Latest / Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags / Can Ilhan Omar Actually Be Deported? Mike Davis Explains

Transcript

Can Ilhan Omar Actually Be Deported? Mike Davis Explains · Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump, Roger Stone, James O'Keefe. It was happy
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: days to hear again. The Dems were dancing in the streets. Hey,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: they got them. They raided them at 6 o'clock in
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: the morning with CNN rolling cameras. Elon Omar gets raided.
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: This is against the law. This is lawfare from the DOJ,
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: which is, of course, bunk. But I can say bunk.
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: Mike Davis will say it better than I will. Frogmen
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: showing up to Roger Stone's home in Broward County, Florida.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: Mar-a-Lago having the underwear drawer of Melania Trump gone through
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: for no reason other than maybe to find the Crossfire
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: Hurricane paperwork. Of course, James O'Keefe, because he dared not
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: publish Ashley Biden's diary, but Elon Omar somehow is off limits.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: I mean, the hypocrisy is even worse than I'm even
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: trying to describe it, isn't it?
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: Well, here is what is the crucial fact for everyone
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: to know. This was a home raid on a member
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: of Congress. It's very hard to get a home raid,
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: and it's particularly hard to get a home rate on
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: a member of Congress because of the speech and debate
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: clause in the U.S. Constitution. Guess who ordered this home rate?
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: It was a Democrat D.C. U.S. magistrate judge who donated
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: to Hillary Clinton's campaign and clerked for an Obama judge twice.
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: So that kind of ends And the criticism that this
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: was a partisan raid on a political opponent.
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: They actually slow walked who it was, who the magistrate was.
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: We didn't have any idea the first day, yesterday. And
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: then we find out this guy was, what, sworn in
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: by Boasberg, right? So Boasberg, who hates Trump. Much like
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: the magistrate in South Florida who hated Trump and wouldn't
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: recuse himself from the Mar-a-Lago thing, this guy swears in
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: the guy who's a Democrat donor who clearly a D.C.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: judge is going to be somebody who's a Democrat, still
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: signs off on it. So how bad must the evidence
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: have been, or how good, depending on your perspective, must
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: the evidence have been for him to say yes?
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: This is probably one of the most damning affidavits that
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: you'll see because it is not taken lightly again to
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: do a home raid, and it is certainly not taken
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: lightly to do a home raid on a member of Congress,
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: particularly when it's a Democrat judge in D.C. and the
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: member of Congress is a top House Democrat, Ilhan Omar, right?
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: So I imagine that this home raid is something much
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: bigger than her immigration status, her naturalization process. I imagine
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: that there are a lot of people wrapped up into
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: this investigation, maybe a RICO investigation on this Somali pirate
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: fraud ring, where they are looting tens of millions of
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: dollars from American taxpayers from our welfare programs that are
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: supposed to benefit the most poor and vulnerable. And instead,
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: this money is buying these Somali pirates money. with their
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: 65 IQs, their brand new cars and their big houses.
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: And I imagine this money's probably going back to terrorism
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: in Somalia against the United States.
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: It is. Mike Davis, go and check out Mike everywhere.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: MRDDMIA over on social media. He, of course, the boss
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: over at the Article Free Project. ArticleFreeProject.org if you want
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: to donate and keep them going. They're doing incredible work.
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: So the lie from the left today is they just
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: now started this process of because the midterms are looking
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: bleak for the Republicans. This is lawfare to try to
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: win the midterms. Mike, can that possibly be true? Every
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: T had to be crossed. Every I had to be dotted.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: This process has to have been going on for a
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: very long time, no?
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's obvious. I think that it has been reported
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: this investigation of Ilhan Omar started under Joe Biden. And remember, again,
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: this is a Democrat D.C.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: U.S.
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: Magistrate judge who donated to Hillary Clinton and clerked for
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: an Obama judge twice. He's certainly not in on some
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: plot to help President Trump and Republicans win the midterm elections.
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: When you mention the speech and debate clause, I always thought,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: probably wrongly so from how you were saying it, that
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: that was you were protected if you were inside the building.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: You can say anything you want. When you stand up
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: and you give a speech, you can debate, you can
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: lie your face off with impunity. There's no trouble there.
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: Does that also cover you outside of the body, outside
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: of the building?
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes. And the whole point of this is so
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: members of Congress are not arrested by states on the
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: way when they're traveling to and from to get to Congress.
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: You want members of Congress to be immune to, from
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: prosecution so they can do their job. For example, if
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: you're a House member from the South and you're traveling
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: up through Virginia to get to D.C., they don't want
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: some county sheriff in Virginia arresting members of Congress on
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: their way to do their job.
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: So this can't possibly have anything to do with anything
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: she said in the capacity of her job as a U.S. representative. Now,
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: we go back to the actual immigration part, and I
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: want to deep dive into Rico in a second. We
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: go back to the immigration part. The allegation is she
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: said she was 17 when she came. Actually, she said
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: she was 18 when her father got citizenship, allegedly. We
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: don't even have any proof that he got any citizenship.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: But she was 18 when he got citizenship. Therefore, she
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: would have to apply for her citizenship herself. So they
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: then went back and changed her birth date to make
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: it look like she was 17, which would have made
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: her a minor. Then she automatically would have gotten citizenship
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: with him when he got it because she's a minor.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's what's up in the air about her
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: actual citizenship. Then there's the whole married the brother thing
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: to help him get citizenship or to come here illegally,
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: married him. And then, of course, there's a whole big
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: dust up. Now, I talked to Liz Collin from Alpha
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: News two days ago. about whether her father ever was
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: a United States citizen. So that's the beginning part of it.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: That already is investigatable, right? She wasn't a U.S. representative.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: This is something that she claimed to be, that it
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: turns out she might not have been that age when
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: she said she was.
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, think about that. Her father was a
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: colonel in the Somali military. He was the bad guy, right?
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: But he comes to America as the bad guy who
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: was oppressing people in Somalia. And he claims asylum status
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: and he supposedly gets his citizenship, naturalized citizenship. There's no
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: record of that. Right. And so if there's no if
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: he doesn't get citizenship, she does not automatically get derivative
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: citizenship as a minor. Right. So and then there's the
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: issue if she's not a minor, she doesn't get citizenship
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: derivatively from her father. So she has to apply. for
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: citizenship on her own and become naturalized.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Which she didn't do.
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: Which she didn't do. So it's very interesting. We could
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: get to the point where she's not lawfully in this country,
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: but I would say this, I would expect that after
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: these midterm elections, I imagine based upon the facts that
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: this DC Democrat judge, this Hillary donor authorized person, a
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: home raid of a sitting member of Congress running for
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: reelection several weeks before her reelection. But I imagine that
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: this criminal investigation is going to be explosive, and you're
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: going to see some serious criminal charges after the midterm elections.
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: Maybe RICO charges, terrorism charges, terrorism finance charges, maybe bribery charges,
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: who knows? But it's Certainly not ticky tacky charges if
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: a D.C. Democrat judge, a partisan D.C. Democrat judge is
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: greenlighting this home raid.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: I want to make sure that I'm as clear as
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: I can be for those watching and listening. If Ilhan
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: Omar's father was never a citizen, she certainly isn't a citizen.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: If he did become a citizen but she was already 18,
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: she is not a citizen right now because she never
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: applied for it as an adult. If she were 17
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: and he did get legal citizenship, she would be a citizen.
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: That's the argument. There are two out of those three
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: cases where she's not a citizen whatsoever. And then you
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: said she would illegally be in the country. If they
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: claimed refugee status, would she still have that status or
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: would she legitimately be in this country illegally right now?
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: If she is not a citizen, she has no legal
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: status in this country. right now. And so that will
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: be adjudicated. It will probably be adjudicated after she's criminally
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: charged and convicted and thrown in prison. So maybe she'll
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: spend many years in federal prison and then she'll get
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: sent back to her great country, Somalia.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: It's a lovely place I hear. It's Mike Davis, article3project. org,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: MRDDMIA over on social media. Follow him everywhere. He's amazing.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: So let's talk about what happens. What's the mechanism in place?
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: We find out there's an infiltrator, somebody with an allegiance
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: to a different country. who is serving in the United
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: States Congress, does she immediately get expelled? How does that work? Because, Mike,
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: it's not lost on me that our side would not
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: even censure her because of what she said about Charlie Kirk.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: Our side would not say yes to Nancy Mace when
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: she said we want to look at her immigration papers.
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: So our side has no backbone. What does the law say?
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: If you're not a legal citizen of this country, what
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: happens if you're serving in the House?
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: Well, that's a good question. That's a very good question.
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: I will say this. Remember, This was not some innocent
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: thing where she can claim, oh, I was just 17
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: or 18 years old. I was just a young girl
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: or I was a young woman and I didn't know
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: what happened. Remember, her staff, her congressional staff, I think
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: it was in 2019, went back and changed her birth
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: date to make her where she would have been 17
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: instead of 18. They changed her birth date. So they're
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: in on this. This is an ongoing conspiracy to cover
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: up her immigration fraud, her fraud to become a U.S. citizen.
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: And so this is ongoing, right? This is not some
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: innocent child who got brought along by her father. This
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: is an ongoing felony.
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but Mike, you have to understand that district is
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: upside down and they're going to vote her back in.
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: So she's still in there and the explosive stuff comes out.
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: And it turns out she is not in this country
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: legally and is not a citizen. Is there a mechanism
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: in the Constitution that says you can't serve if you're
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: not a citizen? Because I know in Minnesota, specifically Democrats
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: in Minnesota, don't have to go through any litmus test.
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: They don't have to prove their citizenship to run for office.
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: They just assume if Ilhan Omar said, yes, I'm a citizen,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: they said, OK, great. Thanks for telling us that you
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: have to prove it. So what happens if she is
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: actually in a seat in Congress and she's found to
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: not be a citizen? Let's be honest. A lot of
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: what comes out of Hollywood these days makes a mockery
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: of America. Somehow we're the bad guys. They make a
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: mockery of our history, our values, our faith. There's still
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: a place telling stories, real stories, that remind us what
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: makes America, the United States, worth celebrating. That place is
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: Angel Studios. They're creating unapologetically patriotic films and shows, original
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: films and shows that uplift, educate, and inspire. Like Sound
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: of Freedom. Have you checked that out yet? A powerful
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: true story that exposed the horrors of child trafficking and
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: inspired millions to take action. Something to Stand For with
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: Mike Rowe. Have you seen this? An incredible tribute to
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: ordinary Americans who risked everything to defend liberty. And The
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: Last Rodeo, an upcoming heartland drama about a bull riding
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: veteran who comes out of retirement to save his grandson.
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: It's faith. It's grit. It's the kind of storytelling Hollywood
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: forgot how to do. These aren't just good films. They
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: are cultural reset buttons. And when you join the Angel Guild,
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: you don't just stream entertainment. You help to create it.
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: You vote on what gets made. You support filmmakers who
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: still believe in this great land, America. And as a
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: premium member, you get two free tickets to every theatrical release,
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: and that's awesome. So if you're ready to support entertainment
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: that celebrates faith, family, community, and freedom, go to angel.com
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: slash PAGS right now. Angel.com slash PAGS. Become a premium
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: Angel Guild member today. Support entertainment that builds something worth
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: passing on.
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: Well, the house can expel her, and they must expel her.
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: And it's going to be really hard to serve. serve
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: in the House of Representatives if you're in federal prison. Well,
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: that's true. Or in federal prison and then deported to
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: Somalia and bored from coming back. So maybe she can
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: phone in her vote to the House floor from Somalia.
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: She can zoom in the vote. It is Mike Davis.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: Let's get into the, I don't know if any of
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: these is worse legally. You'll help me. Maybe they're the
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: same exact thing. Let's say that she's not a citizen.
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: That's a pretty big deal. That's a felony. She's going
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: to be in big trouble. But let's say that she
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: also married her brother. And Liz Collin from Alpha News says, oh, yeah,
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: she did. We know that. If that's the case, is
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: one of those cases worse than the other? Are they
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: both the same? Are they both immigration fraud?
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, they're both immigration fraud. There's immigration fraud.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: where she is lying about her age to get her
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: citizenship and continues to do that, including using her congressional
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: staff to cover up her crime. And then she has
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: the separate crime of trying to get her brother's citizenship
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: by marrying her brother. Now, I get back in Somalia,
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: it's very normal to marry your brother and have inbred
• 13:57
  Speaker 2: kids with 65 IQs. That's what Somalians have been doing.
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: for centuries. But in America, that's illegal. You can't marry
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: your brother because we don't want 65 IQ kids.
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: So you've got bigamy, possibly. You've got, certainly, you've got
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: immigration fraud if, in fact, she married her brother. So
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: let's take it to the next logical step. All this
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: comes out now. Are we going to hear more about
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: this before the midterms? Because politically, this is going to
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: be a huge deal. And I think people are going
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: to have to wake up and realize the left will lie, cheat, steal,
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: and defraud us any turn they can. Will we see
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: something soon or is this going to be a waiting
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: game for months and months?
• 14:34
  Speaker 2: No, no, no. I seriously doubt there will be an
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: indictment before the midterm elections because of the Justice Department's
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: policies on this. I imagine the reason they had to
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: do a home raid is maybe they got evidence that
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: there was evidence inside the home that was going to
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: be destroyed, right? There's a reason, there was an exigent
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: circumstance that this D.C., Democrat U.S. magistrate judge who donated
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: to Hillary Clinton again and clerked for Obama judge twice.
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: There's a reason he ordered the home raid now, right?
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: But there are Justice Department policies where I presume they
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: will wait until after the midterm election before there's an
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: announcement of any indictment. And I imagine this indictment is
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: not going to be over her immigration status. I imagine
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: it's going to be much broader than that. with many
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: more defendants than her just because of the nature of
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: this home rate.
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: What do you suppose they were looking for specifically? Again,
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: we've talked about what the charges could be. And again,
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: there could be all sorts of fraud stuff, Minnesota fraud stuff,
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: RICO stuff. Maybe that's what they were looking for. But
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: if it comes to the immigration stuff, what might they
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: have been looking for in her house? Do you think
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: it was attached to immigration at all? Or is this
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: something that we're not even talking about yet?
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: I imagine it's related to fraud, a massive fraud. on
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: the U.S. government and maybe terrorist financing back in Somalia. Wow.
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: That's huge, obviously. Can you get a grand jury in D.C.
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: to actually send up charges? I mean, they're very, very liberal.
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: What is it, 90% liberal, something like that? Will they
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: be able to indict if the evidence is good enough?
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: Will they still try to turn a blind eye, do
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: you think?
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: Well, when you're dealing with terrorism and terrorist financing and fraud,
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: I think even a D.C. grand jury would return an indictment.
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: Let's make the Rico case. I've interviewed, obviously, Rudy a
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: million times. I've had Michael Franzese on, the former mob boss.
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: I've had a lot of people on. I know a
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: lot about Rico. Generally speaking, there is a top dog.
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: There is the boss. Then you've got underlings, captains, and
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: whatever else. Then you've got the soldiers out on the street.
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: You've got an entire organization run by one sort of entity.
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: And Rico makes it so that if the bottom line
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: soldier kills somebody, you can charge the boss with killing
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: the person. That's the way it is. It is a racket.
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: It is an organization. I forget what Rico stands for.
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: You might know. But how would this be a RICO case?
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: Or are we assuming that Ilhan Omar would be looked
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: at as the boss? Is she a part of the ring?
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: What do you think they're looking at here?
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: I presume there's a conspiracy. I presume that if you're, again,
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: if you're doing a home raid on a sitting member
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: of Congress three weeks before the election and a D.C.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: Democrat judge is signing off on that, I imagine the
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: evidence is explosive and there's massive amounts of evidence involved.
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: I imagine just from from the amount of money that's
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: going out of our social safety net programs to these
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: Somali pirates, billions and overseas, there are going to be charges.
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: And just just look, Judge Jeanine Pirro, the D.C. U.S. attorney,
• 17:44
  Speaker 2: hinted at this when she said that there's she indicated
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: there could be an investigation when Ilhan Omar's disclosed finances
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: in the House go from almost nothing. So like $ 25
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: or $ 30 million, a 13,000% increase in one year. And
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: then when she gets caught, it goes back down to
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: nothing with zero explanation.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: It is Mike Davis, MRDDMIA over on social media. Of course, article3project. org.
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: Let's compare and contrast this to Mar-a-Lago. You and I
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: have talked about Mar-a-Lago a lot since the day it happened.
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: Right up until today, we're still talking about it. The
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: left wants us to believe that Donald Trump, our president,
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: stole a bunch of classified stuff, tried to sell off
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: Our military paperwork to other countries was showing off classified
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: stuff to reporters. When you and I have talked about it,
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: this really probably was to try to cover up a
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: crossfire hurricane and get any documents that he had, which
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: he was allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act.
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: Still today, people like Raskin, who were dancing on Donald
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: Trump's grave prematurely, are pretending like Ilhan Omar is the
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: target of an undue DOJ weaponization while Donald Trump was
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: righteous in that raid. Can you compare the two raids,
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: the processes? Because I would assume that the raid on
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: Trump did not take as long to collect the information on,
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: because you just said the Biden administration, DOJ, probably started
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: this investigation on Omar. But we also know that Trump
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: was only out of office for, what, a year when
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: they raided his house? So they did that one on
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: the fast track. Compare those two, if you don't mind.
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean, here's the comparison. With the Mar-a-Lago raid,
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: the Biden Justice Department went to a biased judge, a
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: magistrate judge in Florida, Bruce Reinhart, who had just recused
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: from Trump's civil lawsuit against Hillary Clinton six weeks prior,
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: the Crossfire Hurricane lawsuit, civil lawsuit. He had Bruce Reinhart
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: recused six weeks prior because of a 2017 lawsuit Facebook
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: post by this magistrate judge crashing President Trump. This judge
• 19:47
  Speaker 2: is clearly biased against President Trump yet. six weeks later,
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: he magically lets that bias go away, and he signs
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: this unprecedented home raid on a former president for presidential
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: records Trump was allowed to have under the Presidential Records Act.
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: Compare that to Ilhan Omar, You have, again, a D.C.
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: U.S.
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: Magistrate judge, a Democrat donated to Hillary, clerked for an
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: Obama judge twice who signed off on this.
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: This is a very serious investigation. If that's happening under
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: those circumstances, three weeks before the midterm elections, including Ilhan
• 20:26
  Speaker 2: Omar's reelection.
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: Let me ask you something that's kind of connected that
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: maybe doesn't seem that connected, but I'll make the connection.
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar has said in speeches in Somalian, she has said,
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: I'm in Congress to do the work of the Somalian people.
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: That's what she said. You've got Rashida Tlaib, who God
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: knows wants river to the sea. She hates the Jews and,
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: and it's going to do the work of the Palestinians.
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: You've got this woman out of Illinois. I can't think
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: of her name right now, but she's Hispanic. Who's from Guatemala,
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: who says she's basically Guatemala first. When she was in
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: Guatemala in Spanish, she said, I am a Guatemalan first
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: before I'm an American. And I think her last name
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: is Ramirez. That said, uh, Mike, aren't there any provisions
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: in our Constitution that were set in stone by our
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: founding fathers that said, if you have an allegiance to
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: some other country, and these people vocally have said they do,
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: you can't serve in our government. Why are they allowed
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: to serve? I'm confused by that. Did they just assume
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: that you would have an allegiance to the United States?
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: Or was there something in the Federalist Papers or the
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: Constitution that said, yes, if you show an allegiance to
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: some other country, you can't serve?
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: Well, you'd pledge allegiance. to the United States as part
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: of your oath when you take office. And so it's
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: up to these houses to, to police their own members. Uh, it's, uh,
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: it's so if, if you have these members of the
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: house who are showing their allegiance to another country and
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: not the United States, then it's up to the majority
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: of the house to expel them. It's up to a
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: majority in the Senate to expel them. And let's just, uh,
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: you know, the, the problem is, is these, these, uh,
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: politicians in Washington don't have the will to do it, right?
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: And so we have to turn to the voters to
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: throw them out of office.
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: And by the way, it's Delia Ramirez out of Illinois.
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: What bothers me is that they had no hesitation kicking
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: George Santos out. George hadn't been convicted of anything. He
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: was accused of all sorts of stuff and since has,
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: of course, been convicted, but he wasn't convicted of anything.
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: And the Republicans got together and said, out you go.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: When it came to what Menendez and the Senate, how
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: long did they let that guy serve knowing we had
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: all the goods on him and all the evidence, but
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: the Democrats circled the wagons? Are you and I and
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: people like us, like-minded like us, ever going to wake
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: the Republicans up and make them understand you're not playing
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: the same game the left is playing?
• 22:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's amazing to me. I always say that the
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: swamp is the one place on the DC swamp is
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: the one place on the planet where the reptiles lack backbones.
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: And so it's unfortunate. But, you know, what we need
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: to do, and I think that this is going to happen.
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: President Trump has assembled a very good team. We have
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: Todd Blanche as the attorney general. We have Mark Wayne
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: Mullen as the secretary of Homeland Security. They are taking
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: these allegations very seriously, as evidenced by the home raid
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: on Ilhan Omar. I would bet you anything there will
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: be an indictment against Ilhan Omar sometime after the midterm elections.
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: And I think this indictment is going to be very serious.
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: I think it's going to be a RICO and or
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: terrorism financing type of an indictment, along with maybe fraud.
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: And there's going to be There are going to be
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: a lot more defendants in this than Elon Omar, if
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: I had to place a bet right now.
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: You mentioned Mark Wayne Mullen. Why is HSI doing the
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: investigating and not the FBI? Do you know?
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: Well, HSI would investigate this. I think the FBI would
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: have the same jurisdiction to do this, but HSI focuses
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: on this. They focus on immigration crimes. They focus on
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: terrorism financing. And they it's actually good to have competition
• 24:06
  Speaker 2: among our federal law enforcement agencies. So the FBI and
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: HSI and the Secret Service and many other federal law
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: enforcement agencies can can race to see who can who
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: can catch the criminals first. Good.
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad I'd like to see them compete and
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: get criminals caught and out of here. While I have you, Mike,
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: please indulge me if you don't mind. And it's been
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: a long time and you're always incredible on the show.
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: I've got to get into a couple of people running
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: for office like this Abdul El-Sayed. It's actually Abdul Rahman
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: Muhammad El-Sayed in Michigan. The guy is lying about a
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: possible connection to the Muslim Brotherhood. The guy lied about
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: having dual citizenship with Egypt. I don't know if that's
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: a problem to run for office. The guy lies about
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: being a physician who was licensed and diagnosing people. That
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: never happened. When you've got somebody who is clearly showing
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: allegiance again to another country, and he's not yet in
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: the Senate, he could get in there. I don't know why,
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: but he could. Again, did the founding fathers not say
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: anything about dual allegiance to another country? We know now
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: he's got dual citizenship with Egypt. Is that not an issue?
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: It seems like it's a big problem. The Michigan voters
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: have a choice. In three weeks, they have a choice
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: between voting Republican and Team America or voting Democrat and
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: Team Muhammad, right? And al-Said, he's Muslim Brotherhood. It's obvious.
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: It's in his family. Look at his associates like Hassan Piker.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: Look at his mother. Look at his sister. Look at
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: his wives. about his background, look at his lies about
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: his dual citizenship. This guy is an Islamist. He is
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: someone who is a Trojan horse, and he is not
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: coming to America. He is not running for the U.S.
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: Senate to make Michigan better. He's running in the U.S.
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: Senate because he wants to support the Middle East. He
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: wants to support his Muslim brothers in the Middle East,
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: and that's the choice for Michigan. Do you want someone
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: like Mike Rogers who's going to fight For America, or
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: do you want someone like Al-Said who's going to fight
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: for the Muslim Brotherhood?
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: I literally posted a video a little while ago that
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: at 18, he's in some debate somewhere saying, I'm a doctor,
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: and I've diagnosed patients who I knew couldn't afford the treatment,
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: and I had to tell them and their family. It's
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: all just a lie, Mike. He will just lie to
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: your face. He's never been licensed. He's never taken the boards.
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: He's never done an internship, yet he will say that.
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: And then I want to finish with the guy here
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: in my state, James Tallarico. Another liar. The guy has
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: said things about Christianity that can't possibly be true. They
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: don't make any sense. The birth of Jesus somehow shows
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: that Christians like abortion or are in favor of abortion.
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: God is non-binary. I love the trans kids. He's for
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: trans changes here in Texas for minors. He wants to
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: punish the parents of kids who will not accept their
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: newfound gender. Yet somehow he walks around like he's a pastor,
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: disappears for almost two weeks, and he's either neck and
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: neck or leading in the polls. Mike, what's going on
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: with the electorate? Why would you buy something like this?
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: I can't believe that anyone would buy this James Delrico candidate.
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: This guy is a fraud. This guy wants to trans kids.
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: He is a left-wing radical. This guy does not have
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: Texas values. He is not a God-fearing Texan who wants
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: to do what's best for Texas and America. This guy
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: is a leftist radical, and he might have a smiling
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: face when he does it, like Mr. Rogers, but James
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: Tallarico is a horrible choice for Texas. And I would
• 27:45
  Speaker 2: just say this to Texas voters. We have four Supreme
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: Court justices in their 70s. Do you want Ken Paxton
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: voting to confirm President Trump's judicial nominees for the next
• 28:00
  Speaker 2: two years? Or do you want James Tallarico voting to
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: block President Trump's judicial nominees for the next two years?
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: That's your choice.
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: Well, I think you're absolutely right. And you and I
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: have talked about the action that Paxton has taken here
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: in Texas. He's been a great attorney general. I don't
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: care what his personal life is, unless he's killed somebody
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: or broken the law. Look, maybe morally you and I
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: could talk about that over a drink, but when it
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: comes to doing the job, has there been a finer
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: AG than Ken Paxton? I mean, maybe Bailey when he
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: was in Missouri, but Paxton has been, I mean, when
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: you talk about Missouri v. Biden, Paxton was all over that.
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: When you talk about suing Google and Meta, Facebook suing
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: all these social and social media sites. When you talk
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: about keeping men and boys out of girls and women's sports,
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: Ken Paxton has been the guy. Is he not touting
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: his praises as much as I am? Because how can
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: this be tied?
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: Well, Ken Paxton, I know him. He's a great man.
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: He's been a fantastic Texas attorney general. He's been the
• 28:57
  Speaker 2: tip of the spear on all the key issues on censorship,
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: on protecting kids, uh, He is the guy, right? He
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: is effective. He's proven he's effective. He's actually put points
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: on the board. He's accomplished things, big things, like holding Google, Amazon, Facebook,
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: and Apple accountable for their abuses, for their crushing competition,
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: shuttering small businesses, canceling conservatives, creeping on kids. I am
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: with Ken Paxton all the way. James Tallarico, I said
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: last question. This is the... one.
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: I know that you're busy. People want you all day.
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: But I got to bring up Jen Psaki. Jen Psaki
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: and Karine Jean-Pierre were two of the biggest liars we've
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: ever had in that press room. I mean, just lie,
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: just flat out lies. Psaki, of course, said if Mike
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: Davis is banned from Twitter, he should be banned from
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: all social media. So the censorship was large when she
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: was running it. She had a negative thing to say
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: about Katie Zakaria, who had her first press conference yesterday.
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: She had something negative and horrible to say about her.
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: If you don't mind, just give me your personal opinion
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: on how disgusting it was, the lack of information we got,
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: the lack of transparency, and the lies we got from Biden, Obama,
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: et al., and the transparency we're seeing from Trump and
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: how these people are making hay out of it somehow.
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: Look, going on live television and arguing... It's very tough.
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: My first media hit was a disaster.
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: And so you've gotten a lot better, Mike. Now I've
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: just become a full on media. Well, I won't say it,
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: but every White House press secretary starts off and there's
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: a learning curve and Katie is going to be great.
• 30:47
  Speaker 2: I have no doubt about it. She is phenomenal. She
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: has been great for President Trump and she will be
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: great in this job.
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: Dana Perino is always the person I look up to.
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: She always has been complimentary. Left, right, in between, press secretary.
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: I wish you the best. It's a hard job. Go
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: out there and kick some ass. It just bothers me
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: that Saki was so disgusting and horrible at the job
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: that she dare say something dumb on her little show
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: on one of those other networks. And I'm glad you
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: said what you said. I mean, it's not an easy job.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: I think I still have the video from 35 years
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: ago when I first showed up on TV. I sucked
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: big time. Not that I'm great now, but I'm a
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: whole lot more comfortable now. Mike, thanks for going all
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: over the place on this. And I'll leave you with this.
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: You do think she'll be indicted, Omar?
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: Oh, I definitely think she's going to be indicted. You
• 31:30
  Speaker 2: don't have a D.C. Democrat judge order a home raid
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: if there's not going to be an indictment coming. There
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: will definitely be an indictment.
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: Thanks for finding time today, brother. MRDDMIA over on social media. Article3project. org.
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: Go and support anything Mike does. Mike, thanks a million.
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: Thank you.
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: All right, brother. We're back after this in the Joe
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: Pag Show. Stay here.