Latest / Honey Badger Radio / BLM Revealed as a Scam, Kentucky Passes Popular Joint-Custody Law | HBR News 407

Transcript

BLM Revealed as a Scam, Kentucky Passes Popular Joint-Custody Law | HBR News 407 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  This is HBr News number four oh seven. BLM revealed as a scam.
• 0:06
  Kentucky passes popular joint custody law where we discuss the news of the week and
• 0:12
  give it the Badger treatment. Hello, everybody, welcome home Badger Radio.
• 0:19
  But you guys are doing well this week and you're laughing at all this absurdity,
• 0:23
  so you're not consumed by it. This is our HBr News show and
• 0:28
  my name is Brian. I'm joined by Hannah Wallen and doctor Random mccam.
• 0:32
  We're gonna be talking about the exciting, well and interesting news of the week,
• 0:37
  and we're going to be doing it from our badgerly perspective. So take
• 0:42
  a seat, get comfortable, and prepare your spines for the incoming cringe.
• 0:47
  So today we have a great showline if you guys. So it's a quick
• 0:54
  little summary of some of the stuff we're gonna be talking about. A major
• 0:58
  Supreme Court ruling on Action to thirty, the group or organization on his Black
• 1:03
  Lives Matter apparently has blown all of the money that they made off of grifting.
• 1:08
  And you know, no one in this group is surprised at all.
• 1:12
  Kentucky has passed a joint custody law that has led to some interesting outcomes and
• 1:19
  more so, stick around, it's going to be a good time and be
• 1:23
  sure to join us afterwards for the patron Only show. So I was looking
• 1:26
  for something that would be kind of like I don't want to say fun because
• 1:32
  the subject isn't really like fun, but something that would be make for an
• 1:37
  interesting discussion topic for the fundraiser, but we never ended up using it,
• 1:42
  so I'm going to use it for the Patron's show instead. And this articles
• 1:45
  from the Guardian and it is called I tried the foreskin facial treatment, so
• 1:51
  you don't have to where a man named I can't remember's name is Adam gebat
• 1:59
  Man. A man, Yes, a man tried out the foreskin facial treatment.
• 2:06
  I don't know why that's any weirder than a woman doing it, but
• 2:08
  it weirdly is weird. Cannibals do come in both sexes. Yeah, And
• 2:13
  I will call this cannibalism because this this works by absorption of the nutrients through
• 2:21
  your skin. And in fact, if if your wife, girlfriend, fiance,
• 2:29
  boyfriend, whoever wears makeup, they have the same issue. If they're
• 2:32
  they're using makeup that has um has neonatal fibroblasts in it. There are some
• 2:39
  types of makeup that have that they're they're cannibal yep, so engage you guys
• 2:46
  don't know, um, the foreskins of Korean newborns. South Korean newborns apparently
• 2:54
  are being used to make a facial cream. Oprah Winfrey has promoted this product
• 3:01
  on her show, and so it's not like a fringe thing. It's not
• 3:07
  unusual. And they went to the fact that they're harvesting South Korean newborn for
• 3:14
  skins. But the fact is they are also harvesting African newborn uh for skins.
• 3:21
  But as they told people that, then then it would be recognized as
• 3:23
  exploitation, right, but they're not. People aren't recognizing the exploitation in an
• 3:30
  Asian community. And that's that's totally not racist or anything. No, it's
• 3:35
  not. It's not a new thing. No, it's been going on for
• 3:38
  decades on our radars since at least seven years ago was when I've first discovered
• 3:43
  it. And evidently, yeah, it's been going on for a long time
• 3:46
  before that. It's just been way out in the open in racing years because
• 3:50
  evidently nobody cares. I mean, some people care, but not enough people
• 3:53
  and not enough care for the practice to be stopped despite it being among the
• 4:00
  most barbaric practices ever in human history. I mean yep, I mean yeah,
• 4:06
  as text cut people's heads off and watch him roll down the pyramid.
• 4:10
  But how much how much better is this than that was? That was just
• 4:14
  not as bad as that? If not newbon children yesterday, old children yes
• 4:19
  like Alex Jones was right. Alex Jones was right before the right. So
• 4:27
  we're gonna read about this guy's experience with his foreskin facial treatment. And um,
• 4:32
  if you want to join us on the Patron Show, you have to
• 4:35
  become a Badger, So go to feed the Badger dot com. Set up
• 4:39
  a monthly subscription five bucks a month. We'll get you into our discord and
• 4:42
  get you access to all of the bonus content. If you want to just
• 4:46
  like try it out. You can have access to some of the content for
• 4:49
  free by going to Badger Nation dot online and that will also let you into
• 4:54
  our discord, although um to a restricted degree. I'll put it that way.
• 4:59
  And if you want to make sure that our videos and content remain accessible
• 5:02
  to you and maybe even after YouTube. Finally, like yeats us off of
• 5:08
  their platform. Well, first of all, you should go to Rumble and
• 5:12
  subscribe to us there at HB Radio on Rumble and I see the Rumble squad.
• 5:17
  What's up, rumble guys. But also check out our content where we
• 5:23
  have an archive of everything on Honey Badger Radio dot com and Badger feed dot
• 5:27
  com. So with all all the way, let's get into today's stories.
• 5:32
  So we're gonna start with the Supreme Court decision on this section two thirty.
• 5:41
  I just want to say that Lindsay, my wife, she did all the
• 5:44
  write ups because Mike j is not available. He's obviously not on the show
• 5:46
  today, and Andrew, who also normally helps out, wasn't able to.
• 5:51
  So thank you, Lindsay, you are a champ. I mean, she
• 5:56
  did like four stories. So all right, as to Supreme Court nine to
• 6:00
  zero ruling now makes it officially legal for the Internal Revenue Service, that's the
• 6:04
  IRS, to secretly obtain the bank records of third party individuals who are not
• 6:11
  under investigation. As the Epoch Times explains, because of this new ruling,
• 6:15
  you can be a person who committed no crime, not even be suspected of
• 6:20
  having committed a crime, and yet still, if the IRS is trying to
• 6:25
  collect back taxes from your friend, they can pull your bank records as well,
• 6:29
  And this entire process can play out in secret without you ever being informed
• 6:33
  that the FEDS have accessed your bank records. So if your employer, if
• 6:39
  your employer owes back taxes, all of their employees are now subject to this.
• 6:46
  So if you work for a company where the maybe the owner does their
• 6:51
  own bookkeeping and they make a mistake, the IRS could go trolling through your
• 6:57
  bank records and I looked at them. So people are immediately going to be
• 7:02
  going that's unconstitutional. It's unconstitutional. I don't think they fought this on the
• 7:09
  basis of search and seizure looking at the story on another site because Epoch Times
• 7:15
  wants to charge money to look at it. This is about whether or not
• 7:24
  a law that's already in existence that allows them to probe the bank records of
• 7:31
  the individual who is suspected of breaking the law has an exception for people who
• 7:40
  are associated with them that they can't just also grab your records too, And
• 7:46
  there's no The Supreme Court ruled that there was nothing in the law that provided
• 7:51
  an exception. They only rule on a constitutional issue if you ask if you
• 8:01
  file a constitutional case, so I think that might be the issue. The
• 8:09
  notice do not containing an exception or a limitation that says they can't get in
• 8:13
  your records. But what this basically means is that because of this ruling,
• 8:18
  if you work for a smaller company, or you own your own company and
• 8:24
  you you know you're dealing with making doing your own tax decisions, you're you're
• 8:33
  caught up in this. If you own your own company and your employee is
• 8:37
  under investigation because they lied on their tax form and got more money back than
• 8:43
  they were supposed to, this could conceivably allow your company's records to be looked
• 8:48
  through, rifled through by the IRS. And there isn't anything in this ruling
• 8:54
  that says that the IRS can't use that as fodder to start in another investigation.
• 8:58
  So there's going to have to be somewhere along the line somebody else is
• 9:01
  gonna have to fight that battle. And it's probably going to happen when somebody
• 9:07
  who had no association with the criminality of somebody else's um behavior in regard to
• 9:16
  their taxes, whether it was fraud, whether they screwed up, or whatever.
• 9:20
  That's going to get their bank records gone through in the IRS is going
• 9:26
  to treat them like a criminal, and then they're going to have to sue
• 9:28
  over search and seizure, unreasonable search and seizure um. And it's a possible
• 9:35
  thing. I mean, because the Fourth Amendment doesn't just protect your home.
• 9:39
  This is an argument I've heard from a lot of people too, like,
• 9:43
  oh, well, that's that doesn't protect protect what you've got in the bank.
• 9:46
  It doesn't protect what you've gotten a storage area. Actually, yes,
• 9:48
  it does. It states that the that the Fourth Amendment or that the right
• 9:56
  of the people to be secure in their person. So what you have on
• 10:01
  you houses, so where you live, papers, meaning all of your financial
• 10:07
  records, all of your medical records, your legal records and effects, so
• 10:11
  all of your stuff, your car, your purse, your you know,
• 10:16
  your briefcase, you know, if you own it and it contains things.
• 10:22
  Technically it's covered against unreasonable searches and seizures. Shall not be violated, and
• 10:26
  no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause. And there's there's more to it,
• 10:33
  but basically, unless the IRS can prove probable cause to go after your
• 10:39
  records and stuff, if somebody actually were to take this to court at under
• 10:43
  Fourth Amendment ruling, I don't see how the Supreme Court could uphold what they
• 10:48
  ruled here. What the implications of this ruling here allows the Irs to do.
• 10:56
  But this will affect a lot of men simply because there's a lot of
• 11:01
  companies like construction companies, housing construction companies and other other things that where there's
• 11:07
  heavy work that gets done or heavy cleanup that gets done, that are family
• 11:11
  owned. That's that's where those kinds of mistakes happen. And the IRS,
• 11:15
  like really doesn't like to go after great, big companies, but they will
• 11:20
  target the little guy because they know they can step on your throat and there
• 11:24
  is nothing you can do about it. And you know, people will get
• 11:28
  mad at me saying this, but my family's experience shows it. They ignored
• 11:37
  a payment seven thousand dollars payment that my grandfather made on his taxes when he
• 11:41
  was in his nineties, and when we proved that it was paid, they
• 11:48
  came back to us and said, we're not accepting the check that you've sent
• 11:52
  us, and somebody has in our office signed as proof of payment. So
• 11:58
  you know, you can take this to but we will come and get him
• 12:01
  and put him in jail, and he will stay in jail the whole time
• 12:05
  it's in court, and he will probably die in there before it's over,
• 12:07
  because we will drag this out until he does. You want to go through
• 12:11
  that. That was actually said to us on the phone, Yeah, by
• 12:16
  an agent of the irs. So you know that if they get power,
• 12:20
  they're going to abuse it. So God, I hope this doesn't stand because
• 12:22
  this is going to affect a lot of men. They were willing to just
• 12:26
  put an old man in jail for nothing for the rest of his life to
• 12:33
  get five seven thousand dollars resolution and be able to say they collected seven thousand
• 12:41
  dollars in backowed taxes that we're not backowed. So what do you think they're
• 12:45
  going to do in this situation where they can get into everybody's financial records just
• 12:48
  by saying, well, you have some association with somebody that didn't pay their
• 12:52
  taxes, and for such a controversial or seemingly controversial thing nine zero, it's
• 13:01
  almost a suspicious ratio, Like, on more than one level, it doesn't
• 13:03
  seem like that kind of unanimity should be possible on something as apparently diverse as
• 13:11
  the Supreme Court sough through the tinfol hat, it looks rather like some corruption
• 13:16
  has taken place, but it's not the first time it's happened. Various different
• 13:18
  Supreme courts over the years have brought unanimous verdicts on various cases. And when
• 13:24
  you take off the tinfol hat, you wonder, maybe there is a good
• 13:28
  reason for it. I realized the irs is the last institution in the world
• 13:31
  anyone should be trusting. Tax is theft. After all, taxes theft.
• 13:37
  That's not a big l libertary same and it's fucking true. Sorry, but
• 13:39
  it is. Property is not theft. On quite the contrary, Stealing property
• 13:46
  is precisely what theft is. But if taxes are to exist, then they
• 13:50
  should be extracted without ideological bias. If they were, then a lot of
• 13:56
  shady people wouldn't get away with their shady dealies. All of this ties into
• 14:00
  our second story to night, which we'll get to, the one about BLM.
• 14:03
  Yeah. If this ruling is what it takes to audit those scumbags,
• 14:09
  is somehow re redistribute the wealth that they scammed out of millions of morons,
• 14:15
  then that's e e. Distributing. Yeah, maybe maybe it could be a
• 14:22
  good thing. This is wishful thinking, obviously. Chances are pretty astronomical that
• 14:26
  it's just going to be used to bankrupt various enemies of the state while subsidizing
• 14:31
  the enemies of the people. But a boy can dream. It is just
• 14:35
  a dream, though, So stay alert people. Even if the state does
• 14:39
  come for your enemies, it doesn't mean they won't. They won't come for
• 14:43
  you if they aren't already. Even when the state is the enemy of your
• 14:48
  enemy, it is still your enemy as well is everybody's enemy. Never forget
• 14:52
  that. Here's the interesting thing about this ruling too. This was supposedly on
• 14:58
  section two thirty. In case you guys don't know. Section two thirty is
• 15:03
  the legal provision that exempts online platforms like Google, YouTube, Facebook, and
• 15:07
  Twitter from being held liable for content that's posted by their users. It's basically
• 15:13
  the small part of the US legal code that allows them to be twet it
• 15:16
  as platforms rather than publishers. And after all of these these months of going
• 15:22
  back and forth, when they reach this decision, apparently the Supreme Court sided
• 15:28
  with Twitter, Google, and Facebook and other social media sites, although in
• 15:31
  an interesting turn of events, they actually sidestep the question of section two thirty
• 15:37
  altogether, and all we get is this IRS thing. So that's just a
• 15:41
  more because the reason why I was interested in this case this thing was about
• 15:48
  the section to thirty thing. The way that you know, these platforms like
• 15:52
  Twitter, Google, Facebook, and YouTube are able to essentially like you know,
• 16:00
  act as um well, act as publishers rather than platforms. So because
• 16:10
  of that, this what we're gonna say. I was gonna say this.
• 16:14
  This makes me wonder who was fighting this battle in terms of the UM exception
• 16:22
  to the the ability of the IRS to get into your bank records without telling
• 16:26
  you if you owe taxes, because it makes me wonder if they were going
• 16:33
  through YouTube's bank records and chose to go after the YouTuber's bank records, because
• 16:41
  that could have implications even further, you know, like if they go after
• 16:48
  some YouTuber that has you know, one of those popular channels, like the
• 16:53
  ones that are basically a scam, you know, the life hack channels that
• 16:57
  show life hacks that don't work, but everybody watches them anyway because addiction,
• 17:03
  I guess I don't know, or or at least they get millions of hits,
• 17:11
  like every time I see them, I don't recommend me this channel,
• 17:14
  you know, click on, don't recommend this channel because they suck. But
• 17:18
  but in any case, like let's say the i RS goes after one of
• 17:23
  those channels, does that give them access to the bank records of say every
• 17:30
  YouTuber and every live streamer that live streams on a YouTube channel, whether they
• 17:37
  are gaining money from that YouTube channel or not. Like, how far does
• 17:41
  this reach? M It's a it's a very strange question to to take to
• 17:47
  the court, But yeah, it does give you something to think about because
• 17:51
  it pretty much creates a situation where you get treated as you know, guilty
• 17:57
  until proven innocent in terms of going through your records for looking for a crime.
• 18:03
  Yeah, and one thing that's different between and it's only marginally different because
• 18:10
  this is somewhat true of law enforcement agencies as well, but where you're dealing
• 18:15
  with regulations that get enforced as a law as opposed to law that was voted
• 18:22
  on by people that got voted into office. So like regulations as opposed to
• 18:26
  legislation, you don't have to do anything wrong. You don't have to violate
• 18:33
  a written rule for a government agency to decide that you are are in the
• 18:40
  wrong, and they can apply a penalty for it. Anybody that's owned a
• 18:45
  business that, say Osha has been called in to investigate, you know something
• 18:52
  along those lines, you'd know that if they could come get called in to
• 18:59
  investigate something and it turns out to not be true, they will find some
• 19:03
  other reason to find your company. So the IRS the IRS is like Osha
• 19:08
  on steroids and crack at the same time. Yeah, so it's it's gonna
• 19:14
  do maybe maybe even angel dust. Um, but it's going to do that
• 19:19
  times millions. M hm, Well, I guess uh, it's uh,
• 19:26
  we'll just have to wait and see if any other developments come. Um.
• 19:32
  I hope that thinks chick out in a way that is beneficial to us,
• 19:37
  but I'm not super optimistic. So um, but we gotta move on.
• 19:42
  Let us tell what you guys think about the story in the comments, and
• 19:45
  uh did you see this coming? Like were you were you pretty sure that
• 19:49
  that wasn't going to pan out for you know, in a way that other
• 19:52
  than the way it did. And also what what's with the extra like IRS
• 19:56
  thing? And why aren't we addressing the you primary point here that people are
• 20:02
  trying to make let us know in the comments. So I got a supercowl
• 20:04
  from Meredith G. Thank you, Meredith. Shout out to Meredith G.
• 20:08
  M alright, alright, alright, and she gives us five dollars and says,
• 20:15
  HBr news for zero seven honey for the Badgers. The court isn't going
• 20:19
  to touch two thirty. They want to legislate legislature to alter your two thirty.
• 20:25
  I think that's what she means to say. They're they're they're gonna try
• 20:27
  to alter it, so they're not gonna touch it. Well, we'll see.
• 20:30
  I mean, I'm I guess we'll see. I don't know what else
• 20:36
  to say, so let us know what you guys think. We're gonna move
• 20:38
  on to the next story. Now we're gonna talk about Black Lives Matter or
• 20:42
  buy large mansions, whichever one you want to call it. Financial disclosures reveal
• 20:48
  Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, which is basically the BLM activist group.
• 20:52
  Not a person holding a sign that says Black Lives Matter on it. Those
• 20:56
  people are just the useful idiots for BLM. The group. They ran an
• 21:03
  eight point five million dollars deficit in twenty twenty two while still paying out seven
• 21:08
  figure salaries to relatives of the founder, Patrese Colors. Patrese resigned as the
• 21:15
  executive director in May of twenty twenty one after the public learned that she was
• 21:18
  spending three point two million dollars of the funds on four separate homes. She
• 21:23
  was also accused of fundeling two hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars to a company
• 21:27
  belonging to the father of her child. However, she seems to still be
• 21:30
  keeping it in the family. Twenty twenty two tax records show or now show
• 21:36
  Patrese's brother, Paul Colors, was paid one hundred and twenty six thousand dollars
• 21:41
  salary as head of security. And I put that in quotes because he had
• 21:45
  no experience. Despite having no experience, he was like a street artist.
• 21:51
  Basically, he made a total of one point six million dollars between him and
• 21:55
  two other security companies a lawsuit filed by Black Lives Matter grassroots. So these
• 22:00
  are like we talked about this of like I think last year or something,
• 22:04
  where there are these smaller grassroots BLM groups that were angry with the main BLM,
• 22:11
  like the head of the Hydra or whatever because they weren't getting enough money,
• 22:17
  so a lawsuit filed by Black Lives Matter Grassroots accuses Black Lives Matter Global
• 22:22
  Network Foundation board member Shalamaya Howard of diverting donations to its to his own coffers.
• 22:30
  The lawsuit accused Howard of stealing ten million dollars for himself instead of quote
• 22:36
  on the ground movement work end quote. Like every activist movement needs to be
• 22:41
  grilled on the subject of exit strategy, A question that you would always do
• 22:47
  well to ask is when has it gone too far? As we know,
• 22:51
  you can't get through to hypocrites by highlighting their hypocrisy. You can point out
• 22:56
  that they're employing a racial hierarchy with blacks on the top and whites on the
• 23:00
  and you can go that means you're the real racists, and they'll just respond
• 23:04
  with black people have been oppressed since forever, and we're just tipping the balance
• 23:08
  in favor of equality finally for the first time ever, for the zero of
• 23:14
  time ever, because it still hasn't happened. And like I said, the
• 23:18
  pertinent question is then when has it gone too far? It's a question they
• 23:22
  don't want to address because the obvious answer is it already has gone too far.
• 23:27
  Clearly, enough history has passed, enough quote unquote progress has taken place
• 23:33
  to get us to the point that we're at. If this was one hundred
• 23:37
  years ago, you might have a point. One hundred years ago, you
• 23:41
  wouldn't have been able to create a Black Lives Matter movement, not even in
• 23:45
  Africa if it was, if it was the mid twentieth century, you would.
• 23:49
  That's what civil rights thing was about. That was the actual Black Lives
• 23:55
  Matter movement. That was the moment in history when people were non racist enough
• 24:00
  to give a damn about genuine inequalities in various legal systems. At that point,
• 24:07
  it had not gone too far, in my opinion. But now you're
• 24:11
  at the point in society half a century later in history where you can run
• 24:18
  any old grift, where you can do absolutely nothing but rile people up and
• 24:23
  steal their money and spend it on mansions for you and your friends and family,
• 24:29
  while cities are burning across the world because of you. You do zero
• 24:33
  good for the world but an incalculable amount of needless, wanton destruction. And
• 24:37
  the only reason you can get away with it is because you wear the label
• 24:40
  of black lives that's a clear indication that it's already gone too far. Do
• 24:45
  you think anyone could do that in the name of white lives now or fifty
• 24:51
  years ago? Not a chance. Nobody has got away with that since the
• 24:55
  Nazis themselves, so you're not tipping the balance in favor of equality. Frankly,
• 25:00
  equality was reached in the nineties. At least it was as close as
• 25:03
  we ever got, probably ever can get. The nineties were the good times
• 25:10
  created by strong men. It was when all these equalities came together and we
• 25:14
  were able to just celebrate our differences without being divided over them. So there
• 25:19
  was nothing left to do but playing Nintendo and eating pizza. It was awesome.
• 25:25
  I feel bad for I feel bad for the Zoomers who never experienced it
• 25:30
  for real. Almost nothing bad happened in the nineties, relatively speaking. I
• 25:33
  mean, Tony Blair and Bill Clinton were sowing the seeds of our nightmares,
• 25:37
  but they hadn't yet fully germinated when it was still the nineties. But nothing
• 25:42
  was ever good enough for the Ecophobes, the Marxists, the children of the
• 25:48
  children of the Frankfurt School. A world in harmony was not a wind condition
• 25:53
  for them. They never did set a wind condition, They never had an
• 25:57
  exit strategy. All ever wanted was to punish straight white men for the crimes
• 26:04
  of their ancests. It's or just the crimes of past tyrants to whom we
• 26:07
  would never even related. And this is where we are now. If you're
• 26:12
  shitting on men, shitting on whites, shitting on cis heat people, you
• 26:17
  can get away with anything. Nothing is too much. They have never gone
• 26:22
  too far. And that's how we got here so fast in twenty five years
• 26:27
  or so, because while while we were enjoying ourselves playing Nintendo and eating pizza,
• 26:33
  these bastards were in the floorboards, chewing away at the foundations of our
• 26:37
  civilization and doing it for its own sake. It's it's because of the white
• 26:42
  pills, folks, be where the white pills. They make you naive and
• 26:47
  complacent and deluded. It's it's the it's the good times creating weak people.
• 26:52
  So it's time, it's long since time to get yourself on a steady,
• 26:56
  healthy diet of black pills. Black hills. Now you have to look at
• 27:04
  them. The way women do things versus the way men do things here as
• 27:07
  well, And it's not that men never get vengeful. But when you let
• 27:17
  the thing that happened that feminists hate the most, when you let boys be
• 27:19
  boys, when they are growing up, and they're gonna be rough and tumble,
• 27:23
  and they're gonna fight with each other, and they're gonna punch each other
• 27:26
  right in the face. Right, Um, they're gonna set boundaries by working
• 27:33
  them out physically, and they're going to learn some things, one of which
• 27:38
  is revenge never pays off. Vengeance is useless. It has no purpose other
• 27:45
  than to deal with feelings that don't don't have any real bearing on reality.
• 27:52
  Right, It's easy to get mad. Probably the absolute easiest thing you can
• 27:56
  ever do in your life is get angry. It's hard to control what you
• 28:03
  do when you're angry. Right, It's even harder to control what you do
• 28:07
  when you're angry than than it is to control what you do when you're high
• 28:12
  and or drunk. Right. Anger really is the biggest hurdle. But boys
• 28:19
  learn to deal with that by working it out with each other, and adults
• 28:26
  really only need to step in if one of the boys has such an unfair
• 28:30
  advantage size wise that he's going to do permanent damage to the other kid or
• 28:36
  he's going to dominate, not learn to work with the other kids. And
• 28:40
  then you have, you know, you have mentoring to do. Right,
• 28:42
  That's what the adults are there for, to mentor the children, not to
• 28:47
  prevent that working out. When boys grow up setting those boundaries with each other
• 28:52
  and using using violence and learning to not use violence because it sucks, right,
• 29:00
  then they learn not to do shit like Black Lives Matter. Right.
• 29:06
  They learn instead to work together between themselves, each other and authorities to again
• 29:15
  iron out boundaries. So instead of having big marches with thousands of people yelling
• 29:22
  about dead cops, they change the rules. They work on what the rules
• 29:26
  are that are allowing bad things to happen. They figure out what, you
• 29:30
  know, what the truth is in terms of the statistics that are being batted
• 29:36
  around, and they work on the problem and solve it, and they have
• 29:40
  an endgame. They have a win strategy and an exit strategy. Right.
• 29:45
  Women, on the other hand, will hold some stupid thing that you said
• 29:52
  twenty years against you or ago against you in an argument about something that has
• 29:57
  nothing to do that and is not even remotely related to it. Right,
• 30:03
  you might be discussing the budget and whether or not the new dress she wants
• 30:08
  fits into the budget right now. And she's mad and she brings up something
• 30:18
  you said about her driving while you were dating that has nothing to do with
• 30:22
  it, right, and she'll shove that down your throat and twist the knife.
• 30:27
  She withhold your kids from you if you get divorced, not because it's
• 30:32
  good for the kids, but because it hurts you. Girls don't grow up
• 30:37
  setting those kind of boundaries. They grow up using relational aggression instead of physical
• 30:44
  violence to hurt each other. And when they get really aggressive about it,
• 30:51
  adults give girls the worst possible advice. Well, maybe it's because nobody likes
• 30:56
  you because of who you are. Maybe maybe it's your fault that you know,
• 31:02
  Susie Is has started a campaign of emotional terror against you, And it's
• 31:08
  it takes um, It takes an unusual situation for a girl to grow up
• 31:17
  and learn to do it the other way, all right, to blake,
• 31:19
  All right, I'm mad about this. I'm gonna go off and do some
• 31:22
  thinking and then, you know, come back later and figure out, all
• 31:26
  right, what would be an actual victory here as opposed to just hurting the
• 31:32
  other person, and how can we accomplish it? And you know how,
• 31:37
  by the by the way, how can I form peace with this enemy so
• 31:40
  that we don't keep hurting each other. Yeah, girls don't do that very
• 31:45
  well. And women don't do that very well. Instead, they lie,
• 31:48
  they cheat, they steal, they do whatever it takes right to hurt the
• 31:56
  person or the entity, the demographic, the business, whatever. Part of
• 32:01
  the reason why we have this massive litigaus law lawsuit culture we have in the
• 32:06
  United States right now because of of women behaving that way. Um. And
• 32:12
  so you get a situation with Black Lives Matter that was mostly run by women,
• 32:16
  It was mostly organized by women. It started right, and women latched
• 32:22
  onto it. And but women of not just women of color, just like
• 32:28
  not just black women, brown women. Uh you know Hispanic women was white
• 32:32
  women. And and they had to be told, you know, you can't
• 32:38
  use this as a vehicle for your anger. Yeah. So if you want
• 32:44
  grifting to to be less less of a thing in situations like this right where
• 32:51
  you know there's discrimination, where you know there's um, well, just like
• 32:55
  the men's rights movement, if it was entirely run by women, I wouldn't
• 33:00
  be able to be part of it. Yeah, if it wasn't theists like
• 33:08
  Hannah Cox. Yeah, I even if it was run by even if it
• 33:14
  was run by feminists that called themselves and caps, which is antithetical feminism,
• 33:21
  right, but I wouldn't care. They're still all women. If there weren't
• 33:27
  women and men working together, and if it wasn't something that men had been
• 33:30
  doing for themselves, uh for for quite a while, I wouldn't be involved
• 33:37
  in it because I wouldn't trust at all that it was not going to be
• 33:42
  like Black Lives Matter and and and and working with an organization like our organization
• 33:47
  is run by women, but you have to run into women like Allison and
• 33:52
  Karen that routinely get accused of being men on the internet because they don't act
• 33:57
  like women. Like There's no way I would have worked with normal women.
• 34:01
  Yeah, um for to do something like this, because it becomes an exercise
• 34:09
  of power, an exercise of revenge, and a moneymaking project that does nothing
• 34:15
  but turn out more financial gain, right. No support for for any other
• 34:22
  uh growth or benefits, No information sharing, no, nothing like and Michael
• 34:30
  Keller, Alison and Karen do not bite unless you deserve it or or you
• 34:35
  ask them very nicely, he said, run into Alison or Karen, isn't
• 34:42
  that dangerous? I heard they bite. Yeah. Out of the whole group,
• 34:45
  probably, I'm the one with the worst temper or the best temper.
• 34:49
  I don't know how keep getting told that it's cool. I don't feel like
• 34:52
  that about it streams. Yeah, I know, okay. Out of the
• 34:59
  three of us, I'm the only one that actually had to go to anger
• 35:01
  management. So I learned some tools. So I don't yell as much,
• 35:06
  right, But um, and it wasn't like court ordered anger management. It
• 35:10
  was I I knew it was me ordered anger management. But it was because
• 35:15
  bad things were happening because of me, all right, I was, I
• 35:20
  was doing bad things. Um, So there you go. Alison barks,
• 35:27
  Karen barks. I don't yell as much, all right, Nobody, nobody
• 35:32
  here knows what I'm I'm like if I lose control when I'm mad, Um,
• 35:37
  nobody's gonna find that out either, because I'm not gonna ever lose control
• 35:40
  again when I'm mad over being mad. But you know, when I when
• 35:46
  I'm mad, I retained control and focus. Now, um, that's dangerous
• 35:52
  too, though. For if somebody really weren't to create a situation where I
• 35:58
  had to do something. But yeah, um, it's I entirely blame this
• 36:06
  on the fact that our society is so used to what I just described that
• 36:12
  they let women get away with the shit. You have this organization that didn't
• 36:19
  do anything right. Well, they made a lot of money off of people's
• 36:22
  misery. They made a lot of money off of, you know, creating
• 36:27
  enough resentment and anger to destroy multiple cities to the point where they're never going
• 36:31
  to recover in our lifetime. They didn't They didn't accomplish anything. They didn't
• 36:37
  have a project, they didn't work on anything. Their entirety of their their
• 36:42
  um activities were to gather people together, go places, raise a ruckus,
• 36:50
  light fires, break things, go into people's homes and kill their pets.
• 36:54
  Yep, right, and then and then move on to the next place.
• 36:59
  It was just in an entirely an intimidation thing. It was that that was
• 37:04
  the goal. I don't think they ever intended on helping anybody, much less
• 37:07
  Black people. In fact, they did than any than anyone else. Ever,
• 37:15
  they didn't lobby, they didn't have any kind of news nope, reporting
• 37:22
  organization that alerted people here's what's going on in this area that needs changed,
• 37:25
  Here's something that you can call your congressmen. But they didn't have any kind
• 37:30
  of organized how to fix this problem, how to how to get people to
• 37:37
  understand, And they didn't help people understand how to deal with police either,
• 37:42
  Like you didn't get advice. You couldn't get advice from Black Lives Matter,
• 37:45
  all Right, if you are stuck in a situation where you think you're at
• 37:49
  risk because of how a police officer is acting, here are things that can
• 37:53
  de escalate the situation. No, they didn't do that, right, they
• 37:59
  did man, because they're right that it wouldn't serve them to do that.
• 38:04
  Like if like if people learn how to negotiate, Like cops are not Cops
• 38:07
  are not running around looking for an excuse to kill people. They're just not.
• 38:12
  The only time something like that happens is if, like you know,
• 38:15
  the the other person is resisting or they're they're aggressive, or they've broken the
• 38:20
  law and they don't want to go they don't want to be have their vehicle
• 38:22
  checked, or but every things go out of control. Primarily so I know
• 38:28
  there are people who hate cops, but I'm sorry. We live in the
• 38:30
  real world where you need them. So most of the time to most of
• 38:35
  what most cops prefer. The only time that they have to to to fire
• 38:38
  their their weapon, discharge their weapon is on the practice range. Yeah,
• 38:43
  we'll just because but in a situation like that, it means their life is
• 38:49
  in danger. Right, Yes, you very rarely get the guys that are
• 38:52
  like there are corrupt cops. They're bad cops there, of course, right.
• 38:55
  And there are cops that are bad at their job too. Sure of
• 38:59
  course, no one as as a little boy or a little girl wants to
• 39:04
  grow up and be the cop that makes the news for shooting somebody. Yeah,
• 39:09
  but cops don't go out looking for an excuse to kill people. But
• 39:15
  in Britain they they certainly do go out looking for an excuse to arrest people
• 39:19
  because yeah happens. They have quotes as to how many people they can you
• 39:23
  know, right against and in and in Britain they can get away with it
• 39:28
  because they know they can wander down to any house to arrest someone for a
• 39:30
  tweet and there's not going to be someone with a gun at the other it's
• 39:34
  not it's not over like a real crime, it's over. Give up your
• 39:37
  guns, never give up your guns. You'll get that in spades. Like
• 39:43
  we do. Yeah, so, and that's what that's what I'm saying.
• 39:45
  But Black Lives Matter has no interest in doing anything productive. They never did.
• 39:49
  They were a feminist organization. They were just trying to get political influence
• 39:52
  and lots of money, and they got both. They managed to essentially like
• 39:58
  run the grift without without a hitch at all. Okay, no problems.
• 40:05
  Why because our society is so not racist that we're willing to let people like
• 40:09
  this run rough shot over everybody and never question them. Because and on top
• 40:15
  of that, because they're also a feminist organization run by women, won't we
• 40:20
  won't call them out for that either, even though they will tell you explicitly
• 40:22
  they're going to destroy the family. They don't want men involved with their children's
• 40:27
  lives. They're okay with single motherhood because it produces more criminality, because it
• 40:31
  produces more teenage pregnancy, because it produces more dysfunction, which they can then
• 40:37
  in turn blame on white supremacy, and nobody questions it, and nobody calls
• 40:40
  them out, and it just keeps going, and it keeps going, and
• 40:44
  that is the point. So they do have a goal, and they are
• 40:47
  succeeding, and they have done it, and I'll tell you right now.
• 40:51
  Despite all of this, despite the fact that they took all their grift money
• 40:53
  and they gave it to their friends and family, which no, I don't
• 40:57
  see how anyone is surprised by that, they will come back. Then when
• 41:01
  the next time a black man is killed under any circumstances that could be spun
• 41:08
  as racist, they will be there. They'll rebrand if they have to,
• 41:13
  but they will be there and the grift will continue because nobody is willing,
• 41:17
  nobody has the balls to basically say no, you guys are grifting. Like
• 41:22
  and I don't like the word grifter. I think it's overused in a lot
• 41:25
  of ways, but this is a primary example of that. This is a
• 41:29
  grift because they are not doing anything useful. They are creating the chaos.
• 41:34
  They are welcoming it. And you know, I'm a little heated about this
• 41:37
  because when did George Floyd things started? Okay, I was very skeptical of
• 41:45
  the narrative. I mean when even going back to Trayvon Martin, I was
• 41:50
  like, this is this is fishy and blm. They said that they started
• 41:53
  to organize, like when the Trayvon Martin thing happened. But it's not because
• 41:59
  they thought there was racist shit going on. It's because, like they were,
• 42:02
  like, well, this is an opportunity for us to use the thing
• 42:06
  that we claim does not exist, which is sympathy for black people, as
• 42:08
  a way to make a lot of money off of guilty white people and everybody
• 42:13
  else, right, and then give that money to ourselves. And they did
• 42:15
  that with Treyvon, they did it with Michael Brown, they did it with
• 42:20
  every instance, even though in every instance the story was not as simple as
• 42:24
  they said, because there was way more going on, And even though things
• 42:30
  like this happen like every day all over the world all the time, but
• 42:34
  they're not. None of those are politically useful, so they get ignored,
• 42:38
  even though they claim that they care about blacks while also wanting to use black
• 42:45
  men's dead bodies to promote their message and make money off of it, which
• 42:49
  is literally the only useful black man to Black Lives Matter is a dead one,
• 42:53
  and not even like a dead one under normal circumstances, a dead one
• 42:58
  under circumstances that can be exploited to their benefits. So when a black man
• 43:02
  kills another black man in the South Side of Chicago. They don't care.
• 43:07
  That doesn't matter. Fuck those guys, right, They're not useful. They're
• 43:09
  the products with single mothers, the same thing that we promote as an organization.
• 43:15
  They want this. They want people killing each other, they want chaos,
• 43:21
  they want lawlessness, they want destruction. They want that because it demoralizes
• 43:27
  people, it makes And then they tell blacks this is the white man's fault.
• 43:30
  And you know, I don't know how many of them, but a
• 43:34
  not insignificant number believe it, and they're like, well, yeah, it
• 43:37
  must be otherwise, why am I not an engineer, millionaire person? Because
• 43:40
  the system man is keeping me down? And that it just keeps a It's
• 43:45
  a never ending cycle, and they will continue to promote it. And this
• 43:50
  is not just for the you know, Black Lives Matter, it's for any
• 43:52
  of these like you know, let's say social justice groups. They're not even
• 43:59
  necessarily about race, but it just so happens that the belief is that this
• 44:04
  will work, especially well in the United States, so they do it,
• 44:07
  you know, and so like in the UK, you know, they won't
• 44:10
  they won't necessarily say that, but they are doing that, but instead they'll
• 44:14
  make it about colonizers it's the same narrative. It does well in the United
• 44:21
  States. You know why it works especially well in the United States because the
• 44:25
  majority, the vast overwhelming majority of the population here if you don't count politicians,
• 44:34
  right, who are their own grift, the vast overwhelming majority of the
• 44:38
  population here already cares about black lives. Lives already matter to the public.
• 44:44
  They wouldn't do it otherwise. It's like, it's like a feminism. We
• 44:47
  live under a hateful patriarchy, yet they make tons of money because men actually
• 44:51
  don't hate women. No, if men didn't care about women, feminism would
• 44:55
  never get a Yeah, it wouldn't exist. Who would who would find who
• 45:00
  would pay for it? Help feminists? Yeah? Who would pass laws to
• 45:02
  protect women if men hated women? Yes, it's the same thing. They
• 45:07
  know, they know the model works, and so they just like reoriented.
• 45:12
  But the people doing it are still feminists. So it's the same people.
• 45:15
  And it's like the tactics just have a slightly different skin and they just use
• 45:22
  different language. But it's the same. And that's what I'm saying. It
• 45:24
  has no interest in you know, like feminism claims that it cares about women's
• 45:30
  issues, right, but they don't. They obviously don't. They're actually doing
• 45:34
  more harm to women than they are to men in some ways. And the
• 45:38
  point is not to fix anything. The point is to always set things up
• 45:44
  so that you need more feminism. You always need more feminism. Give us
• 45:47
  more money, give us more power, give us better jobs, you know,
• 45:51
  make sure that we are taken care of. And that's that's the whole
• 45:54
  system. That is a grif. That is what it is meant by that.
• 45:59
  So someone who's just like, like, here's what I would say about
• 46:02
  the whole grifting thing, just the last thing about that, if men's rights
• 46:07
  activists could be drifters, I don't think it's possible because it's a very unpopular
• 46:13
  position. It's a it's it's not recognized by the left or the right,
• 46:17
  Okay, And so why would anyone think that this is a good way to
• 46:22
  make money when like it's literally you have to work really hard to even get
• 46:27
  people to consider that perspective. If I wanted to get rich quick, i'd
• 46:30
  be a feminist. And I've been saying that for years, Like way back
• 46:32
  when we started, I could just say I care about women and I can
• 46:37
  make money off of that. But I'm doing. I'm doing the opposite.
• 46:39
  I'm saying, women, you know, we need to hold them accountable when
• 46:43
  they when they act up, we need to hold them to some kind of
• 46:45
  a standard. And that actually would help them, but it wouldn't help me,
• 46:50
  and it doesn't So like BLM, I mean I've lost friends over this,
• 46:54
  like that I've known for decades because they can not like they're just they're
• 47:00
  just programmed somehow to just oppose me. And all I'm doing is saying,
• 47:07
  hey, you know this, this is obviously like a grift. And when
• 47:10
  something happens in the news that can be exploited, I step in and say,
• 47:15
  wait a minute, let's let's wait until we have all the facts before
• 47:17
  we start acting crazy, you know. And of course it doesn't work.
• 47:22
  Now Minneapolis. I have a friend who lives in Minneapolis. Minneapolis is a
• 47:24
  shithole. Now, I mean it's panics work. It's a true shit hole.
• 47:30
  And so like that's how moral panics work. Yeah, and all of
• 47:34
  these grifts are are based on moral panics. Like there's the kind of moral
• 47:38
  panic where you decide a group of people are evil and you round them up
• 47:44
  and you do evil things to them in the name of good. Right,
• 47:46
  we are very aware of that as a society, but people still haven't yet
• 47:52
  figured out that playing on on one group's fear of being oppressed and exploited while
• 48:00
  playing on the accused groups fear of being the bad guy, racist, sexist,
• 48:08
  homophobic, whatever name you want to use to call the oppressor group the
• 48:14
  bad guy. Right, the labeled oppressor group the bad guy. Those are
• 48:17
  both playing on people's fears. And then you also play on the alleged oppressed
• 48:22
  groups resentment, anger, pain, suffering, you know, sense of disadvantage,
• 48:29
  and you play on the alleged oppressor groups fear of being the cause of
• 48:37
  an oppressed person's bad experience. Right, that's another moral panic. So this
• 48:45
  is really all about exploiting fear on both sides. Yeah, it's about exploiting
• 48:49
  emotions, and it is a precursor to the other kind of moral panic where
• 48:54
  you round up supposed bad people and do evil things to them in the name
• 48:59
  of good, and then only later on you realize, gush, we were
• 49:01
  the bad guys. Well, I mean, BLM is all about that Antifa
• 49:06
  two. Like you know, when when you look back at the Summer of
• 49:08
  love, billions of dollars in damage, thousands of injuries, and twenty four
• 49:15
  murders at least, so the death of one person, which by the way,
• 49:21
  was proven to be an overdose like proven okay, resulted in twenty four
• 49:25
  deaths that did not have to happen, at least twenty four and yet nothing
• 49:31
  nobody. And the worst part is that the people who you you can who
• 49:36
  supported this shit, you can approach them now and say, look at the
• 49:38
  damage that this did. Why did you support this when I told you you
• 49:43
  should have waited. They will not They will not look at that and say,
• 49:47
  you know what, I was wrong that nobody Like the balls that it
• 49:52
  takes to say that is like it's unfathomable, like nobody has them, okay,
• 49:58
  like almost nobody at least, And that's all that that that's all it
• 50:00
  would take is for somebody to say, you know what, I was wrong
• 50:05
  about that, and I'm going to be careful next time. I'm not saying
• 50:07
  I I don't need the apology. I just need you to understand that you
• 50:12
  supported something that caused the deaths of people, like unnecessarily, and not only
• 50:17
  that, because that's just like Summer of love. Imagine, like look at
• 50:21
  the kind of like, uh, the crimes that were committed. Remember the
• 50:23
  guy that drove into a Christmas parade killing a bunch of people because he wanted
• 50:29
  to kill white people. His name is not Daryl Brooks. He does not
• 50:31
  go by that name. He has never heard anyone of that name. Well,
• 50:35
  I'm what, what what what was it that made him think that was
• 50:38
  a good idea? Could it have been the narrative? Could it have been
• 50:43
  the resentment that was built up? I mean, you know, like what
• 50:47
  this now, I know this isn't a race thing, but the Tennessee shooter
• 50:52
  that killed like, you know, those those uhum, adults and children,
• 50:58
  what what drove them to that? I mean, I don't think it's the
• 51:00
  I don't think it's the hormones. I don't think it's the pills. I
• 51:04
  think there was a lot of resentment and anger and it came out because they
• 51:07
  were responding to something that wasn't real. So um, at least in my
• 51:13
  opinion. So yeah, I mean, this stuff doesn't like it, It
• 51:16
  doesn't happen without unfortunately tragic consequences, And yet we have to We're being told
• 51:22
  that we have to focus on the one person that died of a drug overdose
• 51:27
  because he was around somebody else, and people cannot they cannot wrap their mind
• 51:30
  around that and just say, you know what I think. I think I
• 51:35
  was wrong about that. And now because that what that means is that the
• 51:38
  face the actual like consequences of that belief. So anyway, the sun can
• 51:45
  cost fallacy. It's it's it's the most insidious um section of all of this,
• 51:53
  because once you lost in the sun can cost fallacy, there's no coming
• 51:57
  back. Yeah, because you can admit to a small mistake, you can.
• 52:01
  You can admit to a white lie, I say white lie. But
• 52:07
  once once, once a mistake is big enough, once a lie is dar
• 52:12
  say black enough, it's easier to keep telling it than it is to admit
• 52:16
  that you were wrong. I mean, I'm not saying it's easy to admit
• 52:20
  when you're wrong. I know that it's difficult, but people have to swallow
• 52:24
  the pride. The hardest thing to admit is that you picked the wrong team.
• 52:29
  Yeah, Like, that's something that people really don't deal with well,
• 52:34
  and we do have because of how our species evolved throughout our civilized history and
• 52:44
  even our pre civilized history, where where we were just you know, tribes
• 52:47
  and families and stuff without necessarily having laws and and uh elected leaders or or
• 52:55
  even leaders that that couldn't be ousted just by a few angry people. We've
• 53:02
  always had to pick a team. We've always our species has always been strongest
• 53:09
  in groups instead of individually, and we've always been so weak as individuals that
• 53:17
  survival relied on group mentality. And the really tough thing is, once you
• 53:25
  latch onto that group, it's a terrifying thing to let go because then you're
• 53:31
  not part of that group anymore. You don't have the protection of the group.
• 53:37
  And we don't have so much a need for physical protection from a group
• 53:44
  in the real world anymore. Right, we're not being hunted by wolves,
• 53:50
  we're not sharing our living space with other animals that prey on us that are
• 53:55
  big enough for us to to act like that around it. Like the animal
• 54:00
  that prey on us now are tiny and carry diseases. But we still have
• 54:07
  that instinct, and it's it's a biological instinct, and it's something that people
• 54:14
  will if they don't have it presented to them in that way. This is
• 54:20
  why you. You probably did this, but you have to be conscious of
• 54:24
  it because Your mistake is you gave up individuality and freedom and the protection of
• 54:35
  your civil rights against government interference, and your recourse against criminality and against false
• 54:44
  accusations of racism or or privilege or whatever, or or if you're not white.
• 54:52
  You gave up your individual non victimhood, right you You adopted victimhood that
• 54:59
  isn't even yours, and you went through pain and suffering that you didn't have
• 55:02
  to all because you have this instinct to address things as a group and to
• 55:09
  compromise your own skepticism and your own individual thought processes in order to maintain that
• 55:20
  closeness with the group. Hmm, yeah, that't. When you don't have
• 55:24
  that instinct, you get diagnosed with um, a mental health condition, with
• 55:30
  a with a U, a wrongness about you. I guess you can say,
• 55:34
  I can't, I can't think of the right word at the momentum,
• 55:37
  but a dysfunction. You get diagnosed with a dysfunction if you don't have that
• 55:40
  need for a gang. Yeah, to be part of as as a human
• 55:46
  being, they call you autistic and they shuffle you off to the side and
• 55:51
  say, well you should they want you to join their gang. I think
• 55:54
  all these industries are in on it, like they're pretending to be the underdogs
• 55:58
  and they're literally the establishment. Yeah yeah, I mean that's why I think
• 56:02
  they locked us down. I think that's why they they separated people and they
• 56:07
  isolated people because the majority of people who support these radical groups, and I
• 56:10
  don't even like to say radical, because they're like I said, their mainstream
• 56:15
  are people who are just looking to belong to something, and so they just
• 56:19
  support whatever they think the most popular narrative is. And whole look, the
• 56:22
  media supports all the same popular narratives that groups like Black Lives Matter and Antifa
• 56:28
  support. In fact, they run cover for them. So it's like,
• 56:30
  well, why don't they seem to be the good guys because everybody seems to
• 56:34
  agree, So I'm going to join that or at least support that, you
• 56:37
  know, passively, and so like it's and if somebody dissents, if somebody
• 56:43
  comes along and says, hey, you know, did you know this?
• 56:45
  Or you know, are you skeptical of this? I mean you can look
• 56:47
  at like all kinds of things that people have responded to, you know,
• 56:52
  not just like you know, the George Floyd thing or the BLM things or
• 56:57
  the Antifa things but you can look at let's say a certain virus that was
• 57:02
  going around and how people responded to the kind of like precautions they were told
• 57:07
  to take. You know, I mean it's and it forms tribes, but
• 57:12
  that's it's really not like two polarly like polarized groups. It's one like authoritarian
• 57:22
  polarized group, and then everybody else. It's like I said, it's it's
• 57:25
  everybody else versus these crazy people over here. And and they're not all the
• 57:30
  same exact people, but they're sure is a lot of overlap. Um because
• 57:35
  they're people who, you know, they want everyone to join their cult and
• 57:38
  they want to do used force if necessary, and that joining that cult comes
• 57:44
  with a whole bunch of beliefs that you have to have, you know,
• 57:46
  one of which is feminism. That's how they got in the door. But
• 57:50
  all the other stuff comes with it. And so like, um, you
• 57:53
  know, you can't just get feminism, you gotta go all you gotta get
• 57:55
  all the DLC and the mods. So that, you know, I think
• 58:00
  it is using people's need to belong, especially young people. When you think
• 58:07
  about it as a means to say, well, you know, we will
• 58:10
  we will treat you well, if you join this cult, if you if
• 58:15
  you give us your pronouns, if you you know, want to help smash
• 58:19
  the patriarchy, if you hate buying shit and owning property, that you join
• 58:23
  that. You want to eat the bugs, you want to live in the
• 58:25
  pod, you want to do all of the things. And it's always the
• 58:29
  same people who mostly agree with all of it. You want to mask up,
• 58:32
  you want to get the jab. It goes on and on. So
• 58:37
  we got to reach net zero or a carbon net zero what I don't know
• 58:40
  what you know? What it is, basically a lot of safety net zero
• 58:43
  is what we need to reach. Yeah, you need to stop saying sure,
• 58:45
  okay, every time somebody comes along and says, here's another safety net,
• 58:50
  put this around your neck. No it's not a leash, it's a
• 58:52
  safety net. Yeah no, no, I'm not taking the leash. Stop
• 58:57
  calling it a safety net. Go to hell. I'm doing my own thing
• 59:01
  exactly. But yeah, you got to do that. It's like it's and
• 59:06
  and these people will exploit that. So that that's why this BLM thing is.
• 59:10
  It's it's it's very important because it's not just that there's so much more
• 59:15
  to it, and you you always know what's going on when you look closely
• 59:20
  at what their what their stated goals are. Now these aren't necessarily achievable at
• 59:24
  this stage, but they're certainly working towards it. So you you can't like
• 59:29
  you, you can't be passive in this. And I know it's not easy
• 59:34
  because I've lost friends, like old old friends because I would they would never
• 59:40
  your friends. Yeah, yeah, I know, I mean, I guess,
• 59:45
  I don't know. It's tough, but you know I have friends.
• 59:50
  I have friends to get it. Here's the thing. People, people will
• 59:54
  love you and care about you and still abandon you if they think that you
• 1:00:00
  are in the wrong because you're not part of the group. And it goes
• 1:00:05
  right back to that instinct and that programming. And unfortunately we've had four generations
• 1:00:12
  now of Americans who have been programmed even further into that mentality. Like that,
• 1:00:21
  that mentality exists, but it's not it's not insurmountable naturally. It's it's
• 1:00:32
  something that you can fight. You have to fight it. If you don't
• 1:00:36
  fight it, you end up doing stupid shit. But it is a lot
• 1:00:42
  harder to fight after you've been through twelve years of the public school system,
• 1:00:46
  after your parents were went through twelve years of the public school system, and
• 1:00:51
  your grandparents went through twelve years of the public school system, and their grandparents
• 1:00:54
  went through twelve years of the public school system, and all of those generations
• 1:01:00
  were taught to be part of the group, to value being part of the
• 1:01:06
  group, to be embarrassed about being excluded from the group. You know that
• 1:01:12
  it's their fault and they're always in the wrong if the group disapproves, right,
• 1:01:17
  that if they screw up, they're going to be embarrassed in front of
• 1:01:21
  their their peers, and that you know, if they if they get excluded
• 1:01:27
  from the group, it's going to impact everything else that happens to them for
• 1:01:30
  the rest of their lives. Right, So then you get the reinforcement the
• 1:01:34
  next generation where the teachers do that to the kids and the kids go home
• 1:01:38
  and tell mom and dad. Mom and dad are like, well, no,
• 1:01:42
  that's that's what I learned growing up. That's right. Will you end
• 1:01:45
  up not being able to do the right thing when the group is doing the
• 1:01:50
  wrong thing because you are taught that the group is always right? All right?
• 1:01:59
  Well, I think this is overall though, good news. I guess
• 1:02:02
  like at least Hopefully people will like see this and realize, you know,
• 1:02:07
  that they have to be they have to be less prone to emotional reactions because
• 1:02:12
  that's what these grifting groups like, they prey on that. So hopefully you
• 1:02:17
  know, people will learn, um and uh, they will, they will
• 1:02:22
  be more critical. And also you know, like I said, the true
• 1:02:25
  goals are usually just right there, like you know, they they like when
• 1:02:30
  when word got out that they're one of their primary objectives was essentially to create
• 1:02:36
  like a society, um where children are raised by tribes like you know,
• 1:02:42
  a communist one, I guess, and there were no fathers they were they
• 1:02:45
  were dismantling the patriarchal family, which is something that all feminism wanted anyway.
• 1:02:52
  Um, and then people start but they were putting it out there because they
• 1:02:55
  thought nobody would you know, actually like see it and call them on it.
• 1:03:00
  And then they got called on it, and so they removed it from
• 1:03:01
  their website. So you know that that's that's their goal, and that is
• 1:03:06
  the goal of I don't care what you call yourself, but if you earn
• 1:03:10
  any way associated with feminism, that's your goal. So you got to call
• 1:03:15
  them out, all right, But anyway, let us know what you guys
• 1:03:17
  think about this story in the comments, and we are going to move on
• 1:03:22
  to the next one. This is an interesting story as well that I thought.
• 1:03:27
  It's kind of it's kind of good news, I guess so. Texas
• 1:03:31
  legislature has given final approval on a new bill seeking to ban diversity equity and
• 1:03:37
  inclusion initiatives and publicly funded universities. Under Senate Bill seventeen, Texas universities would
• 1:03:45
  be required to dismantle their d EI offices, programs, and mandatory training.
• 1:03:50
  Hiring practices would also need to be color blind and sex neutral. Remember,
• 1:03:54
  though, this is a government thing, so they can only really affect government
• 1:03:59
  institutions, not things like privately owned companies. State Senator Brandon Creighton, a
• 1:04:05
  Republican and sponsor of the bill, tweeted, quote, the elimination of Diversity,
• 1:04:09
  Equity and Inclusion Offices will result in millions in savings for taxpayers and restoric
• 1:04:15
  culture of free inquiry, meritocracy, equal opportunity, genuine innovation within Texas higher
• 1:04:20
  education and quote. Critics of DI claim that the principles are rooted in Marxism
• 1:04:27
  because they are and are essentially vehicles for left wing radicalists or racialist ideology and
• 1:04:32
  partisan political activism. While Texas universities may need to drop their DI offices soon,
• 1:04:39
  and this isn't a related story, Chick fil A appears to have their
• 1:04:43
  own vice president of DI. While this position's existence is just getting attention on
• 1:04:47
  social media now, Chick fil A has had their own DI vice president since
• 1:04:51
  at least twenty twenty one. Most corporations they were accused of they were accused
• 1:04:58
  of homophobic practice. Yes, not long ago, right, yeah, it
• 1:05:01
  was before twenty twenty one. It was like a while back, I think.
• 1:05:06
  And that well, they're still like considered essentially the devil m And I
• 1:05:12
  don't mean that in a Christian way, because I believe Chick fil as a
• 1:05:15
  Christian company, but like, well the founder was Christian. But I don't
• 1:05:17
  know if it's like didn't they boot him? I don't know, I mean,
• 1:05:24
  but my point is is that I think that the d e I thing
• 1:05:28
  was potentially a way of you know, trying to get better prum because of
• 1:05:33
  the the supposedly the guy donated to you know, I think it was de
• 1:05:39
  donated to charities that were against gay marriage or something like that. Um,
• 1:05:43
  it's not just PR anymore. It's a different initialism. It's COLDSG. Yeah,
• 1:05:48
  in the next paragraph, I'm gonna get to that. Um So.
• 1:05:53
  While Texas Universities may need to drop their d EI offices soon, Chick fil
• 1:05:57
  A appears to have their own vice president of d E. While this position's
• 1:06:00
  existence is just getting attention on social media now, Chick fil A has had
• 1:06:04
  their own DI vice president since at least twenty twenty one. Most large corporations
• 1:06:09
  have some form of DI OR and or EESG, which you guys might know
• 1:06:15
  about ESG, Environmental, social and governance. It's basically what is it called
• 1:06:20
  the social credit score that you get in China. It's the same thing.
• 1:06:25
  But Chick fil A has been generally well respected amongst conservatives due to the company's
• 1:06:29
  religious values until now. In recent weeks, several companies have been punished through
• 1:06:33
  conservative boycotts. You guys probably know bud Light, Target, etc. For
• 1:06:39
  promoting LGBT activism and marketing towards children. Now some are turning their ire towards
• 1:06:46
  Chick fil A. Last week, James Lindsay wrote on Twitter that he agreed
• 1:06:50
  with the boycott calls and made demands. Quote, we must demand that Chick
• 1:06:55
  fil A fire their entire ESG and sustainability staff and partners include DI referring to
• 1:07:01
  the left wing Environmental, Social and Governance framework. Ideally, we get them
• 1:07:05
  to confess how they got caught up in this racket and we return support.
• 1:07:10
  He added, Conservatives might actually be able to pull this one off. Now,
• 1:07:14
  before you guys say anything, there's a couple other things I wanted to
• 1:07:15
  add. EESG Environmental Social and Governance might be an antitrust violation. This was
• 1:07:25
  an opinion piece written for the Wall Street Journal of All Things by Mark Bernovich,
• 1:07:31
  and they said the biggest antitrust violation in history may be in plain sight
• 1:07:36
  Wall Street banks. Because banks are also under ESG that they have to function
• 1:07:42
  under that as well, and money managers are bragging about their coordinated efforts to
• 1:07:46
  choke off investment in energy. It's nearly impossible to raise money to explore for
• 1:07:51
  oil and gas right now, and we may all be experiencing rising energy costs
• 1:07:57
  because of this market manipulation. Russian and Chinese aggression overseas is also exacerbating inflation.
• 1:08:03
  So the ESG thing is a much bigger problem than just like you know,
• 1:08:12
  the hiring practices. It's it's basically being forced in every conceivable way.
• 1:08:18
  Now, if you are in a state or a province that will, um,
• 1:08:24
  you know, do whatever they can to make this like unacceptable, like
• 1:08:29
  make it a law, to ban it or whatever, then you know,
• 1:08:34
  good for you. However, it's not only in the governing the governance aspect,
• 1:08:39
  but it's also in the private sector. And the purpose of this seems
• 1:08:44
  to be so that, you know, like people can use it to make
• 1:08:47
  a lot of money. And here's the thing too about esg and and DI.
• 1:08:51
  The people it's going to hurt the most are small businesses, not giant
• 1:08:56
  corporations. Now it's it's important to boycott, I think at works, and
• 1:09:00
  it's really easy, like just don't eat there, you know, or don't
• 1:09:02
  shop at Target or whatever. Don't buy Middle Light to get the Chinese drink
• 1:09:06
  or whatever it is. Get something else, right, not hard, don't
• 1:09:13
  Yeah, I know there was It's not Chinese, but there was a Brank
• 1:09:17
  Yeah, don't know, a Micael brewery or a local place. Just you
• 1:09:21
  know, just don't just don't buy the product. Maybe quit drinking. I
• 1:09:26
  don't know. But my point is, I'm those things are not difficult to
• 1:09:30
  do, so it's really not a huge deal. And again, it will
• 1:09:34
  hurt small businesses because when you boycott larger businesses, they're just gonna and I'm
• 1:09:40
  not saying it's not useful, so don't don't mistake what I'm saying. But
• 1:09:45
  they're going to survive that because they're gonna be able to go to the state
• 1:09:47
  and say, can you give us some money, give us some bailouts,
• 1:09:50
  and the banks are gonna do the same thing. Um, But the small
• 1:09:54
  businesses, the mom and pop shops, you know, they're not gonna be
• 1:09:57
  able to do that, and so it's gonna it's gonna hurt them. That's
• 1:10:00
  why this has to be fought at every single level and it can't be considered
• 1:10:04
  acceptable. Um. I think the idea of meritocracy itself is a masculine idea.
• 1:10:11
  And this is basically, like, you know, what happens essentially when
• 1:10:15
  this sort of like feminine way of thinking gets into our politics and our our
• 1:10:21
  our products and our companies, you know, And that's what we have to
• 1:10:27
  deal with now. So, uh, Chick fil A, you better do
• 1:10:30
  something because I think you're gonna lose a lot of business. Even though like
• 1:10:33
  they haven't made any overtly woke content yet. Um, but you saw what
• 1:10:39
  happened to bud Light, and I think that's happening to Miller Light because they
• 1:10:43
  made that gross feminist ad and uh and Target so and they're all losing money,
• 1:10:48
  Disney losing money, you know, so anyway it works. Those are
• 1:10:53
  my thoughts. I love how these all these stories we've done tonight sort of
• 1:10:58
  relate to each other sort of chually. And yeah, it's like it's like
• 1:11:01
  it's like poetry, it rhymes. And yeah, I think we fall into
• 1:11:05
  a trap when we speak of banning d EI. You know exactly how these
• 1:11:13
  hypocrites are going to react. How dare you banned things? You can't ban
• 1:11:15
  what we're doing, this is authoritarian. Meanwhile, meanwhile, what is d
• 1:11:20
  EI. It's the practice of banning people along likeophobic lines. It's no white's
• 1:11:28
  allowed, no men allowed, generless they identify as women, and so on
• 1:11:31
  and so forth. And that's that's really where we need to start the argument.
• 1:11:35
  If what we're doing is banning the practice of banning, then we're not
• 1:11:42
  banning. Oh yeah, we're saying you're not allowed to not allow this.
• 1:11:47
  Yeah, I think it's about the words we use. Agree. Yeah,
• 1:11:51
  this in question being genetic demographics that we're banned banning based on nothing but their
• 1:11:59
  genetic This is the opposite of authoritarian. And if the word libertarian might ruffle
• 1:12:05
  your identity politics, folks, go ahead and call it anti authoritarian if you
• 1:12:10
  prefer, Like, is it okay to ban Nazis from your institution? Is
• 1:12:15
  it okay to ban Marxists from your institution? Frankly no, in either case
• 1:12:21
  as far as I'm concerned. They can have whatever beliefs they like. But
• 1:12:26
  if they're just beliefs and not actions based on those beliefs, then by banning
• 1:12:32
  them, all you're doing is persecuting thought crimes. But what we can ban
• 1:12:38
  and should ban and do ban as it happens is the active practice of Nazism.
• 1:12:45
  If there are Nazis who are in your institution actively banning anyone except the
• 1:12:49
  Aryan race on the basis that the Aryan race is best, then we can
• 1:12:56
  go ahead and ban that from happening, because the only thing we're banning is
• 1:13:00
  the banning. If only we could do the same thing with Marxism, and
• 1:13:08
  I mean Marxism. Yeah, you can believe whatever you want. But if
• 1:13:13
  you start banning people based on your delusional perceptions of who they are, based
• 1:13:16
  on their intrinsic properties, then your banning should be banned. But Marxists had
• 1:13:24
  this terribly clever idea of not calling it Marxism. They call it diversity,
• 1:13:30
  equity, and inclusion. They call it emotional social social learning, they call
• 1:13:34
  it environmental social governance. And when all that shit falls through, they will
• 1:13:40
  call it some other euphemistic initialism and they'll get away with it as as long
• 1:13:45
  as at large, we keep giving these left winning extremists the benefit of the
• 1:13:50
  doubt that we would never give to right winning extremists. If a Nazi refers
• 1:13:57
  to their Nazism as merely patriottic, we can tell the difference. It's it's
• 1:14:03
  The difference is when it becomes explicitly racist. What with patriotism having nothing to
• 1:14:11
  do with race, Well, d EI is explicitly racist, Yeah, it
• 1:14:17
  couldn't. It could barely be more explicit in its in its actions, in
• 1:14:21
  its practices. They will claim is not racist because they don't call it racist,
• 1:14:28
  and because they define racism as something that only exists in a in a
• 1:14:32
  one way, one dimensional paradigm where it's impossible to be racist against white people,
• 1:14:39
  and that by definition is an explicitly racist paradigm. So yeah, don't
• 1:14:45
  don't fall for it, folks, the diversity means no white men. Yeah,
• 1:14:51
  that's that's that's what they do. They take the words and change the
• 1:14:56
  meanings to something other than what they normally mean. Yeah, and so,
• 1:15:00
  and don't call it banning when you ban the banhammer. I know, I
• 1:15:04
  know it sounds like a rather squarely paradox, but it's not. It's called
• 1:15:09
  freedom. It's called standing up for freedom, like in principle, don't let
• 1:15:14
  yourself get squirreled out of it through new speak. Friends the ground are so,
• 1:15:20
  Yeah, it's it's it's fair to say that. But at the same
• 1:15:25
  time, if you are prohibiting a policy from being put into place, that's
• 1:15:29
  banning that policy. It's just that these legislators maybe aren't as good at pr
• 1:15:35
  as the bad guys. And I'll call them bad guys because they are basically
• 1:15:41
  Darth Vader there. It's the empire. They're the ones trying to squeeze people's
• 1:15:48
  freedoms away and force conformity and create a universe of all clones um or at
• 1:15:57
  least people who are as much in locks FS clones and when when it comes
• 1:16:03
  down to it, the government's pretty limited in what it has a legal right
• 1:16:09
  to do. But what it can do is tell publicly funded institutions, universities,
• 1:16:17
  department outlets like the Job and Family Services Department, any kind of initiative
• 1:16:26
  that is publicly funded, like if they have a program for summer reading for
• 1:16:30
  kids in poor neighborhoods, all of those they can say, well, all
• 1:16:34
  right, you receive public funds. You and you receive those public funds directly.
• 1:16:41
  It's not other people paying you, like it's not like people taking food
• 1:16:44
  stamps to Walmart to buy groceries. It's you get a check from the government.
• 1:16:48
  You get a direct payment from the government. Therefore, you may not
• 1:16:54
  use in your hiring practices these these policies because they are discrimined, discriminatory.
• 1:17:00
  You may not use in your personnel policies where you determine the boundaries between your
• 1:17:09
  employees and how how they are allowed to treat each other and how they have
• 1:17:13
  to treat each other. You can't use these policies because they are discriminatory.
• 1:17:16
  They take away people's civil rights, and that's fair right, and that's it's
• 1:17:21
  fair to say these policies in these public institutions are banned. Don't get caught
• 1:17:27
  in the trap of people telling you that it's the same as telling a private
• 1:17:34
  university that they cannot have a course on what this is, what this policy
• 1:17:40
  is, the set of policies is, and have debate over it, because
• 1:17:45
  that's not true. It's not the same to say you can't talk about this
• 1:17:49
  as it is to say you can't force this on people using government funds as
• 1:17:55
  as the vehicle of force. It's it's perfectly fair for the government to be
• 1:18:00
  in that. And that's the argument we need to be able to make.
• 1:18:02
  We need to be able to point out to people you're lying. First of
• 1:18:06
  all, when you say that those are the same things that that's what's being
• 1:18:10
  done. This isn't censorship. This is for the prevention of an abuse of
• 1:18:15
  power using government funds. Yep. And you have to directly tell them that
• 1:18:18
  they are lying. You have to say that in front of as many people
• 1:18:21
  as will listen, because if you don't just say you're a liar and this
• 1:18:26
  is a lie, then they'll be able to worm out of it. Called
• 1:18:30
  out that guy that was interviewing him and say you're lying. Yeah, and
• 1:18:33
  the guy was because he was lying and he didn't know what to do after
• 1:18:40
  that. He was just kind of like, yeah, that paralyzed. Yeah,
• 1:18:44
  you know, he didn't he didn't expect that. You know, most
• 1:18:45
  people don't do that. Most people like will will know that they are being
• 1:18:50
  um mistreated in a situation like that, they'll know that they've been um,
• 1:18:56
  that they've been put in a trap, and they'll watch the trap close around
• 1:19:00
  them and they'll watch the the you know, the spikes come down and impale
• 1:19:05
  them, and then they'll be like, that asshole trapped me. But you
• 1:19:11
  know, the reason one of the reasons that guys like Musk are so successful
• 1:19:15
  is because when they see something like that, they absolutely call it out.
• 1:19:19
  They break the rule of politeness. Oh, yes, this person invited me
• 1:19:26
  here to talk. I can't be rude, Yes, you fucking can.
• 1:19:29
  They invited you here under false pretenses. They invited you here to humiliate you.
• 1:19:33
  As soon as you understand that, you can be as rude as you
• 1:19:39
  want in order to protect yourself, and you should. Yeah, And unfortunately,
• 1:19:46
  polite society has become too polite to defend themselves against social predators. And
• 1:19:53
  that is why shit like d EI or I prefer to call it diversity,
• 1:19:59
  inclusion in equity. So therefore it's die die because it is the death of
• 1:20:02
  society is too. Yeah, well, you you're defining diversity as only one
• 1:20:11
  kind of thing. You're defining defining inclusion as exclusion of one particular group of
• 1:20:18
  people, sometimes too men and sometimes whites. Right, that's that's inclusion is
• 1:20:26
  everybody, but these people, these people are excluded. Right. And equity
• 1:20:31
  used to just mean the value of your home, if you were able to
• 1:20:36
  sell it for what it is theoretically worth what the bank thinks it's worth,
• 1:20:42
  that was your equity. Right. The idea of equity as a different type
• 1:20:46
  of equality is completely fake. It's it's as real as unicorns and dragons.
• 1:20:54
  Well, I can't say dragons because technically those exist. They just don't breathe
• 1:20:58
  fire and fly. They they bite you and let you wander around and die
• 1:21:03
  in the hopes that some other dragon gets to eat you. But but there
• 1:21:09
  is real as unicorns, right, that that's it. Yeah. So,
• 1:21:13
  and and if you want society to survive, you have to get rid of
• 1:21:15
  this, and then that's what's happening. I'm glad it's happening. And make
• 1:21:19
  no mistake, right, the primary target for exclusion here is men. It
• 1:21:28
  has It doesn't matter if you're black or white, doesn't matter if you're tall
• 1:21:31
  or short. Right, it's men. Yeah, because they know that men
• 1:21:38
  are the primary obstacle. That's why men are the primary obstacle to communism,
• 1:21:43
  honestly, and men are the primary obstacle to allowing communism to take the mask
• 1:21:51
  off and and just be feudalism, because that's what it really is. There
• 1:21:59
  is always ale in a group like that. There's always somebody who is more
• 1:22:03
  equal than everybody else. There is never an example that the less even you
• 1:22:11
  know, beyond a few weeks or a few months of of UM and even
• 1:22:16
  the one in UM in Washington State, the the the chap or the chairs
• 1:22:29
  or whatever it was called, Oh chas days where the first warlord took it
• 1:22:35
  over. Yeah, okay and started started committing crimes against people that well,
• 1:22:41
  you know, you couldn't do anything about it because the government wasn't in there,
• 1:22:44
  right there, they weren't. They weren't helping anyone. But there were
• 1:22:46
  also no cops, so right, no cops. Yeah. First, people
• 1:22:53
  want they want people unarmed, so they they're against the Second Amendment. They
• 1:22:57
  want to take away our guns, and they don't want us to have what
• 1:23:00
  kind of environment. And Chicago and he was he was running things there for
• 1:23:05
  within within days. And so when you have a situation where they're like,
• 1:23:10
  oh, yeah, we're all gonna be equal, we're all gonna be equal,
• 1:23:13
  what do you get? You get feudalism. Yeah, you get one
• 1:23:15
  person being in charge. Yea. And now that's that's not to say that
• 1:23:18
  you have to have government to prevent that. Like if everybody was allowed to
• 1:23:23
  be armed, if everybody was allowed a chance to defend themselves, to fight
• 1:23:26
  for their freedoms, you wouldn't have that situation, yep, because everybody would
• 1:23:30
  have just as much of power as that guy to take over or not.
• 1:23:34
  And with that many people being able to fight back, nobody can take over,
• 1:23:40
  right yea. But in in that situation, in a in a communist
• 1:23:44
  situation, all you have to have is one person that's like, well,
• 1:23:46
  you know, I know they said no weapons, but fuck that idea.
• 1:23:49
  I'm taken over. And and you now have communist feudalism. Yep. So
• 1:23:56
  yeah, and also it's worth pointing out this di thing. It seems to
• 1:24:00
  me that it's unique to the West. So it because in a country where
• 1:24:03
  there's not really like a significant number of white people, it just doesn't work.
• 1:24:10
  So they're not going to do this in India. They're not gonna do
• 1:24:13
  this in Japan. You know, they're not gonna do this in Saudi Arabia.
• 1:24:16
  I'm sure they wouldn't put up with it anyway. They're not going to
• 1:24:18
  do it in Africa, unless in South Africa. But they will do it
• 1:24:21
  in the UK, they'll do it in Europe, they'll do it in Canada,
• 1:24:25
  they'll do it in the United States. Um, because that's where the
• 1:24:29
  target is. That's that you know, we're the ones living in the countries
• 1:24:31
  that are flourishing and they want some of that, and this is how they
• 1:24:34
  get it, because that's all I come down to. So, well,
• 1:24:36
  they might crack down on white people in those countries, but in that case
• 1:24:42
  it's it's it's technically cenophobia. Yeah yeah, yeah, I guess, so
• 1:24:48
  they can get away with it. And you know, essensibly what nations aren't
• 1:24:53
  going to give a shit because yeah, I mean, all those all those
• 1:24:58
  communities that I that I listed. They may not have like you know,
• 1:25:01
  d I E. Or ESG stuff, but um, they still have feminism
• 1:25:05
  solved. It's there's just a few stuffs behind. That's the universal form of
• 1:25:12
  icophobia. And that's yes, that's why that's why I keep I keep,
• 1:25:15
  I keep beating this drum of ocophobia. And that's why I keep beating this
• 1:25:17
  drum of missengry because missengry is the first kind of icophobia that infects your society
• 1:25:25
  as it becomes more and more decadent. Like you know, and the West
• 1:25:29
  is obviously the most decadent society we've we've had it so we've had it so
• 1:25:33
  easy for so long that we can afford to indulge in in this counterproductive practice
• 1:25:41
  of likecophobia and and and and missengry. And that let this be a lesson
• 1:25:46
  to the rest of the world. I think the rest of the world is
• 1:25:49
  going to learn it long before we do. And it yea when when we
• 1:25:55
  when we finally do, it couldn't possibly come a moment too soon. Yeah,
• 1:26:01
  By the way, ESG is is just straight up feudalism. You realize
• 1:26:09
  it is not your government doing this, right, It's not just your employer
• 1:26:15
  doing this to you. It's not something that was an agreed upon, like
• 1:26:21
  the governments of the world got together and said, you know, we're going
• 1:26:25
  to do this. It's that's bad enough, right, that's bad enough.
• 1:26:30
  But this is a group of just flat out, straight up rich people that
• 1:26:34
  have many of them have generational wealth. That are the financial elites of the
• 1:26:43
  world, whose only power comes from controlling a significant amount of the owned property
• 1:26:53
  and owned financial equity in the world, which equity is based basically imaginary money.
• 1:27:01
  So they control the real wealth and they control the imaginary wealth. It's
• 1:27:06
  why they wanted to get a handle on electronic currency. Electronic currency scared them
• 1:27:15
  when it was you know, digital currency scared them when it was out of
• 1:27:18
  their control. But as they are starting to take control over it now,
• 1:27:23
  they want people to go to it because they control it. They can control
• 1:27:26
  it better than paper money. You can't have access to it, you can't
• 1:27:29
  keep it in your pocket and hand it to whoever you want to. You
• 1:27:32
  have to have the permission of the gatekeepers of the internet, you know,
• 1:27:38
  the gatekeeper of the website, the gatekeeper at the other end, the banks,
• 1:27:41
  so on. So this is literally the kings and queens, princes and
• 1:27:47
  princesses of the financial world using control over that real and imaginary property to control
• 1:28:00
  the behavior of the serfs. And what they have done by doing this,
• 1:28:04
  bypassing elected elected governments, is to make the politicians the serfs in charge of
• 1:28:13
  the serfs. They're there. They're now the um taskmasters, right, the
• 1:28:18
  gauliders, the lords and ladies, the people that really don't have any power
• 1:28:26
  their own, but they do have the power to punish you for disobeying.
• 1:28:30
  Hmm. They're gonna get a little bit cushier lives than the rest of us.
• 1:28:36
  Right, That's basically where we are headed with this um the system unless
• 1:28:44
  the public takes control by refusing to consume. Yes, Well, and there's
• 1:28:50
  the big challenge, because this is the thing, like, the problem is
• 1:28:57
  is and it's very simple. It's women. The problem is women because women
• 1:29:02
  are the largest consumers. Women buy the most crap. Women don't care what
• 1:29:08
  you know, this or that company is actually doing. They care about what
• 1:29:13
  it looks like they're they're presenting. Women are the ones that are going to
• 1:29:15
  be buying the LGBT trans stuff at target. Women are going to be the
• 1:29:19
  ones that are going to be pouring money into it because they spend more money
• 1:29:23
  than men, and they also have more money spent on them than men.
• 1:29:27
  So unless women reign in their consumerism, this might not be a big enough
• 1:29:32
  of a change. And that I'm sorry, it's true. It's women.
• 1:29:36
  They're the problem. It is. So if you, if you got a
• 1:29:40
  daughter, one of the best things that you can do for the future economy
• 1:29:44
  is to teach her early on, way early on, that a practicality is
• 1:29:51
  way more important than how she looks. And that includes practicality of movement,
• 1:29:58
  practicality of storage, being warm enough in cold weather and cool enough in warm
• 1:30:02
  weather, and all those things right, and be that clothing that's uncomfortable,
• 1:30:10
  and spending all that time putting on makeup and doing her hair and all that
• 1:30:14
  shit is wasting half of her life, if not more, she learns that
• 1:30:18
  before she gets out of school, the whole rest of her life is going
• 1:30:23
  to be significantly easier. I cannot emphasize how grateful I am for my allergies
• 1:30:31
  every time I think about that, because I didn't get a choice. By
• 1:30:35
  the time I was in junior high school, there was one kind of makeup
• 1:30:40
  on the market that I could wear like when I was on stage and choir
• 1:30:44
  and stuff, I could have visible eyelashes and visible lips and stuff. And
• 1:30:48
  after by the time I got out of high school, I was using food
• 1:30:50
  coloring so everybody could tell I had lips when I was singing. And that
• 1:30:56
  meant the rest of the time, if I didn't have to do something to
• 1:31:00
  be visible from on stage, I'm not wearing makeup. You can't pay me
• 1:31:03
  to wear that shit like you couldn't if you someone said I'll pay you ten
• 1:31:08
  thousand dollars to advertise our lipstick, I'd be like, I'm sorry, I
• 1:31:12
  don't like you know, having hives not going to happen. And I have
• 1:31:16
  saved hundreds of dollars a year, thousands maybe some women spend three hundred bucks
• 1:31:23
  a month on makeup. When I read that, I was freaked out.
• 1:31:27
  Saved quite a bit of money on all the other hair products and skin products
• 1:31:30
  and stuff that women have to use. Because makeup damage is your skin.
• 1:31:34
  Even the best makeup damage is your skin. It and it made me more
• 1:31:40
  conscious of the price of clothing and everything else. If every girl was raised
• 1:31:45
  with that mentality, you would get rid of a lot of pollution, a
• 1:31:51
  lot of the things that these environmental organizations complain about, right, And you
• 1:32:00
  would also women would save a shitload of money, and your credit card bills
• 1:32:05
  would not be so high. Yeah, like the husband ends up paying for
• 1:32:11
  all of that. You know, the father pays for that when she's a
• 1:32:15
  kid, and the husband pays for it when she's an adult. It would
• 1:32:17
  save men a lot of labor, and it would get rid of some dangerous
• 1:32:23
  jobs too that really nobody should be doing. Yeah, it's as like I
• 1:32:29
  was saying the other week about the difference between a soft narcissist and a hard
• 1:32:32
  narcissist, Like one of these things is an actual medical condition, the other
• 1:32:36
  is really just a description of a personality default. It seems most women,
• 1:32:45
  by default are soft narcissists. And I'll go ahead and say, by contrast,
• 1:32:51
  most men a soft artists, but that that doesn't affect the economy in
• 1:32:57
  the same way. It's the but a soft narcissist, if if left to
• 1:33:02
  their own devices, will eventually become a hard narcissist to the point where they
• 1:33:08
  can't think any other way. They will they will just keep grinding away at
• 1:33:12
  this road until they're at the point where where where they will keep doing it
• 1:33:17
  to their own detriment. They will kill themselves with their hard narcissism. And
• 1:33:24
  so it's up to you as parents to teach your daughters or your your a
• 1:33:30
  parance. Isn't that fucking important? I know it seems like it, especially
• 1:33:32
  when when you're a child, especially when you're a teenager. You just need
• 1:33:36
  to knock some sense into them, not literally, not with actual violence,
• 1:33:41
  in micro some some kind of discipline needs to happen to prevent your soft narcissist
• 1:33:49
  daughters from becoming hard narcissist women. Who who who will become the death of
• 1:33:55
  society. So I don't know, I don't know how you do it.
• 1:33:59
  That's up to you as a pair. I'm not pay so I can't let
• 1:34:00
  you whatever you know it, do something at the very least, like just
• 1:34:05
  women should just not allow themselves to be manipulated because they're they're you know,
• 1:34:13
  when they're when they're shopping at Target in the pride section. I think that
• 1:34:19
  the narcissists. So maybe not all women. Maybe a lot of women are
• 1:34:24
  boycotting it, but but there are some that are, Like, you know,
• 1:34:27
  I want everyone to know how much. I support the LGBTQ community,
• 1:34:32
  so I'm gonna buy products from here. Right, It's not even about anything
• 1:34:36
  real. It's probably gonna end up in the trash at the end of June.
• 1:34:40
  You know us Rush Limbaugh hit hit that with the perfect sketch. Well,
• 1:34:45
  it wasn't really a sketch. He just did it. It was just
• 1:34:47
  a thing he did. And he had a television show for like three years,
• 1:34:54
  and he quit doing it because the networks relegated him to like three o'clock
• 1:34:58
  in the morning in order to you know, like pretty much smash the show.
• 1:35:03
  Um. I kind of wish that that, uh, the the YouTube
• 1:35:10
  slash internet video age had started sooner, because I think he probably would have
• 1:35:15
  been the biggest. But he did this um segment where he he came on
• 1:35:20
  and he had like six different colors of ribbons on his on his lapel um
• 1:35:26
  and and started out, I care more than you, and and then he
• 1:35:31
  did this whole thing about you know, yeah, you maybe you have a
• 1:35:34
  ribbon on your your clothing, but I have all six colors here of these
• 1:35:40
  these different types of and this one's for this, and this one's for that.
• 1:35:43
  You know, I have my my different and and that was the point
• 1:35:48
  obviously, being that all that it did was you know, you're showing support.
• 1:35:53
  Yeah, but what are you accomplishing if if there's a whole room full
• 1:35:58
  of people and all of them have AIDS ribbons, does that mean that less
• 1:36:03
  people are going to die from AIDS? I'm reminded of the Seinfeld sketch and
• 1:36:10
  yeah, and I think, um, I think there are other people that
• 1:36:14
  that picked up on that and did similar like ridicule. Where it really hit
• 1:36:18
  me was of course, first when Rush did that, and then the other
• 1:36:21
  one was I was fairly new, I think at the time on Facebook,
• 1:36:27
  and I like, I had connected with all my friends and family and somebody
• 1:36:30
  sent me this stupid um breast cancer awareness thing. Yeah, you know,
• 1:36:38
  don't tell anybody what. Yeah, I had no idea that you could get
• 1:36:45
  cancer in your tits. It was terrifying, like they know no, but
• 1:36:50
  no, Um, I get this inbox from somebody, this message in my
• 1:36:56
  inbox from somebody in the post where you like to hang year purse, say
• 1:37:01
  I like it, and then finish with that description and then don't tell anybody
• 1:37:06
  what it's for, so that when they ask you, you can say it's
• 1:37:09
  for breast cancer awareness. I'm like, okay, but then what, you
• 1:37:15
  know, where do I tell them to donate? What else? That's it,
• 1:37:17
  that's the whole thing. And I'm like, I don't send me this
• 1:37:21
  stuff because the previous year they've done that with what color is your bra?
• 1:37:27
  And I'm like, I can't participate? Why not? Well I don't have
• 1:37:34
  a color of bra. Well is it just white? No? You know,
• 1:37:42
  like back then, I was barely an a cup, I didn't wear
• 1:37:45
  a bra. Why would I do that? You know? So I couldn't
• 1:37:48
  post a color. There was no color. She's like, we'll just make
• 1:37:51
  one up. Um. But this this pissed me off because I had already
• 1:37:56
  said, don't send me this ship. There isn't anything. Tell me where
• 1:37:58
  to do a marcherus something to like the March of Dimes where you get money
• 1:38:02
  for marching and then you give it to this organization and they pay for research
• 1:38:05
  or something. Don't do that shit. I don't do that shit. And
• 1:38:10
  I get it back again, you know, I'm like, I got it
• 1:38:12
  from like six or seven people eventually, and I finally got fed up,
• 1:38:15
  so I posted on my profile page, I like it hanging from the rocking
• 1:38:24
  chair in the living room in front of the window where everyone can see.
• 1:38:31
  That was the end of that. Nobody ever sent me another one of those
• 1:38:33
  things again. But that's women do that, Like it's absolutely meaningless gestures to
• 1:38:43
  feel like they've done something. But then they will spend hundreds of dollars on
• 1:38:47
  cotton clothing, like all cotton clothing that's dyed funky colors, not considering the
• 1:38:54
  fact that they're doing significant damage to the water supply in some foreign country where
• 1:39:00
  the dying is done. And like just to grow a single T shirt,
• 1:39:06
  the cotton that goes into a single T shirt takes like a year's supply of
• 1:39:11
  water for one person. Yeah, it's just insane, But you know,
• 1:39:15
  they won't vote for politicians that will take the regulations off of an alternative fiber
• 1:39:24
  for clothing that is non allergenic or hypoallergenic at least and it looks lovely without
• 1:39:32
  ever having any die added to it because they're afraid of Mary Jane. Yeah,
• 1:39:41
  Mary Jane's more popular than they are, right, That's that's women in
• 1:39:44
  a nutshell. Yeah, I know, I know. It's more important to
• 1:39:47
  be seen as virtuous than actually be virtuous. Um, okay, So we
• 1:39:54
  gotta move on to the last story. This has become a longer sauceage than
• 1:39:56
  I expected. But I do have a couple of super chat so agree as
• 1:40:00
  Charles sent us too. And I think the second one is a correction on
• 1:40:04
  the first one, So if it's okay with you, Charles, I'll just
• 1:40:08
  read it once as a corrected version. So he gives a seven dollars total
• 1:40:14
  and says everyone else in the fast food space is worse than Chick fil A.
• 1:40:17
  Choosing them for a boycott of all the fast food places is drooling idiocy.
• 1:40:24
  All I will say is that maybe you don't You shouldn't need any fast
• 1:40:28
  food place, and you should just like go to like a small business if
• 1:40:31
  you really want some fast food, like a little greasy. Took your own
• 1:40:38
  point to make about this, of course, go ahead, and I'll try
• 1:40:41
  to make it as brief as I can. But here's the thing. Right,
• 1:40:44
  you already know McDonald's is all in for this. Right, you already
• 1:40:48
  know Burger Kings all in for this. You already know Windys, they're all
• 1:40:50
  in for all the big places that are big corporations, international corporations that have
• 1:40:56
  been for a long time all in for this because it gives them more of
• 1:41:00
  a leg up financially over companies that aren't. Because the big banks, the
• 1:41:08
  the financial elites, the kings and queens of finance are are doing it already,
• 1:41:13
  They've been doing it for years. This is this is established, okay.
• 1:41:18
  Whereas Chick fil A was not. They were a holdout, and they
• 1:41:26
  were liked because they were a holdout. It's fair if they capitulate, if
• 1:41:32
  they cave, to turn around and say, you know what, you caved,
• 1:41:35
  we're abandoning you. Fuck off, we don't. We don't care about
• 1:41:39
  your company anymore. We're done. Because they were getting people were were using
• 1:41:45
  them as an example. Look, I have Chick fil A. I'm I'm
• 1:41:47
  virtue signaling because I'm supporting the company that is a holdout. Now they're not
• 1:41:51
  a holdout. That support deserves to be withdrawn. And I can't really boycot
• 1:41:57
  them because of eating out does is not a thing that we do very much.
• 1:42:00
  So there you go. Yeah, I mean, like, you know,
• 1:42:03
  do your best, but like sometimes I understand it can't be helped.
• 1:42:08
  But as long as you're like you know and and and you can do whatever
• 1:42:12
  you want. I'm not telling you who to boycott. Um, I won't.
• 1:42:15
  I won't do that. I mean, I know that it's easy for
• 1:42:18
  me to do because I mostly cook my own food or Lindsay cooks it.
• 1:42:23
  Um, so I'm but yeah, I mean, if it's not something you
• 1:42:26
  can do, then whatever, that's fine. When you got food allergies,
• 1:42:30
  fast food becomes a challenge. Yeah, Hey, I don't know, Like,
• 1:42:33
  well anyway, just uh, if you have suggestions on places for people
• 1:42:40
  who they just can't not do that, maybe leave us a comment. So
• 1:42:45
  I gotta move on to the final story because we're a little over and I
• 1:42:47
  think this is good news, so I have to share it. Wait,
• 1:42:54
  my bad, guys, Sorry about that. Okay. So, last year,
• 1:43:00
  Kentucky passed America's first shared parenting law. Now the Administrative Office of the
• 1:43:04
  Courts has issued report that the law is as effective as it is popular.
• 1:43:11
  The law created a starting point that both parents have equal child custody time if
• 1:43:15
  the parents are fit caregivers. Kentucky's family court caseload and domestic violence cases have
• 1:43:20
  been rising, but in early July twenty seventeen, that trend abruptly stopped,
• 1:43:27
  and family court cases and domestic violence filings began declining. Why, according to
• 1:43:32
  the Courier Journal, July twenty seventeen, is when Kentucky implemented a partial version
• 1:43:38
  of this shared parenting law. The next July, Kentucky's in full blown shared
• 1:43:43
  parenting law took effect, and the family court caseload and domestic violence filings dropped
• 1:43:48
  even further. This is despite Kentucky's growing population. And this is a quote
• 1:43:55
  from the article Shared Parenting. Supporter and president of Parental Alienation in Kentucky,
• 1:44:01
  Alexandria Beckman said, quote, it's common sense that shared parenting laws less in
• 1:44:06
  parental conflict. As a domestic violence survivor who speaks with alienated mothers every day,
• 1:44:13
  I can personally state that Kentucky's shared parenting law is lessening domestic violence.
• 1:44:16
  And quote Family Court judge and Child Support Commission chair Luscinda Masterson stated a similar
• 1:44:24
  opinion about parental fighting in general. Quote We've got we've had a lot fewer
• 1:44:29
  since the shared parenting statute. We've had a lot fewer disagreements about parenting time
• 1:44:34
  and quote so kind of a good news, a white pill, as it
• 1:44:40
  were. I got three points to make on this and I'm gonna keep it
• 1:44:45
  really brief because I'm I've been working on a video on the importance of shared
• 1:44:53
  parenting and discouraging divorce, both things, so I'm not gonna I'm not gonna
• 1:44:58
  go overwhere in this. But the first thing is it is in the state's
• 1:45:01
  best interest to have shared parenting because it makes it easier for both parents to
• 1:45:10
  earn the financial support their family needs. It is in the child's best interest
• 1:45:16
  to have shared parenting because the child's outcomes from the mentorship of both parents and
• 1:45:24
  having that relationship and that love from both parents at like every single bit of
• 1:45:30
  the outcomes the child has from being raised by an adult are improved with two
• 1:45:36
  parents rather than just one parent. And it's a bigger detriment to time with
• 1:45:44
  the father than it is to lose time with the mother. And when they
• 1:45:47
  don't have shared parenting and divorces just encouraged out the wazoo, it's usually the
• 1:45:53
  father that gets taken away from the child. And it is good in different
• 1:45:56
  ways for both parents because the father loses loses out quite a bit when they
• 1:46:01
  lose their relationship with their child. It makes them suicidal, makes them despondent,
• 1:46:10
  it destroys uh quite a bit of their psychology. Uh, their their
• 1:46:15
  psychological health. And the mother becomes an entirely different person when she's trying to
• 1:46:21
  control the father, and it just you lose yourself trying to control another person.
• 1:46:30
  So this is good for everybody. But I'm gonna I'm gonna actually make
• 1:46:33
  a longer video on this, so I'm not going to take up a bunch
• 1:46:36
  of show time on it. Okay, random caam, do you have any
• 1:46:42
  thoughts? Uh? No, I haven't written anything down. Okay, that's
• 1:46:48
  fine. I know that's fine. I think it's good because because the sausage
• 1:46:55
  has gone a long already. Yeah, it's yeah, We're we're over on
• 1:46:58
  sausage. So all I will say is this is good news, and I
• 1:47:03
  hope that we can use it as president for similar sort of like you know,
• 1:47:10
  similar laws in other states and even other countries hopefully. So let us
• 1:47:16
  know what you guys think about this in the comments. Is it good news
• 1:47:20
  to you too? So we have a couple of super chats and then we're
• 1:47:24
  gonna wrap it up and go into the Patron Show. We're going to be
• 1:47:27
  looking at the guy who tried foreskin facial cream, So that should be interesting.
• 1:47:32
  Yeah, land Rea, I think that's how you say it. Or
• 1:47:36
  land Ray gives us twenty dollars and says, hello, folks, I'm still
• 1:47:41
  having trouble with my Badger account. Haven't been able to subscribe to a monthly
• 1:47:44
  contribution. Send an email to Allison really love you guys, and miss not
• 1:47:47
  having another ICMI since twenty nineteen. I'll remind her. I mean Allison handled
• 1:47:53
  all that stuff. I'm not really involved with. It was somebody going to
• 1:47:56
  say something, Well, we still could, I mean if we schedule it
• 1:48:00
  for August. That gives us. Oh, yes, I know that there
• 1:48:02
  is one in the works. Um that because uh Save Indian Family Foundation actually
• 1:48:10
  messaged me about it so on Twitter. So i'll it's I think it's going
• 1:48:15
  to be an India this year. Oh yeah, I'm going to India.
• 1:48:19
  FU India. No. My problem is it doesn't matter where it's going to
• 1:48:24
  be this year. I'm not having serious health problems, but I'm having health
• 1:48:29
  problems and I'm not traveling this year. I'm not sure about next year.
• 1:48:33
  So when I say fuck India, I don't mean the country all the people.
• 1:48:36
  I mean the fucking diseases that we get just from drinking the water.
• 1:48:40
  That yeah, right, but there Actually I said this, I was hoping
• 1:48:48
  for one to be there, and now that there's going to be one there,
• 1:48:53
  like I unless something changes dramatically, um with me, I'm not gonna
• 1:49:00
  be traveling. So if there's one in the USA Canada, then this is
• 1:49:06
  not I don't want people to worry. This isn't something to worry about.
• 1:49:10
  This is just something I have to deal with right now. Sure, but
• 1:49:13
  yeah, in all likelihood that probably won't. Yeah, it's probably if if
• 1:49:18
  it's gonna be in India, it's probably gonna be. Like that's kind of
• 1:49:21
  a big ask from us. We don't I don't really have the money to
• 1:49:25
  do that, so but but you know, maybe we'll have another one in
• 1:49:28
  the future. Um. All right, but anyway, thank you for the
• 1:49:30
  super chat land Ray. Now we got one more from Solomon Grundy for ten
• 1:49:34
  dollars and he says, let's go ky represent Kentucky. That is yes,
• 1:49:41
  Kentucky. Um all right. So with all that said, we're gonna do
• 1:49:45
  the after show. Now this was a long sausage, um, and we're
• 1:49:49
  gonna head out. So if you want to join us again, go to
• 1:49:51
  feed the badget dot com. Set up a monthly subscription and hopefully it will
• 1:49:56
  work and you'll be able to join us otherwise. If you want to support
• 1:49:59
  us, remember the fundraiser is almost over. We're hoping that we can get
• 1:50:02
  across the finish line there before too long, and that is feedabadger dot com
• 1:50:08
  forward slash support to help us out there. All right, with all that
• 1:50:13
  out of the way, let's go into the after show. So if you
• 1:50:15
  guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe. If you're not already
• 1:50:16
  subscribe, hit the BELF notification, leave as a comment, let us know
• 1:50:18
  what you guys think about what we discussed on the show today, and please
• 1:50:21
  please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much
• 1:50:26
  for coming on today's episode of HBr News and we will talk to you all
• 1:50:30
  in the next video.