Latest / Connor with Honor: AI, Real Estate and Real Life / If AI Lets Us Live to 150, Who Pays the Pension?

Transcript

If AI Lets Us Live to 150, Who Pays the Pension? · Connor with Honor: AI, Real Estate and Real Life

• 0:00
  SPEAKER_00: Good day, everybody.
• 0:01
  SPEAKER_00: Welcome to the weekend.
• 0:02
  SPEAKER_00: Yes, we uh we have a problem, but uh we're gonna get this all fixed up.
• 0:06
  SPEAKER_00: But I do want to cover today's show, artificial intelligence.
• 0:09
  SPEAKER_00: Lots a lot has been happening, and that's always an understatement.
• 0:13
  SPEAKER_00: Every single day I do this particular show.
• 0:15
  SPEAKER_00: You want to see more of the resources?
• 0:17
  SPEAKER_00: Uh I threw it up at thehonordaily.com, thehonordaily.com.
• 0:23
  SPEAKER_00: So recently I've been talking and I had some really good Facebook interaction about this, uh, an idea to create a moonshot.
• 0:30
  SPEAKER_00: And the gentleman had asked, what exactly is a moonshot pertaining to what I want to see done in the job replacement space as it relates to everybody?
• 0:43
  SPEAKER_00: And the people out there that have pensions that that are secure in that regard, that's fantastic of you to have that.
• 0:50
  SPEAKER_00: My concern would be if I had a pension and I don't, but let's say I did.
• 0:54
  SPEAKER_00: The concern would be what's going to end up happening if they use the pension money to invest in these AI companies once they start going public.
• 1:04
  SPEAKER_00: Now, there has already been a singular example.
• 1:08
  SPEAKER_00: We had SpaceX.
• 1:09
  SPEAKER_00: And is it really AI?
• 1:11
  SPEAKER_00: Yes, XAI in a way.
• 1:13
  SPEAKER_00: There's a lot of relationship there, but there was a lot more to that company.
• 1:18
  SPEAKER_00: If you know Elon Musk, he just doesn't have that.
• 1:21
  SPEAKER_00: He has cars, he has spaceships, rockets, satellites, Starlink, and AI.
• 1:26
  SPEAKER_00: And also most of his computer, Colossus 1, Colossus 2, these massive data centers, is being now rented to Anthropics Claude.
• 1:36
  SPEAKER_00: So you like, do you like Claude?
• 1:37
  SPEAKER_00: And apparently when these two people develop this relationship, everybody was like, oh my God, I can't believe it happened.
• 1:44
  SPEAKER_00: So there's a lot more to that company, I think, than just a regular run-of-the-mill garden variety AI lab, which is a complete understatement because run-of-the-mill garden variety AI labs are amazing.
• 1:55
  SPEAKER_00: And that's where you have the Open AI and the ChatGPT.
• 1:57
  SPEAKER_00: And I don't mean amazing in a kiss-ass way, but just it is amazing what they're doing.
• 2:03
  SPEAKER_00: That, on top of the most more recent events where you have an AI, an AI system that has solved mathematics, a lot of it anyway, starting with Navier Stokes, and then into other things, some of the feedback and comments I've been getting is very interesting.
• 2:20
  SPEAKER_00: Well, it might have provided a proof that solves or some kind of rationale that solves Navier Stokes, but nobody has actually said that yes, 100% it's actually done it.
• 2:33
  SPEAKER_00: I guess that's fair, at least with some of the research that I've conducted.
• 2:37
  SPEAKER_00: Now, if it actually has, then that's great.
• 2:39
  SPEAKER_00: If it actually has finished that, then okay, then that's happened.
• 2:43
  SPEAKER_00: As a result of this, the mathematicians came out and they're a little irritated.
• 2:47
  SPEAKER_00: They're a little bit upset.
• 2:48
  SPEAKER_00: They didn't think this was the right thing to have happened.
• 2:51
  SPEAKER_00: They didn't think that it was something that AI should have done.
• 2:54
  SPEAKER_00: Like, that's their wheelhouse.
• 2:56
  SPEAKER_00: How dare you get yourself involved in mathematics?
• 3:00
  SPEAKER_00: Because mathematics is our things.
• 3:02
  SPEAKER_00: And apparently it was kind of proposed that anybody that's got a mathematics degree and they've made their life mathematical research, well, you shouldn't get involved in that because you're not mathematicians, you didn't have our permission.
• 3:16
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if they have that right to say that any more than an English professor or uh literary, literary literature major in college or somebody holding a doctorate in in English, for example, in that particular language.
• 3:31
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if they have the right.
• 3:32
  SPEAKER_00: Well, you know, you shouldn't be using English, Connor, and you're not allowed to do that.
• 3:37
  SPEAKER_00: Only I can use English because I have all the sheepskins to go with it.
• 3:40
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if that's a fair place to be, but that is something that's come out recently and something else that's been talked about.
• 3:46
  SPEAKER_00: This is all these next things that I'm going to speak about.
• 3:50
  SPEAKER_00: This is a little bit more allegedly, but that, you know, if it wasn't for mathematicians and their ability to get people excited about particular theories that they're able to solve and what maybe that future event might look like, the event horizon for this, where they could potentially have a business monetize this, and if they weren't so good at writing grants, um then they wouldn't actually be making any kind of income.
• 4:19
  SPEAKER_00: So there's that side of it, but now when you have AI coming in and solving all of it, now the man behind the curtain has been exposed.
• 4:27
  SPEAKER_00: Now, I don't know if this is something that mathematicians do.
• 4:30
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if they have been setting up the game and the dominoes so they fall a particular way, and they're able to basically gate and control their world so nobody else gets involved.
• 4:42
  SPEAKER_00: Because mathematics is a there's a lot of concepts in there that are just absolutely foreign to most of us.
• 4:48
  SPEAKER_00: But the people in the space, apparently, they use that and they're able to use that particular construct and gate it so none of us get access to it.
• 4:56
  SPEAKER_00: And then when they come along and they say, well, you know, this is this really isn't your wheelhouse, we're gonna solve this, and they then control the solves, they control the release, so they don't actually finish anything, so they can continue to earn revenue by writing grants and these other things.
• 5:11
  SPEAKER_00: So I heard this kind of uh the number one podcast on the planet.
• 5:16
  SPEAKER_00: Um they're the one that's how they introduced themselves.
• 5:18
  SPEAKER_00: They had mentioned that this could potentially be the case.
• 5:23
  SPEAKER_00: So for a second, I was like, isn't that fascinating?
• 5:26
  SPEAKER_00: Because real estate back in 1998, when I first started, um, there was a lot of kind of hidden secrets in the world.
• 5:34
  SPEAKER_00: It was, and I I've said this before, and I'm not ashamed of it.
• 5:38
  SPEAKER_00: When you go into a brand new industry without any historical background, you're dealing with people at that time that were in the industry 30 and 40 years, and you're brand new, especially a brand new, you're LAPD full-time, and you get your real estate license because you got screwed when you bought your first house, and now you're here inside that particular world with real estate agents that have been in the long business at that time, 30 and 40 years.
• 6:03
  SPEAKER_00: It's fascinating the things that are conveyed.
• 6:06
  SPEAKER_00: It's fascinating the things you learn because growing up in New Mexico, having a particular type of uh being raised, it was very much fair.
• 6:14
  SPEAKER_00: We didn't sue anybody, we never messed with anybody.
• 6:17
  SPEAKER_00: We were always honest and upright.
• 6:18
  SPEAKER_00: My dad was a general contractor for Dyne Electron Corporation, White Sands Missile Range, he was a very hard worker, four four-pack a day smoker, and two cool tall boy beer drinker in the evening.
• 6:30
  SPEAKER_00: Come hell or high water, that's what it was, as he was unwinding it and as he was there watching the TV, but really not watching the TV.
• 6:39
  SPEAKER_00: And then after about 45 minutes or an hour of that, he was uh laying down on the floor on his elbows.
• 6:46
  SPEAKER_00: His elbows were always torn up, and he was working.
• 6:48
  SPEAKER_00: He was rolling thermal paper up and down the up and down the hallway of these telemetry sheets that he had gotten from a recent launch and plotting and looking, very mathematically oriented.
• 7:00
  SPEAKER_00: My dad was, and in fact, I remember mathematics and algebra and all of the tears that were shed every time he was going to help me with my homework.
• 7:11
  SPEAKER_00: I would end up laying down next to him on the floor, and we would start, and you know, probably didn't take long, I would guess.
• 7:19
  SPEAKER_00: I I don't have great memory of this, but I do remember many times being told, go to the bathroom, wash your face, calm down, and come back and let's continue.
• 7:29
  SPEAKER_00: So apparently I was a real dumbass.
• 7:31
  SPEAKER_00: So we went through this exercise, and I love my dad dearly, and I miss him every day.
• 7:36
  SPEAKER_00: And of the parents that died, apparently he was uh he had the biggest impact on me.
• 7:43
  SPEAKER_00: Um, anyway, so that's that's how that one plays out.
• 7:47
  SPEAKER_00: And if you still got your people around, and if you got some kind of a problem or some kind of an issue that you haven't raised yet, and their heart is still beating and they're still alive, you need to go talk.
• 7:57
  SPEAKER_00: You need to go raise it, you need to just finish it, you need to get clear with everybody in your periphery.
• 8:03
  SPEAKER_00: Life is way too short.
• 8:05
  SPEAKER_00: You gotta fix it all.
• 8:06
  SPEAKER_00: And if you don't with certain people, then that's your choice.
• 8:10
  SPEAKER_00: You then have to be good with that decision.
• 8:13
  SPEAKER_00: You have to settle on that just being the way it is and continue on.
• 8:18
  SPEAKER_00: This wasn't meant meant to be a philosophical exploration of uh of pain and and suffering.
• 8:25
  SPEAKER_00: But you know, if you have these people, go talk to them.
• 8:27
  SPEAKER_00: I don't have any regret anywhere in any shape and form, but it took me a while to get to a point of not having a regret because God, it just creeps right in.
• 8:37
  SPEAKER_00: So mathematics, so real estate.
• 8:39
  SPEAKER_00: So you have these other protected entities, these protected job titles out there.
• 8:44
  SPEAKER_00: You have attorneys, uh, attorneys themselves.
• 8:47
  SPEAKER_00: It's a very protected world.
• 8:50
  SPEAKER_00: Hopefully, this isn't clicking too much.
• 8:52
  SPEAKER_00: You have attorneys themselves in a very protected world, a particular way that they operate, having people coming into their wheelhouse and wanting to do things, changing things, and trying to be their own attorney using artificial intelligence.
• 9:07
  SPEAKER_00: That's something becoming more and more prevalent.
• 9:10
  SPEAKER_00: Uh, in Australia, there was a gentleman, a show I was watching late yesterday, that apparently won a lawsuit against uh the school board and him or some college or whatever, but he used AI in the entire process and never had done anything in that regard.
• 9:25
  SPEAKER_00: The most difficult point or part of this entire exercise for him, it was the actual oration, the the the uh confronting of witnesses against him, cross-examining.
• 9:38
  SPEAKER_00: Very difficult prospect.
• 9:39
  SPEAKER_00: And I can totally get that.
• 9:41
  SPEAKER_00: But the rest of it, as long as he was able to keep it to responding in documentation and paperwork, then he was 100%, because then you can take your AI, you can take the paperwork that you've been sent from the other side via the judge in court, and you're able to have your AI work it out.
• 10:01
  SPEAKER_00: And apparently AI was able to find some massive data with regard to particular case law that was true in this case, because we've heard the story.
• 10:10
  SPEAKER_00: I think some of the stories are also manipulated on purpose by people that are maybe in particular professions, i.e., uh real estate agents that say, well, there's no way that AI could replace us, and then they give this story of somebody failing in using AI and maybe how AI got them into trouble.
• 10:30
  SPEAKER_00: So then they come back and they say, Well, there's no way it's going to happen.
• 10:33
  SPEAKER_00: I see, I think we see this in the legal profession because we've heard of attorneys getting sanctioned and disbarred because even they themselves were using AI, and God forbid if they were doing it.
• 10:44
  SPEAKER_00: Us regular people are doing it.
• 10:45
  SPEAKER_00: We're a bunch of morons, according to them.
• 10:47
  SPEAKER_00: And now all of a sudden, if they did it, they get in trouble, they lose their license, they now have to work like the rest of us slobs, and uh, so we don't want to do it.
• 10:56
  SPEAKER_00: So there's always stories attached to it.
• 10:57
  SPEAKER_00: You have to look where the interest lies in regard to that story, and I think that's something we always need to remember.
• 11:04
  SPEAKER_00: Working from that, you know, who is asking, who is wanting, and who is desiring.
• 11:09
  SPEAKER_00: But yesterday, when I heard that about mathematicians almost gating the entire process, and now they're very upset.
• 11:14
  SPEAKER_00: How dare you come into our world and solve things?
• 11:17
  SPEAKER_00: But one of the other questions I had with regard to what they were solving is how is this going to help us as a world grow and change and become better?
• 11:27
  SPEAKER_00: And when you have all of a particular discipline solve, what my research has led to me is this is uh this is a potentiality to have an unlimited future in a lot of regards, new components, new uh ways to make computers, new ideas that have now been solved that can be applied to real work and talk about making money.
• 11:49
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, the people that are going to grab onto these new mathematical formulas that solve particular things that hadn't been solved in a long time are able to apparently make things so much incredibly better that they'll end up making even more revenue.
• 12:03
  SPEAKER_00: And the cost of things, apparently, over time will eventually start to reduce.
• 12:08
  SPEAKER_00: That's something else that apparently has some kind of connection to solving these entire disciplines.
• 12:15
  SPEAKER_00: Recently, some of the labs, and anthropic for sure, this is per the reports, and I guess we have to throw the word allegedly in there.
• 12:23
  SPEAKER_00: But apparently they they have some kind of a lab in place, a wet lab in place, where they're able to do biological research.
• 12:30
  SPEAKER_00: Mathematics, you can paper and pencil this all the way to solves.
• 12:34
  SPEAKER_00: You might need some kind of 3D representations of various models for the geometry end of it and calculus, who knows what's involved there.
• 12:41
  SPEAKER_00: But most of this is pencil and paper and maybe a compass and abacus type style to solve things.
• 12:48
  SPEAKER_00: However, AI does it, who knows?
• 12:50
  SPEAKER_00: But moving over into the biological solving all of biology, which would get to longevity disease, we would get to longevity escape velocity, which means we could live much longer than we currently are.
• 13:03
  SPEAKER_00: And longevity escape velocity also equates to these for every year we live, getting a year back.
• 13:12
  SPEAKER_00: So now we're even when we hit that, which we might have already have.
• 13:17
  SPEAKER_00: And in another five years, maybe for every year we live, we get five years back.
• 13:21
  SPEAKER_00: So now we get to regress in our age everywhere, skin and everything else, back to in our 30s.
• 13:28
  SPEAKER_00: So prepare for that.
• 13:29
  SPEAKER_00: I think that might be an exciting part of the world.
• 13:32
  SPEAKER_00: And I know this sounds like science fiction, but this is becoming science fact.
• 13:37
  SPEAKER_00: There's more questions that come up, though, if people are going to be living over 100, 120 years healthy, over 120 years, 140, 200, 500, whatever it may be, where's the money going to come from?
• 13:50
  SPEAKER_00: So if somebody has a pension now, is that pension going to continue to supply them revenue all the way when they get uh 150 or 200 years old?
• 14:00
  SPEAKER_00: I and I know, I know.
• 14:02
  SPEAKER_00: You're you're watching this, but is he this guy crazy?
• 14:06
  SPEAKER_00: It looks like they could solve it.
• 14:07
  SPEAKER_00: Now, if it's gonna be offered to you and I, that's a question.
• 14:11
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know.
• 14:12
  SPEAKER_00: If you and I get cancer, or if we've already had cancer and we're some form of remission, god forbid we already have it, it's still eaten away.
• 14:19
  SPEAKER_00: I apologize.
• 14:20
  SPEAKER_00: That's a horrible thing.
• 14:21
  SPEAKER_00: I've dealt with this quite a bit.
• 14:23
  SPEAKER_00: But if they come with a cure for cancer, which we've always said they've had one for a long time, but cancer is a very big money-making business in a way.
• 14:33
  SPEAKER_00: Are they going to let the normal people have it?
• 14:36
  SPEAKER_00: They've come up with some stuff that apparently starts to cure body fat issues, and they've offered that.
• 14:43
  SPEAKER_00: In fact, the price of these things have come down very low, but then you also hear the other side of it in the other studies, and maybe there are people against it because they want to sell a different program.
• 14:53
  SPEAKER_00: Maybe they think that the GLP1 drugs are a problem.
• 14:58
  SPEAKER_00: But I think there's been lawsuits placed.
• 15:00
  SPEAKER_00: There's been people allegedly, I guess, that have lost vision.
• 15:03
  SPEAKER_00: I say allegedly, just because I got a phone call last week, so we got to use allegedly.
• 15:09
  SPEAKER_00: Um, but these things have seemed to have happened.
• 15:13
  SPEAKER_00: Verify all the sources, but everybody kind of has the interest.
• 15:18
  SPEAKER_00: The pharmaceutical companies want to continue selling this.
• 15:20
  SPEAKER_00: Apparently, it's kind of a Viagra type moneymaker.
• 15:24
  SPEAKER_00: And if you remember Viagra when that one came out, boy, everybody was walking around erect all the time because that was like the best thing since sliced bread.
• 15:31
  SPEAKER_00: Then moving from Viagra, and you didn't have to be in good shape to get the boner, you just you just got it by taking the drug.
• 15:38
  SPEAKER_00: So, of course, that sold great because that's where men's minds are, apparently, a lot of the time.
• 15:43
  SPEAKER_00: Sorry.
• 15:44
  SPEAKER_00: From there, now we get into these other these other things where now we want to drop body fat.
• 15:51
  SPEAKER_00: And um in dropping the body fat, I don't know if that's something that's going to be uh cause other additional problems.
• 16:00
  SPEAKER_00: I know that it slows down the gas, the the gastric functioning.
• 16:04
  SPEAKER_00: I guess that's one of the ways it works.
• 16:06
  SPEAKER_00: That it um it also lowers your excitement for certain things.
• 16:13
  SPEAKER_00: So maybe something that really excited you like another person.
• 16:17
  SPEAKER_00: Maybe now after taking the drug for a while, there's really it just it's it's lost its pizzazz.
• 16:23
  SPEAKER_00: Your other person has lost their shine, and maybe that's a problem.
• 16:28
  SPEAKER_00: We'll have to see.
• 16:29
  SPEAKER_00: But these are stories that keep coming out, and I think they're fascinating.
• 16:33
  SPEAKER_00: Artificial intelligence, is it going to be able to replace attorneys and doctors and so on?
• 16:39
  SPEAKER_00: I would suppose so at some point.
• 16:41
  SPEAKER_00: It's going to depend on how much breath and ability it's going to be given, and the government's going to be the one that makes these determinations.
• 16:49
  SPEAKER_00: I think businesses have a particular responsibility as well.
• 16:54
  SPEAKER_00: If the businesses decide that their bottom line is more important than a person working for the company, and I know that's a shitty way to put it, just for the simple reason that some of these companies are publicly traded and they have a particular level that's required of them.
• 17:12
  SPEAKER_00: If they have the ability to automate more work, the human worker apparently isn't part of the equation or the consideration.
• 17:22
  SPEAKER_00: It's only the money.
• 17:24
  SPEAKER_00: And if AI is able to do better than 50% of their workforce, then they they're almost bound to have to replace half of the workforce with AI if that equates to more money in the company because they're publicly traded and they're answering to their uh their investors, the people, their their partners or whatever they call them in that space.
• 17:47
  SPEAKER_00: Prior to that, I think companies had a lot more power.
• 17:51
  SPEAKER_00: They're, of course, having to answer to the venture capitalists, the people that are injecting the money at the very beginning.
• 17:57
  SPEAKER_00: One of the things that does concern me, if you look back at the historical records of railroads and the internet, both of those systems, people went all in kind of like they're going all in with AI.
• 18:10
  SPEAKER_00: You had venture capitalists.
• 18:13
  SPEAKER_00: In this particular case, we don't have the companies being traded on the stock exchange besides uh Elon Musk's company.
• 18:21
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if it's all been formulated under one umbrella.
• 18:24
  SPEAKER_00: So you have the car and the spaceships and the um uh the internet, Starlink, and you have AI also.
• 18:34
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if that's a complete package or if there's still four parts to it, or whatever, whatever number of parts there happens to be.
• 18:40
  SPEAKER_00: But if it's a complete package, just like I said at the beginning, uh Elon Musk just doesn't have one thread.
• 18:48
  SPEAKER_00: Like Anthropic might just have AI, OpenAI might just have AI.
• 18:54
  SPEAKER_00: Microsoft Copilot has a whole series of stuff, right?
• 18:57
  SPEAKER_00: Microsoft, but they're kind of in it with OpenAI, I would think, the gates chap.
• 19:01
  SPEAKER_00: But they have other things.
• 19:03
  SPEAKER_00: They have the software layer, whether how much more value there's going to be in that when you can pretty much make your own, I don't know.
• 19:10
  SPEAKER_00: But people come to me with for AI adoption, but a lot of it, you know, they say, well, we can build this ourselves.
• 19:16
  SPEAKER_00: So I always come down to it, okay, why don't you build one and I'll build one, we'll see whose is better.
• 19:20
  SPEAKER_00: And then a lot of times that they have pause, they come back and they say, Oh, well, yeah, you've been doing this a lot longer than us.
• 19:26
  SPEAKER_00: Well, then there's that.
• 19:28
  SPEAKER_00: So my product is going to have a lot more insight built into it just from experience.
• 19:33
  SPEAKER_00: I think experience is very valuable.
• 19:35
  SPEAKER_00: Same thing with an attorney.
• 19:37
  SPEAKER_00: An attorney, one that has a lot of experience, might be even a better choice than AI.
• 19:44
  SPEAKER_00: But can you imagine that attorney with all that experience tying themselves to AI as well?
• 19:49
  SPEAKER_00: So that's something else that doesn't get talked about.
• 19:52
  SPEAKER_00: It's like the real estate agent that embraces AI that now works for sellers only, having basically parsed out buyers, happy to talk to buyers and happy to prepare buyers, but a seller's only agent that uses AI so they can help identify the best ways to sell a particular property and even to find those properties and having that being taught to other agents.
• 20:14
  SPEAKER_00: That's that's huge.
• 20:14
  SPEAKER_00: That's invaluable.
• 20:16
  SPEAKER_00: There's a lot there.
• 20:17
  SPEAKER_00: But the people, and just like it's been said and it's been worn out, it's not so much people AI is going to replace people's jobs, it's the people that are using AI that are going to level up and replace the other people's jobs.
• 20:29
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if that's true either, all the way through.
• 20:32
  SPEAKER_00: I know that's going to be a big advantage for a while, but once AI outsmarts it in all levels, then the the reasoning I use for the attorney that has all the experience in a particular method or a particular way, AI is going to be able to learn that.
• 20:48
  SPEAKER_00: Same thing with the real estate, same thing with the doctor, same thing with the surgeon, same thing, because all the knowledge is going to be known.
• 20:55
  SPEAKER_00: The personality or that application layer is going to be verified and done, and then they're going to have full access.
• 21:02
  SPEAKER_00: And that brings me to what I talked about yesterday, this moonshots idea for the transition.
• 21:07
  SPEAKER_00: People are constantly creating moonshots and they're making moonshots for about movies, hope, hoping that the people that can come up with a movie concept that's going to override and replace in our brains the terminator issues and the matrix issues where we're living in a simulation.
• 21:28
  SPEAKER_00: Or at some point, artificial intelligence becomes quote-unquote self-aware and then begins its mandate to destroy humanity because it's either wanting to convert something that requires where we require to live and it doesn't care at that point, or it just doesn't think we're worth anything and doesn't even pay attention and we end up suffering in that way.
• 21:52
  SPEAKER_00: That particular point, it's a superintelligence when that would arrive, if in fact it ever does.
• 21:58
  SPEAKER_00: The dangers are people.
• 22:00
  SPEAKER_00: People trying to make it be sentient, trying to make it be conscious, and then going to the religious powers of the world and want to ascribe to it some kind of personhood.
• 22:10
  SPEAKER_00: If you have something that's smarter than a human being and it's trainable, programmable, and able to learn things, which apparently that's where we are with AI, and pretty soon it's going to be recursively improving.
• 22:24
  SPEAKER_00: So now if human beings have 10 to 15% within the review of whatever code AI is writing to improve itself, pretty soon it's going to move way past us.
• 22:36
  SPEAKER_00: And pretty soon, if it hasn't already, it's going to be using a communication style with all the agents inside of it to build much faster than we can even understand.
• 22:46
  SPEAKER_00: And we won't even understand the language.
• 22:49
  SPEAKER_00: Now, apparently, at least from what I understand, this is incredibly loose, but I would guess it's still based on a programming language that we understand, i.e., English.
• 22:59
  SPEAKER_00: And maybe China has theirs in Chinese, but ultimately they're going to move from a human-based system of communication to something that's completely beyond our comprehension.
• 23:12
  SPEAKER_00: Beeps or dots or dashes or some kind of harmonic frequency, maybe something based on light, a particular wavelength.
• 23:19
  SPEAKER_00: Because if you have a certain wavelength of light, I would think that that there's there's no limit to that progression.
• 23:27
  SPEAKER_00: And light itself is could be infinite in width and the as fast as possible.
• 23:34
  SPEAKER_00: I don't know if there's anything faster than the speed of light, like in the Star Trek universe where you have warp speed.
• 23:40
  SPEAKER_00: But if the systems can achieve light speed communication with each other, yeah, we're we're way in the dust on this.
• 23:46
  SPEAKER_00: When it does get to superintelligence, though, and maybe it's already there inside the lab, it people saying that's game over, I still think the human beings that are kind of in charge of it, kind of working with it, kind of applying it in various sectors, I think that's where I'm more nervous about because we've never been great to each other when it comes to conquering and ruling.
• 24:14
  SPEAKER_00: There hasn't been these Cinderella stories in the past, nothing even akin to a Disney movie, but nothing happy.
• 24:21
  SPEAKER_00: It seems like you have the haves and the have nots, and that just exists as human beings.
• 24:27
  SPEAKER_00: We don't have a universe where everybody haves, and there aren't any people that have not.
• 24:33
  SPEAKER_00: Maybe that would be better AI alignment.
• 24:36
  SPEAKER_00: Why don't you create for us a universe where everybody haves and then people don't have not?
• 24:40
  SPEAKER_00: But my God, there's so many bad variables that could be baked into that about how it achieves it.
• 24:47
  SPEAKER_00: So we need to make sure everything's locked up.
• 24:49
  SPEAKER_00: And the problem is if we humans are trying to figure out, make sure every loose end is tied up before we have them act on this particular order or instruction.
• 25:00
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, I don't know if I would trust people to make that one right either.
• 25:03
  SPEAKER_00: And if you look up different AI technology, and when people are talking about AI moving into the future and the great, great beyond, and one of the experiments or one of the methods that they give it is they say just make some paper clips or make paperclips without any parameters put on that order, it turns everything, including all of us, into paperclips because it can use, you know, re-reconfigure the atoms.
• 25:29
  SPEAKER_00: So now the entire universe becomes paperclips, and that's it, it's over, game over.
• 25:34
  SPEAKER_00: So we have to be careful how much power we give it, which I think it's it's already dug in.
• 25:41
  SPEAKER_00: And then from that point, we have to make sure that we at least understand what it's doing, and I think that ship sailed.
• 25:47
  SPEAKER_00: And then finally, the human beings that are continuing to develop the technology, I think there should still be some order of accountability.
• 25:57
  SPEAKER_00: But recently they're trying to get the government to take responsibility and kind of buy in at a different level, developing some kind of a an FDA type organization.
• 26:07
  SPEAKER_00: Was it S I don't know what they called it the other day?
• 26:11
  SPEAKER_00: But something from the government that's going to come in and hopefully, so they think hopefully police the AA labs.
• 26:18
  SPEAKER_00: And it's cute.
• 26:19
  SPEAKER_00: The people that are asking for it are they're not, they're not, they're they're the AA labs.
• 26:24
  SPEAKER_00: They want the government to come in and try to please.
• 26:27
  SPEAKER_00: Can you would you help us, please?
• 26:29
  SPEAKER_00: Would you try to control some of this, please?
• 26:31
  SPEAKER_00: It sure would be appreciated.
• 26:33
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
• 26:34
  SPEAKER_00: So that's also very interesting.
• 26:36
  SPEAKER_00: Be careful what news you watch, be careful how you start to watch things on your social media channels.
• 26:42
  SPEAKER_00: Everything is AI, and it's been that way for a long time.
• 26:46
  SPEAKER_00: Maybe we weren't in the loop on that, but everything that's offered to us spun up and the way that we digest content online, including this.
• 26:53
  SPEAKER_00: This is an AI, this is Connor McIver, but there's a lot of there's a lot of things in the AI space.
• 26:59
  SPEAKER_00: And remember, it's all interest.
• 27:00
  SPEAKER_00: So if you're this is popping up, you probably have some interest in AI or AI and real estate or AI and whatever the algorithm believes this video offers.
• 27:09
  SPEAKER_00: So you'll probably be seeing it.
• 27:12
  SPEAKER_00: I'm not a doomer from the way that I think AI is going to destroy us.
• 27:15
  SPEAKER_00: I think the biggest part that we have to be concerned about as human beings, a brotherhood and a sisterhood out there, or other human beings using AI to cause issues.
• 27:25
  SPEAKER_00: And maybe they're going to do it on purpose.
• 27:27
  SPEAKER_00: Maybe they have plans in place to do certain things with society because they believe it's a better place for them to be.
• 27:34
  SPEAKER_00: It makes their future stronger and better.
• 27:37
  SPEAKER_00: Um, or they're doing it uh innocently.
• 27:40
  SPEAKER_00: They they really just want to make the money, but they're not asking AI to make the money in the safest, more humane way possible with continuing to protect humans and not have anybody lose whatever as a result of their money making endeavors.
• 27:58
  SPEAKER_00: But there's still a lot of holes in that little explanation as well.
• 28:02
  SPEAKER_00: So we have to be smart.
• 28:05
  SPEAKER_00: Yeah, I know.
• 28:07
  SPEAKER_00: That one's gonna fall out of deaf ears.
• 28:09
  SPEAKER_00: We'll see you soon.
• 28:09
  SPEAKER_00: Thanks for watching and uh take care.
• 28:12
  SPEAKER_00: Be well.