Latest / The Aaron Day Show / Who Controls the Senate? Live Results Tonight

Transcript

Who Controls the Senate? Live Results Tonight · The Aaron Day Show

• there hold on there we go got a whole new set up can you hear me yeah all right we got it going so we've got a whole whole new set up tonight for season three episode 28 this is the special edition as you can see on the screen there's a whole new setup so I'm basically putting my AI skills to work to try to basically recreate kind of how a news desk works so you're gonna see tonight hopefully if all works well you're actually to see real-time results come in on these races especially with a focus on the races that we're the most interested in which are these u.s senate races plus we're going to have a number of guests today so we have ernie hancock is is our co-host tonight um the uh the absolute og working on all things political and liberty whether it's it's Ron Paul coming up with the Levolution logo or running for office himself, getting 7% against John McCain, to winning in court, to building an off-the-grid community. And basically, actually, I just saw, well, I think it was last week that Cato has now listed that Arizona is the freest state in the country, surpassing New Hampshire for the first time, at least in a while. i my guess is that has quite a bit ernie has quite a bit to do with uh with that um we also though this is going to be this show is really uh taking a taking on a life of its own we're going to have many guests tonight and then so i'm going to list off some of the guests and i'm going to kind of set the stage for why we're here and why we're doing this because this is not you know a political pundit show where people just sit around and talk about the election and which party is going to you know i'm going to solve all of our problems this is a much different approach but we're going to have we're going to be talking about essentially the fact that the real battle that we're facing right now is republican versus democrat it is a fundamental fight for free will itself our ability to make our own decisions control our own actions control our own emotions versus technocracy which is a political ideology that says we're too stupid to make our own decisions we need scientists engineers and increasingly ai to make decisions for us and this is an ideology that goes back to the 1930s this has been a plan decades and decades into making and now there is the technology and critical pieces have been put in place to make this happen so if you wanted to say well that sounds outrageous you know they could never do that they've already built the pieces and if you want to look at some of the elements of technocracy you have digital programmable currencies like cbdc or stable coins you have ai surveillance you have with palantir you have digital ids like real id you have a carbon credit system which is essentially what they're moving towards which when you see elon musk say in the future you're not going to need money it's going to be based on energy that is technocracy that is actually one of the founding principles of technocracy so So this is the real battle. And to me, this election, the reason I'm involved in this is for the last four years, I've been warning people about technocracy and trying to promote alternatives, suggesting that we should exit the system and build our own decentralized alternatives. But in the process, and in particular, which was surprising to a lot of people, people thought when Trump won in 2024 that we were actually going to stop the globalists stop Klaus Schwab stop you know UN agenda 2030 we were going to be America first we were going to focus on our own sovereignty and the constitution and all of those things and people are now learning that that in fact is not what happened and in fact you know agenda 2030 is coming by 2028 we have basically technocracy without friction. Palantir is now connected to the IRS, to healthcare systems, other databases. You have the Genius Act, which is a stablecoin bill, which is a backdoor CBDC. They tried to patch Clarity Act, which would take everything that we own and tokenize it and make it something that the government can control centrally. So we've been essentially moving at warp speed towards technocracy. And I realized a while back that we need to exit and build, but we also need to obstruct the system because at the rate at which technocracy was expanding, we pretty much were going to be out of options. And so one way to do that is gridlock. And so we need a check on Trump and we need the opportunity to slow this down. And I think also if you change the composition of the Congress in particular, if the democrats captured the senate um you're going to see articles of impeachment and part of the articles of impeachment are going to expose the technocracy they're going to expose trump and his family and his cabinet and others close to him directly profiting from it and so that's a really good thing and so i started out i formed a super PAC that's a longer story i'll get into this but long story short there's been a concentrated effort to use the third party candidates to basically change the outcome in some of these senate races so that we can get to gridlock and get to the point where we can expose this technology to so tonight we're going to have patrick wood on actually at 6 20 who is the godfather of technocracy he's literally written he knows more about this than anyone he's been covering it for decades written several books that has a website technocracy.news so he's going to come on and talk about this technocracy perspective. We have some folks from the Free State Project coming on, who's the current executive director. To talk about this, we're going to have some of the candidates themselves that we supported in this race. So we're gonna have, and this is, Ernie knows that Bill Redpath from Ohio, a Bernie for US Senate, is gonna come on. We're gonna have Carla Garrick, who I've known for almost 20 years, who basically led the Free State Project for for almost two decades so she's going to come on and talk about some of these things we're going to have mike adams come on and discuss this election he's from texas but to discuss you know the election from the perspective of technocracy and probably from an ai filter as well we're going to have chris martinson come on founder of peak prosperity jeff wadwin who is the libertarian candidate for u.s senate from arkansas edla plant who we supported for u.s senate in new hampshire uh Thomas Laehn this is actually not confirmed yet but there's some others that might come on as well including the candidates from iowa minnesota and others and then ted brown from texas the u.s senate candidate there so it's going to be a jam-packed show and so all of this is going to be going on while the returns are coming in so i encourage you to uh like share them and get this out to as many people as possible and the reason why is you can obviously watch election results anywhere in terms of you know who won but our perspective on this is going to be from the perspective of what does this mean in terms of human freedom liberty the fight against technocracy and how we can use third parties and other unconventional techniques to obstruct these technocrats from basically stripping us of our free will and that is something i guarantee you're not going to find on any other election night podcast so anyway that was a bit of a month long So how are you doing? I'm sorry? How are you doing? Sorry, there's a bit of a monologue there. No, no, I'm good. I'm good. I coughed right when you said something. Yeah, just a correction. The 8% that I got was for a statewide race for Secretary of State against the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House. So that sent him into tizzy. When I ran against McCain, I think I got like 4%. So it's in Arizona. We are activism throughout the 90s and early 2000s made it to where they couldn't ignore us. I mean, it was we participated in all the debates, you know, a lot of editorial board stuff and and everything. So we did well enough that in the late 90s, the Wall Street Journal's call in Arizona, the libertarian state, you know, for a while. and but you have like a two by four with 50 nails in it and then the one that gets hit is the one that's sticking up the most so you know here comes sheriff arpaio and here comes janet napolitano and all the you know machinations with the election laws and so on which i had federal suits on and that's how a lot of people know the issues and though me was because of our activism The activism is what you say made Arizona libertarian. It was by us doing a lot of the work that educated people. That's why I'm so supportive of what you're doing, because this is activism. This isn't, you know, I'm sure like Bill Redpath, you know, is always wanting to run to win. You know, and my perspective, my perspective is the more important thing is you can run the win, but win what? And for me, I don't believe the election. I'm Maricopa County. We're international news here. I knew how corrupt they were a long time ago. So it's it's a battle for the mind. It is an opinion, general public opinion that you even want freedom. What happened in all our races, and we'd fill the ballot up and do, and of course, they have to change laws and so on. But what happened was, it was by just general public opinion in the people, and they could see how popular it was on the campaign trail, the town halls, the meetings, you know, all of the forums and so on, debates. you know the crowd the libertarian message the freedom message you know standing ovations i mean and they see this so the next election cycle two years later well all these congressmen all of this all of this same the same you know where we were getting the response but but but i know you know you can't trust whatever happens tonight the government's government's going to win, but we have to change minds. And what you're doing is making it very clear that if you make a clear decision for not supporting whatever it is that they're doing, that's a voting block. Yep, indeed it is. And I actually think that people are going to be surprised at what happens tonight. I don't know what your predictions are. I mean, I've actually stated I actually think the Democrats are going to win 54-46 on this. I think it's going to be an absolute bloodbath. I could be wrong on that, but I've been watching, obviously, very closely the polls, and I suspect several of the candidates that we support are going to be the margin here. I mean, it's definitely looking that way, possibly in Texas, Iowa, Kansas. I ended up expanding a bit. We went from four candidates to six to eight to 11. So, you know, we're now supporting Dan J. Sullivan in Alaska, who's a guy who has the same name as the guy who's the sitting senator, and Daniel S. Sullivan. And it looks like he's pulling at about 3%, which is more than the margin in that state. I'm also supporting Wadlin in Arkansas this one's kind of a long shot but he's running against Tom Cotton who is one of the biggest warmongers in the U.S. Senate and so he's a quality candidate he'll actually be on tonight so that was a recent addition as well and we're also supporting Dan Osborne who's an independent running in Nebraska against a guy Pete Ricketts who really is another example of the swamp. I mean, Ricketts' father's a billionaire. It's another one of these nepotistic situations where the guy is a complete technocrat, bought the seat. And so it's a long shot because actually the guy that we're supporting is an independent candidate who is, it's neck and neck. I mean, latest polls today, our guy might actually win. In most cases, we're supporting third parties that are hopefully going to be the margin that tips it one way or the other. In that case, that guy might actually. So you never know how these polls work. I mean, the polls could be completely inaccurate. But my sense is, talking to people, that it turns out what the big issue ends up being here at the end is obviously nobody can afford anything, whether it's gas, food, healthcare, or anything else. But they look at that and then they compare it to Trump, whose net worth has tripled just since the second term. And so the two big issues that are emerging are actually corruption and billionaires that are basically buying government. And so states that have been red for forever, like Kansas, are in play because these are states that are facing $6 diesel or have been more negatively impacted by tariffs than other states. And so this could be a wild night. And I just think that Trump's popularity is he is now the least popular president running for reelection in a second term. in fact i think he's no he's not he said that he's not he's the most popular everybody should love him he because he said yeah exactly you know of course he's saying it's all it's all fake news but but the truth is that i mean talk about being tone deaf i just saw today that um they decided that he's going to cut off four billion dollars of aid to israel this was decided like an hour ago it's kind of like you know first of all that's pretty desperate and and of course the punchline is going to be we're cutting four billion dollars in aid because we're going to give them 40 billion dollars in aid i'm sure he he you're gonna have to wait until after the election to hear the the second part of the statement but i mean to come out with that on election day um i i don't think that's gonna gonna move the needle so i i do think it's gonna be a bloodbath and again my point with this because people do not understand this they're like oh does that mean you think the democrats are better no there's no there isn't really any difference between the two of them however what we need is gridlock we just need to buy time we're not going to fix government but we need to buy time and if republicans retained complete control uh you know musk and teal would end up owning this the government by the end of the trump second term i mean just outright from a data perspective and complete infiltration with government top-down regulations for ai that it benefit only them? I mean, it really is. We'll figure out how the flow of this is going to work, but I've got some slides and some information on that. And this is stuff that I've been talking about for years, but people have an incorrect understanding of Elon Musk. People think that he saved free speech and all these other things, which I can tell you, buying ads. So part of what we've done as a pack is I created like 250 ads, commercials, music videos, the whole nine yards. And then I would run tests and see which ones work and then paired it down to like 30 to 40 and then targeted those in each of the states. Well, lo and behold, did you know as much as Elon Musk has talked about this sometimes, I can't run a political ad that has Howard Lutnick's picture in it. I can't run an ad that talks about Jeffrey Epstein or has a picture of Jeffrey Epstein. Now, I've got to be honest with you. You should be able to talk about this. This is a pretty significant issue. And at some point, Elon Musk had even called out. He said, oh, well, Trump is in the Epstein files and more to come or whatever. And then he deleted that tweet. I suspect he might have gotten threatened with a lawsuit for defamation or something. I I don't know what happened, but now I can't run ads talking about this. And of course, this has been a key part of my issue on this has been, you've got to free these crypto prisoners. If you're going to drain the swamp, you need to start with Howard Lutnick. You need to get out of the war. And then stopping the Clarity Act was the fourth of my top priorities. You could have 100 priorities, but I started with a manageable list. And the Clarity Act didn't happen. And ironically, it's not because of anything that I did. It's because Trump's involvement with direct crypto corruption, they wanted to put in something into the Clarity Act to basically add an ethics element to the bill, which would impact Trump. And so that's actually what killed the Clarity Act is Trump did not want that. And so that's the only reason the Clarity Act didn't pass. And so there are issues here. And I hope we get a lot of people watching tonight and then watching the clips after the fact. Because people really need to start looking at what's going on here from the standpoint of these technocrats are coming for our free will. This is no joke. That is, they don't want us making our own thoughts. This moves into transhumanism. And it's a completely materialistic view where the end game of this is just, you know, we're integrating with machines and it's completely and totally controlled from the top down. That is not an understatement. And Elon Musk, his grandfather was involved with the technocrat party. Musk has stated that he wants Mars to be a technocracy. And I'll see online because, of course, whether you follow him or not, you're going to find his posts. They're going to work their way into the algorithm. And so there are all these people celebrating this. And he says, well, there's going to be no money in the future. It's all going to be based on energy. People are like, yeah, that sounds great. And then if you study the history of technocracy, you'll understand that that's not great. That is a way of creating a new artificial currency that will be controlled from the top down. And the control of those energy credits will be tied to your social credit score, will be tied to AI surveillance. So if you're looking at this and say, well, this is great, I don't know why you would think that it's necessarily great that we would have this new energy credit-based system. understand the whole design of technocracy is around an energy credit-based system. And it is a control system by design as part of the political ideology. So I hope more and more people learn about that tonight and wake up. The other thing that is interesting about what's going on tonight is, I'll tell you, I'm the most excited about what's going on in Texas for a whole variety of reasons. I mean, we've got a good candidate there, Ted Brown, who, as I said, will be on later tonight. But Elon Musk put $200 million into the race supporting Ken Paxton. In fact, Elon Musk has now donated more to political candidates and PACs than George Soros. He's actually eclipsed George Soros. So I'm not going to defend George Soros, but I'm saying the fact that he's done that in just the span of two or three years is pretty mind boggling. But even still, even with all of that money, his guy is still losing. Now, why would he care about Ken Paxton? Why would he support Greg Abbott? Remember, he moved from California to Texas, and he has $6 billion plus worth of government contracts. He's trying to buy land. He's trying to buy and own towns in Texas. And so if he loses here, he's going to be in trouble because it's not only that he's going to be slowed down in terms of what he's doing. Some of his activities are going to be investigated. You're going to find that Doge was not about cost savings. There was likely a pretty egregious violation of our privacy rights that happened as a result of... It's all about database. It's all about database. and he wants it. He wants to continue to expand it and he probably did it anyway. So he's in trouble. And I think when Patrick Wood comes on, it'll be interesting to hear his perspective. But again, my prediction is the Democrats are going to win the Senate. They're going to win the House. And I know some people I talked to about, they think that it's theater and it's all planned. But I don't think Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, who's already fled to Argentina, are actually literally rooting for this. At this point, I think that they thought they had a fast track to completely take over, which they were executing on. And now they're going to find out that they're going to have some explaining to do. And the one thing that I will say about the Democrats, because it's really hard to find anything good to say, is they will actually investigate these people. I mean, unlike Trump, who said, you know, lock her up and all the stuff that he was going to do. He really has done nothing. He's done absolutely nothing. I got a comment here I don't see that there is a difference When the Democrats Should they get control of the House, the Senate You know, Trump always I'm going to veto everything and all that kind of stuff No, he's not He's going to work with them They're going to do There's no difference enough They're not going to eliminate the Federal Reserve They're not going to do away with the IRS They're not going to reduce power of the executive or the government or free you. All of a sudden, the Department of Justice is going to defend individual rights. Now, it's all two wings of the same bird of prey. I mean, once you realize that, you know, the kind of thing that you're doing here to give a voice to the voiceless, because who gets on the ballot? I mean, you know how this works. Actually, you may choose from communist candidate A or fascist candidate B. They don't care because the system, in the end, the government always wins. They'll have continuation of government bunker for them. They don't give a crap about the people. All the other countries are going, you need to start preparing and prepping and buying food and everything. Well, you got to leave it to the YouTubers and so on to tell you that in America, it's not coming from Trump. But the military bases got to get ready and the government's got to get ready. but You know, we're screwed. So it is the concept of freedom. That is what they are so worried about that you even have the ability. Oh, my goodness, we have a Second Amendment. Just that mindset that you have. Well, when they start coming down my driveway, I mean, you know, it's on. That is what they are trying to beat out of this to make you think that resistance is futile. You just got to wait to see who gets coronated. They come down the road in their car and which flag do you wave? I mean, you know, it's just, it's so messed up. I'm an activist. I'm here to support what you're doing because I believe what the showing the power of the people of their opinion being registered by not supporting these people. But we don't know if it's accurate. My whole experience is, you know, I started when I was 28 in the late 80s and it became very clear to me that it was election law. It was the voting machines. That's why I ran for Secretary of State twice and county recorder. I mean, these big issues here in Arizona to understand how messed up it was. Out of Arizona is where the revolution came. And for the first time in my lifetime, probably ever, the Federal Reserve became an understood concept and a national international issue. So the people are becoming more and more aware. What the internet did, it gave them, you know, more narrative control. AI is just narrative control. Technocracy is going to be narrative control. And you're with us or against us, you know, kind of thing. But what happens is people now have archives. They have your shows. They have Dreams Phoenix. They have, you know, all kinds of other people that are archiving this information so that you can have a legitimate graph, a legitimate chart, a legitimate understanding of what's going on. What happened when? Why did this happen? Why did they attack Iran after he said he wasn't going to do it? Why do they have all of this Palantir surveillance and flock cameras everywhere? Why? Data centers? You know, we can't have enough energy. We can't have nuclear power plants. We can't, we can't, we can't. We're all going to die. We have no increase in energy production. We get a lot more efficiencies and so on, but we haven't got an increase in energy production until they need it. And when they need it, oh, hell, man, we got energy coming out of our butt, and we're going to dole it out to those that support. So I don't see that there's going to be any real change. change. The only time we had a reduction in the deficit, I think, the debt was during the Clinton administration when you had the Republicans controlling the legislature and you had Clinton in the White House. So will we get that kind of thing with Trump? I don't think so. I don't think so. He's all out of the deal. When he first won in the first election, we've done since 15, we've done 11 years of the Trump report. And so every week we have the Trump report and I'm like, you're still voting? You know, but my co-host in that, you know, was a big supporter. Well, this election cycle, he shredded his early ballot. He just said, I'm done. You know, it took 10 years, but you know, he's coming around. And the reason is, is because you have all of these promises that have obviously been broken. It was, was it ever his intent to do this stuff? And your videos are awesome You know, they're just Especially being a music video With lyrics that, you know, are Appropriate and mind-changing And you have the technology with one guy Using AI But what you're doing is you're training them They're going to be doing the same thing But the problem is, is that they have no credibility the future is about credibility the future is about who do you believe the future is about you know uh who's the truth tellers and who aren't so i see a decentralization down coming down to the states down to the counties the cities the individual because that's the only thing that works collectivism doesn't work because it doesn't work you know so i can i'm looking forward to patrick i know patrick he's here in arizona and he and i are friends but you know it's uh it's his perspective you know in the work of whitney webb and ian davis and james corbin so we we understand what's happening now what what's the solution the solution is decentralized you'll get away from it stop worrying about it i'm i'm doing this you know in support of your project and what's going but i hadn't even looked at the problem now in the land working all day. I get here in time to do the show and my co-host on the Trump report, Dr. Frank Canbury, he gets all mad when I say, that doesn't matter and I don't care. It doesn't matter and I don't care. It doesn't matter and I don't care. But what I do care is the impact your project has on why you did it, the ability for them to have a voice at the ballot box and in public opinion will it be registered in the numbers we get from the states i don't believe i don't care and on that it's a mind of the people that's what has impact like they're saying well arizona you know becoming you know number one freedom state you know the cato report that they did well i'm going wow we got you know still got problems here now we're the best oh my god I mean, the rest of the country, holy crap. So there is a reason why it was for decades, you know, starting in the early 90s, we made very clear, we weren't running for votes or to win, I didn't believe in the system to begin with. But what we did is to make sure people understood the issues. And that was the biggest problem with the media. The media would call us, I go into the large paper here there's our republic and a dozen editors and they're like all right pick two issues we'll be nice to you on like a couple of issues and we'll throw if you'll quit messing up our plan i mean you're messing up our plan man you know you're you're mucking with the minds of the people we can't have that and i'm like you guys can suck it man i don't even have an opinion you guys don't even understand what's going on. So that's why I'm so supportive of what you did. This is power. It is power of demonstrating how bad Trump and his policies and his administration, the cabinet picks that he did this time, the first one he just picked from the swamp, but this one is the swamp monsters. I mean, holy crap. So it's almost like you want to slip them 20 bucks and say thank you for educating everybody on what's really up so I think we're going to be entertained tonight about what's happened and your effort is definitely not going to go unnoticed but I don't see a political solution I don't see how that's going to happen it's going to be from the information that you put out there the rhetoric that you use the issues that really matter and how to look at them so that people understand what's happening to them. But after that, after that understanding, there has to be a solution. Well, that's what libertarians and voluntarists offer is, look, it's free market. You know, technocracy, you want to have your freaking techno state of the super HOA of matrix plug in the back of your head and your vaccine passport and you complied or whatever. But don't make me pay for it. Don't have me do it. Don't ban whatever people currency or alternative currency that we want to use. But they have to outlaw dissent. They have to outlaw you ducking. You deliberately duck. You're not allowed to duck. You got to be our slave. So when they talk about universal basic or high income, you know, and then Trump comes up. what pick republican you get five thousand dollars and your wife too and your little dog i mean you know we're gonna have a bunch of money for you well this is you know i it doesn't matter if they're using robots and ai to do all the work they don't need you anymore it's just you need to understand what's happening we are at a turning point this is mile marker in human history human history, worldwide history. And as soon as they take away all the USAID money, you know, the non-governmental organizations spreading around Latin America and around the world, all of a sudden you start getting more conservative, libertarian elections. So that's what I think they're afraid of, is the mood, the awareness, the access to the information. Because you can go, sit there and doom scroll all the mainstream media and everything without a lick of understanding of what the hell is going on. But you've provided an option. I'm very interested in what's going to happen tonight. Yeah. And I want to be clear. I don't think that there's a political solution either. But what I really think, what I see, and I'm not usually optimistic about any of this, is no one's going to go to jail, but there will be impeachment hearings. And the reason that the impeachment hearings are possible because what you said is exactly true. It's about getting the information out there. And, you know, in fact, I'm glad we have Patrick Wood on here because Patrick Wood has been talking about this stuff for decades. And what I think is going to happen as a result of these impeachment hearings is when people go to look this stuff up, then they're going to find technocracy.news and all of the work that Patrick Wood. And then they're going to look at it and say, great, this guy's been saying this for 30 years. And then you're going to get a bigger understanding. There are some trends. The other thing that's interesting, looking at these races, in Ohio and Michigan, opposition to data centers was a top issue in those states. Okay, well, once you understand data centers, they may have some surface reason for not liking data centers. If they really knew what was going on with data centers, they really wouldn't like it. And this is an opening for people to learn about what's going on. The data centers are part of the technocratic plan. They're a critical part of the digital control system. And so once people start to see how flock cameras work in conjunction with data centers, in conjunction with real ID and digital IDs and digital programmable money, once you learn that, you can't unlearn that. And then people will be finally able to realize, yeah, we're not going to vote our way out of this, but you've got to move towards using alternative technologies. solutions. And so I would say for the first time in the last six months, people are actually starting to open their eyes a little bit. And I think that these impeachment hearings, even though they won't lead to any, no one's going to go to jail, it will become mainstream news where people are going to be talking about world liberty financial and what the Trump family was doing with their stable coin. Which is why I don't think there's going to be impeachment. Even you got AOC coming out, oh, we shouldn't do impeachment here. We can't do that. That'd be wrong or something. Why? Because you think the Democrats want all this stuff found out? They're part of it. They've been using it. They're just as aligned with tech bros as anybody else. It'll be interesting to see if there are impeachment hearings, because if there is, it's going to be exactly what you're saying. And they're going to be doing a lot of investigation, a lot of this stuff and bring this out, which is why I think it's going to be impeachment light or there are certain issues aren't going to be done or they're just not going to do it. And Trump is already negotiating, making some deals. You know, it's like, where the hell is Chuck Schumer? I haven't heard anything from these guys. The left and they're better off just sit down, shut up, you know, which is kind of what they've been doing. But then you have this Democrat socialist group, you know. um and then you have i had a meme sent me today and it was um it said the democrats think that they're using islam to further their agenda and create a voting block to get democrats elected where islam is like we're using the democrats to get what we want you know so it's always that and it was that with obama and it sure as heck was that with hillary this is where all the woke stuff came from. They pick every disaffected group they can, bundle them up, and then promise everything, and there's their foot soldiers, and then Sorrell sends them a check. I mean, it's so obvious if you know where to pay attention, and you have. You really dissected what's going on, and denying Trump the Senate is a laudable goal. It may be a win, you know but um you still need 60 senators to convict in an impeachment so i don't know i don't think they're going to convict but i think that they will impeach and the impeachment process itself is what's going to lead to no i understand but that's why i'm thinking that's not going to happen for that very reason you know but we're going to find out we only got to wait a little while i actually think it might happen in the reason but we have patrick wood here we have the the man, the man himself, we've been talking about. I'm very grateful to have you on tonight. I won't recap all of it, but I, but I will say I'm, I'm actually optimistic, somewhat optimistic about this election. And, you know, whenever I say that people are like, Oh, you, you know, you support the Dems. No, I don't support the Dems, but we've had technocracy without friction for two years. And I think that one thing that could come out of this is impeachment hearings that won't lead to a conviction, but that we already know World Liberty Financial and what Trump has been doing with stable coins and digital tokens. It's already in the draft articles of impeachment by Raskin, which I think this could be a springboard for people to start learning about technocracy. That is my, you know, rose-tinted glasses view of this. I think this is actually, I'm more optimistic now than I have been in the last, since the second term began. But what are your thoughts? What do you think about this election? Believe it or not, I agree with you completely. I just, I see this as an opportunity to fight back against technocracy. And lots of people are waking up, including some Democrats, believe it or not. But the conservative world, the Republican world, they've all flip-flopped all of a sudden to support technocracy with all the data centers, et cetera, around the country. This is just amazing to me just how thin these people are. People like, for instance, the Heartland Institute. They used to be supporters of climate and not supporters of, but they got after things like climate change and the shots and everything else. Now they're all on board with data centers around the country. They're piping the line that the elite had given them. And this is stunning to me that all these people who were formerly on our side are not on our side anymore. So we need to change the guard right now. We need some other group of people to pay attention to what we're saying about what we're saying. Yep. And that's what I see, too. And actually, you know, and Patrick, you and I haven't talked in a while, but I've basically formed a super PAC to to support third party candidates that could be the margin, basically pulling from the Republicans, mostly libertarian constitutional party candidates. And I believe we'll see what happens tonight. But I believe they will be the margin. I mean, some of these races, Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, based on the polling, which may be completely inaccurate, these candidates. But what I've done is something that's different. What I've done, usually PACs do stuff where it's like they don't say who's behind it. And it's some subversive group that doesn't actually like the candidate. And there's all kinds of shenanigans that go on. I formed a PAC and I said, I'm doing this explicitly for this purpose. This is why we're doing it. It's to be a spoiler. I believe in the candidates. I voted for, we supported this guy, Ed Laplante. I just voted for him today. I actually, I don't, I'm not like supporting people I don't believe in. I believe in them, but I know they're not going to win. But I know by voting for them, I'm sending a direct message to the Republicans. And we're sending, everybody that participates in this, you're sending a message that says, we're going to hold you accountable and you need to have candidates that look more like these people or you're not going to get elected. it. And I actually think it's going to work because I did it in 2016 on a small scale. But what was fascinating in Ohio and Michigan, and to a certain degree, Texas, data centers, well, in Ohio and Michigan, data centers are the number one issue. This is what's fascinating about this. And I don't know that people don't understand. I was saying to Ernie earlier, people really understood data centers. They'd be really against them. They know at a surface level they're bad but i'm hoping that what comes out of this is they get to start to understand how data centers fit with you know ai surveillance digital ids programmable digital money because once people learn that once they frankly understand the information that you've been talking about for decades i i think you're going to have a big surge of people they're going to find your information and say wait a minute this guy said this when and and that's what i hope i and and frankly i think the combination of flock cameras and ai data centers gives me gives me some hope exactly the the people who are ignorant who are fighting but ignorant they're they're reachable at this point and uh this is where we should be focusing our attention i think so yeah and i want to ask uh patrick you know when he came in he missed a discussion um the idea that the the Democrats are going to do impeachment and bring up a lot of this technocracy stuff that, you know, Trump has been doing and so on. If they do the impeachment hearings, that's going to come out. And it's going to be technocracy.news is going to shoot to the top. And then of course they'll control that. But you know, the thing is is that we know how that works, but the, I'm kind of of the opinion that even AOC comes out and says, Oh, we shouldn't do impeachment. We should something. I don't know what else you're talking about. Investigate or do whatever. But if there is impeachment hearings, I think a lot more is going to come out than the Democrats or the establishment or the status quo to think that there's a difference between the two parties. It's thinking, in my opinion, do you believe that there will be full-on impeachment hearings or will Trump make a deal or will the Democrats make a deal? I mean, because he's already said, I'm going to veto everything. No, he's not. You know, he's going to, it's part of the deal. He's going to whatever. So I'm really interested in what do you think would come out if there is even going to be impeachment hearings and how integrated is the Democratic Party and the Democrats and the senators and the congressmen and everything, the candidates, everybody, and with technocracy and they're just waiting for their turn to get the grades. Wow. That's a great question. Oh, hang on a sec. I got to answer the door. uh sorry about that i'm gonna yeah go man but you know that you gotta answer that when you come back no office gaining i i will give you i'll give you my opinion it'll be interesting to see what he says as a comparison so this is what i think and i've talked to these people like on the cbdc issue i was at a cb crypto conference cbdc panel and they had republicans and democrats like cynthia loomis they had uh ron wyden who is this very liberal senator from oregon and i'm like this guy's on an anti-CBDC panel. Why is this guy on an anti-CBDC panel? And then I figured out why. His view is we should get rid of the Federal Reserve so that Congress can issue a programmable digital currency directly. So this is what I think. This is why I think that this is why we might get an impeachment hearings, because the difference of opinion is this. And this is why Trump's been more dangerous. The technocrats are these, you know, large multinational corporations. and they're actually competent. They're technically competent. As I've said to a lot of people, we'd be better off if Kamala Harris won. Why? Because they would try to do it centrally, and they're incompetent, and they would fail. So my view is this. The Democrats, yes, do they want the same end? Yeah, they want the same end, but they want to use big government to implement the technocracy. Well, I'll tell you, big government can't implement the technocracy, but big tech can implement technocracy and use government and use government at all levels, at the state level, at the federal level, and these multinational or international organizations. So that's why I think that there's a chance they're going to expose it because they're not in on it in the sense that they're not participating with Musk and Thiel. And I mean, in fact, you look at the money and track all of this. Their viewpoint of it is we're going to get our gang in here and we're going to build us a new Obama website and we're going to do it all ourselves with our DEI team. So that's my my guest i'm back all right patrick you know okay i'll tell you what i i'm i'm pretty sure they're going to be get impeach him at least in the house it may not go to the senate but it's it's immaterial at this point i don't i think so what i expect is the democrats will fight politically i guess the republicans this is all has always been the left left uh right paradigm gotta fight those whatever fill in the blank so technocracy is not political this is what people on both sides need to understand this is not a political issue technocracy is an economic system it's not a political system communism is a political system potentially. Socialism is a political system. Fascism is a political system. Technocracy is not any of those things. It's an economic system. Until people understand that an economic war is being waged against them, then and only then will they look up and see the people who are perpetrating the whole thing in the first place. This has been my contention. We've talked about many times, I think, Ernie, this has been my contention for years, that you can't fight an economic system using political tools. You know, I want to bring something up that Patrick certainly knows about and have a comment. I'm in the West Desert, 70 miles, I'm out in the middle of nothing. And I try to get as far away at the end of the trail, the cow trail of five months building the road to bring my bus out here i mean i'm how far can i get away i can going we're west of phoenix about 70 miles and it goes to la and i can see it it's about five miles down in the valley down that way about 25 miles you know the next exit is where bill gates is building belmont which is a smart city plugging the back of the head matrix uh Where's your vaccine passport, people? Okay. And of course, that just justifies a big giant data center because they're just a few miles north of the Palo Verde nuclear power station. Out here is solar fields everywhere. It is just, they're building them as fast as they can. So they're going to have plenty of power. Everyone's got the power. So here come the data centers. right next to that is a theme park called i don't know some film theme parks we like a universal studio thing out in the middle of the freaking desert i'm like the hell is that about well of course it has a bunch of data centers so you know it you know here we go you can't get far enough away but what can you do so being an example we're doing a newspaper that comes out in january we're going to inform people about the process municipal corporations that they're wanting to do and here comes the debt and here comes and here comes the bonds and here comes you know whatever they're on pinky swear promise that we got away from and they're going oh no don't you want to don't you want to a playground yeah that's it and so you need to have taxes of whatever the hell so this is a real threat to me to my family to the future and i did everything i could to get away so what do you do you inform the people so what do i have i got patrick wood man i got all kinds of goodies i'm gonna tell them what's up we're gonna bring them out here and have us a meeting so you know this is where i see the real um effect but you have to have this message and the archive of information that patrick has done patrick when he wrote a tridialysis over washington and what was going on there in the 90s and yeah so he kind of went away through the 90s while we were doing a lot of stuff and i was introduced to patrick by a state senator a very conservative you know that would introduce legislation we had to be secret or nobody would vote for it but the um um she goes man you got to meet patrick well up until then all this technocracy stuff capital foreign relations uh trilateralist you're a tinfoil hat wearing crazy nut right up until they celebrated their 40th anniversary and thanked the media for letting them get away with it, you know, and they come out. Well, then here's Patrick I've been saying this forever. Well, I'm going, you're the guy you're the guy. This is real? Oh my God. Doesn't surprise me, but you have people like Patrick and activists like Aaron and the technology that Aaron has done with 50 gazillion agents of AI going to whip ass You know, it's a double-edged sword, all this AI technocracy stuff, but can we use it? Yeah. You know, we're looking at a lot of different things that we're doing, but it has to be a free market. You can't fix government. It's already fixed. It's going to do what it's going to do. The only thing that we can do is understand what's happening, who's doing it, and why, and what role do we have? where are we in this plan? We're not. If you're not part of the 500 million or whatever they want to keep around, then if you get replaced by AI and a robot, then what? When humanity faces an existential crisis, an extinction level event on them, the future of their children, their savings, their script mining, the middle class and the boomers of everything, forcing them into more treasuries and backed by stable coins that go into tech you know got whatever and it's gone thanks for playing then you get david webb's the great taking it's happening now and if you're not self-sufficient you're not being able to feed yourself you're not being able to source your own water if you're not being able to educate your own kids if you're not being able to create your own community and have an understanding of the stuff that patrick has been doing you're going to be roadkill on the road to serfdom. I'm just saying. You're absolutely right, I think. This is my latest book. I don't know if you saw it, Ernie. I think maybe we talked about it a little bit, Crucible of Tokens. This is the final in my trilogy that I wrote since November of 2025. I've never written three books in my whole life in one year, but I did this time. And the capstone of this whole thing was the crucible of tokens that threatens to steal all of the private properties in the world if they could possibly get it under their umbrella. If they can, they are. I know the tokenization process is sweeping the world right now. When Larry Fink said, a member of the Trout Auto Commission, by the way, when Larry Fink said anything that can't be tokenized will be tokenized. that's exactly what he said he said multiple times on national tv even so here's a guy at the top top of the PAC he's uh has what almost 15 trillion dollars under management right now he says anything can be tokenized will be tokenized and now we find that the new New York Stock Exchange is going to be tokenized by the end of this year. Go figure. But now tokenization is a mechanism. Forget the great taking at this point. The tokenization process is going to eat the world. If they somehow, if they could, I say, no, I'm not going to, they're not going to eat me, but maybe I'll be eaten no matter what. Aaron is advocating for the revolution will be tokenized. And I know he's not their kind of tokenization, but I'd like you to explain the difference, Aaron, your version of tokenization and the bad guys. Yeah. I mean, my version of tokenization, when y