Latest / The M&M Experience / M and M EXTRA 07.16.26 | Election Integrity, The “2020 Question,” and Schumer’s Flatulence

Transcript

M and M EXTRA 07.16.26 | Election Integrity, The “2020 Question,” and Schumer’s Flatulence · The M&M Experience

0:01
Speaker 1: Welcome to a meeting of the minds crafted from decades
0:05
Speaker 1: of talk show experience, an extension of the magic they've
0:08
Speaker 1: created together on radio in the phenomenon called M and
0:12
Speaker 1: M Hot Topics in the News and wisdom from Life.
0:16
Speaker 1: It's Mark Davis and Mike Gallagher. This is eminem Extra.
0:22
Speaker 2: For a Thursday, the sixteenth of July. Mark Davis, Mike Gallagher.
0:26
Speaker 2: I'm in Texas, Mike is in Florida. But may I begin?
0:30
Speaker 2: I want to ask you a very simple question. Why
0:32
Speaker 2: can I begin today's podcast with a very simple question
0:35
Speaker 2: that should lead us in some interesting places.
0:37
Speaker 3: Absolutely, I hope that question is did Chuck Schumer fart
0:40
Speaker 3: or not? We'll get to that.
0:42
Speaker 2: I promise we'll get to that with live multi team
0:45
Speaker 2: coverage with microphones. My first question, I just want to
0:49
Speaker 2: see how you answer it. Just want to see who
0:52
Speaker 2: won the twenty twenty election.
0:55
Speaker 3: Joe Biden was certified? Did he win? He was sertified?
1:01
Speaker 3: Did he win? I don't know. I mean, I know
1:05
Speaker 3: he was certified, but I don't know. I don't know.
1:07
Speaker 4: I don't know.
1:07
Speaker 3: Me A few minutes this morning, well like somebody somebody
1:11
Speaker 3: texted me and said Mark Davis when you ask him
1:14
Speaker 3: what time it is, she'll take a half hour to
1:15
Speaker 3: tell you how to build a watch. Now I've been
1:17
Speaker 3: accused of that too, But you took this guy to task,
1:21
Speaker 3: this Jake Clayton, and basically he said, not going to
1:23
Speaker 3: play that game. And he did say it's different, but
1:26
Speaker 3: he did say he was certified. He did say, you.
1:29
Speaker 2: Know, but that's not the answer the question that Asoff
1:31
Speaker 2: was asking Clayton. That's why we're all doing this. If
1:33
Speaker 2: everybody has missed the entire morning both of News and
1:36
Speaker 2: Mike and me together on the radio. This Jay Clayton
1:40
Speaker 2: is up to be DNI, a Director of National Intelligence
1:44
Speaker 2: after Tulsea Gabbard. He seems competent in a lot of
1:47
Speaker 2: ways except answering John Ossoff's questions, and it enabled us
1:51
Speaker 2: to have bad optics, like Osoff asking him that question
1:54
Speaker 2: who won, to which my answer, which I gave in detail,
1:57
Speaker 2: a little too much detail for some, was that Biden
2:00
Speaker 2: was certified, but that millions of Americans have proper and
2:04
Speaker 2: righteous doubts based on ballot uncertainties, rule uncertainties. Things changed
2:09
Speaker 2: on the fly in a COVID panic. There are all
2:11
Speaker 2: kinds of reasons to doubt that outcome. You were totally
2:15
Speaker 2: right even as I gave that letter perfect answer in
2:18
Speaker 2: saying that no Democrat would have allowed mister Clayton or
2:21
Speaker 2: would allow me to finish that paragraph. So what really
2:24
Speaker 2: is the best way to handle that vexing twenty twenty question.
2:28
Speaker 3: Well, and the reason it's really important is because I
2:32
Speaker 3: have a funny feeling about Tonight's Trump address. At nine
2:35
Speaker 3: o'clock in the US, I got a funny feeling that
2:38
Speaker 3: it's going to be significant. I saw that Jennifer Jacobs,
2:41
Speaker 3: the CBS White House Senior White House correspondent, is tweeting
2:45
Speaker 3: we're being told by sources that he's got evidence and
2:49
Speaker 3: documentation to confirm that China has interfered with our election
2:54
Speaker 3: process and compromised voter roles in America. Now that's CBS.
3:03
Speaker 3: That ain't Newsmax, you know, CBS is saying that Catherine
3:08
Speaker 3: Herridge is on board saying, look, this isn't new. She
3:12
Speaker 3: tweeted back to Jennifer Jacob saying, this isn't new. We
3:15
Speaker 3: were John Solomon and I've been doing this work for months.
3:18
Speaker 3: Independent journalism, independent journalists have been saying this for a
3:21
Speaker 3: long time. I have a funny feeling tonight might really
3:26
Speaker 3: rock the world mark.
3:28
Speaker 2: Okay, let's see how that might play out if President
3:31
Speaker 2: Trump reveals what he says is evidence of Chinese tampering.
3:36
Speaker 2: Do you think that does the scenario that you envision
3:39
Speaker 2: involve him saying China tampered in twenty twenty, which might
3:43
Speaker 2: add even more doubt to that result. Is that kind
3:46
Speaker 2: of where you're going?
3:47
Speaker 3: Oh? I mean, if what are we going to What
3:50
Speaker 3: are we going to do if we find out that
3:52
Speaker 3: China compromised and infected and destroyed our voting roles in
3:58
Speaker 3: a particular election cycle? What do you do with the outcome?
4:02
Speaker 3: What do you do? Well, you know the short answer
4:03
Speaker 3: is nothing. You shrug it off.
4:05
Speaker 2: You can hold it in well, no, you it makes you,
4:08
Speaker 2: It gives you an added reason to retroactively hold the
4:11
Speaker 2: twenty twenty results in even lower regard.
4:14
Speaker 3: But you know there's nothing to be done.
4:16
Speaker 2: I mean, Biden was declared the winner and served and
4:20
Speaker 2: you know as as was it Rafiki and Lion King
4:23
Speaker 2: says when he clubs Simba, it is in the best
4:27
Speaker 2: The reason I asked about how you think this is
4:29
Speaker 2: going to go? Let's say Trump does this offers up,
4:32
Speaker 2: you know, stack of evidence of Chinese tampering. It will
4:36
Speaker 2: instantly be embraced by some rejected by others. And I
4:40
Speaker 2: wonder if it will be as definite. Will it be definitive?
4:44
Speaker 2: What would he have to do to where even objective
4:46
Speaker 2: people or even people that don't like him would say, wow,
4:48
Speaker 2: that's bad.
4:49
Speaker 3: Well, and again, the reason I think this is significant
4:53
Speaker 3: is because CBS seems to be sort of wow, this
4:58
Speaker 3: could be bad. I mean itself, one of the big
5:02
Speaker 3: heritage networks is apparently giving a preview. And you can
5:07
Speaker 3: tell this Jennifer and she's a pretty good reporter. I've
5:10
Speaker 3: watched her work before. She's like laying this out like
5:14
Speaker 3: this is a bona fide news story. It's a big deal.
5:17
Speaker 3: The commander in chief is going to lay this out
5:21
Speaker 3: and it could be really big, And I think it
5:26
Speaker 3: may be. I don't think it's Trump up there at
5:29
Speaker 3: nine o'clock in a primetime address just babbling about how
5:33
Speaker 3: he was cheated in twenty twenty. I don't think he's
5:35
Speaker 3: got I don't think that's mean. But you don't seem
5:38
Speaker 3: to think that that could be coming.
5:40
Speaker 2: My bar is set so weirdly on what really does
5:44
Speaker 2: move a needle. I've got the thing in front of
5:47
Speaker 2: me that you have referred to. That's Jennifer Jacobs at
5:50
Speaker 2: CBS News the headline Trump to allege Chinese medaling in
5:54
Speaker 2: US elections in primetime speech. Sources say, let's say those
5:59
Speaker 2: sources are right. Let's say your gut feeling is right.
6:03
Speaker 2: He will make these assertions. I don't know that they
6:06
Speaker 2: go anywhere except into the natural corners of people with
6:11
Speaker 2: their preset beliefs. It gives those of us who long
6:15
Speaker 2: believe that they're big election security problems in America more fuel.
6:19
Speaker 3: For our fire.
6:21
Speaker 2: Across the landscape of people that don't like Trump, It'll
6:24
Speaker 2: be there, he goes again, more fantasies, etc. I don't
6:28
Speaker 2: know how the mushy middle, the independents, those who are
6:31
Speaker 2: not that politically wired, I don't know how they'll react.
6:34
Speaker 2: But I think this will be kind of an eye
6:36
Speaker 2: of the beholder moment. Even if this is something that
6:39
Speaker 2: he does so, you know, and I don't know if
6:41
Speaker 2: that matters much. Is there something that would, because all
6:45
Speaker 2: I care about is the effect it has on the
6:47
Speaker 2: midterms in the future.
6:48
Speaker 3: What is it?
6:49
Speaker 2: I just hope that it energizes people to give us
6:51
Speaker 2: more secure elections in the future, and maybe dare I
6:54
Speaker 2: suggest pass the Save Act.
6:56
Speaker 3: Well, you call them the mushy middle, and that's I
6:58
Speaker 3: would kind of agree with that. However, it's the independence
7:01
Speaker 3: and the people in the middle that have to be convinced.
7:04
Speaker 3: So the fact that that Trump supporters are going to say, hey,
7:07
Speaker 3: it's big, this is great, and that Trump critics are
7:10
Speaker 3: going to say it's just him babbling about election fraud again,
7:13
Speaker 3: But the people that I care about are the ones
7:15
Speaker 3: in the middle who are going to show up to
7:17
Speaker 3: vote in November and have to make a decision. Look,
7:20
Speaker 3: election integrity is everything right now. You know, I've been
7:24
Speaker 3: thinking so much about John Thune. I watched him this
7:27
Speaker 3: week admit that most Americans favor the Save America Act.
7:31
Speaker 3: I watched him admit Republicans favor the Save America Act.
7:35
Speaker 3: We see Mike Lee every day getting out there saying
7:38
Speaker 3: there are paths, there's a way to get this across
7:41
Speaker 3: the finish line in the Senate. But John Thune keeps
7:44
Speaker 3: insisting there is not One of them is lying, one
7:47
Speaker 3: of them. One of them is wrong, and I suspect
7:50
Speaker 3: it's Thoon. I think Thun if you look at his
7:53
Speaker 3: past comments about Trump. Doesn't want to hand this to
7:55
Speaker 3: Trump now, it doesn't make a lot of sense because
7:59
Speaker 3: even if he hated Trump, he knows he's on the
8:01
Speaker 3: wrong side of this issue with most people. So why
8:04
Speaker 3: wouldn't he go along and say, you know what, we're
8:09
Speaker 3: going to get this thing passed. Even if I got
8:11
Speaker 3: to hold my nose and I don't like Donald Trump,
8:12
Speaker 3: I just don't see how trump hatred would compel you
8:16
Speaker 3: to reject an Election Integrity Act like.
8:19
Speaker 2: This, because it would hand him the w which Thune
8:22
Speaker 2: does not want to do. And Fune also thinks that
8:25
Speaker 2: in South Dakota he's untouchable, that it's not like it's
8:28
Speaker 2: something that somebody can to successfully primary him on. And
8:32
Speaker 2: he's probably right about that.
8:34
Speaker 3: I don't know that not handing Trump the victory that
8:37
Speaker 3: I think there's something more to this. I think there's
8:40
Speaker 3: something more. And I hate to accuse somebody of a
8:45
Speaker 3: nefarious buy off or payoff, but lord knows, a lot
8:49
Speaker 3: of people do they say that about fun, they say
8:51
Speaker 3: that something do you don't think politicians can get compromised Washington.
8:56
Speaker 2: Of course, But it's sort of Ackham's raizor of politics.
8:59
Speaker 2: When the simple thing is right in front of your face.
9:01
Speaker 2: It's probably true TDS or maybe not full blown TDS.
9:06
Speaker 2: But the Trump hesitancy that infects so much of that
9:10
Speaker 2: sclerotic old school Republican establishment that we are really trying
9:15
Speaker 2: to get past, there is a perfect reason. It's right
9:18
Speaker 2: there in front of your face. Before we go writing
9:20
Speaker 2: a Hollywood screenplay of somebody delivering fun buckets of cash
9:24
Speaker 2: to thwart us on the same egg.
9:26
Speaker 3: If you missed this exchange we had this morning, let
9:29
Speaker 3: me play the exchange in question. I happen to think
9:32
Speaker 3: that Jay Clayton's answer is perfect. Do you think the
9:36
Speaker 3: optics of it weren't very good? And that's a good answer.
9:38
Speaker 3: His answer is justified.
9:40
Speaker 2: He's totally justified, saying, look, I'm not going to play
9:42
Speaker 2: the silly game, but funny, think about somebody, not a
9:44
Speaker 2: talk show host, not a conservative, not a liberal, not
9:46
Speaker 2: politically wide, just watching this, saying, Oh, this guy who
9:50
Speaker 2: wants to be Trump's Dan, he's getting he's in the hearings.
9:53
Speaker 2: Let's see how he does and see how that would strength.
9:55
Speaker 3: Well, let's let's start there, and here it is.
10:00
Speaker 4: Who won the twenty twenty election.
10:02
Speaker 3: You know what. I'm not going to do this with you.
10:06
Speaker 4: This is a job interview. We've established that you have
10:10
Speaker 4: an obligation I'm pretty honest and forthright with the committee. Yes,
10:14
Speaker 4: you do have an obligation to be honest and forthright
10:16
Speaker 4: with the committee. Yes, who won the twenty twenty election?
10:19
Speaker 2: Like I said, I'm not going to get into that with.
10:21
Speaker 4: You, but you do have an obligation to be honest
10:23
Speaker 4: and forthright with the committee. Is anything that I just
10:26
Speaker 4: said not honest or forthright? Yes, you're not being honest
10:29
Speaker 4: or forthright. Who won the question? We can keep doing this, Well,
10:34
Speaker 4: we're going to keep doing it because you're not being
10:37
Speaker 4: honest and forth right. I'm not going to engage in
10:39
Speaker 4: the theater. It's a simple question, mister Clayton, and I've
10:44
Speaker 4: asked who won the twenty twenty presidential election.
10:47
Speaker 3: I've answered it.
10:49
Speaker 4: You're here asking for the support of senators to lead
10:53
Speaker 4: America's intelligence community. We've established that you have an obligation
10:57
Speaker 4: to be honest in forthright with this committy and with
11:01
Speaker 4: the American public. But you refuse to answer a simple
11:04
Speaker 4: matter of fact about the twenty twenty election. Is that right? No,
11:08
Speaker 4: that's not right, then answer the question who won twenty
11:10
Speaker 4: twenty election?
11:11
Speaker 3: I have answer?
11:12
Speaker 4: Answer it? What is your answer? I've given you my answer.
11:16
Speaker 4: What is your answer? You refuse to answer a basic
11:23
Speaker 4: question about who won a presidential election, which you asked
11:28
Speaker 4: to lead America's intelligence community. Isn't it humiliating to be
11:33
Speaker 4: unable to answer this question? To have to indulge the
11:38
Speaker 4: president's delusions?
11:41
Speaker 3: We now, first of all, worse every time it plays.
11:46
Speaker 2: Is there any universe you can think Clayton comes off
11:49
Speaker 2: well in that because imagine those again, because we sit
11:52
Speaker 2: there and we know that he has every right to
11:53
Speaker 2: bow up to as Off, and we know Asoff is
11:56
Speaker 2: a performative stooge. But again, the independence the people that
11:59
Speaker 2: they're going to look of that, and as Asoff, who
12:01
Speaker 2: makes my teeth itch? As Osoff says, answer the question.
12:04
Speaker 2: I can hear people go answer the flipping question? And
12:07
Speaker 2: he doesn't do. But he never ever, he.
12:09
Speaker 3: Didn't want to answer the question. He didn't want to
12:11
Speaker 3: take the bait. He didn't want to take the bait,
12:14
Speaker 3: he says, the trait. There's no bait. Who is all right?
12:19
Speaker 3: You started asking me, I'll ask you who won the election?
12:22
Speaker 2: I don't know, and nor do millions and millions of
12:25
Speaker 2: Americans and you two rampant rules dashed against the Rocks
12:29
Speaker 2: due to COVID panic and MARV custody issues and mars that.
12:33
Speaker 3: Were you know, Clayton would get eviscerated if he said
12:37
Speaker 3: I don't know, you know, he'd get crucified for saying that.
12:41
Speaker 3: He wasn't going to say it.
12:42
Speaker 2: But two good things would happen. Number One, he would
12:45
Speaker 2: have answered the question. He did answer the question. No,
12:49
Speaker 2: he did not look mark, if you if you? If
12:52
Speaker 2: you asked, he finished, no, bull crap. If you said
12:56
Speaker 2: to me, Mike, what did you have for breakfast this morning?
12:59
Speaker 2: And I say to you, I don't care to answer
13:01
Speaker 2: that question. That's an answer. I'm answering you none of
13:05
Speaker 2: your business. I don't want you to know what I
13:06
Speaker 2: had for breakfast. This for you're not he said, I'm
13:09
Speaker 2: not going to play your game. I'm not going to
13:11
Speaker 2: answer what the way you want? So stupid. When there
13:14
Speaker 2: is an answer, yes, it takes more than thirty seconds
13:17
Speaker 2: the answer I just gave it to you. I don't
13:19
Speaker 2: know that yes, that there's uncertainty, and that's unacceptable. It
13:23
Speaker 2: is unacceptable for millions of Americans to not be sure
13:27
Speaker 2: that Biden won, and there are millions who are not
13:29
Speaker 2: so sure because of COVID panic rules that are changed,
13:33
Speaker 2: chain of custody, mystery ballot dumps. There's obvious uncertainty about
13:38
Speaker 2: that election, uncertainty by the millions that could have been
13:40
Speaker 2: exactly right. Well, that's his answer. That's not what Osoff
13:43
Speaker 2: was asking. He would have you answered the question and
13:47
Speaker 2: then osof in interrupting him, which you're totally right he
13:49
Speaker 2: would have done. Then Asof's the jerk for not letting
13:52
Speaker 2: mister Clayton.
13:53
Speaker 3: No, you're you're wrong on this. You're wrong on every level,
13:56
Speaker 3: because let me tell you, and let me tell you
13:57
Speaker 3: why I think you're wrong. Number one, First of all,
14:00
Speaker 3: and most importantly, everybody in that room knew the game.
14:04
Speaker 3: Alsolf was playing, as you said, and this guy was not.
14:08
Speaker 3: He was going to refuse to answer Number one. If
14:11
Speaker 3: he said, I don't know, that's crappy, he would get
14:14
Speaker 3: he would get complete, he'd be laughed out of the
14:17
Speaker 3: room and for months we would hear I mean, it
14:19
Speaker 3: would doom his nomination. You know what. The headline of
14:22
Speaker 3: the New York Times is gonna be Trump's director of
14:25
Speaker 3: National Intelligence nominee doesn't know who won the twenty twenty election,
14:29
Speaker 3: because that's what I don't know means, Mark, I don't know.
14:32
Speaker 3: I don't know, So he wasn't gonna say that. So
14:35
Speaker 3: he's not gonna say your answer, I don't know. He's
14:37
Speaker 3: not gonna say, well, millions of people have doubt because
14:40
Speaker 3: he's Gossap's gonna say, well, I'm gonna asking you about
14:43
Speaker 3: millions of people. I'm asking you what you think and
14:45
Speaker 3: what you think matters. And if you're in cabinet nominee, Mark,
14:49
Speaker 3: you can't get away with the talk show theatrics of this,
14:53
Speaker 3: this nice verbal masturbatory self masturbatory exercise. Oh well, millions.
14:59
Speaker 3: And you're very eloquent, and you're a great talk show host,
15:03
Speaker 3: one of the best. You ain't a cabinet nominee, and
15:05
Speaker 3: you got to sit there and you got to face
15:07
Speaker 3: the slings and arrows that are all being thrown around.
15:10
Speaker 3: Got I never I really believe that that you're you're
15:12
Speaker 3: by the by the way, people are weighing in on
15:14
Speaker 3: the on the chat, on the video on the top chat,
15:18
Speaker 3: Oh Burger, Mark is dead wrong on this one. Oh
15:21
Speaker 3: the other one. Marcus I know you got one, though, Marcus.
15:26
Speaker 3: Actually right on this, my uncle.
15:28
Speaker 2: Friend, as we learned, as we learned this morning on
15:31
Speaker 2: the radio, only somewhat more vividly here in the podcast space,
15:35
Speaker 2: because that's kind of how it goes. My answer was
15:37
Speaker 2: superb and yet perhaps not and yet it was superb.
15:41
Speaker 3: No dot, Yes, it was. It was telling someone how
15:45
Speaker 3: to build a wat answer rock and yet and yet
15:48
Speaker 3: and yet it might not have been as you might
15:51
Speaker 3: not have been useful, so probably would have eaten them alive.
15:55
Speaker 2: And as tricky as his non answer was, it probably
16:01
Speaker 2: was his best, strategic.
16:03
Speaker 3: Best you could do. I mean best in the situation. Look,
16:06
Speaker 3: I'm just mad, you know, I know, I'm mad at you.
16:08
Speaker 3: I mean people are tuning in today to hear the
16:11
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer fart video. We're delaying people. We're delaying that,
16:15
Speaker 3: we've got people on the edge of their people. Well, no,
16:18
Speaker 3: before we do that, can I have some fun? Can
16:20
Speaker 3: I tell you what I did? Did you hear what
16:21
Speaker 3: I did on the show today with food in some
16:24
Speaker 3: of the show, But I okay, not this apparent you're
16:27
Speaker 3: you're listen. This is somebody texted and said, this is
16:31
Speaker 3: vintage classic Mike Gallagher, keeping in mind that my my
16:35
Speaker 3: wife Denise used to always say, Gallagher, you're a little
16:37
Speaker 3: little man. I'm in the middle of a Food for
16:40
Speaker 3: the Poor campaign for the people of Venezuela, the earthquake
16:44
Speaker 3: victims who've lost everything. There's tons of people in the
16:46
Speaker 3: streets right now. You know what's coming. I know what's coming.
16:50
Speaker 3: And I'm a little behind on my fundraising for July,
16:53
Speaker 3: so I'm thinking, you do, I got to come up
16:55
Speaker 3: with some I got to come up with some some rabbits.
16:57
Speaker 3: I gotta pull a rabbit out of the hat to
16:59
Speaker 3: get ahead of the the game here. I got to
17:01
Speaker 3: get a bunch of donations because we got a big goal.
17:04
Speaker 3: It's forty six thousand. You know how this works, and
17:06
Speaker 3: you've been You and I have traveled together to Guatemala
17:10
Speaker 3: on behalf of Food for the Poor. We love this,
17:12
Speaker 3: or you and I love food for the Poor. I
17:15
Speaker 3: wish we could figure out a way to incorporate Food
17:18
Speaker 3: for the Poor, even into our podcast. Who knows, maybe
17:21
Speaker 3: someday we can pull something like that off. But in
17:23
Speaker 3: the meantime, right now, we're raising money to get to
17:26
Speaker 3: send medicine and bottle water and food and tarps and
17:30
Speaker 3: life saving sustenance to the poor people of Venezuela. Many
17:33
Speaker 3: of these people are just on the streets. They've lost
17:35
Speaker 3: their homes, many have died. And I thought, hmm, how
17:39
Speaker 3: can I have some fun with the Chuck Schumer fart
17:42
Speaker 3: video and our food for the Poor campaign now for
17:45
Speaker 3: the benefit of people who don't know what happened with
17:47
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer. It was all over the news last night
17:49
Speaker 3: New York Post TMZ. Apparently Laura Ingram actually played it
17:53
Speaker 3: on Fox News My Heavens. In the middle of Schumer
17:58
Speaker 3: blithering on at the in the well of the Senate
18:01
Speaker 3: about how awful Trump is and the war in Iran,
18:05
Speaker 3: he lets one rip and it's picked up big time
18:08
Speaker 3: on Mike and it's it's I mean, it's profound. I
18:12
Speaker 3: mean it is. You remember when Chuck Schumer said I'm
18:15
Speaker 3: going to unlease the Whirlwind, Yes, they released. We know
18:19
Speaker 3: what he would eventually release. You know he might literally.
18:22
Speaker 3: So this morning on the show, I said, here's what
18:26
Speaker 3: we'll do. Uh, and there on a little old lady
18:29
Speaker 3: from South Carolina College. He said, Mike, you're better than this.
18:32
Speaker 3: Don't play this clip of this poor man. I love
18:36
Speaker 3: I love you better than this? I love I love. Yeah,
18:38
Speaker 3: You're you're no Christian, You're not at all. I told her.
18:43
Speaker 3: I said, I'm not better than this. I'm not. She said,
18:46
Speaker 3: you're you could rise above this. I said, no, I can't.
18:48
Speaker 3: I can't. But here's what I want to do. Here's
18:50
Speaker 3: what I do. All you have to do is give
18:53
Speaker 3: me a five hundred dollars donation to the Food for
18:56
Speaker 3: the Poor campaign by calling Tracy Live on the air.
18:59
Speaker 3: If you give me five hundred dollars, i'll play the clip.
19:01
Speaker 3: If I don't get a five hundred dollars donation, I
19:03
Speaker 3: won't play the clip. Now if I get more than
19:05
Speaker 3: five hundred dollars. Every time I get a five hundred
19:07
Speaker 3: dollars donation, i'll play the clip again. Oh lord, are
19:11
Speaker 3: you ready? Did you?
19:13
Speaker 2: Were you able to cover any other subject or take
19:15
Speaker 2: any other calls except for playing to Schumer farts with
19:17
Speaker 2: all the contributions.
19:18
Speaker 3: Five hundred guests, five times twenty five hundred dollars. Now,
19:21
Speaker 3: first of all, don't have many lives. That saves? How
19:24
Speaker 3: cool is that? I mean this Food for the their
19:26
Speaker 3: Food for the poor is absolutely on the ground in Venezuela,
19:29
Speaker 3: saving lives, twenty five hundred dollars going to go a
19:32
Speaker 3: long way, and so so five times twenty five hundred dollars. Now,
19:37
Speaker 3: we don't need to do that necessarily on the podcast,
19:40
Speaker 3: but we have to play it.
19:41
Speaker 2: We got to play it. We got so for people
19:43
Speaker 2: who are driving or maybe there's ambient noise. I think
19:47
Speaker 2: that the the the the it happens just as Schumer
19:53
Speaker 2: mentions the abbreviation for National Defense Authorization Act, as he
19:57
Speaker 2: says NDAA.
20:00
Speaker 3: After that, he lets it go and and ps on
20:03
Speaker 3: the chat. On the live chat on YouTube, Kenny Craven writes,
20:07
Speaker 3: I think it's best not to embarrass the elderly with
20:10
Speaker 3: childish fart jokes.
20:12
Speaker 4: You may be right about that.
20:13
Speaker 3: Well, it could be right about that. Well, it could
20:16
Speaker 3: be like grow up, Mike, But I can't. I can't
20:18
Speaker 3: help myself. There we go hit it.
20:20
Speaker 5: Yasmin now on Iran and the NDAA. When all the
20:26
Speaker 5: trumpet mean is dressed.
20:28
Speaker 3: That's bad time every time. And I think you know
20:33
Speaker 3: what I actually think, because when I heard it last
20:35
Speaker 3: night it was even louder. And I don't we'll see
20:38
Speaker 3: how Yasmin pleads guilty. I think I think she muted
20:42
Speaker 3: it a little bit. I think she took it. I
20:43
Speaker 3: think she was so offended because I think I think
20:46
Speaker 3: poor yasmin our video review should I think she? I
20:50
Speaker 3: think it was louder. It rattled my ear piece. I mean,
20:53
Speaker 3: one more time with feeling. Sure, why not with feeling.
20:58
Speaker 5: Now on Iran and the NDA when all the Trump's administra.
21:03
Speaker 3: Now here's the funny thing, Mark, if we can analyze
21:06
Speaker 3: this like like this prove let's let's slow it down.
21:12
Speaker 3: Schumer tig fart. He kind of smirks a little bit
21:17
Speaker 3: after he does it, like he knew that he did. Oh,
21:19
Speaker 3: so would we all? Would we all? I go into
21:22
Speaker 3: the witness protection program? What do you I mean for
21:25
Speaker 3: crying out loud? You can't just let it go like that?
21:28
Speaker 3: Got a little bit of control? Man. Oh now Eric
21:32
Speaker 3: got me in trouble because Eric said earlier in the show, well,
21:35
Speaker 3: you know, remember Schumer is eighty years old, and that happens,
21:39
Speaker 3: and of course I should have caught it. Schumer is
21:42
Speaker 3: not eighty years old. He's seventy five years old. But
21:45
Speaker 3: which is seventy five? He's only seventy five. I thought
21:47
Speaker 3: he was eighty two, but our eight years eighty two
21:50
Speaker 3: to make Jack seventy. Let's hope at seventy five we're
21:53
Speaker 3: not just ripping him in the supermarket. You think that's
21:56
Speaker 3: going to happen to us when we get to seventy five?
21:58
Speaker 3: Have no idea? Excuse me? Could you show me where
22:00
Speaker 3: the bro the buttery? I don't know. How's your well?
22:04
Speaker 3: And then this morning when I was talking about it,
22:07
Speaker 3: you kept making fart noises. I thought, well, they think
22:09
Speaker 3: I'm childish. Listen to him. You're the marks, the one
22:12
Speaker 3: making the noises. Why didn't you put your hand under
22:14
Speaker 3: your armpit and do.
22:17
Speaker 2: The old Well, I actually don't have to do that.
22:20
Speaker 2: But I can't believe we're doing this because forever I
22:22
Speaker 2: can't do it as well as I was at once
22:23
Speaker 2: stead as a kid. But I actually have this going on.
22:27
Speaker 3: Oh with your hands, yeah, you know a little bit nice.
22:30
Speaker 3: You know what I can do. I can make the doll.
22:32
Speaker 3: I can make Flipper the dolphins sound effect with my mouth.
22:35
Speaker 4: Go.
22:38
Speaker 3: I can't do it like I used to do it.
22:42
Speaker 3: That's kinder they called flipper Slipper. Fluster is the gold
22:46
Speaker 3: you get a minem extra brought to my ce Flipper man.
22:52
Speaker 3: You know, I like it I like a PhD weight
22:55
Speaker 3: weight though Flipper wanted to be his smelt former self.
22:57
Speaker 3: What would you, Well, Flipper put on a few pounds
23:00
Speaker 3: and he reached out to doctor. Is that he or she?
23:02
Speaker 3: I think Flipper was a girl? Good question. Oh, I'm
23:06
Speaker 3: surprised you don't know Fi. I'll find out. Well, you
23:07
Speaker 3: tell everybody about PhD. But PhD isn't really for dolphins.
23:11
Speaker 3: It's for humans. And if you want to lose the
23:12
Speaker 3: weight and keep it off for good like I did
23:14
Speaker 3: over fifty pounds, it's a game changer. It was Gods
23:17
Speaker 3: send it. It was an answer to a prayer because
23:20
Speaker 3: I tried everything. I counted points, I did everything possible.
23:23
Speaker 3: And you know what I found is that doctor Ashley
23:25
Speaker 3: Lucas's program is brilliant. It targets the visceral, stubborn, that stubborn,
23:30
Speaker 3: visceral belly fat you can't get rid of it. Goes
23:32
Speaker 3: to work on burning the fat the right way. And
23:36
Speaker 3: I can be very transparent, always have been. You know.
23:38
Speaker 3: PhD is low carbs, no show, almost no sugar, but
23:42
Speaker 3: the right combination of things where you're not going to
23:45
Speaker 3: be dependent on a shot or a pill for the
23:47
Speaker 3: rest of your life because look, those may have some
23:50
Speaker 3: momentary or effects today, but the second you come off on,
23:55
Speaker 3: everybody knows the weight comes roaring back. Schedule your consultation
23:59
Speaker 3: with our friends at pa HD weight Loss today because
24:01
Speaker 3: when you call Ah sixty four six four four nineteen
24:04
Speaker 3: hundred mentioned Mike and Mark, you'll get two free weeks
24:07
Speaker 3: added to the program and they'll pay for the cost
24:09
Speaker 3: of your food. That's a fifteen hundred dollars values. It's
24:12
Speaker 3: a great, great offer for you, uh for a limited time.
24:15
Speaker 3: It's just a brilliant, brilliant way to lose weight and
24:18
Speaker 3: never be hungry, because, let's face it, that's where we're
24:20
Speaker 3: always worried about PhD weight loss. PhD weight loss called
24:23
Speaker 3: eight six four six four four nineteen hundred eight sixty
24:26
Speaker 3: four six four four nineteen hundred or visit my phdweight
24:30
Speaker 3: loss dot com. Got to tell you Mark about a
24:33
Speaker 3: conversation I have Flipper news. I got the flipper answer dude, OK,
24:37
Speaker 3: don't I got the mail or flipper. While while portrayed
24:40
Speaker 3: as a male, I think when flip Flipper's pronoun was
24:43
Speaker 3: he portrayed almost exclusively by female dolphins. Flipper Flipper was
24:49
Speaker 3: trans don't. Don't. Well, no, I'm lose a flip flipper
24:56
Speaker 3: identified as mail. That's right, flipper identified as male on
24:59
Speaker 3: the TV S. So there's that, Okay. I'd caught up
25:03
Speaker 3: with a friend of mine that I haven't talked to
25:05
Speaker 3: in decades. You know, how do you ever have friends
25:07
Speaker 3: like from your high school or college age and all
25:10
Speaker 3: that and they catch up to you through your show
25:13
Speaker 3: years later? That doesn't happen very often. But it happened
25:16
Speaker 3: to me an old friend of mine from thirty plus
25:19
Speaker 3: years ago, and caught up with him and great guy.
25:23
Speaker 3: Love him. If he's watching listening. I'm not saying this
25:25
Speaker 3: to attack you in any way, shape or form. But
25:28
Speaker 3: he's a big canvas follower. He's a big follower of
25:31
Speaker 3: these podcasters who go down the conspiracy theories. And he
25:34
Speaker 3: started going on about the data centers, the AI data centers,
25:40
Speaker 3: and he is claiming that it is well known that
25:44
Speaker 3: the data centers are actually government surveillance locations. Of course,
25:50
Speaker 3: they are to give the government and the Deep State
25:53
Speaker 3: the ability to surveil American citizens. And Mark, he was
25:58
Speaker 3: as serious as a heart attack. I mean, have you
26:01
Speaker 3: heard that rumor? No, that's a new one.
26:05
Speaker 4: To me, but what on me too?
26:07
Speaker 2: But it's it's straight from the playbook of conspiracy dorker
26:10
Speaker 2: e that if there's anything that anybody, and first of
26:12
Speaker 2: all I element number one, find something that a lot
26:14
Speaker 2: of people are talking about, so that if you say
26:17
Speaker 2: something about it, even if it's pulled right out of
26:19
Speaker 2: your colon, people may pay attention to it. Then make
26:22
Speaker 2: up something that has a certain harmony with a suspicion
26:26
Speaker 2: in cynicism that people already have, like government getting too
26:29
Speaker 2: much into our lives. Add those two things and it's
26:32
Speaker 2: the perfect perfect mix for a conspiracy fever.
26:36
Speaker 3: Dream. Well, there is news about these data centers out
26:39
Speaker 3: of New York and this is Governor Kathy Hokle. She
26:42
Speaker 3: announced a statewide moratorium for the data centers in New
26:49
Speaker 3: York state. Check this out.
26:52
Speaker 6: No one company at fifty megawatts. That's the equivalent of
26:56
Speaker 6: powering fifty thousand homes. It's just one company. So I
27:00
Speaker 6: step back, say we need to pause here. We are
27:02
Speaker 6: the first in the nation of a statewide moratorium on
27:05
Speaker 6: the issuance that permits to allow these projects to go forward.
27:09
Speaker 6: And what this is going to do is allow us
27:13
Speaker 6: to know one computer, you have to provide your own
27:19
Speaker 6: power or pay a premium into our grid. You're not
27:22
Speaker 6: going to make rate payers pay more. You're also going
27:24
Speaker 6: to contribute to a larger grid resiliency fund that I'm
27:29
Speaker 6: starting up with the proceeds because I need to reinforce
27:33
Speaker 6: our entire grid and expand it. Also, you should not
27:36
Speaker 6: be getting tax breaks. New Yorkers pay enough. They don't
27:40
Speaker 6: think they're harder, and tax pay dollars should be given
27:43
Speaker 6: to you. You should you should be able to avoid
27:45
Speaker 6: paying these taxes yourself. Well, the rest of us are
27:48
Speaker 6: paying our full freak. So I've come up with this strategy.
27:51
Speaker 6: I've also got a year to work on it. We're
27:54
Speaker 6: going to get the right answer, I said, in New
27:56
Speaker 6: York State, you know we like being first, but in
27:59
Speaker 6: this case, will be first, the first state to get
28:02
Speaker 6: it right. And that's why this is so important to
28:05
Speaker 6: me to say what our values are, who we're fighting
28:08
Speaker 6: for and your success in New York if someone comes
28:12
Speaker 6: to New York, and why you be successful but others
28:14
Speaker 6: have to be successful as well.
28:17
Speaker 3: Wow.
28:18
Speaker 2: First, I think she might be drinking. Second, I think
28:21
Speaker 2: she might be right. This is the trickish I think
28:23
Speaker 2: things that she said right there, resonated. I guarantee you
28:26
Speaker 2: with listeners I have if you've done a lot of
28:28
Speaker 2: data center shows.
28:29
Speaker 3: It's a one of.
28:30
Speaker 2: Those really weird rich issues where it's not really left
28:33
Speaker 2: or right necessarily. There are a lot of people who
28:36
Speaker 2: recognize with our AI future and our tech future, we
28:39
Speaker 2: kind of got to have these things in a way somewhere,
28:42
Speaker 2: and yet people are going, yeah, but don't put it
28:44
Speaker 2: by my house. They're big, they're loud, they're environmental disasters,
28:47
Speaker 2: too much water, too much electricity. There's a really interesting,
28:52
Speaker 2: great people on both sides. We think type debate you
28:55
Speaker 2: can have about.
28:55
Speaker 3: That, it's like the daylight saving time debate to the truth.
29:00
Speaker 3: I mean, frankly, the reason I think I'm kind of
29:02
Speaker 3: interested in the in both of those issues is they
29:05
Speaker 3: are non political. You know, you don't really have to
29:08
Speaker 3: it's not really defined, and most things are. I mean,
29:11
Speaker 3: look at look at the mask and the COVID crap.
29:14
Speaker 3: I mean, to this day, you give me five people
29:17
Speaker 3: on an airplane that I'm flying on with a mask,
29:19
Speaker 3: I'll give you five hardcore, stone cold less less. Absolutely,
29:24
Speaker 3: that's a political thing. That is just the way they
29:27
Speaker 3: do it, the way they roll but I want to
29:30
Speaker 3: get more into this because you know, we know Eric
29:33
Speaker 3: Erickson out of Atlanta, and Eric is big time pro
29:37
Speaker 3: data center. He is like, you know, hey, are you hey, hey, Luddites? Hey, dummy,
29:43
Speaker 3: do you want to let us get into the twenty
29:44
Speaker 3: second century or not? You want to advance this country?
29:47
Speaker 3: Do you want to have the technology is here whether
29:50
Speaker 3: you like it or not. It's going to make this
29:51
Speaker 3: country better, It's going to make the planet better. And
29:55
Speaker 3: this is ridiculous. All the conspiracy theories are wrong, all
29:58
Speaker 3: the fears are wrong. If they put up a Walmart
30:01
Speaker 3: and no one would be bitching, you know, except for
30:04
Speaker 3: the normal you know, nimbi people. But you know, they
30:06
Speaker 3: put up a big plant somewhere, they say, great, we're
30:09
Speaker 3: employing a lot of people. This is great for the economy.
30:11
Speaker 3: But for some reason, these data centers mark they've touched
30:14
Speaker 3: a nerve big time.
30:16
Speaker 2: And you know who else very notably did not like
30:18
Speaker 2: the idea of Kathy Hogels one year moratorium. What's that
30:21
Speaker 2: guy's name? Oh yeah, Rose Donald Trump? Because it's it
30:25
Speaker 2: is so, it is, it is fascinating, it's fascinating. I
30:30
Speaker 2: am too, I am too well, can we go? I
30:32
Speaker 2: know we're a couple of moments from the end. This
30:34
Speaker 2: will take up thirty to sixty seconds on the on
30:36
Speaker 2: the show where we've had the Chuck Schumer far in Brolio,
30:40
Speaker 2: We're going to be twelve years old again for just
30:42
Speaker 2: one second. Okay, I don't I don't know. I kind
30:45
Speaker 2: of texted you as a minute ago. I don't know
30:46
Speaker 2: if this photo can be found. If not, I've replicated
30:49
Speaker 2: it right here. Have you seen the seventy seven year
30:52
Speaker 2: old Florida woman given a very unfortunate Florida license plate?
30:56
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, I have seen that. The personal plate.
31:02
Speaker 2: Ice plate is people reading, are listening or whatever reading
31:07
Speaker 2: it's sqz A fifty five. Sqz A fifty five. And
31:13
Speaker 2: in the Florida plates you should know this.
31:15
Speaker 3: Are they using it?
31:16
Speaker 2: Kind of an odd almost Tennessee Titans Jersey squared off
31:20
Speaker 2: numeral thing. Because I'm gonna show you sort of what
31:22
Speaker 2: looks Does this work on a camera doll? I think
31:24
Speaker 2: it might let me can really see that well sqz
31:29
Speaker 2: A fifty five. Just write it for yourself, or do it,
31:32
Speaker 2: if anything, on a calculator. If you know what a
31:33
Speaker 2: fifty five looks like, it looks like sqz ass or
31:38
Speaker 2: it looks.
31:39
Speaker 3: Like squeeze ass.
31:41
Speaker 2: So you have a seventy seven year old woman driving
31:43
Speaker 2: around with a license plate that she looked at and realized, Wow,
31:47
Speaker 2: that looks like squeeze ass, and she's not happy. My
31:51
Speaker 2: reply online was, if I'm sixteen, seventeen eighteen, I'd pay
31:56
Speaker 2: two week salary to have that.
31:58
Speaker 3: Plate on my car. I'd be the most pop kid
32:00
Speaker 3: in school. Kurt Schlichter responded to it last night and said,
32:03
Speaker 3: lucky her, I mean unbelievable, and Mark Davis, you are
32:07
Speaker 3: a little little, a little about met I love you,
32:12
Speaker 3: see you don't forget well, and we'll break down Trump's
32:15
Speaker 3: speech tonight.
32:15
Speaker 2: We were finishing on that. Squeeze ass is our coda.
32:18
Speaker 2: That's that's that's what we're leaving with people. Is somebody
32:21
Speaker 2: nothing dignified you can say or do just to kind
32:23
Speaker 2: of put some flavor of No.
32:25
Speaker 3: I can get to the show. That's the Thursday, July
32:31
Speaker 3: what is it, eighteenth, sixteenth Apollo Apollo eleven launch anniversary. Yes,
32:36
Speaker 3: that's and that's the way it is. I'm Mike Gallagher,
32:39
Speaker 3: he's Mark Davis. God bless you, and we'll see you tomorrow.
32:43
Speaker 3: See it