. Anyway, it's day sixty four of has just
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 2: Intrudeau been arrested yet? And if not, why not? And
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: the answer is still no, And nobody knows why. Well,
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: I suppose it's because he did everything the wef told
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: him to do. That does seem to be the only
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 2: way to avoid assassination these days, or indeed avoid accountability
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 2: of any kind.
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: Hun First of all, I'm going to keep saying loud
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: and clearly that I am a feminist.
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: Yes, so yeah, good luck Canada. Be sure to get
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: out there and vote this time, and like the USA
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: did quite recently, make sure you do it in such
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 2: overwhelming numbers that you make it quote unquote unfortifiable like
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 2: it apparently wasn't the last time, all the time before that.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 2: And remember learned from Pierre Pliev and speak softly and
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: eat an apple.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: Will I will point out something. It may seem off topic,
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: but it's really not right. This is something that we
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 3: figured out in the United States, and as a result
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: of figuring it out in the United States, we had
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: an historical turnout of male voters in this last election.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 3: All right, Canadian women are spoiled brats. American women are
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: also spoiled brats. American men figured that out and they
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 3: just resoundingly told American women no. And American women are
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 3: having a massive screaming down on the ground, kicking and
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: pounding self injuring spaghetti limb dancing temper tantrum. And it's
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 3: doing absolutely nothing to change the minds of American men
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 3: and it's beautiful thing to see because the country may
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: very well be saved by that, right Canadian men. For
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 3: Canadian women to have done what they've done to you,
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 3: you must have been superheroes for the last couple hundred years.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 3: You must have built the most comfortable, safe, easy to
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: live in system for them, so much so that they
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 3: had to find other things to whine about, that they
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: had to pretend to be victims of the terable environment
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 3: that you created for them, and that they had to
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 3: decide it was necessary to elect a man to punish
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 3: you for being so nice to them. And that's basically
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: what I'm seeing happening here, right. That's how Justin Trudeau
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 3: got into office. Canadian women were so upset with the
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 3: level of comfort in which they live and an environment that,
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 3: frankly is incredibly harsh in many places. I don't think
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 3: most people in the continental United States understand. Maybe the
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 3: northern most states, right, maybe the Upers understand, Maybe New
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 3: Yorkers understand. But I remember a conversation with Alison and
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 3: Karen where I had to cancel on an HBr talk
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 3: live stream. I couldn't be there because I was stuck
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 3: at work, and I couldn't get home because there was
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 3: a Level two snow emergency because of how many inches
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 3: of snow we had. And they both laughed. They were like,
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 3: that's so cute. You measure your snow and inches. I
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 3: was just like, well, how do you mixture your snow?
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 3: And they sent me a picture of driving down the
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: road in between walls of snow that were taller than
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 3: the interior walls or the first story of my parents' house.
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 3: And I sayd my parents' house because I got an
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 3: eight foot ceiling here in my apartment. My parents house
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 3: had rooms that had ten foot ceilings because it was
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 3: an older house, brick house, you know. So I looked
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: at that and I'm like, holy crap, that's normal. Oh
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: yeah in some places. Like immediately realized that I couldn't
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: handle living in Canada. That would have just been coal.
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 3: There's coal, right, and then there's Canada. The only people
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 3: in the United States that really understand anything like that
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 3: are the people that live on the Canadian border and
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 3: the people that live in in Alaska and Canadians. Canadian
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 3: men made that livable, they tamed it, they used it,
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: they made it useful, and Canadian women had done nothing
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: but bitch about them in response anyway, Yeah, what kind
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 3: of relationship is that? Because it sounds like abusive codependency
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 3: involving a cluster b clusterfuck as the wife. So guys,
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 3: you gotta vote. It's it's you got to look at
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 3: your political situation and you got to look at it logically.
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: The United States is reacting, right, We're not aggressing. We
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 3: are looking at the way that the relationship between Canada
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 3: and the United States changed during during the last administration,
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 3: during the Trudeau administration, and during the Biden administration and saying, Okay,
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 3: we got to do some stuff to fix this, all right,
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: If you let women continue the pattern of electing stupid
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 3: little bitches of feminist men to punish you for creating
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 3: a beautiful, creative, comfortable environment out of out of a
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: frozen not a wasteland maybe, but a frozen hell for
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: human habitation. If you keep letting women put that in
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: charge of your country, you will never have a good
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: relationship with the United States. And what you are objecting
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 3: to will continue. And this is not the beatings will
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: continue until morale improves. It's we will continue defending ourselves
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: economically until you put sensible leadership in charge that will
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: create a cooperative relationship with our country. So you need
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 3: to outvote the women of your country. Pick somebody who
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 3: is going to do that, and vote for that guy,
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 3: no matter who your wife is voting or who your girlfriend,
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 3: who your mother, who your sister is voting for, no
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: matter what they tell you, is going to happen to
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: women if you don't also vote for that pussy. Vote
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 3: for somebody who is going to work with the United States,
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 3: not somebody who is going to war with the United States.
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 3: Because we're a great friend to have, we're not a
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: great enemy to have. And it's not even really.
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: You don't have any cards, you can't play any cards.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 3: Well, it's not even really worth it. Even if you
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 3: were to win, you would still lose. But if you
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 3: win by making friends, if you win by voting in
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 3: somebody sensible that's going to create an economic plan from
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: which both countries can benefit, then then both countries win.
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 3: You just got to tell women no, and you got
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 3: to do it loud, proud and clear. So if you
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: have never voted before, you should do it now. You
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 3: should do it this year, or at least in this election.
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 3: I don't know what when the voting day actually is,
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 3: but you should do it this time.
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, let us know of you guys think
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. Like I said, put
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: potentially dark times ahead, and yeah, I hope the men
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: of Canada get there, get together and push back in
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: the same way that ours did. Richard Bierre gave us
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: a super child for five dollars and said, I saw
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: an episode of Lotus Eaters where they mentioned that some
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: people are breaking up pavement to resell for quick cash.
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 1: It has been previously mentioned that they have carved up
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: railroad tracks and it also have been stripping electrical cables
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: for cash too, So the country is regressing to dirt
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: roads and little if any available electricity.
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah. I talk about Canada like it's worse than the UK,
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: but it's it's not. And you know, at least you
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: have something resembling Polyef and his party. We have no parties.
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: We've recently had this scandal with the Reform Party. A
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 2: lot of us put all our in the basket of
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: Reform and then this bullshit happened, the same bullshit that
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: keeps happening, Like even the Reform Party is purity spiraling.
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: Into the left wing, and there's no hope on her
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: on the horizon other than possibly Elon Musk funding some
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: kind of party read by led by Rupert Low. I
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 2: don't have time to go into it, but yeah, the
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 2: most right wing party we have is itself capitulating to
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: the left wing at every possible avenue, and it's just awful. Like,
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 2: I would so much like to stay here and try
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 2: and save my country, but I'm so glad that I
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 2: never put my faith in any political party because to
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 2: this day there's no political party that can save us,
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 2: not even close.
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 3: To be fair, that's true here too, like the Republican
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 3: Party is at war with itself. And if you look
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 3: at it, you know, from the perspective of men's rights activists,
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 3: which we generally are, it's guyin of centrism is bad
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 3: enough in both parties that you can't take a party line.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 3: You have to look at individuals. There's no other way.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: Well, let us know what you guys think about this.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: One of the comments. Yep, it's it's definitely the final
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: boss of everything we're dealing with. So all right, let's
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: move on to the next story again with some good news.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: Nature is healing In March of twenty twenty five, Washington,
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: DC began dismantling what we you may have known as
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter Plaza, which I didn't even know it
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 1: was called that, which is a two block mural on
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: sixteenth Street Northwest near the White House, painted in June
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. You might remember that year with black
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 1: lives in large yellow letters following George Floyd's death. The
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: removal started on March tenth, followed pressure from congressional Republicans,
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: notably Representative Andrew Clyde, who introduced the bill, threatening to
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: cut one point five billion in federal funding unless the
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: mural was erased and the plaza renamed Liberty Plaza. Mayor
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: Muriel Bowser, facing this ultimatum and broader fiscal concerns like
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: federal job cuts, announced the plaza's transformation into part of
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 1: DC's America two fifty mural project, costing six hundred and
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: ten thousand dollars and taking six to eight weeks. The
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 1: decision sparked mixed reactions. There's a lot of butt hurt online,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: like local activists and residents mourning the loss of a
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: symbol of racial justice, while far right figures celebrated as
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: a rejection of raci hysteria. That's not even far right,
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: that's normal. Yeah, Like Washington, DC, the capital of our country.
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: Let's call it Liberty Plaza. How about that. How about
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: we don't like leave this thing lingering like a giant
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: fucking wedge in our civilization. And I think everyone except
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: for like you know, female brain low t Americans are
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: okay with this being torn down. So nature is healing.
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, another coke that was going
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: around was from Bowser, the mayor. She was like, well,
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: I want to lower the tensions, so we're gonna get
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: rid of this. Oh are you suggesting that this then
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: created tensions, this attitude burning down cities and businesses and
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: killing people and like, you know, all this, all this assault,
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: everything that's happened. You think that that created a little
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: bit of tension, not just in America, by the way,
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: but in countries where had nothing to do with this.
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: Didn't they tear down a Winston Churchill didn't weren't they
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: doing shit crazy shit in Canada too? Yeah, Bowser, I
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: think it. I think I think it is a bit
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: a bit of a stressful thing, especially considering the people
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: who led this movement ended up buying fucking mansions and
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 1: living it up in like the whitest parts of our country, well,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: claiming to want to get away from all that build
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: large mansions. Anywlong gay bowser.
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, let's let's start with an English lesson, right.
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 3: Do you all know what the word modify means change?
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: Right?
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 3: So if you add a modifier to a to a
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 3: description of something, you are changing the description.
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 3: So if you if you take a dog, for instance,
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 3: say look at that dog down the street, It's nobody
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 3: is going to like have any preconceived Maybe they'll have
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 3: preconceived ideas of what it looks like, but they may
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 3: not accurately preconceive what the dog looks like. Could be
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: a big dog, little dog, could be a scary dog,
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 3: could be a cute, but it's a dog.
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 3: What if you add the modifier dead completely changes the situation.
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 3: Look at that dead dog down the street. Whyt Why
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 3: is there a dead dog there? That's that's a little
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 3: bit out of place.
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 3: The same is true with justice. Okay, When you take
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 3: the very pure meaning of the word justice and you
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 3: add a modifier, any modifier, you are changing it from
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 3: that pure meaning to something else. And it doesn't matter
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 3: whether it's gender justice, racial justice, or criminal justice. It's wrong.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 3: It's no longer just justice, it's no longer just it's modified.
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 3: There's no reason to do that, And every time we
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 3: do it, we create something fucked up. And anybody that
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 3: can recognize that we've done that with criminal justice should
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 3: also be able to recognize that if we take a
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 3: demographic tribe, race, sex, religion, history, future age, whatever, sex, sexuality,
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 3: anything and put that concept as a modifier to the
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: term justice, it is going to create something just as
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 3: fucked up, just as easy to to corrupt as the
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 3: criminal justice system has been. If you don't want that,
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 3: stop using those terms and approach the situations that you're
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 3: objecting to from the standpoint of how do we get
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 3: people on the same page to get along, love each other,
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 3: care about each other, respond with compassion, intelligence and wisdom.
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: If that's not your goal, then what you're doing has
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 3: nothing to do with justice anyway.
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: Yep, well said. And again I am not I'm not
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: even in any way like sad about this. This had
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: to happen. I'm glad. It's symbolic more than anything, and
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: it's gonna cost some money, but it had to go,
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: had to go, all right, So let us know what
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this one.
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 2: And I have to wonder where the fuck it's been
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 2: there for five years?
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: Well, because by this infice for five years is one
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: of the worst things that's ever happened, and it's somehow
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: been there for five years.
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: Yes, I'm not going to rejoice that it's finally being removed.
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 2: It should have been removed four years ago, four years
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 2: and eleven months ago. But all right, fine, yeah, I
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 2: won't call it a white pill. I'll call it an
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: off gray pill.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: They'll do me.
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 2: It's fine, it's fine, all.
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, well the thing is too I will say.
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: You know, I was gonna dismiss this as simply symbolic.
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: But the truth is is that a lot of these people,
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: they operate in a symbolic world, like they're there. Everything
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: is about that for them, Their victories are symbolic, right
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: almost always. This is why, like if you look at
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: women and women by the way, are still losing their
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: shit over the election on TikTok, They're still flipping out
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: as though it just happened, because for them, time doesn't
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: there's no future that's just like right now and that
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: then that's how they live. Like oh, they wake up
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: and like, oh my god, he's still president, and they
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: go on TikTok and they cry and they wail and
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: all that. But what they do is they engage in
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: this kind of symbolic activism because it means you don't
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: actually have to do anything, but you get to be
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: a part of a club that that that is doing
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: the same nothing that you're doing, so you feel like
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: you belong, like you can find like there were, like
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: I said, there was, there were protests in Chicago the
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: other day and there are all these women taking to
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: the streets wearing you know, pussy hats and pink and whatever,
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: dressed up crazy because they didn't they don't see it.
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: They're like holding signs and the signs have all kinds
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: of stuff on it, like you know, it go everything
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: from my body, my choice stuff to you know, income
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: inequality complaints and like universal basic income and free healthcare
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: and you know trans women or women like they were
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: all over the map. Like if you went up to
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: any random person on the street in that protest and
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: said why are you here, they couldn't give you a
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: definite answer, but they felt like they were in a
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: place where they belonged. And so what I notice is
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: that a lot of what is going on with with
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: I don't know the feminists, I guess the feminist left,
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: is that they are engaging in a kind of there.
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: It's like a sense of desire to belong and to
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: do so without expending too much energy because they're lazy.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: So they go to protests and they meet with their friends.
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: We'll meet here and we'll have some coffees and then
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 1: we'll go to the march. And I got my sign.
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 1: They coordinate their outfits and they say, oh, we're gonna
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: wear We're all gonna have our nails done this way.
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: It's it's that shallow, okay. And then they go there.
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 3: Videos of putting on lipstick. The protest was literally we
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 3: are wearing.
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: Yes exactly, or they get yeah the blue heart tattoo.
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: It's like a little tiny blue heart like there, it's
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: all it's all surface level. Some yeah, perfectly, it's completely useless,
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: but it's yeah, it's zero risk. It takes no effort,
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: no work. But they feel good about themselves because they
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: especially because the more people who are there, the more validated.
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: They are Look at all the people who agree with
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: me on this. This is why I'm here right. So
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: so in that sense, if you understand that this is
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: for a lot of these most of these women, it's
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: just symbolic. If you tear down their symbols, Like if
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: you say, well, we're gonna get rid of that Black
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: Lives Matter mural, it may not do anything in terms
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: of like the way that it might alter policy the
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: way that it might you know, like like DC is
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: still gonna have shitty crime because that's not gonna do
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: anything about that. But these people will take a big
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: hit because suddenly their symbol is gone, and then the
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: fact that it's gone says to them, this opinion is
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: not popular. That's what they're really mad about. By the way,
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: but regarding the election, they're not gonna get deported, they're
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: not gonna lose rights. You know. It's all about like,
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: oh no, my opinion is unpopular because we lost the election.
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: That's what they That's what really hurts because it means
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: that they're not interesting. Then there isn't a lot going on.
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: So in a way, I am I am for glad
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: because symbolically this was a massive blow, and that's what
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 1: had to happen.
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 3: What what people, I think a lot of guys don't
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: understand is how women rule in society, because they do,
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 3: and it's it's something that men have had to contend
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 3: with for centuries. Women rule by argumentum ad populum. In
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 3: other words, the belief that you know, if you're on
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 3: the bandwagon, on the correct bandwagon, at least the bandwagon
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 3: that the the media can convince you is the most
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 3: popular bandwagon, then you are in the right place. You
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 3: are right, and you're what you're doing is right and
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 3: and it has moral authority and uh and and you
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 3: are the good guys basically the heroes of the story.
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 3: And so there there is that. Another part of women's psychology,
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 3: and this is a secret that I think should never
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 3: have been a secret, but it's seems to be widely unknown,
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: is that the overwhelming of vast overwhelming majority of women
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: have main character syndrome. So if so, they expect you
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 3: to have sympathy, compassion, empathy, concern and consideration for them.
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: This idea that if you know, oh, I'm gonna win,
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: I'm going to I'm going to fight the patriarchy by
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 3: making a video with a woman's fight anthem in the background,
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 3: which women's fight anthems are pathetic to, by the way,
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 3: Like you listen to men's fight anthems and you're ready
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 3: to get off your ass and go do something. You
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: listen to women's fight anthems and you're ready to go
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 3: find another chick to hold on to while you cry.
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 3: That's not it's not effective in real life, but people
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: expect it to be effective and addressing problems. What it
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 3: does is men who are the most kindescentric will react
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 3: to that by getting off their asses. They see women crying,
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 3: so they got to fix it right. And for centuries,
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 3: women have used that to validate their main character syndrome
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: and to use less and less effective means to fight
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 3: less and less meaningful battles against less and less evil
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: enemies until they have become the bad Guys don't realize
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 3: it and are engaging in this shit still expecting you
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 3: to care. This is going to be one of the
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 3: ugliest battles of the sexiest sexes. Women attention seeking are
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: going to have to get the society wide slap in
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 3: the face from men of being ignored completely lee no attention,
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 3: you know, even making fun of them is useless, right,
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: because they've gotten attention and therefore it's effective they think
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 3: in their minds. Look, I looked pitiful enough or angry
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 3: enough that these men are paying attention. They're going to
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 3: change their minds and do what we want. Right because
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 3: argumentum add populum, guyness centrism is still, unfortunately the song
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 3: of the day. It's still what women expect to be
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 3: able to manipulate to get anything they want, and it
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 3: is still what they are drawing on when they pull
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 3: this shit. So the most important thing you can do
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 3: in regard to all of these meaningless protests is don't
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 3: give them their narcissistic feed. Just keep trudging forward and
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 3: keep chopping down the trash that has been put up
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 3: in your path of bad policy and stupid ideas. And
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 3: ignore the women that are screaming at you from the
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 3: sidelines while they do nothing but put on lipstick with
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 3: a song in the background that makes them feel edgy
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 3: and brave, when in fact they are taking no risk whatsoever.
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, thank you for that, Great Indoors gives
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 1: us fifty dollars, Thank you, great Indoors, and says while
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: I was looking into Donada's Liberal Party election. I stumbled
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: onto the Wikipedia page of a woman called Jenna Sudds,
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: the current Minister of Families, Children and Social Development, and
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: if you scroll down on that page, you'll find the
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: following bit ohh, bit 'll be careful of coming up here.
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: Quote she supported legislation to ban the practice of conversion therapy,
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: which passed the House of Commons and a unanimous vote.
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: End quote, which surprised me because that sounds like a
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: good thing. Right, Please click on the hyperlink of the
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 1: term conversion therapy, read the definition on that page and
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: tell me this is not a massive gaslighting operation. Well,
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: thank you for that. Well, I have to look at
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: that later because we're a little overtime and I have
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: one more story that we.
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 3: Should HBr talk investigation should be.
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: There's like another topic that I think would be good
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 1: for HBr talk as well, which is I didn't I
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: was gonna make it a story here, but it's way
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: too big. And that's all this stuff about Act Blue,
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: So I don't know if you guys are aware of that,
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 1: but that's also pretty interesting. But anyway, let's know what
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this one in the comments. We're
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: move on to the last story. So this broke like yesterday.
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 1: Jamie White, pictured here a thirty one year old reporter
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: for the far right conspiracy outlet infu Wars. Sorry I'm
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: looking at the independence So it's just he worked for
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: info wars. He was a reporter for info Wars. He
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: was fatally shot outside of his apartment in South Austin,
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: Texas around midnight. The Austin Police Department responded to a
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: nine to one one call and found White with obvious
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: signs of trauma in the parking lot of his complex.
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: He was rushed to a hospital but pronounced dead within
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: eighteen minutes. Authorities suspect he may have been killed by
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: individuals attempting to burglarize his vehicle, though the investigation remains ongoing,
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 1: with no official case or cause of death released as
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: of today. Info Wars founder Alex Jones announced White's death
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 1: on March tenth, yesterday, calling it a brutal murder and
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: blaming it on local democratic policies, specifically targeting Travis County
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: District Attorney Jose Garza and alleging a Sorrow's backed agenda
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: enabling this crime, which, whether or not supported by evidence,
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: is unknown at this time. White's family, including his sister
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: Kelly Neil, clarified the killing appeared probably unrelated to his journalism,
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: countering Jones's narrative, while the incident has fueled debates about
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: crime and political rhetoric, with White's last ex posts, which
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: was resharing Elon Musk's comment on liberal violence, drawing additional attention. So,
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 1: just something that a journalist was murdered. We're not sure why,
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: but it is interesting that it was an info Wars guy,
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: considering everything that has happened with X being d lost
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 1: and stuff like that. So I don't know, not much
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 1: I can say about it, but I do think it's interesting.
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 3: So well, I did see Malix Jones talking about this,
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 3: and it didn't sound like he was claiming that White
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 3: was targeted because he was a reporter for Info Wars.
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 3: It sounded like he was saying that the district attorney
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 3: had a soft on crime policy and that the individual
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: who did this may have been in Bolder.
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: That's what you mean, yeah, he said. He said it's
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 1: a soft on crime policy. Austin, Texas is kind of
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 1: the woke part of Texas, so that that might be.
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 3: Yeah, So the idea that his killing was unrelated to
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 3: his journalism. That that might counter Jones's narrative is kind
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 3: of silly, since his narrative, it wasn't that his killing
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 3: was related to his journalism. It's that he might not
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 3: have experienced the crime if he had been better protected
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 3: under a tougher on crime system, in a better area,
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 3: or by a better district attorney, which is a distinct possibility.
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 3: It's definitely something that we should watch. One thing I
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 3: will say about this is if you live in a
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 3: if you live in a neighborhood where there's a lot
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 3: of crime, right what you're going to see depends on
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: what type of crime it is. If it is a
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 3: crime with buildings being broken into, you're going to see
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 3: a lot of businesses being targeted because criminals generally, if
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 3: they're if they're trying to steal stuff, they will avoid
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 3: people at all costs as much as they possibly can,
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 3: so they want to go in when it's closed, which like,
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 3: there's a Mexican restaurant in the next property over from
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 3: the property that my apartment complex sits on that they
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 3: got a really good food They have a pretty busy
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 3: business there, and they've been broken into multiple times at night,
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 3: but there isn't a bunch of violent crime happening two
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 3: people walking around outdoors at night in the neighborhood. And
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: in that same neighborhood, when I worked at the gas
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: station down the street, I used to walk to work
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 3: at like four point thirty in the morning and not
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 3: be afraid that I was going to get attacked by
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 3: by by criminals because they weren't likely to confront somebody
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 3: who was going to street scream and draw the attention
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 3: of all of the men in the neighborhood, some of
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 3: whom might be military. But they might break into a
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 3: building that doesn't have a good alarm system and has
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 3: a safe in there that might have money in it,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 3: or has electronics in there that they might be able
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 3: to sell, and that's what they do. The speedway I
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 3: used to work at used to get held up about
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 3: once a year by somebody with a weapon knives most
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 3: of the time, sometimes guns, and it's always really quick.
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 3: They come in. They stick something in the face of
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 3: the cash cashier that's there. They wait till there's only
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 3: a cashier there and no customers, no cars in the
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 3: parking lot, stuff like that. They're in and out five minutes,
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: they get what they want, and they leave, and it's
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 3: there is non confrontational as possible. So that's one kind
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 3: of neighborhood where there is crime on the regular. The
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 3: other kind of neighborhood where there's crime on the regular
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: is where enforcement is so bad for whatever reason that
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 3: criminals aren't afraid to confront the people in the neighborhood,
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 3: and they break into homes and they carjack people, and
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 3: they confront people in the street and mug them for
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 3: their wallets and stuff like that. And that's the type
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 3: of circumstance in which men are murdered in the conjunction
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 3: of the commission of a crime. So they're targeted because
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 3: somebody wants their wallet, and something happens during the incident
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 3: that causes the criminal, who was only going to commit
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 3: the relatively lesser crime in comparison to murder of mugging
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 3: somebody and stealing from them, and then something happens that
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: they're nervous enough they feel like they need to defend
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 3: themselves and get out of there, or eliminate the witness
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 3: and get out of there, and they kill the individual.
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 3: And then you also have people who are targeting other
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 3: people for murder. The kind of people who are so
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 3: fucked in the head and so criminally violent that they
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 3: hunt other people, or they go out with the express
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 3: purpose in mind of hurting other people. They're going into
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 3: those neighborhoods too, They're more likely to target people in
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 3: those neighbors unless they're like a serial killer, and then
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 3: they're going into the nice neighborhoods again, or they're going
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 3: where they think people are vulnerable. But in all of
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 3: those circumstances, when there is a victim who is experiences
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 3: significant violence beat being shot, being murdered, that victim is
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 3: most of the time a man. And the reason is
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 3: because women are usually not unaccompanied in areas like that.
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 3: Women usually either are in groups, or they are in
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 3: vehicles or that are locked, or they are with men,
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 3: and the only time that they can find somebody alone
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 3: to target, it's usually a guy. And this may have
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 3: been one of those circumstances. So when a politician, when
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 3: a district attorney is soft on crime and doesn't prosecute
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 3: violent crime, this is the result. Men die.
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 1: Yep, Yeah, that's true. Well, let us know what you
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments, Like I said,
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: this is like really breaking, so we don't know much.
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: It's just really unfortunate. You know, he was taken too soon.
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 1: I can only assume he looks pretty young here.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but we will endeavor to follow up if we
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: learn anything interesting about this. It could have simply been
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: a mugging that went sour, so you know, there's always that.
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: But what do you guys think? Let us know in
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: the comments below. And with that said, we're gonna go
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 1: into the Patron Show. We went a little over, that's okay,
• 1:36:26
  Speaker 1: and we're gonna be looking at this.
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 2: It was a six story show we did. We did
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 2: six stories and we got through it in an hour
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 2: and a half.
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, roughly, just a little over. So now we're
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: gonna go into the Patron Show. We're gonna take a
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: look at this article from The Guardian and our one
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: of my favorite go tos. When I can't figure out
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: what to talk about, I just go and see what
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: Rawa Madwi is talking about. And so we're gonna look
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: at this. Hopefully we will see you guys there. What all.
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 1: With all that said, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: please hit like subscribe you don't ready to subscribe with
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: the BELF notification, leave us a comment let us know
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today.
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: You'll find links to the show notes and all of
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: the original sources in the description of this video so
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 1: that you can look at it for yourself. And please
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 1: share this video because sharing is caring. Thanks guys so
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: much for coming on the show and hanging out with us.
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: Uh and we will see you next Tuesday. Have a
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: good one. Everybody.
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 5: Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 5: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 5: deal with, especially if you have, like especially if you
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 5: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 5: On top of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked