Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Vast Network Of Contacts (5/10/26)

Transcript

Ghislaine Maxwell And Her Vast Network Of Contacts (5/10/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
• 0:05
  One of the things that you'll notice when you start
• 0:08
  following the Epstein and Maxwell case religiously is that there's
• 0:12
  a lot of people in the legacy media who really
• 0:15
  don't have any idea what they're talking about. Sure, they
• 0:19
  have the basic talking points down, but they've never really
• 0:22
  scratched under the surface to see what is resting there,
• 0:28
  and they just go with the official narrative, the bland
• 0:31
  ass story that we've heard over and over again from
• 0:33
  the legacy media without going any deeper. And everybody talks
• 0:38
  about these names and getting to the bottom of this
• 0:41
  or that, and I'm on board, right, let's do it.
• 0:44
  But I don't understand why people don't want to start
• 0:48
  with the low hanging fruit. Everybody talks about all these
• 0:53
  other people who might have been involved, who could have
• 0:55
  been involved, who they think were involved, And to be
• 0:58
  honest with you, those that are playing politics, they have
• 1:01
  groups that they want to be involved, so they could
• 1:04
  use this as a political cudgel. But here's something for
• 1:07
  you folks to chew on over the weekend. Here are
• 1:10
  people that are directly pointed at directly involved. According to
• 1:15
  Virginia's account. So let's talk about a couple of these people. Okay,
• 1:20
  why don't we do that? Since everybody wants names, Here
• 1:23
  are a few names. Glenn Dubin, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Richardson,
• 1:30
  Marvin Minsky, George Mitchell, and Jean Luke Brunel. Those are
• 1:35
  people that were directly named by Virginia as taking part
• 1:40
  in her abuse. So when anyone talks about, oh, we
• 1:43
  need names and we need lists, I automatically default to saying, well,
• 1:48
  what about the people we know about already? Are those
• 1:50
  not juicy enough for you? Is that not salacious enough
• 1:53
  for you? You have big time politicians named in there,
• 1:57
  you have, you know, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell. Really nobody
• 2:02
  wants to go any deeper here. Nobody's showing up at
• 2:05
  Bill Richardson's house and asking them a bunch of questions,
• 2:10
  where's the legacy media in the United States of America? Now,
• 2:14
  juxtaposed that with the way the Daily Mail conducted its research,
• 2:18
  with the way the Sun went after the Prince Andrew information,
• 2:22
  and it shows you everything you need to know about
• 2:24
  our failing ass legacy media here in America. And then
• 2:28
  they wonder why what is it two newspapers are going
• 2:32
  by the wayside per day or something like that in
• 2:35
  this country. It's because what they're doing is serving up
• 2:39
  red meat for whatever base they think they represent, and
• 2:44
  at the same time, they're freezing out half of their
• 2:47
  potential readership. Now, it's one thing to have opinion based
• 2:53
  articles and stuff like that, but it's completely a different
• 2:56
  thing to not get the feel of what people want.
• 3:00
  And people want some real news, people want investigative reports.
• 3:05
  There's a reason that podcasts are so popular nowadays because
• 3:10
  people simply do not trust the legacy media, and a
• 3:14
  lot of it has to do with stuff exactly like this.
• 3:18
  All of these names out there for you, and nobody's
• 3:22
  out there digging deep. There should be an expose on
• 3:26
  Bill Richardson's involvement with Virginia Roberts, And if he didn't
• 3:30
  do it, then this would be the perfect chance for
• 3:32
  him to clear his name, right, George Mitchell, Marvin Minsky,
• 3:37
  Glenn Dubin, Alan Dershowitz. We're talking about huge names, folks.
• 3:41
  Are those names not big enough for people? I mean,
• 3:45
  I'm sure there's other names, there's other people who took
• 3:49
  part in the abuse. But remember it's not what we know,
• 3:52
  it's what we can prove. And for me, I think
• 3:55
  that if you brought in these guys and you started
• 3:58
  putting the screws to them, how many other people would
• 4:01
  they give up? How many other people would they say, Hey,
• 4:04
  look this guy was there too. I'm not going down
• 4:06
  on my own. So those are some names right off
• 4:10
  the bat for people to dive into and look at.
• 4:13
  But it doesn't seem like people are really interested in that.
• 4:16
  What it seems like they're interested in is saying, oh,
• 4:19
  what are the names, so that they can try and
• 4:22
  find names that will help them politically. And that's just
• 4:27
  ridiculous because guess what, folks, if you're looking to use
• 4:30
  this story as a political cudgel on your opponents, you're
• 4:35
  gonna be in big trouble because both sides of the
• 4:38
  aisle were waist deep dicking around with Jeffrey Epstein. And
• 4:44
  that's just how it goes. Those are just the facts.
• 4:49
  I know everybody wants to use this case to, you know,
• 4:51
  score those points, but I hate to be the one
• 4:54
  to break it to you, but both sides of the
• 4:56
  aisle are absolutely corrupt. Just take a look at the
• 4:59
  hush just take a look at how they've ignored this
• 5:02
  basically for this whole entire time, and it tells you
• 5:05
  everything you need to know. So before we start talking
• 5:09
  about the other names, I think that it will be
• 5:12
  a good idea to start here, all right, So we
• 5:16
  have an article from a news nation and the headline
• 5:21
  exclusive former associate says, we know the names in Epstein's eight.
• 5:26
  So what they're talking about there are the eight John does.
• 5:30
  I posted an episode about that, the eight John does
• 5:32
  from the defamation suit that Maxwell was protecting and then
• 5:36
  decided that it wasn't worth the wait, so she stopped
• 5:39
  protecting them as far as asking the judge to keep
• 5:43
  the name sealed. So those are the eight that they're
• 5:46
  talking about here. This article was authored by Brian Enton
• 5:52
  and Liz Jason. Now I like Brian Enton, and I
• 5:56
  think he does good work when it comes to missing people,
• 5:59
  but this really isn't in his wheelhouse. He's not completely
• 6:04
  hip to what's going on here as he is to
• 6:06
  those missing persons cases, right, Like his work with Gabby
• 6:09
  Patito was top notch, probably the best, honestly of everybody
• 6:14
  who was covering that case. I have to give a
• 6:16
  lot of props to Brian Enton, but this is a
• 6:18
  whole different ballgame over here, and you're not just gonna
• 6:21
  show up on the scene when it comes to the
• 6:23
  Epstein case and have a complete handle on what's going on.
• 6:27
  So this interview with Christina Oxenburg you can kind of
• 6:31
  get a feel for that. News Nations Brian Entton spoke
• 6:35
  with former Jeffrey Epstein associate Christina Oxenberg about the discussions
• 6:39
  she had with Epstein's partner Glene Maxwell, including talk of
• 6:43
  secret recordings involving some famous people. Look, we all know
• 6:47
  that that's common knowledge. Remember what Maria Farmer told us
• 6:50
  about the whole place being wired up, Remember what Virginia said. So, yeah,
• 6:55
  there's definitely surveillance. The question is where did all of
• 6:59
  this stuff go. There's a lot of people that think
• 7:03
  the FBI is sitting on it, and honestly, I have
• 7:05
  no idea, But it's possible that one of his associates
• 7:10
  snaked it in Dyke or Khan grabbed the footage and
• 7:13
  dipped with it. Maybe it was all hiding out at
• 7:17
  Zoro Wrench. We all know they didn't raid Zoro, so
• 7:20
  it would be the perfect spot to hide something. Yeah,
• 7:23
  Maxwell was sentenced to twenty years in prison on Tuesday
• 7:27
  for helping epstein sex trafficking operation. No, she was imprisoned
• 7:33
  because she was trafficking girls to Jeffrey Epstein. That was
• 7:37
  what the complaints said. That is what the charges were.
• 7:42
  She's been accused of grooming vulnerable girls as young as fourteen. Convicted,
• 7:46
  you mean for Epstein and keeping a meticulous little black
• 7:50
  book for the rich and famous people he dealt with. Now,
• 7:53
  I guess I have to go ahead and post the
• 7:57
  episodes about the Black Book again. I have two pretty
• 8:01
  long episodes about the Black Book and the contents of
• 8:04
  the Black Book and how a journalist from Mother Jones
• 8:08
  called all of the names in that black book. In February,
• 8:16
  one of those men, Prince Andrew, settled a sexual abuse
• 8:18
  lawsuit with Virginia Roberts, who says she was groomed and
• 8:22
  trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell, who says, man, this is
• 8:25
  a pretty poorly written article. Guys, who says, No, that's
• 8:28
  what happened. See all the payouts she got. You see
• 8:31
  how Epstein ended up getting I mean indicted and was
• 8:34
  gonna get convicted. You see how Maxwell went to prison. Yeah,
• 8:38
  not alleged, Okay, this happened. Oxenberg is Prince Andrew's cousin
• 8:45
  and a former friend of Maxwell. She believes Maxwell has
• 8:48
  worked secret deal and will end up in the United Kingdom. Wow,
• 8:52
  I wish I believed in those fantasies. That's not gonna happen.
• 8:56
  That is not going to happen. Zero chance Glenn Maxwell's
• 8:59
  ending up in the United Kingdoms, folks, zero chance. Brian Enton,
• 9:04
  do you think we'll ever find out the names? Do
• 9:07
  you have any idea who they are? Christina Oxenberg? I
• 9:10
  think we know the names. They are former presidents Trump, Clinton,
• 9:16
  Edhod Barock over in Israel. So there's a couple of
• 9:21
  president's names for you right there. A very mauthy lawyer
• 9:24
  who lives in Boston, Alan Dershowitz. They are on the
• 9:27
  flight logs in the Little Black Book. However, are they
• 9:30
  more responsible than Golaine? I am not a victim, so
• 9:33
  I'm going to see things differently. No, of course they're
• 9:35
  not more responsible than Golaine? What sort of what does
• 9:39
  that even mean? Galline, Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein had a
• 9:42
  leadership role here. They're the ones most responsible. Then the
• 9:45
  sick backed bastards who came in and did the abusing.
• 9:48
  They're right there next to them, Brian Entton. Even if
• 9:57
  they're not respond not more responsible if they are still
• 10:00
  a participant at times with some of these girls. Shouldn't
• 10:03
  their names be made public? Christina Oxenberg? Well, the answer,
• 10:07
  of course is yes, everything should be public and all
• 10:11
  bad people should be punished. I'm all for it. You know,
• 10:14
  sex rings have gone on forever. This is not new.
• 10:17
  This has nothing to do with privilege and money. Oh
• 10:19
  yes it does. That has everything to do with that.
• 10:23
  This whole entire operation couldn't have functioned without privilege and money.
• 10:30
  This particular group was to satisfy Jeffrey's proclivity for underage girls.
• 10:35
  That was part of it. It was also to get
• 10:36
  that compromise. Why does everybody forget about that? And I'm
• 10:41
  very cautious whenever people come out and start trying to
• 10:45
  steer the conversation away from the actual facts. This wasn't
• 10:51
  just about Epstein's proclivities. He could have fed those proclivities
• 10:54
  on his own. His proclivities were harnessed and used as
• 10:58
  a vehicle to get somewhere else. That's the problem with
• 11:04
  the whole thing. If Jeffrey had just wanted beautiful young ladies,
• 11:07
  there's no problem. But he liked children. Oh there's a problem,
• 11:10
  all right. If he's trafficking these beautiful young ladies, that's
• 11:13
  a big problem. Now. If he can have all these
• 11:17
  beautiful young women around him that are of age, a
• 11:19
  consensual age, and they want to consent to having relations
• 11:23
  with him, that's not my business. I don't care, really,
• 11:26
  not my here's the thing, folks, for those of you
• 11:28
  who are newly listening to the show, just found it.
• 11:31
  Just so we're clear, I don't care what you do
• 11:33
  in your bedroom. If you want to marry your toaster,
• 11:36
  that is not my business. I do not care as
• 11:39
  long as it has to do with consenting adults and
• 11:41
  no children are involved. Do whatever you want in your bedroom.
• 11:44
  You want to dress up like the Grim Reaper and
• 11:47
  have your spouse dress up like Billard ted, that is
• 11:49
  not my business. Have a blast. Since nineteen ninety three,
• 11:56
  I knew that she Maxwell and Jeffrey used a private
• 11:59
  plane because that was another instance where I spent three
• 12:02
  months with them. They were on the plane every weekend,
• 12:05
  And in nineteen ninety seven, in this crazy meeting, she said,
• 12:08
  Maxwell told Oxenberg. The plane is hooked up with audio
• 12:11
  and video. We have everyone on tape. Why is she
• 12:15
  eliciting things that in the years to come would be
• 12:19
  massively incriminating. I didn't think to ask, who do you
• 12:22
  mean by everyone? I figured she meant anyone who wouldn't
• 12:26
  want to be on tape. Well, the whole reason she's
• 12:29
  so brazen about it is because they had the protection.
• 12:32
  You're not this brazen about shit if you're not being protected.
• 12:36
  And again, I'm not one of these people that's gonna
• 12:38
  sit here and tell you there's a group of guys
• 12:40
  in a room right now and they run the whole world.
• 12:43
  That's not what I mean. But if you don't think
• 12:44
  that there are black ops being run by intelligence, I
• 12:47
  don't know what to tell you, because there are. And
• 12:51
  if you think that they wouldn't use a guy like
• 12:53
  Epstein and him molesting children and trafficking people as a tool,
• 12:58
  you're also wrong. Look at all of the scumbags that
• 13:01
  they've been in bed with throughout the years. Brian Enton,
• 13:07
  where do you think those tapes are now, Christina Oxenberg?
• 13:11
  I think there's certainly more than one copy of everything
• 13:13
  they must have. They must have also been updated, there
• 13:17
  would obviously be more than one copy, and I agree
• 13:20
  with that there's definitely tapes out there. The question is
• 13:23
  where I suspect that Darren Kahn or Richard Endyke excuse me,
• 13:30
  Darren Endyke or Richard Kahn had something to do with that.
• 13:33
  We saw them leaving the house with a bag full
• 13:36
  of stuff. Said it was just you know, clothes and
• 13:39
  a hoodie in bs but who the hell knows, right,
• 13:42
  I'm just spitballing here. I don't have any inside information.
• 13:45
  Believe me when I tell you the sdn WY doesn't
• 13:47
  want to talk to me. Brian Entton. Now that she's
• 13:54
  been sentenced and she's on her way to federal prison
• 13:56
  for twenty years, do you think she's going to start
• 13:58
  naming names? Do you think she's going to tell people
• 14:01
  where those tapes are? Christina Oxenberg, I think all the
• 14:05
  deals have already been made. This is a fact. I
• 14:07
  agree with that as well. I don't know anything. This
• 14:10
  is just my hunch. I think the deals have been
• 14:12
  made already, and that's why she's alive. Because Jeffrey died
• 14:16
  on August tenth in the morning, but on August ninth,
• 14:19
  which was a Friday, his lawyer came out on the
• 14:21
  steps of the courthouse and said, Jeffrey's gonna start naming names,
• 14:24
  and he was dead in the morning. Look, she's not
• 14:27
  wrong about the Epstein situation, Doug shown. His lawyer has
• 14:31
  come out and said, Look, Epstein was not, let me repeat,
• 14:34
  not suicidal. But yet all of a sudden, all of
• 14:39
  those wacky circumstances that led up to his death occur
• 14:44
  camera guards in a cell with TARTAGLIONI. None of it
• 14:51
  made sense then and it still doesn't make sense even
• 14:54
  less now. Honestly, Brian Enton, do you think think she's
• 15:00
  at risk right now? Christina Oxenberg, No, I don't. I
• 15:03
  mean she may want to self harm. That I cannot
• 15:06
  speak of. I think the deals have already been made. Well,
• 15:09
  that might be a fact she is at risk by
• 15:12
  other inmates, There is no doubt about that. Anyone who
• 15:15
  discounts that, even at Danbury, doesn't know what they're talking about.
• 15:22
  And she is being rewarded already of the twenty years
• 15:25
  that you mentioned for her sentence already to have been
• 15:28
  taken off because of time served. She's going to be
• 15:30
  transferred to the UK one hundred percent. I do believe
• 15:33
  that will happen, and once she's there, she'll sell out
• 15:36
  the back door. It's not going to happen. I mean,
• 15:40
  I guess it's possible, but I just don't see it.
• 15:42
  What does the United States get out of that besides
• 15:45
  a pr nightmare. There's nothing that they get out of that.
• 15:48
  There's nothing that the UK can offer us in return.
• 15:53
  I mean maybe Julian Assange, Brian Enton is there just
• 15:59
  is there just's that many powerful people behind the scenes
• 16:01
  doing secret things. What's going on Christina Oxenberg? Well, when
• 16:06
  you say why doesn't she out the list? Why would she?
• 16:09
  They're all on the same team. They're helping her. Now
• 16:12
  that's veering off into the lands where I usually don't travel.
• 16:16
  Who are they that are all helping her? That's the
• 16:19
  question I always ask, who are they? And nobody can
• 16:21
  give me that answer now for my money, there's no
• 16:26
  doubt that she was being run as an asset by
• 16:28
  the intelligence community, no doubt about that, her and Epstein both.
• 16:33
  But those days are over. And once you're burned as
• 16:35
  an asset, well that's it. They burn all ties to
• 16:39
  you and you're left with nothing to give up. For
• 16:43
  as much as I bash on the Intelligence services when
• 16:47
  it comes to this kind of thing, this is what
• 16:48
  they're good at. They can really cover their attracts. So look,
• 16:54
  when it comes to Maxwell and naming names, who knows
• 16:58
  what she's going to do, But for my money, Like
• 17:01
  I said in the very beginning of this article, what
• 17:03
  about the names that I just named earlier? What about
• 17:06
  the names at Virginia has put out there for years?
• 17:09
  To me, it seems like that's a logical place to start.
• 17:13
  And once we open that door, who knows what the
• 17:16
  room will look like. If you'd like to contact me,
• 17:20
  you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com.
• 17:24
  That's bo bbu Y c apu Cci at ProtonMail dot com.
• 17:30
  You can also find me on Twitter at Bobby Underscore
• 17:34
  c ap u Cci. The link that I discussed can
• 17:38
  be found in the description box. All right, folks, we'll
• 17:41
  be back with a little bit more later on. I
• 17:43
  hope that all of you are enjoying the start of
• 17:46
  your holiday weekend.