Latest / The Science of Leading / Turning Team Friction Into Flow with OAD

Transcript

Turning Team Friction Into Flow with OAD · The Science of Leading

• 0:00
  Welcome to the show everyone!
• 0:01
  I'm Claire Monroe, and I'm here with Edwin Carrington.
• 0:04
  Edwin, I was looking at Gallup's Q12 meta-analysis the other day,
• 0:08
  and this one statistic completely stopped me in my tracks.
• 0:11
  It says that managers account for a staggering seventy percent of the variance in
• 0:16
  team engagement.
• 0:17
  Seventy percent!
• 0:19
  That is an immense amount of pressure on a single line leader.
• 0:22
  That seventy percent figure is exactly why management is the hardest job in any
• 0:27
  company, Claire.
• 0:28
  But here is the thing: most of that variance isn't because managers are inherently
• 0:33
  bad people.
• 0:34
  It is because they are operating in the dark.
• 0:37
  We tend to look at team friction and label it as a personality clash,
• 0:41
  like "oh, Sarah just doesn't get along with Dave."
• 0:45
  But in my decades of advising, I have found it is rarely a personality issue.
• 0:49
  It is almost always a predictability problem.
• 0:52
  A predictability problem?
• 0:54
  That is interesting -- can you explain what that looks like in practice?
• 0:58
  Well, think about it.
• 0:59
  If I know exactly how you process information, how you handle pressure,
• 1:03
  and what pace you prefer to work at, I can predict how to communicate with you
• 1:07
  without causing friction.
• 1:09
  When we do not have that predictability, we misinterpret silence as
• 1:13
  passive-aggression, or fast decision-making as recklessness.
• 1:17
  We need a reliable instrument to map those dynamics.
• 1:20
  But you have to be careful with what tools you choose.
• 1:23
  Right, because there are a million trendy personality tests out there.
• 1:26
  But if a company is making real talent and organizational decisions,
• 1:30
  they can't just rely on pop psychology.
• 1:32
  Don't the US Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection require a lot more rigor than
• 1:36
  that?
• 1:37
  They absolutely do.
• 1:39
  Those Uniform Guidelines are the legal and scientific bedrock.
• 1:43
  If you are using assessments for hiring or promotion, they must be job-related and
• 1:48
  scientifically validated.
• 1:50
  And on top of that, you have the ISO 10667 standards, which govern how assessments
• 1:56
  are actually implemented in the workplace.
• 1:58
  You cannot just buy a cheap test online and hope for the best.
• 2:02
  Hmm...
• 2:03
  So would that apply even in a high-turnover or rapidly scaling environment?
• 2:08
  Say, a company with fifty to two hundred and fifty employees?
• 2:11
  They usually don't have the budget for a massive, facilitator-led consulting
• 2:14
  program.
• 2:15
  That fifty to two hundred and fifty range is the danger zone.
• 2:19
  They are too big to manage by raw intuition, but too small to afford a army of
• 2:24
  external consultants.
• 2:26
  That is why they need something objective and scalable.
• 2:29
  And that is exactly where OAD comes in.
• 2:32
  OAD, or Organizational Analysis and Design, is a behavioral tool that gives these
• 2:37
  scaling teams a shared, objective language without the heavy overhead.
• 2:42
  It is built on serious science, but designed for daily use.
• 2:46
  I love that idea of a shared language, but I have to ask: how do we avoid the
• 2:50
  shelfware trap?
• 2:51
  You know, when a team does an assessment, everyone gets a nice colorful report,
• 2:55
  says "wow, that's so me," and then they shove it in a desk drawer and never look at
• 2:59
  it again?
• 3:00
  Ah, the desk drawer graveyard!
• 3:02
  It is where good intentions go to die.
• 3:04
  To beat that, you have to start small.
• 3:06
  Do not roll it out to all two hundred employees at once.
• 3:09
  Pilot it with a small team first.
• 3:12
  And then, you have to build simple, practical routines.
• 3:15
  You do not need complex frameworks.
• 3:18
  Just start by establishing basic team conflict rules and keeping a decision log
• 3:22
  based on your OAD profiles.
• 3:25
  How does that actually look in the day-to-day?
• 3:27
  Like, if we are talking about a classic clash like speed versus accuracy?
• 3:31
  Perfect example.
• 3:32
  Imagine you have a high-speed, action-oriented manager and an accuracy-driven
• 3:37
  analyst.
• 3:38
  Without OAD, the manager thinks the analyst is dragging their feet,
• 3:42
  and the analyst thinks the manager is being reckless.
• 3:45
  But with OAD, they both look at the data and see it is just a natural gap in work
• 3:49
  style.
• 3:50
  The manager can say, "Look, I need a quick-and-dirty direction on this by three PM,
• 3:55
  we don't need ninety-nine percent accuracy yet."
• 3:58
  It depersonalizes the entire tension.
• 4:01
  It completely takes the sting out of it!
• 4:03
  It makes it about mechanics, not motives.
• 4:06
  What about direct versus diplomatic communication styles?
• 4:09
  That is another one where people's feelings get hurt so easily.
• 4:13
  Exactly.
• 4:14
  A direct communicator might send a one-word email: "No."
• 4:18
  To a diplomatic person, that feels like a slap in the face.
• 4:22
  But when they have that shared OAD language, the diplomatic person realizes,
• 4:27
  "Oh, they aren't angry at me, that is just how they process."
• 4:32
  And the direct person learns to add a little more context.
• 4:36
  It bridges those communication gaps without those awkward, emotional confrontations.
• 4:41
  It is like giving the team an operating manual for each other.
• 4:44
  If you are listening to this and you want to bring this kind of predictability and
• 4:48
  clarity to your own team, you should check out O-A-D DOT AI.
• 4:52
  They actually let you start a completely free trial with no contracts and no credit
• 4:56
  cards needed.
• 4:57
  It is a no-brainer for any leader trying to navigate that scaling phase.
• 5:01
  No credit cards and no contracts is a rare thing these days.
• 5:05
  It is a low-risk way to see if your team can move from friction to flow.
• 5:09
  Go to O-A-D DOT AI and try it out.
• 5:12
  Thanks for joining us, Edwin, and thank you all for listening.
• 5:15
  We will see you next time!