Latest / Yaron Brook Show / Trump on Iran Deal; Hormuz: UFC Plot; Fed; DNI; Huawei; China; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

Trump on Iran Deal; Hormuz: UFC Plot; Fed; DNI; Huawei; China; Achievement | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: A lot of fundamental principles of edom, national self interesting
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: and individual wants.
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: This is the show. Oh right, everybody, welcome to you
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: one book show on this Wednesday, July seventeen. Everybody is
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: having a good week, and uh yeah, thank you for
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: joining me today. Let me stop by by, I guess apologizing.
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: We're gonna be talking about the deal again, and we're
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: gonna be talking about Trump, and I'm gonna show you
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: videos of Trump, and I know for some of you
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: that is fairly painful, as it should be, so just
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: take it as oh video, Thank you, Jennifer, take it
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: as uh, you know, this is this is this is life,
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: this is what it's going to be. I hope, I
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: hope this is the last time, or at least I
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: hope this is the last time for a while that
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: I'll show you videos of Trump. Now, you can't tell.
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: He might come out with something really, really outrageous tomorrow,
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: so I can't guarantee that I won't be showing you more,
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: but I'm gonna I'm gonna try because I know again,
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: I know, I know it's it's it's painful. So we're
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: gonna go over the deal, but we're gonna start with
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: really having Trump talk about some of the things that
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: I associated with the deal and and and why he
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: why this deal was arrived at. And it's it's pretty astounding,
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: you know, to hear firsthand from Trump why this deal
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: was was signed and and why he abandoned some of
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: the ideas that he had. So I want you to
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: hear it from him. I can say it and nobody,
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: nobody believes me. But defeat is exactly what this is.
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: So Randa is exactly what this is. And Trump basically
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: acknowledges that it was this deal or global catastrophe basically
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: is how he's positioned it. And he had no choice.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: He just had no choice. So we got the deal.
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: We have better than a global catastrophe, worse than the
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: Great Depression, by the way, just a global catastrophe which
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: he got us into because he launched a war.
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: You think he'd have a plan anyway. Let me just
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: show you.
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: We'll go through a few videos of him, and then
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: I've got one of JD. Van's I do want you
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: to pay attention on some of the videos, not the
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: first one, but on the rest of the videos. And
• 2:39
  Speaker 2: I've got one still picture. I want you just to watch.
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: I want you to look at at Marco Rubio. Just
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: look at Malcha Rubio. And I mean I would I
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: just watching his body language. I'd have him one suicide watch.
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: I really would. I'd have somebody attached to him and
• 3:03
  Speaker 2: watching over him. I'd take away shoelaces in his belt.
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: I'd be worried. I'd be worried. Anyway, let's go to Trump.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: You know, he's going through these meetings where he is
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: meeting with our bleeders, one after the other. Go figure,
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: why exactly, But he is, and this is with a
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: president Ceci of Egypt, and he praises them. I mean,
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: he basically says, we fell in love, and I mean
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: he likes to talk this way. This is Trump. He
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: talked this way about the brutal dictator of North Korea.
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: So he describes how he and Ceci fell in love
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: at a hotel while he's a campaigning in twenty fifteen,
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: twenty sixteen. So anyway, put that aside. I'm not going
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: to show you that video, though it is quite entertaining
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: if you want to see, it's out there. This one
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: explains why he signed the deal, why this deal is necessary.
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: So this is the risks the world faced as a
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: consequence of the closing of the States of Formos. Yes,
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: it's in the low seventies. Now, this is oil and
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: a sting.
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: So that's what speaks. That speaks louder than whereas the
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: alternative would be a worldwide depression. You know, the stupid
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: people want to have a worldwide depression. And the stupid people,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: so you can only go so far. Drive somebody into
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: the ground, and a lot of bad things happen. Number One,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: the Straight would never open because they don't like floating
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: billion dollar ships up and down a straight when their
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: rockets flying over them in minds all over the place.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: So the Straight would never be open. It wouldn't be
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: open for a long time. So we have a very
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: hot stock market and we have a very starting to
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: be a very low oil price.
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: And this is so, this is it. He has no
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: idea how to open the States of Homos. He does
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: not trust the US military to open the States of Homos.
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: And if without the States of Homos being opened, we're
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: heading towards a global depression, a global depression. And you know,
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: you can only do so much, You can only go
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: so far. And the fundamental question is the real question
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: here has to be asked is why did he go
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: to what to begin with? As I've said, and I
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: repeat myself, I know, and you've heard it from me
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: a thousand times. I know. But we all knew the
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: Indians would close the straits of Homos. So if you
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: didn't have a plan to open them, and he didn't,
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: why go to war? And if closing the states of
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: wars are going to cause a great depression, and you
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: cannot open the states the U asked, the mightiest military
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: force in all of human history, cannot open the states,
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: then why are you going to war? So basically he's
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: acknowledging here that the United States couldn't handle the Ranians.
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: It couldn't handle them closing the streets, And in order
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: to avoid the consequence of Iranian power, which the consequence
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: being a great depression, he had to kind of deal
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: with him. That's the bottom line. And know what this does,
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: Know what he's just done.
• 6:33
  Speaker 3: He has just given Iran.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: All the power in the world, more power than a nuke,
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: I think, more power than a nuke, because now they
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: don't need a nuke. All they need to do is threaten,
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: not even do it, just threaten to close the States
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: of Homoes and since nobody can open them, oh my god,
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: can't open it. That's it. I mean, you know, all
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: you have to do is is threatened to close the
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: Station of Homos, and everybody is going to be at
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: their beck and call everybody worse succumb It's literally worse
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: than a nuke. A nuke, you know, they could take
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: it as well, and then they could be nuke back
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: and they would be destroyed. Station of Homos. There's nothing anybody,
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: I mean, Trump has just said nothing you can do
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: about no way to open it. If the mightiest military
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: force in all of human history can't open it, nobody
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: can now.
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: Of course, I believe strongly and.
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: And I think this belief is shared by US generals
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: that Station of Homos could have been opened, can be opened.
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: The US Navy could do it. Indeed, they launched was
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: it called Operation Freedom, and Trump, you know, withdrew them
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: within hours because he panicked and the Gulf States were
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: worried that he wasn't going to win the war, and
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: therefore they're worried about being bombed. So yeah, of course
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: you could open the Straights of Foremoes. You could have
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: opened the States of Hoemos, kept them open on day one.
• 8:09
  Speaker 2: You could have focused the entire campaign in the first
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: week and make you sure the Straits of Homost stay
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: open and only then gone and delta the ballistic missiles
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: and the other things. Priorities, strategic priorities. But nope, nope, No,
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: Trump ain't smart enough. Sorry, guys, Trump is dumb. He's
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: not smart. He couldn't see this coming. I saw this coming.
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: Lots of people saw this coming. And you know the
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: only reason I was a little bluzz about it is
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: because I was convinced that the US Navy had a
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: plan and that they would execute that plan in that
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: first week. And then remember, somebody leaked to me that
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: the White House doesn't have a plan to open the
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: Straits of Homos. And then I started panicking. And you
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: know that that first Saturday, I started worrying about what
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: are they going to do? And my wabbis were justified,
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: and those of you who told me, I remember, there
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: were people out there telling me, you got to be
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: kidding you. On of course, they have a plan to
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: open the states of almost Trump always has a plan.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: There's a strategy here. They know what they're doing. Of course,
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: the United States is a plan. How could they not
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: have a plant? It's so obvious they didn't have a plan.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: They And now he's basically throwing the US military under
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: the bus because instead of admitting that he screwed up
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: on strategy. Can't open him just can't do it. Of
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: course she can't. Of course she can. I laid out
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: a plan on that first weekend after the war started
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: on how to do it, and the US Navy has
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: better plans than their mind. I'm sure they could have
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: done it easily, I mean effort, but easily, mightiest military
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: force in all of human history.
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: They couldn't do that one.
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: This is where you should start looking at us a
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: body language, and not even body lange. We just look
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: at his face. Look at his face, particularly as compared
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: to the Dufus who is the secretary of Commas on
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: his other side. I mean, just just compare the two
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: and and and you'll you'll see. All right, here's again
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: kind of the same thing. We had no choice. We
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: had a cave. I mean, what choice do we have?
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: They closed the station of moments, We have no choice
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: but to surrender. This is Trump reinforcing that same point
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: later on in the day in this press conference.
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: If we didn't do this, Dale, we could have dropped
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: more bombs for another three weeks, two weeks, four weeks,
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: two years. You would never have the harmor straight open never,
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: you would never have success. Never, your market would have
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: Instead of going up at levels that nobody's ever seen before,
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: we go down all about that level, except nobody ever
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: saw it before, maybe except for nineteen twenty nine or whatever.
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a great depression. So the alternative was great
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: depression or surrender. So I surrendered. I mean that makes
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: complete sense. And notice what he's doing here from a
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: let's make a deal perspective. They haven't got a deal yet.
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: It's just a memory of understanding. So he's entering negotiations
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: with Iran basically telling the Ranians, Yeah, we had no choice,
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: and now I want you to sign a nuke deal,
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: and the Ranians are going to go, nah, we don't
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: want to do that, but we'll stop bombing you again.
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: We'll close the states. So Mores, what are you gonna do,
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: We'll just close the streets. What are you gonna do?
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: I mean, it's.
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: I mean out of the deal, and I don't know
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: I'll reach you. Afterwards, an up ed about kind of
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: Republicans made, where are the people defending Trump after these
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: kind of comments? Three D chess fight D chess. I
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: mean he's literally telling the Iranians, you're more powerful than us.
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: You have the cards. Remember he made the big deal
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: about who has the cards in the Ukraine Russia deal.
• 12:23
  Speaker 2: You ion have the cards. Because I want to Stockhmanker
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: to go up. I want all prices to go down,
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: and I don't want a great depression. So you know,
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: keep the Homeost straits open and you can, you can
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: have whatever you want. I'm not gonna insist on anything.
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: He is entering the negotiations explicitly from a position of weakness,
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: and he's creating the weakness. He could just shut up,
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: but the more he talks, the weak he is. The
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: weak is straight negotiating position is here it is again,
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: I mean, very similar, different angle.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: Also, we run out of reserves in about four weeks.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: You know, there are reserves all over the world, and
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: we would really run out and there'll be a time
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: when you wouldn't be.
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: Able to get it. And you want to see bedlam,
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: all bedlam, great depression and bedlam we don't want great
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: depression and bedlam. Now Rubio is eager to roll his eyes,
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: and he's really trying, he's really making an effort not
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: to have any kind of dismissive expression on his face.
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: But but but he looks really really depressed. I mean,
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: this one is uh, this one is you know, look
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: at look at stated, the commis there letnik, look at
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: the letnik and look at Rubia Rubio uh during this uh,
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: this this exchange.
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: So we'll be working on a parallel effort with the
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: Gulf nations address non nuclear issues such as the conventional
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: ballistic missiles will be talking about and support.
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: I mean they have to have some because other people
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: have some. They have to have some. I mean the
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: unions they have to have some, you know, blistic missilves,
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: they have to have some. I remember where that was
• 14:17
  Speaker 2: one of the main goals of the war early on
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: was destroy their missile capabilities. Now they have to have some,
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: have some.
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: Somebody said you shouldn't give them one, and I have
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: guys look at them like some.
• 14:29
  Speaker 2: Of these guys, but I don't think this. They're not
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: so smart.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: Sure, you shouldn't let them have any missile? Said, well,
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: what am I gonna do? Am I gonna let Saudi
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Arabia have missiles? But they can't have them, Yes, sir, can't.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: Doesn't work that way, you know, it doesn't work that way.
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: And missiles aren't the problem. Missiles or they hurt a
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: little location, but they don't blow up the planet.
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: They hurt a little location, no big deal. Hurt a
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: little location, they don't blow up the planet.
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: So why would we why get upset about ballistic missiles? Now,
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: think about what's going on in the minds of the
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: saudiast and the UAE and the rest of the golf saying,
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: wait a minute. Those missiles could take out our desalination plants.
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: Those missiles could take out our oil facilities. They can
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: take out our natural gas facilities. They're just a little thing.
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: Don't blow up the planet, but they could. They could,
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: They could destroy the region. And of course hundreds of
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: them could be launched on Tel Aviv and kill people.
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: But it's just little things that you know. They gotta
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: have some. I gotta have some.
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: How can I deny them having.
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: Some ballistic missiles? I mean, I've been telling you about
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: this guy for ten years and he is outdoing even
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: my worst expectations.
• 15:54
  Speaker 3: Oh, this is the one. This is the one where
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: what's Lutnik?
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: You know?
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: Well, actually, before we do that, just look at this.
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: I want you to look at this. This is just
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: a photo, it's not a video. The guy with the
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: head down over there, that's Marco Rubio. I mean, Marco
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: Rubio deserves all the shit he's getting right now. He
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: deserves being depressed. He should be a thousand times more depressed.
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: He signed on to this, he became Secretary of State,
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: he was eager for the job.
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: He supported Trump.
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: He like all these other loser Republicans back Trump, embraced
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: Trump's you know, and so they deserve everything that they get.
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: Look at that body language. I mean Besa is loving it,
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: Lutnik is loving it. And who are they all? Who
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: is the king here? Who is the guy really running
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: the show in this meeting? It's not Trump because Trump
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: has just groveled before the guy to his right. Who
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: is the guy to his right? Who is who is
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: actually running Trump? That, my friends, is the Emir of Qatar,
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: which all the luminary are sitting before and and you know,
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: Rubo buying his head dutifully before them. It's you know,
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: at this point. You know, Trump is dumber. I think
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: at this point that Biden was during is the minted period. Uh,
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: this one is a classic. Trump is trying to be
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: funny here. Letnik, of course, think this is hysterical. And
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: and Rubio Rubio, Ho Rubio, Oh, Rubio Rubio. Here we
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: go this wayever works out, I'm gonna take credit.
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: If it doesn't work out, I'm blaming JD.
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: You better be careful, j D.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: He's going to turn his playing around and get the
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: hell out of here.
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah. I like that idea. I think it's a good idea.
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: I mean, Rubio can't even smile at that. He can't
• 18:14
  Speaker 3: even smile at the idea.
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: That h j D. Will will will take the blame
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: for this. Yes, Lutnick, look at Lutnik. He's he's beaming.
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: He's beaming, you know, Lutnik, the the tariff, tariff, the
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: teriff Lutnick. I mean, he's just he's a despicable character,
• 18:48
  Speaker 2: at least in in in while he's in the Trump universe.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: Uh yeah, So, as I said, Rubio might need a
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: suicide watch. He doesn't look good here. Finally, Uh, you know,
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: here's here's a g D who made the president one
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: day and he is he's talking about here the all
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: those people that the one who you know, the one
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: of the war to go on, the wanted the Americans win.
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: All the people that are criticizing the deal and that
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: you know, wanted one of the United States actually win
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: this war. He's he's criticizing, He's criticizing them. So pay attention.
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: I mean, this is this is within the Republican Party,
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: a bunch of people. This is Israel. This is me,
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: I guess, but not that he's thinking of me. You
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: can care less. But this is this is those people, right,
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: the people who wanted to actually keep going and and
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: not surrender, the people who are not defeatest and do
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: not want to surrender. This is what he's talking about.
• 19:59
  Speaker 4: I think that fundamentally, if you look at what they're proposing,
• 20:03
  Speaker 4: they're proposing an endless conflict.
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: Now, the proposing winning, the proposing opening the state's and
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: foremost by force by force, and the United States has
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: those capabilities, and then winning winning It's a concept I
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: know that is today foreign when it comes to American
• 20:24
  Speaker 2: use of military force. The idea of winning, No, that
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: could never happen, can't win and Trump is just everything
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: everything we learned from Vietnam to you know, Afghanistan and
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: Iraq and now Ran. The American people are now convinced,
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: and I think justifiably that America cannot win a war.
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: And let's be very clear, this makes the chance of
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: US helping out Taiwan basically zero. Makes the chance of
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: US doing anything militarily anyway in the world zero.
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: Yeah, we are very good at losing.
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: Over and over and over again. And JD. Vans as
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: well as Trump just reinforced that by keep saying we
• 21:10
  Speaker 2: couldn't have won, we couldn't win, no way to win.
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: Endless war would have mean endless, no winning, win win
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: called winning. And it all hinges on the obvious use
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: force to open the streets of homos. But I guess
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: it's not obvious to these.
• 21:29
  Speaker 4: Guys and endless conflict. They want this to go on
• 21:38
  Speaker 4: until every bomb has been dropped, or until every Iranian
• 21:41
  Speaker 4: is dead. That is not what the President of the United.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: Until every Iranian is dead? Who is it exactly? The
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: ones every Uranian dead? Oh? I know, I mean, you
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: know he is on the show who what's her name?
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: He's he's on the show with I forget her name.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: So you want to guess who they think wants every
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: Iranian dead? Starts with a J. The Jews probably want
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: every Iranian dead, That's what they would argue. Who is
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: it who has ever said they want every Iranian dead.
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: Quite the contrary, many of us who want to win
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: this war partially want to win this war.
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: Because it would be good for the Ranians.
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: I mean primarily because it'd be good for Americans, but
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: also because it would be good from Iranians. But no,
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: you know, caricature us at making Kelly's is making Kelly yes,
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: So it's making Kelly, who is an apologist or not apologist,
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: a co conspirator now with Candice Owen and Tucker Carlson,
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: they're all a bunch of anti Semites.
• 22:55
  Speaker 3: And you know here he.
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: Is caricaturing anybody who actually wants to win, caricaturing the
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: very idea of victory because victory means every Uranian dead, and.
• 23:12
  Speaker 3: It's so dishonest. He is such a scumback.
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: Is dead.
• 23:19
  Speaker 4: That is not what the President of the United States wants.
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: What she said, nobody wants since I.
• 23:23
  Speaker 4: Said about this, to end their nuclear program, to eliminate
• 23:26
  Speaker 4: their ability to threaten their neighbors and project power and
• 23:30
  Speaker 4: to fund them.
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: But he just said he's not going to eliminate the
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: ability to project power and to threaten their neighbors. Trump
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: just said it Evans. You need to go catch the video.
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: Trump just said, you know, everybody has ballistic missiles. They
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: can have bilistic missiles. They have to have ballistic missiles,
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: which is the way in which they threaten their neighbors.
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: So vances behind the cove.
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: In terms of the goals of this, ballistic missiles off
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: the table. Now, Trump doesn't care about.
• 23:58
  Speaker 4: That their neighbors and project power and to fundamentally make
• 24:04
  Speaker 4: sure that no future child would have to deal with
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: a terrorist regime with an atomic bomb. That's why the
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: President set out to do this.
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: So is this a terrorist regime or is this now?
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: Are these like Trump called them yesterday, a rational rational actors,
• 24:21
  Speaker 2: you know, rational regime, a very rational regime, extremely rational regime.
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: I think he called them. They're leaving the same people
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: in charge. Absolutely, Trump called them rational. So wait a minute,
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: we still are they terrorists? Are they rational? Or maybe
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: terists can't be rational?
• 24:41
  Speaker 4: I don't feels and he's right that he's accomplished that goal,
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: and now we can get to the negotiation.
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: Just how does he accomplished that goal? I mean, first
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: of all, the ass an accompliation goal, because the Venias
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: have not given up on the nuclear polem.
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: There's nothing in the met amount of.
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: Understanding it says. I mean, they say in the memorandum
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: that they will abandon plans that build a nuclear plant,
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: that they won't have plants. But they've always said that always.
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: That was in an Obama deal, that was in every
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: communication the Iranians have ever engaged in with regards to
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: the nuclear program. They've said, we don't want any clear bump.
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: There was even a fontois from Homini saying they won't
• 25:23
  Speaker 2: have a nuclear bomb.
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: Nobody believed them.
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: Why should we believe them now because they're rational players now,
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: But maybe they're terrorist regime.
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: I don't know one or the other.
• 25:33
  Speaker 4: See what are the other benefits that we can get
• 25:35
  Speaker 4: from this, and frankly, what are the benefits the Iranians
• 25:37
  Speaker 4: could get from this if they behave. I just don't
• 25:40
  Speaker 4: think that that people who are criticizing this one they're
• 25:44
  Speaker 4: not actually dealing with the reality of what's in it.
• 25:47
  Speaker 2: No, we know what's in it. You've sold America out,
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: that's what's in it. You've surrendered. You've just surrendered, right.
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: And number two, they don't have an alternative.
• 26:00
  Speaker 3: We have an alternative. We've had an alternative from day one.
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: You just won't listen because you were eager and this
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: woll before it even started, and you were eager to
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: see America humiliated and surrender because you don't want America
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: in the midd least. You don't. You don't, you don't.
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: You don't want anything to do with what's going on
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: over there. And I'm sure from JD Vance's perspective, eon
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: having a nuke.
• 26:27
  Speaker 3: I mean, look, here's the point, uh Trump.
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Said earlier, Saudi's have bilistic missiles. Well, of course the
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: Venius have to have sibilistic missiles. We can't say no
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: to them. Well, Israel has nuclear bombs. I mean, you
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: needs nuclear bombs. If Israel has them, how can you
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: say no to them?
• 26:45
  Speaker 4: If your alternative is just to drop bombs without any
• 26:48
  Speaker 4: clear goal or any clear American interest implicated, then you're
• 26:54
  Speaker 4: not making the wise decisions on behalf of the American people.
• 26:56
  Speaker 4: The president is and that's why we're in this position that.
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: It's a caricature of his critics. It is. It is
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: completely false. It is a lie.
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: Nobody just wants to drop bombs.
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: People have talked about what the outcome should be and
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: how it can be achieved. But this is jad events
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: he is. He is a liar. And yes, we got
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: what we in essence paid for, We got what we
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: voted for. We got a surrender deal. And that is
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: what that is what it is, right, that is what
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: it is. Now nobody knows exactly what's in the minimum
• 27:37
  Speaker 2: of understanding because, as we talked about yesterday, it is
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: not being disclosed. And according to a CNN story, I
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: don't know if this is true that US officials are
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: downplaying the text of the Iran agreement the actual texts
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: are going to sign, because they say it doesn't account
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: for the back channel commitments. The Uranians have made commitments
• 27:57
  Speaker 2: that are not in writing, and that's what really matters.
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: I mean, now, if officials are saying that, you know
• 28:08
  Speaker 2: that what's in writing is really really bad, and can
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: anybody out there, can anybody out there actually trust any
• 28:20
  Speaker 2: back channel commitments? Now, supposely the memorandum has been released,
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: but it's been titled as a draft. Nobody knows what
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: the actual final won nobody's seen the electronic signatures, because
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: the last I heard they were no electronic signatures. They
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: haven't signed it. They'll signed it on a fight it, But
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: nobody knows exactly what's going to be in the copy
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: that's signed. Nobody's committed, nobody's released it with a commitment
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: that this is what we're signing. There mean a bunch
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: of copies released, a bunch of sourcas, Bloomberg, we'll see journal,
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: others have released it up all under the improviso that
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: SI still a draft and we don't actually know what
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: the final exact language is going to be. But it
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: will be signed on Friday. Something will be signed on Friday.
• 29:13
  Speaker 2: Nobody again knows finally what it is. The surrender document
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: Surrender the United States, you know, I think it's a
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: vice president is going to fly to Geneva to officially surrender.
• 29:26
  Speaker 2: You know, you'll probably bow maybe a white flag, maybe something.
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: Maybe you'll bring flowers to the Uranians in Switzerland. And yes,
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: exactly the nature of that surrender is yet to be determined,
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: but it is without question a surrender. It is, you know,
• 29:48
  Speaker 2: it's if they ever reached a nuclear deal, that nuclear
• 29:53
  Speaker 2: deal will be exactly the same as Obama's nuclear deal.
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: It might be worse the nuclear deal that Obama signed
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: with the Uranians in twenty fifteen that Trump then exited
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: in twenty eighteen, same deal the US is No, there's
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: nothing in the memorative understanding about the destruction of Uran's uranium,
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: zero zilch. Not in a single version I've seen is
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: the destruction of the uranium mentioned and the Uranians they're
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: not gonna have it. They're not gonna allow it. And
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: what is America gonna do and they don't allow it? Nothing?
• 30:32
  Speaker 3: Oh, here it is.
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: Here's the memorative Understanding. So I'm not gonna read it all.
• 30:36
  Speaker 2: But Section one is cessation of the current war, an
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts,
• 30:45
  Speaker 2: including Lebanon. Why I mean, Chrisbellah continues to be a
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: threat to Israel. Israel has to defend itself, It has
• 30:54
  Speaker 2: to deal with Risbella. Does it have to wait until
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: Chrisbella does October seventh before it deals with them? So
• 31:01
  Speaker 2: Israel is now not allowed to preemptively take care of
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: a threat to its own people. And who's going to
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: enforce this? Is the US gonna embargo Israel or are
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: they going to force Israel to stop the war in Lebanon?
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: It continues to undertake from now on, they will not
• 31:24
  Speaker 2: launch any hostile actions against each other and will frame
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: from the threat of use of force against each other.
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: So the United States will not threaten the use of
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: force against Iran even if the negotiations go badly. Regarding
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: a final deal, Wow says, the final agreement will confirm
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: the provisions of this article and the remaining articles. Section two,
• 31:50
  Speaker 2: The Islamic of Republic of Iran in the United States
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: undertake to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity and
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs. By by
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: Irradian people, we don't care about you anymore. We're not
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: going to interfere internal affairs. We're not going to tweet
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: that we're coming to help you, and we don't. Maybe
• 32:08
  Speaker 2: that's good. So and they're recognizing the sovereignty of a
• 32:17
  Speaker 2: Islamist regime committed to death to America. So yep, non
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: interfering in, non interfering each other's I mean, I guess
• 32:36
  Speaker 2: we have to stop the CIA in the Masade from
• 32:38
  Speaker 2: helping out the protesters and stuff. Three, the istamic of
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: Opacavian in the United States undertake to negotiate and reach
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: final agreement with the maximum peer to sixty days, extendable
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: by mutual consent.
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: Anybody want to bet that it will be extended.
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: Four Immediately upon the signing of this moment of understanding,
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: the States lift the naval blockade and prevent any interference
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: or obstruction against the Islamic of Public of Iran, and
• 33:06
  Speaker 2: restore traffic within a maximum of thirty days to full capacity.
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: By the way, that was supposed to be only after Friday.
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: The blockades already lifted. Iranian ships are already leaving and
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: entering as we speak. The blockade. The American side of
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: the blockadess being lifted. States of Moza not open. We'll
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: get to that, but the blockade has been lifted. It
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: says the traffic of ships shall be proportional to the
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: pre war volume of traffic on the part of the
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Islamic Republic of Iran. But they have thirty days to
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: do it. The United States also undertakes to WITHDRAWORGS forces.
• 33:40
  Speaker 2: Listen to this. The United States also undertakes to with
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: George forces from the surrounding area within thirty days after
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: the final agreement. So the United States is to leave
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: the Gulf. They've always been there. Now they're going to leave.
• 33:55
  Speaker 2: The fifth fleet is based there in Barkwad. They're going
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: to leave. Weird.
• 34:03
  Speaker 3: Five.
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: Upon signing the Memoran of Understanding, the Islamic of Public
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: Iran will immediately take steps to ensure the movement of
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: milk Chen ships from Persian Gulf to the SiO Vermont
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: and vice versa, that it is resumed within thirty days
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: on the to pre war volume, taking into account the
• 34:18
  Speaker 2: need for removal of technical obstacles and utilization of minds
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: by Yan all Right, so Yuan's main obligation under this
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: deal is to open the streets. Six, The United States
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: undericates undertakes together with the regional partners to create a
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: comprehensive plan agreeing upon by both parties for the rehabilitation
• 34:38
  Speaker 2: and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran parentheses
• 34:43
  Speaker 2: my parentheses nder its current leadership of IRGC while ensuring
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: financing of at least are you ready for this at
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: least three hundred billion dollars. The implementation mechanism of this plan,
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: as part of the final agreement, will be formulated within
• 35:02
  Speaker 2: sixty days. The United States is guaranteeing that this will
• 35:10
  Speaker 2: be three hundred million dollars at least to rebuild Iran
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: I mean total surrender, total surrender seven. The United States
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: commits the ending on a schedule to be agreed upon.
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: As part of the agreement, all types of sanctions currently
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: faced by the Islamic of Public of Youwon, including resolution
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: of the United Nations Security Council and Board of Governors
• 35:34
  Speaker 2: of International Atomic Energy Agency, and all unilateral US sanctions
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: both primary and secondary.
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: I suppose when the final deal is signed, not clear.
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: The stomach of public of Yuwon reiterates that it will
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: never produce nuclear weapons.
• 35:51
  Speaker 3: Yay, we won.
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: They promised. They put their hand or their hearts parts
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: over and promised public of ionstomica up publy give you on.
• 36:01
  Speaker 2: And I just think the Islamic Republic of Iran, this
• 36:06
  Speaker 2: is who we're dealing with. This is who we're going
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: to rebuild. Three hundred billion dollars. It's a lot of money,
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: even in the world of trillions. The stomic of up'p
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: give you on in the United States have agreed that
• 36:15
  Speaker 2: the fate of the enriched uranium and the fate of
• 36:18
  Speaker 2: all other mutually agreed nuclear related issues, including Iran's nuclear
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: needs needs, will be adequately addressed in a final agreement.
• 36:26
  Speaker 2: A final agreement will confirm provisions of this article. Notice,
• 36:32
  Speaker 2: those of you who think that the United States is
• 36:34
  Speaker 2: going to destroy the uranium, that is not said there.
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: There's nothing there but the destruction of enriched uranium. They'll
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: decide on the fate. Who knows what that fate would be.
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: It might be to keep it in place. Nine. The
• 36:48
  Speaker 2: stomic of public of you on in the United States
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: agreed that pending a final agreement, they will maintain the
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: status quote. Iran will maintain the status quote on its
• 36:56
  Speaker 2: nuclear program in the United States will not impose new
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: sanctions on Iran or length and its forces in the region. Ten.
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: The United States undertakes the immediate immediately after the signing
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: of this mirandum of understanding and until the date of
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: the lifting of sanctions in the United States Treasury Department
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: will issue waivers for exports of Uranian crude oil, petrochemical
• 37:18
  Speaker 2: products and their derivatives, and all related services, including banking, insurance, transportation,
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: and the like. So make sure that the Ranians can
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: sell their oil world markets with no retribution, including insurance
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: and finance and everything. And this before there's ever, before
• 37:35
  Speaker 2: there's a deal. This is just based on the Mirandum
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: Understanding eleven.
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: The United States will undertake that, in light.
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: Of the progress negotiations towards a final agreement foes and
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: are restricted, funds of the assets of the Islamic Republic
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: of Uruana will be released and made fully available.
• 37:59
  Speaker 3: As paps right.
• 38:00
  Speaker 2: These funds, whether held in the massed account or transferred,
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: will be used for any final beneficiary payment determined by
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: the Central Bank of Islamic of Public of view On,
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: so it can be used for anything. They initially said
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: it would only be used for humanitarian purposes, so it
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: could be anything including buying new ballistic missiles, and will
• 38:19
  Speaker 2: be fully available for use. The United States undertakes to
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: issue all necessary permits and licenses on this basis complete
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: complete I mean unconditional surrender part of the United States. Twelve.
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: The Stomic of public of view On in the United
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: States agree with an implementation mechanism will be established to
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: oversee the successful implementation of and future commitment of the
• 38:46
  Speaker 2: Final Agreement and thirteen. Following the signing of the memoraim Understanding,
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: and upon receipt of assurances regarding the commencement of implementation
• 38:55
  Speaker 2: of articles for five, ten, and eleven of this Memorai
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: of Understanding and the continued implementation of these steps, the
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: Islamic Republic of Run in the United States will enter
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: into negotiation for final agreements solely with respect to the
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: remaining articles the Final fourteen. The final Agreement will be
• 39:13
  Speaker 2: approved to a binding resolution of the of the UN
• 39:16
  Speaker 2: Security Council.
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: So now we need the UN Security Council to bless.
• 39:20
  Speaker 2: Anything we do. I can't imagine a worse outcome. Can't
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: imagine a worse outcome. This is about the worst any
• 39:31
  Speaker 2: president could have done. Kamala could not have done worse. Now,
• 39:36
  Speaker 2: Kamala would have never got into the war, which given this,
• 39:40
  Speaker 2: would have been better. Better not to have gone to
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: this war. By the way, we all know where the
• 39:52
  Speaker 2: money is going to go. According to Rouiters, two regional
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: diplomats briefed by he said, Iran has a surella it
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: would receive more funds once assets on frozen. While a
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: senior Lebanese Saw said Iran had promised funds as soon
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: as possible, and another Lebanese Saw said Iran was expected
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: to boost support. So we know the way the money's
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: going to go. But that's okay, that's okay. We've surrendered.
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: We have no say in this. I mean, the best
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: thing that could happen, really is the United States is
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: just leave, not cut a nuclear deal, just leave, just leave,
• 40:32
  Speaker 2: get out of the region, just get up. All he
• 40:38
  Speaker 2: can do at this point is is do damage. All
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: Trump could do is do damage. And the idea that
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: Kamala would have been worse. I mean maybe, but it's
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: hard to imagine. And it's so bad that worse to
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: what agree? How much? How much?
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: Was?
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah? And here's the thing, God, what happened to this?
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: Oh wait a second, let me just log into this.
• 41:21
  Speaker 2: I have to log into for this article. Let's see
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: if that worked anyway.
• 41:31
  Speaker 3: This is the thing.
• 41:35
  Speaker 2: I mean, the Republican Party, while even if it's even
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: if it's critical of the deal, refuses to be critical
• 41:48
  Speaker 2: of Trump. Here's an article by by Kevin Williamson. I'm
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: going to read you parts of it because he expresses
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: it pretty well. He says a few Republican senators will
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: be making a little noise about the Trump administration supposed
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: to deal the agreement to seek an agreement with Iran.
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: Apparently there's some in Congress who believe that Congress should
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: have some input here. That's cute. Trump went a war
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: illegally with Iran without so much as a by your
• 42:22
  Speaker 2: leave or a desultory nod to Congress direction. Congress had
• 42:28
  Speaker 2: no say over how this war started. Congress had no
• 42:31
  Speaker 2: say over how this war was conducted. Congress had no
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: say as to the war's goals or objectives. And members
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: of Congress, led by such servile specimens as Mike Johnson,
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: the Republicans speak of the House, and John Thune, the
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: Republican majority leader in the Senate, did nothing more than
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: work to maintain a firm grip on their ankles. I mean,
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: this guy can write, and he's absolutely right. Radio commentator
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: mak Levin speaking in the haalf of we the people,
• 43:08
  Speaker 2: as is the want of such broadcasts as demanded quote,
• 43:12
  Speaker 2: I have asked for days, why can't we the people
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: see the damn MoU not through people briefed on an
• 43:18
  Speaker 2: anonymous person. Honestly, I've never seen anything like this. If
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: it is a great outcome for peace, then release it.
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: Williamson continues, there's an answer to that question, and it
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: is that Trump does not care what Macklevin has to
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: say about this, about anything else. I used to have
• 43:35
  Speaker 2: a friendly relationship with mak Levin, who used to have
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: me on his show from time to time and blowed
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: one of my books. And one cannot help but admire
• 43:42
  Speaker 2: a man who has made a career in radio with
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: that you know that voice. He makes fun of his
• 43:47
  Speaker 2: voice like but he is like everyone else in Fox
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: News obit a cheap date with Trump is concerned. He
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: has been, among other disreputable things, a notorious apologist for
• 44:02
  Speaker 2: the attempt to could the taunt in twenty twenty twenty one,
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: Trump knows that Levin at L will forgive his attempt
• 44:10
  Speaker 2: to illegally hold onto the presidency after having lost an election.
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: By comparison not being entirely forthcoming with a little bit
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: of text that isn't going to amount to a too
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: much is small stuff? Senator John Thunton whimpet that there
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: should be quote probably some expectation that the Senate would
• 44:32
  Speaker 2: get would get a vote on this. Probably some expectation,
• 44:36
  Speaker 2: forceful stuff if you happen to be an ameemba. Senator
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: James Langford quote, we've got to have a vote on
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: Congress to be able to solidify it long term, unquote,
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: which is to say they were probably gonna. Senate from
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: Oklahoma believes that Congress's job is simply to solidify that
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: which passes out of the executive branch. As if the
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: Senate were a dose of le legislate.
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: Of emodium emodium.
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: You get the anyway solidified. Given the conflicting accounts of
• 45:08
  Speaker 2: what is in the deal, Tehran and Washington still do
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: not seem to quite agree about that. Senator Lindsay Graham,
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: that mighty hyperion of South Carolina thundered. I am somewhat
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: concerned when cannot blame Trump for this. It was not
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: Trump who made live in Thune Johnson Graham at all
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: into such pious and piteous and contemptible figures. They did
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: that to themselves, and you know so many who support
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: Trump have done that to themselves. This is the ironic
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: outcome of setting aside one principles and morality and patriotism
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: to pursue power vicariously through a corrupt demo such as Trump.
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: You lose your reputation, but you don't get the power
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: you thought you were going to get. You abandon your
• 46:09
  Speaker 2: honor for nothing, absolutely or almost nothing, maybe a little
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: bit of money for the broadcaster's and a little bit
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: of time on the public teat for the time servers.
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: Proximity to power creates an illusion of sharing in that power,
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: of being part of some great, great grand thit thing.
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: I've seen men I thought were serious receive a mere
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: text message from the White House and squeal like a
• 46:41
  Speaker 2: four year old girl who is being presented with a
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: real life unicorn on her birthday. It is unseemly upon
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: the triumph of Julius Caesar Cato, the younger disemboweled himself,
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: preferring to die rather than live a day under a tyrant.
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: And when he regained consciousness and discovered that his friends
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: had saved his life and had him stitch back together,
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: he ripped the suitors out with his bare hands and
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: finished the job. Saidator Graham is somewhat concerned, and Mark
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: Levin is out there tweeting on behalf of we the people.
• 47:25
  Speaker 2: The monsters or the monster always turns on Doctor Frankenstein
• 47:32
  Speaker 2: and the Rabbi always ends up crushed under the weight
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: of the GOLMB. Republicans are pretending to be surprised and
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: put and put out by all this. It's your sirlcus,
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: your monkey. That is really good, absolutely correct. These people
• 47:56
  Speaker 2: created Trump. Mark Levin creed Trump. He did everything he
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: could to get Trump elected. He hailed Trump as a
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: great president, complimented Trump about everything, and turned turned away,
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: didn't want to look, and ultimately gave in to Trump
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: on January sixth. They deserve to be betrayed. We don't
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: deserve it. We the people don't deserve it. Republicans deserve this.
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: So I mean, give me a break, Mark Living, give
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: me a break. You're upset from this deal? You don't,
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: you're worried about it. Really, after everything Trump is done
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: for ten years, you're surprised by this anyway. This is
• 49:02
  Speaker 2: this is the world in which we live, and this
• 49:05
  Speaker 2: is the present. We're gonna have to suffer for the
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: next two and a half years and uh survive it somehow.
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: I'm not exactly how, but you know, Parks, I mean, really,
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: I'm here to the markle Evins of the world and
• 49:21
  Speaker 2: the bench Shapiwers of the world, who claim to be
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: for markets and full freedom and for America and support
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: Israel and see the value and you know, overthrowing the
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: regime in Iran and a strong America and a strong
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: foreign policy, and who believe in the Constitution, in the
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: American way of life, in the American government. You you,
• 49:46
  Speaker 2: Mark Levin, You you Ben Shapiro. You created this monster.
• 49:54
  Speaker 2: Is it shocking that the monster will turn on you?
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: Is it shocking that the monster disappoints you. You chose
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: to evade reality. You chose to evade the nature of
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: the monster. And don't tell me there was only there
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: was only this monster Democrat. There were primaries in twenty fifteen,
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: there were primaries in twenty twenty four. I didn't see
• 50:16
  Speaker 2: you stand up against Trump at any point. You created
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: this monster. You deserve anything that comes of this monster.
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: It's just again, we don't deserve it. Yeah, it's it's
• 50:38
  Speaker 2: It is disgusting and despicable, and shame shame on Mark Levin,
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: and shame on Ben Shapiro, and shame on the people
• 50:47
  Speaker 2: who've supported who supported Trump. Thomas says, come on, come on,
• 50:54
  Speaker 2: use that for it. No, why should I descend to
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: using the effort. I could be angry and upset, and
• 50:59
  Speaker 2: I could be pissed off without swearing. And I think
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: my my the passion in my uh in in the
• 51:11
  Speaker 2: extent of my being pissed off, comes across without an effort,
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: without the effort being being needed. Yeah, James Carvill yesterday
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: said Trump is going to resign, that he's gonna get
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: a walloped, He's gonna get walloped in the midterms. He's
• 51:27
  Speaker 2: gonna get crushed in the midterms, and that'll force him
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: to resign. But then we get JD. Evans because that's
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: another one of Trump's decisions.
• 51:36
  Speaker 3: Trump chose JD.
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: Events.
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: So I mean, we're gonna if Trump designs, then you
• 51:43
  Speaker 3: get JD.
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: Vans. Is that good? So am I for Trump designing?
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know if you get JD. Van's,
• 51:57
  Speaker 2: but that's a Trump decision. That's again we get what
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: we pay or what we vote for. This is exactly
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: what you get. Anyway, I want to say a few
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: things about the states of homos separate from the from
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: all of this, just because uh, you know, there's a
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: lot of talk shippings opening up, and you know after
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: this ships will flow, oil will flow in and out
• 52:15
  Speaker 2: of the States of Homos, and it's not that simple.
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: Part of the part of the issue of the States
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: of the bottomnecke of the States of Homoes is insurance costs.
• 52:30
  Speaker 2: And the reality is right now that the risk of
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: transporting a ship to the States of Formos is high.
• 52:39
  Speaker 2: You don't know when the Uranians will decide to close it,
• 52:42
  Speaker 2: when decide to attack a ship, when decide that they
• 52:45
  Speaker 2: don't like the ownership of any particular ship and stop
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: it or or think it. And the insurance companies and
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: the insurance pools they're called clubs and mutual insures. The
• 52:59
  Speaker 2: people who aggregate resources to provide insurance, they have to
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: take that into accounts. So war insurance and damage insurance
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: for any vessel, whether it be a tanker, whether it
• 53:14
  Speaker 2: be an ordinary cargo vessel entering the States through the
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: States of Awards is going to go up significantly. It
• 53:23
  Speaker 2: used to be. It used to be a tiny fraction
• 53:28
  Speaker 2: of the value of the cargo. So ahead of here
• 53:32
  Speaker 2: a second ago, I think it Z point one percent,
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: and it's probably going to go up ten x to
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: one percent.
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: That's a lot of money. And then there was pretty much.
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: Unanimous agreement for anybody who specializes in shipping and knows
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: what's going on in the States of Homos.
• 53:51
  Speaker 3: That the Ranians are going to charge your fee.
• 53:54
  Speaker 2: And it's not clear how big of a fee it is,
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: and everybody recognizes the fee is based on international law.
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: Whatever that's worth goes counter te international law. But they
• 54:06
  Speaker 2: are going to charge a fee, and that's going to lease.
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: So the cost of going in and out of the
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: States of Homoes is going up, and not only that,
• 54:13
  Speaker 2: the cost of going through the other streets, the ones
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: that the hoodies sit on, is also going up because insurance,
• 54:19
  Speaker 2: because they could close that straight as well. By the way,
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: you know, seven drones were fired against ships trying to
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: exit the States of Homoes yesterday or maybe it was
• 54:33
  Speaker 2: this morning by the Ranians, all shut down by the Americans.
• 54:38
  Speaker 2: And it's not a violation of the ceasefire, I guess
• 54:41
  Speaker 2: by Trump's logic, because none of the drones hit they
• 54:45
  Speaker 2: target Nobody died, so it's not a violation. Only people died.
• 54:49
  Speaker 2: There's the counter violation, or at least the helicopter gets
• 54:53
  Speaker 2: shut down, then it's a violation.
• 54:55
  Speaker 3: But if we shoot them before they hit, not a violation.
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: So you know, shippers and insurance companies have got to
• 55:02
  Speaker 2: be concerned, and so they've got a fee on the
• 55:05
  Speaker 2: States of Emars, They've got increased insurance costs. They're still
• 55:08
  Speaker 2: going to do it because it's a profitable route, but
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: now they've also got a fee Ensues Canal. They've got
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: high insurance costs for going through the Red Sea because
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: of the hoodies.
• 55:21
  Speaker 3: A lot of the shippers are going to go.
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: Around the.
• 55:24
  Speaker 3: Cape of Good Hope is it?
• 55:27
  Speaker 2: I think it's a Cape of Good Hope around South
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: Africa to get to Europe. That's gonna make everything more expensive.
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: So you know they ask them it's of at least
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: a dollar or more a gallon of increased costs from
• 55:43
  Speaker 2: this crisis. We're all gonna pay. I mean a few
• 55:46
  Speaker 2: cents here, a few cents there, but it adds up
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: for what just happened. It's gonna increase costs. It's going
• 55:53
  Speaker 2: to complicate shipping, it's going to take it's going to
• 55:57
  Speaker 2: take ships a lot longer to get to where their
• 55:59
  Speaker 2: destination is. As I told you earlier, three Iranian tank
• 56:06
  Speaker 2: has exited the US blockade for the first time in months.
• 56:11
  Speaker 2: But in terms of the Iranian side of the deal.
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: You on fire several drones towards commercial ships in the
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: States of w wars since Society of the memorandum, So
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: they're not living up to their side of the deal.
• 56:28
  Speaker 2: But of course Trump doesn't care, because look, Trump has
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: no choice. Trump is just doing you and me a favor.
• 56:34
  Speaker 2: The world would be in a great depression if not
• 56:39
  Speaker 2: for Trump. I mean, we should all be grateful, super
• 56:43
  Speaker 2: grateful to Trump for uh, you know, for helping out here,
• 56:50
  Speaker 2: for helping out so a god. You know, who the
• 57:05
  Speaker 2: big winner is actually, I was gonna I'll talk about
• 57:10
  Speaker 2: that later. Who the big winner is of all this?
• 57:12
  Speaker 2: I mean, I'll say it now, but then I'll remind you.
• 57:16
  Speaker 2: I'll remind you later. The big winner of all of
• 57:19
  Speaker 2: this is not just yourn but the big winner is China.
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: She is the big win of this. She's profile goes
• 57:26
  Speaker 2: up significantly, She's confidence goes up significantly. She's knowledge that.
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: There is.
• 57:38
  Speaker 2: Nothing in the United States can do to thwart his
• 57:41
  Speaker 2: global ambitions. Everything she does now he does with a
• 57:45
  Speaker 2: lot more confidence than he did before this stupid deal
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: was passed. All right, guys, today's show is going long
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: because I've just finished the second topic out of six
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: or seven, I will have an achievement at the end
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: of the show, So don't worry it. Positives are coming,
• 58:01
  Speaker 2: and you know, I'm just going to make the request
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: that we try to get to our targets. We're one
• 58:09
  Speaker 2: hundred short of our first hour goal, and we're two
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: minutes away from the end of the first hour, and
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: we're probably going to go in to deep into a
• 58:17
  Speaker 2: second hour and maybe into a third, depending because I'm
• 58:20
  Speaker 2: getting a lot of two and five dollars questions, So
• 58:23
  Speaker 2: twenty dollars questions, fifty dollar questions, one hundred dollar questions.
• 58:27
  Speaker 2: Stickers always welcome because that doesn't eat up time. But
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: value for value, I do this, and all right.
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: Let's see.
• 58:41
  Speaker 2: So it turns out that during the UFC match at
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: the White House, the UFC two hundred and fiftieth anniversary
• 58:50
  Speaker 2: or whatever, I don't like the UFC, so I don't
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: think positively the other but anyway, it doesn't matter. It
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: was on a soft loan of the White House. I
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: think very inappropriate for the White House, but there it is.
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: It happened. There was a plot to actually attack the UFC.
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: The plot in its most ambitious form included drones with
• 59:13
  Speaker 2: explosives launched into the crowd, but also snipers in a
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: number of different locations, shooting as the crowd fled the
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: drones of bombing.
• 59:30
  Speaker 3: There was also plans that this.
• 59:31
  Speaker 2: Group had to attack other facilities and locations around around Washington,
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: d C. And these were detailed plans to do this,
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: including weapons, although they never found any drones, but they
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: did find guns and ammunition and I think some potential
• 59:53
  Speaker 2: bomb making material. Now you know, this is all based
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: on FBI FI leaks and Kush Partel announcing this. The
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 2: Secret Service has been a little bit more mum about it.
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 2: The Secret Service is kind of chiding the FBI for
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: leaking any of this information before before there is any
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: solid information, before the investigation has finished. But anyway, the
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 2: FBI has charged five people in connection with this plot,
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: and they learned of the plot on June tenth, about
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: seven days ago, four days before the UFC event, and
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: they learned it from the mother of one of the plotters,
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: a guy named Tyson proper Right, and he had been
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 2: communicating with the group that was described in the court
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: documents as ex military and Christian based, and the members
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: of this group extras expressed ultra religious and anti government sentiments.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: The grievances ranged from government corruption, the handling of the
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein files, and of course the intense control and
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: influence of the Jews on the US government. So who
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: said there was no right wing violence, Well, maybe there
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: was any violence because it was stopped. It's like the
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: drones that are trying to hit the ships, but the
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 2: US shoots them down, so it doesn't count. No, this counts, right,
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 2: this counts. These are Christian based, ultra religious you know,
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein files and anti Jews. In addition to weapons
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 2: which they purchased, Propa's mother had observed her son researching
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 2: and mapping locations in the area of northwest Washington, DC
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 2: and engaging in physical training, which he learned was related
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 2: to what the group was doing.
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 3: She saw that he was receiving additional images and.
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 2: Maps from others through texts and discord messages, and overheard
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: him talking on the phone. When she asked what he
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: was doing, Propa replied that he couldn't tell her exactly,
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 2: but that they were looking at multiple different locations and
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: intended to conduct recon as well as hit and run missions.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: According to quote records. On Thursday, law enforcement search Proper's
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: house in Ohio found a large quantity of boxes of
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: spent ammunition, rounds of spent cartridges, casings, and technical clothing.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: During an interview that day, Proper admitted to planning a
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: coordinated attack during the UFC event. According to court documents,
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: he he said the goal was to jump start a revolution,
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 2: jump start a revolution, not not a Marxist revolution, not
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 2: a woke revolution, a right wing, ultra religious, ultra Christian revolution. Anyway,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: they planned all this online, and again five people have
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: been arrested. The Secret Service is a little bit more
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 2: circums expect inters of who they are, what they are,
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: and and what exactly is going on. But the f
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: BI seems to be eger to claim a win. I
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 2: think kashmtel Is is much more interested in the press
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: than and the press that he gets, than in actually
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 2: actually any any justice. I mean, it really does seem
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: like a bunch of amateurs that probably wouldn't have done anything,
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: or if they had done, probably would have minimal casualties.
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: But good for the mom uh for alerting authorities, Good
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: that they arrested them, and uh yeah, I mean political
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 2: violence and the the intent of political violence is on
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: the rise. And if you want to understand why, I
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: listened to my shows about you know, about this kind
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 2: of the state of the world, and listen to my
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: shows about the philosophical drivers of the modern world, both
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: and the philosophical drivers both on the left.
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 3: And uh, you know, and on the on the right.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: I did a show on Saturday that I think bears
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: a lot to these these kind of phenomena, and and
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: of course, you know, I think Trump and the mindlessness
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 2: that he celebrates bears a lot of responsibility for the
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 2: massive increase in political violence, the weird experiencing. All right,
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: So now for something completely different. Federals of met today,
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: uh for the first time under the leadership of Kevin Walsh,
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 2: who is the new chair, I'm under the Federal Reserve,
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: Kevin Wishart appointed by Trump. And the intent was that
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: he was going to come in and cut rates. I mean,
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: that's being Trump's thing about the Federal Reserve. Cut interest rates,
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: cut interest rates. That's that's that was the idea. The
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 2: current benchmark. The FED at its meeting today held it steady,
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: unchanged in a range between three point five and three
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: point seventy five, and that was a unanimous vote. But
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: when when they went around and asked about increasing rates
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: next time or by year end or decreasing by year end,
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: nine of the nineteen officials penciled in at least one
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 2: rate increased by year's end. That's up from zero in March,
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: so only one My guess is, I don't know who
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 2: that would be. Only one.
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 3: Down from twelve.
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 2: So the previous meeting in at least the meeting in March,
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 2: not the previous but on in March, the FED basically
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: expected the cut rates in the future. At this point
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: they're expecting either keep them the same or to raise them.
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: But there's no rate cut expected at least now. We'll
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: see what happens to the economy. This is all kind
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 2: of a moving target, as the FED is always you know,
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: the FED is trying to manage the money supply, which
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: is like driving a car. Driving a car, but you
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 2: don't look through the wind screen. You only look through
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: the window looking backwards. All their data is the past.
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 2: They have very little insight into the future. So it
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 2: is kind of a twist that it's Kevin Walsh of
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: all people, that is affirming the idea that rates are
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 2: not going down, when this is the whole point of
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 2: him being appointed to the FED according to Trump. Now,
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 2: I guess they're hoping now that because all prices have
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: come down and they're way down since the memory and
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 2: of Understanding was signed, that prices will come down and
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 2: as a consequence, the FED will feel comfortable in reducing
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: interest rates. But at least nobody on the Federal Board
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 2: right now thinks that that is likely, or at least
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: only one person and maybe that's Kevin Walsh thinks that
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: is likely. So yeah, I mean, Kevin Walsh also believes
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 2: that the AI boom is going to be deflationary, that is,
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 2: it's going to be a force reducing prices in the
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 2: economy because productivity will go up so much. And I
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 2: think that's true in the long run, but whether that
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 2: happens in the short run or not is dubious. And
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 2: part of his expectation about lowering interestrates was dependent on
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: AI really kicking productivity, you know, increasing productivity dramatically quickly
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 2: and for price going down, and then he believes he
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: can reduce interest rates. Nobody seems to agree with him
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: on the FED, and it's not clear he even he
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: agrees with himself on the FED given how high prices
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: have jumped over the last couple of months. All Right,
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: you remember we talked about D and I, the Director
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: of National Intelligence. We've talked about a number of times
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: Trump had had appointed this, this housing guy to run intelligence,
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: and you know, nobody understood why. I mean, he has
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: no qualifications. He is a complete partisan hack. He is
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: there to do Trump's bidding and probably just a spy
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: on Trump's enemies. So basically, some Republicans and Democrats basically said, look,
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: we are not going to approve PISA. PISA is the
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: bill that allows the NSA to spy on all of us.
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: We're not not going to prove viser and and the
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: build that has secret courts, which I think is unconstitutional.
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 2: But we're not gonna PROFISA, which which has been approved
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: by every Congress since, uh since nine to eleven, was
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: part of the Patriots Act. We're not gonna have proofser until,
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: you know, unless you replace this guy with somebody else.
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: And then Trump said okay, okay, and uh so Trump
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: nominated Jay Clayton, and he was pushing him to be
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: the permanent guy at the d N. I and Clayton's
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: a guy that Congress will probably approve. And uh, even
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 2: though he has no intelligence experience, he's more respected and
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 2: believed to be more objective. But anyway, that was going
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 2: to go through and Congress was going to profser but
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: then Trump said yesterday or today, no, I'm not I'm
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 2: stopping the nomination of of of of Clayton. Uh, you
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 2: know I'm not interested if you don't go authro I
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: section seven oh two of the Fund Intelligence Surveillance Act.
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: So be it. I want the rest of my agenda
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 2: passed as well. So I want the voting bill, the
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 2: construment what it's called, but the voting bill. I want
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 2: that to pass. And if Congress, if the Senate will
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 2: not pass that bill. It needs sixty votes and it
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: doesn't have them. If Senate doesn't pass that bill, then
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 2: I will not put up Jake Clayton, nominate j Clayton.
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: We will not have PAISA, and the sent won't be
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 2: able to do anything nothing. Zero zilch.
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 3: To put a mildly.
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 2: Senate is a pretty pissed off, including Republicans who thought
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: they had a path at least to get the national
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: security Remember this is the National security issues supposedly, and
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: Trump is basically, yeah, who cares about national security? I
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: want my other stuff passed. I want, you know, the
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: Save America Bill passed, Save America right to help with
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: to help with national security. Right. I don't necessarily believe
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: this is national security, but he thinks it is, and
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: Republicans think it is in order to try to blackmail
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: against Democrats to vote for the Save of America Act,
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: which they're not going to. They're pretty committed not to
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: voting for that. So yeah, nothing's happening. Uh, it's it's Uh,
• 1:11:40
  Speaker 2: it's going to be interesting to see what happens, uh
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: and how this all plays out. But basically, the Senate
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: is paralyzed because Trump Duck can get the Save the
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: Save of America Act, he won't allow anything else to
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: be legislated. But this is Trump. This is not surprising,
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: all right. A couple of Chinese stories Huawei, why Wai?
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 2: Why Wait? Why Wait? Why Wi? Is this phone company right?
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: Or telecommunications company from China? Very very successful. It was
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 2: almost the dominant play in telecommunications globally until people discovered
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 2: that they were actually making it possible for the Chinese
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: to spy on everybody's telecommunication incorporate, including here in the
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: United States. They were clear, they were leaving clear facilitating
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 2: clear ability through the telecommunication to basically use their equipment
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 2: to spy and everybody the US stopped buying banned way Why.
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 2: I think the first Trumpet administration did that, and then
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 2: Biden administration doubled up on that, and the Europeans stopped
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 2: buying way Why equipment because it was obviously a national
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 2: security threat. But the bigger issue is way Why is
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 2: more than just the tir communication company.
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 3: They've gone into chip manufacturing. And here's the thing right now.
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 2: There is only one way to make the most advanced
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: chips in the world, and that's with ultra what's called
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: ultra u V u v I right, ultra uv lights
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: and it's a process that requires machines from ASML in
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: the Netherlands. And there's only one company in the world
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: that makes the machines that can make the most advanced
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 2: chips using this process, which is called ultra ultra you know,
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 2: ultraviolet laser technology. It's it's a it's a special technology
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: that is yeah, that that you there's only one machine
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: and nobody it's it's called sorry, it's called deep ultra violet.
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 2: That's what it's called deep ultraviolet lithography, Deep ultra violet
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: lithography do d u V. Now here's the thing, Uh,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 2: the buying administration and and then Trump followed up on
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 2: that have bored China from buying the most advanced chips
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 2: that are made using the d the you know, the
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: the d u V, the deep ultraviolet lithography systems. They
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 2: banned the Chinese from buying them. Now here's the thing. Oh,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: and they can't buy the chips. But also they've banned
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 2: the Chinese from buying the equipment to make the chips,
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: the do d u V lithography machines that a SML produces.
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 2: A SML is not allowed to sell their machines to
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 2: Chinese right and and it need you know, any other
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: piece like what Japan produces, any piece that is that
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 2: is required to make the most advanced chips.
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 3: The United States's band from selling to the Chinese.
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: That includes companies in the US, for example, that make
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 2: design automation software to design these chips, you know, market
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: leaders like Cadence and Synopsis. It also includes Japanese Japanese
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 2: manufactures of equipment that is used in the DUV process.
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 2: So China relies today on whatever they can get in
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: the black market of the more advanced chips that are
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 2: made by TSMC and Samsung, and they rely on whatever
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 2: they can produce themselves. But this of course has created
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 2: a real desire in China and real competition within China
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 2: to try and developed their own technology to compete. Now
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 2: they probably can do deep ultra violet lithography, it's too complex.
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 2: But what the Chinese is are challenging now is is
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 2: this the only way in the world to make the
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 2: high end chips, And what we're seeing right now is way.
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: Wife for example, has made a seven nanometa. Now it's
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 2: not the most advanced, but they made a seven nanometa
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: employing a different technique to etch the chip without using
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 2: deep ultra violet lithography. And it could very well be
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 2: that they will be able to develop the ability to
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 2: make the four three two nanometer chips the most advanced
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: ships in the world, using new techniques that don't rely
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 2: on ASML equipment. I mean, here's for an article that
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 2: is written about this. The fundamental premise of US exports
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 2: export control strategy was that semiconductor supply chains are too complex,
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 2: too specialized, and too dependent on Western intellectual property for
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 2: any single nation to replicate internally. Way why is progress
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 2: directly challenges as ceases industry. Aleaners points out that while
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: smcs multi patenting techniques are functional, they suffer from significant
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 2: lower yield rates and higher manufacturing costs compared to Western
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: foundries like TSMC.
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 3: S mic is the Chinese foundry.
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: However, because way Y is heavily subsidized by the Chinese state,
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 2: commercial profitability is secondary to strategic independence. The government of
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 2: Beijing views semiconductor autonomy as a matter of national security,
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: absorbing the financial losses that would cripple a traditional corporation.
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 2: So you know, what do you do the US government?
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 2: The article continues, This government faces a critical dilemma. Tightening
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 2: the sanctions further, perhaps by imposing secondary sanctions on legacy
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 2: DUV equipment or targeting foreign subsidies, risks alienating key allies
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: in Europe and Asia who rely on the lucrative Chinese market. Conversely,
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 2: maintaining the status quote essentially concedes that the current export
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 2: controls have failed to hold China's march toward's high tech
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 2: self reliance. As waywide prepares to unveil its next generation
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 2: of propriety silicon. The limits of American economic cosion are
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 2: being tested on a global stage, and I think that's right.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 2: It's very difficult. It's very difficult to constrain trade on
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 2: even on national security grounds. It's very difficult to make
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 2: it effective. And Way why has breakthrough now? How they
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 2: can have a breakthrough and an authoritarian regime? How can
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 2: they continue to advance engineering and science? I don't know.
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: Are they stealing stuff and intellectual property? Are they Is
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: there enough internal freedom that engineers and scientists can still
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 2: do their work and create the stuff. It's hard to tell.
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 2: This is you know, China is very very different than
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 2: the Soviet model. It's not China propaganda because we're seeing
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 2: these ships in action. We're seeing them in data centers,
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 2: We're seeing them in their way. Why phone. The real
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 2: shock was when Way I came out with the phone
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 2: that had the seven animeter and anime to chip in it. Now,
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: it could be that they can do any smaller and
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 2: seven animeter we will see. But there's no reason to
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 2: believe this is just propaganda. And that is it is
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 2: not that it is not happening now so we'll see.
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 2: You know, you have to be a little skeptical, I
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 2: guess of authoritarian regimes making real progress, but for a
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 2: while they probably can't. And you know, this has huge
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 2: consequences to AI and advanced weapons systems. In terms of
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: export controls, let's flip this to the export controls China
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 2: is imposing on the West. And China has embraced export controls,
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: export controls for rare earth materials. But it turns out
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: not only that there's a bunch of stuff that China
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 2: makes that the West, including the United States, just doesn't
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: make in quantities, in the quantities that it needs. And
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 2: China is working to basically weaponize the supply chain.
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 3: And of course some of it is.
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 2: A response the fact that the United States has export
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 2: control in them. Why should they have export controls on
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: us from their perspective, right, it just shows how we
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 2: have to decide what China is. We have to figure
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 2: out a strategy. Oh there's a word that this administration
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: doesn't know what to do with strategy to deal with it,
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 2: and we don't have a strategy. And as I said,
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 2: I think China, China gets from the Iran Wall how
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: weak we are and now, by the way, it's only
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 2: going to increase their export controls.
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 3: It's only going to increase the squeeze they have on us.
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 2: And yes, we have rare materials and we could we
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 2: continuously to devise new ways to get at them into
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 2: but we're not doing it. We're not actually going out
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: there and mining and or finding it. Yet maybe we
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 2: will at some point. So it wants China wants to
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: maintain the chick points now it by doing so, it
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 2: creates the same incentives as the West, the same incentives
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 2: in the West as the West is giving them when
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 2: it's or when it cuts off chip supply, it provides
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: incentives in the West. They innovate and and I think
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 2: that's gonna happen. I think that'll save a bat if
• 1:22:23
  Speaker 2: you will. But China is only gonna get aggressive in
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 2: the in the next few years. As long as Trump
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: is president, China is gonna ramp up because it now
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 2: knows and it's known forever. I think it you from
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 2: the first administ Trump administration.
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 3: Trump is weak.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: Trump is weak, and they're gonna exploit that weakness in
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 2: every angle that they can think of. Now, China's pretty
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 2: weak too, for variety of reasons. But anyway, all right,
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 2: let's let's shift now to human achievements. And really the
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 2: first piece of human achievement I want to talk about
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: is the World Cup. I mean, I love these big
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: sports events. I love watching athletes at the top of
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 2: the game. I love watching the best in the world,
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 2: and World Cup is an opportunity to see that. In
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: soccer football, for those of you who don't live in
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 2: the United States, you get the best football players in
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: the world, and it's it's fun. It's it's fun to watch.
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 2: And I've watched a couple of games now, and you know,
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 2: I think it's worth mentioning today that Lionel Messi probably
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: the greatest soccer player in history. Messi probably the greatest
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 2: soccer player in history, probably better than Pela I, who
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 2: was always considered the greatest soccer player. That Lionel Messi
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 2: scored three goals yesterday, three goals in a three zero
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: victory of Argentina Algeria. They were all beautiful goals. They
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 2: wanted his goals, they were, you know, and you could
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 2: see how smart and competent a player he is.
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 3: He's just fun to watch.
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 2: He just plays fun, smart football and he is exceptional.
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 2: And to watch people at that level, even if it's
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: just physical, to watch people at that level is inspiring.
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 2: And if you watch his interviews, you watch documentaries about him,
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 2: he's smart too, and his life story's fascinating. And here's
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 2: a great athlete and he's thirty nine years old, sees
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 2: at the very end of his career. I mean, he's
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 2: so far at the end of his career that he
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: basically gave up, you know, playing for the top clubs
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 2: in Europe and came to the United States and plays
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 2: in Miami for the last three years, which is a
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 2: lot later of a schedule, is flying high at the
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 2: top of the more than seventy thousand, so I don't
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 2: want to hear this stadium. And you know, in spite
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 2: of that, he manages to score three goals, three goals,
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 2: which is.
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: Spectacular other elite players.
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 2: Yesterday, the league player in France and Beppe scored two goals.
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 2: The top player for Norway scored two goals. So the
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 2: top players have come to play, They have come to play,
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 2: and they are performing so far. Now, this World Cup
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: is a little frustrating because there are a lot of teams,
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 2: way too many teams that were I think fifty teams.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: So it's going to be a while before we get
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 2: into the more exciting games and the top teams playing
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 2: each other. But it's still enjoyable to watch, and you should.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: You should definitely, you should definitely watch. The United States
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 2: came out and played a terrific game against Paraguay and
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 2: they want for one. You know. I noticed they start
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: talking about soccer and people are leaving the live show.
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 3: It's a human achievement. These are good players. This is good.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: Now, what's interesting. There was a story in ABC News
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 2: this was interesting that here. It is across TikTok, Instagram,
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 2: and other social media platforms, fans from around the world
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: are sharing their reactions to uniquely American experiences, from sprawling
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 2: supermarkets and self serve ice dispensers, to oversize pickup trucks,
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: fire engines, and what many describe as exceptionally friendly customer service.
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 2: That's a whole article about all these foreigners coming to
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 2: America and they've heard all these horror stories about American
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 2: Americans and.
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 3: They actually like it here.
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, supermarkets are amazing, the stores are wonderful, that
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: people are super friendly, and the customer service is unhoard
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 2: of competing Europe, and we drive big cars and big
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 2: pickup trucks and we have free ice. Free ice is
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 2: unhoard of in the rest of the world. And that's
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 2: a great story because we should remind ourselves, those of
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: us living in the United States, this is still a
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 2: great place to live. Still, it is a great place
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 2: to live. It's always been a great place to live,
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 2: and it is it still is in many respects, the
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: best place in the world to live. And it is
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 2: it is amazing. I mean, if the people who actually
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 2: manage to get a visa and get into the United States, yeah,
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's it's pretty cool this scene with so
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 2: much richer than Europeans, with so much richer than South Americans,
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: even so much richer than Canadians, that they can't help
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 2: but see that, right they can. Europeans who don't visit
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: America can sit in Europe and think yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 2: you know, you're not richer than us. We have long vacations,
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: we have this No, we're much richer than you. So
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 2: that I think is pretty cool. That is pretty cool
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: that you know, tourists come here and they they see
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 2: the upside, the virtues of American Those virtues are primarily
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: the result of the relatively flexible market economy that we
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 2: have and that they don't. All right, what else, Yeah,
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 2: Researchers a Monash University have found in laboratory experiments that
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 2: a drug which delivers copper to the brain copper to
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: the brain significantly reduces toxic Alzheimer's proteins and improves long
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 2: term facial memory. The study was published today in the
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: General ACS Chemical Neuroscience.
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 3: It shows that the Combound and.
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 2: See You repairs a vital waste cleaning pump at the
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 2: blood brain barrier, unlocking a potential new avenue of therapeutics
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: targeting neo vascular dysfunction caused by one of the world
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: caused by one of the world's leading causes of death. Ultimate. So,
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: any advance Monashes in Australia, Yes, any advance in trying
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: to fight alzheimer Is or any kind of dementia is amazing.
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: Speed it up, guys. We're all getting older here. We
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 2: need these solutions and we need them fast. So I'm
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 2: excited by this, Excited by any of this. Now, you know,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 2: it has to be replicated and has to be tried
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 2: and it has to be. There's a lot of stuff
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 2: that has to happen before this turns into something useful.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 3: And actually happening.
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 2: And that's that's true of all the meta stuff or
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 2: most of medical stuff I talk about on the achievement
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: section is more work needs to be done. There is
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 2: often a lot of a lot of good news on
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 2: the medical front that never makes it to reality. So
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 2: let's hope more of it becomes becomes reality. And uh,
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: and that we get, you know, we get we get some.
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 3: Significant cures for cancer and Alzheimer's.
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 2: And which which which are such horrific killers, horrific killers
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 2: and Alzheimis is not horific, it's horrific in the way
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 2: it kills and time it takes skill all right. Uh,
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 2: you know, Coppa is a compound in anti inflammatory and
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: your protective properties that has already progressed to clinical testing
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 2: for conditions like Parkinson and al a l S. And
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 2: now you know, because it's reducing amyloid burden, Uh, it
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 2: is going to go into clinical trials with to Alzheimer's
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 2: as well. So that's definitely exciting. Whips, That's not the
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: story I had. What happened? Wait a second, My final
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: feel good story disappeared on me. Let me find it,
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 2: uh the dumb No, it's not that one. I think
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: it's this one. Yeah, this is a story. I I
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 2: this is this is a uh you know, I made
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: it to a bunch of different news outlets. This is
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 2: the headline. US infant mortality rate felt an all time low.
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 2: So the decline translates to hundreds a fewer infant deaths
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: per year, uh, you know, basically infant itality, and the
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 2: US dropped a new low in twenty twenty five, a
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 2: significantly than five point four infinite deaths per one thousand
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: light burst in twenty twenty five, according to the Center
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: the Central Disease Control and Prevention. Now, it's true that
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 2: fewer than five point four is U is a decline
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: from you know, previous years and from the history of
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 2: it in the United States. It's still way higher than
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 2: most other developed nations. So there's still quite a bit
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 2: of work to be done for the United States to
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 2: capture up with places like Europe and others. A lot
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 2: of this has to do with lifestyle and and you know,
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 2: people just not taking in themselves. Women are not taking
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 2: care of themselves during pregnancy, and not making preventive care
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 2: available and all kinds of stupid things that involved with medicaid,
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 2: and we're generally with healthcare provisioning in the United States.
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 2: But you know, this is a this is a great
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 2: a great number. So we are definitely in the United
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: States on the path to improvement. And it's been coming
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: down for decades and it continues to go down, and
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: it's still too high, but it's getting better and that
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 2: is a fabulous result that we should thank how medical
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 2: professionals for achieving. All right, that, my friends, is the
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 2: news for this Wednesday, June seventeenth, seventeenth. Thanks thanks for
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 2: joining me. We'll move to the super chat. Not sure
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 2: what's going on today, but the sticker pile is very small,
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 2: and generally we're short of the first hour goal, so
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 2: we typically make that at the very least and exceed it.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 2: So let's see if we can Let's see in a
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: few minutes that we have left if we can make up.
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 2: We do have a few stickers like Roland, thank you,
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: an x it and Jason uh and uh whoops, let's see,
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 2: I love questions as well, so uh and Enrich and
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 2: yes and Stephen Harper, I mean if you ask a question,
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: I get to talk about what you want me to
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 2: talk about. And Bonnie and friend Hopper, so thank you
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 2: guys all for the stickers. Most stickers are welcome. It's
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: a way to trade value for value, more questions of
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 2: well come, It's a way for you to get me
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 2: to talk about what you want, what you think is valuable.
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 2: Remind you that Dinman Institute is a sponsor and you're
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: encouraged to sign up for them. Alright. AI Live, which
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 2: offers courses on objectivism. I'm offering a course on globalization
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: in the History of Trade, which starts July seventh. Uncle
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: Gata is offering a course on objectivism, Deep Dive into Objectivism,
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 2: Understanding Objectivism, and Keith is offering a course on writing
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 2: and a course on science. I think on optics, these
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 2: are fabulous, life changing I think, well, mine is probably
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: not life changing, but enjoyable, and you'll learn a lot,
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 2: and you'll gain a lot of value in at a
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 2: lot of understanding, and maybe I think out of the course,
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: you'll get a much better understanding of why I get
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: so furious, so upset by talk of Tariff's a big
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 2: part of what motivated this course.
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 3: Was you know, my interest in talking about tariffs.
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: But yeah, you know, but primarily it's a positive course
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: about the benefits of trade. The negatives of Tao's are
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 2: just a small part of it, but the positives are
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: what make the negatives so bad. What else, Yes, alex Epstein. Oh,
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 2: you can get a discun coupon discun code twenty six
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 2: YBS ten and you can find out the information on
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 2: nine man dough oak slash ybs. Alex Epstein, alex Epstein
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 2: dot substact dot com, alex Epstein dot substact dot com.
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 2: Check him out World Expert on Energy, all things energy,
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 2: all things environmental policy. Uh and yeah, I mean his
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 2: talking points, you know, basically give you ways in which
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 2: to communicate these ideas of freedom and liberty as they
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 2: apply to energy and electricity and in the environment. It
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 2: is an invaluable resource, amazing resource. All right, let's jump
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 2: in with the questions, and let's start with Silvano's Tones says,
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 2: thanks to the coverage you're on, not a day goes
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 2: by that I don't take solace in voting for Kamala.
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 2: The Cheeto in chief keeps digging deeper to hell. I'm
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 2: almost ready to vote for EOC just to spite the Republicans. Yeah,
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 2: I mean that's there might be a bridge too far,
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 2: but but I get I get your frustration, and I sympathize.
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 3: Fifty dollars.
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 2: Thank you Savannas really really appreciate that, Michael. Is stress
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 2: necessarily necessarily bad for your mental health? Isn't our culture
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 2: oriented of avoiding stress at all costs destructive to growth? Yeah?
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 2: I mean stress is is positive. I mean stress kind
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 2: of the stress is part of that the energy that
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 2: drives you to achieve, to be successful, to work hard.
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 2: So I mean it needs to be managed, and you
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 2: don't want to live in constant But you know, the
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 2: body clearly stresses during certain activities. When you exercise, for example,
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 2: the body is stressed. But also when you engage in
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 2: certain mental activities, stress of the body goes up. But
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 2: those mental activities are crucial and at work, interacting with
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 2: other people. I don't know from some people public speaking,
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 2: but you don't want to avoid those things because they
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 2: might be stressful, but you don't want to manage it that.
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 2: There's nothing wrong with relaxation exercises. I don't know, meditation,
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 2: the breathing exercises, things that help you reduce stress so
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: that when you engage in stress, your body and your
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 2: mind can cope with it better. So, yeah, you want
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 2: stress in your life, you also want to be able
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 2: to manage it. And you ought also want to be
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 2: able to recharge. Find different mechanisms by which to recharge
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 2: your batteries so you can better deal with the stress coming.
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 3: All right, Richard, thank you.
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: Richard says, as much as Trump has boasted about winning,
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 2: how can he accept such a losing outcome regarding you
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 2: on Because because reality has no impact on Trump, it's
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 2: only what goes on in his mind. Now, Look, he's furious,
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: he's angry, he's the I'm sure psychologically this is destructive
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: to him, but he is completely privacy of consciousness. That
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: is what he believes is true, what he thinks is true,
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 2: what he imagines is true. Reality has no currency for Trump.
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 2: Trump doesn't care about facts, he doesn't care about truth,
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 2: He doesn't care about what actually happened. He cares about
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: his own spin, the spin inside his own mind, and
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 2: he cares that other people around him reinforce his delusions.
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 2: This is why he likes the sycophans around him that
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 2: confirm his delusions, to tell him what a winner he is,
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 2: to tell him how successful he's been. That's what he
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 2: cares about. So reality has no bearing on what is
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 2: going on. Sadly it just doesn't. All he says, keep
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 2: up the human achievement please, Well, no interest in stopping
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 2: doing that. Link in a full pot question. What are
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 2: your thoughts on politicians kids serving in the military? On
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 2: the one hand, it gives them skin in the game
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 2: when leaders make military decisions. But on the other hand,
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 2: it gives the kids the job of military officers on
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 2: their resume without real sacrifice, which could greatly boost the
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 2: kid's political career in the future. Why do you think
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 2: the US Navy is or behind? Comparing this is a
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 2: different This is a different question, I think. All right,
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 2: let's take the kids a question first. No, of course not,
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 2: absolutely not. I mean, the kid should not have to
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 2: suffer forcing a kid to serve in the military because
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 2: their father happens to be a politician. Why should the
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 2: kids suffer for the sinners of the father? Why should
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 2: the kids suffer because the father happens to be a politician?
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 2: So absolutely not. You don't have a right to violate
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 2: the right of the child because you want you want the.
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 3: Father to have skin in the game.
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: That's irrelevant. And if you put if they went in
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 2: the military, they would have to go through the military
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 2: like everybody else. So no, absolutely not, I'm not in
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 2: favor of that. Let's see what's the next question. Why
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 2: do you think the US Navy is so behind compared
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 2: to the Army or Air Force in regards to technology,
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 2: longer lifespan of ships versus tanks and planes. Well, I
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: don't know if that's true. I think the Navy, unfortunately
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 2: has been stuck on a model of big ships that
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 2: take years and years and years to create, and then
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 2: a filled with technology that doesn't always work, and they
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 2: over over overdo it. But it's not clear to me
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 2: that the Navy's behind. I mean, they've got they've got
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 2: their unmade submarines, they've got unmanned boats, they've got unmanned
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 2: mind cleaner sweepers or or mine you know, submarine boats
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 2: that can deal with minds. So I'm not clear to
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 2: me that they're way behind. But you do have a
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 2: point about lifespan, and that is I think it took
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 2: it's taken the Navy longer to figure out that maybe
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 2: aircraft carriers are not the solution for the next generation
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: of Wolfare you need some, but beware those hypersonic ballistic
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 2: missiles might be able to take them out. And the
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 2: Navy needs to focus on anti missile technology urgently and
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 2: anti drone technology urgently, because imagine a swarm of a
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 2: thousand drones attacking a US aircraft carrier. Is there anything
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 2: you can do or even worse, you know, five hypersonic
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 2: ballistic missiles coming down on it. Those are the issues
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 2: that Navy has to deal with. So too much focused
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 2: on big and not enough focus on Okay, how's the
• 1:43:01
  Speaker 2: world evolving and how can we adjust? I think it's changing.
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 2: I think the Navy has changed and is changing, so
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 2: you'll see more tech in the Navy in the future. Lincoln,
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: I never understood the peal of UFC. Always felt gladiatorial,
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 2: barbaric compared to mind games like chess or other sports
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 2: that involve strategy. Yeah, I mean I don't like UFC.
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 2: I don't like sports that include violence. Violence is not fun,
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 2: violence should not be celebrated. Sports where people really get
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 2: injured and suffer brain injuries and other things. I don't like.
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 2: It is barbaric and have that at the White House
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 2: that's celebrated as two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 2: Declaration of Independence. I think it is barbaric. So no, I
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 2: don't like any of that. I'm with you on that.
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: Tamo thoughts on Texas GOP treatment of Muslim backers. I
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 2: haven't seen that, so I don't know how they've treated
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 2: Muslim backers. So, you know, I just don't know at
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 2: this point. But let me just we can switch this quickly.
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: They have successfully backers are s sixty raised leading to
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 2: reach the target. I don't know what that means. Oh, whoops,
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 2: I don't know what that was, copy pasted the wrong thing.
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 2: I guess let's see Republican parties a treatment of Muslim
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 2: backers has shifted from stance of engagement to open hostility.
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 2: State UP leaders and candidates have actively adopted anti slum messaging,
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 2: often using Shuia laws the political bogey man. The rhetoric
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 2: has directly filtered down to the grassroots. I mean here
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 2: it depends there are really really bad communities of Muslims
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 2: in Texas that are advocating Sharia law, that are building
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 2: neighborhoods just for Muslims, and the Republicans should be hostile
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 2: towards those. They need to separate those Muslims kind of
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 2: the Muslims advocating for Sharia law and for separatism from
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 2: just plain Muslims who immigrated here and want to integrate
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 2: into American society and not particularly religious or secular Muslims.
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 3: So you need to be able to differentiate.
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 2: But you know, I'm glad somebody is hostile to Sharia
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 2: law and somebody's hostile to Islamists, and they should be
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 2: hostile to Islamists.
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 3: So you know, we will see.
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 2: Now the you know, the exact details of all of
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 2: that haven't looked into and what they're actually doing to
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 2: the Muslims and how it's manifesting itself. But to the
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 2: extent that they are differentiating between the religion and those
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 2: that back the religion and those that would like to
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 2: use the religion to impose it on other people versus
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 2: just Muslims that just want to integrate into American society,
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 2: it's an extent that they separate those two out, then
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 2: it's welcome. It's about time we became more hostile to
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: these Slamists in our mists in miss Midst all right, Richard.
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: Regarding stress management, the best book I've seen on the
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 2: subject is The Powerful Engagement by Jim Lehrer and Tony Schwartz.
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 2: All Right, The Power of Full Engagement. So check it out, guys.
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 2: I have not read the books. I can't. I can't
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: say anything about it now. Jerry j'all go with them
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 2: says Trump is a monster created by cont Yeah, I
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 2: guess he's ultimately the monster created by wimpy Republicans you know,
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 2: who won't stand up to him and who just wants
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 2: He's the He's the monster created by the nihilistic trend
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 2: on the right, the ones who want to smash everything
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 2: as long as you're against the left. But yes, ultimately,
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 2: if you go ultimately, he is a creature of content,
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 2: as is the entire society we live in.
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 3: Lincoln.
• 1:47:20
  Speaker 2: What Who have evangelicals played in the US not electing
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: a female president? Clinton and House who are awful candidates,
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 2: but not but but yes, but the failure of good
• 1:47:33
  Speaker 2: female candidates such as Nikki Haley suggests that a larger
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 2: portion of Republican voters see women is less qualified than
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 2: male candidates. A positive for Daily Wires. Bad recent no
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 2: this is a different question, all right.
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 2: I haven't seen the stats. I think Nikki Haley was
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 2: just unlucky because you know, Trump was going to be
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 2: the candidate no matter what, no matter who ran. So
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 2: I don't think it was because she was a woman.
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 2: And I don't know if she had run without Trump
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 2: being in a ballot, would she have won, would she
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 2: have beaten out the other men male Republicans? I don't know.
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: So I don't know what role Evangelical has played. I mean,
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 2: some eves are very very anti women, so you could
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 2: imagine them playing a big role in it. But I
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 2: just don't know what the numbers are. I haven't seen
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 2: the polls to suggest how big of a deal it is.
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 2: Lincoln a positive for Daily Wires bad recent financial performances,
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 2: being that they seem to have canceled. They offer that
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 2: the Shrugged adaptation. How do you know it's going to
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 2: be awful? But yes, I would rather Daily Wire not
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 2: make that Shrugged adaptation. So it looks like they won't
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 2: be doing that. They won't. They're not going to be
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 2: doing a lot of movies and stuff like that given
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 2: where they are. I like numbers asks what in she's
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 2: Global Governance Initiative. So here's here's some of the stuff
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 2: it's in this Global Governance Initiative, which is supposed to
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 2: a comprehensive framework that is supposed to reform the international
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 2: system to make it more equitable. This is, you know,
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 2: in their language, with a strong focus on increasing the
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 2: voice and representation of the global South. It seeks there
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 2: to tackle global challenges to multilateralism. So that's the key.
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 2: What China's pushing for is multilateralism, which is exactly the
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 2: same as Tucker Carlson is pushing for, and exactly the
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 2: same as what indeed Trump in his National Security Priorities
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 2: document that was published last year, was pushing for multilateralism.
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 2: You know, China gets the gets Asia, the US gets
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: gets the Western hemisphere, and Europe and Russia get to
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 2: get the fight over Europe.
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 3: That is the vision.
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 2: And it's a vision that sadly, uh Trump is not
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 2: challenging and and and I think with this defeat in
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 2: the Middle East, it's certainly not in a position of challenge.
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 2: And that is generally the Global Governance Initiative is the
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 2: idea of diminishing America's role, reducing it minimizing it. You know,
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 2: it's it's got a few principles, principles and quotation monks
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 2: sovereign equality, soueign equality is so it's all countries, regardless
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 2: of size of wealth, eco participants in decision making and
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 2: global affairs. So this is the un model. But again,
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 2: the purpose here primarily is to reduce the power of
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 2: the United States of America. International rule of law calls
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 2: for universal consistent application of global norms and strict opposers
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 2: double standards, hegemony or imposition of specific House rules by
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 2: select Western nations. So again, don't give America anything special
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 2: and reduce the power and influence of the West. Multilateralism
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 2: is that emphasizes the international dialogs that to precede unilateral action.
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 2: But it's more about spheres of influence, even though they
• 1:51:18
  Speaker 2: won't admit that, right, people send it approach whatever the
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 2: hell that means, privatize its human welfare, sustain So this is,
• 1:51:25
  Speaker 2: you know, this is more of their common good bs
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 2: action orientity results focused on pragmatic, tangible deliverables. So it's
• 1:51:36
  Speaker 2: it's a form of global governance, but it's not really.
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 2: China doesn't want global governance.
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 3: It wants Chinese power. It wants China to be.
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 2: Recognized as a power equal to at least the United States,
• 1:51:50
  Speaker 2: if not bigger. It wants to be the player in Asia.
• 1:51:56
  Speaker 2: It wants the United States to stay home. It doesn't
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 2: want them in Europe, it doesn't want them in the
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 2: Middle East. It certainly doesn't want them in Asia. That's
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 2: the whole purpose of this initiative. And again this initiative
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 2: has been dramatically boasted by just the pathetic nature of
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 2: the One Iran and the United States surrender to the Iranians.
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 2: So Trump is playing right into the Chinese initiative for
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 2: you know, multilateralism, whatever they want to call it. Global governance,
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 2: global governance done the Chinese way, with Chinese influences, with
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 2: Chinese that they had. Richard says, keep up the achievement segments.
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 2: It was a nice palette cleanse after today's news. Yeah,
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 2: we need to apply and cleanse after well every day
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 2: because the news is not being good. All right, everybody,
• 1:52:52
  Speaker 2: Thank you to all the superchadas, thank you to all
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 2: the stickers.
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 3: Thank you.
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 2: And if and I will see you guys tomorrow. It
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 2: might be an hour late, but not more than that,
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 2: but we will be the three or four pm East
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 2: Coast time tomorrow. See you then. Hopefully we'll have even
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 2: more good news tomorrow. If I can find some, i'll look,
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 2: I'll look carefully, I'll check. Bye, everybody,