Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Free Speech Under Threat In Trudeau Canada Says Poll

Transcript

Free Speech Under Threat In Trudeau Canada Says Poll · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Majority of Canadians believe free speech is threatened. Well, why would that be?
• 0:07
  Is it because TRADEO keeps passing bills threatening free speech? Let's see,
• 0:12
  this poll is revealed that the majority of Canadians believe that free speech is being
• 0:15
  threatened in the country. According to the poll, fifty seven percent of Canadians
• 0:19
  believe that freedom of speech is threatened in Canada, while only thirty six percent
• 0:24
  believe it is not. The rest are unsure, so fifty seven percent.
• 0:29
  So that's a you know, that's definitely a majority of Canadians. I should
• 0:34
  would think it would be higher. Let's see, Canadians planning to vote conservative
• 0:38
  were significantly more likely to feel this way. Yeah, like me, compared
• 0:42
  to liberal voters, sixty one percent of whom feel that their free speech is
• 0:46
  not threatened. Well, they're not going to because everything they know and everything
• 0:51
  they say they learn off the CBC or CTV or Global or something, So
• 0:55
  of course they're not going to feel like their free speech is threatened. The
• 0:58
  only they just parrot what they hear from the CBC rather far left sources,
• 1:03
  and that's all fine. Anything can be said, right, nobody's shutting them
• 1:07
  up. Fact Trudeau's giving them money, so that's hardly surprising. One of
• 1:12
  the greatest threats currently facing Canadians is the so called Online Harms Act, which
• 1:18
  many critics have stated will limit Canadians free expression online based on an arbitrary definition
• 1:23
  of hatred defined by the government. Now, I've made videos on this.
• 1:29
  Anybody who's not subscribed subscribed to the channel, and you can find my videos
• 1:32
  on Bill C sixty three, the Online's Harm, the Online Harms Act.
• 1:36
  I take you through the bill itself and show you exactly where it says,
• 1:38
  the terrible things that it says, and all of that Trudeau's terrible plans for
• 1:42
  Canada. Everything here is correct. So as one is deemed to have spread
• 1:49
  hate speech online, the punishment can reach seventy thousand in fines and a content
• 1:53
  takedown order. We should mention, of course, there's the Online Online Streaming
• 2:00
  Act, which basically gives the CRTC the power to regulate the Internet. Then
• 2:06
  you have the Online News Act, which has resulted in not being able to
• 2:12
  get Canadian news in Canada on Facebook and Instagram. But Bill C sixty three,
• 2:19
  the Online Harms Act, well, here's the Canadian Constitution Foundation. So
• 2:23
  let's do. We've got over this stuff many times on this channel, but
• 2:28
  it's really worth it to just keep talking about it because this is it is
• 2:30
  totally dystopian, all right. The Canadian Constitution Foundation is deeply concerned that the
• 2:37
  Online Online Harms Act, introduced in the House of Commons on February twenty six,
• 2:42
  will significantly hamper constitutionally protected expression. The bill would create a new process
• 2:49
  for individuals and groups to complain to the Canadian Human Rights Commission that online speech
• 2:53
  directed at them is discriminatory. The tribunal could order fines of up to fifty
• 3:00
  thousand dollars and awards of up to twenty thousand paid to the complainants, who
• 3:06
  in some cases would be anonymous. So, of course fifty thousand to the
• 3:09
  government, because the government's got to get their handed the fucking COMMI government of
• 3:15
  Justin Trudeau has got to get your money. But then a twenty thousand dollars
• 3:19
  reward for probably anonymously making a complaint about you, So somebody can just make
• 3:25
  a complaint and then they just wash their hands of it because the government takes
• 3:29
  over then goes to a far left human rights tribunal which is not a criminal
• 3:35
  court. It's a parallel legal system. In fact, they talk about it
• 3:38
  further in this so let's just keep going here. Findings would be based on
• 3:43
  a mere balance of probability standard rather than the criminal standard of proof beyond a
• 3:49
  reasonable doubt. The subjectivity of defining hate speech will lead to punishments for protected
• 3:54
  speech. The mere threat of a human rights complaint will chill large amounts of
• 4:00
  protected speech. Obviously, that's the whole point of it. That's the purpose.
• 4:05
  And you know, before an election too, you're accused by somebody who
• 4:10
  stands to make money off of this right, make money from you, where
• 4:15
  the court can order you to pay twenty thousand dollars to them. Some anonymous
• 4:18
  person makes this complaint, it goes to a far left kangaroo court, and
• 4:23
  you're basically screwed because they are going to find you guilty. What's another purpose
• 4:28
  of this? I believe that it's to get leftist activists to do Trudeau's censorship
• 4:33
  work, for him to terrify anybody who might be a dissident in any way
• 4:39
  or dissent from, you know, his far left looming ideas in any way,
• 4:44
  to make them afraid to speak their mind. Because an activist out there,
• 4:47
  maybe one who works who works for like the you know, one of
• 4:50
  these advocacy groups who's getting money from the Canadian govern from Trudeau, maybe one
• 4:57
  of them. Maybe that's all they'll do from now on is just soon people
• 5:00
  through this process, they make the complaint, they wash their hands, the
• 5:03
  government does everything. The government brings them the lawyers, so no tax dollars
• 5:09
  have to go to pay for lawyers to persecute people who said politically incorrect things
• 5:14
  on the internet. I mean, you can see this is totally dystopian,
• 5:16
  and I think the goals of it are transparent. The bill would allow judges
• 5:20
  to put prior restraints on people who they believe, on reasonable grounds, may
• 5:26
  commit speech crimes in the future. Yeah, that's nothing but pure and simple
• 5:34
  old fashion communism. Sure is, Jackie Gleeson, Sure is so future crimes,
• 5:42
  future crimes. I mean, is there anything more Trudeau than that?
• 5:46
  It's just pure, pure or Wellian, purely Orwellian, isn't it. The
• 5:51
  accused would be forced to choose between imprisonment or a recognissance to keep the peace.
• 5:57
  That may be accompanied by severe conditions, such as giving a bodily sample,
• 6:01
  refraining from drugs and alcohol, giving up firearms and wearing an ankle monitor.
• 6:06
  I don't know, it's pure lunacy. So unsurprisingly, sixty two percent
• 6:12
  of Canadians now believe it's more difficult to voice their opinion than in the past,
• 6:15
  while twenty seven percent think it's easier. Well, yeah, I mean,
• 6:19
  if you are a far left loomy, it's easy. You're fine.
• 6:24
  Nobody's gonna have a problem. You're not gonna have any part. You're not
• 6:26
  gonna get deplatformed. The media is not gonna call you a hate they're not
• 6:30
  gonna call you, you know, a supremacist or anything. Just repeat everything
• 6:35
  that the CBC says and you'll be fine, or that Trudeau says, you'll
• 6:40
  be fine. Doesn't matter how hateful it is. It's approved. That's the
• 6:45
  approved narrative. See Conservative voters seventy percent this is not surprising, and Canadians
• 6:49
  aged fifty five and older seventy percent think that it's become more difficult to express
• 6:55
  their opinion than before. Anyway, that's all I'm gonna say about that.
• 6:59
  Please like, thanks, share, and subscribe. Sharing really helps me out.
• 7:01
  I thank you for that. I will see you next time.