Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Which US citizen demographic does the FBI hate the most? | HBR Talk 256

Transcript

Which US citizen demographic does the FBI hate the most? | HBR Talk 256 · Honey Badger Radio

0:00
Well, hello, and welcome to HBr Talk two fifty six. Which US
0:05
citizen demographic does the FBI hate the most? How bet we can figure it
0:11
out by the end of the show. I'm your host, Hannah Wallen here
0:14
with nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks, and tonight we're watching a little red dot dance
0:19
across the manisphere over a little of our terminology before landing squarely on the foreheads
0:24
of some of the most vulnerable young men in the country, and we're gonna
0:28
discuss its implications. But first we gotta do what we gotta do. As
0:33
always, Honey Badger Radio dishes out Ace Mortgage Board of thought provoking discussions,
0:38
and as experiences both recent and long past have demonstrated, the provoked thoughts are
0:44
fighting back. They've made it clear that for people like us relying on third
0:48
party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our work is trading on thin ice,
0:54
or perhaps building our house in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire. In
1:00
the light of this, we strongly encourage our supporters to switch at least their
1:03
support for us to feed the Badger dot Com the most stable way to help
1:07
us out, And if you want to tip us directly instead of relying on
1:11
and relying on any social media platforms tip jar. The link for that is
1:17
feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip and as always, the same
1:21
risk applies to our social media platforms, which is why you should further provoke
1:25
the thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions on Honey Badger Brigade dot com,
1:32
where you can find your way to all of our content, as well
1:34
as a link to feed the Badger dot com and the drop down menu at
1:38
the top of the page. Sorry, I sound bad, guys. I'm
1:41
probably going to cough at you tonight. It's April, and you know what
1:45
that means, Like Hannah can't breathe for a couple of couple of weeks while
1:49
I get used to the fact that the trees are horny and the grass is
1:52
horny, and the flowers are horny, and like now I'm dying and so
1:57
are we getting those rape I want to file a complaint. This sucks.
2:02
Um. I'm sure I won't get through this whole thing without sneezing at least
2:07
a couple of times. So you know you're You're not alone. Hannah.
2:12
Oh my gosh, this is this is like I do this every year,
2:15
and then every year it worked, They're like, are you sick? You
2:19
should you be here? Then I'm so tempted to be like, oh I
2:23
think I have the flu. Yeah, days off, But it would be
2:29
why right, we can't do that, right, I know, I know.
2:34
And it sucks like because other people would do that, you know,
2:38
I know. It's just it's it's just not in my it's not who I
2:46
am, you know, right. So we had we had a situation at
2:50
work where we got overpaid for something by the manufacturer, and everybody else wanted
2:58
to just look the other way. Oh god, yeah, and what do
3:02
they think is going to happen when the manufacturer does their internal audit? And
3:06
they figured that out, right, And so I said, okay, And
3:10
nobody was talking to me about it. I know that they know that it
3:15
was there, right, nobody said a word to me. I said,
3:16
all right, I'll fix y'all. Asses. I went and sent an email
3:20
and said, hey, would your mind fixing this? Yeah? And so
3:24
they did and then it was like, hey, you know, um next
3:30
time, and sent it through an email. So it's it's uh, it's
3:35
official, it's documented, and I'm like, oh yeah, no problem,
3:38
next time, sure, but this time I got you a bitch, and
3:43
I got your number, you know, I really it just shows to me,
3:46
it's like a lack of morals, you know, because if if one
3:54
of our employees was in the same situation right where we had overpaid them,
4:00
oh my yeah, they would waste zero time saying oh no, uh pay
4:05
up, we want that backs are and they will get it too. Yeah,
4:11
so I call that back right away. And every every organization does that.
4:15
And organizations are very much immoral a lot of times about that. They
4:19
they they won't um, they won't tolerate it from you, but they expect
4:24
you to tolerate it from them, right right. Oh that's very very similar
4:29
to the US government, right um. And and we're seeing that and like,
4:36
like I was kind of saying before the show, I've this's been a
4:39
long time coming. I've been I've been watching this um and expecting this for
4:44
for ten years. And there were people that called me paranoid for it.
4:49
But uh, you know, when I first started on reddit, um,
4:57
there was a dumbass minist group UM called shit Reddit Says and shit reddit Says.
5:05
They just tracked comments that they felt were um misogynistic that they felt were
5:13
racist, sexist, you know, um homophobic, didn't didn't fit in with
5:18
what we would call woke ideology now political correctness at the time, and they
5:26
had They would just make posts. Their post would be a link to a
5:30
particular comment and it would say you know how many up votes that comment got
5:35
at the time and uh, and then you know, they would discuss it
5:41
underneath and they would all flood and change the vote total on that comment.
5:45
They would all like until um reddit changed some rules, and then then they
5:50
had to change how they did that because they couldn't they couldn't go to another
5:58
subredditum from a link in their subreddit and vote on that comment without getting shadow
6:03
band. But that subreddit created a gosh, I can't think of the name
6:14
of the like. You have both BB code for bulletin boards, you have
6:19
CSS for reddit I think it is. But they created a CSS code that
6:25
would put a flag behind people's names based on what said subreddit srs deemed that
6:34
they had primary or primary users of so they flagged themselves with it to identify
6:42
themselves or each other and other subreddits. But they also had a list of
6:49
prominent MRI's that they flagged. And at the time that I got on this
6:57
list, I didn't realize I was a prominent mr or I mean I was
7:00
very prolific in my discussion there, right, Like, I did a lot
7:04
of discussion there. And oh and they thought I was a guy because I
7:08
when I was on Reddit, I didn't come in, come in with you
7:11
know, bells and whistles and ribbons and bows, going hey everybody, I'm
7:15
a girl. You know, I just cocked to people about sayings. So
7:23
every time they talked about me early on in that subreddit, they used he
7:28
him pronounced for me, and I didn't correct him. I don't care what
7:31
these people think, you know, Like, so would does it make a
7:38
difference if I said this as a man er a woman. It's the thing
7:42
I said was right, and they couldn't discredit it. They just highlighted it
7:46
and called it misogynistic and like whatever, fuck you guys, I don't care.
7:51
Right, Well, then I realized they they had created a list and
7:57
you know, like to me now, the way I grew up my my
8:01
family was really interesting in terms of or interested in terms of like how history
8:09
you know played out in particular, how the history of American involvement in wars
8:16
around the world has played out, and like that meant that I saw a
8:24
lot of documentaries on like the pre war environment in Nazi Germany and the pre
8:35
war environment in Soviet Russia and so on, and it's, um, it
8:41
was kind of an interesting thing, this kind of list making and the flagging
8:48
of people based on who they are and what they think. Uh, that's
8:52
consistent in in that kind of historical othering of a group of people before they're
9:01
targeted for elimination. And so you have this tendency among people that are trying
9:11
to take over a culture, in trying to dominate that culture and control it,
9:16
to flag dissenters in this manner. So well, that's creepy, you
9:22
know. And we talked about that in the subreddit too, about that being
9:24
creepy and everything. But we laughed about, you know, like these people
9:28
put us on a list, We're supposed to be so intimidated, right because
9:31
they're they're just a bunch of dumbasses on the internet. Who cares. Right,
9:37
Well, then they started, you know, all the other stuff that
9:41
they were doing that we've talked about before, campaigning to get us kicked off
9:46
of Reddit and so on. But there's been over the last ten years,
9:52
maybe the last thirteen years, because I was on Reddit in twenty ten.
9:58
There's been this slow march of first they do that, and we had a
10:07
blogger target us with hit pieces, regular hit pieces, and you know people,
10:16
people would reference those on their blogs, and we had a nice little
10:18
blog network, and then we had like the alternative media sources, the lower
10:26
tier alternative media sources for the left wing would reference the blogger. At the
10:35
time, his blog was called man boobs and in which you know, how
10:43
do you take that seriously? So he changed it to We Hunted the Mammoth,
10:46
which is really funny because the story behind that is the idea that men
10:54
do things to make society comfortable for women, and women should appreciate it being
11:01
illegitimate because nobody asked them, which is false. Somebody did ask them.
11:05
People ask them over and over again. Demands have been placed on them for
11:09
throughout history for that right. But this this guy, David Futrell, named
11:16
his blog We Hunted the Mammoth, and he is a feminist blogger who speaks
11:22
on behalf of women, and he is one of the biggest critics of Mr
11:28
Women out there, and he it was the original source sited for most news
11:37
about us. They would go back to his blog. Anything that you read
11:41
about us, even in mainstream media, you would could trace it through like
11:46
alternative left wing media, and going back farther and farther, you would eventually
11:54
find a link to David Futrell's blog. We hunted the mammoth. We never
12:01
asked him to cover us, right, We never asked for his opinion on
12:07
our work or our thoughts. So I think it's kind of ironic that he
12:11
calls himself we hunted the Mammoth based on that, you know, like,
12:16
well, women never asked men to be yes, she did, you know,
12:20
so shut the fuck up, don't tell me that. Right. But
12:22
so, we had this long slow process of news news articles being written about
12:28
us, and in the meantime as that's going on, you also had these
12:35
lists and these news articles referenced in feminist academia, right, they made essays,
12:46
reports for class, gender studies and stuff, and they would write about
12:52
us pretty soon and we would have, you know, we'd see like research
13:01
papers where they were referencing essays and news articles and lists and stuff, and
13:09
we ended up on academic lists of of Um, I guess ne'er do wells,
13:18
dangerous people, scary people, misogynistic people, right, the intiment.
13:24
Yeah, so we're like we really, we really the whole time, you
13:30
know, we've we've kind of like treated this in a fairly lighthearted way because
13:33
it's laughable until it's not right. And those academic lists and the news articles
13:45
are what the SPLC sited when they accused us of being misogynistic extremists, males
13:56
supremacists. I think they call us because some guy with the blog named man
14:03
Boobs ironically has probably has bigger tits than mind. Right, he's he's the
14:11
source of your information. Okay, got it right? Like, did you
14:16
ever ever reach out and try to touch someone? No? No, they
14:22
never talked to a single person in the men's rights movement, and they won't.
14:26
They did what they needed to do. Then, I said, when
14:30
when the SPLC labeled they tried to get this done by the way, Um,
14:37
oh gosh, I want to say twenty fourteen, somebody in the SPLC
14:43
wrote an article. They didn't label us a hate movement. They didn't um
14:50
label us any kind of anything. Really, they just talked about misogyny in
14:56
the manisphere. Right, but this came out and said, yeast they put
15:03
us on their watch list. Well, they didn't put us on a list
15:05
at that time. We weren't on the list yet. That was just not
15:09
officially, not officially, but the signals go out. Right. We didn't
15:15
get our list until much later, but feminists tried to talk about it like
15:20
we were on the watch list. So right, So that's how that's where
15:24
the process was before COVID right that we were on. We hit the point
15:31
where the men's rights movement as a whole, a voice for men, specifically
15:39
um Karen specifically on a watch list, on on a non government organization watch
15:48
list that we kept talking about. You know, this is a little more
15:54
serious because the government does reference this organization. The government does take this organization
16:00
seriously, but it's still it's not that you you don't take it seriously.
16:07
It's not proof of anything yet. But now the FBI has actually got a
16:18
document that's an FBI document, not an SPLC document. Now this document doesn't
16:25
specify men's rights activists as extremists yet. So that's one part of the background.
16:34
Other part of background of this article. Before I go into what it
16:37
says. And this is a full disclosure thing. This article is published on
16:45
the Heritage Foundation's newsletter, the Daily Signal. The reason is because the Heritage
16:51
Foundation is the organization that did the FOYA, that got this document, and
17:00
I traced back to them UM and their their blog or their news site specifically
17:11
because the other articles I read about this said things like, you know this,
17:18
the FBI flag flags were right wingers as uh as extremists, but the
17:25
language that they were showing being flagged wasn't necessarily right wing language. UM.
17:36
That traces more back to the Inzel community. So uh so I wanted to
17:41
go back to the source. So what we're going to be reading here is
17:45
is from a right wing think tank, a conservative think tank, but this
17:52
isn't just a right wing issue. And you'll see what I mean when when
17:59
I read through this. But that's I just wanted to give the background of
18:02
all of that. So that's where we are. It's been about ten to
18:07
thirteen years into making UM feminists have finally gotten a United States government organization to
18:15
flag part of the manisphere as extremists violent extremists, and it is on it's
18:26
being looked into, but it's um, it's still disturbing. So so the
18:34
articles titled here's FBI glossary uh for flagging violent extremism and uh you can see
18:44
here in the picture. Um you got the ag and and and uh the
18:52
director and they're they're um talking about this at a press conference. So this
18:57
was released in a press conference. So that's probably why, Um, the
19:03
Heritage Foundation was aware enough of it to ask for the document itself. The
19:11
FBI uses a glossary of terms to look for on to look for online.
19:17
So in other words, they're looking for these words on social media and in
19:23
blog posts and stuff like that. This is them searching people out. Yeah,
19:27
right, that could indicate someone is involved with violent extremism. According to
19:33
documents obtained by the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project, did they include kill all men?
19:42
No, just I'm just asking, yeah, conspicuously absent? It is
19:51
the violent rhetoric of feminism, right m. But flagged terms include red pilled,
20:06
first popularized by the nineteen ninety nine film The Matrix based Looks Looks Maxing,
20:12
and the names Chad and Stacy. I feel sorry for anybody out there
20:18
right now whose names are actually Chad or Stacy I know a Chad. Yeah.
20:26
We we had several Chads in my class, and also some guys that
20:29
were named Chad. Um, but I've never met a Stacy. Got Oh,
20:36
I had three Stacy's in my class. Oh man, three girls named
20:40
Stacy in my class. Um there were my my my class was we had
20:48
we had two guys named Michael who had the same last name and middle initials.
20:55
Their middle initials rhymed. Oh wow. Yeah, so we had one
21:00
was a middle initial P and the other one was a middle initial T.
21:04
So we uh, we had two. We gave one of them a nickname
21:10
and the other one called him by his last name. Yeah, but uh
21:15
yeah, well and then my maiden name. There's another last name, another
21:22
surname that is the same as my maiden name, but it has an as
21:26
at the end. And I had a class name with that other surname.
21:32
And uh, we looked nothing alike, like he was blond in different different
21:38
shape, face and everything like it was obvious we were not related, but
21:41
people would ask if we were related. So we started telling people that we
21:45
were twins. We just had different parents. Were twins. We have different
21:51
parents, all right, which one was Arnold? Yeah, yeah, yeah.
22:00
So the first the first term they cited is one of the basic terms
22:06
in the men's rights movement. You're red pilled if you start to understand what's
22:10
going on in the world in terms of how male disposability and dinocentrism have affected
22:19
law policy, social attitudes, and so on, and recognizing that you actually
22:26
have to be prepared to act defensively. Um, you know, with things
22:30
like always be recording, um, don't automatically trust people, don't trust the
22:36
government, don't trust the police, those kind of things. Us knowing that,
22:41
um, sorry, us knowing that m is now makes us flagged as
22:52
extremist. Right, we're flagged as people with bad attitudes because we are aware
22:59
that the police might lie to us, and in particular, we are aware
23:03
that if you're a man, the police might discriminate against you, and they
23:07
will use your gender against you to portray you as a violent thug. Right,
23:12
It's it's having the temerity to actually stand up for yourself. You know
23:18
that this is what they're deeming as extreme action, Like this is it's it's
23:26
it's feels like it's straight it's like a straight out of nineteen eighty four,
23:33
you know what I mean? You are not allowed to question anything in society
23:38
what you think might be wrong. Oh oh if you think wrong, Oh
23:42
Michael, Nope, Nope, you're you're a bad thinker, and we got
23:47
to figure out a way to fix your brain. But first we gotta let
23:51
everyone around know that you're the bad guy, and we've got to go exterminate
23:56
you and your way of thinking. Yeah, when all you're sitting there doing
24:02
is trying to maybe learn about something or defend yourself or learn about what your
24:07
rights actually are. These people man, Jesus, Oh yeah, it's it's
24:14
it's great. It's it's just great. They also flagged phrases that include it's
24:19
over and just be first, which it goes on. It'll explain in this
24:25
document when we look at it what those are. These documents were obtained by
24:30
the Heritage Foundation's Oversight project. The Daily Signal is Heritages multimedia news organization.
24:37
Such words and phrases have come to be code for certain extremists who communicate online
24:42
with others like them. According to the FBI's Glossary of Words indicating racially or
24:48
ethnically motivated violent extremism and a list of key terms about involuntary celibate violent extremism.
24:59
So to make this big because it's hard to see um the um.
25:07
I mean, and I'm not gonna go through everything here, but let's see
25:11
we refine these it's it's it's blowing my mind that they spent time on this.
25:18
Meanwhile, the actual violence that was being done in the street in the
25:22
names of BLM M was completely Oh no, this is peaceful protest, guys.
25:30
No, it's just that's a warm, lovely fire. They're just you
25:33
know, getting getting some heat for the homeless people out here. Is peaceful.
25:37
Bad cheese is just the biggest middle finger to the to the FBI.
25:47
Yeah, joke, it's a joke. Sorry, guys, I'm not really
25:48
talking about fuck these people. Well, I'll be honest, like and I
25:56
said this in our in our low bar as well. But I mean,
26:00
the FBI has gotten kind of a reputation, right, especially in the last
26:04
few months with all the information coming out about them, well the last couple
26:12
of years really, with all the information coming out about them getting people involved
26:17
with groups, and then those groups which had never done anything violent before suddenly
26:23
coming up with really stupid plans to kidnap a governor or you know, do
26:29
other stupid violent things. And then it turns out that, gosh, the
26:33
FBI agents were involved in the planning stages of that, maybe maybe the group
26:38
wouldn't have done it if they hadn't been involved. And that actually is one
26:45
of those things that there's a huge difference between an organic crime and entrapment.
26:53
And I've seen this kind of entrapment tactic used in other ways and and it's
27:00
just it's it's just a totally different thing. You're not getting somebody off the
27:06
streets who is dangerous. You're creating a situation where person looks dangerous and you
27:11
have an excuse to incarceerate them. And and that's not serving the community.
27:18
That's that's preying on the weaker elements within the community. Um, the FBI
27:27
shouldn't be doing that. No, no, no, our organization should be
27:30
doing that. It's a and part of it is, you know, they
27:33
can't just surveil you, because you know you're you have rights right. But
27:38
if they get involved with you, they're not surveiling, they're they're in the
27:42
group. You let them in, and so there you go. But I
27:49
like you can see in UM their terminology definitions here like they have the red
28:00
pill and the black pill. Red pill refers to a belief shared by many
28:04
online communities that society is corrupt and that the believer is a victim of this
28:11
corruption. Black pill, which is specific to in cells, So I guess
28:17
they're just completely throwing everybody else that's ever used that term under the bus,
28:22
refers to a belief that this corruption can only be changed through a massive societal
28:26
restructuring, often including violence. So they're they're they like completely redefined black pill
28:36
um which black pill is actually the idea that society is on a slow downwards
28:41
spiral toward um a social a societal collapse. Yeah, that is so fuck
28:48
at all inevitable, all right, that you know, like, well,
28:52
we're screwed. We can't do anything about this, be prepared for it,
28:57
because you're going to have to be right out a situation of economic, social,
29:03
and possibly even governmental collapse. That's black bill. So they don't and
29:10
and all of that, and I'm not coming to save you. Yeah,
29:12
And I'm not coming to save you. And that's that's uh yeah, And
29:15
it's not something that started with the in cell community at all. In fact,
29:19
it's I would say that that's more of a migtou thing. And I
29:23
don't think they're entirely wrong on that. Um. I think if there is
29:30
a chance of avoiding a societal collapse, it's slim and it realizes on stuff
29:34
that is, it's hard to accomplish, and like, you can't avoid societal
29:41
collapse without closing the accountability gap. You can't close the accountability gap without people
29:48
recognizing and counteracting guyna centrism, and in particular guyna centrism that is more dysfunctional
29:56
than just the baseline of dysfunction U And unfortunately, our society kind of relies
30:02
on that and people are comfortable with it, both sexes. Many people are
30:07
comfortable with it. So I don't know. You could probably call me almost
30:14
black pilled in a lot of ways, but I don't think that violence is
30:21
necessary, Like that's bullshit. They refer to migtoo, the acronym for men
30:27
going their Own Way, which refers to an online community that has overlap with
30:33
the end cell community. So men going their own way are men choosing to
30:45
a shoe relationships with women, men choosing to say no, you know,
30:49
like fuck it. You have made it clear that you're going to be dysfunctional,
30:56
made it clear that you're gonna be a legal and social threat, not
31:00
going to get involved. That's voluntary, right, But they have overlapped with
31:11
insuls in culls, I mean involuntary, involuntarily celibate, right. So yeah,
31:21
I it's hard for me to believe that someone presumably with the college degree,
31:30
put these words on this paper and did not know what either of them
31:36
actually meant, right I. I you know, it's sad um. I
31:41
like I said this, This this whole thing kind of reads like um and
31:48
a report written for a one on one level women's studies. Of course,
31:53
honestly, I hate to say that. I hope that it was you know,
32:00
I hope that the person who wrote this put more effort into it than
32:05
a nineteen year old college student. But it just doesn't look like it.
32:09
And it chances are it's a diversity higher anyway either way you slice it.
32:15
So the just be first thing for anybody that does is not familiar within cells.
32:22
They've portrayed it as necessitating that you target someone underage. It's not necessarily
32:32
about someone being underage so much as being inexperienced, which some people are into
32:39
their twenties and more and more that's happening. Feminists have actually talked about this
32:45
too, and they're upset about it. Fewer teenagers are starting sexual relationships.
32:52
I think that's a good thing. I think it's better if teenagers don't have
32:55
sex. I think it's better if they wait. They're better off if they
33:00
wait. Their lives will be better if they don't get pregnant and bear children
33:07
and then have to become parents, you know, or make the decision to
33:12
adopt, to opt for adoption, or you know, the girl have an
33:15
abortion or anything like that. And of course they're safer from STDs, right
33:22
if they're not having sex until they are adults. That's a good thing.
33:27
Yeah, but I guess it's upsetting to feminists. So and I mean,
33:31
I'm really curious about what would be driving that, because, um, I
33:37
think, as we have all seen firsthand, single motherhood, beget single motherhood.
33:45
You know, it's this just a cycle, it really is. I
33:49
don't, I don't what is there something different happening that is making these young
33:55
kids make different choices, make better choices. Yeah, they're watching how dysfunctional
34:00
their parents' lives were, I think, you know, I mean, this
34:05
is what I've heard from a lot of young men that have contacted me,
34:07
is I don't even know who my dad is. I'm not going to be
34:12
that that in that situation, you know. Or I saw my mom yank
34:16
my dad's chain around like, you know, like a choke chain on a
34:21
dog because she could. I'm not going to be subjected to that. And
34:28
you know, then then there's you know, there are guys out there that
34:30
are very much aware of the dangers of like h hpv UM, the dangers
34:38
of some of the other STDs that are out there, and so they're they're
34:44
being careful. They want to make money first before anything else happens to them.
34:49
They want to if they do want to start a family, they want
34:51
to start a family with a home, not you know, just like jump
34:57
in with both feet and then hope that they can for the family. And
35:00
a lot of young women are like, well, I want to get my
35:04
career established first. I don't want to, you know, I don't want
35:07
to do like my mom did and start working and then have babies and then
35:15
not finish you know, school or whatever. And and so there are a
35:21
lot of people that are they're waiting. Some of them are just common sense
35:30
reasons, honestly, yeah, you know, And then there's a lot of
35:32
guys that are seeing like girls are a little more melodramatic now than they were
35:37
when we were growing up, which is really a sad thing to say,
35:42
because our generation was pretty melodramatic, like in terms of the girls were the
35:47
guys weren't, but you know we are. Our generation is the one that
35:54
promoted the idea of a rape culture in the United States that doesn't exist,
36:02
you know, and they they did. They did that, especially using the
36:07
fucking TV shows like Saved by the Bells. Oh do you remember um de
36:13
Grassy Junior High? Yes? And De Grassy High I think was sort of
36:17
a follow up to the end. Uh. Then there were like there were
36:22
movies James at Fifteen, James at sixteen, stuff like that that's like like,
36:32
yeah, that's soap operas for teenagers. And I would hear the kids
36:38
talking about these at school and I tried to watch them and I just couldn't.
36:44
It was so they were so melodramatic. They were soap operas, and
36:50
I don't like soap operas, so but in any case, yeah, so
36:53
we had that, But I mean, like today it's it's totally different thing.
37:00
So this idea that you have to target someone under age, UM,
37:05
I'm not sure because I have I've heard people using the term just be first
37:09
in reference to adults um that are that are actually still virgins, and it's
37:20
it's um, it's hard for me to believe the FBI definition given that,
37:27
Uh, they've got red Pill wrong. So I yeah, and yes,
37:37
August, like you remember Grassy Junior High, you're definitely an eighties kid.
37:42
Yes, I have never ever heard of that, just the first never in
37:49
my lifetime if I heard of that. But that sounds sick. Well,
37:54
it's it's it's not really it's women get if they sleep around, right,
38:02
And I did know that. Notice that when I was in um, when
38:07
I was in college, I had friends that, you know, like just
38:15
go to a party, get drunk, find some guy, and fuck them,
38:17
and like that was a thing. And eventually, you know, they've
38:23
got to the point where they couldn't settle on anyone in terms of like who
38:30
who they're going to go out with regularly, who they're gonna make a partner
38:37
with. And you know, like I was always sort of the background to
38:45
this. I was always I was never like the center of attention because I
38:49
always if if I saw where the spotlight was, I would find the edge
38:52
of it and go just outside of that, because you know, I like
38:58
to hang out with the people in the group. But he didn't necessarily want
39:00
to be that center of attention. And the gal that would would always be
39:05
the center of attention would be similar to you know, Scarlett O'Hara at the
39:09
picnic where they're every guy is you know, oh, you want to desert,
39:13
you want to go for a walk, you want to sit and talk
39:15
with me, you know, and stuff like that. And you know that
39:20
that left me and some of the other gals that were not comfortable with that
39:25
much attention free to just sort of hang out and chit chat with people.
39:30
And you know, you go on dates when you find somebody that you're interested
39:35
in, and you don't go on dates when you don't, and it's there's
39:39
no pressure, right, So some of these gals that were the more popular
39:45
gals in the groups, I this is a good way to put it.
39:49
Richard Bierre nailed it. She has the thousand cocks stare right. And what
39:57
happens there is they stop seeing guys as um individual human beings with their own
40:05
ideas and beliefs and experiences and feelings and personalities. And so they're looking for
40:15
mister perfect. But mister perfect doesn't exist because people aren't perfect, and uh,
40:22
they can't find him. And somebody who hasn't like somebody who's still a
40:28
virgin in college or somebody who's still a virgin after college. Right, Um,
40:32
that that hasn't screwed around. That just treats people as people that can
40:37
see you and not another You know, this is this is insert generic man
40:45
here. Um might actually recognize the value in someone, um that that other
40:54
people don't. So that's part of I really don't think that just be first
41:02
is about specifically targeting miners. I think it's about specifically looking for people who
41:14
aren't. Yeah, yeah, like I get that. And no, no,
41:22
uh the caliman MX. I doubt the FBI knows about pair bonding.
41:30
Um, they don't know about a second breakfast either. Let's see when there
41:35
was a It's over is a comment that describes the hopelessness of being an in
41:39
cell. Typical response to the comment is it never began. Um, so
41:45
I think they've been hanging out maybe an in cell forums and they've seen these
41:49
conversations and they've um put their own spin on what they've seen. Um,
41:58
I'm gonna skip the reading stuff they talk about here because I don't think any
42:05
of it is. I think they are mixing up different groups because they're they're
42:12
talking about anti Semitic groups and stuff like that too. All right. They
42:19
define as a shorthand version of alternative right, loosely associated movement of identitarians,
42:24
white nationalists, and others who reject traditional conservative politics and advocate for the preservation
42:32
and protection of the white race and Western civilization. But they call us,
42:40
all right, and we don't really care about race, right, And then
42:50
they say based and our mves something of something violent extremists, radical, militarized
43:05
violent extremists. I guess use the term to refer to someone who has been
43:08
converted to racist ideology. Wait what, or as a way of in indicating
43:19
ideological agreement. So I guess Gamergate calling Christina Hoffsummer's based mom takes on a
43:29
whole new definition now, yeah, jez oh. And by the way,
43:43
Pole, you're on their radar. Pole specifically refers to politically incorrect discuss discussion
43:51
boards on four chan and eight chan used by some r mvs to broadcast their
43:58
violent intentions and are v E ideology like this, m so back up to
44:07
the top here radical radical something they gave us a yeah, I go,
44:16
I'll go back up to the top of the sheet because they have a thing.
44:21
Um, I don't see r m v E in this stupid list that
44:27
they in the in the like the PDF file. Yeah, I know,
44:30
I'm not looking for it, or I'm I am looking for it. I
44:34
mean the threat overview they call um involuntary celibate violent extremists IVY ees. Uh
44:43
so, and I'm sure that r is radical uh or maybe racially motivated?
44:52
Oh so? They also this is something else, um they they have of
45:02
There was something I had seen from this UM about Alec Menascian where they called
45:09
him Alex And I don't know, let me make sure because I downloaded the
45:22
the um oh piece of OKAD because I noted it in an hour chat.
45:36
I think it's hilarious how these people just love to speak in acronyms. Yeah
45:42
right, It's almost like they just creating code. Yeah, well them,
45:49
um, them noting Alec Menascian is interesting because Alec Menascian came out later and
46:00
told not just his attorney but his UM therapist that everything you said about being
46:08
an insull was made up for attention. And so he's still cited over and
46:15
over again as as um being an in cell and being uh, you know,
46:21
part of some sort of conspiracy to kill women and blah blah blah,
46:25
when in fact, you can't really trust anything. He said. It's one
46:30
of the reasons why I haven't like this, this latest manifesto that people are
46:35
demanding come out from them, the Catholic school shooter. I think it was
46:42
a Catholic school. Yeah, like that. You can't necessarily trust that someone's
46:51
manifesto is an accurate description of their ideology. Now I wouldn't necessarily completely toss
47:00
it out either, but I like, I take a manifesto with a grain
47:04
of salt, because Menascian had one and it was fake, and the this
47:09
other killers not around to say whether that's the case or not. It's possible
47:15
that it's it's genuine, that this person really held those beliefs and so on,
47:21
But I have my UM, I don't know, I have my my
47:27
skepticism. Now, ever since the Menascian thing, when it comes to basing
47:31
what you say about a particular event on a manifesto. As we look at
47:38
this, mass murderers and in particular mass shooters have had a variety of ideological
47:49
causes that they've cited, when in fact, if you look at their individual
47:54
cases and you look at their individual histories, a lot of it traces back
47:59
to untreated mental health conditions and lack of support from their families and in UM,
48:08
you know, do their development and h maybe come in from a violent
48:12
environment, maybe being UM subject to a substitution of drugging for therapy that was
48:19
needed, and things like that. Uh So I don't I don't go in
48:23
for the whole Well, let's get the manifesto and that'll tell us the whole
48:28
cause for this. I think a lot of it is that we are failing
48:31
to support young people in developing functional um ability to confront adversity and you know,
48:45
assess their situation and act accordingly without doing harmed other people. Yeah,
48:51
so there's a lot of there's a lot of reason to not give a rat's
48:55
ass about somebody's manifesto. That said, I think hiding it is not a
49:01
good thing either, because that just makes it look like it's more important than
49:05
it is. But yeah, um, it looks like they're I think,
49:15
I think I see it racially racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism. Yeah,
49:22
racially or so it is racially motivated violent extremism. Um. But yeah,
49:29
so we look at this but base, they were like they literally defined based
49:37
as one who has been converted to racist ideology. Die, you have to
49:42
be kinning me. And then they also they have lar listed here. I
49:47
would I would love to see the examples that they use to draw these conclusions,
49:53
because this just sounds how the hell did you get a racially or a
50:00
racist ideology from being called base? I want to know where the source?
50:08
Where's the source material? Guidemn it. Then then they they they hit LARPing.
50:15
So when somebody pretends, for instance, to uh be an MRA,
50:22
but then they say a bunch of things that are completely against our um you
50:28
know, our our our standards, like they start spouting feminist ideology or they
50:32
just say a bunch of violent things. We like, well, this is
50:36
this is an extremist or a nut job of feminist nut job job LARPing as
50:39
as an MRA, and they refer to it correctly as a term which stands
50:45
for live action role playing, originally meant to describe a role playing game in
50:49
which the participants act out their roles as fictional characters. So they got that
50:52
part right. Um. Then then they go on and I don't know,
50:58
they attribute it to the racially motivated violent Extremist groups r mvs and their associates
51:05
use the term to online to deride individuals accused of not being extreme and not
51:14
being in possession of skills or other valued characteristics they claim to have. They
51:21
sound like machines the R one thousand, I know, but yeah, a
51:28
lot of this doesn't have anything to do with this US. There's a lot
51:30
of terms here they've like sort of mixed in terms UM from like the Jewish
51:36
conspiracy groups and the and everything. The Great Replacement theory they've they've got that
51:44
in there. And what's interesting is it's hard to call that debunked now because
51:52
the World Economic Forum talked about it um and and they basically laid out how
51:59
they were going to do it, and so it's just kind of like,
52:02
I'm not going to argue that that's not happening when the people that are being
52:07
accused of it are like, oh yeah, we're totally doing that and it's
52:10
a good thing and you should like it. But yeah. The Great Replacement
52:16
theory is allegedly first popularized among European nationalists based on a two thousand and five
52:22
book at the same title. The term refers to the belief in a conspiracy
52:25
to replace the white race and Western culture through high non white birthrates, mass
52:31
immigration, and other measures. The title of the manifesto of the individual who
52:37
attacked mosques in churchilland New Zealand in March twenty nineteen. Also see also white
52:45
genocide. So I like that in terms of our movement, that really doesn't
52:54
have any relation to us. But it's interesting that they noted it and consider
53:02
it to be extreme extremist rhetoric UM, because it's not exactly debunked, right,
53:12
it's it's the opposite of debunked. So it's kind of you know,
53:17
my thoughts on it. I like, I'm as if we live in a
53:22
world where we treat everybody equally, um, where we don't have historical guilt
53:31
as a as an excuse for engaging in discrimination and oppression, where we don't
53:39
have historical hate as an excuse, and we don't treat people differently based on
53:45
their gender. If we close the accountability gap, it won't matter who racially
53:53
is a minority or a majority, because we will have a more peaceful and
54:00
vironment, will have a more understanding environment. And like men or men,
54:04
men get along. Um, So it's not the idea of a great replacement,
54:08
but where we have a high birth rate of people who are not white,
54:14
like, that has no bearing on me. I don't care, right,
54:17
but and it's it's an interesting thing to note that it's a goal,
54:22
um, of somebody. I don't it's not necessarily I'm I'm confused because I'm
54:30
not sure how if this is your process of you know, replacing the race,
54:36
wouldn't you be doing that to the other race at the same time,
54:38
if if everyone's converging, it's not just a great white replacement, you are
54:46
then also destroying or not destroying, but reducing the numbers of whatever other race
54:55
that that white person, that dirty white evil man decides to procreate with.
55:01
Well, that's the thing, like that there are people who think that,
55:05
um, the idea is to eliminate white people through reproduction and all that,
55:08
like, right, and it I don't, I don't really care that that
55:13
has No, people love each other and they they reproduce together. That's a
55:19
that's a thing. It's not a big deal to me. Now that when
55:21
it comes to the values of our society, that's a different thing. If
55:24
they're trying to eliminate meritocracy, UM, and they claim that meritocracy is a
55:31
racial thing, then I have a problem with that because smart people come in
55:37
all races, you know, Diligent people come in all races, hard working
55:42
people come in all races. Ingenuity comes from people from all races, right,
55:49
And there's like there's assholes of every stripe, Right, there's assholes of
55:52
every stripe too, and lazy people come in all races. So like this
55:58
is this is kind of for me, I'd be more worried about getting rid
56:01
of um Western society, Western civilization, which isn't really a racial thing like
56:08
that. That bothers me because that that that takes it to a place of
56:14
you know, we're going to get rid of the things that create the best
56:17
medicine, the things that create UM. Ingenuity brings about, that brings about
56:24
great engineering. How do you, you know, help people live better lives?
56:31
How how do you help people have an easier time? How do you
56:34
help people get to and from places easier and so on that we don't want
56:38
to see that eliminated. That's that's greatness. And now those are those are
56:44
characteristics that are in my opinion, associated with masculinity. So if they're attacking
56:52
masculinity, then I have a problem with that. Um But I mean,
56:58
and I'm going to be careful how I say this, because I know YouTube's
57:00
not gonna like it, But the historical experience of Native Americans that we talk
57:09
about in terms of a genocide, A significant factor in that was intermarriage with
57:19
white people resulting in an elimination of purely Native American people because their offspring,
57:30
you know, when when they intermarried were part white, and when when white
57:38
supremacists talk about the thinning of their blood and everything, I think they're talking
57:45
about that kind of phenomenon happening to white people to the degree that eventually there
57:54
won't be anybody that is that has enough genetic heritage from their Western European like
58:02
white nations to be considered primarily that in national descent or whatever. That's what
58:14
they I think, that's what they seem to be worried about, and it's
58:16
it's not an illegitimate description of what can happen. It's my question is whether
58:24
or not you know it's a bad thing if we get to a situation in
58:30
the future where most human beings cultural heritage and most human beings genetic heritage is
58:38
widely spread instead of from this person being from this one specific area and that
58:45
person being from that one specific area. And my perspective on it's probably a
58:51
little different than a lot of other people because my heritage is like that.
58:55
I have a broad spectrum, but between you know, my different branches in
59:01
my family tree of heritage now it's I'm mostly a euromut still, But it
59:10
doesn't bother me that I'm not Like when I say I'm Irish, I'm not
59:15
purely Irish, you know, I'm also you know, French and German and
59:21
English and Welsh and Norse and Italian and like I could name. If I
59:28
go through and try and name everything, it's going to take all night.
59:31
I don't think that's a bad thing, right And if I had other things
59:37
in there, like and I probably do, and I'm eventually going to find
59:40
out, you know, if if I find out there are nationalities in there
59:46
that I didn't know about that'll just be more interesting things for me to find
59:51
out about my family's history. Like that's just cool in my opinion. Like,
59:58
but so it's not a good deal and right, and and that's exactly
1:00:02
where it should be left. Right. It's a cool thing. It's interesting
1:00:07
to learn about the history, but it's not the entirety of who you are
1:00:13
as a person. And I think, um, you know, I don't
1:00:20
know how much I like, I understand the argument for the great replacement.
1:00:27
Um, however, I don't know how you parse that with the fact that
1:00:34
the people who are in charge of us really seem to love to keep us
1:00:38
fighting against black and white. You know, they don't really want to because
1:00:45
a great white replacement would mean what that they go away? Well then who
1:00:52
who are you going to be mad at? Now, Well, you're gonna
1:00:58
direct all your angers. Actually that might be a good thing. Um,
1:01:01
it might be. But you know, on the other hand, if if
1:01:06
they start putting people in camps and getting grito them, that would be a
1:01:08
bad thing. Right yeah, But but obviously, like you know, people
1:01:13
people getting busy, uh with people of different races, and the result being
1:01:20
that most most babies come out with you know, very non white that that's
1:01:25
not a problem in my opinion, as long as we are able to maintain
1:01:29
the values of you know, uh, moving forward with ingenuity and having a
1:01:36
work ethic and not not being dependent on a government. I don't I don't
1:01:40
care you know what color people are. And I think men in general,
1:01:46
men in particular, will um just have fellowship. You can throw men from
1:01:55
different cultures together to work on a project, um, and their cultures can
1:02:00
be dramatically different, and they will find a way to work together. Right.
1:02:07
Women just rip each other to shreds. Women tear each other down.
1:02:10
Uh. They will turn other people against each other right over over the stupidest
1:02:19
little cultural differences. Like men will work shoulder to shoulder with people that that
1:02:25
uh come from a culture that historically, you know, they all try to
1:02:29
kill each other if they if they need to put out a fire or build
1:02:34
something. Um. So, But I think men could solve the problem of
1:02:38
racism if if we just would stop using the gynocentric They're gonna hurt our women,
1:02:47
They're gonna rape our women, they're gonna taint our women, they're gonna
1:02:52
pollute our women like that kind of crap. If that would stop. There
1:02:57
wouldn't be any concern about this in the whole great replacement thing like that,
1:03:01
nobody would care. But those values, I don't know. The bigger scarier
1:03:12
thing to me, like in terms of being replaced and all that, the
1:03:17
bigger scarier thing to me is the idea of an elite class trying to manipulate
1:03:24
society into abolishing meritocracy and abolishing individuality. And that that bothers me because that
1:03:36
that's more of a trying to turn people into clones or automatons or slaves surfs,
1:03:45
you know. And I think they're mistaken if they think that if they
1:03:50
just go a little browner on the melotonin or melotonin on the melanin scale,
1:03:57
don't go to sleep guys on the melanin scale, that that they they'll get
1:04:02
people who will be more likely to tolerate that. I think men of all
1:04:09
races will ultimately figure out what's being done to them and won't put up with
1:04:14
it, right, right, So Uh, there is that. But yeah,
1:04:20
so the terminology that we're looking at here, we are we're not the
1:04:29
the target. Um, there are several targets you can see, and uh,
1:04:34
but we're they're associating us with the targets, and they've got some of
1:04:42
our terminology in there um. But going on below that, then it says,
1:04:47
according to the FBI document, the word cell is short for intel um.
1:04:53
They they're talking about, you know, the involuntary uh celibate community.
1:04:58
Docs we never heard of all that. Yeah, docs we obtained show how
1:05:04
the FBI equates protected online speech to violence. The Oversight Project says in a
1:05:11
tweet, according to at FBI, using the terms based or red pill or
1:05:15
signs of racially or ethnically motivated violent extremism. So their concern is this is
1:05:23
going to flag conservative groups because conservative groups adopted the men's rights based and red
1:05:28
pilled terminology, which based was sort of more gamer term than anything. So
1:05:36
this sort of stretches across MRA's gamers in cells, MiG tao, everybody.
1:05:46
Another tweet from the project says, using terms like looks, maxing, Chad
1:05:53
and Stacy will get you on an FBI list for involuntary celibate violent extremism because
1:06:00
posting typing words online is violent and it's extreme people, right, fuck's sake,
1:06:15
I have no words because I pay taxes to pay these fucker salaries and
1:06:20
this is what they're doing. Well, if you did have words, you
1:06:24
might be in trouble anyway, right yeah, yeah, Like, I mean,
1:06:30
we're we're looking at uh, we're looking at the FBI deeming it extremist
1:06:36
to say words on the internet. What exactly is the end goal of this?
1:06:41
So they're gonna make it illegal to say these words? Or are we
1:06:44
trying to get fines? IBI does right? Like and this isn't new,
1:06:50
Like, who's the twenty seventeen They they got into contact with some kid and
1:06:58
manipulated him into agreeing to bomb something and even got him. They drove him,
1:07:09
They sent somebody to drive him to go get He thought he was gonna
1:07:13
go get these bombs and everything. And as you go through his case you
1:07:20
find out every stage from the conceptualizing of the idea I'm going to do this
1:07:30
to him ending up in the car with the agent on the way to he
1:07:36
thought get bombs, like all of that was guided by the FBI agent,
1:07:43
not just the FBIII agent being there watching him go through all these this process
1:07:49
and land on that he was literally manipulated into it. And then it turns
1:07:55
out he had mental health problems and was I think he was autistic. He
1:08:01
was barely functional. Uh Like it just just somebody that would not have been
1:08:13
capable of coming up with the idea on his own. So and and then
1:08:17
you had the same thing with the attempt at kidnapping the Michigan governor. The
1:08:23
people involved in that, that was not their idea. It was an idea
1:08:29
that was fed to them by an FBI agent, and then the FBI agent
1:08:34
helped them plan this stuff and and everything. Um, they're now starting to
1:08:41
find out, as people thought, there was quite a bit of federal federal
1:08:45
involvement in January sixth, right, and uh, all this stuff, Um,
1:08:51
that's what it ends up happening. So for our listeners who are in
1:08:58
cells, you're all you're gonna have Feds in your forms now. Um,
1:09:01
for our listeners who are miktoo, you're probably gonna have you gotta watch out
1:09:05
for new guys like you might already have people there. Um with regard to
1:09:13
the SPLC and and uh defining the men's rights movement the way that it's been
1:09:18
defined in everything they started with miktoo. Um, the FBI is starting with
1:09:24
in cells because that's the popular group to condemn now because feminists have moved past
1:09:29
MCTOO. So that's all. Like you just kind of have to watch out,
1:09:35
you know, if you've got somebody in your group that starts uncharacteristically for
1:09:40
your group talking about, um, you know, anything violent where they're not
1:09:47
joking, Like we we joke about stuff like that all the time, but
1:09:53
um, you know, like nobody seriously says anything about out wanting to do
1:10:00
anything. It's you know, oh, this person is self destructing, or
1:10:03
this is happening or that's happened, or you know, nothing along the lines
1:10:10
of let's do this, or we should do this, or this should happen
1:10:15
or anything along those lines. If you see something like that, you might
1:10:19
be looking at a fed Yeah, right, that's pretty much you kind of
1:10:25
have to look at it that way. And it's also you know, obviously,
1:10:31
when we have seen people in the past engage in violent rhetoric, we've
1:10:38
we've policed that pretty harshly. But but yeah, that's that's where we are
1:10:44
now. ZERANX gave us five dollars and said based as slang being opposite to
1:10:48
cringe who was started by rapper Little B and the FBI r racist. There
1:10:55
you go, Little B. Yeah, Oh my god, I'm so out
1:11:01
of touch. You know. I work with a bunch of twenty nothings,
1:11:06
right, and so one of them pulled me to the side. He goes,
1:11:12
you know, he's getting like it. Everybody's talking about the situation.
1:11:15
Hey, Laura, Hey, tell me what you think about this. Oh
1:11:17
you heard what happened with blue faced girlfriend? Right, I'm like, uh,
1:11:24
what what is a blue face? Apparently is some rapper and his ratchet
1:11:30
ass girlfriend did something I don't know, but like, I don't know why
1:11:36
he would have expected me to know. I don't listen to that shit.
1:11:42
I don't know who does. It's crazy. I'm I'm if if um a
1:11:49
piece of information permeates or um dominates their sort of sphere of existence where,
1:12:00
yeah, like they assume that it has gotten outside of their shore existence existence
1:12:06
and everybody else knows about it. I think that really is it is?
1:12:12
It is true. I I do it myself, you know, and I
1:12:15
have to catch myself sometimes, you know. I think, because I know
1:12:18
a piece of information that everybody else is aware of it. But you know
1:12:23
that that's not always the case. So yeah, I will say no.
1:12:28
A fan also gave us a dollar on Um, rumble, So it's a
1:12:32
rumble rant. Why are feminists concerned fewer teenagers are starting relationships? I thought
1:12:39
they said women cannot consent under patriarchy, and I'll prove is grape. All
1:12:44
piv is grape. Well yeah, but you know, uh, they still
1:12:47
want women to have as much sex as possible, it seems to me.
1:12:53
And of course, if if teenagers aren't getting pregnant, then they don't have
1:12:57
as much justification for a huge virgin government feeding on abortion industry like that,
1:13:05
sucking at the teats of the federal budget. So so they gotta have the
1:13:11
They gotta have that, Like planned parenthood can't survive if there aren't a bunch
1:13:15
of pregnant teenagers out there going to have abortions. Um, but Hannah,
1:13:20
trans women can have kids too. I don't know trans men can get pregnant.
1:13:30
Um. But yeah, so there you go. That's that's that's our
1:13:34
situation. They go on to say that the FBI didn't immediately respond to an
1:13:40
inquiry Wednesday from the Daily Signal for this news report. Um, they have
1:13:45
their tweets in the article, And the article goes on to say the FBI
1:13:51
documents show several words that the average person probably would associate with racist or white
1:13:57
supremacist individuals or groups such as all right, Zionist, occupied government, blood
1:14:02
and soil, And I had to find out what that meant and the Great
1:14:05
relation replacement theory. However, many of the terms on the list of words
1:14:12
the FBI is watching out for could be used with no content or context involving
1:14:16
race or extremist views. And this is something that feminists have done to us
1:14:20
historically as well. They take a bunch of innocent things and they group them
1:14:26
together with a bunch of things that are not innocent in order to create guilt
1:14:30
by association. Right, So you have this idea of fighting back against against
1:14:43
the Great replacement by fighting back against you know, the groups trying to get
1:14:48
rid of white people being associated with the idea of being treated fairly as a
1:14:59
huge human being. And then by that association, it becomes racist to ask
1:15:09
for fair treatment as human being regardless of your sex, regardless of your race,
1:15:14
and so on, because while you're just like those people that are wanting
1:15:18
to violently fight back against the Greek replacement theory, and yeah, it's it's
1:15:30
quite an insidious tactic there. Let's see we already knew. We'll skip the
1:15:39
bit about Oh yeah, the same term, let's see, the red pill
1:15:47
or being red pilled means someone is accepting racist, antisemitic, or fascist police,
1:15:51
according the FBI. The same term has a different meaning for involuntarily celibate
1:15:56
groups. According to the FBI, for members of this group, read pill
1:16:00
means socially corrupt or society is corrupt and they are victims of the corruption.
1:16:04
A black pills a term meaning that corrupt society can only be changed through massive
1:16:08
social restructuring, often including violence. We talked about that, and then they
1:16:13
get into the word chad. They say the word chat is race specific,
1:16:19
the very specific term used to describe an idealized version of a male who is
1:16:24
successful at gaining sexual and romantic attention from women. According to the FBI List
1:16:29
of key terms, the female version of this is stacy. That's absolutely not
1:16:34
race specific, unless because I know a very black Chad. His name is
1:16:40
Chad Ocho Cinco. Yeah, way for the cowboys. I don't like the
1:16:45
cowboys, but don't hate me. You know, a person's name doesn't determine
1:16:51
their racial makeup. So that's pretty fucking racist of you, right there.
1:16:58
Yeah, but no, it's just a man who is sexually successful. I
1:17:05
guess you know, he's he's got the looks, he's got whatever he's he's
1:17:14
doing whatever he can to pull his much poon and it's working for him.
1:17:17
That's a chad. I guess they exist everywhere. Yeah. So basically going
1:17:25
over this, um my thoughts on this, like, this article isn't really
1:17:30
long, and the um document isn't isn't very in depth, but just reading
1:17:40
this, I'm looking at it as like this really does look to me like
1:17:45
a report that would be written by a first year gender studies major. It
1:17:51
does not look to me like something that the police would come up with.
1:17:57
And you know, no, sorry, so somebody took their high school daughters
1:18:04
UM homework and doctored it up a little bit, yea, or or you
1:18:13
I know someone I'm not going to get two wins to specifics, but they're
1:18:17
going through college right now and using chat GPTs to write papers and it's working.
1:18:25
It's working. That's the scariest fucking part about it. Yeah, it's
1:18:30
it is working. Um. The sad thing is it's that's only going to
1:18:34
get better at it too, Like m but but in any case, we
1:18:43
are at a point now this is a government agency. All right, We're
1:18:47
at a point now where a government agency is um accepting work from it's it's
1:18:56
employees from government employees who um, they're on salary. Their job is to
1:19:05
investigate crime and UH and in the FBI, their their job is often to
1:19:12
investigate crime before it happens, because that that's what they're doing now, right,
1:19:17
UM, who are are using discussion, dissenting terms, UM, questioning,
1:19:28
UH, politics and so on to denote UM to imply to presume,
1:19:41
you know whatever, to decide who the criminals are going to be and then
1:19:46
acting on that. Right, this is a roadmap for deciding that if you
1:19:54
talk about particular issues, if you talk about, um, the relationships between
1:20:00
men and women and what's dysfunctional in the overall societal relationship between men and women,
1:20:08
that you might be a threat. It's a roadmap for deciding that,
1:20:13
you know, maybe they might join your group and start agitating for actions that
1:20:19
your group wouldn't necessarily have taken. And it's it's a roadmap for outlying descent.
1:20:30
So this is just like a thing I don't want to I don't want
1:20:35
to get too paranoid about it. But at the same time, this is
1:20:40
a thing we should be keeping an eye on. It's a thing that we
1:20:43
should be very concerned about, and it is a thing that we should be
1:20:48
alert to in that you want you want to watch out for sort of signs
1:20:58
of manipulation in your group, right, and and that includes not just on
1:21:02
social media, but you know, discord other forums that are more private than
1:21:09
social public social media. But but above all that, but above all that,
1:21:15
this is just another reason of why we need to defund the FBI.
1:21:21
Yeah. Yeah, Honestly, anybody in the FBI that is, um,
1:21:30
it's more oriented to protecting the public and instead of praying on the public could
1:21:36
just go into their regular local police forces. M And I'm quite sure a
1:21:43
lot of local police forces would be quite happy to have former FBI agents on
1:21:48
their team. Um. So it's not like you know, they would get
1:21:54
out of law enforcement necessarily. Yeah, but might be people might be better
1:22:00
off that way. But there's a there's a lot of things that that really
1:22:03
need to change. Um, like this is yeah, and zer X gives
1:22:12
us five dollars and says, I remember they wanted to create a Ministry of
1:22:15
truth this is pre crime. Um. Shoot, what was that movie where
1:22:23
they had seers that would would um predict crime? Minority report? Yes,
1:22:31
this is this is almost minority report. Um. Instead of using a psychic
1:22:38
they're using your language. Right, you say based, they say, oh,
1:22:42
you're going to be a terrorist, Like that's not necessarily true, right,
1:22:49
you don't know that? Um. And And one really annoying thing about
1:22:57
this, Like honestly, one really super annoying thing about this is like a
1:23:02
lot a lot of this terminology is just mainstream now, like when people um
1:23:10
people. When people use the term based, they're not even necessarily using it
1:23:15
in a political way. Like I see that term being used by gamers.
1:23:19
I see that term being used by political advocates. I see that term being
1:23:25
used by people who are religious. Um. I see that term being used
1:23:30
by young people to describe adults that understand issues that are related to to you
1:23:36
know, just being young, like school issues and sports issues and stuff like
1:23:42
that, stuff to do with you know, their their everyday activities as as
1:23:46
kids. So it's it seems kind of silly, right and red pilled.
1:23:53
Everybody knows that terminail. That's not exactly a rarely used term either, so
1:23:58
they're they're looking at something that's going to it's going to impact on a broad
1:24:03
spectrum in society. Absolutely, And I expect them to go after nerds,
1:24:12
autistic people like we're you know, I guess we're dangerous because we think differently.
1:24:18
Right. I expect them to go after men's rights activists. I expect
1:24:23
him to go after Mactow. Expect them to go after right wingers. I
1:24:26
expect them to go after left wingers, especially if you are more of a
1:24:31
libertarian or end cap nature like you know. So this isn't it isn't just
1:24:40
limited to what it's saying in there. But let's see. I think I've
1:24:47
gone through the entire article. So I'm gonna see if we have any super
1:24:56
chose. There we go. Sorry, I'm growling, y'all, and my
1:25:03
allergy medicine is like making my ears ring. M Meredith g gave us five
1:25:11
dollars and said, HBr talked to fifty six. I need for the Badgers
1:25:14
and thanks for the conversation. Um, and that is our super chow,
1:25:20
our only super chow for the nights. So there we go. Um and
1:25:25
I let's see the Assassin of the Gray says they will not go after left
1:25:29
wingers. Witness how Antifa gets away with their violence. They are useful as
1:25:32
the brute squad. Well, they won't go after left wingers who are are
1:25:38
protesting, right, but they might. They might go after left wingers who
1:25:45
are um alternatives to the norm. Like you kind of see how they crushed
1:25:55
Bernie Sanders campaign. Yeah, they did, and that was BLM that did
1:26:01
it. So I don't know, they eat, they eat their own,
1:26:08
they always eat their own. And I'll bet there are um, but there
1:26:14
are FBI involved in pretty much every political group at this point. Um,
1:26:20
Antifa, BLM, all those guys just not you know, going after them
1:26:27
right now, you know, but they will. They will eventually. Um,
1:26:32
the authoritarian state will crush all those groups, all the anti government groups.
1:26:40
So this is this is just the way they do things. It takes
1:26:44
time to to get there because they they they use some of those groups to
1:26:49
break down the society and then when society comes back, like a lot of
1:26:55
what the rioting, the condoning of the rioting was about, was getting you
1:27:01
to ask for more police. The government supported the defund police movement because they
1:27:10
could create dysfunction in the areas where people would would do that would defund the
1:27:16
police. They could send they could bust in the homeless that are drug addicts
1:27:25
because they are homeless that are not. But they could bust in the homeless
1:27:28
that are drug addicts, that that are erratic in their behavior and more likely
1:27:31
to commit crimes and stuff and more likely to engage in violence. And they
1:27:38
could create a lack of authority in neighborhoods where there's gang violence and not bring
1:27:46
in any other solutions and then turn around and say, well, what do
1:27:50
you want us to do? And when you say, well we need more
1:27:54
police, all right, there you go, Crime Bill two point zero,
1:27:58
Here you go, and you'll have another like That's is essentially what the Clintons
1:28:04
did during the Clinton administration was respond to a demand to bring back being tough
1:28:15
on crime and with with with bringing in tons of police funding, tons of
1:28:21
police coming into different neighborhoods and everything. And that's what that's what they're gonna
1:28:28
do. Now, that's why they've been you know, like they they're not
1:28:30
enforcing criminal law in urban neighborhoods. But if you defend yourself then they're going
1:28:42
after you. So if you know, you violate the tenants of the left,
1:28:49
the anti gun tenants of the left, even if it's legal for you
1:28:55
to have that gun, even if it's legal for you to defend your property
1:29:00
or to defend your home, yourself, your person, and even if you
1:29:05
are under stand your ground laws, Like they're going after people for defending themselves,
1:29:14
like they're that's being enforced, but they won't enforce laws against mugging you.
1:29:21
That's targeted, right, that's designed to get you to demand more policing,
1:29:28
right, And it's already started to happen. So yeah, well they're
1:29:35
they're gonna be rolling out these robo dogs, these robo police dogs. Have
1:29:41
you seen those? Yes, I have seen those. They are scary looking
1:29:46
things, and um, god forbid anybody comes into contact with one and that
1:29:54
thing starts to malfunction. M But but you know what's going to happen.
1:30:00
You know, there's there's going to be a casualty. It's like the first
1:30:03
version of anything like a video game system, right, Like, it's going
1:30:08
to have its bugs, it's going to be screwed up, and you kind
1:30:12
of got to wait until the kinks get worked out for it to be functioning
1:30:17
in the manner in which one would expect it to without causing excessive bodily harm.
1:30:26
Yeah. Yeah, like in a perfect society, if they were going
1:30:30
to come up with something like that, they would come up with it for
1:30:31
the purpose of like, oh, there's a fire, we have to send
1:30:35
somebody in to rescue people in the building. You know, Oh, well,
1:30:42
you know, let's send in a robot so that it because it can't
1:30:45
die, right, so that it can go into places that maybe we can't
1:30:49
send a person. But no, no, they've got robots for policing.
1:30:55
So yeah, so that's that's basically it. Um. I think we pretty
1:31:00
much covered this, and I guess my ultimate message with this, the thing
1:31:04
that I wanted to get across to everybody is be aware, be alert.
1:31:10
We are on the radar. This is this is a little red laser pointed
1:31:14
in our direction, and they're they're not trying to entice a cat to play.
1:31:18
So just have that in mind. And you know, in your forums,
1:31:26
in your discussions, in your interactions with people on the internet, if
1:31:31
you run into somebody that starts advocating for things or suggesting things that seem out
1:31:42
of character with the movement, just just don't trust that individual because you're you're
1:31:48
probably dealing with somebody who is either coming into Gauk because of this stuff or
1:31:55
is actually involved with law enforcement and trying to manipulate you into committing a crime.
1:32:02
So with that, UM, I think we're going to close it out.
1:32:08
And I think I've I've gone through all of the super chats, gone
1:32:12
through well, and we just got another one. I did go through all
1:32:15
of the super chats and all of the rumble rants. So our last super
1:32:19
chat is from Zeroans gave us five dollars and said, have those servo monitors
1:32:26
in Manhattan in LA. Uh they're not at the level of using drones like
1:32:31
on the show Dark Angel. Oh my gosh, I remember that show with
1:32:35
Jessica Alba. Um. But yeah, they do have those uh servo monitors
1:32:42
in Manhattan LA. Well, I mean, guys do know that there are
1:32:47
cameras everywhere and they're they're working on Oh there's another super chat, um Thomas
1:32:56
Steine. Thomas Stein gave us a dollar ninety nine. Lucian, don't talk
1:33:00
to anyone. I wouldn't say that necessarily, um, but um definitely,
1:33:09
Uh, be careful who you trust and don't let somebody like if somebody starts
1:33:15
getting in with you know, violent rhetoric or um hateful genuinely hateful rhetoric,
1:33:23
like maybe consider that you're talking to somebody who is being disingenuous and uh,
1:33:30
you know even point blank say, you know, we don't we don't do
1:33:34
that. I don't know where you got that idea, but that's not us,
1:33:39
Like, yeah, that's fun. Don't let anybody else define you,
1:33:42
right, you know, you gotta stick to your stick to your guns.
1:33:47
Well, and remember what I said, um proverbial guns. Right, yeah,
1:33:54
remember what I said and and my video um on on the topic of
1:34:00
quote unquote mail violence. You know, violence is labor, that is work.
1:34:05
You are taking risks, you are exerting effort. You know, you
1:34:11
are exerting emotional effort and everything when you engage in it. You're not obligated
1:34:16
to use your violence for somebody else's purposes. And you're not obligated to switch
1:34:24
from diplomatic methods like we use to violent methods for anything. You know,
1:34:31
if somebody's not attacking you, if you're not in a situation where defending yourself
1:34:36
is your only violence is your only option for defending yourself, there's no reason
1:34:42
why you have to engage in that labor and take that risk. Right.
1:34:46
Our movement sticks to contacting government officials, lobbying for changes in law and policy,
1:34:55
trying to influence social attitudes toward more even handed approach to men, and
1:35:03
uh to to recognizing men's humanity. That's what we do. So if you
1:35:11
see somebody advocating otherwise, they're demanding of you free labor for their purposes,
1:35:20
and you don't owe them that, like it's not your job, you don't
1:35:26
have to do that. Yep. So with that, I will think,
1:35:32
uh, Lauren, first taking out this has been a you know, weird
1:35:36
sausage. This is this is an odd, oddly shaped sausage tonight. Not
1:35:42
not real long, not real short, just kind of like this is what
1:35:45
the fox sausage. Because like being on a list like that, being having
1:35:51
um a watch list for words flag terms that we regularly use is just kind
1:35:58
of weird. Right, Yeah, it's it's almost a PSA. Right,
1:36:02
watch what you're saying out there, guys, because this is what they're doing
1:36:06
and they are ready willing and able to come after any of us. Yeah.
1:36:15
Yeah, well, just like I said, you know, we are
1:36:18
peaceful and maintain your peaceful attitude and document your peacefulness and don't let anybody trick
1:36:26
you into giving it up, right, But but yeah, thanks for sticking
1:36:30
out the weird sausage with us, and you know, all the listeners,
1:36:34
and thanks for all the super chats and everything, and thanks to everybody who
1:36:39
works in the background and make HBr talk happen. And good night all,
1:36:43
good night, y'all.