Latest / The Missing Middle Podcast / Canada Could Build Better Homes AND Make Them Cheaper

Transcript

Canada Could Build Better Homes AND Make Them Cheaper · The Missing Middle Podcast

• 0:00
  SPEAKER_00: In large parts of Canada, particularly Lower Mainland BC and Southern Ontario, it seems that the only housing that has been built in the last 10 to 15 years is either small apartments and high-rises or large homes well outside of our major cities.
• 0:14
  SPEAKER_00: Missing Middle Housing is truly that.
• 0:17
  SPEAKER_00: It's missing.
• 0:18
  SPEAKER_00: Now, today's guest is working hard to change that.
• 0:21
  SPEAKER_00: Adam Modgrane was recently named the Executive Director of More and Better Housing, an organization tasked with finding the ways and means to deliver millions of new affordable, low-carbon, and resilient homes to Canadians everywhere.
• 0:35
  SPEAKER_00: Now, Adam is a longtime resident of Montreal, a city which has historically punched above its weight when it comes to the building of Missing Middle Housing.
• 0:44
  SPEAKER_00: So, Adam, thank you so much for being our guest today.
• 0:46
  SPEAKER_00: Mike, thank you for having me on.
• 0:49
  SPEAKER_01: Classonomics, hosted by Sabrina Mado and Mike Moffat.
• 0:54
  SPEAKER_00: So let's talk about More and Better Housing, an organization that has always had a close affiliation with the Missing Middle Initiative.
• 1:01
  SPEAKER_00: Now, originally your organization was called the Task Force for Housing and Climate.
• 1:06
  SPEAKER_00: It was co-chaired by the former conservative Deputy Prime Minister Lisa Rait and the former mayor of Edmonton, Don Iveson.
• 1:13
  SPEAKER_00: I acted as secretariat for that group.
• 1:16
  SPEAKER_00: And for those of you who don't know what that means, it's basically the secretariat's responsibility is to herd all the members of Task Force, of the task force, which is like herding cats, take all of their great ideas, then you lock yourself in a dark basement with an unlimited supply of coffee, you bang out draft after draft of a final report or final blueprint, and that eventually became the blueprint for more and better housing.
• 1:40
  SPEAKER_00: And that blueprint contained dozens and dozens of recommendations to all three orders of government, many of which have since been implemented.
• 1:48
  SPEAKER_00: Now, there were about a dozen other members of the task force, which included a number of well-known names in housing policy, like Sharice Berta and Richard Joy.
• 1:57
  SPEAKER_00: Adam was one of the members.
• 1:59
  SPEAKER_00: And I remember we also had some guy named Mark from Canada 2020.
• 2:04
  SPEAKER_00: What was his last name again?
• 2:05
  SPEAKER_00: Oh, yeah, Carney.
• 2:06
  SPEAKER_00: Mark Carney.
• 2:07
  SPEAKER_00: You know, I heard he went on to some other job afterwards, you know, prime minister of something or other.
• 2:13
  SPEAKER_00: But anyhow, jokes aside, you know, out of that report, uh, organization was created, which took on the more and better housing branding uh from the blueprint, which you now run.
• 2:24
  SPEAKER_00: So what made you decide to take on this challenge?
• 2:27
  SPEAKER_01: Well, first I want to thank you, Mike, for hurting us cats because I was in there and I know that uh, you know, it's really hard to get 15 people to agree on housing in the best of circumstances.
• 2:38
  SPEAKER_01: Uh and I'm pretty proud of the work we managed to do uh under that stewardship and under that name.
• 2:44
  SPEAKER_01: And I think that's really uh what made me decide to say yes to this.
• 2:48
  SPEAKER_01: And when when you think through about what we managed to do in the short time we had and with the means that we have, it's really impressive that we got so far, but it's not done.
• 2:58
  SPEAKER_01: The work is never done.
• 3:00
  SPEAKER_01: And one of the key areas of you know, difference between the work that we did initially with you and with the other task force members is that we were working off the CMHC recommendation in 2022 to build 5.8 million homes.
• 3:13
  SPEAKER_01: And we wanted to make sure that if we were going to do that, there were going to be low carbon and we would not raise the country to build those homes.
• 3:21
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and I'm pretty proud that our recommendations led to improved outcomes, but it's not done.
• 3:27
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and the the world has changed since we put out that first report.
• 3:32
  SPEAKER_01: As you know, and as everyone knows, things are changing very rapidly.
• 3:35
  SPEAKER_01: So the work ahead for me is to take some of that great work and great intents and take them into new directions to adjust for the way that the world is changing before our eyes.
• 3:45
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, it's it's funny that when you have a blueprint with like 140 recommendations, you might think, like, you know, how could we have possibly missed anything?
• 3:52
  SPEAKER_00: But when I go back and look at it now, I do see things that I wish we had put in that what we didn't, we just missed for one reason or another.
• 4:01
  SPEAKER_00: So, you know, I'm glad you're going to be uh filling in those holes.
• 4:05
  SPEAKER_00: But I want to step back a little bit and not talk so much about the specific policies, but look at a 30,000-foot view of what the organization is trying to accomplish.
• 4:15
  SPEAKER_00: And particularly the word better in the name more and better housing, because you know, one of the challenges I find when I talk about infill or missing middle housing or gentle density, you know, whatever the conversation is, is that people can't visualize it.
• 4:29
  SPEAKER_00: Or even worse, they kind of catastrophize and they get these pictures in their mind of you know, the worst possible scenario of you know, very cramped homes that are less livable than what we have now.
• 4:42
  SPEAKER_00: So, you know, I'm wondering how can we show people that it's possible to build homes differently in a way that actually improves the quality of their life and doesn't diminish it?
• 4:51
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, well, this is going to be a big part of our activities going forward.
• 4:54
  SPEAKER_01: You know, better housing cannot just be a promise.
• 4:57
  SPEAKER_01: It has to be real.
• 4:58
  SPEAKER_01: It has to feel that's it's something tangible that everyday people can attain, can, can dream about.
• 5:05
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and the reason why this is necessary is that to deliver that kind of better housing, we probably have to pass some pretty ambitious reforms uh to make dancing, uh dancer housing legal, to improve the building codes and so on.
• 5:18
  SPEAKER_01: And these things, you know, they're they're complex, they take time, and they demand some kind of very committed leadership.
• 5:24
  SPEAKER_01: When you don't see, when you can't imagine what the outcome is for these big swings, uh it's kind of hard to stay focused.
• 5:32
  SPEAKER_01: It's hard to commit to the reform and say, like, this is necessary, we're going to do it, and it's going to change a bunch of things.
• 5:39
  SPEAKER_01: So the plan is to show that better housing is not just an idea, it's a thing that exists right now in communities and neighborhoods in Canada.
• 5:48
  SPEAKER_01: It's actually things that you can see.
• 5:50
  SPEAKER_01: You can move uh to where they are, you can touch them.
• 5:53
  SPEAKER_01: You can look at the pictures of the interiors and go, like, I can see myself living in this.
• 5:58
  SPEAKER_01: I I actually would think that if I moved into this housing, my life would improve in ways big and small.
• 6:04
  SPEAKER_01: Uh so this is what we mean when we talk about more and better housing.
• 6:08
  SPEAKER_01: It's practical, it's real, it's something that is for you, the consumer.
• 6:13
  SPEAKER_00: So I I love that you're giving positive examples here because one of the things that MMI is criticized for, and I actually think fairly, is how negative uh we are and can come across where you know we are often you know telling government or whoever else, hey, there are, you know, there are these 37 things that that you're getting wrong, and you need to sort of raise your game.
• 6:35
  SPEAKER_00: And you're coming from this uh in part saying, no, actually we're getting a lot of things right, and we just need to get more of those things, and and we can do it and we can kind of navigate those issues, which you know gets into the issue of trade-offs.
• 6:49
  SPEAKER_00: Because I find the biggest challenge when it comes to building infill or multiplexes or homes with a lower environmental footprint is this belief that's understandable that people have that going, okay, yeah, you can do that things, but it comes at the cost of affordability in an era where we have an affordability crisis already.
• 7:09
  SPEAKER_00: So, you know, the ethos of more and better housing is, in my view, acknowledging that yes, you know, trade-offs sometimes do exist.
• 7:16
  SPEAKER_00: You know, you're not pretending that in all cases all things are aligned, but there are many situations that by building differently, we can simultaneously make life more affordable for Canadians and at the same time achieve better environmental outcomes.
• 7:33
  SPEAKER_00: So, can you walk us through that uh trade-off and you know how it's it's possible to get better affordability outcomes and better environmental outcomes at the same time?
• 7:43
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, for sure.
• 7:44
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, for one thing, I will say I appreciate you you um coming to this saying that we are framing things positively because in a previous life I I introduced myself as a problems guy.
• 7:56
  SPEAKER_01: And the only thing all I could think about and talk about really are problems.
• 8:00
  SPEAKER_01: And uh uh, you know, your last question about the trade-offs is really like it this isn't this is uh my thing, thinking about the problems.
• 8:07
  SPEAKER_01: And I think it's a fun question.
• 8:09
  SPEAKER_01: It it it requires thinking through uh a bit more uh, you know, it deserves a bit more air, a bit more time.
• 8:16
  SPEAKER_01: So the plain truth of the matter is that even without any add-ons or requirements, the cheapest housing we can build right now is still pretty expensive compared to the prices of uh 20 years ago.
• 8:29
  SPEAKER_01: Let's say we are paying through to nose for homes that are in, you know, a lot of respects are pretty crummy.
• 8:35
  SPEAKER_01: And when you look at it like that, of course it's going to feel unreasonable to even consider improving the quality of new construction because look, we have trouble finding buyers for even entry-level homes.
• 8:46
  SPEAKER_01: But that's the thing, right?
• 8:48
  SPEAKER_01: Maybe one of the problems with new housing and new construction is not just that it's too expensive, it's that it's not worth it.
• 8:54
  SPEAKER_01: It's not worth the asking price, right?
• 8:57
  SPEAKER_01: Like who wants to pay a million bucks to move in a house that is smaller or maybe uglier or maybe darker than the house they currently have.
• 9:07
  SPEAKER_01: People who have a million dollars to spend on homes usually are not homeless.
• 9:11
  SPEAKER_01: They they're actually living somewhere right now, and they can see the trade-offs.
• 9:16
  SPEAKER_01: They they see the trade-offs at their level, at a consumer level, saying, like, well, I can move into a new a new build, but you know, for a million reasons, I would rather stay where I am.
• 9:26
  SPEAKER_01: And in when you think about it like that, you you actually start to see that it's a false choice between better homes or cheaper homes.
• 9:35
  SPEAKER_01: Like the only way we're going to get people to move into new construction is if we improve the quality of those homes.
• 9:42
  SPEAKER_01: And with the work that we did uh on the blueprint and with the work that we did on the housing and climate task force, what we see is that when you actually get into the details, when you actually start to think through, okay, what would it take to improve the quality of construction, you actually find ways to reduce the cost of construction.
• 9:59
  SPEAKER_01: These two things go together.
• 10:02
  SPEAKER_01: Like if we were to give ourselves a means to build some of the high-quality European flats that we see uh in architectural magazines, uh we would need construction methods that are actually cheaper than the ones we use right now.
• 10:15
  SPEAKER_01: And we could have high ceilings, plenty of natural light, and it would be cheaper to build in some respects than the uh very small condos that we're building right now.
• 10:24
  SPEAKER_01: Uh if we wanted to get high performance materials so that it's easier to heat and cool during the winter and summer, and it's easier to insure because it doesn't catch on fire, uh, this is actually uh something that could be cheaper than the houses we do build right now.
• 10:43
  SPEAKER_01: So, in terms of trade-offs, like I don't want to dodge the question.
• 10:47
  SPEAKER_01: I don't want to say like, ah, it's a solved problem because it's really not a solved problem.
• 10:51
  SPEAKER_01: But the way it grew is actually by making more higher quality housing cheaper than the cheapest housing we have right now.
• 10:59
  SPEAKER_01: And it's exciting work because I do think it's possible, and this is the work ahead.
• 11:03
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, and it's so I I think this is really exciting work.
• 11:07
  SPEAKER_00: And again, I I like how sort of positive and forward-looking it is that you've created uh this kind of north star around what success looks like, you know, at a 30,000 foot level.
• 11:18
  SPEAKER_00: And then if we go down to the kind of 20,000 foot level, you go, okay, well, how do we get there?
• 11:22
  SPEAKER_00: You know, what those sort of broad areas of focus.
• 11:26
  SPEAKER_00: I've seen that the more and better housing has has five of them, uh, which uh you call game changers, around, you know, how do you create more and better housing that's more abundant, more affordable, more environmentally friendly, and so on.
• 11:39
  SPEAKER_00: So the first of those five is is legalizing density.
• 11:42
  SPEAKER_00: It's a term we use a lot here.
• 11:44
  SPEAKER_00: And I get asked all the time by people going, like, what do you mean by legalized density?
• 11:49
  SPEAKER_00: So I'm gonna do what people do to me, and I'm gonna turn around to you know, reverse you know card and ask you, what do you mean by legalized density?
• 11:58
  SPEAKER_00: And what kind of things do you have in mind?
• 12:00
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
• 12:02
  SPEAKER_01: Well, uh, it's a fun job to have, Mike, as you know.
• 12:06
  SPEAKER_01: Well, well, the first the reason this is the first thing we have to consider is that I just I just spoke about like the big, beautiful, uh, naturally lit European flats that I I would love to live in.
• 12:20
  SPEAKER_01: And we we see them and the picture is always great.
• 12:23
  SPEAKER_01: And you know, people inside of those pictures look so happy and their their housing is so solved.
• 12:28
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and we we go like, well, why don't we have that?
• 12:31
  SPEAKER_01: Like, why don't we try to do the exact same thing?
• 12:34
  SPEAKER_01: Clearly, like people inside of those homes look happier for it.
• 12:37
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and the answer when we try to build something like that in Canada is always somewhere between, yes, you can build it, but you will spend years arguing with us about whether or not this is actually possible or feasible or desirable, or on the other end of that spectrum, the other answer is no, this is a criminal consideration and you feel you should feel bad for even attempting to build something like that in our community.
• 13:02
  SPEAKER_01: So, you know, it really starts and ends there.
• 13:06
  SPEAKER_01: Like if we don't think that, if we don't give ourselves the means to actually say, like, hey, this is something that's possible because the law says it's possible, then uh it's going to get extremely challenging to actually deliver on improved outcomes in both housing and climate.
• 13:22
  SPEAKER_01: And I I want to say that I I think even people who agree with me and people who are trying to improve uh the legality of denture housing might be shooting themselves in the foot when they're speaking about deregulation.
• 13:38
  SPEAKER_01: Because I don't think that legalizing density is deregulation.
• 13:42
  SPEAKER_01: Like it's not going to be less rules.
• 13:47
  SPEAKER_01: We're not actually cutting back on regulation when when you have a rule in place that says you absolutely cannot build more than one unit per lot, and when you have another rule that says you can build up to four units per lot, that's the same amount of regulation.
• 14:03
  SPEAKER_01: Like the second rule is not less rule, it's the same is the same quantity of words, uh, to if we we want to think about it like that.
• 14:11
  SPEAKER_01: So uh what I would say is that legalizing density is a matter not of removing rules or removing laws, but improving the laws so that they align with our desired outcomes.
• 14:23
  SPEAKER_01: We should want the rules that we give ourselves to work for us and to deliver better and better results as we go along.
• 14:30
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, so I can I can imagine you kind of uh going around with your red pen.
• 14:34
  SPEAKER_00: I've got a kind of a four-color pen here, you know, crossing out one, replacing it with four.
• 14:38
  SPEAKER_00: And you can say, well, it's not, it's not deregulation.
• 14:40
  SPEAKER_00: And in fact, there's one additional letter in four than there's in one, at least in uh in English.
• 14:47
  SPEAKER_00: And you know, you because we often you know get asked here uh by folks who say, well, you know, can't we create incentives so that builders build X?
• 14:58
  SPEAKER_00: And I find that invariably X is something that's like completely illegal in Canada.
• 15:03
  SPEAKER_00: Like, no, you can't incentivize, you know, breaking the law.
• 15:07
  SPEAKER_00: Uh or you know, if that actually worked, I I think I'd have more questions than answers.
• 15:13
  SPEAKER_00: And if we look at you know the actual areas where you know the the law kind of gets in the way, you know, as it's currently written, do these things, fine, like half the time it's zoning, but the other half the time I think it's building codes.
• 15:27
  SPEAKER_00: And I know building codes is a particular interest and focus of yours.
• 15:31
  SPEAKER_00: So can you give us some examples of things you would like to see changed in Canada's building codes?
• 15:37
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, yeah.
• 15:38
  SPEAKER_01: A couple of years ago, I think maybe it's one or two year old now, there was a study put out by the Center for Building in North America that showed that elevators that we for a four-story building in Canada are four times as expensive as elevators for four-story buildings in Switzerland.
• 15:55
  SPEAKER_01: Now, Switzerland is not a poor country.
• 15:59
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, you know, if we if we showed numbers that said like, oh, it's pretty cheap to build an elevator like in the middle of the Atlantic where there are no rules and no people, people would go, well, this is besides the point.
• 16:11
  SPEAKER_01: You know, what what should we learn from the middle of the Atlantic?
• 16:14
  SPEAKER_01: But the thing is that uh what when we look overseas, especially in Europe and other places too, we see that in you know, in very tangible ways, a lot of the provisions in our building codes are inflating costs.
• 16:27
  SPEAKER_01: And I will say, like, knowing about the elevator figures is kind of a curse because when you see those numbers, you think about them all the time, and you see how how big a problem it is, because we have so little elevators per capita compared to places like Spain and Greece and Switzerland, uh, which is going to be an issue for our aging population and people with disability.
• 16:48
  SPEAKER_01: And you know, it's not it's not sorcery.
• 16:50
  SPEAKER_01: The reason why we have so little elevators is because they're so expensive to build.
• 16:56
  SPEAKER_01: And the way we get cheaper elevators is by changing the building codes because it's not zoning that makes uh elevators pricey.
• 17:03
  SPEAKER_01: It really is the building code.
• 17:05
  SPEAKER_01: And here again, we have some pretty good news.
• 17:07
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, there was uh a report that was put out, I have it with me uh just recently uh by the Neptus Foundation, and it's worked by Conrad Speckard and Jack Keys.
• 17:15
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and it's eight recommendations for the Ontario building code.
• 17:19
  SPEAKER_01: And these things are like big swings like single stair, which would really have to start getting right.
• 17:25
  SPEAKER_01: And getting now, like there's no reason for us to wait because it really unlocks a lot of potential for missing little housing.
• 17:32
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, but a couple of other ideas are just not things that are that that weird or exotic.
• 17:38
  SPEAKER_01: Uh just one of the recommendations for Ontario is to copy some of the provisions in Quebec.
• 17:44
  SPEAKER_01: Where in Quebec, if you add a mezzanine on the fourth floor and it's only 40% of the floor area of the third story, your building still counts as a three-story building.
• 17:55
  SPEAKER_01: And that feels so artificial and so uh uninteresting when you you say, like, okay, so this four-story building actually counts as three-story.
• 18:04
  SPEAKER_01: Why would that matter?
• 18:05
  SPEAKER_01: Why would why is that such a game changer?
• 18:07
  SPEAKER_01: And the reason is that when you actually go into four-story and up in our building code, you start to add a thousand costly requirements.
• 18:16
  SPEAKER_01: And you know, it's no surprise that we build very little four-story buildings because you get all of those add-ons.
• 18:23
  SPEAKER_01: So those tweaks here uh are necessary.
• 18:26
  SPEAKER_01: The reason why we frame that as a game changer, adopting better building codes, is that emerging research like the elevator study and the work that is being done on the Ontario building code really shows that the potential for higher quality housing goes through uh actually untangling some of the nuts in our building codes.
• 18:43
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, and I I find it absolutely wild how much kind of risk aversion there is here, where you kind of we could point out something you know that they're doing in Sweden or or the elevator situation in Switzerland.
• 18:56
  SPEAKER_00: And you know, you get this pushback of like, oh, that's too risky.
• 19:00
  SPEAKER_00: Like, like, you know, like our newspapers are full of you know Swiss elevator tragedies.
• 19:06
  SPEAKER_00: Um, should actually be a really good band name if anybody's uh looking to name an alternative band, but that's uh we'll we'll leave that aside for another time.
• 19:14
  SPEAKER_00: So yeah, I'm really glad that you're uh uh going on this and you know, full full disclosure that uh the Neptus Foundation is is also a funder of the Missing Middle Initiative.
• 19:24
  SPEAKER_00: Uh I want to ask you about the third uh game changer, and that's modern methods of construction.
• 19:29
  SPEAKER_00: So there, you know, we're looking at you know factory-built homes, low-carbon cement, uh mass timber, a lot of different technologies.
• 19:37
  SPEAKER_00: And we know this has been an area of focus for the federal government.
• 19:40
  SPEAKER_00: Uh, it's you know one of the big reasons they created Build Canada homes.
• 19:45
  SPEAKER_00: So, like, what specifically do you want governments, you know, the federal government, provinces, and municipalities to do differently when it comes to modern methods of construction that they aren't currently doing?
• 19:57
  SPEAKER_00: What is really the problem is the lack of standards.
• 20:01
  SPEAKER_01: Because right now, the the industry is not rationalized, the sector is not working with the same rules.
• 20:07
  SPEAKER_01: So that means that every input that comes from prefabrication or industrial scale uh is really a bespoke solution.
• 20:17
  SPEAKER_01: And everyone is trying to make up their own rules about how they work as they go along.
• 20:21
  SPEAKER_01: So that means that when governments put out calls, like they're not specifying, hey, here's what a modern method of construction is, and here is it's supposed to work with other vendors and other providers in that space.
• 20:34
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and that lack of standard really is keeping everyone from uh really rolling in the same direction and at the same speed.
• 20:42
  SPEAKER_01: So in addition to all of the other policies that would essentially fund or make innovations a safer bet, like tax credits and programs and push and pull strategies for uh all of these brilliant new ideas, uh, I would say the first step and the most important step is designing standards for policy and for industry for everyone to agree on what the wording is, what the inputs and outputs, what are the locking points.
• 21:11
  SPEAKER_01: So if you get a panel from factory X and a panel from factory Y, it can actually work together because they're they are uh adhering to the same standards about where are we putting our screw holes and where uh the thickness of our wall should be.
• 21:24
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, and this is going to do a world of good to make modern methods of construction a real game changer for improving the quality and lowering the cost of the homes that we build.
• 21:35
  SPEAKER_00: You know, I I I've noticed a real thread that that runs through the the first three of these uh because they all deal with standards, all right?
• 21:43
  SPEAKER_00: You look at legalizing density, you look at uh building codes, modern methods of construction, and you've kind of mentioned standards in all of these.
• 21:51
  SPEAKER_00: I I think the fourth one we might pivot a little bit, but you could correct me if I'm wrong.
• 21:55
  SPEAKER_00: And it's always amused me.
• 21:57
  SPEAKER_00: It's a it's a serious game changer, but it's always kind of amusing.
• 22:00
  SPEAKER_00: Me because the you know, once you take out the sort of politics speak of it, it's basically boils down to don't build your house somewhere where it's likely to burn down or flood away, which my mind seems like common sense, but like what's the rule for government here?
• 22:16
  SPEAKER_01: Yeah, this is Don Iveson's uh phrasing, I think, and it's so catchy and it's so real.
• 22:21
  SPEAKER_01: Like just thinking through to where we are right now, like we s we know that uh our homes that we live in right now are exposed to greater and greater uh risk from extreme weather events.
• 22:34
  SPEAKER_01: Like it's not hard to think through that when events like these happen and it puts out a hundred families on the street, it increases pressure on the market, and we have to work twice as hard to make sure that everyone is uh housed safely.
• 22:47
  SPEAKER_01: Uh but let's not do that.
• 22:50
  SPEAKER_01: If we know that the uh housing that we have right now is at risk of being flooded or burned, and it's going to make things worse for not just the people in those homes, but for everyone, relatively speaking.
• 23:02
  SPEAKER_01: We know what we have to know to plan for a changing world.
• 23:05
  SPEAKER_01: So, really, the Ford game changer is to build for a changing world.
• 23:09
  SPEAKER_01: Like we have the data, we have the intelligence, we know what we should do to make sure that the homes that we build are actually safe for the future.
• 23:17
  SPEAKER_01: Nothing is future-proof, but we can do so much better than what we are currently doing.
• 23:21
  SPEAKER_01: And these considerations should be folded into every plan we make about more and better housing.
• 23:27
  SPEAKER_00: Okay, so now we're at uh five of five here.
• 23:30
  SPEAKER_00: And the last game changer is around building far more social and not-for-profit housing.
• 23:35
  SPEAKER_00: And you're not talking about just a little bit, like we're we're talking millions and more units here.
• 23:40
  SPEAKER_00: So I think, you know, I have this question.
• 23:42
  SPEAKER_00: I'm sure a lot of our audience would have this question is you know, how can Canada do that with all the other spending priorities that governments have, you know, from defense to caring for an aging population?
• 23:53
  SPEAKER_00: How can we afford to spend that much?
• 23:54
  SPEAKER_01: Well, you know, I'm a housing guy.
• 23:56
  SPEAKER_01: So of course, my my answer is going to be that.
• 23:58
  SPEAKER_01: I'm gonna think that, I'm gonna say that.
• 24:00
  SPEAKER_01: And what I am going to say is that housing is the most fundamental thing.
• 24:04
  SPEAKER_01: Like, if we don't house ourselves properly, we don't, we have no time, we have no safety to think about other considerations.
• 24:11
  SPEAKER_01: Like it really starts with housing.
• 24:13
  SPEAKER_01: And we've seen in the past decade that housing outcomes throughout Canada have deteriorated.
• 24:18
  SPEAKER_01: Uh, people don't move as much as they want to.
• 24:21
  SPEAKER_01: And really, the most expressive uh expression of this high housing is uh the explosion in homelessness.
• 24:27
  SPEAKER_01: This should be item zero on the to-do list that we need to make sure that everyone is housed in dignity and in safety.
• 24:36
  SPEAKER_01: And we can do that.
• 24:37
  SPEAKER_01: It's it's really not uh so much of a trick to say that this is uh uh priority for us and we're going to do it adequately.
• 24:47
  SPEAKER_01: Now, uh with the current cost of construction, like delivering those millions of new units in community housing, not for profit housing, is too expensive.
• 24:56
  SPEAKER_01: Uh so the real limit is you know, we're going to run out of money.
• 25:01
  SPEAKER_01: It actually does not exist that amount of money that we would need for those millions of new homes.
• 25:05
  SPEAKER_01: But the great news is that uh the other four game changers try to address that.
• 25:09
  SPEAKER_01: So not only should we start uh working to deliver housing for people who most need it right away, all of the other things that we're going to be doing at the same time is going to drive down that cost of construction so that we can deliver more and more of those millions of necessary community nonprofits housing unit.
• 25:27
  SPEAKER_00: So this this is all fantastic.
• 25:28
  SPEAKER_00: So uh so thank you so much, Adam, for being here.
• 25:31
  SPEAKER_00: And uh, if our aunties wants to learn more, where can they find you?
• 25:34
  SPEAKER_01: I am going to be at moreandbetterhousing.ca.
• 25:38
  SPEAKER_01: And uh provided that you know the work that we do is interesting to uh people from coast to coast to coast, uh I would like to show up where you are.
• 25:47
  SPEAKER_01: So if you want to work with us, if you have a policy idea or if there's uh something that you think is necessary and requires attention, I would love to hear from people all around Canada about what their challenges are and what their opportunities are.
• 26:00
  SPEAKER_01: So get in touch, more and betterhousing.ca.
• 26:02
  SPEAKER_00: So thanks again, Adam, for being here, and thanks to our audience for watching and listening and to this episode's producer, Kara Stern, and our editor, Sean Foreman.
• 26:10
  SPEAKER_00: And if you have any thoughts or questions about being on a task force with a future prime minister, please send us an email to missing middle podcast at gmail.com.
• 26:19
  SPEAKER_00: And we'll see you next time.